Hubbry Logo
Cyborg artCyborg artMain
Open search
Cyborg art
Community hub
Cyborg art
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Cyborg art
Cyborg art
Cyborg art
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
2013 talk from Neil Harbisson and Moon Ribas: Life with extra Senses - How to become a Cyborg
Part of a series on
Cyborgs
Cyborgology
Theory
Centers
Politics
Related articles

Cyborg art, also known as cyborgism,[1] is an art movement that began in the mid-2000s in Britain.[2] It is based on the creation and addition of new senses to the body via cybernetic implants[3] and the creation of art works through new senses.[4] Cyborg artworks are created by cyborg artists;[5] artists whose senses have been voluntarily enhanced through cybernetic implants.[6]

Among the early artists shaping the cyborg art movement are Neil Harbisson, whose antenna implant allows him to perceive ultraviolet and infrared colours,[7] and Moon Ribas whose implants in her feet[8] allow her to feel earthquakes and moonquakes.[9]

  • Manel De Aguas, a Catalan photographer who developed fins that allow him to perceive atmospheric pressure, humidity and temperature through a couple of implants at each side of his head.[10]
  • Joe Dekni, an artist who has developed and installed a radar system in his head. The sensory system includes two implants in his cheekbones.[11]
  • Pau Prats, creator of a system that allows him to feel the ultraviolet ray levels that reach his skin.[12][13]
  • Alex Garcia, whose sensor installed in his chest allows him to feel the air quality levels around him.[14]
  • Kai Landre, a musician developing two implants to hear the sound of the particles affected by the collusion of cosmic rays.[15]
  • Hannah Meltzer, a visual and performance artist who has magnets implanted in her fingers and ears which allow her to feel magnetic fields.[16][17]
  • Dodo K. Doudová, Czech autism rights advocate who has a sensor that allows them to feel ionizing radiation on their own skin as vibrations and a subdermal chip implant.[18][19][20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cyborg art

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cyborg art is an artistic movement in which practitioners voluntarily implant cybernetic devices into their bodies to extend or enhance sensory perceptions beyond natural human limits, thereby generating artworks derived from these novel perceptual faculties. This integration of with , often denoted as cyborgism, positions the artist's modified body as the site of creation, where the artwork, audience, and exhibition space coalesce internally. Emerging in the early 2000s amid broader discourses on transhumanism and posthumanism—influenced by foundational texts such as Donna Haraway's Cyborg Manifesto (1985)—cyborg art operationalizes cybernetic enhancements to interrogate the boundaries between organic embodiment and mechanical augmentation. Key pioneers include Neil Harbisson, who in 2004 underwent surgery to embed an antenna in his skull, enabling sonochromatic perception of colors as audible frequencies, and Moon Ribas, who implanted a seismic sensor to translate earthquakes into vibrational cues for choreographic performances. The Cyborg Foundation, co-founded by Harbisson and Ribas in 2010, advocates for such enhancements as extensions of human evolution, sponsoring exhibitions like Human+ (2015) that showcase cyborg prototypes and provoke debates on sensory hybridization. These practices redefine artistic agency by prioritizing empirical sensory data from implants over conventional media, yielding outputs such as auditory color portraits or seismically induced dances that embody causal interactions between human physiology and external technological inputs. While advancing discussions on perceptual plasticity and human-machine , cyborg art raises empirical questions about long-term physiological integration and the verifiability of enhanced cognition, grounded in documented functionalities rather than speculative narratives.

Definition and Scope

Conceptual Foundations

The concept of the cyborg originated in 1960, when Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline introduced the term "cybernetic organism" in their paper "Cyborgs and Space," published in . They envisioned it as a self-regulating human-machine system designed to adapt physiological functions for extraterrestrial environments, eliminating the need for cumbersome external life-support by integrating continuous regulatory devices that respond to environmental feedback. This foundation emphasized practical technological symbiosis, where mechanical enhancements enable biological adaptation through closed-loop control mechanisms, drawing from emerging principles. In the context of art, cyborg art builds on this by treating the artist's body as the primary medium, where cybernetic implants or extensions create novel sensory capabilities, thereby generating aesthetic experiences inherent to the hybrid entity itself. The , established in 2010, defines cyborg art as an movement involving the implantation of technology to extend human senses beyond natural limits, such as perceiving or light, with the artwork manifesting directly within the modified body rather than as external objects. This literal embodiment distinguishes it from metaphorical representations, prioritizing verifiable technological integration that alters perception and agency in real-time, often through loops that couple neural processes with computational outputs. Underlying these practices is , formalized by in 1948, which posits that living systems and machines share principles of communication and control via feedback, enabling predictive adaptation. In cyborg art, this translates to enhancements that function as extensions of and embodiment, challenging anthropocentric limits by demonstrating causal efficacy: implanted devices not only augment input (e.g., new sensory data) but also output altered behaviors or creations, as evidenced in early experiments with wearable cybernetic prosthetics that influenced artistic output. While theoretical frameworks like Donna Haraway's 1985 have popularized hybridity as a rejection of binary oppositions, empirical cyborg art prioritizes testable implementations over symbolic critique, with source analyses noting Haraway's influence as primarily discursive rather than engineering-oriented.

Distinctions from Bioart and Digital Art

Cyborg art emphasizes the surgical or invasive integration of cybernetic devices—such as electronic implants or prosthetics—into the artist's body to create novel sensory perceptions, enabling the production of artworks through these augmented human-machine interfaces. This physical hybridization distinguishes it from bioart, which primarily manipulates biological entities like living tissues, cells, bacteria, or genetic material to explore life processes and biotechnological ethics, often without requiring direct bodily alteration by the artist. For example, bioart practitioners may culture hybrid organisms in laboratories or engineer transgenic animals to critique scientific commodification of life, as seen in works involving DNA splicing or microbial ecosystems, whereas cyborg art's core lies in the artist's own body as the site of technological fusion, such as embedding sensors to "hear" colors or detect electromagnetic fields. The former engages organic vitality and ethical boundaries of biology, while the latter probes mechanical extension of human cognition and embodiment. In contrast to digital art, which relies on non-invasive computational tools like software algorithms, graphics tablets, or generative AI for creating virtual or screen-mediated outputs, cyborg art demands irreversible physiological modifications to achieve its effects, rendering the artist's enhanced physiology inseparable from the creative process. Digital art spans techniques including pixel-based rendering, 3D modeling, and interactive media, where technology serves as an external intermediary for ideation and presentation, often preserving the artist's unmodified body. Cyborg art, however, transforms the body into a dynamic, cybernetic instrument—evident in implants that interface directly with neural pathways—challenging distinctions between organic limits and prosthetic expansion in ways that digital methods cannot replicate through simulation alone. This embodied approach underscores cyborg art's focus on lived hybridity over disembodied computation.

Historical Evolution

Precursors in Early Modernism

Italian Futurism, emerging in 1909 with Filippo Tommaso Marinetti's manifesto, celebrated the dynamism of machines and advocated for the integration of human vitality with mechanical speed and power, laying conceptual groundwork for later human-machine hybrids. Artists like explored this fusion in sculptures such as Unique Forms of Continuity in Space (1913), where human figures dissolve into fluid, aerodynamic forms evoking propulsion and technological augmentation. This emphasis on mechanization as an extension of human capability anticipated cyborg aesthetics by portraying the body not as isolated but as intertwined with industrial forces. In the Dada movement of the 1910s and 1920s, particularly Berlin Dada, artists critiqued post-World War I mechanized society through photomontages that grafted mechanical elements onto human forms, prefiguring cyborg imagery as a symbol of and potential reconfiguration. Raoul Hausmann's The Mechanical Head (1920) assembled a wooden mannequin head with a , ruler, and other found objects, representing the rational mind supplanted by machinery. Hannah Höch's collages, such as Cut with the Kitchen Knife Dada Through the Last Beer-Belly Cultural Epoch of Germany (1919–1920), incorporated gears, wheels, and prosthetic-like appendages into fragmented bodies, blending organic and prosthetic elements to challenge bodily norms. These works, while satirical, introduced visual motifs of cybernetic enhancement that influenced subsequent explorations of hybrid identities. Fernand Léger's paintings from the 1910s onward, influenced by and industrial imagery, depicted robust, cylindrical human figures amid machinery, as in Contrast of Forms (1913), blurring distinctions between flesh and metal to evoke a harmonized . Léger's vision of the "modern man" as inherently mechanical underscored a proto-cyborg sensibility, where technological integration amplified human expression rather than alienated it. Such early modernist experiments, rooted in responses to rapid industrialization, provided aesthetic and thematic precedents for cyborg art's literal embodiment of human augmentation decades later.

Post-War Developments and Cybernetics

Following , emerged as a foundational discipline influencing artistic explorations of human-machine interaction, with Norbert Wiener's 1948 book Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine establishing key principles of feedback, control, and systemic adaptation across biological and mechanical entities. This framework resonated in post-war art, where artists began incorporating technological processes to emphasize dynamism, environment, and audience participation over static forms, laying groundwork for cyborg aesthetics through experiments in responsive systems. Pioneering works included Hungarian-French artist Nicolas Schöffer's CYSP 1 (1956), recognized as the first cybernetic sculpture, which integrated photoelectric cells, motors, and wind sensors to enable self-regulating movement and light responses, publicly demonstrated in 1961 at the Musée d'Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris. British artist Roy Ascott advanced "behaviorist art" in the early 1960s, using cybernetic models to create interactive installations like Groundcourse (1961–1964) at Ealing School of Art, where participants engaged in feedback loops mimicking adaptive systems, blurring artist-viewer boundaries. These efforts reflected cybernetics' shift toward art as a process-oriented system rather than fixed object. The 1968 Cybernetic Serendipity exhibition at London's , curated by Jasia Reichardt, marked a pivotal convergence, showcasing over 300 works in computer-generated art, kinetic sculptures, and interactive devices, including Gordon Pask's Colloquy of Mobiles—sound-sensitive structures that adapted to human presence via microphones and lights. Running from August 2 to October 20, 1968, it drew 46,000 visitors and highlighted ' role in generative processes, influencing subsequent cyborg art by demonstrating machine-human in creative output. Critics noted its emphasis on serendipitous emergence from algorithmic rules, though some questioned the depth of artistic intent amid technological novelty. These developments prefigured cyborg art's focus on bodily augmentation, as cybernetic principles extended Wiener's animal-machine analogies to artistic prosthetics and hybrid entities, though early works prioritized environmental feedback over direct implantation. By the late 1960s, thinkers like Jack Burnham critiqued sculpture's evolution toward "systems aesthetics," advocating cybernetic integrations that treated artworks as evolving entities akin to living organisms.

Emergence in the Digital Age

Cyborg art emerged prominently in the as digital technologies, including personal computers and nascent internet infrastructure, enabled artists to fuse human physiology with remote data streams and networked control systems. This period marked a shift from earlier cybernetic experiments toward interactive, telematic where the artist's body served as a node in digital ecosystems, probing the erosion of physical boundaries through real-time augmentation. often utilized (EMS) devices interfaced with computers, allowing external inputs to override voluntary movement and highlight the body's vulnerability to informational flows. A seminal example is Australian performance artist Stelarc's "Fractal Flesh" in 1995, conducted as part of the Telepolis project, where internet users from sites including the Pompidou Centre in and MIT's Media Lab remotely directed electrical impulses to his lower body via EMS, generating involuntary movements mapped to digital visualizations of biometric data. This installation underscored the cyborg's dual nature as both enhanced agency and programmable substrate, with Stelarc's suspended form acting as a vector for distributed control, free from traditional sensory feedback loops. Concurrently, Korean artist debuted elements of her Cyborg series in 1997, crafting silicone-and-aluminum humanoid sculptures with prosthetic limbs and biomechanical features that evoked incomplete mergers of flesh and circuitry, critiquing utopian promises of digital transcendence amid Asia's rapid technologization. These works built on theoretical foundations like Donna Haraway's 1985 "," but materialized distinctly in the digital milieu through accessible computing tools that democratized body-hacking experiments. French artist 's "The Reincarnation of Saint ORLAN," initiated in 1990 and spanning the decade, integrated surgical interventions planned via and broadcast live over early networks, transforming her body into a mutable canvas of implanted materials and cosmetic prosthetics, thereby embodying identity as iterative, data-driven self-sculpture. By the early 2000s, such practices proliferated with implantable RFID and sensors, solidifying cyborg art's critique of human exceptionalism in an era of pervasive digital mediation.

Key Practitioners and Exemplary Works

Neil Harbisson and Sensory Extensions

, born in 1984 in to a Spanish and British-Irish , suffers from , a congenital condition rendering him completely color-blind and able to perceive only shades of gray. In 2003, while studying music composition at in , Harbisson collaborated with cyberneticist to develop the "eyeborg," a prosthetic antenna designed to translate color wavelengths into audible frequencies. The device underwent non-invasive testing on Harbisson's head for a year before surgical implantation in 2004, after bioethics committees rejected the procedure multiple times, requiring anonymous surgeons to perform it. The antenna, protruding from his skull and osseointegrated into his bone, features a camera-like sensor at its tip that detects light frequencies ranging from infrared to ultraviolet, converting them via a chip against his skull into vibrations conducted through bone to his cochlea, which he perceives as specific musical notes and chords. This extension enables perception of 360 colors as distinct sounds, with red corresponding to C notes, green to F, and blue to roughly A, expanding beyond human visual limits to include electromagnetic spectrum data like Wi-Fi signals in later upgrades. Harbisson's work exemplifies cyborg art through sensory augmentation, where the eyeborg serves as both a functional and an artistic tool for creating works that blend with input. He composes by "hearing" facial colors of sitters or environmental hues, translating them into soundscapes, as in pieces derived from scanning celebrities' tones to generate portraits via auditory . In performances, he "paints" sounds by mapping and gradients onto musical scales, challenging conventional boundaries between visual and auditory arts by internalizing technological mediation as a new perceptual organ. Harbisson defines cyborg art as the process of designing and incorporating senses to generate external artworks, emphasizing the internal perceptual shift over mere representation; for instance, he experiences colors as akin to tasting or smelling, informing abstract compositions that prioritize - over traditional media. This approach draws from cybernetic principles, where feedback loops between body and device evolve the 's calibration based on Harbisson's auditory associations, such as associating his mother's hair color with her voice's pitch. The implant's recognition as part of Harbisson's underscores its role in sensory extension art: in 2011, his passport photograph included the antenna, officially classifying it as skeletal, not removable. In 2010, he co-founded the with to promote such extensions, developing projects like seismic sensors for , though Harbisson's primary focus remains color-to-sound transduction as a medium for identity exploration and perceptual expansion. Empirical challenges include initial disorientation from overwhelming data, resolved through months of training to filter inputs, demonstrating causal adaptation in human-machine interfaces without altering core . Harbisson's extensions critique anthropocentric limits, positing technology as evolutionary , though unverified claims of universal precedents lack substantiation beyond his documented case.

Other Pioneers and Collaborative Projects

Stelarc (born Stelios Arcadiou, 1946), an Australian performance artist of Cypriot origin, has been instrumental in advancing cyborg aesthetics through cybernetic body extensions since the 1970s. His Third Hand prosthesis, a pneumatically actuated robotic gripper affixed to his right arm and operated via electromyographic signals from his left arm and toes, debuted in performances in 1980, enabling simultaneous multi-limb actions that challenged conventional human dexterity. Subsequent works include the Extended Arm (developed circa 1999), a 20-kilogram electromechanical limb powered by 18 shape-memory alloy actuators mimicking muscle contractions, and the Prosthetic Head (initiated 2003), an animated 3D-printed cranium with AI-responsive eye mechanisms scanning crowds and generating speech from brain-wave data. These interventions probe the body's redundancy and advocate for engineered anatomical alternatives, often incorporating real-time internet data and robotic feedback loops. Moon Ribas, a Barcelona-based performer, pioneered sensory augmentation for environmental awareness by implanting vibrating seismograph-linked devices in 2013, which transmit global data as physical tremors to her upper limbs, converting tectonic activity into a proprioceptive sense integrated into her choreography. This Seismic Sense system, refined through prototypes connecting to online geophysical monitors, underscores cyborg art's capacity to forge empathetic bonds with planetary phenomena, as Ribas experiences magnitudes from minor rumbles to intense vibrations during major events like the 2011 Tohoku quake. Manel de Aguas, another Catalan innovator, implanted Weather Sense sensors in his ears starting in to detect barometric pressure, humidity, and temperature variations, translating meteorological shifts into subdermal oscillations that influence his electronic production and transspecies . from practices, de Aguas's augmentations, surgically installed in , enable predictive bodily responses to weather patterns, framing the human form as an evolving interface with atmospheric data. Collaborative endeavors amplify these individual pursuits, as seen in the JIZAI ARMS initiative (presented 2023), where augmentation specialists, designers, and artists co-developed swappable robotic upper limbs using magnetic attachments and gesture controls, tested in public installations to explore customizable hybrid anatomies beyond medical utility. Similarly, Thoughtworks Arts' Seismic Sense prototyping (circa 2018) united Ribas with engineers to iterate wearable-to-implant transitions for earthquake detection, yielding insights into haptic feedback calibration and ethical augmentation protocols through iterative field trials. These projects highlight cyborg art's reliance on cross-disciplinary teams to surmount technical barriers, such as signal latency and , while prioritizing experiential verifiability over speculative narratives.

Technological Implementations

Types of Cybernetic Enhancements

Cybernetic enhancements in cyborg art typically involve surgical implants or bio-integrated devices that extend or alter , often blurring the boundaries between body and to explore themes of identity. These enhancements prioritize sensory expansion over mere functionality, with artists using them in performances to demonstrate real-time interactions with streams or environments. Empirical evidence from documented cases shows limited long-term adoption due to biocompatibility issues and rejection risks, though they serve as provocative prototypes. A primary type is sensory substitution implants, which convert one form of input into another perceivable by the body, such as translating visual data into sound. Neil Harbisson's "eyeborg" antenna, surgically implanted into his skull in 2004, exemplifies this: a camera at its tip captures colors, which are processed into vibrations conducted through bone to his , allowing perception of and wavelengths as musical notes. This device, developed with cyberneticist Adam Zaretsky, extends beyond compensating for Harbisson's to enable artistic compositions where colors dictate symphonies. Similar auditory-vibrational interfaces appear in other works, but Harbisson's remains the most cited for its permanence and integration into live performances. Environmental monitoring implants represent another category, embedding sensors that relay external geophysical or data signals directly to the via vibrations or electrical pulses. Moon implanted seismic sensors in her left arm in 2013, connected wirelessly to global earthquake monitors; these vibrate in proportion to seismic intensity, granting her a "sixth sense" for tectonic activity worldwide, which she incorporates into dances responding to real-time events. Later prototypes in her feet aimed for subdermal permanence, though removals due to tissue highlight causal risks like from foreign materials. This type underscores cybernetic art's emphasis on embodiment over utility, as the implants do not predict quakes but amplify planetary connectivity. Hybrid bio-technological appendages involve tissue-engineered structures augmented with cybernetic potential, often grown or implanted to add non-natural organs. Stelarc's "third ear," cultivated from his stem cells and a Medpor inserted into his left in 2006, illustrates this: the 2.5 cm structure was designed for eventual Wi-Fi microphone integration to stream audio online, though initial versions lacked functionality and focused on visual provocation in performances. Measuring pore sizes of 100-250 micrometers for tissue ingrowth, demonstrated but faced vascularization challenges, leading to partial resorption. Such enhancements human by treating the body as a modifiable , distinct from therapeutic prosthetics. Less common but emerging types include neural-data interfaces, such as subdermal RFID chips for machine communication, tested by artists like those in the for artistic data logging. These often combine with wearables for hybrid systems, but verifiable permanent implants remain rare due to infection rates exceeding 10% in small-scale trials and ethical constraints on non-medical experimentation. Overall, these enhancements prioritize experiential novelty, with documented cases showing short-term efficacy but long-term failures from immune responses.

Integration Challenges and Innovations

The integration of cybernetic enhancements in cyborg art encounters substantial biological barriers, including immune-mediated rejection of implanted materials and chronic inflammation at the tissue-device interface, which can lead to device failure or removal. Surgical procedures for non-medical augmentation, often performed outside regulated clinical environments, heighten risks of , nerve damage, and incomplete , where bone fails to fuse stably with anchors like screws. In artistic contexts, these issues are compounded by the demand for devices that prioritize sensory novelty over durability, resulting in higher empirical failure rates compared to therapeutic implants; for example, biohacking-derived enhancements in have documented cases of magnet expulsion due to capsular contraction within months of implantation. Technical challenges further complicate integration, such as reliable between implants and neural or sensory systems, where latency, , and power depletion disrupt real-time artistic expression. Battery life limitations necessitate frequent , potentially interrupting performative works, while scaling enhancements for or ultrasonic strains current limits without compromising resolution. Innovations mitigating these hurdles include the adoption of flexible, bioresorbable electronics that conform to tissue dynamics and degrade non-toxically if needed, reducing long-term reactions. techniques, refined through prosthetic research, enable secure anchoring as demonstrated in Neil Harbisson's 2004 eyeborg implantation, where a skull-mounted antenna uses for color-to-sound transduction, achieving stable after initial adaptation. Wireless protocols and integration further innovate by enabling remote calibration and internet-linked inputs, as in Harbisson's Bluetooth-upgraded system allowing perception of non-visible wavelengths, thus expanding artistic sensory palettes without invasive wiring. Advances in neural interfacing, drawing from precedents, promise adaptive algorithms that self-calibrate to user physiology, addressing variability in individual tissue responses.

Theoretical Underpinnings

Cyborg art intersects with through practitioners who employ technological implants to extend human sensory and perceptual capacities, aligning with the movement's advocacy for overcoming biological constraints via engineering. , implanted with an infrared-sensitive antenna in 2004 that translates colors into audible frequencies, exemplifies this fusion, describing his modification as a means to transcend natural sensory limits and asserting a philosophical to integrate for . The , co-founded by Harbisson and in 2010, promotes such enhancements as artistic and existential pursuits, fostering "cyborg rights" and new perceptual arts that echo transhumanist goals of radical and capability amplification, as articulated in foundational texts like those by in 1990. These works operationalize transhumanist principles empirically, with documented cases of subdermal implants enabling synesthetic experiences previously confined to theoretical speculation. In posthumanist discourse, cyborg art challenges anthropocentric boundaries by manifesting hybrid human-machine ontologies, where the artist's body becomes a site for interrogating fixed notions of humanity. Drawing from Donna Haraway's 1985 "," which posits the as a boundary-dissolving figure rejecting dualisms like /, artists like have since 1980 incorporated prosthetics and robotic extensions in performances to explore distributed agency and bodily obsolescence, influencing posthuman theories of embodiment. Scholarly analyses frame these practices as precursors to posthuman , emphasizing causal integration of cybernetic systems that render the human form contingent rather than essential, as seen in installations blending organic tissue with algorithmic feedback loops. However, while ism often critiques humanism's privileges, cyborg art's empirical implementations—such as Harbisson's sustained antenna use since 2004—prioritize verifiable enhancements over purely speculative deconstructions, grounding abstract philosophy in testable physiological outcomes. This linkage extends to ethical dimensions, where transhumanist cyborg artists advocate for perceptual expansions as democratizing tools, yet posthumanist interpretations highlight risks of , as evidenced by critiques in literature questioning long-term integration without rigorous longitudinal data. Empirical surveys of transhumanist communities, including and implant artists, reveal a growing corpus of such works since the , positioning cyborg as a practical for both movements' visions of augmented futures.

Critiques from Humanist and Naturalist Perspectives

Humanist critiques of cyborg art center on the erosion of human dignity and the shared essence of unenhanced embodiment. , in his 2004 analysis, labels transhumanist pursuits—including artistic integrations of cybernetic enhancements—as the "world's most dangerous idea" because they challenge the fixed that underpins equal rights and moral equality in liberal societies. By prioritizing technological transcendence, cyborg artists like , who have interfaced their bodies with robotic prosthetics in performances since the , risk creating hierarchies where enhanced individuals gain advantages unavailable to others, thus fracturing the egalitarian basis of humanistic ethics. Leon Kass extends this objection through the "wisdom of repugnance," arguing in 1997 that instinctive aversion to radical bodily alterations signals profound ethical boundaries rooted in respect for natural human form. Applied to cyborg art, this view holds that implanting sensors or actuators—as in Neil Harbisson's 2004 color-to-sound antenna—desecrates the body's integrity, treating it as malleable material rather than a holistic vessel for authentic experience, thereby alienating artists from innate human vulnerabilities that foster genuine and . Naturalist perspectives emphasize fidelity to evolved biological realities, critiquing cyborg art for imposing artificial interventions that bypass the causal mechanisms of . Jürgen Habermas, in his 2003 work, warns that such enhancements disrupt the symmetry of natural human development, potentially yielding offspring or experiences untested by evolutionary pressures, which undermines the reliability of human artistic intuition derived from adaptive traits. from supports this, as unproven implants like those in early cyborg performances have led to infections or rejections, illustrating how deviations from physiological norms introduce risks without guaranteed adaptive gains. Proponents of naturalistic realism further argue that true artistic innovation arises from refining innate sensory capacities rather than outsourcing them to machines, viewing cybernetic hybrids as simulations that dilute the causal authenticity of human expression.

Controversies and Criticisms

Ethical and Bioethical Debates

Cyborg art, involving surgical implantation of technological devices for aesthetic or sensory enhancement, has provoked scrutiny primarily over the distinction between therapeutic medical interventions and elective body modifications. committees have repeatedly denied approval for such procedures, citing the absence of medical necessity and potential for irreversible harm, as exemplified by artist Neil Harbisson's antenna implant, which converts colors to sound vibrations and was rejected multiple times before being performed by anonymous surgeons in 2004. These rejections underscore concerns that non-therapeutic enhancements prioritize artistic expression over evidence-based , potentially exposing participants to infections, device rejection, or neurological complications without proven long-term safety data. Critics argue that cyborg art blurs the ethical boundary between human augmentation and self-experimentation, raising questions about in contexts where participants may underestimate psychological or physical sequelae. For instance, the DIY "grinder" subculture within , which overlaps with cyborg , often bypasses regulatory oversight, leading to unregulated implants that amplify risks of device malfunction or hacking vulnerabilities. from related fields, such as neural implants, indicates high rates of revision surgeries and adverse events, suggesting causal links between invasive cybernetic integrations and sustained burdens absent therapeutic justification. Proponents, however, invoke arguments, positing that competent adults should access enhancements expanding perceptual capacities, though this view contends with precedents in prohibiting procedures like non-essential amputations for identity reasons. Broader debates extend to ontological implications, questioning whether cyborg integrations erode baseline identity or foster eugenic pressures toward technological conformity. Academic analyses highlight how such enhancements could exacerbate social inequalities, as access remains limited to those with resources for experimental surgeries, potentially normalizing enhancements that privilege sensory or cognitive elites over natural human variation. Regulatory gaps persist, with calls for frameworks addressing cyborg-specific , such as data privacy in connected implants, amid limited empirical studies validating artistic claims of transcendent experience against verifiable physiological costs.

Health Risks and Empirical Failures

Cyborg art enhancements often involve invasive, non-medical implants performed outside regulated clinical settings, amplifying risks compared to therapeutic devices. These procedures, typically executed by body modification specialists rather than neurosurgeons, expose participants to elevated chances of surgical site infections, which affect approximately 39% of cranial implant cases in analogous medical studies, alongside implant exposure, hematomas, and leaks. Subdermal or osseointegrated implants risk chronic inflammation, tissue rejection, and reactions, including formation and damage, due to unsterile conditions and materials not optimized for . Neurological complications, such as seizures or migration-induced irritation, are particularly acute for cranial augmentations like color-perceiving antennas, where imprecise fitting occurs in 30% of similar implants, potentially exacerbating trauma from trepanation. Empirical evidence underscores failures in sustaining these augmentations long-term. Moon Ribas, who implanted seismic sensors in her feet to detect global earthquakes, removed the devices after several years of use, highlighting challenges in durability and integration absent from controlled trials. Neil Harbisson's skull-implanted antenna, installed in 2004 to transduce colors into sound vibrations, has prompted concerns over eventual removal risks, including bone erosion and during extraction, though no public complications have been reported; however, its reliance on external power and vulnerability to physical damage illustrates functional brittleness untested in peer-reviewed longevity studies. Broader data from non-artistic body augmentations reveal implant fractures in up to 2.9% of hydroxyapatite cranial cases and hypersensitivity reactions with , underscoring how artistic pursuits bypass safety protocols, leading to undocumented but probable attrition rates. The absence of systematic follow-up data—unlike medical implants—reveals these enhancements as prone to , with artists often reverting to baseline when devices malfunction or health deteriorates.

Ideological Objections to Technological Determinism

Critics of within cyborg art contend that the practice often implicitly endorses the notion that cybernetic enhancements autonomously drive artistic innovation and , marginalizing the influence of socioeconomic structures and deliberate human agency. This perspective posits technology as an independent force reshaping society, yet empirical observations reveal that implant adoptions, such as those by artists like since the 1980s, remain rare and context-dependent, shaped by regulatory, ethical, and cultural barriers rather than inevitable progression. Donna Haraway, in her 1985 Cyborg Manifesto, articulates an ideological objection rooted in , rejecting as a limiting ideology that reduces machines and organisms to fixed determinants, instead advocating their reconception as "coded texts" open to political reconfiguration and contestation. Haraway argues this deterministic view aligns with broader technoscientific narratives that obscure power dynamics, such as those in late-20th-century , where enhancements serve elite interests over collective needs. Further ideological resistance emerges from posthumanist and media theory critiques, which fault cyborg art for perpetuating utopian akin to transhumanist , wherein enhancements are presumed to liberate without accounting for co-evolutionary human-technology dynamics or potential exacerbations of inequality. For example, analyses of works involving implants highlight how such art risks "glorifying the and of " while neglecting empirical failures and social mediation, as seen in limited long-term integrations post-2000 due to biocompatibility issues and public . These objections underscore a causal realism wherein technology's artistic applications arise from multifaceted interactions—economic incentives, institutional biases in funding (often favoring Western technophilic narratives), and cultural resistance—rather than unidirectional determination, evidenced by stagnant growth in cybernetic art exhibitions beyond niche venues since the 1990s.

Societal Impact and Reception

Influence on Broader Culture and Technology

Cyborg art has contributed to cultural discourses on human augmentation by challenging traditional notions of and identity, as seen in performances that integrate and implants to explore themes. For instance, Australian artist Stelarc's use of a robotic third arm in performances since the demonstrated of prosthetic limbs, prompting public reflection on the obsolescence of the unaugmented body and influencing representations of in media and literature. Similarly, Neil Harbisson's implantation of an antenna in 2004 to perceive colors as sound vibrations has popularized the idea of sensory transcendence, appearing in documentaries and exhibitions that frame technology as an extension of human capability rather than mere prosthesis. In technology, cyborg art has indirectly advanced biohacking and wearable innovations by prototyping invasive enhancements that highlight engineering challenges in human-machine interfaces. Stelarc's prosthetic "Ear on Arm," surgically created in 2007 and equipped with a and by 2017, tested and wireless , informing experimental prosthetics in research focused on robust, inflatable muscle actuators for reliable movement. Harbisson's eyeborg, developed with Adam Montandon, has inspired commercial sensory devices through CyborgNest, including the NorthSense implant for magnetic direction perception, bridging artistic experimentation with consumer bio-augmentation products. Exhibitions of cyborg works, such as those featuring grinder communities embedding RFID chips and magnets since the early 2010s, have elevated DIY techno-body modification from fringe practice to recognized , influencing the design of implantable tech for non-medical uses like and haptic feedback. This has paralleled the evolution from engineered fashion to modern wearables, fostering innovations in subdermal interfaces that prioritize and user agency over therapeutic necessity. However, empirical data on direct technological adoption remains limited, with influences often manifesting as conceptual provocations rather than scalable engineering breakthroughs.

Achievements in Expanding Artistic Expression

Cyborg art has advanced artistic expression by enabling artists to transcend traditional human sensory and corporeal limits through cybernetic implants and prosthetics, fostering novel perceptual experiences and performative hybridity. Pioneering works demonstrate this through the creation of synthetic senses, where technology augments the body to produce art forms that integrate auditory, visual, and environmental data in unprecedented ways. For instance, Neil Harbisson's implantation of an "eyeborg" antenna in 2004 allowed him, a colorblind individual, to perceive colors as sound frequencies ranging from to , thereby expanding chromatic expression into sonic compositions and audible portraits. This innovation not only personalized sensory art but also challenged conventional boundaries of , influencing subsequent cyborg practices by demonstrating technology's role in perceptual redesign. Stelarc's performances further exemplify expansion by reconfiguring the body as an obsolete structure amenable to mechanical and biological augmentation, interrogating agency and embodiment. His "Third Hand" prosthetic, developed in the and refined through collaborations like the EXTENDED ARM manipulator, enabled multi-handed manipulation in live actions, allowing real-time artistic interventions that blurred human control with robotic extension. Similarly, in 2007, Stelarc surgically attached a cell-cultured to his left forearm, creating a functional extra organ responsive to sound and connectivity, which served as a platform for telematic performances linking body sites globally and redefining sculptural anatomy as interactive and distributed. These achievements shifted artistic focus from static representation to dynamic, embodiment, inspiring hybrid forms where the artist's physique becomes a for evolutionary experimentation. Collaborative cyborg initiatives, such as those by , have introduced environmental sensing as an expressive medium, with implants like vibrating sensors in feet (installed circa 2013) that translate seismic activity into bodily tremors, enabling dances and installations that embody geophysical rhythms. This sensory extends artistic vocabulary to include "seismoception," fostering works that merge human kinetics with planetary data and critiquing anthropocentric isolation. Collectively, these developments have democratized perceptual augmentation, evidenced by the Foundation's advocacy since 2010 for transpecies rights and new organs, which has proliferated exhibitions worldwide and integrated cyborg motifs into mainstream tools post-2020. Such innovations underscore cyborg art's causal role in diversifying expression beyond biological constraints, though empirical validation of long-term perceptual shifts remains artist-led rather than clinically standardized.

Limitations and Unfulfilled Promises

Cyborg art has frequently encountered technological barriers that prevent seamless integration of cybernetic enhancements, resulting in incomplete or malfunctioning systems. Performance artist , a pioneer in the field, has described his extensive body of work—including robotic prosthetics and internet-linked muscle stimulations—as a "career of failures," noting that projects are "always inadequately completed" due to the body's resistance to foreign interventions and the unreliability of mechanical components. These empirical setbacks, such as implant rejections or prosthetic malfunctions during live performances, underscore the physiological limits of human tissue interfacing with non-biological materials, confining many works to temporary setups rather than permanent transformations. The genre's unfulfilled promises lie in its failure to achieve widespread transcendence of human sensory and expressive boundaries, remaining a niche pursuit despite early transhumanist visions of radical evolution. Exhibitions like "Do We Still Dream of a Cyborg Future?" at Kunsthalle Wien highlight how cyborg concepts from the to often devolved into critiques of control and , with works such as Analívia Cordeiro's M3x3 (1970) illustrating machine-imposed loss of rather than liberation. Surveys indicate broad skepticism about current cybernetic maturity, with 69% of respondents viewing the as too primitive for reliable augmentation, limiting artistic beyond experimental fringes. Causal factors include high costs, ethical regulatory hurdles, and minimal societal uptake, as enhancements yield marginal gains outweighed by maintenance demands and , stalling the promised in artistic expression. These constraints reveal a disconnect between conceptual hype and practical outcomes, where cyborg art's emphasis on often amplifies human vulnerabilities instead of overcoming them. While isolated cases like Neil Harbisson's color-hearing implant demonstrate sensory novelty, they have not catalyzed broader movements, as integration challenges persist without scalable solutions. The field's stagnation in mainstream culture stems from these repeated empirical shortfalls, prioritizing provocative gestures over enduring innovations.

Recent Advancements

AI and Hybrid Creations Post-2020

Post-2020, the proliferation of accessible generative AI tools and large language models facilitated novel hybrid creations in cyborg art, where human artists integrated AI-driven elements—such as chatbots, deepfakes, and algorithmic co-performance—directly with bodily or performative interventions to explore human-machine . These works often emphasized empirical tensions between human agency and algorithmic determinism, using AI not merely as a tool but as an embedded extension of the artist's cyborg identity, evidenced in real-time interactions and data-trained outputs. Performance artist Avital Meshi advanced human-AI hybrids through GPT-Me (2025), a durational piece where she wore a forearm device and AirPod connected to ChatGPT, voicing the AI's responses to participants' queries from noon to 8:00 p.m. at venues like Duke University and the CURRENTS 2025 festival, positioning herself as a cyborg medium that blurred personal identity with machine-generated dialogue. In her earlier AI Séance (2024), Meshi simulated spiritual communions via AI, further hybridizing human performance with computational responses to probe identity fluidity, noting altered interpersonal dynamics such as familial rejection of her augmented self. Similarly, the Cyber Subin project by MIT's Pat Pataranutaporn reinterpreted Thailand's Khon dance through human-AI co-dancing, pairing live performers with a screen-projected virtual AI character executing 59 poses via computational processes, framing it as cyborg psychology to preserve cultural forms amid technological mediation. Lynn Hershman Leeson, a longstanding art practitioner, incorporated AI into video works exhibited in "Of Humans, Cyborgs, and AI" at the Nevada Museum of Art (February 8–September 7, 2025). Her Logic Paralyzes the Heart (2021, 13:53 digital video) featured actress as Cyborg #1, interrogating with algorithmic forest fire overlays, while Cyborgian Rhapsody: Immortality (2023, 11:48) introduced an AI persona "Sarah" powered by , edited by Leeson to critique climate and tech risks through hybrid narrative voices. These pieces extended themes by empirically demonstrating AI's role in persona and predictive modeling, drawing on verifiable commodification patterns. Hybrid visual tools emerged alongside, as in Autolume (2024), an open-source AI synthesizer from Simon Fraser University's Metacreation Lab that trains generative models on analog photo datasets—such as 650 film portraits—to produce fleshy, perceptual mutations blending human input with machine hallucination, termed "cyborg art" for its symbiotic human-lens augmentation. Exhibitions like Virtual Beauty at (July 23–September 28, 2025) showcased such integrations, including Filip Ćustić's pi(x)el (2022), a body embedded with phone screens displaying diverse faces to merge organic form with digital augmentation, critiquing AI-influenced beauty standards like Snapchat dysmorphia. These creations highlighted causal realities of AI's influence on bodily , prioritizing data-driven outputs over idealized narratives.

Ongoing Exhibitions and Future Trajectories

As of October 2025, the exhibition Lee Bul: From 1998 to Now at the Leeum Museum of Art in remains on view, featuring approximately 150 works including the artist's early series from the late 1990s, which consists of fragmented, human-scale sculptures blending organic forms with mechanical elements to interrogate human-technology interfaces. These pieces, first exhibited internationally at events like the 1999 , depict hybrid entities with curvaceous limbs, elongated nails, and prosthetic-like attachments, symbolizing cultural anxieties over bodily augmentation. The retrospective, which opened on September 4, 2025, underscores art's persistence in probing themes through material fragility and surreal aesthetics. Similarly, the New Museum's New Humans: Memories of the Future in New York, opened in fall 2025, showcases over 150 works by artists spanning the 20th and 21st centuries, explicitly addressing cyborgs alongside robots and post-human forms as speculative evolutions of humanity driven by technological prognostication. Curated to span multiple floors, it includes contemporary contributions from figures like , who explores digital mediation of identity, and historical precedents from , emphasizing art's role in envisioning human augmentation amid empirical advances in and AI. Looking ahead, cyborg art trajectories increasingly incorporate AI-mediated embodiment and , as seen in projects like Cyborg Futures, which deploy cybernetic tools to induce perceptual states for creative expansion beyond baseline . These developments build on bioengineering potentials, with artists anticipating nanoscale integrations that blur organic and synthetic boundaries, though realizations remain constrained by current technological limits and bioethical hurdles. Exhibitions such as touring retrospectives and residencies signal a shift toward hybrid installations that simulate future sensory augmentations, prioritizing empirical testing of -machine over purely speculative narratives.

References

  1. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2811/Paper06.pdf
  2. https://www.scienceopen.com/document_file/c169201f-4829-42e5-8305-ca59ba080620/ScienceOpen/001_Jaller.pdf
  3. https://www.cyborgfoundation.com/
  4. https://web.mit.edu/digitalapollo/Documents/Chapter1/cyborgs.pdf
  5. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/cyber/surf/022697surf-cyborg.html
  6. https://cyborgproject.com/
  7. https://www.tomtenney.com/2010/12/29/cybernetics-in-art-and-the-myth-of-the-cyborg-artist/
  8. https://sculpturemagazine.art/systems-aesthetics-cyborg-art-the-legacy-of-jack-burnham/
  9. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/yetisen/files/bioart.pdf
  10. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08164649.2017.1466649
  11. https://www.cnn.com/style/article/bio-art-microbes-and-machines
  12. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/d/digital-art
  13. https://www.adobe.com/uk/creativecloud/illustration/discover/digital-art.html
  14. https://hyperallergic.com/391612/fernand-leger-centre-pompidou-metz/
  15. https://blog.apaonline.org/2025/02/13/from-human-to-cyborg-art-technology-and-the-redefinition-of-human-identity/
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321747904_Cyborg_Formations_in_Art
  17. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262537841/cybernetics-or-control-and-communication-in-the-animal-and-the-machine/
  18. http://www.responsivelandscapes.com/readings/CyberneticsArtCultConv.pdf
  19. https://elephant.art/ghost-in-the-machine-nicolas-schoffer-and-the-birth-of-cybernetic-art-21022022/
  20. https://www.amazon.com/Art-Cybernetics-Pedagogy-Post-War-Britain/dp/1032338601
  21. https://www.studiointernational.com/cybernetic-serendipity-history-and-lasting-legacy
  22. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=863
  23. https://www.artforum.com/columns/cybernetic-serendipity-music-223112/
  24. https://andrewwelsby.com/2012/01/09/cybernetics-and-art-by-edward-shanken/
  25. https://www.guarcholga.es/the-evolution-and-impact-of-cyborg-art/
  26. https://humanities.org.au/power-of-the-humanities/stelarc-performance-artist-interview/
  27. http://stelarc.org/_activity-20231.php
  28. https://www.sleek-mag.com/article/lee-bul/
  29. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2013/nov/11/scrotum-top-10-shocking-performance-art
  30. https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/essay/every-brilliant-eye-australian-art-of-the-1990s/
  31. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/worlds-first-cyborg-human-evolution-science
  32. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2014/may/06/neil-harbisson-worlds-first-cyborg-artist
  33. https://www.electronicdesign.com/markets/automation/article/55236502/electronic-design-human-cyborg-gets-documentary-detailing-his-journey-of-augmentation
  34. https://www.sciencefriday.com/articles/hearing-color-through-a-cyborg/
  35. https://www.freethink.com/series/biohackers/cyborg
  36. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-16681630
  37. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2023/12/worlds-first-cyborg-is-fighting-for-transpecies-rights-and-welcomes-ai-takeover-762197
  38. http://stelarc.org/
  39. https://www.agsa.sa.gov.au/education/resources-educators/resources-educators-australian-art/stelarc/
  40. https://digitallibrary.vassar.edu/collections/institutional-repository/bb681b1f-3869-4a76-8915-b12dcd750bd5
  41. https://unlikely.net.au/issue-07/moon-ribas
  42. https://www.cnn.com/style/article/moon-ribas-cyborg-smart-creativity
  43. https://www.vice.com/en/article/manel-de-aguas-cyborg-artist-sense-weather-ear-implants-artifical-organ/
  44. https://www.kaltblut-magazine.com/manel-de-aguas-top-5/
  45. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581169
  46. https://thoughtworksarts.io/projects/seismic-sense/
  47. http://stelarc.org/_activity-20242.php
  48. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg58r70yj43o
  49. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/460698-first-biohacker-with-earthquake-sensing-technology
  50. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2009/apr/14/performance-artist-ear-impant
  51. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/architecture-design-blog/2015/aug/14/body-hackers-the-people-who-turn-themselves-into-cyborgs
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882123000294
  53. https://royalsociety.org/science-events-and-lectures/2025/06/cyborg-futures/
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124000574
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8924218/
  56. https://www.colorado.edu/atlas/bruns-leslie-research-cybernetic-human-advancement-new-frontiers-grant
  57. https://nautil.us/encounters-with-the-posthuman-234320/
  58. https://philarchive.org/archive/CASTAO-20
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352983935_TRANSHUMANISM_AND_ITS_RELATIONSHIP_WITH_ART
  60. https://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/download/5693/2590/7588
  61. https://www.academia.edu/52615543/Human_Posthuman_Cyborg_Art
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9036499/
  63. https://www.designboom.com/art/cyborgs-robots-and-biohackers-the-first-ever-survey-of-transhumanism-03-01-2020/
  64. http://web.stanford.edu/~mvr2j/sfsu09/extra/Kass2.pdf
  65. https://www.anahuac.mx/mexico/CADEBI/en/noticias/neil-harbisson-and-cyborgism
  66. https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/humanism-and-transhumanism
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6919332/
  68. https://lexikon1.medium.com/the-ethics-of-experimentation-ethical-cybernetic-enhancements-48f9ad991769
  69. https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/03/10/468556420/body-hacking-movement-rises-ahead-of-moral-answers
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563218301377
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2563338/
  72. https://academic.oup.com/spp/article-abstract/49/1/42/6366837
  73. https://etica.uazuay.edu.ec/sites/etica.uazuay.edu.ec/files/public/uazuay-etica-ethical-issues-of-human-enhacement-technologies.pdf
  74. https://blog.bham.ac.uk/everydaycyborgs/wp-content/uploads/sites/95/2021/01/Workshop-Report-June-2017.pdf
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8405381/
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967586820316970
  77. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK571741/
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8695845/
  79. https://catalystjournal.org/index.php/catalyst/article/view/35066/28265
  80. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/impromptu-man/201408/the-artist-the-bull-and-the-implanted-antenna
  81. https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/2347-9264.149364
  82. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10856-024-06816-9
  83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1010518220302304
  84. https://www.academia.edu/323980/Technological_Determinism_In_Media_Art
  85. https://unitesi.unive.it/retrieve/55e847bf-1a21-4950-939b-b0351c8b4630/Tesi_Grenzi.pdf
  86. https://www.sfu.ca/~decaste/OISE/page2/files/HarawayCyborg.pdf
  87. https://libcom.org/article/cyborg-manifesto-science-technology-and-socialist-feminism-late-20th-century-donna-haraway
  88. https://zaguan.unizar.es/record/125332/files/TESIS-2023-065.pdf
  89. https://webarchiv.servus.at/archive.thenextlayer.org/files/TechnoDeterminismAM_0/index.pdf
  90. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humaff-2020-0042/html
  91. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/117931/3/nq94278_ocr.pdf
  92. https://www.sleek-mag.com/article/stelarc-interview-posthumanism/
  93. http://stelarc.org/documents/zombiesandcyborgs.pdf
  94. https://daily.redbullmusicacademy.com/2016/05/neil-harbisson-moon-ribas-feature/
  95. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316652865_Manifesting_the_Cyborg_through_Techno-Body_Modification_From_Human-Computer_Interaction_to_Integration
  96. https://www.hnf.de/en/permanent-exhibition/exhibition-areas/everything-goes-digital/interfaces-communication-between-man-and-machine/from-wearables-to-cyborgs.html
  97. https://clotmag.com/body-sculptures/neil-harbisson-on-viewing-colour-through-a-spectrum-of-sound-waves
  98. https://www.guernicamag.com/i-cyborg/
  99. https://theartian.com/episode-11-cyborg-art-creating-new-senses-and-organs-moon-ribas-and-manel-de-aguas/
  100. https://www.documentjournal.com/2023/01/neil-harbisson-cyborgs-moon-rebas-pol-lombarte-manuel-de-aguas-transhumanism-transpecies-rights/
  101. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2020/apr/08/the-artist-with-the-remote-controlled-robotic-body-ive-made-a-career-out-of-being-a-failure
  102. https://www.scrollmagazine.net/stel-arc
  103. https://elementymag.art/en/cialo-i-technologia-rozmowa-ze-stelarkiem/
  104. https://hyperallergic.com/1013957/do-we-still-dream-of-a-cyborg-future-kunsthalle-wien/
  105. https://www.tidio.com/blog/cybernetic-enhancements/
  106. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/our-cyborg-future-law-and-policy-implications/
  107. https://southwestcontemporary.com/lynn-hershman-leeson-nevada-review/
  108. https://3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2025/09/between-an-artist-and-gpt.html
  109. https://kriskrug.co/2024/06/18/the-cyborg-art-of-autolume-when-ai-meets-the-human-lens/
  110. https://www.media.mit.edu/articles/here-s-what-happens-when-humans-and-ai-dance-together/
  111. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2025/jul/13/virtual-beauty-exhibition-somerset-house-london
  112. https://www.e-flux.com/announcements/6783906/lee-bulfrom-1998-to-now
  113. https://www.gallerybbm.com/news/69-lee-bul-lee-bul-from-1998-to-now-leeum/
  114. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/857469
  115. https://www.frieze.com/article/andy-st-louis-lee-bul-253
  116. https://www.newmuseum.org/exhibition/new-humans-memories-of-the-future/
  117. https://www.cyborgfutures.com/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.