Hubbry Logo
SolventSolventMain
Open search
Solvent
Community hub
Solvent
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Solvent
Solvent
from Wikipedia

A solvent dissolves a solute, resulting in a solution
Ethyl acetate, a nail polish solvent.[1]

A solvent (from the Latin solvō, "loosen, untie, solve") is a substance that dissolves a solute, resulting in a solution. A solvent is usually a liquid but can also be a solid, a gas, or a supercritical fluid. Water is a solvent for polar molecules, and the most common solvent used by living things; all the ions and proteins in a cell are dissolved in water within the cell.

Major uses of solvents are in paints, paint removers, inks, and dry cleaning.[2] Specific uses for organic solvents are in dry cleaning (e.g. tetrachloroethylene); as paint thinners (toluene, turpentine); as nail polish removers and solvents of glue (acetone, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate); in spot removers (hexane, petrol ether); in detergents (citrus terpenes); and in perfumes (ethanol). Solvents find various applications in chemical, pharmaceutical, oil, and gas industries, including in chemical syntheses and purification processes

Some petrochemical solvents are highly toxic and emit volatile organic compounds. Biobased solvents are usually more expensive, but ideally less toxic and biodegradable. Biogenic raw materials usable for solvent production are for example lignocellulose, starch and sucrose, but also waste and byproducts from other industries (such as terpenes, vegetable oils and animal fats).[3]

Solutions and solvation

[edit]

When one substance is dissolved into another, a solution is formed.[4] This is opposed to the situation when the compounds are insoluble like sand in water. In a solution, all of the ingredients are uniformly distributed at a molecular level and no residue remains. A solvent-solute mixture consists of a single phase with all solute molecules occurring as solvates (solvent-solute complexes), as opposed to separate continuous phases as in suspensions, emulsions and other types of non-solution mixtures. The ability of one compound to be dissolved in another is known as solubility; if this occurs in all proportions, it is called miscible.[citation needed]

In addition to mixing, the substances in a solution interact with each other at the molecular level. When something is dissolved, molecules of the solvent arrange around molecules of the solute. Heat transfer is involved and entropy is increased making the solution more thermodynamically stable than the solute and solvent separately. This arrangement is mediated by the respective chemical properties of the solvent and solute, such as hydrogen bonding, dipole moment and polarizability.[5] Solvation does not cause a chemical reaction or chemical configuration changes in the solute. However, solvation resembles a coordination complex formation reaction, often with considerable energetics (heat of solvation and entropy of solvation) and is thus far from a neutral process.

When one substance dissolves into another, a solution is formed. A solution is a homogeneous mixture consisting of a solute dissolved into a solvent. The solute is the substance that is being dissolved, while the solvent is the dissolving medium. Solutions can be formed with many different types and forms of solutes and solvents.

Solvent classifications

[edit]

Solvents can be broadly classified into two categories: polar and non-polar. A special case is elemental mercury, whose solutions are known as amalgams; also, other metal solutions exist which are liquid at room temperature.[citation needed]

Generally, the dielectric constant of the solvent provides a rough measure of a solvent's polarity. The strong polarity of water is indicated by its high dielectric constant of 88 (at 0 °C).[6] Solvents with a dielectric constant of less than 15 are generally considered to be nonpolar.[7]

The dielectric constant measures the solvent's tendency to partly cancel the field strength of the electric field of a charged particle immersed in it. This reduction is then compared to the field strength of the charged particle in a vacuum.[7] Heuristically, the dielectric constant of a solvent can be thought of as its ability to reduce the solute's effective internal charge. Generally, the dielectric constant of a solvent is an acceptable predictor of the solvent's ability to dissolve common ionic compounds, such as salts.[citation needed]

Other polarity scales

[edit]

Dielectric constants are not the only measure of polarity. Because solvents are used by chemists to carry out chemical reactions or observe chemical and biological phenomena, more specific measures of polarity are required. Most of these measures are sensitive to chemical structure.

The Grunwald–Winstein mY scale measures polarity in terms of solvent influence on buildup of positive charge of a solute during a chemical reaction.

Kosower's Z scale measures polarity in terms of the influence of the solvent on UV-absorption maxima of a salt, usually pyridinium iodide or the pyridinium zwitterion.[8]

Donor number and donor acceptor scale measures polarity in terms of how a solvent interacts with specific substances, like a strong Lewis acid or a strong Lewis base.[9]

The Hildebrand parameter is the square root of cohesive energy density. It can be used with nonpolar compounds, but cannot accommodate complex chemistry.

Reichardt's dye, a solvatochromic dye that changes color in response to polarity, gives a scale of ET(30) values. ET is the transition energy between the ground state and the lowest excited state in kcal/mol, and (30) identifies the dye. Another, roughly correlated scale (ET(33)) can be defined with Nile red.

Gregory's solvent ϸ parameter is a quantum chemically derived charge density parameter.[10] This parameter seems to reproduce many of the experimental solvent parameters (especially the donor and acceptor numbers) using this charge decomposition analysis approach, with an electrostatic basis. The ϸ parameter was originally developed to quantify and explain the Hofmeister series by quantifying polyatomic ions and the monatomic ions in a united manner.

The polarity, dipole moment, polarizability and hydrogen bonding of a solvent determines what type of compounds it is able to dissolve and with what other solvents or liquid compounds it is miscible. Generally, polar solvents dissolve polar compounds best and non-polar solvents dissolve non-polar compounds best; hence "like dissolves like". Strongly polar compounds like sugars (e.g. sucrose) or ionic compounds, like inorganic salts (e.g. table salt) dissolve only in very polar solvents like water, while strongly non-polar compounds like oils or waxes dissolve only in very non-polar organic solvents like hexane. Similarly, water and hexane (or vinegar and vegetable oil) are not miscible with each other and will quickly separate into two layers even after being shaken well.

Polarity can be separated to different contributions. For example, the Kamlet-Taft parameters are dipolarity/polarizability (π*), hydrogen-bonding acidity (α) and hydrogen-bonding basicity (β). These can be calculated from the wavelength shifts of 3–6 different solvatochromic dyes in the solvent, usually including Reichardt's dye, nitroaniline and diethylnitroaniline. Another option, Hansen solubility parameters, separates the cohesive energy density into dispersion, polar, and hydrogen bonding contributions.

Polar protic and polar aprotic

[edit]

Solvents with a dielectric constant (more accurately, relative static permittivity) greater than 15 (i.e. polar or polarizable) can be further divided into protic and aprotic. Protic solvents, such as water, solvate anions (negatively charged solutes) strongly via hydrogen bonding. Polar aprotic solvents, such as acetone or dichloromethane, tend to have large dipole moments (separation of partial positive and partial negative charges within the same molecule) and solvate positively charged species via their negative dipole.[11] In chemical reactions the use of polar protic solvents favors the SN1 reaction mechanism, while polar aprotic solvents favor the SN2 reaction mechanism. These polar solvents are capable of forming hydrogen bonds with water to dissolve in water whereas non-polar solvents are not capable of strong hydrogen bonds.

Physical properties

[edit]

Properties table of common solvents

[edit]

The solvents are grouped into nonpolar, polar aprotic, and polar protic solvents, with each group ordered by increasing polarity. The properties of solvents which exceed those of water are bolded.

Solvent Chemical formula Boiling point[12]
(°C)
Dielectric constant[13] Density
(g/mL)
Dipole moment
(D)

Nonpolar hydrocarbon solvents

[edit]
Pentane

CH3CH2CH2CH2CH3

36.1 1.84 0.626 0.00
Hexane

CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3

69 1.88 0.655 0.00
Benzene
C6H6
80.1 2.3 0.879 0.00
Heptane

H3C(CH2)5CH3

98.38 1.92 0.680 0.0
Toluene

C6H5-CH3

111 2.38 0.867 0.36

Nonpolar ether solvents

[edit]
1,4-Dioxane
C4H8O2
101.1 2.3 1.033 0.45
Diethyl ether

CH3CH2-O-CH2CH3

34.6 4.3 0.713 1.15
Tetrahydrofuran (THF)
C4H8O
66 7.5 0.886 1.75

Nonpolar chlorocarbon solvents

[edit]
Chloroform

CHCl3

61.2 4.81 1.498 1.04

Polar aprotic solvents

[edit]
Dichloromethane (DCM)

CH2Cl2

39.6 9.1 1.3266 1.60
Ethyl acetate
CH3-C(=O)-O-CH2-CH3
77.1 6.02 0.894 1.78
Acetone
CH3-C(=O)-CH3
56.1 21 0.786 2.88
Dimethylformamide (DMF)
H-C(=O)N(CH3)2
153 38 0.944 3.82
Acetonitrile (MeCN)

CH3-C≡N

82 37.5 0.786 3.92
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
CH3-S(=O)-CH3
189 46.7 1.092 3.96
Nitromethane

CH3-NO2

100–103 35.87 1.1371 3.56
Propylene carbonate

C4H6O3

240 64.0 1.205 4.9

Polar protic solvents

[edit]
Ammonia

NH3

-33.3 17 0.674

(at −33.3 °C)

1.42
Formic acid
H-C(=O)OH
100.8 58 1.21 1.41
n-Butanol

CH3CH2CH2CH2OH

117.7 18 0.810 1.63
Isopropyl alcohol (IPA)
CH3-CH(-OH)-CH3
82.6 18 0.785 1.66
n-Propanol

CH3CH2CH2OH

97 20 0.803 1.68
Ethanol

CH3CH2OH

78.2 24.55 0.789 1.69
Methanol

CH3OH

64.7 33 0.791 1.70
Acetic acid
CH3-C(=O)OH
118 6.2 1.049 1.74
Water
H-O-H
100 80 1.000 1.85

The ACS Green Chemistry Institute maintains a tool for the selection of solvents based on a principal component analysis of solvent properties.[14]

Hansen solubility parameter values

[edit]

The Hansen solubility parameter (HSP) values[15][16][17] are based on dispersion bonds (δD), polar bonds (δP) and hydrogen bonds (δH). These contain information about the inter-molecular interactions with other solvents and also with polymers, pigments, nanoparticles, etc. This allows for rational formulations knowing, for example, that there is a good HSP match between a solvent and a polymer. Rational substitutions can also be made for "good" solvents (effective at dissolving the solute) that are "bad" (expensive or hazardous to health or the environment). The following table shows that the intuitions from "non-polar", "polar aprotic" and "polar protic" are put numerically – the "polar" molecules have higher levels of δP and the protic solvents have higher levels of δH. Because numerical values are used, comparisons can be made rationally by comparing numbers. For example, acetonitrile is much more polar than acetone but exhibits slightly less hydrogen bonding.

Solvent Chemical formula δD Dispersion δP Polar δH Hydrogen bonding

Non-polar solvents

[edit]
n-Pentane CH3-(CH2)3-CH3 14.5 0.0 0.0
n-Hexane CH3-(CH2)4-CH3 14.9 0.0 0.0
n-Heptane CH3-(CH2)5-CH3 15.3 0.0 0.0
Cyclohexane /-(CH2)6-\ 16.8 0.0 0.2
Benzene C6H6 18.4 0.0 2.0
Toluene C6H5-CH3 18.0 1.4 2.0
Diethyl ether C2H5-O-C2H5 14.5 2.9 4.6
Chloroform CHCl3 17.8 3.1 5.7
1,4-Dioxane /-(CH2)2O(CH2)2O-\ 17.5 1.8 9.0

Polar aprotic solvents

[edit]
Ethyl acetate CH3-C(=O)-O-C2H5 15.8 5.3 7.2
Tetrahydrofuran /-(CH2)4-O-\ 16.8 5.7 8.0
Dichloromethane CH2Cl2 17.0 7.3 7.1
Acetone CH3-C(=O)-CH3 15.5 10.4 7.0
Acetonitrile CH3-C≡N 15.3 18.0 6.1
Dimethylformamide H-C(=O)-N(CH3)2 17.4 13.7 11.3
Dimethylacetamide CH3-C(=O)-N(CH3)2 16.8 11.5 10.2
Dimethylimidazolidinone C5H10N2O 18.0 10.5 9.7
Dimethylpropyleneurea C6H12N2O 17.8 9.5 9.3
N-Methylpyrrolidone /-(CH2)3-N(CH3)-C(=O)-\ 18.0 12.3 7.2
Propylene carbonate C4H6O3 20.0 18.0 4.1
Pyridine C5H5N 19.0 8.8 5.9
Sulfolane /-(CH2)4-S(=O)2-\ 19.2 16.2 9.4
Dimethyl sulfoxide CH3-S(=O)-CH3 18.4 16.4 10.2

Polar protic solvents

[edit]
Acetic acid CH3-C(=O)-OH 14.5 8.0 13.5
n-Butanol CH3-(CH2)3-OH 16.0 5.7 15.8
Isopropanol (CH3)2-CH-OH 15.8 6.1 16.4
n-Propanol CH3-(CH2)2-OH 16.0 6.8 17.4
Ethanol C2H5-OH 15.8 8.8 19.4
Methanol CH3-OH 14.7 12.3 22.3
Ethylene glycol HO-(CH2)2-OH 17.0 11.0 26.0
Glycerol HO-CH2-CH(OH)-CH2-OH 17.4 12.1 29.3
Formic acid H-C(=O)-OH 14.6 10.0 14.0
Water H-O-H 15.5 16.0 42.3

If, for environmental or other reasons, a solvent or solvent blend is required to replace another of equivalent solvency, the substitution can be made on the basis of the Hansen solubility parameters of each. The values for mixtures are taken as the weighted averages of the values for the neat solvents. This can be calculated by trial-and-error, a spreadsheet of values, or HSP software.[15][16] A 1:1 mixture of toluene and 1,4 dioxane has δD, δP and δH values of 17.8, 1.6 and 5.5, comparable to those of chloroform at 17.8, 3.1 and 5.7 respectively. Because of the health hazards associated with toluene itself, other mixtures of solvents may be found using a full HSP dataset.

Boiling point

[edit]
Solvent Boiling point (°C)[12]
ethylene dichloride 83.48
pyridine 115.25
methyl isobutyl ketone 116.5
methylene chloride 39.75
isooctane 99.24
carbon disulfide 46.3
carbon tetrachloride 76.75
o-xylene 144.42

The boiling point is an important property because it determines the speed of evaporation. Small amounts of low-boiling-point solvents like diethyl ether, dichloromethane, or acetone will evaporate in seconds at room temperature, while high-boiling-point solvents like water or dimethyl sulfoxide need higher temperatures, an air flow, or the application of vacuum for fast evaporation.

  • Low boilers: boiling point below 100 °C (boiling point of water)
  • Medium boilers: between 100 °C and 150 °C
  • High boilers: above 150 °C

Density

[edit]

Most organic solvents have a lower density than water, which means they are lighter than and will form a layer on top of water. Important exceptions are most of the halogenated solvents like dichloromethane or chloroform will sink to the bottom of a container, leaving water as the top layer. This is crucial to remember when partitioning compounds between solvents and water in a separatory funnel during chemical syntheses.

Often, specific gravity is cited in place of density. Specific gravity is defined as the density of the solvent divided by the density of water at the same temperature. As such, specific gravity is a unitless value. It readily communicates whether a water-insoluble solvent will float (SG < 1.0) or sink (SG > 1.0) when mixed with water.

Solvent Specific gravity[18]
Pentane 0.626
Petroleum ether 0.656
Hexane 0.659
Heptane 0.684
Diethyl amine 0.707
Diethyl ether 0.713
Triethyl amine 0.728
tert-Butyl methyl ether 0.741
Cyclohexane 0.779
tert-Butyl alcohol 0.781
Isopropanol 0.785
Acetonitrile 0.786
Ethanol 0.789
Acetone 0.790
Methanol 0.791
Methyl isobutyl ketone 0.798
Isobutyl alcohol 0.802
1-Propanol 0.803
Methyl ethyl ketone 0.805
2-Butanol 0.808
Isoamyl alcohol 0.809
1-Butanol 0.810
Diethyl ketone 0.814
1-Octanol 0.826
p-Xylene 0.861
m-Xylene 0.864
Toluene 0.867
Dimethoxyethane 0.868
Benzene 0.879
Butyl acetate 0.882
1-Chlorobutane 0.886
Tetrahydrofuran 0.889
Ethyl acetate 0.895
o-Xylene 0.897
Hexamethylphosphorus triamide 0.898
2-Ethoxyethyl ether 0.909
N,N-Dimethylacetamide 0.937
Diethylene glycol dimethyl ether 0.943
N,N-Dimethylformamide 0.944
2-Methoxyethanol 0.965
Pyridine 0.982
Propanoic acid 0.993
Water 1.000
2-Methoxyethyl acetate 1.009
Benzonitrile 1.01
1-Methyl-2-pyrrolidinone 1.028
Hexamethylphosphoramide 1.03
1,4-Dioxane 1.033
Acetic acid 1.049
Acetic anhydride 1.08
Dimethyl sulfoxide 1.092
Chlorobenzene 1.1066
Deuterium oxide 1.107
Ethylene glycol 1.115
Diethylene glycol 1.118
Propylene carbonate 1.21
Formic acid 1.22
1,2-Dichloroethane 1.245
Glycerin 1.261
Carbon disulfide 1.263
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.306
Methylene chloride 1.325
Nitromethane 1.382
2,2,2-Trifluoroethanol 1.393
Chloroform 1.498
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 1.575
Carbon tetrachloride 1.594
Tetrachloroethylene 1.623

Multicomponent solvents

[edit]

Multicomponent solvents appeared after World War II in the USSR, and continue to be used and produced in the post-Soviet states. These solvents may have one or more applications, but they are not universal preparations.

Solvents

[edit]
Name Composition
Solvent 645 toluene 50%, butyl acetate 18%, ethyl acetate 12%, butanol 10%, ethanol 10%.
Solvent 646 toluene 50%, ethanol 15%, butanol 10%, butyl- or amyl acetate 10%, ethyl cellosolve 8%, acetone 7%[19]
Solvent 647 butyl- or amyl acetate 29.8%, ethyl acetate 21.2%, butanol 7.7%, toluene or benzopyrene 41.3%[20]
Solvent 648 butyl acetate 50%, ethanol 10%, butanol 20%, toluene 20%[21]
Solvent 649 ethyl cellosolve 30%, butanol 20%, xylene 50%
Solvent 650 ethyl cellosolve 20%, butanol 30%, xylene 50%[22]
Solvent 651 white spirit 90%, butanol 10%
Solvent KR-36 butyl acetate 20%, butanol 80%
Solvent R-4 toluene 62%, acetone 26%, butyl acetate 12%.
Solvent R-10 xylene 85%, acetone 15%.
Solvent R-12 toluene 60%, butyl acetate 30%, xylene 10%.
Solvent R-14 cyclohexanone 50%, toluene 50%.
Solvent R-24 solvent[clarification needed] 50%, xylene 35%, acetone 15%.
Solvent R-40 toluene 50%, ethyl cellosolve 30%, acetone 20%.
Solvent R-219 toluene 34%, cyclohexanone 33%, acetone 33%.
Solvent R-3160 butanol 60%, ethanol 40%.
Solvent RCC xylene 90%, butyl acetate 10%.
Solvent RML ethanol 64%, ethylcellosolve 16%, toluene 10%, butanol 10%.
Solvent PML-315 toluene 25%, xylene 25%, butyl acetate 18%, ethyl cellosolve 17%, butanol 15%.
Solvent PC-1 toluene 60%, butyl acetate 30%, xylene 10%.
Solvent PC-2 white spirit 70%, xylene 30%.
Solvent RFG ethanol 75%, butanol 25%.
Solvent RE-1 xylene 50%, acetone 20%, butanol 15%, ethanol 15%.
Solvent RE-2 petroleum spirits 70%, ethanol 20%, acetone 10%.
Solvent RE-3 petroleum spirits 50%, ethanol 20%, acetone 20%, ethyl cellosolve 10%.
Solvent RE-4 petroleum spirits 50%, acetone 30%, ethanol 20%.
Solvent FK-1 (?) absolute alcohol (99.8%) 95%, ethyl acetate 5%

Thinners

[edit]
Name Composition
Thinner RKB-1 butanol 50%, xylene 50%
Thinner RKB-2 butanol 95%, xylene 5%
Thinner RKB-3 xylene 90%, butanol 10%
Thinner M ethanol 65%, butyl acetate 30%, ethyl acetate 5%.
Thinner P-7 cyclohexanone 50%, ethanol 50%.
Thinner R-197 xylene 60%, butyl acetate 20%, ethyl cellosolve 20%.
Thinner of WFD toluene 50%, butyl acetate (or amyl acetate) 18%, butanol 10%, ethanol 10%, ethyl acetate 9%, acetone 3%.

Safety

[edit]

Fire

[edit]

Most organic solvents are flammable or highly flammable, depending on their volatility. Exceptions are some chlorinated solvents like dichloromethane and chloroform. Mixtures of solvent vapors and air can explode. Solvent vapors are heavier than air; they will sink to the bottom and can travel large distances nearly undiluted. Solvent vapors can also be found in supposedly empty drums and cans, posing a flash fire hazard; hence empty containers of volatile solvents should be stored open and upside down.

Both diethyl ether and carbon disulfide have exceptionally low autoignition temperatures which increase greatly the fire risk associated with these solvents. The autoignition temperature of carbon disulfide is below 100 °C (212 °F), so objects such as steam pipes, light bulbs, hotplates, and recently extinguished bunsen burners are able to ignite its vapors.

In addition some solvents, such as methanol, can burn with a very hot flame which can be nearly invisible under some lighting conditions.[23][24] This can delay or prevent the timely recognition of a dangerous fire, until flames spread to other materials.

Explosive peroxide formation

[edit]

Ethers like diethyl ether and tetrahydrofuran (THF) can form highly explosive organic peroxides upon exposure to oxygen and light. THF is normally more likely to form such peroxides than diethyl ether. One of the most susceptible solvents is diisopropyl ether, but all ethers are considered to be potential peroxide sources.

The heteroatom (oxygen) stabilizes the formation of a free radical which is formed by the abstraction of a hydrogen atom by another free radical.[clarification needed] The carbon-centered free radical thus formed is able to react with an oxygen molecule to form a peroxide compound. The process of peroxide formation is greatly accelerated by exposure to even low levels of light, but can proceed slowly even in dark conditions.

Unless a desiccant is used which can destroy the peroxides, they will concentrate during distillation, due to their higher boiling point. When sufficient peroxides have formed, they can form a crystalline, shock-sensitive solid precipitate at the mouth of a container or bottle. Minor mechanical disturbances, such as scraping the inside of a vessel, the dislodging of a deposit, or merely twisting the cap may provide sufficient energy for the peroxide to detonate or explode violently.

Peroxide formation is not a significant problem when fresh solvents are used up quickly; they are more of a problem in laboratories which may take years to finish a single bottle. Low-volume users should acquire only small amounts of peroxide-prone solvents, and dispose of old solvents on a regular periodic schedule.

To avoid explosive peroxide formation, ethers should be stored in an airtight container, away from light, because both light and air can encourage peroxide formation.[25]

A number of tests can be used to detect the presence of a peroxide in an ether; one is to use a combination of iron(II) sulfate and potassium thiocyanate. The peroxide is able to oxidize the Fe2+ ion to an Fe3+ ion, which then forms a deep-red coordination complex with the thiocyanate.

Peroxides may be removed by washing with acidic iron(II) sulfate, filtering through alumina, or distilling from sodium/benzophenone. Alumina degrades the peroxides but some could remain intact in it, therefore it must be disposed of properly.[26] The advantage of using sodium/benzophenone is that moisture and oxygen are removed as well.[27]

Health effects

[edit]

General health hazards associated with solvent exposure include toxicity to the nervous system, reproductive damage, liver and kidney damage, respiratory impairment, cancer, hearing loss,[28][29] and dermatitis.[30]

Acute exposure

[edit]

Many solvents[which?] can lead to a sudden loss of consciousness if inhaled in large amounts.[citation needed] Solvents like diethyl ether and chloroform have been used in medicine as anesthetics, sedatives, and hypnotics for a long time.[when?] Many solvents (e.g. from gasoline or solvent-based glues) are abused recreationally in glue sniffing, often with harmful long-term health effects such as neurotoxicity or cancer. Fraudulent substitution of 1,5-pentanediol by the psychoactive 1,4-butanediol by a subcontractor caused the Bindeez product recall.[31]

Ethanol (grain alcohol) is a widely used and abused psychoactive drug. If ingested, the so-called "toxic alcohols" (other than ethanol) such as methanol, 1-propanol, and ethylene glycol metabolize into toxic aldehydes and acids, which cause potentially fatal metabolic acidosis.[32] The commonly available alcohol solvent methanol can cause permanent blindness or death if ingested. The solvent 2-butoxyethanol, used in fracking fluids, can cause hypotension and metabolic acidosis.[33]

Chronic exposure

[edit]

Chronic solvent exposures are often caused by the inhalation of solvent vapors, or the ingestion of diluted solvents, repeated over the course of an extended period.

Some solvents can damage internal organs like the liver, the kidneys, the nervous system, or the brain. The cumulative brain effects of long-term or repeated exposure to some solvents is called chronic solvent-induced encephalopathy (CSE).[34]

Chronic exposure to organic solvents in the work environment can produce a range of adverse neuropsychiatric effects. For example, occupational exposure to organic solvents has been associated with higher numbers of painters suffering from alcoholism.[35] Ethanol has a synergistic effect when taken in combination with many solvents; for instance, a combination of toluene/benzene and ethanol causes greater nausea/vomiting than either substance alone.

Some organic solvents are known or suspected to be cataractogenic. A mixture of aromatic hydrocarbons, aliphatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, esters, ketones, and terpenes were found to greatly increase the risk of developing cataracts in the lens of the eye.[36]

Environmental contamination

[edit]

A major pathway of induced health effects arises from spills or leaks of solvents, especially chlorinated solvents, that reach the underlying soil. Since solvents readily migrate substantial distances, the creation of widespread soil contamination is not uncommon; this is particularly a health risk if aquifers are affected.[37] Vapor intrusion can occur from sites with extensive subsurface solvent contamination.[38]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A solvent is the substance, typically present in greater quantity, in which a solute dissolves to form a homogeneous solution, with the solvent retaining its phase during dissolution. Solvents are indispensable in chemistry for enabling reactions, extractions, and separations by solvating solutes through intermolecular forces such as dipole-dipole interactions, hydrogen bonding, or dispersion forces, determined by the solvent's polarity and dielectric constant. They are broadly classified as polar protic (e.g., water, alcohols, capable of hydrogen bonding), polar aprotic (e.g., acetone, dimethyl sulfoxide, lacking hydrogen bond donors but solvating anions effectively), and nonpolar (e.g., hexane, benzene, suited for nonpolar solutes via London forces). In industry, solvents underpin processes in pharmaceuticals for drug synthesis and purification, paints and coatings for viscosity control and application, adhesives and inks for formulation, and cleaning agents for degreasing, with global consumption exceeding millions of tons annually. However, many organic solvents, particularly volatile ones like chlorinated hydrocarbons and aromatics, pose environmental risks by evaporating as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that contribute to tropospheric ozone formation, smog, and photochemical pollution, while also exhibiting toxicity including neurotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and persistence in ecosystems.

Definition and Fundamentals

Solutions and Solvation

A solution is a homogeneous composed of a solute dispersed at the molecular or ionic level within a solvent, the component present in excess. The solute particles are uniformly distributed, resulting in a single phase with properties distinct from those of the pure components, such as altered boiling or freezing points. Solutions form when the solute-solvent interactions are sufficiently strong to overcome the cohesive forces within the pure solute and solvent. Solvation denotes the stabilization of solute particles through direct interactions with surrounding solvent molecules, often forming a . This process involves three sequential steps: separation of solute units against their lattice or intermolecular attractions (endothermic, positive ΔH), separation of solvent molecules to create space (also endothermic), and the exothermic formation of solute-solvent attractions that release energy exceeding the input from prior steps for spontaneous dissolution. For ionic solutes, solvation typically manifests as ion- interactions, where polar solvent molecules orient their negative ends toward cations and positive ends toward anions; in non-aqueous solvents, similar or induced forces apply. The empirical principle "like dissolves like" governs , positing that solvents dissolve solutes of similar polarity: polar or ionic solutes favor polar solvents via dipole-dipole or hydrogen bonding, while nonpolar solutes dissolve in nonpolar solvents through London dispersion forces. This arises from the dominance of solute-solvent over solute-solute and solvent-solvent interactions, maximizing by dispersing solute particles. Exceptions occur under or , where deviates, as seen in partially miscible liquids like and at ambient conditions. Thermodynamically, solvation is driven by the change ΔG_solv = ΔH_solv - TΔS_solv, where negative ΔG_solv indicates spontaneity; ΔH_solv reflects net enthalpic interactions, often negative for exothermic solvation, while ΔS_solv captures configurational gains from mixing, tempered by solvent ordering around solutes (negative for hydrophobic effects). For nonpolar solutes in , ΔH_solv is near zero but ΔS_solv is negative due to structured water cages, rendering dissolution endergonic; in contrast, polar solvents yield favorable ΔG_solv for matching solutes. Experimental solvation free energies, measured via transfer from gas to solution phases, quantify these effects, with values like -6.3 kcal/mol for Na+ hydration underscoring ion-solvent binding strength.

Classifications

Polarity Scales

Solvent polarity is quantified through various scales that assess the capacity for dipole-dipole, hydrogen bonding, and other electrostatic interactions, which dictate , partitioning, and reaction kinetics in solution. Physical parameters like the static constant (ε_r) measure the solvent's ability to screen electric fields, with nonpolar solvents such as exhibiting ε_r ≈ 1.9 and polar ones like reaching ε_r = 78.5 at 25°C; however, ε_r conflates polarity with and is less predictive for specific solute-solvent interactions. The dipole moment (μ), determined via or computation, reflects intrinsic molecular asymmetry, e.g., μ = 0 D for nonpolar versus μ = 1.85 D for acetone. These bulk properties correlate imperfectly with empirical behaviors, prompting the development of solvatochromic and interaction-specific scales. Empirical polarity scales, derived from spectroscopic probes or thermodynamic measurements, offer refined metrics by isolating interaction types. Reichardt's E_T(30) scale, based on the charge-transfer absorption of a zwitterionic betaine , normalizes polarity from 0.000 () to 1.000 (), capturing solvatochromic shifts sensitive to both nonspecific dipolar forces and hydrogen bonding; for instance, scores 0.654. The Kamlet-Taft framework decomposes effects into π* (dipolarity/polarizability, e.g., 0.00 for alkanes to 1.10 for ), α (H-bond donation, e.g., 0.00 for aprotic solvents to 1.00+ for strong acids), and β (H-bond acceptance, e.g., 0.00 for nonbasic solvents to 0.88 for ), enabling linear solvation energy relationship (LSER) modeling of processes like extraction or . Snyder's P' index, from gas-liquid partition coefficients of probe solutes, ranks solvents linearly from 0.0 () to 10.2 (), emphasizing eluotropic strength in . Gutmann's donor number (DN, kcal/mol) gauges Lewis basicity via calorimetric SbCl_5 adduct formation (e.g., 0 for , 38.8 for ), while the acceptor number (AN) uses ³¹P NMR shifts of triethylphosphine oxide (e.g., 0 for , 100 for SbCl_5 reference), highlighting acid-base coordination.
Solventε_r (25°C)μ (D)P'E_T(30)π*DN (kcal/mol)AN
1.90.00.00.009-0.08~00
Diethyl ether4.31.152.80.3200.2719.23.9
Acetone20.72.885.10.3550.7117.012.5
24.51.694.30.6540.5432.037.9
78.51.8510.21.0001.0918 (ref.)54.8
These scales intercorrelate but diverge for multifunctional solvents, underscoring the need for context-specific selection; for example, protic solvents score higher on E_T(30) due to H-bonding, while aprotic ones align better with π*. Cross-validation against physical data reveals limitations, such as ε_r overestimating polarity in low-viscosity media.

Protic and Aprotic Distinctions

Protic solvents are defined as those capable of acting as hydrogen bond donors due to the presence of O-H or N-H bonds, where the is attached to an electronegative atom such as or . This property arises from the partial positive charge on the , enabling it to interact with electron-rich like anions or lone pairs on other molecules. Common examples include (H₂O), (CH₃OH), (C₂H₅OH), and (NH₃), which exhibit strong intermolecular leading to higher boiling points compared to structurally similar non- compounds. In protic solvents, anions are heavily solvated through networks, which stabilizes charged but can diminish the reactivity of nucleophiles by encasing them in solvent shells. Aprotic solvents, in contrast, lack O-H or N-H bonds and thus cannot donate bonds, though polar aprotic solvents may still accept bonds or solvate cations via interactions. This absence results in weaker of anions, leaving them more free or "naked" and enhancing their nucleophilicity and basicity relative to protic environments. Typical polar aprotic solvents include acetone (CH₃COCH₃), (DMSO, (CH₃)₂SO), (DMF, HCON(CH₃)₂), and (CH₃CN), which possess high constants (e.g., DMSO at 47, acetone at 21) but do not form bonds as donors. Nonpolar aprotic solvents, such as or , further lack significant polarity but share the defining aprotic trait. The primary distinction between protic and aprotic solvents manifests in their influence on reaction mechanisms, particularly nucleophilic substitutions and eliminations. Protic solvents stabilize transition states involving carbocations or separated pairs via hydrogen bonding to leaving groups and anions, thereby favoring unimolecular mechanisms like SN1 and E1, as observed in solvolysis reactions where the solvent itself acts as the (e.g., in ). Conversely, aprotic solvents promote bimolecular pathways (SN2 and E2) by minimally solvating s, increasing their effective concentration and attack rate on substrates; for instance, the rate of SN2 reactions with ions can increase dramatically in acetone compared to . This differential also affects ordering: in protic media, larger anions like are more nucleophilic than smaller ones like due to less tight , whereas aprotic solvents reverse this, making smaller anions more reactive.
AspectProtic SolventsAprotic Solvents
Hydrogen BondingCan donate (O-H, N-H present)Cannot donate (no O-H, N-H)
Anion SolvationStrong via H-bonds; reduces nucleophilicityWeak; enhances nucleophilicity
Favored MechanismsSN1, E1 ( stabilization)SN2, E2 ( activation)
ExamplesH₂O, CH₃OH, C₂H₅OH, NH₃Acetone, DMSO, DMF, CH₃CN
This table summarizes empirical observations from kinetic studies in organic reactions. In practice, solvent choice is guided by these effects to control selectivity, with aprotic solvents often preferred for accelerating reactions involving anionic reagents.

Physical Properties

Thermodynamic Characteristics

The , ΔH_vap, represents the heat absorbed during the from liquid to vapor at constant pressure, a critical for assessing solvent volatility and requirements in processes. For many organic solvents, ΔH_vap at the normal falls between 25 and 45 kJ/mol, influenced by intermolecular forces; non-polar solvents like exhibit lower values around 31.7 kJ/mol, while protic solvents such as show higher values of approximately 38.6 kJ/mol due to hydrogen bonding. These enthalpies decrease with temperature, following the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, which relates to ΔH_vap and enables prediction of boiling points under varying conditions. The of vaporization, ΔS_vap, at the normal adheres approximately to for non-associated solvents, yielding values near 85–88 J/mol·K, indicative of comparable increases in molecular freedom during vaporization. This empirical relation holds well for aprotic solvents like (ΔS_vap ≈ 87 J/mol·K) but deviates positively for hydrogen-bonded solvents such as (≈109 J/mol·K) or acetic , where structured phases contribute additional gain upon breaking associations. Such deviations underscore causal links between molecular interactions and thermodynamic behavior, with lattice models attributing the baseline to balanced attractive-repulsive potentials in non-polar s. Critical temperature (T_c) and critical (P_c) mark the endpoints of the vapor-liquid coexistence , beyond which solvents enter a supercritical state with gas-like and liquid-like solvating power. For typical solvents, T_c ranges from 100°C for low-boiling hydrocarbons like (T_c = 196.5°C, P_c = 33.7 bar) to over 300°C for higher alcohols like (T_c ≈ 295°C, P_c ≈ 44 bar), with P_c generally 30–50 bar. These parameters dictate solvent usability in high-pressure applications, as exceeding T_c precludes phase distinction regardless of .
SolventΔH_vap (kJ/mol)ΔS_vap (J/mol·K)T_c (°C)P_c (bar)
31.3≈86235.047.0
38.6≈110240.861.4
31.7≈86234.230.3
28.1≈8796.759.6
Data compiled from reference thermodynamic tables; values at standard boiling points unless noted.

Solubility Parameters

The , denoted as δ, quantifies a solvent's cohesive and serves as an indicator of solvency behavior, with the principle that solvents and solutes with similar δ values exhibit mutual . It is calculated as δ = √(ΔE_v / ), where ΔE_v represents the molar energy of vaporization and the molar volume, typically yielding values in MPa^{1/2}. This parameter, introduced by Joel H. Hildebrand in the 1930s, effectively predicts for nonpolar systems but shows limitations with polar or hydrogen-bonding interactions, as it aggregates all intermolecular forces into a single scalar value. To overcome these shortcomings, Charles M. Hansen developed the Hansen solubility parameters (HSP) in 1967, decomposing δ into three orthogonal components reflecting distinct interaction types: δ_d for dispersion (van der Waals) forces, δ_p for polar (dipole-dipole) forces, and δ_h for (electron donor-acceptor) forces. The total Hildebrand parameter relates to these via δ = √(δ_d² + δ_p² + δ_h²), maintaining compatibility with the original framework. HSP values are determined experimentally through tests or group contribution methods, with units in MPa^{1/2}. Solubility prediction using HSP employs a three-dimensional "solubility " model, where a solute's parameters define a center point and interaction radius R_0, derived from empirical data against reference solvents. The relative distance Ra between solvent and solute coordinates is computed as Ra = √[4(δ_d,s - δ_d,t)² + (δ_p,s - δ_p,t)² + (δ_h,s - δ_h,t)²], where subscripts s and t denote solvent and test material, respectively; occurs if Ra < R_0, or equivalently if the relative energy difference RED = Ra / R_0 < 1. This approach enhances accuracy for complex systems, such as dissolution or dispersion, by weighting dispersion differences more heavily (factor of 4) to account for their ubiquity. For solvent blends, HSP are averaged by volume fractions, enabling tailored formulations.
Solventδ_d (MPa^{1/2})δ_p (MPa^{1/2})δ_h (MPa^{1/2})δ (MPa^{1/2})
n-Hexane14.90.00.014.9
15.12.94.415.9
Acetone15.510.47.019.9
15.88.819.426.5
15.516.042.347.8
These representative HSP values for common solvents illustrate the progression from nonpolar (low δ_p and δ_h) to highly associating types, aiding practical selection in applications like coatings and extractions. Empirical validation against diverse datasets confirms HSP's predictive power, though temperature dependence requires adjustments, as parameters decrease with rising temperature due to weakened interactions.

Chemical Properties

Reactivity and Stability

Solvents display a of chemical reactivity and stability influenced by molecular , environmental conditions, and exposure to reactive agents. Many organic solvents remain inert at ambient temperatures and pressures, facilitating their use in dissolving solutes without participating in reactions; however, stability diminishes under extremes like elevated temperatures, light, or contact with oxidants, acids, or bases. Empirical data from protocols indicate that nonpolar solvents such as hydrocarbons exhibit high thermal stability, with points and temperatures often exceeding 200°C, whereas polar solvents may undergo or thermal breakdown at lower thresholds. A prominent instability arises in ether-based solvents through , forming explosive peroxides upon prolonged exposure to atmospheric oxygen, particularly under or heat . and , for instance, generate hydroperoxides that concentrate during or , posing detonation risks from shock or ; safety guidelines recommend testing for peroxides via colorimetric assays and discarding solvents after 3-12 months of storage, depending on the type. This reactivity stems from the weak alpha C-H bonds in ethers, enabling radical chain : by trace metals or abstracts hydrogen, adds oxygen to form peroxy radicals, and termination yields peroxides. Halogenated solvents demonstrate reactivity via or , often triggered thermally or photolytically. (CHCl₃) decomposes above 400°C into and dichlorocarbene (:CCl₂), a reactive intermediate used in synthesis but hazardous in uncontrolled conditions; in the presence of oxygen or moisture, it can further yield (COCl₂), a toxic gas, emphasizing the need for stabilizers like in commercial formulations. Similarly, resists mild conditions but reacts explosively with alkali metals or under UV light to form carbenes. Polar aprotic solvents like N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) offer enhanced stability toward nucleophiles and electrophiles due to the absence of labile protons, maintaining integrity in reactions up to 150-200°C; however, DMF hydrolyzes under acidic or basic catalysis to dimethylamine and formic acid, while DMSO oxidizes to dimethyl sulfone with strong oxidants. These behaviors underscore causal dependencies on functional groups: carbonyls in amides confer resistance to oxidation but vulnerability to hydrolysis, whereas sulfoxides balance polarity with moderate thermal endurance. Storage under inert atmospheres and compatibility testing mitigate risks across solvent classes.

Applications

Industrial Processes

Solvents are integral to numerous industrial processes, particularly in extraction, , , and product formulation, where they facilitate the dissolution, separation, or dispersion of substances. In manufacturing sectors such as chemicals, paints, and metals, organic solvents like hydrocarbons and chlorinated compounds dissolve contaminants or resins, enabling efficient and processing. Global solvent demand reached approximately $38.6 billion in 2024, driven largely by these applications, with projections for growth to $61.95 billion by 2032 at a 6.1% CAGR, reflecting their indispensable role despite environmental pressures for recovery and alternatives. Solvent extraction is a primary in the and chemical industries, where solvents selectively dissolve target compounds from or liquid matrices. In production, is commonly employed to percolate through flaked oilseeds like soybeans, extracting up to 99% of the by into cellular structures at temperatures near the solvent's , followed by to recover both and solvent. This method dominates global , processing millions of tons annually, as it achieves higher yields than mechanical pressing alone. In , solvents such as kerosene-diluted extractants separate metals like or from leach solutions via liquid-liquid partitioning, enabling purification at scales exceeding thousands of tons per facility. Industrial cleaning and degreasing rely on solvents to remove oils, greases, and residues from metal parts and equipment, preventing and ensuring assembly integrity. Chlorinated solvents like or non-chlorinated alternatives such as n-propyl bromide are vapor-degreased in enclosed systems, where parts are immersed or exposed to boiling solvent vapors that condense and dissolve contaminants before draining back. This process is prevalent in and automotive , handling components with tolerances under 0.01 mm, and consumes significant volumes—organic solvents account for a substantial portion of the $10 billion U.S. industrial solvents market in 2024. Recovery techniques, including , reclaim up to 95% of used solvents in closed-loop systems to minimize waste. In paints and coatings production, solvents adjust , dissolve binders like resins, and aid application by enabling brushability or sprayability before evaporating to form durable films. Aromatic hydrocarbons such as or comprise 20-50% of solvent-based formulations, supporting a market segment valued at over $41 billion globally in 2024. These processes occur in high-volume batch or continuous reactors, where solvents are mixed under controlled temperatures (typically 20-60°C) to prevent premature , followed by and packaging. Transition to water-based systems has reduced solvent use by 30-50% in some formulations since the , but solvent-based variants persist for high-performance applications like automotive primers due to superior penetration and drying control.

Laboratory and Pharmaceutical Uses

In laboratories, solvents enable key operations such as dissolving reactants for synthesis, performing liquid-liquid extractions, recrystallizations for purification, and mobile phases in . (CH₂Cl₂) is frequently employed for extractions due to its higher density than (1.33 g/mL), facilitating , and its boiling point of 40°C, which allows easy removal post-extraction. and serve similar roles in extractions, though ether's high flammability limits its use in reactions involving oxidants. Acetone functions as a versatile solvent for cleaning glassware and dissolving polar compounds in reactions, with its in and low cost contributing to widespread adoption. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) and (DMF) are staples in organometallic reactions and formations, respectively, owing to their ability to solvate cations and stabilize transition states. In analytical laboratories, solvents like underpin (HPLC) for separating compounds based on polarity differences. and support spectroscopic analyses by dissolving samples without interfering absorption in UV-Vis or NMR ranges. In pharmaceutical applications, solvents act as reaction media during active pharmaceutical ingredient () synthesis, aids in extraction and purification of natural products, and vehicles in for oral, topical, and injectable . The U.S. (FDA) categorizes residual solvents by toxicity: Class 1 (e.g., , avoided due to carcinogenicity); Class 2 (e.g., , limited to 6000 ppm daily exposure); and Class 3 (e.g., , acetone, acceptable without limits as they pose negligible risk). Isopropyl alcohol extracts bioactive compounds from plants, while solubilizes APIs in syrups and creams to enhance . In crystallization, solvents like control polymorph formation, critical for stability and , as seen in the purification of antibiotics where solvent choice influences yield and purity above 99%. Residual solvent levels are monitored via to comply with ICH Q3C guidelines, ensuring levels below permissible daily exposures for .

Advanced Solvent Systems

Multicomponent Mixtures

Multicomponent solvent mixtures, comprising three or more distinct solvents, enable precise tuning of physicochemical properties such as parameters, , and constants, which are often unattainable with binary or single-component systems. These mixtures exploit synergistic interactions to expand the range, facilitating the dissolution of complex solutes in applications where pure solvents fall short. Thermodynamic modeling of such systems relies on approaches like excess expressions to predict , accounting for non-ideal behaviors arising from molecular interactions. In industrial contexts, multicomponent mixtures are employed to optimize extraction and processes, particularly in heavy oil recovery where diluents are blended with to reduce . Experimental data show that varying diluent concentrations from 7 to 70 wt% in such mixtures decreases linearly while drops exponentially, improving flow properties for . These systems require correlations for properties like K-values and to predict phase behavior under conditions. Advanced multicomponent systems, including deep eutectic solvents formed by donors and acceptors (e.g., choline chloride-urea mixtures), exhibit depressed melting points and tunable thermal stability, making them suitable for reaction media in multicomponent syntheses. Their physicochemical properties, such as low volatility and high , can be adjusted by component ratios, enhancing efficiency in processes like organic transformations. However, challenges persist in predictive modeling due to limited datasets, necessitating integrations for generalizable forecasts across diverse compositions. In pharmaceutical production, multicomponent solvent blends support by accommodating varied points and solubilities during synthesis and recovery, with systems designed to handle azeotropic behaviors in mixtures like ethanol-water-acetone. Such applications underscore the economic viability of solvent mixtures in broadening parameter optimization without introducing entirely new compounds.

Green and Bio-Based Solvents

Green solvents encompass substances engineered to diminish adverse environmental and effects relative to conventional petroleum-derived options, prioritizing attributes such as renewability, biodegradability, low , and reduced volatility. These solvents aim to mitigate issues like volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions and persistent pollution through strategies including emission avoidance and substitution of hazardous alternatives, though comprehensive life-cycle assessments reveal that not all purportedly "green" options achieve net reductions in impact without contextual evaluation. Bio-based solvents, a prominent subcategory, derive from renewable feedstocks like agricultural crops or lignocellulosic materials, enabling compatibility with existing processes while curbing dependence on non-renewable . Prominent examples include , obtained via microbial of edible or non-edible sugars, which stands as the most abundantly produced bio-solvent globally due to its versatility in extractions and reactions. Other bio-based variants encompass from , dihydrolevoglucosenone (Cyrene) from cellulose-derived levoglucosenone, and 2,5-dimethyl from sugars, each exhibiting aprotic or ethereal properties suitable for replacing toxic solvents like N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone or . These solvents often demonstrate comparable to fossil counterparts, with empirical studies confirming higher extraction yields for compounds like in bio-based mixtures versus traditional . Advantages of bio-based solvents include inherent biodegradability—many degrade via natural microbial pathways—and lower profiles, reducing occupational hazards in industrial applications such as coatings and pharmaceuticals. For instance, Cyrene supports supramolecular gel formation without the neurotoxic risks of , while 2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran offers stability under aprotic conditions with a of 98°C, facilitating energy-efficient recovery. However, production scalability remains constrained by feedstock competition with supplies and higher upfront energy demands in some cases, necessitating process optimizations for economic viability; claims of universal "greenness" overlook such trade-offs absent rigorous . Ongoing research emphasizes hybrid systems, like bio-based entrainers in , to enhance separation efficiency for platform chemicals such as .
In practice, bio-based solvents have facilitated sustainable recoveries, as in the use of novel biogenic options for bacterial extraction, yielding purities comparable to while minimizing waste via anti-solvent precipitation. Selection guides for these solvents prioritize metrics like Hansen solubility parameters and partition coefficients to ensure efficacy in acid recoveries, underscoring the need for empirical validation over anecdotal endorsements. Despite promotional narratives, systemic assessments indicate that while bio-based options lower direct emissions, full hinges on integrated rather than solvent substitution alone.

Health and Safety Considerations

Exposure Effects

Organic solvents primarily enter the body through due to their high volatility, with dermal absorption via contact representing a secondary route and being uncommon but possible in accidental cases. exposure occurs when solvent vapors are breathed in during like , degreasing, or , leading to rapid uptake into the bloodstream and distribution to lipid-rich tissues such as the . Dermal exposure allows solvents to penetrate the barrier, particularly for non-polar types like hydrocarbons, exacerbating risks in prolonged contact scenarios without protective barriers. Acute effects from high-level exposure predominantly involve central nervous system (CNS) depression, manifesting as , , light-headedness, , , , impaired coordination, and judgment, potentially progressing to , , or in severe instances. For inhalation, these symptoms arise from solvents' lipophilic nature enabling quick crossing of the blood-brain barrier, inducing narcosis akin to . Skin contact acutely causes irritation, dryness, rashes, or chemical burns, with some solvents like chlorinated hydrocarbons promoting defatting of the skin and increasing permeability to further absorption. Occupational data from NIOSH indicate that short-term overexposures, such as in confined spaces, have resulted in immediate CNS impairment documented in worker incident reports. Chronic low-level exposures are linked to persistent , including cognitive deficits, impairment, mood alterations, and sensory losses in vision and hearing, as evidenced by longitudinal studies of painters and factory workers. Hepatic and renal damage occurs from and metabolic stress, with solvents like causing elevated liver enzymes in exposed cohorts. Respiratory effects include chronic symptoms and reduced pulmonary function independent of , per epidemiological analyses. Certain solvents, notably , pose carcinogenic risks, with occupational exposures classified as leukemogenic by regulatory bodies based on cohort mortality data showing dose-dependent incidence. , including menstrual irregularities and sperm quality reduction, has been observed in chronically exposed populations, underscoring solvents' interference with endocrine and gametogenic processes. These outcomes reflect cumulative and neuronal plasticity disruption rather than acute overload, with recovery often incomplete even after cessation.

Hazard Mitigation and Regulations

Hazard mitigation for solvents primarily involves , administrative measures, and (PPE) to minimize exposure to flammability, , and volatility risks. Engineering controls include local exhaust ventilation systems to capture vapors at the source and general dilution ventilation to maintain airborne concentrations below permissible limits, as vapors from solvents like acetone or can ignite at concentrations as low as 2-12% in air. Storage practices require flammable solvents to be kept in approved cabinets or safety cans, separated from ignition sources and incompatibles such as oxidizers, with quantities limited to 25 gallons outside cabinets per OSHA standards to prevent propagation. Administrative controls encompass worker training on safe handling, spill response, and substitution with less hazardous alternatives where feasible, such as replacing chlorinated solvents with water-based cleaners to reduce dermal and inhalation risks. PPE selection depends on solvent properties; for example, nitrile gloves resist permeation by hydrocarbons like hexane, while respirators with organic vapor cartridges are mandated when engineering controls insufficiently limit exposure. Grounding and bonding during transfer prevent static sparks, critical for low-flash-point solvents like diethyl ether (flash point -45°C). In the United States, the (OSHA) enforces permissible exposure limits (PELs) under 29 CFR 1910.1000 Table Z-1, such as 200 ppm 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) for and 50 ppm for methyl ethyl ketone, with skin notation for absorbable solvents like indicating dermal uptake hazards. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), imposing bans or restrictions, as in the 2024 proposed workplace limits for methylene chloride reducing the 8-hour TWA from 25 ppm to 2 ppm due to cancer risks. In the , the REACH regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 mandates registration of solvents exceeding 1 tonne annually, requiring detailed risk assessments and authorization for substances of very high concern like , with derived no-effect levels (DNELs) guiding exposure controls. Globally, the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) standardizes labeling, classifying solvents by flammability categories (e.g., Category 1 for flash points below 23°C) and pictograms for . Compliance involves monitoring via air sampling and maintaining records, with violations subject to penalties; for instance, OSHA PEL exceedances can result in citations up to $15,625 per serious violation as of 2023 adjustments.

Environmental and Economic Impacts

Pollution Dynamics

Organic solvents enter the environment primarily through industrial emissions, accidental spills, discharges, and volatilization during use and storage. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvents such as , , and chlorinated ethenes like (TCE) and (PCE) evaporate readily into the atmosphere, contributing to . In water bodies and , solvents partition based on and ; polar solvents like and acetone dissolve easily, while denser non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) such as PCE (density 1.62 g/cm³) migrate downward, forming persistent plumes that spread laterally over distances exceeding hundreds of meters. In the atmosphere, solvent-derived VOCs undergo photochemical reactions with oxides () under sunlight, driving tropospheric formation and secondary organic production. For instance, aromatic solvents like exhibit high formation potential due to their reactivity, with contributions from solvent use accounting for up to 10-20% of urban VOC emissions in industrialized areas. Atmospheric lifetimes vary: short for reactive alkenes (hours to days) but longer for chlorinated solvents (weeks), enabling long-range transport before deposition as wet or dry fallout. Aquatic and subsurface dynamics favor persistence for many solvents, particularly chlorinated ones, which resist under aerobic conditions and degrade sequentially via reductive dechlorination in anaerobic aquifers, yielding daughter products like dichloroethene (DCE) and —often more toxic and mobile. TCE and PCE frequently exceed U.S. EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) of 5 μg/L and 5 μg/L, respectively, in , with USGS surveys detecting them in over 1% of U.S. wells at concentrations near or above MCLs, reflecting historical releases from and metal since the mid-20th century. and photolysis provide minor degradation pathways, but half-lives in water can span years without microbial intervention. Soil contamination involves adsorption to , retarding leaching for hydrophobic solvents like (log Koc ~2-3), though rainfall and preferential flow accelerate transport to . rates depend on microbial consortia; aliphatic solvents degrade faster (days to months) than aromatics or halocarbons, which may persist for decades in low-oxygen soils. Overall, solvent plumes expand via and dispersion, with retardation factors influencing migration velocity relative to (typically 0.1-1 m/day).

Market and Innovation Drivers

The global solvents market, valued at approximately USD 35 billion in 2024, is projected to grow at a (CAGR) of 4.4% to reach USD 43.4 billion by 2029, primarily driven by expanding demand in sectors such as paints and coatings, adhesives, and pharmaceuticals. Industrialization and in emerging economies, particularly in , accelerate this growth by increasing production of consumer goods, , and , where solvents facilitate processes like extraction, dissolution, and . Paints and coatings represent the largest end-use segment, accounting for over 30% of solvent consumption due to their role in formulating resins and pigments for automotive, construction, and packaging applications; demand here correlates directly with global construction output, which rose 3.2% in 2024 amid post-pandemic recovery. The pharmaceutical industry further propels market expansion, utilizing solvents for drug synthesis and purification, with high-purity variants like oxygenated solvents seeing heightened use as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) production scales in regions like India and China. Adhesives and sealants, driven by automotive and electronics assembly, also contribute significantly, as solvents enable viscosity control and bonding efficiency in high-volume manufacturing. Innovation in the solvent sector is predominantly propelled by regulatory mandates to reduce (VOC) emissions and , spurring development of low-toxicity alternatives since the early under frameworks like the U.S. Clean Air Act amendments and EU REACH regulations. Green and bio-based solvents, derived from renewable feedstocks such as or oils, address these pressures by offering comparable with lower environmental persistence; for instance, the green solvents market is forecasted to expand at a CAGR of over 20% through 2032, fueled by applications in coatings and cleaners. Advancements in solvent recovery technologies, including and supercritical extraction, enhance economic viability by up to 95% of used solvents in , reducing raw material costs and compliance burdens. These innovations are further incentivized by goals and consumer preferences for eco-labeled products, though adoption lags in cost-sensitive sectors without subsidies.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.