Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Actor
View on Wikipedia

An actor (masculine/gender-neutral), or actress (feminine), is a person who portrays a character in a production.[1] The actor performs "in the flesh" in the traditional medium of the theatre or in modern media such as film, radio, and television. The analogous Greek term is ὑποκριτής (hupokritḗs), literally "one who answers".[2] The actor's interpretation of a role—the art of acting pertains to the role played, whether based on a real person or fictional character. This can also be considered an "actor's role", which was called this due to scrolls being used in the theaters. Interpretation occurs even when the actor is "playing themselves", as in some forms of experimental performance art.
Formerly, in ancient Greece and the medieval world, and in England at the time of William Shakespeare, only men could become actors, and women's roles were generally played by men or boys.[3] While Ancient Rome did allow female stage performers, only a small minority of them were given speaking parts. The commedia dell'arte of Italy, however, allowed professional women to perform early on; Lucrezia Di Siena, whose name is on a contract of actors from 10 October 1564, has been referred to as the first Italian actress known by name, with Vincenza Armani and Barbara Flaminia as the first primadonnas and the first well-documented actresses in Italy (and in Europe).[4] After the English Restoration of 1660, women began to appear onstage in England. In modern times, particularly in pantomime and some operas, women occasionally play the roles of boys or young men.[5]
Terminology
[edit]While the word actor has existed for much of the history of English language, as to mean "one who does something",[6][better source needed] it was not used to refer to one who performs in theatre until the 16th century.[7]
The profession of acting possesses a significant amount of terminology, some of which is historically or contemporaneously contentious. This includes the term actress and less common player.
The term actress
[edit]According to the OED, the first occurrence of the term actress was in 1608 and is ascribed to Middleton. In the 19th century, many viewed women in acting negatively, as actresses were often courtesans and associated with promiscuity. Despite these prejudices, the 19th century also saw the first female acting "stars", most notably Sarah Bernhardt.[8]
After 1660, when women first started to appear on stage in England as well, the terms actor or actress were initially used interchangeably for female performers, but later, influenced by the French actrice, actress became the commonly used term for women in theater and film. The etymology is a simple derivation from actor with -ess added.[9] When referring to groups of performers of both sexes, actors is preferred.[10]
Within the profession, the re-adoption of the neutral term dates to the post-war period of the 1950s and '60s, when the contributions of women to cultural life in general were being reviewed.[11] When The Observer and The Guardian published their new joint style guide in 2010, it stated "Use ['actor'] for both male and female actors; do not use actress except when in name of award, e.g. Oscar for best actress".[10] The guide's authors stated that "actress comes into the same category as authoress, comedienne, manageress, 'lady doctor', 'male nurse' and similar obsolete terms that date from a time when professions were largely the preserve of one sex (usually men)." (See male as norm.) "As Whoopi Goldberg put it in an interview with the paper: 'An actress can only play a woman. I'm an actor – I can play anything.'"[10] The UK performers' union Equity has no policy on the use of "actor" or "actress". An Equity spokesperson said that the union does not believe that there is a consensus on the matter and stated that the "...subject divides the profession".[10] In 2009, the Los Angeles Times stated that "Actress" remains the common term used in major acting awards given to female recipients[12] (e.g., Academy Award for Best Actress).
Players
[edit]With regard to the cinema of the United States, the gender-neutral term "player" was common in the silent film era and the early days of the Motion Picture Production Code, but in the 2000s in a film context, it is generally deemed archaic.[citation needed] However, "player" remains in use in the theatre, often incorporated into the name of a theatre group or company, such as the American Players, the East West Players, etc. Also, actors in improvisational theatre may be referred to as "players".[13]
History
[edit]The first recorded case of a performing actor occurred in 534 BC (though the changes in the calendar over the years make it hard to determine exactly) when the Greek performer Thespis stepped onto the stage at the Theatre Dionysus to become the first known person to speak words as a character in a play or story. Before Thespis' act, Grecian stories were only expressed in song, dance, and in third person narrative. In honor of Thespis, actors are commonly called Thespians. The exclusively male actors in the theatre of ancient Greece performed in three types of drama: tragedy, comedy, and the satyr play.[14] This developed and expanded considerably under the Romans. The theatre of ancient Rome was a thriving and diverse art form, ranging from festival performances of street theatre, nude dancing, and acrobatics, to the staging of situation comedies, to high-style, verbally elaborate tragedies.
As the Western Roman Empire fell into decay through the 4th and 5th centuries, the seat of Roman power was moved eastward to Constantinople. Records show that mime, pantomime, scenes or recitations from tragedies and comedies, dances, and other entertainments were very popular. From the 5th century, Western Europe was plunged into a period of general disorder. Small nomadic bands of actors traveled around Europe throughout the period, performing wherever they could find an audience; there is no evidence that they produced anything but crude scenes.[15] Traditionally, actors were not of high status; therefore, in the Early Middle Ages, traveling acting troupes were often viewed with distrust. Early Middle Ages actors were denounced by the Church during the Dark Ages, as they were viewed as dangerous, immoral, and pagan. In many parts of Europe, traditional beliefs of the region and time meant actors could not receive a Christian burial.
In the Early Middle Ages, churches in Europe began staging dramatized versions of biblical events. By the middle of the 11th century, liturgical drama had spread from Russia to Scandinavia to Italy. The Feast of Fools encouraged the development of comedy. In the Late Middle Ages, plays were produced in 127 towns. These vernacular Mystery plays often contained comedy, with actors playing devils, villains, and clowns.[16] The majority of actors in these plays were drawn from the local population. Amateur performers in England were exclusively male, but other countries had female performers.
There were several secular plays staged in the Middle Ages, the earliest of which is The Play of the Greenwood by Adam de la Halle in 1276. It contains satirical scenes and folk material such as faeries and other supernatural occurrences. Farces also rose in popularity after the 13th century. At the end of the Late Middle Ages, professional actors began to appear in England and Europe. Richard III and Henry VII both maintained small companies of professional actors. Beginning in the mid-16th century, Commedia dell'arte troupes performed lively improvisational playlets across Europe for centuries. Commedia dell'arte was an actor-centred theatre, requiring little scenery and very few props. Plays were loose frameworks that provided situations, complications, and the outcome of the action, around which the actors improvised. The plays used stock characters. A troupe typically consisted of 13 to 14 members. Most actors were paid a share of the play's profits roughly equivalent to the sizes of their roles.

Renaissance theatre derived from several medieval theatre traditions, such as the mystery plays, "morality plays", and the "university drama" that attempted to recreate Athenian tragedy. The Italian tradition of Commedia dell'arte, as well as the elaborate masques frequently presented at court, also contributed to the shaping of public theatre. Since before the reign of Elizabeth I, companies of players were attached to the households of leading aristocrats and performed seasonally in various locations. These became the foundation for the professional players that performed on the Elizabethan stage.
The development of the theatre and opportunities for acting ceased when Puritan opposition to the stage banned the performance of all plays within London. Puritans viewed the theatre as immoral. The re-opening of the theatres in 1660 signalled a renaissance of English drama. English comedies written and performed in the Restoration period from 1660 to 1710 are collectively called "Restoration comedy". Restoration comedy is notorious for its sexual explicitness. At this point, women were allowed for the first time to appear on the English stage, exclusively in female roles. This period saw the introduction of the first professional actresses and the rise of the first celebrity actors.
19th century
[edit]
In the 19th century the negative reputation of actors was largely reversed, and acting became an honored, popular profession and art.[18] The rise of the actor as celebrity provided the transition, as audiences flocked to their favorite "stars". A new role emerged for the actor-managers, who formed their own companies and controlled the actors, the productions, and the financing.[19] When successful, they built up a permanent clientele that flocked to their productions. They could enlarge their audience by going on tour across the country, performing a repertoire of well-known plays, such as those by Shakespeare. The newspapers, private clubs, pubs, and coffee shops rang with lively debates evaluating the relative merits of the stars and the productions. Henry Irving (1838–1905) was the most successful of the British actor-managers.[20] Irving was renowned for his Shakespearean roles, and for such innovations as turning out the house lights so that attention could focus more on the stage and less on the audience. His company toured across Britain, as well as Europe and the United States, demonstrating the power of star actors and celebrated roles to attract enthusiastic audiences. His knighthood in 1895 indicated full acceptance into the higher circles of British society.[21]
20th century
[edit]By the early 20th century, the economics of large-scale productions displaced the actor-manager model. It was too hard to find people who combined a genius at acting as well as management, so specialization divided the roles as stage managers and later theatre directors emerged. Financially, much larger capital was required to operate out of a major city. The solution was corporate ownership of chains of theatres, such as by the Theatrical Syndicate, Edward Laurillard, and especially The Shubert Organization. By catering to tourists, theaters in large cities increasingly favored long runs of highly popular plays, especially musicals. Big name stars became even more essential.[22]
Techniques
[edit]
- Classical acting is a philosophy of acting that integrates the expression of the body, voice, imagination, personalizing, improvisation, external stimuli, and script analysis. It is based on the theories and systems of select classical actors and directors including Konstantin Stanislavski and Michel Saint-Denis.
- In Stanislavski's system, also known as Stanislavski's method, actors draw upon their own feelings and experiences to convey the "truth" of the character they portray. Actors puts themselves in the mindset of the character, finding things in common to give a more genuine portrayal of the character.
- Method acting is a range of techniques based on for training actors to achieve better characterizations of the characters they play, as formulated by Lee Strasberg. Strasberg's method is based upon the idea that to develop an emotional and cognitive understanding of their roles, actors should use their own experiences to identify personally with their characters. It is based on aspects of Stanislavski's system. Other acting techniques are also based on Stanislavski's ideas, such as those of Stella Adler and Sanford Meisner, but these are not considered "method acting".[25]
- Meisner technique requires the actor to focus totally on the other actor as though they are real and they only exist in that moment. This is a method that makes the actors in the scene seem more authentic to the audience. It is based on the principle that acting finds its expression in people's response to other people and circumstances. Is it based on Stanislavski's system.
Cross-gender acting
[edit]
Having an actor dress as the opposite sex for comic effect is a long-standing tradition in comic theatre and film. Most of Shakespeare's comedies include instances of overt cross-dressing, such as Francis Flute in A Midsummer Night's Dream. The movie A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum stars Jack Gilford dressing as a young bride.[26] Tony Curtis and Jack Lemmon famously posed as women to escape gangsters in the Billy Wilder film Some Like It Hot. Cross-dressing for comic effect was a frequently used device in most of the Carry On films. Dustin Hoffman and Robin Williams have each appeared in a hit comedy film (Tootsie[27] and Mrs. Doubtfire, respectively) in which they played most scenes dressed as a woman.
Occasionally, the issue can be complicated, for example, by a woman playing a woman acting as a man—who then pretends to be a woman, such as Julie Andrews in Victor/Victoria, or Gwyneth Paltrow in Shakespeare in Love. In It's Pat: The Movie, film-watchers never learn the gender of the androgynous main characters Pat and Chris (played by Julia Sweeney and Dave Foley). Similarly, in The Marriage of Figaro, there is a scene in which Cherubino (a male character portrayed by a woman) dresses up and acts like a woman; the other characters in the scene are aware of a single level of gender role obfuscation, while the audience is aware of two levels.
Women playing male roles are uncommon in film, with notable exceptions. In 1982, Stina Ekblad played the mysterious Ismael Retzinsky in Fanny and Alexander, and Linda Hunt received the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress for playing Billy Kwan in The Year of Living Dangerously. In 2007, Cate Blanchett was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress for playing Jude Quinn, a fictionalized representation of Bob Dylan in the 1960s, in I'm Not There.
Modern examples
[edit]A few modern roles are played by a member of the opposite sex to emphasize the gender fluidity of the role. Edna Turnblad in Hairspray was played by Divine in the 1988 original film, Harvey Fierstein in the Broadway musical, and John Travolta in the 2007 movie musical. Eddie Redmayne was nominated for an Academy Award for playing Lili Elbe (a trans woman) in 2015's The Danish Girl.[28]
As non-binary and transgender characters have become more commonplace in media, including film, it has become more common for cisgender actors to play those characters, such as Hilary Swank starring as Brandon Teena in Boys Don't Cry.[29] Conversely, transgender actors may play cross-gender roles, especially before public transition, such as Elliot Page playing as Shawna Hawkins in the Tales of the City miniseries.
Women in acting
[edit]
Formerly, in some societies, only men could become actors. Women appearing on stage in public have been viewed as controversial, provocative and not respectable, and male actors often played the female roles in plays. In Europe and elsewhere, there have been periods of women being barred from acting or placed in restricted roles.
In ancient Greece and ancient Rome[30] and the medieval world, it was considered disgraceful for a woman to go on stage. Nevertheless, women did perform in Ancient Rome, and again entered the stage in the Commedia dell'arte in Italy in the 16th century; in 1562, Lucrezia Di Siena became the perhaps first professional actress since Ancient Rome. France and Spain also had female actors in the 16th century. In William Shakespeare's England, however, women's roles were generally played by men or boys.[3]
Antiquity
[edit]In ancient Greece, women were barred from appearing on stage. There were only male actors in Ancient Greek theatre, and male actors played the female parts in plays. There have even been speculations as to whether women were allowed to watch plays as members of the audience as well.
In contrast to Ancient Greek theatre, Ancient Roman theatre did allow female performers. While the majority of them were seldom employed in speaking roles but rather for dancing, there was a minority of actresses in Rome employed in speaking roles, and also those who achieved wealth, fame and recognition for their art, such as Eucharis, Dionysia, Galeria Copiola and Fabia Arete, and they also formed their own acting guild, the Sociae Mimae, which was evidently quite wealthy.[31][32] The profession of acting seemingly died out in late antiquity.
Middle ages
[edit]During the Middle Ages, a broad spectrum of genres of theatre were performed. These genres included mystery plays, morality plays, farces and masques.
The actors performing in the medieval theatre genres were normally not professional actors. Rather, they were amateurs who were temporarily engaged to perform a role in a production staged on a temporary basis during some sort of festivity.
The amateurs engaged to perform in religious plays were typically drawn from their sponsoring church congregations, and the common thing was to engage men to perform also the female parts.[33] However, women were not explicitly banned, and there were cases in which women were appointed to play. In 1514, for example, women were engaged to perform all the female plays in the Bozen Passion Play in the city of Bolzano.[33]
Renaissance Europe
[edit]Women in Europe first started to appear on stage professionally during the Renaissance. They first did so in Italy, Spain and France. In the mid-17th century, they started to appear on stage in The Holy German Empire and in The Netherlands. England was late to allow women to appear on stage, but they finnally did so in the 1660s.

The first professional company of actors since antiquity in which the names of the members are known by name are from Padova in 1545; the name of the actors of that company were all men, and since no name of any professional actress is known prior to Lucrezia, it has been assumed that there were no actresses before.[34] During the entry of king Henri II and Catherine de Medici to Lyon in 1548, the tragicomedy La Calandria by Bernardo Dovizi was performed by both male and female actors from Italy, of which Brantome noted that it was "very well performed by the actors and actresses, who were very beauiful, spoke very well, and were extremely graceful".[34] However, it is not known if the Italian actors that performed this play were professional actors, or if they were people temporary engaged to participate in the festivities by staging a play, which would not have been uncommon for women during this time period.[34] A letter from Mantova in 1562 mention an unnamed actress from Rome performing with "Moorish dances".[34] Lucrezia Di Siena, whose name is on an acting contract in Rome from 10 October 1564, has been referred to as the first Italian actress known by name, with Vincenza Armani and Barbara Flaminia as the first primadonnas and the first well-documented actresses in Italy (and Europe).[4] From the 1560s onward, actresses became the norm in Italian theaters, and when Italian theater companies toured abroad, Italian actresses became the first women actors performing in many countries.
Women also started to appear on stage outside of Italy during the 16th century. During the Spanish Golden Age theatre (1590–1641), women performed on stage from the very beginning. Ana Muñoz toured and performed in the theater company of actor-manager Antonio de Villegas after their marriage in 1589, and took over the company herself after his death;[35] Jerónima de Burgos performed with her husband in the theater company of Alonso de Cisneros and Jerónimo Velázquez, touring Portugal as well as Spain during the 1590s;[36] and Micaela de Luján (c. 1570–1614) became the role model for Carmila Lucinda by Lope de Vega;[37] all of them worked as actresses during the 1590s.
In France, women appear to have performed in the travelling theater companies early on during the 16th century, though the exact time the first actress appeared is hard to determin. Prior to the establishment of the first permanent theatre in Paris, the actors of the travelling theatre companies are not well documented regardless of their sex. While professional French actresses were reportedly active in France in the second half of the 16th century, they are seldom mentioned by name and then normally only very briefly. Nine contemporary actresses beside Marie Vernier are briefly mentioned: Jeanne Crevé, Judith Le Messier, Elisabeth Diye, Mlle Dufresne, Isabelle Paquette Le Gendre, Francoise Petit, Marguerite Dugoy, Renée Berenger and Rachel Trepeau, but only Marie Vernier and Rachel Trepeau are documented to any large degree.[38] Marie Vernier, known also as Mlle La Porte, was the leading lady and co-director of Valleran-Lecomte's theatre company, which performed in Hôtel de Bourgogne in Paris and toured the country and the Spanish Netherlands from a least 1604 onward.[38]
17th to 19th centuries
[edit]

Following the Renaissance, the art of theatre spread across Europe also outside of the countries the previously enjoyed Italian or English style theatre. Theatre started to develop independently also in the rest of Europe, that experienced its first native professional actors and theatres in the 17th and 18th centuries.
This also created new attitudes to the issue of women performing on stage, since every country now formed their own opinions in the issue. The outcome was that women actors started to appear one by one in each country; sometimes after a law reform explicitly allowing them to act, and sometimes simply as a matter of slow informal development, when individual theater managers started to employ women. This appeared in different times in different countries. In some countries that had native actors, like the Holy Roman Empire and The Netherlands, this happened earlier. In some countries, like the Nordic countries, Poland and Russia, this happened later, simply because they did not have a native theater with native actors until relatively late in time.
In Germany and the Netherlands, women started to perform in the native travelling theatre companies in the mid-17th century. The first actresses were normally the wives and daughters of the theater managers, and their presence were accepted since they performed in a family company under supervision of a father or husband. Initially they were not allowed to perform in the permanent city theatres, but soon they made their debut there as well. On April 19, 1655, Ariana Nozeman made her debut at the stage of the Schouwberg of Van Kampen in Amsterdam in a play by Jan Jacobsz. Schipper which bore her name 'Onvergelijkelijke Ariana' ('Incomparable Ariana'), and thus became the first woman to play a leading role in a public play in The Dutch Republic.[39] The debut of women on stage in Germany appear to have taken place the same year. In September 1655, "female players" are noted to have been performed in Frankfurt for the first time.[40] Under Magister Velthen and his father-in-law Carl Andreas Paulsen, the first actresses were employed in Germany. Velthens wife Catharina Elisabeth Velten acted with her mother and sister on stage in first in her father's and then in her husband's theater, the Hochdeutsche Hofcomödianten, and after her husband's death, she managed his theater and continued his policy of employing women.[41]
England was late in introducing women on the stage compared to the rest of Western Europe. In the first half of the 17th century, women were still not allowed on the English stage. The English audience were first introduced to female actors by visiting foreign theatre companies. The perhaps first actress to perform in England was the Italian actress Angelica Martinelli,[42] a member of a visiting Italian Commedia dell'arte company, who performed in England as early as 1578.[43] The rare occurrence of foreign actresses during visits by foreign theatre companies, however, did not result in an English reform, and there were no professional native English actresses. In November 1629, a French theatre company was allowed to make a guest appearance at the Blackfriars Theatre in London, during which the actresses were "hissed, booed and pippin - pelted from the stage".[44] When an eighteen-year Puritan prohibition of drama was lifted after the English Restoration of 1660, women began to appear on stage in England. Margaret Hughes is often credited as the first professional actress on the English stage.[45] The prohibition against female actors ended during the reign of Charles II in part because he enjoyed watching actresses on stage.[46] Specifically, Charles II issued letters patent to Thomas Killigrew and William Davenant, granting them the monopoly right to form two London theatre companies to perform "serious" drama, and the letters patent were reissued in 1662 with revisions allowing actresses to perform for the first time.[47]
In rest of Europe, the debut of women actors came later. However, this was normally not because of a ban on female actors, as had been the case in Western Europe, but rather because of the fact that Northern and Eastern Europe came late in establishing a national theater with professional native actors of their own. In Northern and Eastern Europe, foreign actresses appeared onstage decades before there were any native actors of any gender.
One example of this was Sweden. There was never any ban for women performing on the stage in Sweden, and women appear to have performed on stage as soon as the first foreign theatre companies including women members visited Sweden. In 1653, a Dutch theatre company performed at the royal court of queen Christina; this theatre company included female members - Ariana Nozeman, Elisabeth de Baer and Susanna van Lee who are believed to have been the likely first actresses to perform in Sweden.[48] However, Sweden relied on foreign theatre companies for a long time and it took decades after the 1650s until natve Swedish actresses appeared. The first national theatre to employ professional native actors, the Kungliga svenska skådeplatsen was inaugurated at the Stora Bollhuset in 1737; it is noted to have employed three female actors from the start, one of whom being Beata Sabina Straas.[49]
In Russia, the first theatre was founded in Moscow by the Tsar in 1672. This theatre did employ women actors, but all actors were foreigners (mainly German). The following decades, many foreign theater companies, mainly from Italy, France and Germany, were active in Moscow and Saint Petersburg. However, it was not until the 30th August 1756 Decree of the Imperial Theatres that native Russians were, for the first time, recruited to be educated in acting. The pioneer group of Russian actors consisted of fourteen men - Grigorij Jemeljanov, Pavel Ivanov, Kozma Lukjanov, Fjodor Maksimov, Evstafij Grigorjev, Luka Ivanov, Prokofij Prikaznyj, Fjodor Volkov, Grigorij Volkov, Ivan Dmitrevskij, Aleksej Popov, Gavrila Volkov, Jakov Sjumskij and Michail Tjulkov - and five women; Avdotya Mikhailova, Elizaveta Zorina, Maria Ananyin, Olga Ananyin and Agrafena Musina-Pushkina.[50]
In Poland-Lithuania, Italian, French and German theatre and opera companies had performed at the royal court since the 16th century. The first public theatre, the National Theatre, Warsaw, was founded in 1765, and the first pioneering group of native Polish actors were employed and trained to perform there. Women were members of this pioneer acting groupe from the start, and Antonina Prusinowska and Wiktoria Leszczyńska is credited as the first two native female actors in Poland.[51]
In some cases, this did not occur until the 19th century. After the independence of Greece in 1830, a great interest in theatre flourished in Greece. Initially amateur theatre, a professional theatre developed, and the first modern permanent theatre in Athens, the Boukoura Theatre, was founded in 1840. In professional theatre, women's roles were initially played by men or by foreign (Italian) actresses. The first Greek actress being Maria Angeliki Tzivitza, who performed in the Boukoura Theatre on 24 November 1840, and retired after two performances. In September 1842, N. Skoufos, Dimitrios Levidis, Alexandros Rizos Rangavis and Grigoris Kampouroglou founded the Athenian Theatre Committee or Society of Theatre with the intent to educate professional Greek actors in Athens. Male actors were swiftly hired, but it was difficult to find women because the profession was not considered respectable for women. Ekaterina Panayotou signed her contract for the Society of Theatre in Athens on 8 November 1842 and became the first female actor hired, followed by Athena Filipaki, Marigo Defteridi and Marigo Domestini. She has the distinction of being the first professional Greek actress with formal training.[52]
East Asian theatre
[edit]In Japan, onnagata, or men taking on female roles, were used in kabuki theatre when women were banned from performing on stage during the Edo period; this convention continues. In some forms of Chinese drama such as Beijing opera, men traditionally performed all the roles, including female roles, while in Shaoxing opera women often play all roles, including male ones.[53]
Middle East
[edit]
In the 1850s, the modern theatre was founded in the Ottoman Empire during the Tanzimat era by an Armenian theatre company, and Arousyak Papazian was reportedly the first female actor to perform onstage, making her debut in 1857 as a member in the Hekimian theatre company, where she was engaged in 1857–1859.[54] Before becoming an actress, she worked as a teacher.[55] From 1861, she was engaged at the Arevelian Tatron (Oriental Theater) [56] and she also toured with the company, such as to İzmir in 1867. As Muslims did not consider acting a suitable profession for a woman, who were expected to live in harem sex segregation, the first actors in the Ottoman Empire were Christian Armenians; and as the stigma of the profession was especially severe for women, the actresses received a higher salary than their male colleagues, and they could also continue their careers undisturbed after the Armenian theatre monopoly was abolished in the Ottoman Empire in 1879.[54] After this point, male Armenian actors found competition from Muslim Turkish male actors, while no Muslim Turkish female actor ever performed on stage before Afife Jale in the 1920s.[54]
In 1870, the modern theater was founded in Egypt with the foundation of the theater company of the theater pioneer Yaqub Sanu. The modern theater art, imported from the Western world, demanded female actors to play female roles. While Yaqub Sanu was able to acquire indigenous male actors, he experienced great difficulty to engage indigenous Egyptian female actors. In this time period, women in Egypt were normally segregated in harems and veiled in public and it was not accepted for a Muslim woman to engage in acting.[57] Yaqub Sanu was allowed to employ women to act on stage since it was seen as necessary, but he was forced to engage non-Muslim women. He was eventually able to employ two poor Jewish girls: Milia Dayan and her sister. The Dayan sisters are known as the first actresses in the Arab world alongside Miriam Samat, Warda Milan, Mathilde Nagga and the sisters Ibriz Estati and Almaz Estati, all of whom were non-Muslim women.[57] The first Muslim actress did not appear in Egypt and the Arab world until Mounira El Mahdeya in 1915.[58]
Modern roles
[edit]
In modern times, women occasionally play the roles of boys or young men. For example, the stage role of Peter Pan is traditionally played by a woman, as are most principal boys in British pantomime. Opera has several "breeches roles" traditionally sung by women, usually mezzo-sopranos. Examples are Hansel in Hänsel und Gretel, Cherubino in The Marriage of Figaro and Octavian in Der Rosenkavalier.
In the 2000s, women playing men in live theatre is particularly common in presentations of older plays, such as Shakespearean works with large numbers of male characters in roles where gender is inconsequential.[5]
Compensation
[edit]The profession of acting has always had a large breadth of potential incomes. Some actors in 1600s England earned a comfortable income,[62] with Shakespeare himself likely earning 6 shillings per week during his early acting career,[63] which was a typical wage for a skilled tradesman.[64]
In 2024, the median hourly wage for actors in the United States was $23.33 per hour.[65] Many lack benefits such as health insurance, with only 12.7% of SAG-AFTRA members earning enough income to qualify for its health plan.[66] Full-time actors in Britain earned a median of £22,500 in the same year, slightly less than the minimum wage.[67]
Despite lower median incomes in the profession, some actors earn exceedingly large incomes. Film actors such as Aamir Khan[nb 1][69] and Sandra Bullock[70] have earned tens of millions of dollars for single film productions.
In the United States, union child actors are paid a daily rate of at least $1,204,[71][better source needed] although due to their legal status as minors, most or all of the income chiefly goes to the parents or legal guardians. In California, the Coogan Act requires 15% of a child's earnings be placed into a blocked trust account, to be opened when they become a legal adult.[72] Illinois, New York, New Mexico, and Louisiana all have similar requirements.[73]
Gender pay gap
[edit]The examples and perspective in this section deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (December 2018) |
In 2015, Forbes reported that "...just 21 of the 100 top-grossing films of 2014 featured a female lead or co-lead, while only 28.1 percent of characters in 100 top-grossing films were female...".[74] "In the U.S., there is an "industry-wide [gap] in salaries of all scales. On average, white women earn 78 cents to every dollar a white man makes, while Hispanic women earn 56 cents to a white male's dollar, black women 64 cents and Native American women just 59 cents to that."[74] Forbes' analysis of US acting salaries in 2013 determined that the "...men on Forbes' list of top-paid actors for that year made 2+1/2 times as much money as the top-paid actresses. That means that Hollywood's best-compensated actresses made just 40 cents for every dollar that the best-compensated men made."[75][76][77]
Types
[edit]
Actors working in theatre, film, television, and radio have to learn specific skills. Techniques that work well in one type of acting may not work well in another type of acting.
In theatre
[edit]To act on stage, actors need to learn the stage directions that appear in the script, such as "Stage Left" and "Stage Right". These directions are based on the actor's point of view as they stand on the stage facing the audience. Actors also have to learn the meaning of the stage directions "Upstage" (away from the audience) and "Downstage" (towards the audience).[79] Theatre actors need to learn blocking, which is "...where and how an actor moves on the stage during a play". Most scripts specify some blocking. The Director also gives instructions on blocking, such as crossing the stage or picking up and using a prop.[79]
Some theater actors need to learn stage combat, which is simulated fighting on stage. Actors may have to simulate hand-to-hand fighting or sword-fighting. Actors are coached by fight directors, who help them learn the choreographed sequence of fight actions.[79]
In film
[edit]Silent films
[edit]
From 1894 to the late 1920s, movies were silent films. Silent film actors emphasized body language and facial expression, so that the audience could better understand what an actor was feeling and portraying on screen. Much silent film acting is apt to strike modern-day audiences as simplistic or campy. The melodramatic acting style was in some cases a habit actors transferred from their former stage experience. Vaudeville theatre was an especially popular origin for many American silent film actors.[80] The pervading presence of stage actors in film was the cause of this outburst from director Marshall Neilan in 1917: "The sooner the stage people who have come into pictures get out, the better for the pictures". In other cases, directors such as John Griffith Wray required their actors to deliver larger-than-life expressions for emphasis. As early as 1914, American viewers had begun to make known their preference for greater naturalness on screen.[81]

Pioneering film directors in Europe and the United States recognized the different limitations and freedoms of the mediums of stage and screen by the early 1910s. Silent films became less vaudevillian in the mid-1910s, as the differences between stage and screen became apparent. Due to the work of directors such as D W Griffith, cinematography became less stage-like, and the then-revolutionary close-up shot allowed subtle and naturalistic acting. In America, D.W. Griffith's company Biograph Studios, became known for its innovative direction and acting, conducted to suit the cinema rather than the stage. Griffith realized that theatrical acting did not look good on film and required his actors and actresses to go through weeks of film acting training.[83]
Lillian Gish has been called film's "first true actress" for her work in the period, as she pioneered new film performing techniques, recognizing the crucial differences between stage and screen acting. Directors such as Albert Capellani and Maurice Tourneur began to insist on naturalism in their films. By the mid-1920s many American silent films had adopted a more naturalistic acting style, though not all actors and directors accepted naturalistic, low-key acting straight away; as late as 1927, films featuring expressionistic acting styles, such as Metropolis, were still being released.[81]
According to Anton Kaes, a silent film scholar from the University of Wisconsin, American silent cinema began to see a shift in acting techniques between 1913 and 1921, influenced by techniques found in German silent film. This is mainly attributed to the influx of emigrants from the Weimar Republic, "including film directors, producers, cameramen, lighting and stage technicians, as well as actors and actresses".[84]
The advent of sound in film
[edit]
Film actors have to learn to get used to and be comfortable with a camera being in front of them.[86] Film actors need to learn to find and stay on their "mark". This is a position on the floor marked with tape. This position is where the lights and camera focus are optimized. Film actors also need to learn how to prepare well and perform well on-screen tests. Screen tests are a filmed audition of part of the script.
Unlike theater actors, who develop characters for repeat performances, film actors lack continuity, forcing them to come to all scenes (sometimes shot in reverse of the order in which they ultimately appear) with a fully developed character already.[83]
"Since film captures even the smallest gesture and magnifies it..., cinema demands a less flamboyant and stylized bodily performance from the actor than does the theater." "The performance of emotion is the most difficult aspect of film acting to master: ...the film actor must rely on subtle facial ticks, quivers, and tiny lifts of the eyebrow to create a believable character."[83] Some theatre stars "...have made the theater-to-cinema transition quite successfully (Laurence Olivier, Glenn Close, and Julie Andrews, for instance), others have not..."[83]
In television
[edit]"On a television set, there are typically several cameras angled at the set. Actors who are new to on-screen acting can get confused about which camera to look into."[79] TV actors need to learn to use lav mics (Lavaliere microphones).[79] TV actors need to understand the concept of "frame". "The term frame refers to the area that the camera's lens is capturing."[79] Within the acting industry, there are four types of television roles one could land on a show. Each type varies in prominence, frequency of appearance, and pay. The first is known as a series regular—the main actors on the show as part of the permanent cast. Actors in recurring roles are under contract to appear in multiple episodes of a series. A co-star role is a small speaking role that usually only appears in one episode. A guest star is a larger role than a co-star role, and the character is often the central focus of the episode or integral to the plot.
In radio
[edit]
Radio drama is a dramatized, purely acoustic performance, broadcast on radio or published on audio media, such as tape or CD. With no visual component, radio drama depends on dialogue, music and sound effects to help the listener imagine the characters and story: "It is auditory in the physical dimension but equally powerful as a visual force in the psychological dimension."[87]
Radio drama achieved widespread popularity within a decade of its initial development in the 1920s. By the 1940s, it was a leading international popular entertainment. With the advent of television in the 1950s, however, radio drama lost some of its popularity, and in some countries has never regained large audiences. However, recordings of OTR (old-time radio) survive today in the audio archives of collectors and museums, as well as several online sites such as Internet Archive.
As of 2011[update], radio drama has a minimal presence on terrestrial radio in the United States. Much of American radio drama is restricted to rebroadcasts or podcasts of programs from previous decades. However, other nations still have thriving traditions of radio drama. In the United Kingdom, for example, the BBC produces and broadcasts hundreds of new radio plays each year on Radio 3, Radio 4, and Radio 4 Extra. Podcasting has also offered the means of creating new radio dramas, in addition to the distribution of vintage programs.
The terms "audio drama"[88] or "audio theatre" are sometimes used synonymously with "radio drama" with one possible distinction: audio drama or audio theatre may not necessarily be intended specifically for broadcast on radio. Audio drama, whether newly produced or OTR classics, can be found on CDs, cassette tapes, podcasts, webcasts, and conventional broadcast radio.
Thanks to advances in digital recording and Internet distribution, radio drama is experiencing a revival.[89]
See also
[edit]- Bit part
- Body double
- Cameo appearance
- Cast member
- Character actor
- Child actor
- Commedia dell'arte
- Dramatis personæ
- Droll
- Extra (acting)
- Farce
- GOTE
- Kabuki
- Leading actor
- Lists of actors
- Matinee idol
- Meisner technique
- Mime artist
- Movie star
- Music hall
- Pantomime
- Pornographic film actor
- Practical Aesthetics
- Presentational and representational acting
- Supporting actor
- Understudy
- Vaudeville
- Voice acting
Notes
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "The dramatic world can be extended to include the 'author', the 'audience' and even the 'theatre'; but these remain 'possible' surrogates, not the 'actual' referents as such" (Elam 1980, 110).
- ^ "Definition of actor". Archived from the original on January 16, 2013.Hypokrites (related to our word for hypocrite) also means, less often, "to answer" the tragic chorus. See Weimann (1978, 2); see also Csapo and Slater, who offer translations of classical source material using the term hypocrisis (acting) (1994, 257, 265–267).
- ^ a b Neziroski, Lirim (2003). "narrative, lyric, drama". Theories of Media :: Keywords Glossary :: multimedia. University of Chicago. Retrieved 14 March 2009.
For example, until the late 1600s, audiences were opposed to seeing women on stage, because of the belief stage performance reduced them to the status of showgirls and prostitutes. Even Shakespeare's plays were performed by boys dressed in drag.
- ^ a b Giacomo Oreglia (2002). Commedia dell'arte. Ordfront. ISBN 91-7324-602-6
- ^ a b JULIET DUSINBERRE. "Boys Becoming Women in Shakespeare's Plays" (PDF). S-sj.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 July 2008. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
- ^ Harper, Douglas. "actor". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 20 August 2025.
- ^ "actor". Oxford Learner Dictionaries. Retrieved 20 August 2025.
- ^ 'Studies in hysteria': actress and courtesan, Sarah Bernhardt and Mrs Patrick Campbell
- ^ "actress, n.". Oxford English Dictionary (3 ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. November 2010.
Although actor refers to a person who acts regardless of gender, where this term "is increasingly preferred", actress remains in general use; actor is increasingly preferred for performers of both sexes as a gender-neutral term.
- ^ a b c d Pritchard, Stephen (24 September 2011). "The readers' editor on... Actor or actress?". Theguardian.com. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
- ^ Goodman, Lizbeth; Holledge, Julie (1998). The Routledge reader in gender and performance. New York: Routledge. p. 8. ISBN 0-415-16583-0.
- ^ Linden, Sheri (18 January 2009). "From actor to actress and back again". Entertainment. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 14 March 2009.
It would be several decades before the word "actress" appeared – 1700, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, more than a century after the word "actor" was first used to denote a theatrical performer, supplanting the less professional-sounding "player."
- ^ Spolin, Viola (1999). Improvisation for the Theater: A Handbook of Teaching and Directing Techniques (3rd ed.). Evanston, Ill: Northwestern Univ Press. pp. Introduction to the 3rd Edition. ISBN 0810140004. OCLC 41176682.
- ^ Brockett and Hildy (2003, 15–19).
- ^ Brockett and Hildy (2003, 75)
- ^ Brockett and Hildy (2003, 86)
- ^ Adams, Joseph Quincy (1960). Shakespearean Playhouses. Gloucester, Mass.: P. Smith. p. 162. LCCN 61000908.
- ^ Wilmeth, Don B.; Bigsby, C.W.E. (1998). The Cambridge history of American theatre. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 449–450. ISBN 978-0-521-65179-0.
- ^ James Eli Adams, ed., Encyclopedia of the Victorian era (2004) 1:2-3.
- ^ George Rowell, Theatre in the Age of Irving (Rowman & Littlefield, 1981).
- ^ Jeffrey Richards (2007). Sir Henry Irving: A Victorian Actor and His World. A&C Black. p. 109. ISBN 9781852855918.
- ^ Foster Hirsch, The Boys from Syracuse: The Shuberts' Theatrical Empire (Cooper Square Press, 2000).
- ^ Brando, Marlon; Lindsey, Robert (1994). Brando: Songs My Mother Taught Me. Random House. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-679-41013-3.
- ^ "Method To The Madness: 3 Actors That Took Method Acting To The Next Level". New York Film Academy. 11 November 2015.
- ^ Guerrasio, Jason. (19 December 2014) What It Means To Be 'Method' Archived 2017-06-23 at the Wayback Machine. Tribecafilminstitute.org. Retrieved on 2016-02-10.
- ^ Lester, Richard (director) (1966). A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum. Event occurs at 1:05:34 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Kael, Pauline (2011). The age of movies : selected writings of Pauline Kael. New York: Library of America. p. 708. ISBN 978-1-59853-109-1. OCLC 1330351456 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Andrea Mandell, Can Eddie Redmayne nab Oscar No. 2?, 20 December 2015, USA Today
- ^ "Boys Don't Cry Acting Credits". Movies & TV Dept. The New York Times. 2015. Archived from the original on November 17, 2015. Retrieved October 6, 2015.
- ^ "BBC - Radio 4 - Woman's Hour -Women Actors in Ancient Rome". Bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
- ^ Pat Easterling, Edith Hall: Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession
- ^ Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. (2002). Kiribati: Cambridge University Press. p. 294
- ^ a b Katritzky, M. (2017). Women, Medicine and Theatre 1500–1750: Literary Mountebanks and Performing Quacks. Storbritannien: Taylor & Francis.
- ^ a b c d Barasch, Frances K. "Italian Actresses in Shakespeare's World: Flaminia and Vincenza". Shakespeare Bulletin, vol. 18, no. 4, 2000, pp. 17–21. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26355889. Accessed 6 Aug. 2025.
- ^ Prieto, Andrés (2001). Teoría del arte dramático (in Spanish). Editorial Fundamentos. ISBN 978-84-245-0888-3.
- ^ "Jerónima de Burgos". Real academia de la historia. Läst 12 januari 2020.
- ^ Huerta, Javier; Peral, Emilio; Urzaiz, Héctor (2005). Teatro español de la A a la Z. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe. pp. 426–7.
- ^ a b Scott, Virginia (2010). Women on the stage in early modern France : 1540-1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521896757.
- ^ van Elk, Martine (2017), van Elk, Martine (ed.), "Staging Female Virtue: Elizabeth Cary and Katharina Lescailje", Early Modern Women's Writing: Domesticity, Privacy, and the Public Sphere in England and the Dutch Republic, Early Modern Literature in History, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 215–253, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33222-2_6, ISBN 978-3-319-33222-2, retrieved 2023-01-16
- ^ The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Women on Stage. (2020). Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p. 183
- ^ Historical Dictionary of German Theater. (n.d.). (n.p.): (n.p.). p. 3-4
- ^ Duffin, R. W. (2018). Some Other Note: The Lost Songs of English Renaissance Comedy. USA: Oxford University Press. p. 193
- ^ M.A. Katritzky: Women, Medicine and Theatre 1500–1750: Literary Mountebanks and Performing
- ^ The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Women on Stage. (2020). Tyskland: Springer International Publishing. p.182
- ^ "Smallweed". The Guardian. 23 July 2005. Archived from the original on 22 April 2009.
"Whereas women's parts in plays have hitherto been acted by men in the habits of women ... we do permit and give leave for the time to come that all women's parts be acted by women," Charles II ordained in 1662. According to Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, the first actress to exploit this new freedom was Margaret Hughes, as Desdemona in Othello on December 8, 1660.
- ^ "Women as actresses" (PDF). Notes and Queries. The New York Times. 18 October 1885. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 14 March 2009.
There seems no doubt that actresses did not perform on the stage till the Restoration, in the earliest years of which Pepys says for the first time he saw an actress upon the stage. Charles II, must have brought the usage from the Continent, where women had long been employed instead of boys or youths in the representation of female characters.
- ^ Fisk, Deborah Payne (2001). "The Restoration Actress". In Owen, Susan J. A companion to restoration drama, pg. 73, (1. publ. ed.). Oxford [u.a.]: Blackwell. ISBN 978-0631219231.
- ^ Gunilla Dahlberg: Komediantteatern i 1600-talets Stockholm (1992)
- ^ Byström, Tryggve, Svenska komedien 1737-1754: en studie i Stockholmsteaterns historia, Norstedt, Stockholm, 1981
- ^ Бубнова О. В. От Локателли — к Медоксу, от Медокса — к «Дому Щепкина» Архивная копия от 1 октября 2009 на Wayback Machine // «Наше Наследие»
- ^ Laurence Senelick: National Theatre in Northern and Eastern Europe, 1746-1900, 1991
- ^ Walter Puchner, Andrew White:Greek Theatre between Antiquity and Independence
- ^ Richard Gunde, Culture and Customs of China (2002), page 63.
- ^ a b c Köksal, Duygu; Falierou, Anastasia (2013-10-10). A Social History of Late Ottoman Women: New Perspectives. BRILL. p. 40. ISBN 9789004255258.
- ^ Köksal, Duygu; Falierou, Anastasia (2013-10-10). A Social History of Late Ottoman Women: New Perspectives. BRILL. p. 41. ISBN 9789004255258.
- ^ Duygu Köksal,Anastasia Falierou: A Social History of Late Ottoman Women: New Perspectives. (2013). Nederländerna: Brill.
- ^ a b Middle East News Weekly Research Review. (1962). Egypten: Middle East News, p. 36
- ^ Rubin, D. (1999). World Encyclopedia of Contemporary Theatre Volume 4: The Arab World. Storbritannien: Routledge.
- ^ "Viola Davis Reaches EGOT Status". Forbes. Retrieved July 30, 2024.
- ^ "The 100 Most Influential People in the World". Time. April 18, 2012. Archived from the original on April 22, 2012.
- ^ "The 100 Most Influential People in the World: Viola Davis". Time. Archived from the original on April 20, 2017. Retrieved April 21, 2017.
- ^ Oates, Mary I.; Baumol, William J. (March 1972). "On the Economics of the Theater in Renaissance London". Swedish Journal of Economics. 74 (1): 136. doi:10.2307/3439014. JSTOR 3439014.
- ^ Hume, Robert D. (August 2017). "Shakespeare's Money: How Much Did He Make and What Did This Mean?". Book review. Modern Philology. 115 (1). doi:10.1086/691310.
- ^ "Currency converter: 1270–2017". The National Archives. Retrieved 17 September 2025.
- ^ "Occupational Outlook Handbook – Actors". Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Archived from the original on 25 April 2025. Retrieved 17 September 2025.
- ^ Delouya, Samantha (17 July 2023). "Why celebrities are striking: The average pay for actors may surprise you". CNN. Retrieved 19 September 2025.
- ^ Ehlinger, Arthur; Thomas, Amy; et al. "UK Audiovisual Performers (2024)" (PDF). CREATe. Retrieved 19 September 2025 – via the British Equity Collecting Society.
- ^ "Field Listings – Exchange Rates". The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. Archived from the original on 14 December 2018.
- ^ Upadhyaya, Prakash (6 July 2017). "Aamir Khan's remuneration for Dangal: This is the amount the actor takes home after China release". International Business Times. Retrieved 21 October 2017.
- ^ Galloway, Stephen (26 February 2014). "Sandra Bullock to Make $70 Million (At Least) for 'Gravity' (Exclusive)". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 26 February 2014.
- ^ Carson, Nancy (23 April 2025). "How Much Do Child Actors Make?". Retrieved 20 September 2025.
- ^ Cal. Family Code § 6752
- ^ "Coogan Law". SAG–AFTRA. Retrieved 20 September 2025.
- ^ a b "Jennifer Lawrence Speaks Out On Making Less Than Male Co-Stars". Forbes.com. 13 October 2015. Retrieved 2016-02-10.
- ^ Woodruff, Betsy. (23 February 2015) Gender wage gap in Hollywood: It's very, very wide. Slate.com. Retrieved on 2016-02-10.
- ^ "How much do Hollywood campaigns for an Oscar cost?". Stephenfollows.com. 12 January 2015. Retrieved 2 May 2016.
- ^ Female Movie Stars Experience Earnings Plunge After Age 34. Variety (7 February 2014). Retrieved on 2016-02-10.
- ^ Brooks, Xan (26 January 2021). "Judi Dench: 'In my mind's eye I'm six foot and willowy and about 39'". The Irish Times. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f "Industry Tips". Archived from the original on 26 March 2014. Retrieved 4 April 2014.
- ^ Lewis, John (2008). American Film: A History (First ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-97922-0.
- ^ a b Brownlow, Kevin (1968). "Acting". The Parade's Gone By. University of California Press. pp. 344–353. ISBN 9780520030688.
- ^ Arthur Hornblow Jr. (August 1915). "Norma Talmadge: Post-Impression of a Girl of the Photoplays Who Has Enacted Every Sort of Feminine Role, From Childhood to Old Age". Photoplay. p. 99.
- ^ a b c d "Movies and Film". infoplease.com.
- ^ Kaes, Anton (1990). "Silent Cinema". Monatshefte.
- ^ Sherrow, Victoria (2006). Encyclopedia of Hair: A Cultural History. Westport, CT, US: Greenwood Press. p. 70. ISBN 978-0313331459. OCLC 61169697 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ "Auditions for Film: Movie Acting Tips and Techniques". Ace-your-audition.com. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
- ^ Tim Crook: Radio drama. Theory and practice Archived 1 July 2014 at the Wayback Machine. London; New York: Routledge, 1999, p. 8.
- ^ Compare the entry to Hörspiel e.g. in: dict.cc – Deutsch-Englisch-Wörterbuch
- ^ Newman, Barry (25 February 2010). "Return With Us to the Thrilling Days Of Yesteryear—Via the Internet". Wall Street Journal.
Sources
[edit]- Csapo, Eric, and William J. Slater. 1994. The Context of Ancient Drama. Ann Arbor: The U of Michigan P. ISBN 0-472-08275-2.
- Elam, Keir. 1980. The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. New Accents Ser. London and New York: Methuen. ISBN 0-416-72060-9.
- Weimann, Robert. 1978. Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater: Studies in the Social Dimension of Dramatic Form and Function. Ed. Robert Schwartz. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-8018-3506-2.
Further reading
[edit]- An Actor's Work by Constantin Stanislavski
- A Dream of Passion: The Development of the Method by Lee Strasberg (Plume Books, ISBN 0-452-26198-8, 1990)
- Sanford Meisner on Acting by Sanford Meisner (Vintage, ISBN 0-394-75059-4, 1987)
- Letters to a Young Actor by Robert Brustein (Basic Books, ISBN 0-465-00806-2, 2005)
- The Empty Space by Peter Brook (1st ed by Atheneum, ISBN 0-689-70558-1, 1968)
- The Technique of Acting by Stella Adler (Bantam Books, ISBN 0-553-05299-3, 1988)
External links
[edit]
Media related to Actors at Wikimedia Commons
- Screen Actors Guild (SAG): a union representing U. S. film and TV actors.
- Actors' Equity Association (AEA): a union representing U. S. theatre actors and stage managers.
- American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA): a union representing U. S. television and radio actors and broadcasters (on-air journalists, etc.).
- British Actors' Equity: a trade union representing UK artists, including actors, singers, dancers, choreographers, stage managers, theatre directors and designers, variety and circus artists, television and radio presenters, walk-on and supporting artists, stunt performers and directors and theatre fight directors.
- Media Entertainment & Arts Alliance: an Australian/New Zealand trade union representing everyone in the media, entertainment, sports, and arts industries.
Actor
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Terminology
Core Definition
An actor is a person who interprets and embodies a fictional or historical character in performances across mediums such as theater, film, television, or radio, utilizing vocal modulation, physical gesture, and emotional expression to convey the role's internal experiences and external actions to an audience.[6][7] This portrayal demands the actor to inhabit an imagined circumstance, temporarily supplanting their own identity with that of the character through rehearsed techniques that simulate authenticity.[8] The term originates from the Latin āctor, denoting a "doer" or "agent" derived from agō ("to do" or "to drive"), which entered Middle English around the late 14th century to describe individuals who actively perform or plead causes, evolving specifically to signify stage players by the 16th century.[3] In contrast to broader performers—such as musicians or dancers who may entertain without narrative impersonation—actors focus on character-driven storytelling, often drawing from scripted dialogue and director guidance to construct believable personas within a dramatic framework.[9][10] This distinction underscores acting as a disciplined craft rooted in psychological realism and technical skill, rather than mere display.[11]Historical and Evolving Terms
The term "actor" derives from the Latin āctor, meaning "doer" or "agent," entering Middle English around the late 14th century initially to denote a legal pleader or general performer of actions, before specifically applying to theatrical performers by the 16th century.[3] In ancient Greek theater, from which Western acting traditions stem, performers were termed hupokritēs (ὑποκριτής), meaning "one who answers" or "interpreter," referring to their role in responding in dialogue; Thespis of Icaria, active around 534 BCE, is credited as the first to step out from the chorus as a individualized character, originating the term "thespian" for actors.[12] Roman theater adopted similar roles under terms like histrio for professional players, often implying low social status, while medieval European performers were commonly called "minstrels," "troubadours," or "jongleurs," encompassing singers, storytellers, and mimics rather than scripted impersonators.[13] The distinction between "actor" and "actress" arose with the professionalization of theater and the entry of women onto public stages. In England, prior to 1660, female roles were played by boys or men, with "actor" serving as the default term; King Charles II's decree in 1660 permitted women to perform, coinciding with the term "actress" gaining usage, though its earliest recorded English appearance dates to 1586 in William Warner's poetry, denoting a female doer or stage player.[14] [15] By the 18th century, "actress" was standard for women, reflecting linguistic patterns of adding the feminine suffix -ess to distinguish sexes in professions, as seen in contemporaneous terms like "authoress"; this binary persisted through the 19th century, when theater guilds and awards formalized separate categories for male actors and female actresses.[16] In the 20th century, terminology began evolving toward inclusivity, with "actor" reclaiming gender-neutral status in professional contexts by the mid-century, as female performers like those in Hollywood increasingly self-identified as "actors" to parallel male counterparts without diminutive connotations.[17] This shift accelerated post-1970s amid broader feminist linguistic reforms, though "actress" retained niche use in awards (e.g., Academy Awards separating "Best Actor" and "Best Actress" since 1929) and historical references; by the 21st century, major unions like SAG-AFTRA officially endorse "actor" for all genders in non-award contexts, reflecting data from industry directories where over 70% of female respondents preferred the term by 2010 surveys.[18][19]Debates on Gender-Neutral Language
The distinction between "actor" and "actress" has historically denoted male and female performers, respectively, with "actress" emerging in the late 16th century as a feminine form of "actor," derived from Latin roots via French, to specify women in a profession initially dominated by men.[15] Following the 1660 allowance of women on English stages under Charles II, the term gained widespread use by the early 1700s to differentiate female practitioners amid evolving social norms.[17] This binary terminology persisted through the 20th century, reflecting biological sex differences in casting and performance, as evidenced by separate award categories in major ceremonies like the Academy Awards, which maintained distinct Best Actor and Best Actress honors as of the 97th Oscars in 2025.[20] Proponents of gender-neutral language argue that "actor" should encompass all performers to promote inclusivity and avoid the perceived diminutive suffix "-ess," which some view as outdated or lesser, aligning with broader feminist shifts since the 1970s toward desexing professional titles.[18] This view has gained traction in recent years, particularly with non-binary performers advocating for merged categories to recognize talent irrespective of gender identity, as seen in 2023 discussions at the Screen Actors Guild Awards where nominees debated consolidation.[21] Empirical trends show increasing self-identification as "actor" among female performers, with linguistic data from platforms like Reddit indicating a decline in "actress" usage since the 2010s, driven by institutional preferences in casting calls and media descriptions.[22] Critics contend that abandoning "actress" erodes recognition of sex-specific achievements, as separate categories empirically ensure female winners—data from Oscar history reveals that gender-neutral fields like directing yield fewer women (only three female Best Director winners since 1929 versus consistent actress honors).[23] This perspective attributes the push for neutrality to ideological pressures rather than linguistic evolution, noting that merging could statistically disadvantage women given male dominance in high-profile roles, as argued in analyses of award outcomes where sex-segregated honors balance visibility.[24] Traditionalists, including performers like those cited in 2009 Los Angeles Times reports, emphasize that "actress" honors distinct physical and performative realities tied to sex, rejecting neutral terms as a form of erasure that ignores causal differences in audience appeal and industry barriers.[16] Despite these debates, major awards like the Oscars resisted full merger as of June 2024 proposals, prioritizing empirical equity over symbolic change.[25]Historical Development
Ancient and Classical Acting
Acting originated in ancient Greece during religious festivals dedicated to Dionysus, evolving from dithyrambic choral hymns into dramatic performances by the mid-6th century BC. The poet Thespis of Icaria is recognized as the innovator who introduced the first individual actor, stepping forward from the chorus to deliver spoken dialogue opposite the group, thereby inventing tragedy as a distinct form. This occurred around 534 BC at the City Dionysia festival in Athens, where Thespis reportedly won the first recorded competition for tragic performance using a cart as a primitive stage.[26][27] Subsequent developments expanded the actor's role: Aeschylus, active from approximately 525 to 456 BC, introduced a second actor to enable conflict between characters, while Sophocles, from about 496 to 406 BC, added a third, allowing for intricate plots involving up to 10-15 roles played by the same trio of men. All parts, including female ones, were performed by males, who donned painted linen masks with exaggerated features to convey emotion, identity, and vocal projection across amphitheaters seating 15,000 or more. These masks, combined with elevated platform shoes (cothurni) and flowing robes (chitons), facilitated rapid role changes and ensured visibility from afar, while the chorus—typically 12 to 15 masked members—narrated, commented on action, and embodied collective societal perspectives.[28][29][30] Greek actors enjoyed relative prestige as public servants funded by the state, receiving civic awards like olive crowns or tripods for victories, though they were often professionals from lower classes rather than elites. In his Poetics (c. 335 BC), Aristotle analyzed acting within tragedy as part of "spectacle" (opsis), the least essential element after plot, character, and diction, arguing that effective drama relies on imitation of purposeful action rather than mere visual or performative display.[31][32] Roman theatre, emerging in the 4th century BC under Etruscan and Greek influences, adapted these forms but emphasized spectacle and stock characters in permanent stone theaters like the Theatre of Pompey (55 BC). Playwrights Plautus (c. 254–184 BC) and Terence (c. 195–159 BC) dominated comedy, adapting Greek New Comedy originals into fast-paced farces featuring scheming slaves, brash soldiers, and lovers, performed by all-male troupes using masks and minimal scenery. Unlike Greek actors, Roman performers—frequently slaves, convicts, or freedmen—occupied an infamis status, legally barred from voting, holding office, or marrying freely due to associations with public degradation and prostitution, despite drawing crowds of 20,000 to urban games funded by magistrates.[33][34][35]Medieval to Renaissance Periods
In the medieval period, following the decline of Roman theatre around the 5th century, dramatic performances reemerged through liturgical dramas within churches, evolving by the 10th century into more elaborate vernacular plays depicting biblical stories. These expanded into mystery cycles, such as the York, Chester, and Wakefield plays performed annually from the 14th to mid-16th centuries, often on the feast of Corpus Christi, with guilds assigning roles based on trade relevance—tanners portraying the Fall of Lucifer, for instance. Actors were primarily local amateurs, including craftsmen and townsfolk, who took on multiple roles across pageant wagons that paraded through streets, using exaggerated gestures and costumes to convey moral and religious narratives to illiterate audiences.[36][37] Morality plays, emerging around the early 15th century, shifted focus to allegorical depictions of human virtue versus vice, as in Everyman (c. 1495), where performers again drew from community members rather than dedicated professionals, reinforcing communal piety amid feudal structures. Acting techniques emphasized rhetorical delivery and symbolic action over psychological depth, with all roles typically played by men, and performances occurring outdoors without fixed theatres due to ecclesiastical and civic restrictions on secular entertainment. The social status of these actors remained low, akin to vagrants or jesters, as professionalization was absent and participation served didactic rather than vocational purposes.[38] The Renaissance, spanning roughly the 14th to 17th centuries, marked a shift toward secular and professional acting, influenced by rediscovered classical texts and humanism. In Italy, commedia dell'arte troupes formed by the mid-16th century, featuring masked, improvised performances of stock characters like Harlequin and Pantalone by itinerant professionals who honed ensemble skills through lazzi (comic routines), enabling widespread touring across Europe. These actors, often from lower classes, achieved modest economic stability via patronage but faced intermittent bans for perceived immorality.[39][40] In England, professional companies proliferated from the 1570s, spurred by Queen Elizabeth I's 1572 statute licensing troupes under noble patronage to distinguish them from vagabonds; the Admiral's Men, led by Edward Alleyn, operated from 1576, while the Lord Chamberlain's Men, including Richard Burbage, formed in 1594 and built the Globe Theatre in 1599 for 3,000 spectators. Actors became shareholders in cooperative enterprises, training apprentices (often boys for female roles until 1660) in verse delivery, swordplay, and makeup, performing up to 30 plays per season blending tragedy, comedy, and history. This era elevated acting to a craft demanding versatility and public appeal, though actors endured social stigma and plague closures, such as in 1593 and 1603.[41][42]18th and 19th Centuries
![William Hogarth - David Garrick as Richard III - Google Art Project.jpg][float-right] The 18th century marked a transition in acting from the stylized declamation of earlier periods to more naturalistic expressions, driven by performers who emphasized emotional authenticity over rhetorical flourish. David Garrick (1717–1779), often credited with revolutionizing English acting, introduced subtler gestures and facial expressions that conveyed inner psychology, contrasting the bombastic conventions prevalent before his debut in 1741.[43] As manager of Drury Lane Theatre from 1747 to 1776, Garrick reformed stage practices, including banning audiences from the stage and improving lighting to focus attention on performers, thereby professionalizing the craft and elevating actors' social status.[44] His influence extended to promoting Shakespearean works with historical accuracy in costumes and settings, fostering a deeper interpretive approach among actors.[45] Sarah Siddons (1755–1831), a dominant figure in late 18th-century tragedy, exemplified this evolving style through her commanding presence and psychological depth in roles like Lady Macbeth, which she performed over 50 times at Covent Garden starting in 1782.[46] Siddons' performances, marked by intense emotional realism rather than mere spectacle, drew acclaim for their verisimilitude, influencing contemporaries and establishing women as central to serious drama.[47] Theater expansion during this era, with new playhouses built across London and provinces, supported rising actor popularity, though playwriting quality varied amid sentimental comedies and moralistic works.[48] In the 19th century, acting styles initially retained romantic exaggeration in melodrama, which peaked in the 1840s with stock characters, sensational plots, and physical comedy to captivate mass audiences in burgeoning urban theaters.[49] Performers like Edmund Kean emphasized fiery individualism, but by mid-century, a shift toward ensemble coordination and scenic realism emerged, paralleling industrial-era demands for authenticity.[50] Henry Irving (1838–1905), as actor-manager of the Lyceum Theatre from 1878 to 1902, advanced these trends through lavish, historically researched productions of Shakespeare, integrating advanced gas and electric lighting for atmospheric effects and prioritizing collaborative staging over solo stardom.[48] Knighted in 1895 as the first actor so honored, Irving's partnership with Ellen Terry exemplified nuanced character work, bridging romantic excess with proto-modern naturalism that influenced global theater practices.[51] This period saw acting professionalize further, with actor-managers controlling repertory companies and touring circuits expanding reach, though critiques noted persistent reliance on star vehicles amid uneven textual innovation.[48] By century's end, foundational steps toward 20th-century realism were evident, as performers increasingly drew from observed human behavior to achieve believable portrayals.[50]20th Century Innovations
The 20th century marked a shift toward psychological realism in acting, primarily through Konstantin Stanislavski's system, which emphasized internal emotional preparation and truthful character portrayal over external gesture. Stanislavski refined this approach from the late 19th century into the 1930s via the Moscow Art Theatre, using techniques like the "magic if" to explore characters' motivations and affective memory to draw from personal experiences for authenticity.[52][53] His methods reacted against 19th-century declamatory styles, prioritizing causal links between actors' psyches and performance outcomes.[54] In the United States, Stanislavski's ideas evolved into Method acting through the Group Theatre, founded in 1931, where Lee Strasberg, Stella Adler, and Harold Clurman adapted them for American contexts. Strasberg, directing at the Actors Studio from 1948 onward, intensified focus on sensory recall and emotional substitution, training actors to relive personal traumas for role depth, as seen in practitioners like Marlon Brando and Marilyn Monroe.[55][56] This approach contrasted with Adler's emphasis on imagination over personal dredging, highlighting debates on psychological risks versus efficacy.[57] Film's rise amplified these innovations, as silent-era exaggeration yielded to naturalistic subtlety post-1927 sound synchronization in The Jazz Singer, demanding nuanced vocal delivery and facial expressions captured by close-ups. Method-influenced actors like Brando in A Streetcar Named Desire (1951) demonstrated mumblecore naturalism, influencing Hollywood's post-World War II realism amid audience demand for relatable portrayals.[54][58] Television, commercialized from the 1940s with widespread adoption by 1950, introduced serialized continuity and live performance pressures, fostering improvisational adaptability in shows like I Love Lucy (1951–1957). Actors adapted film techniques to smaller screens, prioritizing consistency across episodes over theatrical grandeur, though technical constraints limited innovation until multi-camera setups stabilized delivery.[59][60]21st Century Shifts
The proliferation of streaming platforms since the early 2000s has fundamentally altered actors' career trajectories and compensation structures. Services like Netflix and Hulu expanded opportunities for serialized roles and global distribution, enabling actors to reach wider audiences without traditional theatrical releases, but residuals have diminished compared to broadcast TV due to viewership-based models rather than rerun royalties.[61][62] This shift contributed to the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strikes, where actors secured AI protections and modest wage hikes amid concerns over streaming's erosion of mid-tier earnings.[63] Technological advancements, including digital cameras and performance capture, have redefined on-screen acting demands. The transition from film to digital in the early 2000s allowed for more flexible shooting but emphasized subtle, naturalistic performances suited to post-production enhancements like CGI, as seen in motion-capture roles requiring physical precision for virtual rendering.[64] Audition processes evolved with self-tapes becoming standard by the 2010s, reducing in-person calls and favoring actors adept at remote submissions, though this democratized access while intensifying competition.[65] Virtual reality and AI tools are integrating into training, hybridizing pedagogy to simulate diverse scenarios.[66] Social media platforms have introduced a new variable in casting, where follower counts can amplify visibility and influence decisions, particularly for marketing-driven projects. Casting directors increasingly view online presence as a proxy for audience draw, though talent remains paramount; actors with large followings, like those leveraging TikTok for reels, gain auditions akin to resume boosts.[67][68] This trend accelerated post-2010, blending performance skill with digital branding.[69] The COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 accelerated digital pivots, shuttering live theaters and slashing UK ticket sales by 93% in 2020, prompting adaptations like virtual performances and outdoor venues.[70][71] Post-recovery, theaters grapple with reduced audiences and persistent hybrid models, fostering immersive and site-specific formats that demand versatile actor skills beyond traditional stages.[72][73] Diversity in casting rose through the 2010s, with people of color comprising 29.2% of 2023 film leads, driven by audience preferences for representative content that boosted box office returns.[74][75] However, 2024 data shows declines, with directors of color directing 20.2% of top films versus 22.9% in 2023, amid industry contraction and scrutiny of institutional initiatives.[76] These trends reflect market incentives over mandated equity, as diverse casts correlate with higher viewership among underrepresented demographics.[77]Acting Techniques and Training
Foundational Methods
Konstantin Stanislavski's system, developed starting in the late 1880s, forms the bedrock of modern actor training by emphasizing psychological realism and internal emotional authenticity over the declamatory, externalized styles prevalent in 19th-century European theatre.[52][78] Stanislavski, a Russian practitioner born in 1863, co-founded the Moscow Art Theatre in 1898 to implement naturalistic performances, refining his techniques through trial and error until his death in 1938.[52] This approach countered the era's reliance on exaggerated gestures and rhetorical delivery, which prioritized spectacle and audience address rather than character-driven truth.[78] Central to the system is the principle of "experiencing" a role, where actors draw on personal emotional recall to generate genuine responses analogous to the character's, rather than merely imitating surface behaviors.[79] Key tools include the "Magic If," prompting actors to ask, "What if I were in this situation?" to foster imaginative entry into the character's psyche.[79][80] Complementary is analysis of "given circumstances"—the script's factual environment, including time, place, and relationships—to ground the performance in concrete reality.[81] Actors break scenes into "units" or beats, each defined by a specific objective: the character's immediate want, pursued through actionable tasks that build toward super-objectives spanning the play.[81][79] Emotional memory involves summoning past personal experiences to evoke required feelings, while sense memory extends this to sensory details like textures or smells for embodied recall.[82] Later evolutions incorporated the "method of physical action," prioritizing sequential, truthful behaviors to organically trigger inner states, as physicality drives psychology rather than vice versa.[52] These elements demand rigorous discipline, including concentration exercises and relaxation to eliminate "superficial" habits, ensuring performances arise from causal internal processes rather than rote memorization.[83] Stanislavski's framework, disseminated via his 1930s books like An Actor Prepares, influenced global training by 1920s tours of the Moscow Art Theatre, establishing realism as the empirical standard for truthful representation.[80] Prior methods, such as François Delsarte's 19th-century gesture classifications, provided precursors in expressive anatomy but lacked the system's focus on lived causality.[84]Modern Approaches and Variations
In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, acting techniques evolved to address limitations in psychological realism, incorporating greater emphasis on physicality, ensemble dynamics, and spontaneous response to meet the demands of diverse performance forms like devised theatre and multimedia productions.[85] These variations often prioritize external stimuli and collective creation over solitary emotional recall, reflecting a shift toward collaborative and adaptable practices.[86] The Meisner Technique, developed by Sanford Meisner in the 1930s as a counterpoint to the introspective Method acting derived from Stanislavski, focuses on instinctive reactions through repetitive exercises that train actors to listen and respond authentically in the moment.[87] Core principles include "living truthfully under imaginary circumstances," achieved via the repetition exercise where partners mirror observations to strip away self-consciousness and foster genuine interaction, rather than relying on personal memory.[88] Meisner, a founding member of the Group Theatre, taught at the Neighborhood Playhouse from 1936 onward, influencing actors like Robert Duvall and Diane Keaton by emphasizing behavioral truth over affective recall.[89] This approach gained renewed prominence in contemporary training programs, with over 100 studios worldwide offering Meisner-based classes as of 2024, due to its utility in screen acting where subtle, reactive performances are prized.[90] Viewpoints, originating from choreographer Mary Overlie's Six Viewpoints in the 1970s and expanded by directors Anne Bogart and Tina Landau into nine physical and six vocal elements by the 1990s for the SITI Company, treats the performer's body as a primary tool for composition and spatial awareness.[91] Key components include tempo, duration, kinesthetic response, and topography, encouraging actors to improvise within ensemble structures to explore time, space, and shape without predetermined psychological intent.[86] Bogart and Landau's adaptation, detailed in their 2004 book, promotes a postmodern framework that liberates performers from script-bound psychology, fostering collective invention as seen in SITI's productions since 1992.[92] This method has influenced over 50 theatre companies globally by 2020, particularly in experimental and physical theatre, by prioritizing observation and movement over internal motivation.[93] The Suzuki Method, created by Japanese director Tadashi Suzuki in the 1970s through his Suzuki Company of Toga, integrates rigorous physical disciplines inspired by Noh theatre and martial arts to build stamina, precision, and expressive power. Fundamental exercises, such as foot-stomping patterns and statue poses sustained for hours, aim to center the actor's energy in the lower body, enhancing vocal projection and presence without verbal cues.[94] Suzuki's philosophy posits that true acting stems from a unified body-mind, countering Western emotionalism with stylized discipline; training sessions, often daily for six hours, have trained thousands since the method's formalization in 1976.[95] Adopted internationally via workshops, it emphasizes cultural universality through physical fundamentals, impacting practitioners like those in the Saratoga International Theatre Institute since 1992.[96] Practical Aesthetics, formulated by David Mamet and William H. Macy in the 1980s and refined at the Atlantic Theater Company, distills acting to objective script analysis and behavioral action, rejecting sensory recall as unreliable.[97] Actors break scenes into "beats" of action—what the character wants and does—focusing on truthful behavior derived from text rather than backstory, as outlined in their 1997 training manual.[98] This "no-nonsense" variant, taught to over 1,000 students annually at Atlantic programs by 2023, appeals to film and TV work by streamlining preparation to four questions per scene, promoting efficiency over introspection.[97] These approaches collectively adapt to modern contexts, such as short-form digital content, by valuing adaptability and physical immediacy over exhaustive character immersion.[99]Professional Training Pathways
Professional actors pursue training through diverse pathways, including conservatory programs, university degrees, apprenticeships, and independent study, with formal education being the most common route for skill development and industry entry. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics notes that while some succeed without it, most actors obtain formal preparation via acting conservatories, college drama programs, or workshops to build techniques in voice, movement, improvisation, and scene study.[1] A 2018 Backstage survey indicated that approximately 60% of actors received some formal training, often through structured programs emphasizing practical performance over theoretical study.[100] Conservatories offer intensive, immersion-style training typically lasting two to three years, prioritizing daily classes in acting fundamentals, physicality, and repertory performance under professional mentorship. Institutions like the American Academy of Dramatic Arts provide a two-year Associate of Occupational Studies program focused on discipline, technique, and industry access, graduating students ready for auditions.[101] Similarly, the Pacific Conservatory of the Performing Arts runs a two-year professional actor training sequence, building from foundational skills to advanced audition and business preparation, with participants performing in public productions.[102] The Juilliard School, originating as the Institute of Musical Art in 1905, expanded to include drama training that equips actors with tools for classical and contemporary work through rigorous ensemble practice.[103] These programs, often non-degree or certificate-based, emphasize replicable craft over innate talent alone, though success rates remain low industry-wide, with specialized programs like Made in NY reporting 80% graduate placement in full-time work within three months.[63] University-based pathways integrate acting with broader academics, offering Bachelor of Fine Arts (BFA) undergraduate degrees or Master of Fine Arts (MFA) graduate programs that culminate in theses via produced roles. The University of Washington's three-year MFA, for instance, demands full-day training in diverse techniques alongside contemporary performance, fostering adaptability for professional stages.[104] Yale's School of Drama, established in 1924 with roots in the 1900 Yale Dramatic Association, provides comprehensive MFA training across acting, design, and production, producing alumni who dominate Broadway and film.[105] The University of North Carolina's three-year MFA Acting (Professional Actor Training Program) pairs studio work with repertory seasons at PlayMakers Repertory Company, including digital showcases for agents.[106] These academic routes, while costing time and tuition, correlate with higher employability through networking and credentials, as evidenced by alumni placement data from top programs.[63] Apprenticeships and regional theater attachments represent hands-on alternatives, where aspiring actors join equity companies for paid or low-paid roles under veteran supervision, gaining credits without full-time schooling. Independent pathways, including self-directed workshops, private coaching, and online classes, suit autodidacts but demand self-discipline; resources like books by master teachers or local intensives can replicate conservatory rigor, though formal training edges out in providing verifiable skills and connections.[107] Overall, no pathway guarantees success—only 2% of actors sustain a living wage—but empirical patterns favor structured training for mitigating the field's 98% attrition rate after one year.[108]Mediums and Types of Acting
Theatre and Live Performance
Theatre acting involves the live portrayal of scripted characters before an audience, demanding sustained energy and immediate adaptability without the safety of retakes available in recorded media.[109] Unlike film, where subtle facial expressions suffice due to close-up shots, stage performers must employ exaggerated physicality and vocal projection to convey emotions across larger distances.[110] This medium emphasizes ensemble dynamics, as actors respond in real-time to co-performers and audience reactions, fostering a unique immediacy absent in pre-edited formats.[111] Essential skills for theatre actors include robust memorization of lines and cues, precise control over voice and body for projection and movement, and high stamina to maintain performance quality over extended runs.[112] Stage presence—encompassing spatial awareness, adaptability to technical elements like lighting and props, and the ability to improvise minor adjustments—ensures seamless execution amid variables such as forgotten lines or equipment failures.[113] Script analysis and character immersion prepare actors for authentic embodiment, while techniques in movement and speech training enhance clarity and emotional depth.[114] Professional rehearsals typically span 3 to 6 weeks, beginning with a table read-through to familiarize the cast with the script, followed by blocking scenes, refining interactions, and integrating technical elements in tech rehearsals. Sessions often last 4 to 5 hours daily, 5 or 6 days per week, progressing from conceptual exploration to polished presentation, with directors prioritizing full blocking early to allow refinement.[115] This intensive process builds reliability for live shows, where a single performance—lasting 2 to 3 hours—must captivate without interruption, heightening the risk of unrecoverable errors.[116] Challenges in live performance include physical and mental exhaustion from repetitive shows, vulnerability to onstage mishaps like missed cues or malfunctions, and the pressure of direct audience scrutiny, which can amplify performance anxiety.[117] Financial precarity arises from short production runs and inconsistent employment, compounded by the need for ongoing training to sustain versatility across roles.[118] Despite these, theatre hones irreplaceable skills in real-time connection and resilience, distinguishing it as a foundational training ground for actors transitioning to other mediums.[119]Film Acting
Film acting distinguishes itself from theatrical performance through its reliance on close-up cinematography, which captures subtle facial expressions and internal emotions rather than broad physical projections needed for live audiences. Actors must deliver nuanced, restrained performances knowing that editing and multiple takes allow for precision and continuity, unlike the sustained energy required in one-take stage runs.[109][110] This intimacy demands control over micro-gestures and vocal inflections, as the camera amplifies details invisible from theater seats.[111] In the silent era, beginning around 1895 with early short films, acting emphasized pantomime, exaggerated body language, and expressive faces to convey narrative without dialogue, drawing from vaudeville and commedia dell'arte traditions. Pioneers like Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton developed precise physical comedy and timing suited to the medium's visual focus, using props and slapstick to drive plots.[120] The introduction of synchronized sound in 1927 with The Jazz Singer shifted techniques toward naturalistic speech and lip-sync accuracy, rendering many silent stars' mannerisms obsolete and prompting a wave of re-training or career ends.[121] Post-World War II developments saw the adoption of Method acting, derived from Konstantin Stanislavski's system, which prioritizes emotional authenticity and character immersion. Marlon Brando exemplified this in films like A Streetcar Named Desire (1951), employing substitution techniques to evoke genuine responses through personal sensory memories, contrasting prior stylized deliveries.[122][123] This approach influenced subsequent generations, fostering introspective, psychologically layered portrayals amid Hollywood's studio system decline and the rise of independent cinema.[54] Modern film acting builds on these foundations, incorporating digital effects that require performers to react to non-existent elements, while maintaining subtlety amid faster production paces.[85]Television and Streaming
Television acting originated with live broadcasts in the mid-20th century, demanding skills akin to theatre due to the immediacy of performance and technical constraints like limited camera angles. Early television productions, such as those in the 1950s, required actors to project emotions subtly for the small screen while maintaining energy for live audiences or immediate airing, contrasting with the grand gestures of stage acting.[124] As filmed episodic series became standard by the 1960s, techniques shifted toward naturalistic delivery, emphasizing consistency in character portrayal across multiple episodes to build viewer familiarity.[125] In television production, actors face a faster workflow than film, with shorter preparation periods and the need to sustain performances over extended shoots, often 10-22 episodes per season. Multi-camera setups common in sitcoms and soaps demand precise timing and interaction with co-stars in real-time, while single-camera dramas mimic film but prioritize continuity to avoid reshoots amid tight schedules. Actors must deliver nuanced expressions for close-ups, knowing edits will compress scenes, and adapt to directors' notes across repeated takes without the luxury of extensive rehearsals.[125] [111] Streaming platforms, proliferating since Netflix's original series in 2013, have altered acting demands by enabling serialized narratives without commercial interruptions, allowing deeper character arcs and subtler pacing tailored for binge-viewing. Unlike traditional broadcast TV's episodic resets, streaming favors long-form storytelling, requiring actors to maintain emotional depth over 8-13 episode seasons or limited series, often with higher production values attracting film-trained performers. Success on these platforms benefits from diversified skills, including physical performance, voice acting, and motion capture, to address trends in globalized stories, cross-cultural narratives, and multi-language content, alongside AI-assisted casting.[126] [127][128][129] However, residuals for streaming roles remain lower than broadcast or cable, structured around flat fees rather than viewership-based payments, contributing to financial instability for supporting actors.[130] Challenges in both mediums include grueling schedules leading to physical and mental strain, typecasting from recurring roles, and increasing competition from global talent pools. The rise of AI-generated content and digital replicas poses risks to job security, particularly for background and voice actors, while streaming's data-driven cancellations disrupt long-term commitments.[131] [132] Despite these, television and streaming offer broader accessibility, with platforms producing over 500 original scripted series annually by 2023, providing opportunities for diverse ensembles but intensifying audition pressures.[133]Voice and Audio Acting
Voice acting encompasses the performance of spoken content for audio media, including character voices in animations, narrations in commercials and documentaries, dialogue in video games, and readings in audiobooks, without reliance on visual cues from the performer.[134] Unlike on-camera acting, which incorporates facial expressions and body language, voice acting demands heightened vocal inflection and energy to convey emotions and actions solely through sound, often requiring performers to record lines in isolation rather than with scene partners.[135][136] The practice originated in early radio broadcasts during the 1920s, with dramatic readings and sound effects simulating live theater, evolving significantly with Walt Disney's voicing of Mickey Mouse in the 1928 short Steamboat Willie, marking a pivotal milestone in synchronized animation sound.[137][138] The 1930s to 1940s golden age of animation featured prolific performers like Mel Blanc, who voiced over 400 characters including Bugs Bunny and Porky Pig for Warner Bros. cartoons starting in 1937.[139] Video game voice acting emerged in the 1980s with titles like Super Mario Bros., expanding to full dialogue in modern releases such as Uncharted series, voiced by Nolan North as Nathan Drake from 2007 onward.[140][141] Essential skills include vocal control for pitch variation, clarity in enunciation, and precise pacing to match timing cues, alongside acting fundamentals like character interpretation adapted for audio-only delivery.[142][143] Performers must master microphone technique to avoid distortion, employ breathing exercises for stamina, and develop accents or impersonations to suit diverse roles, such as Frank Welker's animal sounds in Transformers since 1984.[134][139] Training often involves regular warm-ups and script analysis focused on subtext, distinguishing it from visual media by emphasizing auditory storytelling.[144] The industry supports applications in dubbing foreign media, with the global dubbing and voice-over market valued at $3.5 billion in 2023 and projected to reach $7.2 billion by 2033 at a 7.4% CAGR, driven by streaming platforms and international content localization.[145] In audiobooks, narrators like Jim Dale performed over 200 voices for the Harry Potter series recordings starting in 1998, enhancing listener immersion through multifaceted characterizations.[139] Video game sectors highlight actors like Troy Baker in The Last of Us (2013), where vocal nuances convey narrative depth amid interactive gameplay.[141] Overall, voice acting demands technical precision and imaginative range, with market growth reflecting demand across digital entertainment formats estimated at $4.4 billion globally in 2024.[146]Digital and Emerging Formats
Motion capture technology enables actors to perform physical and facial movements that are digitally recorded and mapped onto virtual characters, primarily in video games and visual effects-heavy films. The technique's application in video games dates to 1994 with Rise of the Robots, marking the first commercial use of mocap for character animation.[147] In film, mocap gained prominence in 1999's Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace, where actor Ahmed Best's movements informed Jar Jar Binks' animation.[148] Performers like Andy Serkis pioneered expressive mocap acting as Gollum in The Lord of the Rings trilogy (2001–2003), extending to games such as Heavenly Sword in 2007, where his full-performance capture influenced character realism.[149] Modern examples include mocap for protagonists like Nathan Drake in the Uncharted series and Kratos in God of War, requiring actors to deliver nuanced emotional range within marker suits and sensor rigs.[150] Social media platforms have emerged as venues for short-form acting, where performers create scripted sketches, improvisations, and character-driven content for platforms like YouTube and TikTok. These formats demand concise delivery adapted to algorithmic preferences, often blending acting with content creation to build audiences directly, bypassing traditional casting.[151] Careers originating here include actors who leveraged viral videos for mainstream transitions, though success hinges on consistent output and engagement metrics rather than formal training alone.[152] By 2023, roles explicitly combining acting and social media production proliferated, with job listings seeking on-camera performers for TikTok and YouTube series emphasizing prior personal content experience.[153] Virtual reality (VR) and metaverse environments introduce immersive acting formats, where performers interact in real-time digital spaces using motion-tracked avatars. Early experiments in VR acting focused on rehearsal tools, allowing directors and actors to simulate live performances virtually before physical staging.[154] By 2022, projects theatricalized VR metaverses, enabling actors to embody roles in shared virtual theaters responsive to audience gaze and movement.[155] Acting schools began integrating metaverse training by 2023, with performers using VR headsets for collaborative scenes that adapt to participant inputs, demanding heightened spatial awareness and improvisation.[156] Emerging formats incorporate AI-driven avatars and deepfake synthesis, where actors' likenesses or performances generate synthetic characters for interactive media. AI avatars, powered by tools like those from Synthesia, replicate actors' expressions from limited input footage, applied in virtual production since around 2021.[157] In 2023, discussions arose over "simulation rights" as deepfake tech enabled posthumous or altered actor resurrections, prompting calls for consent protocols in digital likeness use.[158] While beneficial for accessibility, such as resurrecting historical figures in educational content, these methods raise fidelity concerns, as synthetic outputs often lack the causal subtleties of human intent captured in traditional mocap.[159] Technology advancements are fostering new roles for actors, including expanded adaptation to motion capture for hybrid performances, immersive VR/AR experiences, and real-time AI collaboration in virtual productions where actors interact with AI-generated elements to create dynamic content. Opportunities in voice work for gaming and animated content are growing, demanding specialized vocal techniques for interactive and narrative-driven media. Self-produced AI-assisted projects, leveraging tools for editing, virtual sets, and distribution, empower newcomers by reducing production barriers and enabling independent content creation.[160][161]Socioeconomic Realities
Compensation Structures
Compensation in acting is predominantly structured through union contracts that establish minimum wages, residuals, and benefits, with higher earnings negotiated for established performers based on leverage from past successes or box office draw. In the United States, the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) governs film, television, and related media, setting daily or weekly minimums while allowing for profit participation and residuals from secondary markets like streaming and syndication.[162] Actors' Equity Association oversees live theater, emphasizing weekly salaries without residuals due to the ephemeral nature of performances.[163] Non-union work often features lower day rates but lacks protections, contributing to widespread underemployment where median hourly wages hover around $23 per hour as of 2024 data.[1] For film and television, upfront compensation includes scale rates for principals—$1,246 per day or $4,326 per week under SAG-AFTRA's 2025 theatrical agreements—supplemented by residuals calculated as percentages of distributor gross from home video, streaming views, or reruns.[164][165] Residuals for streaming, post-2023 strikes, factor in subscriber counts and title longevity, with payments depreciating over time (e.g., 50% of upfront for high-budget series in year one, declining thereafter), though critics note these often yield minimal returns compared to traditional TV syndication due to opaque streaming metrics.[62] Top-tier actors may secure backend points (1-5% of net profits) or seven-figure upfront fees, but such structures favor stars; day players and extras receive fixed bumps like $184 daily for background work.[166] In theater, Actors' Equity enforces tiered weekly minima, with Broadway principals at $2,717 as of late 2025 contracts, rising 3% annually, plus overtime for rehearsals exceeding eight hours.[167] Smaller venues under Small Professional Theatre agreements offer lower scales (e.g., $367-$525 weekly for entry tiers), often with per diems but no ongoing royalties, reflecting productions' limited revenue from ticket sales.[168] Voice acting follows SAG-AFTRA rates, such as $1,000+ per finished hour for commercials, while emerging digital formats like video games include session fees plus usage-based royalties.[169]| Medium | Union Minimum Example (2025) | Key Supplemental Structure |
|---|---|---|
| Film/TV Principal | $1,246/day | Residuals (e.g., streaming based on views/subscribers)[162] |
| Broadway Theater | $2,717/week | Overtime, no residuals[167] |
| Background/Extra | $184/day | Bumps for stunts/special skills[166] |
Factors Influencing Success
Success in acting is characterized by low probabilities and high variability, with only approximately 2% of actors earning enough from the profession to support themselves without supplementary income, according to Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) data.[170] Sustained productivity, rather than isolated breakthroughs, defines long-term success, often following a "rich-get-richer" dynamic where early roles generate momentum for future opportunities through increased visibility and demand.[171] Empirical analyses indicate that while talent and skill contribute, external factors like timing and market conditions heavily influence outcomes, with about 80% of actors experiencing unemployment at any given time per U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports.[100] Networking and personal connections emerge as critical determinants, with resource-based studies of motion picture actors showing that robust professional contacts provide access to auditions, roles, and endorsements that outperform isolated skill sets in predicting career advancement.[172] Prior fame or popularity in one medium, such as television serials, correlates with elevated employment prospects in subsequent projects, creating a feedback loop where initial exposure amplifies opportunities.[173] This underscores the role of relational capital over merit alone, as actors with established networks secure roles that build further reputation, while newcomers face barriers without such ties.[174] Personal traits including perseverance, determination, and autonomy significantly mediate success amid industry precarity, as qualitative studies of aspiring actors highlight these qualities in sustaining efforts through repeated rejections and financial instability.[175] Luck intersects with preparation, where opportunities arise unpredictably, but actors who maintain readiness—through ongoing training and adaptability—capitalize on them more effectively than those relying solely on innate ability.[176] Quantitative career models reveal that while baseline competencies matter, cumulative advantages from early wins and strategic positioning often eclipse raw talent, with two-thirds of entrants exiting within the first year due to unmet persistence thresholds.[108][171]Diversity and Representation Data
In top-grossing theatrical films, actors of color have comprised approximately 38% of all roles as of 2024, reflecting a slight increase from 36% in 2023 and aligning roughly with the U.S. non-white population share of around 41%. [177] However, representation in lead roles lags behind, with people of color accounting for 25.2% of leads in 2024, a decline from 29.2% in 2023, amid reports of an 8% rise in roles for white actors that year. [178] [179] Large-scale analyses of over 2,300 films from 1980 to 2022 indicate that Black and Asian actors' screen time aligns closely with their U.S. population proportions (approximately 13% and 6%, respectively), while Hispanic actors remain consistently underrepresented relative to their 19% population share. [180] [181] Gender disparities in acting roles have narrowed in recent years, particularly for leads. Women achieved near-proportionate representation at about 50% of movie leads in 2024, up from historical underrepresentation, though films with male protagonists continue to receive larger budgets and higher box office returns on average. [182] [183] Overall actor demographics skew male, with men comprising 68% of the U.S. acting workforce as of recent industry surveys. [184] In television, similar trends hold, with women and people of color driving higher viewer engagement for diverse content, though aggregate role shares for women remain below 50% across scripted series. [185] Actors with disabilities face severe underrepresentation, claiming just 7.1% of roles in top theatrical films in 2023, up marginally from 5% in 2022, compared to an estimated 13% U.S. adult population with disabilities. [186] [187] Over 60% of top films feature no known disabled actors or fewer than 11% in main casts, and nearly 80% of disabled TV characters from 2016 to 2023 were portrayed by able-bodied performers. [188] [189] In theatre, particularly Broadway and major non-profit venues, data on actor demographics is sparser but indicates persistent white dominance, with approximately 70% of roles in top regional theaters going to white performers and limited progression for people of color in creative positions like writing or directing. [190] [191] BIPOC audiences represent about 28% of Broadway theatregoers, down slightly from prior seasons, underscoring a mismatch between onstage representation and broader demographic demands. [192]| Demographic Category | Approximate Share in Film Roles (2024) | U.S. Population Share | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| White actors | 62% | 59% | Recent increase in lead shares. [179] |
| Black actors | 13% | 13% | Matches population; higher in some lead metrics historically. [180] |
| Hispanic actors | <19% | 19% | Consistent underrepresentation. [181] |
| Asian actors | 6-7% | 6% | Proportionate alignment. [180] |
| Disabled actors | 7% | 13% | Primarily visible disabilities; casting often by non-disabled. [186] [189] |