Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Fibre-reinforced plastic
View on WikipediaFibre-reinforced plastic (FRP; also called fibre-reinforced polymer, or in American English fiber) is a composite material made of a polymer matrix reinforced with fibres. The fibres are usually glass (in fibreglass), carbon (in carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer), aramid, or basalt. Rarely, other fibres such as paper, wood, boron, or asbestos have been used. The polymer is usually an epoxy, vinyl ester, or polyester thermosetting plastic, though phenol formaldehyde resins are still in use.
FRPs are commonly used in the aerospace, automotive, marine, and construction industries. They are commonly found in ballistic armour and cylinders for self-contained breathing apparatuses.
History
[edit]Bakelite was the first fibre-reinforced plastic. Leo Baekeland had originally set out to find a replacement for shellac (made from the excretion of lac bugs). Chemists had begun to recognise that many natural resins and fibres were polymers, and Baekeland investigated the reactions of phenol and formaldehyde. He first produced a soluble phenol-formaldehyde shellac called "Novolak" that never became a market success, then turned to developing a binder for asbestos which, at that time, was moulded with rubber. By controlling the pressure and temperature applied to phenol and formaldehyde, he found in 1905 he could produce his dreamed of hard mouldable material (the world's first synthetic plastic): bakelite.[1][2] He announced his invention at a meeting of the American Chemical Society on 5 February 1909.[3]
The development of fibre-reinforced plastic for commercial use was being extensively researched in the 1930s. In the United Kingdom, considerable research was undertaken by pioneers such as Norman de Bruyne. It was particularly of interest to the aviation industry.[4]
Mass production of glass strands was discovered in 1932, when Games Slayter, a researcher at Owens-Illinois accidentally directed a jet of compressed air at a stream of molten glass and produced fibres. A patent for this method of producing glass wool was first applied for in 1933.[5] Owens joined with the Corning company in 1935 and the method was adapted by Owens Corning to produce its patented "fibreglas" (one "s") in 1936. Originally, fibreglas was a glass wool with fibres entrapping a great deal of gas, making it useful as an insulator, especially at high temperatures.
A suitable resin for combining the "fibreglas" with a plastic to produce a composite material, was developed in 1936 by du Pont. The first ancestor of modern polyester resins is Cyanamid's resin of 1942. Peroxide curing systems were used by then.[6] With the combination of fibreglas and resin the gas content of the material was replaced by plastic. This reduced the insulation properties to values typical of the plastic, but now for the first time the composite showed great strength and promise as a structural and building material. Confusingly, many glass fibre composites continued to be called "fibreglass" (as a generic name) and the name was also used for the low-density glass wool product containing gas instead of plastic.

Ray Greene of Owens Corning is credited with producing the first composite boat in 1937, but did not proceed further at the time due to the brittle nature of the plastic used. In 1939, Russia was reported to have constructed a passenger boat of plastic materials, and the United States a fuselage and wings of an aircraft.[7] The first car to have a fibre-glass body was the 1946 Stout Scarab. Only one of this model was built.[8] The Ford prototype of 1941 could have been the first plastic car, but there is some uncertainty around the materials used as it was destroyed shortly afterwards.[9][10]
The first fibre-reinforced plastic plane was either the Fairchild F-46, first flown on 12 May 1937, or the Californian built Bennett Plastic Plane.[11] A fibreglass fuselage was used on a modified Vultee BT-13A designated the XBT-16 based at Wright Field in late 1942.[12] In 1943, further experiments were undertaken building structural aircraft parts from composite materials resulting in the first plane, a Vultee BT-15, with a GFRP fuselage, designated the XBT-19, being flown in 1944.[13][14][15] A significant development in the tooling for GFRP components had been made by Republic Aviation Corporation in 1943.[16]
Carbon fibre production began in the late 1950s and was used, though not widely in British industry until the early 1960s. Aramid fibres were being produced around this time also, appearing first under the trade name Nomex by DuPont. Today, each of these fibres is used widely in industry for any applications that require plastics with specific strength or elastic qualities. Glass fibres are the most common across all industries, although carbon-fibre and carbon-fibre-aramid composites are widely found in aerospace, automotive and sporting good applications.[17] These three (glass, carbon, and aramid) continue to be the important categories of fibre used in FRP.
Global polymer production on the scale present today began in the mid 20th century, when low material and productions costs, new production technologies and new product categories, combined to make polymer production economical. The industry finally matured in the late 1970s, when world polymer production surpassed that of steel, making polymers the ubiquitous material that they are today. Fibre-reinforced plastics have been a significant aspect of this industry from the beginning.
Process definition
[edit]A polymer is generally manufactured by step-growth polymerisation or addition polymerisation. When one or more polymers are combined with various agents to enhance or in any way alter their material properties, the result is referred to as a plastic. Composite plastics refers to those types of plastics that result from bonding two or more homogeneous materials with different material properties to derive a final product with certain desired material and mechanical properties. Fibre-reinforced plastics are a category of composite plastics that specifically use fibre materials to mechanically enhance the strength and elasticity of plastics.
The original plastic material without fibre reinforcement is known as the matrix or binding agent. The matrix is a tough but relatively weak plastic that is reinforced by stronger stiffer reinforcing filaments or fibres. The extent that strength and elasticity are enhanced in a fibre-reinforced plastic depends on the mechanical properties of both the fibre and matrix, their volume relative to one another, and the fibre length and orientation within the matrix.[18] Reinforcement of the matrix occurs by definition when the FRP material exhibits increased strength or elasticity relative to the strength and elasticity of the matrix alone.[17]
Process description
[edit]FRP involves two distinct processes, the first is the process whereby the fibrous material is manufactured and formed, the second is the process whereby fibrous materials are bonded with the matrix during moulding.[17]
Fibre
[edit]Manufacture of fibre fabric
[edit]Reinforcing Fibre is manufactured in both two-dimensional and three-dimensional orientations:
- Two-dimensional fibre glass-reinforced polymer is characterised by a laminated structure in which the fibres are only aligned along the plane in x-direction, and y-direction of the material. This means that no fibres are aligned in the through-thickness or the z-direction, this lack of alignment in the through thickness can create a disadvantage in cost and processing. Costs and labour increase because conventional processing techniques used to fabricate composites, such as wet hand lay-up, autoclave and resin transfer moulding, require a high amount of skilled labour to cut, stack and consolidate into a preformed component.
- Three-dimensional fibreglass-reinforced polymer composites are materials with three-dimensional fibre structures that incorporate fibres in the x-direction, y-direction and z-direction. The development of three-dimensional orientations arose from industry's need to reduce fabrication costs, to increase through-thickness mechanical properties, and to improve impact damage tolerance; all were problems associated with two-dimensional fibre-reinforced polymers.
Manufacture of fibre preforms
[edit]Fibre preforms are how the fibres are manufactured before being bonded to the matrix. Fibre preforms are often manufactured in sheets, continuous mats, or as continuous filaments for spray applications. The four major ways to manufacture the fibre preform is through the textile processing techniques of weaving, knitting, braiding and stitching.
- Weaving can be done in a conventional manner to produce two-dimensional fibres as well as in a multilayer weaving that can create three-dimensional fibres. However, multilayer weaving requires multiple layers of warp yarns to create fibres in the z-direction, creating a few disadvantages in manufacturing, namely the time to set up all the warp yarns on the loom. Therefore, most multilayer weaving is currently used to produce relatively narrow width products, or high value products where the cost of the preform production is acceptable. Another one of the main problems facing the use of multilayer woven fabrics is the difficulty in producing a fabric that contains fibres oriented at other than right angles to each other.
- The second major way of manufacturing fibre preforms is Braiding. Braiding is suited to the manufacture of narrow width flat or tubular fabric and is not as capable as weaving in the production of large volumes of wide fabrics. Braiding is done over top of mandrels that vary in cross-sectional shape or dimension along their length. Braiding is limited to objects about a brick in size. Unlike standard weaving, braiding can produce fabric that contains fibres at 45-degree angles to one another. Braiding three-dimensional fibres can be done using four-step, two-step or Multilayer Interlock Braiding. Four-step or row and column braiding utilises a flat bed containing rows and columns of yarn carriers that form the shape of the desired preform. Additional carriers are added to the outside of the array, the precise location and quantity of which depends upon the exact preform shape and structure required. There are four separate sequences of row and column motion, which act to interlock the yarns and produce the braided preform. The yarns are mechanically forced into the structure between each step to consolidate the structure, as a reed is used in weaving. Two-step braiding is unlike the four-step process because the two-step process includes a large number of yarns fixed in the axial direction and a lesser number of braiding yarns. The process consists of two steps in which the braiding carriers move completely through the structure between the axial carriers. This relatively simple sequence of motions is capable of forming preforms of essentially any shape, including circular and hollow shapes. Unlike the four-step process, the two-step process does not require mechanical compaction: the motions involved in the process allows the braid to be pulled tight by yarn tension alone. The last type of braiding is multi-layer interlocking braiding that consists of a number of standard circular braiders being joined to form a cylindrical braiding frame. This frame has a number of parallel braiding tracks around the circumference of the cylinder but the mechanism allows the transfer of yarn carriers between adjacent tracks forming a multilayer braided fabric with yarns interlocking to adjacent layers. The multilayer interlock braid differs from both the four-step and two-step braids in that the interlocking yarns are primarily in the plane of the structure and thus do not significantly reduce the in-plane properties of the preform. The four-step and two-step processes produce a greater degree of interlinking as the braiding yarns travel through the thickness of the preform, but therefore contribute less to the in-plane performance of the preform. A disadvantage of the multilayer interlock equipment is that due to the conventional sinusoidal movement of the yarn carriers to form the preform, the equipment is not able to have the density of yarn carriers that is possible with the two-step and four-step machines.
- Knitting fibre preforms can be done with the traditional methods of Warp and [Weft] Knitting, and the fabric produced is often regarded by many as two-dimensional fabric, but machines with two or more needle beds are capable of producing multilayer fabrics with yarns that traverse between the layers. Developments in electronic controls for needle selection and knit loop transfer, and in the sophisticated mechanisms that allow specific areas of the fabric to be held and their movement controlled, have allowed the fabric to be formed into the required three-dimensional preform shape with a minimum of material wastage.
- Stitching is arguably the simplest of the four main textile manufacturing techniques and one that can be performed with the smallest investment in specialised machinery. Basically stitching consists of inserting a needle, carrying the stitch thread, through a stack of fabric layers to form a 3D structure. The advantages of stitching are that it is possible to stitch both dry and prepreg fabric, although the tackiness of the prepreg makes the process difficult and generally creates more damage within the prepreg material than in the dry fabric. Stitching also utilises the standard two-dimensional fabrics that are commonly in use within the composite industry, so there is a sense of familiarity with the material systems. The use of standard fabric also allows a greater degree of flexibility in the fabric lay-up of the component than is possible with the other textile processes, which have restrictions on the fibre orientations that can be produced.[19]
Forming processes
[edit]A rigid structure is usually used to establish the shape of FRP components. Parts can be laid up on a flat surface referred to as a "caul plate" or on a cylindrical structure referred to as a "mandrel". However, most fibre-reinforced plastic parts are created with a mould or "tool". Moulds can be concave female moulds, male moulds, or the mould can completely enclose the part with a top and bottom mould.
The moulding processes of FRP plastics begins by placing the fibre preform on or in the mould. The fibre preform can be dry fibre, or fibre that already contains a measured amount of resin called "prepreg". Dry fibres are "wetted" with resin either by hand or the resin is injected into a closed mould. The part is then cured, leaving the matrix and fibres in the shape created by the mould. Heat and/or pressure are sometimes used to cure the resin and improve the quality of the final part. The different methods of forming are listed below.
Bladder moulding
[edit]Individual sheets of prepreg material are laid up and placed in a female-style mould along with a balloon-like bladder. The mould is closed and placed in a heated press. Finally, the bladder is pressurised forcing the layers of material against the mould walls.
Compression moulding
[edit]When the raw material (plastic block, rubber block, plastic sheet, or granules) contains reinforcing fibres, a compression moulded part qualifies as a fibre-reinforced plastic. More typically the plastic preform used in compression moulding does not contain reinforcing fibres. In compression moulding, a "preform" or "charge", of SMC, BMC is placed into mould cavity. The mould is closed and the material is formed and cured inside by pressure and heat. Compression moulding offers excellent detailing for geometric shapes ranging from pattern and relief detailing to complex curves and creative forms, to precision engineering all within a maximum curing time of 20 minutes.[20]
Autoclave and vacuum bag
[edit]Individual sheets of prepreg material are laid-up and placed in an open mould. The material is covered with release film, bleeder/breather material and a vacuum bag. A vacuum is pulled on part and the entire mould is placed into an autoclave (heated pressure vessel). The part is cured with a continuous vacuum to extract entrapped gasses from laminate. This is a very common process in the aerospace industry because it affords precise control over moulding due to a long, slow cure cycle that is anywhere from one to several hours.[21] This precise control creates the exact laminate geometric forms needed to ensure strength and safety in the aerospace industry, but it is also slow and labour-intensive, meaning costs often confine it to the aerospace industry.[20]
Mandrel wrapping
[edit]Sheets of prepreg material are wrapped around a steel or aluminium mandrel. The prepreg material is compacted by nylon or polypropylene cello tape. Parts are typically batch cured by vacuum bagging and hanging in an oven. After cure, the cello and mandrel are removed leaving a hollow carbon tube. This process creates strong and robust hollow carbon tubes.
Wet layup
[edit]Wet layup forming combines fibre reinforcement and the matrix as they are placed on the forming tool.[17] Reinforcing fibre layers are placed in an open mould and then saturated with a wet resin by pouring it over the fabric and working it into the fabric. The mould is then left so that the resin will cure, usually at room temperature, though heat is sometimes used to ensure a proper cure. Sometimes a vacuum bag is used to compress a wet layup. Glass fibres are most commonly used for this process, the results are widely known as fibreglass, and is used to make common products like skis, canoes, kayaks and surf boards.[20]
Chopper gun
[edit]Continuous strands of fibreglass are pushed through a hand-held gun that both chops the strands and combines them with a catalysed resin such as polyester. The impregnated chopped glass is shot onto the mould surface in whatever thickness and design the human operator thinks is appropriate. This process is good for large production runs at economical cost, but produces geometric shapes with less strength than other moulding processes and has poor dimensional tolerance.[20]
Filament winding
[edit]Machines pull fibre bundles through a wet bath of resin and wound over a rotating steel mandrel in specific orientations. Parts are cured either room temperature or elevated temperatures. Mandrel is extracted, leaving a final geometric shape but can be left in some cases.[20]
Pultrusion
[edit]Fibre bundles and slit fabrics are pulled through a wet bath of resin and formed into the rough part shape. Saturated material is extruded from a heated closed die curing while being continuously pulled through die. Some of the end products of pultrusion are structural shapes, i.e. I beam, angle, channel and flat sheet. These materials can be used to create all sorts of fibreglass structures such as ladders, platforms, handrail systems tank, pipe and pump supports.[20]
Resin transfer moulding
[edit]Also called resin infusion. Fabrics are placed into a mould into which wet resin is then injected. Resin is typically pressurised and forced into a cavity which is under vacuum in resin transfer moulding. Resin is entirely pulled into cavity under vacuum in vacuum-assisted resin transfer moulding. This moulding process allows precise tolerances and detailed shaping, but can sometimes fail to fully saturate the fabric leading to weak spots in the final shape.[20]
Advantages and limitations
[edit]FRP allows the alignment of the glass fibres of thermoplastics to suit specific design programs. Specifying the orientation of reinforcing fibres can increase the strength and resistance to deformation of the polymer. Glass reinforced polymers are strongest and most resistive to deforming forces when the polymers fibres are parallel to the force being exerted, and are weakest when the fibres are perpendicular. This alignment significantly enhances the tensile strength of the material along the fibre direction, making it ideal for load-bearing applications where directional strength is critical. Thus, this ability is at once both an advantage or a limitation depending on the context of use. Weak spots of perpendicular fibres can be used for natural hinges and connections, but can also lead to material failure when production processes fail to properly orient the fibres parallel to expected forces.[22] When forces are exerted perpendicular to the orientation of fibres, the strength and elasticity of the polymer is less than the matrix alone. In cast resin components made of glass reinforced polymers such as UP and EP, the orientation of fibres can be oriented in two-dimensional and three-dimensional weaves. This means that when forces are possibly perpendicular to one orientation, they are parallel to another orientation; this eliminates the potential for weak spots in the polymer.
Failure modes
[edit]Structural failure can occur in FRP materials when:
- Tensile forces stretch the matrix more than the fibres, causing the material to shear at the interface between matrix and fibres.
- Tensile forces near the end of the fibres exceed the tolerances of the matrix, separating the fibres from the matrix.
- Tensile forces can also exceed the tolerances of the fibres causing the fibres themselves to fracture leading to material failure.[17]
Failure Mechanisms
[edit]FRP composites can exhibit both micro-structural and macroscopic damage:
Micro-structural Damage
- Matrix micro-cracks, which are small cracks that form in the polymer matrix.
- Fibre-matrix debonding, which is when the reinforcing fibre and the matrix separate, indicating failure at the interface.
- Fibre breakage, which is the fracture of the fibres within the matrix.
- Crack coupling which is the interaction of multiple cracks within the materials as a whole.[23][24]
Macroscopic Damage
- Transverse cracks that occur perpendicular to the direction of the reinforcing fibres.
- Shear failure of the fibre bundles.
- Cracks in the matrix.
- Delamination between fibre bundles in a composite laminate.[25]
- Tensile failure of fibre bundles,
- Final fracture.[23][24]
Load Orientation
The type of load and its orientation with respect to the fibres affect what failure mechanisms are favoured.
- Low-angle impact: Favours abrasive wear that leads to surface wrinkling, increased roughness, and long cracks. Material shedding results after the resulting cracks link.[23]
- High-angle impact: Favours impact damage that leads to smaller cracks.[23]
- Compressive Loads: Channels created by fibre bundles act as critical damage points. Under compression, the fibres begin to buckle which can result in diagonal shear, or net compression depending on the orientation of the fibres.[23][24]
Failure Initiation
The sequence of failure initiation in composite laminates is highly variable, depending on the specific material system and the applied loading conditions. Damage growth can be initiated by either matrix-dominated or fibre-dominated failure mechanisms. However, the interface between layers often serves as a weak link; delamination is a common failure mode because interlaminar strength is typically the lowest in a laminated material, suggesting the interface is frequently the first to fail.[24][25]
Observed sequences of failure initiation provide further insight. Generally, the initial deterioration of composites under repeated loading often appears as a gradual loss of stiffness, which is attributed to failure or breakdown within the resin.[24] In adhesive joints, fracture can begin as debonding at the adhesive/adherend interface, fibre peel-off from the outermost lamina, or intra- or inter-laminar debonding within the composite adherends. It is notable that the relationship between resistance change and debonded area in these joints may not be unique when various micromechanisms are competing.[24][25]
Under tensile loading in microvascular composites, fibre damage in the 0° layers can initiate first, followed by resin damage in the 90° layers. In carbon-fibre reinforced polymer laminated plates subjected to tensile loading, the typical sequence observed is matrix tensile damage and microcrack formation in 90° plies, which then leads to delamination between plies, and ultimately, tensile failure of fibres in 0° plies.[23] Furthermore, ply cracking, where transverse stresses exceed the ply's capacity, can sometimes trigger subsequent delamination. A broken fibre can also initiate a transverse crack, which then contributes to reducing the overall transverse strength of the material.[24]
Material requirements
[edit]A thermoset polymer matrix material, or engineering grade thermoplastic polymer matrix material, must meet certain requirements in order to first be suitable for FRPs and ensure a successful reinforcement of itself. The matrix must be able to properly saturate, and preferably bond chemically with the fibre reinforcement for maximum adhesion within a suitable curing period. The matrix must also completely envelop the fibres to protect them from cuts and notches that would reduce their strength, and to transfer forces to the fibres. The fibres must also be kept separate from each other so that if failure occurs it is localised as much as possible, and if failure occurs the matrix must also debond from the fibre for similar reasons. Finally, the matrix should be of a plastic that remains chemically and physically stable during and after the reinforcement and moulding processes. To be suitable as reinforcement material, fibre additives must increase the tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of the matrix and meet the following conditions; fibres must exceed critical fibre content; the strength and rigidity of fibres itself must exceed the strength and rigidity of the matrix alone; and there must be optimum bonding between fibres and matrix
Glass fibre
[edit]"Fibreglass reinforced plastics" or FRPs (commonly referred to simply as fibreglass) use textile grade glass fibres. These textile fibres are different from other forms of glass fibres used to deliberately trap air, for insulating applications (see glass wool). Textile glass fibres begin as varying combinations of SiO2, Al2O3, B2O3, CaO, or MgO in powder form. These mixtures are then heated through direct melting to temperatures around 1300 degrees Celsius, after which dies are used to extrude filaments of glass fibre in diameter ranging from 9 to 17 μm. These filaments are then wound into larger threads and spun onto bobbins for transportation and further processing. Glass fibre is by far the most popular means to reinforce plastic and thus enjoys a wealth of production processes, some of which are applicable to aramid and carbon fibres as well owing to their shared fibrous qualities.
Roving is a process where filaments are spun into larger diameter threads. These threads are then commonly used for woven reinforcing glass fabrics and mats, and in spray applications.
Fibre fabrics (glass cloth, etc.) are web-form fabric reinforcing material that has both warp and weft directions. Fibre mats are web-form non-woven mats of glass fibres. Mats are manufactured in cut dimensions with chopped fibres, or in continuous mats using continuous fibres. Chopped fibre glass is used in processes where lengths of glass threads are cut between 3 and 26 mm, threads are then used in plastics most commonly intended for moulding processes. Glass fibre short strands are short 0.2–0.3 mm strands of glass fibres that are used to reinforce thermoplastics most commonly for injection moulding.
Carbon fibre
[edit]Carbon fibres are created when polyacrylonitrile fibres (PAN), Pitch resins, or Rayon are carbonised (through oxidation and thermal pyrolysis) at high temperatures. Through further processes of graphitising or stretching, the fibres strength or elasticity can be enhanced respectively. Carbon fibres are manufactured in diameters analogous to glass fibres with diameters ranging from 4 to 17 μm. These fibres wound into larger threads for transportation and further production processes.[17] Further production processes include weaving or braiding into carbon fabrics, cloths and mats analogous to those described for glass that can then be used in actual reinforcements.[18]
Aramid fibre
[edit]Aramid fibres are most commonly known as Kevlar, Nomex and Technora. Aramids are generally prepared by the reaction between an amine group and a carboxylic acid halide group (aramid);.[18] Commonly, this occurs when an aromatic polyamide is spun from a liquid concentration of sulphuric acid into a crystallised fibre.[17] Fibres are then spun into larger threads in order to weave into large ropes or woven fabrics (aramid).[18] Aramid fibres are manufactured with varying grades based on strength and rigidity, so that the material can be adapted to meet specific design requirements, such as cutting the tough material during manufacture.[17]
Example polymer and reinforcement combinations
[edit]| Reinforcing material[17] | Most common matrix materials | Properties improved |
|---|---|---|
| Glass fibres | UP, EP, PA, PC, POM, PP, PBT, VE | Strength, elasticity, heat resistance |
| Wood fibres | PE, PP, ABS, HDPE, PLA | Flexural strength, tensile modulus, tensile strength |
| Carbon and aramid fibres | EP, UP, VE, PA | Elasticity, tensile strength, compression strength, electrical strength. |
| Inorganic particulates | Semicrystalline thermoplastics, UP | Isotropic shrinkage, abrasion, compression strength |
| Microspheres | Glass microspheres | Weight reduction relative to solid fillers |
Applications
[edit]
Fibre-reinforced plastics are best suited for any design program that demands weight savings, precision engineering, definite tolerances, and the simplification of parts in both production and operation.The fibres provide strength and stiffness to the material, while the polymer matrix holds the fibres together and transfers loads between them. FRP composites have a wide range of applications across various industries due to their unique combination of properties, including high strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and design flexibility. A moulded polymer product is cheaper, faster, and easier to manufacture than a cast aluminium or steel product, and maintains similar and sometimes better tolerances and material strengths.
Carbon-fibre-reinforced polymers
[edit]Rudder of Airbus A310
- Disadvantages: hazards relating to hail stones, or bird impacts, while aircraft are flying or while on the ground[26][27][28]
- Advantages over a traditional rudder made from sheet aluminium are:
- 25% reduction in weight
- 95% reduction in components by combining parts and forms into simpler moulded parts.
- Overall reduction in production and operational costs, economy of parts results in lower production costs and the weight savings create fuel savings that lower the operational costs of flying the aeroplane.
Glass-fibre-reinforced polymers
[edit]Engine intake manifolds are made from glass-fibre-reinforced PA 66.
- Advantages this has over cast aluminium manifolds are:
- Up to a 60% reduction in weight
- Improved surface quality and aerodynamics
- Reduction in components by combining parts and forms into simpler moulded shapes.
Automotive gas and clutch pedals made from glass-fibre-reinforced PA 66 (DWP 12–13)
- Advantages over stamped aluminium are:
- Pedals can be moulded as single units combining both pedals and mechanical linkages simplifying the production and operation of the design.
- Fibres can be oriented to reinforce against specific stresses, increasing the durability and safety.
Aluminium windows, doors and façades are thermally insulated by using thermal insulation plastics made of glass fibre reinforced polyamide. In 1977 Ensinger GmbH produced first insulation profile for window systems.
Structural applications
[edit]FRP can be applied to strengthen the beams, columns,[29] and slabs of buildings and bridges. It is possible to increase the strength of structural members even after they have been severely damaged due to loading conditions. In the case of damaged reinforced concrete members, this would first require the repair of the member by removing loose debris and filling in cavities and cracks with mortar or epoxy resin. Once the member is repaired, strengthening can be achieved through wet, hand lay-up of fibre sheets impregnated with epoxy resin, applied to the cleaned and prepared surfaces of the member.
Two techniques are typically adopted for the strengthening of beams, depending on the strength enhancement desired: flexural strengthening or shear strengthening. In many cases it may be necessary to provide both strength enhancements. For the flexural strengthening of a beam, FRP sheets or plates are applied to the tension face of the member (the bottom face for a simply supported member with applied top loading or gravity loading). Principal tensile fibres are oriented parallel to the beam's longitudinal axis, similar to its internal flexural steel reinforcement. This increases the beam strength and its stiffness (load required to cause unit deflection), but decreases the deflection capacity and ductility.
For the shear strengthening of a beam, the FRP is applied on the web (sides) of a member with fibres oriented transverse to the beam's longitudinal axis. Resisting of shear forces is achieved in a similar manner as internal steel stirrups, by bridging shear cracks that form under applied loading. FRP can be applied in several configurations, depending on the exposed faces of the member and the degree of strengthening desired, this includes: side bonding, U-wraps (U-jackets), and closed wraps (complete wraps). Side bonding involves applying FRP to the sides of the beam only. It provides the least amount of shear strengthening due to failures caused by de-bonding from the concrete surface at the FRP free edges. For U-wraps, the FRP is applied continuously in a 'U' shape around the sides and bottom (tension) face of the beam. If all faces of a beam are accessible, the use of closed wraps is desirable as they provide the most strength enhancement. Closed wrapping involves applying FRP around the entire perimeter of the member, such that there are no free ends and the typical failure mode is rupture of the fibres. For all wrap configurations, the FRP can be applied along the length of the member as a continuous sheet or as discrete strips, having a predefined minimum width and spacing.
Slabs may be strengthened by applying FRP strips at their bottom (tension) face. This will result in better flexural performance, since the tensile resistance of the slabs is supplemented by the tensile strength of FRP. In the case of beams and slabs, the effectiveness of FRP strengthening depends on the performance of the resin chosen for bonding. This is particularly an issue for shear strengthening using side bonding or U-wraps. Columns are typically wrapped with FRP around their perimeter, as with closed or complete wrapping. This not only results in higher shear resistance, but more crucial for column design, it results in increased compressive strength under axial loading. The FRP wrap works by restraining the lateral expansion of the column, which can enhance confinement in a similar manner as spiral reinforcement does for the column core.[30][31]
Elevator cable
[edit]In June 2013, KONE elevator company announced Ultrarope for use as a replacement for steel cables in elevators. It seals the carbon fibres in high-friction polymer. Unlike steel cable, Ultrarope was designed for buildings that require up to 1,000 m (3,300 ft) of lift. Steel elevators top out at 500 m (1,600 ft). The company estimated that in a 500 m (1,600 ft) high building, an elevator would use 15% less electrical power than a steel-cabled version. As of June 2013, the product had passed all European Union and United States certification tests.[32]
Design considerations
[edit]FRP is used in designs that require a measure of strength or modulus of elasticity for which non-reinforced plastics and other material choices are ill-suited, either mechanically or economically. The primary design consideration for using FRP is to ensure that the material is used economically and in a manner that takes advantage of its specific structural characteristics, but this is not always the case. The orientation of fibres creates a material weakness perpendicular to the fibres. Thus the use of fibre reinforcement and their orientation affects the strength, rigidity, elasticity and hence the functionality of the final product itself. Orienting the fibres either unidirectionally, 2-dimensionally, or 3-dimensionally during production affects the strength, flexibility, and elasticity of the final product. Fibres oriented in the direction of applied forces display greater resistance to distortion from these forces, thus areas of a product that must withstand forces will be reinforced with fibres oriented parallel to the forces, and areas that require flexibility, such as natural hinges, will have fibres oriented perpendicular to the forces.
Orienting the fibres in more dimensions avoids this either-or scenario and creates objects that seek to avoid any specific weakness due to the unidirectional orientation of fibres. The properties of strength, flexibility and elasticity can also be magnified or diminished through the geometric shape and design of the final product. For example, ensuring proper wall thickness and creating multifunctional geometric shapes that can be moulded as a single piece enhances the material and structural integrity of the product by reducing the requirements for joints, connections, and hardware.[17]
Disposal and recycling concerns
[edit]As a subset of plastic, FR plastics are liable to a number of the issues and concerns in plastic waste disposal and recycling. Plastics pose a particular challenge in recycling because they are derived from polymers and monomers that often cannot be separated and returned to their virgin states. For this reason not all plastics can be recycled for re-use, in fact some estimates claim only 20–30% of plastics can be recycled at all. Fibre-reinforced plastics and their matrices share these disposal and environmental concerns. Investigation of safe disposal methods has led to two main variations involving the application of intense heat: in one binding agents are burned off—in the process recapturing some of the sunk material cost in the form of heat—and incombustible elements captured by filtration; in the other the incombustible material is burned in a cement kiln, the fibres becoming an integral part of the resulting cast material.[33] In addition to concerns regarding safe disposal, the fact that the fibres themselves are difficult to remove from the matrix and preserve for re-use means FRP's amplify these challenges. FRP's are inherently difficult to separate into base materials, that is into fibre and matrix, and the matrix is difficult to separate into usable plastics, polymers, and monomers. These are all concerns for environmentally-informed design today. Plastics do often offer savings in energy and economic savings in comparison to other materials. In addition, with the advent of new more environmentally friendly matrices such as bioplastics and UV-degradable plastics, FRP will gain environmental sensitivity.[18]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Amato, Ivan (29 March 1999). "The Time 100: Leo Baekeland". Time. Archived from the original on 4 January 2007.
- ^ Trueman, C N (17 March 2015). "Plastic". The History Learning Site.
- ^ "New Chemical Substance" (PDF). The New York Times. 6 February 1909.
- ^ Synthetic Resin – Use in Aircraft Construction, The Times, London England, 5 October 1936, page 14, Issue 47497
- ^ US Patent Number 2133235: Method & Apparatus for Making Glass Wool First Slayter glass wool patent, 1933.
- ^ 50 years of reinforced plastic boats, George Marsh, 8 October 2006, http://www.reinforcedplastics.com/view/1461/50-years-of-reinforced-plastic-boats-/ Archived 6 August 2010 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Notable Progress – the use of plastics, Evening Post, Wellington, New Zealand, Volume CXXVIII, Issue 31, 5 August 1939, Page 28
- ^ Car of the future in plastics, The Mercury (Hobart, Tasmania), Monday 27 May 1946, page 16
- ^ "Post war automobile". Bradford Daily Record. 28 March 1941. p. 12. Retrieved 17 June 2015 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Post war automobile". The Corpus Christi Times. 12 January 1942. p. 3. Retrieved 17 June 2015 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ "Plastic planes from molds is plan of army". Greeley Daily Tribune. 24 June 1938. p. 2. Retrieved 12 August 2015 – via Newspapers.com.
- ^ American Warplanes of World War II, David Donald, Aerospace Publishing Limited, 1995, pages 251–252, ISBN 1-874023-72-7
- ^ Accelerating utilization of new materials, National Research Council (U.S.) Committee on Accelerated Utilization of New Materials, Washington, National Academy of Sciences – National Academy of Engineering, Springfield, Va, 1971, pages 56–57 by W P Conrardy
- ^ Moulded glass fibre Sandwich Fuselages for BT-15 Airplane, Army Air Force Technical Report 5159, 8 November 1944
- ^ Reinforced plastics handbook; Donald V. Rosato, Dominick V. Rosato, and John Murphy; Elsevier; 2004; page 586
- ^ Bernadette, Tim; Bensaude-Vincent, Palucka (19 October 2002). "Composites Overview". History of Recent Science & Technology.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Erhard, Gunter. Designing with Plastics. Trans. Martin Thompson. Munich: Hanser Publishers, 2006.
- ^ a b c d e Smallman, R. E., and R.J. Bishop. Modern Physical Metallurgy and Materials Engineering. 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999.
- ^ Tong, L, A.P. Mouritz, and M.k. Bannister. 3D Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Composites. Oxford: Elsevier, 2002.
- ^ a b c d e f g "Quatro Composites Processes 101: Molding Carbon Composite Parts". 15 February 2008. Archived from the original on 15 February 2008. Retrieved 2 April 2018.
- ^ Dogan, Fatih; Hadavinia, Homayoun; Donchev, Todor; Bhonge, Prasannakumar S. (5 August 2012). "Delamination of impacted composite structures by cohesive zone interface elements and tiebreak contact". Central European Journal of Engineering. 2 (4): 612–626. Bibcode:2012CEJE....2..612D. doi:10.2478/s13531-012-0018-0. hdl:10057/16013.
- ^ Huo, L.; Kassapoglou, C.; Alderliesten, R. C. (1 July 2024). "Effect of pre-existing damage on delamination growth in repeatedly indented composites". Materials & Design. 243 113068. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113068. ISSN 0264-1275.
- ^ a b c d e f Cheng, Xiaoquan; Huang, Wenjun; Zhang, Qian (22 January 2025). "Damage and Failure Analysis of Polymer-Based Composites". Polymers. 17 (3): 272. doi:10.3390/polym17030272. ISSN 2073-4360. PMC 11820979. PMID 39940475.
- ^ a b c d e f g Noor, A. K.; Shuart, M. J.; Starnes, J. H.; Williams, J. G. (1 August 1983). "Failure Analysis and Mechanisms of Failure of Fibrous Composite Structures".
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ a b c Wisnom, M. R. (28 April 2012). "The role of delamination in failure of fibre-reinforced composites". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 370 (1965): 1850–1870. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0441. ISSN 1364-503X.
- ^ Salamone, Salvatore; Bartoli, Ivan; Di Leo, Patrizia; Lanza Di Scala, Francesco; Ajovalasit, Augusto; D'Acquisto, Leonardo; Rhymer, Jennifer; Kim, Hyonny (1 June 2010). "High-velocity Impact Location on Aircraft Panels Using Macro-fiber Composite Piezoelectric Rosettes". Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 21 (9): 887–896. doi:10.1177/1045389X10368450. ISSN 1045-389X.
- ^ Kim, Hyonny; Welch, Douglas A; Kedward, Keith T (1 January 2003). "Experimental investigation of high velocity ice impacts on woven carbon/epoxy composite panels". Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 34 (1): 25–41. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00258-0. ISSN 1359-835X.
- ^ Appleby-Thomas, Gareth J.; Hazell, Paul J.; Dahini, Gussan (1 September 2011). "On the response of two commercially-important CFRP structures to multiple ice impacts". Composite Structures. 93 (10): 2619–2627. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.029. ISSN 0263-8223.
- ^ Naderpour, H.; Nagai, K.; Fakharian, P.; Haji, M. (1 May 2019). "Innovative models for prediction of compressive strength of FRP-confined circular reinforced concrete columns using soft computing methods". Composite Structures. 215: 69–84. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.048. ISSN 0263-8223. S2CID 139800570.
- ^ Megalooikonomou, Konstantinos G.; Monti, Giorgio; Santini, Silvia (2012). "Constitutive Model for Fiber –Reinforced Polymer - and Tie – Confined Concrete". ACI Structural Journal. 109 (4): 569–578. doi:10.14359/51683876.
- ^ Megalooikonomou, Konstantinos G.; Papavasileiou, Georgios S. (2019). "Analytical stress-strain model for FRP-confined rectangular RC columns". Frontiers in Built Environment. 5: 39. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2019.00039.
- ^ "UltraRope announced to one-stop zoom up tall buildings". Phys.org. Retrieved 13 June 2013.
- ^ "Composites Recycling Report 2010" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 December 2017.
Fibre-reinforced plastic
View on GrokipediaOverview
Definition and Composition
Fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP), also known as fibre-reinforced polymer, is a composite material consisting of a polymer matrix reinforced with fibres to enhance mechanical properties such as strength and stiffness.[4] The fibres, typically high-strength materials like glass or carbon, serve as the primary load-bearing component, while the polymer matrix acts as a binder that distributes loads and shields the fibres from damage.[5] This combination results in a material that is lightweight yet durable, outperforming many traditional materials in specific applications.[2] The composition of FRP comprises two main phases: the reinforcing fibres (which can be continuous or discontinuous) and the continuous matrix. The fibre phase provides the structural integrity and resistance to deformation, carrying the majority of applied loads, whereas the matrix phase facilitates stress transfer between fibres, maintains their relative positions, and offers protection against environmental factors like moisture and corrosion.[6] Typical volume fractions of fibres in FRP range from 20% to 70%, influencing the overall density and performance; higher fractions generally yield greater stiffness but may complicate processing.[7] The interaction between the fibre and matrix occurs primarily at the interface, where chemical bonding or mechanical interlocking enables efficient load transfer from the matrix to the fibres, optimizing the composite's strength.[6] Fibre orientation within the matrix imparts anisotropic properties to FRP, meaning its mechanical behaviour—such as tensile strength and modulus—varies significantly with direction, unlike isotropic materials.[8] "FRP" denotes polymer-matrix composites, distinguishing them from other fibre-reinforced systems like metal-matrix composites, which use metallic matrices for higher-temperature applications.[9]Classification
Fibre-reinforced plastics (FRPs) are classified primarily based on the type of reinforcing fibre, the nature of the polymer matrix, and the structural arrangement of the fibres within the composite, which influence their processing, performance, and applications.[10] This categorization helps in standardizing nomenclature and selecting materials for specific uses, such as structural components in aerospace or automotive industries.[11] Classification by fibre type focuses on the reinforcing material, which provides the primary load-bearing capacity. Common types include glass-fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP), which uses E-glass or S-glass fibres for cost-effective, corrosion-resistant applications; carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP), employing high-modulus carbon fibres for superior stiffness and strength-to-weight ratios in high-performance structures; and aramid-fibre-reinforced polymer (AFRP), incorporating aramid fibres like Kevlar for enhanced impact resistance and toughness.[10] Other variants, such as basalt-fibre-reinforced polymer (BFRP), are less common but offer similar benefits to GFRP with added environmental resistance.[12] By matrix material, FRPs are divided into thermoset and thermoplastic categories, with further distinctions based on fibre length. Thermoset matrices, such as epoxy, polyester, or vinyl ester resins, undergo irreversible chemical cross-linking during curing, resulting in rigid, heat-resistant composites suitable for load-bearing parts.[10] In contrast, thermoplastic matrices like polypropylene or nylon allow melting and reshaping, enabling recyclability and faster processing, though they may exhibit lower thermal stability.[11] Within these, short or discontinuous fibres (lengths typically ranging from a few millimeters to several centimeters) produce more isotropic properties for injection-molded components, while continuous fibres (longer than the part dimensions) yield anisotropic, high-strength materials for laminated structures.[13] Structural classification addresses fibre orientation and arrangement, affecting directional properties. Laminates consist of stacked plies of fibre-reinforced layers bonded together, often used in aerospace panels. Unidirectional structures align fibres parallel in one direction for maximum strength along that axis, whereas woven or bidirectional fabrics interlace fibres at 90 degrees for balanced in-plane performance. Hybrid composites combine multiple fibre types, such as carbon and glass, to optimize cost and properties, while distinctions between short-fibre and long-fibre reinforcements mirror matrix-based categories but emphasize architectural layout.[10][14] Nomenclature for FRPs follows international standards to ensure consistency. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) define terms like GFRP and CFRP, with ISO 8605 specifying requirements for sheet moulding compound (SMC)—a ready-to-mold sheet of resin-impregnated chopped fibres—and ISO 8606 for bulk moulding compound (BMC), a paste-like mix of short fibres and resin for compression molding.[15][16] ASTM D8335 provides guidelines for identifying polymer-matrix composites, including fibre and matrix types.[17] These standards promote uniform terminology across industries, avoiding ambiguity in specifications.History
Early Development
The concept of fibre reinforcement in composite materials traces its roots to ancient civilizations, where natural fibres such as straw were incorporated into mud bricks to enhance tensile strength and prevent cracking during drying. Around 1500 B.C., Egyptian and Mesopotamian builders used straw to reinforce mud bricks, pottery, and even boat structures, marking early precursors to modern fibre-reinforced plastics (FRP) by improving the mechanical integrity of brittle matrices.[18] In the early 20th century, synthetic attempts began to emerge with the development of phenolic resins like Bakelite, invented in 1907 by Leo Baekeland, which were often filled with natural or mineral fillers to improve properties, though continuous fibre reinforcement remained limited. By the 1920s, advancements in resins paved the way for experimentation with synthetic composites, but true fibre-reinforced systems awaited further innovations in fibres and matrices.[19] The modern era of FRP began in the 1930s with the invention of continuous glass fibres, patented in 1933 by Games Slayter of Owens-Illinois Glass Company, enabling the production of strong, lightweight reinforcements. In 1938, Owens-Illinois merged with Corning Glass Works to form Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, which commercialized the flame-drawn glass fibre process, making it viable for composite applications. Concurrently, unsaturated polyester resins were patented in 1936, providing a curable matrix that could bond effectively with glass fibres; key contributors included Carleton Ellis, who patented polyester formulations in 1933, and British engineer Richard Hill, who explored resin-fibre combinations. The first commercial FRP boat, a dinghy constructed by Ray Greene using Owens-Corning glass fibres and American Cyanamid polyester resin, was built in 1942 in Toledo, Ohio, demonstrating practical viability.[20][21][22] During World War II, FRP saw critical applications due to its radar transparency and lightweight strength, particularly in aircraft radomes that protected radar equipment without interfering with signals and in military boats for non-metallic hulls. These uses accelerated production and refinement, with Owens-Corning supplying materials for such components. However, early FRP faced challenges including poor fibre-matrix adhesion leading to delamination and inherent brittleness of the resin, which limited load-bearing capacity. These issues were addressed in the 1940s through the development of silane coupling agents, organosilicon compounds that formed chemical bridges between glass fibres and polyester resins, significantly improving interfacial bonding and mechanical performance.[23][24]Key Milestones and Advancements
Following World War II, fibre-reinforced plastics (FRPs) saw rapid commercialization in the 1950s, particularly glass fibre-reinforced plastic (GFRP) for consumer goods. The 1953 Chevrolet Corvette marked a pivotal milestone as the first mass-produced car with a GFRP body, enabling lighter designs and complex shapes that traditional metals could not achieve, produced by Molded Fiber Glass Company under General Motors' direction.[25] In 1958, Union Carbide's Roger Bacon discovered high-performance carbon fibres, initially as graphite whiskers from petroleum pitch, laying the foundation for carbon fibre-reinforced plastics (CFRPs) with superior strength-to-weight ratios.[26] The 1960s further advanced aramid fibres, with DuPont's Stephanie Kwolek inventing Kevlar in 1965—a para-aramid fibre offering exceptional tensile strength and impact resistance for high-performance FRPs.[27] The 1980s and 1990s witnessed an aerospace boom driven by CFRPs, with increased adoption in aircraft structures for weight reduction and fuel efficiency. Automation in manufacturing processes, such as filament winding, emerged as a key advancement; continuous filament winding, refined from 1970s innovations, enabled precise, high-volume production of cylindrical FRP components like pressure vessels by the 1980s through computer-controlled machines.[28] This culminated in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner's 2011 entry into service, where CFRP comprised 50% of the airframe by weight, reducing overall aircraft weight by 20% compared to aluminum designs and setting a benchmark for composite-intensive aviation.[29] From the 2010s to 2025, sustainability drove FRP innovations, including bio-based resins derived from plant oils and lignin, which reduced reliance on petroleum and lowered carbon footprints while maintaining mechanical integrity in composites.[11][30] Recycled carbon fibres gained traction, with processes like pyrolysis enabling recovery of carbon fibres that retain up to 90% of their original tensile strength from end-of-life parts, supporting circular economies in aerospace and automotive sectors.[31] Integration in electric vehicles accelerated, exemplified by the 2013 BMW i3, the first mass-produced car with a CFRP passenger cell, cutting body weight by 50% versus steel for extended range.[32] Nano-enhanced FRPs, incorporating carbon nanotubes or graphene, improved lightweighting by boosting stiffness and toughness by 20-50% in targeted applications.[33] Key patents, such as US6306474B1 (2001) for hybrid carbon-high-elongation fibre FRPs, enabled tailored high-strength hybrids combining multiple fibre types for optimized performance.[34] The global FRP market expanded significantly, reaching approximately $111 billion by 2025, fueled by demand in automotive, aerospace, and construction, with a compound annual growth rate of about 6% from 2020 onward.[35]Materials
Reinforcing Fibres
Reinforcing fibres are the primary load-bearing components in fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) composites, providing enhanced tensile strength, stiffness, and durability compared to the matrix material alone. These fibres, typically inorganic or synthetic, are embedded within the polymer matrix to transfer stresses effectively and improve overall mechanical performance. Common fibres include glass, carbon, and aramid, each selected for specific attributes such as strength-to-weight ratio and environmental resistance.[36] Glass fibres, the most widely used in FRP due to their low cost and balanced properties, are produced by melting silica-based raw materials at high temperatures (around 1400–1500°C) and drawing the molten glass through platinum-rhodium bushings to form continuous filaments. E-glass, composed primarily of silica, alumina, and calcium oxide, offers a tensile strength of approximately 3.4 GPa and a modulus of 72 GPa, making it suitable for general-purpose applications where electrical insulation is needed. S-glass, with a higher silica and alumina content from the Mg-Si-Al-O system, provides superior tensile strength up to 4.6 GPa and better fatigue resistance, though at a higher cost. Both types exhibit good corrosion resistance in alkaline environments but are susceptible to moisture absorption over time.[37][38][39] Carbon fibres, valued for their exceptional stiffness and lightweight nature, are manufactured through pyrolysis of organic precursors, involving stabilization, carbonization at 1000–1500°C, and graphitization up to 3000°C to align carbon layers. PAN-based carbon fibres, derived from polyacrylonitrile precursors via polymerization and wet spinning, dominate commercial production and achieve tensile strengths of 3–7 GPa with moduli around 230–590 GPa, offering high strength but lower thermal conductivity. In contrast, pitch-based fibres, produced from mesophase pitch through melt spinning and high-temperature treatment, yield higher moduli up to 500–900 GPa and excellent thermal properties (e.g., conductivity >100 W/m·K), though with reduced tensile strength (2–4 GPa) due to their more graphitic structure. These fibres provide superior density (1.7–2.0 g/cm³) and corrosion resistance, ideal for demanding structural uses.[40][41][42] Aramid fibres, such as Kevlar, are synthetic polyamides produced via solution polymerization of aromatic monomers in a solvent, followed by spinning and drawing to orient the polymer chains, resulting in a highly crystalline structure. Kevlar exhibits a tensile strength of about 3.6 GPa, a modulus of 130 GPa, and exceptional impact resistance due to its ability to absorb energy through fibrillar deformation. With a low density of 1.44 g/cm³ and inherent resistance to chemicals and abrasion, aramid fibres are particularly effective in applications requiring toughness and vibration damping.[43][44][45] Emerging alternatives include basalt fibres, formed by melting basalt rock at 1400–1600°C and drawing it into filaments similar to glass production, offering tensile strengths of 3–4.8 GPa, moduli of 80–90 GPa, and enhanced chemical resistance without the need for additives. Recent developments in the 2020s focus on surface modifications to improve fibre-matrix bonding, significantly boosting composite toughness. Natural fibres like flax, harvested and processed into yarns through retting and scutching, provide sustainable options with tensile strengths of 0.5–1.5 GPa and densities around 1.5 g/cm³; 2020s advancements in hybrid eco-FRP emphasize their renewability and reduced carbon footprint, though challenges remain in moisture sensitivity.[46][47][48] Reinforcing fibres are available in various forms to suit manufacturing needs: continuous filaments for unidirectional tapes, rovings as untwisted bundles of 200–800 filaments wound on spools for weaving or filament winding, and chopped strands (typically 3–50 mm long) for injection molding or mats. Surface treatments, known as sizing (thin polymer coatings applied during production), enhance matrix adhesion by 30–50%, reducing voids and improving load transfer while protecting against mechanical damage.[49][50][51] Selection of reinforcing fibres in FRP depends on key criteria including cost (e.g., glass at $1–2/kg vs. carbon at $10–20/kg), density for weight optimization, and corrosion resistance for harsh environments like marine or chemical exposure. Glass and basalt excel in cost-effectiveness and alkali resistance, while carbon and aramid prioritize high performance in low-density, fatigue-prone scenarios; sustainability drives adoption of natural fibres where environmental impact is critical.[36][52][48]Matrix Materials
The matrix in fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) composites primarily binds the reinforcing fibres together, transfers stresses between them, and protects the fibres from environmental damage.[53] Polymer matrices are typically either thermosetting or thermoplastic resins, selected based on the desired balance of mechanical performance, processability, and cost.[54] Thermoset matrices dominate FRP applications due to their high thermal stability and dimensional stability after curing. Epoxy resins are widely used for their superior mechanical strength and adhesion, achieved through a dense cross-linked network formed during curing, which enhances load-bearing capacity in high-performance composites.[55][56] Unsaturated polyester resins offer a cost-effective option, often dissolved in styrene as a reactive diluent to facilitate polymerization and reduce viscosity during processing.[57][58] Vinyl ester resins, hybrids of epoxy and polyester chemistries, provide excellent corrosion resistance to acids, alkalis, and oxidizing agents, making them suitable for harsh environments.[59] Thermoplastic matrices, such as polypropylene and nylon, enable easier processing through melting and remolding, with advantages in recyclability via re-melting and reprocessing, supporting closed-loop material cycles.[60] Polypropylene is valued for its toughness and low cost, while nylon offers good chemical resistance and elasticity; however, both exhibit lower heat resistance compared to thermosets, limiting their use in high-temperature applications.[11][61] In FRP, the chemistry of resins ensures effective stress transfer from fibres to the matrix under shear loads, while low viscosity promotes wetting and impregnation of fibres for strong interfacial bonding.[62][63] Curing involves hardeners or catalysts that initiate polymerization: amines or anhydrides act as hardeners in epoxies to form cross-links, while peroxides like methyl ethyl ketone peroxide catalyze free-radical polymerization in polyesters and vinyl esters, controlling gel time and cure rate.[64] Additives modify resin properties for enhanced performance; fillers such as calcium carbonate reduce cost and shrinkage, while tougheners like rubber particles or core-shell polymers improve impact resistance by dissipating energy in the matrix.[65][66] Recent developments include bio-based resins, such as soy-based epoxies derived from epoxidized soybean oil, which offer sustainability benefits like renewability and reduced petroleum dependence; these have been commercialized since the 2010s for composite applications, blending up to 50% bio-content while maintaining mechanical integrity. As of 2025, advancements have enabled bio-based epoxy systems with up to 80% bio-content, compatible with various fibers, and commercial adoptions of bio-based unsaturated polyester resins achieving a 20% reduction in CO2 footprint.[67][68][69][70]Manufacturing Processes
Fibre Preparation
Fibre preparation involves processing raw reinforcing fibres, such as glass, carbon, or aramid, into structured forms like fabrics or preforms prior to matrix integration to ensure optimal alignment and handling in composite manufacturing.[2] This stage focuses on creating stable architectures that maximize load transfer while minimizing defects like waviness or misalignment. Fabric manufacture typically employs weaving, braiding, or knitting techniques to produce two-dimensional (2D) reinforcements. In weaving, plain weave alternates warp and weft fibres over one another for high stability and balanced properties, while satin weaves, such as 4- or 8-harness variants, allow longer floats for enhanced drapeability over complex contours without excessive crimp.[71] Braiding interlaces fibres helically around a mandrel to form tubular or near-net-shape preforms suitable for cylindrical components, offering good conformability and through-thickness reinforcement.[72] Knitting uses interlocking loops to create flexible fabrics that can incorporate multiple fibre orientations, though it may introduce more crimp than weaving.[73] Non-crimped fabrics (NCFs), produced by layering unidirectional fibre sheets and securing them via stitching or knitting, provide superior axial alignment and higher stiffness compared to traditional woven fabrics, as the absence of crimp reduces fibre waviness and enhances composite strength.[74] For preform creation in complex geometries, three-dimensional (3D) weaving integrates fibres in multiple directions on specialized looms, enabling near-net-shape structures that improve interlaminar strength and reduce the need for secondary assembly.[75] Stitching binds stacked 2D fabrics with through-thickness yarns to form multilayer preforms, enhancing stability for intricate shapes like T-joints or I-beams.[2] Binder application, often using powder, liquid, or reactive epoxy systems, further stabilizes these preforms by adhering fibres without fully impregnating them, maintaining permeability for subsequent processing while preventing distortion during handling; binder content is typically limited to 2-5% by weight to avoid resin-rich zones.[76] Chopped fibres for short-fibre composites are produced by cutting continuous rovings into segments of typically 3-25 mm length using rotary blades or guillotines, followed by dispersion in air, water, or polymer carriers to form random mats or aligned bundles.[77] Alignment techniques, such as flow moulding, direct fibre orientation during compression or injection by shear forces in the mould, achieving partial unidirectional arrangement that boosts directional stiffness over isotropic distributions.[78] Quality control in fibre preparation emphasizes verifying fibre volume fraction (V_f), typically 40-60% for structural composites, through non-destructive methods like image analysis of cross-sections or micro-CT scanning to detect variations that could compromise uniformity.[79] As of 2025, advancements include AI-enhanced robotic systems for precise weaving and preform manipulation, which improve repeatability, reduce defects, and enable scalable production of customized architectures.[80]Forming and Curing Techniques
Fibre-reinforced plastics (FRPs) are formed by integrating reinforcing fibres with a matrix material, typically a polymer resin, through various moulding techniques that ensure proper wetting, alignment, and consolidation. Open moulding processes, such as wet lay-up, involve manually placing layers of dry fibres or preforms into an open mould, followed by application of liquid resin using brushes, rollers, or squeegees to achieve uniform impregnation and remove air voids.[81] This hand lamination method is versatile for complex shapes and low-volume production, relying on the operator's skill to control fibre volume fraction, often around 40-60%, and minimize defects like dry spots.[82] Another open moulding variant, spray-up or chopper gun technique, sprays chopped fibres and resin simultaneously onto the mould surface, suitable for large, irregular structures like boat hulls, where the mechanical action of the spray promotes mixing but can lead to inconsistent fibre orientation.[81] Closed moulding techniques offer higher precision and automation for medium- to high-volume applications. In compression moulding, sheet moulding compound (SMC) or bulk moulding compound (BMC)—pre-impregnated fibre-resin mats or pastes—are placed in a heated mould and pressed under high pressure, typically 50-100 bar, to flow and cure into the final shape, enabling efficient production of automotive parts with fibre contents up to 20-30 wt% (equivalent to approximately 15-25 vol%).[82][83] Resin transfer moulding (RTM) entails injecting liquid resin into a closed mould containing a dry fibre preform under vacuum or pressure (1-10 bar), ensuring complete infiltration without excess resin waste; variants like vacuum-assisted RTM (VARTM) use atmospheric pressure to draw resin through the preform, reducing tooling costs for large panels.[81] Advanced forming methods target specific geometries and performance needs. Filament winding applies continuous fibres, tensioned and impregnated with resin, onto a rotating mandrel to create cylindrical or spherical structures like pressure vessels, where the winding angle controls anisotropic strength, often achieving fibre volume fractions over 60%.[84] Pultrusion produces constant-cross-section profiles by pulling fibre rovings through a resin bath and then a heated die for simultaneous impregnation and curing, ideal for structural beams with high throughput rates up to several meters per minute.[82] For high-quality laminates, autoclave processing or vacuum bagging consolidates prepregs under elevated pressure (up to 6 bar) and temperature in a sealed bag or chamber, expelling volatiles and achieving void contents below 1%, commonly used in aerospace components.[81] Emerging techniques as of 2025 include additive manufacturing, such as fused deposition modeling (FDM) or fused filament fabrication (FFF) with continuous fiber reinforcement, which extrudes resin-impregnated fibers layer-by-layer to produce complex, lightweight parts; however, challenges like fiber alignment and interfacial bonding limit mechanical performance compared to traditional methods, making it suitable for prototyping and low-volume specialized applications.[85] Curing solidifies the resin matrix through chemical cross-linking, influenced by heat, light, or other energies. Thermal curing, the most prevalent, heats the composite in ovens or autoclaves to 120-180°C for epoxies, with cycle times of 1-4 hours depending on thickness, promoting uniform polymerization while managing exothermic reactions to avoid thermal gradients.[86] UV curing accelerates thin-layer processing by exposing resin to ultraviolet light, completing in seconds to minutes via photoinitiators, though limited to transparent or surface-exposed parts due to light penetration constraints.[86] Microwave curing offers volumetric heating for faster cycles (10-30 minutes) at 2-10 GHz frequencies, reducing energy use by targeting the resin directly, but requires susceptors for uniform distribution in thick sections.[86] Hybrid out-of-autoclave (OOA) methods, emerging in the 2010s, combine vacuum bagging with controlled heating to achieve autoclave-like quality without high-pressure vessels, lowering costs for large structures while maintaining mechanical integrity through optimized resin flows.[87]Properties and Performance
Mechanical and Physical Properties
Fibre-reinforced plastics (FRPs) exhibit highly anisotropic mechanical properties, primarily governed by the orientation and type of reinforcing fibres within the polymer matrix. In the longitudinal direction aligned with the fibres, carbon fibre-reinforced plastic (CFRP) achieves tensile strengths up to 2000 MPa, while glass fibre-reinforced plastic (GFRP) typically ranges from 400 to 800 MPa. Compressive strengths are lower due to buckling tendencies in fibres, with CFRP values around 375 MPa and GFRP around 200-500 MPa. These properties derive from the high-strength fibres, such as carbon fibres with inherent tensile strengths exceeding 3 GPa, combined with the matrix's role in load transfer.[88][89][90] The elastic modulus of FRPs is also direction-dependent, with longitudinal values for CFRP reaching 50-200 GPa based on fibre volume fraction, compared to 20-50 GPa for GFRP. This anisotropy arises because properties in the transverse direction (perpendicular to fibres) are dominated by the softer matrix, often 5-10 times lower than longitudinal values. The longitudinal modulus can be estimated using the rule of mixtures, a micromechanical model that assumes perfect bonding and isostrain conditions: where is the composite modulus, and are the volume fractions of fibre and matrix (with ), and and are the fibre and matrix moduli, respectively. Fibre orientation further influences performance; unidirectional 0° layups maximize tensile and modulus values, whereas 90° orientations reduce them significantly, and quasi-isotropic layups provide balanced but lower overall stiffness. The ASTM D3039 standard governs tensile testing of polymer matrix composites, specifying specimen preparation and strain measurement to ensure consistent evaluation of these properties.[91][92][93] Under cyclic loading, FRPs demonstrate favourable fatigue resistance, with CFRP maintaining integrity for over 10^6 cycles at stress levels below 60% of ultimate strength, though stiffness degrades by up to 50% due to matrix cracking and fibre-matrix debonding. Creep, the time-dependent deformation under constant load, is more evident in the matrix-dominated transverse direction or at elevated temperatures above 50°C, where viscoelastic effects cause up to 1-2% strain over thousands of hours; fibre reinforcement mitigates this in the longitudinal direction. Manufacturing defects like voids (reducing effective fibre volume) or fibre misalignment (altering load paths) can decrease tensile strength by 10-20%, emphasizing the need for quality control in processing.[94][95][96] Physically, FRPs offer densities of 1.5-2.0 g/cm³, approximately 70-80% lighter than steel (7.8 g/cm³) or aluminium (2.7 g/cm³), enabling high specific strength. The coefficient of thermal expansion is low in the fibre direction, ranging from 0-5 × 10^{-6}/°C for CFRP and 5-10 × 10^{-6}/°C for GFRP, compared to 10-20 × 10^{-6}/°C transversely, which helps minimize dimensional changes in structures. Corrosion resistance stems from the inert polymer matrix, preventing degradation in harsh environments like marine or chemical settings, unlike metallic materials.[97][98][99] Hybrid FRPs, combining glass and carbon fibres, achieve balanced properties for cost-sensitive applications, with tensile strengths of 800-1500 MPa and moduli of 40-100 GPa, leveraging carbon's stiffness and glass's affordability and impact resistance. Recent studies on glass-carbon hybrids report flexural strengths up to 500 MPa, with reduced variability in fatigue performance transitioning from carbon-dominant at high stresses to glass-dominant at low stresses. These hybrids maintain low densities (1.6-1.8 g/cm³) and enhanced transverse thermal expansion control.[100][101]| Property | GFRP Typical Value | CFRP Typical Value | Hybrid (Glass-Carbon) Typical Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile Strength (MPa) | 400-800 | 1000-2000 | 800-1500 |
| Longitudinal Modulus (GPa) | 20-50 | 50-200 | 40-100 |
| Density (g/cm³) | 1.8-2.0 | 1.5-1.6 | 1.6-1.8 |
| Longitudinal CTE (×10^{-6}/°C) | 5-10 | 0-5 | 2-7 |
