Hubbry Logo
Echo soundingEcho soundingMain
Open search
Echo sounding
Community hub
Echo sounding
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Echo sounding
Echo sounding
Echo sounding
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Illustration of echo sounding using a multibeam echosounder.
The MTVZA sounder received from the Meteor M2-2 satellite by an amateur station

Echo sounding or depth sounding is the use of sonar for ranging, normally to determine the depth of water (bathymetry). It involves transmitting acoustic waves into water and recording the time interval between emission and return of a pulse; the resulting time of flight, along with knowledge of the speed of sound in water, allows determining the distance between sonar and target. This information is then typically used for navigation purposes or in order to obtain depths for charting purposes.

Echo sounding can also be used for ranging to other targets, such as fish schools. Hydroacoustic assessments have traditionally employed mobile surveys from boats to evaluate fish biomass and spatial distributions. Conversely, fixed-location techniques use stationary transducers to monitor passing fish.

The word sounding is used for all types of depth measurements, including those that don't use sound, and is unrelated in origin to the word sound in the sense of noise or tones. Echo sounding is a more rapid method of measuring depth than the previous technique of lowering a sounding line until it touched bottom.

History

[edit]

German inventor Alexander Behm was granted German patent No. 282009 for the invention of echo sounding (device for measuring depths of the sea and distances and headings of ships or obstacles by means of reflected sound waves) on 22 July 1913.[1][2][3] Meanwhile, in France, physicist Paul Langevin (connected with Marie Curie and better known for his research work in nuclear physics) was recruited by French Navy laboratories at the beginning of World War 1 and conducted (then secret) research on active sonars for anti-submarine warfare (using a piezoelectric transmitter). His work was developed and implemented by other scientists and technicians such as Chilowski, Florisson and Pierre Marti.[These don't have their own articles. Are they notable?] Though a fully operational échosondeur (sonar) was not ready for use in wartime, there were successful trials both off Toulon and in the English Channel as early as 1920, and French patents taken for civilian uses. Oceanographic ships and French high-sea fishing assistance vessels were equipped with Langevin-Florisson and Langevin Marti recording sonars as early as the mid/late 1920s.[4]

One of the first commercial echo sounding units was the Fessenden Fathometer, which used the Fessenden oscillator to generate sound waves. This was first installed by the Submarine Signal Company in 1924 on the M&M[clarification needed] liner SS Berkshire.[5]

Technique

[edit]
Further information: Sound speed profile
Diagram showing the basic principle of echo sounding

Distance is measured by multiplying half the time from the signal's outgoing pulse to its return by the speed of sound in water, which is approximately 1.5 kilometres per second. The speed of sound will vary slightly depending on temperature, pressure and salinity; and for precise applications of echosounding, such as hydrography, the speed of sound must also be measured, typically by deploying a sound velocity probe in the water. Echo sounding is a special purpose application of sonar used to locate the bottom. Since a historical pre-SI unit of water depth was the fathom, an instrument used for determining water depth is sometimes called a fathometer.

Most charted ocean depths are based on an average or standard sound speed. Where greater accuracy is required, average and even seasonal standards may be applied to ocean regions. For high accuracy depths, usually restricted to special purpose or scientific surveys, a sensor may be lowered to measure the temperature, pressure and salinity. These factors are used to estimate more accurately the actual sound speed in the local water column. This technique is often used by the US Office of Coast Survey for navigational surveys of US coastal waters.[6]

Types

[edit]

Single beam

[edit]
beam shape of a single-beam echosounder on a USV

A single-beam echo sounder is one of the simplest and most fundamental types of underwater sonar. They are ubiquitous in the boating world and used on a number of different marine robotic vehicles. It operates by using a transducer to emit a pulse through the water and listen for echos to return. Using that data, it's able to determine the distance from the strongest echo, which can be the seafloor, a concrete structure, or other larger obstacle.[7] A fishfinder is an echo sounding device used by both recreational and commercial fishers.

Multibeam

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Multibeam echosounder.[edit]
Multibeam sonar is used to map the ocean floor
A multibeam echosounder (MBES) is a type of sonar that is used to map the seabed. It emits acoustic waves in a fan shape beneath its transceiver. The time it takes for the sound waves to reflect off the seabed and return to the receiver is used to calculate the water depth. Unlike other sonars and echo sounders, MBES uses beamforming to extract directional information from the returning soundwaves, producing a swathe of depth soundings from a single ping.

Common use

[edit]

As well as an aid to navigation (most larger vessels will have at least a simple depth sounder), echo sounding is commonly used for fishing. Variations in elevation often represent places where fish congregate. Schools of fish will also register.[8]

Hydrography

[edit]

In areas where detailed bathymetry is required, a precise echo sounder may be used for the work of hydrography. There are many considerations when evaluating such a system, not limited to the vertical accuracy, resolution, acoustic beamwidth of the transmit/receive beam and the acoustic frequency of the transducer.

An example of a precision dual frequency echosounder, the Teledyne Odom MkIII

The majority of hydrographic echosounders are dual frequency, meaning that a low frequency pulse (typically around 24 kHz) can be transmitted at the same time as a high frequency pulse (typically around 200 kHz). As the two frequencies are discrete,[clarification needed] the two return signals do not typically interfere with each other. Dual frequency echosounding has many advantages, including the ability to identify a vegetation layer or a layer of soft mud on top of a layer of rock.

A screen grab of the difference between single and dual frequency echograms

Most hydrographic operations use a 200 kHz transducer, which is suitable for inshore work up to 100 metres in depth. Deeper water requires a lower frequency transducer as the acoustic signal of lower frequencies is less susceptible to attenuation in the water column. Commonly used frequencies for deep water sounding are 33 kHz and 24 kHz.

The beamwidth of the transducer is also a consideration for the hydrographer, as to obtain the best resolution of the data gathered a narrow beamwidth is preferable. The higher the operating frequency, the narrower the beamwidth. Therefore, it is especially important when sounding in deep water, as the resulting footprint of the acoustic pulse can be very large once it reaches a distant sea floor.

A multispectral multibeam echosounder is an extension of a dual frequency vertical beam echosounder in that, as well as measuring two soundings directly below the sonar at two different frequencies; it measures multiple soundings at multiple frequencies, at multiple different grazing angles, and multiple different locations on the seabed. These systems are detailed further in the section called multibeam echosounder.

Echo sounders are used in laboratory applications to monitor sediment transport, scour and erosion processes in scale models (hydraulic models, flumes etc.). These can also be used to create plots of 3D contours.

Standards for hydrographic echo sounding

[edit]

The required precision and accuracy of the hydrographic echo sounder is defined by the requirements of the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) for surveys that are to be undertaken to IHO standards.[9] These values are contained within IHO publication S44.

In order to meet these standards, the surveyor must consider not only the vertical and horizontal accuracy of the echo sounder and transducer, but the survey system as a whole. A motion sensor may be used, specifically the heave component (in single beam echosounding) to reduce soundings for the motion of the vessel experienced on the water's surface. Once all of the uncertainties of each sensor are established, the hydrographer will create an uncertainty budget to determine whether the survey system meets the requirements laid down by IHO.

Different hydrographic organisations will have their own set of field procedures and manuals to guide their surveyors to meet the required standards. Two examples are the US Army Corps of Engineers publication EM110-2-1003,[10] and the NOAA 'Field Procedures Manual'.[11]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Echo sounding

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Echo sounding is a hydrographic technique that measures water depth by transmitting acoustic pulses from a transducer mounted on a vessel and recording the time required for the echoes to return from the seafloor, with depth calculated using the known speed of sound in water. This method, a form of active sonar, relies on the principle that sound waves propagate efficiently through water and reflect off surfaces with differing acoustic impedances, such as the seabed. It provides precise bathymetric data essential for navigation, mapping, and scientific research, often achieving resolutions from meters to centimeters depending on the equipment. The development of sounding emerged in the early amid efforts to improve maritime following disasters like the Titanic sinking in 1912. German Behm received a in 1913 for the first practical echo sounder. Independently, Canadian inventor , working with the Submarine Signal Company, developed the Fessenden oscillator starting in 1912, a device capable of both transmitting and receiving underwater sound waves. On April 27, 1914, Fessenden successfully demonstrated echo ranging by detecting an iceberg's distance during tests off Newfoundland, and the following day, he measured seafloor depth, contributing to the early practical development of echo sounding. By 1922, U.S. Navy scientist Harvey Hayes equipped the USS Stewart with an acoustic echo sounder for transatlantic soundings, accelerating its adoption. In operation, modern echo sounders emit short, narrow-beam acoustic pulses—typically at frequencies from 18 kHz to 200 kHz—that travel downward through the water column until reflecting off the bottom or other objects. The transducer then detects the returning , and onboard systems convert the round-trip time into depth, accounting for factors like water temperature, , and vessel motion to ensure accuracy. Single-beam echo sounders provide vertical profiles along a vessel's track, while multibeam emit fan-shaped arrays of beams to wide swaths of the seafloor simultaneously, enabling detailed three-dimensional . Echo sounding has broad applications in , fisheries assessment, , transforming how underwater is charted. In fisheries, systems like the NOAA EK60 echosounder identify schools by analyzing strength and distribution, supporting biomass estimates for such as Pacific . Hydrographic surveys by agencies like the USGS use portable and multibeam echo sounders to map riverbeds and lakes, aiding flood modeling and habitat restoration. During World War II, advancements in echo sounding contributed to sonar technologies for submarine detection, further expanding its military and navigational roles.

Fundamentals

Principles of Operation

Echo sounding is an acoustic technique used to measure water depth by transmitting sound pulses into the water column and recording the time required for the echoes to return after reflection from the seabed. This method relies on the principles of sonar, where sound waves propagate through water as compressional waves, reflect off the seafloor due to acoustic impedance differences between water and sediment, and return to the receiver. The core measurement process involves calculating depth from the round-trip travel time of the acoustic signal using the time-of-flight formula: d=v⋅t2d = \frac{v \cdot t}{2}, where dd is the depth, vv is the speed of sound in water (approximately 1500 m/s under standard conditions), and tt is the elapsed time for the echo to return. The speed of sound in seawater varies significantly with environmental factors, including temperature (increasing speed by about 4.5 m/s per °C), salinity (about 1.3 m/s per parts per thousand), and pressure (about 1.6 m/s per 100 m of depth), which can introduce depth errors of up to 1-2% if not corrected. These variations create a sound velocity profile through the water column, necessitating corrections such as sound velocity profiling using instruments like conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) probes to measure and adjust for local conditions. Without such adjustments, ray bending due to refraction can distort depth estimates, particularly in stratified waters. Echo sounding systems typically operate at frequencies between 12 kHz and kHz, selected based on the required balance between resolution and range. Lower frequencies, such as 12-50 kHz, allow greater penetration and longer ranges (up to several kilometers) but provide coarser resolution due to longer s and broader beam spreads. Conversely, higher frequencies above 200 kHz offer finer resolution for shallow waters (less than 100 m) but suffer from increased , limiting effective range to hundreds of . This trade-off is governed by the relationship where beam width approximates 50.6λ/D50.6 \lambda / D (with λ\lambda as and DD as diameter), emphasizing the role of in determining spatial accuracy.

Key Components

The serves as electroacoustic component in echo sounding systems, functioning dually as both transmitter and receiver to convert electrical signals into for transmission and to convert returning echoes back into electrical signals for . Typically constructed from piezoelectric ceramics, these transducers generate ultrasonic pulses through the piezoelectric effect, where applied voltage causes mechanical deformation to produce sound waves at frequencies ranging from 10 kHz to over 1 MHz, depending on the application depth and resolution needs. Common mounting configurations include hull-mounted setups, such as through-hull or in-hull installations that integrate directly with the vessel's for operation in deep-water surveys, and pole-mounted options that extend from the hull for shallower or more maneuverable deployments on smaller vessels. Pulse generation begins with the transmitter, which produces short electrical pulses—often lasting microseconds—to drive the transducer and emit focused acoustic pulses into the water column, enabling precise timing of echo returns for depth calculation. The returning echoes, weakened by propagation losses, are captured by the receiver, which amplifies the low-level signals, applies filtering to reduce noise, and employs digital signal processing techniques to detect the echo envelope and measure the time-of-flight accurately. This processing often includes analog-to-digital conversion followed by algorithms for envelope detection and threshold-based echo identification, ensuring reliable interpretation across varying water conditions. Modern echo sounding systems integrate with (GPS) receivers and inertial measurement units () to georeference depth soundings with precise positional and attitude , compensating for vessel motion such as heave, pitch, roll, and yaw that could otherwise distort measurements. These integrations typically occur through tightly coupled , where GPS provides , , and time stamps, while deliver real-time orientation , enhancing the accuracy of bathymetric datasets in dynamic marine environments. Supporting software platforms handle real-time visualization of echograms—graphical displays of echo intensity versus time or depth—for immediate operator feedback, alongside automated logging of raw and processed data in formats compatible with geographic information systems. These tools also apply initial environmental corrections, such as tide height adjustments to account for water level variations relative to a datum and draft offsets to subtract the submerged depth of the transducer below the waterline, ensuring soundings reflect true seabed elevations. Such components are foundational to both single-beam and multibeam echo sounding configurations, where they adapt to varying pulse widths and beam geometries for comprehensive seafloor mapping.

Historical Development

Early Innovations

The development of echo sounding in the early 1910s is credited to two independent inventors: German Behm, who obtained German No. 282009 for an acoustic depth device on July 22, 1913, motivated in part by the Titanic of 1912, and Canadian inventor , who demonstrated practical echo ranging and seafloor depth in 1914 using the Fessenden oscillator. In 1920, Behm established the Behm Echo Sounding in , , to commercialize the and early models for maritime use. During , acoustic technologies including hydrophones and early locators were adapted for naval applications to detect submarines, providing advantages in anti-submarine warfare for Allied and navies. Following the war's end in , the transitioned to civilian sectors, safer and hydrographic as designs became more accessible for commercial shipping. In the 1920s, early commercial devices proliferated, with British firm Kelvin & Hughes introducing the first practical recording echo sounder in 1923, which automated depth recordings on paper charts for improved accuracy during voyages. Key milestones included the 1922 transatlantic crossing by the USS Stewart, which produced the first continuous acoustic sounding profile across the Atlantic Ocean using an experimental echo sounder developed by U.S. Navy scientist Dr. Harvey Hayes. This demonstrated the technology's potential for large-scale bathymetric mapping. Additionally, in 1924, the Submarine Signal Company installed the first commercial Fathometer—based on Reginald Fessenden's oscillator design—aboard the S.S. Berkshire, a liner of the Merchants and Miners Transportation Company, enabling real-time depth monitoring on routine commercial routes. World War II further propelled innovations, as echo sounding systems were enhanced for naval operations and integrated into comprehensive shipboard navigation suites alongside radar for combined surface and subsurface awareness. The Submarine Signal Company, a leading supplier, provided echo sounders and related acoustic equipment to the U.S. Navy through 1943, supporting anti-submarine efforts and depth measurement in combat zones. These wartime adaptations emphasized reliability under harsh conditions, laying the groundwork for post-war civilian expansions while adhering to basic acoustic principles of sound pulse transmission and echo reception.

Evolution in the 20th and 21st Centuries

Following World War II, echo sounding underwent significant advancements driven by the limitations of early single-beam systems, which restricted measurements to directly beneath the . This transition enabled more consistent signal and detection, laying the groundwork for broader hydrographic applications. The 1980s marked a pivotal era with the commercialization of multibeam echo sounding systems, exemplified by Simrad's EM100 introduced in , which used multiple beams to map swaths up to five times the depth. This dramatically increased survey over traditional single-beam methods, supporting large-scale seafloor mapping projects. Entering the 2000s, (DSP) revolutionized echo sounder operations by enabling real-time filtering, , and artifact removal, resulting in higher-fidelity outputs. Concurrent integration with positioning systems like GPS, achieving sub-meter accuracy by the mid-2000s, synchronized depth measurements with geographic coordinates, transforming bathymetric into geospatial models. In the 21st century, unmanned surface (USVs) have incorporated compact sounders, autonomous, cost-effective surveys in hazardous or remote areas. High-frequency shallow-water systems operating above 200 kHz have advanced monitoring of sediment dynamics and coastal shifts linked to environmental changes.

Techniques

Single-Beam Echo Sounding

Single-beam echo sounding employs a transducer mounted on the vessel to emit acoustic pulses vertically downward, measuring water depth by calculating the round-trip travel time of the returning echo from the seafloor. The system is typically integrated with positioning tools like GPS and motion sensors for accurate georeferencing, with transducers often installed amidships to minimize interference from hull effects. Operational setup involves calibrating for sound velocity, vessel draft, and motion compensation to ensure precise depth computations along predefined survey lines. The beam features a narrow conical , typically spanning 5 to 20 degrees, with common hydrographic configurations using 3 to 8 degrees for focused concentration directly beneath the vessel. This vertical profiling limits the acoustic to a single point per , where the beam width determines the ensonified area at the seafloor—scaling roughly with depth, such that a 5-degree beam covers about 0.09 times the water depth in diameter. Such enables high vertical resolution but introduces beam spreading, where the widening at greater depths can average returns from uneven terrain, potentially leading to overestimation of depths in irregular seabeds. Data output consists of depth profiles recorded along linear track lines, generating time-stamped soundings that form one-dimensional transects suitable for cross-sectional in linear surveys like channel maintenance or reservoir monitoring. These profiles are processed to produce corrected depths relative to a vertical datum, often exported in formats compatible with hydrographic software for or calculations. Advantages of single-beam systems include their operational simplicity, requiring minimal training and setup compared to more complex arrays, which facilitates deployment on small vessels or in shallow waters. They offer low acquisition costs, with systems ranging from $20,000 to $70,000, and deliver high vertical accuracy—often ±0.2 feet at 95% in controlled conditions—particularly effective for deep-water profiling using low-frequency transducers that maintain resolution over extended ranges. In contrast to multibeam methods, single-beam provides targeted precision without the need for extensive swath . Limitations center on poor lateral coverage, as the single nadir-point measurement necessitates dense —typically three to four times the depth or less—to achieve adequate bathymetric representation, resulting in survey efficiencies below 5% for large areas. Susceptibility to beam spreading errors further compromises accuracy in deep or variable bottoms, where the expanded may incorporate off-nadir returns, and environmental factors like soft sediments can cause signal or multipath echoes.

Multibeam and Side-Scan Echo Sounding

Multibeam echo sounding employs an array of transducers to transmit and receive multiple acoustic beams simultaneously, forming a fan-shaped pattern oriented across the ship's track to provide wide-area seafloor coverage. This configuration allows systems to generate up to 1000 or more beams per ping, enabling high-resolution bathymetric mapping over swath widths that can extend up to 5.5 times the water depth, depending on frequency and environmental conditions. In addition to depth measurements, multibeam systems collect backscatter data, which reflects the intensity of returned echoes and aids in seabed classification by distinguishing sediment types, rock outcrops, and biological features based on acoustic properties. Unlike single-beam methods, which provide point-specific depth data, multibeam techniques expand coverage for efficient large-area surveys. To ensure accuracy, multibeam operations incorporate calibration for vessel motion, using integrated motion reference units (MRUs) or inertial measurement units (IMUs) to apply real-time corrections for roll, pitch, and yaw. These sensors measure angular deviations and accelerations, compensating for platform instability during data acquisition; for instance, patch tests over known seafloor features verify and adjust offsets in these parameters sequentially—starting with time latency, followed by pitch, roll, and heading. Such corrections are essential for maintaining positional precision, particularly in dynamic marine environments where wave-induced motions can otherwise distort beam footprints. Side-scan echo sounding complements multibeam by projecting narrow, horizontal acoustic beams to the survey track, producing high-resolution of the seafloor similar to an acoustic . Typically deployed via a towed "fish" or towfish—a streamlined connected by cable to the survey vessel—this method allows the to maintain a consistent altitude above the seabed, optimizing grazing-angle illumination for detecting subtle features like shipwrecks, debris, or fish schools. The towfish is deployed from a winch or J-frame, with cable length adjusted to position it 10-20% of the desired range altitude, enabling detection of targets through shadow patterns and echo intensity variations. Recent advancements in multibeam include variable-frequency or multifrequency models, which adapt operating frequencies (e.g., from 150 kHz to kHz) to optimize resolution and penetration for both shallow and deep-water environments. These systems enhance versatility by allowing real-time frequency adjustments to mitigate in shallow waters while maintaining coverage in deeper profiles, as demonstrated in 2020s commercial models like the Hydro-Tech MS8240. Such innovations support broader applications in dynamic coastal zones without requiring multiple dedicated instruments.

Applications

Bathymetric Mapping

Echo sounding plays a central role in bathymetric mapping by providing the primary data for constructing detailed representations of the seafloor topography. The process begins with the acquisition of depth measurements using single-beam or multibeam echo sounders, which emit acoustic pulses and record the time for echoes to return from the seabed. These raw depth data are then integrated with ancillary information, including tidal corrections to account for sea level variations, adjustments for water currents that influence sound propagation and vessel position, and precise positioning data from GNSS systems to georeference each sounding accurately. This integration compensates for environmental and instrumental factors, such as vessel motion and sound velocity profiles, enabling the generation of contour maps that delineate seafloor features like ridges, valleys, and slopes. The primary outputs of bathymetric mapping via echo sounding include digital terrain models (DTMs), which represent the seafloor as a continuous raster surface of elevation values, and isobath charts, which depict depth contours at specified intervals. These products facilitate the visualization and analysis of underwater terrain, with resolutions varying from several meters in broader surveys to as fine as centimeters in high-precision applications using modern multibeam systems in shallow waters. For instance, multibeam echo sounding, which acquires data across a swath perpendicular to the survey track, supports the creation of these high-resolution outputs by providing dense point clouds that are interpolated into seamless models. A prominent case study is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) U.S. coastal mapping programs, which have employed multibeam echo sounding since the 1990s to systematically chart nearshore and offshore areas. Through initiatives like the Integrated Ocean and Coastal Mapping (IOCM) program, NOAA has conducted extensive surveys to update nautical charts and support habitat assessment, revealing previously unmapped features such as and seafloor hazards in regions like the southeastern U.S. . These efforts have produced comprehensive bathymetric datasets covering thousands of square kilometers, enhancing the understanding of coastal . Bathymetric from echo sounding are often integrated with geographic systems (GIS) to enable advanced 3D visualizations, allowing users to explore seafloor models interactively. Tools within platforms like Arc facilitate the import of processed echo into spatial databases, where geoprocessing functions generate draped surfaces, cross-sections, and volumetric analyses for applications in . This integration supports the creation of immersive 3D scenes that combine with overlying features, such as sediment layers or ecological zones. In marine navigation, echo sounding provides real-time depth measurements essential for avoiding shallow waters and ensuring under-keel clearance, particularly in areas with limited charted depths. Mariners rely on these devices to monitor water depth continuously, adjusting for factors such as tide levels and vessel squat to navigate safely through constrained channels. Echo sounders often integrate with the Electronic Display and (ECDIS), overlaying live depth data onto digital charts to enhance situational awareness and comply with international standards like those in the International Convention for the of at (SOLAS). This integration supports precise route planning and hazard avoidance, with variations between echo sounder readings and charted soundings typically attributed to uncorrected instrument errors or environmental factors. In fisheries management, echo sounding serves as the core technology in fish finders, which detect schools of fish by analyzing acoustic echoes from targets with differing densities in the water column. Vertical-beam echo sounders transmit pulses downward to identify fish locations and densities, displaying returns as marks on screens or recorders for immediate operational decisions. For biomass estimation, echo-integration processes these signals to quantify fish density per unit area, assuming echo strength correlates with target size and swim bladder presence, often calibrated using standard targets or live fish in controlled settings. This method enables surveys to estimate total biomass across transects, supporting sustainable harvesting quotas and stock assessments. Beyond navigation and fisheries, echo sounding supports dredging operations by delivering precise bathymetric for calculations, monitoring, and verification in port projects. Single-beam and multibeam systems measure layers and channel depths, ensuring compliance with required clearances in high-traffic harbors like those managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In offshore site surveys, multibeam echo sounders seafloor to identify hazards and , often combined with for comprehensive site clearance before installation. Similar applications extend to offshore wind farm developments, where echo sounders are used for high-resolution seabed mapping to assess foundation suitability and environmental impacts as of 2025. These applications prioritize high-resolution to minimize risks in resource extraction and development. Echo sounding also aids by tracking and through repeated bathymetric profiling. Acoustic systems on or vessels measure changes in elevation and sediment movement, as seen in studies of where echo sounders quantify delta-to-coast transport pathways. In broader sediment mapping, echosounders classify types and monitor dynamic processes like hotspots, providing for predictive models of shoreline stability. Such monitoring informs strategies to mitigate habitat loss from natural and human-induced changes.

Standards and Limitations

Hydrographic Standards

The International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) establishes global standards for hydrographic surveys through its publication S-44, which specifies requirements for echo sounding and other bathymetric methods to ensure data quality for nautical charting and safe navigation. These standards classify surveys into orders based on the intended use and environmental conditions: Exclusive Order for exceptional shallow areas with strict clearance needs (e.g., a = 0.25 m, b = 0.007 for TVU above vertical datum); Special Order for critical underkeel clearance areas like harbors (a = 0.5 m, b = 0.013); Order 1a for feature detection in areas where clearance is important but not critical (a = 0.5 m, b = 0.013, 100% coverage); Order 1b for general areas with less critical clearance (a = 1.0 m, b = 0.023, 100% coverage in shallow water); and Order 2 for deeper waters (>200 m) with general charting needs (a = 1.0 m, b = 0.023, partial coverage). Accuracy in depth measurements for these orders is defined by the Total Vertical Uncertainty (TVU) formula: TVU = √(a² + (b × d)²), where d is the depth in meters, and parameters a and b ensure 95% confidence levels. These thresholds, varying by order and whether above or below the vertical datum, support reliable echo sounding data, with multibeam systems often employed to achieve compliance through comprehensive ensonification. Total Horizontal Uncertainty (THU) for sounding positions is uniformly 2 m + 2% of the horizontal distance from the epicenter at 95% confidence across all orders. Survey planning under IHO guidelines mandates careful to meet coverage and resolution needs, particularly for echo sounding operations. Bathymetric coverage requirements range from 200% for Exclusive Order % for Order 2, with line spacing adjusted accordingly (e.g., denser for full-coverage orders using multibeam, wider for partial in Order 2 up to approximately 3–5 times depth depending on ). For full-coverage requirements in Special, Exclusive, and Order 1a, overlap between survey lines or multiple passes is essential, typically achieving 100% ensonification with multibeam echo sounders, while partial coverage in Order 2 permits wider spacing. These protocols adapt to beam type, with single-beam systems requiring denser lines compared to multibeam arrays. Feature detection and search requirements also vary, e.g., detecting 0.5 m cubic features in Exclusive Order versus 2 m in Order 1a. Documentation is a core requirement to verify compliance and enable data validation, including comprehensive metadata for echo sounding surveys. Essential elements encompass sound speed profiles to correct for refraction effects, vessel motion data from gyroscopes and accelerometers to account for heave and pitch, positioning uncertainties (THU), and environmental parameters like tides and currents. Surveys must also record the technique used (e.g., single-beam or multibeam), datum references, and feature detection thresholds, all reported at 95% confidence to support official hydrographic products. As of 2025, S-44 Edition 6.2.0 (October 2024) maintains the order-based framework while clarifying uncertainty assessments (distinguishing above/below vertical datum) and extending applicability to emerging technologies, emphasizing that unmanned and autonomous systems must demonstrate equivalent compliance with TVU, THU, and coverage standards to qualify for hydrographic use. This update facilitates integration of autonomous underwater or surface vehicles in surveys, provided they incorporate validated sensors for sound speed and motion compensation.

Accuracy Considerations and Challenges

Echo sounding measurements are subject to various error sources that can compromise accuracy. Refraction errors arise primarily from variability in the water column's sound velocity profile, influenced by temperature, salinity, and pressure gradients, leading to beam bending and depth miscalculations that increase with angle from . For instance, a 10 m/s velocity error in 10 m of water can produce up to 4.6 cm depth error at a 45° beam angle. Multipath echoes occur when acoustic signals reflect multiple times between the transducer, sea surface, and seabed, resulting in false or duplicated depth readings on records. Seabed roughness exacerbates s by causing irregular scattering and internal wave distortions, which can mimic or obscure true bathymetric features, particularly in rocky or uneven terrains. To mitigate these errors, several correction techniques are employed. Real-time kinematic (RTK) GPS enhances positional accuracy by providing centimeter-level horizontal positioning, reducing uncertainties from vessel motion and . Automated sound velocity adjustments, using conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) profilers or surface probes, enable real-time profiling to correct for by applying accurate velocity profiles during . modeling, such as Total Horizontal (THU), quantifies combined errors in sounding positions at a 95% level, specified as 2 m + 2% of the horizontal distance from the , integrating contributions from positioning, motion sensors, and beam geometry to guide . Despite these corrections, significant challenges persist in achieving high accuracy. In shallow waters, acoustic attenuation intensifies due to frequent bottom and surface interactions, limiting signal strength and resolution for depths below 10 . Shipping noise introduces interference, masking weak return echoes and increasing detection thresholds in busy coastal areas. Climate-driven ocean warming, observed as temperature anomalies up to 5°C in regions like the , elevates sound speeds by approximately 20 /s, altering propagation paths and necessitating adaptive corrections as of 2025. Emerging approaches leverage for error detection to address these limitations. models, such as architectures, enable real-time identification of outliers and artifacts in multibeam data from unmanned surface vehicles, improving in noisy environments. Weighted outlier detection functions combining multiple techniques further enhance automated filtering, outperforming traditional methods in complex seabed scenarios.

References

  1. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/fliers/84mgg18.html
  2. https://www.nist.gov/how-do-you-measure-it/how-do-you-measure-depth-ocean
  3. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/science-blog/acoustic-echosounders-essential-survey-equipment
  4. https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/reginald-fessenden-and-the-invention-of-sonar/
  5. https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/history/timeline-the-age-or-electronics-1-1923-1945/
  6. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/hydrographic-surveys-rivers-and-lakes-using-a-multibeam-echosounder-mapping-system
  7. https://iho.int/uploads/user/pubs/cb/c-13/english/C_13_Chapter_3_December2010.pdf
  8. https://lismap.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2333/2018/11/SeaBeamMultibeamTheoryOperation.pdf
  9. https://www.marineinsight.com/tech/what-is-an-echosounder/
  10. https://www.alcommarine.com/echo-sounder/
  11. https://www.piceramic.com/en/expertise/piezo-technology/generating-ultrasound-with-piezo-components
  12. https://www.teledynemarine.com/products/product-line/sonar/singlebeam-and-transducers
  13. https://acousticsunpacked.echoview.com/acoustics/EquipmentDeployment/TransducerDeployment.asp
  14. https://epic.awi.de/36478/1/echosounding.pdf
  15. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2041-210X.14261
  16. https://dosits.org/galleries/technology-gallery/observing-the-sea-floor/multibeam-echosounder/
  17. https://data.ngdc.noaa.gov/platforms/ocean/nos/DAPRs/OPR-B370-TJ-14_DAPR.pdf
  18. https://www.sbg-systems.com/ins/ekinox-e/
  19. https://knudseneng.com/files/manuals/D101-04969-Rev2.0-SounderSuite-USBUserManual.pdf
  20. https://www.kongsberg.com/discovery/seafloor-mapping/sis5/
  21. https://www.eye4software.com/hydromagic/documentation/manual/single-beam-processing/tide-correction/
  22. https://marinegyaan.com/what-is-an-echo-sounder-its-principle-errors-and-corrective-action/
  23. https://dosits.org/people-and-sound/history-of-underwater-acoustics/world-war-i-1914-1918/
  24. https://archive.navalsubleague.org/2003/submarine-bells-to-sonar-radar-submarine-signal-company-1901-1946-part-ii
  25. https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb248-ugd033
  26. https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/exploration-and-innovation/radar-sonar.html
  27. https://www.britannica.com/technology/depth-finder
  28. https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/history/timeline-the-age-or-electronics-2-1946-1970/
  29. https://docs.iho.int/mtg_docs/rhc/MACHC/MACHC13/Presentations/03-Kongsberg.pdf
  30. https://www.kongsberg.com/contentassets/47d7f3d5d4fa4c1b980d9861d1c70c12/160692_em_datagram_formats.pdf
  31. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA408960.pdf
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235208062_Advanced_Digital_Processing_of_Echo_Sounder_Signals_for_Characterization_of_Very_Dense_Submersed_Aquatic_Vegetation
  33. https://www.oceansciencetechnology.com/news/satlab-unveils-new-usv-with-integrated-multibeam-echo-sounder/
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357179802_Determination_of_the_relevant_multibeam_echosounder_frequency_to_estimate_the_suspended_sediment_concentrations_for_environmental_damage_monitoring_of_mass_movement
  35. https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-1003.pdf
  36. https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/publications/docs/standards-and-requirements/specs/hssd-2019.pdf
  37. https://iho.int/uploads/user/pubs/standards/s-44/S-44_Edition_6.1.0.pdf
  38. https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/technology/sonar-multibeam/
  39. https://data.ngdc.noaa.gov/instruments/remote-sensing/active/profilers-sounders/acoustic-sounders/kongsberg_em120_product_specification.pdf
  40. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/sim3515/full
  41. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/1739/noaa_1739_DS1.pdf
  42. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA349408.pdf
  43. https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/patchtest-poster.pdf
  44. https://www.r2sonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/The-New-Patch-Test.pdf
  45. https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/technology/sonar-side-scan/
  46. https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/publications/docs/standards-and-requirements/fpm/field_procedures_manual_2020.pdf
  47. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1634/jf_scan.htm
  48. https://hydro-techmarine.com/news
  49. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/8/1539
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338123736_Mapping_the_Seabed_and_Shallow_Subsurface_with_Multi-Frequency_Multibeam_Echosounders
  51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1178845
  52. https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/publications/docs/standards-and-requirements/specs/hssd-2020.pdf
  53. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/bathymetry/multibeam/
  54. https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/updates/how-accurate-are-nautical-charts/
  55. https://iocm.noaa.gov/
  56. https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-bathymetry/overview
  57. https://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/publications/coast-pilot/files/cp5/CPB5_C01_WEB.pdf
  58. https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/DCO%20Documents/5p/5ps/NVIC/2003/02-03.pdf
  59. https://www.fao.org/4/x6602e/x6602e02.htm
  60. https://www.fao.org/4/x5818e/x5818e08.htm
  61. https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/about/docs/about/ocean-mapping-capabilities.pdf
  62. https://www.kongsberg.com/discovery/applications/offshore-wind/
  63. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/navigation/hydro/
  64. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/pcmsc/news/travels-sediment-san-francisco-bay-delta-and-coastal-system
  65. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/64410/noaa_64410_DS1.pdf
  66. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1180/ofr20151180.pdf
  67. https://iho.int/en/standards-and-specifications
  68. https://iho.int/en/iho-publications
  69. https://www.terradepth.com/media/terradepth-achieves-iho-special-order-standard-for-seabed-mapping-accuracy/
  70. https://www.r2sonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/R2Sonic-Basic-Acoustic-Theory.pdf
  71. https://orbital.co.ke/single-beam-or-multi-beam-echosounder-for-bathymetric-survey/
  72. https://ihr.iho.int/articles/the-analysis-of-error-sources-and-quality-assessment-for-multibeam-sounding-products/
  73. https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/publications/docs/standards-and-requirements/specs/hssd-2017.pdf
  74. https://dosits.org/science/advanced-topics/shallow-water-propagation/
  75. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221253/
  76. https://tos.org/oceanography/article/impacts-of-ocean-warming-on-acoustic-propagation-over-continental-shelf-and
  77. https://unbscholar.lib.unb.ca/bitstreams/8b4cf246-9994-4941-8358-0fa1edb606ef/download
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300424000554
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.