Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Millstone
View on Wikipedia

Millstones or mill stones are stones used in gristmills, used for triturating, crushing or, more specifically, grinding wheat or other grains. They are sometimes referred to as grindstones or grinding stones.
Millstones come in pairs: a stationary base with a convex rim known as the bedstone[1] (or nether millstone)[2] and a concave-rimmed runner stone[3] that rotates. The movement of the runner on top of the bedstone creates a "scissoring" action that grinds grain trapped between the stones. Millstones are constructed so that their shape and configuration help to channel ground flour to the outer edges of the mechanism for collection.
The runner stone is supported by a cross-shaped metal piece (millrind or rynd) fixed to a "mace head" topping the main shaft or spindle leading to the driving mechanism of the mill (wind, water (including tide), or other means).
History
[edit]The origins of an industry
[edit]Often referred to as the "oldest industry", the use of the millstone is inextricably linked to human history. Integrated into food processes since the Upper Palaeolithic, its use remained constant until the end of the 19th century, when it was gradually replaced by a new type of metal tool. However, it can still be seen in rural domestic installations, such as in India, where 300 million women used hand mills daily to produce flour in 2002.[4]

The earliest evidence for stones used to grind food is found in northern Australia, at the Madjedbebe rock shelter in Arnhem Land, dating back around 60,000 years. Grinding stones or grindstones, as they were called, were used by the Aboriginal peoples across the continent and islands, and they were traded in areas where suitable sandstone was not available in abundance. Different stones were adapted for grinding different things and varied according to location. One important use was for foods, in particular to grind seeds to make bread, but stones were also adapted for grinding specific types of starchy nuts, ochres for artwork, plant fibres for string, or plants for use in bush medicine, and are still used today. The Australian grindstones usually comprise a large flat sandstone rock (for its abrasive qualities), used with a top stone, known as a "muller", "pounder",[5] or pestle. The Aboriginal peoples of the present state of Victoria used grinding stones to crush roots, bulbs, tubers, and berries, as well as insects, small mammals, and reptiles before cooking them.[6]
In Ancient history
[edit]Careful examination of Paleolithic grinders (pebbles, wheels, mortar and pestle, etc.) enables us to determine the nature of the action exerted on the material and the gesture performed; the function of the tool can then be specified, as well as the activity in which it participated.
Neanderthal people were already using rudimentary tools to crush various substances, as attested by the presence of rudimentary grinders at the end of the Mousterian and millstones in the Châtelperronian. From the Aurignacian period onwards (around 38,000 years ago), Cro-Magnon man regularly used millstones, elongated grinders, and circular wheels. From the Gravettian period onwards (circa 29,000 years), this equipment became more diversified, with the appearance of new types of tools such as millstones and pestle grinders.
At the end of the Palaeolithic, millstones from Wadi Kubbaniya (Middle East, 19,000 B.C.) were involved in dietary processes and associated with residues of tuberous plants, which were known to require grinding before consumption, either to extract their toxins (Cyperus rotundus, nutsedge), or to remove the fibrous texture that would make them indigestible (Scirpus maritimus).[7] The rhizomes of ferns and the peel of the fruit of the doum palm, also found on this site, benefit from being ground to improve their nutritional qualities; they thus complemented the meat diet of hunter-gatherers. Grinding barley or oat seeds was practiced at the end of the Upper Palaeolithic (Franchthi) or the Kebarian (Ohalo II, 19,000 BC).[8]
As tools improved, the material was increasingly finely ground, but only when it became a real powder could we speak of grinding. Thus, the men of the European Upper Paleolithic were already dissociating grinding and milling, as attested by the appearance at this time of the first grinding slabs used with grinders or millstones. While there is no evidence of the milling of wild cereals in the early Upper Paleolithic, at least in Europe, there is no reason not to believe that other plant matter (acorns, nuts, hazelnuts, etc.) and animal matter (fat) were already being ground into paste before cooking. Similarly, it's likely that millstones were being used at this time for technical purposes, to crush mineral substances (dyes) and certain plant or animal fibers for technical use.

In the Mesolithic and Neolithic eras, with the domestication of plants, much larger, fully formed grinding, pounding, and milling equipment appeared. From the Natufian onwards, several types of millstones can be found side by side, such as the deep "trough-shaped" millstone or the flat millstone, indicating a specialization of their function. In the Near East, the pestle-grinder began to be developed in the Kebarian and Natufian periods. It gradually evolved into the heavy, generally wooden, thrown pestle. This type of equipment is still used today in many regions, such as in Ethiopia for milling millet.
The appearance of flat, elongated millstones in the Natoufian period (Abu Hureïra on the Euphrates) dates back to the 9th millennium BC. They feature larger active surfaces and mark the emergence of a new gesture, that of grinding from front to back, with both hands, which implies a new posture for the body, kneeling in front of the millstone. The appearance of large, asymmetrical, shaped millstones (Mureybet, Sheikh Hassan, circa 10,000 BP) led to the "saddle-shaped" millstones still known today as the metate.[9]
In the rest of the world
[edit]
At the Tell Abu Hureyra archaeological site, as early as the 8th millennium BC, women's skeletons show traces of osteoarthritis in the knees, spinal deformity and deformation of the first metatarsal, pathologies associated with long periods of bending while grinding, supporting the theory that early humans practiced a sexual division of labor.[10] In India, millstone (Chakki) were used to grind grains and spices. These consist of a stationary stone cylinder upon which a smaller stone cylinder rotates. Smaller ones, for household use, were operated by two people. Larger ones, for community or commercial use, used livestock to rotate the upper cylinder. Today a majority of the stone flour mills (Atta Chakki) are equipped with lower stone rotating and upper stone stationary millstones also called Shikhar Emery Stones which are made from abrasive emery grains and grits, with a binding agent similar to Sorel Cement. These stones are made from two types of emery abrasives - Natural Jaspar Red Emery or Synthetic Calcined Bauxite Black Emery.[citation needed]


In Korea, there were three different millstones, each made from different materials, serving other purposes, such as threshing, grinding, and producing starch. Generally, the handle of a millstone in Korea was made from an ash tree, the process for making a handle from the ash tree was known as "Mulpure-namu". To ensure that everything is "all right" with the creation of a millstone, a mason within ancient Korea offered food and alcohol in a ritual.[11]
Millstones were introduced to Britain by the Romans during the 1st century AD and were widely used there from the 3rd century AD onwards.[12]
In 1932-1933 in Ukraine, during the man-made famine known as Holodomor, the Soviet authorities prohibited the use of millstones, claiming that a millstone is a "mechanism for enrichment" (which was a negative term in Soviet communist ideology).[13] This forced Ukrainian villagers to hide their manually operated millstones and use them secretly during the famine. In response, Soviet authorities regularly searched villages for "illegal" millstones and destroyed them.[13] In 2007, the people of Victorivka village in Cherkasy Oblast built a monument using the millstones they had managed to hide and save from the Soviet plunder during the Holodomor.[13]
Different techniques: grinding, crushing, milling
[edit]The preparation of vegetable products (roots, tubers, almonds, leaves, etc.), animal products (marrow, tendons, etc.), or mineral products (ochre) by grinding or milling, for consumption or technical use, has existed for several dozen millennia. Unlike crushing, in which a hard envelope such as a shell or bone is broken open to recover its contents, in this case, the aim is to reduce a much softer material to a powder or paste.
Depending on the place and time, millstones were used for "dry" grinding: in the manufacture of flour, sugar, or spices, but also for the preparation of kaolinite, cement, phosphate, lime, enamel, fertilizer, and other minerals. The milling operation can also be carried out "wet", as in the case of durum wheat semolina, nixtamal, or the grinding of mustard seeds. During preparation, some raw materials produce a naturally fluid paste, as in olive crushing or cocoa grinding.
In his typology of percussion, André Leroi-Gourhan defines several families of gestures, three of which are essential for the preparation of raw materials:
- Crushing gestures involve vertical percussion using a heavy, elongated object in the manner of the African pestle. This gesture is also used by the trip hammer to make paper pulp, or in forging;
- Milling gestures, using percussion, which are performed in a circular, disordered, or back-and-forth motion on a millstone;
- Grinding gestures, in which the movements are roughly circular and occasionally vertical, thus combining a thrown percussion and a percussion posed, are qualified here as diffuse. This is the case with the contemporary mortar-pestle system.
Milling systems
[edit]Until the invention of the watermill, mills operated using "strength-powered", i.e. the force of animals or people.

The metate
[edit]The metate is a nether millstone for domestic use, for grinding corn. It has been used for several thousand years (around 3000 BC) in the cultural area of Mesoamerica, and its name comes from the Nahuatl "metatl".[14]
Today's millstones are monolithic, usually made of basalt, apodous, or tripod, rectangular, and slightly concave on the grinding surface. These millstones are associated with a two-handed wheel, called a "mano", whose size generally exceeds the width of the millstone and which is driven in an alternating rectilinear motion. On tripod wheels, one of the legs is slightly higher than the other two, giving the whole unit an inclination, with the user standing in front of the highest part.
The manufacture of millstones was essentially a male occupation. In pre-Hispanic times, millers used only stone tools, a practice that persisted in some villages until the mid-20th century. The use of metal tools, probably inherited from building stonemasons, made it possible to use the hardest basalts, resulting in millstones with a lifespan of over thirty years. While the manufacture of apod millstones from blocks of stone naturally polished in a riverbed was once within the reach of many farmers, the production of tripode metates requires specialized craftsmanship.
Grinding plays a key role in Mexican cuisine. Dry grinding is possible, but very few recipes are produced in this way: roasted coffee, roasted corn or beans, salt, sugar loaves, and cocoa are ground into powder. But most preparations require grinding with water. Fruits are ground into juices, beans or boiled vegetables, ingredients are added to various spicy sauces and, above all, corn is used to make the tortillas that form the basis of every meal. The latter are made from nixtamal, i.e. dry corn kernels cooked with lime, then rinsed with water, which softens the kernels and produces a paste. Maize or nixtamal can be ground for preparations other than patties: tamales, pozole, atole, pinole, and masa, with variations in the fineness of the grind depending on the use.

The metate was used exclusively by women, and in Mixtec lands, the place where the millstone is located was a space reserved for women. A couple often acquires, or is given, a millstone when they set up home. This acquisition represents a major expense in the life of a Mixtec peasant, as evidenced by the wills of nobles and wealthy peasants from the 16th to 18th centuries, which included metates.[14]
Daily tortillas are made from sufficiently moistened corn dough, which, unlike flour, cannot be preserved. This technical characteristic no doubt explains why domestic metates were not replaced centuries ago by mills, as they were in Europe. During the wars of the 19th century and the Mexican Revolution of 1910, Mexican armies were accompanied by women and metates to ensure the stewardship of the country; the Spanish conquest did not replace tortillas with bread - quite the contrary. At the end of the 19th century, the owners of the large plantations introduced motorized corn mills, which freed up female labor for the fields.[15] From 1920 onwards, electric mills appeared in the countryside, owned by municipalities, cooperatives or private individuals. However, still in use today, nether millstones are still part of Mexico's rural heritage.[citation needed]
The Olynthus mill
[edit]
The town of Olynthus was destroyed in 348 BC by Philip II of Macedonia, and the name "Olynthus millstone, Olynthus grinder, Olynthus mill" has come to be attached to this type of mill, which represents a genuine technical revolution. In 1917, the Greek Konstantinos Kourouniotis elucidated the workings of the hopper millstone, which played an important role in ancient Greece.[16]
In the Olynthus mill, the nether millstone(4) is rectangular, resting on a table (5); it measures between 0.42 m and 0.65 m in length, 0.36 m to 0.54 m in width and 0.08 to 0.25 m in thickness. The grinder, which forms the upper millstone (common millstone (3)), is usually rectangular, sometimes oval, with a central hopper parallel to the long sides, designed to receive the grain to be ground. The mill is capped by a horizontal axle attached to a pivot (1) on one side of the table, the other end being operated by a worker who moves the lever (2) back and forth horizontally. The Olynthus mill thus shows the beginnings of mechanization, with millers now standing on their feet, making work easier.
This type of mill certainly appeared as early as the beginning of the 5th century BC. Its use was widespread throughout the Greek civilization in the 4th century B.C., from Macedonia to the Peloponnese, and was adopted as far afield as the islands of Anatolia, Egypt, and modern-day Syria. It continued into the 1st century B.C., and sometimes even later, as the excavations at the Agora in Athens suggest. The importance of this mill type for the Greek world was confirmed by the discovery, in 1967, of 22 hopper mills in the cargo of a ship wrecked off Kyrenia, dated to the end of the 4th century BC. Increasing demand undoubtedly led to standardization in manufacturing and specialization of production centers. For example, flat Argolidian millstones, made of andesite and rhyolite, were produced from local quarries (Isthmus of Corinth, Saronic Gulf), while grinders came from more distant quarries (islands of Nysiros, Milos).[16]
The use of this type of mill was not limited to grinding cereals, as the finds from Thasos or Lavrio suggest: it was also used to grind ore, so as to calibrate it for subsequent selection by washing. It may even have appeared in the mines of Pangaion Hills. The text by Agatharchides on the gold mines of Egypt in the 1st century B.C., transmitted by Photios and Diodorus, mentions a mill with a lever:
"Women and older men then receive this ore crushed to the size of peas, throw it into the millstones, in numerous lines, two or three people standing at each lever and grind it." Photius' version specifies "on either side" of the lever.[16]
The rotating millstone
[edit]This rotating millstone was spin by many ladies. The millstones name changes in many different parts of India. This is because there are so many different languages. The parts though will still stay the same.[citation needed]
It's also known as a "hand millstone", "arm millstone" or "moulinet", and in Latin as a "molendinum bracchis" or "molendinum manuale".[citation needed]
According to de Barry, the oldest circular stone millstone was unearthed in the ruins of the town of Olynthus: it was the millstone of an oil mill, not a flour mill. Historians Marie-Claire Amouretti and Georges Comet[17] point out that these millstones pre-date the earliest known examples of circular grain mills. So it was probably through oil production that the first rotary crushing machine was introduced. Cereals and other fruits and seeds followed.[18]

The oldest rotating millstone are thought to have originated in Spain 2,500 years ago(600 BC - 400 BC).[19][20][21] It seems that the rotating millstone spread at the end of the 5th century BC from Spain,[19] and that it was directly derived from attempts to perfect the Olynthus mill.[22] André Leroi-Gourhan states that "the transformation of rectilinear reciprocating motion into circular-continuous motion leads to another form of milling". Some authors do not agree on its geographical origin, located for some "towards Carthage and the Syrian-Egyptian region", "simultaneously in Spain[23][24] and England" for others, and even though it was found in China in the 1st century BC.[22] According to L.A. Moritz, the rotating grain mill only appeared in the first century BC. He bases his demonstration on Latin texts, in particular those of Plautus and Cato, and fixes the introduction of this type between the time of Plautus' death in 184BC and the composition of De agri cultura, around 160 BC.[16]
Several types of mills can be identified in Europe, depending on the morphology of the millstones used in these manually operated rotary mills.
The Celtic mill is made up of massive millstones, with a conical external profile and virtually flat active stone surfaces.
In Dacia, between the 1st century B.C. and the 1st century A.D., the Celtic mill evolved into an intermediate type with two millstones superimposed and integrated, featuring a three-lobed feed opening. The more sharply tapered inner surfaces of the millstones ensured that the grains flowed more quickly under the effect of gravity, but the quality of the flour obtained remained mediocre. On the other hand, the effort required to operate the current millstone is considerable. The profile of the millstones makes them more difficult to cut, imposes a standardization of the millstones, and explains their diffusion and maintenance in a given region.[16] Some examples feature flatter wheels, with a much reduced taper, which reduces the stone mass. The speed of rotation became higher, providing a greater gyroscopic effect, but also requiring the installation of a system of claws fixed with molten lead on the upper side of the movable wheel, to hold it in place around the pivot.[14]
Romanization led to the widespread use of hand mills, which were perfected in terms of volume by increasing diameter and reducing height and weight. The profile of the millstones became flatter, and a number of improvements were introduced, such as an upper wedge to center the movable wheel on the pivot.[14] A device for adjusting the distance between the millstones (the anille) also appeared, enabling grinding quality to be controlled (1st century B.C.), and radii cut into the millstone could accentuate the natural abrasiveness of the stone.[22] Later developments, such as the installation of the double lever or the use of a crank fixed to the center of the millstone (14th - 15th centuries), meant that this type of hand mill was used in the countryside until the 20th century.[14]
Because they wear more quickly, this type of millstone requires a stricter selection of stones, among which basalt has a privileged place. Most of the stone used in Roman times seems to have come from just a few quarries. In France, millstones from Cap d'Agde supplied Languedoc and Provence; further north, quarries from the Massif Central (Volvic) supplied a vast territory stretching from Aquitaine to the Helvetic valleys; finally, from the Saône valley to the German border, millstones came mainly from Eifel quarries (Mayen).[22]
In Europe as a whole, the hand mill remained the main milling method until the end of Antiquity, and then throughout the Middle Ages; it only began to give way to the advances of water and then wind mills.[citation needed]
The Pompeian mill or "blood" mill
[edit]With a diameter limited to the reach of an arm's movement, i.e. 40 to 70 cm, the hand mill could only produce a limited quantity of flour and was therefore essentially reserved for domestic use. By increasing the diameter and, above all, the height of the meta (nether millstone) and the catillus (runner millstone), the Romans were able to overcome this constraint with the animal-drawn Pompeian mill, also known as the "blood" mill.[26]
In this mill, the nether millstone is conical at the top and the runner millstone looks like an hourglass, with its lower half covering the conical top of the nether millstone. The upper part of the runner millstone acts as a funnel, and a slight gap is maintained between the two millstones. The running wheel pivots around a wooden axle embedded in the standing wheel, and it is thanks to its suspension on this axle that the gap between the two wheels is ensured. This type of millstone could be powered either by two or four men, or by animal rides, hence its name mola asinaria, literally "donkey mill".
An example of this type of millstone can be found as early as the Classical era, used to grind ore in the Laurion mines,[27] although it did not overtake the less efficient reciprocating millstone.[28] Despite its qualities, it didn't really spread throughout the Roman world until later.[27] They were found throughout the Mediterranean basin, but never in very large numbers, except in Italy. Their very high cost - 1,250 denarii in the Late Roman period, compared with 250 denarii for hand millstones - meant that they were only used by millers and bakers. In Gaul, millstones are known from Lyon, Saint-Raphaël, Paris, Amiens and Clermont-Ferrand, all fashioned from basalt from the Eifel, Volvic or Cap d'Agde.[22]
During the Late Antiquity, the donkey mill retreated, probably disappearing after the 5th century as a result of the expansion of the watermill, then the windmill, except in Sardinia, where it remained until the 20th century.[citation needed]
The Roman trapetum
[edit]The Hellenistic period also saw the appearance of the olive crusher, which the Romans called the trapetum. Legend has it that it was invented by Aristaeus, and excavations at Olynthus have revealed examples dating back to the 5th century BC.[27]
The trapetum was precisely described by Cato the Elder, who gave us the technical names of all its parts. Excavations at Stabies, Pompeii, the villa at Boscoreale and in Roman Africa show that the system was widely used in ancient Rome and disappeared with it.
The trapetum consists of two plano-convex millstones (3, orbes), standing vertically, supported by a horizontal axis rotating around a vertical pivot (1, columella). This pivot rests on a short stone column (milliarium) at the center of a large hemispherical mortar (4). The lying millstone is a stone vat (4, mortarium) whose walls follow the external profile of the two common millstones. The orbs can move in a circular motion inside the mortarium, and are set in motion by the action of two wooden handles (2, modioli). Wooden wedges (orbiculi) inserted between the milliarium and the columella are used to adjust the height of the orbs above the bottom of the vat. In this system, the olives are not crushed under the millstone, but between the millstone and the sides of the vat.[16] As in the previous model, a gap was maintained between the two millstones. The resistance offered by the fruit forces the stone half-spheres to turn slightly on their axis; the two movements combine and the pressure is exerted only moderately, without breaking the stones, which would give bad taste.[30] The resultant pulp could then be subjected to the action of a press to collect the oil.
Millstones of southern Morocco
[edit]

A melting pot of African, Eastern and Mediterranean civilizations, Morocco has preserved tools and techniques from different eras.
The Volubilis site, located in Mauritania Tingitana (northeastern Morocco), features grain and olive mills from the Roman period (1st century-2nd century). These mills consist of a truncated cone-shaped standing millstone and a convex grinding ring to which the wooden machinery is connected, apparently operated without the aid of animal power. In this arrangement, the grinding ring is fitted onto the lying millstone. The Volubilitan olive millstone differs from the grain millstone by having oblique striations on the truncated surface of the lying millstone and on the inside of the grinding ring. Columella asserts that,[31] to extract the oil, the millstones (molae) are more useful than the crusher (trapetum), as they can be lowered or raised according to the size of the fruit, so as to avoid crushing the stone.[32]
A second type of olive mill can be found on the same site, and consists of a monolithic vat on which a fluted drum turns around a vertical mast like the section of a column. This type of mill is more common and can be found on many sites, even in recent times.
The argan tree is a woodland species endemic to southwest Morocco. The technical environment of the argan mill covers its range. It's a stone hand mill used to grind roasted kernels and almonds.
It stands out from the grain mill thanks to the truncated cone shape and greater height of its runner millstone (agurf wuflla), as well as the presence of a spout (abajjr or tilst) and a pouring spout (ils) on the nether millstone (agurf u wadday). At the center of the nether millstone is a short pivot (tamnrut) made of argan wood, around which the upper millstone rotates, pierced by an eyelet (tit n tzrgt) into which one or two handfuls of kernels are inserted. The circular movement is interrupted to remove the kernels after the millstone has been lifted. The whole unit can be raised on stones welded together in a "bakehouse"-style architecture, allowing embers or argan shells to warm the unit, thus facilitating grinding in winter.[14]
Chronology of milling systems
[edit]Mortars and pestles have survived the centuries and are predominant for barley in Greece, starch in Italy, and millet in Africa. They slowly became marginal in some regions, but did not disappear. In classical times, they were still widely represented in Greece and were still used for hulling cereals, even if the advent of adjustable millstones meant that they could now be ground. The advance of naked wheat, particularly common wheat, in Italy and Egypt made them less useful, but they were still mentioned in the Late Roman Empire, in Roman Egypt, and in the monastic rule of Saint Isidore. With the arrival of maize, they were once again used in certain regions.[33]
A first typology of milling systems can be drawn up according to the driving force used; a complementary approach will look at the social context in which the mechanism is implemented.
According to Diocletian's edict, the "blood" mill costed six times more than the hand mill, and the watermill eight times more. The latter therefore competed mainly with the "blood" mill, and took almost three centuries to supplant it. This was also the time it took the "blood" mill to supplant the hopper mill, and the hopper mill to supplant the flat millstone.
It seems that the watermill originated in the Eastern Mediterranean. An inscription from the Phrygian town of Orcistus,[34] which praised the advantages of its site in order to retain its privileges, states that it possesses "thanks to the slope of the waters flowing through it, a large number of watermills". At the beginning of the Christian era, the watermill was still a novelty in the western Mediterranean, and Vitruvius classed it with irrigation machines. This type of mill proved ill-suited to the design of Pompeian millstones. In Caligula's time, "blood" mills were still dominant, as Apuleius describes. Over the course of the 1st and 2nd centuries, the watermill slowly spread to a wide variety of provinces: Brittany, Gaul, and Africa, where the rotary millstone was often more widespread than the Pompeian mill. Over the course of the 4th century, the watermill slowly replaced the "blood" mill in Rome itself, becoming the predominant mill in the 2nd century. While there were some spectacular achievements in cities, such as the Barbegal mill in Arles, the watermill seems to have spread more slowly to rural villas, as Palladius indicates.[33]
We don't really know how the Greeks processed their cereals between the 1st and 4th centuries. The "blood" mill was undoubtedly widespread, as attested by the legend of Lucius' donkey, borrowed by Lucian of Samosata and Apuleius. The coexistence of several types of milling seems to be the rule in the Aegean world, and the codification of Diocletian's edict in the 2nd century, which established three types of mills (hand, blood, and water), can still be found in the Byzantine rural code in the 6th century, and even in travellers' accounts in the 17th century.[33]
In the Mediterranean, watermills, which depended on water supply, progressed especially when they had a complement to avoid the vagaries of the dry season. In this context, windmills undoubtedly contributed to the spread of watermills as early as the 11th century in regions such as Provence and the Greek islands.[citation needed]
Other milling systems
[edit]Assembled millstones
[edit]
In a study of millstones in Flanders from the Middle Ages to the French Revolution, Jean Bruggeman[35] points out that medieval millstones were always monolithic, that black basalt stones were still monolithic in later centuries, and that white stones remained so until the 18th century. However, "gisantes" were sometimes made up of several irregularly shaped pieces. These were bound in plaster, encased in an iron or wooden casing, and sometimes placed on a bed of cemented bricks.
In fact, the invention of millstones made of pieces, i.e. an assembly of several stones or tiles, remains difficult to date precisely.[36]
In the 15th century, the river trade passing through Paris was strictly controlled by the Hanseatic League of water merchants; "French companies" had to inform the clerks of the names of their partners, the city of destination, and the nature and value of the cargo. Thus, on May 3, 1452, a Rouen merchant named Robert Le Cornu declared that he was bringing to Normandy one or more boats loaded with 35 millstones, 5 blinkers, 100 carreaux and a tombstone.[37]
Various texts provide clues to the manufacture of millstones in the 17th century. On March 10, 1647, Jacques Vinault "sold 3 rounds[38] of grinding stone" to Pierre Bailly. On March 26, 1652, another text evokes the difficulties of a millstone assembly site, with a "lack of wood to cook the plastre quy is not in sufficient quantity to plastrer and put in the places where it is necessary, joinct aussy that there is stone to suffice to make the millstones". On July 7, 1680, Sr Delugré "made a deal with Claude Duvau and Jullien Boullmer, stone molders [...] to supply them with 2 molds of molding stone and plaster to make the millstones [...] made and perfect to make flour".[39]
According to Dorothée Kleinmann, "economic milling" and its improvements really took off at the end of the 18th century. This led to the development of stone quarrying and millstone production in new regions such as Cinq-Mars-la-Pile and Domme, where "millstones are always formed by joining several pieces together; there are no blocks large enough to make masses from a single piece".[40] In these locations, it seems that at the beginning of the eighteenth century, millstone was not yet quarried, preferring to salvage scattered blocks from woods, fields and vineyards, which sometimes considerably increased their value.

Once the millstone blocks have been transported to the site and "peeled", the manufacturer selects the stones required for the millstone. The different pieces are classified according to their quality, taking into account hardness, grain, porosity, and color. At this stage, it is also necessary to take into account the milling system used in the country of dispatch, and the type of wheat produced in the region.[41] Once the choice has been made, production begins with the center or "boitard", which is usually made in one piece. This must be very solid, especially for the current millstone, as it is at this level that the casing on which the millstone is suspended is fixed. Around the boitard, the tiles are arranged and fixed with plaster or cement, and chiseled to fit together sufficiently. A wheel of this type is generally made up of two to six quarters. "When the job is done and the blocks match, the worker adjusts them by cementing them with Portland cement, sometimes with a paste of Spanish white and oil that hardens with age, and clamps the whole with iron hoops". On the other side of the working surface, the back of the millstone, or "counter-molding", is surrounded by a strip of sheet metal serving as temporary formwork. To give the millstone the necessary weight and thickness, it is reloaded with small stones embedded in fine concrete, into which are inserted cast-iron balancing boxes, which may contain lead if necessary.[citation needed]
Edge mill
[edit]Horizontal use of the millstone is generally associated with milling. When the millstone is "upright", i.e. on its edge, it is used for grinding, crushing, or milling operations. In this configuration, the nether millstone is fixed by its eyebolt to a vertical mast located centrally on the nether millstone which acts as a pivot. Depending on the size of the installation, and to maintain the verticality of the mast, its upper part may be attached to a beam overhanging the mill. The current millstone is rotated either " by means of force", or more often, in a riding hall. In this way, the mill is driven by a double movement, turning on itself while pivoting around the mast, as in the Roman trapetum. In this type of device, the millstone is monolithic or made up of a paved or even masonry surface. Depending on the product to be processed, the millstone may be slightly concave, with a rim around the periphery to avoid dispersing the crushed material.[citation needed]
Materials
[edit]In common language, "millstone" refers to any type of rock that may have been used in a mill, whereas in the geological sense, true "millstone" is defined as a siliceous accident in a sedimentary basin.
The type of stone most suitable for making millstones is a siliceous rock called burrstone (or buhrstone), an open-textured, porous but tough, fine-grained sandstone, or a silicified, fossiliferous limestone. In some sandstones, the cement is calcareous.[42]
On a historical scale, it seems that most types of rock have been used in milling. Among the sedimentary rocks of potential use are limestone and sandstone. The latter soon emerged as the stones of choice, with porosities that make them easy to shape[43] and extraction that can be facilitated by bedding between clay interbeds.[44] It wasn't until the 15th century that millstones stricto sensu began to be quarried, a practice that became widespread in the 18th century.[45]
Deep-lying magmatic rocks, such as granite, are widespread, but were ultimately little used for millstone manufacture, probably due to their low porosity and the presence of black mica, which rapidly alters to form iron oxides. Basalt was widely used in Germany (Eifel), but is not widespread in France, with the exception of the Évenos volcano in Provence; other examples include the basalt millstones of the Agde volcano, and those of the Sainte Magdeleine volcano at La Môle, not far from Cogolin.
Limestones are generally porous, with medium to low compressive strengths, so "classic" limestones seem to have been quickly abandoned in favor of better stones. Although very fine-grained, limestone polishes very quickly and needs to be re-cut frequently to keep the stones rough. Some sandstone limestones (Saint-Julien-des-Molières limestone) can have very good compressive strength (over 100 MPa).[46]
Sandstone rocks (sandstones and microconglomerates[47] up to 1 cm) are the preferred material for millstones. Analysis of production sites shows that they can be limestone-cemented sandstones, silica-cemented sandstones, or even slightly metamorphosed sandstones.[48]
Limestone-cemented sandstones, such as Alpine molasses, are widespread. They have medium porosities (6 to 12%), medium compressive strength (35 MPa), often coarse grain size, and variable silica content.
A very good millstone is generally rich in silica: the higher the percentage, the stronger the rock, silica being the hardest common mineral on the Earth's surface. The same is true of sandstone with siliceous cement, where the percentage of silica is high because both the grains and the cement are siliceous in nature. However, they don't necessarily make good millstones, like Vosges sandstone, which has a rather fine grain and traces of iron.
Slightly metamorphosed sandstones often have very low porosity (around 2%) due to tectonic compression, resulting in somewhat compact sandstones. Compressive strength can be very high (over 100 MPa), as in the case of Arros sandstone, despite an average silica percentage.
Finally, millstones in the geological sense are porous stones, which play a role not only for cutting, but also undoubtedly for grinding. These include stones such as those from La Ferté-sous-Jouarre, with high porosity (20%), compressive strength of 80 MPa, and medium grain. Corfélix stones have exceptional compressive strength on the order of solid basalt (190 MPa), 98% silica, fairly coarse grain, and medium to high porosity.[48]
In a nutshell, for the rock mechanics, a good millstone has three fundamental characteristics:
- insensitivity to alteration, whether through dissolution (gypsum), the action of moisture (as in the case of limestone), or the chemical action of water, as in the case of granite mica or Vosges sandstone (presence of iron) ;
- heterogeneity on a millimeter and centimeter scale is a quality that provides crushing asperities and evacuating channels, like hard punches held together by a slightly less hard but tenacious cement, which is not generally a characteristic of limestone;
- high porosity, which facilitates quarrying, as it is easier to introduce cutting tools into porous rock than into solid rock, but also undoubtedly facilitates grinding.
The following table presents some examples of geological and petrophysical data obtained from sites used for the production of millstones:[49]
| Production site | Rock type | SiO2 % | CaO % | Density (t/m3) | Porosity % | Rc (compression) Mpa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mont-Saint-Martin | Breccia | - | 54,2 | 2,36 | 11,1 to 11,7 | Medium to low |
| Saint-Julien-des-Molières | Marine honeycomb limestone with quartz-feldspar inclusions | 33,8 | 35,6 | 2,65 to 3,39 | 0,9 to 1,1 | 130 to 133 |
| Les Écouges | Late Cretaceous microconglomeratic sandstone | 40,6 | 28,1 | 2,35 | 11 | 37 to 44 |
| Le Bézu | Siliceous cement sandstone | 98,6 | - | 2,35 | 11,9 | 23 to 26 |
| Pareil | Late Cretaceous fine-grained sandstone and carbonate cement | 54,7 | 22,7 | 2,6 | 1,7 | 124 |
| Tarterel | Gritstone | 98,3 | - | 2,1 to 2,4 | 17,5 to 21,4 | 38 to 100 |
| Bois de l'Homme Blanc | Gritstone | 97,8 | - | 2,4 | 10,3 to 10,6 | 139 to 240 |
Millstones used in Britain were of several types:[50]
- Derbyshire Peak stones of grey Millstone Grit, cut from one piece, used for grinding barley;[51] imitation Derbyshire Peak stones are used as decorative signposts at the boundaries of the Peak District National Park. Derbyshire Peak stones wear quickly and are typically used to grind animal feed since they leave stone powder in the flour, making it undesirable for human consumption.
- French buhrstones, used for finer grinding. French Burr comes from the Marne Valley in northern France. The millstones are not cut from one piece, but built up from sections of quartz cemented together, backed with plaster and bound with shrink-fit iron bands. Slots in the bands provide attachments for lifting. In southern England the material was imported as pieces of rock, only assembled into complete millstones in local workshops.[52] It was necessary to balance the completed runner stone with lead weights applied to the lighter side.[51]
- Composite stones, built up from pieces of emery, were introduced during the nineteenth century; they were found to be more suitable for grinding at the higher speeds available when auxiliary engines were adopted.[51]
In Europe, a further type of millstone was used. These were uncommon in Britain, but not unknown:
Patterning
[edit]
The surface of a millstone is divided by deep grooves called furrows into separate flat areas called lands. Spreading away from the furrows are smaller grooves called feathering or cracking. The grooves provide a cutting edge and help to channel the ground flour out from the stones.
The furrows and lands are arranged in repeating patterns called harps. A typical millstone will have six, eight or ten harps. The pattern of harps is repeated on the face of each stone, when they are laid face to face the patterns mesh in a kind of "scissoring" motion creating the cutting or grinding function of the stones. When in regular use stones need to be dressed periodically, that is, re-cut to keep the cutting surfaces sharp.
The major challenge is to limit the heat generated by the pressure of the millstones on the ground flour. In addition to denaturing the flour (browning), this overheating, and any sparks generated by the rubbing of the stones, could cause an explosion in the mill, whose atmosphere is charged with fine flour particles.[56] A complex system of spokes had to be devised to ventilate the gap between the millstones and, at the same time, progressively push the material from the eyelet to the peripheral rabbet. Wheat millstones have long been used to grind cereals in a single pass. We had to find the best way of extracting the flour and cleaning the bran, ensuring that it was unbroken and free of flour.
Millstones need to be evenly balanced, and achieving the correct separation of the stones is crucial to producing good quality flour. The experienced miller will be able to adjust their separation very accurately.

For the manufacture of the millstone, the customer had to specify the diameter, the size of the eye and the direction of the furrows. Occasionally, a miller was mistaken about the direction of the furrows, as extracts from correspondence testify: "You tell us that your top wheels must be rifled to turn counter-clockwise. We therefore understand that these millstones must be radiused to turn counter-clockwise, i.e. in the opposite direction to that in which the sun seems to revolve around the earth". Despite all the precautions taken at the time of ordering, it sometimes happened that, in the event of a dispute, we were obliged to travel to change the direction: "we sent a workman a hundred leagues from here to unravel, straighten and re-radiate two pairs of millstone; the profit is eaten twice".[57]
Between the furrows, the millstone is covered with fine grooves called feathering or cracking, also cut into the stone, to make it more aggressive and thus better able to grind the grains. They run along the edge of the millstone, over a width of around 15 cm, to form the rabbet. Regularly, the furrows need to be redone with a special hammer: the millstone is said to need to be rhabillaged or rebatted. This operation must be carried out after grinding around 50 tons of wheat.[58] Special steel hardening techniques enabled certain companies, such as Kupka in Germany, to produce picks and hammers that were particularly appreciated by millstone reworkers. During the operation, the light blows emitted a cloud of siliceous dust that could cause lung ailments in specialized workers. In addition, the cutting of millstones led to professional tattoos, with steel particles from the tools embedded under the dermis. Eye diseases were also common.[59]
Grinding with millstones
[edit]

Grain is fed by gravity from the hopper into the feed-shoe. The shoe is agitated by a shoe handle running against an agitator (damsel) on the stone spindle, the shaft powering the runner stone. This mechanism regulates the feed of grain to the millstones by making the feed dependent on the speed of the runner stone. From the feed shoe the grain falls through the eye, the central hole, of the runner stone and is taken between the runner and the bed stone to be ground. The flour exits from between the stones from the side. The stone casing prevents the flour from falling on the floor, instead it is taken to the meal spout from where it can be bagged or processed further. The runner stone is supported by the rind, a cross- shaped metal piece, on the spindle. The spindle is carried by the tentering gear, a set of beams forming a lever system, or a screw jack, with which the runner stone can be lifted or lowered slightly and the gap between the stones adjusted.[60] The weight of the runner stone is significant (up to 1,500 kilograms (3,300 lb)) and it is this weight combined with the cutting action from the porous stone and the patterning that causes the milling process.
Millstones for some water-powered mills (such as Peirce Mill) spin at about 125 rpm.[61]
Especially in the case of wind-powered mills the turning speed can be irregular. Higher speed means more grain is fed to the stones by the feed-shoe, and grain exits the stones more quickly because of their faster turning speed. The miller has to reduce the gap between the stones so more weight of the runner presses down on the grain and the grinding action is increased to prevent the grain being ground too coarsely. It has the added benefit of increasing the load on the mill and so slowing it down. In the reverse case the miller may have to raise the runner stone if the grain is milled too thoroughly making it unsuitable for baking. In any case the stones should never touch during milling as this would cause them to wear down rapidly. The process of lowering and raising the runner stone is called tentering and lightering. In many windmills it is automated by adding a centrifugal governor to the tentering gear. Depending on the type of grain to be milled and the power available the miller may adjust the feed of grain to stones beforehand by changing the amount of agitation of the feed-shoe or adjusting the size of the hopper outlet. Milling by millstones is a one-step process in contrast with roller mills in modern mass production where milling takes place in many steps. It produces wholemeal flour which can be turned into white flour by sifting to remove the bran.[citation needed]
Symbolism
[edit]Symbolism in the Bible
[edit]Millstones were often essential objects within a community. For that reason, they gain multiple symbolic meanings and symbolism within mythology, folklore, and the Bible. The Hebrew Bible admonishes (Deuteronomy 24:6): "No one shall take a lower millstone, nor an upper millstone, in pledge [for the payment of a debt], for that would be tantamount to taking away a life in pledge." The rabbis have explained that not only a millstone cannot be taken as security for a pledge, but anything in which the life of man depends cannot be taken as security for a pledge.[62]
The Bible heavily utilized millstone symbolism within its various proverbs. A common one is the millstone's proverbial designation of something as a great weight, as seen in Matthew 18:6
But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.[63]
Likewise, due to the exhausting physical labor associated with the earliest millstones, they were symbolic of hard work and accredited as a menial task given to the lowest form of a laborer.[64] This is not the only symbolic meaning of millstones within the Bible; millstones were also used as a symbol of civilization, prosperity, and comfortable living.[65]
Other symbolism
[edit]Out of the Bible, the millstone can be seen as a symbol of transformation, death, and rebirth. This is due to the strenuous amount of work and effort that goes into utilizing a millstone to grind grain into flour. Other symbolic meanings associated with millstones include fertility and abundance. In Korea, a practice existed in which the husband would use a millstone while his wife was in childbirth, hoping that he could share her pain.[11] In both the Bible and folklore, the millstone can be associated with punishment. In some instances and stories, a millstone is used to harm an individual for their behavior. Examples of millstones being used to punish individuals can be seen in "The Juniper Tree"[64] and Judges 9:53, where one is used to kill Abimelech by tossing it on his head.[65]

Heraldry
[edit]In heraldry, as a demonstration of military bravado, a millstone features as the heraldic crest of John de Lisle, 2nd Baron Lisle (c.1318-1355), one of the founder knights of the Order of the Garter, as shown on his garter-plate in St George's Chapel, Windsor: A mill-stone argent pecked sable the inner circle and the rim of the second the fer-de-moline or. Thus symbolising super-human strength necessary to support such a weight atop his helmet.
In its more basic heraldic form it is a charge symbolising industry.[66] The fer-de-moline ("mill-iron") or millrind, which attaches to the millstone and transfers to it the torque of the drive-shaft, is also a common heraldic charge, used as canting arms by families named Mills, Milles, Turner, etc.[citation needed]
Photo gallery
[edit]See also
[edit]- Millrind
- Bedrock mortar
- Edge mill
- Gristmill
- Quern-stone
- Mühlsteinbrüche —historic millstone quarries in Saxony
- Grain grinding wheel
- Ground stone
Appendix
[edit]Bibliography
[edit]- (fr) Meules à grains. Actes du colloque international de La Ferté-sous-Jouarre, 16-19 mai 2002 archive, Éditions Ibis Press - Éditions de la maison des sciences de l'homme (ISBN 2-910728-35-8)
- (fr) Alain Belmont, La Pierre à pain. Les carrières de meules de moulins en France, du Moyen ge à la révolution industrielle, Presses universitaires de Grenoble, 2006, 2 vol. (ISBN 2-7061-1305-7)
- (fr) Bertrand Gille (s. dir.), Histoire des techniques, Gallimard, coll. "La Pléiade", 1978. (ISBN 978-2-07-010881-7)
- (fr) Bertrand Gille, Les sources statistiques de l'histoire de France - Des enquêtes du xviie siècle à 1870, Centre de recherches d'histoire et de philologie de la IVe section de l'École pratique des hautes études, 1964.
- (fr) Auguste Armengaud, Claude Rivals, Moulins à vent et meuniers des pays d'oc, Toulouse, Loubatières, 1992 (ISBN 2-86266-162-7)
- (fr) Marie-Claire Amouretti, Le pain et l'huile dans la Grèce antique. De l'araire au moulin, Besançon, Les Belles Lettres, ALUB, (328), 1986 (ISBN 2-251-60328-X)
- (fr) Jean-Pierre Brun. Archéologie du vin et de l'huile. De la préhistoire à l'époque hellénistique. Éditions errance, 2004 (ISBN 2-87772-285-6)
- (fr) Jean-Pierre Brun. Archéologie du vin et de l'huile dans l'Empire romain. Éditions errance, 2004 (ISBN 2-87772-293-7)
- Ritti, Tullia; Grewe, Klaus; Kessener, Paul (2007), "A Relief of a Water-powered Stone Saw Mill on a Sarcophagus at Hierapolis and its Implications", Journal of Roman Archaeology, vol. 20, pp. 138–163
External links
[edit]- Millstone Dressing Tools
- European millstone quarries: a database[permanent dead link]
- Abandoned Millstones - Peak District
- Video clip demonstrating millstone dressing
- Millstones & Querns on Flickr
- Atlas of the millstones of France and Europe archive
- Millstones. Recherche, protection et valorisation d'un patrimoine industriel européen (Antiquité-xxie s.) archive. International symposium, Grenoble - Thursday 22nd to Sunday 25th September 2005 - Maison des Sciences de l'Homme-Alpes.
- Techniques in Greco-Roman antiquity archive.
- The Dussart mill archive
- History of anille archive
- Le moulin de la Mousquère archive Detail of the grindstone's grain-feeding mechanism
- Millstone" encyclopedia article on wikisources
- [PDF] Processing techniques archive
- [PDF] And man created the millstone Archived 22 November 2008 at the Wayback Machine archive
- Fédération Des Moulins de France archive, Monde des Moulins magazine archive
- Fédération Française des Associations de sauvegarde des Moulins archive, Moulins de France magazine archive
- Rotary hand mills archive
References
[edit]- ^ "bed-stone". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
- ^ Emblematic of hardness in (for example) Job 41:24 - "His heart is as firm as a stone; yea, as hard as a piece of the nether millstone."
- ^ "cock-eye". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
- ^ (fr) Jean-Pierre Henri Azéma, Actes du colloque de La Ferté-sous-Jouarre, p. 424
- ^ Giorgi, Marisa (19 May 2020). "Grindstone – ancient multi-tools". The Queensland Museum Network Blog. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
- ^ "Fact sheet: Aboriginal grinding stones". First Peoples – State Relations. Victorian Government. 6 October 2021. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
- ^ Fred Wendorf The Prehistory of Wadi Kubbaniya Vol. 1, 2 & 3, 1986-1989, Dallas, (with R. Schild). SMU Press (Assembler and Contributor)
- ^ (fr) Meules à grains. Actes du colloque international de La Ferté-sous-Jouarre.
- ^ (fr) Meules à grains. Actes du colloque international de La Ferté-sous-Jouarre.
- ^ Theya Molleson, "Seed preparation in the Mesolithic: the osteological evidence", Antiquity, vol. 63, no 239, June 1989, p. 356-362 (DOI 10.1017/S0003598X00076079).
- ^ a b Yeon, Yoo S. (2016). "Millstone: The Creation of a New Coalescence Consciousness of Opposites" (PDF). Journal of Symbols & Sandplay Therapy. 7 (1): 57–76. doi:10.12964/jsst.160003.
- ^ Shaffrey, Ruth (2015). "Intensive milling practices in the Romano-British landscape of southern England. Using newly established criteria for distinguishing millstones from rotary querns". Britannia. 46: 55–92. doi:10.1017/S0068113X15000185. S2CID 164726574 – via cambridgecore.org.
- ^ a b c Кобиляцька, Вікторія (7 December 2012). "Пам'ятник із жорен" [Monument from millstones]. День (in Ukrainian). No. 224. Kiev, Ukraine. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f (fr) Meules à grains. Actes du colloque international de La Ferté-sous-Jouarre.
- ^ Here we find an example of the influence of a technical system on a social system, like the hitching system described by Major Richard Lefebvre des Noëttes
- ^ a b c d e f (fr) Marie-Claire Amouretti. Le pain et l'huile dans la Grèce antique.
- ^ (fr) Le livre de l'olivier, Marie-Claire Amouretti and Georges Comet, Éditions EDISUD (Aix-en-Provence, France), ISBN 2-7449-0198-9
- ^ [PDF] http://www.moulins-a-vent.net/Images/dossier-de-presse.pdf
- ^ a b Ritti, Grewe & Kessener 2007, p. 158, 159
- ^ Alonso i Martínez, Natalia (2015). "«Moliendo en ibero, moliendo en griego»: aculturación y resistencia tecnológica en el Mediterráneo occidental durante la Edad del Hierro". Vegueta: Anuario de la Facultad de Geografía e Historia (15): 23–36. ISSN 1133-598X.
- ^ Rodríguez Díaz, Alonso; Pavón Soldevila, Ignacio; Duque Espino, David M.; Ponce de León Iglesias, Moisés (2014). "Molinos y molienda en el mundo tartésico: el Guadiana y Tajo Medios". Revista d'arqueologia de Ponent (24): 189–214. ISSN 1131-883X.
- ^ a b c d e (fr) Et l'Homme créa la meule Archived 22 November 2008 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ (fr) Alonso Martinez, N. 1995. "Les premières meules rotatives manuelles dans le nord-est de la péninsule Iberique." In La Transmission des connaissances techniques, edited by M.-Cl. Amouretti and G. Comet, 15–23. Cahiers d'histoire des techniques 3. Aix en Provence: L'Université de Provence.
- ^ (fr) Rafael Frankel: The Olynthus Mill, Its Origin, and Diffusion: Typology and Distribution, in American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 107, no. 1 (2003), p. 17-19
- ^ (fr) CHAUSSAT, Alain-Gilles. 2008. Les meules à main rotatives: Collection du musée de Saint-Michel-de-Monjoie dans la Manche, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, p. 120.[1]
- ^ (fr) See the expression moulin à sang in Blanchemanche Philippe. Georges Cornet, "Le paysan et son outil. Essai d'histoire technique des céréales (France, 8th - 15th century)", Études rurales, No. 129-130, 1993, p. 201-204 read online
- ^ a b c (fr) Histoire des techniques - Bertrand Gille
- ^ (fr) Roland Étienne, Christel Müller, Francis Prost, Archéologie historique de la Grèce antique, Ellipses, 2006, p. 180
- ^ Two square-section iron boxes (arm fasteners) held the levers, which were secured by a wooden peg slid into the round-section hole running right through them.
- ^ (fr) Techniques dans l'antiquité gréco-romaine Archived 10 November 2007 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ XII, 52, 6-7
- ^ (fr) Jean-Pierre Brun. Archéologie du vin et de l'huile. De la préhistoire à l'époque hellénistique
- ^ a b c (fr) Marie-Claire Amouretti. Le pain et l'huile dans la Grèce antique.
- ^ The town of Orcistus is mentioned in the Tabula Peutingeriana (Table de Peutinger) and corresponds to the Turkish site of Alikel Yaila, also known as Alekian.
- ^ (fr) Jean Bruggeman, l'Historien des Moulins Archived 17 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ (fr) Actes du colloque international de La Ferté-sous-Jouarre, p. 297
- ^ (fr) Actes du colloque international de La Ferté-sous-Jouarre, p. 283
- ^ This term should be understood as a unit of volume
- ^ (fr) Actes du colloque international de La Ferté-sous-Jouarre, p. 298
- ^ Ours Pierre Armand Dufrénoy, 1834
- ^ (fr) Patrimoine meulier Archived 12 January 2009 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Bucksch, Herbert (1997). Dictionary Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 1. Springer-Verlag. p. 80. ISBN 978-3-540-58164-2.
- ^ Limestone or sandstone for construction stones have porosities of the order of 20%.
- ^ In this case, at least one of the two planes of the grinding wheel is roughened, which facilitates shaping.
- ^ (fr) Analyses pétrographiques et mécaniques d'un ensemble de roches meulières utilisées en France à l'époque médiévale. Denis Fabre, Colloque international Archived 9 February 2005 at the Wayback Machine "Les meulières. Recherche, protection et valorisation d'un patrimoine industriel européen (Ancient times-21st century)", Grenoble 2005.
- ^ Ordinary concrete has a compressive strength of around 35 MPa, while high-performance concrete used for high-rise buildings has a compressive strength of around 80 MPa.
- ^ Strictly speaking, sandstones are defined as rocks with grain sizes of up to 2 mm.
- ^ a b (fr) Analyses pétrographiques et mécaniques d'un ensemble de roches meulières utilisées en France à l'époque médiévale. Denis Fabre, Colloque international Archived 9 February 2005 at the Wayback Machine "Les meulières. Recherche, protection et valorisation d'un patrimoine industriel européen (Ancient times-21st century)", Grenoble 2005.
- ^ (fr) Source : Atlas des meulières de France et d'Europe
- ^ Johnson, David (2023). Millstones of the Pennines and North West England. Amberley Publishing. ISBN 9781-3981-1293-3.
- ^ a b c Freese, Stanley (27 May 2011). Windmills and millwrighting. Cambridge University Press. p. 14. ISBN 9781107600133.
- ^ Wood, Geoff (2003). Thorrington Tide Mill. Essex County Council. p. 13. ISBN 185281-232-X.
- ^ "Peak District Millstones". Stephen N Wood. Retrieved 10 April 2010.
- ^ Aikin, Arthur (1838). "On Corn Mills". Transactions. 51. Royal Society of Arts: 121.
- ^ Santi, Gambin, Renzulli (2021) "The millstone trade from the most exploited Italian volcanic areas: an overview from the phoenicians to the roman period", ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 64, 5, VO551, 2021 ; doi:10.4401/ag-8647
- ^ (fr) inrs.fr See also: Silos grains then Explosion et lieu de travail Archived 11 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ (fr) Meules à grains. Actes du colloque international de La Ferté-sous-Jouarre.
- ^ (fr) Moulin Dussart
- ^ (fr) Meules à grains. Actes du colloque international de La Ferté-sous-Jouarre.
- ^ Wood (2003) p 19
- ^ NPS publication "Peirce Mill" GPO: 2004--304-337/00145 Reprint 2004
- ^ Mishnah (1977). The Mishnah. Translated by Herbert Danby (12th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 364. ISBN 0-19-815402-X., s.v. Baba Mezia 9:13
- ^ Matthew 18:6: King James Version, paralleled in Luke 17:2
- ^ a b Lynch, Alban J; Rowland, Chester A. (1 November 2005). The History of Grinding. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration. ISBN 978-0873352383.
- ^ a b Walton, Steven A. "The Mill in the Bible" (PDF). Retrieved 12 February 2023.
- ^ Bernhard Peter: The mill iron and derived forms (in German)
Millstone
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Basic Principles
Function and Components
A millstone functions by crushing and shearing grain between two large, circular stones to produce flour or meal. The lower bedstone remains fixed, providing a stable base, while the upper runner stone rotates above it in a horizontal plane, driven by manual, animal, water, wind, or mechanical power. Grain enters through a central aperture, called the eye, in the runner stone and is progressively ground finer as it moves outward between the stone faces under the weight and motion of the runner.[10][11][12] The primary components of a millstone pair are the bedstone and runner stone, each typically 1 to 2 meters in diameter and weighing hundreds of kilograms in powered mills. The grinding surfaces are dressed with radial furrows—deep grooves pecked into the stone—and intervening flat lands, which create a shearing action akin to scissors while channeling the flour toward the periphery. Furrows often number six to ten per stone, converging toward the center to aid initial crushing and diverging outward for finer grinding and material evacuation; their profiles include a feather edge for cutting and a heel for support.[11][13][14] Additional elements integral to operation include the central spindle or rynd, which transmits rotational force from the drive mechanism to the runner and aligns the stones, and the rind—an iron ring or frame encircling and supporting the runner stone against centrifugal forces. In automated mills, a hopper feeds grain via a shoe regulated by a damsel—a vibrating spindle that maintains consistent flow and prevents overload. Dressing patterns vary by grain type and era, with coarser setups for initial breakage and finer for bolting-quality flour, requiring periodic re-pecking to maintain sharpness.[15][13][16]Principles of Grinding
Grinding in millstones occurs through the relative motion between a stationary bedstone and a rotating runner stone, where grain particles are subjected to compressive, shear, and abrasive forces that progressively reduce their size.[17] The process begins with grain fed centrally through the eye of the runner stone, which then migrates outward via channels formed by the furrows carved into both stones.[1] These furrows serve dual purposes: directing the flow of grain from the center toward the periphery under centrifugal force and creating a scissoring action that initially fractures kernels as the rotating furrows intersect with those on the bedstone.[13] The mechanical forces dominate the breakdown: compression arises from the vertical pressure between the stones, shearing from the tangential motion across the surfaces, and abrasion from frictional contact on the lands between furrows.[18] In stone milling, these combined actions—compression, shear, and abrasion—simultaneously act on the grain, differing from roller mills that emphasize sequential crushing and shearing.[17] Particle size reduction follows a gradient, with coarser breakage near the center where furrows are deeper and wider, transitioning to finer grinding at the edges where surfaces are smoother and gaps narrower, allowing fine flour to escape while coarser bran and middlings are ejected separately.[1] At the micro-scale, the grinding involves a mix of two-body abrasion (direct stone-to-grain contact) and three-body abrasion (grain particles rubbing against each other), with friction generating localized stresses that propagate cracks along the kernel's brittle endosperm.[19] The slow rotational speed, typically 100-150 RPM in traditional setups, minimizes heat buildup—often below 40°C—preserving nutrient integrity by avoiding thermal degradation of oils and enzymes, unlike high-speed modern mills.[20] Empirical studies confirm that stone-ground flours exhibit broader particle size distributions due to these diffuse forces, with mean diameters around 100-200 microns compared to narrower spectra from roller milling.[21]Historical Development
Origins in Prehistory
The earliest known grinding stones date to approximately 65,000 years ago at Madjedbebe rock shelter in northern Australia, where archaeological excavations uncovered a continuous record of ground stone tools used for processing plant foods, including toxic nardoo spores and other seeds requiring detoxification through grinding and heating.[22] These implements represent an early technological adaptation for exploiting a broader range of plant resources, predating agriculture and evidencing sophisticated food preparation techniques among Pleistocene human populations.[22] In Eurasia, grinding technology emerged during the Middle Paleolithic, initially for processing ochre and organic materials, with evidence from sites indicating percussive and abrasive actions on stone tools as early as 200,000–300,000 years ago, though food-related uses intensified in the Upper Paleolithic around 40,000–10,000 years ago for tubers, nuts, and wild seeds.[23] By the Epipaleolithic Natufian culture in the Levant (circa 15,000–11,500 years ago), saddle querns—sloped lower stones paired with handheld upper stones—became common for grinding wild cereals and other plants, facilitating semi-sedentary lifestyles and intensive foraging that presaged Neolithic farming.[24] Use-wear analysis on Natufian saddle querns from sites like Ain Mallaha confirms their primary role in cereal processing, with increased prevalence in later Natufian phases linked to resource intensification.[25] The Neolithic Revolution, beginning around 10,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent, marked the proliferation of specialized grinding stones for domesticated grains, evolving saddle querns into more efficient forms and laying the groundwork for later rotary querns.[26] These tools, often made from local sandstones or basalts, enabled the production of finer flours, supporting population growth and surplus storage, as evidenced by abundant assemblages at early farming sites like Abu Hureyra (circa 11,200 years before present).[27] While rotary mechanisms appeared sporadically in Neolithic contexts, the predominant prehistoric forms relied on linear or reciprocal motions, reflecting causal efficiencies in manual grain reduction before mechanized milling.[28]Ancient Civilizations
In ancient Mesopotamia, saddle querns predominated as the primary cereal grinding implements from prehistoric times through the early historical periods, reflecting the region's reliance on manual processing of barley and emmer wheat for daily sustenance.[29] These elongated, trough-like lower stones paired with handheld rubbing stones enabled efficient shearing action but required significant labor, often performed by women in household settings.[30] Fixed grinding installations, including basalt pestles and sandstone millstones, emerged around 10,000–8000 BCE, signaling the onset of sedentarization and surplus grain production in proto-agricultural communities.[31] Ancient Egyptian grinding practices utilized similar saddle querns crafted from durable materials like granite, granodiorite, and silicified sandstone, sourced from local quarries including those in the Western Desert's Kharga Depression as early as the Neolithic period.[32][33] By the New Kingdom (circa 1550–1070 BCE), these tools processed emmer and barley into flour for bread, a staple consumed by all social classes, with upper stones typically oval and lower ones flattish for optimal grain flow.[34] Quarry evidence indicates specialized extraction sites yielding thousands of blanks, underscoring the scale of production to support urban populations in centers like Thebes and Memphis.[35] In ancient Greece, the transition to rotary querns occurred around the 5th–4th centuries BCE, replacing saddle types with more efficient circular designs that reduced grinding time by up to 50% through rotational shearing.[36] Early innovations included the Olynthus mill, featuring a hopper-fed upper stone rotated by a handle, as evidenced in archaeological assemblages from colonies like Megara Hyblaea in Sicily (8th–6th centuries BCE).[37] Millstones were predominantly fashioned from volcanic lavas and sandstones imported from regions like the Aegean islands, prioritizing hardness and abrasiveness for sustained use in household and proto-industrial contexts.[38] Roman adaptations advanced millstone technology with widespread adoption of hourglass-shaped Pompeian mills by the 1st century BCE, comprising a conical meta base and rotating catillus upper stone, often powered by slaves in bakery complexes housing 8–10 units each.[39][40] Volcanic basalts from central Italy, such as those from Orvieto, were preferred for their fine-grained durability, enabling finer flour yields essential for urban bread distribution under systems like the annona.[41] Water-powered horizontal mills, documented by Vitruvius around 25 BCE, marked an engineering leap, though hand-rotary querns persisted in rural and military settings across the empire.[42] In ancient China, stone milling traces back over 4,000 years, with Neolithic sites yielding flat grinding slabs and rollers for processing millet and rice, evolving into paired circular stones by the Shang Dynasty (1600–1046 BCE).[43] These manual devices, often muscle- or animal-driven, facilitated flour production for staple porridges and dumplings, with materials like sandstone selected for their grit to enhance milling efficiency without excessive wear. Archaeological exhibits confirm roller-style millstones in use by the Zhou period (1046–256 BCE), reflecting adaptations to intensive wet-rice agriculture in the Yangtze and Yellow River basins.[44]Classical and Medieval Periods
In ancient Greece during the Classical period, grinding technology advanced from saddle querns to the Olynthus mill, a hopper-equipped device featuring a stationary lower stone and a rocking upper stone, first attested archaeologically at the site of Olynthus around 350 BC.[45] This innovation, likely originating in the eastern Mediterranean before diffusing westward via Greek colonization, enabled semi-continuous grain processing by allowing direct feeding into a central hopper, improving efficiency over manual rubbing methods.[45] By the late Classical and Hellenistic eras, the rotary quern—consisting of two circular stones with the upper one rotating via a central handle—became widespread, marking a shift to mechanical advantage through circular motion and reducing labor intensity.[36] Millstones were typically fashioned from local sandstones or volcanic rocks, selected for their abrasiveness and durability.[38] The Romans adopted and refined these designs, employing both hand-rotated and animal- or water-powered systems with distinct millstone typologies, including the hourglass-shaped "Pompeian" mills and flatter cylindrical forms.[40] Roman millstones favored vesicular basalts and lavas from volcanic sources like Mount Vesuvius, prized for their porosity that aided flour release and hardness that sustained sharpness, as evidenced by specialized quarrying and extensive trade networks supplying urban centers.[46] [47] Artisans demonstrated material specificity, matching rock types to functions—such as leucite-augite-tephrite lavas for grain mills—to optimize grinding performance, with production scaling to industrial levels in provinces like North Africa.[47] [46] In medieval Europe, millstone use persisted and expanded within watermills and nascent windmills, maintaining monolithic construction from basalts or sandstones to accommodate powered rotation. Economic records indicate millstone prices doubled from the early 13th century to the Black Death around 1348, then doubled again in the late 14th century, driven by heightened milling demand amid population growth and feudal obligations.[48] To mitigate costs, late medieval operators increasingly substituted expensive imported French burr or lava stones with regional alternatives from Wales or England's Peak District, reflecting adaptations to profitability pressures without fundamental design shifts.[49] This continuity from antiquity underscores incremental rather than revolutionary changes, with powered systems amplifying output but relying on established stone geometries for effective shear and abrasion.[50]Industrial Era and Decline
During the early 19th century, millstones remained central to flour milling as water-powered grist mills evolved into larger operations, with steam engines enabling mills to operate independently of water sources and increasing output capacity.[51] In the United States, for instance, steam-powered grist mills constructed around 1856, such as the Stone Mill in New Jersey, ground grains using traditional millstones driven by boilers, processing local crops like corn and wheat for regional markets.[52] Innovations in millstone materials, including the importation of fine-grained French burr (buhr) stones from the Paris Basin starting in the late 18th century, improved grinding efficiency for softer wheats, producing finer flour textures suitable for the growing demand in urban bakeries.[53] These porous quartzite stones, prized for their durability and sharp cutting edges, were quarried in sizes up to 5 feet in diameter and weighed several tons, allowing mills to handle up to 100 bushels of grain per day in well-equipped setups.[54] By the mid-19th century, steam mills proliferated in industrializing regions like England and the American Midwest, where engines replaced water wheels but retained millstone pairs for the core grinding process, as stones effectively sheared and crushed kernels in a single pass.[55] The Albion Mill in London, operational from 1784 to 1791, exemplified early steam integration with multiple millstone sets powered by Matthew Boulton's engines, though it burned down amid debates over steam's reliability for continuous operation.[51] Peak usage occurred around 1850–1870, with thousands of such mills in operation; in Ontario, Canada, for example, over 200 grist mills equipped with millstones processed regional harvests until the 1880s.[56] Maintenance practices evolved, including periodic "dressing" to recut furrows, ensuring consistent particle size reduction from whole grain to flour, though contamination risks from stone abrasion persisted.[57] The decline of millstones began in the 1870s with the reinvention of roller milling technology, initially developed in Hungary by engineer András Mechwart in 1874, which used chilled iron or steel rollers to crush and sift grain in graduated stages. This method supplanted millstones by producing whiter, purer flour through better bran separation, avoiding the gritty residues inherent in stone grinding and meeting consumer preferences for refined white bread amid urbanization.[54] In the United States, the first all-roller mill operated briefly in Philadelphia in 1876, but widespread adoption accelerated in the 1880s, particularly in Minneapolis, where Hungarian immigrants introduced the system, boosting capacity to thousands of barrels daily and rendering stone mills obsolete for commercial wheat flour by 1900.[58] Roller mills offered superior scalability, hygiene, and control over extraction rates—typically yielding 72% flour purity versus millstones' 70%—while reducing labor for dressing and minimizing downtime.[59] By the early 20th century, most large-scale mills converted, though small stone mills endured for custom grinding of coarser meals or in regions with soft grains until post-World War II mechanization.[60] The shift reflected causal efficiencies: rollers' progressive reduction prevented overheating and preserved gluten structure better than the frictional heat of spinning stones, enabling mass production without quality loss.[61]Materials and Sourcing
Geological Requirements
![Burrstone, a siliceous rock ideal for millstones][float-right] Millstones necessitate rocks with high silica content to ensure durability and effective abrasiveness during grinding operations. Siliceous rocks, particularly those rich in quartz or chalcedony, provide the hardness required to fracture grain particles without rapid self-abrasion, as silica's Mohs hardness of approximately 7 resists wear from cereals like wheat.[62] Burrstone, a preferred material, consists of siliceous limestone featuring fossilized shells cemented by silica, creating a vesicular structure that yields naturally sharp grinding surfaces upon dressing.[63] This composition allows for controlled porosity, enabling the formation of furrows that shear and crush material efficiently while minimizing overheating.[64] Geological suitability demands compactness and uniformity to prevent fracturing under rotational stress, with the rock free from structural defects, cracks, or soft inclusions that could cause uneven wear or operational failure.[38] The stone must exhibit sufficient toughness to maintain integrity when shaped into circular forms typically 1.2 to 1.8 meters in diameter, yet possess enough friability in select varieties for periodic redressing to expose fresh abrasive elements.[16] Igneous siliceous variants, such as rhyolitic ignimbrites or vesicular lavas, have also been utilized where their fine-grained, hard matrices offer comparable grinding efficacy without excessive dust production.[40] Coarse-grained siliceous sandstones, akin to gritstones from Carboniferous formations, fulfill requirements when their quartz grains are well-cemented, providing a balance of sharpness from angular particles and cohesion against disintegration.[65] These rocks must derive from stable depositional environments yielding homogeneous layers, as heterogeneities like clay interbeds reduce grinding efficiency by promoting rapid dulling.[66] Overall, the causal mechanism for suitability lies in the rock's mineralogy enabling sustained mechanical advantage in comminution, where silica dominance ensures prolonged utility before replacement.[67]Quarrying and Trade
Millstones suitable for grain milling were quarried from lithologies providing optimal hardness, porosity, and abrasiveness, such as silicified freshwater limestone (burrstone) and volcanic tuffs. In France, over 200 quarries operated across regions including the Forêt de Moulière in Poitou, Domme and Bergerac in Périgord, Touraine near Cinq-Mars-la-Pile, and Champagne-Brie at La Ferté-sous-Jouarre, yielding silica-rich meulière stone prized for its durability and fine grinding qualities.[68] Norwegian production centered on phyllite and quartzite in the Skarvan-Roltdalen National Park, particularly Høgfjellet with its 35 km quarry stretch, while Sweden's Lugnås exploited quartz sandstone, initiated by Cistercian monks in 1147.[69][70] Other notable sites included volcanic areas in Italy for Mediterranean trade and small-scale sandstone operations in New York's Shawangunk Mountains, run by family enterprises from the colonial era.[71] Quarrying methods evolved from rudimentary surface extraction to organized industrial processes. Early efforts involved collecting loose boulders or shallow pits using wedges, picks, and chisels to hew rough blanks, as practiced in Norway until the 18th century when gunpowder blasting, capstans for lifting, and hand-draining enabled deeper operations and stones weighing up to 1,600 kg.[69] In Sweden's Lugnås, open-pit mining predominated until the 19th century's shift to underground tunnels, supporting a peak workforce of about 100 miners plus support labor.[70] French quarries at La Ferté-sous-Jouarre achieved industrial scale by the 14th–15th centuries, extracting burrstone in small, irregular blocks (burrs) via channeled cuts and hammers, with regular dressing to expose fresh abrasive surfaces; production peaked in the 18th–19th centuries before depletion and mechanized milling led to closures by the 1960s.[68] Trade in millstones transitioned from local medieval networks—constrained by poor roads, favoring waterways—to international commerce by the 16th century. French burr blocks, not formed as monolithic stones due to quarry fragmentation, were exported raw from La Ferté-sous-Jouarre to England, Flanders, Germany, Brittany, southern France, and American colonies, where they were assembled with mortar backings into complete millstones for superior flour production; this export dominated global supply in the 18th–19th centuries, though high shipping costs made them premium items.[68][72] Norwegian quarries exceeded domestic demand, shipping pairs of bed and runner stones to Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Russia via coastal routes, fueling economic growth from the 16th century to 1914.[69] Swedish Lugnås output circulated nationally and reached North Africa and Turkey, often as ship ballast, until new milling technologies halted operations around 1920.[70] In medieval England, millstone prices doubled between the early 13th century and the Black Death, then doubled again post-1348 amid rising milling monopolies and transport improvements.[48] Roman-era sourcing of Mediterranean volcanics similarly mapped trade routes, with basalt from sites like Capernaum exported along the Via Maris.[47][73]Construction and Design
Shaping and Patterning
Millstones are shaped into circular discs with parallel faces from blocks of hard, abrasive stone quarried in regions yielding suitable lithologies like quartz-rich sandstone or silicified limestone. Initial forming occurs at or near the extraction site using wedges to split rough blocks, followed by chiseling and hammering to approximate circular outlines and thicknesses typically ranging from 20 to 30 centimeters. Finer shaping refines edges and surfaces for balance and fit within mill frameworks, ensuring minimal vibration during rotation; this process, often completed before transport, reduced handling of heavy, irregular masses.[74] The functional grinding faces undergo patterning, or dressing, with incised furrows that create alternating raised lands and channels. These furrows, cut using specialized chisels, enable a shearing mechanism where the rotating runner stone's edges slice against the bed stone, fracturing grain kernels efficiently while the lands provide compressive grinding. Patterns direct feed from a central eye hole outward via radial or segmental grooves, averting clogs and promoting even distribution to maximize contact area and output rates, which could reach 100-200 kilograms of flour per hour in powered setups depending on stone size and speed.[13][75] Historical designs emphasized causal efficiency: deeper central furrows scoop incoming grain, transitioning to shallower peripheral ones for finer pulverization, with configurations like six-to-ten repeating "harps"—segmented arcs of grooves—balancing shear, transport, and cooling via air circulation. Regional variants reflected material properties; French burr stones featured fine, intricate lattices for superior bran separation in wheat milling, yielding whiter flours, whereas coarser Peak District grits used broader radial cuts for versatile grains including rye or maize. Complementary dressing between paired stones prevented slippage and optimized particle size reduction, as verified in operational analyses showing patterned surfaces outperforming smooth ones by factors of 2-3 in throughput.[11][76][1]Dressing and Maintenance
Dressing millstones involves recutting the furrows, lands, and fine grooves on the grinding surfaces to restore sharpness and ensure efficient grain shearing, as wear from milling dulls the patterns and reduces output quality.[76] This process, typically performed by skilled millwrights, requires lifting the upper runner stone using a wooden crane, screwjack, or manual levers to access both the fixed bedstone and the rotatable runner.[77] High spots on the surfaces are identified by applying a paint-staff coated in red oxide or blue coloring mixed with water, which marks uneven areas for removal with specialized tools.[78][79] The primary tools for dressing are mill bills or picks—double-ended, cast-steel implements 17.8 to 22.9 cm long, often with carbide tips for durability—struck with a hammer to chisel furrows typically 6.4 to 19.1 mm deep and to score cracks or "stitching" at densities of 3 to 16 per inch on the lands between furrows.[76] Furrows channel grain inward from the eye while cutting it against the bedstone, and stitching provides additional scouring for finer meal; patterns vary by stone type, such as the "harp" or quarter dress for wheat.[79][78] Flatness is verified iteratively with the paint-staff until even transfer occurs, and alignment checked using a proofing staff for levelness and a quill staff for spindle perpendicularity, adjusting wedges as needed.[76] A full dressing may remove up to 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) of stone depth and take three days per pair.[79] Maintenance frequency depends on milling volume and grain type: French burrstones require redressing every 200 to 500 hours or several months, while softer gritstones need it every few weeks, signaled by symptoms like overheated, cakey meal or darkened flour from poor shearing.[76][79] Beyond dressing, routine upkeep includes cleaning residue with dry brushes to prevent glazing, inspecting for elliptical wear on the runner's skirt, and ensuring the runner's slight concavity maintains a precise gap—thicker at the eye (e.g., brown paper thickness) tapering to the edge (tissue paper thickness).[77][79] Neglect leads to inefficient grinding, but proper execution sustains stone life for decades, as evidenced by operational 19th-century mills.[76]Types of Millstones and Systems
Manual Mills
Manual mills, primarily quern-stones, represent the earliest form of millstone-based grain processing, relying on human power for grinding cereals into flour. These devices consist of two stones: a stationary lower stone (nether stone) and a movable upper stone (runner stone), with grinding achieved through direct manual manipulation. Originating alongside cereal domestication in the Neolithic period, saddle querns featured a dished lower stone and a handheld rubbing stone moved in a back-and-forth motion, as evidenced by artifacts from sites like Windmill Hill in Wiltshire, England, dating to the early Neolithic around 4000 BCE.[30] This method persisted for approximately 3,500 years in Britain before being supplanted by more advanced designs.[30] The rotary quern, a significant technological advancement, emerged in the western Mediterranean around the 5th century BCE, likely in regions like Catalonia, Spain, with adoption in southern England by 400 BCE and wider European spread by the 1st century BCE.[80] [81] Unlike saddle querns, rotary models used two circular stones, the upper one rotated via a central handle or peg, allowing grain to be fed through a hole (eye) in the runner stone for continuous grinding via shearing action between patterned surfaces.[80] This design improved efficiency and ergonomics, often operated by two individuals—one turning the handle, the other feeding grain—reducing physical strain compared to the laborious reciprocal motion of saddle querns.[30] Archaeological finds, such as those from Iron Age hillforts like Hunsbury in Northamptonshire, illustrate early rotary querns with beehive-shaped upper stones transitioning to flatter forms in Roman and medieval periods.[80] Materials for manual millstones prioritized hard, abrasive rocks like basalt lava from the Eifel region in Germany, valued for their durability and grinding efficacy due to porous, vitreous textures that resisted wear while effectively fracturing grain husks and endosperm.[82] Local alternatives, such as greensand or sandstone, were used where imports were unavailable, though they wore faster and produced coarser flour.[30] Surface dressing—carving radial grooves or patterns—enhanced grip and flour release, with periodic maintenance required to maintain sharpness. Operation typically yielded about 2.7 kilograms of flour per hour from a skilled user processing wheat or similar grains, though outputs varied with stone quality, grain type, and operator experience; saddle querns achieved lower rates of 0.3 to 1.3 kg per hour due to intermittent contact.[82] [83] Manual mills remained prevalent in domestic and small-scale settings through the medieval era, even as water-powered systems proliferated, as documented in late 11th-century records like the Domesday Book, which note their use in rural England alongside emerging mills.[82] In regions without mechanical power, such as prehistoric Americas with metate-mano systems or ancient Near Eastern saddle querns, similar manual techniques persisted for processing maize, barley, or emmer, underscoring the universality of stone-based manual grinding before mechanization.[30] Their decline accelerated with the Industrial Revolution, though replicas and archaeological studies continue to inform reconstructions of ancient food processing energetics and labor division, often highlighting gendered roles where women performed much of the grinding.[80]Animal and Water-Powered Mills
Animal-powered mills harnessed the rotary motion generated by draught animals, typically horses, oxen, or donkeys, to drive millstones for grain grinding. In these systems, the animal was tethered to a horizontal sweep or walked within a circular track, turning a central post or gear that transmitted power via wooden cogwheels to the upper runner stone, which rotated against the stationary bed stone below. This configuration, often termed a horse mill or norse mill, allowed for semi-automated processing of cereals like wheat and barley, producing coarser flour than manual querns but at higher volumes.[84] Evidence of such mills appears in Roman-era sites, including Pompeii, where hourglass-shaped donkey mills from the 1st century AD demonstrate early adoption, predating widespread water power in some regions and relying on animal endurance for output rates of approximately 10-20 kg of flour per hour depending on the beast's size and load.[84][85] These mills proliferated in agrarian societies lacking reliable water sources, such as arid Mediterranean or early colonial American settlements, where a single horse could sustain daily operations for small communities. Maintenance involved periodic dressing of the millstones to maintain sharp furrows for efficient shearing of grain, and gearing ratios were adjusted to match animal torque, typically yielding 1-2 horsepower equivalents. Limitations included inconsistent power from fatigued animals and seasonal fodder demands, rendering them less scalable than hydraulic alternatives.[86][87] Water-powered mills, or watermills, converted the potential energy of falling or flowing water into mechanical rotation via an undershot, breastshot, or overshot water wheel connected to a vertical shaft. Gearing from the shaft elevated and spun the runner stone at speeds of 60-120 RPM, enabling finer grinding and outputs up to 100 kg of flour per hour in larger setups, far surpassing animal mills in consistency and capacity due to the steady hydraulic force. The earliest technical account describes an undershot wheel system in Vitruvius's De Architectura circa 25 BC, though archaeological traces suggest prototypes in Hellenistic Greece by the 3rd century BC.[88][89] Roman engineering advanced the technology, as seen in the Barbegal aqueduct mills near Arles, France, operational by the 2nd century AD with 16 overshot wheels delivering an estimated 4.5 kW total power for dual-purpose grain and industrial milling. By the early medieval period, Domesday Book records from 1086 AD document over 5,000 watermills in England alone, integral to manorial economies for processing rents in kind. Efficiency stemmed from site-specific head of water (typically 2-5 meters for optimal torque) and wheel design, with overshot variants achieving up to 70% energy transfer, though silt buildup and flooding posed operational risks requiring stone rynd and tentering mechanisms for load balancing.[90][91][92]Regional and Specialized Variants
Regional variants of millstones primarily differ in their geological composition and quarrying origins, which influence grinding efficiency and suitability for specific grains. French burr stones, quarried from the Marne Valley and Alsace-Lorraine regions in France, consist of high-silica, light-colored chert characterized by hardness and porosity from natural voids, enabling finer flour production with less bran contamination.[72] These stones are composite, assembled from segmented blocks bound with plaster or concrete for stability, and were exported globally for wheat milling due to their ability to maintain sharp edges and produce whiter flour.[63][93] In England, Peak District millstones derived from Carboniferous-age millstone grit sandstone, a coarse-grained material abundant in Derbyshire, have been produced since at least the 13th century.[94] These monolithic stones, typically 1.8 meters in diameter and weighing up to a ton each, were shaped for use in water, wind, and steam mills, with many unfinished examples remaining on moorland sites like Stanage Edge due to historical quarrying practices.[95][96] German cullin or cullen millstones, sourced from basalt-like lava in the Eifel Mountains of western Germany, represent another regional type valued for durability in coarser grinding applications.[97] Specialized variants include those optimized for particular grains, such as French buhr for fine wheat flour versus local granites like Quincy granite in early American mills for cornmeal production.[11] These differences stem from material properties: porous cherts for scouring action in fine milling and denser sandstones for general-purpose grinding.[1]Operation and Efficiency
Grinding Techniques
The grinding process in millstones employs a combination of crushing, shearing, and abrasive actions facilitated by the relative rotation of the upper runner stone against the stationary lower bedstone. Grain introduced at the center eye of the runner is drawn downward by gravity and the stones' motion, where it encounters radial furrows—deep grooves typically angled to converge toward the center—that initiate coarse fracture by trapping and compressing kernels against the bedstone, mimicking a scissoring mechanism as the runner advances.[13] [1] This shearing breaks the bran from the endosperm, with furrow depths and angles calibrated to specific grains; for instance, deeper, sharper furrows suit harder wheats to enhance initial cracking efficiency.[98] Between furrows lie the lands—flat, abrasive surfaces that refine the partially crushed particles through sustained friction and pressure as the material migrates outward via centrifugal force generated by the runner's rotation, typically at 100-150 RPM for watermills to minimize heat buildup and preserve nutrient integrity.[20] [10] The gap between stones, adjustable via wooden wedges or levers, determines fineness: a narrower burr (0.5-2 mm for bolting-grade flour) yields finer output but risks clogging, while wider settings produce coarser meal, with operators monitoring for overheating or uneven wear through tactile and auditory cues during runs.[99] [100] Historical techniques emphasized periodic dressing to restore grinding efficacy, involving chiseling new furrows and roughening lands in stages—first with bushing tools for texture, then furrow cutters for channels—to counteract glazing from silica in bran, which otherwise diminishes cutting power after processing 50-100 tons of grain per dressing.[98] [77] In low-milling systems prevalent in Britain from the medieval period, grain underwent a single rapid pass for quick throughput, prioritizing volume over extraction rate, whereas high-milling variants staged multiple passes with intermediate sifting for higher yields, reflecting adaptations to power sources and grain types.[51] Regional patterns, such as French burr stones' balanced furrow-land ratios, optimized for vitreous grains by balancing shear and abrasion, demonstrating empirical refinements over centuries without modern metallurgy.[101]Output and Technological Advancements
Manual millstone operations, particularly rotary querns, achieved grinding rates of approximately 5 kilograms of flour per hour under optimal conditions, though daily yields were reduced by operator fatigue.[102] Experimental archaeology demonstrates that the shift from reciprocal to rotary querns during the Iron Age significantly reduced grinding time and energy expenditure per unit of output.[103] The integration of mechanical power sources marked a profound advancement in output capacity. Water-powered mills, utilizing geared mechanisms to rotate the runner stone at around 120 revolutions per minute, enabled continuous processing far exceeding manual limits.[104] Large-scale installations with multiple wheels could generate up to 25 metric tons of flour daily, sufficient to sustain thousands of individuals.[90] Windmills similarly amplified productivity through sail-driven gearing, though variable wind speeds introduced inconsistencies in historical yields.[105] Refinements in millstone dressing enhanced operational efficiency by optimizing furrow layouts, such as sickle or quarter patterns, which improved grain shearing, flour release, and material flow while minimizing heat generation.[76] Periodic redressing with bushing tools roughened surfaces to sustain sharpness, preventing productivity declines from glazing; gritstone pairs required maintenance every few weeks, while burr stones endured for months.[79] Sharper inner tapers in millstone profiles accelerated grain descent via gravity, further boosting throughput without compromising grind quality.[106] These design evolutions peaked with composite burr stones, which supported elevated rotational speeds and durability, but ultimately proved insufficient against 19th-century roller mills. Rollers enabled gradual reduction processes tailored to hard wheats, yielding nearly three times more white flour than traditional stone high-grinding methods and facilitating industrial-scale outputs.[107][108] By the early 20th century, such innovations rendered millstones obsolete for commercial flour production.[109]Cultural and Symbolic Roles
Religious Symbolism
In Christian scripture, the millstone serves as a potent metaphor for divine judgment and the severe consequences of moral failing, particularly in the New Testament. Jesus employs it to emphasize the gravity of causing spiritual harm to the vulnerable: "If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them if a large millstone were hung around their neck and they were drowned in the depths of the sea" (Matthew 18:6; parallels in Mark 9:42 and Luke 17:2).[9] This imagery underscores the weight of accountability for leading believers astray, portraying the millstone not merely as a tool of sustenance but as an instrument of inescapable doom, evoking the finality of drowning weighted by its unyielding mass.[110] In the Book of Revelation, the symbolism extends to apocalyptic destruction, where an angel casts a "mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone and threw it into the sea" to depict the violent overthrow of Babylon: "Thus with violence the great city Babylon shall be thrown down, and shall not be found anymore" (Revelation 18:21). Here, the millstone embodies irreversible cataclysm and the cessation of corrupt systems, mirroring the grinding halt of societal provision and echoing Old Testament motifs of desolation, such as the silencing of millstones signaling famine and ruin (Jeremiah 25:10).[6][111] Old Testament references further layer the symbol with themes of provision and retribution, prohibiting the seizure of millstones as pledges since they represent "your neighbor’s livelihood" (Deuteronomy 24:6), thus linking the tool to essential life sustenance.[9] Conversely, its weaponization— as when a woman drops an upper millstone on Abimelech, crushing his skull (Judges 9:53)—foreshadows lethal judgment, reinforcing the dual role of millstones as emblems of both daily faith-sustaining labor (grinding grain into flour for bread) and burdensome penalty.[111] These biblical usages, drawn from agrarian realities, prioritize causal consequences of actions over abstract morality, with no equivalent prominence in other ancient religious texts.[112]Folklore and Iconography
In biblical texts, the millstone serves as a potent symbol of divine judgment and irreversible destruction. In Revelation 18:21, an angel casts a great millstone into the sea, proclaiming the fall of Babylon, with the cessation of the "sound of the millstone" signifying the end of commerce, joy, and daily sustenance, underscoring total societal collapse.[111] Similarly, in Matthew 18:6 and Mark 9:42, Jesus warns that it would be better for one who causes a child to stumble to have a millstone hung around their neck and be drowned, evoking the Roman practice of execution by weighted submersion for heinous crimes and emphasizing the gravity of moral offense.[9] This imagery draws on the millstone's inherent heaviness—often exceeding 3,000 pounds for larger examples—and its role in essential grinding, transforming it into a metaphor for inescapable burden and retribution.[113] Norse mythology features the millstone Grótti, a magical artifact forged by dwarves and captured by the sea-king Mysinger, capable of grinding any requested material, from salt to gold, symbolizing unchecked abundance and the perils of exploitation.[114] In the poem Gróttasöngr from the Poetic Edda, the giantesses Fenja and Menja, enslaved to operate it for the Danish king Fróði, grind prosperity until overworked into producing an invading army led by Mysinger, leading to Fróði's death and the mill's submersion, where it purportedly generates whirlpools or treasures. This legend illustrates themes of transformation, labor's limits, and the destructive inversion of productivity, with the millstone embodying both boon and curse.[114] Broader folklore associates millstones with cycles of life, death, and rebirth, mirroring the milling process where whole grain is crushed to yield flour, akin to sacrifice yielding sustenance. In various traditions, the act evokes alchemical change from raw to refined, but also peril, as in tales of hurled millstones as weapons shattering skulls or cities, reflecting their mass as an instrument of sudden violence.[115][116] Iconographically, millstones appear in religious art as emblems of toil and provision, often depicting women at hand-querns to symbolize domestic stability or oppression, as in ancient Near Eastern reliefs or medieval manuscripts illustrating biblical parables. In symbolic contexts, they denote judgment in apocalyptic imagery, such as engravings of Revelation's millstone cast into waters, reinforcing themes of finality. Less commonly, in non-Western iconography, variants like querns feature in mythological depictions of cosmic grinding, representing eternal cycles, though direct artistic survivals are sparse outside scriptural exegesis.[117]Phallic and Other Interpretations
In Roman Britain, phallic imagery carved directly onto millstones and rotary querns represents a rare but deliberate symbolic practice, with at least four documented examples from the period. These carvings, typically depicting erect phalluses with wings or other apotropaic features, align with broader Roman cultural motifs where the phallus symbolized virility, strength, and protection against misfortune, such as the evil eye. Archaeologists interpret these markings on grinding implements as invoking enhanced productivity and fertility, given the millstone's functional role in transforming grain into flour—a process tied to sustenance and abundance. For instance, a basalt millstone unearthed in 2021 during A14 roadworks near Fen Ditton, Cambridgeshire, featured a prominent phallic engraving on its underside, likely intended as a votive dedication before deposition around the 4th century CE. Similar carvings have been recorded at sites like Corbridge and South Shields, suggesting a localized Romano-British tradition rather than empire-wide prevalence.[118][119][120] Scholarly analysis posits that the phallus on millstones served "double magic," combining the stone's inherent productivity symbolism with the emblem's protective and generative connotations, potentially warding off mechanical failure or ensuring bountiful yields. This interpretation draws from Roman apotropaic traditions, where phallic amulets (fascini) were commonplace among soldiers and civilians for warding off harm, as evidenced by legionary badges and household artifacts. The carvings' placement—often on non-functional surfaces—indicates ritual intent over utilitarian decoration, with deposition patterns suggesting decommissioning rituals upon site abandonment. No equivalent phallic millstone carvings have been widely attested elsewhere in the Roman Empire, highlighting the Romano-British cases' uniqueness.[118][121][122] Beyond phallic motifs, millstones have occasionally been linked to fertility symbolism through their form and operation, though such readings lack the direct evidence of carvings. In some archaeological contexts, the central hopper hole of rotary querns has been analogized to female genitalia, with the rotating upper stone evoking sexual union and generative processes, paralleling ethnographic parallels in agrarian societies where grinding tools embody domestic fertility. However, these interpretations remain speculative, as no ancient texts or widespread artifacts substantiate them, and they risk overimposition of modern symbolic frameworks onto functional objects. In biblical and Judeo-Christian traditions, millstones more commonly symbolize inexorable burdens or judgment, as in the Gospel of Matthew's reference to a millstone tied around the neck of one causing harm to children, emphasizing consequence over generative imagery.[118]Archaeological and Modern Perspectives
Excavation and Analysis Methods
Archaeological excavation of millstones prioritizes stratigraphic integrity to preserve contextual data on site chronology and activity areas, with artifacts documented in situ via photogrammetry, 3D scanning, and detailed plans recording orientation, fragmentation, and associations with features like hearths or storage pits.[5] Recovery techniques emphasize non-invasive lifting using supports to minimize damage to friable surfaces, as demonstrated in Roman-period assemblages where millstones' positions relative to water channels or animal pens reveal operational layouts.[123] Sediments adhering to grinding faces are systematically sampled during extraction for paleoenvironmental proxies, while quarry-site excavations focus on tool marks from pecking and chiseling to reconstruct procurement sequences.[124] Post-excavation analysis begins with typological assessment of morphology, including diameter, thickness, central perforation, and furrow patterns, enabling differentiation between low-output querns (typically under 50 cm diameter, hand-rotated) and high-volume millstones (often exceeding 1 m, evidencing powered rotation via levers or gears).[125] Petrographic thin-section microscopy identifies lithic composition—such as vesicular basalt or quartz-rich sandstone—and provenance through mineral fabric and inclusions, as in studies tracing volcanic millstones from Sicily to regional quarries via comparative sampling.[126] [127] Geochemical profiling, including X-ray fluorescence for trace elements, further refines sourcing, confirming intra-regional trade in durable lithologies like Old Red Sandstone during the Romano-British era.[128] Use-wear scrutiny employs low- and high-power microscopy to detect kinematic traces like linear striations from rotational shear, differential polish from grain abrasion, and micro-pitting from percussive loading, quantifying wear rates to infer processing volumes—e.g., heavy polish on upper stones indicating cereal grinding over pigments.[129] [130] Residue extraction via ultrasonication or acid washes recovers starch granules and phytoliths from interstices, linking millstones to specific crops like emmer wheat, while experimental replication tests hypothesized mechanics against archaeological wear profiles.[131] [132] These integrated approaches, cross-validated against quarry lithologies, mitigate interpretive biases from incomplete assemblages and illuminate technological diffusion, such as the adoption of geared mills by the 1st century CE.[133]Preservation and Contemporary Uses
Preservation efforts for historic millstones involve specialized restoration techniques, primarily focused on maintaining their grinding surfaces through a process known as dressing, where furrows and grooves are recut using traditional iron picks or modern tools like angle grinders to ensure functionality.[134] [135] Organizations such as the Society for the Preservation of Old Mills (SPOOM), founded to promote the historical significance of mills, support documentation, repair, and public appreciation of millstones dating back centuries.[136] Specific restorations include the 2011 overhaul of Peirce Mill in Washington, D.C., where millstones were refurbished alongside the water wheel, enabling corn grinding operations to resume that year.[137] Similarly, the Anselma Mill in Pennsylvania undergoes continuous repairs to replicate its 1747 operational state, preserving both structure and stones.[138] Millstones are displayed and studied in museums and historical sites worldwide, providing insights into ancient milling technologies. The Frenchtown Flouring Mill stones, used in the 1860s for wheat grinding, were donated to Fort Missoula Museum in 1975 and remain on exhibit.[139] In Norway, Millstone Park serves as a dedicated museum showcasing the evolution of these tools from prehistoric querns to industrial-era variants, emphasizing their role in food production.[140] Demonstrations of dressing techniques occur at sites like George Washington's Gristmill at Mount Vernon, where experts recut stone surfaces to historical specifications.[134] These preserved examples, often sourced from local quarries like French buhrstone or Cumbrian millstone grit, highlight material durability, with some stones operational for over 200 years before retirement.[141] In contemporary settings, millstones continue limited practical use in artisanal and small-scale grain processing, valued for producing finer, more nutritious flours compared to roller mills due to lower heat generation during grinding.[2] Modern stone mills, such as those employed by Minoterie Suire in France, utilize cylindrical pairs—one fixed and one rotating—to process grains for bakery products, maintaining traditional low-height, large-diameter designs.[12] Some industrial applications persist, including in tortilla production where stones grind corn for premium items, as noted in facilities operational as of 2023.[142] Beyond milling, repurposed millstones serve decorative purposes in landscaping, functioning as garden tables, patios, fountains, or focal points symbolizing rustic heritage, with salvaged granite examples enhancing outdoor aesthetics.[143] Artistic installations, like the 47 millstones in the Millstone Courtyard at The Hermitage Museum & Gardens, transform them into sculptural elements collected from regional sites.[144]References
- https://handwiki.org/wiki/Engineering:Millstone

