Hubbry Logo
GarveyismGarveyismMain
Open search
Garveyism
Community hub
Garveyism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Garveyism
Garveyism
Garveyism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of a series on
Pan-Africanism
Pan-African flag
Symbols
Ideologies
Organizations
People
Dynamics
Related
This article is part of a series on
Black power
History
Ideologies
Organizations
People
Works
Related
Part of a series on
African Americans
History
Periods
Aspects
Migrations
Culture
Lifeways
Schools
Academic study
Celebrations
Economic class
Symbols and ideas
Religion
Institutions
Theologies
Non-Christian groups
Politics
Organizations
Ideologies
Civic/economic groups
Organizations
Sports
Athletic associations and conferences
Sub-communities
Multiethnic
Specific ancestries
Sexual orientation
Dialects and languages
English dialects
Languages and other dialects
Population
US states
US cities
Historic places
Population count
Diaspora
Prejudice
Racism
Stereotypes and media depictions

Garveyism is an aspect of black nationalism that refers to the economic, racial and political policies of UNIA-ACL founder Marcus Garvey.[1][2]

Ethiopia, thou land of our fathers,
Thou land where the gods loved to be,
As storm cloud at night suddenly gathers
Our armies come rushing to thee.
We must in the fight be victorious
When swords are thrust outward to gleam;
For us will the vict'ry be glorious
When led by the red, black, and green.

— Lyrics from the UNIA anthem[3]

Ideologically, Garvey was a black nationalist and racial separatist.[4] Generally referring to dark-skinned peoples of African descent as "Negroes", he and the UNIA insisted that that term should be capitalized, thus affording dignity and respect to those whom it described.[5] His ideas were influenced by a range of sources. According to biographer Colin Grant, while he was living in London, Garvey displayed "an amazing capacity to absorb political tracts, theories of social engineering, African history and the Western Enlightenment."[6] Garvey was exposed to the ideas about race that were prevalent at the time;[7] his ideas on race were also heavily informed by the writings of Edward Wilmot Blyden[8] and by his work in London with Dusé Mohamed Ali.[9]

During the late 1910s and 1920s, Garvey was also influenced by the ideas of the Irish independence movement, to which he was sympathetic.[10] He saw strong parallels between the subjugation of Ireland and the global subjugation of black people,[11] and identified strongly with the Irish independence leader Éamon de Valera.[12] In 1922, he sent a message to Valera stating that "We believe Ireland should be free even as Africa shall be free for the Negroes of the world. Keep up the fight for a free Ireland."[13]

For Garvey, Ireland's Sinn Féin and the Irish independence movement served as blueprints for his own black nationalist cause.[12] In July 1919 he stated that "the time has come for the Negro race to offer up its martyrs upon the altar of liberty even as the Irish [had] given a long list from Robert Emmet to Roger Casement."[14] He also expressed admiration for the Indian independence movement, which was seeking independence from British rule in India, describing Mahatma Gandhi as "one of the noblest characters of the day".[15]

Race and racial separatism

[edit]

"Race first" was the adage which was widely used in Garveyism.[16] In Garvey's view, "no race in the world is so just as to give others, for the asking, a square deal in things economic, political and social", but rather each racial group will favor its own interests.[17] Rejecting the "melting pot" notion of much 20th century American nationalism,[18] he thought that European Americans would never willingly grant equality to African Americans, and thus it was inefficient for the latter to ask for it.[19] He was hostile to the efforts of the progressive movement to agitate for social and political rights for African Americans, arguing that this was ineffective and that law would never change the underlying racial prejudice of European Americans.[20]

He argued that the European-American population of the U.S. would never tolerate the social integration which was being advocated by activists like W. E. B. Du Bois because he believed that campaigns for such integration would lead to anti-black riots and lynchings.[21] He openly conceded that the U.S. was a white man's country and thus, he did not think that African Americans should expect equal treatment within it. Thus, he opposed attempts to socially and economically integrate the different races which lived within the country.[22] Garveyism promoted the view that whites had no duty to help blacks achieve racial equality, maintaining the view that the latter needed to advance themselves on their initiative.[23] He advocated racial separatism,[24] but he did not believe in black supremacy.[25] He also rallied against Eurocentric beauty standards among blacks, seeing them as impediments to black self-respect.[22]

[African Americans should] stop making[...] noise about social equality, giving the White people the idea that we are hankering after their company, and get down to business and build up a strong race, industrially, commercially, educationally and politically, everything social will come afterwards.

— Marcus Garvey, 1921[17]

In the U.S., ideas about the need for black racial purity became central to Garvey's thought.[7] He vehemently denounced miscegenation,[21] believing that mixed-race individuals were "torn by dual allegiances" and they would often ally themselves "with the more powerful race," thus, they would become "traitors to the [black] race".[26] Garvey argued that mixed-race people would be bred out of existence.[27] Cronon believed that Garvey exhibited "antipathy and distrust of anybody but the darkest-skinned Negroes";[28] the hostility towards black people whose African blood was not considered "pure" was a sentiment which Garvey shared with Blyden.[29]

This view caused great friction between Garvey and Du Bois,[30] with the former accusing Du Bois and the NAACP of promoting "amalgamation or general miscegenation".[31] He rallied against what he called the "race destroying doctrine" of those African Americans who were promulgating racial integration in the U.S., instead, he maintained the view that his UNIA stood for "the pride and purity of race. We believe that the white race should uphold its racial pride and perpetuate itself, and we also believe that the black race should do likewise. We believe that there is room enough in the world for the various race groups to grow and develop by themselves without seeking to destroy the Creator's plan by the constant introduction of mongrel types."[22] Arguing that Garvey "imitated white supremacist ideas at random", the scholar John L. Graves commented that "racism permeated nearly every iota of his ideology," with Garveyism representing "a gospel of hate for whites".[32]

Garvey's belief in racial separatism, his advocacy of the migration of African Americans to Africa, and his opposition to miscegenation endeared him to the KKK, which supported many of the same policies.[33][21] Garvey was willing to collaborate with the KKK in order to achieve his aims, and it was willing to work with him because his approach effectively acknowledged its belief that the U.S. should only be a country for white people and campaigns for advanced rights for African Americans who are living within the U.S. should be abandoned.[34] Garvey called for collaboration between black and white separatists, stating that they shared common goals: "the purification of the races, their autonomous separation and the unbridled freedom of self-development and self-expression. Those who are against this are enemies of both races, and rebels against morality, nature and God."[35] In his view, the KKK and other far-right white groups were "better friends" of black people "than all other groups of hypocritical whites put together" because they were honest about their desires and intentions.[20]

Pan-Africanism

[edit]
See also: Pan-Africanism

Garvey was a Pan-Africanist,[36] and an African nationalist.[37] In Jamaica, he and his supporters were heavily influenced by the pan-Africanist teachings of Dr Love and Alexander Bedward.[38] In the wake of the First World War, Garvey called for the formation of "a United Africa for the Africans of the World".[39] The UNIA promoted the view that Africa was the natural homeland of the African diaspora.[40] While he was imprisoned, he penned an editorial for the Negro World titled "African Fundamentalism", in which he called for "the founding of a racial empire whose only natural, spiritual and political aims shall be God and Africa, at home and abroad."[41]

Garvey supported the Back-to-Africa movement, which had been influenced by Edward Wilmot Blyden, who migrated to Liberia in 1850.[42] However, Garvey did not believe that all African Americans should migrate to Africa. Instead, he believed that an elite group, namely those African Americans who were of the purest African blood, should do so. The rest of the African-American population, he believed, should remain in the United States, where it would become extinct within fifty years.[34]

A proponent of the Back-to-Africa movement, Garvey called for a vanguard of educated and skilled African Americans to travel to West Africa, a journey which would be facilitated by his Black Star Line.[43] Garvey stated that "The majority of us may remain here, but we must send our scientists, our mechanics and our artisans and let them build railroads, let them build the great educational and other institutions necessary", after which other members of the African diaspora could join them.[43] He was aware that the majority of African Americans would not want to move to Africa until it had the more modern comforts that they had become accustomed to in the U.S.[43] Through the UNIA, he discussed plans for a migration to Liberia, but these plans came to nothing and his hope to move African Americans to West Africa ultimately failed.[44]

Wheresoever I go, whether it is England, France or Germany, I am told, "This is a white man's country." Wheresoever I travel throughout the United States of America, I am made to understand that I am a "nigger". If the Englishman claims England as his native habitat, and the Frenchman claims France, the time has come for 400 million Negroes to claim Africa as their native land... If you believe that the Negro should have a place in the sun; if you believe that Africa should be one vast empire, controlled by the Negro, then arise.

— Garvey, August 1920 [45]

In the 1920s, Garvey referred to his desire for a "big black republic" in Africa.[46] Garvey's envisioned Africa was to be a one-party state in which the president could have "absolute authority" to appoint "all of his lieutenants from cabinet ministers, governors of States and Territories, administrators and judges to minor offices".[27] According to the scholar of African-American studies Wilson S. Moses, the future African state which Garvey envisioned was "authoritarian, elitist, collectivist, racist, and capitalistic",[27] suggesting that it would have resembled the later Haitian government of François Duvalier.[47] Garvey told the historian J. A. Rogers that he and his followers were "the first fascists", adding that "Mussolini copied Fascism from me, but the Negro reactionaries sabotaged it".[48]

Garvey never visited Africa himself,[49] and he did not speak any African language.[50] He knew very little about the continent's varied customs, languages, religions, and traditional social structures,[51] and his critics frequently believed that his views of the continent were based on romanticism and ignorance.[52] It has been suggested that the European colonial authorities would not have given Garvey permission to visit colonies where he would be calling for decolonization.[42]

For instance, the Jamaican writer and poet Claude McKay noted that Garvey "talks of Africa as if it were a little island in the Caribbean Sea."[52] Garvey believed in negative stereotypes about Africa which portrayed it as a backward continent that was in need of the civilizing influence of Western, Christian states.[53] Among his stated aims, he wanted "to assist in civilizing the backward tribes of Africa" and he also wanted "to promote a conscientious Christian worship among" them.[53] His belief that Africans would ultimately be liberated by the efforts of the African diaspora which was living outside the continent has been considered condescending.[54]

Moses stated that instead of being based on respect for indigenous African cultures, Garvey's views of an ideal united Africa were based on an "imperial model" of the kind which was promoted by western powers.[55] When he extolled the glories of Africa, Garvey cited the ancient Egyptians and Ethiopians who had built empires and monumental architectural structures, which he cited as evidence of civilization, rather than the smaller-scale societies which lived on other parts of the continent.[56] In doing so, he followed the lead of white academics of that era, who were similarly ignorant of most of African history and who focused nearly exclusively on ancient Egypt. Moses thought that Garvey "had more affinity for the pomp and tinsel of European imperialism than he did for black African tribal life".[56] Similarly, the writer Richard Hart noted that Garvey was "much attracted by the glamour of the British nobility", an attraction which was reflected when he honored prominent supporters by giving them such British-derived titles as "Lords", "Ladies", and "Knights".[57] Garvey's head was not turned, however, by the scholarly authority of Harvard University professor George Reisner whose opinion Garvey challenged on the pages of The Negro World.[9]

Economic views

[edit]

We must prepare now by organizing ourselves all over the world, by building businesses, stores and factories to sustain our people and free ourselves.

— Marcus Garvey[58]

Garvey believed in economic independence for the African diaspora and through the UNIA, he attempted to achieve it by forming ventures like the Black Star Line and the Negro Factories Corporation.[59] In Garvey's opinion, "without commerce and industry, a people perish economically. The Negro is perishing because he has no economic system".[25] In his view, European-American employers would always favor European-American employees, so to gain more security, African Americans needed to form their own businesses.[35] In his words, "the Negro[...] must become independent of white capital and white employers if he wants salvation."[60] He believed that financial independence for the African-American community would ensure greater protection from discrimination,[25] and provide the foundation for social justice.[61]

Economically, Garvey supported capitalism,[62] stating that "capitalism is necessary to the progress of the world, and those who unreasonably and wantonly oppose it or fight against it are enemies of human advancement."[27] In the U.S., Garvey promoted a capitalistic ethos for the economic development of the African-American community,[63] advocating black capitalism.[64] His emphasis on capitalist ventures meant, according to Grant, that Garvey "was making a straight pitch to the petit-bourgeois capitalist instinct of the majority of black folk."[65]

He admired Booker T. Washington's economic endeavours but criticized his focus on individualism: Garvey believed that African-American interests would best be advanced if businesses included collective decision-making and group profit-sharing.[63] His advocacy of capitalistic wealth distribution was a more equitable view of capitalism than the view of capitalism which was then prevalent in the U.S.;[66] he believed that some restrictions should be imposed on individuals and businesses in order to prevent them from acquiring too much wealth, in his view, no individual should be allowed to control more than one million dollars and no company should be allowed to control more than five million dollars.[27] While he was living in Harlem, he envisioned the formation of a global network of black people who would trade among themselves, believing that his Black Star Line would contribute to the achievement of this aim.[67]

There is no evidence to support the view that Garvey was ever sympathetic to socialism.[68] While he was living in the U.S., he strongly opposed attempts to recruit African Americans into the trade union movement by socialist and communist groups,[69] and he urged African Americans not to support the Communist Party.[70] This led to heavy scrutiny from communist group leaders and figureheads such as Grace Campbell, among others. He believed that the communist movement did not serve the interests of African Americans because it was a white person's creation.[70] He stated that communism was "a dangerous theory of economic or political reformation because it seeks to put government in the hands of an ignorant white mass who have not been able to destroy their natural prejudices towards Negroes and other non-white people. While it may be a good thing for them, it will be a bad thing for the Negroes who will fall under the government of the most ignorant, prejudiced class of the white race."[70] In response, the Communist International characterised Garveyism as a reactionary bourgeois philosophy.[35]

Black Christianity

[edit]

Whilst our God has no color, yet it is human to see everything through one's own spectacles, and since the white people have seen their God through white spectacles, we have only now started out (late though it be) to see our God through our own spectacles.

— Garvey, on viewing God as black, 1923[71]

Grant noted that "Garveyism would always remain a secular movement with a strong under-tow of religion".[72] Garvey envisioned a form of Christianity which would specifically be designed for black African people,[57] a sort of black religion.[56] Reflecting his own view of religion, he wanted this black-centric Christianity to be as close to Catholicism as possible.[71]

Even so, he attended the foundation ceremony of the African Orthodox Church in Chicago in 1921.[73] According to Graves, this Church preached "the orthodox Christian tradition with emphasis on racism",[74] and Cronon suggested that Garvey promoted "racist ideas about religion".[75]

Garvey emphasised the idea of black people worshipping a God who was also depicted as black.[71] In his words, "If the white man has the idea of a white God, let him worship his God as he desires. Since the white people have seen their God through white spectacles, we have only now started out to see our God through our own spectacles[...] we shall worship Him through the spectacles of Ethiopia."[30] He called for black people to worship images of Jesus of Nazareth and the Virgin Mary that depicted these figures as black Africans.[57] In doing so, he did not make use of pre-existing forms of black-dominated religions. Garvey had little experience with them, because he had attended a white-run Wesleyan congregation when he was a child, and later, he converted to Catholicism.[76]

See also

[edit]
  • Black Power – Political slogan and ideology
  • Back-to-Africa movement – Political movement in the United States during the 19th and 20th centuries
  • Black nationalism – Ideology that seeks to develop a Black national identity
  • Black supremacy – Belief in superiority of black people
  • Rastafari – Abrahamic religion originating in 1930s Jamaica

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Garveyism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Garveyism is the ideology and mass movement pioneered by , a Jamaican activist (1887–1940), which promoted Black racial pride, economic , global unity among people of African descent, and to to establish an independent empire free from white domination. Centered on the principle that should be for Africans as is for Europeans, it rejected assimilation into white societies in favor of and . The movement crystallized through the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA), founded by Garvey in in 1914 and expanded to the , where it grew into the largest organization led by people of African descent, boasting millions of members across branches in dozens of countries by the early . Core tenets, articulated in Garvey's addresses, emphasized uniting 400 million Negroes worldwide for industrial, educational, and political emancipation, with as the focal point for redemption and sovereign governance under a unified . Blending with Christian elements—such as viewing as Black and invoking biblical prophecies of African resurgence—Garveyism fostered rituals of communal solidarity, including parades and the Negro World newspaper, which disseminated its message globally. Garvey's initiatives included the Negro Factories Corporation for economic autonomy and the , a shipping venture intended to facilitate trade and , though it collapsed amid financial difficulties. At the 1920 UNIA convention in New York, Garvey was proclaimed Provisional President of the African Republic, symbolizing aspirations for continental unity. Controversies arose from its separatist stance, which clashed with integrationist leaders, and Garvey's 1923 conviction for mail fraud tied to Black Star Line promotions—critics alleged political by U.S. authorities amid extensive —resulting in a term and deportation to in 1927. Despite setbacks, Garveyism influenced subsequent movements like the Nation of Islam and Rastafarianism, underscoring its enduring legacy in promoting racial self-assertion over reliance on external reform.

Origins and Development

Marcus Garvey's Formative Influences

was born on August 17, 1887, in St. Ann's Bay, , a British colony marked by rigid racial hierarchies that limited opportunities for people of African descent despite formal abolition of in 1838. Growing up in a large family of modest means—his father a stonemason and his mother a — received only a before leaving school at age 14 around 1901 due to economic pressures. He apprenticed as a compositor in Kingston's printing trade, where he gained skills in , , and organization that later proved instrumental in disseminating ideas and building movements, while encountering labor unrest and colonial censorship. Garvey's intellectual foundations drew from Booker T. Washington's emphasis on economic self-reliance and racial uplift through vocational training, as outlined in Up from Slavery (1901), which Garvey encountered as a young man and credited with shaping his early views on black advancement independent of white patronage. He also engaged with nascent Jamaican nationalist efforts, such as the National Club of Jamaica (founded 1910), where he honed public speaking and advocacy against colonial inequities, though these yielded limited success amid entrenched British control. Travels abroad further crystallized his perspective: from 1904, he worked on banana plantations in , including and , witnessing the exploitation of black laborers under white overseers and contributing to publications highlighting these conditions. In from 1912 to 1914, Garvey studied at Birkbeck College and worked for the African Times and Orient Review, edited by Egyptian nationalist Duse Mohamed Ali, exposing him to global discourses on anti-colonialism and the shared subjugation of peoples of African descent across continents. These experiences revealed patterns of racial beyond Jamaica, from Latin American plantations to European imperial attitudes, fostering a realist assessment that integration into white-dominated societies offered illusory progress. Returning to Jamaica in 1914, Garvey initially pursued accommodationist strategies akin to Washington's but grew frustrated with their inefficacy against systemic barriers. Garvey's arrival in the United States in May 1916, originally to study Washington's model at Tuskegee Institute, coincided with Washington's death the prior year and confronted him with stark evidence of American racial divisions, including Jim Crow segregation and anti-black violence. This disillusionment—witnessing whites' unwillingness to accord blacks equality despite rhetorical appeals—prompted a pivot toward recognizing inherent ethnic as a causal reality, rather than a temporary amenable to reformist integration. His observations aligned with empirical patterns of , leading him to prioritize black over assimilationist hopes prevalent among some U.S. leaders.

Establishment of the UNIA and Early Expansion

The Universal Negro Improvement Association () was founded on July 20, 1914, in , by , then aged 28, with Amy Ashwood as co-founder. The organization aimed to foster unity among people of African descent worldwide through fraternal and self-improvement activities. Initially struggling in Jamaica, the UNIA gained traction after Garvey relocated to the in 1916, establishing its headquarters in , New York, where the local branch began with 17 members. By the early 1920s, the had expanded rapidly, forming over 700 branches across 38 U.S. states and extending to numerous countries in the , , and , capitalizing on post-World War I migration and racial unrest to mobilize communities. Membership claims reached six million globally at its peak, though historians estimate paid-up dues-paying members at 90,000 to 100,000, reflecting significant but contested mass appeal. The organization's hierarchical structure included local divisions led by potentates, supported by auxiliaries such as the Black Cross Nurses—formed in 1920 as a women's health service modeled on the Red Cross—and the African Legion, a men's unit promoting discipline. Central to expansion was the Negro World newspaper, launched on August 17, 1918, as the UNIA's official organ, with circulation estimates of 50,000 to 200,000 by 1920, disseminating messages via sailors and migrants to remote branches. Annual international conventions underscored growth; the 1919 gathering in Liberty Hall drew crowds, while the 1920 event in New York attracted 25,000 delegates over two weeks, featuring parades and addresses that highlighted organizational cohesion. These events empirically demonstrated the UNIA's ability to convene large numbers amid heightened racial tensions following the war and the Red Summer of 1919.

Core Ideological Principles

Racial Separatism and Black Pride

Garveyism emphasized racial as a pragmatic response to centuries of subjugation, arguing that integration in white-majority societies inevitably led to cultural dilution and economic dependency rather than empowerment. , drawing from his observations of persistent discrimination during travels in the United States, , and between and , concluded that assimilation failed to elevate black communities, as evidenced by ongoing and exclusion despite adopting Western norms. Instead, enabled causal by allowing blacks to develop institutions insulated from external subversion, a view reinforced by ethnic conflicts in multi-racial settings worldwide where dominant groups maintained control. This doctrine manifested in the rallying cry "Africa for the Africans," first prominently articulated by Garvey in a speech at , New York, on August 21, 1921, demanding black over African lands to counter colonial exploitation and marginalization. Garvey rejected miscegenation as a threat to racial purity, believing it weakened black cohesion and identity; in 1922, he met with leaders to endorse mutual racial separation, prioritizing pragmatic division over interracial mixing despite ideological differences. Such positions stemmed from a racial realist framework acknowledging inherent group differences, positing that forced proximity exacerbated tensions without yielding equity, as seen in historical patterns of conquest and enslavement. Black pride formed the psychological cornerstone of Garveyism, countering white supremacist denigration not through denial of racial distinctions but by inverting the narrative to affirm black aesthetics, capabilities, and destiny when organized independently. Garvey promoted self-respect via UNIA parades, uniforms, and events like the 1924 International Pageant of Negro Womanhood, which celebrated dark-skinned beauty and rejected European standards of attractiveness. He argued that unified blacks possessed the inherent potential for civilizational superiority in their domain, capable of empire-building akin to historical powers, provided they shed inferiority complexes induced by subjugation. This reversed realism, grounded in empirical failures of diaspora assimilation—such as persistent socioeconomic disparities in the U.S. by the 1920s—aimed to instill agency, viewing separation as the causal pathway to reclaiming power lost through historical dependency.

Pan-Africanism and the Back-to-Africa Movement

Garveyism advocated Pan-African unity among people of African descent worldwide to liberate the continent from European colonial domination and establish sovereign black governance. The Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) positioned itself as a provisional government-in-exile for Africa, with Marcus Garvey elected as Provisional President of Africa at the organization's First International Convention in August 1920, attended by over 25,000 participants and featuring delegates from more than 20 countries. During the 1920 and 1921 conventions, UNIA members adopted the Declaration of Rights of the Negro Peoples of the World and designated red, black, and green as the symbolic colors of African racial sovereignty, intended to represent the blood of the race, its rich soil, and lush vegetation, respectively. Central to this vision was the , which Garvey promoted as a pragmatic alternative to futile assimilation into white societies, where blacks faced perpetual minority status and disenfranchisement. The sought to facilitate organized through the steamship company, established in to enable direct trade and passenger transport between the diaspora and Africa, with initial sailings in the early aimed at building connections despite mechanical failures, financial strains, and legal challenges that limited actual migrant numbers to small groups rather than mass exodus. Plans for large-scale settlement, particularly in , encountered diplomatic opposition and insufficient resources, underscoring the logistical barriers to widespread return. Unlike W. E. B. Du Bois's , which emphasized elite intellectual leadership through congresses like the 1919 Paris meeting focused on advocating for colonial reforms via educated representatives, Garveyism stressed to foster unfractured racial , bypassing class divisions in favor of broad participation that drew millions into branches globally. This approach prioritized and cultural affirmation over diplomatic petitions, viewing unified popular action as essential for reclaiming African .

Economic Self-Reliance and Nationalism

Garveyism promoted economic as a prerequisite for black advancement, emphasizing enterprise over dependency on external systems. Influenced by Booker T. Washington's emphasis on industrial self-help, urged to develop their own businesses and patronize black-owned enterprises exclusively through the "buy black" principle, aiming to retain wealth within the community and build cooperative economic structures. The (UNIA) implemented this vision by establishing ventures modeled on Washington's Tuskegee approach but expanded internationally to foster job creation and . In 1919, the launched the Negro Factories Corporation as a financing mechanism for black-owned industries, offering stock to members and raising around one million dollars to support operations like laundries, bakeries, and printing facilities that employed black workers. These initiatives demonstrated short-term viability, providing hundreds of jobs and producing goods for black consumers, though sustainability proved challenging without established expertise. The corporation's efforts aligned with Garvey's blueprint for scaling cooperative businesses globally, rejecting reliance on white-controlled economies in favor of self-sustaining models. Central to this economic nationalism was the Black Star Line, incorporated in 1919 as a shipping enterprise to enable trade among black diaspora communities and facilitate repatriation to . Financed through stock sales to supporters, the line acquired three vessels and symbolized black capitalist ambition, operating briefly to transport passengers and goods before ceasing in 1922 due to mismanagement and inexperience in maritime operations. This venture highlighted the risks of pioneering untested black-led , yet underscored Garvey's insistence that through such enterprises must precede political gains. Garvey rejected socialism as incompatible with black interests, viewing it as a white-originated system that ignored racial economic control and promoted dependency rather than self-directed wealth creation. He argued that blacks required their own capitalists and industries to achieve autonomy, critiquing integrative or welfare-oriented paths as delaying true independence. UNIA branches supplemented these principles by functioning as mutual aid societies, offering loans and support that reinforced entrepreneurial realism over redistributive alternatives.

Religious and Cultural Dimensions

Reinterpretation of Christianity

Garveyism adapted to emphasize black racial divinity, portraying and Christ as African figures to counteract the demoralizing effects of Eurocentric religious . In his 1925 manifesto "African Fundamentalism," urged blacks to reject adoration of non-African heroes and focus on indigenous pride, implicitly challenging white depictions that fostered psychological inferiority. This theological shift aimed to restore self-conception by aligning divine imagery with the black experience, as Garvey argued in speeches that viewing "through our own spectacles" was essential for racial empowerment. A pivotal expression occurred in Garvey's August 3, 1924, address in New York, where he preached faith in a black and advocated a new for African redemption, separate from white influences. The Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) institutionalized this through rituals in its divisions, including chapels where prayers, scripture readings, and Garvey's sermon-style orations promoted collective racial salvation over individual piety. Hymns such as "Shine On, Eternal Light," composed for the UNIA in the early 1920s, and recitations of Psalm 68:31 ("Princes shall come out of ; shall soon stretch out her hands unto ") reinforced separatism by linking spiritual devotion to the upliftment of and its . This reinterpretation intertwined faith with Garveyite separatism, positing redemption as achievable through disciplined racial organization rather than heavenly escapism. Chaplain-General George Alexander McGuire formalized it via the , established on September 2, 1921, in New York, which developed the Universal Catechism to teach youth doctrines of black divine origins and a redemptive mission tied to nationalist . Garvey positioned this activist against mainstream black churches, which he viewed as complicit in passivity by prioritizing otherworldly consolation amid earthly , thereby failing to instill the organizational discipline needed for black autonomy.

Promotion of African Cultural Revival

Garveyism emphasized reclaiming pre-colonial African heritage to counteract the cultural erasure imposed by and colonial narratives, fostering racial pride through targeted education on historical achievements. The UNIA's official newspaper, , launched on August 17, 1918, disseminated articles and editorials underscoring the sophistication of ancient African societies, portraying as a foundational with advanced , , and intellectual traditions that predated European contact. Similarly, UNIA conventions, such as the First International Convention held in from August 1 to 31, 1920, featured sessions and speeches debunking myths of African inferiority by citing empires like Ethiopia's resistance to invasion and 's monumental legacies, attended by over 25,000 delegates from 25 countries who affirmed resolutions on historical vindication. These efforts aimed to instill empirical awareness of Africa's causal contributions to human , rejecting unsubstantiated claims of perpetual backwardness. To embody this revived heritage, Garveyism employed symbolic practices that projected dignity and authority, including uniforms, parades, and honorific titles modeled on monarchical and nationalist traditions. At the 1920 convention, Garvey was elected "Provisional President of " and appeared in a plumed military uniform, leading processions down on August 3, 1920, with thousands of uniformed participants from the African Legion, Black Cross Nurses, and Motor Corps marching in formation amid brass bands and flags. These spectacles, drawing tens of thousands of Harlem spectators, served to reconstruct a collective regal identity, drawing parallels to European royal pageantry or emerging independence movements, thereby cultivating discipline and self-perception as capable rulers rather than subordinates. While acknowledging the transatlantic slave trade's severance of cultural continuity—displacing millions and enforcing assimilation—Garveyism maintained that such disruptions did not negate inherent capacities, advocating revival via structured reclamation to achieve resilience through internal agency. This approach prioritized causal self-mastery over narratives of enduring victimhood, positing that disciplined with heritage would yield psychological and communal fortitude, as evidenced by the UNIA's rapid growth to millions of claimed adherents by the mid-1920s.

Controversies and Internal Challenges

Divisions Within Black Leadership

Garveyism encountered significant opposition from established black integrationist leaders, particularly W. E. B. Du Bois and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), who viewed its separatist ideology as counterproductive to racial advancement through assimilation and legal advocacy. Du Bois, a proponent of the "Talented Tenth" theory emphasizing elite black leadership to uplift the masses via integration, publicly denounced Garvey as a "charlatan" and "demagogue" whose back-to-Africa schemes distracted from achievable gains within American society. In The Crisis, the NAACP's magazine edited by Du Bois, articles criticized Garvey's Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) for financial mismanagement in ventures like the Black Star Line, portraying it as fraudulent despite the organization's rapid growth. This opposition stemmed from ideological divergence: while the NAACP pursued court challenges and interracial alliances, Garvey advocated self-reliance and racial purity, rejecting interracial cooperation as diluting black identity. Garveyism's appeal to the black working class contrasted sharply with the NAACP's more limited reach among educated elites, highlighting class divisions within black leadership. By 1919, the UNIA claimed influence over approximately 2 million followers worldwide, drawing primarily from urban laborers, recent immigrants, and poorer southern migrants who responded to Garvey's messages of pride and economic independence. In comparison, the NAACP's membership peaked at around 90,000 in the late , focused on professional and middle-class blacks prioritizing respectability politics. Garvey's emphasis on over elite brokerage resonated empirically with disenfranchised workers facing post-World War I economic exclusion, as evidenced by UNIA parades attracting tens of thousands in , whereas NAACP strategies yielded incremental legal wins but struggled to galvanize broad participation. Critics like Du Bois dismissed this popularity as demagoguery, yet it exposed tensions where integrationist approaches overlooked the causal inefficacy of appealing solely to white goodwill amid persistent segregation. These rifts culminated in the "Garvey Must Go" campaign of 1922, orchestrated by black intellectuals and socialists including A. Philip Randolph and Chandler Owen, who rallied against Garvey's leadership through public meetings and editorials in outlets like The Messenger. The campaign, echoing bourgeois disdain for Garvey's unpolished style and prioritization of numerical strength over elite endorsement, underscored class antagonisms: Garvey positioned the UNIA as a counter to "mulatto" leadership beholden to white interests, while opponents saw his movement as undermining unified anti-racist efforts. Though Garveyism succeeded in instilling racial consciousness among millions previously alienated from formal activism, detractors argued its divisiveness fragmented black unity, potentially weakening collective bargaining power against systemic racism by fostering internal rivalries over strategy. This critique, however, often ignored Garvey's empirical success in organizing where elite-led groups faltered, revealing a preference for controlled influence over grassroots empowerment. The , a central UNIA enterprise launched in to facilitate trade and , encountered severe financial difficulties due to the purchase of outdated and overpriced vessels requiring extensive repairs, compounded by internal and mismanagement of funds. By 1922, the company had accumulated debts exceeding its revenues, leading to its dissolution in April of that year after operating only three ships that made limited voyages. Despite these setbacks, the line successfully raised approximately $750,000 through stock sales to thousands of small investors, primarily UNIA members, demonstrating significant support and trust in Garvey's vision amid limited access to capital for black-owned ventures. Garvey faced federal on February 16, 1922, for mail fraud related to the promotion and sale of , charged with using the U.S. mails to defraud by misrepresenting the company's viability despite knowing its ships were unseaworthy. Following a in which Garvey acted as his own , he was convicted on one count on June 18, 1923, and sentenced to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine. The hinged on of continued solicitations after internal awareness of financial insolvency, though critics noted the absence of personal enrichment by Garvey, who drew no salary from the venture. The prosecution was influenced by targeted investigations from the Bureau of Investigation (BOI), precursor to the FBI, under , who as assistant director prioritized disrupting black nationalist groups perceived as threats to social order. A 1919 BOI memo from Hoover suggested pursuing fraud charges against Garvey to counter his " propaganda," and agents advised against ship sales to while amplifying scrutiny of its operations. Garvey began serving his sentence in February 1925 after appeals failed; President Calvin Coolidge commuted it on November 18, 1927, mandating deportation as a non-citizen, which occurred on December 7, 1927, to , effectively halting 's U.S.-based momentum. Assessments of these events reveal a mix of genuine operational overreach—stemming from ambitious scaling with scarce black capital and inadequate expertise—and , as the BOI's focus on Garvey contrasted with leniency toward similar white-promoted schemes, suggesting causal prioritization of ideological neutralization over isolated . While Garvey's centralized control invited mismanagement risks, the scale of prior to indicates viable public endorsement disrupted by legal intervention, with subsequent UNIA enterprises like Negro Factories Corporation also faltering under ongoing federal pressure rather than inherent unfeasibility alone.

Associations with Separatist Groups

In 1922, met with Edward Young Clarke, the acting Imperial Wizard of the , in , Georgia, on June 25. publicly endorsed the KKK's commitment to , stating that their forthright opposition to racial intermixing aligned with the Universal Negro Improvement Association's (UNIA) objectives of black racial purity and , which he contrasted with the deceptive assurances of integration offered by some white liberals and integrationist black leaders. He argued that such mutual recognition of irreconcilable racial differences would expedite black economic and political independence by dispelling illusions of assimilation, rather than fostering dependency on unachievable equality. Garvey's rhetoric drew accusations of antisemitism, particularly after his 1923 mail fraud conviction, when he attributed the trial's outcome to a "Jewish jury" and criticized Jewish dominance in finance, media, and organizations like the NAACP, portraying Jews as exploitative economic competitors to black enterprises. These statements, often framed by critics as rooted in prejudice, reflected Garvey's broader critique of perceived monopolistic practices hindering black self-reliance, akin to his denunciations of other groups' business encroachments, though they echoed contemporary resentments over Jewish success in urban commerce. Garvey did not advocate violence against Jews but emphasized competitive nationalism, viewing their influence as a barrier to black autonomy rather than an inherent racial inferiority. Garvey expressed admiration for Benito Mussolini's nationalist regime in , claiming in 1937 that the had pioneered fascist organizational principles, with its disciplined ranks of over 100,000 members predating Mussolini's rise and inspiring his methods. This endorsement highlighted shared emphases on authoritarian leadership, structure, and national revival against perceived decadence, though Garvey adapted these to racial , rejecting universal application in favor of black sovereignty. He saw fascism's rejection of liberal individualism as a model for combating exploitation, but his support waned amid Mussolini's later aggressions, prioritizing African redemption over ideological alignment. Left-leaning critics, including figures like , condemned these associations as a betrayal of interracial , equating Garvey's with complicity in that undermined broader civil rights efforts. Defenders from more nationalist perspectives, however, portray them as realist acknowledgments of entrenched racial animosities, enabling focused pursuit of black repatriation and institution-building without reliance on adversarial alliances. This strategic navigation, while polarizing, underscored Garvey's insistence on reciprocal as a causal precondition for genuine self-rule, eschewing optimistic integration amid empirical patterns of segregation.

Legacy and Enduring Impact

Influence on Subsequent Black Nationalist Movements

Garveyism's doctrines of black and repatriation to profoundly shaped the Nation of Islam (NOI), established in in 1930 by and later led by , who incorporated Garveyite principles of economic independence and racial separatism into the group's theology of black divinity and rejection of white integration. The NOI's emphasis on building autonomous black institutions mirrored the Universal Negro Improvement Association's (UNIA) shipping venture and paramilitary organizations, with explicitly crediting Garvey's mass mobilization tactics as a model for NOI expansion to over 100 temples by the 1950s. Malcolm X, whose parents Earl and were active organizers in the 1920s, internalized Garvey's critique of accommodationist black leadership and advocacy for African unity, themes he echoed in speeches like his 1963 "," where he urged black Americans to prioritize over civil rights appeals to white authorities. This influence persisted despite Malcolm's later shift toward orthodox , as Garveyite separatism informed his early NOI tenure, during which membership surged from 400 in 1952 to 40,000 by 1960 under his organizational efforts. In Jamaica, Garvey's 1920 prediction of a "black king" in was interpreted by early Rastafarians as foretelling Haile Selassie's 1930 coronation as Ethiopian emperor, elevating Garvey to prophetic status within the movement that coalesced in around to and rejection of Babylonian (Western) oppression. Rastafari adopted Garveyism's cultural revivalism, promoting African-centered identity through practices like diet and , which symbolized resistance to colonial assimilation, though Garvey himself distanced from the emerging faith before his 1940 death. The 1960s revived Garveyite mass nationalism, with leaders like citing UNIA's 1919 peak of 6 million claimed members as evidence of black potential for outside white systems, influencing slogans like "Black is Beautiful" and demands for community control in urban enclaves. However, Garveyism's strict racial drew critiques for fostering , as seen in factions' rejection of interracial coalitions, which some analysts argued hindered broader alliances against economic disenfranchisement affecting 40% of black Americans in poverty by 1966. Across , surviving UNIA chapters in countries like and disseminated Garvey's pan-African vision, contributing causally to independence struggles by framing colonial rule as a racial betrayal amenable only to unified black reclamation of the continent. , who led to independence on March 6, 1957, drew inspiration from Garvey's organizational model, incorporating UNIA-style conventions into his and echoing calls in his push for a at the 1958 All-African Peoples' Conference. This linkage empirically bolstered post-colonial pan-African institutions, such as the Organization of African Unity founded in 1963, though Garveyism's essentialist racial focus sometimes clashed with Nkrumah's socialist internationalism, limiting its adoption in multi-ethnic states.

Criticisms of Practicality and Long-Term Viability

Critics of Garveyism have highlighted the logistical and economic barriers that rendered the "Back to Africa" repatriation program largely unfeasible, despite its rhetorical appeal to millions. Although the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) promoted mass return to Africa as a path to self-determination, few African Americans expressed interest in emigrating, and colonial administrations in Africa, such as Liberia, restricted settlement due to diplomatic pressures and local concerns over influxes of unskilled diaspora populations. The Black Star Line, established in 1919 to facilitate transport and symbolize Black economic independence, acquired three aging vessels but quickly faltered under mismanagement, including inadequate maintenance and overpriced purchases, culminating in financial collapse, ship seizures, and suspension by 1922 following mail fraud indictments related to stock sales. Garvey's centralized, authoritarian governance of the exacerbated these practical shortcomings by stifling dissent and fostering cult-like devotion to his persona, which deterred broader alliances and amplified operational incompetence. Contemporaries like criticized Garvey as "dictatorial, domineering, inordinately vain and very suspicious," a style that led to expulsions of internal critics and fragmented the organization's cohesion. This top-down approach, while mobilizing short-term enthusiasm, failed to cultivate decentralized leadership or adaptive strategies, contributing to the movement's vulnerability when Garvey faced legal setbacks. The UNIA's post-1920s trajectory illustrates Garveyism's limited long-term viability, as membership—claimed at up to 2 million during its 1920 peak—plummeted after Garvey's 1925 for mail and 1927 to , with branches dissolving amid financial and leadership vacuums. Although the ideology instilled racial pride and entrepreneurial aspirations, its separatist framework presupposed viable autonomous institutions without addressing the causal prerequisites of sustained economic sovereignty or defensive capabilities against state opposition, resulting in symbolic endurance over institutional permanence.

Recent Reassessments and Developments

On January 19, 2025, President issued a posthumous for , convicted in 1923 of mail fraud in connection with the shipping venture, a prosecution widely viewed by advocates as politically motivated to suppress his nationalist activities. The action followed advocacy from civil rights groups and 21 Democratic members of , who argued the case exemplified prosecutorial overreach against Black leaders challenging the status quo. This reframed Garvey's legal downfall as emblematic of state efforts to discredit Garveyism's push for economic independence, rather than evidence of inherent fraud. In August 2025, U.S. Representative introduced the "Marcus Legacy Package," comprising resolutions urging congressional recognition of 's contributions and designating August 17 as "Marcus Recognition Day" to honor his role in fostering Black . H. Res. 654 expressed the 's sense that 's 1923 conviction involved bias and warranted formal exoneration, while H. Res. 655 called for presidential issuance of a proclamation affirming his legacy. These measures built on by emphasizing 's victimization under selective enforcement, amid broader 21st-century scrutiny of historical injustices against Black nationalists. Garveyism's emphasis on has informed contemporary debates contrasting with dependency on government programs, as critics of expansive welfare systems invoke Garvey's model of enterprise-led uplift to argue against disincentives to personal initiative. Proponents highlight how Garvey's promotion of Black-owned businesses prefigured discussions on economic autonomy over redistributive policies like reparations, though Garvey himself in 1919 advocated reparations alongside as complementary paths to redress slavery's harms. This tension persists in analyses questioning whether state interventions undermine the entrepreneurial ethos Garvey championed. Recent cultural movements have seen a resurgence of Garveyite themes in expressions of African heritage pride, with Garvey credited as a of global narratives that reject assimilationist norms. Yet scholars caution that reviving separatist elements of Garveyism risks obsolescence in an era of and interracial coalitions, where rigid racial exclusivity may hinder adaptive strategies for minority advancement. Such reassessments underscore Garveyism's enduring appeal for identity affirmation while noting its practical limits against integrated world systems.

References

  1. https://www.archives.gov/research/african-americans/individuals/marcus-garvey
  2. https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/twenty/tkeyinfo/garvey.htm
  3. https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/issues/the-principles-of-the-universal-negro-improvement-association/
  4. https://spartacus-educational.com/USAgarvey.htm
  5. https://blackpast.org/global-african-history/garvey-marcus-1887-1940/
  6. https://www.international.ucla.edu/africa/mgpp/lifeintr
  7. https://rediscovering-black-history.blogs.archives.gov/2023/04/28/leader-of-a-movement-during-a-turbulent-time-garvey/
  8. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/analysis-marcus-garvey-back-africa
  9. https://www.caribbean-beat.com/issue-121/falling-star-marcus-garvey
  10. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=etd
  11. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/garvey-biography/
  12. https://teachdemocracy.org/online-lessons/bill-of-rights-in-action/bria-19-3-a-4
  13. https://www.international.ucla.edu/asc/mgpp/intro01
  14. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/garvey-unia/
  15. https://marcusgarveymuseum.com/index.php/history/hisory
  16. https://www.nytimes.com/1984/04/02/arts/a-10-volume-look-at-garvey.html
  17. https://unia-aclgovernment.com/about2/black-cross-nurses/
  18. https://marcusgarveymuseum.com/index.php/history/the-negro-world
  19. https://unia-aclgovernment.com/convention-2/
  20. https://coloredconventions.org/before-garvey-mcneal-turner/marcus-garvey/
  21. https://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5124/
  22. https://www.thoughtco.com/marcus-garvey-biography-45236
  23. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/garvey-unia-convention/
  24. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/garvey-timeline/
  25. https://theburningspear.com/celebrate-the-100-year-anniversary-of-the-unias-adoption-of-the-african-nations-flagthe-red-black-and-green/
  26. https://www.marinersmuseum.org/2021/02/marcus-garveys-black-star-line/
  27. https://teachdemocracy.org/online-lesson/marcus-garvey/
  28. http://www.jpanafrican.org/docs/vol5no9/5.9Radical.pdf
  29. https://hutchinscenter.fas.harvard.edu/web-dubois
  30. https://spokesman-recorder.com/2025/03/25/marcus-garvey-black-economic-ideology/
  31. https://blackhistorystudies.com/resources/resources/25-facts-about-marcus-mosiah-garvey/
  32. https://www.workersliberty.org/story/2020-11-24/marcus-garvey-and-socialists
  33. https://jacobin.com/2023/02/marcus-garvey-unia-racial-uplift-entrepreneurism-pan-africanism-black-capitalism
  34. https://staush.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/garvey-african-fundamentalism-1925.pdf
  35. https://www.nytimes.com/1924/08/04/archives/garvey-preaches-faith-in-black-god-negro-leader-makes-plea-for-free.html
  36. https://garveylhkgn.wordpress.com/2023/05/31/garveys-black-theology/
  37. https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/3264/chapter/8314748/Garvey-s-GodRacial-Uplift-and-the-Creation-of-the
  38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40282558
  39. https://unia-aclgovernment.com/history/the-negro-world/
  40. https://unia-aclgovernment.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-Jan-GARVEY-VOICE-PARTIAL.pdf
  41. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/garvey-du-bois/
  42. https://www.aaihs.org/colorism-as-racism-garvey-du-bois-and-the-other-color-line/
  43. https://marcusgarveymuseum.com/index.php/newsroom/marcus-garvey-and-w-e-b-du-bois
  44. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Universal-Negro-Improvement-Association
  45. https://naacp.org/about/our-history
  46. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/garvey-must-go-campaign/
  47. https://www.nytimes.com/1922/09/11/archives/carvey-must-go-negroes-declare-three-harlem-mass-meetings-hear.html
  48. https://blackpast.org/african-american-history/friends-negro-freedom-1920-1930/
  49. https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801448973.003.0002
  50. https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1513&context=fac_articles
  51. https://www.nytimes.com/1923/06/19/archives/garvey-convicted-in-black-line-fraud-jury-out-ten-hours-in-case-of.html
  52. https://blackpast.org/african-american-history/1923-marcus-garvey-last-word-incarceration/
  53. https://amistadresource.org/documents/document_07_04_020_hoover.pdf
  54. https://www.historytoday.com/archive/months-past/marcus-garvey-meets-kkk
  55. https://www.shogafilms.org/post/marcus-garvey-s-antisemitic-flare-up
  56. https://anthonygflood.com/2019/02/we-were-the-first-fascists-from-garvey-to-farrakhan/
  57. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/03/02/qhdd-m02.html
  58. https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/1047477B164D7A9B8106F93FCE3F3F47/9780511617225c5_p111-136_CBO.pdf/black-nationalism-and-neofascism-marcus-garvey-and-the-universal-negro-improvement-association.pdf
  59. https://ibw21.org/commentary/african-american-muslims-and-the-garvey-movement/
  60. https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/black-nationalism
  61. https://www.metopera.org/discover/education/educator-guides/x-the-life-and-times-of-malcolm-x/a-nation-within-a-nation/
  62. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/garvey-impact/
  63. https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/rastafari/people/marcusgarvey.shtml
  64. https://garveylhkgn.wordpress.com/2021/06/30/garvey-and-the-rastafari-connection/
  65. https://www.druglibrary.org/olsen/rastafari/garvey/rupert.html
  66. https://www.aaihs.org/garveyism-black-power-and-the-intellectual-history-of-the-caricom-reparations-case/
  67. https://www.aaihs.org/work-that-must-be-done/
  68. https://marcusgarveymuseum.com/index.php/newsroom/marcus-garvey-s-africa
  69. https://eajournals.org/ijhphr/vol-5-issue-4-august-2017/black-leadership-black-liberation-influence-marcus-garvey-kwame-nkrumah-1914-1966/
  70. https://clevelandhistorical.org/items/show/898
  71. https://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5121/
  72. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/films/garvey/?feature_filter=All&page=2
  73. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/biden-issues-pardon-to-late-black-nationalist-marcus-garvey-who-influenced-civil-rights-movement
  74. https://www.npr.org/2025/01/19/g-s1-43579/biden-pardons-virginia-scott-garvey
  75. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2025/jan/26/marcus-garvey-pardon-campaign
  76. https://clarke.house.gov/clarke-introduces-marcus-garvey-legacy-package-to-exonerate-and-commemorate-marcus-mosiah-garvey/
  77. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-resolution/654
  78. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-resolution/655/text
  79. https://ibw21.org/commentary/reparations-legacy-marcus-mosiah-garvey/
  80. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%257CA93458247&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=01974327&p=AONE&sw=w
  81. https://theaccomplishmagazine.com/marcus-garvey-the-father-of-black-pride-and-global-black-empowerment/
  82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393596845_Revisiting_Marcus_Garvey_His_Resonance_and_Relevance_in_the_Twenty-First_Century
  83. https://lavelleporter.com/2010/06/18/marcus-garvey-and-black-solidarity-in-the-21st-century/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.