Hubbry Logo
World landscapeWorld landscapeMain
Open search
World landscape
Community hub
World landscape
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
World landscape
World landscape
from Wikipedia
Pieter Bruegel the Elder, Landscape with the Flight into Egypt, 1563, 37.1 × 55.6 cm (14.6 × 21.9 in)

The world landscape, a translation of the German Weltlandschaft, is a type of composition in Western painting showing an imaginary panoramic landscape seen from an elevated viewpoint that includes mountains and lowlands, water, and buildings. The subject of each painting is usually a Biblical or historical narrative, but the figures comprising this narrative element are dwarfed by their surroundings.

The world landscape first appeared in painting in the work of the Early Netherlandish painter Joachim Patinir (c. 1480–1524), most of whose few surviving paintings are of this type, usually showing religious subjects, but commissioned by secular patrons. "They were imaginary compilations of the most appealing and spectacular aspects of European geography, assembled for the delight of the wealthy armchair traveler",[1] giving "an idealized composite of the world taken in at a single Olympian glance".[2]

The compositional type was taken up by a number of other Netherlandish artists, most famously Pieter Bruegel the Elder. There was a parallel development by Patinir's contemporary Albrecht Altdorfer and other artists of the Danube school. Although compositions of this broad type continued to be common until the 18th century and beyond, the term is usually only used to describe works from the Low Countries and Germany produced in the 16th century. The German term Weltlandschaft was first used by Eberhard Freiherr von Bodenhausen in 1905 with reference to Gerard David,[3] and then in 1918 applied to Patinir's work by Ludwig von Baldass, defined as the depiction of "all that which seemed beautiful to the eye; the sea and the earth, mountains and plains, forests and fields, the castle and the hut".[4]

Netherlands

[edit]
Detail from Patinir's St Jerome (National Gallery), between formations in the vicinity of Dinant.

The treatment of landscape backgrounds in Early Netherlandish painting was greatly admired in Italy, and Flemish specialists were employed in some Italian workshops, including that of Titian. The backgrounds to many of Albrecht Dürer's early prints were appropriated by a number of Italian artists. Patinir, "emboldened by the Italian taste for Northern rusticity, began as early as the 1510s to expand the backgrounds of his paintings out of all proportion" in a way that "violently reversed the ordinary hierarchy of subject and setting".[5] By 1520 he was well known for these subjects, and when Dürer visited him in Antwerp he described him in his diary as "the good painter of landscapes" (gut landschaftsmaler) in the first use of Landschaft in an artistic context.[6]

The paintings are relatively small and use a horizontal format; this was to become so standard for landscapes in art that it is now called "landscape" format in ordinary contexts, but at the time it was a considerable novelty, as "portable panel paintings were almost always vertical in format before 1520" and "Patinir's landscapes were among the first small horizontal panels of any sort".[7] He typically uses three base colours to articulate his compositions, with a brownish foreground, a blue-green middle zone, and blues in the distance. The horizon-line is relatively high on the picture plane.[8] Patinir (and Herri met de Bles) came from Dinant on the Meuse (in modern Belgium) where, in "a startlingly un-Netherlandish landscape", there are dramatic rock cliffs and free-standing crags along the river. These are frequently recalled in his paintings, and came to form a common feature of works by other artists.

Landscape with Charon Crossing the Styx, Joachim Patinir, c. 1515–1524, Prado

With other vertical features, these are painted as though seen straight on even when in the lower parts of the landscape, and thus "reassert the integrity of the picture plane" in his works, against the sprawling horizontal impetus of the main landscape.[9] Both Kenneth Clark and Simon Schama see these as "the last survivors of the landscape of symbols", relating them to medieval and even earlier "corkscrew" representations of mountains.[10]

The style is related to the landscape backgrounds of Hieronymous Bosch, although in his main works these function as a backdrop to his crowds of figures and are not as concerned to include a variety of landscape elements; but those of smaller works such as his St. Jerome at Prayer anticipate the new style.[11] In most respects the paintings retain the same elements as many 15th-century treatments of the same subjects but show, in modern cinematic terms, a long shot rather than a medium shot.

Most art historians regard the figure subject as continuing to be important in the works of Patinir and his followers, rather than mere staffage for a landscape, and most are of subjects where a wide landscape had relevance. Among the most popular were the Flight to Egypt, and the Netherlandish 15th-century innovation of the Rest on the Flight to Egypt, and subjects showing hermits such as Saints Jerome and Anthony with the world from which they had withdrawn laid out beneath them. As well as connecting the style to the Age of Discovery, the role of Antwerp as a booming centre both of world trade and cartography, and the wealthy town-dweller's view of the countryside, art historians have explored the paintings as religious metaphors for the pilgrimage of life.[12]

Rest on the Flight into Egypt, Cornelis Massys, c. 1540

The style is also an early example of the 16th-century artistic trend to "Mannerist inversion" (the term devised by Max Dvořák) or the "inverted composition", where previously minor or background elements come to dominate the picture space. In the 1550s Pieter Aertsen began a style of large canvasses dominated by great spreads of food still life and large genre figures of cooks or market-sellers, while in the background small biblical scenes can be glimpsed. Some paintings by Jan Sanders van Hemessen place genre figures in the foreground of paintings on religious or moral subjects.[13] In the 17th century all these subject areas became established as independent genres in Dutch and Flemish painting, and later throughout Western painting.

Patinir's invention was developed by Herri met de Bles (1510 – c.1555–1560), who was probably his nephew. He took the type into the new style of Northern Mannerism.[14] Other artists were Lucas Gassel, the Brunswick Monogrammist, and Cornelis Massys.[15]

Landscape with the Fall of Icarus, Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium, now seen as a good early copy of Bruegel's original

Massys was the son of Quentin Massys, a friend of Patinir, who had added the figures to at least one Patinir landscape, the Temptation of St Anthony (Prado),[16] and who had used the style in some of his own works, such as a Madonna and Child (1513) in Poznań. Patinir increasingly left the larger figures in his works to other masters, and also seems to have had a large workshop or circle of followers in Antwerp.[17]

The style was adopted and made more natural in the landscapes of Pieter Brueghel the Elder, who had travelled to Italy via the Alps. Back in Antwerp he was commissioned in the 1550s by the publisher Hieronymus Cock to make drawings for a series of engravings, the Large Landscapes, to meet what was now a growing demand for landscape images. Some of his earlier paintings, such as his Landscape with the Flight into Egypt (Courtauld, 1563, illustrated at top), are fully within the Patinir conventions, but his Landscape with the Fall of Icarus (known from two copies) had a Patinir-style landscape, but already the largest figure was a genre figure and not part of the supposed narrative subject.

Other works explored variations on the theme, with his famous set of landscapes with genre figures depicting the seasons being the culmination of his style; the five surviving paintings use the basic elements of the world landscape (only one lacks craggy mountains) but transform them into his own style. They are larger than most previous works, with a genre scene with several figures in the foreground, and the panoramic view seen past or through trees.[18] Bruegel was also aware of the Danube landscape style through prints.[19]

Danube school

[edit]
Albrecht Altdorfer, The Battle of Alexander at Issus, 1529, 158.4 cm × 120.3 cm (62.4 in × 47.4 in)

The Danube school was a contemporary group of German and Austrian artists who were also pioneers of landscape painting, and the first to regularly paint pure landscapes without figures. Their landscapes revel in the forests of the Upper Danube, and the place of a foreground figure is often taken by a single tree, a formula invented by Albrecht Altdorfer, the most significant artist of the group, and used, mostly in drawings and prints, by Wolf Huber and Augustin Hirschvogel. Other innovative works showed close-up views of dense forest with hardly any distant view or even sky. But many of their landscapes are panoramic in a version of the Netherlandish style, although the river winding out of sight normally replaces the sea that occupies the horizon of many Netherlandish works.[20] It is probable that at least Altdorfer had seen a Patinir by about 1531; one was in Augsburg from 1517 (an Assumption now in Philadelphia).[21]

Altdorfer's painted landscapes are usually vertical,[22] and, if only because it was commissioned for a vertical space, this is the case for the most extreme of all large world landscapes, his The Battle of Alexander at Issus (1529, Munich). This extraordinary painting shows a view right across the Mediterranean, with a mass of tiny figures fighting a great battle in the foreground. They are in modern Turkey, and the view extends beyond the island of Cyprus to the coast of Egypt and the Sinai Peninsula and the Red Sea.[23] The painting originally formed one part of a set of historical paintings in the same format.

Influence on later landscape painting

[edit]

Both the Netherlandish and Danubian approaches to landscape painting were greatly influential for later artists.[24] Later generations of Flemish artists such as Jan Brueghel the Elder, Anton Mirou, Lucas van Valkenborch and Gillis van Coninxloo continued to produce late Mannerist versions of the full formula, as developed by Pieter Bruegel the Elder, before in the 1590s van Coninxloo let the trees move in like curtains from the sides to restrict and then eliminate a distant view, pioneering the Flemish development of the dense forest views of the Danube school.[25] Rubens had studied in the 1590s with his relative Tobias Verhaecht, an especially conservative artist who continued to use world landscape styles derived from Pieter Bruegel the Elder until the 1620s.[26] Though Rubens rapidly outgrew his influence, in some of his later landscapes, such as the Summer, Peasants going to Market (c. 1618, Royal Collection), "the tradition of the old 'world landscape' plainly lives on".[27]

Summer, Peasants going to Market, Peter Paul Rubens, c. 1618

Aspects of the particular formula of the world landscape, though no longer usually described by that term, continue to reappear in different versions until the 19th century. In Dutch Golden Age painting the idiosyncratic paintings and prints of Hercules Seghers (c. 1589 – c. 1638), as rare as Patinirs, were great panoramic views, very often with mountains.[28] In contrast, Philips Koninck (1619–1688) used the panoramic elevated view, and often included water, but showed vistas of flat farmland or town roofs with a low horizon.

The Italian Niccolò dell'Abbate, part of the School of Fontainebleau, introduced the Flemish world landscape into French art in works such as the Orpheus and Euridice in the National Gallery, London and the Rape of Proserpine in the Louvre, both large paintings.[29] In French Baroque or classical painting many artists including both Claude Lorrain and Nicolas Poussin painted "Landscape with ..." subjects, and for Claude wide panoramic views with mixed elements of mountains, water and small figures formed the bulk of his work, although both the viewpoint and horizon are generally much lower than in 16th-century works. Claude in turn became enormously influential, and until the early 19th century his style continued to have the advantage of giving a painting of a "landscape with" a higher place in the hierarchy of genres, and consequently a higher price, than a mere pure landscape.[30]

With Romanticism this changed, but panoramic views continued to be painted in the 19th century, and artists such as those in the Hudson River School, Edward Lear and Russian landscape painters took the compositional style to new landscapes around the world in works such as The Heart of the Andes (1859, Frederic Edwin Church), though often excluding all people and buildings. These still featured in the huge apocalyptic religious paintings of the English painter John Martin, which are often literally "end of the world landscapes", taking the history of the genre back to its origins with Bosch.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The world landscape (German: Weltlandschaft), also known as Weltlandschaft or world landscape style, is a genre of painting that emerged in the early , particularly in the . It is characterized by expansive, panoramic depictions of imaginary yet detailed natural landscapes, often viewed from a high vantage point, with winding rivers, rocky outcrops, and distant mountains dominating the composition. Small human figures, typically engaged in religious, mythological, or allegorical scenes, are dwarfed by the vast terrain, emphasizing the grandeur and universality of the natural world. Pioneered by Flemish artist Joachim Patinir (c. 1480–1524), the style blended innovative landscape elements with traditional narrative subjects, influencing the Antwerp Mannerists and later artists like . It represented a shift toward as a central theme in European art, symbolizing divine creation and human insignificance within it, and laid foundations for the development of independent . The genre flourished amid the interest in and , bridging medieval symbolism with emerging realism.

Definition and Origins

Core Definition

The world landscape, known in German as Weltlandschaft, is a subgenre of art that flourished in the early , characterized by expansive, harmonious panoramic views presented from a high, bird's-eye perspective. These compositions integrate human figures or narrative elements as secondary motifs within a dominant natural setting, creating a unified scene where the itself serves as the primary subject. Unlike earlier depictions of nature as mere backdrop, the world landscape elevates the terrain—encompassing mountains, rivers, forests, and plains—into a cohesive, immersive environment that conveys a sense of vastness and serenity. This genre distinguishes itself from pure through its invented and idealized , which blends observable natural features with fantastical or symbolic elements to evoke a microcosmic "world" in miniature. Rather than strictly topographical realism, artists crafted hybrid scenes drawing from diverse regions, often incorporating dramatic contrasts like rugged cliffs juxtaposed with fertile valleys to symbolize the breadth of creation or divine order. Human activity, when present, appears diminutive against the scale of the environment, emphasizing nature's supremacy and the viewer's contemplative distance. enhances this effect, layering atmospheric depth to suggest infinite expanse without adhering to a single, verifiable locale. The world landscape emerged around 1520 in the and the , coinciding with heightened artistic interest in empirical observation of nature and the synthesis of innovations in perspective with Northern traditions. This development marked landscape's transition toward autonomy as a , rooted in Antwerp's vibrant art market and regional traditions of manuscript illumination. Joachim Patinir, who enrolled in Antwerp's in 1515, is recognized as a primary pioneer of the .

Historical Emergence in Early 16th Century

The world landscape genre, characterized by expansive panoramic views integrating human figures into vast natural settings, crystallized in Northern European painting circa 1515–1530, coinciding with the transition from the and the ascendance of in the . This period marked a shift toward viewing not merely as a backdrop but as a reflective "mirror of the earth," symbolizing divine creation and human contemplation, as explored in Walter Gibson's seminal analysis of Flemish developments. Humanist scholarship, emphasizing empirical observation and , encouraged artists to elevate landscape as an independent subject, blending spiritual introspection with newfound scientific curiosity about the . Key catalysts for this emergence included the synthesis of innovations, particularly linear perspective and atmospheric depth pioneered by artists like , with the meticulous, emblematic detail of Northern Gothic traditions inherited from Early Netherlandish masters such as . This hybrid approach allowed for immersive, bird's-eye compositions that unified disparate elements into cohesive, infinite vistas. Early adoption of the world landscape occurred prominently in , the era's premier commercial art hub in the , where the city's prosperity from trade and printing facilitated artistic experimentation. Patrons among the merchant class, including figures like Lucas Rem, and the nobility commissioned these works for allegorical, devotional, or status-enhancing purposes, integrating them into altarpieces and independent panels; Joachim Patinir's enrollment in 's in 1515 exemplifies this institutional support. Parallel advancements in the Danube School of southern Germany further propelled the genre's diffusion across the during this formative phase.

Artistic Characteristics

Compositional Elements

World landscapes employ a distinctive achieved through a high, elevated viewpoint that unfolds a sweeping panoramic vista across the . This approach creates a centralized composition where the landscape is structured in receding planes: a detailed foreground often featuring human activities or natural elements like rocks and foliage, a middle ground populated by architectural ruins, villages, or rolling hills, and a vast background dominated by towering mountains, expansive seas, or hazy horizons. Such layering simulates infinite depth without relying on the rigorous linear perspective of Italian Renaissance art, instead prioritizing an imaginary, all-encompassing view of the world. The balance of scale in these compositions underscores the sublime dominance of over humanity, with human figures rendered small and ancillary to emphasize a divine order in creation. Vertical elements such as trees, cliffs, and spires rise assertively to draw the eye upward, counterbalanced by horizontal expanses of rivers, plains, and distant waterways that promote a sense of serene and spatial continuity. This interplay of lines fosters a rhythmic stability, integrating disparate natural forms into a cohesive, microcosmic representation of the . Color and light techniques further enhance atmospheric depth through soft gradations, transitioning from warm, earthy tones—ochres, greens, and browns—in the foreground to cooler, ethereal blues and grays in the background. This tonal recession, coupled with diffused lighting that softens contours at greater distances, evokes the natural haze of air and moisture, creating an illusion of vastness and luminosity without harsh contrasts. These methods not only define spatial recession but also infuse the scene with a transcendent, almost spiritual clarity.

Symbolic and Thematic Features

In world landscape painting of the , religious symbolism played a central role in integrating Biblical narratives with expansive, invented natural settings to emphasize universal spiritual truths. Scenes such as the were often placed within vast, timeless environments that transcended specific historical locales, allowing the landscape to serve as a metaphorical stage for divine intervention and human frailty, thereby broadening the appeal of Christian messages to a wider audience. Ruins within these compositions symbolized the theme, representing the transience of earthly power and the inevitability of decay in contrast to eternal spiritual verities, evoking contemplation of mortality amid the enduring natural world. Thematic duality further enriched these works by juxtaposing the harmony of divine creation with the impermanence of human existence, portraying as both a reflection of God's ordered design and a reminder of life's . Lush, verdant expanses and serene vistas underscored the and stability of the created world, while fleeting human figures or decaying structures highlighted vulnerability to time and change. Incorporation of exotic elements, such as fantastical rock formations or mist-shrouded forests, evoked the unknown and divine mystery, blending the familiar with the sublime to suggest realms beyond human comprehension and reinforce the landscape's role as a portal to the transcendent. Moral undertones permeated these landscapes, functioning as microcosms of the that encouraged viewers to reflect on nature's inherent order during the religious upheavals of the , including the Protestant . By depicting untamed wilderness as a site for spiritual trial and renewal, artists promoted ethical introspection on themes of , redemption, and fidelity to faith, aligning with broader cultural shifts toward direct engagement with divine creation over institutional mediation. This approach fostered a contemplative ethic, urging audiences to find moral guidance in the balance of natural forces amid societal and doctrinal turmoil.

Key Artists and Schools

Danube School Pioneers

The Danube School emerged as a pivotal movement in the early along the River valley in and , spanning roughly 1500 to 1550, where artists developed as an independent distinct from mere background elements in religious or historical scenes. Influenced by the innovative world landscapes of the Flemish painter Joachim Patinir, the school's works featured expressive, poetic interpretations of nature, with a linear style, warm color palettes, and vivid depictions of dense forests and riverine vistas that evoked a sense of mystery and human-nature interconnectedness, often drawing on the fairytale-like of the local Germanic environment. Albrecht Altdorfer (c. 1480–1538), the preeminent figure and leader of the Danube School, advanced this tradition by prioritizing luminous, forested panoramas inspired directly by the Danube's rugged terrain, infusing his compositions with an intuitive mastery of light and color to convey emotional depth and the sublime power of nature. In Danube Landscape (c. 1520–1525), Altdorfer captures a steeply wooded stretch of the river below Regensburg, including the castle of Wörth, where towering trees and misty valleys vibrate with personal lyricism, marking one of the earliest pure landscapes in European art history and elevating the genre beyond illustrative purposes.

Netherlandish Contributors

Joachim Patinir (c. 1480–1524), recognized as the first specialist in , laid foundational groundwork for the genre through his innovative "world landscapes," which blended the meticulous detail and aerial perspectives of Flemish tradition with a romantic emphasis on expansive, fantastical terrains. His seminal work, Landscape with (c. 1515–1524), depicts the mythological ferryman Charon guiding a soul across the River Styx, dividing a luminous, paradisiacal left side from a dark, infernal right, thereby establishing a template for the genre's dramatic spatial and thematic structure where nature dominates and symbolizes moral choices. Herri met de Bles (c. 1510–c. 1555), possibly a relative of Joachim Patinir, emerged as a leading Flemish practitioner of the world landscape genre in the mid-16th century, refining its panoramic scope with heightened dramatic intensity. His compositions often featured fiery, turbulent skies that evoked divine intervention or apocalyptic tension, paired with meticulously rendered intricate foliage that added layers of naturalistic detail to the expansive vistas. These elements grounded religious narratives within immersive environments, as seen in The Temptation of Saint Anthony (c. 1540), where a central confronts demonic temptations amid a vast, rugged terrain blending rocky outcrops, dense vegetation, and stormy atmospheric effects. Pieter Bruegel the Elder (c. 1525–1569) further developed the world landscape in the latter half of the , introducing greater topographic realism and integration of human activity into panoramic views. His works, such as (1565), depict seasonal landscapes with detailed, bird's-eye perspectives that capture the ' terrain while embedding moral or proverbial themes, influencing the transition from fantastical to more observational styles. In the latter half of the , artists associated with workshops began shifting the world landscape toward greater topographic realism while preserving its characteristic panoramic scale. This evolution emphasized more accurate representations of local geography and architecture, drawing from advancing cartographic techniques and observations of the ' terrain, yet maintained the elevated bird's-eye viewpoints for comprehensive spatial overviews. Antwerp's prolific studios facilitated this adaptation through collaborative production, where landscape specialists contributed backgrounds to multi-artist panels destined for international markets. The commercialization of world landscapes in 16th-century Antwerp transformed the genre into a staple of the , driven by the burgeoning middle class's appetite for secular decorative panels and prints. Workshops mass-produced these works on panels and in engravings, often featuring standalone landscapes or biblical scenes integrated into topographic spectacles, which appealed to merchants and collectors as symbols of worldly exploration and prosperity. This export-oriented industry, centered in 's , proliferated the style across , with prints enabling wider dissemination and variations by engravers like Hieronymus Cock.

Influence and Legacy

Impact on Renaissance Landscape Painting

The World landscape style, developed in the , profoundly influenced mid-16th-century Italian painting through the circulation of prints from Flemish and German workshops. Venetian artists, including , incorporated its panoramic vistas into narrative compositions, transforming backgrounds into integral, expansive elements that enhanced thematic depth. This adoption stemmed from engravings by artists like and , which reached via trade networks and local printing industries, allowing Southern painters to adapt the Weltlandschaft's emphasis on vast, unified views without direct travel. For instance, Titian's (c. 1507) features a detailed forest landscape with motifs drawn from Northern prints, reflecting broader Venetian enthusiasm for such styles. Beyond , the style reshaped portraiture and by promoting as a co-equal component rather than subordinate decoration, a hallmark of Northern innovation that spread across . exemplified this in his English court portraits of the 1530s, such as The Ambassadors (1533), where a detailed backdrop with scientific instruments, a , and an anamorphic integrates worldly context to mirror the sitters' status and evoke the era's intellectual spirit. This elevation of reflected the Weltlandschaft's tradition of embedding symbolic geography within human-centered scenes, fostering a more immersive narrative that balanced individual likeness with broader worldly context. Technically, the World landscape advanced the use of oil on panel, prized for its capacity to render intricate textures like foliage and reflections with unprecedented clarity, a method that Italian artists emulated to achieve similar and depth. This medium's popularity facilitated the style's , as seen in the prolific output of Antwerp publisher Hieronymus Cock during the 1550s, whose series—such as Landscapes with Figures after designs by —reproduced panoramic compositions for a wide audience. Cock's workshop produced over 1,000 prints, standardizing the motif of elevated viewpoints over expansive terrains and enabling artists from to the to incorporate these elements into their oeuvre.

Evolution in Later European Art

In the 17th-century , the world landscape genre evolved through , as artists like transitioned from earlier symbolic depictions to more naturalistic studies of the physical environment. Ruisdael's panoramic compositions, such as Wheat Fields (ca. 1670), emphasize observed rural scenes with expansive fields, dramatic skies, and subtle atmospheric effects, capturing the harmony and transience of nature without overt religious allegory. This shift reflected the era's growing interest in empirical observation and the beauty of the Dutch countryside, marking a departure from the fantastical, elevated viewpoints of 16th-century predecessors toward grounded, secular representations of the world. The genre experienced a Romantic revival in the , where painters like reinterpreted its vast, panoramic scale to evoke the sublime, prioritizing emotional and spiritual resonance over serene harmony. In works such as Wanderer above the Sea of Fog (ca. 1818), Friedrich presents towering, mist-shrouded mountains and infinite horizons as metaphors for human introspection and the overwhelming power of nature, infusing the landscape with a sense of awe and existential isolation. This approach echoed the original genre's emphasis on expansive worlds but transformed it into a vehicle for personal emotion, aligning with Romantic ideals of nature as a divine, untamed force that challenges human limits. In the , the world landscape's legacy influenced and , as seen in Max Ernst's dreamlike terrains that blended historical panoramic visions with subconscious distortions to explore human-nature dynamics. Ernst's surreal works, such as Europe After the Rain II (1940–1942), draw on landscape traditions by constructing otherworldly, fragmented environments that symbolize ecological disruption and psychological unease, extending the genre's conceptual framework into modern existential concerns. This influence further manifested in , where artists like those in the movement reconceived vast landscapes as sites for intervention and reflection on humanity's relationship with the planet, perpetuating the genre's role in visualizing interconnected natural systems.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.