Hubbry Logo
AmphetamineAmphetamineMain
Open search
Amphetamine
Community hub
Amphetamine
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Amphetamine
Amphetamine
from Wikipedia

Amphetamine
INN: Amfetamine
An image of the amphetamine compound
Clinical data
Pronunciation/æmˈfɛtəmn/
Trade namesEvekeo, Adderall,[note 1] others
Other namesα-methylphenethylamine, β-phenylisopropylamine, thyramine
AHFS/Drugs.comMonograph
MedlinePlusa616004
License data
Dependence
liability
Physical: None
Psychological: Moderate[1]
Addiction
liability
Moderate
Routes of
administration
Medical: Oral
Recreational: Oral, insufflation, rectal, intramuscular, intravenous
Drug class
ATC code
Physiological data
ReceptorsTAAR1, VMAT2, 5HT1A
MetabolismCYP2D6,[2] DBH,[3][4] FMO3[3][5][6]
Legal status
Legal status
Pharmacokinetic data
BioavailabilityOral: ~90%[8]
Protein binding20%[9]
MetabolismCYP2D6,[2] DBH,[3][4] FMO3[3][5][6]
Metabolites4-hydroxyamphetamine, 4-hydroxynorephedrine, 4-hydroxyphenylacetone, benzoic acid, hippuric acid, norephedrine, phenylacetone[2][10]
Onset of actionIR dosing: 30–60 minutes[11]
XR dosing: 1.5–2 hours[12][13]
Elimination half-lifeD-amph: 9–11 hours[2][14]
L-amph: 11–14 hours[2][14]
pH-dependent: 7–34 hours[15]
Duration of actionIR dosing: 3–6 hours[1][12][16]
XR dosing: 8–12 hours[1][12][16]
ExcretionPrimarily renal;
pH-dependent range: 1–75%[2]
Identifiers
  • (RS)-1-phenylpropan-2-amine
CAS Number
PubChem CID
IUPHAR/BPS
DrugBank
ChemSpider
UNII
KEGG
ChEBI
ChEMBL
NIAID ChemDB
CompTox Dashboard (EPA)
ECHA InfoCard100.005.543 Edit this at Wikidata
Chemical and physical data
FormulaC9H13N
Molar mass135.210 g·mol−1
3D model (JSmol)
ChiralityRacemic mixture[17]
Density.936 g/cm3 at 25 °C[18]
Melting point146 °C (295 °F) [19]
Boiling point203 °C (397 °F) at 760 mmHg[20]
  • NC(C)Cc1ccccc1
  • InChI=1S/C9H13N/c1-8(10)7-9-5-3-2-4-6-9/h2-6,8H,7,10H2,1H3 checkY
  • Key:KWTSXDURSIMDCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N checkY
  (verify)

Amphetamine[note 2] is a central nervous system (CNS) stimulant that is used in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), narcolepsy, and obesity; it is also used to treat binge eating disorder in the form of its inactive prodrug lisdexamfetamine. Amphetamine was discovered as a chemical in 1887 by Lazăr Edeleanu, and then as a drug in the late 1920s. It exists as two enantiomers:[note 3] levoamphetamine and dextroamphetamine. Amphetamine properly refers to a specific chemical, the racemic free base, which is equal parts of the two enantiomers in their pure amine forms. The term is frequently used informally to refer to any combination of the enantiomers, or to either of them alone. Historically, it has been used to treat nasal congestion and depression. Amphetamine is also used as an athletic performance enhancer and cognitive enhancer, and recreationally as an aphrodisiac and euphoriant. It is a prescription drug in many countries, and unauthorized possession and distribution of amphetamine are often tightly controlled due to the significant health risks associated with recreational use.[sources 1]

The first amphetamine pharmaceutical was Benzedrine, a brand which was used to treat a variety of conditions. Pharmaceutical amphetamine is prescribed as racemic amphetamine, Adderall,[note 4] dextroamphetamine, or the inactive prodrug lisdexamfetamine. Amphetamine increases monoamine and excitatory neurotransmission in the brain, with its most pronounced effects targeting the norepinephrine and dopamine neurotransmitter systems.[sources 2]

At therapeutic doses, amphetamine causes emotional and cognitive effects such as euphoria, change in desire for sex, increased wakefulness, and improved cognitive control. It induces physical effects such as improved reaction time, fatigue resistance, decreased appetite, elevated heart rate, and increased muscle strength. Larger doses of amphetamine may impair cognitive function and induce rapid muscle breakdown. Addiction is a serious risk with heavy recreational amphetamine use, but is unlikely to occur from long-term medical use at therapeutic doses. Very high doses can result in psychosis (e.g., hallucinations, delusions, and paranoia) which rarely occurs at therapeutic doses even during long-term use. Recreational doses are generally much larger than prescribed therapeutic doses and carry a far greater risk of serious side effects.[sources 3]

Amphetamine belongs to the phenethylamine class. It is also the parent compound of its own structural class, the substituted amphetamines,[note 5] which includes prominent substances such as bupropion, cathinone, MDMA, and methamphetamine. As a member of the phenethylamine class, amphetamine is also chemically related to the naturally occurring trace amine neuromodulators, specifically phenethylamine and N-methylphenethylamine, both of which are produced within the human body. Phenethylamine is the parent compound of amphetamine, while N-methylphenethylamine is a positional isomer of amphetamine that differs only in the placement of the methyl group.[sources 4]

Uses

[edit]

Medical

[edit]

Amphetamine is used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), narcolepsy, obesity, and, in the form of lisdexamfetamine, binge eating disorder.[1][35][36] It is sometimes prescribed off-label for its past medical indications, particularly for depression and chronic pain.[1][51]

ADHD

[edit]

Long-term amphetamine exposure at sufficiently high doses in some animal species is known to produce abnormal dopamine system development or nerve damage,[52][53] but, in humans with ADHD, long-term use of pharmaceutical amphetamines at therapeutic doses appears to improve brain development and nerve growth.[54][55][56] Reviews of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies suggest that long-term treatment with amphetamine decreases abnormalities in brain structure and function found in subjects with ADHD, and improves function in several parts of the brain, such as the right caudate nucleus of the basal ganglia.[54][55][56]

Reviews of clinical stimulant research have established the safety and effectiveness of long-term continuous amphetamine use for the treatment of ADHD.[44][57][58] Randomized controlled trials of continuous stimulant therapy for the treatment of ADHD spanning 2 years have demonstrated treatment effectiveness and safety.[44][57] Two reviews have indicated that long-term continuous stimulant therapy for ADHD is effective for reducing the core symptoms of ADHD (i.e., hyperactivity, inattention, and impulsivity), enhancing quality of life and academic achievement, and producing improvements in a large number of functional outcomes[note 6] across 9 categories of outcomes related to academics, antisocial behavior, driving, non-medicinal drug use, obesity, occupation, self-esteem, service use (i.e., academic, occupational, health, financial, and legal services), and social function.[44][58] Additionally, a 2024 meta-analytic systematic review reported moderate improvements in quality of life when amphetamine treatment is used for ADHD.[60] One review highlighted a nine-month randomized controlled trial of amphetamine treatment for ADHD in children that found an average increase of 4.5 IQ points, continued increases in attention, and continued decreases in disruptive behaviors and hyperactivity.[57] Another review indicated that, based upon the longest follow-up studies conducted to date, lifetime stimulant therapy that begins during childhood is continuously effective for controlling ADHD symptoms and reduces the risk of developing a substance use disorder as an adult.[44]

Models of ADHD suggest that it is associated with functional impairments in some of the brain's neurotransmitter systems;[61] these functional impairments involve impaired dopamine neurotransmission in the mesocorticolimbic projection and norepinephrine neurotransmission in the noradrenergic projections from the locus coeruleus to the prefrontal cortex.[61] Stimulants like methylphenidate and amphetamine are effective in treating ADHD because they increase neurotransmitter activity in these systems.[26][61][62] Approximately 80% of those who use these stimulants see improvements in ADHD symptoms.[63] Children with ADHD who use stimulant medications generally have better relationships with peers and family members, perform better in school, are less distractible and impulsive, and have longer attention spans.[64][65] The Cochrane reviews[note 7] on the treatment of ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults with pharmaceutical amphetamines stated that short-term studies have demonstrated that these drugs decrease the severity of symptoms, but they have higher discontinuation rates than non-stimulant medications due to their adverse side effects.[67][68] However, a 2025 meta-analytic systematic review of 113 randomized controlled trials found that stimulant medications were the only intervention with robust short-term efficacy, and were associated with lower all-cause treatment discontinuation rates than non-stimulant medications (e.g., atomoxetine).[note 8][69] A Cochrane review on the treatment of ADHD in children with tic disorders such as Tourette syndrome indicated that stimulants in general do not make tics worse, but high doses of dextroamphetamine could exacerbate tics in some individuals.[70]

Binge eating disorder

[edit]

Binge eating disorder (BED) is characterized by recurrent and persistent episodes of compulsive binge eating.[71] These episodes are often accompanied by marked distress and a feeling of loss of control over eating.[71] The pathophysiology of BED is not fully understood, but it is believed to involve dysfunctional dopaminergic reward circuitry along the cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical loop.[72][73] As of July 2024, lisdexamfetamine is the only USFDA- and TGA-approved pharmacotherapy for BED.[36][74] Evidence suggests that lisdexamfetamine's treatment efficacy in BED is underpinned at least in part by a psychopathological overlap between BED and ADHD, with the latter conceptualized as a cognitive control disorder that also benefits from treatment with lisdexamfetamine.[72][73]

Diagram of TAAR1 organ-specific expression and function
This diagram illustrates how TAAR1 activation induces incretin-like effects through the release of gastrointestinal hormones and influences food intake, blood glucose levels, and insulin release.[75] TAAR1 expression in the periphery is indicated with "x".[75]

Lisdexamfetamine's therapeutic effects for BED primarily involve direct action in the central nervous system after conversion to its pharmacologically active metabolite, dextroamphetamine.[74] Centrally, dextroamphetamine increases neurotransmitter activity of dopamine and norepinephrine in prefrontal cortical regions that regulate cognitive control of behavior.[72][74] Similar to its therapeutic effect in ADHD, dextroamphetamine enhances cognitive control and may reduce impulsivity in patients with BED by enhancing the cognitive processes responsible for overriding prepotent feeding responses that precede binge eating episodes.[72][76][77] Dextroamphetamine is also a full agonist of trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1), a G-protein coupled receptor that regulates monoaminergic systems in the brain;[78][79] Activation of TAAR1 may restore impaired dopaminergic signaling in the prefrontal cortex and thereby correct deficits in inhibitory control associated with binge eating behaviors.[79] Beyond central nervous system mechanisms, peripheral actions of dextroamphetamine may also contribute to its treatment efficacy in BED. Through noradrenergic signaling pathways, dextroamphetamine triggers lipolysis in adipose fat cells, thereby prompting the release of triglycerides into blood plasma to be utilized as a fuel substrate.[73][80] Moreover, dextroamphetamine induces synthesis of the cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART), a peptide neurotransmitter that regulates food intake.[81] Within the hypothalamus, CART interacts with leptin signaling pathways to promote appetite suppression.[81] Dextroamphetamine also activates TAAR1 in peripheral organs along the gastrointestinal tract that are involved in the regulation of food intake and body weight.[79][75] Together, these actions confer an anorexigenic effect that promotes satiety in response to feeding and may decrease binge eating as a secondary effect.[77][75] While lisdexamfetamine's anorexigenic effects contribute to its efficacy in BED, evidence indicates that the enhancement of cognitive control is necessary and sufficient for addressing the disorder's underlying psychopathology.[72][82] This view is supported by the failure of anti-obesity medications and other appetite suppressants to significantly reduce BED symptom severity, despite their capacity to induce weight loss.[82]

Medical reviews of randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that lisdexamfetamine, at doses between 50–70 mg, is safe and effective for the treatment of moderate-to-severe BED in adults.[sources 5] These reviews suggest that lisdexamfetamine is persistently effective at treating BED and is associated with significant reductions in the number of binge eating days and binge eating episodes per week.[sources 5] Furthermore, a meta-analytic systematic review highlighted an open-label, 12-month extension safety and tolerability study that reported lisdexamfetamine remained effective at reducing the number of binge eating days for the duration of the study.[77] In addition, both a review and a meta-analytic systematic review found lisdexamfetamine to be superior to placebo in several secondary outcome measures, including persistent binge eating cessation, reduction of obsessive-compulsive related binge eating symptoms, reduction of body-weight, and reduction of triglycerides.[73][77] Lisdexamfetamine, like all pharmaceutical amphetamines, has direct appetite suppressant effects that may be therapeutically useful in both BED and its comorbidities.[36][77] Based on reviews of neuroimaging studies involving BED-diagnosed participants, therapeutic neuroplasticity in dopaminergic and noradrenergic pathways from long-term use of lisdexamfetamine may be implicated in lasting improvements in the regulation of eating behaviors that are observed.[36][74][77]

Narcolepsy

[edit]

Narcolepsy is a chronic sleep-wake disorder that is associated with excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, and sleep paralysis.[84] Patients with narcolepsy are diagnosed as either type 1 or type 2, with only the former presenting cataplexy symptoms.[85] Type 1 narcolepsy results from the loss of approximately 70,000 orexin-releasing neurons in the lateral hypothalamus, leading to significantly reduced cerebrospinal orexin levels;[16][86] this reduction is a diagnostic biomarker for type 1 narcolepsy.[85] Lateral hypothalamic orexin neurons innervate every component of the ascending reticular activating system (ARAS), which includes noradrenergic, dopaminergic, histaminergic, and serotonergic nuclei that promote wakefulness.[86][87]

Amphetamine's therapeutic mode of action in narcolepsy primarily involves increasing monoamine neurotransmitter activity in the ARAS.[16][88][89] This includes noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus, dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area, histaminergic neurons in the tuberomammillary nucleus, and serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus.[87][89] Dextroamphetamine, the more dopaminergic enantiomer of amphetamine, is particularly effective at promoting wakefulness because dopamine release has the greatest influence on cortical activation and cognitive arousal, relative to other monoamines.[16][90] In contrast, levoamphetamine may have a greater effect on cataplexy, a symptom more sensitive to the effects of norepinephrine and serotonin.[16] Noradrenergic and serotonergic nuclei in the ARAS are involved in the regulation of the REM sleep cycle and function as "REM-off" cells, with amphetamine's effect on norepinephrine and serotonin contributing to the suppression of REM sleep and a possible reduction of cataplexy at high doses.[16][85][87]

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) 2021 clinical practice guideline conditionally recommends dextroamphetamine for the treatment of both type 1 and type 2 narcolepsy.[91] Treatment with pharmaceutical amphetamines is generally less preferred relative to other stimulants (e.g., modafinil) and is considered a third-line treatment option.[47][92][93] Medical reviews indicate that amphetamine is safe and effective for the treatment of narcolepsy.[16][47][91] Amphetamine appears to be most effective at improving symptoms associated with hypersomnolence, with three reviews finding clinically significant reductions in daytime sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy.[16][47][91] Additionally, these reviews suggest that amphetamine may dose-dependently improve cataplexy symptoms.[16][47][91] However, the quality of evidence for these findings is low and is consequently reflected in the AASM's conditional recommendation for dextroamphetamine as a treatment option for narcolepsy.[91]

Enhancing performance

[edit]

Cognitive performance

[edit]

In 2015, a systematic review and a meta-analysis of high quality clinical trials found that, when used at low (therapeutic) doses, amphetamine produces modest yet unambiguous improvements in cognition, including working memory, long-term episodic memory, inhibitory control, and some aspects of attention, in normal healthy adults;[94][95] these cognition-enhancing effects of amphetamine are known to be partially mediated through the indirect activation of both dopamine D1 receptor and α2-adrenergic receptor in the prefrontal cortex.[26][94] A systematic review from 2014 found that low doses of amphetamine also improve memory consolidation, in turn leading to improved recall of information.[96] Therapeutic doses of amphetamine also enhance cortical network efficiency, an effect which mediates improvements in working memory in all individuals.[26][97] Amphetamine and other ADHD stimulants also improve task saliency (motivation to perform a task) and increase arousal (wakefulness), in turn promoting goal-directed behavior.[26][98][99] Stimulants such as amphetamine can improve performance on difficult and boring tasks and are used by some students as a study and test-taking aid.[26][99][100] Based upon studies of self-reported illicit stimulant use, 5–35% of college students use diverted ADHD stimulants, which are primarily used for enhancement of academic performance rather than as recreational drugs.[101][102][103] However, high amphetamine doses that are above the therapeutic range can interfere with working memory and other aspects of cognitive control.[26][99]

Physical performance

[edit]

Amphetamine is used by some athletes for its psychological and athletic performance-enhancing effects, such as increased endurance and alertness;[27][40] however, non-medical amphetamine use is prohibited at sporting events that are regulated by collegiate, national, and international anti-doping agencies.[104][105] In healthy people at oral therapeutic doses, amphetamine has been shown to increase muscle strength, acceleration, athletic performance in anaerobic conditions, and endurance (i.e., it delays the onset of fatigue), while improving reaction time.[27][106][107] Amphetamine improves endurance and reaction time primarily through reuptake inhibition and release of dopamine in the central nervous system.[106][107][108] Amphetamine and other dopaminergic drugs also increase power output at fixed levels of perceived exertion by overriding a "safety switch", allowing the core temperature limit to increase in order to access a reserve capacity that is normally off-limits.[107][109][110] At therapeutic doses, the adverse effects of amphetamine do not impede athletic performance;[27][106] however, at much higher doses, amphetamine can induce effects that severely impair performance, such as rapid muscle breakdown and elevated body temperature.[28][106]

Recreational

[edit]

Amphetamine, specifically the more dopaminergic dextrorotatory enantiomer (dextroamphetamine), is also used recreationally as a euphoriant and aphrodisiac, and like other amphetamines; is used as a club drug for its energetic and euphoric high. Dextroamphetamine (d-amphetamine) is considered to have a high potential for misuse in a recreational manner since individuals typically report feeling euphoric, more alert, and more energetic after taking the drug.[111][112][113] A notable part of the 1960s mod subculture in the UK was recreational amphetamine use, which was used to fuel all-night dances at clubs like Manchester's Twisted Wheel. Newspaper reports described dancers emerging from clubs at 5 a.m. with dilated pupils.[114] Mods used the drug for stimulation and alertness, which they viewed as different from the intoxication caused by alcohol and other drugs.[114] Dr. Andrew Wilson argues that for a significant minority, "amphetamines symbolised the smart, on-the-ball, cool image" and that they sought "stimulation not intoxication [...] greater awareness, not escape" and "confidence and articulacy" rather than the "drunken rowdiness of previous generations."[114] Dextroamphetamine's dopaminergic (rewarding) properties affect the mesocorticolimbic circuit; a group of neural structures responsible for incentive salience (i.e., "wanting"; desire or craving for a reward and motivation), positive reinforcement and positively-valenced emotions, particularly ones involving pleasure.[115] Large recreational doses of dextroamphetamine may produce symptoms of dextroamphetamine overdose.[113] Recreational users sometimes open dexedrine capsules and crush the contents in order to insufflate (snort) it or subsequently dissolve it in water and inject it.[113] Immediate-release formulations have higher potential for abuse via insufflation (snorting) or intravenous injection due to a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile and easy crushability (especially tablets).[116][117] Injection into the bloodstream can be dangerous because insoluble fillers within the tablets can block small blood vessels.[113] Chronic overuse of dextroamphetamine can lead to severe drug dependence, resulting in withdrawal symptoms when drug use stops.[113]

Contraindications

[edit]

According to the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA),[note 9] amphetamine is contraindicated in people with a history of drug abuse,[note 10] cardiovascular disease, severe agitation, or severe anxiety.[35][28][119] It is also contraindicated in individuals with advanced arteriosclerosis (hardening of the arteries), glaucoma (increased eye pressure), hyperthyroidism (excessive production of thyroid hormone), or moderate to severe hypertension.[35][28][119] These agencies indicate that people who have experienced allergic reactions to other stimulants or who are taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) should not take amphetamine,[35][28][119] although safe concurrent use of amphetamine and monoamine oxidase inhibitors has been documented.[120][121] These agencies also state that anyone with anorexia nervosa, bipolar disorder, depression, hypertension, liver or kidney problems, mania, psychosis, Raynaud's phenomenon, seizures, thyroid problems, tics, or Tourette syndrome should monitor their symptoms while taking amphetamine.[28][119] Evidence from human studies indicates that therapeutic amphetamine use does not cause developmental abnormalities in the fetus or newborns (i.e., it is not a human teratogen), but amphetamine abuse does pose risks to the fetus.[119] Amphetamine has also been shown to pass into breast milk, so the IPCS and the FDA advise mothers to avoid breastfeeding when using it.[28][119] Due to the potential for reversible growth impairments,[note 11] the FDA advises monitoring the height and weight of children and adolescents prescribed an amphetamine pharmaceutical.[28]

Adverse effects

[edit]

The adverse side effects of amphetamine are many and varied, and the amount of amphetamine used is the primary factor in determining the likelihood and severity of adverse effects.[28][40] Amphetamine products such as Adderall, Dexedrine, and their generic equivalents are currently approved by the U.S. FDA for long-term therapeutic use.[37][28] Recreational use of amphetamine generally involves much larger doses, which have a greater risk of serious adverse drug effects than dosages used for therapeutic purposes.[40]

Physical

[edit]

Cardiovascular side effects can include hypertension or hypotension from a vasovagal response, Raynaud's phenomenon (reduced blood flow to the hands and feet), and tachycardia (increased heart rate).[28][40][122] Sexual side effects in males may include erectile dysfunction, frequent erections, or prolonged erections.[28] Gastrointestinal side effects may include abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, and nausea.[1][28][123] Other potential physical side effects include appetite loss, blurred vision, dry mouth, excessive grinding of the teeth, nosebleed, profuse sweating, rhinitis medicamentosa (drug-induced nasal congestion), reduced seizure threshold, tics (a type of movement disorder), and weight loss.[sources 6] Dangerous physical side effects are rare at typical pharmaceutical doses.[40]

Amphetamine stimulates the medullary respiratory centers, producing faster and deeper breaths.[40] In a normal person at therapeutic doses, this effect is usually not noticeable, but when respiration is already compromised, it may be evident.[40] Amphetamine also induces contraction in the urinary bladder sphincter, the muscle which controls urination, which can result in difficulty urinating.[40] This effect can be useful in treating bed wetting and loss of bladder control.[40] The effects of amphetamine on the gastrointestinal tract are unpredictable.[40] If intestinal activity is high, amphetamine may reduce gastrointestinal motility (the rate at which content moves through the digestive system);[40] however, amphetamine may increase motility when the smooth muscle of the tract is relaxed.[40] Amphetamine also has a slight analgesic effect and can enhance the pain relieving effects of opioids.[1][40]

FDA-commissioned studies from 2011 indicate that in children, young adults, and adults there is no association between serious adverse cardiovascular events (sudden death, heart attack, and stroke) and the medical use of amphetamine or other ADHD stimulants.[sources 7] These findings were subsequently corroborated by a 2022 meta-analysis that sampled nearly four million participants, which found no association between therapeutic use of amphetamine and the development of cardiovascular disease in any age group.[129] However, amphetamine pharmaceuticals are contraindicated in individuals with preexisting cardiovascular disease.[sources 8]

Psychological

[edit]

At normal therapeutic doses, the most common psychological side effects of amphetamine include increased alertness, apprehension, concentration, initiative, self-confidence and sociability, mood swings (elated mood followed by mildly depressed mood), insomnia or wakefulness, and decreased sense of fatigue.[28][40] Less common side effects include anxiety, change in libido, grandiosity, irritability, repetitive or obsessive behaviors, and restlessness;[sources 9] these effects depend on the user's personality and current mental state.[40] Amphetamine psychosis (e.g., delusions and paranoia) can occur in heavy users.[28][41][42] Although very rare, this psychosis can also occur at therapeutic doses during long-term therapy.[28][42][43] According to the FDA, "there is no systematic evidence" that stimulants produce aggressive behavior or hostility.[28]

Amphetamine has also been shown to produce a conditioned place preference in humans taking therapeutic doses,[67][131] meaning that individuals acquire a preference for spending time in places where they have previously used amphetamine.[131][132]

Reinforcement disorders

[edit]

Addiction

[edit]
Addiction and dependence glossary[132][133][134]
  • addiction – a biopsychosocial disorder characterized by persistent use of drugs (including alcohol) despite substantial harm and adverse consequences
  • addictive drug – psychoactive substances that with repeated use are associated with significantly higher rates of substance use disorders, due in large part to the drug's effect on brain reward systems
  • dependence – an adaptive state associated with a withdrawal syndrome upon cessation of repeated exposure to a stimulus (e.g., drug intake)
  • drug sensitization or reverse tolerance – the escalating effect of a drug resulting from repeated administration at a given dose
  • drug withdrawal – symptoms that occur upon cessation of repeated drug use
  • physical dependence – dependence that involves persistent physical–somatic withdrawal symptoms (e.g., delirium tremens and nausea)
  • psychological dependence – dependence that is characterised by emotional-motivational withdrawal symptoms (e.g., anhedonia and anxiety) that affect cognitive functioning.
  • reinforcing stimuli – stimuli that increase the probability of repeating behaviors paired with them
  • rewarding stimuli – stimuli that the brain interprets as intrinsically positive and desirable or as something to approach
  • sensitization – an amplified response to a stimulus resulting from repeated exposure to it
  • substance use disorder – a condition in which the use of substances leads to clinically and functionally significant impairment or distress
  • drug tolerance – the diminishing effect of a drug resulting from repeated administration at a given dose
Transcription factor glossary
  • gene expression – the process by which information from a gene is used in the synthesis of a functional gene product such as a protein
  • transcription – the process of making messenger RNA (mRNA) from a DNA template by RNA polymerase
  • transcription factor – a protein that binds to DNA and regulates gene expression by promoting or suppressing transcription
  • transcriptional regulationcontrolling the rate of gene transcription for example by helping or hindering RNA polymerase binding to DNA
  • upregulation, activation, or promotionincrease the rate of gene transcription
  • downregulation, repression, or suppressiondecrease the rate of gene transcription
  • coactivator – a protein (or a small molecule) that works with transcription factors to increase the rate of gene transcription
  • corepressor – a protein (or a small molecule) that works with transcription factors to decrease the rate of gene transcription
  • response element – a specific sequence of DNA that a transcription factor binds to


Signaling cascade in the nucleus accumbens that results in amphetamine addiction
The image above contains clickable links
This diagram depicts the signaling events in the brain's reward center that are induced by chronic high-dose exposure to psychostimulants that increase the concentration of synaptic dopamine, like amphetamine, methamphetamine, and phenethylamine. Following presynaptic dopamine and glutamate co-release by such psychostimulants,[135][136] postsynaptic receptors for these neurotransmitters trigger internal signaling events through a cAMP-dependent pathway and a calcium-dependent pathway that ultimately result in increased CREB phosphorylation.[135][137] Phosphorylated CREB increases levels of ΔFosB, which in turn represses the c-Fos gene with the help of corepressors;[135][138][139] c-Fos repression acts as a molecular switch that enables the accumulation of ΔFosB in the neuron.[140] A highly stable (phosphorylated) form of ΔFosB, one that persists in neurons for 1–2 months, slowly accumulates following repeated high-dose exposure to stimulants through this process.[138][139] ΔFosB functions as "one of the master control proteins" that produces addiction-related structural changes in the brain, and upon sufficient accumulation, with the help of its downstream targets (e.g., nuclear factor kappa B), it induces an addictive state.[138][139]

Addiction is a serious risk with heavy recreational amphetamine use, but is unlikely to occur from long-term medical use at therapeutic doses;[45][46][47] in fact, lifetime stimulant therapy for ADHD that begins during childhood reduces the risk of developing substance use disorders as an adult.[44] Pathological overactivation of the mesolimbic pathway, a dopamine pathway that connects the ventral tegmental area to the nucleus accumbens, plays a central role in amphetamine addiction.[141][142] Individuals who frequently self-administer high doses of amphetamine have a high risk of developing an amphetamine addiction, since chronic use at high doses gradually increases the level of accumbal ΔFosB, a "molecular switch" and "master control protein" for addiction.[133][143][144] Once nucleus accumbens ΔFosB is sufficiently overexpressed, it begins to increase the severity of addictive behavior (i.e., compulsive drug-seeking) with further increases in its expression.[143][145] While there are currently no effective drugs for treating amphetamine addiction, regularly engaging in sustained aerobic exercise appears to reduce the risk of developing such an addiction.[146][147] Exercise therapy improves clinical treatment outcomes and may be used as an adjunct therapy with behavioral therapies for addiction.[146][148][sources 10]

Biomolecular mechanisms

[edit]

Chronic use of amphetamine at excessive doses causes alterations in gene expression in the mesocorticolimbic projection, which arise through transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms.[144][149][150] The most important transcription factors[note 12] that produce these alterations are Delta FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (ΔFosB), cAMP response element binding protein (CREB), and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB).[144] ΔFosB is the most significant biomolecular mechanism in addiction because ΔFosB overexpression (i.e., an abnormally high level of gene expression which produces a pronounced gene-related phenotype) in the D1-type medium spiny neurons in the nucleus accumbens is necessary and sufficient[note 13] for many of the neural adaptations and regulates multiple behavioral effects (e.g., reward sensitization and escalating drug self-administration) involved in addiction.[133][143][144] Once ΔFosB is sufficiently overexpressed, it induces an addictive state that becomes increasingly more severe with further increases in ΔFosB expression.[133][143] It has been implicated in addictions to alcohol, cannabinoids, cocaine, methylphenidate, nicotine, opioids, phencyclidine, propofol, and substituted amphetamines, among others.[sources 11]

ΔJunD, a transcription factor, and G9a, a histone methyltransferase enzyme, both oppose the function of ΔFosB and inhibit increases in its expression.[133][144][154] Sufficiently overexpressing ΔJunD in the nucleus accumbens with viral vectors can completely block many of the neural and behavioral alterations seen in chronic drug abuse (i.e., the alterations mediated by ΔFosB).[144] Similarly, accumbal G9a hyperexpression results in markedly increased histone 3 lysine residue 9 dimethylation (H3K9me2) and blocks the induction of ΔFosB-mediated neural and behavioral plasticity by chronic drug use,[sources 12] which occurs via H3K9me2-mediated repression of transcription factors for ΔFosB and H3K9me2-mediated repression of various ΔFosB transcriptional targets (e.g., CDK5).[144][154][155] ΔFosB also plays an important role in regulating behavioral responses to natural rewards, such as palatable food, sex, and exercise.[145][144][158] Since both natural rewards and addictive drugs induce the expression of ΔFosB (i.e., they cause the brain to produce more of it), chronic acquisition of these rewards can result in a similar pathological state of addiction.[145][144] Consequently, ΔFosB is the most significant factor involved in both amphetamine addiction and amphetamine-induced sexual addictions, which are compulsive sexual behaviors that result from excessive sexual activity and amphetamine use.[145][159][160] These sexual addictions are associated with a dopamine dysregulation syndrome which occurs in some patients taking dopaminergic drugs.[145][158]

The effects of amphetamine on gene regulation are both dose- and route-dependent.[150] Most of the research on gene regulation and addiction is based upon animal studies with intravenous amphetamine administration at very high doses.[150] The few studies that have used equivalent (weight-adjusted) human therapeutic doses and oral administration show that these changes, if they occur, are relatively minor.[150] This suggests that medical use of amphetamine does not significantly affect gene regulation.[150]

Pharmacological treatments
[edit]

As of December 2019, there is no effective pharmacotherapy for amphetamine addiction.[161][162][163] Reviews from 2015 and 2016 indicated that TAAR1-selective agonists have significant therapeutic potential as a treatment for psychostimulant addictions;[39][164] however, as of February 2016, the only compounds which are known to function as TAAR1-selective agonists are experimental drugs.[39][164] Amphetamine addiction is largely mediated through increased activation of dopamine receptors and co-localized NMDA receptors[note 14] in the nucleus accumbens;[142] magnesium ions inhibit NMDA receptors by blocking the receptor calcium channel.[142][165] One review suggested that, based upon animal testing, pathological (addiction-inducing) psychostimulant use significantly reduces the level of intracellular magnesium throughout the brain.[142] Supplemental magnesium[note 15] treatment has been shown to reduce amphetamine self-administration (i.e., doses given to oneself) in humans, but it is not an effective monotherapy for amphetamine addiction.[142]

A systematic review and meta-analysis from 2019 assessed the efficacy of 17 different pharmacotherapies used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for amphetamine and methamphetamine addiction;[162] it found only low-strength evidence that methylphenidate might reduce amphetamine or methamphetamine self-administration.[162] There was low- to moderate-strength evidence of no benefit for most of the other medications used in RCTs, which included antidepressants (bupropion, mirtazapine, sertraline), antipsychotics (aripiprazole), anticonvulsants (topiramate, baclofen, gabapentin), naltrexone, varenicline, citicoline, ondansetron, prometa, riluzole, atomoxetine, dextroamphetamine, and modafinil.[162]

Behavioral treatments
[edit]

A 2018 systematic review and network meta-analysis of 50 trials involving 12 different psychosocial interventions for amphetamine, methamphetamine, or cocaine addiction found that combination therapy with both contingency management and community reinforcement approach had the highest efficacy (i.e., abstinence rate) and acceptability (i.e., lowest dropout rate).[166] Other treatment modalities examined in the analysis included monotherapy with contingency management or community reinforcement approach, cognitive behavioral therapy, 12-step programs, non-contingent reward-based therapies, psychodynamic therapy, and other combination therapies involving these.[166]

Additionally, research on the neurobiological effects of physical exercise suggests that daily aerobic exercise, especially endurance exercise (e.g., marathon running), prevents the development of drug addiction and is an effective adjunct therapy (i.e., a supplemental treatment) for amphetamine addiction.[sources 10] Exercise leads to better treatment outcomes when used as an adjunct treatment, particularly for psychostimulant addictions.[146][148][167] In particular, aerobic exercise decreases psychostimulant self-administration, reduces the reinstatement (i.e., relapse) of drug-seeking, and induces increased dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) density in the striatum.[145][167] This is the opposite of pathological stimulant use, which induces decreased striatal DRD2 density.[145] One review noted that exercise may also prevent the development of a drug addiction by altering ΔFosB or c-Fos immunoreactivity in the striatum or other parts of the reward system.[147]

Summary of addiction-related plasticity
Form of neuroplasticity
or behavioral plasticity
Type of reinforcer Ref.
Opiates Psychostimulants High fat or sugar food Sexual intercourse Physical exercise
(aerobic)
Environmental
enrichment
ΔFosB expression in
nucleus accumbens D1-type MSNsTooltip medium spiny neurons
[145]
Behavioral plasticity
Escalation of intake Yes Yes Yes [145]
Psychostimulant
cross-sensitization
Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Attenuated Attenuated [145]
Psychostimulant
self-administration
[145]
Psychostimulant
conditioned place preference
[145]
Reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior [145]
Neurochemical plasticity
CREBTooltip cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation
in the nucleus accumbens
[145]
Sensitized dopamine response
in the nucleus accumbens
No Yes No Yes [145]
Altered striatal dopamine signaling DRD2, ↑DRD3 DRD1, ↓DRD2, ↑DRD3 DRD1, ↓DRD2, ↑DRD3 DRD2 DRD2 [145]
Altered striatal opioid signaling No change or
μ-opioid receptors
μ-opioid receptors
κ-opioid receptors
μ-opioid receptors μ-opioid receptors No change No change [145]
Changes in striatal opioid peptides dynorphin
No change: enkephalin
dynorphin enkephalin dynorphin dynorphin [145]
Mesocorticolimbic synaptic plasticity
Number of dendrites in the nucleus accumbens [145]
Dendritic spine density in
the nucleus accumbens
[145]

Dependence and withdrawal

[edit]

Drug tolerance develops rapidly in amphetamine abuse (i.e., recreational amphetamine use), so periods of extended abuse require increasingly larger doses of the drug in order to achieve the same effect.[168][169] According to a Cochrane review on withdrawal in individuals who compulsively use amphetamine and methamphetamine, "when chronic heavy users abruptly discontinue amphetamine use, many report a time-limited withdrawal syndrome that occurs within 24 hours of their last dose."[170] This review noted that withdrawal symptoms in chronic, high-dose users are frequent, occurring in roughly 88% of cases, and persist for 3–4 weeks with a marked "crash" phase occurring during the first week.[170] Amphetamine withdrawal symptoms can include anxiety, drug craving, depressed mood, fatigue, increased appetite, increased movement or decreased movement, lack of motivation, sleeplessness or sleepiness, and lucid dreams.[170] The review indicated that the severity of withdrawal symptoms is positively correlated with the age of the individual and the extent of their dependence.[170]

According to a 2025 review, the discontinuation of amphetamine at therapeutic doses does not typically result in withdrawal symptoms.[171] Discontinuation may unmask or cause a rebound of ADHD symptoms due to the cessation of treatment-related drug effects.[171] In cases where mild withdrawal symptoms do occur, they can be avoided by tapering the dose.[1] Unlike amphetamine abuse, where drug tolerance necessitates escalating doses to achieve the same effect, tolerance to clinically relevant doses of amphetamine plateaus after the initial titration period, and "drug holidays" (i.e., temporary treatment discontinuation) are not required to prevent the development of tolerance.[171]

Overdose

[edit]

An amphetamine overdose can lead to many different symptoms, but is rarely fatal with appropriate care.[1][119][172] The severity of overdose symptoms increases with dosage and decreases with drug tolerance to amphetamine.[40][119] Tolerant individuals have been known to take as much as 5 grams of amphetamine in a day, which is roughly 100 times the maximum daily therapeutic dose.[119] Symptoms of a moderate and extremely large overdose are listed below; fatal amphetamine poisoning usually also involves convulsions and coma.[28][40] In 2013, overdose on amphetamine, methamphetamine, and other compounds implicated in an "amphetamine use disorder" resulted in an estimated 3,788 deaths worldwide (3,425–4,145 deaths, 95% confidence).[note 16][173]

Overdose symptoms by system
System Minor or moderate overdose[28][40][119] Severe overdose[sources 13]
Cardiovascular
Central nervous
system
Musculoskeletal
Respiratory
  • Rapid breathing
Urinary
Other

Toxicity

[edit]

In rodents and primates, sufficiently high doses of amphetamine cause dopaminergic neurotoxicity, or damage to dopamine neurons, which is characterized by dopamine terminal degeneration and reduced transporter and receptor function.[175][176] There is no evidence that amphetamine is directly neurotoxic in humans.[177][178] However, large doses of amphetamine may indirectly cause dopaminergic neurotoxicity as a result of hyperpyrexia, the excessive formation of reactive oxygen species, and increased autoxidation of dopamine.[sources 14] Animal models of neurotoxicity from high-dose amphetamine exposure indicate that the occurrence of hyperpyrexia (i.e., core body temperature ≥ 40 °C) is necessary for the development of amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity.[176] Prolonged elevations of brain temperature above 40 °C likely promote the development of amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in laboratory animals by facilitating the production of reactive oxygen species, disrupting cellular protein function, and transiently increasing blood–brain barrier permeability.[176]

Psychosis

[edit]

An amphetamine overdose can result in a stimulant psychosis that may involve a variety of symptoms, such as delusions and paranoia.[41][42] A Cochrane review on treatment for amphetamine, dextroamphetamine, and methamphetamine psychosis states that about 5–15% of users fail to recover completely.[41][181] According to the same review, there is at least one trial that shows antipsychotic medications effectively resolve the symptoms of acute amphetamine psychosis.[41] Psychosis rarely arises from therapeutic use.[28][42][43]

Drug interactions

[edit]

Many types of substances are known to interact with amphetamine, resulting in altered drug action or metabolism of amphetamine, the interacting substance, or both.[28] Inhibitors of enzymes that metabolize amphetamine (e.g., CYP2D6 and FMO3) will prolong its elimination half-life, meaning that its effects will last longer.[5][28] Amphetamine also interacts with MAOIs, particularly monoamine oxidase A inhibitors, since both MAOIs and amphetamine increase plasma catecholamines (i.e., norepinephrine and dopamine);[28] therefore, concurrent use of both is dangerous.[28] Amphetamine modulates the activity of most psychoactive drugs. In particular, amphetamine may decrease the effects of sedatives and depressants and increase the effects of stimulants and antidepressants.[28] Amphetamine may also decrease the effects of antihypertensives and antipsychotics due to its effects on blood pressure and dopamine respectively.[28] Zinc supplementation may reduce the minimum effective dose of amphetamine when it is used for the treatment of ADHD.[note 17][186] Norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (NRIs) like atomoxetine prevent norepinephrine release induced by amphetamines and have been found to reduce the stimulant, euphoriant, and sympathomimetic effects of dextroamphetamine in humans.[187][188][189]

In general, there is no significant interaction when consuming amphetamine with food, but the pH of gastrointestinal content and urine affects the absorption and excretion of amphetamine, respectively.[28] Acidic substances reduce the absorption of amphetamine and increase urinary excretion, and alkaline substances do the opposite.[28] Due to the effect pH has on absorption, amphetamine also interacts with gastric acid reducers such as proton pump inhibitors and H2 antihistamines, which increase gastrointestinal pH (i.e., make it less acidic).[28]

Pharmacology

[edit]

Pharmacodynamics

[edit]
Pharmacodynamics of amphetamine in a dopamine neuron
A pharmacodynamic model of amphetamine and TAAR1
via AADC
The image above contains clickable links
Amphetamine enters the presynaptic neuron across the neuronal membrane or through DAT.[38] Once inside, it binds to TAAR1 or enters synaptic vesicles through VMAT2.[38][190][191] When amphetamine enters synaptic vesicles through VMAT2, it collapses the vesicular pH gradient, which in turn causes dopamine to be released into the cytosol (light tan-colored area) through VMAT2.[190][192] When amphetamine binds to TAAR1, it reduces the firing rate of the dopamine neuron via G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels (GIRKs) and activates protein kinase A (PKA) and protein kinase C (PKC), which subsequently phosphorylate DAT.[38][193][194] PKA phosphorylation causes DAT to withdraw into the presynaptic neuron (internalize) and cease transport.[38] PKC-phosphorylated DAT may either operate in reverse or, like PKA-phosphorylated DAT, internalize and cease transport.[38][191] Amphetamine is also known to increase intracellular calcium, an effect which is associated with DAT phosphorylation through a CAMKIIα-dependent pathway, in turn producing dopamine efflux.[195][196]

Amphetamine exerts its behavioral effects by altering the use of monoamines as neuronal signals in the brain, primarily in catecholamine neurons in the reward and executive function pathways of the brain.[38][62] The concentrations of the main neurotransmitters involved in reward circuitry and executive functioning, dopamine and norepinephrine, increase dramatically in a dose-dependent manner by amphetamine because of its effects on monoamine transporters.[38][62][190] The reinforcing and motivational salience-promoting effects of amphetamine are due mostly to enhanced dopaminergic activity in the mesolimbic pathway.[26] The euphoric and locomotor-stimulating effects of amphetamine are dependent upon the magnitude and speed by which it increases synaptic dopamine and norepinephrine concentrations in the striatum.[24]

Amphetamine potentiates monoaminergic neurotransmission primarily by entering axon terminals either through active transport by monoamine transporters (DAT, NET, and SERT) or by passive diffusion across neuronal membranes.[197][198] The uptake of amphetamine through these transporters competitively inhibits the reuptake of monoamine neurotransmitters from the synaptic cleft, thereby elevating their synaptic concentrations.[197][199] Once inside the neuronal cytosol, amphetamine initiates intracellular signaling cascades involving protein kinases, including protein kinase C (PKC) and Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha (CaMKIIα), leading to the phosphorylation of specific monoamine transporters and modification of their activity.[198][199] PKC-mediated phosphorylation can either reverse transporter function to facilitate neurotransmitter efflux into the synaptic cleft or induce transporter internalization, resulting in non-competitive inhibition of neurotransmitter reuptake.[198][200] In contrast, CaMKIIα-mediated transporter phosphorylation selectively reverses DAT and NET to confer dopamine and norepinephrine efflux respectively, but unlike PKC does not terminate transporter function through internalization.[198][201]

Amphetamine has been identified as a full agonist of trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1), a Gs-coupled and G13-coupled G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) discovered in 2001, which is important for regulation of brain monoamines.[38][202] Several reviews have linked amphetamine's agonism at TAAR1 to modulation of monoamine transporter function and subsequent neurotransmitter efflux and reuptake inhibition at monoaminergic synapses.[sources 15] Activation of TAAR1 increases cAMPTooltip cyclic adenosine monophosphate production via adenylyl cyclase activation, which triggers protein kinase A (PKA)- and PKC-mediated transporter phosphorylation.[38][78][205] Monoamine autoreceptors (e.g., D2 short, presynaptic α2, and presynaptic 5-HT1A) have the opposite effect of TAAR1, and together these receptors provide a regulatory system for monoamines.[38][39][202] Notably, amphetamine and trace amines possess high binding affinities for TAAR1, but not for monoamine autoreceptors.[38][39] Although TAAR1 is implicated in amphetamine-induced transporter phosphorylation, the magnitude of TAAR1-mediated monoamine release in humans remains unclear.[sources 15][202] Findings from studies using TAAR1 gene knockout models suggest that, despite facilitating reverse transport through Gs-coupled receptor-mediated cAMP signaling, TAAR1 may paradoxically attenuate amphetamine's psychostimulant effects by opening G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels through a Gs-independent pathway, an action that reduces neuronal firing.[206][38][202]

Amphetamine is also a substrate for the vesicular monoamine transporters VMAT1 and VMAT2.[192][207] Under normal conditions, VMAT2 transports cytosolic monoamines into synaptic vesicles for storage and later exocytotic release. When amphetamine accumulates in the presynaptic terminal, it collapses the vesicular pH gradient and releases vesicular monoamines into the neuronal cytosol.[192][207] These displaced monoamines expand the cytosolic pool available for reverse transport, thereby increasing the capacity for monoamine efflux beyond that achieved by amphetamine-mediated transporter phosphorylation alone.[199][201][207] Although VMAT2 is recognized as a major target in amphetamine-induced monoamine release at higher doses, some reviews have challenged its relevance at therapeutic doses.[197][207][208]

In addition to membrane and vesicular monoamine transporters, amphetamine also inhibits SLC1A1, SLC22A3, and SLC22A5.[sources 16] SLC1A1 is excitatory amino acid transporter 3 (EAAT3), a glutamate transporter located in neurons, SLC22A3 is an extraneuronal monoamine transporter that is present in astrocytes, and SLC22A5 is a high-affinity carnitine transporter.[sources 16] Amphetamine is known to strongly induce cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) gene expression,[9][214] a neuropeptide involved in feeding behavior, stress, and reward, which induces observable increases in neuronal development and survival in vitro.[9][215][216] The CART receptor has yet to be identified, but there is significant evidence that CART binds to a unique Gi/Go-coupled GPCR.[216][217] Amphetamine also inhibits monoamine oxidases at very high doses, resulting in less monoamine and trace amine metabolism and consequently higher concentrations of synaptic monoamines.[208][21][218] In humans, the only post-synaptic receptor at which amphetamine is known to bind is the 5-HT1A receptor, where it acts as an agonist with low micromolar affinity.[219][220]

The full profile of amphetamine's short-term drug effects in humans is mostly derived through increased cellular communication or neurotransmission of dopamine,[38] serotonin,[38] norepinephrine,[38] epinephrine,[190] histamine,[190] CART peptides,[9][214] endogenous opioids,[221][222][223] adrenocorticotropic hormone,[224][225] corticosteroids,[224][225] and glutamate,[195][210] which it affects through interactions with CART, 5-HT1A, EAAT3, TAAR1, VMAT1, VMAT2, and possibly other biological targets.[sources 17] Amphetamine also activates seven human carbonic anhydrase enzymes, several of which are expressed in the human brain.[226]

Dextroamphetamine displays higher binding affinity for DAT than levoamphetamine, whereas both enantiomers share comparable affinity at NET;[197] Consequently, dextroamphetamine produces greater CNS stimulation than levoamphetamine, roughly three to four times more, but levoamphetamine has slightly stronger cardiovascular and peripheral effects.[197][40] Dextroamphetamine is also a more potent agonist of TAAR1 than levoamphetamine.[227][228]

Dopamine

[edit]

In certain brain regions, amphetamine increases the concentration of dopamine in the synaptic cleft by modulating DAT through several overlapping processes.[201][198][78] Amphetamine can enter the presynaptic neuron either through DAT or, to a lesser extent, by diffusing across the neuronal membrane directly.[38][198] As a consequence of DAT uptake, amphetamine produces competitive reuptake inhibition at the transporter.[197][199] Upon entering the presynaptic neuron, amphetamine provokes the release of Ca²⁺ from endoplasmic reticulum stores, an effect that raises intracellular calcium to levels sufficient for downstream kinase-dependent signalling.[200][201] In parallel, amphetamine also increases intracellular cAMPTooltip cyclic adenosine monophosphate, which activates protein kinase A (PKA) and protein kinase C (PKC), whilst elevated intracellular Ca²⁺ activates PKC alone.[204][198][78] Phosphorylation of DAT by either kinase induces transporter internalization (non-competitive reuptake inhibition), but PKC-mediated phosphorylation alone induces the reversal of dopamine transport through DAT (i.e., dopamine efflux).[198][200]

TAAR1 has been identified as a biomolecular target of amphetamine that initiates some of amphetamine's kinase-dependent signaling cascades.[204][198][78] When TAAR1 signals via Gs-coupled receptors, intracellular cAMP increases through adenylyl cyclase activation and activates PKA and PKC, in turn phosphorylating DAT.[78][204] TAAR1 also couples G-protein alpha subunit G13;[229] when triggered by amphetamine, this pathway activates Ras homolog A (RhoA) and its downstream effector, Rho-associated coiled-coil kinase (ROCK), an effect that internalizes both DAT and the neuronal glutamate transporter EAAT3.[note 18][230][198] Transporter internalization via TAAR1's G13-coupled pathway is transient because Gs-cAMP-PKA signaling functionally inhibits RhoA's downstream activity;[229][231] once intracellular cAMP sufficiently accumulates, PKA is activated and phosphorylates RhoA, thereby terminating ROCK-mediated transporter internalization.[230][198] In addition to presynaptic actions that regulate DAT, TAAR1 activation exerts a somatodendritic inhibitory influence on dopamine output by reducing the firing rate of midbrain dopamine neurons via G protein-coupled inwardly-rectifying potassium channels, an effect that can attenuate amphetamine's psychostimulant response.[202][193][194]

Amphetamine's effect on intracellular calcium is associated with DAT phosphorylation through Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha (CAMKIIα), in turn producing dopamine efflux.[198][200][196] Because conventional PKC isoforms can be activated by Ca²⁺ and diacylglycerol, elevated intracellular calcium can promote PKC-dependent DAT phosphorylation independent of TAAR1.[201]

Effects of amphetamine on membrane transport proteins in dopamine neurons[note 19]
Biological target of amphetamine Initial effector / G-protein Second messenger(s) Secondary effector
protein kinase
Phosphorylated transporter Effect on transporter function Effect on neurotransmission Sources
Unidentified Unidentified intracellular effector IP₃-mediated intracellular Ca²⁺ release CAMKIIαTooltip Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha DATTooltip Dopamine transporter Reverse transport of dopamine Dopamine efflux into synaptic cleft [201][200]
TAAR1Tooltip Trace amine-associated receptor 1 G13 RhoA–GTP ROCK DAT Transporter internalization Dopamine reuptake inhibition [198][231][230]
TAAR1Tooltip Trace amine-associated receptor 1 G13 RhoA–GTP ROCK EAAT3Tooltip Excitatory amino acid transporter 3 Transporter internalization Glutamate reuptake inhibition [198][202][230]
TAAR1Tooltip Trace amine-associated receptor 1 Gs cAMPTooltip cyclic adenosine monophosphate PKATooltip Protein kinase A DAT Transporter internalization Dopamine reuptake inhibition [38][198][78]
TAAR1Tooltip Trace amine-associated receptor 1 Gs cAMP PKCTooltip Protein kinase C DAT Reverse transport of dopamine
Transporter internalization
Dopamine efflux into synaptic cleft
Dopamine reuptake inhibition
[38][78][204]
Unidentified Unidentified intracellular effector IP₃/DAG pathway PKCTooltip Protein kinase C DAT Reverse transport of dopamine
Transporter internalization
Dopamine efflux into synaptic cleft
Dopamine reuptake inhibition
[201][200]
†ROCK-mediated transporter internalization is transient due to the inactivation of RhoA (which activates ROCK) by PKA.

‡IP₃ binds to its receptors on the endoplasmic reticulum to release intracellular Ca²⁺ stores, and together with diacylglycerol activates conventional PKC isoforms.

[198][200][230]

Amphetamine is also a substrate for the presynaptic vesicular monoamine transporter, VMAT2.[192] Following amphetamine uptake at VMAT2, amphetamine induces the collapse of the vesicular pH gradient, which results in a dose-dependent release of dopamine molecules from synaptic vesicles into the cytosol via dopamine efflux through VMAT2.[192][207] Subsequently, the cytosolic dopamine molecules are released from the presynaptic neuron into the synaptic cleft via reverse transport at DAT.[199][192][207]

Norepinephrine

[edit]

Similar to dopamine, amphetamine dose-dependently increases the level of synaptic norepinephrine, the direct precursor of epinephrine. Amphetamine is believed to affect norepinephrine analogously to dopamine.[198][201][78] In other words, amphetamine induces competitive NET reuptake inhibition, non-competitive reuptake inhibition and efflux at phosphorylated NET via PKC activation, CAMKIIα-mediated NET efflux without internalization, and norepinephrine release from VMAT2.[198][201][78]

Serotonin

[edit]

Amphetamine exerts analogous, yet less pronounced, effects on serotonin as on dopamine and norepinephrine.[38] Amphetamine affects serotonin via VMAT2 and is thought to phosphorylate SERT via a PKC-dependent signaling cascade.[78] Like dopamine, amphetamine has low, micromolar affinity at the human 5-HT1A receptor.[219][220]

Other neurotransmitters, peptides, hormones, and enzymes

[edit]
Human carbonic anhydrase
activation potency
Enzyme KA (nMTooltip nanomolar) Sources
hCA4 94 [226]
hCA5A 810 [226][232]
hCA5B 2560 [226]
hCA7 910 [226][232]
hCA12 640 [226]
hCA13 24100 [226]
hCA14 9150 [226]

Acute amphetamine administration in humans increases endogenous opioid release in several brain structures in the reward system.[221][222][223] Extracellular levels of glutamate, the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain, have been shown to increase in the striatum following exposure to amphetamine.[195] This increase in extracellular glutamate presumably occurs via the amphetamine-induced internalization of EAAT3, a glutamate reuptake transporter, in dopamine neurons.[195][210] This internalization is mediated by RhoA activation and its downstream effector ROCK.[198][233] Amphetamine also induces the selective release of histamine from mast cells and efflux from histaminergic neurons through VMAT2.[190] Acute amphetamine administration can also increase adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosteroid levels in blood plasma by stimulating the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis.[35][224][225]

In December 2017, the first study assessing the interaction between amphetamine and human carbonic anhydrase enzymes was published;[226] of the eleven carbonic anhydrase enzymes it examined, it found that amphetamine potently activates seven, four of which are highly expressed in the human brain, with low nanomolar through low micromolar activating effects.[226] Based upon preclinical research, cerebral carbonic anhydrase activation has cognition-enhancing effects;[234] but, based upon the clinical use of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, carbonic anhydrase activation in other tissues may be associated with adverse effects, such as ocular activation exacerbating glaucoma.[234]

Sex-dependent differences

[edit]

Clinical research indicates that the pharmacological effects of amphetamine may vary depending on sex and menstrual cycle phase, possibly due to fluctuations in female sex hormones.[sources 18] In menstruating individuals, subjective and behavioral responses to amphetamine are heightened during the follicular phase (i.e., when estrogen levels are higher), and reduced during the luteal phase (i.e., when progesterone is elevated).[235][236][238] Reviews of human studies have also noted that men typically report stronger positive subjective responses to amphetamine compared to women tested during the luteal phase, whereas these sex differences are absent when women are tested during the follicular phase;[sources 18] subjective responses to amphetamine appear to correlate positively with plasma or salivary estrogen concentrations.[235][238] Moreover, neuroimaging studies have reported significant sex differences in the neural response to amphetamine in humans, including differences in dopamine release within the striatum and other brain regions.[239][240]

Preclinical studies have also produced findings of sex-dependent differences in drug response to amphetamine.[240][241] In contrast to human studies, adult female rats exhibit markedly greater dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens and more pronounced behavioral effects from amphetamine administration relative to males, effects that may be modulated by fluctuating estradiol levels across the estrous cycle or more broadly by adult gonadal hormones.[239][240][241]

Some evidence suggests that amphetamine interacts more strongly with female sex hormones than other psychostimulants such as methylphenidate, which may result in relatively greater variability in drug response across the menstrual cycle.[235][237] Although preliminary observational evidence suggests potential benefit from adjusting amphetamine doses according to menstrual cycle phases, randomized controlled trials have not evaluated this practice.[235][236][171]


Pharmacokinetics

[edit]

The oral bioavailability of amphetamine varies with gastrointestinal pH;[28] it is well absorbed from the gut, and bioavailability is typically 90%.[8] Amphetamine is a weak base with a pKa of 9.9;[2] consequently, when the pH is basic, more of the drug is in its lipid soluble free base form, and more is absorbed through the lipid-rich cell membranes of the gut epithelium.[2][28] Conversely, an acidic pH means the drug is predominantly in a water-soluble cationic (salt) form, and less is absorbed.[2] Approximately 20% of amphetamine circulating in the bloodstream is bound to plasma proteins.[9] Following absorption, amphetamine readily distributes into most tissues in the body, with high concentrations occurring in cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue.[15]

The half-lives of amphetamine enantiomers differ and vary with urine pH.[2] At normal urine pH, the half-lives of dextroamphetamine and levoamphetamine are 9–11 hours and 11–14 hours, respectively.[2] Highly acidic urine will reduce the enantiomer half-lives to 7 hours;[15] highly alkaline urine will increase the half-lives up to 34 hours.[15] The immediate-release and extended release variants of salts of both isomers reach peak plasma concentrations at 3 hours and 7 hours post-dose respectively.[2] Amphetamine is eliminated via the kidneys, with 30–40% of the drug being excreted unchanged at normal urinary pH.[2] When the urinary pH is basic, amphetamine is in its free base form, so less is excreted.[2] When urine pH is abnormal, the urinary recovery of amphetamine may range from a low of 1% to a high of 75%, depending mostly upon whether urine is too basic or acidic, respectively.[2] Following oral administration, amphetamine appears in urine within 3 hours.[15] Roughly 90% of ingested amphetamine is eliminated 3 days after the last oral dose.[15] 

Lisdexamfetamine is a prodrug of dextroamphetamine.[242][243] It is not as sensitive to pH as amphetamine when being absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract.[243] Following absorption into the blood stream, lisdexamfetamine is completely converted by red blood cells to dextroamphetamine and the amino acid L-lysine by hydrolysis via undetermined aminopeptidase enzymes.[243][242][244] This is the rate-limiting step in the bioactivation of lisdexamfetamine.[242] The elimination half-life of lisdexamfetamine is generally less than 1 hour.[243][242] Due to the necessary conversion of lisdexamfetamine into dextroamphetamine, levels of dextroamphetamine with lisdexamfetamine peak about one hour later than with an equivalent dose of immediate-release dextroamphetamine.[242][244] Presumably due to its rate-limited activation by red blood cells, intravenous administration of lisdexamfetamine shows greatly delayed time to peak and reduced peak levels compared to intravenous administration of an equivalent dose of dextroamphetamine.[242] The pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine are similar regardless of whether it is administered orally, intranasally, or intravenously.[242][244] Hence, in contrast to dextroamphetamine, parenteral use does not enhance the subjective effects of lisdexamfetamine.[242][244] Because of its behavior as a prodrug and its pharmacokinetic differences, lisdexamfetamine has a longer duration of therapeutic effect than immediate-release dextroamphetamine and shows reduced misuse potential.[242][244]

CYP2D6, dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH), flavin-containing monooxygenase 3 (FMO3), butyrate-CoA ligase (XM-ligase), and glycine N-acyltransferase (GLYAT) are the enzymes known to metabolize amphetamine or its metabolites in humans.[sources 19] Amphetamine has a variety of excreted metabolic products, including 4-hydroxyamphetamine, 4-hydroxynorephedrine, 4-hydroxyphenylacetone, benzoic acid, hippuric acid, norephedrine, and phenylacetone.[2][10] Among these metabolites, the active sympathomimetics are 4-hydroxyamphetamine,[245] 4-hydroxynorephedrine,[246] and norephedrine.[247] The main metabolic pathways involve aromatic para-hydroxylation, aliphatic alpha- and beta-hydroxylation, N-oxidation, N-dealkylation, and deamination.[2][248] The known metabolic pathways, detectable metabolites, and metabolizing enzymes in humans include the following:

Metabolic pathways of amphetamine in humans[sources 19]
Graphic of several routes of amphetamine metabolism
Amphetamine
Para-
Hydroxylation
Para-
Hydroxylation
Para-
Hydroxylation
unidentified
Beta-
Hydroxylation
Beta-
Hydroxylation
Oxidative
Deamination
Oxidation
unidentified
Glycine
Conjugation
The image above contains clickable links
The primary active metabolites of amphetamine are 4-hydroxyamphetamine and norephedrine;[10] at normal urine pH, about 30–40% of amphetamine is excreted unchanged and roughly 50% is excreted as the inactive metabolites (bottom row).[2] The remaining 10–20% is excreted as the active metabolites.[2] Benzoic acid is metabolized by XM-ligase into an intermediate product, benzoyl-CoA, which is then metabolized by GLYAT into hippuric acid.[250]

Pharmacomicrobiomics

[edit]

The human metagenome (i.e., the genetic composition of an individual and all microorganisms that reside on or within the individual's body) varies considerably between individuals.[254][255] Since the total number of microbial and viral cells in the human body (over 100 trillion) greatly outnumbers human cells (tens of trillions),[note 21][254][256] there is considerable potential for interactions between drugs and an individual's microbiome, including: drugs altering the composition of the human microbiome, drug metabolism by microbial enzymes modifying the drug's pharmacokinetic profile, and microbial drug metabolism affecting a drug's clinical efficacy and toxicity profile.[254][255][257] The field that studies these interactions is known as pharmacomicrobiomics.[254]

Similar to most biomolecules and other orally administered xenobiotics (i.e., drugs), amphetamine is predicted to undergo promiscuous metabolism by human gastrointestinal microbiota (primarily bacteria) prior to absorption into the blood stream.[257] The first amphetamine-metabolizing microbial enzyme, tyramine oxidase from a strain of E. coli commonly found in the human gut, was identified in 2019.[257] This enzyme was found to metabolize amphetamine, tyramine, and phenethylamine with roughly the same binding affinity for all three compounds.[257]

[edit]

Amphetamine has a very similar structure and function to the endogenous trace amines, which are naturally occurring neuromodulator molecules produced in the human body and brain.[38][48][258] Among this group, the most closely related compounds are phenethylamine, the parent compound of amphetamine, and N-methylphenethylamine, a structural isomer of amphetamine (i.e., it has an identical molecular formula).[38][48][259] In humans, phenethylamine is produced directly from L-phenylalanine by the aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) enzyme, which converts L-DOPA into dopamine as well.[48][259] In turn, N-methylphenethylamine is metabolized from phenethylamine by phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase, the same enzyme that metabolizes norepinephrine into epinephrine.[48][259] Like amphetamine, both phenethylamine and N-methylphenethylamine regulate monoamine neurotransmission via TAAR1;[38][258][259] unlike amphetamine, both of these substances are broken down by monoamine oxidase B, and therefore have a shorter half-life than amphetamine.[48][259]

Chemistry

[edit]
Racemic amphetamine
The image above contains clickable links
The skeletal structures of L-amph and D-amph
An image of amphetamine free base
A vial of the colorless amphetamine free base
An image of phenyl-2-nitropropene and amphetamine hydrochloride
Amphetamine hydrochloride (left bowl)
Phenyl-2-nitropropene (right cups)

Amphetamine is a methyl homolog of the mammalian neurotransmitter phenethylamine with the chemical formula C9H13N. The carbon atom adjacent to the primary amine is a stereogenic center, and amphetamine is composed of a racemic 1:1 mixture of two enantiomers.[9] This racemic mixture can be separated into its optical isomers:[note 22] levoamphetamine and dextroamphetamine.[9] At room temperature, the pure free base of amphetamine is a mobile, colorless, and volatile liquid with a characteristically strong amine odor, and acrid, burning taste.[20] Frequently prepared solid salts of amphetamine include amphetamine adipate,[260] aspartate,[28] hydrochloride,[261] phosphate,[262] saccharate,[28] sulfate,[28] and tannate.[263] Dextroamphetamine sulfate is the most common enantiopure salt.[49] Amphetamine is also the parent compound of its own structural class, which includes a number of psychoactive derivatives.[3][9] In organic chemistry, amphetamine is an excellent chiral ligand for the stereoselective synthesis of 1,1'-bi-2-naphthol.[264]

Substituted derivatives

[edit]

The substituted derivatives of amphetamine, or "substituted amphetamines", are a broad range of chemicals that contain amphetamine as a "backbone";[3][50][265] specifically, this chemical class includes derivative compounds that are formed by replacing one or more hydrogen atoms in the amphetamine core structure with substituents.[3][50][266] The class includes amphetamine itself, stimulants like methamphetamine, serotonergic empathogens like MDMA, and decongestants like ephedrine, among other subgroups.[3][50][265]

Synthesis

[edit]

Since the first preparation was reported in 1887,[267] numerous synthetic routes to amphetamine have been developed.[268][269] The most common route of both legal and illicit amphetamine synthesis employs a non-metal reduction known as the Leuckart reaction (method 1).[49][270] In the first step, a reaction between phenylacetone and formamide, either using additional formic acid or formamide itself as a reducing agent, yields N-formylamphetamine. This intermediate is then hydrolyzed using hydrochloric acid, and subsequently basified, extracted with organic solvent, concentrated, and distilled to yield the free base. The free base is then dissolved in an organic solvent, sulfuric acid added, and amphetamine precipitates out as the sulfate salt.[270][271]

A number of chiral resolutions have been developed to separate the two enantiomers of amphetamine.[268] For example, racemic amphetamine can be treated with d-tartaric acid to form a diastereoisomeric salt which is fractionally crystallized to yield dextroamphetamine.[272] Chiral resolution remains the most economical method for obtaining optically pure amphetamine on a large scale.[273] In addition, several enantioselective syntheses of amphetamine have been developed. In one example, optically pure (R)-1-phenyl-ethanamine is condensed with phenylacetone to yield a chiral Schiff base. In the key step, this intermediate is reduced by catalytic hydrogenation with a transfer of chirality to the carbon atom alpha to the amino group. Cleavage of the benzylic amine bond by hydrogenation yields optically pure dextroamphetamine.[273]

A large number of alternative synthetic routes to amphetamine have been developed based on classic organic reactions.[268][269] One example is the Friedel–Crafts alkylation of benzene by allyl chloride to yield beta chloropropylbenzene which is then reacted with ammonia to produce racemic amphetamine (method 2).[274] Another example employs the Ritter reaction (method 3). In this route, allylbenzene is reacted acetonitrile in sulfuric acid to yield an organosulfate which in turn is treated with sodium hydroxide to give amphetamine via an acetamide intermediate.[275][276] A third route starts with ethyl 3-oxobutanoate which through a double alkylation with methyl iodide followed by benzyl chloride can be converted into 2-methyl-3-phenyl-propanoic acid. This synthetic intermediate can be transformed into amphetamine using either a Hofmann or Curtius rearrangement (method 4).[277]

A significant number of amphetamine syntheses feature a reduction of a nitro, imine, oxime, or other nitrogen-containing functional groups.[269] In one such example, a Knoevenagel condensation of benzaldehyde with nitroethane yields phenyl-2-nitropropene. The double bond and nitro group of this intermediate is reduced using either catalytic hydrogenation or by treatment with lithium aluminium hydride (method 5).[270][278] Another method is the reaction of phenylacetone with ammonia, producing an imine intermediate that is reduced to the primary amine using hydrogen over a palladium catalyst or lithium aluminum hydride (method 6).[270]

Amphetamine synthetic routes
Diagram of amphetamine synthesis by the Leuckart reaction
Method 1: Synthesis by the Leuckart reaction 
Diagram of a chiral resolution of racemic amphetamine and a stereoselective synthesis
Top: Chiral resolution of amphetamine 
Bottom: Stereoselective synthesis of amphetamine 
Diagram of amphetamine synthesis by Friedel–Crafts alkylation
Method 2: Synthesis by Friedel–Crafts alkylation 
Diagram of amphetamine via Ritter synthesis
Method 3: Ritter synthesis
Diagram of amphetamine synthesis via Hofmann and Curtius rearrangements
Method 4: Synthesis via Hofmann and Curtius rearrangements
Diagram of amphetamine synthesis by Knoevenagel condensation
Method 5: Synthesis by Knoevenagel condensation
Diagram of amphetamine synthesis from phenylacetone and ammonia
Method 6: Synthesis using phenylacetone and ammonia

Detection in body fluids

[edit]

Amphetamine is frequently measured in urine or blood as part of a drug test for sports, employment, poisoning diagnostics, and forensics.[sources 20] Techniques such as immunoassay, which is the most common form of amphetamine test, may cross-react with a number of sympathomimetic drugs.[282] Chromatographic methods specific for amphetamine are employed to prevent false positive results.[283] Chiral separation techniques may be employed to help distinguish the source of the drug, whether prescription amphetamine, prescription amphetamine prodrugs, (e.g., selegiline), over-the-counter drug products that contain levomethamphetamine,[note 23] or illicitly obtained substituted amphetamines.[283][286][287] Several prescription drugs produce amphetamine as a metabolite, including benzphetamine, clobenzorex, famprofazone, fenproporex, lisdexamfetamine, mesocarb, methamphetamine, prenylamine, and selegiline, among others.[24][288][289] These compounds may produce positive results for amphetamine on drug tests.[288][289] Amphetamine is generally only detectable by a standard drug test for approximately 24 hours, although a high dose may be detectable for 2–4 days.[282]

For the assays, a study noted that an enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) assay for amphetamine and methamphetamine may produce more false positives than liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry.[286] Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) of amphetamine and methamphetamine with the derivatizing agent (S)-(−)-trifluoroacetylprolyl chloride allows for the detection of methamphetamine in urine.[283] GC–MS of amphetamine and methamphetamine with the chiral derivatizing agent Mosher's acid chloride allows for the detection of both dextroamphetamine and dextromethamphetamine in urine.[283] Hence, the latter method may be used on samples that test positive using other methods to help distinguish between the various sources of the drug.[283]

History, society, and culture

[edit]
Global estimates of drug users in 2016
(in millions of users)[290]
Substance Best
estimate
Low
estimate
High
estimate
Amphetamine-
type stimulants
34.16 13.42 55.24
Cannabis 192.15 165.76 234.06
Cocaine 18.20 13.87 22.85
Ecstasy 20.57 8.99 32.34
Opiates 19.38 13.80 26.15
Opioids 34.26 27.01 44.54

Amphetamine was first synthesized in 1887 in Germany by Romanian chemist Lazăr Edeleanu who named it phenylisopropylamine;[267][291][292] its stimulant effects remained unknown until 1927, when it was independently resynthesized by Gordon Alles and reported to have sympathomimetic properties.[292] Amphetamine had no medical use until late 1933, when Smith, Kline and French began selling it as an inhaler under the brand name Benzedrine as a decongestant.[29] Benzedrine sulfate was introduced 3 years later and was used to treat a wide variety of medical conditions, including narcolepsy, obesity, low blood pressure, low libido, and chronic pain, among others.[51][29] During World War II, amphetamine and methamphetamine were used extensively by both the Allied and Axis forces for their stimulant and performance-enhancing effects.[267][293][294] As the addictive properties of the drug became known, governments began to place strict controls on the sale of amphetamine.[267] For example, during the early 1970s in the United States, amphetamine became a schedule II controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act.[7] In spite of strict government controls, amphetamine has been used legally or illicitly by people from a variety of backgrounds, including authors,[295] musicians,[296] mathematicians,[297] and athletes.[27]

Amphetamine is illegally synthesized in clandestine labs and sold on the black market, primarily in European countries.[298] Among European Union (EU) member states in 2018, 11.9 million adults of ages 15–64 have used amphetamine or methamphetamine at least once in their lives and 1.7 million have used either in the last year.[299] During 2012, approximately 5.9 metric tons of illicit amphetamine were seized within EU member states;[300] the "street price" of illicit amphetamine within the EU ranged from 6–38 per gram during the same period.[300] Outside Europe, the illicit market for amphetamine is much smaller than the market for methamphetamine and MDMA.[298]

[edit]

As a result of the United Nations 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances, amphetamine became a schedule II controlled substance, as defined in the treaty, in all 183 state parties.[30] Consequently, it is heavily regulated in most countries.[301][302] Some countries, such as South Korea and Japan, have banned substituted amphetamines even for medical use.[303][304] In other nations, such as Brazil (class A3),[305] Canada (schedule I drug),[306] the Netherlands (List I drug),[307] the United States (schedule II drug),[7] Australia (schedule 8),[308] Thailand (category 1 narcotic),[309] and United Kingdom (class B drug),[310] amphetamine is in a restrictive national drug schedule that allows for its use as a medical treatment.[298][31]

Pharmaceutical products

[edit]

Several currently marketed amphetamine formulations contain both enantiomers, including those marketed under the brand names Adderall, Adderall XR, Mydayis,[note 1] Adzenys ER, Adzenys XR-ODT, Dyanavel XR, Evekeo, and Evekeo ODT. Of those, Evekeo (including Evekeo ODT) is the only product containing only racemic amphetamine (as amphetamine sulfate), and is therefore the only one whose active moiety can be accurately referred to simply as "amphetamine".[1][35][123] Dextroamphetamine, marketed under the brand names Dexedrine and Zenzedi, is the only enantiopure amphetamine product currently available. A prodrug form of dextroamphetamine, lisdexamfetamine, is also available and is marketed under the brand name Vyvanse. As it is a prodrug, lisdexamfetamine is structurally different from dextroamphetamine, and is inactive until it metabolizes into dextroamphetamine.[37][243] The free base of racemic amphetamine was previously available as Benzedrine, Psychedrine, and Sympatedrine.[24] Levoamphetamine was previously available as Cydril.[24] Many current amphetamine pharmaceuticals are salts due to the comparatively high volatility of the free base.[24][37][49] However, oral suspension and orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) dosage forms composed of the free base were introduced in 2015 and 2016, respectively.[123][311][312] Some of the current brands and their generic equivalents are listed below.

Amphetamine pharmaceuticals
Brand
name
United States
Adopted Name
(D:L) ratio
Dosage
form
Marketing
start date
Sources
Adderall 3:1 (salts) tablet 1996 [24][37]
Adderall XR 3:1 (salts) capsule 2001 [24][37]
Mydayis 3:1 (salts) capsule 2017 [313][314]
Adzenys ER amphetamine 3:1 (base) suspension 2017 [315]
Adzenys XR-ODT amphetamine 3:1 (base) ODT 2016 [312][316]
Dyanavel XR amphetamine 3.2:1 (base) suspension 2015 [123][311]
Evekeo amphetamine sulfate 1:1 (salts) tablet 2012 [35][317]
Evekeo ODT amphetamine sulfate 1:1 (salts) ODT 2019 [318]
Dexedrine dextroamphetamine sulfate 1:0 (salts) capsule 1976 [24][37]
Zenzedi dextroamphetamine sulfate 1:0 (salts) tablet 2013 [37][319]
Vyvanse lisdexamfetamine dimesylate 1:0 (prodrug) capsule 2007 [24][243][320]
tablet
Xelstrym dextroamphetamine 1:0 (base) patch 2022 [321]
Amphetamine base in marketed amphetamine medications
drug formula molar mass
[note 24]
amphetamine base
[note 25]
amphetamine base
in equal doses
doses with
equal base
content
[note 26]
(g/mol) (percent) (30 mg dose)
total base total dextro- levo- dextro- levo-
dextroamphetamine sulfate[323][324] (C9H13N)2•H2SO4
368.49
270.41
73.38%
73.38%
22.0 mg
30.0 mg
amphetamine sulfate[325] (C9H13N)2•H2SO4
368.49
270.41
73.38%
36.69%
36.69%
11.0 mg
11.0 mg
30.0 mg
Adderall
62.57%
47.49%
15.08%
14.2 mg
4.5 mg
35.2 mg
25% dextroamphetamine sulfate[323][324] (C9H13N)2•H2SO4
368.49
270.41
73.38%
73.38%
25% amphetamine sulfate[325] (C9H13N)2•H2SO4
368.49
270.41
73.38%
36.69%
36.69%
25% dextroamphetamine saccharate[326] (C9H13N)2•C6H10O8
480.55
270.41
56.27%
56.27%
25% amphetamine aspartate monohydrate[327] (C9H13N)•C4H7NO4•H2O
286.32
135.21
47.22%
23.61%
23.61%
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate[243] C15H25N3O•(CH4O3S)2
455.49
135.21
29.68%
29.68%
8.9 mg
74.2 mg
amphetamine base suspension[123] C9H13N
135.21
135.21
100%
76.19%
23.81%
22.9 mg
7.1 mg
22.0 mg

Notes

[edit]

Reference notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Amphetamine is a chiral of the class with the molecular formula C₉H₁₃N, functioning as a potent through the release of monoamine neurotransmitters including , norepinephrine, and serotonin, as well as inhibition of their transporters. Medically approved for (ADHD) and , it enhances executive function, attention, and wakefulness by elevating synaptic catecholamine levels, with clinical evidence supporting its efficacy in symptom management when dosed appropriately. First synthesized in 1887 and introduced therapeutically in , amphetamine's dual-edged profile includes substantial therapeutic value alongside high abuse potential, as its reinforcement via mesolimbic pathways drives dependence and necessitates strict regulatory controls as a Schedule II substance.

Chemical and Structural Properties

Molecular Structure and Derivatives

Amphetamine possesses the molecular formula C₉H₁₃N and the systematic IUPAC name 1-phenylpropan-2-. Its core structure derives from (β-phenylethylamine) through α-methylation, featuring a phenyl ring bonded to a -CH₂-CH(NH₂)-CH₃ chain, where the chiral α-carbon attaches to the amine, methyl, hydrogen, and benzyl groups; this includes an extra methylene (-CH₂-) bridge compared to α-phenylethylamine, in which the amine attaches directly to the carbon bearing the phenyl ring and methyl group. This configuration imparts a basic character to the amine nitrogen (pKa ≈9.9), enabling salt formation with acids for pharmaceutical use, such as amphetamine . The presence of the chiral center yields two enantiomers: (S)-(+)-amphetamine (dextroamphetamine), which predominates in activity due to enhanced and norepinephrine release, and (R)-(-)-amphetamine (levoamphetamine), which exerts stronger peripheral sympathomimetic effects with comparatively less brain penetration. Therapeutic preparations often employ the (equal proportions) or isolated dextroamphetamine, as in formulations like Adderall (mixed amphetamine salts) or Dexedrine (dextroamphetamine sulfate). Amphetamine derivatives encompass structural analogs modifying the parent scaffold for varied pharmacological profiles. Methamphetamine, the N-methyl derivative (C₁₀H₁₅N), exhibits heightened lipophilicity and blood-brain barrier crossing, amplifying stimulant potency. Other derivatives include phentermine (with an additional α-methyl group for effects) and , a linking to L-lysine via bond for enzymatic activation and abuse deterrence. Ring-substituted variants, such as those bearing methylenedioxy groups (e.g., ), alter serotonergic activity alongside catecholaminergic effects, though these fall under broader classes.

Synthesis and Detection

Amphetamine is synthesized via multiple chemical routes, with pharmaceutical production favoring methods that yield the pharmacologically active d-enantiomer. One established pharmaceutical begins with (norephedrine), which is chlorinated using in at 55–60°C for 3–6 hours to form the corresponding intermediate. This crude product is purified by filtration through , then hydrogenated with 0.5–10% palladium-on-carbon catalyst under 15–50 psi at 20–55°C for 4–24 hours, followed by pH adjustment, , and to isolate d,l- or enantiopure amphetamine. This approach enhances purity and avoids carcinogenic solvents like , making it suitable for large-scale medicinal production. Alternative syntheses include of phenyl-2-propanone (P2P, also known as benzyl methyl ketone) with and a such as over a metal or aluminum amalgam, a method adaptable for both legitimate and illicit contexts. For racemic mixtures, via precipitation separates d- and l-enantiomers, while stereoselective routes employ or enzymatic methods to directly produce d-amphetamine. Illicit production, predominant in regions like the , often utilizes P2P derived from pre-precursors like alpha-phenylacetoacetonitrile (APAAN) or glycidic acid derivatives, followed by Leuckart–Wallach reaction involving and acid , though this generates significant waste and impurities. Detection of amphetamine relies on analytical techniques tailored to sample type, with toxicology screening in urine typically initiating with (EIA) for presumptive identification of amphetamine and classes. These immunoassays exhibit with sympathomimetic amines like , necessitating confirmatory testing via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for definitive quantification and isomer differentiation (e.g., d vs. l-amphetamine). Detection windows in urine range from 72–96 hours post-ingestion, influenced by urine , dose, and , with acidic conditions accelerating elimination. In forensic analysis of seized materials, preliminary color tests (e.g., Marquis or Simon's reagents) and (TLC) provide rapid screening, while instrumental methods such as Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) , GC-MS, or (HPLC) enable precise identification and purity assessment per international standards. Emerging portable electrochemical sensors, including voltammetric and potentiometric devices, offer field-deployable alternatives but require validation against gold standards for reliability. Chiral separations via specialized columns distinguish enantiomers, critical for attributing sources to pharmaceutical versus illicit origins.

Pharmacology

Pharmacodynamics

Amphetamine exerts its primary pharmacological effects by enhancing monoaminergic neurotransmission in the central and peripheral nervous systems, predominantly through increased extracellular levels of dopamine and norepinephrine, with lesser effects on serotonin. This occurs via multiple mechanisms, including reversal of monoamine transporters (DAT for dopamine, NET for norepinephrine, and SERT for serotonin), which promotes efflux of neurotransmitters from presynaptic neurons into the synaptic cleft, and inhibition of their reuptake. Additionally, amphetamine interacts with the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) on synaptic vesicles, disrupting the storage of monoamines and facilitating their release into the cytoplasm for subsequent transport out of the neuron. Amphetamine also acts as an at trace amine-associated receptor 1 (), a expressed on monoaminergic neurons, which modulates function and contributes to enhanced release while providing feedback inhibition on neuronal firing rates. Weak inhibition of (MAO) further elevates cytosolic monoamine levels by reducing their enzymatic degradation. These actions collectively amplify signaling at postsynaptic adrenergic and receptors, leading to sympathomimetic effects such as increased alertness, elevated , and . The pharmacodynamic profile exhibits stereoselectivity between the dextro- and levo-isomers. demonstrates greater potency in releasing via DAT reversal and central nervous system stimulation, being 3-5 times more effective than in this regard, while preferentially releases norepinephrine and exerts stronger peripheral sympathomimetic effects, including cardiovascular stimulation. Racemic amphetamine, a 1:1 , combines these properties, resulting in balanced central and peripheral actions.

Pharmacokinetics

Amphetamine is rapidly absorbed from the following , with complete absorption typically occurring within 4-6 hours. The of oral amphetamine is high, though exact figures vary by formulation and ; for mixed amphetamine salts, peak plasma concentrations are achieved within 3 hours for immediate-release forms. Intravenous and intranasal routes provide near-immediate onset due to bypassing first-pass , while or also yields rapid absorption. Amphetamine exhibits a large , approximately 4 L/kg, indicating extensive tissue penetration including the . It readily crosses the blood-brain barrier, contributing to its psychoactive effects, and is approximately 20% protein-bound in plasma. Metabolism occurs primarily in the liver via enzymes, notably , through aromatic hydroxylation to form and side-chain oxidation to produce norephedrine and derivatives. Both d- and l-enantiomers are metabolized, though the d-form predominates in therapeutic contexts; metabolites retain some activity but are less potent than the parent compound. Excretion is predominantly renal, with 30-40% eliminated unchanged and the rest as metabolites; urinary output ranges from 1-75% depending on . In acidic ( <6), amphetamine ionization increases, enhancing tubular reabsorption and excretion up to 75%, shortening to as low as 7 hours; alkaline ( >7) reduces excretion to 1-2%, prolonging up to 34 hours. The elimination averages 10 hours for d-amphetamine and 13 hours for l-amphetamine in adults. Hepatic and renal clearance both contribute, with total clearance influenced by genetic polymorphisms in CYP2D6.

Endogenous Analogues and Sex Differences

Amphetamine's pharmacological actions parallel those of endogenous trace amines, particularly β-phenylethylamine (β-PEA), a naturally occurring monoamine found in trace amounts in the mammalian brain and periphery. Structurally, β-PEA shares a phenethylamine backbone with amphetamine, differing only by the absence of the α-methyl group. The α-methyl group in amphetamine resists breakdown by monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzymes, unlike β-PEA, which is rapidly metabolized by MAO; this allows amphetamine to cause stronger and longer-lasting release of dopamine and norepinephrine. This contributes to β-PEA's shorter half-life but similar capacity to promote catecholamine release via reversal of vesicular monoamine transporters and activation of trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1). This endogenous compound potentiates dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission, eliciting amphetamine-like effects such as increased locomotor activity and reinforcement at elevated concentrations, though its rapid metabolism by monoamine oxidase limits physiological impact under normal conditions. Other trace amines, including tyramine and octopamine, exhibit analogous but weaker interactions with TAAR1 and monoamine transporters, serving as neuromodulators that amplify catecholamine signaling in response to physiological stressors. Sex differences in amphetamine's and arise primarily from gonadal influences on monoamine systems and transporter function. In humans, females demonstrate heightened sensitivity to amphetamine's subjective effects during phases of elevated , with studies linking higher estrogen-to-progesterone ratios to enhanced and "drug liking" ratings following oral d-amphetamine administration. models corroborate this, showing greater (DAT) inhibition by amphetamine in estrus females compared to males or diestrus females, resulting in amplified extracellular levels in the . Conversely, males exhibit stronger reinforcing effects at higher doses, as evidenced by increased d-amphetamine self-administration in male versus female participants under progressive-ratio schedules. Pharmacokinetic variations further contribute to these disparities. Females metabolize methamphetamine—a close amphetamine analog—into amphetamine at lower rates, potentially prolonging exposure to active metabolites, though direct amphetamine studies indicate no consistent sex-based differences in plasma clearance. In preclinical assays, female rats display dose-dependent to amphetamine's locomotor and stereotypic effects, independent of ovarian hormones in some contexts, suggesting innate sex-specific neural adaptations in mesolimbic pathways. These findings imply that modulates and DAT efficacy, enhancing amphetamine's efficacy in females during fertile phases, while androgens may blunt such responses in males, influencing therapeutic dosing and abuse liability.

Therapeutic Applications

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Amphetamines, including and mixed amphetamine salts such as , are approved by the U.S. (FDA) for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in patients aged 3 years and older, with formulations like extended-release versions indicated for children, adolescents, and adults to manage core symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, and . , an amphetamine , is also FDA-approved for ADHD, offering once-daily dosing with reduced potential for immediate misuse compared to immediate-release forms. These medications work by increasing and norepinephrine levels in the , thereby enhancing executive function and attention regulation in individuals with ADHD, as demonstrated in randomized controlled trials showing symptom reductions of 20-30% on standardized rating scales like the ADHD Rating Scale-IV. In children and adolescents, amphetamines demonstrate moderate to high efficacy in reducing ADHD symptoms, with meta-analyses of randomized trials indicating effect sizes comparable to but with slightly higher tolerability concerns such as suppression and . 30269-4/fulltext) For instance, a of 19 trials involving over 2,500 pediatric patients found amphetamines superior to in improving hyperactivity and inattention, with response rates exceeding 50% in short-term studies, though long-term data beyond 12 months remain limited and suggest sustained benefits when adhered to. children show smaller effect sizes with stimulants including amphetamines, prompting cautious use per guidelines recommending behavioral interventions first. For adults with ADHD, network meta-analyses of over 100 trials identify amphetamines as the most efficacious first-line pharmacological option, outperforming and non-stimulants in symptom reduction and global functioning, with standardized mean differences of 0.8-1.0 versus . 30269-4/fulltext) Controlled studies, such as those with mixed amphetamine salts, report 70% response rates based on clinical global impressions, surpassing by factors of 10-fold, though efficacy wanes without continuous use and requires monitoring for cardiovascular effects. These findings hold across diverse adult populations, including those with comorbidities, underscoring amphetamines' role in restoring prefrontal catecholamine signaling deficits characteristic of ADHD. Day-to-day variability in response is common, with greater effectiveness on days featuring solid sleep, adequate hydration and protein intake, lower stress, and optimal dosing timing that avoids rebound or crash periods, contrasted by reduced efficacy amid poor sleep, skipped meals, dehydration, or entering the wear-off window; ADHD amplifies these symptom fluctuations due to sensitivity to lifestyle and physiological factors.

Narcolepsy and Excessive Daytime Sleepiness

Amphetamines, particularly , are approved for managing (EDS) in , a chronic characterized by irresistible sleep episodes and disrupted nighttime sleep. sulfate tablets are indicated for , with FDA-approved initial dosing of 10 mg daily for adults, adjustable in 10 mg increments at weekly intervals up to a maximum of 60 mg per day, divided into multiple administrations to sustain . Pediatric patients aged 6 years and older start at 5 mg daily, titrated similarly. Introduced in , amphetamines marked a foundational pharmacological advance for treatment, with Benzedrine (amphetamine sulfate) launched in 1935 by Smith, Kline and French explicitly for this indication, reducing sleep attacks through stimulation. Early clinical observations confirmed efficacy in alleviating EDS, as amphetamines like enhance alertness by promoting catecholamine release and inhibition in wake-promoting brain regions. By the mid-20th century, emerged as a preferred due to its higher potency and lower peripheral side effects compared to racemic mixtures. Empirical evidence supports amphetamines' role in EDS management, with studies showing (10-45 mg daily) and (20-60 mg daily) significantly decreasing sleep attack frequency in narcoleptic adults, though without impact on . The endorses amphetamine-based stimulants, including , methamphetamine, and mixed amphetamine salts, as effective for EDS, based on consistent reductions in subjective and objective sleepiness measures across decades of use. In refractory cases, where first-line agents like prove insufficient, amphetamines provide robust symptomatic relief, with clinical improvements in scores and maintenance of wakefulness test performance. However, long-term use risks tolerance, necessitating periodic dose adjustments or drug holidays to restore efficacy. Despite their efficacy, amphetamines are often positioned as second-line options due to cardiovascular risks, potential for abuse, and , contrasting with newer agents' profiles; carries a conditional recommendation for adult EDS per guidelines, emphasizing individualized assessment. Patient-reported outcomes highlight sustained benefits in daily functioning when titrated carefully, underscoring amphetamines' enduring utility in this context amid evolving .

Obesity and Binge Eating Disorder

Amphetamines, including , were first observed to induce in 1937 through suppression in patients treated for other conditions. From 1945 to 1962, the U.S. approved several amphetamine-based drugs as adjuncts to diet for treatment, capitalizing on their stimulation that reduces hunger via enhanced and norepinephrine signaling. However, widespread and concerns led to their withdrawal from routine obesity pharmacotherapy; amphetamine itself is classified as a Schedule II and lacks FDA approval for . Only select amphetamine derivatives, such as phendimetrazine and , remain approved for short-term use (up to 12 weeks) in , typically in patients with BMI over 30 kg/m² or 27 kg/m² with comorbidities, due to risks of tolerance, cardiovascular effects, and dependence. Limited clinical evidence supports dextroamphetamine's efficacy in specific subtypes. In hypothalamic —a rare condition post-brain injury or tumor—dextroamphetamine stabilized or reduced BMI z-scores in small cohorts of children and adults, with one study of seven patients showing no adverse effects over short-term follow-up. Another trial in 18 children with hypothalamic reported clinically relevant in 55.6%, particularly among those with acquired forms, alongside reduced hyperphagia. In non-hypothalamic cases, a prospective study of women unresponsive to found 44% achieved at least 10% initial body within 6 months on dextroamphetamine sulfate, sustained in 42% at 5 years, though long-term cardiovascular monitoring was emphasized. These findings derive from small, specialized trials; broader application is constrained by abuse potential and lack of large-scale, randomized data confirming sustained benefits outweighing risks like and . For (), dimesylate—a converting to —received FDA approval on January 30, 2015, as the first for moderate-to-severe BED in adults, dosed at 50-70 mg daily. Phase 3 trials demonstrated significant reductions in binge days per week (e.g., from 4.8 to 1.7 versus placebo's 3.8) over 12 weeks, with 35-40% remission rates and secondary of 4-6 kg, attributed to impulse control via monoamine enhancement. A of randomized controlled trials affirmed 's efficacy in diminishing BED symptoms and body weight, with effect sizes comparable to ADHD applications. Safety profiles mirror concerns, including , dry mouth, and increased , but abuse-deterrent formulation mitigates intravenous misuse; long-term data beyond 1 year remains limited, with recent analyses noting variable real-world outcomes influenced by comorbidities like ADHD. Guidelines recommend it alongside for BED patients with , prioritizing those unresponsive to behavioral interventions alone.

Performance Enhancement

Cognitive and Productivity Effects

Amphetamines, particularly , acutely enhance sustained attention and vigilance in healthy adults at low to moderate doses, typically 5-20 mg, by increasing catecholamine signaling in regions responsible for executive control. This effect is most pronounced in tasks requiring prolonged focus, such as continuous performance tests, where response accuracy improves without significant changes in reaction time variability. However, enhancements are dose-dependent and follow an inverted-U curve, with higher doses impairing performance due to overstimulation and increased . Effects on working memory show domain-specific patterns: spatial working memory tasks often benefit from amphetamine administration, with improved accuracy in or delayed match-to-sample paradigms, while verbal working memory remains largely unaffected. In individuals with lower baseline cognitive capacity, such as those fatigued or with suboptimal prefrontal tone, selectively boosts working memory load capacity and cortical activation during encoding. Meta-analyses confirm modest gains in processing speed and but inconsistent benefits for planning or decision-making in non-clinical populations. Regarding productivity, amphetamines promote subjective feelings of increased and reduced perceived effort, which may drive task persistence in demanding environments like extended study sessions or . Objective productivity metrics, however, reveal limited net gains; while simple repetitive tasks see throughput increases, complex creative or strategic work can suffer from narrowed attentional focus and elevated error rates under influence. Chronic or repeated use leads to tolerance, diminishing cognitive benefits over time and potentially exacerbating baseline deficits upon cessation due to rebound dysregulation. These patterns underscore that amphetamine's utility for productivity enhancement is constrained to specific contexts and user profiles, with risks of over-reliance offsetting marginal advantages.

Physical and Athletic Performance

Amphetamines exert ergogenic effects on physical performance primarily by masking fatigue, elevating alertness, and modulating , allowing athletes to sustain effort longer despite physiological strain. In controlled studies with trained athletes, administration of 10-20 mg of amphetamine improved time to exhaustion by approximately 2-3% and enhanced performance in events like weight throwing by 3-4%, with runners showing gains around 1.5%. These benefits stem from stimulation via increased and norepinephrine release, which delays the onset of perceived exhaustion without proportionally boosting maximal oxygen uptake or anaerobic capacity. Evidence for endurance enhancement is more robust than for pure strength gains; animal models demonstrate extended treadmill running in rats, while human trials link amphetamine to slowed core body temperature rise through enhanced heat dissipation, enabling prolonged high-intensity efforts in neutral or cool conditions. However, higher doses in warm environments may negate benefits by impairing thermoregulation, and subjective reports of improved coordination or strength lack consistent objective corroboration across studies. In ADHD populations using therapeutic amphetamines, six of nine reviewed studies reported significant athletic improvements, including better sprint times and agility, though confounding factors like baseline deficits limit generalizability to elite athletes. Despite these effects, amphetamines do not universally elevate performance metrics like peak power output or , and risks such as , nervousness, or cardiovascular strain can degrade output in prolonged or precision-demanding activities. Historical doping scandals, including widespread use in mid-20th-century and Olympic events, underscore their edge in sports but highlight inconsistent and health costs, contributing to bans by organizations like the since the 1960s. Empirical data thus supports modest, context-dependent enhancements, tempered by individual variability and environmental factors, rather than transformative gains.

Military and Occupational Applications

Amphetamines, particularly Benzedrine (amphetamine sulfate), were widely distributed to Allied forces during to counteract fatigue and sustain performance during extended operations. The British military issued approximately 20 million tablets between 1939 and 1945, while the supplied around 72 million amphetamine tablets to troops by war's end, enabling prolonged wakefulness in pilots, crews, and under stress. Axis forces, including the German Wehrmacht, relied heavily on methamphetamine variants like Pervitin, but amphetamine compounds similarly supported tactics and long-range reconnaissance flights. These applications stemmed from empirical observations of reduced sleep needs and heightened alertness, though chronic use led to dependency issues post-war. In modern militaries, dextroamphetamine remains authorized for U.S. Air Force pilots on extended sorties to mitigate sleep deprivation and preserve cognitive function. Doses of 5 mg every four hours have been shown to enhance cockpit task performance and flight safety without major adverse effects during tactical operations, as documented in studies from the 1990s Gulf War era. For B-2 bomber missions, pilots reported using dextroamphetamine on 97% of shorter flights and 58% of longer ones, often combined with controlled rest periods. While modafinil has partially supplanted amphetamines since the early 2000s due to a lower side-effect profile, dextroamphetamine persists for critical missions requiring immediate stimulant onset, with protocols emphasizing voluntary use and medical oversight. Such applications prioritize causal links between dopamine/norepinephrine release and sustained vigilance, overriding natural fatigue cycles. Beyond contexts, amphetamines see illicit occupational use among commercial drivers to extend during long-haul shifts, driven by economic pressures and regulatory gaps. Surveys indicate rates up to 82.5% in some driver populations, correlating with poor working conditions like extended hours and tight deadlines, though such impairs judgment and elevates crash risk despite short-term alertness gains. In and other safety-sensitive civilian roles, prescribed amphetamines are restricted by federal testing mandates, limiting legitimate applications to therapeutic needs rather than routine performance enhancement. Empirical data underscore that while amphetamines temporarily boost endurance, unregulated use introduces variability in efficacy and heightens vulnerability to errors from tolerance buildup.

Non-Therapeutic Use

Recreational Patterns and Motivations

Recreational use of amphetamine, often referred to as "speed," is driven by desires for , heightened alertness, and enhanced physical and social energy. Users report motivations centered on achieving intense pleasure and through the drug's effects, which amplify and norepinephrine signaling in the . Additional incentives include temporary relief from stress and suppression to facilitate weight control or prolonged during social or occupational demands. In some contexts, particularly among risk-prone individuals, the drug's reward-reinforcing properties appeal to sensation-seeking behaviors. Common patterns involve episodic bingeing, characterized by repeated high-dose administrations over extended periods, such as multi-day "runs," to sustain and counteract tolerance onset. This intermittent escalation often precedes chronic and is associated with intravenous or intranasal routes for rapid onset, where intranasal amphetamines like dextroamphetamine produce subjective effects (e.g., stimulation, positive mood) comparable to intranasal cocaine in terms of intensity and profile, though cocaine's effects are typically shorter-lasting and more cardiotoxic. Oral ingestion remains prevalent for milder recreational sessions. Polydrug combinations, including with alcohol, opioids, or other stimulants, frequently accompany use, increasing risks of adverse interactions. In and environments, amphetamine serves as "party fuel" to endure all-night dancing and , with usage correlating to attendance frequency at such events. Emerging adults in these settings cite social enhancement and perceived benefits for group bonding as key drivers, though unplanned consumption can occur amid peer influence. Overall, these patterns reflect the drug's pharmacological profile, promoting prolonged activity at the expense of natural recovery cycles, often culminating in exhaustion upon cessation. Globally, non-medical use of amphetamines, encompassing both and prescription stimulants like , affected an estimated 36 million people aged 15-64 in the past year as of , equivalent to 0.7% of that population, up from 34 million the prior year. This figure reflects sustained production, particularly methamphetamine from and , with worldwide seizures of amphetamine-type stimulants reaching record levels in 2023, accounting for nearly half of all seizures. Trends indicate gradual expansion driven by synthetic manufacturing scalability, though prevalence remains lower than or opioids, with underreporting likely due to stigma and survey limitations in high-use regions like . In the United States, past-year methamphetamine use among individuals aged 12 and older stood at 0.9%, or 2.6 million people, in 2023, with use disorder affecting 0.6% of that group. Misuse of prescription stimulants, primarily amphetamines such as , involved approximately 1.3% or 3.7 million people aged 12 and older in 2021, with similar rates persisting into recent years amid stable self-reported data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Non-therapeutic patterns show higher rates among young adults (e.g., 1-2% past-year misuse in college-aged groups) and rural populations for methamphetamine, fueled by diversion from legitimate ADHD prescriptions and cartel-supplied meth, though overall prevalence has plateaued since 2020 despite rising overdose deaths linked to adulteration. In , lifetime amphetamine use prevalence among adults aged 15-64 averages 3.7% in the , with past-year estimates around 0.8-1% varying by country, higher in the and where methamphetamine predominates. Trends from 2020-2025 reveal stable amphetamine use but emerging methamphetamine spread westward from , correlating with increased treatment entries (e.g., over 100,000 primary amphetamine users in 2023) and seizures, though overall non-medical demand lags behind the due to stricter precursor controls. Demographically, males aged 18-34 report higher involvement, often tied to or performance motives, with wastewater analyses confirming consistent urban consumption levels. Epidemiological shifts globally and regionally underscore causal factors like economic pressures and post-COVID, with UNODC data showing a 28% rise in total drug users over the decade to 2023, including synthetics, yet amphetamine-specific prevalence growth remains modest at 1-2% annually, tempered by enforcement and substitution with cheaper alternatives like . In the , methamphetamine initiation rates have climbed among those over 25 since 2015, per NSDUH trends, while prescription misuse dipped slightly among young adults (e.g., from 7.8% to 3.7% for select stimulants in 2022-2023), reflecting regulatory scrutiny on overprescribing. exhibits geographic divergence, with Northern markets stable and Southern/Eastern upticks in methamphetamine, highlighting supply-driven epidemics over demand surges.

Risks and Adverse Effects

Acute Physical and Psychological Effects

Amphetamine administration produces a range of acute physical effects primarily through its sympathomimetic actions, which enhance the release and inhibit the of catecholamines such as norepinephrine and in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Common effects include and due to increased sympathetic stimulation, often accompanied by elevated body temperature () from heightened metabolic activity and . Dry mouth, dilated pupils (), and reduced appetite also occur as a result of activation and central effects suppressing signals. Increased respiration and locomotor activity are further manifestations of this arousal state. At higher doses or in sensitive individuals, acute physical effects can escalate to include arrhythmias, , , , , , seizures, myocardial infarction, increased stroke risk, bladder pain, and abnormal urine, reflecting cardiovascular strain, neuroexcitotoxicity, and gastrointestinal or urinary disruption. In cases of methamphetamine abuse, acute testicular ischemia can occur, mimicking testicular torsion with scrotal pain and reduced blood flow observable on ultrasound. may intensify, posing risks of and organ stress, while (teeth grinding) and emerge from excessive motor stimulation. These effects are dose-dependent and typically resolve upon cessation, though they underscore amphetamine's potential for even in non-overdose scenarios. Psychologically, amphetamine induces acute states of heightened , , and enhanced mood via elevated extracellular levels in mesolimbic pathways, promoting a sense of increased energy and reduced fatigue. Acute administration can increase sexual desire and arousal via dopaminergic enhancement in reward pathways, particularly at higher or recreational doses with potential for hypersexuality, though effects vary by dose, context, and individual factors; in therapeutic doses for ADHD, clinical reports indicate predominantly decreased libido, reduced arousal, erectile dysfunction, or no change. Users often report improved focus and wakefulness, attributable to noradrenergic enhancement in circuits, though this can manifest as restlessness or . At recreational or supratherapeutic doses, anxiety, agitation, panic, and impulsivity may arise from overstimulation of adrenergic systems, sometimes progressing to [paranoia](/page/Paranoia] or acute characterized by delusions, hallucinations (including auditory hallucinations resembling schizophrenia). These psychological effects vary by individual factors such as dose, (e.g., oral vs. intravenous, with faster onset amplifying intensity), and tolerance, but they stem causally from surges that disrupt normal inhibitory controls in limbic and cortical regions. While low therapeutic doses (e.g., 5-30 mg for ADHD) minimize adverse psychological outcomes, higher acute exposures reliably produce excitatory and potentially dysphoric states, including aggression or in poly-substance contexts. Empirical data from controlled studies confirm these patterns, with subjective reports of elation peaking 1-3 hours post-ingestion.

Chronic Health Consequences

Prolonged amphetamine use, particularly at high doses associated with abuse, is linked to , a condition involving structural and functional heart damage often manifesting as with reduced . This arises from catecholamine-mediated mechanisms, including , , , and direct myocardial , leading to , myocyte death, and increased risk of or arrhythmias. In severe cases, left ventricular thrombus formation can occur, predisposing users to embolic . Even therapeutic doses in ADHD treatment, such as mixed amphetamine salts up to 60 mg/day, show minimal long-term cardiovascular changes in healthy adults, though monitoring is advised due to rare cardiomyopathy risks in younger patients. Chronic exposure induces , primarily affecting and serotonergic systems in regions like the and , resulting in persistent deficits in , executive function, and . from repeated dosing exacerbates neuronal damage via and mitochondrial dysfunction, with animal models demonstrating long-lasting dendritic remodeling and terminal loss. studies indicate that adolescent onset amplifies these effects due to immature development, though direct causation in low-dose therapeutic use remains debated and evidence is limited to high-dose abuse scenarios. Psychiatrically, sustained amphetamine abuse elevates risks of persistent , characterized by persecutory delusions and hallucinations, alongside heightened anxiety, depression, and violent ideation, independent of acute intoxication. These outcomes correlate with dosage, duration, and earlier initiation, with withdrawal exacerbating mood dysregulation, though causality is confounded by polydrug use and preexisting vulnerabilities in observational data. Additional physical sequelae include severe from appetite suppression leading to , dental decay ("meth mouth" from and ), skin lesions from picking, and immune suppression increasing infection susceptibility. Animal studies of methamphetamine exposure demonstrate histopathological changes in the testes, reduced spermatogenesis, and impaired fertility. Long-term use of prescription ADHD stimulants, including amphetamines, is associated with a small increased risk of testicular hypofunction (low testosterone), with a hazard ratio of approximately 1.8 but low absolute incidence (0.69% in users versus 0.39% in non-users). These effects are primarily associated with abuse or long-term high-dose use and are not commonly listed in prescribing information for drugs like Adderall, where sexual side effects more often involve libido changes or erectile dysfunction. Vascular permeability changes may contribute to risk beyond cardiac . Recovery potential varies; may partially reverse with abstinence, but neurological deficits often endure.

Dependence, Addiction, and Withdrawal

Amphetamine dependence develops through repeated use leading to tolerance, where higher doses are required to produce the initial pharmacological effects, primarily due to downregulation of transporters and receptors in the mesolimbic reward pathway. This tolerance manifests behaviorally as diminished and locomotor stimulation after chronic exposure, often within days to weeks of regular administration. Physical dependence involves neuroadaptations that sustain drug-seeking to avoid withdrawal, while psychological dependence reinforces compulsive patterns via conditioned cues tied to surges. Addiction, classified as amphetamine use disorder in diagnostic criteria, entails persistent use despite adverse consequences, with core features including tolerance, withdrawal, unsuccessful quit attempts, and excessive time spent obtaining or recovering from the drug. A key molecular mechanism is the accumulation of the transcription factor ΔFosB in the nucleus accumbens, induced by repeated amphetamine exposure; this stable protein persists for weeks to months post-cessation, epigenetically altering gene expression to heighten sensitivity to drug cues and promote relapse vulnerability. In the United States, among approximately 16 million adults misusing prescription stimulants annually, about 3.1% (roughly 500,000 individuals) meet criteria for stimulant use disorder, with higher rates observed in methamphetamine-prevalent regions. Withdrawal from amphetamine typically begins within 24 hours of cessation, peaking in the first 2-4 days with an acute "crash" phase characterized by profound fatigue, dysphoric mood, , increased appetite, and intense cravings driven by depletion. Physical symptoms may include and , contrasting the drug's hypertensive effects, while psychological manifestations encompass , , and in severe cases. The acute phase resolves in 5-7 days for many users, but protracted withdrawal—lasting weeks to months—involves lingering depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairments, contributing to high rates exceeding 90% without intervention. No pharmacotherapies are FDA-approved specifically for amphetamine withdrawal; management relies on supportive measures like hydration, , and behavioral therapies to mitigate symptoms and prevent complications.

Overdose and Toxicity

Symptoms and Mechanisms

Amphetamine overdose manifests through a hyperadrenergic state driven by excessive release, primarily , , and , leading to widespread sympathetic overstimulation. Common cardiovascular symptoms include , , and arrhythmias, which can progress to or in severe cases. , often exceeding 40°C (104°F), arises from increased metabolic demand, , and impairing , contributing to multi-organ dysfunction. Neurological effects encompass acute agitation, impulsivity, and aggression, escalating to with persecutory delusions, auditory or visual hallucinations, and paranoid ideation resembling . Seizures occur due to excitotoxic neuronal hyperactivity, while severe intoxication may induce , cerebral hemorrhage, or ischemic stroke from and . Other manifestations include , diaphoresis, from prolonged muscle activity, and secondary to or . The primary mechanism involves amphetamine's entry into neurons via and norepinephrine transporters, where it promotes (VMAT2) reversal, displacing neurotransmitters into the and subsequently reversing transporter function to release them extracellularly. This flood of catecholamines activates alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptors, amplifying , contractility, and , while central effects heighten via trace amine-associated receptor 1 () agonism and D2 receptor modulation. Serotonin release contributes to serotonergic toxicity, potentially fulfilling criteria for with and . Pathophysiologically, overdose toxicity is exacerbated by from dopamine auto-oxidation, generating that damage and serotonergic terminals, particularly in the and . synergizes with this by denaturing proteins, disrupting ion channels, and amplifying mitochondrial dysfunction, creating a vicious cycle of , lactic acidemia, and cellular energy failure. In fatal cases, mechanisms culminate in cardiovascular collapse, , or seizures, with lethality thresholds varying by dose, route, and individual factors like tolerance or polydrug use.

Management and Outcomes

Amphetamine overdose management primarily relies on supportive care, as no specific antidote exists. Initial evaluation focuses on airway protection, hemodynamic stabilization, and addressing life-threatening complications such as seizures, , and arrhythmias. Agitated or combative patients often require chemical with benzodiazepines like (2-4 mg IV) or (5-10 mg IV), titrated to effect, to control and prevent from restraint or exertion. Physical restraints should be minimized to avoid exacerbating or injury, with continuous monitoring of in an intensive care setting for severe cases. Gastrointestinal decontamination with activated charcoal (1 g/kg) may be administered if ingestion occurred within 1-2 hours and the patient is not at risk of aspiration, though its is limited due to rapid absorption. , a common and potentially fatal feature, is managed aggressively with external cooling measures such as ice packs, cool fluids, and evaporative techniques; antipyretics like acetaminophen are ineffective for this sympathomimetic-induced elevation. Seizures are treated initially with benzodiazepines, escalating to or for refractory cases, while avoiding phenothiazines due to lowered . Cardiovascular effects, including and , respond to benzodiazepines in most instances; persistent severe may warrant short-acting agents like or nitroprusside, but beta-blockers alone are contraindicated due to risk of unopposed alpha-adrenergic stimulation. Acid-base disturbances and necessitate fluid resuscitation and urine alkalinization in select cases to prevent . Outcomes of amphetamine overdose are generally favorable with timely supportive intervention, with most patients achieving full recovery without permanent sequelae, though complications such as , , or can prolong hospitalization. Mortality is low for isolated amphetamine overdoses treated promptly—estimated at less than 1% in emergency settings—but rises significantly with polysubstance involvement, particularly opioids or alcohol, and in cases of delayed presentation or extreme exceeding 41°C. From 2018 to 2023, U.S. psychostimulant-involved overdose death rates increased from approximately 3.5 to 7.0 per 100,000 population, reflecting broader trends in and amphetamine misuse rather than isolated overdose lethality. Long-term survivors may experience neuropsychiatric residuals like or cognitive deficits, especially among chronic users, underscoring the need for follow-up psychiatric evaluation. Factors worsening prognosis include intravenous use, underlying , and co-ingestion, with injectors facing elevated risks of infectious complications contributing to indirect mortality.

Contraindications and Interactions

Patient-Specific Contraindications

Amphetamines are contraindicated in patients with known to amphetamine or other components of the formulation, as such reactions can include and . Administration is prohibited in individuals with advanced , symptomatic , moderate to severe , , or , owing to the sympathomimetic effects that can precipitate hypertensive crises, arrhythmias, or elevated . These conditions heighten the risk of acute cardiovascular events, as amphetamines elevate and via catecholamine release and inhibition of . Patients with a history of or drug abuse represent a specific due to amphetamines' high abuse potential and reinforcement of addictive behaviors through surge in reward pathways. Clinical guidelines emphasize avoidance in such cases to prevent escalation to dependence, supported by epidemiological data showing rapid tolerance and withdrawal in predisposed individuals. In patients with severe agitation, psychosis, or , amphetamines are contraindicated as they may exacerbate manic episodes or induce hallucinations via excessive dopaminergic and noradrenergic stimulation. Similarly, those with Tourette's syndrome or motor/phonic tics face worsened symptoms, necessitating prior clinical evaluation. Structural cardiac abnormalities, , or serious arrhythmias further preclude use, with recommendations to avoid entirely rather than titrate cautiously.

Pharmacological Interactions

Amphetamine exhibits both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with other substances, altering its absorption, , , or effects on systems. Pharmacokinetically, amphetamine is partially metabolized by 2D6 () to form metabolites such as , with renal influenced by urinary pH. Inhibitors of , including and , can elevate amphetamine plasma concentrations by impeding this metabolic pathway, potentially intensifying adverse effects like and . Urinary alkalinizers, such as or antacids, reduce amphetamine and in the kidneys, decreasing and prolonging its , whereas acidifiers like enhance elimination. Pharmacodynamically, amphetamine's release of and norepinephrine from presynaptic vesicles interacts additively or synergistically with agents affecting monoamine systems. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), such as , are contraindicated due to the risk of severe ; MAOIs block , amplifying the catecholamine surge induced by amphetamine's vesicular release and inhibition mechanisms. This interaction stems from unchecked accumulation of released neurotransmitters, leading to excessive sympathetic activation, with case reports documenting fatalities from . Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like sertraline may potentiate amphetamine's stimulation, increasing risks of anxiety, restlessness, and , though amphetamine's primary action on and norepinephrine limits serotonergic overlap compared to . Tricyclic antidepressants, such as amitriptyline, additively enhance cardiovascular effects through shared sympathomimetic properties, potentially elevating and . Co-administration with other stimulants, including or , heightens sympathomimetic toxicity, including arrhythmias and , due to compounded monoamine efflux. Alcohol consumption with amphetamine exacerbates cardiovascular strain, with alcohol's effects masking amphetamine-induced and alertness, often leading to increased dosing and risks of , , and hepatic injury from combined . indicate that amphetamine-alcohol mixtures disrupt signaling more profoundly than either alone, contributing to and behavioral . Interactions with antihypertensives like beta-blockers may blunt amphetamine's tachycardic effects but exacerbate via unopposed alpha-adrenergic stimulation. Overall, these interactions necessitate careful monitoring, with at least a 14-day washout for MAOIs before amphetamine initiation.

Historical Development

Early Discovery and Pre-War Uses

Amphetamine was first synthesized on October 24, 1887, by Romanian chemist Lazăr Edeleanu at the University of Berlin, who produced it via chemical reduction of phenylacetone and named the compound phenylisopropylamine; however, it garnered no pharmacological interest at the time and remained obscure for decades. In the late 1920s, American biochemist Gordon Alles independently resynthesized amphetamine sulfate while seeking synthetic alternatives to ephedrine for treating asthma and nasal congestion, self-administering an intravenous dose of 50 milligrams on June 3, 1929, which produced pronounced central nervous system stimulation, euphoria, and elevated blood pressure without the peripheral vasoconstriction of ephedrine. Alles published initial clinical observations that year, highlighting its potential as a respiratory and mood stimulant, prompting further pharmacological exploration. By 1932, pharmaceutical firm commercialized amphetamine as the over-the-counter Benzedrine inhaler, containing 250 milligrams of amphetamine base impregnated in a wick, primarily for relieving via in the mucous membranes; users inhaled the volatile vapors, though the device allowed easy extraction of the sulfate for oral or intravenous misuse. Early studies in the mid-1930s confirmed its for , with Prinzmetal and Bloomberg reporting in 1935 that oral doses alleviated in patients by enhancing alertness without significant toxicity in short-term use. It was also investigated for , where it raised systolic by 20-30 mmHg in trials, and for mild depression, attributing benefits to its sympathomimetic actions mimicking adrenaline. In 1937, Benzedrine sulfate tablets (initially 10 milligrams per dose) were introduced for , expanding applications to include reduction in shift workers, suppression for management—demonstrated by doses reducing caloric intake by up to 40% in controlled observations—and adjunctive therapy for symptoms like bradykinesia. Pre-war endorsements from physicians positioned it as a versatile euphoriant and performance enhancer, with reports of improved concentration in students and professionals, though dependency risks emerged from anecdotal overuse, such as students consuming multiple tablets for exam preparation. By , annual U.S. sales exceeded 1 million inhalers, reflecting widespread despite emerging concerns over tolerance development after prolonged daily dosing.

World War II Military Deployment

During , amphetamine, marketed as Benzedrine sulfate, was widely deployed by Allied forces to counteract fatigue and sustain alertness during extended operations. British military authorities approved its use across all branches, distributing approximately 72 million doses to enhance endurance in combat scenarios, including long-range bombing raids and ground assaults. In , formally authorized Benzedrine for operational missions, enabling pilots to maintain focus over prolonged flights that often exceeded 24 hours, such as those targeting German industrial sites. Ground forces, including units, also utilized it during high-risk raids, where small teams covered vast distances behind enemy lines with minimal rest. The military similarly adopted Benzedrine, issuing between 250 and 500 million tablets to troops over the course of the war, with an emphasis on aviation personnel. By 1945, about 15 percent of U.S. Army Air Forces fighter pilots self-administered the routinely to cope with and operational demands. Bomber crews received it to combat the physiological toll of high-altitude, multi-hour missions, where it was credited with improving vigilance and reaction times under duress. Distribution was managed through medical officers, though informal use grew as troops recognized its capacity to suppress hunger and elevate mood alongside wakefulness. In contrast to Axis powers' reliance on methamphetamine variants like Pervitin for similar purposes, Allied deployment of amphetamine prioritized controlled issuance to mitigate risks such as dependency or impaired judgment post-use, though empirical validation of its battlefield efficacy remained limited at the time. Postwar analyses indicated that while Benzedrine facilitated short-term performance, its adoption stemmed more from pragmatic needs than exhaustive fatigue research, influencing subsequent pharmacology.

Post-War Expansion and Regulation

Following , amphetamine prescriptions surged in the United States for treating , , and mood disorders, with over half a million civilians using amphetamine tablets by 1945, building on wartime exposure that reached up to 16 million service members and normalizing the drug's effects. In 1949, the approved advertising amphetamines for , fueling further expansion as physicians liberally prescribed them despite limited safety data, often combining them with barbiturates for mood control. By the , amphetamines were marketed as diet pills and mood elevators, with production quotas set by the reflecting high demand, though prescribing rates remained elevated into the amid emerging abuse concerns. Globally, non-medical amphetamine use proliferated in the two decades post-war, driven by military surpluses and recreational appeal; in Japan, intravenous methamphetamine abuse erupted from excess stockpiles, creating an epidemic that peaked in the early 1950s before subsiding with economic recovery and job growth by the late 1950s and 1960s. In the United Kingdom, amphetamines gained traction in the 1960s mod subculture for enhancing alertness and sociability, contributing to widespread recreational patterns. Abuse escalated into epidemics, with retrospective data showing high prevalence of non-medical dependence in the comparable to later peaks, prompting regulatory responses; prescribing did not decline significantly until federal interventions curbed access. In the , the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of classified amphetamine as a II controlled substance, imposing strict prescription limits and reducing medical use thereafter, while earlier FDA actions included production caps and warnings on risks. Modern alternatives to Benzedrine include amphetamine-based medications such as Adderall and Dexedrine, which treat similar conditions like ADHD and narcolepsy under stricter controls as Schedule II substances, contrasting with Benzedrine's earlier over-the-counter availability. Internationally, similar restrictions emerged by the late , reflecting causal links between unchecked availability and dependency patterns observed in empirical data.

International and National Scheduling

Amphetamine and its salts are controlled internationally under Schedule II of the [Convention on Psychotropic Substances](/page/Convention_on_Psychotropic Substances) (1971), which mandates strict licensing for manufacture, export, import, distribution, and trade, while permitting medical and scientific applications under governmental oversight to balance therapeutic utility against abuse risks. This scheduling reflects amphetamine's classification as an amphetamine-type stimulant with recognized but limited medical value, alongside requirements for annual statistical reporting to the (INCB). Precursors for amphetamine synthesis, such as certain derivatives, face additional controls under Schedule II of the 1988 United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances to curb diversion. Nationally, scheduling aligns with the 1971 Convention but varies in stringency. In the United States, amphetamine is designated a Schedule II substance under the (1970), signifying high abuse potential with accepted medical uses (e.g., for ADHD and ) but requiring prescriptions via secure systems and limiting refills to prevent diversion. This classification, upheld since 1971, imposes penalties of up to 20 years imprisonment for trafficking 5 grams or more of pure amphetamine. In contrast, countries like classify amphetamine under Schedule I of the (1996), treating it as having no accepted medical use despite international allowances, which has led to tighter import restrictions and debates over therapeutic access. Other nations, such as , regulate it as a Schedule 8 controlled drug under state poisons acts, mandating special prescriptions and monitoring akin to opioids. These frameworks reflect empirical assessments of amphetamine's pharmacological profile—its efficacy in treating disorders like ADHD via and norepinephrine modulation, juxtaposed against risks of dependence evidenced by epidemiological on misuse patterns—yet national divergences arise from differing priorities, with more restrictive schedules in some jurisdictions potentially constraining legitimate medical supply amid rising demand for conditions like . INCB reports highlight ongoing challenges in harmonizing controls, as clandestine production exploits scheduling gaps, contributing to global seizures exceeding 100 tons of amphetamine-type stimulants annually as of 2022.

Prescription Controls and Access Challenges

In the United States, amphetamines such as (mixed amphetamine salts) and Dexedrine (dextroamphetamine) are classified as Schedule II controlled substances under the , reflecting their high potential for abuse and severe psychological or despite accepted medical uses. Prescriptions for these drugs require a written or electronic format without automatic refills, expiring after six months, and practitioners may issue up to three sequential prescriptions for a 90-day supply under specific conditions, but only with explicit instructions for dispensing. The (DEA) imposes annual production quotas on manufacturers to curb diversion, calculated based on estimated medical need plus a 20-25% buffer for inventory, though these limits have been criticized for failing to account for demand surges. Access challenges intensified with the nationwide shortage of immediate-release Adderall announced by the FDA on October 12, 2022, initially triggered by manufacturing delays at one supplier but prolonged by DEA quota restrictions amid rising prescriptions—up 58% for adults from 2018 to 2022—partly attributed to expanded ADHD diagnoses post-COVID-19 telehealth relaxations. By 2023, the DEA reported a one-billion-dose shortfall in stimulant production, leading to pharmacy stockouts, patient rationing, and shifts to alternatives like lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse), though some analyses link persistent shortages to adult ADHD overdiagnosis inflating demand beyond evidence-based needs. As of 2025, shortages have eased for some generics but continue for certain formulations, prompting warnings from health authorities about risks of unverified online or illicit substitutes, which carry contamination dangers. Internationally, amphetamines fall under Schedule II of the UN 1971 , mandating strict national controls, but implementation varies widely. In the , prescriptions require similar safeguards, yet countries like have banned outright since 2012, citing unacceptable dependency risks despite its efficacy for ADHD, forcing reliance on alternatives like and complicating cross-border access for expatriates. Developing regions face amplified barriers, including overly restrictive laws, inadequate supply chains, and prescriber hesitancy due to regulatory fears, resulting in under-treatment of conditions like ADHD and despite WHO estimates of unmet need. These controls, while aimed at preventing illicit diversion—evidenced by global amphetamine seizure trends—often inadvertently limit legitimate medical availability, as seen in where essential psychostimulants remain scarce.

Recent Policy Shifts (2023-2025)

In response to persistent shortages of amphetamine-based medications, such as , the U.S. (DEA) implemented adjustments to aggregate production quotas (APQs). The shortage, officially noted by the () on , 2023, stemmed from limitations, surging , and prior quota constraints that resulted in an estimated one billion dose shortfall in both 2022 and 2023. To mitigate this, the DEA proposed shifting APQ allocations from annual to quarterly distributions in November 2023, a change finalized in 2024 to enhance responsiveness and reduce inventory pressures on manufacturers. For 2025, the DEA established initial APQs in December 2024, followed by an upward adjustment on October 2, 2025, increasing the quota for d-amphetamine—the primary active ingredient in —from 21.2 million grams to 26 million grams, marking the first such quota expansion in response to documented . These revisions aimed to align production more closely with medical needs, though of specific formulations persisted into 2025, with some products temporarily removed from the FDA's shortage list amid ongoing supply volatility. Concurrently, policies on prescribing of Schedule II controlled substances like amphetamines evolved to extend post-COVID flexibilities. The DEA, in coordination with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), issued a third temporary extension on November 19, 2024, allowing practitioners to prescribe amphetamines via audio-video telemedicine without an initial in-person examination through December 31, 2025. In January 2025, the DEA proposed additional rules, including a special telemedicine registration for Schedules III-V substances and continued flexibilities for Schedule II, alongside requirements for certain direct-to-consumer platforms to maintain state-specific presence, reflecting efforts to balance access with oversight amid concerns over diversion. These measures responded to highlighting barriers to ADHD treatment, though critics noted potential risks of increased non-medical use without robust verification. State-level variations emerged in 2025, with some jurisdictions enacting stricter ADHD prescription requirements, such as mandatory prior authorizations or enhanced monitoring for stimulants, to address perceived overprescribing amid national shortages. No federal rescheduling of amphetamine occurred during this period, maintaining its Schedule II status under the , with policy emphasis on supply stabilization rather than reclassification.

Societal Impact and Controversies

Cultural Perceptions and Stigma

Amphetamines were initially perceived in the early as beneficial stimulants for medical applications, including treatment of , , and low , with widespread prescription reflecting societal acceptance of their energizing effects. By the 1930s and 1940s, their use expanded into , where they were marketed as aids for fatigue and productivity, often endorsed by physicians for housewives and professionals seeking enhanced alertness. This era's views aligned with a cultural valorization of stimulants as tools for overcoming human limitations, evidenced by their integration into everyday medical practice without significant moral reproach. World War II marked a peak in positive military perceptions, as amphetamines like Benzedrine were routinely supplied to Allied and Axis forces to sustain wakefulness during extended operations, framing the substances as essential for combat efficacy rather than recreational vices. Post-war, this utilitarian image persisted into the , influencing countercultural figures such as Beat writers who celebrated amphetamines for fueling creativity and endurance, as depicted in literary works portraying them as muses for intellectual output. However, by the , rising reports of intravenous abuse and associated health crises, including and dependency, prompted a shift toward stigmatization, with media coverage amplifying fears of an "epidemic" and leading to federal controls under the 1970 . This transition reflected causal links between unregulated access and misuse patterns, rather than inherent drug toxicity alone, though public discourse often conflated medical and illicit uses. In contemporary contexts, cultural stigma intensifies around prescription amphetamines like for ADHD treatment, driven by high-profile misuse among college students seeking cognitive enhancement, which fosters mistrust toward legitimate patients despite of efficacy in symptom management. Surveys indicate that two-thirds of teens view prescription misuse as a significant peer issue, contributing to broader societal wariness that discourages and treatment, even as untreated ADHD correlates with higher risks. Mainstream narratives, often shaped by institutional biases emphasizing harms over benefits, overlook data showing low rates in monitored therapeutic contexts—under 1% for ADHD patients—while amplifying recreational overdose stories, thus perpetuating a that equates controlled medications with street drugs like . Recent shortages, exacerbated by regulatory scrutiny from 2023 onward, have heightened perceptions of overprescription, yet critiques highlight how stigma impedes access for those with verifiable neurodevelopmental needs, prioritizing ideological concerns over clinical outcomes. In subcultures like certain or Nordic work environments, residual views persist of amphetamines as productivity boosters aligned with ethic-driven ambition, contrasting dominant anti- sentiments.

Debates on Medicalization and Enhancement

The of amphetamines, particularly in treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), has sparked debate over whether diagnostic expansion represents improved recognition of a legitimate neurodevelopmental condition or the pathologization of normal behavioral variation, leading to widespread prescription of stimulants like and Dexedrine. In the United States, stimulant prescriptions rose 57.9% from 2012 to 2022, with a 70% increase from 2011 to 2021, disproportionately affecting females (87.5% rise) and adults aged 31 and older. Critics argue this surge reflects , citing evidence such as systematic reviews documenting overtreatment in children and adolescents, where symptoms like inattention may stem from environmental factors rather than inherent deficits. For instance, children born in the youngest months of school entry cohorts are over twice as likely to receive an ADHD diagnosis compared to older peers, suggesting relative immaturity is misattributed to disorder. Proponents of expanded medicalization counter that historical underdiagnosis, especially in adults, justifies current trends, with 15 million U.S. adults now reporting ADHD diagnoses as of 2024, often validated by improved functioning post-treatment. However, empirical critiques highlight limited long-term benefits and risks, including modest cognitive gains outweighed by cardiovascular effects like elevated and , alongside potential for dependence. concerns intensified during 2023-2025 stimulant shortages, attributed partly to adult ADHD expansions without rigorous verification, straining supply for confirmed cases. This debate underscores causal realism: while amphetamines causally enhance signaling to alleviate severe symptoms in subsets with verifiable deficits, broad application risks iatrogenic harm by conflating statistical norms with , influenced by pharmaceutical incentives and diagnostic criteria broadened since the 1980s. Parallel discussions on enhancement involve non-medical use of amphetamines by healthy individuals seeking cognitive or motivational boosts, such as students or professionals in competitive settings. Studies show mixed amphetamine salts yield only small objective improvements in among healthy young adults, though subjective perceptions of enhancement are stronger, potentially driving demand. Ethically, this raises issues of versus , as societal pressures in high-stakes environments may normalize use, blurring voluntary choice with implicit mandates for . Critics invoke fairness, arguing enhancements confer unfair advantages akin to doping, while proponents emphasize personal and potential societal benefits from heightened , provided risks like and are managed. Empirical data reveals diversion rates, with misuse among non-ADHD users tied to performance goals rather than therapeutic need, complicating regulatory efforts to distinguish from augmentative applications. These debates highlight tensions between individual agency and collective norms, with evidence suggesting enhancement effects are context-dependent and often overstated relative to placebo-driven expectancy.

Empirical Critiques of Mainstream Narratives

Mainstream portrayals often equate therapeutic amphetamine use with inevitable , yet epidemiological data indicate low rates of misuse and dependence in prescribed contexts. Among U.S. adults using prescription , only 0.2% met criteria for use disorder, with misuse at 1.9% and non-misuse therapeutic use comprising the majority at 4.5%. In ADHD patients, stimulant treatment correlates with reduced future substance use disorders rather than increased risk, challenging claims of inherent gateway effects. These findings contrast with narratives amplified by media and regulatory bodies, which draw heavily from illicit patterns without distinguishing dose, purity, and administration route in medical versus recreational scenarios. Assertions of amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity frequently rely on animal models or high-dose human abuse cases, but evidence for brain damage at therapeutic levels remains scant in humans. Long-term suggest potential neurotoxic effects, yet parallel human data for prescribed use are absent, with rare psychoses occurring primarily in non-medical contexts. Human imaging and longitudinal studies on ADHD cohorts show no consistent markers of structural damage from stimulants, undermining extrapolations from abuse to controlled amphetamine therapy. This discrepancy highlights a causal oversight: appears tied to binge patterns and in abuse, not the modulated release in therapeutic dosing, where self-titration and monitoring mitigate escalation. Cardiovascular risk narratives portray amphetamines as disproportionately hazardous relative to benefits, but observational data reveal associations confounded by underlying conditions like ADHD, which independently elevate CVD incidence. While prolonged high-dose use links to modest increases in or (e.g., 17-57% in some cohorts), absolute event rates remain low, and no causal mechanisms dominate over or genetic factors in treated populations. Benefits, including enhanced executive function and reduced accident rates, often outweigh these in risk-benefit analyses for indicated uses, with safety profiles comparable to non-stimulant alternatives when monitored. Sources emphasizing risks, frequently from academic or institutions, may reflect toward adverse events, neglecting comparator data like caffeine's sympathetic effects or untreated ADHD morbidity. Broader societal critiques stem from conflating amphetamine with epidemics, inflating abuse perceptions despite declining prescription misuse trends. U.S. adult stimulant misuse dropped significantly post-2020, driven by regulatory scrutiny, yet public discourse persists in equating all amphetamines with "speed" crises of prior decades. Empirical reviews indicate that therapeutic adherence yields functional gains without the narratives of or inevitable decline, which media amplify via anecdotal horror stories over aggregate outcomes. This pattern suggests in source selection, where anti-drug advocacy prioritizes alarmism over nuanced data on dose-dependent effects and individual variability.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.