Community hub
0 subscribers7 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Phytochorion.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Phytochorion
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
In phytogeography, a phytochorion is a geographic area with a relatively uniform composition of plant species. Adjacent phytochoria do not usually have a sharp boundary, but rather a soft one, a transitional area in which many species from both regions overlap, called a vegetation tension zone.
In traditional schemes, areas in phytogeography are classified hierarchically, according to the presence of endemic families, genera or species, e.g., in floral (or floristic, phytogeographic) zones and regions,[1] or also in kingdoms, regions and provinces,[2] sometimes including the categories empire and domain. However, some authors prefer not to rank areas, referring to them simply as "areas", "regions" (in a non hierarchical sense) or "phytochoria".[3]
Systems used to classify vegetation can be divided in two major groups: those that use physiognomic[definition needed]-environmental parameters and characteristics and those that are based on floristic (i.e., shared genera and species) relationships.[4] Phytochoria are defined by their plant taxonomic composition, while other schemes of regionalization (e.g., vegetation type, physiognomy, plant formations, biomes) may variably take in account, depending on the author, the apparent characteristics of a community (the dominant life-form), environment characteristics, the fauna associated, anthropic factors or political-conservationist issues.[5]
Explanation
[edit]Several systems of classifying geographic areas where plants grow have been devised. Most systems are organized hierarchically, with the largest units subdivided into smaller geographic areas, which are made up of smaller floristic communities, and so on. Phytochoria are defined as areas possessing a large number of endemic taxa. Floristic kingdoms are characterized by a high degree of family endemism, floristic regions by a high degree of generic endemism, and floristic provinces by a high degree of species endemism. Systems of phytochoria have both significant similarities and differences with zoogeographic provinces, which follow the composition of mammal families, and with biogeographical provinces or terrestrial ecoregions, which take into account both plant and animal species.
The term "phytochorion" (Werger & van Gils, 1976)[6] is especially associated with the classifications according to the methodology of Josias Braun-Blanquet, which is tied to the presence or absence of particular species,[7] mainly in Africa.[8]
Taxonomic databases tend to be organized in ways which approximate floristic provinces, but which are more closely aligned to political boundaries, for example according to the World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions.
Early schemes
[edit]In the late 19th century, Adolf Engler (1844-1930) was the first to make a world map with the limits of distribution of floras, with four major floral regions (realms).[9][10] His Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, from the third edition (1903) onwards, also included a sketch of the division of the earth into floral regions.[11]
Other important early works on floristics includes Augustin de Candolle (1820),[12] Schouw (1823),[13] Alphonse de Candolle (1855),[14] Drude (1890),[1] Diels (1908),[15] and Rikli (1913).[16]
Good (1947) regionalization
[edit]
Botanist Ronald Good (1947) identified six floristic kingdoms (Boreal or Holarctic, Neotropical, Paleotropical, South African, Australian, and Antarctic), the largest natural units he determined for flowering plants. Good's six kingdoms are subdivided into smaller units, called regions and provinces. The Paleotropical kingdom is divided into three subkingdoms, which are each subdivided into floristic regions. Each of the other five kingdoms are subdivided directly into regions. There are a total of 37 floristic regions. Almost all regions are further subdivided into floristic provinces.[17]
Takhtajan (1978, 1986) regionalization
[edit]Armen Takhtajan (1978, 1986), in a widely used scheme that builds on Good's work, identified thirty-five floristic regions, each of which is subdivided into floristic provinces, of which there are 152 in all.[18][19][20][21]
- 1 Arctic province
- 2 Atlantic Europe province
- 3 Central Europe province
- 4 Illyria or Balkan province
- 5 Pontus Euxinus province
- 6 Caucasus province
- 7 Eastern Europe province
- 8 Northern Europe province
- 9 Western Siberia province
- 10 Altai-Sayan province
- 11 Central Siberia province
- 12 Transbaikalia province
- 13 Northeastern Siberia province
- 14 Okhotsk-Kamchatka province
- 15 Canada incl. Great Lakes province
- 16 Manchuria province
- 17 Sakhalin-Hokkaidō province
- 18 Japan-Korea province
- 19 Volcano-Bonin province
- 20 Ryūkyū or Tokara-Okinawa province
- 21 Taiwan province
- 22 Northern China province
- 23 Central China province
- 24 Southeastern China province
- 25 Sikang-Yuennan province
- 26 Northern Burma province
- 27 Eastern Himalaya province
- 28 Khasi-Manipur province
- 29 Appalachian province (forested areas extending east to include the piedmont and west to the start of the prairies)
- 30 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain province
- 31 North American Prairies province
- 32 Vancouverian province
- 33 Rocky Mountains province
- 34 Azores province
- 35 Madeira province
- 36 Canaries province
- 37 Cape Verde province
VI. Mediterranean region
[edit]- 38 Southern Morocco province
- 39 Southwestern Mediterranean province
- 40 South Mediterranean province
- 41 Iberia province
- 42 Baleares province
- 43 Liguria-Tyrrhenia province
- 44 Adriatic province
- 45 East Mediterranean province
- 46 Crimea-Novorossijsk province
VII. Saharo-Arabian region
[edit]VIII. Irano-Turanian region
[edit]8A. Western Asiatic subregion
[edit]- 49 Mesopotamia province
- 50 Central Anatolia province
- 51 Armenia-Iran province
- 52 Hyrcania province
- 53 Turania or Aralo-Caspia province
- 54 Turkestan province
- 55 Northern Baluchistan province
- 56 Western Himalaya province
8B. Central Asiatic subregion
[edit]- 57 Central Tien Shan province
- 58 Dzungaria-Tien Shan province
- 59 Mongolia province
- 60 Tibet province
IX. Madrean region
[edit]- 61 Great Basin province
- 62 Californian province
- 63 Sonoran province
- 64 Mexican Highlands province
- 65 Upper Guinean forests province
- 66 Nigeria-Cameroon province
- 67 Congo province
- 68 Zanzibar-Inhambane province
- 69 Tongoland-Pondoland province
XII. Sudano-Zambezian region
[edit]12A. Zambezian subregion
[edit]- 70 Zambezi province
12B. Sahelo–Sudanian subregion
[edit]12C. Eritreo–Arabian subregion
[edit]- 73 Somalia-Ethiopia province
- 74 South Arabia province
- 75 Socotra province
12C. Omano-Sindian subregion
[edit]- 76 Oman province
- 77 South Iran province
- 78 Sindia province
XIII. Karoo-Namib region
[edit]- 79 Namibia province
- 80 Namaland province
- 81 Western Cape province
- 82 Karoo province
- 83 St. Helena and Ascension province
XV. Madagascan region
[edit]- 84 Eastern Madagascar province
- 85 Western Madagascar province
- 86 Southern and Southwestern Madagascar province
- 87 Comoro province
- 88 Mascarenes province
- 89 Seychelles province
XVI. Indian region
[edit]- 90 Ceylon (Sri Lanka) province
- 91 Malabar province
- 92 Deccan province
- 93 Upper Gangetic Plain province
- 94 Bengal province
XVII. Indochinese region
[edit]- 95 South Burma province
- 96 Andamans province
- 97 South China province
- 98 Thailand province
- 99 North Indochina province
- 100 Annam province
- 101 South Indochina province
XVIII. Malesian region
[edit]18A. Malesian subregion
[edit]- 102 Malaya province
- 103 Borneo province
- 104 Philippines province
- 105 Sumatra province
- 106 Java province
18B. Papuan subregion
[edit]- 107 Celebes province
- 108 Moluccas and West New Guinea province
- 109 Papua province
- 110 Bismarck Archipelago province
XIX. Fijian region
[edit]- 111 New Hebrides province
- 112 Fiji province
XX. Polynesian region
[edit]- 113 Micronesia province
- 114 Polynesia province
XXI. Hawaiian region
[edit]- 115 Hawaii province
XXII. Neocaledonian region
[edit]- 116 New Caledonia province
XXIII. Caribbean region
[edit]- 117 Central America province
- 118 West Indies province
- 119 Galápagos Islands province
- 120 The Guianas province
XXV. Amazon region
[edit]XXVI. Brazilian region
[edit]- 123 Caatinga province
- 124 Central Brazilian Uplands province
- 125 Chaco province
- 126 Atlantic province
- 127 Paraná province
XXVII. Andean region
[edit]- 128 Northern Andes province
- 129 Central Andes province
XXVIII. Cape region
[edit]- 130 Cape province
XXIX. Northeast Australian region
[edit]- 131 North Australia province
- 132 Queensland province
- 133 Southeast Australia province
- 134 Tasmania province
- 135 Southwest Australia province
XXXI. Central Australian or Eremaean region
[edit]- 136 Eremaea province
XXXII. Fernandezian region
[edit]- 137 Juan Fernández province
XXXIII. Chile-Patagonian region
[edit]- 138 Northern Chile province
- 139 Central Chile province
- 140 Pampas province
- 141 Patagonia province
- 142 Tierra del Fuego province
XXXV. Neozeylandic region
[edit]- 145 Lord Howe province
- 146 Norfolk province
- 147 Kermadec province
- 148 Northern New Zealand province
- 149 Central New Zealand province
- 150 Southern New Zealand province
- 151 Chatham province
- 152 New Zealand Subantarctic Islands province
Regionalization according to Wolfgang Frey and Rainer Lösch (2004, 2010)
[edit].png)
- The central European region and the central Russian region are sister regions.
- The border between them is similar to the Fagus sylvatica limit (January, day-time temperature average: above -2 °C).
- The border between the central Russian region and the boreal region is similar to the Quercus spp. limit (Day-time temperature average: above 10 °C, 4 months per year).
- The border between the boreal region and the arctic region is similar to the tree line, taiga/arctic tundra limit (July, day-time temperature average: above 10 °C).
- The border of the Atlantic region is the limit of no frost (average), Gulf Stream influence.
- The warm islands in the Atlantic Ocean are in the Macaronesia region: isolated populations in a more humid environment.
- The Mediterranean region is similar to the occurrence of wild Olea europea and wild Cistus salviifolius (Olea europea is grown very North in Italy).
- The border between the submediterranean region and the central European region is similar to the alpine arc (upper Rhone, upper Rhine, lower Danube), a weather barrier.
- The Pontic region border is similar to the tree line/ steppe limit (less than 450 mm precipitation per year).
- The Turanian region has a semi-arid climate.
Liu et al. (2023, 2024) Regionalization
[edit]Critiquing previous attempts for their lack of phylogenetic relationships in the construction of their regions, Liu et al. incorporated distribution data alongside phylogenetic relationships to configure their realms. This led to the classification of eight realms organized into two super-realms and each composed of a number of sub-realms.[24]
- Gondwanan super-realm
- 1 African
- 2 Indo-Malesian
- 3 Australian
- 4 Novozealandic
- 5 Neotropical
- 6 Chile–Patagonian
- Laurasian super-realm
- 7 Holarctic
- 8 Saharo-Arabian
Differences from Takhtajan's floristic kingdoms mainly focus on emphasizing the uniqueness of certain realms that he had as subdivisions within kingdoms. Two examples are separating some kingdoms into two separate realms, as happened to the Paleotropical and Antarctic kingdoms, reasoning that they have been separated form each other for long enough time to constitute a different phylogenetic trajectory. The merging of the Cape floristic kingdom with the African realm was based by the low endemism of higher taxonomic ranks, which could be found outside the cape region in the rest of Africa. The final major change is the separation of the Saharo-Arabian realm from the Holarctic kingdom, though they admit the northern boundary is not clear, with flora from the Holarctic being found within this area.
After publishing their regions, Dr. Hong Qian criticized Liu et al. for the inclusion of nonnative distributions in their analyses.[25] In response to this, the group cleaned their data to remove nonnative ranges and reassessed their regions. They suggest that the previous inclusion of exotic species did not significantly affect their mapping and found that the cleaned data revealed the same floristic realms.[26]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Drude, O. (1890). Handbuch der Pflanzengeographie. Stuttgart: Engelhorn, [1], [2]. French translation: Manuel de géographie botanique. Paris: P. Klincksieck, 1897. 552 p., [3].
- ^ Braun-Blanquet, J. (1932). Plant sociology; the study of plant communities. New York and London, McGraw-Hill, [4].
- ^ Linder, Lovett, Mutke, et al. (2005): A numerical re-evaluation of the sub-Saharan phytochoria. Biologiske Skrifter 55: 229-252.
- ^ JOLY, C.A., AIDAR, M.P.M., KLINK, C.A., McGRATH, D.G., MOREIRA, A.G., MOUTINHO, P., NEPSTAD, D.C., OLIVEIRA, A.A.; POTT, A.; RODAL, M.J.N. & SAMPAIO, E.V.S.B. 1999. Evolution of the Brazilian phytogeography classification systems: implications for biodiversity conservation. Ci. e Cult. 51: 331-348.
- ^ Magno Coutinho, L. (2006) O conceito de bioma. Acta bot. bras. 20(1): 13-23.
- ^ Werger, M. J. A. & H. van Gils. 1976. Phytosociological classification problems in chorological border line areas. J. Biogeogr. 3: 49–54, [5].
- ^ glossary Archived 2008-04-11 at the Wayback Machine from Bredenkamp, George J.; Granger, J. Ed; Hoffman, M. Timm; Lubke, Roy A.; Mckenzie, Bruce; Rebelo, A. (Tony) & Noel, van Rooyen (February 1998). Low, A. Barrie & Rebelo, A. (Tony) G. (eds.). Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: A companion to the Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria.
- ^ Prance, G. T. (1989). American Tropical forests, in Ecosystems of the World, Vol. 14B. Tropical Rain Forest Ecosystems, (eds H. Lieth and M. J. A. Werger), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 99–132, [6].
- ^ Engler, A. (1879-1882). Versuch einer Entwicklungsgeschichte der Pflanzenwelt. 2 vols., Leipzig.
- ^ Cox, C. B., Moore, P.D. & Ladle, R. J. 2016. Biogeography: an ecological and evolutionary approach. 9th edition. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, p. 10, [7].
- ^ Engler, Adolf (1903). Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien: eine Übersicht über das gesamte Pflanzensystem mit Berücksichtigung der Medicinal- und Nutzpflanzen nebst einer Übersicht über die Florenreiche und Florengebiete der Erde zum Gebrauch bei Vorlesungen und Studien über specielle und medicinisch-pharmaceutische Botanik (3rd ed.). Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlag. p. 233. Retrieved 31 January 2014.
- ^ de Candolle, Augustin (1820). Essai Élémentaire de Géographie Botanique. In: Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles, Vol. 18. Flevrault, Strasbourg, [8].
- ^ Schouw, J. F. (1822). Grundtræk til en almindelig Plantegeographie. Copenhagen, Gyldendalske Boghandels Forlag. German translation: Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Pflanzengeographie, Berlin, 1823, [9].
- ^ de Candolle, Alphonse (1855). Géographie botanique raisonnée. Paris: V. Masson, [10].
- ^ Diels, L. (1908). Pflanzengeographie. Göschen, Leipzig, [11]; 5th ed. rev. 1958 (F. Mattick), De Gruyter, Berlin.
- ^ Rikli, M. (1913). "Geographie der Pflanzen (Die Florenreiche)". In: Handwörterbuch der Naturwissenschaften 4:776–857, [12].
- ^ Good, R. (1947). The Geography of Flowering Plants. Longmans, Green and Co, New York, [13]. 2nd ed., 1953, [14].
- ^ Takhtajan, A. 1969. Flowering plants: origin and dispersal. Transl. by C. Jeffrey. Oliver &. Boyd, Edinburgh. 310 pp. [15].
- ^ Тахтаджян А. Л. Флористические области Земли / Академия наук СССР. Ботанический институт им. В. Л. Комарова. — Л.: Наука, Ленинградское отделение, 1978. — 247 с. — 4000 экз. DjVu, Google Books.
- ^ Takhtajan, A. (1986). Floristic Regions of the World. (translated by T.J. Crovello & A. Cronquist). University of California Press, Berkeley, PDF, DjVu.
- ^ Cox, C. B. (2001). The biogeographic regions reconsidered. Journal of Biogeography, 28: 511-523, [16].
- ^ Frey, Wolfgang; Lösch, Rainer (2004). Lehrbuch der Geobotanik. München, Heidelberg: Elsevier, Spektrum. ISBN 3-8274-1193-9.
- ^ Frey, Wolfgang; Lösch, Rainer (2010). Geobotanik: Pflanzen und Vegetation in Raum und Zeit (3 ed.). Heidelberg: Spektrum. ISBN 978-3-8274-2335-1.
- ^ Liu, Y., Xu, X., Dimitrov, D., Pellissier, L., Borregaard, M. K., Shrestha, N., Su, X., Luo, A., Zimmermann, N. E., Rahbek, C., & Wang, Z. (2023). An updated floristic map of the world. Nature Communications, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38375-y
- ^ Qian, H. (2024). Reassessing data quality underlying the recently updated floristic map of the world. Nature Communications, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47543-7
- ^ Liu, Y., Xu, X., Dimitrov, D., Rahbek, C., & Wang, Z. (2024). Reply to: Reassessing data quality underlying the recently updated floristic map of the world. Nature Communications, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47544-6
Bibliography
[edit]- Frodin, D.G. (2001). Guide to Standard Floras of the World. An annotated, geographically arranged systematic bibliography of the principal floras, enumerations, checklists and chorological atlases of different areas. 2nd ed. (1st edn 1984), pp. xxiv, 1100, .Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, [17].
Phytochorion
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
A phytochorion is a phytogeographic region or area of any rank—such as kingdom, region, province, or district—with a relatively uniform floristic composition, where smaller units are nested within successively larger ones. These units are delineated based on the shared distribution of plant species, particularly endemics, and serve as fundamental categories in phytogeography for understanding global patterns of plant diversity and evolution.[1]
Phytochoria form a hierarchical framework that reflects both historical biogeographic processes, such as continental drift and glaciation, and contemporary environmental influences like climate and soil.[2] Unlike biomes, which emphasize vegetation structure and function, phytochoria prioritize taxonomic composition and floristic affinities to map natural areas of plant distribution.[1] Boundaries between adjacent phytochoria are typically transitional rather than abrupt, allowing for overlap in species ranges.[3]
The concept of phytochoria emerged in the early 20th century as part of advancing phytogeography, with foundational classifications proposed by Ronald Good in his 1947 (revised 1974) work The Geography of the Flowering Plants, which outlined six major floristic kingdoms: Boreal (Holarctic), Paleotropical, Neotropical, South African (Cape), Australian, and Antarctic.[4] Armen Takhtajan expanded this in 1986 with Floristic Regions of the World, recognizing six kingdoms and 35 regions, emphasizing endemic taxa and evolutionary history to refine global divisions.[5] For Africa, Frank White's 1983 UNESCO-backed The Vegetation of Africa defined eight major phytochoria, including the Guinea-Congolian (tropical rainforest-dominated) and Afromontane (highland) regions, integrating floristic data with vegetation mapping.[6] These systems continue to influence modern analyses, often validated through numerical clustering of species distributions.[7]
Notable examples include the Holarctic Kingdom, spanning northern Eurasia and North America with temperate and boreal forests dominated by families like Pinaceae and Betulaceae; the Cape Floristic Region, a global biodiversity hotspot within Good's South African Kingdom, featuring approximately 9,000 vascular plant species, more than 6,000 of which are endemic, in Mediterranean-climate fynbos vegetation; and the Irano-Turanian Region, part of Takhtajan's Holarctic Kingdom, characterized by arid-adapted steppe flora across Central Asia.[4][8][6][9] Phytochoria analyses have proven essential for conservation, highlighting centers of endemism and informing protected area designations amid ongoing climate change.[7]
Definition and Concepts
Core Definition
A phytochorion is a geographic area characterized by a relatively uniform floristic composition, meaning it features a distinctive assemblage of plant species that sets it apart from neighboring areas, though transitions between phytochoria are typically gradual rather than abrupt. This concept emphasizes the distribution patterns of plant taxa at various taxonomic levels, reflecting historical, evolutionary, and ecological processes that shape regional plant diversity. Unlike broader ecological units such as biomes, which are primarily defined by vegetation structure and climate, phytochoria focus on the similarity and endemism of species, genera, and higher taxa to delineate natural boundaries.[2] The term "phytochorion" originates from the Greek words phyton (plant) and chōrion (region or land), denoting a "plant region." It was introduced by botanists M. J. A. Werger and H. van Gils in their 1976 paper addressing classification challenges in transitional zones, building on earlier phytogeographic frameworks. The foundational ideas for dividing the world into major floristic units trace back to Ronald Good's 1947 work The Geography of Flowering Plants, which proposed six primary floristic kingdoms based on patterns of plant distribution and endemism.[10][11][12] Phytochoria operate at multiple hierarchical scales, ranging from expansive kingdoms that span continents or large latitudinal belts to more localized regions and provinces within them. This nested structure allows for a detailed mapping of global plant diversity, where higher-level units exhibit greater degrees of endemic families and genera, while lower levels highlight provincial species turnover. For instance, a kingdom might encompass vast areas with shared ancient lineages, whereas a region could represent a subcontinental expanse with transitional floristic affinities. Such scaling underscores the dynamic nature of plant geography, influenced by barriers like oceans and mountains without relying solely on environmental gradients.[4]Key Characteristics and Boundaries
Phytochoria are defined by their relatively uniform floristic composition, encompassing areas where plant species share a high degree of similarity due to common evolutionary origins, climatic influences, and vegetation structures such as biomes and subbiomes. Delineation relies primarily on floristic criteria, including phylogenetic diversity and levels of endemism, where higher hierarchical units like kingdoms are distinguished by endemic families, subfamilies, or tribes, and regions by elevated rates of generic and specific endemism, with notable levels of generic endemism (e.g., about 17% in the Cape Floristic Region within kingdoms) and high species endemism (over 60%). These units form cohesive entities because their flora reflects historical assembly processes rather than purely ecological convergence, ensuring that shared taxa predominate over widespread cosmopolitan elements.[13][14] Boundaries between phytochoria are generally transitional rather than abrupt, manifesting as ecotones where floristic elements gradually intermix across climatic or topographic gradients. Physical barriers, including oceans, mountain ranges, and deserts, contribute to these delineations by limiting gene flow and promoting isolation, while areas of overlap occur where environmental conditions allow partial blending of adjacent floras. This gradual nature complicates precise mapping but underscores the dynamic interplay between geography and plant distribution.[13][4] The cohesion of phytochoria arises from vicariance, where geological events like continental fragmentation isolate populations, fostering endemic diversification, and dispersal, which facilitates species exchange via migration corridors or long-distance events. These processes, operating over geological timescales, integrate evolutionary history with current distributions to maintain internal homogeneity. For example, vicariance from the breakup of Gondwana has profoundly shaped southern hemisphere phytochoria through allopatric speciation.[13] In comparison to zoogeographic regions for animals, phytochoria emphasize sedentary plant distributions influenced more by abiotic barriers and historical contingency than by active movement, aligning conceptually with broader biogeographic realms while highlighting flora-specific patterns.[13]Historical Development
Early Classification Efforts
The foundations of classifying plant distributions were laid in the early 19th century through the pioneering work of Augustin Pyramus de Candolle, whose 1820 publication Essai élémentaire de géographie botanique introduced key concepts in phytogeography, including the distinction between a plant's "station" (local habitat) and "habitation" (broader geographic range), thereby emphasizing patterns of species distribution across regions.[15] Building on this, Adolf Engler advanced the field in 1882 by proposing a system of floristic realms based on the distribution of plant families and genera, delineating major global areas such as the Holarctic and Paleotropical realms to reflect distinct floral assemblages shaped by historical and geological factors.[16] By the late 19th century, Andreas Schimper's 1898 treatise Pflanzen-Geographie auf physiologischer Grundlage (translated as Plant-Geography upon a Physiological Basis in 1903) served as a precursor to more formalized phytochoria by classifying global vegetation into physiological formations, such as tropical rainforests and sclerophyllous woodlands, linking plant adaptations to environmental influences like climate and soil.[17] Complementary efforts by key figures like Eugen Warming and Oscar Drude introduced broader "kingdom" concepts; Warming's 1895 Plantesamfund emphasized ecological plant geography through vegetation communities tied to habitat conditions, while Drude's 1884 Die Florenreiche der Erde outlined 14 floristic kingdoms and 55 regions, integrating ecological data with distributional patterns to map global plant diversity.[18][16] These early systems, however, faced significant challenges, including the absence of standardized criteria for delimiting regions—often relying on subjective assessments of similarity—and a predominant emphasis on climatic zones rather than floristic endemism, which limited their precision in capturing evolutionary and historical divergences in plant taxa.[19] Such informal efforts set the stage for later formalized classifications, culminating in Ronald Good's introduction of the term "phytochorion" in 1947 to denote areas of high endemicity.[20]Ronald Good's Regionalization (1947)
In his seminal 1947 book The Geography of the Flowering Plants, British botanist Ronald Good introduced the concept of phytochorion as a geographic area characterized by a relatively uniform composition of plant species, with boundaries often transitional rather than sharp.[16] This work marked the first formal use of the term "phytochorion" to denote such floristic units, establishing a foundational framework for plant biogeography that emphasized hierarchical classification based on shared evolutionary histories.[21] Good's regionalization divided the world's flowering plants into six primary floristic kingdoms: Boreal (also termed Holarctic), Neotropical, Paleotropical, South African, Australian, and Antarctic.[16] These kingdoms were further subdivided into a total of 37 floristic regions, with many regions containing additional provinces and districts, creating a nested hierarchy that highlighted patterns of endemism at different scales—such as family-level endemism for kingdoms and generic or species-level endemism for lower units.[16] For instance, the Boreal Kingdom encompassed northern temperate and arctic zones across Eurasia and North America, while the Antarctic Kingdom linked southern continents through relict distributions of genera like Nothofagus.[22] The classification relied on criteria of floristic homogeneity, defined by the distinctive assemblage of plant families and genera within each unit, coupled with high rates of endemism that reflected long-term isolation.[20] Good incorporated historical biogeographic factors, such as the breakup of the supercontinent Gondwana, to explain disjunct distributions in the southern kingdoms (e.g., shared elements between South Africa, Australia, and South America), attributing these to vicariance rather than dispersal.[16] This approach represented an innovation by integrating paleogeographic evidence into a systematic hierarchy, from local districts to global kingdoms, influencing subsequent phytogeographic schemes.[20]Takhtajan's Floristic System (1978, 1986)
System Overview and Principles
Armen Takhtajan introduced his floristic regionalization system in the 1978 Russian edition of Floristic Regions of the World, with an English translation and revisions published in 1986, delineating the global landmasses into six floristic kingdoms and 35 regions based on patterns of plant distribution and endemism.[23][5] This framework represents a qualitative synthesis of expert knowledge on floral assemblages, prioritizing historical and evolutionary factors over purely ecological ones.[23] Unlike Ronald Good's earlier 1947 system, which outlined broader zones with fewer subdivisions, Takhtajan's approach provides higher resolution by incorporating subregions and emphasizing floristic discontinuities at higher taxonomic levels, such as families and genera.[24] The core principles of Takhtajan's system center on the evolutionary history of angiosperms, integrating evidence from paleobotany, phylogeny, and biogeographic barriers to define units of floristic similarity.[23] He stressed that floristic regions reflect long-term processes like continental drift and climatic shifts, which have shaped the divergence and isolation of plant lineages over geological time scales.[24] Plate tectonics plays a pivotal role in establishing boundaries, as the separation of ancient supercontinents like Gondwana and Laurasia created vicariance events that fragmented ancestral floras and promoted endemic speciation.[23] Climate, particularly paleoclimatic variations, further influences these patterns by determining habitat suitability and migration corridors for angiosperm groups.[24] Takhtajan's hierarchy organizes the system into kingdoms as the highest rank—large-scale areas with distinct floristic cores separated by major barriers like oceans or deserts—followed by regions as floristically homogeneous subunits exhibiting high endemism.[5] Subregions and provinces provide finer divisions within regions, allowing for nuanced recognition of transitional zones.[23] Among the six kingdoms, the Holarctic stands as the largest, encompassing vast northern temperate and boreal zones across Eurasia and North America, unified by shared glacial histories and land bridges.[24] This structure underscores Takhtajan's view that phytogeographic units must align with evolutionary trajectories rather than modern political or physiographic divisions.[23]Holarctic Kingdom and Its Regions
The Holarctic Kingdom in Armen Takhtajan's floristic classification system represents the dominant temperate and boreal flora of the Northern Hemisphere, extending across Eurasia and North America and encompassing approximately 40% of global angiosperm genera. This kingdom reflects historical continental connections, such as the Bering land bridge, allowing significant floristic exchange between the two continents, though regional differentiation has occurred due to climatic and geological factors. The flora is characterized by temperate deciduous and coniferous forests, steppes, deserts, and Mediterranean scrublands, with key families including Pinaceae, Fagaceae, and Rosaceae. Takhtajan's delineation emphasizes evolutionary history, endemism patterns, and phytogeographic boundaries, dividing the kingdom into three subkingdoms—the Boreal, Madro-Tertiary, and Mediterranean—comprising nine distinct regions.[25] The kingdom's vegetation patterns have been profoundly influenced by Pleistocene glaciations, which forced southward migrations of boreal and temperate species into refugia, followed by post-glacial recolonization that homogenized circumboreal elements while preserving regional endemism in unglaciated areas.[25] This dynamic history explains transitions between regions, such as shared genera between the Eastern Asiatic and North American Atlantic regions, and the persistence of relict species in mountainous and coastal refugia. The nine regions are as follows:- Circumboreal Region (Boreal Subkingdom): Spans boreal forests and tundra across northern Eurasia and North America, dominated by conifers like Picea, Abies, and Pinus, with low endemism (~24 species in Canadian areas) due to recent glacial retreat and uniform post-glacial flora; includes Arctic tundra with ~892 species and herbaceous dominants like Salix and Betula.[25]
- Eastern Asiatic Region (Boreal Subkingdom): Centered in eastern China, Japan, and adjacent areas, featuring diverse forests from subtropical to temperate, with over 300 endemic genera (e.g., Davidia, Metasequoia) representing a major center of Holarctic plant evolution and high species richness.[26]
- North American Atlantic Region (Madro-Tertiary Subkingdom): Covers eastern North America, including the Appalachian and Atlantic Coastal Plain provinces, with ~5,500–6,000 species in deciduous forests and pine savannas; high endemism (several hundred species, one endemic family) in unglaciated refugia, sharing ~74 genera with eastern Asia.[25]
- Rocky Mountain Region (Madro-Tertiary Subkingdom): Encompasses the western cordillera from Canada to Mexico, with conifer forests, sagebrush steppes, and alpine tundra; ~4,000–4,500 species overall, increasing endemism southward (~40 species in core areas), exemplified by relict conifers like Pseudotsuga.[25]
- Madrean Region (Madro-Tertiary Subkingdom): Includes southwestern deserts and Mediterranean-like habitats of the U.S. Southwest and northern Mexico, such as the Californian and Sonoran provinces; ~4,000 species in California alone with ~50% endemism (e.g., Arctostaphylos, diverse Astragalus), featuring chaparral, oak woodlands, and cacti-dominated deserts.[25]
- Mediterranean Region (Mediterranean Subkingdom): Extends around the Mediterranean Basin with sclerophyllous maquis, garrigue, and woodlands adapted to summer drought; over 10,000 species with exceptionally high endemism driven by topographic diversity and historical isolation.
- Macaronesian Region (Mediterranean Subkingdom): Comprises Atlantic islands like the Canaries, Madeira, and Azores, with laurel forests (laurisilva) and endemic laurels (Laurus, Laurelia); notable for relict Tertiary flora and high insular endemism, bridging Mediterranean and subtropical elements.
- Saharo-Arabian Region (Mediterranean Subkingdom): Covers North African and Arabian deserts, characterized by xerophytic shrubs and succulents (e.g., Zygophyllum, Ochradenus); low overall diversity but adapted to extreme aridity, with endemics linked to oases and wadis.
- Irano-Turanian Region (Mediterranean Subkingdom): Spans Central Asian steppes and semi-deserts from Iran to Mongolia, dominated by grasses, chenopods, and cushion plants; moderate endemism in mountainous areas, serving as a transition to Paleotropical floras.
Paleotropical Kingdom and Its Regions
The Paleotropical Kingdom in Armen Takhtajan's floristic classification system (1978, 1986) comprises the tropical and subtropical zones of the Old World, spanning from mainland Africa and Madagascar across the Indian subcontinent, Southeast Asia, and the tropical islands of the Pacific Ocean up to but excluding Australia. This kingdom is distinguished by its ancient, relict flora with strong Gondwanan affinities, resulting from prolonged isolation following the breakup of the supercontinent Gondwana, which fostered unique evolutionary radiations in humid, evergreen forests and associated ecosystems. Takhtajan emphasized the kingdom's role as a center of tropical angiosperm diversification, with floristic boundaries often aligned with climatic gradients and historical biogeographic barriers like the Wallace Line. Takhtajan subdivided the Paleotropical Kingdom into five floristic subkingdoms—African, Madagascan, Indomalesian, Polynesian, and Neocaledonian—encompassing 13 distinct regions characterized by varying degrees of endemism and habitat diversity, from lowland rainforests to montane and insular systems. These regions highlight the kingdom's tropical nature, with dominant families such as Dipterocarpaceae, Annonaceae, and Rubiaceae reflecting adaptations to warm, wet climates and seasonal monsoons. The African Subkingdom includes five regions: the Guineo-Congolian Region, centered on the Congo Basin's evergreen rainforests, which harbor high alpha diversity with over 10,000 vascular plant species and numerous endemic genera like Gilbertiodendron; the Usambara-Zululand Region, featuring Afromontane forests in eastern Africa's highlands, known for relict species such as those in the Proteaceae family; the Sudano-Zambezian Region, dominated by miombo woodlands and savannas across central and southern Africa, with fire-adapted grasses and trees like Brachystegia; the Karoo-Namib Region, an arid zone in southwestern Africa with succulent karoo vegetation and high endemism in families like Aizoaceae; and the St. Helena and Ascension Region, comprising oceanic islands with extreme isolation leading to unique endemics, such as the endemic genus Trochetiopsis on St. Helena.[27] The Madagascan Subkingdom consists solely of the Madagascan Region, an isolated island landmass that exemplifies explosive speciation, with approximately 11,500 vascular plant species, of which about 82% are endemic, including iconic radiations in families like Sarcolaenaceae and diverse orchids adapted to spiny thickets and humid forests.[28][29] The Indomalesian Subkingdom encompasses four regions: the Indian Region, covering the Indian subcontinent's diverse habitats from Western Ghats rainforests to Himalayan foothills, with monsoonal elements like teak (Tectona); the Indochinese Region, spanning mainland Southeast Asia's seasonal tropics, featuring dipterocarp-dominated forests; the Malesian Region, a premier global hotspot in Indonesia, the Philippines, and surrounding islands, boasting extreme diversity with over 25,000 vascular plant species, including vast orchid and fig radiations; and the Fijian Region, marked by volcanic island flora with high insular endemism.[30][31] The Polynesian Subkingdom includes the Polynesian Region and Hawaiian Region, both representing remote Pacific archipelagos with wind- and bird-dispersed floras, where isolation has driven adaptive radiations, such as the silversword alliance (Argyroxiphium) in Hawaii amid low overall species richness but high endemism rates exceeding 90% for native angiosperms.[32] Finally, the Neocaledonian Subkingdom is defined by the Neocaledonian Region on New Caledonia, a fragment of ancient Gondwana with ultramafic soils supporting over 3,000 vascular plant species, around 75% endemic, including unique conifers like Amborella, the most basal extant angiosperm lineage.[33]Neotropical Kingdom and Its Regions
The Neotropical Kingdom, also known as Neotropis, encompasses the floras of Central and South America, extending from Mexico southward to the southern tip of the continent, including the Caribbean islands and excluding the southernmost temperate zones. This kingdom is considered the youngest among Takhtajan's floristic divisions due to its relatively recent geological history, including the uplift of the Andes and the formation of the Isthmus of Panama, which facilitated biotic exchanges and evolutionary radiations in the past few million years. Takhtajan delineates five principal regions within the Neotropical Kingdom, each characterized by distinct floristic assemblages shaped by topographic, climatic, and historical factors. The Caribbean Region includes the Central American, West Indian, and Galapageian provinces, featuring high levels of endemism on islands such as Cuba and Hispaniola, where isolation has promoted the diversification of tropical dry forests and montane species. Adjacent to this, the Guayana Highlands Region, centered on the Guayana Province, is defined by ancient tabletop mountains (tepuis) that harbor relict and endemic flora, including carnivorous plants and unique orchids adapted to nutrient-poor soils and frequent fires. The Amazonian Region forms the core of the kingdom's biodiversity, comprising the vast Amazonian Province with its basin rainforests and the Llanos Province of seasonal savannas; this area supports over 40,000 vascular plant species, representing approximately 10% of the global total and serving as a primary hotspot for tropical endemism. To the east, the Brazilian Region encompasses diverse provinces such as the Atlantic (with coastal rainforests), Caatinga (semiarid thorny scrub), Central Brazil Uplands (cerrado savannas), Chacoan (subtropical dry forests), and Parana (mixed forests), reflecting a gradient from humid to seasonal habitats that has driven adaptive radiations in families like the Bromeliaceae. Finally, the Andean Region, divided into Northern and Central Andean provinces, spans high-elevation ecosystems from Colombia to Bolivia, including páramos—alpine grasslands above the treeline that host giant rosette plants and support exceptional speciation rates. The ongoing tectonic uplift of the Andes since the Miocene has been a key driver of this diversification, creating steep environmental gradients that isolate populations and foster adaptive evolution in lineages such as the Asteraceae and Orchidaceae.South African and Australian Kingdoms
In Takhtajan's floristic system, the South African Kingdom comprises a single floristic region, the Cape Floristic Region, located at the southwestern tip of Africa and recognized for its extraordinary plant diversity within a relatively small area of approximately 90,000 km². This region is dominated by fynbos vegetation, a sclerophyllous shrubland adapted to nutrient-poor, sandy soils and featuring fine-leaved proteoids, ericoids, and restioids. It harbors about 9,030 vascular plant species, of which roughly 69% (over 6,200 species) are endemic, making it one of the world's biodiversity hotspots. The climate is Mediterranean-type, with winter-dominant rainfall ranging from 200 to 2,000 mm annually, coupled with summer droughts that have shaped the flora's adaptations to periodic water stress and fire.[34] The Australian Kingdom, in contrast, is divided into three principal regions reflecting Australia's diverse climatic gradients: the Northeast Australian Region, characterized by tropical and subtropical rainforests in the wetter eastern coastal areas; the Southwest Australian Region, home to kwongan heathlands and sclerophyllous shrublands in a Mediterranean climate zone; and the Central Australian or Eremaean Region, encompassing the vast arid interior with drought-tolerant desert flora and spinifex grasslands. These regions together support a flora with high endemism, particularly in families like Proteaceae and Myrtaceae, adapted to oligotrophic soils across a continent spanning arid to humid environments. The broader latitudinal and climatic range in Australia results in greater overall floristic diversity compared to the more uniform Cape Region. Both kingdoms share ancient Gondwanan relict elements, such as lineages in Proteaceae that trace back to the Cretaceous, and exhibit pronounced sclerophylly—tough, leathery leaves—as a convergent adaptation to low-nutrient soils, seasonal aridity, and frequent fires. These fire-adapted floras, including serotinous seed release in many species, evolved in response to the post-Gondwanan isolation, particularly after Australia's separation from Antarctica around 35 million years ago, which restricted gene flow and promoted regional divergence. While the South African Kingdom's isolation was further reinforced by surrounding savannas and oceans, Australia's larger size and varied topography allowed for more heterogeneous vegetation mosaics.[35]Antarctic Kingdom and Its Regions
The Holantarctic Kingdom, also referred to as the Antarctic Kingdom in Armen Takhtajan's floristic classification system, represents the southernmost phytochorion, spanning cool-temperate to subantarctic latitudes primarily south of 40°S. This kingdom is defined by its relict floras of ancient Gondwanan origin, which connect the southern continents through shared phylogenetic lineages shaped by tectonic isolation following the supercontinent's fragmentation during the Mesozoic era. Takhtajan emphasized endemism at generic and familial levels, driven by paleoclimatic shifts and geological history, distinguishing it from adjacent kingdoms like the Neotropical and Australian. The flora exhibits relatively low diversity in angiosperms compared to tropical kingdoms, reflecting adaptation to harsh, windy, and often nutrient-poor environments, including survival in glacial refugia during Quaternary ice ages. A hallmark of the Holantarctic Kingdom is the dominance of woody angiosperms, particularly species of Nothofagus (southern beeches), which form extensive forests and serve as key indicators of its Gondwanan heritage, with fossil records tracing their diversification to the late Cretaceous. These elements, alongside podocarpaceous conifers and cushion-forming perennials, underscore the kingdom's circumpolar connectivity via ancient land bridges and long-distance dispersal. Takhtajan subdivided the kingdom into four regions based on floristic composition and biogeographic barriers: the Fernandezian, Chile-Patagonian, South Subantarctic Islands, and Neozeylandic regions. The Fernandezian Region encompasses the isolated Juan Fernández and Desventuradas archipelagos off central Chile, featuring oceanic island floras with extraordinarily high endemism—over 60% of vascular plants are unique to these islands—arising from adaptive radiation of South American colonists, primarily via avian dispersal. This region highlights the kingdom's insular dynamics, with laurel forests (Persea spp.) and ferns dominating moist habitats, though total species richness remains modest at around 600 vascular plants. In contrast, the Chile-Patagonian Region covers the southern Andean cordillera and Patagonian lowlands of Chile and Argentina, characterized by temperate rainforests, Valdivian woodlands, and subalpine meadows where Nothofagus species like N. obliqua and N. betuloides prevail, comprising up to 80% of forest canopy in some areas. This continental core exhibits moderate diversity (about 1,200 vascular species) but high Gondwanan relictism, with glacial refugia in fjords and valleys preserving lineages absent elsewhere, linking it briefly to floras in the adjacent South African and Australian kingdoms through shared southern beech distributions. The Region of the South Subantarctic Islands includes remote oceanic groups such as Kerguelen, Heard, South Georgia, and Tristan da Cunha, where angiosperm diversity is extremely low—often fewer than 50 species per island group—dominated by rosette herbs, grasses, and megaherbs like Pringlea antiscorbutica adapted to perpetual winds and cool summers. Endemism here reaches 20-30% at the species level, with many taxa representing depauperate Gondwanan holdovers that survived post-glacial recolonization via rafting or bird transport. The Neozeylandic Region, centered on New Zealand and its offshore islands (e.g., Auckland Islands), stands out for its elevated diversity and endemism, with approximately 80% of the 2,500 native vascular plants unique to the area, including diverse Nothofagus forests (N. menziesii, N. solandri) that cover vast tracts and define altitudinal zones from sea level to treeline. This region's varied topography—from coastal dunes to alpine herbfields—supports relict Gondwanan elements like ancient angiosperm families (e.g., Winteraceae), preserved in ice-free refugia during Pleistocene glaciations, making it a critical node in the kingdom's biogeographic network.Alternative and Modern Regionalizations
Frey and Lösch's Scheme (2004, 2010)
Frey and Lösch introduced an updated scheme for the global classification of phytochoria in the second edition of their Lehrbuch der Geobotanik (2004), with refinements in the third edition (2010). This framework builds on earlier systems by incorporating advances in phytosociology and vegetation analysis, emphasizing the dynamic interplay between floristic composition, syntaxonomic units, and environmental transitions. Unlike more rigid hierarchical models, their approach prioritizes the integration of vegetation syntaxa—associations of plant communities defined by shared species and ecological affinities—to delineate regions, resulting in a more fluid representation of boundaries.[36] The scheme proposes a total of approximately 20-25 phytochorions worldwide, structured around fewer kingdoms than predecessors like Takhtajan's six-kingdom model, but with enhanced resolution in transitional areas. For the Holarctic kingdom, they delineate 7 regions, including a distinct Euro-Siberian unit that highlights temperate forest and steppe assemblages across Eurasia. In the Paleotropical kingdom, 8 regions are recognized, encompassing diverse tropical formations from rainforests to savannas. These divisions reflect a synthesis of floristic endemism and vegetation patterns, such as the merger of Takhtajan's Saharo-Arabian and Irano-Turanian regions into a single arid-zone phytochorion to better capture shared xerophytic elements and historical connectivity. Broader African units are also defined, accommodating the continent's gradient from Mediterranean to tropical biomes under unified categories that stress phytosociological continuity over strict floristic isolation.[36] Central to Frey and Lösch's principles is the incorporation of phytosociology, drawing on European syntaxonomic traditions to classify global vegetation classes and orders as diagnostic for regional boundaries. This vegetation-focused lens reduces the number of kingdoms—focusing on Holarctic, Paleotropical, Neotropical, and others—while amplifying emphasis on ecotones and hybrid zones where phytochoria overlap, such as the Afro-Asiatic transition. Compared to Takhtajan's emphasis on evolutionary centers of endemism, their model underscores practical applications in conservation and land management by linking floristic regions to observable vegetation dynamics and climatic gradients. For instance, the recognition of the Euro-Siberian region as separate from broader circumboreal elements accounts for unique syntaxa in hemiboreal forests, informed by post-glacial recolonization patterns. Overall, this scheme provides a balanced, integrative update suited to contemporary geobotanical research.[36]Liu et al.'s Molecular-Based Regionalization (2023, 2024)
Liu et al. developed a quantitative, phylogenetic approach to global floristic regionalization, published in 2023, that integrates molecular phylogenies with species distribution data to delineate evolutionary distinct regions.[23] Their analysis utilized a dated supertree comprising 12,664 angiosperm genera—representing approximately 85% of known genera—constructed from eight molecular markers and calibrated with fossil constraints via a molecular clock to estimate divergence times.[23] This data-driven method employed hierarchical clustering based on phylogenetic beta diversity to identify eight floristic realms and 16 nested sub-realms, organized into two super-realms: the Gondwanan (encompassing African, Australian, Indo-Malesian, Neotropical, Novozealandic, and Chile-Patagonian realms) and the Laurasian (Holarctic and Saharo-Arabian realms).[23] The realms reflect major evolutionary barriers, with boundaries defined where phylogenetic turnover is high, indicating limited genus dispersal across them. This scheme confirms the broad structure of Takhtajan's six floristic kingdoms while refining boundaries through empirical evidence, such as dividing the Paleotropical kingdom into separate African and Indo-Malesian realms and splitting the Antarctic kingdom into Novozealandic and Chile-Patagonian realms, alongside elevating the Saharo-Arabian region to full realm status.[23] Key innovations include the use of molecular clock data to trace temporal dynamics of regional assembly, revealing that vicariance from plate tectonics—particularly the breakup of Gondwana and the opening of the Atlantic—drove the formation of these divisions over the past 100 million years.[23] The approach provides stronger quantitative support for endemism patterns, with 53.6% of genera confined to one side of high-confidence boundaries, and generates updated maps highlighting hotspots like the Cape sub-realm within the African realm.[23] It also critiques and updates outdated boundaries in Africa and Asia by incorporating sparse tropical data to better capture phylogenetic discontinuities, such as those separating the Indo-Malesian from adjacent realms. In a 2024 follow-up responding to data quality concerns, Liu et al. refined their database by excluding additional non-native and cultivated records from sources like Plants of the World Online, then re-executed the analyses, which upheld the original regionalization with minimal changes to realm delineations.[37] This iteration emphasized the robustness of the molecular-based framework against sampling biases, particularly in understudied tropical areas, and reinforced its value in addressing gaps in traditional schemes by prioritizing evolutionary history over purely distributional patterns.[37] Overall, the structure parallels Takhtajan's hierarchical system but advances it with phylogenetic rigor, offering a scalable model for future refinements as genomic data expands.[23]Applications and Critiques
Biogeographical Applications
Phytochoria serve as foundational frameworks for predicting plant species distributions by delineating areas of shared floristic affinities, enabling models to forecast potential ranges based on historical and ecological patterns of endemism and dispersal.[23] In species distribution modeling, these regions help integrate environmental variables with phylogenetic data to anticipate invasions or expansions, particularly for taxa with restricted distributions within specific kingdoms like the Paleotropical or Neotropical.[38] For instance, Takhtajan's classification has been used to parameterize ecological niche models that project habitat suitability across continental scales, improving accuracy for conservation prioritization.[7] Studying climate change impacts represents a key application, where phytochoria boundaries are analyzed to assess shifts in floristic composition under future scenarios. Projections indicate that warming and altered precipitation could homogenize phylogenetic diversity within regions, with some phytochoria like the Circumboreal persisting while others, such as the Californian, may merge or fragment by 2100, driven by temperature seasonality and historical climate velocities. These models, applied to over 189,000 vascular plant species, reveal potential boundary shifts of up to several hundred kilometers, informing adaptive strategies to mitigate loss of evolutionary legacies in hotspots. Such analyses contribute to IUCN Red List assessments by highlighting endemic-rich areas vulnerable to range contractions, where species restricted to single phytochoria face elevated extinction risks under moderate emissions pathways. In conservation, phytochoria guide the identification and protection of biodiversity hotspots, such as the Cape Floristic Region within the South African Kingdom, which contains approximately 9,000 vascular plant species, of which 69% (over 6,000) are endemic and has informed systematic planning to secure 75% of critical habitats.[39] Similarly, the Madagascan region in the Paleotropical Kingdom, with more than 11,000 endemic vascular plants, underpins targeted interventions to expand protected areas in the Madagascar and Indian Ocean Islands hotspot, which cover over 16 million hectares as of recent assessments, addressing threats like deforestation.[40] These frameworks align with Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) targets, particularly Target 5 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation, which calls for protecting at least 75% of key areas for plant diversity in each ecological region, using phytochoria to define such units for effective management.[41] Research tools leveraging phytochoria include GIS-based mapping, which overlays floristic boundaries with environmental layers to visualize endemism patterns and connectivity, as seen in digitized versions of Takhtajan's regions for global analyses.[42] Integration with phylogeography further enhances this by incorporating genetic lineages to refine regional delineations, revealing deep historical splits that predict contemporary diversity gradients across kingdoms.[38] For example, updated floristic maps derived from phylogenetic data support global biodiversity assessments in reports like those from the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), aiding in the evaluation of ecosystem service declines and restoration priorities.[23]Limitations and Ongoing Debates
One major limitation of traditional phytochorion systems, such as Armen Takhtajan's influential classification, lies in their static boundaries, which fail to account for ongoing species dispersal and environmental dynamics. These schemes delineate fixed regions based on historical floristic patterns, yet contemporary climate change and natural migration processes are projected to homogenize phylogenetic beta diversity, with declines ranging from -0.0058 (2021–2040) to -0.06 (2081–2100), potentially merging distinct realms like the Amazonian and Brazilian phytochoria.[43] Similarly, the Afromontane phytochorion exemplifies scale mismatches and ambiguities, spanning 48° of latitude while incorporating non-montane alpine areas, thus obscuring finer floristic variability in grasslands and plateaus.[44] Phytochorion classifications have also historically underrepresented cryptogams, including bryophytes, ferns, and mosses, by prioritizing seed plants as the primary basis for regionalization. For instance, southern African schemes align bryofloristic patterns with seed-plant phytochoria but reveal stark endemism disparities (6–10% for bryophytes versus 17–75% for seed plants), attributed to cryptogams' greater dispersibility and understudied distributions.[45] This oversight extends to global systems like Takhtajan's, which emphasize vascular plants and neglect the ecological roles of cryptogams in soil stabilization and biodiversity hotspots.[46] Early phytochorion schemes exhibit Eurocentric biases, rooted in colonial-era botanical explorations that favored European and accessible regions, leading to skewed data on global floristic diversity. Colonialism facilitated plant introductions that homogenized floras, while research biases directed more effort toward Europe and the Americas than Africa or Asia, distorting kingdom delineations.[47][48] Ongoing debates center on the optimal number of kingdoms, with Takhtajan's six-kingdom model contested for overemphasizing minor units like the Cape and Antarctic, which some propose eliminating to reallocate to adjacent realms. Quantitative analyses yield 9 bioregionalization units, contrasting with 6–8 descriptive kingdoms, highlighting inconsistencies between functional biomes and historical phytochoria.[49][50] The role of molecular versus traditional data remains contentious; phylogenetic beta diversity from molecular trees better maps biogeographic patterns than morphology-based ones, revealing a deep Laurasian-Gondwanan split into three kingdoms (Holarctic, Holotropical, Austral), unlike the qualitative ambiguities in Takhtajan's system.[38][51] Human activities further blur boundaries through habitat alteration and species introductions, surpassing geological forces in reshaping floristic regions and accelerating homogenization.[43] Knowledge gaps persist, particularly in Arctic and Antarctic phytochoria post-2020, where undersampling of interior tundras and high logistical costs (e.g., US$51,000 for 5 days in remote areas) hinder assessments of warming-induced shifts.[52] Antarctic biodiversity suffers from limited data on biotic interactions and microbial functioning, with 98% ice cover excluding comprehensive polar analyses.[53] Integration of cryptogams into phytochoria remains incomplete, as their underrepresentation in vascular-focused schemes obscures full floristic profiles. Liu et al.'s molecular regionalization (2023, 2024) addresses some polar exclusions but underscores the need for broader genomic inclusion.[38] Future directions emphasize AI-driven phylogenomics for refining dynamic phytochoria, integrating multi-omics to predict evolutionary responses to climate change, and enhancing conservation via automated trait mapping. Climate modeling will enable projections of shifting boundaries, such as habitat declines under SSP2-4.5 scenarios, fostering adaptive regionalizations that incorporate human impacts.[54][55][56]References
- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/phytochorion