Hubbry Logo
U.S. stateU.S. stateMain
Open search
U.S. state
Community hub
U.S. state
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
U.S. state
U.S. state
from Wikipedia

State
  • Also known as:
  • Commonwealth
    (the self-designation of four states)
CategoryFederated state
LocationUnited States
Number50
Populations
Areas
  • Smallest: Rhode Island, 1,545 square miles (4,000 km2)
  • Largest: Alaska, 665,384 square miles (1,723,340 km2)[2]
Government
Subdivisions

In the United States, a state is a constituent political entity, of which there are 50. Bound together in a political union, each state holds governmental jurisdiction over a separate and defined geographic territory where it shares its sovereignty with the federal government. Due to this shared sovereignty, Americans are citizens both of the federal republic and of the state in which they reside.[3] State citizenship and residency are flexible, and no government approval is required to move between states, except for persons restricted by certain types of court orders, such as paroled convicts and children of divorced spouses who share child custody.

State governments in the U.S. are allocated power by the people of each respective state through their individual state constitutions. All are grounded in republican principles (this being required by the federal constitution), and each provides for a government, consisting of three branches, each with separate and independent powers: executive, legislative, and judicial.[4] States are divided into counties or county-equivalents, which may be assigned some local governmental authority but are not sovereign. County or county-equivalent structure varies widely by state, and states also create other local governments.

States, unlike U.S. territories, possess many powers and rights under the United States Constitution. States and their citizens are represented in the United States Congress, a bicameral legislature consisting of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each state is also entitled to select a number of electors, equal to the total number of representatives and senators from that state, to vote in the Electoral College, the body that directly elects the president of the United States. Each state has the opportunity to ratify constitutional amendments. With the consent of Congress, two or more states may enter into interstate compacts with one another. The police power of each state is also recognized.

Historically, the tasks of local law enforcement, public education, public health, intrastate commerce regulation, and local transportation and infrastructure, in addition to local, state, and federal elections, have generally been considered primarily state responsibilities, although all of these now have significant federal funding and regulation as well. Over time, the Constitution has been amended, and the interpretation and application of its provisions have changed. The general tendency has been toward centralization and incorporation, with the federal government playing a much larger role than it once did. There is a continuing debate over states' rights, which concerns the extent and nature of the states' powers and sovereignty in relation to the federal government and the rights of individuals.

The Constitution grants to Congress the authority to admit new states into the Union. Since the establishment of the United States in 1776 by the Thirteen Colonies, the number of states has expanded from the original 13 to 50. Each new state has been admitted on an equal footing with the existing states.[5] While the Constitution does not explicitly discuss secession from the Union, the United States Supreme Court, in Texas v. White (1869), held that the Constitution did not permit states to unilaterally do so.[6][7]

List

[edit]

The 50 states, in alphabetical order, along with each state's flag:


Background

[edit]

The 13 original states came into existence in July 1776 during the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783), as the successors of the Thirteen Colonies, upon agreeing to the Lee Resolution[8] and signing the United States Declaration of Independence.[9] Prior to these events each state had been a British colony;[8] each then joined the first Union of states between 1777 and 1781, upon ratifying the Articles of Confederation, the first U.S. constitution.[10][11] During this period, the newly independent states developed their own individual state constitutions, among the earliest written constitutions in the world.[12]

Although different in detail, these state constitutions shared features that would be important in the American constitutional order: they were republican in form, and separated power among three branches, most had bicameral legislatures, and contained statements, or a bill, of rights.[13] From 1787 to 1790, each of the states ratified a new federal frame of government in the Constitution of the United States.[14] In relation to the states, the U.S. Constitution elaborated concepts of federalism.[15]

Governments

[edit]

Under U.S. constitutional law, the 50 individual states and the United States as a whole are each sovereign jurisdictions.[16] The states are not administrative divisions of the country; the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution reserves to the states or to the people all powers of government not delegated to the federal government.

Consequently, each of the 50 states reserves the right to organize its individual government in any way (within the broad parameters set by the U.S. Constitution and the Republican Guarantee enforced by Congress) deemed appropriate by its people, and to exercise all powers of government not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution.[17] A state, unlike the federal government, has un-enumerated police power, that is, the right to generally make all necessary laws for the welfare of its people.[18] As a result, while the governments of the various states share many similar features, they often vary greatly with regard to form and substance. No two state governments are identical.

Constitutions

[edit]

The government of each state is structured in accordance with its individual constitution, all of which are written constitutions. Many of these documents are more detailed and more elaborated than their federal counterpart. For example, before its revision in 2022, the Constitution of Alabama, contained 310,296 words, which is more than 40 times as many as the U.S. Constitution.[19] In practice, each state has adopted a three-branch frame of government: executive, legislative, and judicial, even though doing so has never been required.[4][19]

Early in American history, four state governments differentiated themselves from the others in their first constitutions by choosing to self-identify as Commonwealths rather than as states: Virginia, in 1776;[20] Pennsylvania, in 1777; Massachusetts, in 1780; and Kentucky, in 1792. Consequently, while these four are states like the other states, each is formally a commonwealth because the term is contained in its constitution.[21]

The term, commonwealth, which refers to a state in which the supreme power is vested in the people, was first used in Virginia during the Interregnum, the 1649–60 period between the reigns of Charles I and Charles II, during which parliament's Oliver Cromwell as Lord Protector established a republican government known as the Commonwealth of England. Virginia became a royal colony again in 1660, and the word was dropped from the full title. It went unused until reintroduced in 1776.[20]

Executive

[edit]

In each state, the chief executive is called the governor, who serves as both head of state and head of government. All governors are chosen by statewide direct election. The governor may approve or veto bills passed by the state legislature, as well as recommend and work for the passage of bills, usually supported by their political party. In 44 states, governors have line item veto power.[22] Most states have a plural executive, meaning that the governor is not the only government official in the state responsible for its executive branch. In these states, executive power is distributed amongst other officials,[23] elected by the people independently of the governor—such as the lieutenant governor, attorney general, comptroller, secretary of state, and others.

Elections of officials in the United States are generally for a fixed term of office. The constitutions of 19 states allow for citizens to remove and replace an elected public official before the end of their term of office through a recall election.[24] Each state follows its own procedures for recall elections, and sets its own restrictions on how often, and how soon after a general election, they may be held. In all states, the legislatures can remove state executive branch officials, including governors, who have committed serious abuses of their power from office. The process of doing so includes impeachment (the bringing of specific charges), and a trial, wherein legislators act as a jury.[24]

Legislative

[edit]

The primary responsibilities of state legislatures are to enact state laws and appropriate money for the administration of public policy.[22] In all states, if the governor vetoes a bill, or a portion of one, it can still become law if the legislature overrides the veto (repasses the bill), which in most states requires a two-thirds vote in each chamber.[22]

In 49 of the 50 states the legislature consists of two chambers: a lower house (variously called the House of Representatives, State Assembly, General Assembly or House of Delegates) and a smaller upper house, in all states called the Senate. The exception is the unicameral Nebraska Legislature, meaning it has only a single chamber.[25] Most states have a part-time legislature, traditionally called a citizen legislature. Ten state legislatures are considered full-time. These bodies are more similar to the U.S. Congress than are the others.[26]

Members of each state's legislature are chosen by direct election. In Baker v. Carr (1962) and Reynolds v. Sims (1964), the U.S. Supreme Court held that all states are required to elect their legislatures in such a way as to afford each citizen the same degree of representation (the one person, one vote standard). In practice, most states elect legislators from single-member districts, each of which has approximately the same population. Some states, such as Maryland and Vermont, divide the state into single- and multi-member districts. In this case, multi-member districts must have proportionately larger populations, e.g., a district electing two representatives must have approximately twice the population of a district electing just one. The voting systems used across the nation are: first-past-the-post in single-member districts, and multiple non-transferable vote in multi-member districts.

In 2013, there were 7,383 legislators in the 50 state legislative bodies. They earned from $0 annually (New Mexico) to $90,526 (California). There were various per diem and mileage compensation.[27]

Judicial

[edit]

States can also organize their judicial systems differently from the federal judiciary, as long as they protect the federal constitutional right of their citizens to procedural due process. Most have a trial-level court, generally called a district court, superior court or circuit court, a first-level appellate court, generally called a court of appeal (or appeals), and a supreme court. Oklahoma and Texas have separate highest courts for criminal appeals. Uniquely, in New York State, the trial court is called the Supreme Court; appeals go up first to the Supreme Court's Appellate Division, and from there to its highest court, the New York Court of Appeals.

State court systems exercise broad, plenary, and general jurisdiction, in contrast to the federal courts, which are courts of limited jurisdiction. The overwhelming majority of criminal and civil cases in the United States are heard in state courts. Each year, roughly 30 million new cases are filed in state courts and the total number of judges across all state courts is about 30,000—for comparison, 1 million new cases are filed each year in federal courts, which have about 1,700 judges.[28]

Most states base their legal system on English common law (with substantial statutory changes and incorporation of certain civil law innovations), with the notable exception of Louisiana, a former French colony, which draws large parts of its legal system from French civil law.

Only a few states choose to have the judges on the state's courts serve for life terms. In most states, the judges, including the justices of the highest court in the state, are either elected or appointed for terms of a limited number of years and are usually eligible for re-election or reappointment.

Unitarism

[edit]

All states are unitary states, not federations or aggregates of local governments. Local governments within them are created by and exist by virtue of state law, and local governments within each state are subject to the central authority of that particular state. State governments commonly delegate some authority to local units and channel policy decisions down to them for implementation.[29] In a few states, local units of government are permitted a degree of home rule over various matters. The prevailing legal theory of state preeminence over local governments, referred to as Dillon's Rule, holds that,

A municipal corporation possesses and can exercise the following powers and no others: First, those granted in express words; second, those necessarily implied or necessarily incident to the powers expressly granted; third, those absolutely essential to the declared objects and purposes of the corporation—not simply convenient but indispensable; fourth, any fair doubt as to the existence of power is resolved by the courts against the corporation—against the existence of the powers.[30]

Each state defines for itself what powers it will allow local governments. Generally, four categories of power may be given to local jurisdictions:

  • Structural – power to choose the form of government, charter and enact charter revisions,
  • Functional – power to exercise local self-government in a broad or limited manner,
  • Fiscal – authority to determine revenue sources, set tax rates, borrow funds and other related financial activities,
  • Personnel – authority to set employment rules, remuneration rates, employment conditions and collective bargaining.[31]

Relationships

[edit]

Interstate

[edit]

Each state admitted to the Union by Congress since 1789 has entered it on an equal footing with the original states in all respects.[32] With the growth of states' rights advocacy during the antebellum period, the Supreme Court asserted, in Lessee of Pollard v. Hagan (1845), that the Constitution mandated admission of new states on the basis of equality.[33] With the consent of Congress, states may enter into interstate compacts, agreements between two or more states. Compacts are frequently used to manage a shared resource, such as transportation infrastructure or water rights.[34]

Under Article IV of the Constitution, which outlines the relationship between the states, each state is required to give full faith and credit to the acts of each other's legislatures and courts, which is generally held to include the recognition of most contracts and criminal judgments, and before 1865, slavery status. Pursuant to the Extradition Clause, a state must extradite people located there who have fled charges of "treason, felony, or other crimes" in another state if the other state so demands.[35]

The full faith and credit expectation does have exceptions, some legal arrangements, such as professional licensure and marriages, may be state-specific, and until recently states have not been found by the courts to be required to honor such arrangements from other states.[36] Such legal acts are nevertheless often recognized state-to-state according to the common practice of comity. States are prohibited from discriminating against citizens of other states with respect to their basic rights, under the Privileges and Immunities Clause.

With the federal government

[edit]

Under Article IV, each state is guaranteed a form of government that is grounded in republican principles, such as the consent of the governed.[37] This guarantee has long been at the forefront of the debate about the rights of citizens vis-à-vis the government. States are also guaranteed protection from invasion, and, upon the application of the state legislature (or executive, if the legislature cannot be convened), from domestic violence. This provision was discussed during the 1967 Detroit riot but was not invoked.

Ownership of federal lands in the 50 states, 2005

The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.[38] It provides that state courts are bound by the supreme law; in case of conflict between federal and state law, the federal law must be applied. Even state constitutions are subordinate to federal law.[39]

States' rights are understood mainly with reference to the Tenth Amendment. The Constitution delegates some powers to the national government, and it forbids some powers to the states. The Tenth Amendment reserves all other powers to the states, or to the people. Powers of the U.S. Congress are enumerated in Article I, Section 8, for example, the power to declare war. Making treaties is one power forbidden to the states, being listed among other such powers in Article I, Section 10.

Among the Article I enumerated powers of Congress is the power to regulate commerce. Since the early 20th century, the Supreme Court's interpretation of this "Commerce Clause" has, over time, greatly expanded the scope of federal power, at the expense of powers formerly considered purely states' matters. The Cambridge Economic History of the United States says, "On the whole, especially after the mid-1880s, the Court construed the Commerce Clause in favor of increased federal power."[40]

In 1941, the Supreme Court in U.S. v. Darby upheld the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, holding that Congress had the power under the Commerce Clause to regulate employment conditions.[41] In 1942, in Wickard v. Filburn, the Court expanded federal power to regulate the economy by holding that federal authority under the commerce clause extends to activities which may appear to be local in nature but in reality effect the entire national economy and are therefore of national concern.[42]

For example, Congress can regulate railway traffic across state lines, but it may also regulate rail traffic solely within a state, based on the reality that intrastate traffic still affects interstate commerce. Through such decisions, argues law professor David F. Forte, "the Court turned the commerce power into the equivalent of a general regulatory power and undid the Framers' original structure of limited and delegated powers." Subsequently, Congress invoked the Commerce Clause to expand federal criminal legislation, as well as for social reforms such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Only within the past couple of decades, through decisions in cases such as those in U.S. v. Lopez (1995) and U.S. v. Morrison (2000), has the Court tried to limit the Commerce Clause power of Congress.[43]

Another enumerated congressional power is its taxing and spending power.[44] An example of this is the system of federal aid for highways, which include the Interstate Highway System. The system is mandated and largely funded by the federal government and serves the interests of the states. By threatening to withhold federal highway funds, Congress has been able to pressure state legislatures to pass various laws.[45] An example is the nationwide legal drinking age of 21, enacted by each state, brought about by the National Minimum Drinking Age Act. Although some objected that this infringes on states' rights, the Supreme Court upheld the practice as a permissible use of the Constitution's Spending Clause in South Dakota v. Dole 483 U.S. 203 (1987).

As prescribed by Article I of the Constitution, which establishes the U.S. Congress, each state is represented in the Senate (irrespective of population size) by two senators, and each is guaranteed at least one representative in the House. Both senators and representatives are chosen in direct popular elections in the various states. Prior to 1913, senators were elected by state legislatures. There are presently 100 senators, who are elected at-large to staggered terms of six years, with one-third of them being chosen every two years. Representatives are elected at large or from single-member districts to terms of two years, not staggered. The size of the House—presently 435 voting members—is set by federal statute. Seats in the House are distributed among the states in proportion to the most recent constitutionally mandated decennial census.[46] The borders of these districts are established by the states individually through a process called redistricting, and within each state all districts are required to have approximately equal populations.[47]

Citizens in each state plus those in the District of Columbia indirectly elect the president and vice president. When casting ballots in presidential elections they are voting for presidential electors, who then, using procedures provided in the 12th amendment, elect the president and vice president.[48] There were 538 electors for the most recent presidential election in 2024; the allocation of electoral votes was based on the 2010 census.[49] Each state is entitled to a number of electors equal to the total number of representatives and senators from that state; the District of Columbia is entitled to three electors.[50]

While the Constitution does set parameters for the election of federal officials, state law, not federal, regulates most aspects of elections in the U.S., including primaries, the eligibility of voters (beyond the basic constitutional definition), the running of each state's electoral college, as well as the running of state and local elections. All elections—federal, state, and local—are administered by the individual states, and some voting rules and procedures may differ among them.[51]

Article V of the Constitution accords states a key role in the process of amending the U.S. Constitution. Amendments may be proposed either by Congress with a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.[52] To become part of the Constitution, an amendment must be ratified by either—as determined by Congress—the legislatures of three-quarters of the states or state ratifying conventions in three-quarters of the states.[53] The vote in each state (to either ratify or reject a proposed amendment) carries equal weight, regardless of a state's population or length of time in the Union.

With other countries

[edit]

U.S. states are not sovereign in the Westphalian sense in international law which says that each State has sovereignty over its territory and domestic affairs, to the exclusion of all external powers, on the principle of non-interference in another State's domestic affairs, and that each State, no matter how large or small, is equal in international law.[54] The 50 U.S. states do not possess international legal sovereignty, meaning that they are not recognized by other sovereign States such as, for example, France, Germany or the United Kingdom.[54] The federal government is responsible for international relations, but state and local government leaders occasionally travel to other countries and form economic and cultural relationships.

Admission into the Union

[edit]
U.S. states by date of statehood:
  1776–1790    1791–1796
  1803–1819    1820–1837
  1845–1859    1861–1876
  1889–1896    1907–1912
  1959
The order in which the original 13 states ratified the Constitution, then the order in which the others were admitted to the Union

Article IV also grants to Congress the authority to admit new states into the Union. Since the establishment of the United States in 1776, the number of states has expanded from the original 13 to 50. Each new state has been admitted on an equal footing with the existing states.[33] Article IV also forbids the creation of new states from parts of existing states without the consent of both the affected states and Congress. This caveat was designed to give Eastern states that still had Western land claims (including Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia) to have a veto over whether their western counties could become states,[32] and has served this same function since, whenever a proposal to partition an existing state or states in order that a region within might either join another state or to create a new state has come before Congress.

Most of the states admitted to the Union after the original 13 were formed from an organized territory established and governed by Congress in accord with its plenary power under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2.[55] The outline for this process was established by the Northwest Ordinance (1787), which predates the ratification of the Constitution. In some cases, an entire territory has become a state; in others some part of a territory has.

When the people of a territory make their desire for statehood known to the federal government, Congress may pass an enabling act authorizing the people of that territory to organize a constitutional convention to write a state constitution as a step toward admission to the Union. Each act details the mechanism by which the territory will be admitted as a state following ratification of their constitution and election of state officers. Although the use of an enabling act is a traditional historic practice, a number of territories have drafted constitutions for submission to Congress absent an enabling act and were subsequently admitted. Upon acceptance of that constitution and meeting any additional congressional stipulations, Congress has always admitted that territory as a state.

In addition to the original 13, six subsequent states were never an organized territory of the federal government, or part of one, before being admitted to the Union. Three were set off from an already existing state, two entered the Union after having been sovereign states, and one was established from unorganized territory:

Congress is under no obligation to admit states, even in those areas whose population expresses a desire for statehood. Such has been the case numerous times during the nation's history. In one instance, Mormon pioneers in Salt Lake City sought to establish the state of Deseret in 1849. It existed for slightly over two years and was never approved by the United States Congress. In another, leaders of the Five Civilized Tribes (Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole) in Indian Territory proposed to establish the state of Sequoyah in 1905, as a means to retain control of their lands.[63]

The proposed constitution ultimately failed in the U.S. Congress. Instead, the Indian Territory and Oklahoma Territory were both incorporated into the new state of Oklahoma in 1907. The first instance occurred while the nation still operated under the Articles of Confederation. The State of Franklin existed for several years, not long after the end of the American Revolution, but was never recognized by the Confederation Congress, which ultimately recognized North Carolina's claim of sovereignty over the area. The territory comprising Franklin later became part of the Southwest Territory, and ultimately of the state of Tennessee.

The entry of several states into the Union was delayed due to distinctive complicating factors. Among them, Michigan Territory, which petitioned Congress for statehood in 1835, was not admitted to the Union until 1837, due to a boundary dispute with the adjoining state of Ohio. The Republic of Texas requested annexation to the United States in 1837, but fears about potential conflict with Mexico delayed the admission of Texas for nine years.[64] Statehood for Kansas Territory was held up for several years (1854–61) due to a series of internal violent conflicts involving anti-slavery and pro-slavery factions. West Virginia's bid for statehood was also delayed over slavery and was settled when it agreed to adopt a gradual abolition plan.[65]

Proposed additions

[edit]

Guam

[edit]

Guam is an organized, unincorporated territory of the United States in the western Pacific Ocean.[66][67] The future political status of Guam has been a matter of significant discussion, with public opinion polls indicating a strong preference of becoming a U.S. state.[68][69]

Puerto Rico

[edit]

Puerto Rico, an unincorporated U.S. territory, refers to itself as the "Commonwealth of Puerto Rico" in the English version of its constitution, and as "Estado Libre Asociado" (literally, Associated Free State) in the Spanish version. As with all U.S. territories, its residents do not have full representation in the United States Congress. Puerto Rico has limited representation in the U.S. House of Representatives in the form of a Resident Commissioner, a delegate with limited voting rights in the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, but no voting rights otherwise.[70]

A non-binding referendum on statehood, independence, or a new option for an associated territory (different from the current status) was held on November 6, 2012. Sixty one percent (61%) of voters chose the statehood option, while one third of the ballots were submitted blank.[71][72]

On December 11, 2012, the Legislative Assembly of Puerto Rico enacted a concurrent resolution requesting the President and the Congress of the United States to respond to the referendum of the people of Puerto Rico, held on November 6, 2012, to end its current form of territorial status and to begin the process to admit Puerto Rico as a state.[73]

Another status referendum was held on June 11, 2017, wherein 97% percent of voters chose statehood. Turnout was low, as only 23% of voters went to the polls, with advocates of both continued territorial status and independence urging voters to boycott it.[74]

On June 27, 2018, the H.R. 6246 Act was introduced on the U.S. House with the purpose of responding to, and comply with, the democratic will of the United States citizens residing in Puerto Rico as expressed in the plebiscites held on November 6, 2012, and June 11, 2017, by setting forth the terms for the admission of the territory of Puerto Rico as a state of the Union.[75] The act has 37 original cosponsors between Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives.[76]

On November 3, 2020, Puerto Rico held another referendum. In the non-binding referendum, Puerto Ricans voted in favor of becoming a state. They also voted for a pro-statehood governor, Pedro Pierluisi.[77]

Washington, D.C.

[edit]

The intention of the Founding Fathers was that the United States capital should be at a neutral site, not giving favor to any existing state; as a result, the District of Columbia was created in 1800 to serve as the seat of government. As it is not a state, the district does not have representation in the Senate and has a non-voting delegate in the House; neither does it have a sovereign elected government. Additionally, before ratification of the 23rd Amendment in 1961, district citizens did not get the right to vote in presidential elections.

The strong majority of residents of the District support statehood of some form for that jurisdiction – either statehood for the whole district or for the inhabited part, with the remainder remaining under federal jurisdiction. In November 2016, Washington, D.C. residents voted in a statehood referendum in which 86% of voters supported statehood for Washington, D.C.[78] For statehood to be achieved, it must be approved by Congress.[79]

Secession from the Union

[edit]

The Constitution speaks of "union" several times, but does not explicitly discuss the issue of whether a state can secede from the Union. Its predecessor, the Articles of Confederation, stated that the union of the United States "shall be perpetual." The question of whether or not individual states held the unilateral right to secession was a passionately debated feature of the nations' political discourse from early in its history and remained a difficult and divisive topic until the American Civil War. In 1860 and 1861, 11 southern states each declared secession from the United States and joined to form the Confederate States of America (CSA). Following the defeat of Confederate forces by Union armies in 1865, those states were brought back into the Union during the ensuing Reconstruction era. The federal government never recognized the sovereignty of the CSA, nor the validity of the ordinances of secession adopted by the seceding states.[6][80]

Following the war, the United States Supreme Court, in Texas v. White (1869), held that states did not have the right to secede and that any act of secession was legally void. Drawing on the "perpetual" union language of the Articles of Confederation, and its succeeding Preamble to the Constitution, which states that the Constitution intends to "form a more perfect union", and speaks of the people of the United States a single body politic who are the authors of the more perfect union ("We the people"), the Supreme Court found that states did not have a right to secede. The court's reference in the same decision to the possibility of such changes occurring "through revolution, or through consent of the States", essentially means that this decision holds that no state has a right to unilaterally decide to leave the Union.[6][80]

Name origins

[edit]
A map showing the source languages of state names

The 50 states have taken their names from a wide variety of languages. Twenty-four state names originate from Native American languages. Of these, eight are from Algonquian languages, seven are from Siouan languages, three are from Iroquoian languages, one is from Uto-Aztecan languages and five others are from other indigenous languages. Hawaii's name is derived from the Polynesian Hawaiian language.

Of the remaining names, 22 are from European languages. Seven are from Latin (mainly Latinized forms of English names) and the rest are from English, Spanish and French. Eleven states are named after individual people, including seven named for royalty and one named after a President of the United States. The origins of six state names are unknown or disputed. Several of the states that derive their names from names used for Native peoples retain the final letter "s" in the indigenous name.

Geography

[edit]

Borders

[edit]

The borders of the 13 original states were largely determined by colonial charters. Their western boundaries were subsequently modified as the states ceded their western land claims to the Federal government during the 1780s and 1790s. Many state borders beyond those of the original 13 were set by Congress as it created territories, divided them, and over time, created states within them. Territorial and new state lines often followed various geographic features (such as rivers or mountain range peaks), and were influenced by settlement or transportation patterns. At various times, national borders with territories formerly controlled by other countries (British North America, New France, New Spain including Spanish Florida, and Russian America) became institutionalized as the borders of U.S. states. In the West, relatively arbitrary lines following latitude and longitude often prevail due to the sparseness of settlement west of the Mississippi River.

Once established, most state borders have, with few exceptions, been generally stable. Only two states, Missouri (Platte Purchase) and Nevada grew appreciably after statehood. Several of the original states ceded land, over a several-year period, to the Federal government, which in turn became the Northwest Territory, Southwest Territory, and Mississippi Territory. In 1791, Maryland and Virginia ceded land to create the District of Columbia (Virginia's portion was returned in 1847). In 1850, Texas ceded a large swath of land to the federal government. Additionally, Massachusetts and Virginia (on two occasions), have lost land, in each instance to form a new state.

There have been numerous other minor adjustments to state boundaries over the years due to improved surveys, resolution of ambiguous or disputed boundary definitions, or minor mutually agreed boundary adjustments for administrative convenience or other purposes.[56] Occasionally, either Congress or the U.S. Supreme Court has had to settle state border disputes. One notable example is the case New Jersey v. New York, in which New Jersey won roughly 90% of Ellis Island from New York in 1998.[81]

Once a territory is admitted by Congress as a state of the Union, the state must consent to any changes pertaining to the jurisdiction of that state and Congress.[82] The only potential violation of this occurred when the legislature of Virginia declared the secession of Virginia from the United States at the start of the American Civil War and a newly formed alternative Virginia legislature, recognized by the federal government, consented to have West Virginia secede from Virginia.

Regional grouping

[edit]

States may be grouped in regions; there are many variations and possible groupings. Many are defined in law or regulations by the federal government. For example, the United States Census Bureau defines four statistical regions, with nine divisions.[83] The Census Bureau region definition (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West) is "widely used ... for data collection and analysis,"[84] and is the most commonly used classification system.[85][86][87] Other multi-state regions are unofficial, and defined by geography or cultural affinity rather than by state lines.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A U.S. state is one of the 50 sovereign political subdivisions that constitute the United States of America, each retaining powers not delegated to the federal government under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. These states originated from the 13 former British colonies that ratified the U.S. Constitution between 1787 and 1790, establishing a federal union, with subsequent states admitted by act of Congress pursuant to Article IV, Section 3. In this federal system, states exercise primary authority over local governance, education, law enforcement, and intrastate commerce, while sharing or ceding powers like national defense and foreign affairs to the central government, a division designed to balance unity with regional autonomy. Each state maintains its own constitution, bicameral legislature (except Nebraska), executive branch headed by a governor, and independent judiciary, mirroring the federal structure but adapted to local needs. Defining characteristics include vast disparities in geography, population—from Wyoming's under 600,000 residents to California's nearly 39 million—and economic output, fostering policy experimentation that has historically driven innovations in areas like infrastructure and criminal justice. Controversies over state-federal power balances, evident in events like the Civil War and modern disputes over regulatory preemption, underscore the enduring tension between centralized authority and states' rights enshrined in the founding document.

Definition and Characteristics

Under the U.S. Constitution, a state is understood as a pre-existing or admitted political entity forming part of the federal Union, with Article IV, Section 3 specifying that "New States may be admitted by the into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the ." This provision implies states possess defined territorial jurisdictions and governmental structures capable of consenting to alterations, but the Constitution itself does not provide an exhaustive definitional clause, instead assuming states as foundational units derived from colonial predecessors or territorial organization. State sovereignty operates within a system of dual sovereignty, where states retain authority over matters not expressly delegated to the federal government, as affirmed by the Tenth Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the by the , nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This reservation preserves states' capacity to govern internal affairs, such as police powers over health, safety, and local regulation, while prohibiting federal actions that commandeering state officials or impair core functions. The has invoked the Tenth Amendment to invalidate federal mandates requiring states to enforce regulatory schemes, as in Printz v. (1997), where the Court ruled that Congress cannot compel state executive officers to administer federal programs like background checks under the Brady Act. However, state sovereignty is constrained by federal supremacy under Article VI, which declares the , federal laws, and treaties as "the supreme ," binding state judges notwithstanding contrary state laws. States lack international sovereignty, possessing no independent authority to enter treaties, declare , or conduct , powers exclusively federal. The has reinforced this in rulings emphasizing that while states maintain structural integrity against undue federal encroachment, the Union is perpetual and states cannot unilaterally alter their status, as established in precedents protecting the federal-state balance without endorsing or dissolution. This framework reflects a deliberate constitutional to prevent both state dominance over national interests and federal overreach into reserved domains.

List of current states

The comprises 50 states as its constituent political units, each admitted to the Union under Article IV, Section 3 of the . These states possess defined geographic territories, populations, and governments with powers not delegated to the federal government. The current states, listed alphabetically with their official two-letter postal abbreviations, are as follows:
StateAbbreviation
AlabamaAL
AlaskaAK
ArizonaAZ
ArkansasAR
CaliforniaCA
ColoradoCO
ConnecticutCT
DelawareDE
FloridaFL
GeorgiaGA
HawaiiHI
IdahoID
IllinoisIL
IndianaIN
IowaIA
KansasKS
KentuckyKY
LouisianaLA
MaineME
MarylandMD
MassachusettsMA
MichiganMI
MinnesotaMN
MississippiMS
MissouriMO
MontanaMT
NebraskaNE
NevadaNV
New HampshireNH
New JerseyNJ
New MexicoNM
New YorkNY
North CarolinaNC
North DakotaND
OhioOH
OklahomaOK
OregonOR
PennsylvaniaPA
Rhode IslandRI
South CarolinaSC
South DakotaSD
TennesseeTN
TexasTX
UtahUT
VermontVT
VirginiaVA
WashingtonWA
West VirginiaWV
WisconsinWI
WyomingWY

Historical Formation

Colonial origins and independence

The thirteen British colonies in , which became the original U.S. states, were established between 1607 and 1732 as settlements motivated by economic opportunities, religious dissent, and strategic expansion. The first permanent English colony, , was founded at Jamestown in 1607 by the under a from King James I. Subsequent foundations included () in 1620 by Pilgrims seeking religious freedom; the in 1630; in 1634 as a for English Catholics; and in the 1630s by Puritan dissenters; the (split into North and by 1729) in 1663; New York and (from Dutch New Netherland) in 1664; in 1681 as a Quaker haven; (initially part of ) around 1682; separated from in 1679; and Georgia in 1732 as a buffer against . These colonies varied in , , or royal— but generally featured elected assemblies alongside appointed governors, fostering self-rule that later fueled resistance to metropolitan control. By the mid-18th century, the colonies had grown into prosperous societies with populations exceeding 2.5 million by 1775, economies based on (tobacco in the , shipping and in the North), and shared British legal traditions, yet distinct regional identities. Post-1763 British policies, including the Proclamation Line restricting western settlement, the of 1765 imposing direct taxes without colonial representation, and the of 1767, provoked unified opposition through boycotts, the in 1774, and armed conflict starting with Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775. These measures aimed to assert over the colonies as subordinate entities, but colonists invoked natural rights and prior to claim equality as British subjects, escalating to demands for . The Declaration of Independence, adopted by the Second Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, marked the colonies' formal break, proclaiming them "Free and Independent States" capable of entering alliances, waging war, and conducting foreign affairs as sovereign entities absolved of allegiance to Britain. Between 1776 and 1777, most colonies drafted and ratified new constitutions, transitioning to republican governments with elected legislatures and executives, thereby establishing state sovereignty de facto amid the ongoing Revolutionary War (1775–1783). The war's conclusion via the Treaty of Paris, signed September 3, 1783, secured British recognition of U.S. boundaries and the independence of these states, which retained internal sovereignty while confederating under the Articles of Confederation (ratified March 1, 1781) for mutual defense and diplomacy. This framework affirmed the states as primary political units, with the national government deriving powers from their delegation, reflecting a causal progression from colonial autonomy to post-independence statehood rooted in revolutionary assertion of self-determination.

Ratification of the Constitution and original states

The United States Constitution, drafted during the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia from May to September 1787 and signed by 39 delegates on September 17, 1787, replaced the weaker Articles of Confederation. Article VII specified that ratification by popularly elected conventions in at least nine of the thirteen existing states would suffice to establish the Constitution among those states, bypassing the Articles' requirement for unanimous congressional approval. This process involved state conventions where delegates, often divided between Federalists favoring a stronger central government and Anti-Federalists wary of centralized power and seeking explicit protections for individual rights, debated the document's merits. Ratification began swiftly in smaller states with less internal division. Delaware's convention unanimously approved the on December 7, 1787, becoming the first state. Pennsylvania followed on December 12, 1787, by a vote of 46–23, amid controversy over the convention's rushed call. ratified unanimously on December 18, 1787. Georgia approved without opposition on January 2, 1788, reflecting Southern support for federal protections against external threats. ratified on January 9, 1788, by 128–40. Massachusetts's convention, held from January 9 to February 7, 1788, nearly derailed the process due to strong Anti-Federalist opposition led by figures like ; it ratified narrowly 187–168 on February 6, 1788, only after assurances of future amendments. ratified 63–11 on April 28, 1788, and 149–73 on May 23, 1788, the latter marking the eighth state. New Hampshire's approval on June 21, 1788, by 57–47 provided the ninth ratification, making the operational for the union as of that date, though and New York had not yet acted. ratified 89–79 on June 25, 1788, followed by New York's slim 30–27 margin on July 26, 1788. ratified 194–77 on November 21, 1789, after initially rejecting it in August 1788. , the last holdout, approved 34–32 on May 29, 1790, under economic pressure from federal tariffs and trade isolation. These thirteen former British colonies—Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Virginia—constituted the original states of the upon full , transitioning from sovereign entities under the loose confederation of the Articles to components of a constitutional . The process highlighted regional tensions, with smaller states ratifying quickly for security and commerce benefits, while larger ones like and New York demanded concessions, ultimately leading to the Bill of Rights in 1791.
StateRatification DateConvention Vote
December 7, 1787Unanimous (30–0)
December 12, 178746–23
December 18, 1787Unanimous
GeorgiaJanuary 2, 1788Unanimous (26–0)
January 9, 1788128–40
February 6, 1788187–168
April 28, 178863–11
May 23, 1788149–73
June 21, 178857–47
June 25, 178889–79
New YorkJuly 26, 178830–27
November 21, 1789194–77
May 29, 179034–32

Territorial expansion and subsequent admissions

The process of U.S. territorial expansion began with the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which organized the Northwest Territory—lands north of the Ohio River and west of Pennsylvania, ceded by Britain under the 1783 Treaty of Paris—and established a framework for subdividing it into future states with at least 60,000 free inhabitants for admission. This enabled the admission of Ohio on March 1, 1803, from the eastern portion of the territory. The ordinance's provisions for orderly governance and prohibition of slavery north of the Ohio River influenced subsequent territorial policies, balancing federal oversight with paths to statehood. The of 1803 marked the largest single expansion, acquiring approximately 828,000 square miles from for $15 million, effectively doubling the nation's size and opening the Valley to settlement. This transaction, negotiated by President despite constitutional debates over federal authority, facilitated the admission of states including on April 30, 1812; on August 10, 1821; on June 15, 1836; and on December 28, 1846, each carved from portions of the purchase after territorial organization. Further acquisitions included the Adams-Onís Treaty of 1819, under which ceded East and for $5 million in assumed claims, leading to Florida's admission as a state on March 3, 1845. The 1840s accelerated expansion through annexation and war. , an independent republic since 1836, was annexed on December 29, 1845, prompting the Mexican-American War (1846–1848); the resulting on February 2, 1848, ceded over 500,000 square miles—including present-day , , , and parts of , , , and —for $15 million, enabling admissions such as on September 9, 1850, and and in 1912. The of 1846 with Britain resolved the northern boundary at the 49th parallel, contributing to Oregon's admission on February 14, 1859, and Washington's on November 11, 1889. The of 1853 added 29,670 square miles from for $10 million to facilitate a southern railroad route. Later continental expansions were limited, but non-contiguous territories expanded the union. was purchased from on March 30, 1867, for $7.2 million, admitted as a state on January 3, 1959. was annexed via on July 7, 1898, following the 1893 overthrow of its , and admitted on August 21, 1959. Other states emerged from these and earlier territories, often amid debates over and sectional balance, as seen in the (1820) and Compromise of 1850. Subsequent admissions after the original thirteen states followed Article IV, Section 3 of the , requiring congressional approval and typically a republican form of government. The table below lists states admitted from 1791 to 1959, with admission dates:
OrderStateAdmission Date
14March 4, 1791
15June 1, 1792
16June 1, 1796
17March 1, 1803
18April 30, 1812
19December 11, 1816
20December 10, 1817
21December 3, 1818
22December 14, 1819
23March 15, 1820
24August 10, 1821
25June 15, 1836
26January 26, 1837
27March 3, 1845
28December 29, 1845
29December 28, 1846
30May 29, 1848
31September 9, 1850
32May 11, 1858
33February 14, 1859
34January 29, 1861
35June 20, 1863
36October 31, 1864
37March 1, 1867
38August 1, 1876
39–40/November 2, 1889
41November 8, 1889
42WashingtonNovember 11, 1889
43July 3, 1890
44July 10, 1890
45January 4, 1896
46November 16, 1907
47January 6, 1912
48February 14, 1912
49January 3, 1959
50August 21, 1959
These admissions reflected pragmatic federal incentives for westward migration, economic integration, and geopolitical security, though often entangled with conflicts over —resolved temporarily by compromises until the Civil War—rather than purely ideological drives like , which served as post-hoc rationalization for opportunistic gains. No further states have been admitted since 1959, with remaining territories like retaining non-state status despite periodic debates.

Secession and Sovereignty Challenges

American Civil War and Reconstruction

The (1861–1865) represented the most profound challenge to the federal union of states, as eleven Southern states invoked doctrines of state sovereignty to secede and form the (CSA), primarily to preserve the institution of . became the first to secede on December 20, 1860, followed by on January 9, 1861; on January 10, 1861; on January 11, 1861; Georgia on January 19, 1861; on January 26, 1861; and on February 1, 1861. joined on April 17, 1861; on May 6, 1861; on May 20, 1861; and on June 8, 1861, bringing the total to eleven. Declarations of secession from these states explicitly cited threats to as the core grievance, with non-slaveholding states accused of encroaching on Southern property rights in slaves through opposition to fugitive slave laws and territorial expansion restrictions. The CSA's provisional congress convened on February 4, 1861, and adopted a on March 11, 1861, that mirrored the U.S. but explicitly protected , prohibiting any laws denying its right and empowering Congress to regulate only its interstate aspects while banning the international slave trade. Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens affirmed in a March 1861 speech that the new government's "corner-stone rests upon the great truth, that the negro is not equal to the white man; that —subordination to the superior race—is his natural and normal condition." The secessions tested the principle of voluntary union versus perpetual federal supremacy, with Southern states arguing that the compact theory allowed withdrawal, while President maintained that no state had reserved the right to unilaterally dissolve the union. The war began on April 12, 1861, with Confederate bombardment of in , escalating into a conflict that resulted in approximately 620,000–750,000 deaths and affirmed federal authority through Union military victory in 1865. The Confederacy's defeat nullified state ordinances of and dissolved its claims to , reimposing U.S. control over the territories and establishing that states could not secede without consent, a rooted in the supremacy of the federal over irreconcilable assertions of state . Reconstruction (1865–1877) addressed the reintegration of former Confederate states into the union, imposing federal oversight to restructure state governments and extend civil rights, thereby curtailing unchecked state authority over freed slaves. Following Amendment's ratification on December 6, 1865, which abolished nationwide, Congress passed the Reconstruction Act of 1867 over President Andrew Johnson's veto, dividing the South into five military districts under Union generals tasked with registering voters (including Black men) and requiring new state constitutions that ratified the 14th (1868), granting citizenship and equal protection while prohibiting states from abridging privileges or immunities of citizens. The 14th further limited state power by allowing federal intervention against discriminatory laws and reducing congressional representation for states denying voting rights, directly countering prewar state assertions of sovereignty over domestic institutions like . States were readmitted progressively: in 1866 under lenient terms, followed by and in 1868; , , Georgia, , , and (re-readmitted) in 1868–1870; in 1870; in 1870; in 1870; and Georgia fully in 1870 after temporary expulsion for violating terms. The 15th (1870) barred states from denying voting rights based on race, though enforcement waned after 1877 with the , which withdrew federal troops and restored white Democratic control in most Southern states, enabling the erosion of these protections through state-level measures like poll taxes and literacy tests. This era entrenched federal constitutional limits on state autonomy regarding civil rights, shifting the balance in American toward greater national authority while exposing tensions in enforcing uniform standards across diverse state contexts.

20th and 21st-century secession movements

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, secessionist movements advocating for U.S. states to withdraw from the federal union have remained marginal, lacking legal viability under the Supreme Court's 1869 ruling in that declared unilateral unconstitutional and void. These efforts, often driven by grievances over federal overreach, economic policies, or cultural identities, have garnered limited public support—typically under 40% in polls—and failed to advance beyond petitions, referenda pushes, or symbolic declarations. Key examples include campaigns in , , , , and , reflecting diverse motivations from resource control to historical claims of unlawful . The (AIP), founded in 1978 by gold miner Joe Vogler, has been the most enduring 20th-century effort, seeking a on state to reclaim control over vast natural resources like and minerals from federal oversight. Vogler, who famously stated his goal was "to kick the federal government's evil, usurping, power-hungry hand out of Alaska's pockets," led the party until his unsolved murder in 1994. In , Alaskans voted on a non-binding advisory question for a constitutional convention to review the state's political status, with 16% favoring full , 36% preferring enhanced autonomy, and the rest opposing change; no convention occurred. The AIP continues as Alaska's largest third party, endorsing candidates and advocating , though it holds no legislative seats. A 2024 poll found 36% of residents support , amid ongoing disputes over federal land management comprising 61% of the state. Hawaii's sovereignty movement, intensifying in the late 20th century after the 1993 U.S. congressional apology for the 1893 , seeks restoration of native governance or full , arguing the violated and lacked native consent. Organizations like the Nation of Hawaii, established in the 1990s, promote cultural revival, land returns, and de-occupation, viewing statehood as perpetuating colonial wardship. Activism includes protests against military bases and the 2000 Rice v. Cayetano decision, which struck down race-based voting in native elections, galvanizing calls for self-rule. Support remains fragmented, with polls showing 20-30% favoring , but no statewide has materialized, and federal recognition efforts like the failed for native entity status highlight tensions between and integration. Vermont's (SVR), launched in 1994 by political scientist Frank Bryan and others, invokes the state's brief as an independent from 1777 to 1791 to argue for peaceful as a libertarian antidote to federal centralization. The group, blending progressive anti-corporate rhetoric with rural , has held mock conventions and fielded candidates, though electoral success is negligible. A SVR-sponsored poll indicated 8% support for independence, rising modestly in subsequent surveys amid frustrations with federal regulations on agriculture and energy. Critics note alliances with Southern neo-Confederate figures for cross-promotion, despite SVR's left-leaning core opposing militarism and globalization. Local efforts, such as Killington's 2004 vote (by 2,496 to 1,973) to join over tax disputes, failed legislative hurdles. Texas secessionism revived in the 1990s with the Republic of Texas group, which claimed the state was never legally rejoined after the Civil War, culminating in a 1997 armed standoff resolved without casualties. The Texas Nationalist Movement (TNM), formed in 2005, formalized "Texit" advocacy, pushing legislative resolutions for independence referenda; a 2022 TNM poll of 814 voters showed 44% support, though broader surveys indicate 20-30%. Post-2016 election, TNM lobbied for a 2018 non-binding poll, but Governor Greg Abbott rejected it, citing constitutional impossibility. Efforts persist, with 2023 bills for a convention on separation failing amid economic interdependence—Texas receives $40 billion net in federal funds annually. California's "Calexit" gained traction after Donald Trump's 2016 victory, with the campaign collecting signatures for a 2019 secession advisory vote that collapsed short of 585,000 required. Led by Marcus Ruiz Evans, proponents argue the state's $3 trillion GDP could sustain a sovereign nation, citing mismatches with federal and environmental policies. A refiled initiative for a 2028 question—"Should leave the and become a free and independent country?"—entered circulation in January 2025 but faces steep hurdles, including 600,000 signatures and likely court rejection. Support hovers at 20-25% in polls, concentrated in urban areas, underscoring partisan divides rather than viable . These movements, while highlighting strains, have prompted no congressional action and reinforce the union's permanence through economic and military realities.

Governmental Structure

State constitutions

Each of the 50 U.S. states maintains its own constitution, which establishes the framework for state government, including the separation of powers among legislative, executive, and judicial branches, and enumerates individual rights, while remaining subordinate to the U.S. Constitution under the Supremacy Clause of Article VI. Unlike the federal document, state constitutions typically address a broader array of policy matters, such as education, local government organization, and taxation, reflecting their role in managing intrastate affairs delegated by federalism. They originated primarily during the American Revolutionary era, with early examples drafted between 1776 and 1780 by colonial conventions asserting sovereignty from British rule, though subsequent versions emerged with territorial expansions and reconstructions. The Massachusetts Constitution, ratified on October 25, 1780, stands as the oldest state constitution still in continuous effect and the world's oldest functioning written constitution. Drafted largely by John Adams, it influenced the U.S. Constitution through its emphasis on separation of powers and a bicameral legislature, and has undergone 130 amendments as of 2023, often expanding rights like those related to education and environmental protections. In contrast, Alabama's 1901 constitution, the longest at over 40,000 words originally, has accrued more than 900 amendments, many addressing fiscal constraints imposed post-Reconstruction to limit state spending and intervention. Vermont's 1793 constitution remains the shortest, at approximately 8,300 words, prioritizing brevity in outlining government functions. State constitutions differ markedly from the federal one in length, amendability, and detail: the average state document exceeds 20,000 words and has been amended hundreds of times collectively across states—far surpassing the U.S. Constitution's 27 amendments—due to processes like legislative proposals requiring voter ratification or, in 18 states, citizen initiatives. This flexibility allows responsiveness to local needs but can lead to patchwork revisions; for instance, California's constitution, amended over 500 times since 1879, includes provisions on water rights and initiative processes not found in federal law. Courts interpret these documents independently, sometimes affording greater protections—such as expanded privacy rights—than federal minima, as state supreme courts hold final authority on state law absent federal preemption. No state constitution has been entirely rewritten since 1982, though periodic conventions or commissions propose consolidations to reduce bloat from accreted amendments.

Executive branch

The executive branch of each U.S. state is responsible for implementing and enforcing state laws, managing state agencies, and overseeing administrative operations, with the serving as its chief executive. Governors are directly elected by popular vote in all states, typically for four-year terms in 48 states (including of Columbia for comparative purposes), and two-year terms in and . Their powers, derived from state constitutions, generally include proposing budgets, ing (with item veto authority in 43 states allowing rejection of specific provisions), commanding the state , granting pardons, and appointing officials to fill vacancies or head agencies, though the scope varies by state—such as stronger appointment powers in states like New York compared to more fragmented authority in plural executive systems. Thirty-six states impose term limits on governors, most commonly restricting service to two consecutive four-year terms with eligibility to run again after one term out of office, while 14 states impose no such limits, allowing indefinite reelection. The lieutenant governor serves as second-in-command in 45 states, often assuming gubernatorial duties in cases of vacancy, death, or incapacity; this office is elected separately in 16 states but on a joint ticket with the governor in 26 states to align party affiliation, while in Maine and New Hampshire, the state senate president fills the role, and Arizona lacks a distinct lieutenant governor position. In states with lieutenant governors, the officeholder may also preside over the state senate, casting tie-breaking votes, though duties differ—ranging from ceremonial in some to substantive policy roles in others like budget oversight in Texas. Most states operate under a plural executive model, where key positions beyond the —such as (elected in 43 states), (35 states), (36 states), and or (in varying forms)—are filled by separate popular elections rather than gubernatorial appointment, reducing centralized control compared to the federal executive and fostering checks among independently accountable officials. This structure, rooted in post-colonial distrust of concentrated power, contrasts with unitary executives in a minority of states like , where the appoints cabinet heads with legislative confirmation. State executives coordinate with federal counterparts on shared issues like emergency response but retain autonomy in areas such as and , subject to constitutional limits on .

Legislative branch

Forty-nine U.S. states operate bicameral legislatures consisting of an upper chamber, typically called the , and a lower chamber, often designated as the , house of delegates, or assembly, with the combined body usually termed the or . is the sole exception, employing a unicameral known as the , established in 1937 to streamline decision-making and reduce costs associated with dual chambers. Across all states, there are 7,386 legislative seats distributed among 99 chambers (98 in bicameral systems plus 's single body), with chamber sizes varying widely—California's assembly holds 80 members while 's house has 40, and senates range from 20 in to 67 in . State legislators are elected by popular vote from single-member districts apportioned by population decennially following the federal census, ensuring representation aligns with demographic shifts, though controversies persist in several states. Term lengths differ: lower chambers typically serve two-year terms in 46 states, with four-year terms in , , , and ; upper chambers generally have four-year terms, often staggered to maintain continuity, except for and where senators also serve two years. Fifteen states impose term limits on legislators—typically six to eight years for lower houses and eight to twelve for senates—enacted via voter initiatives or since the to curb careerism, though compliance and effects on legislative expertise remain debated. The primary functions of state legislatures include enacting statutes on intrastate matters such as , , transportation, and —areas reserved under the U.S. Constitution's Tenth Amendment—while appropriating funds for state operations, approving budgets proposed by the , and originating revenue bills including taxes. Legislatures also wield oversight powers, such as confirming gubernatorial appointments in many states, conducting investigations, and executive or judicial officials, with the lower chamber typically initiating impeachment and the upper chamber conducting trials. Bills require passage by both chambers (or unicameral approval in ) and gubernatorial signature, subject to veto override by supermajority vote, mirroring federal processes but adapted to state constitutions. Legislative sessions occur annually in 46 states, convening for durations from 30 days in to year-round in , while , , , and hold biennial sessions limited by constitution to fiscal biennia. Professionalism varies: NCSL classifies legislatures into full-time (e.g., New York, with salaried lawmakers and extensive staff), part-time (e.g., hybrid models in ), and citizen types (e.g., , where members receive minimal pay and meet briefly), influencing policy depth and responsiveness. Committee systems dominate bill review, with leadership roles like speaker of the house and senate president shaping agendas, often along partisan lines given that Republicans controlled 57 chambers and Democrats 41 as of 2023, with one tied.

Judicial branch

Each U.S. state operates an independent judicial branch responsible for interpreting and applying its , statutes, and in resolving disputes. State courts exercise over most civil and criminal matters arising under state law, including , , contracts, torts, and felonies, while also serving as courts of last resort for state constitutional issues unless appealed to the on federal grounds. This system handles the overwhelming majority of litigation in the United States, with state courts adjudicating approximately 66 million cases per year as of recent data, dwarfing the federal judiciary's caseload of around 353,000 filings annually. State judicial structures generally follow a three-tier : trial courts of limited (such as municipal or courts handling minor offenses and small claims), trial courts of general (often called superior, , or circuit courts for major civil and criminal cases), and appellate courts culminating in the state's highest court. Larger states typically include intermediate appellate courts to review trial decisions before reaching the , while smaller states may route appeals directly to the highest level. The highest court, usually named the but occasionally the Court of Appeals (as in New York or ), possesses discretionary review authority over most appeals and mandatory in key areas like death penalty cases or conflicts between lower courts. Justices on these courts number between five and nine, with terms varying from six years to life in rare cases, though most states impose fixed terms followed by retention elections or reappointment processes. Selection of state judges diverges significantly across states and court levels, reflecting debates over versus accountability. Common methods include partisan elections (where candidates affiliate with , used for some judges in 14 states), nonpartisan elections (21 states, emphasizing qualifications over party), gubernatorial appointment with legislative confirmation or retention votes (13 states), legislative appointment, and merit selection systems (such as the , involving nominating commissions and retention elections in 10 states for appellate judges). Trial court judges are more often elected, while appellate judges lean toward appointment or merit processes to insulate from electoral pressures. These variations stem from state constitutions and traditions, with elections predominant in the and appointments more common in the Northeast. State judiciaries maintain administrative independence, often led by the who oversees court operations, budgets, and rulemaking under authority. However, funding reliance on legislatures can introduce tensions, and some states employ judicial conduct commissions for discipline. While state courts may adjudicate federal questions under , federal courts generally preempt in areas like constitutional rights or interstate commerce, ensuring dual sovereignty without routine overlap.

Federalism and Intergovernmental Dynamics

Constitutional principles of federalism

The U.S. Constitution establishes federalism as a system dividing sovereignty between the national government and the states, granting the former limited, enumerated powers while preserving substantial authority for the latter. Article I, Section 8 specifies eighteen enumerated powers for Congress, including the authority to lay and collect taxes, regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the states, coin money, establish post offices, and declare war, all intended to address collective needs without encroaching on state autonomy. These powers reflect the framers' intent to create a stronger central authority than under the Articles of Confederation, which had proven inadequate for national coordination, yet still constrain federal reach to explicit grants. Complementing these delegations, the Tenth Amendment, ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, codifies the principle of : "The powers not delegated to the by the , nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This provision affirms that states retain sovereignty over local governance, such as education, , and intrastate regulation, unless explicitly surrendered, ensuring federalism's dual structure where neither level dominates inherently. The amendment arose from Anti-Federalist concerns during ratification debates, emphasizing that unenumerated powers default to states or individuals to prevent centralized overreach. Article VI, Clause 2, known as the Supremacy Clause, declares the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant thereto, and treaties as "the supreme Law of the Land," binding state judges and overriding conflicting state measures. This clause upholds federal preeminence in delegated areas—such as interstate commerce regulation—but does not expand federal authority beyond constitutional limits, maintaining federalism's balance by requiring federal actions to align with enumerated powers. In practice, it resolves conflicts by prioritizing valid federal enactments, as seen in early judicial interpretations affirming state immunity from federal commandeering in non-delegated spheres. These principles collectively embody a compact among states, forming a union where federal authority derives from state consent via , yet states operate as co-sovereigns with independent electoral processes and constitutional frameworks. thus promotes experimentation in state policies—such as varying structures or criminal codes—while enabling national uniformity in defense and trade, a design rooted in the Constitution's commitment to a "more perfect Union" without dissolving state identities.

Historical tensions and nullification doctrines

The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 represented early assertions of state authority to counter perceived federal overreach. Drafted anonymously by for Kentucky and for Virginia, these resolutions protested the , which expanded federal power over immigration and criminalized criticism of the government. They advanced the of the Constitution, positing that states, as parties to the union, retained the right to "interpose" against unconstitutional federal laws to protect citizens' liberties. This doctrine emphasized the limited, delegated nature of federal authority, rooted in the voluntary association of sovereign states rather than unlimited national supremacy. These ideas evolved into the more explicit nullification doctrine, formalized by in his 1828 South Carolina Exposition and Protest. Responding to the Tariff of 1828—derisively called the "Tariff of Abominations" for its protective rates favoring Northern manufacturing at the expense of Southern agricultural exporters—Calhoun argued that a state convention could declare a unconstitutional, rendering it void within state borders until repealed or overridden by a . The doctrine framed the as a compact among states, with each retaining to judge federal actions' , reflecting causal tensions from economic disparities: Southern states viewed tariffs as redistributive plunder benefiting industrial North over export-dependent South. The Nullification Crisis peaked in 1832–1833 when South Carolina enacted Calhoun's theory. On November 24, 1832, a state convention adopted the Ordinance of Nullification, declaring the Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 "null, void, and no law" within the state, effective February 1, 1833, and threatening secession if federal enforcement proceeded. President Andrew Jackson countered with a December 10, 1832, proclamation affirming federal supremacy under Article VI, rejecting nullification as incompatible with union and warning of military enforcement. Congress passed the Force Bill on March 2, 1833, authorizing Jackson to use army and navy to collect duties, while Henry Clay's Compromise Tariff gradually reduced rates over a decade, prompting South Carolina to rescind its ordinance on March 15, 1833—though it symbolically nullified the Force Bill to preserve face. These events underscored persistent federal-state frictions, with nullification embodying resistance to centralized power amid sectional economic interests, though it failed practically and was later repudiated in favor of via the . Other 19th-century instances, such as Wisconsin's declaration against the Fugitive Slave Act, echoed interposition but similarly yielded to federal authority, highlighting the doctrine's limits under the . The crisis intensified debates over sovereignty, presaging Civil War divisions without resolving underlying causal drivers like tariff-induced wealth transfers.

Modern conflicts over sovereignty

In the 21st century, U.S. states have increasingly invoked principles of to challenge federal authority, often through lawsuits, non-cooperation policies, and assertions of , particularly in areas like , environmental regulation, and mandates. These conflicts reflect ongoing debates over the scope of federal supremacy under the versus states' reserved powers under the Tenth Amendment, with states arguing that federal overreach encroaches on their . For instance, between 2020 and 2025, over 25 multistate lawsuits targeted federal executive actions, highlighting a pattern of resistance to perceived unfunded mandates and regulatory expansion. A prominent example involves immigration enforcement, where states have diverged sharply from federal policy. Texas launched in 2021, deploying state resources including troops and installing razor wire along the to deter illegal crossings, directly conflicting with federal Border Patrol operations. In January 2024, the U.S. ruled 5-4 that federal agents could remove Texas-installed barriers in Eagle Pass, affirming federal primacy over border removal but not halting state installations, as Texas continued fortifications amid over 500,000 apprehensions in 2024. Bill 4, enacted in 2024, empowered state officers to and deport suspected illegal entrants, prompting federal injunctions on preemption grounds, though the law underscored states' claims to protect public safety absent federal action. Conversely, sanctuary jurisdictions in states like and New York have limited local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement () since the 2010s, refusing to honor detainers without warrants; by 2025, the Department of Justice identified over 300 such policies restricting federal access to jails, invoking the anti-commandeering doctrine from (1997), which prohibits federal coercion of state officials. Environmental policy has similarly fueled sovereignty disputes, with energy-producing states contesting EPA regulations as exceeding statutory authority under the Clean Air Act. In May 2024, attorneys general from 25 states, led by , petitioned the D.C. Circuit to overturn the EPA's power plant emissions rule, which aimed to shift generation from and gas to renewables by 2035-2040, arguing it imposed unachievable standards and bypassed congressional intent. Similar challenges arose against 2023 emission limits for oil and gas operations, with 24 Republican-led states seeking intervention in 2024 to pause enforcement, citing economic harm to local industries estimated at billions in compliance costs. These suits echo prior invalidations, such as the 2015 Clean Power Plan's partial overturn in (2022), where the curtailed agency deference under the . Public health responses to the from 2020-2022 exemplified ad hoc assertions of state autonomy, with governors in states like and issuing to reopen economies and prohibit local mask or vaccine mandates conflicting with federal Centers for Disease Control guidelines, leading to over 100 lawsuits testing emergency powers. While federal funding conditions under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 spurred some compliance, states successfully resisted vaccine mandates for federal contractors in cases like NFIB v. OSHA (2022), where the blocked broad employer requirements affecting 84 million workers. These episodes, alongside ongoing litigation over voting laws and post-Dobbs v. Jackson (2022), illustrate states' use of courts to recalibrate , often prevailing when federal actions lack clear statutory backing.

Relations with Other Entities

Interstate compacts and disputes

Interstate compacts are binding agreements between U.S. states that address shared interests such as resource management, transportation, and criminal justice, requiring congressional consent under the Compact Clause (Article I, Section 10, Clause 3) to ensure they do not encroach on federal authority or alter the balance of power among states. Historically, these compacts originated from colonial-era boundary resolutions and proliferated in the for regional governance; as of 2023, over 200 active compacts exist, covering topics from water allocation to professional licensing. The has clarified that not all interstate agreements qualify as compacts necessitating consent—only those infringing on congressional prerogatives or resembling treaties— as in Virginia v. (1896), where a boundary adjustment was upheld without prior approval. Key examples include the Colorado River Compact of 1922, ratified by Congress in 1928, which divides annual flows of 15 million acre-feet among Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming to mitigate drought-induced conflicts, supplemented by the Boulder Canyon Project Act of 1928 for downstream allocations. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Compact of 1921 established a bistate agency managing bridges, tunnels, and airports across 1,500 square miles, handling over 350 million vehicle crossings annually as of recent data. Other significant compacts encompass the Interstate Driver License Compact (joined by 45 states by 2023 for reciprocal licensing) and the Multistate Tax Compact (1967), which standardized apportionment formulas to curb double taxation until partial invalidation by the Court in United States Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax Comm'n (1978). Interstate disputes, often involving water rights, boundaries, or compact enforcement, fall under the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction per Article III, Section 2, with the Court adjudicating over 150 such cases since 1789, though fewer than 10% reach full merits review. In Arizona v. California (1963), the Court upheld federal allocations under the 1922 Compact and 1928 Act, awarding California 4.4 million acre-feet annually while resolving claims by Arizona and others over tributaries. Boundary conflicts, such as Illinois v. Kentucky (1991), determined the Mississippi River's thalweg (deepest channel) as the line circa 1830 surveys, rejecting modern shifts due to accretion. Water enforcement disputes persist; in Texas v. New Mexico (2024), the Court imposed a gradual reduction plan for New Mexico's diversions under the 1938 Rio Grande Compact to address deficits exceeding 100,000 acre-feet yearly, incorporating federal Rio Grande Project operations. Groundwater disputes emerged later; v. (2021) dismissed claims of equitable liability for Memphis depletion, ruling no general duty exists absent compact or riparian principles, as extraction occurred within state borders despite hydrologic interdependence. Compact withdrawal challenges, like New York v. (2023), tested unilateral exits, with the deferring to compact terms allowing notice-based termination for the 1954 agreement. These mechanisms underscore federal oversight in preventing unilateral state actions that could escalate to broader conflicts, though critics note delays in adjudication—averaging years—exacerbate resource strains.

Interactions with foreign governments

The U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from entering into treaties, alliances, or confederations with foreign powers, reserving foreign affairs powers primarily to the federal government under Article I, Section 10, Clause 1. This restriction aims to prevent fragmented diplomacy that could undermine national unity, with the Supreme Court invalidating state actions that unduly interfere with federal foreign relations even absent explicit federal policy. Despite these limits, states engage in "" through non-binding economic and cultural initiatives, such as trade promotion and memoranda of understanding (MOUs), which do not require federal consent unless they resemble compacts affecting interstate or foreign commerce. States maintain overseas trade offices to facilitate exports, attract investment, and build business networks, with 40 states operating such offices as of 2002, often in major markets like , , and . For instance, New York operates a global network of trade directors who conduct and connect state firms with foreign partners. These offices assist in identifying importers, organizing trade exhibitions, and negotiating commercial deals, boosting state economies without encroaching on federal treaty-making authority. , , and others have similarly established representative offices in countries like , , and to promote sectors such as , , and . Cultural and educational exchanges, including sister-state or sister-city agreements, further exemplify state-level interactions, fostering goodwill and indirect economic ties; over 500 such city pairings exist with Japanese localities alone, signed since the . States also participate in inbound promotion, collaborating with foreign governments on issues like environmental or , though federal courts scrutinize arrangements that could imply binding commitments. These activities, while economically oriented, occasionally draw federal pushback if perceived to signal divergent policy, as in cases where state sanctions or s conflict with national agreements. Overall, state engagements prioritize over , aligning with federal supremacy in .

Geography and Territorial Aspects

Border delineation and disputes

U.S. state boundaries are primarily established through acts of during the admission of new states from federal territories or by colonial charters for the original thirteen states. For the original colonies, borders derived from royal grants and charters issued by the British Crown, often following natural features such as rivers or vague descriptions along meridians and parallels. Western states' borders were frequently delineated using straight lines of latitude and longitude to facilitate land surveys under the , prioritizing administrative efficiency over topography in sparsely settled areas. Natural boundaries, including rivers and mountain ridges, were employed where practical, though shifts in river courses have occasionally prompted adjustments. Boundary delineation often involved professional surveys, such as the Mason-Dixon line completed in 1767-1768 to resolve colonial disputes between and . Congress retained authority to define or alter boundaries upon state admission, as seen in the of 1787, which outlined provisional territorial divisions later formalized into states like and . Interstate compacts, requiring congressional approval, or Supreme Court rulings under Article III, Section 2 of the , can modify boundaries post-admission. Disputes over state borders have historically arisen from ambiguous enabling acts, survey inaccuracies, or competing territorial claims, with the U.S. exercising to adjudicate most cases. A prominent example is the of 1835-1836 between and , stemming from conflicting interpretations of the 1787 Northwest Ordinance's boundary along the and ; Congress resolved it in 1836 by granting the disputed Toledo Strip while compensating with the Upper Peninsula. Other notable disputes include v. Massachusetts (1838 onward), involving colonial charter ambiguities, and more recent cases like v. (1985), which addressed shifts in the Mississippi River boundary affecting interstate commerce. The has decided over 100 boundary cases since 1789, emphasizing equitable principles and historical evidence rather than strict equity rules. Few active disputes remain, though occasional litigation occurs over river avulsions or erosion, as in Georgia v. (1990) regarding the . Once settled, state borders are rarely altered, preserving absent mutual consent or federal intervention.

Regional classifications and physical features

The divides the 50 states into four main regions for data collection and statistical purposes: Northeast, Midwest, , and West. These regions are subdivided into nine divisions to reflect geographic and cultural similarities. The Northeast includes the division (, , , , , ) and Middle Atlantic division (, New York, ). The Midwest consists of the East North Central division (, , , , ) and West North Central division (, , , , , , ). The encompasses the South Atlantic division (, , Georgia, , , , , ), East South Central division (, , , ), and West South Central division (, , , ). The West comprises the Mountain division (, , , , , , , ) and Pacific division (, , , , Washington).
RegionDivisionsStates
NortheastNew EnglandConnecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont
NortheastMiddle Atlantic, New York,
MidwestEast North CentralIllinois, , , ,
MidwestWest North Central, , , , , ,
SouthSouth Atlantic, , Georgia, , , , ,
SouthEast South Central, , ,
SouthWest South CentralArkansas, , ,
WestMountain, , , , , , ,
WestPacific, , , , Washington
Alternative classifications exist, such as those based on cultural, economic, or historical factors, but the Census Bureau's framework remains the standard for federal statistics due to its consistency since 1950. The physical features of U.S. states vary widely across physiographic provinces, shaped by tectonic activity, erosion, and glaciation over millions of years. Eastern states predominantly feature the Atlantic Coastal Plain and , with low-lying plains along the coast rising to folded mountains averaging 900 meters in elevation, eroded to rounded peaks. Central states lie within the and Interior Highlands, including the vast —covering about 1.3 million square kilometers of flat to gently rolling grasslands—and the Ozark Plateau with elevations up to 600 meters. Western states encompass the Rocky Mountain System, Intermontane Plateaus, and Pacific Mountain System, featuring high, rugged peaks like the Rockies exceeding 4,000 meters, basin-and-range topography with fault-block mountains and valleys, and active volcanic ranges such as the Cascades and Sierra Nevada. Arid deserts, including the Mojave and , occupy much of the Southwest, while includes glaciated mountains and volcanoes, and consists of volcanic islands formed by the . Major water features include the —totaling 245,000 square kilometers of surface area bordering eight states—the draining 3.2 million square kilometers, and extensive coastlines spanning 19,924 kilometers for the contiguous states plus additional for and . These features influence state climates, economies, and ecosystems, with eastern regions generally humid and forested, central areas prone to tornadoes, and western landscapes marked by seismic activity and aridity.

Nomenclature and Identity

Etymology of state names

The names of the 50 U.S. states originate from a variety of sources, with approximately 26 deriving from Native American languages—often referencing tribes, rivers, or landscape features—while others stem from European royal honors, Spanish or French geographical descriptors, Latin terms, or English colonial place names. This linguistic diversity underscores the interplay of , European colonization, and territorial expansion, though some etymologies remain disputed due to inconsistent historical records or multiple proposed interpretations.
StateEtymology
AlabamaLikely from the Choctaw words alba (vegetation) and amo (to gather), meaning "thicket-clearers," associated with a Native tribe of the Creek Confederacy that named a local river.
AlaskaFrom the Aleut alaxsxaq, meaning "the mainland" or "object toward which the sea breaks."
ArizonaDisputed; possibly from O'odham ali ṣonak ("little spring place") or Basque haritz ona ("good oak"); alternative proposals include Pima or Aztec terms for silver-bearing sites.
ArkansasFrom the Quapaw (Siouan) tribal name, a nasalized form of Kansa, used by upstream tribes for "people of the south wind."
CaliforniaUncertain; possibly from Spanish novelist Garci Ordóñez de Montalvo's 1510 fictional island paradise in Las sergas de Esplandián, or Latin calida fornax ("hot furnace") for thermal features.
ColoradoSpanish for "colored red" (colorado), referring to the reddish tint of the Colorado River's sediment-laden waters; officially adopted by Congress in 1861.
ConnecticutFrom Mohican quinnitukqut, meaning "at the long tidal river," describing the Connecticut River.
DelawareNamed for Thomas West, Baron De La Warr (from Old French "of the war"), Virginia's colonial governor who explored the Delaware River and Bay in 1610.
FloridaSpanish la Florida ("flowery" or "full of flowers"), coined by Juan Ponce de León in 1513 during Easter (Pascua Florida) amid lush vegetation.
GeorgiaHonors King George II of England, who granted the colony's charter in 1732; the suffix -ia denotes "land of."
HawaiiDisputed Polynesian origin; possibly from Hawaiʻi Loa (legendary discoverer), or hawa ("homeland") + ii ("small"), or simply the native name for the largest island.
IdahoLikely fabricated; proposed as Shoshone edah hoe ("light on the mountains") but actually coined by lobbyist George M. Willing as "gem of the mountains," later applied after rejection for Colorado.
IllinoisFrom Illiniwek ("men" or "warriors" in Miami-Illinois), altered via Ojibwe and French pronunciation to Illinois.
IndianaLatin for "land of the Indians," reflecting early land purchases from Native tribes or the Indiana Territory's indigenous inhabitants.
IowaFrom the Ioway (Ayuhwa) tribal name, possibly Dakota for "sleepy ones" or self-designation baxoje ("dusty-nosed" or "ashy snow").
KansasFrom Kansa (Kaw) tribal name, a Siouan term possibly meaning "south wind people," Anglicized from French Cansez.
KentuckyDisputed; possibly Wyandot ken-tah-ten ("land of tomorrow"), Iroquois for "meadow land," or Shawnee for "at the head of a river."
LouisianaFrench La Louisiane, "land of Louis," honoring King Louis XIV; named by explorer René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, in 1682.
MaineDisputed; possibly English "mainland" (contrasting coastal islands) or after the French province of Maine.
MarylandHonors Queen Henrietta Maria, wife of King Charles I, via a 1632 charter; Latinized as Terra Mariae ("Mary's land").
MassachusettsFrom Massachusett tribal name, meaning "at the great hill" (referencing the Blue Hills).
MichiganFrom Ojibwe mishigamaa ("large water" or "great lake"), referring to Lake Michigan.
MinnesotaDakota mní sóta ("sky-tinted water" or "cloudy water"), describing the Minnesota River's muddy hue.
MississippiOjibwe mísi-ziibi ("great river" or "father of waters").
MissouriAlgonquian ouemessourita (tribal name), possibly "people of the big (dugout) canoe" or from the muddy Missouri River.
MontanaLatin montana ("mountainous"), via Spanish montaña; adopted for the mountainous territory.
NebraskaOmaha or Otoe ñí brásge ("flat water"), for the Platte River.
NevadaSpanish nevada ("snowy" or "snow-covered"), for the Sierra Nevada mountains.
New HampshireNamed by Captain John Mason in 1623 after his English homeland, Hampshire County.
New JerseyHonors the Channel Island of Jersey, birthplace of colonist Sir George Carteret; Jersey's own etymology is debated (Latin Caesarea or Norse "Geirr's island").
New MexicoSpanish Nuevo México ("new Mexico"), possibly referencing the Valley of Mexico or Aztec migrations; origins unclear.
New YorkNamed for James II, Duke of York, after England's 1664 conquest of Dutch New Amsterdam.
North CarolinaFrom Latin Carolus ("Charles"), honoring King Charles I or II; split from unified Carolina in 1712.
South CarolinaFrom Latin Carolus ("Charles"), honoring King Charles I or II; split from unified Carolina in 1712.
North DakotaSioux Dakȟóta ("allies" or "friends"), from the Dakota Territory; split in 1889.
South DakotaSioux Dakȟóta ("allies" or "friends"), from the Dakota Territory; split in 1889.
OhioSeneca ohi:yo’ ("good river"), for the Ohio River.
OklahomaChoctaw okla humma ("red people"), referring to the Choctaw or Chickasaw.
OregonUncertain; possibly Algonquian wauregan (via Ohio River) or Chinook ooligan (candlefish); first attested in 1765 writings.
PennsylvaniaLatin Penn's sylvania ("Penn's woods"), honoring Admiral William Penn (father of founder William Penn).
Rhode IslandDisputed; possibly Dutch Roodt Eylandt ("red island") for clay shores, or explorer Giovanni da Verrazzano's comparison to Greek Rhodes.
TennesseeFrom Cherokee village Tanasi, meaning unknown (possibly "meeting place" or "river bend").
TexasCaddo taysha ("friend" or "ally"), Hispanicized by Spanish explorers.
UtahSpanish yuta, from the Ute tribal name; possibly meaning "people of the mountains" or "god's people," though disputed.
VermontFrench vert mont ("green mountain"), coined in 1763 by settlers describing the Green Mountains; unusually lacks typical French feminine article.
VirginiaLatin for "virgin," honoring Queen Elizabeth I as the "Virgin Queen" by Sir Walter Raleigh in the 1580s.
WashingtonHonors George Washington, first U.S. president; named in the 1850s, distinct from D.C.'s original Columbia reference.
West VirginiaRetains "Virginia" from the parent state, formed in 1863 during the Civil War; alternatives like Kanawha were rejected.
WisconsinMiami-Illinois for the Wisconsin River, possibly "it lies red" (referencing reddish sandstone) or "where the waters gather"; French-altered to Ouisconsin.
WyomingMunsee Delaware xwəwamənk ("at the large river plain" or "extensive plains"); popularized by a Pennsylvania valley's name from 18th-century poetry.

State symbols and emblems

U.S. states designate official symbols and emblems to encapsulate their historical, cultural, natural, and geological identities, with adoptions typically enacted through legislative bills signed by governors. These designations promote civic pride, , and conservation efforts, often originating from public campaigns, including those led by schoolchildren. The practice accelerated after the in , where a "National Garland of Flowers" showcased state-representative blooms, prompting many legislatures to formalize floral emblems and expanding to broader categories. Core emblems include the , , and . All 50 states maintain an official , most featuring the state seal centered on a monochromatic field, with designs generally to the late 19th or early to distinguish states during national events like expositions. State seals, used for authenticating official documents, depict allegorical scenes of , industry, or —such as agricultural motifs or founding dates—and are rooted in colonial charters or post-independence legislatures. Mottos, often in Latin to evoke classical virtues, appear on seals or flags; examples include "Excelsior" (New York, meaning "ever upward") and "Ad Astra per Aspera" (, meaning "to the stars through difficulties"), selected for their resonance with state ethos. Natural symbols predominate, reflecting regional : every state has designated a (e.g., cardinals or eagles symbolizing resilience), flower (often like goldenrods or magnolias for botanical heritage), and (such as oaks or pines denoting endurance). extends to animals, , reptiles, amphibians, and , while geological emblems cover minerals, gems, rocks, and fossils to highlight extractive industries or paleontological finds. Cultural and whimsical additions include foods, beverages, dances, and even dinosaurs or footwear, totaling over 200 categories across states, with some like adopting a state pepper or a state . Adoptions require legislative approval, frequently spurred by petitions from educators or youth—such as third-graders in proposing reptiles or high schoolers in advocating birds—to foster engagement with state heritage. While most symbols endure, revisions occur; for instance, flags in states like and were updated in the for vexillological improvements emphasizing and symbolism over cluttered seals. These emblems appear on license plates, tourism materials, and public buildings, serving as enduring markers of state within the federal union.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.