Hubbry Logo
State legislature (United States)State legislature (United States)Main
Open search
State legislature (United States)
Community hub
State legislature (United States)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
State legislature (United States)
State legislature (United States)
State legislature (United States)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
For the documentary film, see State Legislature (film). For a list of US state legislatures, see List of United States state legislatures.

This article is part of a series on the
Politics of the
United States
Federal government
Legislature
Executive
Judiciary
Elections
  • National elections
  • Elections by state and territory
Political parties
Political ideologies
Federalism
Foreign relations
US state and territorial governments (governor and legislature) by party control
  Democratic control
  Republican control
  PNP control
  Split control
US state and territorial legislatures by party control
  Democratic control
  Republican control
  PNP control
  Split control

In the United States, the state legislature is the legislative branch in each of the 50 U.S. states.

A legislature generally performs state duties for a state in the same way that the United States Congress performs national duties at the national level. Generally, the same system of checks and balances that exists at the federal level also exists between the state legislature, the state executive officer (governor) and the state judiciary.

In 27 states, the legislature is called the legislature or the state legislature, while in 19 states the legislature is called the general assembly. In Massachusetts and New Hampshire, the legislature is called the general court, while North Dakota and Oregon designate the legislature the legislative assembly.

Legislature overview

[edit]

Responsibilities

[edit]

The responsibilities of a state legislature vary from state to state, depending on state's constitution.

The primary function of any legislature is to create laws. State legislatures also approve budget for state government. They may establish government agencies, set their policies, and approve their budgets. For instance, a state legislature could establish an agency to manage environmental conservation efforts within that state. In some states, state legislators elect other officials.

State legislatures often have power to regulate businesses operating within their jurisdiction. They also regulate courts within their jurisdiction. This includes determining types of cases that can be heard, setting court fees, and regulating attorney conduct.

Other responsibilities

Under the terms of Article V of the U.S. Constitution, state lawmakers retain the power to ratify Constitutional amendments which have been proposed by both houses of Congress and they also retain the ability to call for a national convention to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

After the convention has concluded its business, 75% of the states will ratify what the convention has proposed. Under Article II, state legislatures choose the manner of appointing the state's presidential electors. Formerly, some state legislatures appointed the U.S. Senators from their respective states until the ratification of the 17th Amendment in 1913 required the direct election of senators by the state's voters.

Sometimes what the legislature wishes to accomplish cannot be done simply by the passage of a bill, but rather requires amending the state constitution. Each state has specified steps intended to make it difficult to alter the constitution without the sufficient support of either the legislature, or the people, or both.

Organization

[edit]

All states except Nebraska have a bicameral legislature. The smaller chamber is called the senate, usually referred to as the upper house. This chamber usually has the exclusive power to confirm appointments made by the governor and to try articles of impeachment. (In a few states, a separate executive council, composed of members elected from large districts, performs the confirmation function.)

Nebraska originally had a bicameral legislature like the other states, but the lower house was abolished following a referendum, effective with the 1936 elections. The remaining unicameral (one-chamber) legislature is called the Nebraska Legislature, but its members are called state senators.

During the 20th century, state legislatures further emulated the activities and structures of the US Congress as institutions at both levels grew in size and complexity, often accompanied by increases in staffing and member pay.[1] While most state legislatures remain part-time institutions, a handful of states have expanded theirs to meet year-round.[2]

History

[edit]
Further information: Colonial government in the Thirteen Colonies

The first bicameral American legislature was formed in 1619 as the Virginia House of Burgesses.[3] The early colonial assemblies were not rooted in English models of parliament.[4] The early colonial assemblies also varied among each other in terms of structure and organization.[4]

The legislatures of the initial Thirteen Colonies usually consisted of an elected lower house and an appointed upper house, the latter of which also functioned as an advisory council to the colonial governor. After the American Revolution and the establishment of the United States, most states wrote new constitutions which had direct elections for both chambers of the legislature. This model helped influence the U.S. Constitution and was then adopted by new states which later joined the union.

Representation

[edit]

Members of the smaller chamber represent more citizens and usually serve for longer terms than members of the larger chamber, generally four years. In 41 states, the larger chamber is called the House of Representatives. Five states designate the larger chamber the assembly, three states call it the House of Delegates, and one has just one chamber. Members of the larger chamber usually serve for terms of two years. The larger chamber customarily has the exclusive power to initiate taxing legislation and articles of impeachment.

Prior to the United States Supreme Court decisions Baker v. Carr (1962) and Reynolds v. Sims (1964), the basis of representation in most state legislatures was modeled on that of the U.S. Congress: the state senators represented geographical units, while members of the larger chamber represented population. In Reynolds v. Sims the Supreme Court decided upon the one man, one vote standard for state legislatures and invalidated representation based on geographical units regardless of population. (The ruling does not affect the U.S. Senate, because that chamber's makeup is prescribed by the U.S. Constitution.)

Sessions

[edit]

During a legislative session, the legislature considers matters introduced by its members or submitted by the governor. Businesses and other special interest organizations often lobby the legislature to obtain beneficial legislation, defeat unfavorably perceived measures, or influence other legislative action. A legislature also approves the state's operating and capital budgets, which may begin as a legislative proposal or a submission by the governor.

In most states, a new state legislature convenes in January of the odd-numbered year after the election of members to the larger chamber. The period during which the legislature remains in session varies by state. In states where the legislature is considered part-time, a session may last several months; where the legislature is considered full-time, the session may last all year, with periodic breaks for district work.

Some states have varying lengths for odd-numbered and even-numbered years, or allow for a fixed number of either legislative or calendar days. Georgia for example, allows only 40 legislative days per year, and Wyoming allows 60 legislative days per term and no more than 40 per one calendar year.[5][6] Whereas in Michigan, New Jersey, New York (in odd-numbered years), Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (in odd-numbered years), the sessions usually last all year.[7]

Four state legislatures – Montana, Nevada, North Dakota and Texas – meet only biennially. In the early 1960s, only 19 legislatures met annually, but by the mid-1970s, it had increased to 41.[8] The latest legislature to switch to annual sessions was Oregon in 2011, following a voter-approved ballot measure.[9]

Many state legislators meet every year at the National Conference of The Council of State Governments (CSG), headquartered in Lexington, Kentucky, with offices in Washington, DC; New York City; Chicago; Atlanta; and Sacramento, and at the annual meetings of CSG's regions, The Southern Legislative Conference, The Midwestern Legislative Conference, the Eastern Regional Conference and CSG West, and at the Legislative Summit of the National Conference of State Legislatures, which is headquartered in Denver, Colorado and has a lobbying office in Washington, D.C.

Additionally, privately funded organizations with ideological leanings have annual meetings attracting many legislators. These include the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a conservative organization, and the State Innovation Exchange (SIX), its progressive counterpart.

Legislative procedure

[edit]
The Iowa State Capitol building, where the Iowa General Assembly convenes

Generally, the legislative bodies and their committees use either Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure or an amended form thereof.[10] During official meetings, a professional parliamentarian is available to ensure that legislation and accompanying discussion proceed as orderly as possible without bias.

Bill drafting and submission

The lawmaking process begins with the introduction of a bill in either the House of Representatives or the Senate. Bills may be introduced in either house, sometimes with the exception of bills increasing or decreasing revenue, which must originate in the House of Representatives. The order of business in each house provides a proper time for the introduction of bills.

As of 2017, 24 of 99 chambers have limits on the number of bills that a legislator can introduce per year according to NCSL.[11] Most limits are set by internal legislative rules, while Louisiana's legislature is limited by constitutional amendment.

Bills are usually assigned consecutive numbers, given in the order of their introduction, to facilitate identification. Usually a bill cannot become enacted until it has been read on a certain number of days in each house. Upon introduction, a bill is usually read by its title only, constituting the first reading of the bill. Because a bill is usually read by title only, it is important that the title give the members notice of the subject matter contained in the bill.

When a bill passes where most votes are from the minority party and "moderate" members of a majority party, this is known as the majority being "rolled".[12] When there are bills which most of the majority oppose,[12] roll rates are a measure of the majority party's avoidance of voting on those bills.

A 2013 study of state legislatures found that of the 99 studied, about half, 53, had roll rates below 5%. And most, 83, had roll rates below 10%.[12]

Committee review

Committees review bill, often holding hearings to gather information and opinions, and can propose amendments to bill similar to legislative bodies throughout the world. Most bills cannot be enacted into law until it has been referred to, acted upon by, and returned from, a standing committee in each house. Reference to committee usually follows the first reading of the bill.

Each committee is set up to consider bills relating to a particular subject. Standing committees are charged with the important responsibility of examining bills and recommending action to the Senate or House. Often on days when a legislature is not in session, the committees of each house meet and consider the bills that have been referred to them to decide if the assigned bills should be reported for further action.

For most bills, the recommendations of the committee are followed, although either house is free to accept or reject the action of the committee. Bills reported favorably by a committee may be placed on a regular calendar (the agenda of the deliberative body).

Most of the work of the legislature is done by committees. The legislature as a whole relies on its committees to report out only those bills deserving the consideration of the entire house.

Through standing committees, each bill is addressed by a group of members who have special knowledge of its subject. Some members of the legislature have expert knowledge of particular subjects of legislation, and these members are usually placed on committees to take full advantage of this specialized knowledge. For this reason, the legislature often accepts the final recommendations of its standing committees. As has been noted, however, the legislature does not completely abdicate its responsibility for the consideration of pending bills. If the need arises, the members of either house can force a committee to take action on a bill, or they can ignore the committee's recommendations.[citation needed]

Pocket veto and discharge petitions

Pocket veto powers are common, which allows a committee to "kill" a bill, sometimes without even a public vote; in Colorado, the power was notably repealed in a citizen initiative constitutional amendment in 1988 driven by various reform groups.[13]

When a committee refuses to vote a bill out of committee, a discharge petition can be passed by the broader membership. The specifics vary from state to state; for example, in 2004, a report found that New York State "places more restrictions than any other state legislature on motions to discharge a bill from a committee",[14] which led to subsequent reforms.[15]

Reports of Committee

After a committee has completed work on a bill, it reports the bill to the appropriate house during the "reports of committees" in the daily order of business. Reported bills are immediately given a second reading. The houses do not vote on a bill at the time it is reported; however, reported bills are placed on the calendar for the next legislative day. This second reading is made by title only.

The regular calendar is a list of bills that have been favorably reported from committee and are ready for consideration by the membership of the entire house.

Third reading

Regardless of where a bill is placed on the calendar, once the bill is considered and adopted, this is called the third reading. At this third reading of the bill, the entire legislature gives consideration to its passage. At this time, the bill may be studied in detail, debated, amended, and read at length before final passage.

If the majority vote in favor of the bill, it is recorded as passed.

Transmission to second house

A bill that is passed in one house is transmitted, along with a formal message, to the other house. If the bill is not reported from committee or is not considered by the full house, the bill is defeated.

The house of origin, upon return of its amended bill, may take any one of several courses of action. It may concur in the amendment by the adoption of a motion to that effect; then the bill, having been passed by both houses in identical form, is ready for enrollment. Another possibility is that the house of origin may adopt a motion to non-concur in the amendment, at which point the bill dies. Finally, the house of origin may refuse to accept the amendment but request that a conference committee be appointed. The other house usually agrees to the request, and the presiding officer of each house appoints members to the conference committee.

Conference committees

A conference committee is often empaneled to discuss the points of difference between the two houses' versions of the same bill, and tries to reach an agreement between them so that the identical bill can be passed by both houses. If an agreement is reached and if both houses adopt the conference committee's report, the bill is passed. If either house refuses to adopt the report of the conference committee, a motion may be made for further conference. If a conference committee is unable to reach an agreement, it may be discharged, and a new conference committee may be appointed. Some highly controversial bills may be referred to several different conference committees. If an agreement is never reached in conference prior to the end of the legislative session, the bill is lost.

When a bill has passed both houses in identical form, it is then ready for transmittal to the governor.

Governor's Approval or Veto

The governor may sign bills presented by the legislature, which completes its enactment into law. From this point, the bill becomes an act, and remains the law of the state unless repealed by legislative action or overturned by a court decision. Governors who do not approve of the bill may veto it. In the event of a veto, the governor returns the bill to the house in which it originated with a message of objections and amendments (if applicable) which might remove those objections. The bill is then reconsidered, and if a simple majority of the members of both houses agrees to the proposed executive amendments, it is returned to the governor for signature.

On the other hand, a qualified majority (two-thirds) of the members of each house can choose to approve a vetoed bill precisely as the legislature originally passed it, in which case it becomes a law over the governor's veto. If the governor fails to return a bill to the legislative house in which it originated within a specified number of days after it was presented, it becomes a law without their signature.

The bills that reach the governor less than a specified number of days before the end of the session may be approved within ten days after adjournment. The bills not approved within that time do not become law. This is known as a "pocket veto". This is the most conclusive form of veto, for the legislature (having adjourned) has no chance to reconsider the vetoed measure.

See also

[edit]

U.S. articles

[edit]

Other countries

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

State legislature (United States)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A state legislature in the United States is the popularly elected body responsible for enacting laws, appropriating funds, and providing oversight within each of the 50 states' governments, exercising authority over areas not reserved to the federal government by the Constitution. Forty-nine states maintain bicameral legislatures divided into an upper chamber, typically called the Senate, and a lower chamber known as the House of Representatives or Assembly, while Nebraska operates the sole unicameral legislature. These 99 legislative chambers collectively seat 7,386 lawmakers, who are generally elected from single-member districts for terms ranging from two to six years depending on the state and chamber. State legislatures handle the bulk of policymaking on domestic issues such as , , transportation, and , functioning as key arenas for innovation and adaptation to local conditions under . Their sessions vary from full-time professional bodies in states like to part-time citizen legislatures in others, influencing the depth of legislative output and legislator compensation. As of early 2025, following the 2024 elections, Republicans hold majorities in 57 chambers, Democrats in 41, and North Dakota's legislature remains officially nonpartisan, reflecting partisan divisions that shape state-level responses to national debates. This distribution underscores the legislatures' role in amplifying regional political differences, with unified party control in many states enabling swift enactment of partisan priorities while divided chambers often necessitate .

Basis in State Constitutions

State constitutions serve as the foundational legal authority for establishing and empowering the legislatures of the 50 U.S. states, vesting in them the primary responsibility for enacting laws, appropriating funds, and exercising oversight within the bounds of . These documents, which emerged following from Britain, typically allocate legislative authority to a designated assembly or assemblies, drawing from colonial precedents of representative bodies while emphasizing and checks against executive dominance. For example, the , adopted on June 29, 1776, created a bicameral consisting of a House of Delegates and a , with legislative sessions required at least annually to deliberate on bills and resolutions. Provisions vesting legislative power vary slightly in phrasing but uniformly affirm the legislature's core role, as seen in North Carolina's , which states that such power "shall be vested in the General Assembly," comprising a and elected for fixed terms. Similarly, Louisiana's vests it in a bicameral of a and , underscoring the assembly's authority to define state policy absent delegation to other entities. This constitutional framework ensures legislatures operate as co-equal branches, with powers including taxation, regulation, and , though constrained by enumerated rights and procedural requirements unique to each state. While 49 states prescribe bicameral legislatures in their constitutions—reflecting a deliberate design to balance representation by population in the lower house against regional interests in the upper—Nebraska amended its constitution via voter initiative in 1934 to establish a unicameral, nonpartisan body, which held its inaugural session in January 1937 to promote efficiency and eliminate duplicative processes. This exception arose from reform efforts led by Senator George Norris, who argued that bicameralism fostered inefficiency inherited from federal imitation, though it remains the sole deviation among states. State constitutions thus not only originate legislatures but also adapt their form to local priorities, while maintaining fidelity to republican principles guaranteed by Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution.

Federal Constraints and Supremacy

The , enshrined in Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, declares that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties constitute "the supreme ," binding judges in every state regardless of contrary state constitutions or laws. This provision directly constrains state legislatures by invalidating any state statutes that conflict with valid federal enactments, ensuring uniformity in areas of national interest while preserving state autonomy in non-conflicting domains. The clause originated as a remedy to the weaknesses of the , under which states often disregarded national obligations, leading to inconsistent enforcement and economic disarray. State legislatures are explicitly bound by this framework, as the clause requires members of such bodies to swear an oath to support the , subordinating their legislative output to federal supremacy. Consequently, state laws attempting to regulate matters exclusively reserved to the —such as interstate commerce under Article I, Section 8—are preempted, as affirmed in cases like (1824), where the struck down a New York steamboat monopoly for interfering with federal commerce authority. Additional constraints arise from the incorporation of federal rights via the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibiting state legislatures from enacting laws that violate or equal protection, thereby extending protections against state action. Federal preemption of state legislation operates through express declarations in statutes or implied mechanisms, including field preemption (where federal regulation is so pervasive that states cannot intrude) and conflict preemption (where compliance with both laws is impossible or frustrates federal objectives). For instance, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974 expressly preempts state laws "related to" employee benefit plans, centralizing regulation to avoid a patchwork of varying standards that could undermine national portability and uniformity. Similarly, the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act preempts state and local laws on intrastate transportation routes to prevent economic fragmentation. Courts enforce these limits, reviewing and nullifying conflicting state measures, as in Arizona v. United States (2012), where provisions of Arizona's S.B. 1070 were invalidated for encroaching on federal immigration enforcement. This supremacy does not grant unlimited federal power; the Tenth Amendment reserves undelegated powers to the states, and courts may strike down overreaching federal statutes as unconstitutional, allowing state law to prevail in those instances. Nonetheless, the doctrine upholds a hierarchical , compelling state legislatures to align their enactments with national priorities in overlapping jurisdictions, such as environmental standards under the Clean Air Act, where federal baselines preempt stricter or inconsistent state rules unless explicitly permitted. Empirical data from preemption challenges indicate that since the 1970s, federal statutes have increasingly incorporated explicit preemption language, reflecting congressional intent to standardize regulation amid growing interstate economic interdependence.

Structure and Composition

Bicameral and Unicameral Systems

Forty-nine U.S. state legislatures operate under a bicameral structure, featuring a lower chamber—typically designated the House of Representatives or Assembly—and an upper chamber known as the Senate, with each body possessing distinct powers and representational bases as defined in state constitutions. This arrangement, adopted by all states except Nebraska, emulates the federal Congress established by the U.S. Constitution in 1787 and aims to balance population-based representation in the lower house with geographic or equal district representation in the Senate, thereby mitigating risks of impulsive legislation through sequential review. Lower houses generally comprise more members, ranging from 40 in Alaska to 400 in New Hampshire, while senates typically have 20 to 67 members, with terms often staggered to ensure continuity. Nebraska stands alone with a unicameral legislature, the , which voters established via approved on November 6, 1934, effective for the 1937 session after 68 years of bicameral operation since statehood in 1867. Championed by U.S. Senator , the reform sought to eliminate bicameral deadlocks, curb lobbyist influence between chambers, and lower operational costs by consolidating into a single nonpartisan body of 49 members elected from single-member districts for four-year terms, with half facing election biennially. Unlike partisan bicameral legislatures, Nebraska's unicameral prohibits official party affiliations in elections and operations, though informal caucuses persist, and bills undergo committee scrutiny akin to bicameral processes but without inter-chamber reconciliation. Historical precedents for existed in early state constitutions of Georgia (1777–1789), (1776–1790), and (1777–1836), but all reverted to bicameral systems amid concerns over concentrated power and inadequate checks. Nebraska's model has endured without reversion, attributed to its streamlined efficiency despite occasional criticisms of reduced deliberation.

House and Senate Organization

In the 49 bicameral state legislatures, the lower chamber—typically designated the (in 41 states) or House of Delegates/ (in the remainder)—is the larger body, with membership ranging from 21 to 400 legislators, totaling 5,505 seats nationwide as of 2024. Terms in lower chambers are two years in 45 states and four years in five states (, , , , and ). The chamber organizes at the session's outset by electing a Speaker as presiding officer, chosen by majority vote among members, who appoints chairs and controls the floor agenda. Additional officers include a and party-specific roles such as majority and minority leaders, whips, and chairs, with the majority party holding most positions. The upper chamber, universally called the , is smaller, with 20 to 67 members per state (most commonly 35), totaling 1,972 seats excluding . terms are four years in 34 states and two years in 16 states, often staggered to ensure continuity. Presiding as President is the lieutenant governor in 44 states, who casts tie-breaking votes but rarely participates in debates; the elects a from its members to handle daily operations when the lieutenant governor is absent. Party leadership mirrors the lower house, featuring majority/minority leaders and whips elected by caucuses to manage scheduling, strategy, and bill advancement. Both chambers establish standing committees—typically 10 to 30 per house, appointed by leadership—to scrutinize by subject (e.g., , , ), conduct hearings, and recommend amendments or passage. Joint committees, shared between houses, address specific issues like budgets or audits in some states, while select committees form for investigations. Each chamber adopts internal rules of procedure annually, governing (usually a ), debate limits, voting (voice, , or electronic), and , often modeled on congressional precedents but customized for state needs. Nebraska's unicameral legislature, with 49 nonpartisan members serving four-year terms, deviates by combining functions into one body led by a Speaker elected by the chamber, supported by committees but without partisan divisions in . Overall, chamber organization emphasizes majority control, with staff offices (partisan and nonpartisan) aiding research, drafting, and administration to facilitate operations.

Districting and Representation

State legislative seats in the United States are allocated through single-member districts apportioned according to population, ensuring approximate equality among constituents as required by the of the Fourteenth Amendment. In bicameral legislatures, house districts typically represent smaller populations than senate districts, with boundaries drawn to reflect decennial census data; for example, California's State Assembly districts average around 470,000 residents, while senate districts cover about 940,000. Unicameral maintains 49 single-member districts based on similar population equality principles. Redistricting occurs every ten years following the U.S. Census to adjust for shifts, with districts required to be contiguous, compact, and substantially equal in —deviations often capped at 5-10% within states. In 34 states, the state holds primary authority over drawing these maps, passing them as subject to gubernatorial . However, to address concerns over partisan self-interest, at least ten states have established independent or advisory commissions for state legislative , including (since 2000), (via 2008 and 2010 ballot measures), (amended in 2018), and (2015 reforms). These commissions often include bipartisan appointees or public members screened for conflicts, aiming to prioritize neutral criteria over electoral outcomes.
State Examples with Independent Commissions for Legislative DistrictsYear EstablishedKey Features
2000Five-member commission with balanced partisanship; maps subject to court review.
201014-member Citizens Redistricting Commission; lottery-selected applicants vetted for independence.
201813-member Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission; prohibits partisan data in initial drafts.
Partisan gerrymandering remains prevalent where legislatures control the process, enabling mapmakers to maximize seats for the majority party by concentrating or dispersing opponents—evident in North Carolina's 2021 maps, which courts partially invalidated for diluting competitive districts. Federal law under the Voting Rights Act mandates avoiding dilution of minority voting power, requiring districts to enable cohesive minority groups to elect preferred representatives where feasible, though compliance varies and invites litigation. State courts increasingly intervene, as in Pennsylvania's 2018 rejection of congressional maps (influencing state processes) for unconstitutional partisan bias. Representation thus hinges on these maps' integrity, with deviations risking underrepresentation of population changes, such as urban growth outpacing rural areas post-2020 Census.

Powers and Responsibilities

Core Legislative Authority

State legislatures hold the primary authority to enact statutes that govern intrastate matters, including the creation, modification, and repeal of laws on subjects such as , civil rights, family relations, and public welfare, as derived from powers reserved to the states under the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This legislative power is typically vested in bicameral bodies (or unicameral in ) through state constitutions, which mirror the federal structure by assigning law-making to elected representatives accountable to the populace. In practice, this authority manifests in the passage of codes defining felonies and misdemeanors, procedures for civil litigation, regulations on contracts and property ownership, and standards for professional licensing, ensuring state-specific adaptation to local needs without federal interference in reserved domains. Beyond foundational codes, state legislatures exercise core by establishing policies on curricula and mechanisms (distinct from appropriations), election administration including voter qualifications and , and statutes, and mandates such as protocols and requirements. These enactments form the bulk of state statutory law, with legislatures in 2023 alone considering over 180,000 bills across sessions, resulting in approximately 20,000 new laws on diverse topics from environmental permitting to business incorporations. The process underscores causal primacy: legislative majorities directly shape behavioral incentives and dispute resolutions within state borders, subject only to gubernatorial veto and for constitutional fidelity. This authority extends to creating statutory frameworks for administrative agencies, delegating on technical details while retaining oversight to prevent excessive executive encroachment, as affirmed in state constitutional doctrines prohibiting wholesale transfer of legislative power. For instance, legislatures define agency mandates on issues like rates or , ensuring alignment with elected priorities rather than unelected . Empirical patterns show variation by state political composition, with Republican-controlled legislatures in 2024 prioritizing in sectors, while Democrat-led ones emphasized consumer protections, highlighting the mechanism's responsiveness to voter mandates without inherent partisan skew in the power itself.

Fiscal and Oversight Functions

State legislatures exercise primary control over state finances through the power of appropriation, authorizing expenditures from state revenues for operations, programs, and . This authority stems from state constitutions, which generally vest the legislature with the to allocate funds, preventing executive-branch spending without legislative consent. In practice, governors propose budgets—typically annually or biennially, depending on the state—but legislatures amend, prioritize, and enact these into law, often through dedicated appropriations committees in both chambers. For instance, in fiscal year 2023, state legislatures collectively approved budgets totaling over $2.5 trillion in general fund expenditures across the 50 states, reflecting their role in balancing revenues from taxes, fees, and federal aid against demands like (averaging 25% of budgets) and (around 20%). Taxation powers further define fiscal responsibilities, with legislatures levying and modifying , , , and taxes to generate , subject to voter-approved limits in many states such as California's Proposition 13 (1978), which capped increases. They also authorize state borrowing via bonds for capital projects, requiring approval for debt issuance to avoid deficits, as most states mandate balanced budgets annually or biennially. These functions ensure fiscal accountability, with legislatures often incorporating performance-based budgeting to evaluate program efficacy before funding renewals. Oversight functions complement fiscal powers by monitoring executive implementation of appropriated funds and laws, primarily through standing committees that conduct ongoing reviews of state agencies within their policy domains. This includes holding hearings, subpoenaing records, and auditing expenditures to verify alignment with legislative intent, as seen in states like where oversight evaluates whether programs achieve statutory goals. Approximately 40 states maintain dedicated oversight mechanisms, such as joint committees or non-partisan fiscal offices, which analyze agency rule-making and contract performance; for example, administrative rule review processes in 45 states allow legislatures to approve, modify, or reject executive regulations post-adoption. During emergencies, legislatures in all states retain authority to oversee and terminate gubernatorial , with 49 allowing session suspension of such powers after 60 days without renewal. These activities promote accountability, though capacity varies: professional legislatures like those in New York conduct more hearings (over 100 annually in some cases), while citizen-part-time bodies rely on interim studies.

Impeachment and Confirmation Roles

State legislatures in the United States exercise powers as a mechanism to check executive and judicial officials, mirroring the federal Constitution's framework. In the 49 bicameral state legislatures, the —typically the or assembly—holds the exclusive authority to initiate by adopting articles of impeachment, which function as formal charges of such as , , or . The , usually the , then conducts a , hears , and votes on , often requiring a two-thirds for removal from office and potential disqualification from future roles. This process applies to a range of officials, including governors, governors, state judges, and executive department heads, though eligibility and grounds for are defined by individual state constitutions and statutes. Nebraska, with its unicameral legislature, deviates from this model; the single legislative body votes on impeachment articles by a two-thirds majority, combining initiation and trial functions without a separate house-senate division. trials may occur during legislative sessions or recesses in some states, and upon conviction, the legislature can impose additional penalties like fines or bans on holding office, separate from any criminal prosecution. Historical usage remains rare; for instance, only a handful of governors have faced successful since the , underscoring the process's gravity as a political rather than routine tool. In addition to , state legislatures—primarily through their —play a critical role in confirming gubernatorial appointments, providing legislative oversight of executive branch composition. Most state constitutions grant governors the power to nominate officials for positions such as agency directors, board members, and judges, subject to "," typically requiring a vote after and hearings. This authority extends to over 40 states where the holds exclusive confirmation power, ensuring appointees align with legislative priorities on issues like safety or . In states like New York and , confirmation applies to hundreds of positions annually, with failures to confirm often tied to partisan disagreements or ethical concerns. Variations exist; a minority of states involve both legislative houses in confirmations or limit senate involvement to judicial or high-level executive roles, while some governors retain recess appointment powers for interim fills without immediate confirmation. Rejection rates are low—often under 5% in routine sessions—but can spike during divided government, as seen in where senate committees scrutinize nominees for qualifications and conflicts of interest before floor votes. This confirmation process reinforces bicameral balance, preventing unchecked executive patronage while allowing governors to staff administrations efficiently.

Legislative Process

Bill Introduction and Committee Review

In United States state legislatures, bills originate from ideas proposed by legislators, constituents, groups, executive branch officials, or legislative staff, but formal introduction requires sponsorship by one or more members of the chamber. The drafting process typically involves review by nonpartisan legislative counsel offices to ensure legal precision and compliance with chamber rules, after which the sponsor files with the chamber's or presiding . Upon filing, receives a designation, such as "HB 123" for House Bill 123 in bicameral states, and undergoes a first reading where its title is announced without . Bills may be introduced during active sessions, though over three-fourths of state legislative chambers permit prefiling before the session convenes, allowing accumulation of proposed legislation for efficient organization at the outset. Introduction deadlines vary by state and chamber, with some imposing limits on the number of bills per to manage workload— for instance, certain states cap daily introductions near session starts. In unicameral , the process mirrors bicameral houses but occurs in a single body, while citizen-initiated bills in states like or bypass traditional introduction via ballot petition but may still route through committees for refinement if referred. Following introduction, chamber —typically the Speaker of the House or Senate President—refers the bill to one or more standing committees based on subject matter, such as , , or , to facilitate specialized scrutiny. Committees, composed of chamber members appointed by , conduct detailed review, often beginning with staff-prepared fiscal and policy analyses estimating costs, impacts, and precedents. Public hearings allow from stakeholders, experts, and citizens, though participation levels differ: some states mandate open hearings with recorded input, while others limit to invited witnesses to expedite proceedings. During committee consideration, members the bill's merits, propose amendments to address concerns or refine , and vote on motions such as "do pass," "pass as amended," "hold," or "do not pass." A favorable committee vote, usually requiring a simple majority, results in a report to the full chamber with recommendations; unfavorable outcomes effectively kill the bill unless reconsidered or reassigned. Subcommittees may handle initial reviews in larger states to distribute workload, and joint s occasionally address cross-chamber issues, though these are less common than in . This stage serves as a primary gatekeeping mechanism, with data from the indicating that a significant portion—often over 80%—of introduced bills fail to advance beyond committee due to resource constraints and policy disagreements.

Debate, Voting, and Passage

Following committee approval, bills advance to the chamber floor for debate and potential amendments, typically after a second reading that includes printing and distribution to members. Floor proceedings are governed by each chamber's standing rules, often derived from Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure, which emphasizes orderly discussion on the bill's merits while allowing motions to limit or close debate to prevent filibusters—unlike the U.S. Senate's practices. Debate focuses on germaneness, with the presiding officer (speaker or ) recognizing speakers in alternating fashion between proponents and opponents where rules specify; many states impose time limits, such as Connecticut's 15-minute cap equally divided or Nevada's 30-minute individual limit without consent to extend. Amendments may be offered, debated, and voted upon sequentially, with germaneness requirements stricter in some houses to avoid unrelated "riders." Voting occurs after debate concludes, often on a third and final reading for passage. Methods include voice votes ("aye" and "nay" calls by the presiding officer), division (members stand or divide physically for counting), roll calls for recorded positions, or electronic systems in approximately two-thirds of chambers as of the mid-1990s, with many states modernizing to digital boards displaying real-time tallies. A —typically a of members—must be present, and passage generally requires a simple majority of those voting, though supermajorities (e.g., two-thirds) apply to specific bills like tax increases in states such as or constitutional amendments nationwide. Failed bills may be reconsidered via motion, but successful ones are engrossed (incorporating amendments) and transmitted to the opposite chamber in bicameral legislatures, or directly to the in unicameral . If the second chamber amends the bill, it returns for ; unresolved differences prompt a conference committee to reconcile versions before final votes. These procedures ensure deliberate consideration but vary significantly, with professionalized legislatures (e.g., New York) enforcing stricter timelines than citizen-part-time ones.

Executive Veto and Overrides

In all 50 U.S. states, governors hold the constitutional authority to bills passed by the , returning them with objections unless the legislature overrides the . This regular power applies to entire bills and functions as an executive check on legislative enactments, requiring the bill to be reconsidered by both chambers. Forty-three states extend this authority to include line-item vetoes for appropriation bills, enabling governors to strike specific fiscal provisions without rejecting the entire measure, which then returns to the legislature for potential override or amendment. The remaining seven states—, , , , , , and —limit vetoes to whole bills, though some allow reductions in appropriation amounts. To override a veto, both legislative chambers must approve the bill again by a vote, with thresholds specified in state constitutions: two-thirds of members elected or present in 39 states, three-fifths in seven states (, , , , , , and ), and a simple majority in six states (, —under specific conditions, , , , and ). Overrides typically occur during the same , though 25 states permit post-adjournment overrides via reconvened sessions or special procedures. Successful overrides are infrequent due to the high thresholds, which demand bipartisan support or unified party control; for instance, between 1995 and 2010, legislatures overrode fewer than 5% of gubernatorial vetoes on average across states. Governors must act within fixed periods—often 5 to 10 days after bill receipt or —after which unsigned bills may become law automatically in most states, though six employ equivalents where adjournment prevents override attempts.

Operations and Sessions

Session Types and Durations

State legislatures in the United States convene in regular sessions, which are the primary annual or biennial meetings prescribed by state constitutions or statutes for conducting legislative business, including passing bills, budgets, and resolutions. As of 2023, 46 states hold regular sessions annually, typically beginning in January following elections, while four states—, , , and —convene biennially, every two years, reflecting historical practices aimed at reducing costs and limiting legislative overreach in part-time bodies. The duration of regular sessions varies significantly by state, with 41 states imposing constitutional or statutory limits to constrain time and expenses, often ranging from 30 calendar days in to 120 legislative days in states like and New York. In part-time legislatures, classified by the (NCSL) as "gold" category states like and , sessions typically last 30 to 60 days, allowing citizen-legislators to maintain other professions. Hybrid "gray" states, such as and , extend to 90-120 days, while full-time "green" legislatures like those in and may remain in session for six months or more without fixed limits, enabling year-round policy deliberation but increasing operational costs. These limits, where present, count legislative days excluding weekends and holidays, and exceeding them requires extensions or special authority, as seen in recent adjustments like Colorado's increase from 120 to 160 days in 2025. Special sessions, also termed extraordinary sessions, are convened outside regular periods to address urgent or specific matters, such as crises, emergencies, or priorities, and are initiated by the in 43 states or by legislative in others like and . Their durations are generally shorter and more constrained, often limited to 20-30 calendar days by , with topics restricted to those specified in the call to prevent , though some states like allow broader agendas once convened. In 2023, governors called over 50 special sessions across states, averaging 10-15 days each, focused on issues like or disaster relief, underscoring their role in responsive governance without disrupting biennial cycles. Certain states, including Georgia and , also hold automatic "veto sessions" limited to one day for overriding vetoes post-adjournment.
CategoryStates (Examples)Typical Regular Session LengthKey Features
Full-time (Green), New York, 6+ months, often unlimitedProfessional staff, year-round committees; higher per diem.
Hybrid (Gray), , 90-120 daysMix of paid and interim work; moderate professionalization.
Part-time (Gold), , 30-60 daysLow salaries, citizen focus; emphasis on efficiency.
These variations stem from constitutional designs balancing legislative capacity with fiscal restraint, with biennial states preserving shorter terms to align with federal cycles and limit intervention in local affairs.

Legislator Qualifications and Compensation

Qualifications for serving as a state are established by individual state constitutions and statutes, with no overarching federal mandates beyond general qualifications for holding public office under the U.S. Constitution's Article I provisions on elections. These requirements generally encompass , a minimum age threshold, and residency criteria, though specifics differ across states and between legislative chambers. All 50 states mandate U.S. , with durations ranging from none specified beyond to nine years in a few cases; 47 states explicitly require it for legislative candidacy. Minimum age requirements for the lower chamber ( or assembly) vary from 18 years in 11 states (e.g., , Georgia) to 25 in 9 states (e.g., , ), with 21 years as the median in 30 states. Upper chamber () thresholds are higher, at 25 years in 42 states, 21 in 4 (e.g., ), and 30 in 4 (e.g., , ). Residency demands typically include in the state prior to election, though periods extend to two years in 20 states and up to five in others like ; district residency is required for lower chamber candidates in 27 states and for senators in 49 states, often for preceding the election. Additional barriers in some states include mandatory , prohibitions on holding other public offices, or disqualifications for convictions, though restoration of rights post-sentence allows candidacy in most jurisdictions. State legislator compensation comprises base salaries, reimbursements for session expenses, and occasional benefits such as pensions or health coverage, calibrated to length and state fiscal capacity. As of 2023 data extended into 2024, 41 states provide an annual base salary averaging $39,216 among paying states, while 9 states (e.g., , ) offer no salary and compensate solely via . Salaries span a wide range, from $100 annually in to $119,702 in , with other high payers including ($71,685), ($85,000), and New York ($110,000); lower examples include ($10 daily during session) and ($104.71 daily). Per diem allowances, intended for lodging, meals, and travel, average $150–$200 per legislative day in many states but vary from $10 in to over $300 in during sessions; interim per diems for committee work apply in 20 states. Compensation levels correlate with legislature type: "professional" bodies like California's offer full-time pay supporting dedicated lawmakers, whereas "citizen" legislatures like New Hampshire's low stipends necessitate external employment, influencing demographics toward retirees or professionals with flexible schedules. roles (e.g., speakers, leaders) receive stipends of $5,000–$50,000 extra annually in most states, and about 30 states provide pensions vesting after 6–10 years of service, though reforms in states like have shifted toward defined-contribution plans amid fiscal pressures.

Staffing, Resources, and Professionalization

State legislatures in the United States exhibit significant variation in staffing, resources, and levels of professionalization, reflecting differences in state constitutions, budgets, and political priorities. Professionalization is typically measured by factors such as legislator compensation, session duration, and support staff size, with the Squire Index providing a standardized metric that compares state bodies to the U.S. House of Representatives on these dimensions; higher scores indicate greater resources for full-time legislative work, with updates through 2021 showing relative stability alongside modest gains in some states. The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) classifies legislatures into three broad categories based on these criteria: "citizen" legislatures (part-time with low pay and minimal staff, emphasizing legislators' external occupations), hybrid or "gray" legislatures (intermediate resources), and (full-time equivalents with higher compensation and extensive support). As of recent assessments, approximately seven states maintain highly legislatures akin to , while over 30 operate as citizen or hybrid models, enabling broader citizen participation but potentially limiting in-depth scrutiny. This spectrum has evolved since the mid-20th century, with rising due to demands for complex policymaking, though it correlates with increased state spending as better-resourced bodies conduct more oversight and initiate fiscal measures. Staffing levels underpin these differences, with the 2021 NCSL census reporting over 33,000 positions across legislatures and territories, including personal aides to legislators, analysts, leadership support, and nonpartisan research bureaus. legislatures allocate 10-20 staff per lawmaker on average, facilitating bill drafting, constituent services, and fiscal analysis, whereas citizen legislatures often rely on 1-3 aides per chamber or shared central staff, constraining capacity for independent research. Staff compensation remains a challenge, with a 2022-23 NCSL survey of 1,450 employees indicating that 66% prioritize pay in retention decisions, prompting reforms in competitive states to attract expertise amid turnover rates exceeding 20% in under-resourced chambers. Resources beyond staffing include operational budgets for facilities, , and , which scale with ; for instance, professional states invest in advanced legislative information systems for real-time bill tracking and , while citizen legislatures depend on basic capitol infrastructure and volunteer networks. Overall legislative operating budgets constitute 1-3% of state expenditures, varying from under $50 million annually in small states like to over $500 million in California, funding session logistics and year-round offices. Enhanced resources correlate with improved legislative effectiveness, as measured by bill passage rates and , but critics argue they foster and reduced to part-time citizen lawmakers.

Historical Evolution

Colonial and Revolutionary Foundations

The origins of state legislatures in the United States lie in the representative assemblies formed within the British North American colonies starting in the early . The , established by the and first convened on July 30, 1619, at Jamestown, represented the initial experiment in elected colonial self-governance, with burgesses chosen by landowners to address local concerns under proprietary charter. Similar bodies emerged elsewhere, such as the in 1630, which combined legislative and judicial functions among freemen before evolving into distinct houses. By the late , most colonies had adopted bicameral structures, featuring an elected of assemblymen representing propertied voters and an upper council or , often appointed by governors or proprietors to advise and check popular impulses, mirroring aspects of the English Parliament while adapting to frontier conditions. These assemblies primarily managed taxation for local defense, regulated trade, and organized militias, but their authority was constrained by royal vetoes and parliamentary supremacy, leading to recurrent disputes over fiscal control. During the 18th century, colonial legislatures expanded their powers, leveraging control over appropriations to negotiate with or defy governors, as seen in resistance to requisitions for imperial wars and encroachments like the 1765 , which assemblies denounced as violations of their exclusive right to tax constituents. This period solidified legislative traditions of annual sessions, committee-based review, and petition-driven lawmaking, with assemblies passing hundreds of acts per colony on matters from to Indian relations, though outputs varied by colony size and charter type—proprietary colonies like granting broader autonomy than royal ones like . Elected indirectly through county or town restricted to freeholders, these bodies fostered a of planters, merchants, and lawyers who prioritized colonial interests, setting precedents for amid growing imperial tensions. The transformed these colonial assemblies into foundational state legislatures, as independence prompted the drafting of constitutions that prioritized legislative supremacy to avert monarchical abuses. Virginia's constitution of June 29, 1776—the first formal state charter—empowered its bicameral with extensive lawmaking authority, including electing governors and judges, while minimizing executive veto. Eight states initially adapted via provincial congresses renamed as legislatures, but radical experiments emerged: Pennsylvania's September 28, 1776, frame established a unicameral assembly with single-year terms and a plural executive, aiming for ; Georgia and followed suit with unicameral designs until 1789 and 1793, respectively, reflecting fears of elite capture in upper houses. Most states retained or adopted , balancing popular assemblies against senatorial councils for deliberation, with sessions often annual and limited to 50-100 days; these bodies not only codified republican principles but tested causal mechanisms of divided powers, influencing federal framers who observed state under weak executives by 1787.

19th-Century Expansion and Reforms

During the early 19th century, the Jacksonian era prompted significant democratic reforms in state legislatures, primarily through the expansion of to most white adult males and the shift toward elective offices previously held by appointment. Between 1807 and 1821, multiple states eliminated property and tax qualifications for voting, enabling broader participation in electing legislators and reducing control over assemblies. This reflected a rejection of to traditional elites, fostering more populist legislative bodies that prioritized , though it excluded women, Native Americans, and enslaved people. Westward territorial expansion, accelerated by the in 1803 and subsequent acquisitions, led to the creation of new state legislatures modeled on bicameral federal structures, with lower houses representing population and upper houses often providing geographic balance. From 1815 onward, all newly admitted states incorporated white male without property restrictions, expanding the total number of legislative seats as the union grew from 17 states in to 45 by 1900. and in established states necessitated reapportionment, with many shifting from equal representation per to population-based districts by the mid-century, though rural overrepresentation persisted due to minimum guarantees for sparsely populated areas. The Civil War disrupted Southern legislatures, as secessionist assemblies in 11 states dissolved or relocated, prompting federal intervention via the of 1867, which divided the into five military districts and mandated new constitutions granting to Black males. These reforms temporarily diversified legislatures, with over 600 serving in Southern state houses and senates between 1869 and 1877, enacting measures like public education systems and debt relief before Democratic "Redeemer" majorities regained control through violence and fraud, reversing many gains via poll taxes and literacy tests. Northern legislatures, meanwhile, focused on wartime financing and loyalty oaths, contributing to perceptions of inefficiency that spurred late-century calls for procedural improvements, such as longer sessions and specialized committees, amid industrialization pressures. By century's end, legislatures faced criticism for corruption and malapportionment, setting the stage for changes, though empirical evidence shows they adapted to demographic shifts by increasing average house sizes from around 100 members in 1800 to over 200 by 1900 in larger states.

20th- and 21st-Century Modernization

The early 20th century saw state legislatures grappling with urbanization, population shifts, and Progressive Era demands for efficiency, often resulting in malapportioned districts that underrepresented growing urban areas. U.S. Supreme Court decisions in the 1960s, including Baker v. Carr (1962) and Reynolds v. Sims (1964), mandated "one person, one vote" reapportionment, forcing states to redraw districts after each decennial census and diminishing rural overrepresentation. These rulings, combined with critiques of legislatures as amateurish and part-time, prompted a modernization wave; the Citizens Conference on State Legislatures' 1971 report The Sometime Governments evaluated all 50 legislatures against 10 institutional criteria—such as accountable leadership, independent staffing, and competitive elections—and found most deficient, catalyzing reforms for greater capacity. The 1970s marked accelerated professionalization, with the (NCSL), founded in 1972, facilitating knowledge-sharing on staffing and procedures. States expanded nonpartisan central services for bill drafting, fiscal analysis, and ; for instance, legislative staff numbers grew from minimal pre-1960s levels to thousands in larger states by the 1980s, enabling handling of complex policy like environmental regulation. Compensation rose—averaging under $100 annually in many states in 1900 to over $10,000 by 1970—and sessions lengthened from biennial short terms to annual or year-round in professionalized chambers like and New York, as measured by indices like the Squire Professionalization Index, which tracks pay, session days, and staff relative to . These changes varied interstate, with 10-15 states classified as highly professional by 2000, improving legislative independence from governors but raising costs and potentially fostering career politicians. In the late , voter initiatives imposed term limits on legislators in 23 states starting in 1990—first in (Proposition 140), , and —typically capping service at 6-12 years per chamber to promote turnover and curb incumbency advantages averaging 90% reelection rates. By 2025, 15 states retain these limits, affecting over 20% of legislative seats periodically, though studies attribute mixed outcomes: increased amateurism and reliance on lobbyists in some cases, without consistently reducing spending or enhancing representation. Ethics reforms, including disclosure laws post-Watergate (e.g., federal influences via 1970s state analogs), and procedural standardizations like recorded votes further modernized operations. Into the , technology transformed procedures: by the early , nearly all states offered online bill tracking and digitized records, reducing paper reliance and enhancing public access. systems, adopted widely post-2000, streamlined floor actions, while data analytics tools for policy evaluation emerged in professional legislatures. The accelerated hybrid sessions in 45 states by 2021, with some like retaining remote options for committees, though most reverted to in-person mandates amid debates over deliberation quality. Ongoing efforts include cybersecurity enhancements and AI pilots for drafting, but interstate disparities persist, with less professional states lagging in digital infrastructure.

Interstate Variations

Size, Terms, and Procedures

Forty-nine U.S. states maintain bicameral legislatures comprising a (upper chamber) and (lower chamber), while is the only state with a unicameral consisting of 49 members. Chamber sizes differ substantially by state population and constitutional provisions. Senate memberships range from 20 in to 67 in , and house memberships from 40 in to 400 in , yielding total bicameral sizes from 60 members in to 424 in . These disparities reflect efforts to balance representation with manageability, as smaller states like apportion districts with ratios as low as one representative per 3,300 residents, compared to larger states like California's house districts averaging one per 475,000. Legislative terms vary to align with election cycles and stability goals. Senate terms are 4 years in 48 states, but 2 years in and ; house terms are 2 years in 45 states, but 4 years in , , , , and ; Nebraska's unicameral terms are 4 years. Many states stagger senate elections, with half the seats up every 2 years, to ensure continuity, though and elect all senators biennially alongside house members. Procedural rules for bill passage, while following a core sequence of introduction, committee assignment, hearings, amendments, votes, interchamber , and gubernatorial , incorporate state-specific adaptations. Simple majorities suffice for most bill passage, but supermajorities (often two-thirds) are required in many states for overriding gubernatorial vetoes, declaring emergencies, or raising taxes. Variations include mandatory three readings on separate days (e.g., in ), strict germaneness rules limiting amendments to bill subjects, and options for multiple referrals or fiscal notes assessing budgetary impacts. Quorums generally require a of members, with electronic roll-call voting prevalent in professionalized legislatures to enhance efficiency and transparency. Unicameral streamlines the process by eliminating interchamber conference committees, reducing negotiation layers present in bicameral states.

Partisan Dynamics and Control

As of the 2025 state legislative sessions following the November 2024 elections, the Republican Party holds majorities in 57 of the 98 partisan legislative chambers across the , while Democrats control 39 chambers. Republicans occupy 4,092 seats, comprising 55.4% of the total 7,386 partisan seats, compared to Democrats' 3,223 seats at 43.6%. Nebraska's unicameral operates on a non-partisan basis, with members caucusing by party but elected without formal party labels. This distribution underscores a sustained Republican edge in state legislative control, influencing , policy agendas, and electoral map-drawing for congressional seats. In terms of unified legislative control, Republicans dominate both chambers in 23 states, enabling them to advance without bipartisan compromise in those venues, while Democrats hold both chambers in 18 states. The remaining nine states feature divided control between the parties' upper and lower houses, often resulting in , veto threats from opposing gubernatorial parties, or stalled initiatives. Unified partisan control of legislatures frequently aligns with gubernatorial control to form "trifectas," where one party governs all executive and legislative branches; post-2024, Republican trifectas encompass 41.5% of the U.S. population, Democratic trifectas 36.5%, and divided governments 22%. Such alignments facilitate rapid policy enactment, as seen in Republican-led states passing restrictive voting laws or cuts, contrasted with Democratic strongholds advancing environmental regulations or expansions of social programs. The current configuration stems from pivotal shifts beginning with the 2010 midterm elections, when Republicans captured 20 legislative chambers amid the Tea Party wave, securing control ahead of the post-2010 cycle. This allowed GOP majorities to craft state and congressional district boundaries that maximized their seat efficiency, minimizing "wasted" votes in safe districts and creating durable advantages persisting through the . Empirical analyses indicate that while contributed, underlying demographic sorting—urban-rural divides favoring Republicans in winner-take-all systems—and higher GOP turnout in off-year elections amplified the edge, with Republicans maintaining or expanding chamber majorities in 20 of the 2022 cycle's contested states despite national headwinds. The 2024 elections yielded minimal net changes despite unprecedented Democratic spending on legislative races, preserving the Republican structural lead and enabling further entrenchment via 2021 maps projected to hold through 2031. Partisan dynamics in state legislatures often exhibit polarization, with supermajorities in unified chambers reducing incentives for cross-aisle and increasing reliance on procedural tactics like filibusters or calls in divided settings. Control fluctuations correlate with national electoral tides but are buffered by staggered terms—most states elect half their every two years—and anti-incumbent sentiments, though Republicans' rural base provides resilience against urban Democratic strongholds. This asymmetry has causal implications for , as GOP-controlled legislatures experiment with and , while Democratic ones prioritize equity-focused interventions, with empirical outcomes varying by state-specific factors like economic conditions over partisan labels alone.

Unique State Practices

Nebraska maintains the only unicameral state legislature in the United States, consisting of a single chamber known as the with 49 members elected to four-year terms. Adopted via ratified on November 6, 1934, and effective from January 1937, this structure eliminates the bicameral system found in the other 49 states, aiming to streamline lawmaking and reduce redundancy. Senators are elected on nonpartisan ballots, with no designations appearing on the , though internal party caucuses influence organization and leadership selection. To end debate on a bill, known as invoking , requires the affirmative vote of at least 33 senators, a threshold that differs from simple majority rules in many bicameral states. Bills must receive three readings on separate days before passage, reinforcing deliberation in the absence of a second chamber. In Texas, the lieutenant governor wields exceptional authority over the state Senate, presiding as its president and exercising control beyond that of counterparts in most states. Elected independently for four-year terms, the lieutenant governor appoints all Senate committees, designates their chairs and vice-chairs, assigns bills to committees, and manages the legislative calendar, effectively shaping the chamber's agenda and priorities. This concentration of power stems from the Texas Constitution of 1876, which vests the lieutenant governor with both executive succession duties and extensive legislative prerogatives, making the office more influential in state governance than the separately elected governor in certain policy domains. Such arrangements contrast with states where senate presidents or speakers hold more limited roles, often constrained by party caucuses or internal rules. Minnesota employs a multiple referral system for bills, allowing measures to be assigned to more than one for review, which facilitates broader input but can complicate and prolong the legislative process. Under and rules, the presiding officer may refer a bill sequentially or simultaneously to multiple committees based on subject matter, requiring approval from each before advancing to the ; this practice, formalized in standing rules, ensures interdisciplinary scrutiny but differs from single-referral norms in states like , where bills typically funnel through one primary committee per chamber. Amendments must adhere to strict germaneness requirements, prohibiting extraneous provisions, a safeguard against observed less rigidly elsewhere. Louisiana's legislature operates under a civil law tradition inherited from its French and Spanish colonial heritage, uniquely codifying statutes into comprehensive civil, criminal, and procedural codes rather than relying primarily on precedents as in the other 49 states. This approach influences drafting and interpretation, with lawmakers prioritizing code revisions over standalone statutes, a practice that promotes systematic legal organization but requires specialized legislative committees for maintenance. The bicameral structure meets annually for 60 legislative days in odd-numbered years and 30 in even, with unique fiscal session provisions, embedding code-based deliberation into routine operations.

Controversies and Reforms

Gerrymandering and Electoral Manipulation

Gerrymandering in U.S. state legislatures involves the deliberate manipulation of boundaries to favor the party controlling the process, typically occurring after each decennial . In 42 states, legislatures hold primary authority over drawing both state legislative and congressional districts, enabling the to entrench its power by maximizing seats relative to its vote share. This practice distorts representation, as districts are engineered to waste opposing votes through "packing"—concentrating opponents into districts—or "cracking"—dispersing them across districts to ensure narrow losses. The term "gerrymander" originated in 1812, when Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry approved state senate districts contorted to benefit his Democratic-Republican Party, with one district likened to a salamander. Both major parties have employed it when holding legislative majorities, though its extent correlates with unified partisan control (trifectas). Post-2010, Republicans, controlling more state legislatures, drew aggressive maps in states like Wisconsin and North Carolina; for instance, Wisconsin's 2011 Republican-led redistricting yielded the GOP approximately 60% of Assembly seats despite Democrats garnering 52% of the statewide legislative vote in 2012. In North Carolina, similar post-2010 maps sustained Republican legislative majorities exceeding their vote proportions through 2020. Democrats countered in controlled states like Maryland, where maps have favored their congressional delegation by wide margins. Empirical analyses reveal gerrymandering reduces district competitiveness, entrenching incumbents and diminishing incentives for broad voter appeal, which fosters legislative polarization and policy extremism. Studies of state legislatures show it correlates with heightened partisan bias in social policies, as gerrymandered majorities pursue agendas misaligned with statewide medians. Voter turnout declines in safe districts, and legislators exert less effort on constituent services or compromise, prioritizing primary electorates. While national congressional effects often cancel across parties, state-level distortions persist, amplifying minority rule locally. The U.S. Supreme Court in (2019) deemed partisan gerrymandering nonjusticiable federally, shifting challenges to state courts and constitutions. State tribunals have struck down maps in (2023) and (multiple rulings through 2023), mandating fairer alternatives, though litigation recurs post-census. Beyond redistricting, legislatures manipulate electoral outcomes via laws on voter ID, , and ballot harvesting, enacted along partisan lines to advantage their base—Republicans often tightening access post-2020 amid claims, Democrats broadening it—though verified incidents remain statistically negligible per official audits. These tactics, while framed as integrity measures, empirically alter turnout demographics without proportional evidence of targeted abuses.

Lobbying, Corruption, and Influence Peddling

Lobbying in U.S. state legislatures involves registered advocates representing interests such as industries, unions, and groups to influence legislation, with regulations varying by state but generally requiring disclosure of expenditures, clients, and targeted bills. Most states mandate periodic reports from lobbyists detailing spending on activities like direct contacts, events, and issue , though and transparency levels differ, with some states like imposing stricter gift bans and cooling-off periods. Nationwide, state-level expenditures reached approximately $1.4 billion in 2021, surpassing federal in some years due to the decentralized nature of state policy-making on issues like taxes, , and . Campaign contributions from lobbyists and affiliated PACs provide a primary avenue for influence, often granting access rather than direct vote-buying, as evidenced by studies showing donors receive more meetings with legislators but mixed effects on roll-call voting. In , for instance, special interests donated $18 million to top lawmakers between 2019 and 2024, predominantly from sectors like , , and , correlating with policy favors such as expanded gaming licenses despite weak disclosure laws obscuring full traceability. Empirical analyses across states indicate contributions modestly shift legislative agendas toward donor priorities, particularly in competitive districts, though causality is debated due to endogeneity—legislators aligned with interests attract funds proactively. Corruption scandals underscore risks of , with high-profile cases involving and kickbacks. In , former House Speaker Michael Madigan was convicted in October 2024 on 10 federal counts, including , for leveraging his power over 15 years to steer contracts and jobs to allies in exchange for political favors, marking the longest-serving state leader's fall amid a pattern of self-enrichment. Ohio's 2019 House Bill 6 bailout of nuclear plants involved $60 million in bribes funneled through dark money to lawmakers and allies, leading to indictments of former Speaker and lobbyist Matt Borges in 2021 for . In , federal probes as of 2025 targeted Senate Insurance Committee members over cannabis-related , with Senator denying involvement amid broader legislative opacity on investigations. The between legislatures and exacerbates influence peddling, as former lawmakers leverage insider knowledge for clients. As of 2024, 41 states prohibit ex-legislators from immediate , with bans ranging from 1 to 2 years, though enforcement varies and some allow indirect influence via firms. Research shows such restrictions reduce candidate entry, particularly moderates, potentially entrenching incumbents while curbing post-office careers—former state legislators lobby at rates of 11%, compared to 4% for non-incumbents. Reform efforts focus on tightening disclosure, extending cooling-off periods, and limiting contributions, but progress is uneven due to legislative . States like expanded laws in 2025 to cover influencing, yet nationwide, post-Citizens United dark money proliferation has outpaced reforms, with calls for federal overlays unmet. Proposals in states like (2025 bill for 2-year bans) aim to close gaps, but suggests partial measures fail to deter access-driven without broader overhaul.

Polarization, Gridlock, and Institutional Weakness

State legislative polarization, measured by the ideological gap in roll-call voting between Democratic and Republican medians, widened from approximately 1.5 units in 1996 to 2 units by 2020, with inter-party overlap in positions falling from 14-16% to nearly zero across states. This trend reflects Democrats shifting leftward more rapidly than Republicans rightward, contrasting with congressional patterns, and is more pronounced in lower chambers than upper ones, as well as in Western states like Colorado and California compared to Midwestern ones. Primaries have driven this by selecting more ideologically extreme candidates, reducing moderate representation and mirroring national dynamics while amplifying state-level policy divergence. Polarization fosters gridlock primarily in divided governments, where regression-discontinuity analyses show legislators adopting more extreme positions, hindering on contentious issues like budgets or . However, states exhibit less overall than the federal due to structural features: fewer veto points ( without filibusters in most), shorter sessions pressuring action, and frequent unified partisan control—over two-thirds of states had unified legislatures and governorships as of 2024. Productivity metrics, such as bills enacted per session, have held steady or increased in many states despite polarization; for example, amid 2023-2024 disruptions including speaker ousters and protests, legislatures passed core initiatives like appropriations and reforms by negotiating across aisles or leveraging majorities. Lower civility correlates with reduced output in polarized settings, yet empirical reviews find no uniform collapse in lawmaking, attributing resilience to electoral incentives for tangible results over federal-style obstruction. Institutional weaknesses compound polarization's risks by limiting legislative capacity. Approximately 26 states operate part-time legislatures, where members devote less than two-thirds of a full-time equivalent to duties, resulting in shorter sessions (often under 100 days biennially) and reliance on limited staff—averaging two per in low-resource bodies. These "citizen legislatures" feature low salaries (under $11,000 annually in 14 states), fostering amateurism, high external job demands, and deference to lobbyists or governors for drafting and expertise. Term limits, enacted in 15 states since the 1990s (e.g., California's Proposition 140 in 1990 limiting assembly terms to six years), accelerate turnover—up to 20-30% annually in affected chambers—eroding and empowering unelected actors like interest groups, as departing members lose leverage while novices prioritize short-term gains over long-term governance. This amateur dynamic, evident in variable bill sponsorship success tied to prior experience, weakens counterweights to executive overreach and sustains polarization by favoring ideological purists over pragmatic deal-makers. Public disengagement exacerbates vulnerabilities, with four-fifths of voters unaware of their state representatives as of 2023 surveys.

Role in American Federalism

Policy Experimentation and Innovation

State legislatures in the United States facilitate policy experimentation by enacting laws tailored to local conditions, allowing for empirical evaluation and potential diffusion to other states or the federal level, a dynamic rooted in that enables variation absent a uniform national approach. This process, often described as states serving as laboratories for democracy, permits testing of interventions in areas like welfare, , taxation, and , where outcomes can inform broader through observable on efficacy, costs, and unintended effects. Empirical studies of policy diffusion show that innovations spread via mechanisms such as interstate competition, learning from successes or failures, and emulation by political actors, though organized interest groups can influence adoption patterns beyond pure evidence-based reasoning. A prominent success in welfare policy occurred in Wisconsin, where the under Republican Governor enacted reforms starting in 1987, including work requirements, time limits on benefits, and job training mandates, which reduced Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) caseloads by over 60% by the mid-1990s through increased and economic growth. These measures, evaluated via caseload data and metrics, demonstrated causal links to reduced dependency without corresponding rises in , influencing the federal Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 that adopted similar principles nationwide. Similarly, Texas legislators in 2007 passed bipartisan reforms diverting low-risk, non-violent offenders to community supervision and treatment programs, averting over $3 billion in prison construction costs while crime rates fell to levels not seen since the , providing evidence that alternatives to incarceration can yield fiscal savings and public safety gains when targeted appropriately. In education, Florida's legislature pioneered school choice expansions with the 1999 A+ Plan, introducing opportunity scholarships—vouchers for students in low-performing public schools to attend private alternatives—which subsequent studies linked to improved test scores and graduation rates among participants, prompting emulation in states like and . However, not all experiments succeed; Kansas lawmakers' 2012 tax cuts under , which slashed income and property taxes to stimulate growth, instead produced budget shortfalls exceeding $1 billion annually by 2017, underfunded schools, and no measurable economic boom, leading to partial repeal and underscoring risks of over-reliance on supply-side assumptions without robust revenue projections. Cannabis policy offers another case, with Colorado's 2013 legislative implementation of voter-approved recreational legalization generating over $2 billion in by 2022 but correlating with a 30% rise in youth usage and mixed effects on traffic fatalities, informing cautious diffusion to 24 states by 2025 while highlighting trade-offs in and enforcement costs. These instances illustrate how state legislative innovations generate real-world data for causal assessment, though outcomes depend on execution, economic context, and avoidance of ideological overreach, with failures providing equal value in refining approaches.

Checks on Federal Overreach

State legislatures assert sovereignty against perceived federal encroachments primarily through the Tenth Amendment, which reserves to the states or the people powers not delegated to the federal government nor prohibited to the states. This framework enables legislatures to enact laws, authorize litigation, and withhold cooperation from federal mandates, thereby imposing political and legal costs on expansive federal authority. While the Supremacy Clause ensures federal law prevails in direct conflicts, state actions often force judicial clarification of constitutional boundaries, as seen in challenges to federal programs exceeding enumerated powers. A core mechanism is the anti-commandeering doctrine, affirmed by the , which prohibits the federal government from compelling state legislatures or executives to enforce or administer federal regulatory programs. In (1997), the Court invalidated provisions of the requiring state officials to conduct background checks, ruling that such mandates violate state sovereignty by transforming state resources into federal administrative arms. Subsequent rulings, including New York v. United States (1992) against coerced state and (2018) on commandeered bans, have reinforced this principle, allowing legislatures to decline participation without enacting contrary laws. As of 2023, this doctrine has shielded states from over 20 federal initiatives spanning firearms, environmental regulation, and . State legislatures further check federal overreach by directing attorneys general to initiate lawsuits testing federal actions' constitutionality, with multistate coalitions filing over 130 suits against the Biden administration by 2024 and similar volumes against prior administrations. For instance, legislatures in and other states authorized challenges to federal policies, such as the 2021 suspension of border wall construction, resulting in injunctions that delayed implementation. These suits, often rooted in Tenth Amendment claims, have succeeded in narrowing federal scope, as in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012), where state challenges transformed the Affordable Care Act's mandate into a to avoid of state participation. Data from the National Association of Attorneys General indicate that since 1980, states have pursued hundreds of such actions, with success rates varying by partisan alignment but consistently elevating debates. Legislatures also enact "nullification-inspired" measures declaring federal laws invalid within state borders, though courts routinely reject outright nullification as incompatible with federal supremacy. Modern examples include Missouri's 2021 law purporting to invalidate federal restrictions, prompting federal lawsuits, and over 1,800 county-level "" resolutions since 2018, backed by state legislative affirmations in places like . Similarly, 24 states had legalized recreational marijuana by 2025, with legislatures defying federal prohibition through regulated markets that generated $30 billion in annual revenue, indirectly pressuring federal via economic and non-cooperation. These strategies, while risking preemption, exemplify causal leverage: by creating parallel systems, states compel federal adaptation or litigation, as evidenced by the Department of Justice's amid resource constraints. Empirical outcomes show such resistance correlating with policy diffusion, where successful state models influence national shifts, underscoring legislatures' role in preserving dual .

Empirical Impacts on Governance Outcomes

Empirical analyses reveal that the volume of enacted by state legislatures positively influences , with a 10% increase in legislative output linked to approximately 0.15 points higher GDP growth rates from 1965 to 2012, driven by mechanisms such as contingent clauses addressing economic uncertainty and facilitating relationship-specific investments. This effect holds after accounting for state and time fixed effects, suggesting that active policymaking enhances sectoral rather than mere . Conversely, higher legislative turnover, often induced by term limits or , shifts spending toward capital projects at the expense of operational fiscal restraint, leading to long-term economic distortions and reduced growth potential through diminished incentives for efficient . Partisan composition of legislatures shapes outcomes through differential priorities. Democratic control, estimated via regression discontinuity around close elections from to , reduces state K-12 appropriations per by 6.5% two years post-election, though local increases offset this to maintain stable total expenditures; this results in modestly lower student-teacher ratios (0.2-0.4 fewer students per teacher) but no change in attendance rates. In higher education, Democratic legislatures boost appropriations by 3.6% overall (2.3% per ), particularly in high-unemployment states (up to 8.5%), without significantly altering enrollment, while redirecting resources toward welfare expansions like that indirectly support child health coverage for non-White students (2% increase three to four years later). Republican control, by contrast, sustains higher K-12 state levels but shows less emphasis on higher education amid competing priorities. Labor policies enacted by legislatures, such as right-to-work laws prohibiting compulsory , yield measurable socioeconomic benefits. Adoption of these laws correlates with 2.29 percentage point reductions in childhood rates in bordering counties over the long run, alongside improved metrics, as firms respond with higher investment and employment while workers gain flexibility in non-union environments. Evidence from contexts indicates initial wage adjustments downward for unionized workers (about 1% after five years) but overall employment gains without leverage reductions, contributing to state-level output expansion. Fiscal outcomes further reflect legislative choices, with divided committee structures curbing spending growth compared to unified ones, promoting restraint amid voter preferences for balanced budgets. These patterns underscore causal links between institutional designs and tangible results, though academic consensus varies on magnitudes due to methodological challenges in isolating effects from external shocks.

References

  1. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures
  2. https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/number-of-legislators-and-length-of-terms-in-years
  3. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/state-partisan-composition
  4. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-amgovernment/chapter/governors-and-state-legislatures/
  5. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/full-and-part-time-legislatures
  6. https://www.ncsl.org/resources/ncsl-state-elections-2024
  7. https://www.ncsl.org/resources/map-monday-party-control
  8. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/the-constitution-of-virginia-1776/
  9. https://www.ncleg.gov/EnactedLegislation/Constitution/NCConstitution.html
  10. https://senate.la.gov/Documents/Constitution/Article3.htm
  11. https://law.lis.virginia.gov/constitutionfull/
  12. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/about/ou_facts.php
  13. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/about/history_unicameral.php
  14. https://common.usembassy.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/111/2023/02/us_governed.pdf
  15. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artVI-C2-1/ALDE_00013395/
  16. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/supremacy_clause
  17. https://federalism.org/encyclopedia/no-topic/supremacy-clause-article-vi-clause-2/
  18. https://constitution.findlaw.com/article6/annotation02.html
  19. https://www.cga.ct.gov/PS95/rpt/olr/htm/95-R-0216.htm
  20. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-6/modern-doctrine-on-supremacy-clause
  21. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45825
  22. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48525
  23. https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications/439/
  24. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/preemption
  25. https://www.acus.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Executive-Summary_Dec_20.pdf
  26. https://ballotpedia.org/Bicameral_legislature
  27. https://www.house.mn.gov/hrd/pubs/uni-bicam.pdf
  28. https://nebraskalegislature.gov/about/ou_history.php
  29. https://www.lrl.mn.gov/guides/guides?issue=uni
  30. https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/leadership-positions-in-state-legislatures
  31. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/inside-the-legislative-process
  32. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/parliamentary-procedure-a-legislators-guide
  33. https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/redistricting-criteria
  34. https://redistricting.lls.edu/redistricting-101/where-are-the-lines-drawn/criteria-for-state-legislative-districts/
  35. https://www.ncsl.org/redistricting-and-census/redistricting-commissions-state-legislative-plans
  36. https://ballotpedia.org/State-by-state_redistricting_procedures
  37. https://redistricting.lls.edu/redistricting-101/who-draws-the-lines/
  38. https://gerrymander.princeton.edu/redistricting-report-card/
  39. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/who-controlled-redistricting-every-state
  40. https://www.ncsl.org/redistricting-and-census
  41. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/separation-of-powers-an-overview
  42. https://www.usvotefoundation.org/what-powers-do-state-governments-hold
  43. https://open.oregonstate.education/stateandlocalgovernment3e/chapter/chapter-7/
  44. https://votesmart.org/education/states
  45. https://www.rockthevote.org/explainers/state-legislatures/
  46. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/separation-of-powers-delegation-of-legislative-power
  47. https://civicsforlife.org/powers-of-the-state-government/
  48. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/separations-of-powers-appropriation-powers
  49. https://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/state-budgets-basics
  50. https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2150&context=lalrev
  51. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/separation-of-powers-legislative-oversight
  52. https://www.lsc.ohio.gov/assets/organizations/legislative-service-commission/files/chapter-7-legislative-oversight-10021973.pdf
  53. https://csgwest.org/2023/12/07/the-nuts-and-bolts-of-legislative-oversight/
  54. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/legislative-oversight-of-emergency-executive-powers
  55. https://levin-center.org/state-oversight-academy/oversight-in-the-50-states/
  56. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/separation-of-powers-impeachment
  57. https://bookofthestates.org/tables/2022-4-8/
  58. https://csgmidwest.org/2020/09/15/confirming-state-agency-heads-is-usually-a-straightforward-process/
  59. https://www.nga.org/governors/powers-and-authority/
  60. https://legislativelibrary.ny.gov/research-guide-governor-appointments
  61. https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/government-code/gov-sect-1774/
  62. https://www.coloradosenaterepublicans.com/governor-appointments-and-senate-confirmations/
  63. https://www.ncsl.org/legislative-staff/civics-education/learning-the-game
  64. https://leg.wa.gov/learn-and-participate/how-a-bill-becomes-a-law/
  65. https://documents.ncsl.org/wwwncsl/LegislativeStaff/ASLCS/ILP/96Tab3Pt1.pdf
  66. https://www.senate.ca.gov/citizens-guide/legislative-process
  67. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/remote-public-participation-in-committee-proceedings
  68. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/masons-manual-2020-edition
  69. https://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/rpt/2009-r-0249.htm
  70. https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/82nd2023/Docs/82_ASR.pdf
  71. https://documents.ncsl.org/wwwncsl/LegislativeStaff/ASLCS/ILP/96Tab5Pt1.pdf
  72. https://documents.ncsl.org/wwwncsl/LegislativeStaff/ASLCS/ILP/96Tab5Pt3.pdf
  73. https://info.legistorm.com/blog/how-do-state-legislatures-make-bills-and-pass-laws
  74. https://documents.ncsl.org/wwwncsl/LegislativeStaff/ASLCS/ILP/98Tab3Pt4.pdf
  75. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/separation-of-powers-executive-veto-powers
  76. https://www.ncsl.org/center-for-legislative-strengthening/veto-overrides-and-supermajorities
  77. https://ballotpedia.org/Veto_overrides_in_state_legislatures
  78. http://mcgrath.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/VetoOverrides_Budgets.pdf
  79. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/special-sessions
  80. https://www.multistate.us/insider/2025/4/11/why-46-states-meet-annually-the-modernization-of-state-legislatures-is-north-dakota-next
  81. https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/legislative-session-length
  82. https://ballotpedia.org/State_legislature_candidate_requirements_by_state
  83. https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/eligibility-requirements-to-run-for-the-state-legislature
  84. https://bookofthestates.org/tables/2022-3-5/
  85. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/2024-legislator-compensation
  86. https://www.ncsl.org/center-for-legislative-strengthening/legislative-compensation-overview
  87. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/state-politics-and-policy-quarterly/article/squire-index-update-stability-and-change-in-legislative-professionalization-19792021/C5E16DABEB01963B1B039B3C69D9B592
  88. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/C5E16DABEB01963B1B039B3C69D9B592/S1532440023000221a.pdf/a-squire-index-update-stability-and-change-in-legislative-professionalization-1979-2021.pdf
  89. https://www.judgewatch.org/compensation/2016-correspondence/10-6-16-hearings/malhotra-1.pdf
  90. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/size-of-state-legislative-staff/results-of-the-2021-ncsl-legislative-staff-census
  91. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/size-of-state-legislative-staff
  92. https://www.ncsl.org/center-for-legislative-strengthening/setting-legislative-staff-pay-a-complicated-calculation
  93. https://thelawmakers.org/legislative-research/legislative-effectiveness-in-the-american-states
  94. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0160323X231167614
  95. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/era.cfm?eraID=2&smtID=4
  96. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/csdi/miller-stokes/01_MillerStokes_Squire.pdf
  97. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/thirteen-colonies
  98. https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/american-revolution-1763-1783/british-reforms-1767-1772/
  99. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:5a059228-0670-4464-9c20-5c14fe655503/download_file?safe_filename=Graham_2017_legislatures_legislation_and_legislating_in_the_british.pdf&type_of_work=Journal%2Barticle
  100. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=3&psid=164
  101. https://teachdemocracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/First-States-Constitution.pdf
  102. https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/pennsylvania-constitution
  103. https://civics.asu.edu/sites/g/files/litvpz456/files/2021-06/Q81%2520Making%2520Revolutionary%2520State%2520Constitutions_CPTL_1.pdf
  104. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/american-revolution-1763-1783
  105. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/history/us-history-i/jacksonian-democracy/politics-of-the-jacksonian-era
  106. https://americainclass.org/the-expansion-of-democracy-during-the-jacksonian-era/
  107. https://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/HAIC/Historical-Essays/Continental-Expansion/Era-of-U-S--Continental-Expansion/
  108. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/apportionment-state-legislatures-1776-1920
  109. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/Civil_War_AdmissionReadmission.htm
  110. https://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/BAIC/Historical-Essays/Fifteenth-Amendment/Reconstruction/
  111. https://www.governing.com/politics/the-evolution-of-state-legislatures-throughout-u-s-history
  112. https://cqpress.sagepub.com/cqresearcher/report/download/state-legislatures-transition-cqresrre1971122400
  113. https://origins.osu.edu/article/re-mapping-american-politics-redistricting-revolution-fifty-years-later
  114. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Sometime_Governments.html?id=WHeIAAAAMAAJ
  115. https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/then-and-now-ncsl-and-50-years-of-legislative-evolution
  116. https://search.proquest.com/openview/f996959e490d85360fc0d766176e94ba/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  117. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/the-term-limited-states
  118. https://ballotpedia.org/State_legislatures_with_term_limits
  119. https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/legislative-information-technology
  120. https://www.votemamafoundation.org/modernization
  121. https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/artificial-intelligence-in-government-the-federal-and-state-landscape
  122. https://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_legislatures
  123. https://ballotpedia.org/Historical_partisan_composition_of_state_legislatures
  124. https://theconversation.com/republicans-didnt-lose-big-in-2020-they-held-onto-statehouses-and-the-power-to-influence-future-elections-150237
  125. https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/election-outcomes-status-quo-in-the-states-despite-federal-level-gop-gains
  126. https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/2024-state-elections-by-the-numbers
  127. https://ballotpedia.org/Nebraska_State_Senate_%28Unicameral%29
  128. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/GetStatute.aspx?Code=CN&Value=4.16
  129. https://www.kut.org/politics/2014-10-16/why-is-the-lieutenant-governor-the-most-powerful-office-in-texas-and-who-wants-that-power
  130. https://texapedia.info/lieutenant-governor/
  131. https://www.leg.mn.gov/leg/faq/faq?subject=9
  132. https://www.startribune.com/minnesota-legislative-procedure-single-subject-battle-has-been-won-now-bring-back-subcommittees/493653491
  133. https://www.facebook.com/NOLAnews/posts/among-louisianas-many-quirks-is-a-legal-one-its-laws-rather-than-being-based-on-/1211360787686663/
  134. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/gerrymandering-explained
  135. https://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2024/07/gerrymandering-the-origin-story/
  136. https://www.fairmapswi.com/wi-maps
  137. https://enewspaper.latimes.com/infinity/article_share.aspx?guid=cbaa51f8-e9aa-4c59-b530-07c3922c2273
  138. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/current-partisan-gerrymandering-cases
  139. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/how-gerrymandering-tilts-2024-race-house
  140. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2119&context=public_law_and_legal_theory
  141. https://scholars.fhsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=sociology_facpubs
  142. https://www.ejournalofpublicaffairs.org/effects-of-gerrymandering-on-state-and-social-policy/
  143. https://electionlab.mit.edu/articles/gerrymandering-turnout-and-lazy-legislators
  144. https://isps.yale.edu/news/blog/2023/06/partisan-gerrymandering-mostly-cancels-out-at-national-level-study-shows
  145. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10288623/
  146. https://www.ncsl.org/redistricting-and-census/redistricting-and-the-supreme-court-the-most-significant-cases
  147. https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/status-partisan-gerrymandering-litigation-state-courts
  148. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/07/biggest-problem-with-gerrymandering/
  149. https://www.ncsl.org/ethics/lobbyist-activity-report-requirements
  150. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/reports/layers-of-lobbying
  151. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.2454352
  152. https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2025/03/pennsylvania-campaign-finance-special-interest-donations/
  153. http://www.cfinst.org/pdf/papers/02_Powell_Influence.pdf
  154. https://apnews.com/article/chicago-corruption-trial-illinois-politics-speaker-legislative-dd66340338a95d8580ce741e6429b3c4
  155. https://ohiohouse.gov/members/c-allison-russo/in-the-news/roots-of-hb-6-corruption-scandals-run-deep-in-ohio-justice-department-must-investigate-4684
  156. https://calmatters.org/politics/2025/01/california-democrat-senate-bribery-investigation/
  157. https://www.ncsl.org/ethics/legislator-revolving-door-prohibitions
  158. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w33626/w33626.pdf
  159. https://www.cato.org/research-briefs-economic-policy/effect-revolving-door-laws-candidates-incumbents
  160. https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/06/state-lobbying-update-hawaii-expands-lobbying-law
  161. https://gophouse.org/posts/representatives-introduce-plan-to-close-revolving-door-from-legislator-to-lobbyist-3
  162. https://research.bshor.com/publication/polarization_2decades/polarization_2decades.pdf
  163. https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/roots-legislative-polarization-how-state-elections-are-producing-more-extreme-pipeline
  164. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268023001179
  165. https://news.vanderbilt.edu/2025/03/27/legislative-gridlock-did-not-stop-lawmaking/
  166. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=plscpub
  167. https://modernization.stateinnovation.org/crisis-democracy-state-legislatures
  168. https://mostpolicyinitiative.org/science-note/retaining-institutional-knowledge-in-a-state-legislature/
  169. https://thelawmakers.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Hansen_Treul_2024_CEL_Working_Paper.pdf
  170. https://www.governing.com/assessments/whats-the-matter-with-legislatures
  171. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/laboratories-of-democracy/
  172. https://columbialawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Tyler-Gerken-The_myth_of_the_laboratories_of_democracy.pdf
  173. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2648004
  174. https://www.heritage.org/welfare/report/the-good-news-about-welfare-reform-wisconsins-success-story
  175. https://www.hoover.org/research/wisconsins-welfare-miracle
  176. https://www.wisconsinhistory.org/Records/Article/CS331
  177. https://csgjusticecenter.org/projects/justice-reinvestment/past-states/texas/
  178. https://www.cbpp.org/blog/state-cost-savings-from-criminal-justice-reforms-some-examples
  179. https://excelined.org/2024/02/08/competitive-effects-analyses-in-florida-showcase-positive-results-for-other-states-pursuing-private-school-choice-programs/
  180. https://thefga.org/research/expanded-school-choice-generate-positive-outcomes/
  181. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-kansas-tax-cut-experiment/
  182. https://taxfoundation.org/blog/kansas-experiment-kansas-tax-cuts-critique/
  183. https://www.colorado.edu/today/2022/11/04/decade-after-legalizing-cannabis-colorado-heres-what-weve-learned
  184. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/effect-state-marijuana-legalizations-2021-update
  185. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-025-05621-5
  186. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45323
  187. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-10/anti-commandeering-doctrine
  188. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/521/898/
  189. https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/on-this-day-the-supreme-court-reinforces-the-10th-amendment
  190. https://ballotpedia.org/Multistate_lawsuits_against_the_federal_government_during_the_Biden_administration
  191. https://attorneysgeneral.org/multistate-lawsuits-vs-the-federal-government/list-of-lawsuits-1980-present/
  192. https://attorneysgeneral.org/multistate-lawsuits-vs-the-federal-government/statistics-and-visualizations-multistate-litigation-vs-the-federal-government/
  193. https://scholars.org/contribution/nullification-growing-form-resistance-federal
  194. https://rockinst.org/blog/missouris-attempt-to-nullify-federal-gun-laws-and-the-broadening-of-statutory-gun-rights/
  195. https://www.usconstitution.net/state-nullification-of-federal-laws/
  196. https://www.theregreview.org/2018/05/07/napolio-peterson-partisanship-state-agencies-resistance-federal-regulation/
  197. https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/the-fight-for-federalism-lawmakers-share-strategies-to-protect-state-sovereignty
  198. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/734874
  199. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ecin.12118
  200. https://sheeo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/The-Impact-of-Political-Party-Control-on-Education-Finance-and-Outcomes_Chin-and-Shi.pdf
  201. https://manhattan.institute/article/long-run-effects-of-right-to-work-laws
  202. https://www.nber.org/digest/202208/impacts-right-work-laws-unionization-and-wages
  203. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X20300386
  204. https://www.mercatus.org/research/working-papers/house-divided-against-itself-cannot-spend-much-fiscal-effect-separate
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.