Hubbry Logo
Cured fishCured fishMain
Open search
Cured fish
Community hub
Cured fish
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cured fish
Cured fish
Cured fish
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Equipment for curing fish used by the North Carolina Algonquins, 1585

Cured fish is fish which has been cured by subjecting it to fermentation, pickling, smoking, or some combination of these before it is eaten. These food preservation processes can include adding salt, nitrates, nitrite[1] or sugar, can involve smoking and flavoring the fish, and may include cooking it. The earliest form of curing fish was dehydration.[1] Other methods, such as smoking fish or salt-curing also go back for thousands of years. The term "cure" is derived from the Latin curare, meaning to take care of. It was first recorded in reference to fish in 1743.[2]

History

[edit]

Salt is "the oldest and best known of preserving agents... its chief action appears to be due to its power of attracting moisture, and thus extracting fluid to harden the tissues"

– Edward Smith, 1873 [3]

According to Binkerd and Kolari (1975), the practice of preserving meat by salting it originated in Asian deserts.[4] "Saline salts from this area contained impurities such as nitrates that contributed to the characteristic red colour of cured meats. As early as 3,000 BC in Mesopotamia, cooked meats and fish were preserved in sesame oil and dried salted meat and fish were part of the Sumerian diet. Salt from the Dead Sea was in use by Jewish inhabitants around 1,600 BC, and by 1,200 BC, the Phoenicians were trading salted fish in the Eastern Mediterranean region. By 900 BC, salt was being produced in "salt gardens" in Greece and dry salt curing and smoking of meat were well established. The Romans (200 BC) acquired curing procedures from the Greeks and further developed methods to "pickle" various kinds of meats in a brine marinade. It was during this time that the reddening effect of salting was noted. Saltpeter (potassium nitrate) is mentioned as being gathered in China and India prior to the Christian era for use in meat curing... In medieval times, the application of salt and saltpeter as curing ingredients was commonplace and the reddening effect on meat was attributed to saltpeter."[3]

Salt curing

[edit]
Salmon prepared for curing
See also: Salted fish

Salt (sodium chloride) is a primary ingredient used to cure fish and other foods.[5] Removal of water and addition of salt to fish creates a solute-rich environment where osmotic pressure draws water out of microorganisms, retarding their growth.[5][6] Doing this requires a concentration of salt of nearly 20%.[6] Iodized table salt may be used, but the iodine generally causes a dark end product and a bitter taste. Non-iodized salts like those used for canning and pickling foods and sea salt are the preferred types of salt to use for curing meats.

Sugar curing

[edit]

Sugar is sometimes added when curing fish, particularly salmon. The sugar can take many forms, including honey, corn syrup solids, and maple syrup.[7] Adding sugar alleviates the harsh flavor of the salt.[5] It also contributes to the growth of beneficial bacteria like Lactobacillus by feeding them.[8]

Nitrates and nitrites

[edit]

Nitrates and nitrites have been used for hundreds of years to prevent botulism in fish and ensure microbial safety. Nitrates help kill bacteria, produce a characteristic flavor, and give fish a pink or red color.[9] Nitrite is commonly used to speed up the curing of meat and also impart an attractive colour while having no effect on the growth of the Clostridium botulinum bacteria which causes botulism.[10][11]

The use of nitrates in food preservation is controversial, and some traditional and artisanal producers avoid using them. This is due to the potential for the formation of nitrosamines when the preserved food is cooked at high temperature.[9] However, the production of carcinogenic nitrosamines can be potently inhibited by the use of the antioxidants Vitamin C and the alpha-tocopherol form of Vitamin E during curing. A 2007 study by Columbia University suggests a link between eating cured meats and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nitrites were posited as a possible cause.[12] The use of either compound is carefully regulated.[9] For example, the FDA Code of Federal Regulations states that sodium nitrite may be safely used: "As a color fixative in smoked cured tunafish products so that the level of sodium nitrite does not exceed 10 parts per million (0.001 percent) in the finished product... As a preservative and color fixative, with or without sodium nitrate, in smoked, cured sablefish, smoked, cured salmon, and smoked, cured shad so that the level of sodium nitrite does not exceed 200 parts per million and the level of sodium nitrate does not exceed 500 parts per million in the finished product."[13]

Smoking

[edit]
Main article: Smoked fish

Fish can also be preserved by smoking, which is drying the fish with smoke from burning or smoldering plant materials, usually wood. Smoking helps seal the outer layer of the food being cured, making it more difficult for bacteria to enter. It can be done in combination with other curing methods such as salting. Common smoking styles include hot smoking, smoke roasting and cold smoking. Smoke roasting and hot smoking cook the fish while cold smoking does not. If the fish is cold smoked, it should be dried quickly to limit bacterial growth during the critical period where the fish is not yet dry. This can be achieved by drying thin slices of fish.

Cured fish dishes

[edit]
For a list of fermented fish dishes, see Fermented fish.
See also: List of smoked foods § Fish

Europe

[edit]

Africa

[edit]

East Asia

[edit]

Southeast Asia

[edit]

South America

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cured fish

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cured encompasses fish preserved through techniques such as salting, , , , or , which lower to suppress bacterial proliferation and enzymatic degradation, thereby extending without reliance on modern . These methods draw moisture from the fish via induced by salt or sugars, often combined with controlled exposure to air or smoke for enhanced preservation and flavor development. Salting, one of the earliest documented approaches, dates to Roman production of bacalao or salt cod, facilitating storage and transport in pre-refrigeration eras and enabling extensive trade networks. Cured products like dried fish exhibit concentrated nutritional profiles, boasting elevated protein levels—typically 50-80% on a dry basis—alongside essential minerals, vitamins, and lipids including omega-3 fatty acids, though they carry elevated sodium content that necessitates moderation in consumption. Beyond basic preservation, curing imparts distinctive textures and flavors through partial and Maillard reactions during drying or smoking, rendering products such as or kippers staples in global cuisines while posing risks like formation if temperatures fluctuate improperly during processing. Empirical assessments confirm that properly cured fish maintains microbial stability for months, supporting in regions with limited infrastructure, yet underscore the need for hygiene to avert pathogens like in low-acid environments.

History

Ancient Origins and Traditional Practices

The earliest archaeological evidence for fish preservation through fermentation dates to the period in southern , approximately 10,200 to 9,550 years ago, where pits lined with pine bark contained dense layers of fish bones suggesting controlled anaerobic to extend . This method relied on natural to lower and inhibit spoilage organisms, marking an initial step beyond immediate consumption or simple drying. Drying emerged as another foundational technique, though direct archaeological traces are scarce due to the perishability of wooden racks or screens used for sun or air exposure; indirect evidence includes fish bone assemblages from sites like in the northern Black Sea region around the 5th century BCE, interpreted as remnants of dried products. In arid regions such as Mleiha in southeastern Arabia during antiquity, sun-drying of is evidenced by preserved remains, exploiting low humidity to reduce moisture content below levels supporting microbial growth. Salting practices originated in the and Mediterranean, with textual accounts from in the 5th century BCE describing consuming raw sun-dried or brined fish, a method likely predating this record given Pharaonic traditions like , a salted and fermented mullet dish tied to flood cycles from at least 2000 BCE. Archaeological confirmation appears in Phoenician colonial sites from the 8th to 6th centuries BCE, where mass salting of species like occurred in vats, facilitating trade across the Mediterranean. By the late 5th century BCE, Punic facilities in Gades (modern Cadiz) produced salted fish evidenced by amphorae and bones, evolving into larger Roman cetariae complexes with capacities exceeding 200 m³ by the 1st century BCE. Traditional practices varied by environment but centered on osmosis-driven via salt, often combined with or ; in , persisted alongside light salting and burial in pits, while coastal communities layered gutted with coarse salt in barrels for dry-curing or immersed them in , achieving preservation through reduction below 0.75. , inferred from and deposits in 4th-3rd century BCE pits at Elizavetovka, added and facilitated in cooler climates. These methods enabled surplus storage for months, supporting seasonal booms without .

Medieval to Industrial Evolution

In medieval , particularly , the production of —air-dried and ling—emerged as a cornerstone of fish curing, leveraging cold winds to dehydrate fish split open and hung on wooden racks, achieving preservation without salt for up to several years. This method, evidenced in Norse sagas with the oldest manuscript references dating to around 1240, supported extensive trade networks, including exports to the markets in and the Mediterranean, where demand surged due to Catholic fasting requirements limiting meat consumption on over 150 days annually. Southern European innovations, such as Basque and salting of using imported Mediterranean sea salt, gained prominence by the 14th to 15th centuries, producing denser, barrel-packed products like that withstood longer voyages and higher humidity than . These heavy-salting techniques, involving layering fish with dry salt to draw out moisture via , enabled the provisioning of exploratory fleets; for instance, voyages to the Grand Banks around 1500 relied on such cured for crews, fostering a linking Newfoundland fisheries to Iberian ports and African salt sources. By the 16th to 17th centuries, Dutch advancements in curing introduced onboard processing, including rapid gutting and light salting in barrels to prevent spoilage during extended voyages, scaling production to millions of barrels annually and integrating curing into proto-industrial ship-based operations resembling assembly lines. The 18th and 19th centuries marked a shift toward industrialized curing through shore-based facilities in colonial outposts like and Newfoundland, where resident fisherfolk and merchants processed via standardized dry- and wet-salting in larger volumes—exporting over 200,000 tons annually from by the early 1800s—supported by abundant cheap salt from Caribbean evaporation ponds. While core osmotic and principles persisted, mechanized splitting tools and steam-powered drying racks emerged in late-19th-century establishments, boosting efficiency but preceding refrigeration's dominance after , which curtailed but did not eliminate cured fish output.

Twentieth-Century Standardization and Global Trade

In the early twentieth century, cured fish production remained significant but began declining relative to fresh and frozen alternatives as technologies advanced, enabling longer without salting or . In the United States, cured fish output peaked at approximately 187 million pounds in 1908, valued at $11 million, but fell to 97 million pounds by 1940 despite a value increase to $14.2 million, reflecting a shift toward and freezing. Newfoundland's salt cod production averaged around 70,000 metric tons annually in the 1920s, dropping to 54,000 tons in the 1930s amid quality inconsistencies that eroded European markets by 1914, prompting a pivot to less discerning buyers in the and . disrupted transatlantic shipping, further favoring "wet" salting methods that allowed faster processing but required destination , as seen in Icelandic exports to and . Standardization efforts intensified post-World War II to address variability in curing techniques and ensure amid expanding . In Newfoundland, the formation of the Newfoundland Associated Fish Exporters Ltd. (NAFEL) in 1947 and the Canadian Saltfish Corporation in 1970 introduced centralized processing plants that enforced uniform grading, salting, and drying protocols, improving product consistency for export. Globally, the Codex Alimentarius Commission established the Standard for Salted Fish and Dried Salted Fish of the Family (Codex Stan 167-1989) in 1989, specifying requirements for salt saturation, moisture content, hygiene, and absence of defects like nematode larvae to facilitate harmonized trade regulations. These measures countered earlier criticisms of inconsistent quality, such as those noted in 1933 European inspections of Newfoundland fish, where improper curing led to spoilage complaints. Global trade in cured fish persisted in niche markets despite overall contraction, with key flows from North Atlantic producers like , , and to importers in , the , and . By , emerged as a major cured fish producer with over 1.2 billion pounds annually, while Newfoundland's exports shifted: accounted for 67% in the 1920s but only 36% by 1935-1939, with the rising to 40%. By 1950, Newfoundland exported 938,000 quintals, but salted cod's share of landings fell below 9% by 1990 due to frozen fish competition and overfishing moratoriums like the 1992 cod ban. Trade volumes reflected cultural preferences, such as Portugal's demand for , sustaining dried salted imports despite technological disruptions.

Scientific Foundations

Biochemical and Osmotic Mechanisms

Salt curing of primarily relies on to reduce in the tissue, creating a hypertonic environment that draws moisture from the fish muscle and microbial cells via across semi-permeable membranes. When is exposed to high concentrations of (typically 15-25% by weight), water migrates outward from the intracellular spaces, leading to and shrinkage of muscle fibers, with studies showing up to 20-30% in water content during initial salting phases. This process lowers the water activity (a_w) below 0.75, inhibiting the growth of most spoilage and enzymes that require higher moisture levels for activity. Biochemically, salt induces protein denaturation in myofibrils, particularly and , by disrupting electrostatic bonds and promoting solubilization of sarcoplasmic proteins, which alters texture from firm to more gel-like during ripening. Sodium ions penetrate the muscle lattice, increasing and causing partial unfolding of proteins, as evidenced by reduced extractable protein fractions in salted samples compared to fresh tissue. This denaturation, coupled with a drop in pH (often to 5.5-6.0 due to from limited ), further stabilizes the matrix against autolysis, though excessive salting can lead to over-denaturation and toughening. The combined osmotic and biochemical effects also disrupt by plasmolyzing cells and inhibiting key enzymes like proteases and lipases, reducing oxidation rates by 50-70% in salted versus unsalted . However, incomplete can allow halophilic to persist, necessitating controlled salt gradients (e.g., 60-100° ) to optimize without fostering resistant strains. These mechanisms underpin the preservation efficacy, with empirical data from diffusion models confirming salt ingress rates of 0.1-0.5 cm/day in fillets under saturated conditions.

Microbiology and Pathogen Control

Cured fish preservation relies on reducing (a_w) through salting, which inhibits microbial proliferation by osmotic stress, dehydrating bacterial cells and preventing spore germination; typical salt levels achieve a_w below 0.90, suppressing pathogens like and spoilage organisms such as spp. Smoking complements this by introducing phenolic compounds and from wood smoke, which disrupt microbial cell membranes and enzyme function, further reducing viable counts of . In cold-smoked products, where internal temperatures rarely exceed 30°C, these combined hurdles prevent outgrowth but do not always achieve lethality, necessitating strict to minimize initial contamination. Clostridium botulinum type E, prevalent in aquatic environments, poses a toxigenic risk in anaerobic conditions like vacuum-packaged ; nonproteolytic strains germinate at temperatures (3–30°C) if a_w exceeds 0.94 and is above 5.0. Nitrites (from added or reduction) inhibit this by generating , which binds proteins essential for outgrowth, with effective levels of 100–200 ppm in providing a barrier against toxigenesis in cold-smoked stored at 5°C. Hot-smoking (above 60°C core for 30 minutes) inactivates vegetative cells and some spores, though reliance on nitrites persists for residual risk, as validated in FDA guidelines. Listeria monocytogenes survives dry-curing if salt penetration is uneven, allowing localized growth during early stages before a_w drops sufficiently; challenge tests show counts can increase by 1–2 log CFU/g if curing exceeds 48 hours at ambient humidity without rapid dehydration. Fermentation variants introduce lactic acid bacteria that produce bacteriocins, competitively excluding pathogens via pH reduction to below 4.6, though empirical data indicate variable efficacy against Listeria in salted matrices. Pathogen control integrates Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP), monitoring brine strength (>16% NaCl), smoking time-temperature profiles, and post-process refrigeration at ≤4°C to limit histamine-forming Morganella spp. and ensure shelf-life stability. Parasitic risks, such as Anisakis larvae, are mitigated by pre-cure freezing to -20°C for 7 days, aligning with FDA recommendations for raw-derived cured products.

Preservation Techniques

Salt Curing Processes

Salt curing of involves the application of to reduce in the flesh through , thereby inhibiting microbial growth and enzymatic activity. The process exploits the hygroscopic nature of salt, which draws moisture from the tissue, concentrating solutes and lowering the (Aw) to levels typically below 0.85, where most spoilage cannot proliferate. muscle, containing 75-80% , achieves effective preservation when salt penetrates to reach 6-10% concentration in the tissue, often combined with to further reduce Aw to 0.75 or lower. Dry salting entails layering clean, gutted with dry salt, allowing the formation and drainage of as water exudes from the flesh under . Salt application rates commonly range from 20-30% of the 's weight, depending on and desired product firmness, with lean like requiring higher ratios to prevent spoilage. The process duration varies from 24 hours for small to several days for larger ones, during which salt diffuses inward while excess moisture drains, yielding a firm, concentrated product suitable for long-term storage or further . This method, rooted in ancient practices, remains prevalent for products like salt , where uniform salt distribution is achieved by periodic repositioning of layers. Brine salting, or wet curing, submerges in a saltwater solution, typically at 15-25% salt concentration, to achieve similar but with more even penetration for fatty species like or . Immersion times range from hours to days, influenced by strength and fish thickness; for instance, a 20% may cure fillets in 12-24 hours. Equilibrium is reached when salt content in the fish matches the , preventing over-salting, though monitoring and temperature (ideally 0-5°C) is essential to control bacterial risks during . Pickle salting variants incorporate mild acids alongside salt for enhanced flavor and preservation, but pure salt suffice for microbial control via alone. Factors influencing efficacy include fish freshness, salt purity (food-grade, non-iodized preferred to avoid discoloration), and post-curing rinsing to adjust for palatability. Lean fish cure faster due to lower fat barriers to , while high-fat species may require longer exposure to attain uniform salt levels. Empirical studies confirm that salt curing alone reduces pathogens like by water removal, though or augments safety for commercial products.

Sugar Curing Methods

Sugar curing for fish primarily involves the application of granulated sugar, often in combination with salt, to extract moisture through osmosis while enhancing flavor and texture. This method is most commonly associated with the preparation of gravlax, a Scandinavian dish featuring salmon coated in a dry mixture of salt and sugar. The sugar serves as a humectant, mitigating excessive drying from salt alone and contributing to a balanced, less intensely saline taste. In the standard dry curing process, a ratio of equal parts salt and by weight—typically totaling 50% of the 's —is applied to both sides of the fillet, including the skin. For a 500-gram fillet, this equates to approximately 125 grams each of and granulated , mixed with optional aromatics like , pepper, or zest. The coated is then wrapped in plastic or parchment and refrigerated at 0–4°C for 24 to 48 hours, during which time liquid exudes, forming a that is discarded post-cure. Shorter times yield lighter curing, while extended periods up to 72 hours produce firmer texture suitable for slicing. Wet brining variants incorporate dissolved and salt in a solution, submerging the for 4–24 hours, which allows for even distribution but requires precise concentration to avoid over-salting. Empirical studies on lightly salted demonstrate that adding 0.8–1.6% alongside salt delays microbial growth and oxidative rancidity in species like , improving sensory attributes such as color retention and firmness without compromising safety. However, 's preservative effect is secondary to salt's, as its larger molecular size slows diffusion and reduction compared to . This technique is best suited to fatty fish like , , or , where the aid flavor penetration and the cure prevents spoilage by lowering below 0.85, inhibiting pathogens such as . Unlike pure salt curing, sugar-inclusive methods prioritize palatability over long-term dry storage, with cured products typically consumed within weeks under refrigeration. Variations may include for caramel notes or for subtle sweetness, but white granulated remains standard for its neutral osmotic pull.

Nitrates and Nitrites Application

Nitrates, primarily in the form of sodium or potassium salts, are converted to nitrites during curing processes and serve as antimicrobial agents in preserved fish products, particularly those undergoing cold-smoking or heavy salting. Sodium nitrite is directly incorporated into dry rubs or brine solutions at regulated levels, typically ranging from 50 to 200 parts per million (ppm) depending on jurisdiction and product type, to prevent the proliferation of pathogens such as Clostridium botulinum. In salmon curing, for instance, nitrite addition to salt mixtures has been documented to yield concentrations around 100 ppm in the final product, enhancing preservation efficacy when combined with refrigeration. The application process involves dissolving nitrite salts alongside in formulations or mixing them into dry cures applied directly to fillets, followed by a holding period of 12 to 48 hours to allow and reaction. This method traces back to intentional use in smoke-cured products starting around 1925, evolving from incidental presence in impure sea salts used historically. reacts with meat proteins to form nitrosyl compounds, which inhibit bacterial and stabilize the pigmentation derived from in species like (Salmo salar), resulting in a more consistent reddish hue compared to nitrite-free cures. Empirical studies confirm that these levels also improve retention during subsequent smoking, reducing oxidative degradation. Regulatory limits, such as those set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, cap residual nitrite at 200 ppm in cured fish to balance preservation benefits against potential risks, with mandatory labeling for nitrite-containing products. In modern industrial settings, nitrites are often sourced as Prague powder #1 (containing 6.25% sodium nitrite), though application rates are adjusted lower for fish than for red meats due to differing pH and water activity profiles. Alternatives like bacterial nitrate reductases from strains such as Staphylococcus saprophyticus are under investigation to generate in situ nitrites, aiming to replicate traditional effects while minimizing synthetic additive use.

Smoking Techniques

Smoking fish involves exposing salted or brined fillets to wood smoke generated from smoldering hardwoods such as alder, apple, or hickory, which imparts flavor through phenolic compounds and aids preservation via dehydration and antimicrobial effects. The process typically follows salting to reduce water activity and inhibit bacterial growth, with a preliminary drying step to form a pellicle—a tacky surface protein layer that facilitates smoke adhesion. Traditional smoking occurs in enclosed smokehouses where fish are hung or placed on racks above the heat source, allowing controlled smoke flow; modern variants use mechanical smokers for precise temperature regulation. Cold smoking maintains smokehouse temperatures below 90°F (32°C)—typically 68–86°F (20–30°C)—to avoid cooking the while infusing smoke for extended periods of 6–12 hours or more, relying on prior salting to prevent toxin-producing bacteria like . This method dehydrates the flesh, reducing moisture content and extending through lowered , but the product remains raw and requires below 38°F (3°C) for safety, as internal temperatures do not exceed ambient levels. Cold-smoked , such as from , achieves a firm texture and subtle smoky flavor, with smoke components like acting as antioxidants to limit oxidation. Hot smoking, by contrast, elevates temperatures to 120–180°F (49–82°C) for 2–6 hours, cooking the to an internal temperature above 140°F (60°C) to destroy parasites and non-spore-forming pathogens while simultaneously and flavoring the product. The higher heat denatures proteins for a flaky consistency and evaporates surface , but over-smoking risks out the flesh; equilibration post-brining ensures even salt distribution before to avoid case-hardening. Hot-smoked varieties, including or , are shelf-stable longer than cold-smoked if properly dried to below 10% , though is recommended to prevent . Liquid smoking, a modern industrial technique, applies smoke condensates derived from pyrolized wood to fish surfaces via dipping or spraying, bypassing traditional to standardize flavor and reduce polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation, though it lacks the nuanced profile of direct smoking. In all methods, smoke generation involves incomplete of wood at 390–840°F (200–450°C), producing volatile compounds that penetrate the fish, with airflow management critical to balance preservation efficacy and sensory qualities. Safety hinges on and , as inadequate processing can foster formation in scombroid species or bacterial proliferation.

Drying and Fermentation Variants

Drying variants of cured fish preservation primarily achieve microbial inhibition by reducing (a_w) through moisture removal, typically to levels below 0.75, where most cannot proliferate. This process exploits and , often combined with prior salting to draw out intracellular fluids and accelerate . Traditional open-air sun drying, prevalent in tropical regions, involves splitting or filleting fish and exposing them to and for 2-5 days, yielding products with 10-20% residual moisture content. In contrast, modern controlled methods like drying at 40-60°C or freeze-drying under preserve texture and nutrients better by minimizing oxidation and enzymatic degradation, though they require energy-intensive equipment. Fermentation variants employ salt-tolerant microorganisms, primarily (LAB) such as species, to convert fish proteins and carbohydrates into lactic and acetic acids, lowering pH to 4.0-5.0 and enhancing shelf-life through biopreservation. High-salt processes (20-30% NaCl) dominate, as in production where small fish like anchovies are mixed at a 3:1 fish-to-salt ratio and fermented anaerobically for 6-18 months at ambient temperatures, yielding umami-rich hydrolysates via . Low-salt variants (<10% NaCl) incorporate carbohydrates (e.g., rice or flour) to fuel LAB growth, as seen in Southeast Asian pastes like pla ra from fermented freshwater fish, which undergo 1-3 months of maturation and result in biogenic amines that must be monitored to avoid toxicity risks like histamine poisoning. Both drying and fermentation can overlap in hybrid techniques, such as salted fermentation followed by air-drying, which further stabilizes products by combining acid production with desiccation; for instance, certain dried-fermented fish in Asia achieve a_w <0.8 and pH <4.5, extending storage to years without refrigeration. These methods' efficacy depends on fish species, fat content, and environmental controls, with biochemical autolysis initiating protein breakdown in both but microbial succession dominating fermentation outcomes.

Health and Nutrition

Nutritional Retention and Benefits

Curing processes, such as salting, drying, and smoking, primarily achieve nutrient concentration through moisture removal, resulting in cured fish exhibiting elevated levels of protein and lipids relative to fresh counterparts on a per-weight basis. Studies on dried fish indicate protein content can increase by over 2.5-fold compared to raw material, with typical values ranging from 60% to 80% in sun-dried varieties, attributed to dehydration without significant protein denaturation under controlled conditions. Similarly, lipid concentrations rise, enhancing the density of essential fatty acids like omega-3s, though absolute losses may occur during processing due to oxidation or leaching. Retention of polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), varies by method; smoking demonstrates a protective effect against degradation during storage, with losses in raw samples exceeding those in smoked by threefold after extended periods. True retention rates for EPA and DHA in smoked fish hover around 70-77%, mitigating oxidative damage through phenolic compounds from smoke. Protein quality remains high, with cured products providing bioavailable amino acids comparable to fresh fish, supporting muscle repair and enzymatic functions without substantial Maillard reaction-induced reductions under mild curing. Micronutrient profiles in cured fish, exemplified by smoked salmon, retain substantial vitamin B12 (up to 136% of daily value per 100 grams) and vitamin D (86% DV), alongside minerals like selenium and phosphorus, which concentrate via water loss and resist thermal degradation in fat-soluble forms. These attributes position cured fish as a nutrient-dense option for addressing deficiencies in protein, omega-3s, and select vitamins, particularly in regions reliant on preserved seafood for year-round access, though water-soluble vitamins like B-group may experience partial losses from salting brines. Empirical data affirm benefits for cardiovascular health via sustained omega-3 intake and enhanced mineral bioavailability, outweighing minor processing-induced declines when consumed in moderation.

Safety Risks from Processing

Cured fish processing, involving salting, smoking, drying, or fermentation, can introduce microbial hazards if parameters such as salt concentration, temperature, pH, and water activity are inadequately controlled. Non-proteolytic strains of Clostridium botulinum (types E and non-proteolytic B and F), which thrive in low-oxygen environments like vacuum-packaged cold-smoked fish, pose a severe botulism risk due to toxin production at refrigeration temperatures (3–30°C). Uneviscerated salt-cured or smoked fish products heighten this danger, as intestinal bacteria may contaminate the flesh during processing, leading the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to classify such items as life-threatening hazards requiring strict controls. Listeria monocytogenes survives and grows in ready-to-eat cured or smoked fish under refrigeration (0–4°C), particularly in products with water activity above 0.92 or insufficient acidification, contributing to listeriosis outbreaks among vulnerable populations. Parasitic risks arise when viable larvae persist through processing, as salting or light smoking alone often fails to inactivate nematodes like Anisakis simplex in marine fish such as herring, cod, or salmon. These larvae, ingested via underprocessed raw or semi-cured fish, embed in the gastrointestinal tract, causing anisakiasis with symptoms including abdominal pain and allergic reactions; freezing to –20°C for 7 days or –35°C for 15 hours is required for elimination, per FDA and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) standards, but inconsistent application during curing heightens exposure. Trichinella larvae, though rarer in finfish and more associated with marine mammals, can survive inadequate salting or drying in products like salted cod if encysted in muscle tissue. Histamine formation, leading to scombroid poisoning, occurs in histidine-rich species (e.g., tuna, mackerel) if bacterial decarboxylases act during processing delays or temperature abuse above 4°C, producing toxic levels (>500 ppm) resistant to cooking or curing. Symptoms, mimicking allergic reactions, onset within minutes to hours, with documented cases linked to mishandled smoked or salted fish. Chemical hazards include N-nitrosamine formation from nitrates or nitrites used in curing, which react with amines under acidic or heated conditions (e.g., ) to yield carcinogenic compounds like N-nitrosodimethylamine. EFSA assessments link dietary nitrosamines from processed to potential and cancer risks, though human epidemiological data show inconsistent associations, with safe intake levels set at 0.025–0.18 μg/kg body weight daily for specific nitrosamines. Regulatory limits (e.g., maxima of 100–250 mg/kg for nitrites in cured products) aim to minimize this, but processing variables like temperature exacerbate formation.

Additive Controversies and Empirical Evidence

The primary additives in cured fish production are nitrates and nitrites, typically added as sodium nitrite at levels below 150 parts per million (ppm) to inhibit bacterial growth, stabilize color, and enhance flavor. These compounds are particularly employed in smoked and salted fish products like lox or kippers to prevent the proliferation of Clostridium botulinum, the spore-forming bacterium responsible for botulism toxin production under anaerobic conditions prevalent in low-oxygen curing environments. Empirical data from historical outbreaks demonstrate that nitrite addition has drastically reduced botulism incidence in cured fish; prior to widespread use in the mid-20th century, vacuum-packed smoked fish occasionally led to toxin formation, whereas post-regulation monitoring shows negligible cases when nitrite levels are maintained. Controversies arise from the potential of nitrites to react with amines in fish proteins, forming volatile N- (e.g., N-nitrosodimethylamine) under acidic or heated conditions, which are classified as probable human carcinogens by agencies like the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Peer-reviewed studies, including meta-analyses of epidemiological data, associate higher intake of nitrite-preserved processed fish and meats with elevated risks of colorectal and gastric cancers, with relative risks increasing by 15-20% per 50 g daily consumption in some cohorts. However, these associations are correlative and confounded by factors like high salt content and iron in fish products, which independently promote nitrosamine formation; rodent bioassays confirm dose-dependent tumor induction from nitrosamines, but human exposure levels in cured fish (typically <10 μg/kg) fall below thresholds for significant endogenous formation in most cases. Countervailing evidence highlights the preservatives' necessity for microbial safety, as nitrite-free alternatives (e.g., natural antimicrobials like extracts) yield inconsistent inhibition and may elevate risks if converts inefficiently. Regulatory bodies, including the U.S. FDA, permit in cured fish under strict limits based on risk-benefit analyses showing prevention outweighs theoretical cancer increments at approved doses, with no documented outbreaks in compliant products since 1970s reforms. Recent reviews critique alarmist interpretations of risks, noting equivocal human trial data and protective effects from dietary antioxidants (e.g., ) that block synthesis in cured fish matrices. Other additives like phosphates, used sparingly for moisture retention in some processed fish, face minimal scrutiny but contribute to debates on profiles linked to metabolic disorders in observational studies. Overall, while formation represents a verifiable chemical pathway, population-level cancer attributions remain debated, with causal evidence stronger for unchecked bacterial hazards than for additive-driven oncogenesis at regulated exposures.

Production and Sustainability

Global Production Scales and Economics

Global production of cured fish, encompassing salted, dried, smoked, and fermented products, represents approximately 10-12 percent of total processed fisheries and supply, primarily serving preservation needs in regions with limited cold-chain . In , total global fisheries and output reached 223.2 million tonnes, with cured methods accounting for a disproportionate share in and where salting, , and exceed the world average due to traditional practices and economic constraints on freezing. Exact volumes are challenging to isolate, as FAO aggregates them under "cured" categories, but estimates suggest 20-25 million tonnes annually when applying the 12 percent utilization rate from earlier assessments to food-grade production (around 180 million tonnes). This includes low-value dried small in developing economies and higher-value smoked products in export-oriented nations. Major producing countries reflect regional divides: leads overall with substantial output of salted and dried fish from its dominant sector, producing millions of tonnes of processed freshwater and marine species annually, though much is domestic. and follow for sun-dried and salted varieties, often from small-scale coastal operations targeting local markets, with 's production emphasizing fermented and dried and sardines. stands out in high-value segments, particularly smoked , leveraging farmed production exceeding 1.5 million tonnes annually, much of which undergoes curing for export. Other key players include and for dried exports, while African nations like process imported alongside local smoked products. Economically, the cured fish sector generates modest global revenues relative to fresh or frozen segments, with the subcategory valued at approximately $18.6 billion in 2024, projected to grow at 6-7 percent CAGR through 2033 driven by premium demand in and . Broader cured products, including low-cost , contribute to a total market around $6-7 billion for smoked, salted, or dried variants, reflecting bifurcated pricing: bulk low-value items (e.g., $1-2 per kg in ) versus premium ($10-20 per kg). Trade volumes for dried, salted, or exceed 1-2 million tonnes annually in select HS codes, with exports valued at billions; Norway's exports, heavily featuring cured , reached NOK 18 billion (about $1.7 billion) in September 2025 alone, underscoring export dependency. Economic impacts include employment in artisanal processing (millions of jobs in /) but vulnerability to price fluctuations and pressures, with over-reliance on wild capture in some chains amplifying costs from .

Sourcing Impacts and Overfishing

The sourcing of fish for curing processes, particularly species like (Gadus morhua) and various (Salmo salar and Pacific species), has contributed to significant pressures, leading to stock depletions and disruptions. stocks, historically targeted for salting and drying in products like and , experienced a catastrophic in the northwest Atlantic by 1993, with falling to less than 1% of historical levels due to excessive harvesting rates exceeding sustainable yields from the 1950s onward. Current assessments indicate persistent in regions such as , where the stock remains overfished and subject to ongoing , with spawning well below recovery targets as of 2023. In the , recent evaluations project limited recovery prospects, exacerbating supply vulnerabilities for cured cod products. Overfishing of has induced genetic shifts, favoring smaller, slower-growing individuals through selective pressure on harvestable sizes, as evidenced by genomic studies of Baltic cod populations showing for reduced growth rates linked to decades of intense . This evolutionary impact reduces long-term productivity, with models indicating potential commercial extinction risks in North American east coast stocks without stricter controls. For used in and curing, wild Pacific stocks face similar threats; as of 2018, NOAA classified five stocks—including Chinook and coho—as overfished, with additional listings in subsequent years due to exploitation rates surpassing maximum sustainable thresholds. Although much cured derives from , which alleviates direct wild harvest pressure, feed requirements often incorporate wild-caught , indirectly straining pelagic stocks and contributing to broader . Globally, the FAO's 2024 assessment of marine stocks reveals that 35.5% are overfished, with trends stabilizing but regional disparities persisting, particularly in areas supplying cured fish like the Northeast Atlantic where and fisheries operate near or beyond limits. These sourcing dynamics amplify and damage from methods common in , reducing and resilience, while economic dependencies on cured products—such as Newfoundland's -reliant sectors—face chronic instability from quota reductions and moratoria, as seen in Canada's partial reopening in 2024 amid shaky recoveries. Empirical data underscore that without enforced frameworks, overfished cured fish stocks could yield 10.6 million metric tons less annually, equivalent to 12% of global catches.

Regulatory Frameworks and Standards

Regulatory frameworks for cured fish emphasize food safety through controls on microbial hazards, chemical contaminants, and processing parameters, primarily to mitigate risks such as production in low-acid environments and formation in scombroid species. Internationally, the Commission establishes voluntary standards, including CODEX STAN 311-2013 for smoked, smoke-flavoured, and smoke-dried fish, which specifies essential composition, quality factors like minimum fish content, and limits on contaminants such as and mycotoxins, while requiring hygienic processing from fresh or frozen raw materials. Similarly, CODEX STAN 167-1989 governs salted and dried salted fish of the family, mandating full salt saturation for heavy-salted variants and sensory criteria to ensure wholesomeness, with references to general labeling standards like CXS 1-1985. In the United States, the (FDA) enforces mandatory and Critical Control Points (HACCP) plans under 21 CFR Part 123 for all and products, including cured variants, requiring processors to identify and control hazards like in uneviscerated salt-cured, dried, or , which FDA deems a life-threatening risk necessitating evisceration or validated heat treatments. FDA guidance further details controls such as reducing to 0.85 or below for shelf-stable dried products to prevent growth, alongside monitoring for decomposition and pathogens like in ready-to-eat items. Good manufacturing practices (GMPs) for cured, salted, and establishments, updated in 2019, provide uniform regulatory guidance beyond federal minima, including controls and sanitation protocols often adopted by states. European Union regulations harmonize safety criteria across member states, with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 setting microbiological standards, such as absence of Listeria monocytogenes in 25g samples of ready-to-eat cured fish like smoked salmon, and process hygiene criteria for Enterobacteriaceae. For smoked products, Regulation (EU) 2020/1255 establishes maximum levels for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phasing in stricter limits for benzopyrene (2 µg/kg by 2023) to address carcinogenic risks from traditional smoking, with a three-year transition for certain traditionally smoked fish. The EU Guide to Good Practice for smoked, salted, or marinated fish outlines voluntary hygiene and HACCP-aligned controls for shelf-life extension via cold/hot smoking or salting, targeting pathogens in raw fish like salmonids. Recent amendments, including 2024 proposals on Listeria sampling during salmon stiffening, reflect ongoing refinements to balance safety and industry feasibility.

Cultural and Culinary Applications

European Dishes and Traditions

In Scandinavia, gravlax, a dish of raw salmon cured with salt, sugar, and dill, originated in 14th-century northern Sweden where fishermen buried salted fish in sand above the high-tide line for light fermentation. Modern preparations cure the salmon dry without burial, typically for 1-3 days, resulting in a firm texture served thinly sliced with mustard sauce. This method preserved salmon during long winters when salt was scarce, reflecting adaptive preservation techniques in harsh climates. Norway's , or tørrfisk, involves air-drying unsalted on wooden racks (hjell) along the coast from February to May, a practice dating to the and Norway's oldest export commodity. The process leverages cold winds and low humidity to concentrate proteins without salt, yielding a lightweight product stored for years; it forms the base for , rehydrated in solution for Christmas traditions, though this alkaline treatment introduces unique gelatinous qualities debated for digestibility. Annual production peaks in , supporting economic ties to Mediterranean markets since . In , —dried and salted cod—became a staple from the late when naval discoveries enabled long-term storage without , with claiming over 365 recipes. Preparation requires soaking slabs in water changes every few hours for 2-3 days to desalinate before cooking in dishes like , shredded with onions, potatoes, and eggs. This reliance on imported cod sustained populations during lean periods, embedding it in daily and festive meals despite modern sustainability concerns. Italy features baccalà, salt-cured soaked similarly and braised in regional styles, such as alla vicentina with , onions, and anchovies simmered for hours, a Venetian tradition since the tied to trade routes. In , it's stewed with tomatoes and potatoes for hearty winter fare, preserving nutritional value through salting while adapting to local agriculture. These methods underscore Europe's historical use of curing to combat spoilage in pre-refrigeration eras, with ongoing cultural reverence despite shifts to fresh .

African and Middle Eastern Uses

In , feseekh (also spelled ) represents a longstanding tradition of fermenting and salting gray mullet (Mugil cephalus), a process involving gutting the fish, layering it with coarse salt, and allowing anaerobic fermentation for 15 to 40 days, resulting in a pungent preserve consumed during the ancient spring festival of Sham el-Nessim, which dates to pharaonic times. This method preserves the fish through production and salt's osmotic dehydration, though inadequate salting or hygiene has caused recurrent outbreaks, with the Egyptian Ministry of Health issuing annual warnings; in 2017 alone, over 100 cases were reported linked to contaminated batches. Across , particularly in and , imported —unsalted, air-dried (Gadus morhua) from Norway's Islands—serves as a durable protein source, rehydrated by soaking and boiling before incorporation into stews such as or soup, where it contributes and texture after cooking times of 1-2 hours to soften the fibrous flesh. Annual imports to exceed 100,000 tons, sustaining a trade valued at over $100 million USD as of 2017, rooted in the fish's resistance to spoilage in tropical climates without refrigeration, though local alternatives like smoked supplement supplies. In , koobi employs salting and sun-drying small such as anchovies or sardines for 2-3 days, yielding a fermented paste used to season banku or soups, mirroring osmotic preservation techniques that extend to months. Sub-Saharan African communities around inland fisheries, such as in and , rely on smoking over hardwood fires or rack-based solar drying to cure catches like and , with improved elevated racks reducing contamination from soil and insects while shortening drying to 1-2 days under direct sun, thereby minimizing post-harvest losses estimated at 20-30% in traditional ground-drying methods. In Cameroon's Southwest Region, fish are scaled, eviscerated, and either sun-dried for 6-12 hours followed by smoking or directly smoke-dried, producing products that constitute 70-80% of local preservation and support cross-border trade. In the , in southern preserves masmouta by cleaning riverine , applying coarse salt and spices, and sun-drying them for several days on lines or mats, a labor-intensive process historically led by women that integrates the cured into rice dishes or as snacks, maintaining nutritional access in arid environments despite modernization pressures. Yemeni Hadhrami communities cure by splitting the carcass longitudinally, salting heavily, and drying in the sun, yielding a chewy, long-lasting staple for stews that leverages the species' abundance in the and withstands storage without cooling for up to a year. Along Egypt's coast, onboard salting during multi-month fishing voyages applies dry salt to species like , forming a that cures the flesh for export, with practices documented since the mid-20th century emphasizing high salt concentrations (20-30%) to inhibit .

East and Southeast Asian Preparations

In , traditional salted and sun-dried , known as xiányú (咸鱼) or là yú (腊鱼), is prepared by lightly salting fresh small-bodied such as croakers or pomfrets, marinating briefly, and then hanging them to dry under winter sunlight, which preserves pliability while concentrating natural flavors through gradual moisture evaporation. This method, rooted in coastal preservation practices, yields a product with intensified suitable for with or incorporating into clay pot dishes, where the fish's subtle saltiness enhances accompanying ingredients without overpowering them. In variants like mui heung , an additional controlled step allows surface mold development (faat mui), imparting a pungent, earthy depth prized in stir-fries and , a technique historically adapted by fishermen to extend amid variable humidity. Japanese himono (干物) encompasses salted and air-dried fish preparations, typically involving a dry salting of species like mackerel (saba) or horse mackerel (aji), followed by sun or wind drying to reduce water content by up to 50-70%, resulting in firm textures ideal for grilling (yaki) or simmering in soups like miso-shiru. This curing concentrates glutamates for savory profiles, with production peaking in regions like Hokkaido using cold northerly winds for efficient drying without excessive salting. In Korea, similar techniques produce seokkok or dried anchovies (myeolchi), salted lightly and sun-dried for use in stocks (yuksu) or as snacks, where the process inhibits bacterial growth via osmotic dehydration, preserving nutritional proteins and omega-3 fatty acids. Southeast Asian curing emphasizes salting combined with or light , accounting for nearly 30% of regional to combat spoilage in tropical climates, often using coarse at ratios of 20-40% by fish weight to draw out moisture and inhibit pathogens like . In the , or tuyo involves gutting and heavily salting fish such as (bangus), then sun- for 1-2 days, yielding crisp, intensely flavored products fried for pairings with rice and , a method sustaining coastal households amid inconsistent . In , ikan asin follows analogous heavy salting and solar of reef fish, integrated into condiments, while variants like cakalang fufu from incorporate alkali curing with soda ash alongside salt and spices before and skipjack tuna, enhancing tenderness and shelf stability for up to months. Thai and Vietnamese practices blend salting with partial fermentation for or mắm precursors, but strict dry-cured forms prioritize sun exposure post-salting to minimize below 0.75, averting microbial risks in humid environments.

Americas and Other Regions

![Curingsalmon.jpg][float-right] In North American indigenous traditions, particularly among tribes such as the Clatsop and those affiliated with the Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, was a central preserved through and to extend and facilitate trade or storage. These methods involved heat smoking over open fires or drying strips of into jerky-like forms, often combined with pounding to create mixtures incorporating with berries or fats for nutritional density during winter months. Arctic indigenous groups, including the and , employed air-drying, cold smoking, and salting to cure fish in harsh climates where freezing was primary but insufficient alone against spoilage. Fish were cut into thin strips, hung on racks exposed to wind and low temperatures, or lightly salted before drying, yielding storable products essential for survival through periods without fresh catches. Fermentation techniques like , involving autolysis in sealed containers, also preserved marine species but carried risks of if not managed precisely. In , pre-Columbian cultures developed acid-based curing evident in precursors, where raw was marinated in acidic fruit juices—though modern lime dominates, historical variants used tumbo or other native acids—to denature proteins and inhibit bacteria. Mayan sites reveal salt production for mass-scale curing as early as 1000 years ago, supporting coastal economies through preserved trade. Across and Australian indigenous contexts, acid-curing persists in dishes like namas from , where fish is marinated in lime or lemon juice for brief periods to achieve a firm, tangy texture suitable for immediate consumption or short-term storage. ' ika mata similarly combines raw fish with and , reflecting adaptations to tropical abundances where or supplemented fresher preservation needs. traditionally smoked fish over open fires using native woods, enhancing flavor while partially curing for portability during nomadic patterns.

References

  1. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118346174.ch6
  2. https://www.easternshorecooperator.ca/resurrecting_old_fish_curing_methods
  3. https://www.fao.org/flw-in-fish-value-chains/resources/articles/fish-salting-101-what-you-need-to-know/en/
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9562176/
  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643824015160
  6. https://extension.umn.edu/preserving-and-preparing/preserving-fish-safely
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440316000170
  8. https://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/40626
  9. https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/Bosphorus-BlackSea/BlackSeaFish-BekkerNielsen2005.pdf
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259546331_Evidence_of_sun-dried_fish_at_Mleiha_S-E_Arabia_in_antiquity
  11. https://ancientegyptonline.co.uk/dietmeat/
  12. https://hakaimagazine.com/features/the-fish-that-gave-too-much/
  13. https://academic.oup.com/book/11580/chapter/160418717
  14. https://www.academia.edu/34743664/Fisheries_and_salted_fish_in_Ptolemaic_Egypt_A_state_of_the_art
  15. https://www.historytoday.com/archive/historians-cookbook/history-salt-cod
  16. https://monthlyreview.org/articles/the-fishing-revolution-and-the-origins-of-capitalism/
  17. https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-content/MFR/mfr504/mfr50431.pdf
  18. https://www.the-low-countries.com/article/the-fishy-history-of-dutch-herring/
  19. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/tqcrv1/how_did_european_ocean_fishers_store_and_preserve/
  20. https://www.heritage.nf.ca/articles/economy/fishers-lifestyle.php
  21. https://teara.govt.nz/en/photograph/6272/fishing-curing-establishment
  22. https://npshistory.com/publications/sama/newsletter/v6n1.pdf
  23. https://www.heritage.nf.ca/articles/economy/salt-fish-markets-1914.php
  24. https://yourfriendinreykjavik.com/salted-fish-in-iceland-a-historical-overview/
  25. https://www.fao.org/input/download/standards/113/CXS_167e.pdf
  26. https://courseware.cutm.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SALTING-OF-FSIH.pdf
  27. https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/jan2021/A-Mini-review-Of-Salting-Techniques-To-Improve-Food-Quality.pdf
  28. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/f50-021
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12400352/
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317167617_Biochemical_Changes_During_Salt_Fermentation_of_Pangasius_hypophthalmus_Sauvage_1878
  31. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1081/DRT-120001372
  32. https://matis.is/media/utgafa/visindagreinar/SA_KATh_2004_Effects_of_various_salt_concentrations.pdf
  33. https://www.fda.gov/files/food/published/Processing-Parameters-Needed-to-Control-Pathogens-in-Cold-Smoked-Fish.pdf
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643824006601
  35. https://www.food-safety.com/articles/10016-understanding-hot-and-cold-smoked-fish-processing-and-safety
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160597000512
  37. https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-content/MFR/mfr384/mfr3845.pdf
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10301060/
  39. https://www.afdo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Cured_salted_and_smoked_fish_establishments_good_manufacturing_practices_acc_updated_2019.pdf
  40. https://nofima.com/worth-knowing/all-you-need-to-know-about-salting-fish/
  41. https://www.perennia.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Process-Guidelines-for-Salted-Seafood-Products.pdf
  42. https://agriculture.institute/fish-processing-packaging-value-addition/salting-techniques-fish-preservation/
  43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513599/
  44. https://www.bonappetit.com/test-kitchen/inside-our-kitchen/article/understand-the-science-behind-curing-fish
  45. https://www.scienceofcooking.com/curing_foods.htm
  46. https://www.recipetineats.com/cured-salmon-gravlax/
  47. https://www.seriouseats.com/gravlax-cured-salmon-recipe
  48. https://www.capturethechef.com/chefs-secrets/guide-to-curing-fish-like-a-pro
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X22106095
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0260877417303023
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814610008034
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285524695_Sodium_Nitrite_Salt-Curing_and_Effects_on_Carotenoid_and_N-Nitrosoamines_in_Marine_Foods
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12056399/
  54. https://www.uaf.edu/ces/publications/database/food/smoking-fish.php
  55. https://www.themeateater.com/cook/cooking-techniques/how-to-smoke-fish
  56. https://agriculture.institute/fish-processing-packaging-value-addition/fish-smoking-techniques-benefits-health/
  57. https://three-little-pigs-bbq.com/dev/a-b-cs-of-smoking-fish-hot-cold-smoking-technique/
  58. https://eatcuredmeat.com/cold-smoking/does-cold-smoking-preserve-food-how-does-it-work/
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8890880/
  60. https://seafood.oregonstate.edu/sites/agscid7/files/snic/smoking-fish-at-home-safely.pdf
  61. https://www.keylargofisheries.com/blogs/recipes/the-art-of-smoking-fish-techniques-and-recipes
  62. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963996923006579
  63. https://journalofethnicfoods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42779-021-00109-0
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9914387/
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10121635/
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Protein-content-of-ten-dried-fish-species_fig2_291349423
  67. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2021/5539376
  68. https://foodexpertshub.com/dried-fish-a-concentrated-source-of-protein-and-minerals/
  69. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/smoked-salmon-calories
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6683256/
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584401936623X
  72. https://www.fda.gov/files/food/published/Fish-and-Fishery-Products-Hazards-and-Controls-Guidance-Chapter-13-Download.pdf
  73. https://www.food.gov.uk/research/foodborne-pathogens/the-risk-to-vulnerable-consumers-from-listeria-monocytogenes-in-ready-to-eat-smoked-fish?print=1
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11687444/
  75. https://www.cdc.gov/anisakiasis/about/index.html
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014489419304084
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924224418301560
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9818752/
  79. https://www.fda.gov/food/seafood-guidance-documents-regulatory-information/scombrotoxin-poisoning-and-decomposition
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4273511/
  81. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/ScombroidFish%2520Poisoning.aspx
  82. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/170615
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9654915/
  84. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7884
  85. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-84059-y
  86. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1114&context=itpi
  87. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/14/1/112
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9365633/
  89. https://www.bmj.com/content/357/bmj.j1957
  90. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223969061_Human_safety_controversies_surrounding_nitrate_and_nitrite_in_the_diet
  91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713523004401
  92. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/13/5/1555
  93. https://www.fao.org/3/cc0461en/online/sofia/2022/utilization-processing-fisheries-production.html
  94. http://www.fao.org/interactive/state-of-fisheries-aquaculture/2018/en/
  95. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/top-fish-and-seafood-exporting-countries.html
  96. https://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics-query/en/trade_pp/trade_pp_quantity
  97. https://straitsresearch.com/report/smoked-fish-market
  98. https://gtaic.ai/market-reports/smoked-salted-or-dried-fish-market-china-review-in-2025
  99. https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2025/10/03/norways-salmon-trade-with-china-booms-in-september-while-supplies-fall-back-to-earth/
  100. https://phys.org/news/2025-06-canada-reopened-cod-fishery-shaky.html
  101. https://sustainablefisheries-uw.org/atlantic-cod-part1/
  102. https://www.nationalfisherman.com/northeast/the-fate-of-atlantic-cod-stocks-from-optimism-to-concern
  103. https://www.geomar.de/n9917
  104. https://www.seafoodsource.com/news/supply-trade/north-american-east-coast-cod-stocks-facing-very-dire-situation
  105. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/west-coast/sustainable-fisheries/status-salmon-stocks-managed-under-magnuson-stevens-act-west-coast
  106. https://www.seafoodsource.com/news/environment-sustainability/10-fish-stocks-added-to-noaa-s-overfishing-list-in-u-s
  107. https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/t5ce9d/wild_fish_stocks_squandered_to_feed_farmed_salmon/
  108. https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/fao-releases-the-most-detailed-global-assessment-of-marine-fish-stocks-to-date/en
  109. https://www.globalseafood.org/advocate/fao-64-5-of-global-stocks-are-sustainably-fished-but-overfishing-persists-without-management/
  110. https://www.clf.org/blog/critical-atlantic-cod-research-puts-survival-of-struggling-fish-at-a-crossroads/
  111. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01851-4
  112. https://www.fda.gov/food/seafood-guidance-documents-regulatory-information/fish-and-fishery-products-hazards-and-controls
  113. https://www.fao.org/input/download/standards/13292/CXS_311e.pdf
  114. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/zh/?lnk=1&url=https%25253A%25252F%25252Fworkspace.fao.org%25252Fsites%25252Fcodex%25252FStandards%25252FCXS%252B167-1989%25252FCXS_167e.pdf
  115. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-123
  116. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/cpg-sec-540650-uneviscerated-fish-products-are-salt-cured-dried-or-smoked-revised
  117. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160524000850
  118. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R1255
  119. https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2018-10/biosafety_fh_guidance_essa_smoked-salted-marinated-fish.pdf
  120. https://www.seafoodsource.com/news/food-safety-health/eu-proposing-stricter-listeria-regulations-smoked-salmon-industry-pushes-back
  121. https://houseofhegelund.com/blog/2018/01/09/gravlax-the-arctic-origins-of-a-legendary-dish/
  122. https://sweden.se/culture/food/gravlax
  123. https://swedishspoon.com/gravlax/
  124. https://www.visitnorway.com/things-to-do/food-and-drink/stockfish/
  125. https://www.fromnorway.com/seafood-from-norway/stockfish/
  126. https://visitlofoten.com/en/topic/lofoten-food/skrei-and-stockfish/
  127. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20221019-a-fish-that-sparked-a-national-obsession
  128. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/16/world/europe/16cod.html
  129. https://stefangourmet.com/2016/02/07/bacala-alla-vicentina-dried-cod-braised-in-milk-and-olive-oil/
  130. https://www.seriouseats.com/baccala-alla-napoletana-neapolitan-style-braised-salt-cod-5212995
  131. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20170323-the-deadly-dish-people-love-to-eat
  132. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-42137476
  133. https://www.foodbusinessafrica.com/fishermen-in-east-africa-widely-adopt-rack-drying-technique-to-tame-fish-preservation-woes/
  134. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2023/8763080
  135. https://shafaq.com/en/Iraq/Basra-keeps-ancient-culinary-tradition-alive-with-Masmouta-fish-dish
  136. https://hadhramouts.blogspot.com/2008/11/power-of-salted-dried-shark-meat.html
  137. https://www.fao.org/fishery/publications/query/Astyanax%2520saltor
  138. https://www.thehongkongcookery.com/2021/02/chinese-winter-sun-dried-fish.html
  139. https://www.roots.gov.sg/stories-landing/stories/Against-All-Odds-Salted-Fish-In-Cantonese-Cuisine-In-Singapore/Against-All-Odds-Salted-Fish-In-Cantonese-Cuisine-In-Singapore
  140. https://www.clovegarden.com/ingred/sf_pdfshdry.html
  141. https://journalofethnicfoods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42779-025-00275-5
  142. https://festival.si.edu/blog/2016/native-foodways-roast-salmon-on-sticks
  143. https://critfc.org/salmon-culture/tribal-salmon-culture/
  144. https://neptunesnacks.com/blogs/from-the-deep/fish-jerky-how-the-native-americans-did-it
  145. http://www.ankn.uaf.edu/publications/vs/cutting.html
  146. https://earthwormexpress.com/about-eben/k-b/sacred-salt-and-the-northern-gods/holisticus-index-page/survival-spirituality-and-celebration-inughuit-meat-preservation-practices-and-the-quviasukvik-winter-feast/
  147. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/ceviche-surprising-history-behind-perus-raw-fish-dish
  148. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6253611/Ancient-Mayan-salt-factory-reveals-mysterious-culture-cured-fish-meats-1-000-years-ago.html
  149. https://www.sbs.com.au/food/article/why-you-should-try-namas-the-torres-strait-islands-simple-acid-cured-fish-dish/d3eljmzbd
  150. https://manaui.com/how-to-make-simple-cook-island-style-ika-mata/
  151. https://warndu.com/blogs/blog/traditional-aboriginal-food
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.