Hubbry Logo
HaloalkaneHaloalkaneMain
Open search
Haloalkane
Community hub
Haloalkane
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Haloalkane
Haloalkane
Haloalkane
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Tetrafluoroethane (a haloalkane) is a colorless liquid that boils well below room temperature (as seen here) and can be extracted from common canned air canisters by simply inverting them during use.

The haloalkanes (also known as halogenoalkanes or alkyl halides) are alkanes containing one or more halogen substituents of hydrogen atom.[1] They are a subset of the general class of halocarbons, although the distinction is not often made. Haloalkanes are widely used commercially. They are used as flame retardants, fire extinguishants, refrigerants, propellants, solvents, and pharmaceuticals. Subsequent to the widespread use in commerce, many halocarbons have also been shown to be serious pollutants and toxins. For example, the chlorofluorocarbons have been shown to lead to ozone depletion. Methyl bromide is a controversial fumigant. Only haloalkanes that contain chlorine, bromine, and iodine are a threat to the ozone layer, but fluorinated volatile haloalkanes in theory may have activity as greenhouse gases. Methyl iodide, a naturally occurring substance, however, does not have ozone-depleting properties and the United States Environmental Protection Agency has designated the compound a non-ozone layer depleter. For more information, see Halomethane. Haloalkane or alkyl halides are the compounds which have the general formula "RX" where R is an alkyl or substituted alkyl group and X is a halogen (F, Cl, Br, I).

Haloalkanes have been known for centuries. Chloroethane was produced in the 15th century. The systematic synthesis of such compounds developed in the 19th century in step with the development of organic chemistry and the understanding of the structure of alkanes. Methods were developed for the selective formation of C-halogen bonds. Especially versatile methods included the addition of halogens to alkenes, hydrohalogenation of alkenes, and the conversion of alcohols to alkyl halides. These methods are so reliable and so easily implemented that haloalkanes became cheaply available for use in industrial chemistry because the halide could be further replaced by other functional groups.

While many haloalkanes are human-produced, substantial amounts are biogenic.

Classes

[edit]

From the structural perspective, haloalkanes can be classified according to the connectivity of the carbon atom to which the halogen is attached. In primary (1°) haloalkanes, the carbon that carries the halogen atom is only attached to one other alkyl group. An example is chloroethane (CH
3CH
2Cl). In secondary (2°) haloalkanes, the carbon that carries the halogen atom has two C–C bonds. In tertiary (3°) haloalkanes, the carbon that carries the halogen atom has three C–C bonds.[citation needed]

Haloalkanes can also be classified according to the type of halogen on group 17 responding to a specific halogenoalkane. Haloalkanes containing carbon bonded to fluorine, chlorine, bromine, and iodine results in organofluorine, organochlorine, organobromine and organoiodine compounds, respectively. Compounds containing more than one kind of halogen are also possible. Several classes of widely used haloalkanes are classified in this way chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). These abbreviations are particularly common in discussions of the environmental impact of haloalkanes.[citation needed]

Properties

[edit]

Haloalkanes generally resemble the parent alkanes in being colorless, relatively odorless, and hydrophobic. The melting and boiling points of chloro-, bromo-, and iodoalkanes are higher than the analogous alkanes, scaling with the atomic weight and number of halides. This effect is due to the increased strength of the intermolecular forces—from London dispersion to dipole-dipole interaction because of the increased polarizability. Thus tetraiodomethane (CI
4) is a solid whereas tetrachloromethane (CCl
4) is a liquid. Many fluoroalkanes, however, go against this trend and have lower melting and boiling points than their nonfluorinated analogues due to the decreased polarizability of fluorine. For example, methane (CH
4) has a melting point of −182.5°C whereas tetrafluoromethane (CF
4) has a melting point of −183.6°C.[citation needed]

As they contain fewer C–H bonds, haloalkanes are less flammable than alkanes, and some are used in fire extinguishers. Haloalkanes are better solvents than the corresponding alkanes because of their increased polarity. Haloalkanes containing halogens other than fluorine are more reactive than the parent alkanes—it is this reactivity that is the basis of most controversies. Many are alkylating agents, with primary haloalkanes and those containing heavier halogens being the most active (fluoroalkanes do not act as alkylating agents under normal conditions). The ozone-depleting abilities of the CFCs arises from the photolability of the C–Cl bond.[citation needed]

Natural occurrence

[edit]

An estimated 4,100,000,000 kg of chloromethane are produced annually by natural sources.[2] The oceans are estimated to release 1 to 2 million tons of bromomethane annually.[3]

Nomenclature

[edit]

IUPAC

[edit]

The formal naming of haloalkanes should follow IUPAC nomenclature, which put the halogen as a prefix to the alkane. For example, ethane with bromine becomes bromoethane, methane with four chlorine groups becomes tetrachloromethane. However, many of these compounds have already an established trivial name, which is endorsed by the IUPAC nomenclature, for example chloroform (trichloromethane) and methylene chloride (dichloromethane). But nowadays, IUPAC nomenclature is used. To reduce confusion this article follows the systematic naming scheme throughout.

Production

[edit]

Haloalkanes can be produced from virtually all organic precursors. From the perspective of industry, the most important ones are alkanes and alkenes.

From alkanes

[edit]
Main article: Free radical halogenation

Alkanes react with halogens by free radical halogenation. In this reaction a hydrogen atom is removed from the alkane, then replaced by a halogen atom by reaction with a diatomic halogen molecule. Free radical halogenation typically produces a mixture of compounds mono- or multihalogenated at various positions.[citation needed]

From alkenes and alkynes

[edit]

In hydrohalogenation, an alkene reacts with a dry hydrogen halide (HX) electrophile like hydrogen chloride (HCl) or hydrogen bromide (HBr) to form a mono-haloalkane. The double bond of the alkene is replaced by two new bonds, one with the halogen and one with the hydrogen atom of the hydrohalic acid. Markovnikov's rule states that under normal conditions, hydrogen is attached to the unsaturated carbon with the most hydrogen substituents. The rule is violated when neighboring functional groups polarize the multiple bond, or in certain additions of hydrogen bromide (addition in the presence of peroxides and the Wohl-Ziegler reaction) which occur by a free-radical mechanism.[citation needed]

Alkenes also react with halogens (X2) to form haloalkanes with two neighboring halogen atoms in a halogen addition reaction. Alkynes react similarly, forming the tetrahalo compounds. This is sometimes known as "decolorizing" the halogen, since the reagent X2 is colored and the product is usually colorless and odorless.[citation needed]

From alcohols

[edit]

Alcohol can be converted to haloalkanes. Direct reaction with a hydrohalic acid rarely gives a pure product, instead generating ethers. However, some exceptions are known: ionic liquids suppress the formation or promote the cleavage of ethers,[4] hydrochloric acid converts tertiary alcohols to chloroalkanes, and primary and secondary alcohols convert similarly in the presence of a Lewis acid activator, such as zinc chloride. The latter is exploited in the Lucas test.[citation needed]

In the laboratory, more active deoxygenating and halogenating agents combine with base to effect the conversion. In the "Darzens halogenation", thionyl chloride (SOCl
2) with pyridine converts less reactive alcohols to chlorides. Both phosphorus pentachloride (PCl
5) and phosphorus trichloride (PCl
3) function similarly, and alcohols convert to bromoalkanes under hydrobromic acid or phosphorus tribromide (PBr3). The heavier halogens do not require preformed reagents: A catalytic amount of PBr
3 may be used for the transformation using phosphorus and bromine; PBr
3 is formed in situ.[5] Iodoalkanes may similarly be prepared using red phosphorus and iodine (equivalent to phosphorus triiodide).[citation needed]

One family of named reactions relies on the deoxygenating effect of triphenylphosphine. In the Appel reaction, the reagent is tetrahalomethane and triphenylphosphine; the co-products are haloform and triphenylphosphine oxide. In the Mitsunobu reaction, the reagents are any nucleophile, triphenylphosphine, and a diazodicarboxylate; the coproducts are triphenyl­phosphine oxide and a hydrazodiamide.[citation needed]

From carboxylic acids

[edit]

Two methods for the synthesis of haloalkanes from carboxylic acids are Hunsdiecker reaction and Kochi reaction.[citation needed]

Biosynthesis

[edit]

Many chloro- and bromoalkanes are formed naturally. The principal pathways involve the enzymes chloroperoxidase and bromoperoxidase.[citation needed]

From amines by Sandmeyer's Method

[edit]
Further information: Sandmeyer reaction

Primary aromatic amines yield diazonium ions in a solution of sodium nitrite. Upon heating this solution with copper(I) chloride, the diazonium group is replaced by -Cl. This is a comparatively easy method to make aryl halides as the gaseous product can be separated easily from aryl halide.[citation needed]

When an iodide is to be made, copper chloride is not needed. Addition of potassium iodide with gentle shaking produces the haloalkane.[citation needed]

Reactions

[edit]

Haloalkanes are reactive towards nucleophiles. They are polar molecules: the carbon to which the halogen is attached is slightly electropositive where the halogen is slightly electronegative. This results in an electron deficient (electrophilic) carbon which, inevitably, attracts nucleophiles.[citation needed]

Substitution

[edit]

Substitution reactions involve the replacement of the halogen with another molecule—thus leaving saturated hydrocarbons, as well as the halogenated product. Haloalkanes behave as the R+ synthon, and readily react with nucleophiles.[citation needed]

Hydrolysis, a reaction in which water breaks a bond, is a good example of the nucleophilic nature of haloalkanes. The polar bond attracts a hydroxide ion, OH− (NaOH(aq) being a common source of this ion). This OH− is a nucleophile with a clearly negative charge, as it has excess electrons it donates them to the carbon, which results in a covalent bond between the two. Thus C–X is broken by heterolytic fission resulting in a halide ion, X−. As can be seen, the OH is now attached to the alkyl group, creating an alcohol. (Hydrolysis of bromoethane, for example, yields ethanol). Reactions with ammonia give primary amines.[citation needed]

Chloro- and bromoalkanes are readily substituted by iodide in the Finkelstein reaction. The iodoalkanes produced easily undergo further reaction. Sodium iodide is used as a catalyst.[citation needed]

Haloalkanes react with ionic nucleophiles (e.g. cyanide, thiocyanate, azide); the halogen is replaced by the respective group. This is of great synthetic utility: chloroalkanes are often inexpensively available. For example, after undergoing substitution reactions, cyanoalkanes may be hydrolyzed to carboxylic acids, or reduced to primary amines using lithium aluminium hydride. Azoalkanes may be reduced to primary amines by Staudinger reduction or lithium aluminium hydride. Amines may also be prepared from alkyl halides in amine alkylation, Gabriel synthesis and Delepine reaction, by undergoing nucleophilic substitution with potassium phthalimide or hexamine respectively, followed by hydrolysis.[citation needed]

In the presence of a base, haloalkanes alkylate alcohols, amines, and thiols to obtain ethers, N-substituted amines, and thioethers respectively. They are substituted by Grignard reagent to give magnesium salts and an extended alkyl compound.[citation needed]

Elimination

[edit]
Main article: Dehydrohalogenation

In dehydrohalogenation reactions, the halogen and an adjacent proton are removed from halocarbons, thus forming an alkene. For example, with bromoethane and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in ethanol, the hydroxide ion HO− abstracts a hydrogen atom. A Bromide ion is then lost, resulting in ethene, H2O and NaBr. Thus, haloalkanes can be converted to alkenes. Similarly, dihaloalkanes can be converted to alkynes.[citation needed]

In related reactions, 1,2-dibromocompounds are debrominated by zinc dust to give alkenes and geminal dihalides can react with strong bases to give carbenes.[citation needed]

Other

[edit]

Haloalkanes undergo free-radical reactions with elemental magnesium to give alkyl-magnesium compound: Grignard reagent. Haloalkanes also react with lithium metal to give organolithium compounds. Both Grignard reagents and organolithium compounds behave as the R− synthon. Alkali metals such as sodium and lithium are able to cause haloalkanes to couple in Wurtz reaction, giving symmetrical alkanes. Haloalkanes, especially iodoalkanes, also undergo oxidative addition reactions to give organometallic compounds.[citation needed]

Applications

[edit]
Teflon structure

Chlorinated or fluorinated alkenes undergo polymerization. Important halogenated polymers include polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and polytetrafluoroethene (PTFE, or teflon).[citation needed]

Alkyl fluorides
An estimated one fifth of pharmaceuticals contain fluorine, including several of the top drugs. Most of these compounds are alkyl fluorides.[6]
Alkyl chlorides
Some low molecular weight chlorinated hydrocarbons such as chloroform, dichloromethane, dichloroethene, and trichloroethane are useful solvents. Several million tons of chlorinated methanes are produced annually. Chloromethane is a precursor to chlorosilanes and silicones. Chlorodifluoromethane (CHClF2) is used to make teflon.[7]
Alkyl bromides
Large scale applications of alkyl bromides exploit their toxicity, which also limits their usefulness. Methyl bromide is also an effective fumigant, but its production and use are controversial.[citation needed]
Alkyl iodides
No large scale applications are known for alkyl iodides. Methyl iodide is a popular methylating agent in organic synthesis.[citation needed]
Chlorofluorocarbons
Chlorofluorocarbons were used almost universally as refrigerants and propellants due to their relatively low toxicity and high heat of vaporization. Starting in the 1980s, as their contribution to ozone depletion became known, their use was increasingly restricted, and they have now largely been replaced by HFCs.

Environmental considerations

[edit]

Nature produces massive amounts of chloromethane and bromomethane. Most concern focuses on anthropogenic sources, which are potential toxins, even carcinogens. Similarly, great interest has been shown in remediation of man made halocarbons such as those produced on large scale, such as dry cleaning fluids. Volatile halocarbons degrade photochemically because the carbon-halogen bond can be labile. Some microorganisms dehalogenate halocarbons. While this behavior is intriguing, the rates of remediation are generally very slow.[8]

Safety

[edit]

As alkylating agents, haloalkanes are potential carcinogens. The more reactive members of this large class of compounds generally pose greater risk, e.g. carbon tetrachloride.[9]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Haloalkane

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Haloalkanes, also known as alkyl halides, are a class of organic compounds consisting of alkanes in which one or more hydrogen atoms have been substituted by atoms—, , , or iodine—resulting in the general formula R–X, where R denotes an and X the substituent. These compounds exhibit physical properties distinct from parent alkanes, including greater molecular polarity due to the electronegative , higher boiling points arising from increased molecular weight and dipole-dipole interactions, and densities typically exceeding those of hydrocarbons of comparable mass. Chemically, haloalkanes are valued for their reactivity in (SN1 and SN2) and elimination reactions, which facilitate the synthesis of diverse organic molecules such as alcohols, amines, and alkenes, underpinning much of industrial . Historically employed as solvents, anesthetics, refrigerants, and propellants—exemplified by chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) like —haloalkanes have faced scrutiny for environmental persistence and toxicity, with CFCs catalyzing stratospheric decomposition via radical chains, contributing to the hole observed since the 1980s and prompting global phase-outs under the . Modern alternatives, such as hydrofluoroalkanes, mitigate risks but introduce concerns, reflecting ongoing trade-offs in their applications.

Classification

Monohaloalkanes and Polyhaloalkanes

Monohaloalkanes are haloalkanes featuring a single atom attached to an sp³-hybridized carbon in an aliphatic chain, with the general formula RX where R represents an and X denotes a such as , , , or iodine. Representative examples include (CH₃Cl) and (CH₃CH₂CH₂Br).Complete_and_Semesters_I_and_II/Map%3A_Organic_Chemistry(Wade)/03%3A_Functional_Groups_and_Nomenclature/3.05%3A_Haloalkane_-_Classification_and_Nomenclature) In contrast, polyhaloalkanes incorporate two or more atoms on the alkane framework, encompassing dihaloalkanes like 1,2-dichloroethane (ClCH₂CH₂Cl), trihaloalkanes such as chloroform (CHCl₃), and perhaloalkanes including carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄). These may feature halogens (on the same carbon), vicinal halogens (on adjacent carbons), or positions further apart, altering the overall and polarity. The structural distinction arises primarily from the number of substituents, which modulates via the ; , being electronegative, withdraw electrons through bonds (-I effect). In monohaloalkanes, this withdrawal is localized to one site, whereas in polyhaloalkanes, the cumulative -I effect from multiple significantly depletes across the carbon framework, enhancing polarity and influencing intermolecular forces. This electron deficiency in polyhaloalkanes weakens adjacent C-H bonds relative to monohaloalkanes, as evidenced by progressively lower C-H bond dissociation energies moving from CH₃Cl to CHCl₃. Consequently, polyhaloalkanes often display greater stability against oxidation but heightened susceptibility to nucleophilic attack at remaining hydrogens due to reduced bond strengths. Haloalkanes, both mono- and poly-, are defined by their aliphatic C-X bonds involving sp³-hybridized carbons, distinguishing them from haloarenes where the halogen attaches to an sp²-hybridized aromatic carbon, imparting stabilization and shorter, stronger C-X bonds. This aliphatic nature results in more polarized yet labile C-X bonds in haloalkanes, with bond dissociation energies typically ranging from 285 kJ/mol for C-I to 443 kJ/mol for C-F, varying modestly with halogen count but primarily dictated by the identity rather than multiplicity in monohalo cases. Polyhaloalkanes thus exhibit empirical reactivity enhancements from inductive reinforcement, such as easier , without the delocalization seen in aromatic systems.

Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Haloalkanes

Haloalkanes are classified as primary, secondary, or tertiary according to the number of s attached to the carbon atom bearing the . In primary haloalkanes, the is bonded to a carbon atom that is itself attached to only one other carbon atom, as in the structure R-CH₂-X, where R is an or and X is the . Secondary haloalkanes feature the on a carbon attached to two other carbon atoms (R₂CH-X), while tertiary haloalkanes have the on a carbon bonded to three other carbon atoms (R₃C-X). This substitution level determines the degree of steric crowding around the reactive carbon and the extent of electron donation from adjacent s via inductive effects. For instance, 1-chloropropane (CH₃CH₂CH₂Cl) exemplifies a primary haloalkane, with the attached to a terminal carbon bearing two hydrogens and one alkyl chain. In contrast, ( (CH₃)₃CCl ), also known as 2-chloro-2-methylpropane, is a tertiary haloalkane, where the chlorine is linked to a central carbon surrounded by three methyl groups. These structural differences causally influence reactivity patterns, particularly in pathways involving intermediates, where tertiary haloalkanes exhibit higher rates due to enhanced carbocation stability from greater alkyl substitution. The reactivity order for unimolecular (SN1) follows tertiary > secondary > primary, stemming from the relative stabilities of the carbocations formed: tertiary carbocations benefit from three alkyl groups providing inductive electron donation and , which delocalizes positive charge and lowers the of the rate-determining ionization step by approximately 10-20 kcal/mol compared to primary analogs, based on empirical solvolysis rate data. Primary carbocations, lacking such stabilization, are highly unstable and rarely form under typical conditions. Conversely, steric bulk in tertiary haloalkanes impedes backside attack in bimolecular (SN2) pathways, favoring carbocation-dependent routes through increased hindrance. This interplay of inductive stabilization and underscores why substitution classification predicts mechanistic preferences and relative rates across haloalkane types.

Historical Development

Early Observations and Isolation

Chloroethane, the earliest documented haloalkane, was synthesized in the through alchemical reactions of with , yielding a volatile, colorless observed for its pungent odor and rapid evaporation. This compound, termed spiritus salis dulci or "sweet spirit of salt," emerged from empirical distillations aimed at purifying mineral acids, where alchemists noted its formation as a byproduct distinct from the parent alcohol and acid due to its lower and flammability. The synthesis is attributed to the pseudonymous alchemist , active around 1440, who described the reaction in treatises on antimonial preparations, emphasizing reproducible heating and condensation steps that isolated the haloalkane without theoretical understanding of its carbon-chlorine bond. Empirical evidence from these processes included the compound's solubility in alcohol, its reaction with metals to produce gas, and its use in rudimentary medicinal applications for its anesthetic-like effects on skin contact, though these observations predated any causal analysis of substitution mechanisms. In the , refined the preparation by reacting with , achieving higher yields and confirming the substance's consistency across batches through yields of approximately 20-30% under controlled heating. These isolations relied on basic apparatus like alembics and retorts, with alchemists documenting the haloalkane's density (around 0.91 g/cm³) and refractive properties as hallmarks distinguishing it from ethers or acids, grounding early recognition in sensory and volumetric rather than molecular models. Such discoveries highlighted haloalkanes' stability relative to alkanes while foreshadowing their reactivity, as inadvertent exposures produced corrosive fumes verifiable by litmus-like color changes in nearby materials.

Systematic Synthesis and Key Discoveries

The systematic synthesis of haloalkanes progressed in the through direct of alkanes, where or substitutes hydrogen atoms under ultraviolet light or thermal conditions, yielding monohaloalkanes such as (CH₃Cl) from . This method, characterized by initiation via homolytic cleavage of the halogen molecule, propagation through hydrogen abstraction and halogen addition, and termination steps, provided a versatile route for preparing simple alkyl halides from abundant hydrocarbons. A pivotal advancement occurred in 1900 when discovered that alkyl halides react with magnesium turnings in anhydrous to form Grignard reagents (RMgX), highly reactive organometallics that enable to carbonyl compounds, facilitating carbon-carbon bond formation and expanding haloalkane utility in synthetic sequences. This breakthrough, detailed in Grignard's doctoral work under Philippe Barbier, earned him the 1912 and marked a shift toward controlled reactivity beyond substitution. Industrial-scale production emerged in the early , exemplified by Hoechst's implementation of gas-phase chlorination of in 1923, which generated chloromethanes (CH₃Cl, CH₂Cl₂, CHCl₃, CCl₄) via controlled radical processes for use as solvents and intermediates. This transition from laboratory methods to continuous high-yield processes, often at elevated temperatures (400–500°C), addressed selectivity challenges through optimized ratios and conditions, supporting burgeoning chemical manufacturing.

Physical Properties

Molecular Structure and Bonding

Haloalkanes contain a covalent carbon- (C-X) bond, where the carbon atom bonded to the is sp³ hybridized, adopting a tetrahedral with bond angles of approximately 109.5° around that carbon, consistent with for AX₃E systems when considering the as an effective substituent./Alkyl_Halides/Properties_of_Alkyl_Halides/Structure_of_Alkyl_Halides) The C-X bond exhibits characteristics influenced by the 's atomic size and ; bond lengths increase down group 17 due to expanding atomic radii, as seen in methyl halides: C-F ≈ 138 pm, C-Cl ≈ 178 pm, C-Br ≈ 193 pm, C-I ≈ 215 pm. Bond dissociation energies decrease correspondingly, from C-F at 485 kJ/mol to C-I at 213 kJ/mol, arising from diminished s-p orbital overlap efficiency with larger, more diffuse p-orbitals despite the smaller size of fluorine's orbitals leading to stronger bonds via better overlap and higher -driven ionic contributions. The polarity of the C-X bond stems from differences (Pauling scale: C 2.55, F 3.98, Cl 3.16, Br 2.96, I 2.66), rendering the bond polar covalent with partial positive charge (δ⁺) on carbon and partial negative (δ⁻) on , most extreme for C-F due to fluorine's highest . This manifests in moments for methyl halides, peaking at 1.87 D for CH₃Cl owing to optimal charge separation balancing and polarity, followed by CH₃F (1.85 D), CH₃Br (1.81 D), and CH₃I (1.62 D). Infrared spectroscopy confirms these structural features through C-X stretching frequencies, which decrease with heavier due to reduced force constants from longer, weaker bonds: C-F at 1000–1400 cm⁻¹, C-Cl at 600–850 cm⁻¹, C-Br at 500–700 cm⁻¹, and C-I below 500 cm⁻¹, often requiring far-IR for detection. Quantum mechanical calculations, such as Hartree-Fock or DFT methods, reproduce these trends by accounting for electronegativity-induced charge transfer and hybridization effects, validating empirical data without invoking reactivity pathways.

Thermodynamic Properties

Haloalkanes display boiling points that increase with , primarily due to enhanced London dispersion forces from greater and surface area. For a fixed , replacing a lighter with a heavier one elevates the , as seen in the methyl halide series: (−78.4 °C), (−23.7 °C), (3.6 °C), and (42.4 °C). Within , extending the carbon chain also raises boiling points; for instance, boils at −23.7 °C, while 1-chloroethane boils at 12.3 °C and 1-chloropropane at 46.6 °C.
Methyl HalideBoiling Point (°C)Melting Point (°C)
CH₃F−78.4−141.8
CH₃Cl−23.7−97.6
CH₃Br3.6−93.7
CH₃I42.4−66.0
Melting points follow a less predictable trend but generally rise with , influenced by lattice packing efficiency alongside dispersion forces; for example, the methyl halides melt at −141.8 °C (), −97.6 °C (), −93.7 °C (), and −66.0 °C (). Solubility in water is limited for haloalkanes, despite the polar C–X bond contributing some dipole-dipole attraction, because the nonpolar alkyl moiety dominates hydrophobic interactions and prevents effective hydration shell formation. exhibits modest solubility of 0.53 g/100 mL at 25 °C, but this diminishes rapidly with longer alkyl chains, such as in (<0.1 g/100 mL), as the increasing hydrocarbon content strengthens van der Waals self-association over water interactions./06._Properties_and_Reactions_of_Haloalkanes:_Bimolecular_Nucleophilic_Substitution/6.01:_Physical_Properties_of_Haloalkanes) Densities of liquid haloalkanes exceed those of analogous alkanes owing to the atomic mass of halogens; dichloromethane measures 1.33 g/cm³ at 20 °C, chloroform 1.49 g/cm³ at 25 °C, and dibromomethane approximately 2.49 g/cm³ at 20 °C. Viscosities remain low, indicative of minimal internal friction in these small molecules; chloroform viscosity is 0.56 mPa·s at 20 °C, and dichloromethane 0.44 mPa·s at 20 °C.

Spectroscopic Characteristics

In nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, haloalkanes display deshielded signals for nuclei adjacent to the halogen due to its electronegativity. For ¹H NMR, alpha protons (on the carbon directly attached to halogen) typically resonate at 3.0–4.5 ppm; for instance, the -CH₂Cl protons in chloromethane appear at 3.05 ppm, while those in bromoethane are around 3.4 ppm, with shifts decreasing slightly from chlorine to iodine owing to reduced inductive withdrawal. In ¹³C NMR, the ipso carbon (bearing the halogen) exhibits shifts of 0–35 ppm for CH₃-X, 0–45 ppm for -CH₂-X, and up to 55 ppm for tertiary C-X, varying by halogen: fluorocarbons at 70–110 ppm, chlorocarbons at 25–50 ppm, bromocarbons at 10–40 ppm, and iodocarbons near 0–20 ppm. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy identifies haloalkanes via C-X stretching bands in the fingerprint region (below 1500 cm⁻¹), where frequencies inversely correlate with halogen mass: C-F at 1000–1360 cm⁻¹ (strong), C-Cl at 600–840 cm⁻¹ (medium), C-Br at 500–700 cm⁻¹ (medium), and C-I at 450–570 cm⁻¹ (weak). These bands are often broad and may overlap with alkane C-H deformations, but their presence alongside absent O-H or C=O stretches confirms haloalkane functionality; heavier halogens yield lower-energy vibrations due to reduced bond force constants. Mass spectrometry of haloalkanes features a often weak molecular ion (M⁺) due to facile fragmentation, with common losses of halogen radical (M – X•) or alkyl group via alpha-cleavage, yielding acylium-like ions or halocarbenium species (e.g., R⁺ or X⁺). Chlorine and bromine isotopes produce diagnostic peak pairs: ³⁵Cl/³⁷Cl ratio ~3:1 at Δm/z=2, and ⁷⁹Br/⁸¹Br ~1:1, aiding elemental confirmation; primary haloalkanes favor inductive cleavage over rearrangement./Instrumentation_and_Analysis/Mass_Spectrometry/Mass_Spec/Mass_Spectrometry_-_Fragmentation_Patterns) These patterns distinguish haloalkanes from hydrocarbons, where such halogen-specific ions and isotope clusters are absent.

Chemical Properties

The reactivity of haloalkanes in nucleophilic substitution reactions decreases in the order RI > RBr > RCl > RF, reflecting the ease with which the acts as a . This trend holds across both SN1 and SN2 mechanisms, though it is most pronounced in SN2 reactions where bond breaking is rate-determining. Alkyl fluorides are notably unreactive, often requiring harsher conditions or alternative pathways for substitution, while alkyl iodides react readily under mild conditions. The primary factor driving this order is the decreasing carbon-halogen bond dissociation energy (BDE) from to iodine, which lowers the for C-X bond cleavage:
HalogenC-X BDE (kJ/mol)
F473
Cl347
Br293
I238
Weaker bonds in heavier haloalkanes facilitate departure of the ion. Complementing this, leaving group ability improves down the group due to increasing atomic size, , and decreasing basicity of the conjugate acids (pKa values: HF 3.17; HCl ≈ -7; HBr ≈ -9; HI ≈ -10), which stabilizes the anionic leaving group in the . Fluoride's poor performance stems from the exceptionally strong C-F bond and its low , which hinders effective overlap and charge delocalization during substitution. Empirical rate data for SN2 or displacement reactions of methyl halides confirm this, with relative rates for CH3I versus CH3F differing by factors up to 10^6.

Influence of Alkyl Group Structure

The structure of the profoundly affects haloalkane reactivity in , primarily through stabilization of intermediates and steric modulation of transition states. In unimolecular substitution (SN1), increased branching—such as in tertiary alkyl halides—enhances rates by forming more carbocations, where adjacent alkyl groups provide electron donation via from C-H sigma orbitals overlapping the empty p-orbital and, to a lesser extent, inductive effects. Relative solvolysis rates in aqueous at 50°C illustrate this: tertiary chlorides react approximately 10^5 times faster than primary ones, reflecting the number of stabilizing alkyl substituents (zero for methyl, one for primary, two for secondary, three for tertiary). Recent computational analyses confirm as the dominant factor, with traditional views of strong inductive donation from alkyl groups overstated; alkyls exhibit sigma-withdrawing character in isolated inductive assessments, yet net stabilization occurs in carbocations. In bimolecular substitution (SN2), alkyl branching imposes steric hindrance, reducing reactivity by impeding backside nucleophilic attack. Primary alkyl halides exhibit the highest SN2 rates, with each additional branching level (secondary to tertiary) decreasing rates by factors of 10^2 to 10^4 in prototypical reactions like iodide displacement in acetone. Neopentyl halides, featuring beta-branching, show particularly sluggish kinetics due to conformational crowding that enforces a compact geometry incompatible with nucleophile approach. Quantitative steric assessment via A-values in monosubstituted cyclohexanes underscores the modest bulk of halogens themselves (e.g., 0.43 kcal/mol for Cl, 0.38 kcal/mol for Br, 0.47 kcal/mol for I), contrasting sharply with larger alkyl groups like methyl (1.70 kcal/mol) or isopropyl (2.15 kcal/mol), which exacerbate hindrance in branched haloalkanes.

Natural Occurrence and Biosynthesis

Environmental Sources

Oceans serve as a primary natural reservoir for methyl halides, with emissions driven by biological production in marine environments. Marine , , and generate compounds such as (CH₃Cl), (CH₃Br), and (CH₃I) through processes, leading to sea-to-air fluxes observed in field measurements. For instance, surveys in the western between 2°N and 24°N documented elevated concentrations of these halides, correlating with nutrient levels and contributing to atmospheric burdens via volatilization. Global oceanic emissions of CH₃Cl are estimated at approximately 655 Gg yr⁻¹ based on empirical models incorporating and concentration data. For CH₃Br, oceans represent a net source overall, though regional sinks exist; measurements indicate in surface waters, with the potentially contributing substantially to the atmospheric flux due to high . Coastal and wetland ecosystems, including salt marshes, provide additional verified reservoirs, where vegetation and microbial activity release CH₃Cl and CH₃Br. Empirical flux measurements from diverse vegetation zones in coastal salt marshes confirm emissions across tidal and upland areas, with rates varying by plant species and salinity but consistently positive to the atmosphere. These terrestrial biotic sources complement oceanic inputs, though their global contribution remains smaller, on the order of tens to hundreds of Gg yr⁻¹ for CH₃Cl from wetlands and similar habitats. Abiotic processes like natural biomass burning from wildfires also liberate haloalkanes, primarily through incomplete of . Global modeling of biomass burning events, such as those in 2003–2020, attributes significant CH₃Cl emissions (part of non-anthropogenic totals exceeding 4700 Gg yr⁻¹ when excluding controlled fires) to pyrogenic release, with CH₃Br fluxes similarly elevated during peak fire seasons. Volcanic activity contributes minor amounts via diffuse from flanks and craters, where trace organohalogens including CH₃Br have been detected in emissions, potentially addressing budget discrepancies but with fluxes orders of magnitude below oceanic or biomass sources. Overall, these natural reservoirs sustain baseline atmospheric levels of short-chain haloalkanes, with empirical budgets highlighting oceans as the dominant contributor for methyl bromides and chlorides.

Biological Production Pathways

Haloperoxidases, enzymes prevalent in marine and certain microbes, catalyze the biological formation of haloalkanes through the oxidation of ions (Cl⁻, Br⁻, or I⁻) using (H₂O₂) as the oxidant. These vanadium- or heme-dependent enzymes generate hypohalous acids (HOX) as reactive intermediates, which electrophilically abstract hydrogen from C-H bonds in substrates, yielding C-X bonds and producing haloalkanes or more complex organohalides. This pathway is site-selective in some cases, influenced by substrate proximity to the enzyme , and predominates in organisms accumulating high concentrations from . In such as red seaweeds (e.g., Asparagopsis armata), haloperoxidases facilitate bromoalkane synthesis, including (CHBr₃), which functions in by deterring herbivores and inhibiting bacterial pathogens. Bromoform production escalates under environmental stressors like oxidative conditions, correlating with enhanced resistance to grazing and microbial fouling, as evidenced by greater bioactivity against stress-induced bacterial isolates compared to non-producers. Such compounds likely evolved as adaptive responses to predation pressure in halide-rich marine niches, prioritizing bromination due to seawater's abundance over chlorination. Beyond haloperoxidases, cyanobacteria employ flavin-dependent halogenases for haloalkane incorporation into natural products like cylindrocyclophanes, chlorinated cyclic peptides with alkyl moieties. The CylC in the cylindrocyclophane pathway executes regioselective chlorination of precursors, enabling dimerization and cyclization. A 2024 workflow exploiting anion depletion—mimicking substrate limitation to trigger shunt products—uncovered novel alkyl -derived cylindrocyclophane variants from cyanobacterial cultures, confirming halogenase dependency and accelerating identification of underrepresented chlorinated metabolites. This approach highlights enzymatic versatility in prokaryotes, where supports structural diversity for potential ecological advantages, though direct defense roles remain under investigation.

Nomenclature

IUPAC Systematic Naming

In IUPAC systematic , haloalkanes are named using substitutive , treating atoms as substituents on the parent chain. The name consists of the prefix for the (fluoro-, chloro-, bromo-, or iodo-) followed by the name of the corresponding to the longest continuous carbon chain, with s specifying the positions of the substituents to ensure the lowest possible numbers. For unbranched chains with a single at the end, no locant is needed, as in (CH₃Cl) or (CH₃CH₂Br); however, for internal positions or branched structures, locants are required, such as 2-chloropropane for CH₃CHClCH₃. For compounds containing multiple identical halogen substituents, numerical prefixes such as di-, tri-, or tetra- are employed, with locants cited in ascending order and the chain numbered to minimize the set of locants; for example, for BrCH₂CH₂Br or 2,2-dichloropropane for (CH₃)₂CCl₂. When different are present, their prefixes are listed in (ignoring multiplicative prefixes), and the carbon chain is numbered to assign the lowest possible locants to the substituents collectively, starting from the end that yields the lowest number at the first point of difference. An illustration is 1-bromo-2-chloroethane for BrCH₂CH₂Cl, where "bromo" precedes "chloro" alphabetically, and locants 1 and 2 are preferred over 2 and 1 for the combined set. Halogen substituents hold low priority in the order of functional group precedence, functioning solely as prefixes when a higher-priority characteristic group (such as -OH in alcohols or -COOH in carboxylic acids) is present in the molecule, which then determines the parent chain and suffix. For instance, in ClCH₂CH₂OH, the compound is named , with the receiving the suffix "-ol" and the chloro- as a prefix, numbered to prioritize the principal function. This ensures consistent naming across organic compounds by subordinating to more senior functional groups.

Historical and Common Naming Conventions

Prior to systematic IUPAC , haloalkanes were named using a straightforward convention that appended the name (ending in "-ide") to the derived from the parent , such as ethyl for the compound with the formula CH₃CH₂Br. This approach, rooted in 19th-century practices, emphasized the substituent and identity for quick recognition in early synthetic and descriptive work. Polyhaloalkanes followed similar descriptive patterns, often highlighting the central carbon and halogen count, as in (CCl₄), first prepared in 1839 by Victor Regnault via chlorination of . itself, synthesized in 1831 by , exemplified this by directly denoting its trichloromethane structure through common usage. Industrial applications led to proprietary names like , a trademark introduced in 1930 for chlorofluorocarbons such as dichlorodifluoromethane (designated Freon-12), prioritizing commercial brevity over structural detail in contexts. These historical names endured in technical literature and patents well into the for their simplicity in denoting familiar compounds, even as the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, founded in 1919, advanced substitutive to handle increasingly complex molecules systematically. By the mid-20th century, IUPAC recommendations favored alkane-parent names with halo-prefixes for precision, yet common terms like methylene chloride (for ) and persisted in applied fields for practical reference, reflecting a balance between tradition and standardization.

Synthesis

Free Radical Halogenation of Alkanes

Free radical halogenation of alkanes is a in which a is replaced by a atom (typically or ) through a chain mechanism involving free radicals, initiated by light or heat. This process is exothermic for chlorination and less so for bromination, with the reaction proceeding under conditions that generate halogen radicals without requiring initiators, unlike anti-Markovnikov additions to alkenes. The mechanism consists of three stages: , , and termination. In , homolytic cleavage of the molecule (X₂ → 2X•) produces radicals, requiring energy input such as 242 kJ/mol for Cl–Cl or 193 kJ/mol for Br–Br bonds. involves two steps: abstraction of a by the radical (X• + R–H → HX + R•), forming an alkyl radical, followed by reaction of the alkyl radical with X₂ (R• + X₂ → R–X + X•), regenerating the radical and yielding the haloalkane. Termination occurs when two radicals combine (e.g., R• + R• → R–R or X• + R• → R–X), reducing the radical concentration and halting the chain. These termination steps are less frequent due to low radical concentrations but contribute to minor byproducts. Selectivity in hydrogen abstraction depends on the stability of the resulting alkyl radical and the exothermicity of the step, with tertiary > secondary > primary hydrogens reflecting C–H bond dissociation energies of approximately 410 kJ/mol (3°), 397 kJ/mol (2°), and 423 kJ/mol (1°). For chlorination, the relative reactivities are 1:3.8:5.0 for primary:secondary:tertiary hydrogens, indicating low selectivity due to the high reactivity of Cl• and early . Bromination exhibits high selectivity with relative reactivities of 1:82:1600, as Br• abstraction is endothermic, leading to a late that favors the more stable tertiary radical. Side products arise primarily from polyhalogenation, as the C–H bond in the mono- is weakened (e.g., by 10–20 kJ/mol for chlorination), allowing further substitution, and from non-selective yielding constitutional isomers. To optimize monohaloalkane yields, reactions employ excess (e.g., 10:1 molar to ), low halogen concentration, and controlled temperatures (around 25–40°C for chlorination to balance rate and selectivity). Fluorination is too violent and unselective for practical use, while iodination does not propagate effectively due to endothermic steps.

Addition Reactions to Unsaturated Hydrocarbons

Haloalkanes can be synthesized through reactions of halides (HX, where X is , , or iodine) to s, which follow : the atom adds to the sp²-hybridized carbon bearing the greater number of substituents, while the adds to the other carbon, reflecting the formation of the more stable intermediate. This arises because the of the generates a at the carbon that can better stabilize the positive charge through and inductive effects from adjacent alkyl groups. For instance, propene (CH₃-CH=CH₂) reacts with HBr to predominantly yield (CH₃-CHBr-CH₃), with the secondary forming preferentially over the primary alternative. In the absence of peroxides, the reaction mechanism involves two key steps: initial of the by HX to form the , followed by rapid nucleophilic attack by the anion. This pathway is favored under ionic conditions and applies to HCl, HBr, and HI, though HI additions can be complicated by competing elimination due to its stronger acidity. The reaction typically occurs at room temperature or with mild heating, often in inert solvents, and yields are high for terminal alkenes. Addition of molecular (X₂, where X = Cl or Br) to alkenes also produces haloalkanes, specifically vicinal dihalides, via an anti addition mechanism involving a cyclic intermediate that enforces stereospecific trans geometry. The halogen molecule polarizes upon approach to the π-bond, with the electrophilic halogen bridging the carbons, followed by backside attack by the nucleophilic . For example, ethene reacts with Br₂ to form , a vicinal dibromide used in further synthesis. This method extends to alkynes, where one equivalent of X₂ yields vinyl dihalides, but excess halogen can lead to tetrahalides. An exception to Markovnikov occurs in the addition of HBr to in the presence of (ROOR), which initiates a free radical chain mechanism yielding the anti-Markovnikov product, where attaches to the less substituted carbon. The mechanism proceeds via peroxide decomposition to alkoxy radicals, radical addition to the alkene forming the more stable carbon radical (at the less substituted carbon due to lower steric hindrance), and subsequent abstraction of from HBr. This peroxide effect is unique to HBr, as the H-Br bond dissociation energy (366 kJ/mol) supports efficient radical , unlike HCl or HI. For propene, this yields as the major product under radical conditions.

Conversion from Alcohols and Other Functional Groups

Haloalkanes can be synthesized from alcohols through reactions in which the hydroxyl group is replaced by a atom, typically under acidic conditions that facilitate the departure of as a . For tertiary alcohols, concentrated hydrohalic acids such as HCl or HBr react rapidly via an SN1 mechanism involving intermediates, often at . Secondary alcohols follow a similar SN1 pathway but require mild heating, while primary alcohols proceed via SN2 with HX reagents, sometimes assisted by to enhance reactivity, though this risks rearrangement in branched systems. The , a mixture of concentrated HCl and anhydrous ZnCl₂, is particularly effective for converting secondary and tertiary alcohols to alkyl chlorides, with reaction rates distinguishing alcohol types: tertiary alcohols react immediately at , secondary within minutes upon warming, and primary only under forcing conditions or not at all without rearrangement. To minimize carbocation-mediated side reactions in primary and secondary alcohols, alternative reagents like (SOCl₂) for chlorides or (PBr₃) for bromides are preferred, as they operate via SN2 mechanisms with retention or inversion of configuration depending on conditions (e.g., SOCl₂ with yields retention via an internal return mechanism). These methods avoid the need for strong acids and provide cleaner conversions, with SOCl₂ producing SO₂ and HCl as byproducts. From carboxylic acids, haloalkanes are obtained via the , where silver(I) salts of the acids (RCOOAg) are treated with in , leading to decarboxylative bromination and formation of RBr with one fewer carbon atom than the original acid. This radical process involves homolytic cleavage of Br₂, attack on the , and subsequent of an acyl hypobromite intermediate, typically conducted under with yields of 60-80% for unbranched chains, though it is less effective for α-branched acids due to steric hindrance. Unlike the , which applies to aromatic diazonium salts for aryl halides, the Hunsdiecker method is specific to alkyl chains from aliphatic carboxylic acids and does not involve diazotization.

Advanced and Green Synthetic Methods

In the 2020s, electrochemical methods have advanced selective C-H of alkanes, providing sustainable alternatives to classical free radical processes by operating under mild conditions with as the oxidant, thus reducing reliance on chemical initiators and waste generation. A metal-free protocol reported in 2025 enables regioselective chlorination of terminal C-H bonds in unfunctionalized linear alkanes using salts, achieving up to 80% yield for primary chlorides with minimal over-chlorination, attributed to anodic generation of radicals that preferentially abstract terminal hydrogens. This approach demonstrates improved and scalability compared to thermal methods, with empirical yields exceeding 70% for substrates like n-hexane in undivided cells at . Photocatalytic strategies, utilizing visible light and earth-abundant catalysts, facilitate radical-mediated C-H of aliphatic chains, emphasizing metrics such as minimization and operational simplicity. For example, visible-light-driven systems with organic dyes or metal complexes generate radicals for site-selective bromination or chlorination, yielding alkyl bromides from cycloalkanes with selectivities up to 90% at benzylic or allylic positions, as evidenced by transfer mechanisms that avoid stoichiometric oxidants. These methods, developed post-2010, often proceed in aqueous or solvent-free media, with turnover numbers exceeding 100 for iridium-based photocatalysts in deformylative halogenations of aldehydes to primary alkyl halides, highlighting reduced energy input relative to UV-initiated classical routes. Biocatalytic halogenation employs flavin-dependent halogenases (FDHs) to catalyze regioselective C-X bond formation, drawing from enzymatic mechanisms for precise control in aqueous environments at ambient conditions, thereby aligning with goals through cofactor recycling and minimal byproduct formation. Engineered FDH variants, such as those derived from PrnA or RebH, have been applied to aliphatic and substrates, achieving chlorination yields of 50-90% for epsilon positions in derivatives via hypohalite intermediates generated from O2 and ions. Recent efforts, including , expand substrate scope to non-natural alkanes, with immobilized systems demonstrating reusability over multiple cycles and enantioselectivities >95% ee, underscoring their potential for scalable green synthesis despite challenges in cofactor supply.

Reactivity and Reactions

Nucleophilic Substitution Mechanisms

Haloalkanes undergo reactions where a displaces a , proceeding via either SN1 or SN2 mechanisms depending on substrate structure, strength, solvent polarity, and ability. The SN2 pathway is a concerted, bimolecular process characterized by second-order kinetics, where the rate depends on both the concentrations of the haloalkane and , as evidenced by experimental rate laws such as rate = k [RX][Nu⁻]. This mechanism involves backside attack of the on the carbon atom, resulting in complete inversion of , a phenomenon confirmed through stereochemical studies on chiral secondary alkyl halides like reacting with in acetone, yielding inverted products with high enantiomeric excess. In contrast, the SN1 mechanism is a stepwise, unimolecular process with first-order kinetics, where the rate-determining step is the dissociation of the haloalkane to form a intermediate, independent of concentration (rate = k [RX]). This leads to at the reaction center due to planar carbocation geometry allowing attack from either face, though partial inversion may occur from ion-pair effects; kinetic studies on tertiary halides like in aqueous show approximately 50:50 mixtures of enantiomers. SN1 is favored for tertiary haloalkanes and secondary ones under ionizing conditions, as carbocation stability increases with alkyl substitution, supported by relative rate data: methyl < primary << secondary < tertiary, with tertiary rates up to 10^5 times faster than primary in solvolysis reactions. Key factors influencing mechanism selection include substrate type, where primary haloalkanes predominantly follow SN2 due to minimal steric hindrance, while tertiary favor SN1 from enhanced carbocation stabilization. Strong nucleophiles like alkoxides promote SN2 by direct displacement, whereas weak ones like water favor SN1 via carbocation capture. Solvent effects are pronounced: polar protic solvents (e.g., water, alcohols) stabilize the SN1 transition state and carbocation through hydrogen bonding but solvate anions, slowing SN2; polar aprotic solvents (e.g., DMSO, acetone) enhance SN2 rates by up to 10^6-fold for primary halides by leaving nucleophiles unsolvated, while minimally aiding SN1. Leaving group ability correlates with halide basicity, following the order I⁻ > Br⁻ > Cl⁻ > F⁻, as iodide's weaker C–I bond (bond dissociation energy ~234 kJ/mol vs. 485 kJ/mol for C–F) and lower basicity facilitate departure, with rate enhancements of 10^4–10^5 for iodides over fluorides in substitution kinetics.
FactorSN2SN1
KineticsSecond-order: rate = k [RX][Nu]First-order: rate = k [RX]
InversionRacemization (partial)
Substrate PreferencePrimary > secondary >> tertiaryTertiary > secondary >> primary
Strong, good nucleofugicityWeak, often solvent
Polar aproticPolar protic
Leaving Group EffectModerate; better groups accelerate bothPronounced; stabilizes carbocation formation

Elimination Reactions

Elimination reactions of haloalkanes typically involve β-dehydrohalogenation, where a base abstracts a β-hydrogen, leading to the formation of an and expulsion of the halide ion. These reactions are key for synthesizing s from saturated halides and proceed predominantly via the E2 or E1 mechanisms, with the pathway determined by factors such as substrate structure, base strength, polarity, and temperature. Strong, non-nucleophilic bases generally promote E2 elimination, while weaker bases in ionizing s favor E1. The E2 mechanism is a single-step, concerted bimolecular process characterized by second-order kinetics, where the rate depends on both the haloalkane and base concentrations. It requires anti-periplanar alignment of the β-hydrogen and for optimal p-orbital overlap during the , often necessitating a staggered conformation in acyclic systems or axial positioning in cyclohexyl halides. This ensures efficient elimination, with the base strength playing a crucial role—stronger bases like alkoxides or ions accelerate the process by enhancing hydrogen abstraction. In E2 reactions, follows Zaitsev's rule, favoring the more substituted (thermodynamically more stable) as the major product, as the resembles the product and benefits from and inductive stabilization in the more alkylated . Exceptions occur with bulky bases, which sterically hinder access to more substituted β-hydrogens, leading to Hofmann products. The E1 mechanism, in contrast, is a stepwise unimolecular with kinetics, rate-dependent solely on the haloalkane concentration, as the rate-determining step involves spontaneous departure of the to form a intermediate. This intermediate, being planar and achiral, allows from adjacent carbons, again adhering to Zaitsev's rule due to preferential loss of from the most substituted β-position to yield the more stable . E1 is favored for tertiary haloalkanes or secondary ones in polar protic solvents like alcohols or , which stabilize the ionic intermediate through , and with weaker bases that cannot effectively compete in E2 pathways; elevated temperatures further shift equilibrium toward elimination by increasing .

Organometallic and Radical Reactions

Haloalkanes react with magnesium metal in anhydrous to form Grignard reagents, represented as RMgX, where R denotes the and X the (typically or ). This proceeds via a radical initiation step involving , followed by coupling on the magnesium surface, yielding highly nucleophilic organomagnesium species stable in solvents. Grignard reagents from primary and secondary haloalkanes enable carbon-carbon bond formation through addition to electrophiles; for example, reaction with produces primary alcohols, while ketones yield tertiary alcohols after , facilitating the synthesis of complex organic molecules in multistep sequences. The Wurtz coupling reaction couples two molecules using sodium metal in dry , forming a symmetrical via 2RX + 2Na → R-R + 2NaX. This process, effective primarily for primary alkyl bromides or iodides, operates through a radical mechanism: sodium donates an electron to the haloalkane, generating an alkyl radical that dimerizes, though elimination side reactions produce alkenes and reduce yields to 50-70% in optimized cases. Limitations include inability to form unsymmetrical alkanes without mixtures and incompatibility with tertiary or aryl halides due to steric hindrance and competing reductions. Recent advances employ haloalkanes in photocatalytic radical reactions for olefin difunctionalization, leveraging visible-light to generate haloalkyl radicals. In a 2023 protocol, haloalkyl radicals, initiated from haloalkanes via single-electron reduction, add intermolecularly to unactivated alkenes in three-component couplings with nucleophiles, achieving alkylcarbofunctionalization with yields up to 90% under mild conditions using or organic photocatalysts. Similarly, a 2025 method exploits haloalkanes to drive dichotomous aryl radical reactivity, enabling halogen-atom transfer for olefin arylalkylation or hydrogen-atom transfer for cascade functionalizations, with broad substrate scope including styrenes and dienes, demonstrating selectivity via energy-transfer mechanisms. These metal-free or low-metal approaches circumvent traditional radical initiators, offering scalable routes to functionalized alkanes with minimal byproducts.

Applications

Industrial Production and Uses

Dichloromethane, produced via sequential chlorination of followed by , achieves global output of approximately 1 million metric tons annually, representing a significant portion of production efficiencies that have scaled with integration. Its primary industrial uses include applications in pharmaceutical processing (accounting for over 50% of demand) and formulations, where its low and solvency enable high-throughput extraction and purification steps. Chloroform, similarly derived from methane chlorination, yields around 757,000 metric tons per year worldwide, with production optimized for by-product recycling in integrated facilities. It serves as a key intermediate in hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) synthesis, particularly HCFC-22 for systems, and as a in pharmaceutical and production, contributing to cost-effective scaling in these sectors prior to HCFC phase-downs. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), historically manufactured through fluorination of chlorinated hydrocarbons, peaked at over 1 million metric tons annually in the , driving economic growth in cooling technologies via their stability and non-flammability. These compounds underpinned and industries until the 1990s phase-out under the , after which production ceased globally by 2010, shifting market dynamics toward alternatives while legacy stocks sustained transitional uses. Brominated haloalkanes, such as those in tetrabromomethane derivatives, support production estimated at 200,000–300,000 metric tons yearly, integrated into polymers for and to meet standards with minimal impact on material performance. Organochlorine pesticides like , produced via chlorination of , reached peaks exceeding 100,000 metric tons annually mid-20th century, enabling efficient that reduced incidence by up to 90% in targeted regions through persistent insecticidal action.

Role in Organic Synthesis

Haloalkanes function as versatile electrophilic intermediates in , primarily through reactions that enable the construction of carbon-oxygen and carbon-nitrogen bonds. In the , primary alkyl halides undergo SN2 displacement by alkoxide ions derived from alcohols, yielding symmetrical or unsymmetrical ethers under basic conditions; this method favors unhindered primary halides to minimize elimination side products. Similarly, the utilizes potassium as a nucleophile to alkylate primary or secondary alkyl halides, followed by hydrazinolysis or to liberate primary amines while avoiding over-alkylation common in direct routes. Beyond substitution, haloalkanes serve as precursors for organometallic reagents that facilitate carbon-carbon bond formation. Treatment of alkyl halides with magnesium metal generates Grignard reagents (RMgX), which act as strong nucleophiles to add to aldehydes, ketones, or other electrophiles, extending carbon chains in a controlled manner; the reaction requires anhydrous conditions to prevent by protic . Haloalkanes also participate in transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, expanding their utility in complex molecule assembly. complexes enable the coupling of alkyl halides with organozinc, organoboron, or other partners via , , and cycles, overcoming challenges like β-hydride elimination; these methods gained prominence from the 1970s onward with advancements in design for efficient alkyl activation.

Emerging Technological Applications

Tertiary alkyl halides function as dual growth activators and inhibitors in advanced (ALD) techniques for producing low-resistivity (TiN) thin films. A 2021 investigation demonstrated their use in self-limiting processes that enable deposition at temperatures below 200°C, yielding TiN films with resistivities around 100 μΩ·cm and enhanced conformality on high-aspect-ratio structures. This innovation improves upon conventional ALD by mitigating precursor inefficiencies, supporting applications in next-generation such as interconnect barriers and capacitors. Haloalkynes, bearing halogen atoms on carbon-carbon triple bonds, emerge as versatile in modern synthetic protocols for assembling intricate molecular scaffolds. A analysis underscores their multitasking utility as simultaneous alkynylation and agents, enabling regioselective cycloadditions, couplings, and functionalizations to yield diverse heterocycles and alkynes. These transformations, often catalyzed by metals like or , facilitate concise routes to building blocks for bioactive molecules and functional materials, with potential extensions to optoelectronic components via precise halogen placement.

Environmental Impact

Persistence and Bioaccumulation

Haloalkanes display environmental persistence that varies with molecular structure, halogen count, and environmental compartment, but empirical measurements indicate short atmospheric lifetimes for many simple congeners, mitigating long-term accumulation risks. (CH₃Cl), a naturally abundant haloalkane, has an atmospheric lifetime of approximately 0.9–1.2 years, driven primarily by oxidation via tropospheric hydroxyl (OH) radicals. (CH₂Cl₂) persists for about 0.4 years in the atmosphere under similar oxidative conditions, while (CHCl₃) exhibits a lifetime of roughly 0.5 years. These half-lives, derived from kinetic models and field observations, underscore that atmospheric rather than indefinite persistence governs the fate of volatile haloalkanes, with global burdens remaining low despite industrial emissions. Volatilization further limits persistence in aqueous and soil phases, as haloalkanes' high vapor pressures facilitate rapid transfer to air, where degradation occurs. For instance, chloromethane volatilizes readily from surface waters, with estimated air-water partitioning favoring the gas phase and contributing to its short overall environmental residence time. Hydrolysis in neutral water proceeds slowly for many haloalkanes, with half-lives often exceeding 100 years at 25°C and pH 7, though this pathway is secondary to atmospheric sinks for volatile species. Measured release data from solvent applications reveal that despite substantial historical use, steady-state concentrations reflect efficient natural removal processes rather than unchecked buildup. Bioaccumulation potential is generally low for simple haloalkanes due to rapid and , but increases with chlorination degree and in polyhaloalkanes. Short-chain , for example, exhibit factors (BCF) exceeding 5,000 in tissues, attributable to high log Kow values promoting partitioning into . However, such compounds represent niche industrial uses with quantified low-volume releases, where causal analysis prioritizes their utility in and stabilization against documented environmental loadings, which empirical monitoring shows do not lead to widespread trophic magnification in most ecosystems.

Degradation Pathways and Byproducts

Haloalkanes undergo abiotic degradation primarily in the atmosphere via reaction with hydroxyl (OH) radicals, which abstract hydrogen atoms to form alkyl radicals that subsequently react with O2, leading to oxygenated byproducts such as aldehydes, ketones, and carboxylic acids, along with hydrohalic acids (HX). For compounds absorbing ultraviolet radiation, photolysis directly cleaves carbon-halogen bonds, producing halogen atoms and alkyl radicals that propagate further oxidation chains. Kinetic studies indicate OH reaction rate constants for short-chain haloalkanes like (CH3Cl) on the order of 10^{-14} cm³ molecule^{-1} s^{-1} at 298 K, driving tropospheric lifetimes of weeks to months depending on the substitution pattern. In anaerobic subsurface environments, abiotic reductive occurs via from zero-valent iron or other reductants, sequentially replacing with hydrogen to yield less chlorinated or parent alkanes as byproducts. These pathways often compete with biotic processes and can generate vicinal dihalides as transient intermediates before full . Biotic degradation relies on microbial such as haloalkane dehalogenases, which hydrolyze the carbon- bond in a mechanism (SN2 for primary substrates), producing the corresponding primary or secondary alcohol and . These , structurally belonging to the α/β-hydrolase fold superfamily and found in bacteria including rhodochrous and , facilitate haloalkane utilization as sole carbon sources under aerobic conditions, with byproducts including salts and, upon further metabolism, CO2. rates vary with enzyme specificity; for instance, DbjA from exhibits k_cat values up to 10 s^{-1} for 1-bromohexane. Advanced oxidation processes, such as photo-Fenton-like reactions involving Fe(III) and H2O2, can degrade haloalkanes in aqueous media via hydroxyl radical attack, but recent investigations highlight potential formation of unintended alkyl halide byproducts from concurrent carboxylic acid intermediates under halide-rich conditions. This underscores incomplete mineralization risks, where partial dehalogenation yields persistent organohalides alongside desired alcohols and carbonyls.

Regulatory Frameworks and Alternatives

The , adopted on September 16, 1987, established binding phase-out schedules for chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other ozone-depleting haloalkanes, with developed nations required to reduce production by 50% by 1998 and achieve near-total elimination by 2000. Full implementation has resulted in over 99% reduction in global emissions of ozone-depleting substances since 1989, correlating with empirical signs of stratospheric ozone recovery, including a 20% increase in column ozone over since 2000 and progression toward 1980 baseline levels by mid-century. This framework's success stems from verifiable causal links between haloalkane emissions and catalytic ozone destruction cycles, though critics note initial compliance costs exceeded $2 trillion globally in foregone refrigeration efficiencies before alternatives scaled. The 2016 Kigali Amendment to the Protocol extended phase-downs to hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), potent greenhouse haloalkanes exempt from earlier rules, targeting 80-85% reductions by 2047 for developed parties starting in 2019. , the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of December 2020 mandates an 85% HFC production cut by 2036 relative to 2011-2013 baselines, with EPA rules restricting high-GWP variants (e.g., HFC-134a at 1,430 GWP) in sectors like while allowing sector-based allocations. Economic analyses project net benefits of $1.7 billion annually by 2022 from avoided climate damages, yet compliance imposes recordkeeping costs and disruptions, prompting 2025 EPA proposals to extend timelines and exempt certain uses to curb industry burdens estimated in billions. In the , REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 restricts persistent fluorinated haloalkanes, including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); for instance, C9-C14 perfluorocarboxylic acids and precursors were banned in manufacturing and imports exceeding 0.025% w/w since February 2023, with proposals for broader PFAS curbs covering over 10,000 compounds by 2025-2027. These measures prioritize substitution based on metrics over full risk-benefit analyses, raising concerns among stakeholders about innovation stifling and unproven alternatives' safety, as evidenced by over 5,600 public comments highlighting substitution feasibility gaps. Hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs), such as HFO-1234yf (GWP <1), serve as primary alternatives to HFCs in automotive and commercial cooling, offering 99%+ GWP reductions and compatibility with existing systems via drop-in blends. Their unsaturated bonds enhance atmospheric degradation, minimizing long-term warming, but mild flammability () requires enhanced and ventilation, increasing retrofit costs by 10-20% in some applications. While empirical field data affirm lower emissions footprints, potential byproducts from HFO breakdown pose unresolved aquatic concerns, and transition economics favor them only where regulatory penalties outweigh safety premiums. options like (GWP 3) provide zero-ODS, near-zero GWP profiles with superior thermodynamic efficiency but heightened explosion risks in larger systems, limiting adoption absent subsidies.

Health and Safety Considerations

Toxicological Profiles

Acute exposure to volatile haloalkanes often manifests as (CNS) depression, with effects including narcosis, incoordination, and anesthesia-like states at high concentrations. For instance, inhalation of halogenated hydrocarbons at levels ranging from 0.24% to over 80% in rats induces either CNS stimulation or depression within 10 minutes. exemplifies this, with an oral LD50 of 908 mg/kg in male rats, reflecting dose-dependent and cardiac arrhythmias above threshold exposures. Similarly, short-term inhalation of compounds like causes CNS depression at concentrations exceeding 1,000 ppm in humans. Chronic exposure to certain haloalkanes, particularly those metabolized to reactive intermediates, elevates risks of organ-specific damage and carcinogenicity, though effects are concentration-dependent and typically observed at elevated occupational levels. , a chlorinated ethene , induces hepatic in workers exposed to parts-per-million concentrations during production, with epidemiological data linking risks to cumulative doses far exceeding environmental backgrounds. confirm carcinogenicity at inhaled doses as low as 250 ppm, but human incidence correlates with prolonged high-exposure scenarios rather than trace levels. demonstrates via free radical formation, with thresholds evident in dose-response curves where low exposures yield no histopathological changes. Toxicity profiles vary by halogen, influenced by bond strength and metabolic susceptibility; fluoroalkanes generally exhibit inertness due to the robust carbon-fluorine bond, resulting in minimal acute effects and low systemic absorption even at high doses. In contrast, chloro- and bromoalkanes are more bioactivated by enzymes, yielding electrophilic metabolites that drive and , with brominated analogs often showing heightened potency in comparative assays. Iodoalkanes, while reactive, display intermediate profiles but limited chronic data beyond acute irritation.

Exposure Risks and Mitigation

Haloalkanes pose primary exposure risks via of vapors and dermal absorption in and industrial settings, where workers handle solvents like or during synthesis or cleaning operations. OSHA designates many haloalkanes with a "" notation, indicating significant cutaneous absorption that can contribute to systemic dose beyond inhaled amounts, necessitating prevention of direct contact to avoid exceeding permissible exposure limits (PELs). For , a common haloalkane, the OSHA PEL is 25 ppm as an 8-hour time-weighted average () with a 125 ppm (STEL) over 15 minutes, reflecting levels associated with reduced acute irritation and long-term effects when maintained. Mitigation prioritizes such as local exhaust ventilation and fume hoods to capture vapors at the source, maintaining airborne concentrations below PELs in enclosed workspaces. NIOSH and OSHA guidelines recommend monitoring exposure via personal sampling, with administrative measures like rotating shifts and prohibiting eating in handling areas to minimize cumulative risks; these controls have demonstrated effectiveness in industrial audits, where compliant ventilation systems reduced measured levels by over 90% in solvent degreasing operations. (PPE) includes chemical-resistant gloves (e.g., for short-term contact with chlorinated haloalkanes), safety goggles, and laboratory coats; supplied-air or NIOSH-approved half-facepieces with organic vapor cartridges are required when insufficiently limit exposures, as evidenced by post-incident analyses of methylene chloride-related overexposures in stripping tasks where inadequate ventilation led to peak levels exceeding 1,000 ppm, but use confined doses below thresholds. Workplace incident data underscore mitigation efficacy: prior to stricter OSHA enforcement, methylene chloride exposures in confined spaces like bathtub refinishing caused multiple fatalities from acute hypoxia, but implementation of PEL-compliant ventilation and PPE has correlated with a decline in reported overexposure cases, with NIOSH surveillance indicating fewer than 5% of monitored sites exceeding limits after controls. Regular training on spill response—using absorbents and evacuation rather than direct contact—further reduces secondary exposures, supported by laboratory hygiene plans that integrate these practices to sustain safe handling.

References

  1. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_%28Organic_Chemistry%29/Alkyl_Halides/Properties_of_Alkyl_Halides/Haloalkanes
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/haloalkane
  3. https://colapret.cm.utexas.edu/courses/Chap8.pdf
  4. https://chemistry.sdsu.edu/courses/CHEM130/chapters/130_chapter_07.pdf
  5. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Chemistry_for_Changing_Times_%28Hill_and_McCreary%29/09%253A_Organic_Chemistry/9.04%253A_Halogenated_Hydrocarbons-_Many_Uses_Some_Hazards
  6. https://senecalearning.com/en-GB/revision-notes/international-a-level/chemistry/cambridge-international/3-3-3-environmental-impacts-of-haloalkanes
  7. https://www.rroij.com/open-access/haloalkanes-balancing-benefits-and-risks-for-human-health-and-the-environment.pdf
  8. https://byjus.com/jee/alkyl-halide/
  9. https://byjus.com/chemistry/haloalkanes-haloarenes/
  10. https://labs.chem.ucsb.edu/zakarian/armen/11---bonddissociationenergy.pdf
  11. https://byjus.com/chemistry/freons-ddt-carbontetrachloride/
  12. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/chemistry/haloalkanes-and-haloarenes/
  13. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_%28Organic_Chemistry%29/Reactions/Substitution_Reactions/IV._Nucleophilic_Substitution_Reactions/A._Types_of_Halogenoalkanes
  14. https://www.chemguide.co.uk/mechanisms/nucsub/types.html
  15. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Map%253A_Organic_Chemistry_%28Wade%29_Complete_and_Semesters_I_and_II/Map%253A_Organic_Chemistry_%28Wade%29/03%253A_Functional_Groups_and_Nomenclature/3.05%253A_Haloalkane_-_Classification_and_Nomenclature
  16. http://rightfuture.weebly.com/uploads/1/5/8/1/15812910/chap-10-haloalkanes_and_haloalkenes.pdf
  17. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Map%253A_Organic_Chemistry_%28Wade%29_Complete_and_Semesters_I_and_II/Map%253A_Organic_Chemistry_%28Wade%29/07%253A_Alkyl_Halides-_Nucleophilic_Substitution_and_Elimination/7.09%253A_Characteristics_of_the_S1_Reaction
  18. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/07/13/the-sn1-mechanism/
  19. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/08/08/comparing-the-sn1-and-sn2-reactions/
  20. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed053p235
  21. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tcr.202400196
  22. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_(Morsch_et_al.)/10:_Organohalides/10.02:_Preparing_Alkyl_Halides_from_Alkanes_-_Radical_Halogenation
  23. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/om900088z
  24. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1912/grignard/biographical/
  25. https://www.lookchem.com/Chempedia/Chemical-Technology/3060.html
  26. https://www.wiredchemist.com/chemistry/data/bond_energies_lengths.html
  27. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/Map%3A_Chemistry_-_The_Central_Science_(Brown_et_al.)/08%3A_Basic_Concepts_of_Chemical_Bonding/8.04%3A_Bond_Polarity_and_Electronegativity
  28. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/chemistry/nomenclature-and-nature-of-c-x-bond/
  29. https://orgchemboulder.com/Spectroscopy/irtutor/alkhalidesir.shtml
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225974958_The_Equilibrium_C-Cl_C-Br_and_C-I_Bond_Lengths_from_Ab_Initio_Calculations_Microwave_and_Infrared_Spectroscopies_and_Empirical_Correlations
  31. https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C74839&Units=SI&Mask=660
  32. https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C74873&Mask=4
  33. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Dichloromethane
  34. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Chloroform
  35. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01540a056
  36. https://wissen.science-and-fun.de/chemistry/spectroscopy/13c-chemical-shifts/
  37. https://sceweb.sce.uhcl.edu/wang/orglab/IR.pdf
  38. https://www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/virttxtjml/spectrpy/massspec/masspec1.htm
  39. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-potsdam-organicchemistry/chapter/8-3-factors-affecting-rate-of-nucleophilic-substitution-reactions/
  40. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/07/04/the-sn2-mechanism/
  41. https://alpha.chem.umb.edu/chemistry/ch471/documents/PS3Solution.pdf
  42. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_%28Morsch_et_al.%29/11%253A_Reactions_of_Alkyl_Halides-_Nucleophilic_Substitutions_and_Eliminations/11.03%253A_Characteristics_of_the_SN2_Reaction
  43. https://homework.study.com/explanation/in-sn2-reactions-of-alkyl-halides-the-order-of-reactivity-is-ri-greater-than-rbr-greater-than-rcl-greater-than-rf-alkyl-iodides-are-considerably-more-reactive-than-alkyl-fluorides-often-by-factors-as-great-as-10-6-all-1-halo-2-4-dinitrobenzenes-howev.html
  44. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Brevard_College/CHE_202%253A_Organic_Chemistry_II/04%253A_Substitution_and_Elimination_reactions/4.07%253A_Factors_Affecting_the_SN1_Reaction
  45. https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/time-to-stop-mentioning-alkyl-group-inductive-effects/4020750.article
  46. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2011/03/11/3-factors-that-stabilize-carbocations/
  47. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/07/01/substituted-cyclohexanes-a-values/
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720380190
  49. http://apollo.eas.gatech.edu/yhw/publications/yoshida_etal_2004.pdf
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11539402/
  51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10659844/
  52. https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/10/5515/2010/acp-10-5515-2010.pdf
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498422000849
  54. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11892756.pdf
  55. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.3c00761
  56. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.31.606109v1.full-text
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211926424000900
  58. https://www.int-res.com/articles/meps2006/306/m306p087.pdf
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3148503/
  60. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.biochem.4c00720
  61. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41557-023-01390-z
  62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377361417_Accelerating_the_discovery_of_alkyl_halide-derived_natural_products_using_halide_depletion
  63. https://www.chem.ucalgary.ca/courses/351/WebContent/orgnom/halkanes/halkanes-01.html
  64. https://www.chemistrysteps.com/nomenclature-alkyl-halides/
  65. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_%28Morsch_et_al.%29/10%253A_Organohalides/10.01%253A_Names_and_Properties_of_Alkyl_Halides
  66. https://www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/virttxtjml/nomen1.htm
  67. https://www.chemistryworld.com/podcasts/carbon-tetrachloride/3005730.article
  68. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_I_%28Cortes%29/07%253A_Introduction_to_Organic_Chemistry/7.04%253A_Haloalkanes_or_Alkyl_Halides
  69. https://gml.noaa.gov/hats/publictn/elkins/cfcs.html
  70. https://iupac.org/who-we-are/our-history/
  71. https://learn.openochem.org/learn/first-semester-topics/alkyl-halides-and-alcohol/naming-alkyl-halides
  72. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_I_%28Liu%29/09%253A_Free_Radical_Substitution_Reaction_of_Alkanes/9.02%253A_Halogenation_Reaction_of_Alkanes
  73. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Purdue/Purdue%253A_Chem_26605%253A_Organic_Chemistry_II_%28Lipton%29/Chapter_15.__Reactions_of_Free_Radicals_and_Radical_Ions/15.1%253A_Free_Radical_Halogenation_of_Alkanes
  74. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/reaction-guide/free-radical-alkane-chlorination/
  75. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Map%253A_Organic_Chemistry_%28Wade%29_Complete_and_Semesters_I_and_II/Map%253A_Organic_Chemistry_%28Wade%29/05%253A_An_Introduction_to_Organic_Reactions_using_Free_Radical_Halogenation_of_Alkanes/5.10%253A_The_Free-Radical_Halogenation_of_Alkanes
  76. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2013/09/06/initiation-propagation-termination/
  77. https://www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/virttxtjml/funcrx1.htm
  78. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_I_%28Liu%29/09%253A_Free_Radical_Substitution_Reaction_of_Alkanes/9.04%253A_Chlorination_vs_Bromination
  79. https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/relative-reactivity-1-2-3-hydrogens-ch3-3cch2ch3-free-radical-chlorination-1-38-50-provide-q13728135
  80. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2013/10/31/selectivity-in-free-radical-reactions-bromine-vs-chlorine/
  81. https://www.chem.ucalgary.ca/courses/351/Carey5th/Ch04/ch4-4-4.html
  82. https://www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/virttxtjml/chapt8.htm
  83. http://colapret.cm.utexas.edu/courses/Chap6.pdf
  84. https://www.utdallas.edu/~scortes/ochem/OChem1_Lecture/Class_Materials/alkene_rxs1.pdf
  85. http://employees.oneonta.edu/knauerbr/221lects/alkenrxn.pdf
  86. https://crab.rutgers.edu/~alroche/Ch08.pdf
  87. http://www.columbia.edu/itc/chemistry/c3045/client_edit/ppt/PDF/06_14_17.pdf
  88. https://faculty.fiu.edu/~kellerl/SolomonsLKChapter8.pdf
  89. https://www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/virttxtjml/chapt9.htm
  90. https://roche.camden.rutgers.edu/files/Ch08.pdf
  91. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_%28Morsch_et_al.%29/10%253A_Organohalides/10.05%253A_Preparing_Alkyl_Halides_from_Alcohols
  92. https://openstax.org/books/organic-chemistry/pages/10-5-preparing-alkyl-halides-from-alcohols
  93. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/University_of_Illinois_Springfield/CHE_267%253A_Organic_Chemistry_I_%28Morsch%29/Chapters/Chapter_09%253A_Alcohols_Ethers_and_Epoxides/9.11%253A_Conversion_of_Alcohols_to_Alkyl_Halides_with_HX
  94. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Sonoma_State_University/SSU_Chem_335A/Material_for_Exam_3/Unit_10%253A_Organohalides/10.5_Preparing_Alkyl_Halides_from_Alcohols
  95. https://www.organic-chemistry.org/namedreactions/hunsdiecker-reaction.shtm
  96. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_%28Organic_Chemistry%29/Carboxylic_Acids/Reactivity_of_Carboxylic_Acids/Reactions_of_Carboxylic_Acids/Reduction_and_Oxidation_Reactions_of_Carboxylic_Acids
  97. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.202504478
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8659127/
  99. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00278
  100. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2021/cs/d0cs01551b
  101. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2214512120
  102. https://ocw.uci.edu/upload/files/chapter_7_chem_51a_f14.pdf
  103. https://web.pdx.edu/~wamserc/C334F99/8notes.htm
  104. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/AnS/Chemistry/Rizzo/chem220a/Ch11slides.pdf
  105. https://crab.rutgers.edu/~alroche/Ch06.pdf
  106. https://kpu.pressbooks.pub/organicchemistry/chapter/7-5-comparison-between-sn1-and-sn2-reactions/
  107. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Chabot_College/Chem_12A%253A_Organic_Chemistry_Fall_2022/09%253A_Elimination_Reactions/9.07%253A_Comparison_of_E1_and_E2_Reactions
  108. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/10/10/comparing-the-e1-and-e2-reactions/
  109. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Map%253A_Organic_Chemistry_%28Wade%29_Complete_and_Semesters_I_and_II/Map%253A_Organic_Chemistry_%28Wade%29/07%253A_Alkyl_Halides-_Nucleophilic_Substitution_and_Elimination/7.18%253A_Comparison_of_E1_and_E2_Reactions
  110. https://www.chem.uci.edu/files/smith_textbook/smi96656_c08_001_030.pdf
  111. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_%28Morsch_et_al.%29/11%253A_Reactions_of_Alkyl_Halides-_Nucleophilic_Substitutions_and_Eliminations/11.07%253A_Elimination_Reactions-_Zaitsev%27s_Rule
  112. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/08/31/elimination-reactions-2-zaitsevs-rule/
  113. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2012/09/19/the-e1-reaction/
  114. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/grignard-reagent
  115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/wurtz-reaction
  116. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37470716/
  117. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/cc/d4cc06592a
  118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/dichloromethane
  119. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44339-024-00012-8
  120. https://www.chemanalyst.com/industry-report/chloroform-market-2938
  121. https://ozone.unep.org/story-behind-unexpected-emissions-cfc-11
  122. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/bromine-flame-retardant-market
  123. https://www.indexbox.io/blog/chloroform-world-market-overview-2024-3/
  124. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2014/10/24/the-williamson-ether-synthesis/
  125. https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2018/01/31/the-gabriel-synthesis/
  126. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_%28Organic_Chemistry%29/Amines/Synthesis_of_Amines/Gabriel_Synthesis
  127. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_%28Morsch_et_al.%29/10%253A_Organohalides/10.06%253A_Reactions_of_Alkyl_Halides_-_Grignard_Reagents
  128. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_%28Organic_Chemistry%29/Aldehydes_and_Ketones/Synthesis_of_Aldehydes_and_Ketones/Grignard_Reagents
  129. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2011/cs/c1cs15129k
  130. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.4c02573
  131. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/adv/article/11/1/015218/1070085/Tertiary-alkyl-halides-as-growth-activator-and
  132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040403924003241
  133. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxguides/toxguide-106.pdf
  134. https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/1703/2019/
  135. https://www.chlorinated-solvents.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Dichloromethane-paper.pdf
  136. https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/6/2847/2006/acp-6-2847-2006.pdf
  137. https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00298.x
  138. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es404008g
  139. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4376206/
  140. https://csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/1994/chapters/chapter12.pdf
  141. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA351167.pdf
  142. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/bi9913855
  143. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/AEM.66.1.219-222.2000
  144. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959440X03001672
  145. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135423002774
  146. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969722054808
  147. https://www.epa.gov/ozone-layer-protection/international-treaties-and-cooperation-about-protection-stratospheric-ozone
  148. https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/emissions-of-substances-that-deplete-the-ozone-layer-have-fallen-by-more-than-99-since-1989
  149. https://csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/2022/executivesummary/
  150. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1817831/
  151. https://www.epa.gov/ozone-layer-protection/recent-international-developments-under-montreal-protocol
  152. https://www.epa.gov/climate-hfcs-reduction/background-hfcs-and-aim-act
  153. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/10/24/2023-22529/phasedown-of-hydrofluorocarbons-restrictions-on-the-use-of-certain-hydrofluorocarbons-under-the
  154. https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0044-0223
  155. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-proposes-reforming-biden-technology-transitions-rule-lower-costs-american-families
  156. https://echa.europa.eu/hot-topics/perfluoroalkyl-chemicals-pfas
  157. https://www.lawbc.com/echa-publishes-updated-reach-restriction-proposal-for-pfas/
  158. https://www.actagroup.com/ec-adopts-reach-restriction-for-pfhxa-and-related-substances/
  159. https://www.danfoss.com/en/about-danfoss/our-businesses/cooling/refrigerants-and-energy-efficiency/refrigerants-for-lowering-the-gwp/
  160. https://www.thetrainingcenter.com/hfo-hfc-whats-really-the-difference
  161. https://www.coolingpost.com/features/low-gwp-alternatives-the-pros-and-cons/
  162. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014070072030459X
  163. https://www.turi.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025-Refrigerant-Report-041025-FINAL.pdf
  164. https://www.carel.com/blog/-/blogs/pros-and-cons-of-hydrocarbons-as-refrigerants
  165. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7173904/
  166. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/SA/en/sds/SIAL/288306
  167. https://oehha.ca.gov/sites/default/files/media/downloads/crnr/appendixd2final.pdf
  168. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/substances/vinyl-chloride
  169. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/late-lessons-2/late-lessons-chapters/late-lessons-ii-chapter-8
  170. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12708612/
  171. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/580560
  172. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041008X99986982
  173. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318028334_Comparative_toxicity_of_chloro-_and_bromo-nitromethanes_in_mice_based_on_a_metabolomic_method
  174. https://www.osha.gov/dermal-exposure
  175. https://www.osha.gov/surface-contamination
  176. https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/572
  177. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/osha3144.pdf
  178. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0414.html
  179. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3404laboratory-safety-guidance.pdf
  180. https://www.elcosh.org/document/3657/d001199/OSHANIOSH%2BAlert%25253A%2BMethylene%2BChloride%2BHazards%2Bfor%2BBathtub%2BRefinishers.html
  181. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/idlh/75092.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.