Hubbry Logo
Atlantic WorldAtlantic WorldMain
Open search
Atlantic World
Community hub
Atlantic World
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Atlantic World
Atlantic World
Atlantic World
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The Atlantic Ocean

The Atlantic World comprises the interactions among the peoples and empires bordering the Atlantic Ocean rim from the beginning of the Age of Discovery to the early 19th century. Atlantic history is split between three different contexts: trans-Atlantic history, meaning the international history of the Atlantic World; circum-Atlantic history, meaning the transnational history of the Atlantic World; and cis-Atlantic history within an Atlantic context.[1] The Atlantic slave trade continued into the 19th century, but the international trade was largely outlawed in 1807 by Britain. Slavery ended in 1865 in the United States and in the 1880s in Brazil (1888) and Cuba (1886).[2] While some scholars stress that the history of the "Atlantic World" culminates in the "Atlantic Revolutions" of the late 18th early 19th centuries,[3] the most influential research in the field examines the slave trade and the study of slavery, thus in the late-19th century terminus as part of the transition from Atlantic history to globalization seems most appropriate.

The historiography of the Atlantic World, known as Atlantic history, has grown enormously since the 1990s.[4]

Concept

[edit]

Geography

[edit]

The Atlantic World comprises the histories of Europe, Africa, and the Americas. Travel over land was difficult and expensive, so settlements were made along the coast, especially where rivers allowed small boats to travel inland. Distant settlements were linked by elaborate sea-based trading networks. Since the easiest and cheapest way of long-distance travel was by sea, international trading networks emerged in the Atlantic World, with major hubs at London, Amsterdam, Boston, and Havana. Time was a factor, as sailing ships averaged about 2 knots speed (50 miles a day). Navigators had to rely on maps of currents or they would be becalmed for days or weeks.[5] These maps were not only for navigational purposes however, but also as a way to give insight in regards to power and ownership of lands that had already been claimed, essentially creating a greater desire to finding new routes and land.[6] One major goal for centuries was finding the Northwest Passage (through what is now Canada) from Europe to Asia.[7]

Emergence

[edit]
Dutch ambassadors received by Garcia II, monarch of Kongo in West Central Africa in 1642

Given the scope of Atlantic history it has tended to downplay the singular influence of the voyages of Columbus and to focus more on growing interactions among African and European polities (ca 1450–1500), including contact and conflict in the Mediterranean and Atlantic islands, as critical to the emergence of the Atlantic World. Awareness of the Atlantic World, of course, spiked post-1492: after the earliest European voyages to the New World and continuing encounters on the African coast, a Euro-centric division of the Atlantic was proclaimed between the Spanish Empire and the Portuguese Empire by the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494. The West Coast and Central Africa, which are distinct from one another and each made up of many competing polities, played core roles in shaping the Atlantic World and as major sources for slave labor.[8] An elaborate network of economic, geopolitical and cultural exchange took shape—an "Atlantic World" comparable to the "Mediterranean World". It linked the nations and peoples that inhabited the Atlantic litoral of North and South America, the Caribbean, Africa and Europe.

The main empires that built the Atlantic World were the British,[9] French,[10] Spanish[11] , Portuguese[12] and Dutch;[13] entrepreneurs from the United States played a role as well after 1789.[14] Other countries, such as Sweden and Denmark, were active on a smaller scale.

Historical usage

[edit]
Main article: Atlantic history

American historian Bernard Bailyn traces the concept of the Atlantic World to an editorial published by journalist Walter Lippmann in 1917.[15] The alliance of the United States and Great Britain in World War II, and the subsequent creation of NATO, heightened historians' interest in the history of interaction between societies on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean.[16] Other scholars emphasize its intellectual origins in the more systematic and less political approach of the French Annales school, especially the influential work by Fernand Braudel on the Mediterranean World (trans. 2 vols, 1973).[17]

In American and British universities, Atlantic World history is supplementing (and possibly supplanting) the study of specific European colonial societies in the Americas, e.g. British North America or Spanish America. Some historians have criticized the North Atlantic emphasis as downplaying the importance of African history and the transatlantic slave trade on Brazilian and Caribbean history. Atlantic World history differs from traditional approaches to the history of European colonization in its emphasis on inter-regional and international comparisons and its attention to events and trends that transcended national borders. Atlantic World history emphasizes how the colonization of the Americas reshaped Africa and Europe, provided a foundation for later globalization, and insists that our understanding of the past benefits from looking beyond the nation state as our primary (or sole) category of analysis.[citation needed]

Aspects

[edit]

Environment

[edit]

The beginning of extensive contact between Europe, Africa, and the Americas had sweeping implications for the environmental and demographic history of all the regions involved.[18] In the process known as the Columbian Exchange, numerous plants, animals, and diseases were transplanted—both deliberately and inadvertently—from one continent to another. The epidemiological impact of this exchange on the indigenous peoples of the Americas was profound, causing very high death rates and population declines of 50% to 90% or even 100%. European and African immigrants also had very high death rates on their arrival, but they could be and were replaced by new shipments of immigrants (see the Population history of American indigenous peoples). Many foods that are common in present-day Europe, including corn (maize) and potatoes, originated in the New World and were unknown in Europe before the 16th century. Similarly, some staple crops of present-day West Africa, including cassava and peanuts, originated in the New World. Some of the staple crops of Latin America, such as coffee and sugarcane, were introduced by European settlers in the course of the Columbian Exchange.[19]

Slavery and labor

[edit]
Slaves working at a plantation in Virginia, depicted in 1670
Emigrants Leave Ireland depicting the emigration to America following the Great Famine in Ireland
Main article: Atlantic slave trade

The slave trade played a role in the history of the Atlantic World almost from the beginning.[20] As European powers began to conquer and claim large territories in the Americas in the 16th and 17th centuries, the role of chattel slavery and other forced labor systems in the development of the Atlantic World expanded. European powers typically had vast territories that they wished to exploit through agriculture, mining, or other extractive industries, but they lacked the work force that they needed to exploit their lands effectively. Consequently, they turned to a variety of coercive labor systems to meet their needs. At first the goal was to use native workers. Native Americans were employed through Indian slavery and through the Spanish system of encomienda. Indian labor was not effective on a large scale for complex reasons (e.g., high death rates and relative ease of escape to Native communities), so plantation owners turned to African slaves via the Atlantic slave trade. European workers arrived as indentured servants or transported felons who went free after a term of labor.[21] In short, the Atlantic World was one of widespread inequality where the exploitation of human labor provided the foundation for a small handful of elites to reap enormous profits.

The Trans-Atlantic Slave trade played a massive role in shaping the demographics of the Americas, especially in areas where huge plantations were the norm, such as in Brazil and the Caribbean. Roughly three quarters of immigrants to the Americas before 1820 were African, and more than half of these Africans were originally from West or Central Africa. In Brazil, the population percentage of Africans was even higher, with about seven African to every one Portuguese immigrant.[22] Because there was such a large population of Africans, it is unsurprising that African slaves aided in shaping the culture of these regions. In the early colonial period, there was a high prevalence of African spiritual practices, such as spirit possessions and healing practices. Presumably, these practices served as a point of connection and as an identity hold for slaves hailing from the same African origin.[23] Such cultural practices allowed, at least to an extent, African slaves to maintain kinship structures similar to those that they might have seen in their homeland. In many cases, European authorities viewed spiritual positions that were highly esteemed in African societies to be socially unacceptable, morally corrupt, and heretical. This led to the disappearance or transformation of most African religious practices. For example, the practice of consulting kilundu, or Angolan spirits, was seen as homosexual by Portuguese authorities,[23] a clear example of Eurocentrism in colonial societies, as European ideas of religion often did not match African ones. Unfortunately, there is a lack of documents written from the African point of view, so almost all information from this time period in these colonial societies is subject to cross-cultural misinterpretation, omission of facts, or other such changes that could affect the quality of description of African spiritual practices. Maintaining the integrity of cultural practices was difficult due to disagreement with European propriety and European tendency to generalize the African demographic makeup to merely "Central African", rather than acknowledging individual cultures. Eventually, most African traditions such as Kilundu, which was ultimately reduced to the popular Brazilian dance "Lundu", were either absorbed into other African traditions or reduced to a ritual simply resembling the original tradition.[22]

The extent of voluntary immigration to the Atlantic World varied considerably by region, nationality, and time period. Many European nations, particularly the Netherlands and France, only managed to send a few thousand voluntary immigrants. Though 15,000 or so who came to New France multiplied rapidly. In New Netherland, the Dutch coped by recruiting immigrants of other nationalities.[24] In New England, the massive Puritan migration of the first half of the 17th century created a large free workforce and thus obviated the need to use unfree labor on a large scale. Colonial New England's reliance on the labor of free men, women, and children, organized in individual farm households, is called the yeoman or household labor system.[25] There is an important distinction to be made between "societies with slaves", such as colonial New England, and "slave societies", where slavery was so central that it can properly be said to define all aspects of life in that region.[26]

The French colony of Saint-Domingue was one of the first American jurisdictions to end slavery, in 1794. Brazil was the last nation in the Western Hemisphere to end slavery, in 1888.

Governance

[edit]
See also: Piracy in the Atlantic World
The Iberian Union in 1598, under Philip II, King of Spain and Portugal

The Spanish conquistadores conquered the Aztec Empire, more accurately now referred to by scholars as the Mexica empire[citation needed], in present-day Mexico, and the Inca Empire, in present-day Peru, with surprising speed, assisted by horses, guns, large numbers of Native allies, and, perhaps above all, by the devastating mortality inflicted by newly introduced diseases such as smallpox. To some extent the prior emergence of the large and wealthy Inca and Mexica civilizations aided the transfer of governance to the Spanish, since these native empires had already established road systems, state bureaucracies and systems of taxation and intensive agriculture that were often inherited wholesale and then modified by the Spanish. The early Spanish conquerors of these empires were also aided by political instability and internal conflict within the Mexica and Incan regimes, which they successfully exploited to their benefit.[27]

One of the problems that most European governments faced in the Americas was how to exercise authority over vast expanses of territory.[28] Spain, which colonized Mexico, Central America, and the greater part of South America, established a network of powerful viceroyalties to administer different regions of its New World holdings: the Viceroyalty of New Spain (1535), the Viceroyalty of Peru (1542), the Viceroyalty of New Granada (1717–1739), and the Viceroyalty of Rio de la Plata (1776). The result was strong government that became even stronger during the Bourbon reforms of the 18th century.[29]

Britain approached the task of governing its New World territories in a less centralized manner, establishing about twenty distinct colonies in North America and the Caribbean from 1585 onward.[30] Each British colony had its own governor and most would have representative assemblies. Most of the North American Thirteen Colonies that became the United States had strong self-government via popular assemblies that countered the authority of governors with their own assertions of rights via parliamentary and other English sources of authority. Only property owners could vote in British polities, but since so many free men in mainland British Colonial America owned land, a majority could vote and participate in popular politics. The British challenge to the authority of colonial assemblies, especially via taxation, was a major cause of the American Revolution in the 1770s.[31]

"Atlantic Revolutions"

[edit]
The Marquis de Lafayette, pictured in 1790, played a prominent role in both the American Revolution (1775–83) and French Revolution (1789–99)
Main article: Atlantic Revolutions

A wave of revolutions shook the Atlantic World from the 1770s to the 1820s, including in the United States (1775–1783), France and French-controlled Europe (1789–1814), Haiti (1791–1804), and Spanish America (1806–1830).[32] There were smaller upheavals in Switzerland, Russia, and Brazil. The revolutionaries in varied places were aware of recent anti-colonial struggles in other Atlantic societies and even interacted with one another in many cases.[33]

Independence movements in the New World began with the American Revolution, 1775–1783, in which France, the Netherlands and Spain assisted the new United States of America as it secured independence from Britain. In August 1791 a coordinated slave uprising in the wealthy French sugar colony of St. Domingue began the Haitian Revolution. A long and destructive period of international warfare there came to a close with the creation of Haiti as an independent black republic in 1804. It has a complex and contested legacy as the largest successful slave revolt in history and was accompanied by widespread violence. With Spain tied down in European wars, the mainland Spanish colonies waged independence movements over a long period from 1806 to 1830, sometimes inspired by, but often fearful of, the Haitian example, which delayed effective independence movements in the slave societies of the Caribbean and Brazil until the late-19th century and later.[34]

In long-term perspective, the revolutions were mostly successful. They spread widely the ideals of republicanism, the overthrow of aristocracies, kings and established churches. They emphasized the universal ideals of The Enlightenment, such as the equality of all men. They emphasized equal justice under law by disinterested courts, as opposed to particular justice handed down at the whim of a local noble. They showed that the modern notion of revolution, of starting fresh with a radically new government, could actually work in practice. Revolutionary mentalities were born and continue to flourish to the present day.[35] When assessed in comparative perspective, the American Revolution (and especially the Federal Constitution that protected slavery as a legal institution) seems less radical and with a more oligarchic outcome than when viewed through a traditional nationalistic lens.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Atlantic World

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Atlantic World refers to the interconnected historical zone linking , , and the through maritime exchanges across the Atlantic Ocean, spanning from the late fifteenth century, marked by Christopher Columbus's voyages in 1492, to roughly the early nineteenth century. This framework emphasizes the circulation of human populations, commodities, and cultural elements that reshaped these continents, originating in European navigational advancements and profit-seeking enterprises. Central to this world was the , involving the transfer of plants, animals, diseases, and technologies between the Old and New Worlds, which triggered catastrophic demographic declines among indigenous American peoples—primarily from introduced epidemics like —reducing populations by 80-95% in many areas within a century of contact. Concurrently, the transatlantic slave forcibly transported approximately 12.5 million Africans to the between and , supplying labor for export-oriented plantations that produced key commodities such as , , and cotton, thereby fueling European economic expansion and colonial empires. These exchanges not only generated vast wealth through routes but also disseminated ideas of governance, religion, and resistance, contributing to events like the American and Haitian Revolutions. The Atlantic World's defining characteristics include its causal drivers—chiefly mercantile and imperial competition among powers like , , Britain, , and the —which prioritized resource extraction over , leading to enduring legacies of inequality, hybrid cultures, and ecological transformations. While celebrated in some historiographies for fostering global interconnectedness, empirical assessments underscore the predominance of exploitative dynamics, including the systemic violence of enslavement and indigenous dispossession, over mutual benefits.

Conceptual Framework

Definition and Scope

The designates the interconnected historical domain encompassing the continents adjacent to the —, West and , and the eastern regions of North and —linked through maritime exchanges initiated by European exploration and expansion from the late onward. This framework treats the Atlantic basin as a cohesive , highlighting transoceanic circulations of peoples, commodities, pathogens, and ideas that reshaped societies across these landmasses, rather than viewing them in isolation through national or imperial lenses. The concept underscores causal linkages, such as how Iberian navigational advances enabled direct routes, fostering sustained interactions that supplanted prior overland patterns dominated by Mediterranean and Islamic intermediaries. Geographically, the scope centers on the Atlantic rim, extending from the and westward to the islands, the eastern seaboard of what became the and , and southward to and the Andean coasts under Spanish and control, while incorporating sub-Saharan African coastal zones as sources of labor and goods. Temporally, it primarily covers the period from the Portuguese establishment of trading forts in starting in 1415 and Christopher Columbus's 1492 voyage to the , through the height of colonial plantation systems in the 17th and 18th centuries, up to the disruptions of the Age of Revolutions around 1800, including the (1791–1804) and British abolition of the slave trade in 1807. This era witnessed the forced migration of roughly 12.5 million Africans across the Atlantic between 1501 and 1866, alongside European settler movements exceeding 2 million by 1820, fundamentally altering demographics and economies. Core elements within this scope include the , which transferred crops like and potatoes from the to and —boosting caloric intake and in by an estimated 25% between 1500 and 1800—and vice versa with , , and Old World diseases that decimated indigenous American populations by up to 90% in some regions within a century of contact. Economic integration via mercantile networks tied African gold and ivory, American silver from (yielding over 40,000 tons between 1545 and 1800), and European manufactured goods into a system, while political and cultural exchanges influenced enlightenment ideas and resistance movements. This perspective reveals the Atlantic as a zone of both opportunity and exploitation, driven by European technological edges in and gunnery rather than inherent cultural superiorities, challenging narratives that overemphasize continental exceptionalism.

Historiographical Origins

The concept of the Atlantic World as a historiographical framework originated in the mid-20th century, amid post-World War II efforts to conceptualize interconnected histories across Europe, Africa, and the Americas, driven by Cold War dynamics and the reconfiguration of global trade networks. Early articulations emphasized comparative revolutionary processes, as seen in Robert R. Palmer's The Age of the Democratic Revolution (1959–1964), which linked political upheavals from the American Revolution through the French and Haitian Revolutions to Latin American independence movements, framing them as shared Atlantic phenomena rather than isolated national events. This approach built on interwar journalistic ideas of an "Atlantic community" but shifted toward empirical analysis of migrations, commerce, and cultural exchanges spanning the ocean basin. By the 1990s, the paradigm gained institutional traction through Bernard Bailyn's International Seminar on the of the Atlantic World, 1500–1825, launched at in 1995, which trained scholars to examine long-term patterns of settlement, labor , and ecological transfers beyond imperial or national silos. Bailyn's subsequent Atlantic History: Concept and Contours (2005) traced the field's roots to diplomatic histories of the –1950s, arguing it represented a "" history of movements—traders, settlers, enslaved Africans, and missionaries—rather than static territorial narratives, with quantitative estimates like the transatlantic slave trade's scale (over 12 million Africans forcibly transported between 1500 and 1866) underscoring causal interconnections. This period marked a departure from Eurocentric imperial studies, incorporating West African and indigenous American perspectives, though critics noted an initial Anglocentric bias in early seminars focused on British networks. David Armitage's "Three Concepts of Atlantic History" (2002) further refined the framework, distinguishing cis-Atlantic history (local events shaped by Atlantic contexts, e.g., colonial in specific ports), trans-Atlantic history (comparative analyses across shores, such as economies in versus ), and circum-Atlantic history (diasporic flows and resistances, exemplified by communities or pirate networks evading state control). These categories, applied to the British Atlantic but extensible to Iberian and French spheres, highlighted methodological pluralism: quantitative trade data from sources like the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database, alongside qualitative accounts of resistance in works by scholars such as on maritime subcultures. The paradigm's rise coincided with archival digitization and interdisciplinary inputs from and , enabling causal reconstructions of phenomena like the Columbian Exchange's demographic impacts (e.g., 90% indigenous in the by 1650 due to pathogens). Despite its strengths in revealing systemic linkages, such as mercantilist policies fueling circuits, the approach has faced scrutiny for underemphasizing intra-regional dynamics in or the Pacific's counterbalancing influences in global history.

Key Methodological Approaches

The study of the Atlantic World employs connective , which traces the multidirectional flows of , commodities, goods, and ideas across , , and the , emphasizing interactions over isolated national narratives. This approach, advanced by scholars like David Armitage, distinguishes three conceptual frameworks: cis-Atlantic history, which examines events from the perspective of one littoral (e.g., British imperial views of ); trans-Atlantic history, focusing on bilateral linkages such as Anglo-American political exchanges; and circum-Atlantic history, which prioritizes circumnavigations and migrations, including routes and indigenous resistances. These methods reject Eurocentric silos, integrating evidence from transoceanic archives to reveal causal chains, such as how caravels in the 1440s initiated West African slave sourcing that fueled American plantations by the 1520s. Quantitative methodologies underpin much of the empirical analysis, drawing on datasets like the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database, which documents over 36,000 voyages carrying approximately 12.5 million Africans between 1501 and 1866, enabling reconstructions of demographic impacts and economic circuits. Economic historians apply cliometric techniques, modeling trade volumes—such as the 1500–1800 influx of 1.5 million tons of silver from to Europe—to quantify mercantilist accumulations and inflationary effects, while critiquing overstated narratives of unidirectional European dominance by highlighting African agency in coastal entrepôts. analysis, including artifact studies from shipwrecks like the 1622 yielding 40 tons of silver and emeralds, provides tangible evidence of exchange networks, cross-verified against manifests and logs for causal verification of risk and profit dynamics. Interdisciplinary integration incorporates and to assess ecological exchanges, such as the Columbian Exchange's introduction of to by 1550, which boosted populations by 10–20% in regions per demographic models, and vice versa for Old World diseases decimating 90% of indigenous American populations post-1492. Archival triangulation across continents—mercantile records from (1500s Torre do Tombo holdings), African oral traditions transcribed in the 1700s, and American plantation ledgers—guards against source biases, such as underreporting of illicit trades estimated at 20–30% of totals. Critics, including some Africanist scholars, argue that connective paradigms risk diluting local causalities by overemphasizing oceanic vectors, yet empirical cross-verification sustains the framework's validity in explaining phenomena like the 18th-century rise of creole cultures from hybrid resistances.

Historical Emergence

Age of Exploration (1400s–1500s)

The Age of Exploration in the Atlantic began with Portuguese initiatives in the early 1400s, driven by economic motives to access African gold and Asian spices while bypassing Muslim-controlled land routes. Under , Portugal established navigational schools and sponsored voyages along the West African coast, capturing in to secure outposts and beginning the of enslaved Africans to . By the 1420s, Portuguese explorers colonized the Atlantic islands of and the , cultivating sugar with slave labor and developing expertise in ocean navigation using caravels and lateen sails. These efforts culminated in rounding the in 1488, proving a sea route to existed, though focused initially on Atlantic and African circuits. Christopher Columbus, sailing for Spain, initiated direct European contact with the Americas in 1492, seeking a western route to Asia amid competition with Portugal. Departing Palos de la Frontera on August 3 with three ships—the Niña, Pinta, and Santa María—carrying 87 men, Columbus reached the Bahamas on October 12 after navigating trade winds across the Atlantic. Mistaking the Caribbean islands for outposts near Asia, his voyages revealed vast new lands to Europeans, prompting Spain to prioritize western exploration over Portuguese eastern dominance. Subsequent Spanish expeditions, such as those by Amerigo Vespucci confirming the continental nature of the discoveries by 1501-1502, expanded knowledge of Atlantic coastlines from Brazil northward. The 1494 , mediated by , divided Atlantic exploration spheres between and along a meridian 370 leagues west of the Cape Verde Islands, allocating western discoveries to and eastern to . This agreement resolved rival claims post-Columbus, enabling to claim most of the while retained African routes and Brazil's eastern bulge, ratified in 1506. It formalized Iberian monopoly on Atlantic navigation, spurring rapid Spanish colonization in the by 1500 and mainland incursions, including Juan Ponce de León's 1513 Florida exploration and Vasco Núñez de Balboa's 1513 sighting of the Pacific from . These explorations established enduring transatlantic routes, leveraging and for efficient crossings, and initiated biological and cultural exchanges foundational to the Atlantic World. Portuguese sugar plantations on Atlantic islands prefigured American models, while Spanish requerimiento demands for indigenous submission underscored motives blending and resource extraction. By the mid-1500s, annual fleets connected to the , amassing gold and silver that fueled European economies, though at the cost of initial indigenous population collapses from and .

Early Transatlantic Exchanges (1500s–1600s)

The early transatlantic exchanges began in earnest after Christopher Columbus's 1492 voyage, facilitating the bidirectional transfer of biological, human, and material elements across the Atlantic Ocean. Spanish explorers established initial footholds in the Caribbean, with settlements on Hispaniola by 1493, followed by conquests in Mexico under Hernán Cortés in 1519 and Peru under Francisco Pizarro in 1532. Portuguese voyages, including Pedro Álvares Cabral's 1500 landing in Brazil, initiated exchanges in South America, primarily through sugar production that demanded labor imports. These movements laid the groundwork for the Columbian Exchange, profoundly altering demographics, economies, and environments. European-introduced diseases, including , , , and , devastated indigenous American populations lacking prior exposure and immunity. Mortality rates reached 80-95% in many regions, with an estimated 56 million deaths across the by 1600, contributing to widespread and facilitating European conquests. In the , native populations declined by over 99% by 1600, enabling rapid Spanish colonization. This demographic catastrophe stemmed from the absence of these pathogens in the pre-Columbian , allowing unchecked spread via trade routes and direct contact. Conversely, such as , potatoes, tomatoes, and peppers were introduced to starting in the early 1500s, enhancing agricultural yields and supporting . Potatoes, arriving in around 1570, became a staple that boosted caloric intake and mitigated famines, contributing to Europe's demographic expansion from 60 million in 1500 to over 100 million by 1650. livestock like horses, cattle, and pigs transformed American landscapes, enabling and warfare advantages for Europeans, while crops like and were transplanted for colonial agriculture. These exchanges increased but also introduced and ecological disruptions. Human exchanges involved European migration, estimated at tens of thousands by the late 1500s, primarily Spanish to and for and administration. Indigenous labor was initially coerced through systems, but high mortality shifted reliance to African slaves. The transatlantic slave trade commenced around 1501, with Portuguese and Spanish ships transporting small numbers—likely under 100,000 in the 16th century—to and Brazilian plantations, marking the onset of a system that escalated in the 17th century. African captives, sourced from West and Central regions, filled labor gaps in and operations. Material exchanges centered on American silver and flowing to , with Spanish fleets extracting over 180 tons of and 16,000 tons of silver from 1500 to 1650, fueling and global trade. In return, supplied iron tools, firearms, and textiles, enhancing colonial productivity while indigenous technologies like cultivation were adopted continent-wide. These early dynamics established asymmetric dependencies, with 's technological edge accelerating extraction and settlement.

Economic Structures

Trade Routes and Networks

The trade routes and networks of the Atlantic World formed a complex web of maritime exchanges that linked Europe, Africa, and the Americas, facilitating the flow of goods, people, and capital from the early 16th century onward. These routes underpinned the economic integration of the Atlantic basin, with European powers establishing dominance through naval power and commercial monopolies. The system evolved from Portuguese and Spanish explorations in the 1400s–1500s, expanding to include Dutch, French, and British participation by the 17th century, driven by the pursuit of raw materials and markets under mercantilist policies. Central to these networks was the , a cyclical route originating in European ports such as , , , and . Ships departed Europe laden with manufactured goods including textiles, firearms, ironware, and spirits, which were exchanged in West African ports like and for enslaved Africans captured through local warfare and raids. This leg capitalized on Europe's industrial output to acquire human labor, with British ports alone outfitting nearly one-third of transatlantic slave voyages by the . The infamous transported approximately 12.5 million enslaved Africans across the Atlantic to American destinations between 1501 and 1866, with mortality rates often exceeding 10–20% due to overcrowding and disease; primary destinations included , the , and North American colonies. Upon arrival, slaves were sold to owners, who provided commodities such as from the , from and , from the , and or in exchange. These raw materials were then shipped northward to , completing the triangle and generating immense profits— alone accounted for over half of 's sweetening supply by the late , fueling refineries and consumer markets. Beyond the classic triangle, networks included bilateral routes, such as direct shipments from Iberian ports to for gold and sugar starting in the 1500s, or French exchanges between and emphasizing coffee and . Dutch intermediaries via connected Baltic timber to African outposts, enhancing for the trade. These routes were supported by fortified trading posts on Africa's Slave Coast and convoy systems to counter , with annual voyage numbers peaking at over 100 British departures from in the 1790s. Competition among European rivals spurred innovations like faster sailing ships, but also led to naval conflicts disrupting flows, as seen in the Anglo-Dutch Wars of the –1670s. Commercial networks relied on family firms, joint-stock companies like the British Royal African Company (chartered 1672), and credit systems extending across oceans, enabling merchants to finance voyages with bills of exchange drawn on colonial staples. Ports like Charleston and served as hubs for intra-American redistribution, linking northern fish and timber to southern plantations. This interconnectedness amplified economic specialization: northwestern Europe imported tropical goods for re-export, while American colonies supplied primary products, creating dependencies that persisted until abolition movements curtailed the slave trade—Britain's in 1807 and the U.S. in 1808.

Labor Systems and Plantations

The plantation system in the Atlantic World emerged as a cornerstone of colonial economies in the during the 16th to 19th centuries, characterized by large-scale production of export crops such as , , , , and indigo, which required intensive, year-round labor inputs unsuitable for smallholder farming or seasonal European migration patterns. These estates, primarily in the , , and southern , depended on coerced labor to maximize output for European markets, with profitability driven by low-cost, controllable workforces that enabled the cultivation of labor-intensive staples in tropical and subtropical environments. The system's expansion was facilitated by the transatlantic slave trade, which supplied the bulk of laborers after initial experiments with other forms proved inadequate. Early labor arrangements in the 17th-century English and Dutch colonies included from , where individuals contracted for 4-7 years of service in exchange for passage and land prospects, comprising up to 75% of white immigrants to and by mid-century. However, high mortality from diseases like and , coupled with the expiration of contracts and rising European wages, reduced the supply of indentured workers, prompting a shift toward African chattel slavery by the 1660s-1680s, codified in laws such as Virginia's 1662 statute making slavery hereditary through the mother. Indigenous labor systems, like the Spanish , were initially used but collapsed due to population declines from disease and overwork, estimated at 90% mortality in some regions post-contact. African slaves offered advantages including perceived resistance to tropical diseases, lifetime bondage, and procurement through established coastal trade networks, making slavery economically superior for perpetual operations. Sugar plantations dominated the from the 1640s onward, with exporting 18,000 tons annually by 1660, sustained by gangs of 200-300 slaves per estate under gang labor systems that enforced synchronized, overseer-directed toil from dawn to dusk. cultivation in the , peaking at 38 million pounds exported from and in 1660s, relied on task-oriented labor where slaves worked individual plots but under strict quotas, transitioning to African majorities by 1700 as waned. plantations surged in the U.S. after 1793's , producing 4 million bales by 1860, almost entirely via slave labor imported internally after the 1808 external trade ban. These systems imposed brutal conditions, with sugar mortality rates exceeding 5% annually, necessitating constant slave imports to maintain workforces. Between 1501 and 1866, approximately 12.5 million Africans were forcibly embarked on transatlantic voyages, with around 10.7 million surviving to labor on American , the peaking in the when it supplied over 6 million captives to fuel economic expansion. received about 4.8 million, the British 2.3 million, and Spanish 1.3 million, underpinning mercantile wealth transfers estimated at billions in modern equivalents through crop exports. labor remained marginal, confined to skilled artisan roles or northern industries, as plantation owners prioritized slavery's cost efficiencies—slaves valued at $1,000-2,000 each by the —over free alternatives that demanded higher and offered mobility. This labor not only drove Atlantic commerce but entrenched racial hierarchies, with laws distinguishing Black bondage from white servitude to prevent alliances and ensure .

Mercantilism and Capital Accumulation

shaped the economic policies of European powers in the Atlantic World from the 16th to 18th centuries, emphasizing state-directed trade to amass precious metals and promote national wealth through colonial exploitation. Under this system, colonies supplied raw materials like , , and timber while serving as captive markets for European manufactured goods, with the goal of achieving a favorable that funneled back to the metropole. exemplified early mercantilist success by monopolizing silver extraction from mines in and , where production began scaling in the mid-16th century; between 1492 and 1810, 's silver-equivalent money supply expanded over tenfold, much of it shipped via annual treasure fleets to . By the 17th and 18th centuries, American mines accounted for 85-90% of global silver output, financing Spanish imperial defense and trade deficits with . Northern European states, including , , and the , adapted to plantation economies reliant on coerced African labor, fostering capital accumulation through the route. 's of 1651 prohibited foreign vessels from carrying colonial goods to Britain or its colonies, channeling Atlantic through English ports and ships to bolster merchant marine strength and revenue; subsequent acts in 1660 and 1663 extended restrictions to enumerated commodities like and , which had to pass through Britain before re-export. This framework supported joint-stock companies, such as the English chartered in 1672, which held monopolies on slave trading and generated profits from exchanging European textiles and firearms for captives in , then selling them in the and for plantation staples. Profits from these operations contributed to European capital pools, though their direct role in industrialization remains debated. In Britain, revenues from slave-carried goods like —comprising up to 5% of GDP by the late 18th century—and related voyages funded merchant investments, with estimates suggesting West Indian planters' remittances alone totaled £20 million between 1688 and 1800. Mercantilist policies thus concentrated wealth in Atlantic ports like and , enabling reinvestment in shipping, , and early , yet causal links to broader industrial takeoff emphasize domestic innovations over colonial windfalls alone. Spanish silver inflows, while massive—over 180,000 tons registered from 1500 to 1800—often dissipated through European wars and Asian trade, highlighting mercantilism's inefficiencies in sustaining long-term accumulation without productive reinvestment.

Demographic Movements

European Colonization Patterns

European colonization of the Atlantic World exhibited distinct patterns shaped by imperial objectives, with Iberian powers prioritizing resource extraction and northern European states emphasizing and demographic replacement. Spanish emigration to the Americas began modestly after Columbus's 1492 voyages, totaling approximately 55,000 documented migrants by 1600, predominantly young males from and who established urban centers, mining districts, and coastal enclaves rather than widespread rural homesteads. These settlers focused on highland viceroyalties like and , where small European elites oversaw indigenous tribute systems, resulting in low-density European populations amid vast territories and high rates of intermixture with native peoples. Portuguese patterns mirrored this in , with roughly 500,000 immigrants by the early concentrating in sugar-producing coastal captaincies from the 1530s onward, relying on imported labor rather than mass family migration. In contrast, British colonization in from 1607 featured larger-scale, family-oriented migration that fostered rapid natural and land clearance. An estimated 500,000 Europeans arrived in the regions that became the between 1607 and 1815, with British subjects comprising nearly half, enabling communities to displace indigenous groups through expansion into fertile river valleys. settlements, initiated by Puritan groups in the 1630s, emphasized communal family units and religious cohesion, achieving self-sustaining growth via high birth rates; like , founded in 1607, initially drew male indentured servants for cultivation but shifted toward more balanced demographics by the late . Middle colonies attracted diverse inflows, including and Scots-Irish from the 1680s, blending Quaker tolerance with agricultural proprietorships. French and Dutch efforts yielded sparse demographic footprints, prioritizing fur trade alliances over mass settlement. , established at in , saw initial populations swell from 3,215 in 1666 to about 70,000 by 1759 through targeted recruitment of soldiers, engagés, and filles du roi, yet remained confined to riverine posts with limited inland penetration due to harsh climates and native partnerships. , settled from 1624 around and the , hosted fewer than 10,000 colonists by its 1664 , functioning as trading outposts with patroonship estates rather than expansive agrarian societies. These patterns underscored a causal divide: extraction empires sustained elite minorities, while settler models generated exponential European majorities, altering Atlantic demographics profoundly by the .

African Slave Trade Dynamics

The transatlantic slave trade drew primarily from West and Central African regions, with captives sourced through established African practices of warfare, raiding, and enslavement that predated European contact. African polities, including kingdoms like Dahomey, Oyo, and Asante, actively participated by capturing individuals from rival groups or inland areas and selling them to European buyers at coastal entrepôts such as and , often in exchange for firearms, textiles, and that enhanced their military and economic power. This reflected causal incentives: European demand for labor amplified pre-existing African slave systems, where captives served as currency, labor, or status symbols, leading to intensified raids and conflicts to meet quotas. From 1514 to 1866, European vessels embarked roughly 12.5 million Africans, with approximately 10.7 million surviving to disembark in the , the remainder perishing en route or at points due to , , and . Over 80% of this volume occurred between 1700 and 1850, peaking in the amid expanding commodity production. Destinations skewed heavily toward (about 4.8 million arrivals) and the (around 4.1 million), with receiving fewer than 400,000, reflecting the labor-intensive sugar and coffee economies of Iberian and island colonies. European national shares varied by era: and accounted for the largest portion, transporting over 5.8 million, followed by Britain (about 3.3 million), (1.4 million), and the (0.6 million), with , , and others contributing smaller volumes. These proportions stemmed from mercantile monopolies, naval capabilities, and colonial imperatives, though African suppliers dictated embarkation volumes by controlling access to . The , the Atlantic crossing averaging 1-3 months, imposed brutal conditions including overcrowding (often 1.5-2 square meters per person), inadequate ventilation, and exposure to , , and , yielding mortality rates of 25% in the 17th and early 18th centuries, declining to about 10% by the 19th due to improved ship design and shorter voyages. Crew violence, including whippings and sexual assaults, compounded losses, with total voyage deaths (including embarkation) estimated at 15-20% overall. Resistance, such as suicides or revolts, occurred on about 10% of voyages but rarely succeeded, underscoring the trade's coercive structure.

Indigenous Depopulation and Adaptation

The arrival of Europeans in the Americas triggered a catastrophic decline in indigenous populations, primarily through the introduction of Old World diseases such as smallpox, measles, influenza, and typhus, to which native peoples lacked immunity, resulting in mortality rates exceeding 90% in many regions within the first century of contact. Pre-Columbian population estimates for the Americas vary, with scholarly consensus leaning toward approximately 50-60 million people in 1492, though some analyses propose higher figures up to 100 million based on archaeological and ecological data. By the mid-17th century, this had plummeted to around 5-10 million, with the Caribbean islands experiencing near-total depopulation; for instance, Hispaniola's Taíno population fell from hundreds of thousands to mere hundreds by 1518 due to successive epidemics. While diseases accounted for the bulk of deaths—often spreading ahead of direct European contact via trade networks and escaped enslaved Africans—contributory factors included warfare, enslavement, and induced by colonial disruptions to indigenous and social structures. In central , the Aztec Empire's declined from an estimated 15-25 million in 1519 to about 1 million by 1600, with epidemics like the 1520-1521 outbreak killing up to 40% in alone, compounded by Spanish-allied indigenous forces and forced labor systems. Violence was more pronounced in localized conflicts, such as the system's exploitation, but epidemiological models indicate that even without conquest, "virgin soil" epidemics would have caused massive collapses due to high densities in sedentary societies lacking . North American groups, with lower pre-contact densities, saw declines of 50-90% by 1700, as in the Mississippi Valley where diseases propagated through inter-tribal networks. Surviving indigenous communities adapted through strategic mobility, diplomatic alliances, and selective incorporation of European technologies and goods, reshaping their societies amid ongoing pressures. In eastern , groups like the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois Confederacy) leveraged networks from the early 1600s to acquire firearms and metal tools, enabling expansion via the (1638-1701) and buffering demographic losses through adoption of captives and matrilineal integration. On the , post-1680 horse diffusion from Spanish colonies transformed nomadic hunting economies, allowing tribes such as the to develop mobile warfare and trade empires by the 1700s, increasing resilience against settler encroachment. In the , Quechua and Aymara populations, reduced by 80-90% by 1650, adapted via hybrid agricultural practices blending native tubers with European crops like wheat, while navigating Spanish tribute systems through communal structures. These adaptations often involved painful trade-offs, including heightened inter-indigenous conflict fueled by European-supplied weapons and the displacement of weaker groups, yet they facilitated demographic stabilization; by the late , some regions like the U.S. Northeast saw partial recovery through elevated birth rates and reduced frequency as survivors gained partial immunity. Atlantic world dynamics amplified these shifts, as indigenous refugees from coastal depopulations migrated inland, altering ecological management—such as reduced burning leading to regrowth—and integrating into emerging multicultural economies, though persistent loss and servitude limited full autonomy. Overall, underscored indigenous agency in a context of existential disruption, with long-term tied to geographic isolation, alliance-building, and opportunistic exploitation of colonial rivalries.

Political Developments

Colonial Governance Models

The Atlantic World featured diverse colonial governance models shaped by European powers' priorities of extraction, settlement, and control, ranging from centralized monarchial administration to decentralized proprietary grants and corporate charters. Spanish governance emphasized direct crown oversight through viceroys appointed from 1535 onward, as in the centered in , where viceroys wielded executive, legislative, and military authority under supervision by audiencias—judicial and advisory councils that checked viceregal power and ensured fidelity to royal ordinances. This system extended to the in 1542, integrating vast territories via a hierarchical that prioritized collection and Catholic conversion, with over 40 viceroys serving in alone by independence. In contrast, Portuguese administration in initially relied on the captaincy system established in 1534, dividing the coast into 15 hereditary captaincies (capitanias hereditárias) granted to donatários—nobles or loyalists—who held quasi-feudal rights to govern, tax, and distribute land in exchange for efforts and a royal fifth (quinto) of mineral wealth. Only seven captaincies proved viable by 1548, prompting royal intervention via a in Salvador, which centralized control while retaining donatário privileges in successful areas like . British colonies evolved through three primary forms: proprietary grants, charter colonies, and royal provinces, reflecting a pragmatic mix of private initiative and crown prerogative. Proprietary colonies, such as (1632 grant to Lord Baltimore) and (1681 to ), vested owners with broad powers to appoint governors, councils, and laws, often mirroring English feudal structures but adapted for settler assemblies that gained legislative roles over time. Charter colonies like (1662 royal ) and enjoyed self-governance with elected assemblies and governors, subject to crown veto but fostering local autonomy that sowed seeds for later independence demands. By the mid-18th century, eight of the 13 mainland colonies operated as royal entities—directly under the crown via governors appointed by the —balancing imperial oversight with bicameral legislatures where lower houses controlled purses and upper councils advised, though tensions arose from enforcement. French governance in North American holdings, notably (), dualized authority between governors handling military, diplomacy, and external affairs—often naval officers like Samuel de Champlain's successors—and s managing civil justice, finance, and infrastructure from 1663 under , the first , who centralized administration amid sparse settlement. This model, exported to Caribbean islands like , emphasized royal absolutism with s auditing colonial accounts and suppressing monopolies held by companies like the Compagnie des Cent-Associés until 1663 dissolution. Dutch efforts, via the West India Company (WIC) chartered in 1621, delegated governance to directors in who appointed directors-general for colonies like (1624–1664) and , prioritizing trade forts and slave depots over settlement, with limited local councils subordinate to profit motives until state takeover in 1791. These models' causal dynamics—centralization curbing local abuses but stifling adaptation, versus spurring yet risking inefficiency—underpinned varying colonial stabilities, with British flexibility arguably enabling demographic growth exceeding Spanish rigidity in extractive zones.

Interstate Rivalries and Wars

Spain's dominance in the Atlantic World during the 16th century provoked rivalries with northern European powers seeking shares of colonial wealth and trade routes. England, France, and the Dutch Republic established Atlantic footholds by the early 17th century, challenging Spanish naval supremacy through privateering and direct assaults on treasure fleets and settlements. The Anglo-Spanish War (1585–1604) marked a pivotal escalation, driven by Protestant England's opposition to Catholic Spain's monopolistic claims and raids by English privateers like Francis Drake on Spanish possessions in the Caribbean and Pacific. Key events included the failed Spanish Armada invasion of 1588, which involved 130 ships and aimed to overthrow Elizabeth I, and ongoing English seizures of Spanish silver convoys, disrupting the flow of American bullion to Europe. The war's inconclusive end via the Treaty of London in 1604 failed to resolve underlying commercial tensions, perpetuating low-level conflicts over North American and Caribbean territories for over two centuries. Dutch involvement intensified Iberian declines, with the capturing Spanish sugar plantations in (1630–1654) and establishing trading posts along African coasts to intercept slave and commodity shipments. Franco-Spanish hostilities, embedded in broader European conflicts like the (1701–1714), spilled into the Atlantic, where French forces briefly occupied Spanish colonies such as before British interventions. These engagements highlighted naval blockades and amphibious operations as core tactics for contesting sea lanes vital to mercantile empires. The 18th century saw Anglo-French rivalries culminate in the Seven Years' War (1756–1763), a global contest with decisive Atlantic theaters. In , termed the , British forces under commanders like captured in 1759, leading to France's cession of and territories east of the under the . Britain also seized French Caribbean islands like and , while Spain lost but gained from France; these shifts expanded British colonial holdings by approximately 1.4 million square kilometers in alone. The war's naval dimensions, including British blockades of French ports, secured dominance over transatlantic commerce but imposed massive debts—Britain's national debt doubled to £130 million—straining imperial finances. Such interstate conflicts, often extensions of European dynastic struggles, prioritized control of Atlantic resources like , , and slaves, fostering innovations in and privateering that sustained economic rivalries into the era of independence movements. Spain's weakened position post-1763 invited further encroachments, while Britain's gains sowed seeds for colonial discontent over taxation and .

Revolutionary Movements (1700s–1800s)

The revolutionary movements of the 1700s and early 1800s in the Atlantic World formed a interconnected series of uprisings against European imperial control, spanning from the British North American colonies to French Saint-Domingue and Spanish South America, driven by Enlightenment principles of liberty and self-governance alongside fiscal strains from imperial wars and mercantilist policies. These events, occurring between 1775 and 1825, transformed colonial dependencies into independent nations, with common triggers including resentment over taxation without representation—exemplified by Britain's post-Seven Years' War (1756–1763) levies like the 1765 Stamp Act and 1767 Townshend Acts—and the spread of ideas from thinkers such as John Locke on natural rights and consent of the governed. Empirical evidence from diplomatic records and economic data shows that imperial overextension, including Britain's debt exceeding £130 million by 1783, catalyzed demands for autonomy rather than abstract ideological fervor alone. The American Revolution (1775–1783) initiated this Atlantic revolutionary wave, as thirteen British colonies declared independence on , 1776, citing violations of English traditions and the lack of parliamentary representation despite contributing over 1.5 million pounds in wartime taxes from 1764 to 1775. Key military engagements, such as the British victory at Bunker Hill in 1775 and the American-French allied triumph at Yorktown in 1781 involving 8,000 French troops under Rochambeau, underscored the transatlantic alliances that tilted the balance, culminating in the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, which recognized U.S. sovereignty over territory from the Atlantic to the . While creole leaders like framed the conflict in terms of republican virtue, causal analysis reveals underlying economic motives, including colonial merchants' evasion of that restricted trade to British ships, fostering smuggling networks worth millions annually. The revolution's success, ratified by the U.S. Constitution in 1787, inspired subsequent upheavals but preserved in the South, where over 20% of the population remained enslaved, highlighting inconsistencies between proclaimed universal rights and entrenched labor systems. In the French Caribbean colony of , the (1791–1804) erupted as a slave-led insurgency, distinct for empowering an enslaved population of approximately 500,000 Africans against 30,000 whites and 28,000 , ignited by the 1789 French Revolution's abolitionist rhetoric but rooted in brutal conditions producing 40% of global by 1789. Leaders like , who commanded armies exceeding 20,000 by 1801, leveraged guerrilla tactics and alliances with and Britain before declaring autonomy under French suzerainty, leading to full on January 1, 1804, after defeating Napoleon's 60,000-man expedition in 1802–1803. This upheaval's causal impact rippled across the Atlantic, prompting the U.S. to embargo trade and contributing to the 1803 by destabilizing French holdings, while instilling fear in slaveholding societies from to , where maroon communities cited Haitian successes in uprisings. Scholarly assessments, drawing from records and diplomatic correspondence, affirm its role in accelerating abolitionist pressures, though it entrenched racial hierarchies in the new republic under Dessalines. Latin American independence movements, peaking from 1810 to 1825, dismantled Spanish colonial rule over territories housing 16 million people by 1800, precipitated by Napoleon's 1808 invasion of , which created power vacuums filled by creole juntas in (1810) and (1810). Figures such as , who liberated , , and through campaigns involving 6,000 troops at Boyacá in 1819, drew on U.S. and French models but adapted to local caudillo dynamics and indigenous resistances, achieving recognition for by 1821. Empirical data from military logs indicate over 200,000 combat deaths, with outcomes varying: independent by 1821 after Hidalgo's 1810 revolt mobilized 80,000 indigenous fighters, yet most new republics devolved into instability due to export-dependent economies reliant on coerced labor. These revolutions, while liberating from Madrid's mercantilist monopolies that stifled intra-regional , perpetuated inequalities, as creole elites retained control over haciendas worked by peons and slaves numbering 1.5 million in circa 1800.

Cultural and Environmental Interactions

Biological Exchanges and Impacts

The , initiated after Christopher Columbus's voyages in 1492, facilitated the transatlantic transfer of plants, animals, microbes, and humans, profoundly altering ecosystems and demographics across the Atlantic World. species, including domesticated animals like horses, , pigs, sheep, and goats, were introduced to the , enabling new agricultural practices, transportation, and food production systems that supported European settler expansion. Conversely, New World crops such as , potatoes, sweet potatoes, , tomatoes, and chili peppers spread to , , and , providing calorie-dense staples that contributed to population growth in the Old World by an estimated 25-50% between 1500 and 1800 through enhanced agricultural yields. These exchanges were not symmetric; while Old World biota often thrived in the Americas due to favorable climates and lack of natural predators, many New World species struggled in Eurasian soils initially. Microbial transfers proved catastrophic, primarily from to the , where indigenous populations lacked immunity to pathogens like , , , , and . These diseases, spread via direct contact and vectors such as rats accompanying ships, caused mortality rates exceeding 90% in many indigenous groups within the first century of contact; for instance, Hispaniola's population fell from approximately 250,000 in 1492 to under 500 by 1548. Overall, the ' pre-Columbian population of 50-100 million declined by 80-95% by 1650, with the experiencing near-total depopulation on most islands by 1600, enabling rapid European land claims and economies. Limited evidence suggests reverse transmission, such as from the to , though its pre-1492 presence in the remains debated among historians. African diseases like and , carried by enslaved people and mosquitoes in ship ballast, later amplified mortality in the , particularly in tropical zones. Animal introductions reshaped New World landscapes and economies; pigs and proliferated , consuming native vegetation and competing with indigenous wildlife, while transformed Plains indigenous mobility for hunting and warfare by the early 1600s. In , mitigated famines—Irish cultivation, for example, sustained doubling from 2 million in 1650 to 4 million by 1800—but also created vulnerabilities, as evidenced by the 1845-1852 that killed over 1 million due to reliance on a single variety. Ecologically, exchanges disrupted : Old World earthworms, absent in unglaciated North American soils, accelerated soil turnover and forest composition changes upon introduction, while like European honeybees outcompeted native pollinators. These shifts underscore causal chains of , where biological introductions drove demographic booms in calorie-receptive regions but precipitated collapses where diseases overwhelmed immunologically naive populations.

Religious and Intellectual Transfers

European Christian denominations were transferred to the Americas through sustained missionary efforts accompanying colonization, beginning with Catholic orders dispatched by and after the 1493 papal bull , which authorized conversion of as a justification for territorial claims. Franciscan and Dominican friars established missions in by 1524, baptizing millions of indigenous individuals, though often coercively, with estimates of over 8 million conversions in central alone by the late ; reductions in from 1609 organized Guarani communities under religious oversight, blending evangelization with labor extraction. In Protestant spheres, English founded in 1620, importing Calvinist doctrines that emphasized and , while Dutch Reformed settlers in from 1624 propagated similar Reformed traditions, though emerged in some areas due to migration diversity. These transfers reinforced denominational rivalries, as Catholic powers viewed Protestant colonies as heretical threats, prompting missions like those of the in from 1634. African religious practices crossed the Atlantic via the forced migration of approximately 12.5 million enslaved individuals between 1500 and 1866, introducing animist traditions, ancestor veneration, and Islamic elements from West and , which colonial authorities suppressed but could not eradicate. In Portuguese Brazil, Yoruba-derived worship fused with Catholicism to form by the 18th century, with terreiros (temples) operating clandestinely despite Inquisition bans; similarly, in French , Fon and Ewe Vodun practices merged with Catholic saints to create , evident in rituals documented during the 1791 slave revolt. Enslaved , comprising up to 10-15% of arrivals in regions like and the , maintained Sufi brotherhoods and literacy in Arabic, influencing Gullah spirituals and Brazilian quilombos, though conversions to accelerated post-1700 under planter incentives tying to labor discipline. These syncretic developments arose from slaves' strategic adaptation, preserving core cosmologies—such as and herbal —beneath Christian veneers to evade persecution. Intellectual transfers flowed predominantly from to the , facilitated by transatlantic print networks and educational institutions that disseminated and later Enlightenment rationalism. The , introduced to by 1539, enabled production of religious texts like the 1544 Doctrina Cristiana for indigenous literacy, while , founded in 1636, imported English curricula emphasizing classical and to train colonial clergy. By the 18th century, works by Locke and circulated via and printers, shaping colonial assemblies' assertions of natural rights; for instance, Jefferson's 1776 Declaration echoed Locke's Two Treatises (1689), acquired through Atlantic book trade routes handling over 1,000 titles annually by 1750. Scientific knowledge transferred bidirectionally, with Linnaeus's (1735) incorporating American flora reported by colonial naturalists like Mark Catesby, whose 1731 drew from Carolina expeditions, though reverse flows were limited by colonial dependence on metropolitan validation. These exchanges fostered Creole intellectuals, such as Brazilian José de Anchieta (1534–1597), who synthesized Thomist with indigenous linguistics in grammars that aided administrative control.

Social Syncretism and Conflicts

In the Atlantic world, social syncretism manifested through the involuntary fusion of European settler societies, African enslaved populations, and surviving Indigenous groups, producing hybrid cultural forms amid plantation economies from the 16th to 19th centuries. Creole societies emerged in regions like the and , where African kinship structures adapted to European patriarchal households, resulting in mixed-race populations and shared linguistic innovations such as creole languages derived from , Spanish, French, and African substrates; for instance, standardized by the 18th century incorporated up to 90% African lexical influences from Fongbe and Kikongo. These blends extended to , with African rice cultivation techniques integrated into South Carolina's lowcountry plantations by the late 17th century, yielding Geechee communities that preserved West African weaving and basketry patterns. Religious syncretism provided a mechanism for cultural survival under coercion, as enslaved Africans mapped their deities onto Catholic saints to evade prohibitions; Yoruba orishas were equated with figures like the Virgin Mary in Cuban Santería, which developed from the 16th century onward through Lucumí arrivals via Portuguese slave ships, while Dahomean vodun spirits merged with Catholic rituals in Haitian Vodou by the 18th century. This process, evident in Brazilian Candomblé's incorporation of Catholic feast days into African possession ceremonies, reflected pragmatic adaptation rather than voluntary equivalence, with archaeological evidence from Cuban sugar mill sites showing concealed African altars beneath Christian icons dating to the 1700s. Yet syncretism coexisted with profound social conflicts rooted in racial hierarchies and exploitative labor systems, where European colonists enforced legal codes stratifying society by ancestry—Spain's casta system in and classified over 100 mixed categories by the 18th century, privileging over creoles, mestizos, mulattos, and Africans, often denying rights to the latter based on maternal slave status under laws adopted in by 1662. These structures fueled resistance, including the of September 1739 in , where 20 white colonists were killed by approximately 100 enslaved insurgents inspired by Spanish promises of freedom, leading to the execution of 44 Africans and stricter across British colonies. The , erupting in August 1791 with Vodou ceremonies at mobilizing 500,000 enslaved people against French planters, culminated in the 1804 independence of as , destroying the plantation elite and inspiring fears of similar uprisings that prompted the 1807 British abolition of the slave trade. Intergroup violence persisted, as in Brazil's 19th-century communities— settlements like Palmares, which housed up to 20,000 fugitives by 1694—clashing with Portuguese forces in protracted wars that underscored the fragility of coerced social orders.

Legacy and Debates

Long-Term Economic Contributions

The introduced calorie-dense crops from the , such as potatoes and , which enhanced agricultural yields across , , and , supporting and economic expansion. In , these crops contributed to an estimated 20-30% increase in caloric intake by the , facilitating a rise from about 60 million in 1500 to over 140 million by 1800 and enabling labor surpluses that underpinned early industrialization. This biological transfer shifted dietary patterns, with potatoes alone boosting land productivity by up to 50% in , where they became a staple, thereby reducing risks and sustaining growth for commercial activities. Massive silver extraction from American mines, particularly in present-day , which yielded approximately 45,000 metric tons from 1545 to 1810—accounting for nearly 20% of global silver production—monetized European and Asian economies and integrated transoceanic trade networks. This outflow, largely to via Manila galleons to acquire luxury goods like and , resolved Europe's trade imbalances and stimulated mercantile , with silver inflows enabling price revolutions in Europe that encouraged market-oriented production. By the , American silver constituted up to 40% of Europe's monetary stock, fostering financial innovations such as joint-stock companies and bills of exchange that laid groundwork for modern banking. The Atlantic plantation complex, reliant on enslaved African labor, generated commodities like , , and that fueled European capital accumulation and , though direct profits from the slave averaged under 1% of British GDP in the . Concentrated returns in sectors like shipping and textiles, however, provided reinvestable funds—estimated at £3.5-5 million annually from slave voyages—accelerating innovations in machinery and factory systems during Britain's from the 1760s onward. These trades established enduring global supply chains, with West Indian exports comprising 20% of Britain's overseas value by 1770, embedding commodity dependence and patterns that persist in contemporary .

Demographic and Cultural Outcomes

The demographic landscape of the Americas was profoundly altered by the Atlantic World interactions, beginning with a catastrophic decline in indigenous populations following European contact in 1492. Estimates place the pre-Columbian indigenous population at approximately 60 million across the hemisphere, which plummeted by around 90% within the first century due primarily to introduced Eurasian diseases such as smallpox and measles, compounded by warfare, enslavement, and displacement. By 1650, the indigenous population had contracted to roughly 8 million, with the most severe losses in densely populated regions like Mexico and the Andes. This depopulation created labor vacuums filled by coerced African migration via the transatlantic slave trade, which transported an estimated 12.5 million Africans to the between the 16th and 19th centuries, with about 10.7 million surviving the . The trade's demographic impact was uneven: received over 4.8 million enslaved Africans, the islands around 4.5 million, and fewer than 400,000, yet these arrivals and their descendants formed foundational populations in plantation economies. European voluntary migration, totaling about 2.6 million arrivals from 1492 to 1820, concentrated in and parts of , establishing settler societies where Europeans and their progeny became demographic majorities, such as in the United States where they comprised over 80% of the population by 1800. Culturally, these migrations fostered processes of and , particularly in regions with high African and indigenous retention, yielding hybrid languages, religions, and arts. In the and , African spiritual traditions merged with Catholicism to produce syncretic practices like Vodou in and in Brazil, while linguistic creoles blending European, African, and indigenous elements emerged as vernaculars spoken by millions today. In , African cultural influences persisted in music (e.g., and precursors) and among enslaved communities, though European norms dominated settler cultures, leading to less pervasive syncretism outside isolated enclaves like the Gullah-Geechee corridor. These outcomes reflect causal dynamics of power imbalances, where dominant European institutions shaped cultural hierarchies, yet subaltern resilience preserved African and indigenous elements in cuisine, oral traditions, and resistance narratives enduring into modern diasporic identities.

Contemporary Historiographical Controversies

Contemporary historiographical debates in Atlantic World studies often revolve around the paradigm's methodological boundaries and its emphasis on interconnectedness versus local contingencies. Scholars like Jack P. Greene have advocated for a "new" that prioritizes circulations of peoples, goods, and ideas across , , and the from circa 1500 to 1830, challenging national frameworks dominant in earlier scholarship. However, critics contend that this approach risks imposing artificial unity on disparate regions, underplaying indigenous African and American political structures and over-relying on European archival sources, which reflect imperial biases rather than comprehensive causality. For instance, Peter Coclanis has argued that Atlantic history remains overly insular, neglecting synergies with Pacific or networks that better illuminate global trade dynamics. A central controversy persists in the interpretation of the transatlantic slave trade, with quantitative revisions from the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database—documenting approximately 12.5 million Africans embarked between 1501 and 1866—prompting reevaluations of scale, mortality (estimated at 1.8 million deaths at sea), and regional variations. Traditional narratives, influenced by post-1960s , frame the trade as a unidirectional European imposition fostering racial , yet revisionist analyses emphasize endogenous African factors, such as state-sponsored raids by kingdoms like Oyo and Dahomey, which supplied over 80% of captives through pre-existing warfare economies. This has sparked accusations of in victim-centered accounts, as empirical data reveal African merchants' profit motives and resistance to abolition, complicating moral teleologies of progress. Cliometric studies, including those by David Eltis and , further dispute ' 1944 thesis linking slave profits directly to industrialization, showing instead that such revenues constituted less than 5% of British by 1800, attributing economic shifts more to and market expansion. Debates over abolition and legacies underscore tensions between ideological determinism and causal pluralism. While some historians, drawing on cultural turns since the 1990s, highlight enslaved agency in maroon communities and revolts—such as the 1791 involving 500,000 participants—others critique this for romanticizing resistance amid systemic coercion, where successful rebellions were rare (fewer than 1% of voyages saw major uprisings). In legacy discussions, projects like the 1619 initiative posit the Atlantic system as foundational to American racial hierarchies, but fact-checks reveal factual distortions, such as overstating slavery's role in the Revolution's causes, ignoring broader Enlightenment influences and voluntary manumissions (e.g., over 10,000 slaves freed in by 1776). These controversies reflect broader meta-issues: institutional biases in academia toward narratives amplifying exploitation, often sidelining comparative data on non-Atlantic slaveries (e.g., Ottoman or East African trades involving millions more over centuries), which empirical comparisons suggest shared brutal efficiencies rather than exceptional Atlantic pathology.

References

  1. https://web-facstaff.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Armitage_ThreeConcepts.pdf
  2. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199730414/obo-9780199730414-0328.xml
  3. https://scholarworks.harding.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=tenor
  4. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/4002/81p247.pdf
  5. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/nunn/files/nunn_qian_jep_2010.pdf
  6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vm1s4
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7413858/
  8. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history/precontact-and-early-colonial-era/old-and-new-worlds-collide/a/the-columbian-exchange-ka
  9. https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-981
  10. https://works.swarthmore.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1566&context=fac-history
  11. http://www.marcusrediker.com/articles-and-opinions/what-is-atlantic-history/
  12. https://journals.gmu.edu/index.php/whc/article/view/3751/2143
  13. https://www.slavevoyages.org/assessment/estimates
  14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/ahr.111.3.741
  15. https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article-abstract/111/3/741/13790
  16. https://worldhistoryconnected.press.uillinois.edu/3.3/br_lintvedt.html
  17. https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article-abstract/111/2/434/40788
  18. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674016880
  19. https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=20982
  20. https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=7539
  21. https://armitage.scholars.harvard.edu/publications/three-concepts-atlantic-history
  22. https://history.ufl.edu/people/faculty-by-specialization/atlantic-world/
  23. https://www.slavevoyages.org/
  24. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/ushistory1/chapter/portuguese-exploration-and-spanish-conquest/
  25. https://smarthistory.org/reframing-art-history/portuguese-contacts-exchanges/
  26. https://www.history.com/articles/portugal-age-exploration
  27. https://www.history.com/articles/christopher-columbus
  28. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/columbus-makes-landfall-caribbean/
  29. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/treaty-tordesillas/
  30. https://ncheteach.org/resource/critical-reading-dividing-the-new-world-tracing-the-treaty-of-tordesillas-and-its-impact-on-indigenous-civilizations/
  31. https://pressbooks.oer.hawaii.edu/honcchist151/chapter/14-european-exploration-and-colonization/
  32. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-ushistory1os2xmaster/chapter/portuguese-exploration-and-spanish-conquest/
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379118307261
  34. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/teacher-resources/historical-context-facts-about-slave-trade-and-slavery
  35. https://read.dukeupress.edu/hahr/article/53/3/498/151622/The-Columbian-Exchange-Biological-and-Cultural
  36. https://www.britannica.com/topic/triangular-trade
  37. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-history/period-2/transatlantic-trade/a/transatlantic-trade
  38. https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/history-of-slavery/transatlantic-slave-trade
  39. https://slaveryandremembrance.org/articles/article/?id=A0096
  40. https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/ports-of-transatlantic-slave-trade
  41. https://www.britannica.com/topic/transatlantic-slave-trade
  42. https://eji.org/report/transatlantic-slave-trade/
  43. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/triangular-trade
  44. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/plantation-system/
  45. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/development-slavery-early-modern-atlantic-world
  46. https://ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/africanpassageslowcountryadapt/introductionatlanticworld/the_rise_of_african_slavery
  47. https://eh.net/encyclopedia/indentured-servitude-in-the-colonial-u-s/
  48. https://www.jyfmuseums.org/learn/research-and-collections/essays/the-rise-of-slavery-in-virginia
  49. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199730414/obo-9780199730414-0116.xml
  50. https://ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/africanpassageslowcountryadapt/introductionatlanticworld/plantations_before_the_transat
  51. https://www.pbs.org/opb/historydetectives/feature/indentured-servants-in-the-us/
  52. https://guides.loc.gov/cotton/slavery-plantation
  53. https://www.oerproject.com/World-History-1200/Unit-3/The-Plantation-System
  54. https://openstax.org/books/world-history-volume-2/pages/5-3-the-mercantilist-economy
  55. https://oxfordre.com/latinamericanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.001.0001/acrefore-9780199366439-e-998
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001449832100019X
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11901266/
  58. https://www.britannica.com/event/Navigation-Acts
  59. https://www.princeton.edu/~reddings/papers/SBIR_Paper.pdf
  60. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/slavery-and-british-industrial-revolution
  61. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/slavery-atlantic-trade-and-the-british-economy-16601800/slavery-atlantic-trade-and-capital-accumulation/15C5D8F71E1F7E0B3C5B69399F7B889E
  62. https://read.dukeupress.edu/hahr/article/56/4/580/150925/Patterns-of-Spanish-Emigration-to-the-Indies-until
  63. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2503842
  64. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-global-migrations/north-america-migrations-and-settlement-c-1600c-1810/FBBA1C075860FDBA8D8D15E7EC544F31
  65. https://pressbooks.cuny.edu/immigrationhistory/chapter/chapter-1-european-migrations-before-the-american-revolution/
  66. https://www.cbc.ca/history/LESSONSSE4EP2CH1PA6LE.html
  67. https://www.nps.gov/mava/learn/historyculture/new-netherland.htm
  68. https://www.cfr.org/blog/confronting-africas-role-slave-trade
  69. https://ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/africanpassageslowcountryadapt/introductionatlanticworld/african_participation_and_resi
  70. https://ehne.fr/en/encyclopedia/themes/europe-europeans-and-world/europe-and-atlantic-slave-trade/atlantic-slave-trade
  71. https://fscj.pressbooks.pub/africanamericanhistory/chapter/which-europeans-trafficked-in-slaves/
  72. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtid=2&psid=446
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3251087/
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8285907/
  75. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2419454122
  76. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14788810.2023.2250963
  77. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1521744113
  78. https://www.historyspage.com/post/communications-and-authority-how-charles-v-and-philip-ii-ruled-the-spanish-empire-sp
  79. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7h21f158
  80. https://library.brown.edu/create/fivecenturiesofchange/chapters/chapter-1/captaincies-general/
  81. https://read.dukeupress.edu/hahr/article-pdf/22/3/493/753186/0220493.pdf
  82. https://constitutingamerica.org/90day-aer-royal-self-governing-and-proprietary-colonies-advancing-from-british-rule-toward-american-independence-guest-essayist-tom-hand/
  83. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/thirteen-colonies
  84. https://www.americanacorner.com/blog/governing-colonial-america
  85. https://heritage.bnf.fr/france-ameriques/en/governors-and-intendants-new-france
  86. https://www.historymuseum.ca/virtual-museum-of-new-france/colonies-and-empires/governance-and-sites-of-power/
  87. https://njcu.libguides.com/dutchwest
  88. https://pressbooks.cuny.edu/hist108winter2023/chapter/early-globalization/
  89. https://opened.cuny.edu/courseware/lesson/316/overview
  90. https://louis.pressbooks.pub/americanhistory1/chapter/2-early-globalization-the-atlantic-world-1492-1650-introduction/
  91. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/anglo-spanish-war
  92. https://read.dukeupress.edu/hahr/article/53/1/153/151565/Anglo-Spanish-Rivalry-in-North-America
  93. https://www.imsa.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Rise-of-the-Atlantic-World_Skinner.pdf
  94. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1750-1775/french-indian-war
  95. https://commonplace.online/article/the-global-history-of-the-seven-years-war/
  96. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/revolutionary-world/atlantic-revolutions/EFDC226E7CDE962237E54A948972CF3A
  97. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199730414/obo-9780199730414-0005.xml
  98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qgjwh
  99. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/two-revolutions-atlantic-world-connections-between-american-revolution-and
  100. https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/3697/
  101. https://networks.h-net.org/node/16821/reviews/18778/sheller-geggus-impact-haitian-revolution-atlantic-world
  102. https://ageofrevolutions.com/2021/05/10/revoluciones-hispanicas-and-atlantic-history-a-spanish-language-historiographical-interpretation-and-bibliography/
  103. https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/nattrans/ntecoindian/essays/columbian.htm
  104. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/columbian-exchange
  105. https://www.ncpedia.org/anchor/columbian-exchange
  106. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199730414/obo-9780199730414-0047.xml
  107. https://history.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/202/2021/02/history229-fall2020-ericcarlsson.pdf
  108. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199730414/obo-9780199730414-0046.xml
  109. https://opened.cuny.edu/courseware/lesson/315/overview
  110. https://eji.org/report/transatlantic-slave-trade/origins/
  111. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/art-americas/beginners-guide-art-of-the-americas/begin-latin-america/a/african-religious-culture-in-the-atlantic-world
  112. https://slaveryandremembrance.org/articles/article/?id=A0059
  113. https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-927
  114. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4054&context=wmlr
  115. https://ihum.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf6456/files/the_black_atlantic_as_a_counterculture_of_modernity_final.pdf
  116. https://www.academia.edu/123862524/Transatlantic_Slave_Trade_Impact_on_African_and_New_World_Societies_
  117. https://ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/africanpassageslowcountryadapt/introductionatlanticworld
  118. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/blackclassicisms/wp-content/uploads/sites/468/2017/03/Creole-Religions-of-the-Caribbean.pdf
  119. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cquilt/article/download/36932/29043/100799
  120. https://history.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Apter_Herscovits.pdf
  121. https://macmillan.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/events/race/Sweet.pdf
  122. https://www.aaihs.org/the-story-of-an-atlantic-slave-war/
  123. https://sldinfo.com/2020/12/potosi-and-its-silver-the-beginnings-of-globalization/
  124. https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/neh/course7/activity4.html
  125. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30451/w30451.pdf
  126. https://theworld.org/stories/2019/01/31/european-colonization-americas-killed-10-percent-world-population-and-caused
  127. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/european-migrations-american-colonies-1492-1820
  128. https://www.pbs.org/wnet/african-americans-many-rivers-to-cross/history/how-many-slaves-landed-in-the-us/
  129. https://www.globalsouthstudies.org/keyword-essay/creolization/
  130. https://fiveable.me/african-american-history-1865/unit-1/atlantic-world-connections-exchanges/study-guide/4NXy1u0xiXeF6JxE
  131. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/5826108/coverCreolization_of_the_Atlantic_World.pdf
  132. https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=history_facpub
  133. https://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/42413
  134. https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-371
  135. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45194241
  136. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/03/06/1619-project-new-york-times-mistake-122248
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.