Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Liminality
View on Wikipedia
| Part of a series on |
| Anthropology of religion |
|---|
| Social and cultural anthropology |
In anthropology, liminality (from Latin limen 'a threshold')[1] is the quality of ambiguity or disorientation that occurs in the middle stage of a rite of passage, when participants no longer hold their pre-ritual status but have not yet begun the transition to the status they will hold when the rite is complete.[2] During a rite's liminal stage, participants "stand at the threshold"[3] between their previous way of structuring their identity, time, or community, and a new way (which completing the rite establishes).
The concept of liminality was first developed in the early twentieth century by folklorist Arnold van Gennep and later taken up by Victor Turner.[4] More recently, usage of the term has broadened to describe political and cultural change as well as rites.[5][6] During liminal periods of all kinds, social hierarchies may be reversed or temporarily dissolved, continuity of tradition may become uncertain, and future outcomes once taken for granted may be thrown into doubt.[7] The dissolution of order during liminality creates a fluid, malleable situation that enables new institutions and customs to become established.[8] The term has also passed into popular usage and has been expanded to include liminoid experiences that are more relevant to post-industrial society.[9]
Rites of passage
[edit]Arnold van Gennep
[edit]Van Gennep, who coined the term liminality, published in 1909 his Rites de Passage, a work that explores and develops the concept of liminality in the context of rites in small-scale societies.[10] Van Gennep began his book by identifying the various categories of rites. He distinguished between those that result in a change of status for an individual or social group, and those that signify transitions in the passage of time. In doing so, he placed a particular emphasis on rites of passage, and claimed that "such rituals marking, helping, or celebrating individual or collective passages through the cycle of life or of nature exist in every culture, and share a specific three-fold sequential structure".[8]
This three-fold structure, as established by van Gennep, is made up of the following components:[10]
- preliminal rites (or rites of separation): This stage involves a metaphorical "death", as the initiate is forced to leave something behind by breaking with previous practices and routines.
- liminal rites (or transition rites): Two characteristics are essential to these rites. First, the rite "must follow a strictly prescribed sequence, where everybody knows what to do and how".[8] Second, everything must be done "under the authority of a master of ceremonies".[8] The destructive nature of this rite allows for considerable changes to be made to the identity of the initiate. This middle stage (when the transition takes place) "implies an actual passing through the threshold that marks the boundary between two phases, and the term 'liminality' was introduced in order to characterize this passage."[8]
- postliminal rites (or rites of incorporation): During this stage, the initiate is re-incorporated into society with a new identity, as a "new" being.
Turner confirmed his nomenclature for "the three phases of passage from one culturally defined state or status to another...preliminal, liminal, and postliminal".[11]
Beyond this structural template, Van Gennep also suggested four categories of rites that emerge as universal across cultures and societies. He suggested that there are four types of social rites of passage that are replicable and recognizable among many ethnographic populations.[12] They include:
- Passage of people from one status to another, initiation ceremonies in which an outsider is brought into the group. This includes marriage and initiation ceremonies that move one from the status of an outsider to an insider.
- Passage from one place to another, such as moving houses, moving to a new city, etc.
- Passage from one situation to another: beginning university, starting a new job, and graduating high school or university.
- Passage of time such as New Year celebrations and birthdays.[12]
Van Gennep considered rites of initiation to be the most typical rite. To gain a better understanding of "tripartite structure" of liminal situations, one can look at a specific rite of initiation: the initiation of youngsters into adulthood, which Turner considered the most typical rite. In such rites of passage, the experience is highly structured. The first phase (the rite of separation) requires the child to go through a separation from his family; this involves his/her "death" as a child, as childhood is effectively left behind. In the second stage, initiands (between childhood and adulthood) must pass a "test" to prove they are ready for adulthood. If they succeed, the third stage (incorporation) involves a celebration of the "new birth" of the adult and a welcoming of that being back into society.
By constructing this three-part sequence, van Gennep identified a pattern he believed was inherent in all ritual passages. By suggesting that such a sequence is universal (meaning that all societies use rites to demarcate transitions), van Gennep made an important claim (one that not many anthropologists make, as they generally tend to demonstrate cultural diversity while shying away from universality).[12]
An anthropological rite, especially a rite of passage, involves some change to the participants, especially their social status.;[13] and in 'the first phase (of separation) comprises symbolic behaviour signifying the detachment of the individual...from an earlier fixed point in the social structure.[14] Their status thus becomes liminal. In such a liminal situation, "the initiands live outside their normal environment and are brought to question their self and the existing social order through a series of rituals that often involve acts of pain: the initiands come to feel nameless, spatio-temporally dislocated and socially unstructured".[15] In this sense, liminal periods are "destructive" as well as "constructive", meaning that "the formative experiences during liminality will prepare the initiand (and his/her cohort) to occupy a new social role or status, made public during the reintegration rituals".[15]
Victor Turner
[edit]Turner, who is considered to have "re-discovered the importance of liminality", first came across van Gennep's work in 1963.[6] In 1967 he published his book The Forest of Symbols, which included an essay entitled Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites of Passage. Within the works of Turner, liminality began to wander away from its narrow application to ritual passages in small-scale societies.[6] In the various works he completed while conducting his fieldwork amongst the Ndembu in Zambia, he made numerous connections between tribal and non-tribal societies, "sensing that what he argued for the Ndembu had relevance far beyond the specific ethnographic context".[6] He became aware that liminality "...served not only to identify the importance of in-between periods, but also to understand the human reactions to liminal experiences: the way liminality shaped personality, the sudden foregrounding of agency, and the sometimes dramatic tying together of thought and experience".[6]
'The attributes of liminality or of liminal personae ("threshold people") are necessarily ambiguous'.[16] One's sense of identity dissolves to some extent, bringing about disorientation, but also the possibility of new perspectives. Turner posits that, if liminality is regarded as a time and place of withdrawal from normal modes of social action, it potentially can be seen as a period of scrutiny for central values and axioms of the culture where it occurs.[17]—one where normal limits to thought, self-understanding, and behavior are undone. In such situations, "the very structure of society [is] temporarily suspended"[8]
'According to Turner, all liminality must eventually dissolve, for it is a state of great intensity that cannot exist very long without some sort of structure to stabilize it...either the individual returns to the surrounding social structure...or else liminal communities develop their own internal social structure, a condition Turner calls "normative communitas"'.[18]
Turner also worked on the idea of communitas, the feeling of camaraderie associated among a group experiencing the same liminal experience or rite.[19] Turner defined three distinct and not always sequential forms of communitas, which he describes as "that 'antistructural' state at stake in the liminal phase of ritual forms."[19] The first, spontaneous communitas, is described as "a direct, immediate, and total confrontation of human identities" in which those involved share a feeling of synchronicity and a total immersion into one fluid event.[19] The second form, ideological communitas, which aims at interrupting spontaneous communitas through some type of intervention which would result in the formation of a utopian society in which all actions would be carried out at the level of spontaneous communitas.[19] The third, normative communitas, deals with a group of society attempting to grow relationships and support spontaneous communitas on a relatively permanent basis, subjecting it to laws of society and "denaturing the grace" of the accepted form of camaraderie.[19]
Turner has been criticized for limiting the meaning of the concept to the concrete settings of small-scale tribal societies, preferring the neologism "liminoid" coined by him to analyse certain features of the modern world. Agnes Horvath (2013) argues that the term can and should be applied to concrete historical events as offering a vital means for historical and sociological understanding. Turner also attributed a positive connotation to liminal situations as ways of renewal when others argue liminal situations can be periods of uncertainty, anguish, even existential fear: a facing of the abyss in void.[20]
Liminality theory today
[edit]In contemporary anthologies such as Neither Here nor There: The Many Voices of Liminality,[21] and The Liminal Loop: Astonishing Stories of Discovery and Hope[22] topics such as poetic interpretations, Central American notions of the in-between, pilgrimage, spiritual transformation, crisis passages, war, natural disaster, cross-cultural adoption, climate change and spirituality, religious shifts, cyborgs, critical illness, prison, social collapse and reconstruction, gender, and communities in conflict, extreme adventure, initiation, process of transition, ritual, complex liminalities, spiritual practices, black experience, education abroad, genocide, therapeutic practices, ecological collapse, and the arts are explored by a variety of thinkers and practitioners in light of their liminal nature.
Types
[edit]Liminality has both spatial and temporal dimensions, and can be applied to a variety of subjects: individuals, larger groups (cohorts or villages), whole societies, and possibly even entire civilizations.[6] The following chart summarizes the different dimensions and subjects of liminal experiences, and also provides the main characteristics and key examples of each category.[6]
| Individual | Group | Society | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moment |
|
|
|
| Period |
|
|
|
| Epoch (or life-span duration) |
|
|
|
Another significant variable is "scale," or the "degree" to which an individual or group experiences liminality.[6] In other words, "there are degrees of liminality, and…the degree depends on the extent to which the liminal experience can be weighed against persisting structures."[6] When the spatial and temporal are both affected, the intensity of the liminal experience increases and so-called "pure liminality" is approached.[6]
In large-scale societies
[edit]
The concept of a liminal situation can also be applied to entire societies that are going through a crisis or a "collapse of order".[6] Philosopher Karl Jaspers made a significant contribution to this idea through his concept of the "Axial Age", which was "an in-between period between two structured world-views and between two rounds of empire building; it was an age of creativity where "man asked radical questions", and where the "unquestioned grasp on life is loosened".[6] It was essentially a time of uncertainty which, most importantly, involved entire civilizations. Seeing as liminal periods are both destructive and constructive, the ideas and practices that emerge from these liminal historical periods are of extreme importance, as they will "tend to take on the quality of structure".[6] Events such as political or social revolutions (along with other periods of crisis) can thus be considered liminal, as they result in the complete collapse of order and can lead to significant social change.[15]
Liminality in large-scale societies differs significantly from liminality found in ritual passages in small-scale societies. One primary characteristic of liminality (as defined van Gennep and Turner) is that there is a way in as well as a way out.[6] In ritual passages, "members of the society are themselves aware of the liminal state: they know that they will leave it sooner or later, and have 'ceremony masters' to guide them through the rituals".[6] However, in those liminal periods that affect society as a whole, the future (what comes after the liminal period) is completely unknown, and there is no "ceremony master" who has gone through the process before and that can lead people out of it.[6] In such cases, liminal situations can become dangerous. They allow for the emergence of "self-proclaimed ceremony masters", that assume leadership positions and attempt to "[perpetuate] liminality and by emptying the liminal moment of real creativity, [turn] it into a scene of mimetic rivalry".[6]
Depth psychology
[edit]Jungians have often seen the individuation process of self-realization as taking place within a liminal space. "Individuation begins with a withdrawal from normal modes of socialisation, epitomized by the breakdown of the persona...liminality".[23] Thus "what Turner's concept of social liminality does for status in society, Jung [...] does for the movement of the person through the life process of individuation".[24] Individuation can be seen as a "movement through liminal space and time, from disorientation to integration [...] What takes place in the dark phase of liminality is a process of breaking down [...] in the interest of "making whole" one's meaning, purpose and sense of relatedness once more"[25] As an archetypal figure, "the trickster is a symbol of the liminal state itself, and of its permanent accessibility as a source of recreative power".[26]
Jungian-based analytical psychology is also deeply rooted in the ideas of liminality. The idea of a 'container' or 'vessel' as a key player in the ritual process of psychotherapy has been noted by many and Carl Jung's objective was to provide a space he called "a temenos, a magic circle, a vessel, in which the transformation inherent in the patient's condition would be allowed to take place."[12]
But other depth psychologies speak of a similar process. Carl Rogers describes "the 'out-of-this-world' quality that many therapists have remarked upon, a sort of trance-like feeling in the relationship that client and therapist emerge from at the end of the hour, as if from a deep well or tunnel.[27] The French talk of how the psychoanalytic setting 'opens/forges the "intermediate space," "excluded middle," or "between" that figures so importantly in Irigaray's writing".[28] Marion Milner claimed that "a temporal spatial frame also marks off the special kind of reality of a psycho-analytic session...the different kind of reality that is within it".[29]
Jungians however have perhaps been most explicit about the "need to accord space, time and place for liminal feeling"[30]—as well about the associated dangers, "two mistakes: we provide no ritual space at all in our lives [...] or we stay in it too long".[31] Indeed, Jung's psychology has itself been described as "a form of 'permanent liminality' in which there is no need to return to social structure".[32]
Examples of general usage
[edit]In rites
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2010) |

In the context of rites, liminality is being artificially produced, as opposed to those situations (such as natural disasters) in which it can occur spontaneously.[6] In the simple example of a college graduation ceremony, the liminal phase can actually be extended to include the period of time between when the last assignment was finished (and graduation was assured) all the way through reception of the diploma. That no man's land represents the limbo associated with liminality. The stress of accomplishing tasks for college has been lifted, yet the individual has not moved on to a new stage in life (psychologically or physically). The result is a unique perspective on what has come before, and what may come next.
It can include the period between when a couple get engaged and their marriage or between death and burial, for which cultures may have set ritual observances. Even sexually liberal cultures may strongly disapprove of an engaged spouse having sex with another person during this time. When a marriage proposal is initiated there is a liminal stage between the question and the answer during which the social arrangements of both parties involved are subject to transformation and inversion; a sort of "life stage limbo" so to speak in that the affirmation or denial can result in multiple and diverse outcomes.
Getz[33] provides commentary on the liminal/liminoid zone when discussing the planned event experience. He refers to a liminal zone at an event as the creation of "time out of time: a special place". He notes that this liminal zone is both spatial and temporal and integral when planning a successful event (e.g. ceremony, concert, conference etc.).[34]
In time
[edit]The temporal dimension of liminality can relate to moments (sudden events), periods (weeks, months, or possibly years), and epochs (decades, generations, maybe even centuries).[6]
Examples
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2010) |
Twilight serves as a liminal time, between day and night—where one is "in the twilight zone, in a liminal nether region of the night".[35] The title of the television fiction series The Twilight Zone makes reference to this, describing it as "the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition" in one variant of the original series' opening. The name is from an actual zone observable from space in the place where daylight or shadow advances or retreats about the Earth. Noon and, more often, midnight can be considered liminal, the first transitioning between morning and afternoon, the latter between days.
Within the years, liminal times include equinoxes when day and night have equal length, and solstices, when the increase of day or night shifts over to its decrease. This "qualitative bounding of quantitatively unbounded phenomena"[36] marks the cyclical changes of seasons throughout the year. Where the quarter days are held to mark the change in seasons, they also are liminal times. New Year's Day, whatever its connection or lack of one to the astrological sky, is a liminal time. Customs such as fortune-telling take advantage of this liminal state. In a number of cultures, actions and events on the first day of the year can determine the year, leading to such beliefs as first-foot. Many cultures regard it as a time especially prone to hauntings by ghosts—liminal beings, neither alive nor dead.
In religion
[edit]Judeo-Christian worship
[edit]
Liminal existence can be located in a separated sacred space, which occupies a sacred time. Examples in the Bible include the dream of Jacob (Genesis 28:12–19) where he encounters God between heaven and earth and the instance when Isaiah meets the Lord in the temple of holiness (Isaiah 6:1–6).[37] In such a liminal space, the individual experiences the revelation of sacred knowledge where God imparts his knowledge on the person.
Worship can be understood in this context as the church community (or communitas or koinonia) enter into liminal space corporately.[37] Religious symbols and music may aid in this process described as a pilgrimage by way of prayer, song, or liturgical acts. The congregation is transformed in the liminal space and as they exit, are sent out back into the world to serve.
Judeo-Christian ministry
[edit]In Liminal Reality and Transformational Power,[38] Dr. Timothy Carson, curator of the Liminality Project,[39] co-founder of the Guild for Engaged Liminality[40] with Lisa Withrow and Jonathan Best, and co-founder The Liminality Press[41] with Lisa Withrow, explores the outer and inner aspects of liminality, addressing the history of the discipline with mythological and psychological underpinnings, and an application of the concepts to theology, Biblical hermeneutics, symbolism, and practical applications for those engaged in religious leadership.
In Crossing Thresholds: A Practical Theology of Liminality,[42] Carson serves as co-author with Rosy Fairhurst, Nigel Rooms, and Lisa Withrow, as they define the aspects of liminality vis-à-vis its practical applications in religious life. The book includes a conceptual description of liminality as well as applications for hermeneutics, liturgy, ecclesiology, leadership, learning, faith formation, and pastoral care and crisis.
In Leaning into the Liminal: A Guide for Counselors and Companions, [43] Carson utilizes a model informed by liminality – The Rites of Passage process – as a pan-theoretical resource for counselors, therapists, religious leaders, spiritual directors, and chaplains. It includes reflections on the role of the liminal guide, as well as contributions by seven other authors who address a variety of therapeutic models, healing the wounds of war, spiritual direction, and guiding through the end passages of life.
Of beings
[edit]Various minority groups can be considered liminal. In reality illegal immigrants (present but not "official"), and stateless people, for example, are regarded as liminal because they are "betwixt and between home and host, part of society, but sometimes never fully integrated".[6] Bisexual, intersex, and transgender people in some contemporary societies, people of mixed ethnicity, and those accused but not yet judged guilty or not guilty can also be considered to be liminal. Teenagers, being neither children nor adults, are liminal people: indeed, "for young people, liminality of this kind has become a permanent phenomenon...Postmodern liminality".[44]
The "trickster as the mythic projection of the magician—standing in the limen between the sacred realm and the profane"[45] and related archetypes embody many such contradictions as do many popular culture celebrities. The category could also hypothetically and in fiction include cyborgs, hybrids between two species, shapeshifters. One could also consider seals, crabs, shorebirds, frogs, bats, dolphins/whales and other "border animals" to be liminal: "the wild duck and swan are cases in point...intermediate creatures that combine underwater activity and the bird flight with an intermediate, terrestrial life".[46] Shamans and spiritual guides also serve as liminal beings, acting as "mediators between this and the other world; his presence is betwixt and between the human and supernatural."[47] Many believe that shamans and spiritual advisers were born into their fate, possessing a greater understanding of and connection to the natural world, and thus they often live in the margins of society, existing in a liminal state between worlds and outside of common society.[47]
In places
[edit]
The spatial dimension of liminality can include specific places, larger zones or areas, or entire countries and larger regions.[6] Liminal places can range from borders and frontiers to no man's lands and disputed territories, to crossroads to perhaps airports, hotels, and bathrooms. Sociologist Eva Illouz argues that all "romantic travel enacts the three stages that characterize liminality: separation, marginalization, and reaggregation".[48]
In mythology and religion or esoteric lore liminality can include such realms as Purgatory or Da'at, which, as well as signifying liminality, some theologians deny actually existing, making them, in some cases, doubly liminal. "Between-ness" defines these spaces. For a hotel worker (an insider) or a person passing by with disinterest (a total outsider), the hotel would have a very different connotation. To a traveller staying there, the hotel would function as a liminal zone, just as "doors and windows and hallways and gates frame...the definitively liminal condition".[49]
More conventionally, springs, caves, shores, rivers, volcanic calderas—"a huge crater of an extinct volcano...[as] another symbol of transcendence"[50]—fords, passes, crossroads, bridges, and marshes are all liminal: "'edges', borders or faultlines between the legitimate and the illegitimate".[51] Oedipus met his father at the crossroads and killed him; the bluesman Robert Johnson met the devil at the crossroads, where he is said to have sold his soul.[52]
In architecture, liminal spaces are defined as "the physical spaces between one destination and the next."[53] Common examples of such spaces include hallways, airports, and streets.[54][55]
In contemporary culture viewing the nightclub experience (dancing in a nightclub) through the liminoid framework highlights the "presence or absence of opportunities for social subversion, escape from social structures, and exercising choice".[56] This allows "insights into what may be effectively improved in hedonic spaces. Enhancing the consumer experience of these liminoid aspects may heighten experiential feelings of escapism and play, thus encouraging the consumer to more freely consume".[56]
In folklore
[edit]
There are a number of stories in folklore of those who could only be killed in a liminal space: In Welsh mythology, Lleu could not be killed during the day or night, nor indoors or outdoors, nor riding or walking, nor clothed or naked (and is attacked at dusk, while wrapped in a net with one foot on a cauldron and one on a goat). Likewise, in Hindu text Bhagavata Purana, Vishnu appears in a half-man half-lion form named Narasimha to destroy the demon Hiranyakashipu who has obtained the power never to be killed in day nor night, in the ground nor in the air, with weapon nor by bare hands, in a building nor outside it, by man nor beast. Narasimha kills Hiranyakashipu at dusk, across his lap, with his sharp claws, on the threshold of the palace, and as Narasimha is a god himself, the demon is killed by neither man nor beast. In the Mahabharata, Indra promises not to slay Namuci and Vritra with anything wet or dry, nor in the day or in the night, but instead kills them at dusk with foam.[57]
The classic tale of Cupid and Psyche serves as an example of the liminal in myth, exhibited through Psyche's character and the events she experiences. She is always regarded as too beautiful to be human yet not quite a goddess, establishing her liminal existence.[58] Her marriage to Death in Apuleius' version occupies two classic Van Gennep liminal rites: marriage and death.[58] Psyche resides in the liminal space of no longer being a maiden yet not quite a wife, as well as living between worlds. Beyond this, her transition to immortality to live with Cupid serves as a liminal rite of passage in which she shifts from mortal to immortal, human to goddess; when Psyche drinks the ambrosia and seals her fate, the rite is completed and the tale ends with a joyous wedding and the birth of Cupid and Psyche's daughter.[58] The characters themselves exist in liminal spaces while experiencing classic rites of passage that necessitate the crossing of thresholds into new realms of existence.
In ethnographic research
[edit]In ethnographic research, "the researcher is...in a liminal state, separated from his own culture yet not incorporated into the host culture"[59]—when he or she is both participating in the culture and observing the culture. The researcher must consider the self in relation to others and his or her positioning in the culture being studied.
In many cases, greater participation in the group being studied can lead to increased access of cultural information and greater in-group understanding of experiences within the culture. However increased participation also blurs the role of the researcher in data collection and analysis. Often a researcher that engages in fieldwork as a "participant" or "participant-observer" occupies a liminal state where he/she is a part of the culture, but also separated from the culture as a researcher. This liminal state of being betwixt and between is emotional and uncomfortable as the researcher uses self-reflexivity to interpret field observations and interviews.
Some scholars argue that ethnographers are present in their research, occupying a liminal state, regardless of their participant status. Justification for this position is that the researcher as a "human instrument" engages with his/her observations in the process of recording and analyzing the data. A researcher, often unconsciously, selects what to observe, how to record observations and how to interpret observations based on personal reference points and experiences. For example, even in selecting what observations are interesting to record, the researcher must interpret and value the data available. To explore the liminal state of the researcher in relation to the culture, self-reflexivity and awareness are important tools to reveal researcher bias and interpretation.[citation needed]
In higher education
[edit]For many students, the process of starting university can be seen as a liminal space.[60] Whilst many students move away from home for the first time, they often do not break their links with home, seeing the place of origin as home rather than the town where they are studying. Student orientation often includes activities that act as a rite of passage, making the start of university as a significant period. This can be reinforced by the split of town and gown, where local communities and the student body maintain different traditions and codes of behaviour. This means that many university students are no longer seen as school children, but have not yet achieved the status of independent adults. This creates an environment where risk-taking is balanced with safe spaces that allow students to try out new identities and new ways of being within a structure that provides meaning.[61]
In popular culture
[edit]Novels and short stories
[edit]Rant: An Oral Biography of Buster Casey by Chuck Palahniuk makes use of liminality in explaining time travel. Possession by A. S. Byatt describes how postmodern "Literary theory. Feminism...write about liminality. Thresholds. Bastions. Fortresses".[62] Each book title in The Twilight Saga speaks of a liminal period (Twilight, New Moon, Eclipse, and Breaking Dawn). In The Phantom Tollbooth (1961), Milo enters "The Lands Beyond", a liminal place (which explains its topsy-turvy nature), through a magical tollbooth. When he finishes his quest, he returns, but changed, seeing the world differently. The giver of the tollbooth is never seen and name never known, and hence, also remains liminal. Liminality is a major theme in Offshore by Penelope Fitzgerald, in which the characters live between sea and land on docked boats, becoming liminal people. Saul Bellow's "varied uses of liminality...include his Dangling Man, suspended between civilian life and the armed forces"[63] at "the onset of the dangling days".[64] In her short story collection, Tales From the Liminal (2021 Deuxmers[65]), S. K. Kruse[66] explores the potential transformative power of liminal times, places, and states of being.
Charlotte Brontë's Jane Eyre follows the protagonist through different stages of life as she crosses the threshold from student to teacher to woman.[67] Her existence throughout the novel takes a liminal character. She can first be seen when she hides herself behind a large red curtain to read, closing herself off physically and existing in a paracosmic realm. At Gateshead, Jane is noted to be set apart and on the outside of the family, putting her in a liminal space in which she neither belongs nor is completely cast away.[68] Jane's existence emerges as paradoxical as she transcends commonly accepted beliefs about what it means to be a woman, orphan, child, victim, criminal, and pilgrim,[69] and she creates her own narrative as she is torn from her past and denied a certain future.[69] Faced with a series of crises, Jane's circumstances question social constructs and allow Jane to progress or to retract; this creates a narrative dynamic of structure and liminality (as coined by Turner).[69]
Karen Brooks states that Australian grunge lit books, such as Clare Mendes' Drift Street, Edward Berridge's The Lives of the Saints, and Andrew McGahan's Praise "...explor[e] the psychosocial and psychosexual limitations of young sub/urban characters in relation to the imaginary and socially constructed boundaries defining...self and other" and "opening up" new "liminal [boundary] spaces" where the concept of an abject human body can be explored.[70] Brooks states that Berridge's short stories provide "...a variety of violent, disaffected and often abject young people", characters who "...blur and often overturn" the boundaries between suburban and urban space.[70] Brooks states that the marginalized characters in The Lives of the Saints, Drift Street and Praise are able to stay in "shit creek" (an undesirable setting or situation) and "diver[t]... flows" of these "creeks", thus claiming their rough settings' "liminality" (being in a border situation or transitional setting) and their own "abjection" (having "abject bodies" with health problems, disease, etc.) as "sites of symbolic empowerment and agency".[70]
Brooks states that the story "Caravan Park" in Berridge's short story collection is an example of a story with a "liminal" setting, as it is set in a mobile home park; since mobile homes can be relocated, she states that setting a story in a mobile home "...has the potential to disrupt a range of geo-physical and psycho-social boundaries".[70] Brooks states that in Berridge's story "Bored Teenagers", the adolescents using a community drop-in centre decide to destroy its equipment and defile the space by urinating in it, thus "altering the dynamics of the place and the way" their bodies are perceived, with their destructive activities being deemed by Brooks to indicate the community centre's "loss of authority" over the teens.[70]
In-Between: Liminal Stories is a collection of ten short stories and poems that exclusively focus on liminal expressions of various themes like memory disorder, pandemic uncertainty, authoritarianism, virtual reality, border disputes, old-age anxiety, environmental issues, and gender trouble. The stories, such as "In-Between", "Cogito, Ergo Sum", "The Trap", "Monkey Bath", "DreamCatcher", "Escape to Nowhere", "A Letter to My-Self", "No Man's Land", "Whither Am I?", and "Fe/Male",[71] apart from their thematic relevance, directly and indirectly link the possibilities and potential of liminality in literature for developing characters, plots, and settings. The experiences and expressions of the in-between states of living 'betwixt and between' in a transitional world that intricately changes the constants and perpetuities of human life are eminent in the stories that are associated with the theoretical concepts such as permanent and temporary liminality, liminal space, liminal entity, liminoid, communitas, and anti-structure. The significance of liminality in the short stories is emphasised by conceptualising the existence of the characters as "living not here, not there – but somewhere in a space between here and there".[71]
Plays
[edit]Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, a play by Tom Stoppard, takes place both in a kind of no-man's-land and the actual setting of Hamlet. "Shakespeare's play Hamlet is in several ways an essay in sustained liminality ... only via a condition of complete liminality can Hamlet finally see the way forward".[72] In the play Waiting for Godot for the entire length of the play, two men walk around restlessly on an empty stage. They alternate between hope and hopelessness. At times one forgets what they are even waiting for, and the other reminds him: "We are waiting for Godot". The identity of 'Godot' is never revealed, and perhaps the men do not know Godot's identity. The men are trying to keep up their spirits as they wander the empty stage, waiting.
Films and TV shows
[edit]The Twilight Zone (1959–2003) is a US television anthology series that explores unusual situations between reality and the paranormal. The Terminal (2004), is a US film in which the main character (Viktor Navorski) is trapped in a liminal space; since he can neither legally return to his home country Krakozhia nor enter the United States, he must remain in the airport terminal indefinitely until he finds a way out at the end of the film. In the film Waking Life, about dreams, Aklilu Gebrewold talks about liminality. Primer (2004), is a US science fiction film by Shane Carruth where the main characters set up their time travelling machine in a storage facility to ensure it will not be accidentally disturbed. The hallways of the storage facility are eerily unchanging and impersonal, in a sense depicted as outside of time, and could be considered a liminal space. When the main characters are inside the time travel box, they are clearly in temporal liminality. Yet another example comes from Hayao Miyazaki's Princess Mononoke in which the Forest Spirit can only be killed while switching between its two forms.
Photography and Internet culture
[edit]
In the late 2010s, a trend of images depicting so-called "liminal spaces" surged in online art and photography communities, with the intent to convey "a sense of nostalgia, lostness, and uncertainty".[73] The subjects of these photos may not necessarily fit within the usual definition of spatial liminality (such as that of hallways, waiting areas or rest stops) but are instead defined by a forlorn atmosphere and sentiments of abandonment, decay and quietness. Additionally, it has been suggested that the liminal space phenomenon could represent a broader feeling of disorientation in modern society, explaining the usage of places that are common in childhood memories (such as playgrounds or schools) as reflective about the passage of time and the collective experience of growing older.[74]
The phenomenon gained media attention in 2019, when a short creepypasta originally posted to 4chan's /x/ board in 2019 went viral.[75] The creepypasta showed an image of a hallway with yellow carpets and wallpaper, with a caption purporting that by "noclipping out of bounds in real life", one may enter the Backrooms, an empty wasteland of corridors with nothing but "the stink of old moist carpet, the madness of mono-yellow, the endless background noise of fluorescent lights at maximum hum-buzz, and approximately six hundred million square miles of randomly segmented empty rooms to be trapped in".[76] Since then, a popular subreddit titled "liminal space", cataloguing photographs that give a "sense that something is not quite right",[77] has accrued over 500,000 followers.[78][79] A Twitter account called @SpaceLiminalBot posts many liminal space photos and it has accrued over 1.2 million followers.[80] Liminal spaces can also be found in painting and drawing, for example in paintings by Jeffery Smart.[81][82]
Research indicates that liminal spaces may appear eerie or strange because they fall into an uncanny valley of architecture and physical places.[83]
Music and other media
[edit]Many videogames exist which are based on the aesthetic concept of liminal spaces. Examples include Superliminal and the video game adaptations of the Backrooms among many others.
Liminal Space is an album by American breakcore artist Xanopticon. Coil mention liminality throughout their works, most explicitly with the title of their song "Batwings (A Limnal Hymn)" (sic) from their album Musick to Play in the Dark Vol. 2. In .hack//Liminality Harald Hoerwick, the creator of the MMORPG "The World", attempted to bring the real world into the online world, creating a hazy barrier between the two worlds; a concept called "Liminality".
In the lyrics of French rock band Little Nemo's song "A Day Out of Time", the idea of liminality is indirectly explored by describing a transitional moment before the returning of "the common worries". This liminal moment is referred as timeless and, therefore, absent of aims and/or regrets.
Liminoid experiences
[edit]In 1974, Victor Turner coined the term liminoid (from the Greek word eidos, meaning "form or shape"[12]) to refer to experiences that have characteristics of liminal experiences but are optional and do not involve a resolution of a personal crisis.[2] Unlike liminal events, liminoid experiences are conditional and do not result in a change of status, but merely serve as transitional moments in time.[2] The liminal is part of society, an aspect of social or religious rites, while the liminoid is a break from society, part of "play" or "playing". With the rise in industrialization and the emergence of leisure as an acceptable form of play separate from work, liminoid experiences have become much more common than liminal rites.[2] In these modern societies, rites are diminished and "forged the concept of 'liminoid' rituals for analogous but secular phenomena" such as attending rock concerts and other[84] liminoid experiences.
The fading of liminal stages in exchange for liminoid experiences is marked by the shift in culture from tribal and agrarian to modern and industrial. In these societies, work and play are entirely separate whereas in more archaic societies, they are nearly indistinguishable.[2] In the past play was interwoven with the nature of work as symbolic gestures and rites in order to promote fertility, abundance, and the passage of certain liminal phases; thus, work and play are inseparable and often dependent on social rites.[2] Examples of this include Cherokee and Mayan riddles, trickster tales, sacred ball games, and joking relationships which serve holy purposes of work in liminal situations while retaining the element of playfulness.[2]
Ritual and myth were, in the past, exclusively connected to collective work that served holy and often symbolic purposes; liminal rites were held in the form of coming-of-age ceremonies, celebrations of seasons, and more. Industrialization cut the cord between work and the sacred, putting "work" and "play" in separate boxes that rarely, if ever, intersected.[2] In a famous essay regarding the shift from liminal to liminoid in industrial society, Turner offers a twofold explanation of this sect. First, society began to move away from activities concerning collective ritual obligations, placing more emphasis on the individual than the community; this led to more choice in activities, with many such as work and leisure becoming optional. Second, the work done to earn a living became entirely separate from his or her other activities so that it is "no longer natural, but arbitrary."[2] In simpler terms, the industrial revolution brought about free time that had not existed in past societies and created space for liminoid experiences to exist.[2]
Examples of liminoid experiences
[edit]Sports
[edit]Sporting events such as the Olympics, NFL football games, and hockey matches are forms of liminoid experiences. They are optional activities of leisure that place both the spectator and the competitor in in-between places outside of society's norms. Sporting events also create a sense of community among fans and reinforces the collective spirit of those who take part.[19] Homecoming football games, gymnastics meets, modern baseball games, and swim meets all qualify as liminoid and follow a seasonal schedule; therefore, the flow of sports becomes cyclical and predictable, reinforcing the liminal qualities.[19] Amateur treasure hunting has been described using liminal theory (King, 2024).
Commercial flight
[edit]One scholar, Alexandra Murphy, has argued that airplane travel is inherently liminoid—suspended in the sky, neither here nor there and crossing thresholds of time and space, it is difficult to make sense of the experience of flying.[85] Murphy posits that flights shift our existence into a limbo space in which movement becomes an accepted set of cultural performances aimed at convincing us that air travel is a reflection of reality rather than a separation from it.[85]
See also
[edit]- Androgyny – Having both male and female characteristics
- Bardo – Buddhist Concept
- Cognitive dissonance – Mental phenomenon of holding contradictory beliefs
- Critical point (thermodynamics) – Temperature and pressure point where phase boundaries disappear
- Limbo – Theological concept
- Liminal being – Being that cannot be easily placed into a single category of existence
- Liminal deity – Gods of boundaries or transitions
- Limit situation
- Locus amoenus – Literary topos involving an idealized place of safety or comfort
- Phase transition – Physical process of transition between basic states of matter
- Transitioning (transgender) – Changing gender presentation to accord with gender identity
- Trance – Abnormal state of wakefulness or altered state of consciousness
- Entity – Something that exists in some identified universe of discourse
- Intermediate state (disambiguation)
Citations
[edit]- ^ "liminal", Oxford English Dictionary. Ed. J. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. OED Online Oxford 23, 2007; cf. subliminal.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Turner, Victor (July 1974). "Liminal to Liminoid, in Play, Flow, and Ritual: An Essay in Comparative Symbology". Rice Institute Pamphlet - Rice University Studies. 60 (3). hdl:1911/63159. S2CID 55545819.
- ^ Guribye, Eugene; Lie, Birgit; Overland, Gwynyth, eds. (2014). Nordic Work with Traumatised Refugees: Do We Really Care. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 194. ISBN 978-1-4438-6777-1.
- ^ "Liminality and Communitas", in "The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure" (New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction Press, 2008).
- ^ Katznelson, Ira (11 May 2021). "Measuring Liberalism, Confronting Evil: A Retrospective". Annual Review of Political Science. 24 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-042219-030219.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Thomassen, Bjørn (2009). "The Uses and Meanings of Liminality". International Political Anthropology. 2 (1): 5–27.
- ^ Horvath, A.; Thomassen, B.; Wydra, H. (2009). "Introduction: Liminality and Cultures of Change". International Political Anthropology. 2 (1): 3–4.
- ^ a b c d e f Szakolczai, A. (2009). "Liminality and Experience: Structuring transitory situations and transformative events". International Political Anthropology. 2 (1): 141–172.
- ^ Barfield, Thomas (1997). The Dictionary of Anthropology. p. 477.
- ^ a b van Gennep, Arnold (1977). The rites of passage. Routledge & Kegan Paul. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-7100-8744-7. OCLC 925214175.
- ^ Victor W. Turner, The Ritual Process (Penguin 1969) p. 155.
- ^ a b c d e Andrews, Hazel; Roberts, Les (2015). "Liminality". International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. pp. 131–137. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.12102-6. ISBN 978-0-08-097087-5.
- ^ Victor Turner, "Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites de Passage", in The Forest of Symbols (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967).
- ^ Turner, Ritual p. 80
- ^ a b c Thomassen, Bjørn (2006). "Liminality". In Harrington, A.; Marshall, B.; Müller, H.-P. (eds.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Social Theory. London: Routledge. pp. 322–323.
- ^ Turner Ritual p. 81
- ^ Turner, Ritual p. 156
- ^ Peter Homas, Jung in Context (London 1979) p. 207
- ^ a b c d e f g John, Graham St (2008). Victor Turner and Contemporary Cultural Performance. Berghahn Books. p. 127. ISBN 978-0-85745-037-1.
- ^ Horvath, Agnes (2013). Modernism and Charisma. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9781137277862. ISBN 978-1-349-44741-1.[page needed]
- ^ Carson, ed; The Lutterworth Press, 2019
- ^ The Lutterworth Press, 2022
- ^ Homans 1979, 207.
- ^ Hall, quoted in Miller and Jung 2004, 104.
- ^ Shorter 1988, 73, 79.
- ^ Robert Pelton in Young-Eisendrath and Dawson eds. 1997, 244
- ^ Rogers 1961, 202.
- ^ E. Hirsh, in Burke et al. eds. 1994, 309n
- ^ Quoted in Casement 1997, 158.
- ^ Shorter 1988, 79.
- ^ Bly, 1991, 194.
- ^ Homans 1979, 208.
- ^ Getz 2007, 179.
- ^ Getz 2007, 442.
- ^ Costello 2002, 158.
- ^ Olwig, Kenneth R (April 2005). "Liminality, Seasonality and Landscape". Landscape Research. 30 (2): 259–271. Bibcode:2005LandR..30..259O. doi:10.1080/01426390500044473. S2CID 144415449.
- ^ a b Carson, Timothy L (2003). Transforming Worship. Chalice Press. p. 61. ISBN 978-0-8272-3692-9.
- ^ 2nd Edition, The Lutterworth Press, 2016
- ^ "The Liminality Project". www.theliminalityproject.org. Retrieved 2025-09-07.
- ^ "Guild for Engaged Liminality – A Community Engaging Liminality as Interdisciplinary Reflective Practice through Art, Culture, Religion, Spirituality, and Society". www.engagedliminality.org. Retrieved 2025-09-07.
- ^ "The Liminality Press | Publishing House for Liminality Studies". www.liminalitypress.com. Retrieved 2025-09-07.
- ^ The Lutterworth Press, 2021
- ^ The Liminality Press, 2024
- ^ Kahane 1997, 31.
- ^ Nicholas 2009, 25.
- ^ Joseph Henderson in Jung 1978, 153.
- ^ a b Takiguchi, Naoko (1990). "Liminal Experiences of Miyako Shamans: Reading a Shaman's Diary". Asian Folklore Studies. 49 (1): 1–38. doi:10.2307/1177947. JSTOR 1177947.
- ^ Illouz 1997, 143.
- ^ Richard Brown in Corcoran 2002, 211.
- ^ Joseph Henderson, in Jung 1978, 152.
- ^ Richard Brown in Corcoran 2002, 196
- ^ El Khoury, 2015, 217[full citation needed]
- ^ Asuncion, Isabel Berenguer (13 June 2020). "Living through liminal spaces". INQUIRER.net.
- ^ Matthews, Hugh (2003). "The street as a liminal space". Children in the City. Routledge. pp. 119–135. doi:10.4324/9780203167236-11. ISBN 978-0-203-16723-6.
- ^ Huang, Wei-Jue; Xiao, Honggen; Wang, Sha (May 2018). "Airports as liminal space". Annals of Tourism Research. 70: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2018.02.003. hdl:10397/77916.
- ^ a b Taheri, Babak; Gori, Keith; O'Gorman, Kevin; Hogg, Gillian; Farrington, Thomas (2 January 2016). "Experiential liminoid consumption: the case of nightclubbing". Journal of Marketing Management. 32 (1–2): 19–43. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2015.1089309. S2CID 145243798.
- ^ "Vritra". Encyclopedia of Religion. Macmillan Reference USA/Gale Group. 2006. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
- ^ a b c Peters, Jesse (2014). "Intra Limen: An Examination of Liminality in Apuleius' Metamorphoses and Giulio Romano's Sala di Amore e Psiche". CiteSeerX 10.1.1.840.7301.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ Norris Johnson, in Robben and Sluka 2007, 76
- ^ Heading, David; Loughlin, Eleanor (2018). "Lonergan's insight and threshold concepts: students in the liminal space" (PDF). Teaching in Higher Education. 23 (6): 657–667. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1414792. S2CID 149321628.
- ^ Rutherford, Vanessa; Pickup, Ian (2015). "Negotiating Liminality in Higher Education: Formal and Informal Dimensions of the Student Experience as Facilitators of Quality". The European Higher Education Area. pp. 703–723. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_44. ISBN 978-3-319-18767-9. S2CID 146606519.
- ^ Byatt 1990, 505–06.
- ^ Elsbree 1991, 66.
- ^ Bellow 1977, 84.
- ^ "Deuxmers - Tales from the Liminal".
- ^ "S. K. Kruse". www.skkruse.com. Retrieved 2025-09-07.
- ^ Brontë, Charlotte (1816–1855). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. 2017-11-28. doi:10.1093/odnb/9780192683120.013.3523.
- ^ Clark, Megan (2017). "The Space In-Between: Exploring Liminality in Jane Eyre". Criterion: A Journal of Literary Criticism. 10.
- ^ a b c Gilead, Sarah (1987). "Liminality and Antiliminality in Charlotte Brontë's Novels: Shirley Reads Jane Eyre". Texas Studies in Literature and Language. 29 (3): 302–322. JSTOR 40754831.
- ^ a b c d e Brooks, Karen (1 October 1998). "Shit Creek: Suburbia, Abjection and Subjectivity in Australian 'Grunge' Fiction". Australian Literary Studies. 18 (4): 87–99.
- ^ a b Mathew, Raisun (2022). In-Between: Liminal Stories. Authorspress. ISBN 978-93-91314-04-0.[page needed][self-published source?]
- ^ Liebler, pp. 182–84
- ^ "Architecture: The Cult Following Of Liminal Space". Musée Magazine. 2 November 2020. Retrieved 2021-03-05.
- ^ "How liminal spaces became the internet's latest obsession". TwoPointOne Magazine. 18 June 2021. Retrieved 2022-08-03.
- ^ S, Michael L.; al (2020-04-30). "'The Backrooms Game' Brings a Modern Creepypasta to Life [What We Play in the Shadows]". Bloody Disgusting!. Retrieved 2021-03-05.
- ^ "We will find where the Original Backrooms Photo was taken. But, we need your help. - YouTube". YouTube. 2020-10-30. Archived from the original on 2020-10-30. Retrieved 2021-03-05.
- ^ "Liminal Spaces may be the most 2020 of all trends". Earnest Pettie Online. 2020-12-31. Retrieved 2021-03-05.
- ^ "Will the mall survive COVID? Whatever happens, these artists want to capture them before they're gone | CBC Arts". CBC. Retrieved 2021-03-05.
- ^ "LiminalSpace". Reddit. Retrieved 2021-07-07.
- ^ Pitre, Jake (2022-11-01). "The Eerie Comfort of Liminal Spaces". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2023-01-02.
- ^ Kenyon, Nick (2022-03-02). "The Exhibition Spotlighting One Of Australia's Greatest Artists". Boss Hunting. Retrieved 2022-09-02.
- ^ "Jeffrey Smart - 155 artworks - painting". www.wikiart.org. Retrieved 2022-09-02.
- ^ Diel, Alexander; Lewis, Michael (1 August 2022). "Structural deviations drive an uncanny valley of physical places". Journal of Environmental Psychology. 82 101844. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101844. S2CID 250404379.
- ^ Illouz, Consuming p. 142
- ^ a b Murphy, Alexandra G. (October 2002). "Organizational Politics of Place and Space: The Perpetual Liminoid Performance of Commercial Flight". Text and Performance Quarterly. 22 (4): 297–316. doi:10.1080/10462930208616175. S2CID 145132584.
General sources
[edit]- Barfield, Thomas J. The Dictionary of Anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.
- Bellow, Saul. Dangling Man (Penguin 1977).
- Benzel, Rick. Inspiring Creativity: an Anthology of Powerful Insights and Practical Ideas to Guide You to Successful Creating. Playa Del Rey, CA: Creativity Coaching Association, 2005.
- Bly, Robert. Iron John (Dorset 1991).
- Burke, Carolyn, Naomi Schor, and Margaret Whitford. Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist Philosophy and Modern European Thought. New York: Columbia UP, 1994.
- Byatt, A. S. Possession; a Romance. New York: Vintage International, 1990.
- Carson, Timothy L. "Chapter Seven: Betwixt and Between, Worship and Liminal Reality." Transforming Worship. St. Louis, MO: Chalice, 2003.
- Casement, Patrick. Further Learning from the Patient (London 1997).
- Corcoran, Neil. Do You, Mr Jones?: Bob Dylan with the Poets and Professors. London: Chatto & Windus, 2002.
- Costello, Stephen J. The Pale Criminal: Psychoanalytic Perspectives. London: Karnac, 2002.
- Douglas, Mary. Implicit Meanings Essays in Anthropology. London [u.a.]: Routledge, 1984.
- Elsbree, Langdon. Ritual Passages and Narrative Structures. New York: P. Lang, 1991.
- Getz, D. 2007. Event studies: theory, research and policy for planned events. Burlington, MA:Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Gennep, Arnold Van. The Rites of Passage. (Chicago: University of Chicago), 1960.
- Girard, René. "To Double Business Bound": Essays on Literature, Mimesis, and Anthropology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1988.
- Girard, René. Violence and the Sacred. London: Athlone, 1988.
- Homans, Peter. Jung in Context: Modernity and the Making of a Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1979.
- Horvath, Agnes (November 2009). "Liminality and the Unreal Class of the Image-making Craft: An Essay on Political Alchemy". International Political Anthropology. 2 (1): 51–73.
- Horvath, Agnes; Thomassen, Bjorn (May 2008). "Mimetic Errors in Liminal Schismogenesis: On the Political Anthropology of the Trickster". International Political Anthropology. 1 (1).
- Illouz, Eva. Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. UCP, 1997.
- Jung, C. G. Man and His Symbols. London: Picador, 1978.
- Kahane Reuven, et al., The Origins of Postmodern Youth (New York: 1997)
- King, A. R. (2024). "The pursuit of unattainable goals". Possibility Studies & Society, 1-18. doi:10.1177/27538699231225551.
- Liebler, Naomi Conn. Shakespeare's Festive Tragedy: the Ritual Foundations of Genre. London: Routledge, 1995.
- Lih, Andrew. The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World's Greatest Encyclopedia. London: Aurum, 2009.
- Mathew, Raisun (2022). In-Between: Liminal Stories. Authorspress.
- Miller, Jeffrey C., and C. G. Jung. The Transcendent Function: Jung's Model of Psychological Growth through Dialogue with the Unconscious. Albany: State University of New York, 2004.
- Nicholas, Dean Andrew. The Trickster Revisited: Deception as a Motif in the Pentatech. New York: Peter Lang, 2009.
- Oxford English Dictionary. Ed. J. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. OED Online Oxford University Press. Accessed June 23, 2007; cf. subliminal.
- Quasha, George & Charles Stein. An Art of Limina: Gary Hill's Works and Writings. Barcelona: Ediciones Polígrafa, 2009. Foreword by Lynne Cooke.
- Ramanujan, A. K. Speaking of Śiva. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979.
- Robben, A. and Sluka, J. Editors, Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
- Rogers, Carl R. On Becoming a Person; a Therapist's View of Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1961.
- Shapiro, Andrew J. (2022). "On Power's Doorstep: Gays, Jews, and Liminal Complicity in Reproducing Masculine Domination". Men and Masculinities. 25 (5): 743–764. doi:10.1177/1097184X221098365.
- Shorter, Bani. An Image Darkly Forming: Women and Initiation. London: Routledge, 1988.
- St John, Graham (April 2001). "Alternative Cultural Heterotopia and the Liminoid Body: Beyond Turner at ConFest". The Australian Journal of Anthropology. 12 (1): 47–66. doi:10.1111/j.1835-9310.2001.tb00062.x.
- St John, Graham (ed.) 2008. Victor Turner and Contemporary Cultural Performance Archived 2010-05-07 at the Wayback Machine. New York: Berghahn. ISBN 1-84545-462-6.
- St John, Graham (June 2013). "Aliens Are Us: Cosmic Liminality, Remixticism, and Alienation in Psytrance". The Journal of Religion and Popular Culture. 25 (2): 186–204. doi:10.3138/jrpc.25.2.186. S2CID 194094479.
- St. John, Graham (2014). "Victor Turner". Oxford Bibliographies in Anthropology. Oxford University Press (OUP). doi:10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0074. ISBN 978-0-19-976656-7.
- John, Graham St (2015). "Liminal Being: Electronic Dance Music Cultures, Ritualization and the Case of Psytrance". The SAGE Handbook of Popular Music. 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications. pp. 243–260. doi:10.4135/9781473910362.n14. ISBN 978-1-4462-1085-7.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link) - Szakolczai, A. (2000) Reflexive Historical Sociology, London: Routledge.
- Turner, "Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites de Passage", in The Forest of Symbols Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967
- Turner, Victor Witter. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine Pub., 1969
- Turner, Victor Witter. Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1974.
- Turner, Victor. Liminal to liminoid in play, flow, and ritual: An essay in comparative symbology. Rice University Studies 1974.
- Turner, Victor W., and Edith Turner. Image and Pilgrimage in Christian Culture Anthropological Perspectives. New York: Columbia UP, 1978.
- Waskul, Dennis D. Net.seXXX: Readings on Sex, Pornography, and the Internet. New York: P. Lang, 2004.
- Wels, Harry; van der Waal, Kees; Spiegel, Andrew; Kamsteeg, Frans (2011). "Victor Turner and liminality: An introduction". Anthropology Southern Africa. 34 (1–2): 1–4. doi:10.1080/23323256.2011.11500002.
- Young-Eisendrath, Polly, and Terence Dawson. The Cambridge Companion to Jung. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge UP, 1997.
External links
[edit]
The dictionary definition of liminal at Wiktionary
The dictionary definition of liminality at Wiktionary
The dictionary definition of liminoid at Wiktionary
Liminality
View on GrokipediaTheoretical Origins
Arnold van Gennep's Framework
Arnold van Gennep, a French ethnographer and folklorist, outlined a tripartite structure for rites of passage in his seminal 1909 work Les Rites de Passage, analyzing rituals across diverse cultures that mark transitions in social status, such as birth, puberty, marriage, and death.[6] He argued that these rites universally follow a sequence of detachment from the familiar, a period of ambiguity, and reintegration into a new role, drawing on empirical observations from European folklore, Australian Aboriginal practices, and North American indigenous ceremonies.[7] This framework emphasized the spatial and temporal dimensions of rituals, where physical separation from the community mirrors symbolic status shifts.[8] The first phase, termed préliminaire or separation, involves detaching the individual from their prior social position through symbolic acts like isolation or symbolic death, as seen in seclusion rites before initiation among Australian Aboriginal groups.[7] Van Gennep described this as a necessary rupture from everyday structure to enable transformation.[9] The central liminaire phase, from the Latin limen (threshold), constitutes the core of liminality: participants occupy a nebulous, "betwixt and between" state, stripped of former attributes yet lacking new ones, often enduring trials, humiliations, or teachings that foster humility and equality. In this interval, typical durations varied—days for puberty rites in some Melanesian societies or months for apprenticeships—but the phase inherently suspended normal hierarchies, rendering the subject anonymous and receptive to restructuring.[7] The final postliminaire or incorporation phase reaggregates the individual into society with elevated status, via feasts, markings, or marriages that affirm the transition, as in the public revelations following Native American vision quests.[9] Van Gennep noted that the liminal phase's ambiguity often equalizes participants, temporarily inverting social norms, which he observed in widespread customs like novice monks' humility trials or betrothal isolations.[8] His analysis, grounded in comparative ethnography rather than theoretical abstraction, highlighted how these phases ensured social continuity amid change, influencing subsequent anthropological models while underscoring rituals' adaptive role in maintaining order.[6]Victor Turner's Elaboration
Victor Turner, an anthropologist who conducted extensive fieldwork among the Ndembu people of Zambia in the 1950s and 1960s, significantly expanded Arnold van Gennep's framework of rites of passage by emphasizing the transformative potential of the liminal phase. In his seminal 1969 book The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure, Turner analyzed Ndembu initiation rituals, such as those involving the symbolic death and rebirth of neophytes, to argue that liminality represents not merely a transitional interlude but a realm of "anti-structure" where established social hierarchies and norms are suspended.[10][2] This elaboration shifted focus from van Gennep's more descriptive tripartite model—separation, limen, and incorporation—to the dynamic social processes within liminality itself, portraying it as a subjunctive space that generates novel possibilities for social reorganization.[1] Central to Turner's elaboration is the concept of liminality as a state of being "betwixt and between," where participants, or "liminars," are stripped of prior statuses and attributes, often through rituals of humility, anonymity, and inversion (e.g., neophytes in Ndembu mukanda circumcision rites enduring isolation, mud smearing, and role reversals).[2] Unlike van Gennep's neutral threshold, Turner viewed this phase as generative, fostering a suspension of structure that exposes the contingencies of social order and enables critique or renewal of it. He distinguished liminality from everyday transitions by its ritual orchestration, which imposes uniformity on diverse individuals, rendering them temporarily invisible or equal in the social fabric.[1] This process, observed in Ndembu healing and fertility rites, underscores liminality's role in maintaining societal equilibrium by periodically dissolving rigidities. Turner introduced "communitas" to describe the egalitarian bonds emerging in liminality, characterized by undifferentiated, immediate fellowship that transcends hierarchical divisions.[12] In Ndembu rituals, this manifested as neophytes sharing hardships and symbols, cultivating a sense of humility and interdependence that contrasted with the "structure" of everyday authority and roles. He categorized communitas into spontaneous (existential equality in the moment), ideological (doctrines aspiring to it), and normative (institutionalized approximations), arguing that its anti-structural essence poses both creative threats to and regenerative supports for society.[2] Turner cautioned, however, that prolonged liminality without reaggregation could destabilize order, as seen in his analyses of pilgrimage and social dramas where unresolved transitions lead to conflict.[1] Through these concepts, Turner's work elevated liminality from a static interval to a dialectic force in social process, influencing subsequent anthropological inquiries into ritual's capacity for innovation amid structure. His Ndembu-derived insights revealed how liminal anti-structure, by inverting norms (e.g., seniors serving juniors in rituals), reinforces long-term cohesion upon reintegration, though he noted empirical variations across cultures.[10] This elaboration privileged ethnographic detail over abstraction, grounding theory in observable ritual behaviors rather than speculative universals.[12]Evolution of Core Concepts
Following Victor Turner's elaboration in the 1960s and 1970s, the core concepts of liminality evolved through his own extensions to broader social processes, distinguishing obligatory ritual transitions in pre-industrial societies from voluntary, creative "liminoid" experiences in modern industrial contexts, as outlined in his 1974 analysis where liminoid phenomena emerge in leisure, arts, and individual experimentation rather than collective rites.[13] This refinement emphasized liminality's potential for innovation, with liminoid states fostering personal transformation and cultural critique outside structured hierarchies.[14] Turner further applied liminality to "social dramas," four-phase sequences of breach, crisis, redress, and reintegration (or schism) observed in real-world conflicts, such as tribal disputes among the Ndembu, where the liminal crisis phase enables collective reflection and normative reevaluation.[15] In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, political anthropologists extended these ideas to macro-scale historical and modern phenomena, historicizing liminality as a driver of societal upheaval rather than merely a ritual interlude. Bjørn Thomassen, in his 2014 monograph Liminality and the Modern, reframed core concepts to encompass "multiple liminalities"—overlapping thresholds in politics, identity, and culture—evident in events like the French Revolution (1789–1799), where prolonged ambiguity dissolved old structures and birthed new ones, arguing that such states are not aberrant but constitutive of historical change.[16] Thomassen critiqued overly ritual-bound interpretations, insisting on empirical grounding in diverse case studies from antiquity to postcolonial transitions, thus broadening ambiguity and communitas to include collective effervescence in revolutionary mobs or state-building crises.[17] Árpád Szakolczai built on this by theorizing "permanent liminality" in modernity, where transitional voids persist indefinitely due to failed reintegration, as analyzed in his 2017 book examining European history from the Renaissance onward; here, core elements like anti-structure become pathological, fueling "sacrificial" politics—such as totalitarian regimes or endless bureaucratic reforms—that exploit ambiguity without resolution, evidenced by 20th-century cases like the interwar period's economic collapses leading to authoritarianism.[18] Szakolczai integrates Turner's communitas with caution, viewing its egalitarian impulses as prone to manipulation by "trickster" figures in protracted crises, supported by archival data on figures like Machiavelli and modern technocrats.[19] These developments prioritize causal sequences of dissolution and potential reconstruction, applying first-principles scrutiny to avoid romanticizing liminality's transformative promise amid empirical evidence of stagnation in globalized voids, such as migration fluxes or digital identities lacking aggregation.[20]Defining Features
Threshold and Ambiguity
The concept of threshold in liminality originates from the Latin term limen, denoting a doorway or boundary, which Arnold van Gennep identified as the central phase in rites of passage.[1] In his 1909 analysis, van Gennep structured such rituals into three stages: separation from the prior social state, the transitional liminal phase at the threshold, and reaggregation into a new status.[2] This threshold marks the point where participants detach from established norms yet remain unintegrated into the subsequent structure, embodying a literal and figurative crossing.[21] Victor Turner, building on van Gennep in works like The Ritual Process (1969), emphasized the threshold as a realm of potential transformation, where fixed identities dissolve.[21] During this phase, individuals or groups exist "betwixt and between" prior and future positions, unbound by conventional hierarchies or roles.[21] Turner noted that threshold experiences, observed in Ndembu initiation rites among other examples, facilitate symbolic death and rebirth, enabling reconfiguration of social relations.[21] Ambiguity constitutes a defining attribute of the liminal threshold, manifesting as disorientation and indeterminacy.[21] Liminal subjects, termed "threshold people," possess nebulous qualities: they are neither classified nor fixed, often rendered passive, uniform in nondescript attire, and equalized regardless of origin.[21] This ambiguity arises from the suspension of juridical, moral, and social attributes, allowing emergence of novel cultural forms through experimentation unhindered by structure.[21] Turner argued that such states, while unstable, hold creative power, as evidenced in pilgrimage or tribal ceremonies where participants navigate existential uncertainty before resolution.[21] Empirical observations from African fieldwork underscore how this threshold ambiguity fosters communitas, a sense of undifferentiated fellowship, prior to reimposition of order.[21]Communitas and Anti-Structure
In Victor Turner's framework, anti-structure denotes the suspension or negation of established social hierarchies and norms during the liminal phase of rites of passage, where participants exist in a realm "betwixt and between" fixed positions in the social order.[1] This condition emerges as individuals are temporarily detached from their everyday roles, statuses, and attributes, fostering a state of ambiguity that challenges the rigidities of "structure."[2] Turner contrasted anti-structure with the ordered "structure" of society, arguing that liminality periodically releases social actors from normative constraints, enabling reflection on and renewal of social bonds.[22] Communitas, as conceptualized by Turner, represents the egalitarian, undifferentiated sociality that spontaneously arises within this anti-structural liminal space, characterized by comradeship and equality irrespective of prior social differences.[1] Participants in liminal rites, such as Ndembu circumcision initiations observed by Turner in the 1950s and 1960s, experience communitas through shared ordeals that dissolve hierarchies, promoting a sense of immediate, holistic fellowship akin to "humankindness."[2] Turner identified three modalities of communitas—spontaneous (unstructured bonding), ideological (articulated as a model for society), and normative (institutionalized yet retaining anti-structural elements)—with the spontaneous form being the purest expression of liminal equality.[22] The interplay between communitas and anti-structure underscores liminality's dual role in social processes: it critiques and temporarily inverts structure, yet ultimately facilitates reaggregation into society with reinforced or transformed norms.[1] In Turner's analysis of pilgrimage, for instance, pilgrims en route—detached from home structures—cultivate communitas through collective humility and shared vulnerability, as documented in medieval European and contemporary African examples.[2] This dynamic reveals liminality not as mere chaos but as a generative anti-structure that sustains social vitality by balancing equality against hierarchy.[22]Symbolic and Ritual Elements
In the liminal phase of rites of passage, symbols frequently evoke themes of death, dissolution, and potential rebirth, reflecting the transitional ambiguity of participants' status. Arnold van Gennep, in his 1909 analysis, identified this phase as the threshold where initiates are metaphorically detached from prior social structures, often marked by rituals symbolizing a symbolic death to the old self.[23] Victor Turner expanded on this in his 1969 work, noting that Ndembu liminal rituals employ death imagery extensively; for instance, the circumcision site is termed ifwilu, a word also denoting a grave, underscoring the neophytes' passage through a state akin to demise.[2] Ritual elements in liminality often involve inversion of normative structures to foster equality and communitas. Turner observed that Ndembu initiates in the Mukanda circumcision rite are stripped of clothing, adorned uniformly in ragged waist-cloths, and assigned the collective name mwadyi ("initiate"), erasing individual statuses and promoting undifferentiated solidarity.[2] Additional practices include seclusion in symbolic shelters like the kafu—derived from ku-fwa, "to die"—where participants endure reviling rites (Kumukindyila) and perform menial tasks, inverting hierarchical roles to humble and reshape identities.[2] Such rituals enforce passivity, sexual continence, and communal instruction, preparing individuals for reintegration.[2] Symbols in liminal contexts exhibit multivocality, linking sensory experiences to broader ideological meanings, as Turner analyzed in Ndembu practices. Dominant symbols, such as the mudye tree, condense attributes of motherhood, purity (via white milk), and matrilineal continuity, operating on exegetical, operational, and positional levels to evoke both auspicious and inauspicious states.[23] Colors like red, white, and black recur in ritual objects—red clay for vitality, white for death or equality, black for affliction—facilitating the ritual's transformative potency through bipolar oppositions. These elements underscore liminality's anti-structural nature, where ritual acts dissolve boundaries to enable renewal.[1]Anthropological and Sociological Applications
In Traditional Rites of Passage
In traditional rites of passage, liminality constitutes the intermediary phase where participants are symbolically detached from their former social positions and suspended in ambiguity prior to reaggregation into new statuses. Arnold van Gennep outlined this structure in his 1909 monograph Les rites de passage, identifying three sequential stages—separation, limen (threshold), and incorporation—applicable to rituals marking transitions such as birth, puberty, marriage, and death. The liminal stage, in particular, involves the neutralization of prior identities through isolation, humility, and exposure to sacred knowledge, enabling transformation.[6] Victor Turner, building on van Gennep, analyzed liminality's anti-structural dynamics in Ndembu tribal rituals of northwestern Zambia during the mid-20th century. In the Mukanda boys' circumcision initiation, neophytes aged around 10–12 are separated from village life and confined to a remote bush camp for approximately one month, where they undergo circumcision and reside in a state of enforced equality devoid of hereditary distinctions.[23] During this period, initiates are ritually humbled—often daubed with white clay symbolizing uniformity and rebirth, deprived of names, and treated as passive recipients of instruction in moral codes and cosmology—fostering communitas, an unstructured camaraderie that temporarily dissolves social hierarchies.[1][2] Parallel features characterize Ndembu girls' puberty rites, such as the Nkang'a milk ritual, where post-menarche initiates are secluded, anointed with symbolic fluids, and schooled in reproductive responsibilities amid conditions of sensory deprivation and communal bonding.[23] These liminal ordeals, involving physical trials like scarring or fasting, underscore causal mechanisms of identity reconstruction: the deliberate inversion of everyday norms—neophytes clad in minimal attire, mimicking animals or infants—facilitates psychological divestment and reorientation toward adult roles upon emergence and incorporation via feasting and reintegration dances.[24] Such processes, empirically observed across preliterate societies, prioritize experiential ambiguity to instill resilience and collective ethos, as evidenced in Turner's longitudinal fieldwork from 1950–1954.[1]In Modern Social Transitions
In contemporary societies, liminality manifests in unstructured social transitions such as migration, unemployment, and retirement, where individuals or groups exist in prolonged states of ambiguity without the ritual frameworks of traditional rites. Unlike pre-modern passages marked by defined ceremonies, modern transitions often lack clear separation and incorporation phases, leading to extended betwixt-and-between conditions that foster both creative potential and psychological strain. Anthropologist Bjørn Thomassen argues that this reflects modernity's inherent flux, with recurrent crises like economic shifts producing "permanent liminality" in social structures.[25] Migration exemplifies modern liminality, as asylum seekers and refugees navigate indefinite legal and cultural suspensions between origin and host societies. For instance, during the 2015-2016 European migrant crisis, approximately 1.3 million people sought asylum in the EU, many enduring years in camps or provisional statuses that suspended normal social roles and identities. Sociological analyses describe these as liminal zones promoting emergent communitas among displaced groups, yet also vulnerability to exploitation and identity erosion without resolution.[26] Economic disruptions, such as job loss in deindustrialized regions, create individual liminal phases characterized by detachment from prior occupational identities and uncertain reincorporation. A 2012 study of male workers in transition found that unemployment induces a "remaking of the masculine self," with liminality amplifying coping strategies like temporary communal bonds in support networks, though often yielding anti-structure without stable reintegration. In gig economies, freelancers inhabit serial liminal states between contracts, as evidenced by surveys showing 36% of U.S. workers in such roles by 2021 reported heightened ambiguity in professional belonging.[27] Political upheavals further illustrate collective liminality, as in post-revolutionary or transitional regimes where societies hover between old orders and new constitutions. Thomassen applies the framework to such cases, noting how the Arab Spring uprisings from 2010 onward generated liminal politics, with citizens in ambiguous civic spaces fostering egalitarian communitas amid institutional voids, though frequently devolving into prolonged instability rather than incorporation. Empirical critiques highlight that without ritual mediation, these transitions risk conceptual overextension, diluting liminality's analytical precision in non-ritual contexts.[28][29]Liminal versus Liminoid Phenomena
Victor Turner, building on his earlier work on liminality, introduced the term "liminoid" in the 1970s to delineate phenomena in modern societies that approximate the transitional qualities of liminal rites but differ in origin, form, and social function. Liminal phenomena arise within traditional, pre-industrial societies as integral components of obligatory rites of passage, such as puberty initiations or funerals, where participation is collective, undifferentiated, and compelled by social norms to reaffirm hierarchical structures through structured ambiguity and eventual reintegration.[30] Liminoid phenomena, by contrast, manifest in industrial and post-industrial contexts amid specialized labor divisions, manifesting as optional, leisure-based activities detached from core social reproduction. These include artistic pursuits like theater, literature, or music concerts, and recreational forms such as sports or festivals, where individuals elect participation, often experiencing individualized or segmented versions of ambiguity, flow, and temporary communitas without mandatory communal obligation.[30] Unlike liminal rites, which holistically embed participants in anti-structure to ultimately bolster structure, liminoid experiences—crafted by cultural specialists—permit innovation, reflexivity, and even critique of dominant social orders, reflecting modernity's pluralism and market-driven creativity.[31] The distinction highlights adaptive shifts: liminal processes operate within rhythmic, cyclical social calendars of small-scale communities, enforcing conformity; liminoid ones proliferate in segmented, elective spheres of complex societies, enabling personal agency and cultural experimentation, as Turner noted in analyzing how "liminoid phenomena may be individual or collective" yet foster renewal outside ritual compulsion.[30]| Aspect | Liminal Phenomena | Liminoid Phenomena |
|---|---|---|
| Societal Context | Traditional, tribal or agrarian societies | Industrial or post-industrial societies |
| Participation | Compulsory, holistic, collective | Voluntary, segmented, individual or group |
| Production | Emergent from communal rituals | Created by specialists (e.g., artists) |
| Primary Function | Reinforces and reproduces social structure | Generates innovation, critique, diversity |
| Examples | Initiation ceremonies, seasonal festivals | Theater plays, novels, competitive sports |
Psychological and Existential Interpretations
Integration with Depth Psychology
In depth psychology, particularly within the Jungian tradition, liminality is conceptualized as a psychic space of ambiguity and potentiality essential for transformation, paralleling anthropological rites of passage where structure dissolves to enable reconfiguration of the self. This integration draws on Victor Turner's elaboration of Arnold van Gennep's tripartite model—separation, limen (threshold), and incorporation—to frame intrapersonal processes like individuation, wherein the ego confronts the unconscious, fostering emergence of archetypal contents.[32] Scholars in depth psychology posit that such liminal states occur during crises of meaning, such as midlife transitions or analytic work, where fixed identities yield to symbolic death and rebirth, akin to alchemical nigredo stages analyzed by Carl Jung in his studies of psyche transformation.[33] Jungian analysts emphasize the therapeutic container, or temenos—a sacred enclosure borrowed from ancient Greek ritual—as a liminal arena mirroring the ambiguity of the threshold, where conscious and unconscious elements interact without premature resolution. This space facilitates the transcendent function, Jung's mechanism for synthesizing opposites (e.g., persona and shadow) into novel attitudes, requiring suspension of ego defenses much like initiatory ordeals.[32] Empirical applications appear in hermeneutic studies of dreams and active imagination, where liminal immersion reveals numinous archetypes, as seen in analyses linking somatic unconscious eruptions to boundary-crossing experiences.[33] Critics within depth psychology caution against over-romanticizing liminality, noting its potential for disorientation without communal or analytic support, which can exacerbate fragmentation rather than integration; nonetheless, its utility persists in framing psychedelic-assisted therapy or grief work as structured liminal traversals toward wholeness.[32] This synthesis underscores causal mechanisms in psychic change: liminality disrupts habitual structures, compelling engagement with autonomous unconscious dynamics, thereby enabling causal realism in self-realization absent mere intellectual assent.[33]Phenomenological and Existential Perspectives
Phenomenological approaches to liminality focus on the lived, pre-reflective experience of transitional states, where perceptual horizons shift and habitual meanings suspend. In Maurice Merleau-Ponty's framework, the lived body engages liminal places through embodied immersion, revealing essential qualities of spatial ambiguity that disrupt normalized perception and foster a heightened awareness of being-in-the-world.[34] This perspective interprets liminality not as mere spatial transition but as a phenomenological rupture in the body's perceptual synthesis, evident in urban environments where fleeting encounters evoke dwelling amid indeterminacy.[35] Architectural features like balconies, positioned between private and public realms, exemplify this through their ethical communication of vulnerability and openness in everyday phenomenology.[36] Existential interpretations frame liminality as a profound disruption of identity continuity, characterized by a qualitative break from ordinary temporal and narrative structures, compelling confrontation with freedom and potential meaninglessness.[37] Søren Kierkegaard's analysis of existential dread aligns with liminal anxiety, where the suspension of ethical or aesthetic certainties propels the individual toward authentic leaps, such as faith, amid despairing ambiguity.[38] This state erodes coherent self-narratives, fostering nihilistic tendencies unless resolved through subjective reconstruction, as seen in pedagogical contexts prioritizing individual existential uniqueness over structured certainty.[39] Unlike phenomenological emphasis on embodied immediacy, existential views underscore voluntary choice in navigating liminality's void, potentially yielding transformative authenticity or deepened alienation.[40]Individual Identity Formation
Liminality facilitates individual identity formation by creating a transitional space of ambiguity where established social roles and self-concepts are suspended, allowing for deconstruction of prior identities and experimentation with new ones. In this phase, individuals, often described as "neophytes," experience a temporary equalization and detachment from normative structures, which promotes receptivity to cultural symbols, narratives, and relational influences that shape emerging selves.[41] Psychologically, liminal states involve exploring "possible selves"—provisional images of future identities—through trial activities and social interactions, leading to conflict resolution via integrated personal narratives that solidify commitment to transformed identities.[42] This process buffers disorientation by establishing boundaries for safe experimentation, enabling individuals to reconcile incompatible self-aspects and achieve coherence.[42] While such ambiguity can trigger anxiety, depression, or identity instability, it also cultivates resilience and novel perspectives when navigated constructively.[43] In practice, liminal identity reconstruction relies on dialogical interactions and symbolic practices that negotiate self-other relations, particularly during organizational or professional transitions.[44] Empirical evidence from professional training contexts shows that sequenced rituals within liminality—such as initiation sequences—systematically support identity shifts by guiding participants from divestiture to reinvestment in new roles, as observed in studies of medical and vocational programs published in 2024.[45] These mechanisms underscore liminality's causal role in personal development, where structured ambiguity drives adaptive self-reconfiguration rather than mere flux.Criticisms and Theoretical Debates
Overextension and Conceptual Dilution
The application of liminality beyond its origins in structured rites of passage has drawn criticism for overextending the concept, thereby diluting its analytical precision. Originally formulated by Arnold van Gennep in 1909 as the middle phase of transition marked by ambiguity and suspension of social norms, and later expanded by Victor Turner in works like The Ritual Process (1969), liminality was tied to empirical observations of ritual sequences in tribal societies. However, by the early 1970s, Turner's broadening of the term to encompass diverse phenomena—such as pilgrimage, theater, and industrial work—prompted rebuke from anthropological peers for rendering it overly elastic and detached from verifiable ritual contexts.[3] This trend intensified in subsequent decades, with liminality invoked pervasively across disciplines including religious studies, performance theory, and sociology, often as a "master concept" to describe any state of ambiguity or flux, from digital spaces to personal crises. Critics contend that such proliferation transforms it into a buzzword, stripped of specificity: attributing liminality to "everything" paradoxical or transitional erodes its meaning, as the term loses traction when applied indiscriminately without evidence of the structured entry, ambiguity, and reaggregation phases central to Turner's model.[14][46] For instance, Barry Stephenson argues that liminality's "free-floating" status in modern analyses overemphasizes critique and anti-structure while neglecting post-liminal normativity and empirical validation of transformative outcomes.[14] Empirical shortcomings arise from this dilution, as the concept fails to differentiate causally distinct processes; not all ambiguous states yield communitas or reconfiguration, and cultural variations—such as cyclical Buddhist interpretations of impermanence—challenge universal claims of "permanent liminality" in modernity.[46] In fields like archaeology, the term's popularity has depreciated its value, with applications far removed from theoretical roots yielding vague interpretations rather than testable hypotheses.[47] Proponents of refinement, including Turner himself via the distinction of "liminoid" for voluntary, modern equivalents, suggest preserving liminality's core for ritual-bound transitions to avoid conceptual vagueness, though widespread adoption has not curbed overextension.[46]Cultural Relativism and Exceptions
Critics of liminality theory contend that its tripartite model of rites of passage—separation, liminality, and reaggregation—presupposes a universality that overlooks significant cultural variations, rendering the concept susceptible to charges of ethnocentrism when applied beyond Western or specific ethnographic contexts studied by van Gennep and Turner.[48] For instance, anthropological analyses highlight how non-Western worldviews, such as those in Buddhist traditions emphasizing pervasive impermanence (anicca), undermine the discrete boundaries of liminal phases by framing existence itself as fluid and transitional, rather than confined to ritual intervals.[48] This relativism challenges Turner's extension of liminality to broader social processes, as cultural interpretive frameworks reshape the perceived "in-between" nature of transitions, preventing a one-size-fits-all application.[48] Exceptions to the liminal model further illustrate its limitations, as not all societal transitions conform to an identifiable middle phase of ambiguity or threshold-crossing. In certain cultural practices, shifts in status occur abruptly without prolonged liminality, such as in some indigenous Australian initiation rites where separation and incorporation merge seamlessly, defying the extended "anti-structure" Turner described.[46] Similarly, contemporary critiques note that liminality describes transitional phenomena but fails to predict or explain outcomes reliably, as evidenced in failed political revolutions or stalled personal developments where no reaggregation follows the liminal disruption.[48] These exceptions underscore methodological overreach, where the model's descriptive power does not equate to explanatory universality across diverse ethnographic data.[48] Such debates reflect broader anthropological skepticism toward grand theories, with scholars like Thomassen arguing that liminality's proliferation in popular discourse dilutes its analytical precision, particularly when ignoring culture-specific exceptions that resist generalization.[48] While van Gennep's original framework drew from global ethnographies to assert structural invariance, empirical counterexamples from non-ritualized or holistic cosmologies—such as cyclical Hindu life stages (ashramas) lacking stark liminal voids—demonstrate how relativist perspectives demand contextual adaptation over rigid universality.[48] This has prompted calls for refined models that prioritize cultural particularity, avoiding the imposition of Eurocentric ritual logics on heterogeneous practices.[46]Empirical and Methodological Shortcomings
Critics have argued that liminality theory, as developed by Victor Turner, suffers from insufficient empirical grounding, with claims of transformative effects in liminal phases often asserted without robust verification. For instance, ritual scholar Ronald Grimes contends that not all rites produce transformation; many serve to conserve or reinforce existing social orders, and assertions of change demand specific evidence regarding the nature, duration, and extent of any shifts, which is frequently absent in Turner's analyses.[14] This reliance on interpretive ethnography rather than controlled comparative studies or longitudinal data limits the theory's ability to distinguish liminal effects from coincidental social dynamics, rendering it more descriptive than explanatory. Empirical applications in fields like organizational studies reveal similar gaps, where liminal spaces are invoked to explain creativity or disruption but lack standardized metrics for measuring outcomes, leading to anecdotal rather than replicable findings.[49] Methodologically, liminality's vagueness hampers operationalization and falsifiability, as the concept's core ambiguity—betwixt-and-between status—defies precise boundaries for research design. Turner's emphasis on anti-structure and communitas privileges subjective experience over testable propositions, often detaching the term from its original rite-of-passage sequence proposed by Arnold van Gennep, resulting in "free-floating" applications that prioritize metaphorical extension over rigorous sequencing.[14] In cross-cultural contexts, this manifests as overgeneralization, ignoring variability; for example, concepts of impermanence in Buddhist traditions may preclude the structured ambiguity central to liminality, yet the model is applied without adjusting for such differences, undermining universality claims.[46] Systematic reviews highlight inconsistent definitions—temporality oscillating between transient and permanent without resolution—and dual interpretations (e.g., liminality as empowering or alienating), which complicate hypothesis testing and invite confirmation bias in qualitative data interpretation.[49] Furthermore, the theory's expansion beyond anthropology into diverse domains exacerbates these issues, as broad invocations dilute analytical precision and evade methodological scrutiny. Applications to modern phenomena, such as digital transitions or identity crises, often treat liminality as a static condition rather than a dynamic process, bypassing the need for contextual validation and risking pseudoscientific elasticity where any uncertainty qualifies as liminal.[46] This conceptual stretching, while heuristically appealing, prioritizes interpretive flexibility over causal rigor, as evidenced by the scarcity of studies employing mixed methods to correlate liminal exposure with measurable psychological or social outcomes, such as identity stability or group cohesion post-transition.[14]Contemporary Developments
Applications in Identity and Gender Studies
Scholars in gender studies have adapted the anthropological concept of liminality to analyze transgender transitions as modern equivalents of rites of passage, characterized by a phase of ambiguity between assigned sex at birth and affirmed gender identity. Drawing on Victor Turner's framework, this application posits the transition period—encompassing social coming out, hormonal therapies, or surgeries—as a liminal state where binary gender norms are suspended, fostering potential identity reconfiguration amid uncertainty and social isolation.[50] Dentice and Dietert's 2015 qualitative study of gender non-conforming individuals, based on in-depth interviews, illustrates this through participants' accounts of navigating "betwixt-and-between" statuses, with some achieving post-liminal incorporation into affirmed roles by 2014 data points, while others faced protracted ambiguity due to familial rejection or incomplete medical access.[51] Extensions of liminality in transgender contexts emphasize its non-linear or perpetual dimensions, challenging the assumption of resolution. Merlini and Aboim (forthcoming 2025) reconceptualize transgender journeys via life course theory, arguing that liminal transitions extend over time, influenced by biographical contingencies like age at transition (e.g., individuals starting in their 30s reporting prolonged flux compared to adolescents).[52] Empirical narratives from small cohorts, such as Davis and Paramanathan's 2024 ethnographic analysis of three South Asian trans professionals in Australia, reveal temporary liminal engagements—via weekend cross-dressing and consumption of attire like sarees—offering respite from intersecting oppressions of migration and gender, yet reverting to male presentations weekdays to maintain employment stability as of 2022 interviews.[53] In queer identity formation more broadly, liminality underscores spatial and experiential margins where non-binary or fluid genders emerge, often in leisure or migratory contexts. For instance, analyses of gay and trans geographies highlight liminal sites like urban bathhouses or diaspora communities as arenas for identity experimentation, though constrained by heteronormative residues.[54] These applications, predominantly from qualitative methodologies with samples under 30 participants, prioritize interpretive depth over statistical generalizability; however, the field's reliance on self-selected activist-influenced respondents raises questions about representational bias, as longitudinal surveys (e.g., U.S. Transgender Survey 2015 data subsets) indicate higher rates of persistent dissatisfaction post-transition than traditional rite incorporations.[55]Organizational and Economic Contexts
In organizational theory, liminality describes transitional phases where conventional structures, roles, and hierarchies are suspended, creating spaces of ambiguity that can enable innovation, conflict, or identity reconfiguration among participants. During episodic changes such as mergers, restructurings, or strategic shifts, organizations enter liminal periods marked by blurred boundaries and provisional norms, often leading to heightened creativity alongside resistance and social drama.[56] This application draws from anthropological roots but adapts to management contexts, where liminality is analyzed through dimensions of process (temporal flux), position (status ambiguity), and place (spatial reconfiguration).[57] Empirical studies highlight how such states challenge fixed identities, as in career transitions where professionals navigate "betwixt and between" roles amid precarious labor markets.[58] Distinctions between ritualistic liminality (pre-structured transitions within organizations) and liminoid experiences (voluntary, playful deviations) inform methodological approaches, with the former emphasizing planned change and the latter optional experimentation.[59] Books synthesizing these applications propose models for managing liminality, integrating temporal suspension with spatial and relational dynamics to mitigate risks like stalled progress or cultural clashes. In economic contexts, liminality emerges during macro-level disruptions like deindustrialization or crises, where established production modes dissolve without immediate replacements, fostering adaptive behaviors in postindustrial landscapes. The night-time economy exemplifies this as a liminal domain, operating beyond diurnal regulations with fluid governance, heightened risks, and alternative social economies that redistribute power from industrial centers to leisure-oriented peripheries.[60] [61] Economic commemorations of downturns, such as makeshift monuments during recessions, further illustrate liminal sites where dissent and creativity contest official narratives of stability.[62] Entrepreneurship often unfolds in liminal zones, particularly for migrants or informal workers who leverage transitional statuses to launch ventures amid structural marginality, as in self-storage businesses exploiting storage ambiguities or collaborative innovations navigating sensemaking thresholds.[63] [64] [65] These applications underscore liminality's role in economic adaptability, though prolonged states risk perpetuating precarity without aggregation into stable structures.[66]Technological and Digital Extensions
In digital environments, liminality manifests as transitional states where individuals or technologies occupy ambiguous positions between established structures and emerging forms, extending Victor Turner's anthropological framework to virtual and networked spaces.[67] For instance, crowdwork platforms position participants in "digital liminality," a betwixt-and-between condition akin to rites of passage, where workers navigate fluid roles without traditional employment securities, enacting culturally specific responses to precarity rather than uniform Western models.[68] This extension highlights how digital mediation disrupts normative social categories, fostering temporary communitas or collective ambiguity among users disconnected from physical locales yet bound by algorithmic interfaces.[68] Technological trajectories further embody liminality when innovations linger in developmental "no man's land," neither fully realized nor discarded, as seen in prolonged struggles over adoption and integration.[67] Scholars describe these as "liminal technologies," where temporal ambiguities—such as stalled prototyping or regulatory limbo—mirror the anti-structural phases of rituals, challenging linear progress narratives in innovation studies.[67] Cognitive shifts induced by digital affordances, such as evolving tacit understandings of privacy or interaction in algorithmic ecosystems, also exhibit liminal traits, as users adapt to unfamiliar sensory and social cues without clear resolution.[69] In cross-cultural contexts, digital liminality aids re-integration by simulating threshold experiences, as in expatriate communities using online forums to bridge home and host cultures amid physical dislocation.[70] Virtual reality and social media platforms amplify this by enabling fluid identity experimentation, detaching participants from embodied norms and creating spaces for provisional self-construction, though empirical validation remains limited to qualitative accounts rather than large-scale metrics.[71] These extensions underscore liminality's adaptability to technology, yet critiques note potential overextension, as digital permanence (e.g., archived data) may undermine true transience central to Turner's original conception.[67]Manifestations and Examples
Temporal and Spatial Forms
Temporal liminality manifests as the intermediate phase in rites of passage, where participants are symbolically detached from prior social statuses and identities while awaiting incorporation into new ones. This stage, termed the "limen" or threshold by Arnold van Gennep and expanded by Victor Turner, involves a temporal suspension of structure, often featuring ambiguity, humility, and egalitarian communitas among neophytes.[1] In Turner's analysis of Ndembu rituals, the liminal period enforces separation through seclusion or trials, lasting from days to weeks; for example, in boys' circumcision rites, initiates endure isolation and symbolic death imagery at a hidden site, marking a prolonged transitional duration before reintegration.[2] Such temporal forms extend beyond strict rituals to life crises like migration or illness recovery, where unstructured intervals foster identity reconfiguration, though empirical durations vary by cultural context and lack universal standardization.[13] Spatial forms of liminality embody physical thresholds or margins that parallel temporal transitions, serving as loci for anti-structural experiences. Derived from the Latin "limen" meaning threshold, these spaces—such as doorways, bridges, or ritual peripheries—represent neither origin nor destination, enabling detachment from profane order.[72] In anthropological examples, Ndembu initiates are removed to bush encampments or sacred sites like the ifwilu circumcision ground, spatially inverting village norms to evoke liminal chaos and renewal over the rite's course.[2] Turner observed that these locales, often temporary and marginal, amplify communitas by neutralizing hierarchies, as seen in communal huts during Nkang'a puberty rituals for girls, where spatial isolation reinforces the phase's transformative potential.[1] Empirical studies confirm such spaces' role in channeling transitions, though their universality depends on ritual specificity rather than inherent properties.[73]Religious and Spiritual Contexts
In religious and spiritual traditions, liminality appears as the transitional phase in rites of passage, where individuals or communities undergo symbolic detachment from prior social or existential statuses to acquire new ones. Arnold van Gennep, in his 1909 work Les Rites de Passage, identified this phase as the "limen" or threshold, following separation from the familiar and preceding reintegration, often involving rituals that neutralize hierarchies and foster transformative ambiguity.[21] Victor Turner expanded this in studies of Ndembu rituals in Zambia during the 1950s and 1960s, describing liminality as a realm of "anti-structure" that generates communitas—a sense of equality and undifferentiated fellowship among participants, as seen in boys' circumcision initiations where novices endure isolation, trials, and symbolic death to emerge as adults.[1] Shamanic practices across indigenous cultures exemplify spiritual liminality through induced altered states of consciousness, enabling practitioners to navigate boundaries between human and spirit realms. Ethnographic accounts from Siberian and Amazonian traditions, documented in cross-cultural analyses, portray shamans entering trances via drumming, fasting, or entheogens to mediate supernatural forces, a process rooted in prehistoric neurobiological adaptations for healing and divination.[74] These experiences, verified in phenomenological studies, involve temporary ego dissolution and access to archetypal symbols, distinguishing shamanism as an originary form of religiosity where liminality facilitates ecstatic communion rather than doctrinal permanence.[75] Pilgrimages in major faiths constitute collective liminal events, suspending everyday roles to inhabit sacred thresholds. In Islam, the Hajj requires pilgrims to enter ihram—a state of ritual purity and uniformity—during circuits around the Kaaba in Mecca, annually drawing over 2 million participants since the 7th century CE and exemplifying Turner's model of mass communitas amid spatial and temporal dislocation.[76] Similarly, Hinduism's Kumbh Mela, held every 12 years at river confluences like Prayagraj, gathers tens of millions in ascetic renunciation, mirroring van Gennep's transitional immersion in holy waters for purification and rebirth.[77] Christian pilgrimages, such as the Camino de Santiago walked by over 300,000 annually in recent decades, impose physical marginality that fosters reflective liminality, as pilgrims traverse liminal landscapes detached from secular identities toward eschatological renewal.[78]Folklore, Mythology, and Narrative Traditions
In folklore and mythological narratives, liminality manifests as transitional phases in rites of passage, where individuals or entities exist in ambiguous states between established social or existential categories. Anthropologist Victor Turner, building on Arnold van Gennep's framework from The Rites of Passage (1909), identified the liminal stage as a period of "betwixt and between" during rituals, characterized by the suspension of normal structures and the emergence of communitas, a sense of undifferentiated equality among participants.[1] This concept applies to folkloric initiation ceremonies, such as those documented among the Ndembu of Zambia, where boys undergo seclusion and symbolic trials to transition from childhood to adulthood, embodying temporary inversion of hierarchies and exposure to mystical dangers.[2] Mythological traditions frequently depict liminal spaces and times as portals to other realms, facilitating encounters with the divine or supernatural. In Celtic lore, thresholds like crossroads, riverbanks, and fairy mounds (sídhe) serve as sites for transformative interactions between human and fairy worlds, often during liminal periods such as Samhain, when the veil between the living and the dead thins.[79] Similarly, Greek myths portray underworld descents—such as Orpheus's journey or Persephone's abduction—as liminal ordeals testing resolve and enabling rebirth, with the chthonic realm functioning as a threshold of death and renewal.[80] Narrative traditions in folklore exploit liminality to structure tales of heroism and moral ambiguity, often leaving protagonists in unresolved "in-between" states that mirror real-world uncertainties. Folktales worldwide, from European fairy narratives to indigenous oral epics, feature liminal motifs like enchanted forests or mountain passes where heroes shed old identities and confront chaos before reintegration, as seen in the uncertain, open-ended conclusions of many traditional stories that prioritize transformation over tidy resolution.[81] Turner's analysis extends this to dramatic narratives, where liminal "social dramas" drive plot through breaches, crises, and redress, underscoring causality in cultural storytelling as a mechanism for processing societal flux.[31] These elements highlight liminality's role not as mere symbolism but as a causal framework for identity reconstruction in pre-modern lore.Educational and Developmental Processes
In rites of passage, the liminal phase functions as a critical period for educational transformation, where initiates undergo structured instruction detached from prior social structures. Anthropologist Victor Turner observed that during liminality, neophytes receive verbal and nonverbal teaching on cultural sacra, including myths, symbols, and roles, often through ordeals that equalize participants and foster communitas—a sense of undifferentiated community that enhances learning.[1] This process, rooted in Arnold van Gennep's tripartite model of separation, liminality, and incorporation, emphasizes causal mechanisms of identity reconstruction via ambiguity and guided trials, rather than mere ritual symbolism.[39] Traditional initiation rites exemplify this in developmental contexts, imparting practical and moral knowledge for adulthood. Among the Yao people of Malawi, boys aged approximately 9–10 participate in ceremonies involving circumcision, seclusion, and explicit teachings on sexuality, responsibilities, and social norms, with 73% of Yao boys reporting involvement in a 2008 study across southern Malawi districts.[82] These rites, while culturally framed as preparatory for adolescence, occur amid empirical concerns over health risks and premature sexualization, yet they structurally align with liminal education by suspending childhood status to instill adult competencies through communal oversight.[83] Similar patterns appear in other African societies, where liminality bridges biological maturation and cultural role acquisition via experiential learning.[84] In contemporary educational systems, liminality manifests in transitional programs that mirror these anthropological processes, promoting skill acquisition amid role ambiguity. Teacher preparation programs position candidates betwixt learner and practitioner, revising Turner's liminality to account for modern mentorship and reflective practice that drives professional identity formation.[85] Internships and apprenticeships similarly create liminal spaces for students, enabling practical immersion that disrupts prior knowledge structures and facilitates adaptive learning, as evidenced in analyses of temporary status shifts fostering entrepreneurial or vocational competencies.[86] Developmental theories incorporating liminality highlight its role in third-wave student models, where betwixt-and-between experiences across diverse populations yield shared transformative outcomes, supported by empirical links to reduced attrition when navigated with intentional pedagogy.[87][88]Popular Culture and Media Representations
In horror cinema, liminal spaces frequently serve as settings that amplify psychological tension through their transitional and ambiguous nature. Stanley Kubrick's The Shining (1980) utilizes the Overlook Hotel's vast, empty corridors and rooms as a liminal environment, where the isolation of winter confines characters in a threshold state between sanity and madness, contributing to the film's enduring atmospheric dread.[89] [90] Similarly, David Lynch's Lost Highway (1997) employs shifting identities and surreal domestic spaces to depict protagonists trapped in liminal identity crises, blurring boundaries between reality and hallucination.[89] David Robert Mitchell's It Follows (2014) portrays liminality through suburban pools, abandoned buildings, and endless roads as sites where a pursuing entity manifests, symbolizing inescapable transitional vulnerability that persists until transmitted.[89] The 2006 adaptation of Silent Hill draws on the video game series' foggy, decaying townscapes as liminal realms where dimensions overlap, forcing characters into rites of confrontation with personal and supernatural ambiguities.[89] In video games, liminal aesthetics underpin indie horror experiences emphasizing existential isolation. The Backrooms, originating from a May 2019 4chan creepypasta describing endless, yellow-hued office mazes, has spawned games like The Backrooms: Survival (2022), where procedural generation creates monotonous, disorienting voids evoking subconscious unease.[91] Titles such as Superliminal (released December 2019) manipulate spatial perception in dreamlike, shifting architectures, inducing liminal disorientation through optical illusions and perspective puzzles.[92] Internet memes and visual media have popularized liminal spaces as eerie, nostalgic depictions of unoccupied transitional zones like empty malls or hotel lobbies, often shared on platforms such as Reddit's r/LiminalSpace subreddit, which amassed over 500,000 subscribers by 2023, reflecting a cultural fixation on the uncanny familiarity of in-between places.[92] This aesthetic extends to experimental works, including vaporwave-influenced art and ASMR videos simulating liminal ambiance, though critics note its roots in architectural nostalgia rather than strict anthropological liminality.[93]References
- https://www.[routledge](/page/Routledge).com/The-Ritual-Process-Structure-and-Anti-Structure/Turner-Abrahams-Harris/p/book/9780202011905
