Hubbry Logo
OnogursOnogursMain
Open search
Onogurs
Community hub
Onogurs
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Onogurs
Onogurs
Onogurs
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Onoghurs, Onoğurs, or Oğurs (Ὀνόγουροι, Οὔρωγοι, Οὔγωροι; Onογurs, Ογurs; "ten tribes", "tribes") were a group of Turkic nomadic equestrians who flourished in the Pontic–Caspian steppe and the Volga region between the 5th and 7th centuries, and spoke an Oghuric language.[1]

Etymology

[edit]

The name Onoğur is widely thought to derive from On-Oğur "ten Oğurs (tribes)".[2] Modern scholars consider Turkic terms for tribe oğuz and oğur to be derived from Turkic *og/uq, meaning "kinship or being akin to".[3] The terms initially were not the same, as oq/ogsiz meant "arrow",[4] while oğul meant "offspring, child, son", oğuš/uğuš was "tribe, clan", and the verb oğša-/oqša meant "to be like, resemble".[3] The modern name of "Hungary" (see name of Hungary) is usually believed to be derived from On-Oğur (> (H)Ungari).[5][6]

Language

[edit]
Main article: Oghuric languages

The Onoghuric or Oghuric languages are a branch of the Turkic languages. Some scholars suggest Hunnic had strong ties with Bulgar and to modern Chuvash[7] and refer to this extended Oghuric grouping as separate Hunno-Bulgar languages.[8] However, such speculations are not based on proper linguistic evidence, since the language of the Huns is almost unknown except for a few attested words and personal names. Scholars generally consider Hunnish as unclassifiable.[9][10][11][12]

Chuvash language is agglutinative in the structure of grammar, phonetically it is synharmonic. Some scholars consider the Chuvash as the sole living representative of Volga Bulgar language.[13][14][15][16] while others support the idea that Chuvash is another distinct Oghur Turkic language.[17] Chuvash is sometimes considered to share a linguistic connection with the Khazar language although the classification of Khazar language debated among scholars.[18][19][20][21] Chuvash has two to three dialects.[22][23] Chuvash language is agglutinative in the structure of grammar, phonetically it is synharmonic. In this respect, it's almost no different from other Turkic languages. Oghuric family is distinguished from the rest of the Turkic family by sound changes and it has a special place.

The Oghuric languages are also known as "-r Turkic" because the final consonant in certain words is r, not z as in Common Turkic.[24] Chuvash: вăкăр - Turkish: öküz - Tatar: үгез - English: ox. Hence the name Oghur corresponds to Oghuz "tribe" in Common Turkic.[25] Other correspondences are Com. š : Oghur l (tâš : tâl, 'stone'); s > š; *č > ś; k/q > ğ; y > j, ś; d, δ > δ > z (10th cent.) > r (13th cent.)"; ğd > z > r (14th cent.); a > ı (after 9th cent.).[26][27] The shift from s to š operates before i, ï, and iV, and Vladimir Dybo calls the sound change the "Bulgar palatalization".[28]

Denis Sinor believed that the differences noted above suggest that the Oghur-speaking tribes could not have originated in territories inhabited by speakers of Mongolic languages, given that Mongolian dialects feature the -z suffix.[29] Peter Golden, however, has noted that there are many loanwords in Mongolic from Oghuric, such as Mongolic ikere, Oghuric *ikir, Hungarian iker, Common Turkic *ikiz 'twins',[25] and holds the contradictory view that the Oghur inhabited the borderlands of Mongolia before the 5th century.[30]

The Oghuric tribes are also connected with the Hungarians, whose exo-ethnonym is usually believed to be derived from On-Oğur (> (H)Ungari). Hungarians -> Hun Oghur -> (ten oghur tribes): On ogur -> up.chv. Won ogur -> dow.chv. Wun ogur -> belor. Wugorac -> rus. Wenger -> slove. Vogr, Vogrin -> cheh. pol. Węgier, Węgrzyn, -> lit. Veñgras.[5] The Hungarians are culturally of mixed Ugrian / Turkic heritage, with Oghuric-Bulgar and Khazar influences, even though much of the modern-day Hungarian gene pool also has strong Slavic, Germanic, and Iranic influences.[31][32][33] Hungarian has many borrowings from Common Turkic and Oghuric languages:[34]

Hung. tenger, Oghur. *tengir, Comm. *tengiz 'sea',[25] Hung. gyűrű, Oghur. *ǰürük, Comm. *yüzük 'ring',[35] and terms of equestrian culture ló 'horse', nyereg 'saddle', fék 'bridle', ostor 'whip'.[36] A number of Hungarian loanwords were borrowed before the 9th century, shown by sz- (< Oğ. *ś-) rather than gy- (< Oğ. *ǰ-), for example Hung. szél, Oghur. *śäl, Chuv. śil, Comm. *yel 'wind', Hung. szűcs 'tailor', Hung. szőlő 'grapes'.[35]

In the Oghuz languages as azer. tur. öküz means ox (totemic animal), and is a reflection of the Chuvash language wăkăr where rhotacism is used, in the Kipchak languages it is ögiz.[37][38]

History

[edit]

The Onogurs were one of the first Oghuric Turkic tribes that entered the Ponto-Caspian steppes as the result of migrations set off in Inner Asia.[39] The 10th century Movses Kaghankatvatsi recorded, considered late 4th century, certain Honagur, "a Hun[nb 1] from the Honk" who raided Persia, which were related to the Onoghurs, and located near Transcaucasia and the Sassanian Empire.[42] Scholars also relate the Hyōn to this account.[42]

According to Priscus, in 463 the representatives of Ernak's Saraghurs (Oghur. sara, "White Oghurs"), Oghurs and Onoghurs came to the Emperor in Constantinople,[43] and explained they had been driven out of their homeland by the Sabirs, who had been attacked by the Avars in Inner Asia.[44][45] This tangle of events indicates that the Oghuric tribes are related to the Ting-ling and Tiele people.[46][47] It is considered they belonged to the westernmost Tiele tribes, which also included the Uyghurs-Toquz Oghuz and the Oghuz Turks, and were initially located in Western Siberia and Kazakhstan.[48] Leo I the Thracian granted Ernak the lands of the treacherous Karadach's Akatziroi roughly corresponding to 20th century Ukraine. Later kings of the Onogur Huns included Grod, Mugel and Sandilch, whose Utigurs were engaged in a civil war against the Kutrigurs of Khinialon.

The origin of the Kutrigurs and Utigurs, who lived in the vicinity of the Onoghurs and Bulgars, and their mutual relationship, is considered obscure.[49][50] Scholars are unsure how the union between Onoghurs and Bulgars formed, imagining it as a long process in which a number of different groups merged.[51][52] During that time, the Bulgars may have represented a large confederation of which the Onoghurs formed one of the core tribes,[52] together with the remnants of the Utigurs and Kutrigurs, among others.[53]

Jordanes in Getica (551) mentioned that the Hunuguri (believed to be the Onoghurs) were notable for the marten skin trade.[54][55][56] In the Middle Ages, marten skin was used as a substitute for minted money.[57][42] This also indicates they lived near forests and were in contact with Finno-Ugrian peoples.[42][58]

The Syriac translation of the Pseudo-Zacharias Rhetor's Ecclesiastical History (c. 555) in Western Eurasia records the Avnagur (Aunagur; considered Onoghurs), wngwr (Onoğur), wgr (Oghur).The author wrote following: "Avnagur (Aunagur) are people, who live in tents. Avgar, sabir, burgar, alan, kurtargar, avar, hasar, dirmar, sirurgur, bagrasir, kulas, abdel and hephtalit are thirteen peoples, who live in tents, earn their living on the meat of livestock and fish, of wild animals and by their weapons (plunder)". About the Bulgars and Alans, during the first half of 6th century, he added: "The land Bazgun ... extends up to the Caspian Gates and to the sea, which are in the Hunnish lands. Beyond the gates live the Burgars (Bulgars), who have their language, and are people pagan and barbarian. They have towns. And the Alans - they have five towns." .[54][59]

The Onoghurs (Oghurs), in the 6th and 7th century sources, were mentioned mostly in connection with the Avar and Göktürk conquest of Western Eurasia.[60] According to the 6th century Menander Protector, the "leader of the Οὐγούρων" had the authority of the Turk Yabgu Khagan in the region of Kuban River to the lower Don.[61]

In early 7th century Theophylaktos Simokattes recorded that certain Onoghur city Βακάθ was destroyed by an earthquake before his lifetime.[42] The Sogdian name indicates it was situated in the vicinity of Iranian Central Asia.[42]

Simokattes in the Letter of the Turk Qaγan (Tamgan) to the Emperor Maurikios recorded a complex notice:

"...the Qaghan set off on another undertaking and subjugated all the Ὀγώρ. This people is (one) of the most powerful because of their numbers and their training for war in full battle-gear. They have made their abodes towards the East, whence flows the river Τίλ, which the Turks have the custom of calling the "Black". The oldest chieftains of this people are called Οὐάρ and Χουννί."[61]

According to the Qaghan, part of those Ouar (Uar) and Khounni (Huns) who arrived to Eastern Europe were mistook by the Onoghurs, Barsils, Sabirs and other tribes for the original Avars, and as such the Uar and Huns took advantage of the situation and began call themselves Avars.[62] Simokattes also recounts "when the Ogor, then, were brought completely to heel, the Qaγan gave over the chief of the Κὸλχ (Kolx[61]) to the bite of the sword", shows Oghurs resistance toward Turkic authority.[61] Scholars consider if the Til is Qara Itil (Black Itil) i.e. Volga (Atil/Itil), then the mentioned Ὀγώρ would be the Oghurs, while if it is in Inner Asia, then it could be the Uyghurs.[61]

Avar Khaganate

[edit]
Main article: Avar Khaganate

By 568 the Avars, under Khagan Bayan I established an empire in the Carpathian Basin that lasted for 250 years. Related peoples from the east arrived in the Avar Kaganate several times: around 595 the Kutrigurs, and then around 670 the Onoghurs.[63] The Avar Khaganate collapsed after c. 822, a few decades later, Álmos and his son Árpád conquered the Carpathian Basin around c. 862–895. The Hungarian conquerors together with the Turkic-speaking Kabars integrated the Avars and Onoghurs.[64]

Old Bulgaria

[edit]
Main article: Old Great Bulgaria

Kubrat organised the Onogurs under his Empire of Old Great Bulgaria in the Mid 7th century. From the 8th century, the Byzantine sources often mention the Onoghurs in close connection with the Bulgars. Agathon (early 8th century) wrote about the nation of Onoghur Bulgars. Nikephoros I (early 9th century) noted that Kubrat was the lord of the Onoghundurs; his contemporary Theophanes referred to them as Onoghundur–Bulgars. Kubrat successfully revolted against the Avars and founded the Old Great Bulgaria (Magna Bulgaria[65]), also known as Onoghundur–Bulgars state, or Patria Onoguria in the Ravenna Cosmography.[66][67][54] Constantine VII (mid-10th century) remarked that the Bulgars formerly called themselves Onogundurs.[68]

Onoghur-Bulgars who settled on the Volga river in the 7th century AD and converted to Islam in 922 during the missionary work of Ahmad ibn Fadlan, inhabited the present-day territory of Tatarstan.[69] After the Batu Khan invasions of 1223–1236, the Golden Horde annexed Volga Bulgaria. Most of the population survived, and a certain degree of mixing between it and the Kipchaks of the Horde ensued. Onoghur-Bulgar group as a whole accepted the exonym "Tatars."

This association was previously mirrored in Armenian sources, such as the Ashkharatsuyts, which refers to the Olxontor Błkar, and the 5th century History by Movses Khorenatsi, which includes an additional comment from a 9th-century writer about the colony of the Vłĕndur Bułkar. Marquart and Golden connected these forms with the Iġndr (*Uluġundur) of Ibn al-Kalbi (c. 820), the Vnndur (*Wunundur) of Hudud al-'Alam (982), the Wlndr (*Wulundur) of Al-Masudi (10th century) and Hungarian name for Belgrad Nándorfehérvár, the nndr (*Nandur) of Gardīzī (11th century) and *Wununtur in the letter by the Khazar King Joseph. All the forms show the phonetic changes typical of late Oghuric (prothetic w-; o- > wo-, u-, *wu-).[68][70]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Onogurs

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Onogurs (also known as Onoğurs or Unogonduri) were a of Oghuric Turkic nomadic tribes that emerged in the Eurasian steppes during the CE, playing a pivotal role in the political and cultural dynamics of the Pontic-Caspian region through their involvement in tribal alliances, migrations, and the formation of early medieval states such as Great Bulgaria. Speaking an Oghuric branch of the Turkic language, distinct from Common Turkic, they derived their name from Onoğur, meaning "ten Oğurs" or "ten tribes," reflecting their multi-tribal structure. Originating as part of the western Tiele () tribal union in the Kazakh steppes, the Onogurs migrated westward around 463 CE, likely driven by pressures from the Sabirs and broader disruptions caused by the Rouran and Asian Avars, arriving in the Pontic steppes shortly after the collapse of the Hunnic Empire under in 453 CE. They settled among remnants of earlier nomadic groups, intermingling with local populations including , and established dominance in the region by the , forming the polity known as Patria Onoguria centered on the . Closely related to other Oghuric tribes such as the , , and , the Onogurs absorbed these groups over time, contributing to a broader that facilitated interactions with Byzantine, Iranian, and Caucasian entities. Key historical developments included their conflicts with neighboring tribes, followed by subjugation under the Avars in the 550s CE. Under (c. 632–665 CE), the Onogurs broke free from Avar control by 635 CE, establishing the short-lived , a multi-ethnic that united various Oghuric tribes until its dissolution by Khazar incursions in the 660s CE. Following the 's fall, Onogur remnants dispersed, with some integrating into the Khazar Khaganate and others contributing to the Bulgar state (8th–10th centuries), while groups migrating westward influenced the etymology of "" through the Byzantine and Latin rendering of their name as Ungri. Their legacy endures in linguistic traces, such as Oghuric loanwords in Hungarian and , underscoring their enduring impact on Eurasian nomadic history.

Etymology and Name

Derivation and Meaning

The term "Onogur" derives from the Turkic words on, meaning "ten," and oğur, referring to "tribes" or "clans," yielding the literal translation "ten tribes." This etymology reflects the structure of a tribal , where numerical prefixes like on denoted the number of constituent groups in early Turkic political formations. In the broader Oghuric context, oğur connects to the ancient Turkic root og/uq, which signifies "" or "being akin to," often used in to denote tribal affiliations or related clans, as seen in related terms like ogul ("") and ("tribe"). This root underscores the ethnic and social cohesion among Oghur-speaking peoples, distinguishing their dialect branch within the Turkic family. The term evolved to encompass a specific of ten related Oghur-speaking groups active between the 5th and 7th centuries, forming a nomadic in the Pontic-Caspian and adjacent regions, as evidenced by linguistic remnants in modern Chuvash (vună yăh, "ten tribes"). This usage highlights the Onogurs' role as a cohesive political entity amid migrations and interactions with neighboring powers.

Historical Attestations and Variants

The earliest historical attestation of the Onogurs appears in the 5th-century Byzantine historian , who records in a fragment from around 463 CE that the Onogouroi, along with the Saragurs and Ogurs, sent an embassy to after being displaced westward by the Sabirs and pressured by the Avars. This account, preserved in the Excerpta de legationibus edited by Carl de Boor (Berlin, 1903, pars II, p. 586), describes the tribes originating from the eastern shores of Lake Maeotis () and seeking alliance with the . Another early Byzantine reference occurs in Theophylact Simocatta's Historiae (Book VII, chapter 15; ed. Carl de Boor, , 1887, pp. 272-273), where the Onogouroi are mentioned in the context of interactions with Emperor Maurice amid barbarian migrations in the late . Phonetic variants of the name appear across multiple linguistic traditions, reflecting the Onogurs' interactions with neighboring peoples. In Armenian sources, the 5th-century historian Khorenatsi refers to them as "vh’ndur Bulgar Vund" in his , linking the group to migrations affecting the region. The contemporary Armenian writer Elishe (Egishe) uses "Hajlandurs" in his account of events between 458 and 464 CE, associating the with settlements north of and early Christian influences among their elite. By the , lists "Oghondor-blkar" in his geographical work, identifying it as a Bulgarian variant tied to Oghuric groups. Slavic texts preserve forms like "Ugri" or "Ungari," as seen in later medieval chronicles where the term denotes steppe nomads, evolving from earlier Onogur associations. Arabic sources render the name as "balandzhar" or "belendzher," a Perso- adaptation noted by in the 9th-10th century for a kingdom north of inhabited by Onogur-related tribes with numerous fortified towns. , in his 10th-century travelogue from a 921-922 CE mission to the (an Onogur-Bulgar successor group), indirectly attests to their legacy by describing the ruler and society of the Bulghar kingdom, confirming the enduring presence of Oghuric elements in the without using the exact term. Later geographical texts like Hudud al-Alam () employ "Venenders" or "Nenders" as variants for Unogundur-Bulgar remnants. The name's influence extended to the etymology of "Hungary," where Byzantine sources from the 9th-10th centuries applied "Ungroi" or "Ouggroi" to the arriving , likely due to their confederation with or proximity to Onogur-Bulgar groups in the , despite lacking direct ethnic continuity with the Magyars. This form evolved into the Latin "Ungaria" or "Hungaria" in Western European texts by the , as chroniclers like Anonymus and the perpetuated the association, solidifying the exonym for the .

Language

Classification and Characteristics

The Onogur language is classified as part of the Oghuric (also termed Bulgharic or Lir-Turkic) of the , representing one of the earliest divergences from Proto-Turkic around 100 BCE to the . This is distinct from the more widespread Common Turkic (or Shaz-Turkic) subgroup, primarily due to systematic phonological innovations such as , where Common Turkic *z corresponds to Oghuric *r (e.g., Proto-Turkic *tokuz "nine" yields Oghuric *toğur, as reflected in Chuvash tăhhăr), and lambdacism, substituting *l for Common Turkic *š. Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of confirm this binary split as the foundational structure of the family, with the Oghuric forming a basal separate from other subgroups. Like other , Onogur exhibits an agglutinative morphology, relying on suffixation to express without prefixes or infixes, allowing for complex through sequential addition. It features (synharmonism), where within a word must align in front/back quality across stems and affixes, though Oghuric varieties like show deviations due to historical vowel shifts, such as back appearing in front-harmonic Proto-Turkic stems. Initial consonant clusters are largely absent, with syllable structure favoring CV(C) patterns, a trait conserved in its descendant and rare exceptions limited to loanwords. The modern , spoken by approximately 800,000 people primarily in (as of ), is the sole surviving representative of the Oghuric branch, preserving these core features while attesting to the Onogur linguistic heritage; however, the number of speakers has been declining due to assimilation pressures. The Onogur language maintains close linguistic ties to ancient Bulgar varieties, such as those of the and , sharing the defining Oghuric innovations and forming a continuum within the branch. Evidence from toponyms and names suggests possible Bulgharic (Oghuric) influence on the , though direct attestation remains sparse. Linguistic scholarship has firmly established Onogur as Turkic, refuting earlier conjectures of Indo-European or Uralic affiliations through comparative reconstruction and shared typological traits like and .

Known Vocabulary and Inscriptions

The linguistic record of the Onogurs is sparse, with surviving evidence limited to scattered lexical items, primarily anthroponyms and toponyms embedded in external accounts, alongside a handful of glosses that reveal Oghuric phonological traits. No complete texts or literary compositions in the Onogur language exist, reflecting the predominantly oral traditions of these nomadic Turkic speakers and the perishability of their . Reconstruction efforts draw on comparisons with related , such as Chuvash, which preserves archaic features, but direct attestation remains fragmentary. Among the known vocabulary, terms like bulğaq, denoting "great," appear in descriptions of tribal leaders and hierarchies within Byzantine sources, underscoring the Onogurs' confederative . Tribal titles, such as those denoting or alliances, are also recorded in these accounts, often transcribed phonetically to capture Oghuric sound shifts. A distinctive Oghuric exemplifying is found in numerals, such as *toğur "nine" from Proto-Turkic *tokuz, in contrast to Common Turkic *toquz. Epigraphic material is equally scarce, with potential Oghuric runic inscriptions confined to isolated artifacts from the Pontic steppe, including debated 7th-century stones near the Don River that may feature script variants attributable to Onogur or closely related Bulgar groups. These include personal names resembling "Kubrat," the attested leader of the Onogur-Bulgar confederation, possibly marking ownership or commemorative purposes. Such finds, though undeciphered in full and subject to scholarly debate on their authenticity and attribution, suggest use of an adapted runiform system for short notations, distinct from the more elaborate Orkhon-style inscriptions of eastern Turkic peoples. The primary sources for this evidence derive from toponyms (e.g., river and tribal territory names in the Pontic-Caspian zone), anthroponyms of rulers and elites, and incidental glosses in Greek and chronicles, where Onogur terms were adapted for foreign audiences. Byzantine historians like Theophanes preserved names such as and , while geographers like al-Istakhri referenced tribal designations, offering phonetic clues to Oghuric . This indirect transmission preserves no extended discourse but confirms the language's role in and .

Geography and Origins

Territorial Range

The Onogurs, a Turkic-speaking nomadic confederation, occupied the western portion of the Pontic-Caspian steppe as their core territory during the 5th to 7th centuries CE, primarily extending from the Dnieper River in the west to the Don River and Sea of Azov in the east. This vast grassland region, north of the Black Sea and Sea of Azov, provided ideal conditions for their pastoral economy, with historical accounts placing their settlements and seasonal camps across these steppes. Byzantine chroniclers, such as Procopius of Caesarea, described related Bulgar groups like the Utigurs and Kutrigurs—components of the Onogur union—inhabiting areas adjacent to the Maeotic Lake (Sea of Azov) and extending inland, confirming the Onogurs' dominance in this zone. Their range further incorporated the northern foothills of the Caucasus Mountains, where subgroups maintained presence in the Kuban River basin, facilitating oversight of mountain passes and river valleys. Key regional centers included the area around Phanagoria on the Taman Peninsula, which emerged as a political hub under Onogur leader Kubrat in the 7th century, leveraging its strategic position near the Kerch Strait for maritime and overland connections. Settlements along the Don River, serving as a central axis, supported transhumance patterns where groups moved seasonally between open steppes for grazing and riverine zones for water and fortification. Archaeological findings corroborate this territorial extent, with (mound) burials and pit graves distributed from the -Don interfluve, featuring artifacts indicative of steppe nomad culture such as horse gear and weapons from the 6th-7th centuries. The Pereshchepina treasure, unearthed near modern in (within the Dnieper steppe), includes Byzantine and Sasanian gold items dated to circa 641-668 CE, linking it to Onogur elite and underscoring their control over trade routes branching from the across the Pontic grasslands. Fortified sites and necropolises in the northern reveal similar burial practices with , affirming Onogur influence in these peripheral areas.

Pre-Avar Migrations and Formation

The Onogurs emerged as a distinct group among the Oghuric branch of Turkic-speaking nomadic tribes during the 4th and 5th centuries CE, originating as part of the western tribal union in the Kazakh steppes and migrating westward into the Pontic-Caspian region in the aftermath of the Hunnic confederation's collapse following Attila's death in 453 CE. These tribes, part of broader Oghur migrations triggered by the power vacuum and inter-tribal conflicts in the post-Hunnic era, gradually consolidated in the northern area, where they engaged in pastoral nomadism and interacted with remnants of Hunnic and Iranian nomadic groups. A pivotal event in their early history occurred around 463 CE, when the Onogurs, along with the related Saragurs and Urogs, were displaced from their territories near the northwestern by the advancing Sabirs, who themselves had been pushed westward by the initial movements of the Avars from . In response, envoys from these tribes approached Byzantine Leo I (r. 457–474 CE) in , seeking an alliance and temporary refuge amid the cascading nomadic pressures; Leo I reportedly granted them provisional shelter in to counterbalance other threats. This displacement marked a critical phase in their westward shift, forcing the Onogurs into more fragmented groupings while heightening their vulnerability to further incursions. Amid these migrations and existential pressures from the Sabirs and other nomads, the Onogurs coalesced into a loose of ten tribes, which provided a framework for mutual defense and resource sharing in the unstable Pontic s. This formation, occurring by the mid-5th century, solidified their identity as a unified prior to deeper entanglements with emerging steppe powers.

History

Integration into the Avar Khaganate

The Onogurs, a Turkic-speaking nomadic group inhabiting the Pontic , became integrated into the Avar Khaganate following the Avars' westward migration and conquests in the mid-6th century. The Avars, arriving in around 558 CE, subjugated several Oghur tribes, including the Onogurs, between 558 and 562 CE, compelling them to serve as subordinate allies under Avar overlordship. By 568 CE, when the Avars established their khaganate in the , the Onogurs had been incorporated as tributaries, providing military support in exchange for nominal protection against rival steppe powers like the . This integration marked a shift from the Onogurs' pre-Avar to a dependent status within the multi-ethnic Avar . As auxiliary forces, the Onogurs played a crucial role in the Avar Khaganate's expansionist campaigns against the , contributing cavalry units renowned for their mobility and archery skills. In 594 CE, Onogur contingents joined Avar forces in operations along the Lower , targeting defenses and Slavic settlements. Further joint expeditions occurred in 599 CE in and 602 CE in , where Onogur warriors aided in raids that pressured frontiers and facilitated Avar territorial gains in the . These military contributions extended to broader Avar raids on Slavic and territories, enhancing the khaganate's dominance in through coordinated nomadic warfare tactics. Politically, the Onogurs functioned as tributaries to the Avar khagans, obligated to supply warriors and resources while retaining some tribal under Avar . The Avars leveraged this relationship to extract tribute from , citing their control over the Onogurs and other subject peoples as leverage in diplomatic negotiations, such as those in 568 and CE. Onogur proved essential in Avar offensives, including assaults on fortified Byzantine positions, though their subordinate role often involved high-risk frontline duties. Key interactions between the Onogurs and Avars included both cooperative alliances and underlying tensions, exemplified by joint Balkan expeditions that deepened military interdependence. However, the Onogurs' reluctant alliance occasionally surfaced in localized conflicts, as noted in Byzantine sources describing their participation in Avar raids while maintaining distinct tribal identities.

Central Role in

In the mid-7th century, the Onogurs assumed a pivotal leadership role in the formation of Old Great Bulgaria, a multi-ethnic that represented their ascent to regional dominance. Around 630–635, Khan , descended from the Onogur-Bulgar lineage and ruler of the Onogundurs, united the Onogur tribes with the closely related Kutrigur and Utigur groups, creating a cohesive state independent of Avar control. This foundation was facilitated by Kubrat's strategic alliances and military prowess, as he had been raised in and cultivated ties with Byzantine Emperor , who recognized him as a patrician and upon receiving an embassy from Kubrat. describes Kubrat as having "gained power over the Onogurs" and established "Old Great Bulgaria," while identifies him explicitly as "lord of the Onogundurs" who "revolted from the Avar ." The capital of Old Great Bulgaria was located at Phanagoria on the Taman Peninsula, a strategic site between the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov that supported administrative and economic functions. The state's territorial extent spanned a broad swath of the Pontic-Caspian steppe, from the Dnieper River and Sea of Azov in the east to the Dniester and Danube rivers in the west, and southward toward the Caucasus, bordering both Byzantine and Sassanid Persian domains. This expansive reach enabled the Onogur-led confederation to thrive on trans-regional trade routes, exchanging goods like furs, slaves, and horses with Byzantium and Persia, while maintaining nomadic pastoralism as the economic backbone. Nikephoros notes that Kubrat's land "bordered on those of the Romans and the Persians," underscoring its geopolitical significance. Under Kubrat's rule, the Onogurs achieved notable military victories over the Avars, consolidating independence and repelling incursions that had previously subordinated Bulgar tribes. A landmark accomplishment was the of Kubrat and his nobles in , arranged through , which strengthened Byzantine alliances and introduced Christian elements to the elite without fully supplanting traditional beliefs. Kubrat's eldest son, , succeeded him around 665 and upheld the realm's core, preserving stability through a tribal council system that balanced the interests of Onogur, Kutrigur, and Utigur factions. Theophanes records Kubrat's and the subsequent division among his five sons, with retaining the original territory.

Decline and Dispersal

The death of Khan Kubrat around 665 marked the beginning of the Onogurs' fragmentation within , as internal divisions among his five sons undermined the confederation's unity despite his admonition to remain together against external threats. According to the Byzantine chronicler , Kubrat's eldest son, , succeeded him in the core territories east of the but faced mounting pressure from the expanding Khazar Khaganate. Khazar invasions in the late seventh century accelerated the Onogurs' dispersal, with Batbayan's group submitting as tributaries and becoming known as the "Black Bulgars" in the Pontic steppes, effectively assimilating into the Khazar political structure by the 670s. Theophanes records that the second son, Kotrag, led a faction across the Tanais River (Don) northward toward the , laying the foundations for . Meanwhile, the third son, Asparukh, migrated westward with Onogur warriors, settling initially between the and rivers before crossing the around 679 to establish a new power in the . The fourth son, , joined the Avar Khaganate in , while the fifth, (or Alzeco), reached the in , placing his followers under Byzantine protection near . Historian Peter B. Golden notes that this Khazar dominance over the remaining Onogur-Bulgar groups in the steppes led to their partial absorption, with non-migrating elements serving as vassals. By the eighth century, the Onogurs had lost their independent cohesion, with dispersed groups integrating into successor entities or local powers; remnants of the "Black Bulgars" persisted under Khazar overlordship in the north Pontic area, while smaller contingents, including those under Alcek, entered Byzantine military service as auxiliaries. This dispersal not only ended Old Great Bulgaria's brief prominence but also scattered Onogur tribal structures across Eurasia.

Society and Culture

Tribal Organization and Economy

The Onogurs maintained a loose tribal comprising ten tribes, reflected in their , which derives from the Turkic on oğur meaning "ten tribes" or "ten arrows," symbolizing a union of allied groups for mutual defense and migration. This structure was hierarchical yet decentralized, organized around patrilineal clans led by khans or beys who coordinated through assemblies for major decisions such as warfare or seasonal movements, allowing flexibility in the fluid environment. Under leaders like in the early , the confederation absorbed neighboring groups, such as remnants of the Avars, to bolster its cohesion without rigid centralization. Economically, the Onogurs relied on horse-based , herding sheep and other across the Pontic to sustain their mobile lifestyle, with horses serving as the cornerstone for transport, herding, and warfare. They established seasonal camps rather than permanent settlements, migrating to exploit pastures and avoid resource depletion in the expansive regions. Trade supplemented activities, involving exchanges of furs, slaves captured during raids, and procured via steppe routes linking to Byzantine and Central Asian markets, facilitating access to luxury goods and metals. Daily life emphasized equestrian proficiency, integral to and survival, with communities centered on felt tents that could be swiftly relocated. The diet featured meat from , fermented products like , and millet supplemented through trade, providing essential nutrition for the rigors of nomadism. Gender roles were pragmatic: men typically handled raiding and , while women oversaw sheep , processing, and crafting items such as and tools from , , and , contributing to household self-sufficiency. These roles and practices are inferred from broader Oghuric and Turkic nomadic traditions, as for Onogurs is limited.

Religion and Material Culture

The Onogurs, as a Turkic nomadic , predominantly adhered to , a shamanistic and animistic belief system centered on the worship of , the sky god regarded as the supreme deity overseeing life, war, and death. This faith emphasized the khan's divine authority derived from Tengri, with rituals often involving sacrifices to honor the deity and seek protection in battles or migrations. Shamanistic practices were integral, featuring shamans as soothsayers and healers who conducted ecstatic rituals, used amulets like golden or silver dragon figures for protection, and interpreted omens through natural elements such as sacred trees. Ancestor veneration formed a key aspect of Onogur spiritual life, reflecting beliefs in an where the deceased continued to influence the living; this is evidenced by that included to sustain ancestors and inscriptions invoking ancestral spirits, such as terms like "ata" denoting revered forebears. Diplomatic contacts with the during the 7th century introduced early Christian influences, fostering cultural exchanges that gradually exposed Onogur elites to Orthodox Christianity, though widespread conversion occurred only among successors. Onogur material culture, shaped by steppe nomadic traditions, is primarily known from archaeological sites in the Don-Volga region associated with Old Great Bulgaria, featuring kurgan and pit burials that underscore their mobile lifestyle and warrior ethos. These burials often included horse sacrifices—such as the Voznesenka grave with 40 ritually slain horses—to accompany elites into the afterlife, symbolizing status and mobility, alongside weapons like swords, arrows, and axes for martial symbolism. Grave goods also encompassed gold jewelry and ornaments, as seen in the Pereschepina treasure hoard of over 20 kg of gold and 50 kg of silver items blending Byzantine and Sasanian styles, indicating elite wealth and trade networks. Pottery and textiles in Onogur sites displayed Central Asian motifs adapted to local steppe aesthetics, with earthen cauldrons featuring inner lugs for cooking and storage, found in necropolises like Borissovo (6th-9th centuries). Artifacts from Don-Volga burials, including belts and cauldrons with decorative elements, reveal Scytho-Sarmatian influences through techniques like artificial skull deformation and animal-style engravings, highlighting cultural continuity from earlier Eurasian nomads. These remnants, unearthed at sites like Phanagoria—the capital of Old Great Bulgaria—demonstrate a blend of nomadic craftsmanship and emerging settled elements, such as fortified semi-dugout dwellings.

Legacy

Formation of Successor Groups

Following the dispersal of the Onogurs in the 7th century after the collapse of Old Great Bulgaria, remnants of these Turkic tribes migrated northward and westward, contributing to the formation of distinct successor polities that preserved elements of Onogur political and social structures. One major branch, led by Kotrag—son of Khan Kubrat—consisted of Onogur-Bulgar migrants who moved to the middle Volga region around 668, where they established the Volga Bulgaria state by the early 8th century through alliances with local Finno-Ugric and Turkic groups. This polity developed into a prosperous trading hub, with its capital at Bolghar, and maintained continuity in Bulgar tribal organization until the Mongol conquest in 1236, which led to its incorporation into the Golden Horde. Volga Bulgaria adopted Islam as the state religion in 922, following a diplomatic mission from the Abbasid Caliphate, marking a significant cultural shift while retaining Onogur military traditions. In the , another Onogur-led group under Asparukh, Kubrat's third son, crossed the around 680 and defeated Byzantine forces, founding the in 681 through the integration of Onogur warriors with local Slavic populations. The early rulers of this empire, from the clan, embodied an Onogur core elite that imposed a hierarchical tribal system on the blended society, enabling rapid expansion and Byzantine recognition via the Treaty of 681. This fused Onogur nomadic heritage with Slavic agrarian elements, forming the basis of the empire's military and administrative framework until its in the 9th century. Smaller Onogur-Bulgar contingents dispersed to other regions, including minor settlements in around 662 under leaders like Alzeco, where they allied with and left archaeological traces of distinct warrior burials. In , residual Onogur groups integrated into the Avar Khaganate's remnants, contributing to local power structures before the Magyar conquest in the late . Further east, the "Black Bulgars"—Onogur descendants in the Pontic steppe—fell under Khazar suzerainty in the late and later merged with incoming and by the 10th century, losing independent identity amid steppe confederations.

Linguistic and Toponymic Influences

The Oghuric branch of the , spoken by the Onogurs and related groups such as the , has left a significant linguistic legacy, most notably through its survival in the of the . Chuvash, the sole extant member of this branch, preserves phonological and morphological features distinct from Common Turkic, such as the r/z correspondence (e.g., Chuvash jĕr corresponding to Common Turkic yaz 'summer'), reflecting the ancient Oghuric substrate. This language developed among Volga Bulgar communities after the 7th-century dispersal of Onogur-Bulgar confederations, maintaining Oghuric traits amid interactions with Finnic and Slavic speakers. Oghuric influences appear in loanwords across neighboring languages, particularly Hungarian, where approximately 300-500 early Turkic borrowings date to contacts between the 5th and 12th centuries, many traceable to an Oghuric (Chuvash-like) source rather than Common Turkic. Representative examples include Hungarian gyümölcs 'fruit' linked to Oghuric roots for berries or gathered produce, illustrating lexical exchanges during steppe migrations. In Russian, Oghuric loanwords from Bulgar intermediaries include terms for administrative and nomadic concepts, while modern Bulgarian retains a few archaic substrates from its Oghuric-speaking founders, such as words for kinship or horse gear, though largely overshadowed by Slavic adoption. The river Volga exemplifies this through its Turkic name Itil (meaning 'great river'), used by Volga Bulgars and preserved in Chuvash Ätel, influencing Slavic Volga via phonetic adaptation. Toponymic traces of Onogur nomenclature persist in the , Volga-Ural region, and , often deriving from tribal or geographical terms. The name "" stems directly from the Bulgar, an Oghuric term possibly meaning 'mixed' or 'stirred' (from bulğa- 'to mix'), applied to successor states in the and areas after the 7th-century Onogur-Bulgar expansions. Similarly, "" originates from the Onogur tribal confederation, with the Latin Hungaria evolving from Slavic Ǫgǔrъ ('ten tribes' or on oğur), transmitted via Byzantine and Slavic intermediaries to denote the Magyar lands post-9th-century settlement. In the Volga-Ural zone, Chuvash-inhabited areas feature toponyms like Äsal (from Bulgar Asal 'noble') and river names echoing Oghuric terms, while sites such as the Bulgarian Balgari villages preserve direct Bulgar derivatives. Modern scholarship in the 20th and 21st centuries has illuminated these influences through and interdisciplinary approaches, linking Oghuric to Uralic-Turkic contacts via the Volga-Kama , where Hungarian exhibits both Uralic roots and Oghuric overlays from shared environments. Genetic studies further support this, revealing migration patterns with Turkic admixture in Uralic-speaking populations, such as elevated East Asian haplogroups (e.g., C-M217) in modern Chuvash and , consistent with Onogur-Bulgar dispersals around the 7th-10th centuries. These findings underscore persistent cultural-linguistic exchanges rather than wholesale replacement. The Oghuric classification places it within the Turkic family's Lir (rhotacizing) subgroup, distinct by its western innovations.

References

  1. https://maiet.cfuv.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/014golden.pdf
  2. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsEurope/EasternPatriaOnoguria.htm
  3. http://doktori.bibl.u-szeged.hu/10600/3/Peter_Juhasz_Thesis_From_the_Sea_of_the_Steppe_to_the_Island_of_the_Carpathians_vegl_A5_cover.pdf
  4. https://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/55273/1/128.pdf.pdf
  5. https://salmin-ak.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2014_Savirs_Bulgars_Chuvash.pdf
  6. http://www.kroraina.com/bulgar/setton.html
  7. https://www.academia.edu/49816649/40_Early_Byzantine_Sources_on_the_Oghuric_Tribes_in_the_Northern_Black_Sea_Area
  8. http://protobulgarians.com/English%20translations/History%20of%20the%20Proto-Bulgarians.pdf
  9. http://www.kroraina.com/hungar/ds_ohp.html
  10. https://iling-ran.ru/savelyev/2020_chuvash_and_the_bulgharic_languages.pdf
  11. https://www.academia.edu/43119051/A_Bayesian_approach_to_the_classification_of_the_Turkic_languages
  12. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/18793665231185792
  13. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/turkic/lexicon/E9F27E9EADD6D6D86A3917E25ABE8334
  14. https://books.google.com/books/about/West_Old_Turkic.html?id=DtfVZwEACAAJ
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309764017_2012_Review_of_Rona-Tas_Andras_Berta_Arpad_eds_West_Old_Turkic_Turkic_Loanwords_in_Hungarian_Turcologica_84_Wiesbaden_Harrassowitz_Turkic_languages_16_265-293
  16. https://www.academia.edu/40571300/Origin_and_development_of_Bulgar_Runiform_Script
  17. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783112208953-012/html
  18. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004382268/BP000014.xml
  19. https://old.day.kyiv.ua/en/article/society/unique-find-near-poltava
  20. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004441095/BP000013.xml
  21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-the-age-of-attila/steppe-world-and-the-rise-of-the-huns/347731DBA6E3390CB079FCA8A69521FB
  22. https://www.academia.edu/101957764/The_Migration_History_of_the_Savirs
  23. https://journals.uni-vt.bg/getarticle.aspx?aid=5156&type=.pdf
  24. https://www.brill.com/display/book/9789004382268/BP000012.pdf
  25. http://www.kroraina.com/bulgar/pohl_etnicity.html
  26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/1291492
  27. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110875376/html
  28. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004382268/BP000012.pdf
  29. https://www.promacedonia.org/en/ibn/ibn_5.htm
  30. https://archive.org/download/chronicle-of-theophanes-the-confessor/Chronicle%20of%20Theophanes%20the%20Confessor%20%28t%29.pdf
  31. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/publication/op92_turkic_peoples_caucasia_golden_1980.pdf
  32. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805216/67364/excerpt/9780521667364_excerpt.pdf
  33. https://valeristica.ihist.bas.bg/books/Chronica_2023-21.pdf
  34. https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/content/did-you-know-role-women-central-asian-nomadic-society
  35. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1163757
  36. https://www.academia.edu/37841699/Cult_to_Ancestors_in_Medieval_Bulgaria
  37. https://phanagoria.info/upload/iblock/775/Phanagoriya_English_web.pdf
  38. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsEurope/EasternGreatBulgaria.htm
  39. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsEurope/EasternVolgaBulgaria.htm
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318508060_Migrations_and_formation_of_the_Volga_Bulgarian_State_VIII-X_C_Results_of_the_complex_analysis
  41. https://akjournals.com/view/journals/068/61/3/article-p295.xml
  42. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsEurope/EasternBulgariaKingdom.htm
  43. https://archaeologyinbulgaria.com/2011/05/31/bulgarian-toponyms-in-italy-legacy-from-the-ancient-bulgars-and-their-leaders-khan-altsek-and-khan-kubrat/
  44. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsEurope/BarbarianAvars.htm
  45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4202597
  46. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/37877079/5714_State_Art_Uralic_Studies_OA_0.pdf
  47. https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/193787/jlc-article-p54_3.pdf?sequence=1
  48. https://journal.fi/fuf/article/download/120944/86382/308127
  49. https://real-phd.mtak.hu/2040/1/file
  50. https://landsurvival.com/schools-wikipedia/wp/v/Volga_River.htm
  51. https://palaeobulgarica.eu/sites/default/files/pdf-journal/Reviews/1984/1984_4_a13_ft.pdf
  52. https://epa.oszk.hu/01400/01462/00066/pdf/EPA01462_hungarian_studies_2023_1_123-139.pdf
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4405460/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.