Hubbry Logo
KaramanidsKaramanidsMain
Open search
Karamanids
Community hub
Karamanids
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Karamanids
Karamanids
Karamanids
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Part of a series on the
History of Turkey
Turkey in Asia Minor and Transcaucasia, 1921
Prehistory
Palaeolithic Anatolia c. 500,000– 
10,000 BC
Mesolithic Anatolia c. 11,000– 
9,000 BC
Neolithic Anatolia c. 8,000– 
5,500 BC
Bronze Age
Troy 3000–700 BC
Hattians 2500–2000 BC
Akkadian Empire 2400–2150 BC
Luwians 2300–1400 BC
Assyria 1950–1750 BC
Kussara 1780–1680 BC
Achaeans (Homer) 1700–1300 BC
Kizzuwatna 1650–1450 BC
Hittites 1680–1220 BC
Arzawa 1500–1320 BC
Mitanni 1500–1300 BC
Hayasa-Azzi 1500–1290 BC
Lycia 1450–350 BC
Assuwa 1300–1250 BC
Diauehi 1200–800 BC
Neo-Hittites 1200–800 BC
Phrygia 1200–700 BC
Caria 1150–547 BC
Tuwanuwa 1000–700 BC
Ionia 1000–545 BC
Urartu 859–595/585 BC
Iron Age
Diauehi 1200–800 BC
Neo-Hittites 1200–800 BC
Phrygia 1200–700 BC
Caria 1150–547 BC
Doris 1100–560 BC
Aeolis 1000–560 BC
Tuwanuwa 1000–700 BC
Ionia 1000–545 BC
Urartu 859–595/585 BC
Median Empire 678–549 BC
Lydia 685–547 BC
Classical Age
Achaemenid Empire 559–331 BC
Kingdom of Alexander the Great 334–301 BC
Kingdom of Cappadocia 322–130 BC
Antigonids 306–168 BC
Seleucid Empire 305–64 BC
Ptolemaic Kingdom 305–30 BC
Kingdom of Pontus 302–64 BC
Bithynia 297–74 BC
Attalid kingdom 282–129 BC
Galatia 281–64 BC
Parthian Empire 247 BC–224 AD
Armenian Empire 190 BC–428 AD
Roman Republic 133–27 BC
Commagene 163 BC–72 AD
Ancient Rome 133 BC-27 BC–330 AD
Sasanian Empire 224–651 AD (briefly in Anatolia)
Medieval Age
Eastern Roman Empire (330–1453; 1204-1261 in exile as Empire of Nicaea)
Rashidun Caliphate (637–656)
Great Seljuk State (1037–1194)
Danishmends (1071–1178)
Sultanate of Rum (1077–1307)
Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia (1078–1375)
Anatolian beyliks (1081–1423)
County of Edessa (1098–1150)
Artuqids (1101–1409)
Empire of Trebizond (1204–1461)
Latin Empire (1204–1261)
Karamanids (1250–1487)
Ilkhanate (1256–1335)
Kara Koyunlu (1375–1468)
Ak Koyunlu (1378–1501)
Ottoman Era
Rise (1299–1453)
Classical Age (1453–1566)
Transformation (1566–1703)
Old Regime (1703–1789)
Decline and modernization (1789–1908)
Defeat and dissolution (1908–1922)
Republic of Turkey
War of Independence (1919–1922)
Provisional government (1920–1923)
One-party period (1923–1930)
(1930–1945)
Multi-party period (1945–present)
By topic
Timeline
flag Turkey portal
The Beylik of Karaman (orange) in 1300

The Karamanids (Turkish: Karamanoğulları or Karamanoğulları Beyliği), also known as the Emirate of Karaman and Beylik of Karaman (Turkish: Karamanoğulları Beyliği), was a Turkish Anatolian beylik (principality) of Salur tribe origin, descended from Oghuz Turks, centered in South-Central Anatolia around the present-day Karaman Province. From the mid 14th century until its fall in 1487, the Karamanid dynasty was one of the most powerful beyliks in Anatolia.[3]

History

[edit]
Page from the Quran manuscript made for Halil of Karaman. Konya, 1314. Mevlâna Museum

The Karamanids traced their ancestry from Hodja Sad al-Din and his son Nure Sufi Bey, who emigrated from Arran (roughly encompassing modern-day Azerbaijan) to Sivas because of the Mongol invasion in 1230.

The Karamanids were members of the Salur tribe of Oghuz Turks.[4] According to others, they were members of the Afshar tribe,[5] which participated in the revolt led by Baba Ishak and afterwards moved to the western Taurus Mountains, near the town of Larende, where they came to serve the Seljuks. Nure Sofi worked there as a woodcutter. His son, Kerîmeddin Karaman Bey, gained tenuous control over the mountainous parts of Cilicia in the middle of the 13th century. A persistent but spurious legend, however, claims that the Seljuq Sultan of Rum, Kayqubad I, instead established a Karamanid dynasty in these lands.[5]

Karaman Bey expanded his territories by capturing castles in Ermenek, Mut, Ereğli, Gülnar, and Silifke. The year of the conquests is reported as 1225,[6] during the reign of Ala al-Din Kaykubadh I (1220–1237), which seems excessively early. Karaman Bey's conquests were mainly at the expense of the Kingdom of Lesser Armenia (and perhaps at the expense of Rukn al-Din Kilij Arslan IV, 1248–1265); in any case it is certain that he fought against the Kingdom of Lesser Armenia (and probably even died in this fight) to such extent that King Hethum I (1226–1269) had to place himself voluntarily under the sovereignty of the great Khan, in order to protect his kingdom from Mamluks and Seljuks (1244).

The rivalry between Kilij Arslan IV and Izz al-Din Kaykaus II allowed the tribes in the border areas to live virtually independently. Karaman Bey helped Kaykaus, but Arslan had the support of both the Mongols and Pervâne Sulayman Muin al-Din (who had the real power in the sultanate).

The Mongolian governor and general Baiju was dismissed from office in 1256 because he had failed to conquer new territories. Still, he continued to serve as a general and appeared, the same year, fighting the Sultan of Rum, who had not paid the tax, and he managed to defeat the sultan a second time. Rukn al-Din Kilidj Arslan IV got rid of almost all hostile begs and amirs except Karaman Bey, to whom he gave the town of Larende (now Karaman, in honour of the dynasty) and Ermenek (c. 1260) in order to win him to his side. In the meantime, Bunsuz, brother of Karaman Bey, was chosen as a Candar, or bodyguard, for Kilij Arslan IV. Their power rose as a result of the unification of Turkish clans that lived in the mountainous regions of Cilicia with the new Turkish population transferred there by Kayqubad.

Good relations between the Seljuqs and the Karamanids did not last. In 1261, on the pretext of supporting Kaykaus II, who had fled to Constantinople as a result of the intrigues of the chancellor Mu'in al-Din Suleyman, the Pervane, Karaman Bey and his two brothers, Zeynül-Hac and Bunsuz, marched toward Konya, the Seljuq capital, with 20,000 men. A combined Seljuq and Mongol army, led by the Pervane, defeated the Karamanid army and captured Karaman Bey's two brothers.

After Karaman Bey died in 1262, his older son, Mehmet I of Karaman, became the head of the house. He immediately negotiated alliances with other Turkmen clans to raise an army against the Seljuqs and Ilkhanids. During the 1276 revolt of Hatıroğlu Şemseddin Bey against Mongol domination in Anatolia, Karamanids also defeated several Mongol-Seljuq armies. In the Battle of Göksu in 1277 in particular, the central power of the Seljuq was dealt a severe blow. Taking advantage of the general confusion, Mehmed Bey captured Konya on 12 May and placed on the throne a pretender called Jimri, who claimed to be the son of Kaykaus. In the end, however, Mehmed was defeated by Seljuq and Mongol forces and executed with some of his brothers in 1278.

Despite these blows, the Karamanids continued to increase their power and influence, largely aided by the Mamluks of Egypt, especially during the reign of Baybars. Karamanids captured Konya on two more occasions at the beginning of the 14th century but were driven out the first time by emir Chupan, the Ilkhanid governor of Anatolia, and the second time by Chupan's son and successor Timurtash. An expansion of Karamanoğlu power occurred after the fall of the Ilkhanids in the 1330s. A second expansion coincided with Karamanoğlu Alâeddin Ali Bey's marriage to Nefise Hatun, the daughter of the Ottoman sultan Murat I, the first important contact between the two dynasties.

As Ottoman power expanded into the Balkans, Aleaddin Ali Bey captured the city of Beyşehir, which had been an Ottoman city. However, it did not take much time for the Ottomans to react and march on Konya, the Karamanoğlu capital city. A treaty between the two kingdoms was formed, and peace existed until the reign of Bayezid I.

Timur gave control of the Karamanid lands to Mehmet Bey, the oldest son of Aleaddin Ali Bey. After Bayezid I died in 1403, the Ottoman Empire went into a political crisis as the Ottoman family fell prey to internecine strife. It was an opportunity not only for Karamanids but also for all of the Anatolian beyliks. Mehmet Bey assembled an army to march on Bursa. He captured the city and damaged it; this would not be the last Karamanid invasion of Ottoman lands. However, Mehmet Bey was captured by Bayezid Pasha and sent to prison. He apologized for what he had done and was forgiven by the Ottoman ruler.

Ramazanoğlu Ali Bey captured Tarsus while Mehmet Bey was in prison. Mustafa Bey, son of Mehmet Bey, retook the city during a conflict between the Emirs of Sham and Egypt. After that, the Egyptian sultan Sayf ad-Din Inal sent an army to retake Tarsus from the Karamanids. The Egyptian Mamluks damaged Konya after defeating the Karamanids, and Mehmet Bey retreated from Konya. Ramazanoğlu Ali Bey pursued and captured him; according to an agreement between the two leaders, Mehmet Bey was exiled to Egypt for the rest of his life.

During the Crusade of Varna against the Ottomans in 1443–44, Karamanid İbrahim Bey marched on Ankara and Kütahya, destroying both cities. In the meantime, the Ottoman sultan Murad II was returning from Rumelia with a victory against the Hungarian Crusaders. Like all other Islamic emirates in Anatolia, the Karamanids were accused of treason. Hence, İbrahim Bey accepted all Ottoman terms. The Karamanid state was eventually terminated by the Ottomans in 1487, as the power of their Mameluke allies was declining. Some were resettled in various parts of Anatolia. Large groups were accommodated in northern Iran on the territory of present-day Azerbaijan.[citation needed] The main part was brought to the newly conquered territories in north-eastern Bulgaria – the Ludogorie region, another group – to what is now northern Greece and southern Bulgaria— present-day Kardzhali region and Macedonia. Ottomans founded Karaman Eyalet from former territories of Karamanids.

Power of the Karamanid state in Anatolia

[edit]

According to Mesâlik-ül-Ebsâr, written by Şehâbeddin Ömer, the Karamanid army had 25,000 riders and 25,000 saracens. They could also rely on some Turkmen tribes and their warriors.

Their economic activities depended mostly on control of strategic commercial areas such as Konya, Karaman and the ports of Lamos, Silifke, Anamur, and Manavgat.

Karamanid architecture

[edit]
Tiled mihrab niche from the Karamanoglu Ibrahim Bey Imaret, Karaman, now displayed in the Tiled Kiosk of Istanbul

66 mosques, 8 hammams, 2 caravanserais and 3 medreses built by the Karamanids survived to the present day. Notable examples of Karamanid architecture include:

  • Hasbey Medrese (1241)
  • Şerafettin Mosque (13th century)
  • İnce Minare (Dar-ül Hadis) Medrese (1258–1279)
  • Hatuniye Medrese (Karaman)
  • Mevlana Mosque and Tomb in Konya
  • Mader-i Mevlana (Aktekke) mosque in Karaman
  • Ibrahim Bey Mosque (Imaret) in Karaman

List of Karamanid Rulers

[edit]
No. Name Reign start Reign end
1. Nure Sofi 1250 1256
2. Karim al-Din Karaman 1256 1263
3. Mehmed I 1263 1277
4. Güneri Beg 1277 1300
5.. Badr al-Din Mahmud 1300 1311
6. Yahsi Han Bey 1311 1312
7. Haci Sufi Musa 1st:1312

2nd:1352

1st:1318

2nd:1356

8. Ibrahim I 1st:1318

2nd:1340

1st:1332

2nd:1349

9. Alaeddin Halil 1332 1340
10. Ahmed I 1349 1350
11 Şemseddin Beg 1350 1352
12. Süleyman 1356 1361
13. Alaattin Ali 1361 1398
14. Mehmed II 1st:1398

2nd:1421

1st:1420

2nd:1423

15. Alaatin Ali II 1420 1421
16. Ibrahim II 1423 1464
17. Ishak Beg 1464 1465
18. Pir Ahmed II 1465 1466
19. Kasım Beg 1466 1483
20. Turgutoglu Mahmut II 1483 1487
21. Mustafa Beg 1487 1501

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Leiser, Gary (2010). "The Turks in Anatolia before the Ottomans". In Fierro, Maribel (ed.). The New Cambridge History of Islam, Volume 2: The Western Islamic World, Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 310. ISBN 978-0-521-83957-0. His ally the Qaramanid Muhammad (r. 660–77/1261–78) did capture Konya in 675/1276 and attempted to replace Persian with Turkish as the official government language.
  • Green, Nile (2019). "Introduction". In Green, Nile (ed.). The Persianate World: The Frontiers of a Eurasian Lingua Franca. University of California Press.
  • Mehmet Fuat Köprülü (1992). The Origins of the Ottoman Empire. Translated by Gary Leiser. State University of New York Press. ISBN 0-7914-0819-1.

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Karamanids

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Karamanids, formally the Beylik of Karaman, constituted a Turkmen principality in south-central from 1256 to 1483, emerging amid the fragmentation of the Seljuk and persisting as one of the most formidable through persistent rivalry with the rising Ottoman state. Founded by the chieftain Bey, who led raids against Seljuk and Armenian Cilician territories in the Taurus foothills, the beylik rapidly consolidated power by capturing key cities like from Mongol overlords in 1277 under his successor Mehmed Bey. This ruler notably decreed Turkish as the of administration and court, supplanting Persian dominance and fostering Anatolian Turkish literary and cultural expression. The Karamanids positioned themselves as heirs to Seljuk legitimacy, expanding influence over central Anatolian territories and engaging in recurrent conflicts with the Ottomans from the late onward, including decisive defeats in 1390 and post-Timurid restorations in 1402 that briefly revived their fortunes. Under rulers like and later Pir Ahmed, they allied intermittently with Mamluks and others against Ottoman encroachment, but sustained military pressure culminated in Mehmed II's annexation of core lands in 1468, with final Ottoman incorporation under by 1483 following the defeat of Kasım Bey. Architecturally and culturally, the beylik left a legacy in mosques, madrasas, and tiled works, such as those in , underscoring their role in Turkic consolidation before Ottoman .

Origins and Foundation

Tribal Background and Establishment

The Karamanids traced their origins to the , a nomadic confederation whose tribes migrated westward into amid the disruptions caused by Mongol invasions of the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum following the in 1243. These migrations, intensified by political instability and pressure from Mongol overlords in the 1230s–1260s, displaced Turkmen groups from and eastern , leading to the fragmentation of Seljuk authority and the rise of independent beyliks in the power vacuum. The Karamanid lineage specifically belonged to branches of the Oghuz federation, with claims varying between the Salur and Afshar tribes, both of which contributed to the Turkic settlement of the Anatolian plateau. The formal establishment of the Karamanid beylik occurred under Kerîmeddin Bey (d. c. 1261–1262), who seized control of the town of Larende—ancient , now modern —in approximately 1256 during the waning years of Seljuk influence. Bey, leveraging the clan's nomadic warrior traditions, renamed the settlement after himself and used it as a strategic base amid the region's anarchy, where central Seljuk governance had collapsed under Mongol tribute demands and internal revolts. This foothold marked the transition from tribal raiding bands to a nascent , initially semiautonomous under nominal Seljuk granted by Sultan . Early consolidation relied on the ghazi ethos, with Karamanid forces operating as frontier holy warriors (ghazis) against Byzantine remnants in Cappadocia and Cilicia, as well as local Armenian and Greek Christian communities, capitalizing on the ethnic and religious tensions exacerbated by Seljuk decline. These activities, rooted in Turkmen pastoralist mobility and martial culture, secured initial loyalties among disparate Oghuz clans and laid the groundwork for the beylik's identity as defenders of Islam on the marches, distinct from the more urbanized Seljuk elite.

Initial Expansion under Karaman Bey

Karaman Bey, the eponymous founder of the Karamanid dynasty from the Afshar tribe of , capitalized on the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum's diminished authority after its decisive defeat by Mongol forces at the on June 26, 1243. This Mongol victory under imposed suzerainty on the Seljuks, extracting heavy tribute and fragmenting central control, which enabled peripheral Turkmen chieftains to conduct independent raids and consolidate local power in Anatolia's . Karaman Bey, operating from tribal bases in the western Taurus, rejected subservience to both weakened Seljuk sultans and Mongol overlords, initiating the beylik's formation as a semi-autonomous entity focused on territorial aggrandizement rather than vassalage. In the 1250s and 1260s, Karaman Bey directed military campaigns that secured core territories through the capture of strategic fortresses, including Ermenek, , Ereğli, and Gülnar, thereby establishing dominance in southern-central Anatolia's mountainous frontiers. These conquests filled the void left by Seljuk garrisons strained by Mongol exactions and internal rebellions, with Ereğli—previously under Seljuk influence—serving as a pivotal gateway for further incursions toward the Cilician plains. Raids extended influence toward Beyşehir, exploiting undefended plains amid the broader Anatolian fragmentation, though full control over such areas solidified only later in the century. By prioritizing defensible highland strongholds, Karaman Bey built a resilient base resilient to retaliatory strikes from Mongol-aligned Seljuk forces. The beylik under Karaman Bey symbolically oriented toward , the historic Seljuk capital, as a nod to Rum's Turkish-Islamic legacy without formal allegiance, fostering claims of continuity that bolstered legitimacy among local Turkmen and Muslim populations. This strategic posturing avoided direct confrontation with the while enabling opportunistic advances, setting the stage for the dynasty's enduring rivalry with emerging powers in . Karaman Bey's death around 1260 marked the transition to his successors, who inherited a consolidated enclave amid ongoing Mongol-Seljuk .

Rise and Peak of Power

Territorial Growth in

The Karamanids' territorial expansion in the capitalized on the Ilkhanate's disintegration after 1335, enabling absorption of fragmented local powers in central-southern . Initial advances under Mehmed Bey I culminated in the seizure of in May 1277, establishing a foothold in the former Seljuk capital and its surrounding plain, though Mongol intervention briefly halted further gains. Güneri Bey, succeeding in 1277, pursued aggressive enlargement despite Mongol checks, incorporating castles and districts in the Taurus foothills and toward . This phase extended the beylik's reach from the Cilician coast—encompassing ports like , , and Lamos—to the Konya interior, rivaling other Anatolian principalities. By mid-century, domains aligned with modern provinces of , , northern , and western , facilitating Mediterranean naval forays for trade and raids. Peaceful annexations via marriage alliances and territorial purchases complemented military absorptions of weaker neighbors like remnants of the Eshrefids. Temporary vassalage to the Ilkhanids secured autonomy amid expansions, as nominal payments averted full-scale reprisals while resources were redirected southward. Post-Ilkhanid allowed rulers like Alâeddin Ali I to claim sultanic titles, solidifying dominance without immediate Ottoman interference.

Key Alliances and Conflicts with Neighbors

The Karamanids maintained complex relations with neighboring , marked by intermittent cooperation against common threats like Mongol overlords but dominated by territorial rivalries. With the Eretna Beylik, conflicts arose over central Anatolian lands, including a Karamanid defeat of Eretna forces near Ilgın in 1364 amid bids for regional dominance following the fragmentation of Seljuk authority. Relations with the involved occasional alignment on shared interests, such as resistance to external pressures, but were more frequently characterized by violations, Karamanid , and that drove the to seek Ottoman protection before their absorption circa 1429. Rivalries extended eastward to the Dulkadir Beylik, where for influence in the Taurus region and Cilician approaches fueled proxy tensions, often mediated through patronage dynamics. Against the remnants of Seljuk authority, the Karamanids asserted independence post-Mongol invasions, capturing —the former Seljuk capital—around 1277 under Mehmed Bey and positioning themselves as heirs to Seljuk legitimacy while resisting Ilkhanid . Byzantine relations soured after initial support for the exiled Seljuk claimant in around 1261, evolving into Karamanid raids on Byzantine Anatolian holdings in the late , though direct confrontations remained limited compared to western beyliks. Tensions with the intensified in the as Karamanid rulers challenged Cilician borders; Mehmed Beg seized Tarsus in , and Ibrahim II's rebellion from 1456–1458 involved capturing fortresses like Gülek and Tarsus, prompting Inal's expeditions funded at 3,000–4,000 dinars per emir to reassert control. The Timurid invasion provided a temporary respite, enabling the Karamanids under to recover Anatolian territories lost to prior conquests during the following Timur's 1402 victory at . These engagements underscored the Karamanids' strategic opportunism amid Anatolia's power vacuums, balancing aggression with selective diplomacy to sustain expansion.

Governance and Administration

List of Rulers

The Karamanid dynasty's rulers, titled beys or emirs, followed a succession pattern dominated by agnatic interspersed with fratricidal conflicts, as brothers vied for control amid external pressures from Mongol Ilkhanids, Mamluks, and later Ottomans; such internal strife, documented in chronicles like those of Şikârî and Neşrī, eroded the beylik's cohesion despite periods of territorial consolidation. Ottoman sources like Neşrī, compiled post-conquest, offer detailed chronologies but exhibit bias by emphasizing Karamanid defeats and portraying them as perennial rebels against Seljuk and Ottoman legitimacy.
RulerReign (approximate)Key Notes
Nūr al-Dīn ṢūfīPre-1256Father of Karaman Beg; focused on religious leadership, delegating secular rule; buried in Ermenek.
Karaman Begc. 1256–1262Founder; expanded from Ermenek-Mut region; died from battle wounds against Armenian ruler .
Şems al-Dīn Mehmed I Begc. 1276–1277Son of Karaman Beg; captured in 1277 and decreed Turkish as administrative language; killed fighting .
Günerî Begc. 1277–1300Conducted raids on ; died 20 April 1300.
Maḥmūd Begc. 1300–1307/1308Son of Karaman Beg; constructed and mausoleum in Ermenek (1302); died 1307/1308.
Yak̲h̲s̲h̲î Begc. 1307/1308–1317/1318Son of Maḥmūd; seized c. 1314; died 1317/1318.
Sulaymān Begc. 1317/1318–1361Brother of Yak̲h̲s̲h̲î; assassinated in internal plot (1361).
ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn ʿAlî Begc. 1361–1397/1398Killed nephew Qāsim to usurp throne; expanded holdings before execution by Ottoman .
Meḥmed Begc. 1402–1423Son of ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn; reinstated by post-Ankara (1402); died besieging (1423).
Tāj al-Dīn Ibrāhīm Begc. 1423–1464Son of Meḥmed; captured (1448); resisted Ottoman incursions until death.
Pîr Aḥmad Begc. 1464–1474Son of Ibrāhīm; internal disputes with brothers; territory partially ized by Ottomans by 1474.
Qāsim Begc. 1474–1483Brother of Pîr Aḥmad; ruled as Ottoman ; died 1483 amid final subjugation efforts.
Post-1483, pretenders like Turgut , a Karamanid descendant, mounted brief resistance until the beylik's full annexation in 1487, though primary chronicles provide scant details on these late figures due to Ottoman dominance. recurred, as in the poisoning of Şems al-Dīn by kin (1352) and ʿAlî's , exacerbating vulnerabilities exploited by rivals. The Karamanid beylik operated under a centralized yet tribal-influenced , with the ruling exercising supreme authority over political, military, and judicial affairs, advised by a divan-like council composed of tribal chieftains and appointed officials. This governance model drew from Seljuk precedents, featuring viziers and secretaries for administrative tasks, but prioritized alliances with to ensure loyalty amid decentralized provincial control. Local begs, often kin or trusted tribal leaders, governed key cities such as Larende () and , collecting revenues and maintaining order while remitting tribute to the central court. Fiscal policy emphasized agrarian taxation, primarily the Islamic ushr tithe on agricultural produce, supplemented by levies and customs duties from trade routes in central . Raids (ghanima) against neighboring Byzantine or Armenian territories provided additional irregular income, reflecting the ghazi ethos of early Turkmen principalities. Coinage, minted in silver and copper from the onward, asserted sovereignty; examples under Muhammad II (r. circa 1420s) bore Arabic inscriptions invoking Islamic formulae, though administrative promotion of Turkish under earlier rulers like Mehmed (r. 1277–1308) influenced documentary practices. The legal system blended , enforced by kadis appointed in major towns for civil and criminal matters among settled populations, with customary law governing tribal disputes, pastoral rights, and blood feuds among nomadic elements. This dual framework accommodated the beylik's heterogeneous society of Sunni Muslims, Christian subjects paying , and semi-autonomous tribes, preventing fragmentation while allowing flexibility in frontier enforcement. No comprehensive kanun codes akin to later Ottoman compilations are attested, underscoring the beylik's reliance on and religious legitimacy over codified .

Military Organization and Warfare

Military Structure and Tactics

The Karamanid military was predominantly composed of Turkmen tribal cavalry, drawing from nomadic horsemen skilled in mounted archery and rapid maneuvers, a hallmark of post-Seljuk Anatolian forces. These riders, lightly armored for speed and endurance, formed the core of raiding parties akin to the akıncı warriors of neighboring beyliks, enabling hit-and-run tactics that exploited the mobility advantages of steppe-bred horses over heavier infantry formations. Infantry contingents, recruited from settled agrarian populations in central and southern Anatolia, provided support for holding ground and conducting sieges against fortified positions, though they were secondary to the cavalry's offensive role. Warfare tactics emphasized from horseback to harass enemies at range, feigned retreats to draw foes into ambushes, and avoidance of prolonged pitched battles in open plains unless numerical superiority allowed . This approach was well-suited to Anatolia's diverse of mountains, plateaus, and river valleys, where could outmaneuver slower armies while minimizing exposure to defensive strongholds. Sieges relied on , , and rudimentary borrowed from Seljuk traditions, prioritizing the capture of key fortresses like those in to secure trade routes and expand territory. Limited naval elements, drawn from coastal holdings in , facilitated opportunistic raids against Armenian remnants and European outposts, though the beylik lacked a dedicated fleet comparable to Aegean rivals.

Major Battles and Campaigns

The Karamanids initiated their expansion through campaigns against the remnants of the in during the mid-13th century. Under Karaman Bey (r. ca. 1256–1260s), forces captured key fortresses including Ermenek, Mut, Ereğli, Gülnar, and , primarily at the expense of Armenian holdings weakened by prior pressures. These conquests secured the beylik's southern flanks and provided access to Mediterranean ports, though specific pitched battles are sparsely documented, with success attributed to nomadic mobility and opportunistic raids rather than large-scale engagements. In the , following the Ilkhanid collapse around 1335, the Karamanids launched campaigns into adjacent Byzantine themes in and , exploiting imperial fragmentation. These efforts involved raids and sieges that eroded Byzantine control over inland districts, contributing to the beylik's growth into central without decisive field battles recorded in primary accounts. Concurrently, defensive wars against the Eretnids (ruling eastern from 1335) centered on contested regions like and , where Karamanid forces repelled incursions and gradually absorbed territories amid Eretnid internal strife, highlighting tactical reliance on for hit-and-run operations. Clashes with the s over intensified in the 15th century, driven by Karamanid ambitions to control Tarsus and Gülek. In 1417, Mamluk al-Muʾayyad Shaykh retook Tarsus from Karamanid Beg, only for the latter to reclaim it after Mamluk withdrawal, underscoring fragile truces. A more sustained conflict erupted in 1456–1458 under Ibrahim II, when Karamanid forces seized Tarsus and Gülek fortresses, prompting a Mamluk counter-campaign under Inal that restored through sieges and , limiting Karamanid gains to temporary border raids. During the Timurid invasion's aftermath (post-1402), Karamanid campaigns capitalized on regional to recapture and adjacent areas, leveraging alliances with who reinstated their control over central Anatolian heartlands previously contested by rivals. This opportunistic expansion, involving skirmishes against fragmented beyliks rather than major battles, temporarily restored the beylik's peak territorial extent before renewed pressures.

Cultural and Linguistic Contributions

Promotion of Turkish Language

The Karamanids distinguished themselves among Anatolian beyliks by elevating Turkish to a prominent role in official and cultural domains, countering the prevailing Persianate administrative traditions inherited from the Seljuks. In 1277, following the capture of Konya, Mehmed Bey issued a firman decreeing that Turkish replace Persian and Arabic in governmental proceedings, courts, public inscriptions, and religious settings, proclaiming it the sole language for state affairs. This edict, issued while Mehmed served briefly as a Seljuk vizier, represented the earliest documented effort in Anatolia to mandate a Turkic vernacular over Persian, the dominant court language of the region, thereby asserting a distinct ethnic Turkic identity amid Mongol-influenced fragmentation. Although surviving administrative records from the Karamanids are limited and some scholars question the decree's long-term enforcement due to persistent Persian influences, it symbolized a deliberate linguistic shift that fostered Turkic consolidation. This policy extended to numismatics and literary patronage, where Turkish appeared on coins and in decrees, reinforcing vernacular usage. Karamanid mints produced dirhams and akçes bearing Turkish inscriptions alongside Arabic, such as invocations and ruler names, diverging from the exclusively Perso-Arabic epigraphy common in Seljuk and early Ottoman issues. In literature, the beylik supported early Old Anatolian Turkish works, including poetry by figures like Yunus Emre (d. circa 1320), whose mystical verses in accessible Turkish dialects circulated widely and helped standardize the language against Persian poetic dominance. Unlike the Seljuks, who confined Turkish to folk contexts while privileging Persian for administration and high culture, or the Ottomans, who initially retained Persian-Arabic hybrids in chancellery documents until the 19th century, the Karamanids' emphasis on Turkish accelerated its institutionalization, contributing causally to Anatolia's gradual Turkification by embedding it in power structures.

Architecture and Artistic Developments

Karamanid primarily consisted of religious and educational structures such as mosques and , built in major centers like and Ermenek, which blended Seljuk-era motifs with local Turkmen adaptations emphasizing geometric patterns and glazed tilework. These buildings often featured turquoise-glazed tiles applied to and portals, incorporating both abstract designs and figurative elements like animal motifs, reflecting a continuation of Anatolian Islamic decorative traditions amid the beylik's political fragmentation. The Hatuniye in , completed in 1382 under the patronage of Nefise Sultan—daughter of Ottoman Sultan and wife of Karamanid ruler Ala al-Din Ali Bey—stands as a prime example, with its ornate entrance portal and interior tile revetments showcasing techniques derived from earlier Seljuk practices. Mosques from the period, such as the Ulucami in Ermenek dating to 1302, prioritized functional halls with minarets and domes, serving communal prayer while integrating defensive elements suitable for the beylik's volatile frontiers. Artistic developments in tile production highlighted innovation in underglaze painting and molded reliefs, though many original features were altered or repurposed during Ottoman conquests, limiting intact survivals to select niches and fragments now in museum collections. Beyond religious edifices, Karamanids invested in caravanserais and fortifications to bolster trade along Anatolian routes and secure territories, with records indicating at least two such inns constructed to accommodate merchants amid the beylik's expansion. Castles like Mamure Kalesi received Karamanid reinforcements, featuring layered walls and towers that combined Byzantine foundations with Turkmen military adaptations for coastal defense against Mediterranean threats. These utilitarian structures underscored a pragmatic approach, prioritizing durability over elaborate ornamentation in response to ongoing rivalries with neighboring powers.

Society, Economy, and Religion

Social Structure and Economy

The social structure of the Karamanid Beylik emphasized tribal hierarchies rooted in its origins as a Turkmen nomadic warband under Karim al-Din Karaman around 1256. The ruling bey and his kin dominated, supported by elite tribal emirs and warriors who held authority over subordinate clans, prioritizing martial loyalty over urban commercial interests. Peasants, comprising the bulk of the reaya (taxpaying subjects), formed the base layer, cultivating lands and herding livestock under obligations to tribal lords, with limited evidence of independent merchant classes gaining prominence until later urban growth in centers like Karaman city. Demographically, the beylik's population blended incoming Muslim Turkic nomads with pre-existing Christian communities, including and in rural and urban areas of central and southern . These non-Muslim groups, some adopting Turkish as a vernacular while retaining Orthodox practices—evident in the emergence of Turkish-speaking —coexisted as subjects, often through conversion or accommodation amid Turkic settlement pressures following Mongol disruptions circa 1243. No precise census data survives, but the beylik's expansion from Larende (modern ) to by the incorporated diverse agrarian villages, sustaining a mixed ethnic fabric without full assimilation. The economy relied on agrarian production and , leveraging the beylik's central Anatolian plateau for , , and cultivation alongside extensive sheep herding. Karaman-specific sheep breeds, resilient to harsh winters, supported transhumant by , yielding , , and hides for local use and export. Trade routes through the linked inland resources to Mediterranean ports in , which the Karamanids intermittently controlled from the 1360s, facilitating exchange of grains, textiles, and metals with Levantine and European markets, though disrupted by rival beyliks and Mongol aftermath. accumulation centered on iqta-style land assignments to tribal retainers, granting rights from tithes in exchange for service, mirroring Seljuk precedents adapted to post-1243 fragmentation. This system, without full hereditary ownership, incentivized expansion into underutilized lands devastated by earlier invasions, bolstering elite amid sparse .

Religious Policies and Composition

The Karamanids adhered to Sunni Islam within the Hanafi school of jurisprudence, consistent with the broader tradition of Anatolian Turkish principalities succeeding the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum. Rulers patronized religious scholars (ulema) through the construction of madrasas and support for Sufi orders, fostering orthodox Hanafi teachings amid the region's post-Mongol fragmentation. This framework emphasized legalistic interpretations derived from the Quran, sunnah, and analogical reasoning, aligning with the beylik's efforts to legitimize authority via Islamic scholarship rather than solely military prowess. Non-Muslims, primarily Greek Orthodox Christians, were treated as dhimmis under pragmatic policies that granted protected status in exchange for the and adherence to Islamic legal restrictions, particularly in frontier border areas vulnerable to Byzantine or Armenian incursions. Such tolerance facilitated economic stability and military alliances, avoiding wholesale forced conversions that might destabilize agrarian populations. Proto-Karamanlides—Turkish-speaking Orthodox communities—emerged in the region during this era, reflecting gradual linguistic among Christian subjects through intermarriage, trade, and cultural osmosis, with incentives like tax exemptions or social elevation encouraging voluntary Islamization over coercion. The beylik's ghazi ideology, rooted in frontier against non-Muslim polities, motivated expansionist campaigns portraying rulers as holy warriors defending , yet this was tempered by in diverse territories lacking the formalized millet system later developed by the Ottomans. Ghazi ethos prioritized raids on infidel borders for booty and recruits, drawing on Oghuz Turkish traditions, but internal religious composition remained mixed, with Christian villages persisting under local autonomy rather than systematic segregation or mass assimilation. This approach sustained demographic pluralism, as evidenced by the endurance of Orthodox communities into the Ottoman period.

Rivalry with the Ottoman Empire

Early Clashes and Temporary Alliances

In the early , the Karamanids, centered in central with as their capital, expanded westward, encroaching on territories claimed by the nascent Ottoman beylik in the northwest, leading to initial border skirmishes under (r. c. 1299–1323/4) and his son (r. 1323/4–1362). These conflicts arose as both principalities competed for dominance among the post-Seljuk Turkish beyliks, with Karamanid forces posing a threat to Ottoman consolidation in regions like and . To mitigate rivalry and secure borders, Sultan (r. 1362–1389) arranged a marriage alliance around 1378–1381 between his Nefise (or Melek) Hatun and Alaeddin , of the Karamanid Halil , fostering temporary cooperation amid shared pressures from Byzantine remnants and Mongol influences. This pact allowed both sides to focus on peripheral threats, including Byzantine holdings, though it did not eliminate underlying territorial ambitions; Ottoman sources note Karamanid raids into Ottoman Anatolian lands persisted, prompting Murad's intervention in 1386 to curb Alaeddin Ali's incursions. Tensions escalated under (r. 1389–1402), who prioritized n unification to support his European campaigns. In the early 1390s, Bayezid subdued a Karamanid-led coalition of beyliks, capturing key cities including Akşehir, , and temporarily by 1397 after defeating Alaeddin Ali at the Battle of Akçay. These gains were short-lived; Timur's of in 1402, culminating in the , shattered Ottoman forces, enabling Karamanid restoration under Mehmed II Bey and reversing Bayezid's conquests through Timurid patronage. This interlude highlighted the opportunistic nature of prior alliances, as Karamanids exploited Ottoman vulnerability without formal pacts against Byzantines, prioritizing self-preservation over enduring cooperation.

Escalation and Perceived Betrayals

Following the death of İbrahim II in 1464, succession struggles among his sons, including İshak and Halil, escalated tensions with the Ottoman Empire, as the Karamanids sought external support to resist Ottoman dominance. The Akkoyunlu ruler Uzun Hasan intervened on behalf of İshak, installing him as emir and providing military aid, which Ottoman chroniclers later framed as a treacherous alliance with a foreign power hostile to Ottoman interests in eastern Anatolia. This involvement contravened prior Ottoman-Karamanid agreements, where İbrahim II had pledged non-aggression after earlier defeats, prompting Mehmed II to launch decisive offensives in the mid-1460s to assert central authority. Mehmed II's 1468 campaign marked a peak in hostilities, with Ottoman forces capturing the Karamanid capital of and razing key fortresses such as Gevele to dismantle resistance infrastructure, while fortifying strategic sites to prevent recapture. Despite these victories, full subjugation proved elusive, as Karamanid forces, bolstered by Akkoyunlu reinforcements, mounted revolts and temporarily reclaimed territories, highlighting their operational resilience amid repeated truces that both sides accused the other of violating. Ottoman narratives emphasized Karamanid perfidy in breaking oaths of vassalage, portraying such acts as betrayals that justified harsh reprisals, though these accounts, produced by the victors, systematically downplayed Ottoman breaches of fragile peace terms. The Karamanids' persistent assertion of Seljukid heritage further fueled Ottoman perceptions of existential rivalry, as they invoked titles and legitimacy tied to the Sultanate of Rum—whose capital Konya they controlled—directly challenging Mehmed II's ambitions to monopolize Anatolian Turkish sovereignty and caliphal pretensions. Karamanid chroniclers like Şikârî upheld their dynasty as the true Seljuk successors, contrasting with Ottoman efforts to legitimize expansion through conquest narratives that marginalized rival claims. Both parties engaged in documented atrocities, including mass displacements and fortress demolitions, amid a cycle of alliances with mutual enemies—Karamanids with Akkoyunlu and sporadically Mamluks, Ottomans with regional proxies—rendering truces short-lived and conflicts protracted through the 1470s.

Decline and Annexation

Internal Weaknesses and External Pressures

Following the death of Ibrahim Bey in 1464, the Karamanid dynasty experienced acute dynastic instability, as his sons Pir Ahmed and Ishak vied for control, leading to the temporary deposition of their father and subsequent civil discord that fragmented authority. This infighting, characteristic of post-1400 succession disputes in the beylik, eroded central cohesion and military readiness, with rival claimants seeking external alliances—Pir Ahmed with the and others turning to the Ottomans—further compromising sovereignty. Prolonged warfare, especially the Ottoman-Karamanid conflicts escalating from the 1440s, inflicted severe economic pressures through territorial losses, disrupted agriculture, and diminished revenues from key ports like Silifke and Anamur, which underpinned the beylik's commerce in grains, textiles, and Mediterranean trade. These strains were compounded by vassalage impositions, including tribute demands and population displacements, which strained fiscal resources without corresponding administrative reforms to bolster sedentary taxation or infrastructure. The Karamanids' foundational dependence on nomadic Turkmen loyalists for cavalry and raiding clashed with the governance needs of urban centers like Konya and Karaman, where settled populations required stable law and revenue systems incompatible with tribal autonomy and seasonal migrations. This tension manifested in unreliable mobilization during crises, as nomadic factions prioritized internal raids or external patrons over unified state-building, ultimately undermining the beylik's transition to a more centralized polity amid 15th-century pressures.

Final Conquest and Integration

Following the death of Sultan Mehmed II in 1481, Karamanid loyalists under leaders such as Kasım Bey briefly reasserted control over parts of the beylik, exploiting the Ottoman succession crisis between Bayezid II and his brother Cem Sultan, with whom some Karamanids allied in attempts to capture Konya. This resurgence challenged Ottoman authority amid Bayezid II's ongoing conflicts, including the Ottoman-Mamluk War (1485–1491), where Mamluk support for Karaman waned due to their own military preoccupations.) Bayezid II responded decisively, dispatching forces under governors like Karagöz Mehmed Pasha to subdue the region, culminating in the Ottoman conquest of remaining Karamanid strongholds in 1487 as Mamluk influence declined further.) A key engagement occurred near Konya, where Ottoman troops crushed Karamanid resistance led by figures including Turgut Mehmed, effectively ending organized opposition and securing the beylik's annexation. The campaign capitalized on the Ottomans' superior mobilization from Balkan timariots and artillery, overwhelming the fragmented Karamanid forces reliant on local Turkmen tribes. Post-conquest, Bayezid II integrated Karaman as the Eyalet of Karaman, a provincial administrative unit governed from Konya, with Ottoman officials replacing local dynastic rule to centralize tax collection and military levies. To prevent future revolts, elites and families from the Karamanid ruling class were forcibly relocated to Ottoman heartlands in Rumelia and western Anatolia, diluting regional autonomy and incorporating their resources into the imperial system. Ottoman chronicles, such as those reflecting court historiography under Bayezid II, framed the Karamanids not as independent sovereigns but as wayward subjects of the defunct Sultanate of Rum, whose "rebellion" necessitated restoration of legitimate suzerainty—a narrative that minimized the beylik's centuries-long autonomy to legitimize expansion. This portrayal aligned with broader Ottoman ideological claims to Anatolian inheritance, though modern assessments highlight the Karamanids' distinct statehood prior to subjugation.

Legacy and Historical Assessment

Role in Turkification of Anatolia

The Karamanids accelerated the Turkification of central Anatolia through deliberate linguistic policies and support for Turkmen migrations. In 1277, Mehmed Bey promulgated a firman designating Turkish as the sole language for state administration, courts, and daily use in Konya, the former Seljuk capital under their control, effectively challenging the entrenched Persian linguistic dominance in official spheres. This edict, which reportedly involved the destruction of Persian and Arabic texts to prioritize Turkish, marked an early institutional push for vernacular Turkish, fostering its entrenchment among elites and populace alike. As a Turkmen dynasty originating from Oghuz tribes, the Karamanids' expansion from their Larende base into central and southern Anatolia from the mid-13th century onward drew significant Turkmen pastoralist influxes, particularly those displaced by Mongol incursions into Iran and Central Asia. Their beylik, encompassing key agricultural and pastoral zones around Konya by the 14th century, provided a stable polity for these settlers, promoting demographic shifts that increased Turkish-speaking populations relative to Greek, Armenian, and other indigenous groups through intermarriage, conversion, and land grants to nomads. This settlement pattern solidified Turkish ethnic presence in the region's heartland, contrasting with more peripheral Byzantine holdouts. The Karamanids' administrative use of Turkish set a precedent later emulated by the Ottomans, influencing the gradual vernacularization of governance amid persistent Persianate influences. By patronizing early Anatolian Turkish literary works, such as those in the emerging vernacular tradition, they helped preserve Turkmen epics and folklore, countering Persian literary hegemony and embedding Turkic cultural motifs in local Islamic expression. This cultural consolidation reinforced linguistic dominance, laying groundwork for Turkish as a unifying medium in post-Seljuk Anatolia.

Modern Interpretations and Debates

In Ottoman historiography, Karamanid rulers were systematically depicted as treacherous rebels undermining imperial unity, a portrayal evident in chronicles like those of Aşıkpaşazade and Neşri, which justified their subjugation by emphasizing repeated alliances with external foes such as the Byzantines and Akkoyunlu. This bias served to legitimize Ottoman expansion while marginalizing Karamanid legitimacy claims rooted in Seljukid succession. Modern scholars, drawing on comparative analysis of beylik-era waqfs and diplomatic correspondence, argue such accounts reflect post-conquest propaganda rather than objective causality, as Karamanid resistance often stemmed from defensive responses to Ottoman encroachments rather than inherent disloyalty. Contemporary Turkish scholarship frequently reframes the Karamanids as proto-nationalist figures for their advocacy of vernacular Turkish in governance and literature, highlighted by Karamanoğlu Mehmed Bey's circa 1277 decree prioritizing Turkish over Persian and Arabic in official usage—a policy fostering administrative efficiency amid Mongol-era fragmentation. This interpretation aligns with post-republican emphasis on linguistic indigenization as a precursor to Atatürk-era reforms, yet risks anachronism; peer-reviewed analyses contend it arose from pragmatic Turkic tribal consolidation rather than foresight of ethnic nationalism, as evidenced by bilingual court practices persisting alongside Turkish promotion. Debates on Karamanid socio-religious dynamics contrast their reputed Turkic exclusivity—manifest in patronage of Oghuz poets and resistance to Persianate cosmopolitanism—with Ottoman models of multi-ethnic governance via the devshirme and millet systems. Archival evidence from Karamanid-endowed madrasas indicates selective tolerance for Christian dhimmis under jizya but prioritizes Muslim-Turkic cadre integration, potentially limiting broader alliances that enabled Ottoman longevity. Counterarguments highlight shared Anatolian beylik norms of pragmatic coexistence, critiquing projections of intolerance as derived from Ottoman victors' narratives rather than demographic data showing sustained Greek Orthodox communities in Karaman territories until the 15th century. Speculative historiography posits that Karamanid survival might have yielded a more linguistically unified Anatolian polity, emphasizing Turkic core identity over Ottoman pluralism and possibly averting devshirme-era resentments, though lacking the diplomatic flexibility for Balkan or Levantine conquests. Recent studies, leveraging digitized Ottoman defters and Karamanid vakfiyes, prioritize empirical fiscal records over epic ghazi legends, revealing internal factionalism as a greater causal factor in decline than mythic betrayals, thus demystifying romanticized rivalries in favor of structural realpolitik.

References

  1. https://kipchaks.com/karamanogullar-the-fiercest-rivals-of-the-ottoman-sultans-among-the-turkish-beys/
  2. https://curate.nd.edu/articles/thesis/Nomadic_Warriors_on_the_Edge_of_the_World_Empire_The_Early_Karamanids_1225-1335_/24735525
  3. https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkey-marks-743rd-anniversary-of-turkish-language-154738
  4. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004216570/B9789004216570-s010.pdf
  5. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bulletin-of-the-school-of-oriental-and-african-studies/article/crossing-the-line-mamluk-response-to-qaramanid-threat-in-the-fifteenth-century-according-to-ms-ar-4440-bnf-paris1/8C5C78CD021BB19C4AD7C0511A1BEB64
  6. https://www.facebook.com/100068585383851/posts/the-karamanids-or-karamanid-dynasty-modern-turkish-karamano%25C4%259Fullar%25C4%25B1-karamano%25C4%259Fulla/395200577482012/
  7. http://www.cometoturkey.com/karaman.html
  8. https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/296356
  9. https://idealestates.com/turkish-culture-and-history/seljuks-to-the-dawn-of-the-ottomans/
  10. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Battle-of-Kose-Dag
  11. https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/TURKS.htm
  12. https://historica.fandom.com/wiki/Mehmet_I_of_Karaman
  13. https://www.investinkonya.gov.tr/konya/history
  14. https://historica.fandom.com/wiki/Guneri_of_Karaman
  15. https://romeartlover.tripod.com/Karaman.html
  16. https://www.britannica.com/place/Karaman
  17. http://nehrreview.com/?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=&makaleurl=b148f91a-bf4c-4380-bbc5-047372cdd82b.pdf&key=74423
  18. https://tidsad.com/index.jsp?mod=makale_ing_ozet&makale_id=30396
  19. https://historica.fandom.com/wiki/Karamanids
  20. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EIEO/SIM-3919.xml
  21. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805216/20932/index/9780521620932_index.pdf
  22. https://www.sullacoins.com/post/anatolian-beyliks
  23. https://www.numisforums.com/topic/6515-a-coin-with-beautiful-caligraphy/
  24. https://www.kleiohistoricaljournal.com/post/shari-a-and-kanun-a-study-of-the-ottoman-empire-s-legal-system
  25. https://www.britannica.com/technology/military-technology/The-horse-archer
  26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-war/ottoman-expansion-and-military-power-13001453/A0310E3C60C10C4FA33FB40370C19A3A
  27. https://byzantinemilitary.blogspot.com/2014/09/mamure-castle-defending-coast-of.html
  28. https://graphsearch.epfl.ch/en/concept/541567
  29. https://mkasu.journals.ekb.eg/article_271086.html?lang=en
  30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/islam-literature-and-society-in-mongol-anatolia/emergence-of-literary-turkish/C9B66FD860C0EDD6ABFCB90506F2DC56
  31. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/historiography-xiv/
  32. https://ia802901.us.archive.org/34/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.46665/2015.46665.The-Coins-Of-The-Turks.pdf
  33. https://www.romeartlover.it/Karaman.html
  34. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/781615
  35. https://www.archnet.org/sites/3624
  36. https://turkmeniya.tripod.com/id33.html
  37. https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5734/
  38. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/7196/1/Usta17PhD.pdf
  39. https://www.dailysabah.com/feature/2017/04/18/the-karamanlides-anatolias-forgotten-orthodox-turks
  40. https://lup.nl/wp-content/uploads/9789400604759-AL-intro.pdf
  41. https://www.britannica.com/topic/iqta
  42. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/52925821.pdf
  43. https://fountainmagazine.com/all-issues/2002/issue-40-october-december-2002/the-status-of-dhimmis-in-the-ottoman-empire
  44. https://greekreporter.com/2023/08/06/the-story-of-the-karamanlides-orthodox-turkish-speaking-people-native-to-anatolia/
  45. https://www.academia.edu/7414489/A_Comparative_Analysis_of_the_Concepts_of_Holy_War_and_the_Idealized_Topos_of_Holy_Warrior_In_Medieval_Anatolian_And_European_Sources
  46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43391224
  47. https://tidsad.com/?mod=makale_ing_ozet&makale_id=30394
  48. https://dominadespina.blog/post/743408413786177536/the-life-of-nefise-hatun
  49. https://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam032/98038430.pdf
  50. https://www.facebook.com/theislamicchronicles/posts/uzun-was-the-greatest-rival-of-sultan-mehmed-the-conqueror-in-eastern-anatolia-b/384456336427171/
  51. https://maypoleofwisdom.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/the-ottoman-empire-the-classical-age-1300-1600-halil-inalcik-z-lib.org_.pdf
  52. https://www.academia.edu/691268/_Razing_Gevele_and_Fortifying_Konya_the_Beginning_of_the_Ottoman_Conquest_of_the_Karamanid_Principality_in_South_Central_Anatolia_1468_2009_
  53. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780748647576-009/html
  54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43385268
  55. https://www.academia.edu/102115257/Turkomans_Between_Two_Empires_The_Origins_of_the_Qizilbash_Identity_in_Anatolia_1447_1514_
  56. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YD1yNDCWpXE
  57. https://www.academia.edu/40707032/KARAMAN_IN_THE_MAMLUK_SULTANATE_S_POLICY_13TH_15TH_CENTURIES_
  58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24692276
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316523418_The_Turks_in_Anatolia_before_the_Ottomans
  60. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789047433187/Bej.9789004165755.i-496_003.pdf
  61. https://www.etd.ceu.edu/2025/derindere_ece.pdf
  62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/204822
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.