Hubbry Logo
MenemismMenemismMain
Open search
Menemism
Community hub
Menemism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Menemism
Menemism
Menemism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Part of a series on
Conservatism in Argentina
Ideologies
Principles
History
People
Parties
Active
Defunct
Alliances
Active
Defunct
Organisations
Media
Related topics

Menemism is a term that refers to the policies implemented in Argentina by Carlos Menem, president of the country from 1989 to 1999. Like Peronism (the movement Menem belonged to), Menemism is complex, being most usually defined as populist rhetoric combined with neoliberal policies.

Menemism came to power from the Popular Unity Justicialista Front. He is remembered for the electoral platform with which he won the elections; the measures included a "salariazo" and "productive revolution." He won the elections with other sectors of Peronism or center-left radicalism.

Menemism returned to power with a resoundingly high vote rate, having already modified the national constitution, with the Co-participation, so that the government mandates would last 4 years, making it possible for Carlos Saúl Menen to be re-elected. The recurring problems of this economic model determined an economic recession since 1998, which would end up exploding in the 2001 crisis.

Ideology

[edit]

Menemism constituted a political-cultural period around the practice of an excessive consensus of the neoliberal ideology, with policies such as convertibility, the privatization of companies, economic liberation, where the economy was deregulated, reducing quotas, tariffs and import prohibitions. Ideology that was contradicted mainly by the national-popular sectors of Peronism that branded Menem as a "traitor". In order to contradict these sectors, an attempt was made to relate, in this sense, the trace of a certain turn of Peronism in public policies during 1952 to open up to foreign capital, with the liberal policies that the Menemist government was carrying out. In order to show some continuity and relationship with the Peronist movement.[16]

Menemism was qualified in various ways around its position in the political spectrum, the most common is the center-right[17] or the right-wing.[12][18][19]

Menemism is considered conservative by most sectors, although in their governments there were not too many cultural or social policies where we can see it clearly represented.

Political program

[edit]

Economic model

[edit]

Menem quickly adhered to the policies of economist John Williamson, who proposed a set of ten specific formulas for developing countries affected by macroeconomic crises, such as a package of tax, trade and labor reforms to stabilize prices, attract foreign investment; reduce the size of the state, and encourage the expansion of internal market forces.[20] Greater opening of the economy. It implied the entry of financial and productive capital and the entry of goods that compete with national products. This measure once again caused the closure of factories and workshops.

Convertibility plan

[edit]

By law, the national currency was set at parity with the US dollar. As a consequence, the cost of national production increased and businessmen could not compete with imports. Therefore, production fell and unemployment rose.

Privatizations

[edit]

Based on Law No. 23,696, better known as the State Reform Law, Menemism in his government implemented a series of massive privatizations of state-owned companies in order to generate a more liberal economy. Menem put the following state companies up for sale: YPF, YCF, Gas del Estado, the National Telecommunications Company, Aerolíneas Argentinas, the Port, the national retirement and pension system, among others. Which translated into strategic relations with the United States and Great Britain, being applauded by conservative leaders of the moment such as Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher.[21]

Decrease in public spending

[edit]

The decrease in public spending under Menemism was one of the conditions imposed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to grant credit to the country and sustain the convertibility regime. Public spending went from representing 35.6% of GDP in 1989 to only 18.3% in 1992. This reduction was achieved mainly through the privatization or concession of public companies and services. The decrease in public spending also affected areas sensitive areas such as education, health, defense and security. The budget allocated to these areas was reduced or transferred to the provinces, which had to take charge of financing them with their own resources or with debt. The consequence was a deterioration in the quality and coverage of these services, as well as a loss of public jobs and social rights. Its objective was to achieve a fiscal balance and avoid the monetary issue that generated inflation. However, it also had negative effects on the productive development, employment, income distribution and well-being of the population.[22][23][24][25]

International alignment

[edit]

Menem's economy ministers were prominent academics and privileged relations with the United States. However, there were differences between the management of Cavallo and that of Di Tella. While Cavallo tried to maintain differences without diplomatic pressure from the United States, Di Tella did not hesitate to adopt a policy of exclusive attention to that country, called "carnal relations." In 1996 changes were observed in this strategy that could mean the abandonment of this policy.

Legacy

[edit]

Currently there are various politicians who are usually considered by the political scene as menemistas or vindicators of it. As Mauricio Macri,[26][27][28][29] Javier Milei,[30][31][32][33][34] Miguel Ángel Pichetto[35][36][37][38] or Patricia Bullrich.[39][40]

Some parties that are considered menemists are, for example, Encuentro Republicano Federal.[41][42]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Menemism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Menemism denotes the neoliberal economic and political framework adopted by , from 1989 to 1999, which diverged from by emphasizing market liberalization, state contraction, and fiscal austerity to address chronic instability. Under Menem's administration, core policies included the of 1991, which pegged the to the U.S. dollar at a 1:1 rate, effectively halting that had exceeded 5,000% annually in 1989 and fostering initial economic stability through reduced monetary expansion and enhanced credibility for foreign investment. Extensive of state-owned enterprises, such as utilities and airlines, alongside and opening, aimed to boost efficiency and competitiveness, yielding short-term GDP growth averaging 6% annually from 1991 to 1998 while curbing public sector deficits. Despite these gains, Menemism encountered significant backlash for exacerbating income inequality, with rising to over 15% by the late 1990s, and for enabling scandals tied to privatizations that favored connected elites over broad-based prosperity. The rigid currency peg, while stabilizing prices, masked underlying fiscal vulnerabilities and accumulation, culminating in the 2001 crisis when convertibility collapsed amid recession and default. Scholarly assessments, often from institutions prone to critiquing market-oriented shifts, highlight Menemism's role in modernizing Argentina's economy but underscore its failure to build resilient institutions, leading to recurrent cycles rather than sustained growth.

Origins and Context

The 1980s Hyperinflation Crisis

Following the restoration of in 1983 under President Raúl Alfonsín, grappled with escalating rooted in chronic fiscal deficits and excessive monetary expansion. Public spending outpaced revenues, with deficits averaging 6-8% of GDP annually in the mid-1980s, financed primarily through from the printing money to cover obligations. This monetization of debt eroded currency value, compounded by wage indexation demands that fueled a wage-price spiral and loss of export competitiveness due to overvalued exchange rates. The Austral Plan, launched in June 1985, temporarily curbed by introducing a new , freezing prices and wages, and imposing fiscal , reducing annual inflation from 672% in 1985 to 90% in 1986. However, adherence waned as subsidies and public employment ballooned, deficits reemerged, and monetary issuance resumed, driving back above 170% by 1987. The 1988 Spring Plan attempted stabilization via tax reforms and reduced money growth but collapsed amid political gridlock and losses, unleashing . Hyperinflation peaked in 1989, with monthly rates surpassing 200% in June and July—reaching 196.6% in the latter—yielding an annual rate of approximately 3,079%. Prices doubled every few days, devastating : real fell by over 30% from 1988 levels, middle-class savings evaporated, and surged to affect nearly 50% of the population. Food shortages triggered widespread riots and looting in May and June 1989, particularly in and , as supermarkets were ransacked amid desperation. The crisis forced Alfonsín to cede power prematurely to president-elect on July 8, 1989—six months before the scheduled inauguration—amid institutional breakdown and public unrest. This episode exemplified how unchecked fiscal expansion and inconsistent stabilization efforts, absent credible commitment to restraint, perpetuated inflationary inertia, setting the stage for Menem's subsequent neoliberal pivot within .

Menem's Rise Within

entered politics in the mid-1950s following Juan Perón's overthrow in a 1955 military coup, aligning with the movement's resistance efforts. In June 1956, he participated in an abortive uprising led by General Juan José Valle, resulting in his brief arrest and establishing his early credentials as a loyalist amid proscribed party activities. Menem built his base in his native province, rising through local Peronist structures by the 1960s and founding a factional group there. With the lifting of Peronist bans in , he secured election as governor of that May, implementing populist measures like and debt forgiveness to bolster support among rural and working-class constituents. His term ended abruptly with the military coup, during which he was detained for over a year on suspicions of guerrilla ties, though no charges were proven. Following the restoration of democracy in , Menem was reelected governor in October of that year and again in , leveraging provincial networks and charismatic appeals reminiscent of Perón's personalismo to consolidate power outside ' dominant party factions. Within Peronism's fragmented landscape—marked by tensions between orthodox labor unions, renovators, and regional bosses—Menem positioned himself as an outsider challenger, gaining traction through alliances with interior governors and union leaders wary of urban elites. His national ascent culminated in July 1988, when held its first internal primaries for a presidential candidate; Menem defeated establishment figure Antonio Cafiero, securing 41% of the vote against Cafiero's 31% by mobilizing grassroots support and portraying himself as Perón's true ideological heir despite his peripheral status. This upset reflected Peronist voters' frustration with the Radical government's economic failures and a desire for a bold, provincial voice amid exceeding 3,000% annually by mid-1989.

Ideological Framework

Adaptation of Peronist Doctrine

Menem's adaptation of Peronist centered on reinterpreting the movement's core tenets—, economic independence, and political sovereignty—to align with neoliberal prescriptions, marking a departure from Juan Domingo Perón's emphasis on state-led import-substitution industrialization, , and redistributive policies. Upon assuming the on July 8, 1989, following an election victory on May 14 amid exceeding 5,000 percent annually, Menem invoked Peronism's inherent pragmatism, famously encapsulated in Perón's dictum that "Peronism is a fact, not a ," to justify programmatic flexibility in response to the exhaustion of the statist model inherited from prior Peronist governments. This reframing positioned market-oriented reforms not as ideological betrayal but as the updated path to Perón's vision of national greatness, with economic independence redefined as integration into global markets rather than . Central to this adaptation was the reconceptualization of : whereas classical relied on state intervention, wage controls, and union power to achieve equity, Menem argued that true distributive gains required first restoring macroeconomic stability through , , and fiscal , enabling private-sector-led growth to benefit the working classes. He delayed promised "productive revolution" initiatives—echoing Peronist —until after initial stabilization, prioritizing and openness to foreign as prerequisites for and . The Justicialist Party's (PJ) decentralized , lacking rigid ideological enforcers, facilitated this pivot, granting Menem to override from orthodox Peronists who decried the abandonment of redistributional . Analysts characterize Menem's approach as pragmatic opportunism rather than principled conversion, adapting Peronist 's rhetorical appeal—personalist , nationalist symbolism, and promises of inclusion—to cloak neoliberal structural adjustments, thereby sustaining electoral viability despite intra-party schisms. This synthesis, dubbed "neoliberal populism," coexisted uneasily with Peronism's labor base, as reforms eroded union privileges and state , yet Menem retained loyalty through targeted subsidies and charismatic framing of as temporary sacrifice for long-term . By 1995 reelection, this doctrinal elasticity had entrenched Menemism as a viable Peronist variant, though it provoked enduring debates over fidelity to foundational principles.

Neoliberal Principles and First-Principles Rationale

Menemism incorporated core neoliberal principles such as monetary stabilization through currency convertibility, extensive of state-owned enterprises, of markets, and fiscal measures to curb government spending. These elements aimed to integrate into global markets by prioritizing initiative over state intervention, drawing from theoretical foundations emphasizing individual incentives and market competition as drivers of efficiency. The , enacted on April 1, 1991, pegged the to the U.S. at a 1:1 rate, legally prohibiting the from issuing pesos without dollar backing, thereby eliminating the government's ability to finance deficits through . The first-principles rationale for these policies stemmed from the recognition that Argentina's chronic —peaking at over 3,000% annually in —was causally rooted in persistent fiscal deficits funded by , eroding currency credibility and distorting economic signals. By imposing a hard peg, the plan created a credible that anchored inflationary expectations and restored monetary discipline, as unchecked money printing incentivizes short-term political gains at the expense of long-term stability. This approach aligned with causal mechanisms where stable facilitates savings, , and predictability, countering the perverse incentives of discretion that had previously fueled velocity increases and asset flight. Structural reforms like targeted the inefficiencies of state monopolies, which prior to 1989 absorbed subsidies equivalent to 4-5% of GDP annually while operating at losses due to lack of profit motives and political interference in . Transferring assets to private hands enforced through market discipline, where owners bear losses and capture gains, fostering innovation and cost reductions absent in bureaucratic structures. Deregulation similarly removed , enabling to reveal true scarcities and allocate capital based on rather than , addressing the fundamental mismatch between state planning and dispersed in .

Core Policies

Convertibility Plan and Monetary Stabilization

The Convertibility Plan, enacted through the Convertibility Law on March 27, 1991, and effective April 1, 1991, established a fixed exchange rate pegging the Argentine peso to the U.S. dollar at parity (1:1), functioning as a currency board regime to enforce monetary discipline. The law mandated that the Central Bank of Argentina maintain full convertibility of pesos into dollars, with the monetary base backed by international reserves, initially requiring coverage of at least two-thirds but evolving toward full reserve backing to prevent money creation without corresponding foreign asset inflows. This mechanism, designed by Economy Minister Domingo Cavallo under President Carlos Menem, prohibited the central bank from financing fiscal deficits through seigniorage and eliminated peso-denominated indexation clauses to break inflationary expectations. Prior to implementation, Argentina faced hyperinflation exceeding 3,000% annually in 1989, with monthly rates reaching about 11% by March 1991 amid repeated failed stabilization attempts. The plan's rigid dollar linkage imported U.S. monetary credibility, rapidly curbing : annual rates fell to 17.5% in 1992, 7.4% in 1993, and under 5% thereafter through the decade, while the expanded only in tandem with reserve accumulation. Fiscal complemented this by achieving primary surpluses, enabling reserve buildup from approximately $2.3 billion in early 1991 to over $12 billion by mid-decade, which supported the regime's sustainability. Monetary stabilization extended to broader financial reforms, including banking sector recapitalization and the of dollarization alternatives initially, fostering that attracted foreign and stabilized finances. The endorsed the framework, providing extended fund facility support from 1992 onward, crediting it with transforming from chronic to a low-inflation environment akin to advanced economies. However, the plan's success hinged on external reserve inflows and export competitiveness, exposing vulnerabilities to global shocks, though it unequivocally halted the inflationary spiral through credible commitment to .

Privatization Initiatives

The privatization program launched by President Carlos Menem's administration in 1989 sought to divest the Argentine state of inefficient, debt-laden enterprises accumulated over decades of interventionist policies, thereby alleviating fiscal deficits exceeding 10% of GDP and generating revenue for debt reduction. The initiative was enabled by the Emergency Law of 1989 and subsequent legislation, including a July 27, 1989, Senate-approved bill authorizing the sale or partial divestment of up to 35 state-owned companies, many operating at chronic losses. Privatizations were executed primarily through public auctions and concessions to domestic and foreign consortia, often involving regulatory frameworks to encourage competition, with the government retaining minority stakes in some cases to facilitate transitions. By design, the process prioritized speed, completing divestments of nearly all targeted entities within three years, marking one of Latin America's most ambitious programs. Early actions focused on telecommunications and aviation. In 1990, the state telephone monopoly ENTel was divided and sold to two private consortia—Telecom Argentina and Telefónica de Argentina—for approximately $5 billion, ending decades of waiting lists for service and underinvestment. That same year, Aerolíneas Argentinas, the flag carrier burdened by $1.5 billion in debts, was privatized to a consortium led by Iberia for $260 million, with the government transferring routes and assets under a 10-year exclusivity period. Railway concessions followed, beginning in 1989 with restructuring under the Emergency Law; by 1991-1993, six regional lines were awarded to private operators on 30-year terms, saving the government an estimated $1 billion annually in subsidies. Subsequent privatizations targeted energy and utilities from 1991 onward. Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales (), the state oil company controlling 80% of reserves, underwent staged : minority shares sold in 1990, followed by a landmark June 1993 auction of 45% of shares for $3 billion to international firms like , reducing to 10% by 1999. Electricity distribution and generation firms, including Edelap and Edesur in the region, were concessioned in 1992-1993 to private entities for $2.5 billion, with tariffs regulated to attract investment. Gas transport and distribution (e.g., Gas del Estado split into Transportadora de Gas del Sur and others) followed in 1992, while water and sewage services in were privatized in 1993 to Aguas Argentinas for $1.1 billion on a 30-year concession. Petrochemicals, steel (Siderar), and ports were also divested, with concessioned in 1998 to Corporación América.
Major PrivatizationYearKey DetailsProceeds (approx.)
ENTel (telecom)1990Split into two companies; sold to foreign-led consortia$5 billion
1990Sold to Iberia-led group; debt transfer included$260 million
Railways (concessions)1991-1993Six lines privatized; 30-year termsSubsidy savings $1B/year
(oil)199345% shares auctioned; partial earlier sales$3 billion (1993 tranche)
(e.g., Edelap)1992-1993Distribution firms concessioned$2.5 billion
Water (Aguas Argentinas)1993Buenos Aires concession$1.1 billion
Overall, the initiatives raised $19.44 billion in federal revenue by the late , funding Brady Bond repurchases and fiscal stabilization, though implementation involved controversies over valuation and foreign dominance, as documented in government audits.

Deregulation and Fiscal Austerity

Upon assuming office in July 1989, President initiated as a core component of his neoliberal reforms to dismantle the interventionist state apparatus inherited from decades of Peronist . These measures aimed to liberalize markets, reduce bureaucratic barriers, and foster amid exceeding 5,000% annually. In October 1991, Menem issued a sweeping 122-article decree that abolished numerous sectoral restrictions, including on goods and services previously enforced by the state. This was followed on November 2, 1991, by an executive decree eliminating all import and export quotas, liberalizing professional fees and commissions, and disbanding ten government regulatory agencies, thereby streamlining trade and . Further targeted financial and utility sectors. The banking system was overhauled by removing ceilings and entry barriers for foreign banks, enabling greater capital inflows and . In , rate reforms in November shifted from fixed tariffs to negotiated agreements between private operators and the post-privatization of state telecom assets. Foreign restrictions were lifted across industries, discarding prior requirements for local content or , which facilitated inflows reaching $24 billion cumulatively by 1999. These steps collectively reduced the state's regulatory footprint, with over 1,000 laws and decrees repealed or amended by mid-decade to prioritize market signals over administrative fiat. Fiscal complemented by enforcing budgetary discipline to underpin monetary stability under the 1991 , which pegged the peso to the U.S. dollar. Initial shock measures in included sharp cuts to public spending, slashing subsidies on and that had fueled deficits averaging 8% of GDP pre-Menem. employment was reduced by approximately 100,000 jobs through attrition and early retirements, while social spending was curtailed to prioritize servicing and convertibility reserves. By 1993, these adjustments yielded a primary fiscal surplus of 1.2% of GDP, reversing chronic imbalances and enabling the to back the with over 100% reserves. Austerity extended to revenue enhancements via tax simplification and broadened bases, though evasion persisted; the value-added tax rate was unified at 21% in to boost collections without expansive spending. Privatization proceeds, totaling $18 billion from sales of entities like and , were partly directed to deficit reduction rather than new outlays, though later years saw fiscal slippage with deficits reemerging above 3% of GDP by 2001 due to expansionary policies. Critics, including Peronist unions, attributed short-term recessionary effects—GDP contracted 2.8% in 1990—to these cuts, yet proponents credited them with halting and restoring investor confidence, as evidenced by bond yields falling from 100% in 1989 to under 10% by 1993.

Labor Market Reforms

The Menem administration enacted significant labor market reforms in 1991 through Law 24.013, known as the , which aimed to enhance flexibility amid and economic stagnation. This legislation introduced temporary and fixed-term contracts, allowing employers to hire workers for up to three years under promotional regimes with reduced social security contributions and modified wage adjustment mechanisms. It also facilitated part-time employment, even in the , and established mechanisms for regularizing unregistered work while providing protections like extended benefits. These changes targeted rigidities in the pre-existing Peronist-era labor code, which featured high severance costs and strict dismissal procedures that had contributed to informality rates exceeding 40% of the workforce by the late . The reforms sought to lower hiring barriers and stimulate job creation by aligning labor costs with market dynamics, particularly after the Convertibility Plan's implementation in April 1991 stabilized prices but initially exacerbated through layoffs. Empirical analyses indicate that the flexibility provisions, such as probationary periods and easier terminations, reduced firms' reluctance to expand formal , with temporary contracts rising from negligible levels to over 10% of new hires by the mid-1990s. However, union opposition, including general strikes by the CGT, highlighted concerns over diminished , as the law waived certain protections for promotional jobs and allowed . Subsequent adjustments in the mid-1990s, including 1997 decrees attempting further of hiring and firing, faced judicial setbacks but reinforced the 1991 framework's emphasis on adaptability. Data from the period show peaking at 18.4% in 1995 before declining to 14.5% by 1998, attributable in part to flexibility enabling recovery in sectors like and services, though critics attribute rising income inequality— increasing from 0.42 in 1990 to 0.49 in 1999—to the proliferation of low-wage, unstable positions. Firm-level studies confirm that reduced protection correlated with higher hiring rates during expansions but also faster adjustments during downturns, underscoring a causal link between and labor market responsiveness.

Economic Outcomes

Achievements in Macroeconomic Stability

The , enacted on April 1, 1991, pegged the to the U.S. dollar at a one-to-one rate, backed by full dollar reserves at the , which effectively eliminated monetary emission as a tool for deficit financing and halted the that had ravaged the economy. This reform, under Economy Minister , transitioned from a period of annual exceeding 3,000% in 1989—characterized by monthly rates often surpassing 200%—to single-digit figures by the mid-1990s. Inflation declined sharply post-implementation: from 1,344% in 1990 to 84% in 1991, 17.5% in 1992, 7.4% in 1993, and stabilizing below 5% annually thereafter through 1999, fostering price predictability and restoring public confidence in the . The plan's rigid regime remonetized the economy, increasing in real terms and attracting foreign capital inflows, which supported banking sector deposits rising from under 10% of GDP in 1990 to over 30% by 1995. Fiscal discipline complemented monetary reforms, with the primary deficit shrinking from 7.6% of GDP in 1989 to near balance by 1991, maintained through spending cuts and proceeds that reduced liabilities. Public debt-to-GDP ratios stabilized initially, aided by Brady Plan restructurings in 1993 that cut face-value debt by approximately $10 billion, enabling sustained low —near zero for over five years—after decades of chronic double- or triple-digit rates.
YearInflation Rate (Annual %)
1989>3,000
19901,344
199184
199217.5
19937.4
19944.2
19953.4
These metrics reflect empirical in macroeconomic stabilization, as the regime's credibility curbed inflationary expectations rooted in prior fiscal profligacy and monetary overhang.

Growth and Investment Data

Following the implementation of the in April 1991, experienced robust economic expansion, with real GDP growth averaging 6.7% annually from 1991 to . This period marked a recovery from the hyperinflationary crisis inherited in 1989, when GDP contracted by 6.8% that year; subsequent years saw cumulative GDP expansion of approximately 35% by . Growth moderated to 5.5% in 1996 and peaked at 8.1% in 1997, driven by trade liberalization and proceeds, though a regional from Mexico's crisis triggered a -2.8% contraction in , followed by swift rebound. Overall, from 1990 to 1998, real GDP rose by over 50% in nominal terms adjusted for inflation stabilization, reflecting improved macroeconomic confidence.
YearReal GDP Growth (%)
1989-6.8
19900.1
199110.5
19929.6
19936.3
19945.8
1995-2.8
19965.5
19978.1
19983.9
1999-3.4
Source: World Bank national accounts data. Investment inflows surged under Menem's reforms, with gross (FDI) exceeding $60 billion cumulatively from 1992 to 1999, compared to minimal levels in the prior decade amid chronic . Net capital inflows totaled over $100 billion in the same period, fueled by deregulated markets and privatizations of state assets like telecoms and utilities, which attracted multinational firms seeking undervalued opportunities. , stagnant pre-1990, expanded by roughly 150% from 1990 to 1994, supported by fiscal and currency peg credibility that reduced risk premiums. FDI as a of GDP peaked above 4% in the mid-1990s, positioning among top developing-country recipients, though inflows tapered post-1998 amid emerging fiscal imbalances. These metrics underscore the reforms' role in restoring investor access to credit markets, previously choked by default risks.

Causal Factors Behind Successes

The , enacted via Law 23.928 on April 1, 1991, established a regime pegging the to the U.S. dollar at parity and requiring full reserve backing for expansion, which causally broke the hyper-inertia cycle by removing the Central Bank's discretion to monetize deficits and importing external monetary credibility. This institutional commitment shifted public expectations from persistent to stability, as evidenced by the decline in annual inflation from 2,314% in 1990 to 17.5% in 1991 and below 5% thereafter through 1994, enabling normalization and restoring saver confidence. The plan's success hinged on its self-enforcing mechanism against reversal, as abandoning the peg would require legislative amendment amid fiscal constraints, thus prioritizing causal discipline over discretionary policy errors that had fueled prior episodes of monetary disorder. Privatization of approximately 90 state firms from 1989 to 1999, including (oil), Entel (telecom), and , directly alleviated fiscal pressures by offloading loss-making entities that had consumed up to 5% of GDP in subsidies annually, yielding $22 billion in proceeds used for debt reduction and reserve accumulation under the Brady Plan restructuring. These transfers to private operators enhanced efficiency through competition and investment—telecom access lines tripled from 3 million to 9 million by 1998—driving productivity surges that supported GDP growth averaging 5.5% yearly from 1991 to 1998. The causal link stemmed from dismantling state monopolies, which first-principles analysis identifies as inherent generators of inefficiency absent market incentives, thereby unlocking capital inflows that reached $70 billion in FDI stock by decade's end. Deregulatory measures, such as eliminating , trade barriers, and financial restrictions via decrees like 1,289/1991, complemented stabilization by fostering competition and , with export volumes rising 150% from to under reduced tariffs averaging 12%. This openness attracted risk capital amid the peg's stability signal, as real GDP rebounded 20% from trough to peak, causally tied to improved rather than exogenous booms. Menem's Peronist , securing 47% of the vote in and congressional majorities post-reelection, enabled decree-based implementation bypassing union resistance, exploiting the hyperinflation crisis (peaking at 197% monthly) to build a consensus that tolerated short-term adjustment costs for long-run gains.

Social and Political Dimensions

During the initial years of Menem's , following the of neoliberal reforms including labor market flexibilization and , Argentina's rate hovered around 7% in late 1989, reflecting the legacy of prior economic instability. By the mid-1990s, amid from 1991 to 1994 driven by currency stabilization and foreign , formal expanded temporarily, but structural adjustments such as state enterprise layoffs contributed to a gradual rise in open , reaching approximately 12.4% by 1998. These trends were exacerbated by external shocks like the 1995 Tequila crisis, which prompted recessions and heightened job insecurity, with youth and unskilled workers disproportionately affected due to reduced hiring protections under new labor laws. A defining feature of dynamics was the surge in informal sector work, which increased more rapidly in than in any other Latin American country during the and , as deregulatory measures and reduced formal job protections while failing to generate sufficient high-quality . In , up to 95% of new jobs created in the were informal, characterized by lack of social security, benefits, or stable contracts, reflecting a shift toward precarious labor amid fiscal and openness to global . This informalization, while providing short-term income for the underemployed, perpetuated vulnerability, as evidenced by stagnant and reliance on temporary or unregistered work, particularly in urban areas.
YearGini Coefficient
19920.450
19930.448
19940.459
19950.489
19960.495
19980.507
19990.498
20000.510
Inequality metrics deteriorated over the decade, with the for urban households rising from 0.450 in 1992 to 0.504 by 2000, indicating widening income disparities as capital-intensive growth and skill-biased reforms favored higher earners while low-skilled workers faced and job displacement. rates, measured at national lines, fluctuated but trended upward from about 20% in the early 1990s to 25.9% by 1998, correlating with spikes and informalization rather than outright growth failure, as initially recovered from pre-1989 lows. These shifts underscore how market-oriented policies, while stabilizing macro aggregates, amplified distributional tensions by prioritizing efficiency over equitable job preservation, though empirical analyses attribute much of the rise to pre-existing rigidities and cyclical downturns rather than reforms per se.

Realignment of Peronist Base

During Carlos Menem's presidency, the (PJ), 's primary vehicle, underwent a structural realignment that diminished the influence of organized labor in favor of territorial clientelist networks. Traditional had relied on strong party-union linkages, with unions holding a "" allocation in party bodies to ensure working-class representation. Menem's administration replaced this with direct internal elections, empowering local brokers and provincial governors who could mobilize voters through rather than union mobilization. This shift facilitated neoliberal reforms by insulating party elites from union veto power, as clientelist machines at the municipal and provincial levels became the dominant mechanism for securing electoral loyalty. The realignment preserved Peronism's core electoral base among lower-income and working-class voters, rooted in historical identity ties, while adapting to economic liberalization that alienated union leadership. Despite widespread strikes and opposition from the General Confederation of Labor (CGT) against privatizations and labor flexibility laws enacted between 1989 and 1994, Menem's PJ secured 47% of the vote in the 1989 presidential runoff and nearly 50% in 1995, reflecting sustained grassroots support amid macroeconomic stabilization. This stability stemmed from Peronism's societal embeddedness, allowing the party to retain voters through localized clientelism—distributing selective benefits like public jobs and subsidies—rather than ideological orthodoxy or union endorsements. Academic analyses attribute this resilience to the weakly institutionalized nature of prior union-party ties, enabling reformers to pivot without collapsing the vote share. Critics from orthodox Peronist factions argued the changes diluted the movement's proletarian essence, fostering dependency on state largesse over class mobilization, yet empirical vote data showed no net loss in base turnout, with capturing over 40% in congressional races throughout the decade. The transformation thus realigned the base around Menem's personalist leadership and policy pragmatism, incorporating middle-sector voters drawn to growth and dollar peg stability, while traditional union strongholds adapted via co-optation of dissident leaders into roles. This hybrid model sustained Peronist dominance until the 2001 crisis exposed vulnerabilities in clientelist overreach.

International Relations and Alignment

Menem's foreign policy represented a sharp departure from Argentina's traditional emphasis on non-alignment and autonomy, pivoting toward pragmatic alignment with the United States and Western institutions to bolster economic reforms and enhance international credibility. This shift, often termed "carnal relations" (relaciones carnales) in reference to the intimate US partnership, prioritized cooperation on security, trade, and multilateral initiatives over ideological independence. The administration actively supported US-led efforts, including consistent backing of American positions at the United Nations, which facilitated access to international financing and markets amid domestic stabilization efforts. A emblematic early action was Argentina's participation in the 1990-1991 coalition against , where on September 25, 1990, Menem dispatched two naval corvettes—the ARA Spiro and ARA Badaro—for in the , making Argentina the sole Latin American contributor to the -led multinational force. This deployment, involving approximately 500 personnel and costing around $10 million, aimed to rehabilitate Argentina's global image post-Falklands War and Falklands conflict isolation, while securing goodwill for negotiations. The move drew domestic criticism from Peronist nationalists but yielded tangible benefits, including strengthened defense ties and Argentina's inclusion in training programs. Regionally, Menem fostered reconciliation with historical rivals, notably through the founding of (Southern Common Market) via the Treaty of signed on March 26, 1991, with , , and , establishing a that reduced tariffs and promoted trade volumes exceeding $20 billion annually by the mid-1990s. This integration supplanted decades of border tensions and arms races, particularly with , aligning Argentina with pro-market hemispheric frameworks like the . Simultaneously, ties with the improved post-Falklands, enabling joint ventures in oil exploration and defense sales, while relations with advanced via the 1991 peace treaty resolving disputes. By 1998, these alignments culminated in designation of as a Major Non-NATO Ally on July 10, granting preferential access to military equipment and joint exercises, a status reflecting sustained cooperation in peacekeeping operations like those in the and . Menem's distancing from the , articulated in 1991 when he deemed it "obsolete" amid post-Cold War realities, underscored this Western pivot, though it provoked backlash from Third Worldist factions within . Overall, these policies embedded in global institutions, aiding inflows but exposing it to external shocks like the 1998 Asian financial crisis.

Controversies

Corruption and Privatization Irregularities

The privatization program implemented during Carlos Menem's presidency (1989–1999) involved the sale of major state assets, including (the national oil company, privatized in 1993 for approximately $3 billion), (sold in 1990 to a led by Iberia), telecommunications firm Entel, and water utilities in , generating over $20 billion in revenues but drawing persistent accusations of procedural flaws, favoritism, and graft. Critics, including opposition lawmakers and investigative reports, highlighted opaque bidding processes that allegedly undervalued assets and directed sales to politically connected buyers, with funds from privatizations reportedly diverted for campaign financing or personal enrichment. The rapid pace of reforms, often enacted via emergency decrees bypassing full legislative scrutiny, created opportunities for irregularities, as noted in analyses of the era's weak institutional controls. A prominent case involved the of , where in March 2009, Menem faced charges related to contracts awarded to a local unit of French firm Thales for avionics and maintenance during the 1990s sale process; prosecutors alleged irregularities in that benefited favored contractors, though Menem was ultimately acquitted in subsequent rulings. Similarly, the early of state television channels in – went to consortia with documented ties to Menem administration figures, raising concerns over non-competitive awards and lack of transparency in evaluations. concessions tied to privatizations, overseen by Minister José Roberto Dromi, triggered scandals like "Swiftgate," where a U.S. firm allegedly paid bribes exceeding $4 million to secure contracts, leading to Dromi's in 2002 for and illicit enrichment. Post-privatization regulatory lapses exacerbated issues, as seen in the water concession awarded to Aguas Argentinas (a Suez-led ) in 1993. Economy official María Julia Alsogaray intervened to override the regulatory body ETOSS, securing a hike from 1.61% to 5.1% in 1995, which investigations linked to and potential kickbacks; Alsogaray was later convicted in related cases involving public funds during Menem's term. Overall, while some privatizations attracted foreign investment and reduced fiscal burdens, the absence of robust antitrust measures and —coupled with Menem's use of decree powers—fostered a perception of systemic favoritism, with later ranking Argentina's corruption perceptions among the region's worst in the late 1990s. These irregularities contributed to legal probes that ensnared dozens of officials, though convictions were limited by protracted trials averaging over a decade.

Critiques of Social Impacts

Critics of Menemism argue that the neoliberal reforms, including mass privatizations and labor market deregulation, exacerbated social vulnerabilities by prioritizing macroeconomic stability over equitable distribution, leading to structural unemployment and heightened inequality. Privatization of state-owned enterprises, such as YPF and Aerolíneas Argentinas between 1990 and 1999, resulted in the dismissal of tens of thousands of workers without sufficient retraining programs or transitional support, contributing to a sharp rise in joblessness. Unemployment rates climbed from approximately 7% in 1989 to 18.4% by 1995, remaining above 13% through the decade's end, as rigid labor laws were relaxed to attract investment but failed to generate broad-based employment growth. Poverty levels, while initially declining from hyperinflationary peaks due to price stabilization under the 1991 , reversed course amid recessions, reaching 29.4% by 1996 and persisting at elevated levels into the early . This uptick stemmed from reduced in formal sectors and expansion of informal employment, which offered precarious livelihoods without social protections, disproportionately affecting urban working-class families. Income inequality widened markedly, with the for urban areas rising from 0.450 in 1992 to 0.504 by 2000, reflecting concentrated benefits from export-led growth and financial liberalization among higher-income groups while lower strata faced stagnant or declining . Fiscal austerity measures curtailed social spending, including subsidies and , which critics contend amplified the human costs of adjustment by eroding safety nets for the displaced and indigent. Labor reforms in , such as shortening dismissal notice periods and easing hiring restrictions, boosted flexibility for firms but correlated with informalization rates exceeding 40% by the late , leaving millions without insurance or pensions. Detractors, including Peronist unions and social movements, highlighted how these policies realigned the traditional Peronist base toward market conformity, fostering and paving the way for unrest, as evidenced by rising piquetero protests against job scarcity in the mid-. Despite antipoverty initiatives like the Social Plan, which targeted emergency aid, evaluations noted their inadequacy in addressing root causes like skill mismatches from .

Debates on Unsustainability

Critics of Menemism argue that the , which pegged the to the U.S. dollar at a 1:1 rate starting in April 1991, created inherent rigidities that undermined long-term sustainability by sacrificing autonomy and exposing the economy to external shocks without adjustment mechanisms. This fixed , combined with open capital accounts, violated the of international , leading to overvaluation of the peso as the dollar appreciated globally and regional currencies like the Brazilian real devalued in January 1999, eroding export competitiveness and widening current account deficits to 4.5% of GDP by 1998. from real effective (REER) indices shows Argentine currency appreciation of approximately 20-30% relative to trading partners between 1995 and 2001, contributing to industrial contraction and from 1998 onward, with GDP declining 3.4% in 1999 alone. Fiscal policy under Menem further fueled unsustainability, as initial reduction to 29% of GDP by 1993 reversed into accumulation, reaching 45% by 1999 through quasi-fiscal operations and off-budget spending, including subsidies to privatized utilities that masked inefficiencies rather than promoting . Generational analyses indicate that the plan's implicit fiscal stance projected intergenerational imbalances, with future generations bearing higher tax burdens to service without corresponding gains from incomplete structural reforms like labor market flexibilization. Proponents of this view, including IMF assessments, attribute the 2001 collapse—marked by a 28% GDP drop and —to policymakers' failure to devalue or adjust expenditures amid rising interest rates on dollar-denominated , which ballooned servicing costs to 20% of exports by 2001. Defenders counter that unsustainability stemmed not from the convertibility mechanism itself, which delivered decade-long stability absent , but from post-Menem political reversals under President (1999-2001), including tax hikes, monetary interventions, and property rights erosions that triggered and bank runs. Economists at institutions like the challenge the overvaluation narrative, arguing that productivity gains from privatizations and offset any nominal appreciation, with the peso's real value aligning with pre-1991 levels adjusted for differentials; they posit external factors, such as the 1997 Asian and Brazil's , amplified vulnerabilities but were manageable with fiscal discipline Menem had initially enforced. These debates highlight causal tensions: while empirical data confirm rising imbalances under rigid , alternative analyses emphasize institutional breakdowns and policy U-turns as proximate triggers, underscoring that sustainability required ongoing commitment to orthodox fiscal rules beyond Menem's tenure.

Legacy and Ongoing Influence

Long-Term Structural Changes

The initiatives of the Menem administration (1989–1999) dismantled a substantial portion of Argentina's sector, with 34 enterprises sold and concessions awarded for 19 services, yielding over $20 billion in revenues by 1994. This restructuring curtailed chronic fiscal deficits from inefficient public monopolies in , energy, railways, and airlines, while enabling private capital inflows that modernized —such as expanding lines from 3.5 million to over 7 million subscribers by the late —and improved operational efficiencies in privatized utilities. However, inadequate regulatory oversight fostered oligopolistic structures and inconsistencies, contributing to partial reversals like the 2012 renationalization of oil company, underscoring enduring challenges in sustaining competitive markets. Trade and financial further entrenched an outward-oriented , slashing average tariffs from over 30% to approximately 14% by the late , abolishing most quantitative restrictions, and liberalizing capital flows. These measures elevated as a share of GDP from 20% in 1989 to nearly 40% by 1998, fostering export growth in and commodities while diminishing import-substitution industries, though manufacturing's GDP contribution declined from 25% to under 20%. The system's 1993 shift to privatized accounts (AFJPs) diversified from pay-as-you-go to capitalized funds, initially bolstering national savings and depth with assets reaching 20% of GDP by 2000, but subsequent in 2008 eroded these gains, reverting to state management amid coverage gaps for informal workers. Labor market adjustments sought greater flexibility through decree reforms in the , easing hiring/firing and promoting temporary contracts, which expanded informal to over 40% of the by decade's end and fragmented union . Yet, resistance from entrenched labor laws preserved rigidities, resulting in a with persistent averaging 15–18% post-1995 , influencing long-term wage stagnation and inequality metrics where the rose from 0.42 in 1989 to 0.49 by 2000. Collectively, these reforms diminished state dominance, deepened financial intermediation, and oriented production toward global integration, but incomplete institutional adaptations—such as fiscal and antitrust —amplified vulnerabilities to mismatches and external shocks, as evidenced by the 2001 crisis.

Role in Preventing Recurrence of Hyperinflation

The , enacted on April 1, 1991, under President Carlos Menem's administration, pegged the to the at a one-to-one rate, effectively transforming the into a that backed each peso with dollar reserves and prohibited monetary financing of fiscal deficits. This measure directly addressed the of 1989–1990, during which prices surged by approximately 20,000% from March 1989 to March 1990, by eliminating the central bank's discretion to expand the money supply beyond foreign reserves, thereby breaking the cycle of inflationary expectations fueled by repeated deficit monetization. , which had reached annual rates exceeding 2,300% in 1990, plummeted to 17.7% in 1991 and stabilized at single-digit levels (typically 3–5%) through the , demonstrating the plan's immediate efficacy in restoring without recurrence during Menem's tenure. The plan's success in preventing hyperinflation's return stemmed from its causal mechanism of imposing hard budget constraints on the government: of state enterprises reduced fiscal burdens, while the rigid peg compelled expenditure restraint to avoid reserve depletion, fostering investor confidence and real averaging 6% annually from 1991 to 1998. Unlike prior stabilization attempts that failed due to inconsistent fiscal-monetary coordination, convertibility's institutional lock-in—requiring congressional approval to alter—sustained discipline, as evidenced by the absence of money-printing episodes that had previously triggered hyperinflationary spirals since 1945. This framework not only halted the immediate crisis but instilled a nominal that recalibrated public and market expectations, making inflationary outbursts politically and economically costlier. In the post-2001 period, following the peg's abandonment amid fiscal imbalances and external shocks, reemerged at elevated annual rates (e.g., 41% in 2002), yet —defined as sustained monthly rates above 50%—did not recur, with no episodes matching the 1989–1990 intensity despite subsequent policy volatility. Menemism's legacy contributed here through demonstrated proof-of-concept: the stabilization revealed that credible monetary rules could tame chronic , deterring policymakers from reverting to outright money issuance for deficits, as the traumatic memory of pre-convertibility chaos reinforced aversion to ary paths. Empirical analyses attribute this non-recurrence to the era's establishment of fiscal prudence norms, even if imperfectly sustained, contrasting with Argentina's pre-1991 of multiple cycles driven by unchecked .

Parallels with Milei's Reforms

Both Carlos Menem's Menemism and Javier Milei's subsequent reforms emphasized shock therapy to combat through currency stabilization and fiscal discipline. Menem's , enacted on April 1, 1991, pegged the Argentine to the U.S. dollar at a 1:1 fixed rate, ending monthly that peaked at 197% in July 1989 and enabling initial via restored confidence. Milei, inheriting annual of 211% in 2023 with monthly rates near 25% upon his December 10 inauguration, achieved a primary fiscal surplus for the first time in 123 years by slashing public spending by 30% in real terms, reducing annual to 117.8% in 2024 and monthly rates to under 5% by early 2025. Structural liberalization formed another core parallel, with Menem privatizing over 90 state-owned enterprises—including oil, , and telecommunications—generating $18 billion in proceeds and deregulating trade by cutting tariffs from 35% to under 20%. Milei's "Chainsaw Plan," via a December 2023 omnibus , targeted similar rollbacks, privatizing entities like , deregulating labor and export markets, and issuing 1,246 deregulations by August 2025 to eliminate bureaucratic barriers across sectors. On , Menem's quasi-dollarization via prefigured Milei's push for full dollarization, which seeks to abolish the and replace the peso to prevent fiscal dominance over . Menem explicitly advised Milei in January to dollarize immediately, citing 's success in crushing but warning of its vulnerability due to retained discretion, which contributed to the 2001 crisis after reserves dwindled. These reforms shared an initial focus on market-oriented shifts from statist precedents, with Menem adapting toward through repealed industrial protections and opened skies, akin to Milei's repeal of rent controls and promotion of . Both yielded short-term stabilization—Menem's plan spurred 6% annual GDP growth from 1991-1995—though sustained success hinged on political consolidation amid social costs like rising .

References

  1. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/962909
  2. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/transforming-laborbased-parties-in-latin-america/menemism-and-neoliberalism-programmatic-adaptation-in-the-1990s/560AE5B0E4E6990FD066FFF732D9AEFF
  3. https://scholar.umw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1250&context=student_research
  4. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/argentina-5/
  5. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9ec2/18cd6ecfc702f47e094b5c8912cd727d0531.pdf
  6. https://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstreams/aeabc18c-2efe-4f55-9b83-97ef198a46b4/download
  7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/166248
  8. https://kellogg.nd.edu/sites/default/files/old_files/documents/206_0.pdf
  9. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/238412/1/787.pdf
  10. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/downloadpdf/display/book/9781557754301/C12.pdf
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376700907_A_Brief_History_of_Hyperinflation_in_Argentina
  12. https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=eeb
  13. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/537781468741907868/pdf/multi-page.pdf
  14. https://truflation.com/blog/pre-milei-the-historic-inflation-of-argentina-causes-impact-and-numbers
  15. https://www.citeco.fr/10000-years-history-economics/contemporary-world/hyperinflation-in-argentina
  16. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/argentinas-struggle-stability
  17. https://www.batimes.com.ar/news/opinion-and-analysis/carlos-menem-peronist-president-playboy.phtml
  18. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-27469242
  19. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/flamboyant-former-argentine-president-carlos-menem-dies
  20. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP04T00990R000100680001-6.pdf
  21. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/15/carlos-menem-obituary
  22. https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/atc/5268.html
  23. https://againstthecurrent.org/atc037/p5268/
  24. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/levitsky/files/SL_organization.pdf
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3339428
  26. https://latinoamerica21.com/en/menems-imprint-on-argentine-democracy/
  27. https://www.cato.org/commentary/argentinas-fall-grace
  28. https://www.ilo.org/media/153206/download
  29. https://jpia.princeton.edu/document/294
  30. https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/5fbf2f91-6cdf-4e70-8ff2-620ba901fc4c/argentina-s-economic-crisis---06-13-03.pdf
  31. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2000/03/pou.htm
  32. https://www.cato.org/testimony/argentinas-current-political-economic-crisis
  33. https://www.cato.org/commentary/argentinas-blunders
  34. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781557754196/ch006.xml
  35. https://www.galbithink.org/topics/cred/argcb.htm
  36. https://www.imf.org/external/np/ieo/2004/arg/eng/pdf/exesum.pdf
  37. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2015/09/14/01/49/pr9518
  38. https://www.imf.org/external/np/ieo/2003/arg/index.htm
  39. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-96-55/pdf/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-96-55.pdf
  40. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1989/07/27/Argentine-Senate-OKs-privatization-bill/3817651274500/
  41. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/964131468741388046/pdf/multi0page.pdf
  42. https://www.gao.gov/assets/aimd-96-55.pdf
  43. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12696&context=notisur
  44. https://documents.worldbank.org/pt/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/317171468768711000
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969699707000816
  46. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-10-06-fi-47284-story.html
  47. https://www.emerald.com/arla/article/28/3/309/132795/The-privatization-process-in-Argentina-the-case-of
  48. https://community.wvu.edu/~smpinto/ch%25205.pdf
  49. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8559&context=notisur
  50. https://www.nytimes.com/1991/11/02/world/argentina-deregulates-its-economy.html
  51. https://www.heritage.org/americas/commentary/dont-blame-capitalism-argentina
  52. https://scholar.smu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1808&context=lbra
  53. https://wp.nyu.edu/schoolofprofessionalstudies-ga_review/argentina-a-historical-analysis-of-the-states-fiscal-gordian-knot/
  54. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1612&context=sjsj
  55. https://www.cato.org/commentary/argentinas-boom-bust
  56. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/nacional/ley-24013-412
  57. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/The-Effects-of-Labor-Market-Regulations-on-Employment-Decisions-by-Firms-Empirical-Evidence-for-Argentina.pdf
  58. https://www.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.5744/florida/9781683400455.001.0001/upso-9781683400455-chapter-005
  59. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=13320&context=notisur
  60. https://publications.iadb.org/en/poverty-and-employment-problem-argentina
  61. https://kingcenter.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj16611/files/media/file/133wp_0.pdf
  62. https://www.worlddata.info/america/argentina/inflation-rates.php
  63. https://www.reed.edu/economics/parker/f13/201/cases/Argentina.html
  64. https://www.piie.com/publications/chapters_preview/343/2iie339x.pdf
  65. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4150168
  66. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=AR
  67. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781589063808/ch001.xml
  68. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=AR
  69. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c0156/c0156.pdf
  70. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/2000-09-01/privatization-south-american-style
  71. https://www.scielo.br/j/rep/a/4GQsYN9sCPc6SVTrcrBQJmj/?format=html&lang=en
  72. https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/argentinas-current-politicaleconomic-crisis
  73. https://countryeconomy.com/labour-force-survey/argentina?dr=1989-12
  74. https://cdi.mecon.gob.ar/bases/docelec/dp3063.pdf
  75. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/4b24f8c2-e247-502c-92b2-d51e8f8a1b86/content
  76. https://webimages.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Poverty-and-the-Employment-Problem-in-Argentina.pdf
  77. https://latinaer.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s40503-017-0048-3
  78. https://countryeconomy.com/demography/gini-index/argentina
  79. https://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=WDI&f=Indicator_Code%253ASI.POV.GINI
  80. https://www.bu.edu/econ/files/2012/11/dp208.pdf
  81. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0486613415621744
  82. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-research-review/article/from-labor-politics-to-machine-politics-the-transformation-of-partyunion-linkages-in-argentine-peronism-19831999/57F9F480299F678C4774DF1AEBD60F29
  83. https://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/15/world/peronist-is-victor-by-a-wide-margin-in-argentine-vote.html
  84. https://www.latinnews.com/search.html?id=80&archive=69429
  85. https://latinoamerica21.com/en/milei-and-trump-a-remake-of-the-carnal-relations-of-the-menemist-era/
  86. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-interamerican-studies-and-world-affairs/article/argentina-deepening-alignment-with-the-west/CCAF822EA55966BCD7823E480BA4A513
  87. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/argentina-united-states-bilateral-relations-historical-perspective-and-future-challenges
  88. https://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/01/world/argentine-leader-sees-gulf-role-as-best-way-to-reverse-old-image.html
  89. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R48303.html
  90. https://www.csmonitor.com/1999/1101/p6s1.html
  91. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48303
  92. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/carlos-menem-dead/2021/02/14/8e074ea0-6ed9-11eb-b8a9-b9467510f0fe_story.html
  93. https://1997-2001.state.gov/background_notes/argentina_0997_bgn.html
  94. https://1997-2001.state.gov/background_notes/argentina_0199_bgn.html
  95. https://1997-2001.state.gov/regions/wha/990111_statement.html
  96. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1991/05/02/Argentina-at-odds-with-Nonaligned-Movement/8052673156800/
  97. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/05/30/business/world-markets-valuing-argentina-s-crown-jewel.html
  98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24085831_From_Privatization_to_Re-nationalization_What_Went_Wrong_with_Privatizations_in_Argentina
  99. https://www.reuters.com/article/markets/us/argentinas-menem-charged-with-fraud-over-contract-idUSN23446879/
  100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3339503
  101. https://www.icij.org/investigations/waterbarons/aguas-tango/
  102. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/02/world/americas/carlos-menem-ex-president-of-argentina-is-sentenced-in-embezzlement.html
  103. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00572515
  104. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1709&context=honors_etd
  105. https://financialservices.house.gov/media/pdf/107-52.pdf
  106. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c6687/c6687.pdf
  107. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/downloadpdf/display/book/9781589063808/ch004.pdf
  108. https://www.econstor.eu/obitstream/10419/64436/1/57263966X.pdf
  109. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-96-55/html/GAOREPORTS-AIMD-96-55.htm
  110. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13600810802264456
  111. https://1997-2001.state.gov/issues/economic/trade_reports/1999/argentina.html
  112. https://www.bowtiedmara.io/p/afjp-private-pensions-no-more
  113. https://edz.bib.uni-mannheim.de/www-edz/pdf/zei/b02-12.pdf
  114. https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/01/a-message-from-menem-to-milei-dollarize-argentina-now/
  115. https://www.freiheit.org/one-year-javier-mileis-economic-policy
  116. https://www.state.gov/reports/2025-investment-climate-statements/argentina
  117. https://www.dlapiper.com/en-eu/insights/publications/2025/10/president-milei-and-the-challenges-of-state-policy
  118. https://thediplomatinspain.com/en/2024/01/09/argentina-many-similarities-between-milei-and-menem/
  119. https://www.cato.org/free-society/fall-2025/liberty-versus-power-mileis-argentina
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.