Hubbry Logo
Imperial unitsImperial unitsMain
Open search
Imperial units
Community hub
Imperial units
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Imperial units
Imperial units
from Wikipedia

The former Weights and Measures office in Seven Sisters, London (590 Seven Sisters Road)

The imperial system of units, imperial system or imperial units (also known as British Imperial[1] or Exchequer Standards of 1826) is the system of units first defined in the British Weights and Measures Act 1824 and continued to be developed through a series of Weights and Measures Acts and amendments.

The imperial system developed from earlier English units as did the related but differing system of customary units of the United States. The imperial units replaced the Winchester Standards, which were in effect from 1588 to 1825.[2] The system came into official use across the British Empire in 1826.

By the late 20th century, most nations of the former empire had officially adopted the metric system as their main system of measurement, but imperial units are still used alongside metric units in the United Kingdom and in some other parts of the former empire, notably Canada.

The modern UK legislation defining the imperial system of units is given in the Weights and Measures Act 1985 (as amended).[3]

Implementation

[edit]

The Weights and Measures Act 1824 was initially scheduled to go into effect on 1 May 1825.[4] The Weights and Measures Act 1825 pushed back the date to 1 January 1826.[5] The 1824 act allowed the continued use of pre-imperial units provided that they were customary, widely known, and clearly marked with imperial equivalents.[4]

Apothecaries' units

[edit]
Imperial standards of length 1876 in Trafalgar Square, London

Apothecaries' units are not mentioned in the acts of 1824 and 1825. At the time, apothecaries' weights and measures were regulated "in England, Wales, and Berwick-upon-Tweed" by the London College of Physicians, and in Ireland by the Dublin College of Physicians. In Scotland, apothecaries' units were unofficially regulated by the Edinburgh College of Physicians. The three colleges published, at infrequent intervals, pharmacopoeias, the London and Dublin editions having the force of law.[6][7]

Imperial apothecaries' measures, based on the imperial pint of 20 fluid ounces, were introduced by the publication of the London Pharmacopoeia of 1836,[8][9] the Edinburgh Pharmacopoeia of 1839,[10] and the Dublin Pharmacopoeia of 1850.[11] The Medical Act 1858 transferred to the Crown the right to publish the official pharmacopoeia and to regulate apothecaries' weights and measures.[12]

Units

[edit]

Length

[edit]

Metric equivalents in this article usually assume the latest official definition. Before this date, the most precise measurement of the imperial Standard Yard was 0.914398415 metres.[13]

Table of length equivalent units
Unit Abbr. or symbols Relative to previous Feet Metres Notes
twip 117280 0.000017638 typographic measure
thou th 1.44 twip 112000 0.0000254

Abbreviation of "thousandth of an inch". Also known as mil.[14]

barleycorn 333+13 th 136 0.00846 13 in
inch in () 3 Bc 112 0.0254 1 metre ≡ 39 47127 inches
hand hh 4 in 13 0.1016 Used to measure the height of horses
foot ft () 3 h 1 0.3048 12 in
yard yd 3 ft 3 0.9144 Defined as exactly 0.9144 m by the international yard and pound agreement of 1959
chain ch 22 yd 66 20.1168 100 links, 4 rods, or 110 of a furlong. The distance between the two wickets on a cricket pitch.
furlong fur 10 chains 660 201.168 220 yd
mile mi 8 furlongs 5280 1609.344 1760 yd or 80 chains
league lea 3 miles 15840 4828.032
Maritime units
fathom ftm 2.02667 yd 6.0761 1.852 The British Admiralty in practice used a fathom of 6 ft. This was despite its being 11000 of a nautical mile (i.e. 6.08 ft) until the adoption of the international nautical mile.[15]
cable 100 fathoms 607.61 185.2 One tenth of a nautical mile. Equal to 100 fathoms under the strict definition.
nautical mile nmi 10 cables 6076.1 1852 Used for measuring distances at sea (and also in aviation) and approximately equal to one arc minute of a great circle. Until the adoption of the international definition of 1852 m in 1970, the British nautical (Admiralty) mile was defined as 6080 ft.[16]
Gunter's survey units (17th century onwards)
link 7.92 in 66100 0.201168 1100 of a chain and 11000 of a furlong
rod 25 links 664 5.0292 The rod is also called pole or perch and is equal to 5+12 yards

Area

[edit]
Table of area units and equivalents
Unit Abbr. or symbol Relative to previous Relation to units of length Square feet Square yards Acres Square metres Hectares
perch* 1 rd × 1 rd 272+14 30+14 1160 25.29285264 0.002529285264
rood 40 perches 1 furlong × 1 rd[17] 10890 1210 14 1011.7141056 0.10117141056
acre 4 roods 1 furlong × 1 chain 43560 4840 1 4046.8564224 0.40468564224
square mile sq mi 640 acres 1 mile × 1 mile 27878400 3097600 640 2589988.110336 258.9988110336
Note: *The square rod has been called a pole or perch or, more properly, square pole or square perch for centuries.

Volume

[edit]
Imperial volume units, illustrated as jugs of various sizes

The Weights and Measures Act 1824 invalidated the various different gallons in use in the British Empire, declaring them to be replaced by the statute gallon (which became known as the imperial gallon), a unit close in volume to the ale gallon. The 1824 act defined as the volume of a gallon to be that of 10 pounds (4.54 kg) of distilled water weighed in air with brass weights with the barometer standing at 30 inches of mercury (102 kPa) at a temperature of 62 °F (17 °C).[18] The 1824 act went on to give this volume as 277.274 cubic inches (4.54371 litres).[18] The Weights and Measures Act 1963 refined this definition to be the volume of 10 pounds of distilled water of density 0.998859 g/mL weighed in air of density 0.001217 g/mL against weights of density 8.136 g/mL, which works out to 4.546092 L.[nb 1] The Weights and Measures Act 1985 defined a gallon to be exactly 4.54609 L (approximately 277.4194 cu in).[19]

Table of equivalences
Unit Imperial
ounces
Imperial
pints
Millilitres Cubic inches US ounces US pints
fluid ounce (fl oz) 1     120     28.4130625 1.7339 0.96076 0.060047
gill (gi) 5     14     142.0653125 8.6694 4.8038 0.30024
pint (pt) 20     1     568.26125 34.677 19.215 1.2009
quart (qt) 40     2     1136.5225 69.355 38.430 2.4019
gallon (gal) 160     8     4546.09 277.42 153.72 9.6076
Note: The millilitre equivalences are exact, but cubic-inch and US measures are correct to 5 significant figures.
Unit measures defined by the Weights and Measures Act 1824,
all measures determined by reference to the statute gallon of 277.274 cubic inches.[18]
Unit gallons Capacity
pint 18 34.76 cu in (569.6 mL; 0.5696 L)
quart 14 69.32 cu in (1.1360 L)
gallon 1 277.274 cu in (4.54371 L)
peck 2 554.548 cu in (9.08741 L)
bushel 8 2,218.192 cu in (36.34965 L)
quarter 64 17,745.536 cu in (290.79723 L)
Note: The 1824 Act removed the distinction between liquid and dry measure, specifying instead that
the dry quantities shall be unheaped. The metric equivalences shown are approximate.

British apothecaries' volume measures

[edit]

These measurements were in use from 1826, when the new imperial gallon was defined. For pharmaceutical purposes, they were replaced by the metric system in the United Kingdom on 1 January 1971.[20][21] In the US, though no longer recommended, the apothecaries' system is still used occasionally in medicine, especially in prescriptions for older medications.[22][23]

Table of British apothecaries' volume units[nb 2]
Unit Symbols and
abbreviations
Relative to
previous
Exact
metric value[note 1]
minim ♏︎, , m, m., min   (19600 pint) 59.1938802083 μL
fluid scruple fl ℈, fl s 20 minims (1480 pint) 1.18387760416 mL
fluid drachm
(fluid dram, fluidram)
ʒ, fl ʒ, fʒ, ƒ 3, fl dr 3 fluid scruples (1160 pint) 3.5516328125 mL
fluid ounce ℥, fl ℥, f℥, ƒ ℥, fl oz 8 fluid drachms 28.4130625 mL
pint O, pt 20 fluid ounces 568.26125 mL
gallon C, gal 8 pints 4.54609 L
Note:
  1. ^ The vinculum over numbers (e.g. 3) represents a repeating decimal.

Mass and weight

[edit]

In the 19th and 20th centuries, the UK used three different systems for mass and weight.

The distinction between mass and weight is not always clearly drawn. Strictly a pound is a unit of mass, but it is commonly referred to as a weight. When a distinction is necessary, the term pound-force may refer to a unit of force rather than mass. The troy pound (373.2417216 g) was made the primary unit of mass by the Weights and Measures Act 1824 and its use was abolished in the UK on 1 January 1879,[30] with only the troy ounce (31.1034768 g) and its decimal subdivisions retained.[31] The Weights and Measures Act 1855 made the avoirdupois pound the primary unit of mass.[32] In all the systems, the fundamental unit is the pound, and all other units are defined as fractions or multiples of it.

Table of mass units
Unit Pounds In SI units Notes
grain (gr) 17000 64.79891 mg Exactly 64.79891 milligrams.
drachm (dr) 1256 1.7718451953125 g A dram is 116 of an ounce
ounce (oz) 116 28.349523125 g An ounce is 116 of a pound
pound (lb) 1 0.45359237 kg Defined by the Units of Measurement Regulations 1994 (SI 1994/2867)[33]
stone (st) 14 6.35029318 kg The plural stone is often used when providing a weight (e.g. "this sack weighs 8 stone").[34] A person's weight is usually quoted in stone and pounds in English-speaking countries that use the avoirdupois system, with the exception of the United States and Canada, where it is usually quoted in pounds.
quarter (qr or qtr) 28 12.70058636 kg One quarter (literally a quarter of a hundredweight) is equal to two stone or 28 pounds. The term quarter is also used in retail contexts, where it refers to four ounces, i.e. a quarter of a pound. (The 1824 act defined a quarter as a unit of volume, as above: thus a 'quarter of wheat', 64 gallons, would weigh about 494 lb.[35]).
hundredweight (cwt) 112 50.80234544 kg One imperial hundredweight is equal to eight stone. This is the long hundredweight, 112 pounds, as opposed to the short hundredweight of 100 pounds used in the United States and Canada.[36]
ton (ton) 2240 1016.0469088 kg Twenty hundredweight equals a ton (as in the US and Canadian[36] systems). The imperial hundredweight is 12% greater than the US and Canadian one. The imperial ton (or long ton) is 2240 pounds, which is much closer to a tonne (about 2204.6 pounds), compared to the 10.7% smaller North American short ton of 2000 pounds (907.185 kg). The symbol “t” is used to denote a tonne.
Gravitational units
slug (slug) 32.17404856 14.59390294 kg The slug, a unit associated with imperial and US customary systems, is a mass that accelerates by 1 ft/s2 when a force of one pound (lbf) is exerted on it.[37]
F  = ma (Newton's second law)
1 lbf  = 1 slug × 1 ft/s2 (as defined above)
1 lbf  = 1 lb × g/gc (by definition of the pound force[citation needed])
g  32.17404856 ft/s2
gc  32.17404856 lbm⋅ft/lbf⋅s2
1 slug  32.17404856 pounds

Natural equivalents

[edit]

The 1824 Act of Parliament defined the yard and pound by reference to the prototype standards, and it also defined the values of certain physical constants, to make provision for re-creation of the standards if they were to be damaged. For the yard, the length of a pendulum beating seconds at the latitude of Greenwich at mean sea level in vacuo was defined as 39.1393 inches. For the pound, the mass of a cubic inch of distilled water at an atmospheric pressure of 30 inches of mercury and a temperature of 62° Fahrenheit was defined as 252.458 grains, with there being 7,000 grains per pound.[4]

Following the destruction of the original prototypes in the 1834 Houses of Parliament fire, it proved impossible to recreate the standards from these definitions, and a new Weights and Measures Act 1855 was passed which permitted the recreation of the prototypes from recognized secondary standards.[32]

Current use

[edit]

United Kingdom

Countries using the metric (SI), imperial and US customary systems as of 2019

Since the Weights and Measures Act 1985, British law defines base imperial units in terms of their metric equivalent. The metric system is routinely used in business and technology within the United Kingdom, with imperial units remaining in widespread use amongst the public.[38] All UK roads use the imperial system except for weight limits, and newer height or width restriction signs give metric alongside imperial.[39]

A baby bottle that measures in three measurement systems—metric, imperial (UK), and US customary

Traders in the UK may accept requests from customers specified in imperial units, and scales which display in both unit systems are commonplace in the retail trade. Metric price signs may be accompanied by imperial price signs provided that the imperial signs are no larger and no more prominent than the metric ones.

The United Kingdom completed its official partial transition to the metric system in 1995, with imperial units still legally mandated for certain applications such as draught beer and cider,[40] and road-signs.[41] Therefore, the speedometers on vehicles sold in the UK must be capable of displaying miles per hour. Even though the troy pound was outlawed in the UK in the Weights and Measures Act 1878, the troy ounce may still be used for the weights of precious stones and metals. The original railways (many built in the Victorian era) are a big user of imperial units, with distances officially measured in miles and yards or miles and chains, and also feet and inches, and speeds are in miles per hour.

Some British people still use one or more imperial units in everyday life for distance (miles, yards, feet, and inches) and some types of volume measurement (especially milk and beer in pints; rarely for canned or bottled soft drinks, or petrol).[38][42] As of February 2021, many British people also still use imperial units in everyday life for body weight (stones and pounds for adults, pounds and ounces for babies).[43] Government documents aimed at the public may give body weight and height in imperial units as well as in metric.[44] A survey in 2015 found that many people did not know their body weight or height in both systems.[45] As of 2017, people under the age of 40 preferred the metric system but people aged 40 and over preferred the imperial system.[46] As in other English-speaking countries, including Australia, Canada and the United States, the height of horses is usually measured in hands, standardised to 4 inches (102 mm). Fuel consumption for vehicles is commonly stated in miles per gallon (mpg), though official figures always include litres per 100 km equivalents and fuel is sold in litres. When sold draught in licensed premises, beer and cider must be sold in pints, half-pints or third-pints.[47] Cow's milk is available in both litre- and pint-based containers in supermarkets and shops. Areas of land associated with farming, forestry and real estate are commonly advertised in acres and square feet but, for contracts and land registration purposes, the units are always hectares and square metres.[48]

Office space and industrial units are usually advertised in square feet. Steel pipe sizes are sold in increments of inches, while copper pipe is sold in increments of millimetres. Road bicycles have their frames measured in centimetres, while off-road bicycles have their frames measured in inches. Display sizes for screens on television sets and computer monitors are always diagonally measured in inches. Food sold by length or width, e.g. pizzas or sandwiches, is generally sold in inches. Clothing is usually sized in inches, with the metric equivalent often shown as a small supplementary indicator. Gas is usually measured by the cubic foot or cubic metre, but is billed like electricity by the kilowatt hour.[49]

Pre-packaged products can show both metric and imperial measures, and it is also common to see imperial pack sizes with metric only labels, e.g. a 1 lb (454 g) tin of Lyle's Golden Syrup is always labelled 454 g with no imperial indicator. Similarly most jars of jam and packs of sausages are labelled 454 g with no imperial indicator.

India

[edit]

India began converting to the metric system from the imperial system between 1955 and 1962. The metric system in weights and measures was adopted by the Indian Parliament in December 1956 with the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, which took effect beginning 1 October 1958. By 1962, metric units became "mandatory and exclusive."[50]

Today all official measurements are made in the metric system. In common usage some older Indians may still refer to imperial units. Some measurements, such as the heights of mountains, are still recorded in feet. Tyre rim diameters are still measured in inches, as used worldwide. Industries like the construction and the real estate industry still use both the metric and the imperial system though it is more common for sizes of homes to be given in square feet and land in acres.[51]

In Standard Indian English, as in Australian, Canadian, New Zealand, Singaporean, and British English, metric units such as the litre, metre, and tonne utilise the traditional spellings brought over from French, which differ from those used in the United States and the Philippines. The imperial long ton is invariably spelt with one 'n'.[51]

Hong Kong

[edit]

Hong Kong has three main systems of units of measurement in current use:

In 1976 the Hong Kong Government started the conversion to the metric system, and as of 2012 measurements for government purposes, such as road signs, are almost always in metric units. All three systems are officially permitted for trade,[52] and in the wider society a mixture of all three systems prevails.

The Chinese system's most commonly used units for length are (lei5), (zoeng6), (cek3), (cyun3), (fan1) in descending scale order. These units are now rarely used in daily life, the imperial and metric systems being preferred. The imperial equivalents are written with the same basic Chinese characters as the Chinese system. In order to distinguish between the units of the two systems, the units can be prefixed with "Ying" (, jing1) for the imperial system and "Wa" (, waa4) for the Chinese system. In writing, derived characters are often used, with an additional (mouth) radical to the left of the original Chinese character, for writing imperial units. The most commonly used units are the mile or "li" (, li1), the yard or "ma" (, maa5), the foot or "chek" (, cek3), and the inch or "tsun" (, cyun3).

The traditional measure of flat area is the square foot (方呎, 平方呎, fong1 cek3, ping4 fong1 cek3) of the imperial system, which is still in common use for real estate purposes. The measurement of agricultural plots and fields is traditionally conducted in (mau5) of the Chinese system.

For the measurement of volume, Hong Kong officially uses the metric system, though the gallon (加侖, gaa1 leon4-2) is also occasionally used.

Canada

[edit]
A one US gallon gas can purchased near the US-Canada border showing equivalences in imperial gallons and litres
Imperial and metric measurements on Canadian canned goods labels. The imperial measurements often take precedence over the metric ones on labels.

During the 1970s, the metric system and SI units were introduced in Canada to replace the imperial system. Within the government, efforts to implement the metric system were extensive; almost any agency, institution, or function provided by the government uses SI units exclusively. Imperial units were eliminated from all public road signs and both systems of measurement will still be found on privately owned signs, such as the height warnings at the entrance of a parkade. In the 1980s, momentum to fully convert to the metric system stalled when the government of Brian Mulroney was elected. There was heavy opposition to metrication and as a compromise the government maintains legal definitions for and allows use of imperial units as long as metric units are shown as well.[53][54][55][56]

The law requires that measured products (such as fuel and meat) be priced in metric units and an imperial price can be shown if a metric price is present.[57][58] There tends to be leniency in regards to fruits and vegetables being priced in imperial units only. Environment Canada still offers an imperial unit option beside metric units, even though weather is typically measured and reported in metric units in the Canadian media. Some radio stations near the United States border (such as CIMX and CIDR) primarily use imperial units to report the weather. Railways in Canada also continue to use imperial units.

Imperial units are still used in ordinary conversation. Today, Canadians typically use a mix of metric and imperial measurements in their daily lives. The use of the metric and imperial systems varies by age. The older generation mostly uses the imperial system, while the younger generation more often uses the metric system. Quebec has implemented metrication more fully. [citation needed] Newborns are measured in SI at hospitals, but the birth weight and length is also announced to family and friends in imperial units. Drivers' licences use SI units, though many English-speaking Canadians give their height and weight in imperial. In livestock auction markets, cattle are sold in dollars per hundredweight (short), whereas hogs are sold in dollars per hundred kilograms. Imperial units still dominate in recipes, construction, house renovation and gardening.[59][60][61][62][63] Land is now surveyed and registered in metric units whilst initial surveys used imperial units. For example, partitioning of farmland on the prairies in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was done in imperial units; this accounts for imperial units of distance and area retaining wide use in the Prairie Provinces.

In English-speaking Canada commercial and residential spaces are mostly (but not exclusively) constructed using square feet, while in French-speaking Quebec commercial and residential spaces are constructed in metres and advertised using both square metres and square feet as equivalents. Carpet or flooring tile is purchased by the square foot, but less frequently also in square metres.[64][65] Motor-vehicle fuel consumption is reported in both litres per 100 km and statute miles per imperial gallon,[66] leading to the erroneous impression that Canadian vehicles are 20% more fuel-efficient than their apparently identical American counterparts for which fuel economy is reported in statute miles per US gallon (neither country specifies which gallon is used). Canadian railways maintain exclusive use of imperial measurements to describe train length (feet), train height (feet), capacity (tons), speed (mph), and trackage (miles).[67]

Imperial units also retain common use in firearms and ammunition. Imperial measures are still used in the description of cartridge types, even when the cartridge is of relatively recent invention (e.g., .204 Ruger, .17 HMR, where the calibre is expressed in decimal fractions of an inch). Ammunition that is already classified in metric is still kept metric (e.g., 9×19mm). In the manufacture of ammunition, bullet and powder weights are expressed in terms of grains for both metric and imperial cartridges.

In keeping with the international standard, air navigation is based on nautical units, e.g., the nautical mile, which is neither imperial nor metric, and altitude is measured in imperial feet.[68]

Australia

[edit]

While metrication in Australia has largely ended the official use of imperial units, for particular measurements, international use of imperial units is still followed.

  • In licensed venues, draught beer and cider is sold in glasses and jugs with sizes based on the imperial fluid ounce, though rounded to the nearest 5 mL.
  • Newborns are measured in metric at hospitals, but the birth weight and length is sometimes also announced to family and friends in imperial units.
  • Screen sizes, are frequently described in inches instead of or as well as centimetres.
  • Property size is infrequently described in acres, but is mostly as square metres or hectares.
  • Marine navigation is done in nautical miles, and water-based speed limits are in nautical miles per hour.
  • Historical writing and presentations may include pre-metric units to reflect the context of the era represented.
  • The illicit drug trade in Australia still often uses imperial measurements, particularly when dealing with smaller amounts closer to end user levels e.g. "8-ball" an 8th of an ounce or 3.5 g; cannabis is often traded in ounces ("oz") and pounds ("p")[citation needed]
  • Firearm barrel length are almost always referred by in inches, ammunition is also still measured in grains and ounces as well as grams.
  • A persons height is frequently and informally described in feet and inches, but on official records is described in metres.

The influence of British and American culture in Australia has been noted to be a cause for residual use of imperial units of measure.

New Zealand

[edit]

New Zealand introduced the metric system on 15 December 1976.[69] Aviation was exempt, with altitude and airport elevation continuing to be measured in feet whilst navigation is done in nautical miles; all other aspects (fuel quantity, aircraft weight, runway length, etc.) use metric units.

Screen sizes for devices such as televisions, monitors and phones, and wheel rim sizes for vehicles, are stated in inches, as is the convention in the rest of the world - and a 1992 study found a continued use of imperial units for birth weight and human height alongside metric units.[70]

Ireland

[edit]

Ireland has officially changed over to the metric system since entering the European Union, with distances on new road signs being metric since 1997 and speed limits being metric since 2005. The imperial system remains in limited use – for sales of beer in pubs (traditionally sold by the pint). All other goods are required by law to be sold in metric units with traditional quantities being retained for goods like butter and sausages, which are sold in 454 grams (1 lb) packaging. The majority of cars sold pre-2005 feature speedometers with miles per hour as the primary unit, but with a kilometres per hour display. Often signs such as those for bridge height can display both metric and imperial units. Imperial measurements continue to be used colloquially by the general population especially with height and distance measurements such as feet, inches, and acres as well as for weight with pounds and stones still in common use among people of all ages. Measurements such as yards have fallen out of favour with younger generations. Ireland's railways still use imperial measurements for distances and speed signage.[71][72] Property is usually listed in square feet as well as metres also.

Horse racing in Ireland still continues to use stones, pounds, miles and furlongs as measurements.[73]

Bahamas

[edit]

Imperial measurements remain in general use in the Bahamas.

Legally, both the imperial and metric systems are recognised by the Weights and Measures Act 2006.[74]

Belize

[edit]

Both imperial units and metric units are used in Belize. Both systems are legally recognized by the National Metrology Act.[75]

Myanmar

[edit]

According to the CIA, in June 2009, Myanmar was one of three countries that had not adopted the SI metric system as their official system of weights and measures.[76][unreliable source?] Metrication efforts began in 2011.[77] The Burmese government set a goal to metricate by 2019, which was not met, with the help of the German National Metrology Institute.[78]

Other countries

[edit]

Some imperial measurements remain in limited use in Malaysia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and South Africa. Measurements in feet and inches, especially for a person's height, are frequently encountered in conversation and non-governmental publications.

Prior to metrication, it was a common practice in Malaysia for people to refer to unnamed locations and small settlements along major roads by referring to how many miles the said locations were from the nearest major town. In some cases, these eventually became the official names of the locations; in other cases, such names have been largely or completely superseded by new names. An example of the former is Batu 32 (literally "Mile 32" in Malay), which refers to the area surrounding the intersection between Federal Route 22 (the Tamparuli-Sandakan highway) and Federal Route 13 (the Sandakan-Tawau highway). The area is so named because it is 32 miles west of Sandakan, the nearest major town.

Petrol is still sold by the imperial gallon in Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, Myanmar, the Cayman Islands, Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St Kitts and Nevis and St. Vincent and the Grenadines.[citation needed] The United Arab Emirates Cabinet in 2009 issued the Decree No. (270 / 3) specifying that, from 1 January 2010, the new unit sale price for petrol will be the litre and not the gallon, which was in line with the UAE Cabinet Decision No. 31 of 2006 on the national system of measurement, which mandates the use of International System of units as a basis for the legal units of measurement in the country.[79][80][81][82] Sierra Leone switched to selling fuel by the litre in May 2011.[83]

In October 2011, the Antigua and Barbuda government announced the re-launch of the Metrication Programme in accordance with the Metrology Act 2007, which established the International System of Units as the legal system of units. The Antigua and Barbuda government has committed to a full conversion from the imperial system by the first quarter of 2015.[84]

In March 2025, Dubai completed the switch from imperial gallons to cubic metres as the unit to measure water consumption.[85]

See also

[edit]

Explanatory notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Britannica Educational Publishing (2010). The Britannica Guide to Numbers and Measurement. The Rosen Publishing Group. p. 241. ISBN 978-1-61530-218-5. Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
  2. ^ Chaney, Henry James (1897). A Practical Treatise on the Standard Weights and Measures in Use in the British Empire with some account of the metric system. Eyre and Spottiswoode. p. 3. Retrieved 11 September 2016.
  3. ^ "Weights and Measures Act 1985". legislation.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 2 January 2022. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  4. ^ a b c Great Britain (1824). The statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (1807-1865). His Majesty's statute and law printers. pp. 339–354. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  5. ^ Great Britain; William David Evans; Anthony Hammond; Thomas Colpitts Granger (1836). A collection of statutes connected with the general administration of the law: arranged according to the order of subjects. W. H. Bond. pp. 306–27. Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  6. ^ Edinburgh medical and surgical journal. A. and C. Black. 1824. p. 398.
  7. ^ Ireland; Butler, James Goddard; Ball, William (barrister.) (1765). The Statutes at Large, Passed in the Parliaments Held in Ireland: From the twenty-third year of George the Second, A.D. 1749, to the first year of George the Third, A.D. 1761 inclusive. Boulter Grierson. p. 852.
  8. ^ Gray, Samuel Frederick (1836). A supplement to the Pharmacopœia and treatise on pharmacology in general: including not only the drugs and preparations used by practitioners of medicine, but also most of those employed in the chemical arts : together with a collection of the most useful medical formulæ ... Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman. p. 516. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
  9. ^ "A Translation of the Pharmacopoeia of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 1836.: With ..." S. Highley, 32, Fleet Street. 1837.
  10. ^ The Pharmacopoeia of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. Adam and Charles Black and Bell and Bradfute. 1839. pp. xiii–xiv.
  11. ^ Royal College of Physicians of Dublin; Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (1850). The pharmacopœia of the King and queen's college of physicians in Ireland. Hodges and Smith. p. xxii. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
  12. ^ Great Britain (1858). A collection of the public general statutes passed in the ... year of the reign of ... Printed by G. W. Eyre and W. Spottiswoode, Printers to the Queen. p. 306.
  13. ^ Sears et al. 1928. Phil Trans A, 227:281.
  14. ^ Jerrard and McNeill, Dictionary of Scientific Units, second edition, Chapman and Hall; cites first appearance in print in Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers (G.B.) vol. 1, page 246 (1872).
  15. ^ The exact figure was 6.08 ft, but 6 ft was in use in practice. The commonly accepted definition of a fathom was always 6 feet. The conflict was inconsequential, as Admiralty nautical charts designated depths shallower than 5 fathoms in feet on older imperial charts. Today, all charts worldwide are metric, except for USA Hydrographic Office charts, which use feet for all depth ranges.
  16. ^ The nautical mile was not readily expressible in terms of any of the intermediate units, because it was derived from the circumference of the Earth (like the original metre).
  17. ^ "Appendix C: General Tables of Units of Measurements" (PDF). NIST. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 November 2006. Retrieved 4 January 2007.
  18. ^ a b c "An Act for ascertaining and establishing Uniformity of Weights and Measures (17 June 1824)" (PDF). legislation.gov.uk. 17 June 1824. p. 639,640. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 July 2020. Retrieved 19 January 2020. Two such Gallons shall be a Peck, and Eight such Gallons shall be a Bushel, and Eight such Bushels a Quarter of Corn or other dry Goods, not measured by Heaped Measure.. (The date of coming into effect was 1 May 1825).
  19. ^ imperial gallon. Sizes.com. 25 October 2013. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011. Retrieved 10 July 2019.
  20. ^ "The Weights and Measures (Equivalents for dealings with drugs) Regulations 1970". Archived from the original on 20 June 2013. Retrieved 7 July 2012.
  21. ^ "Information Sheet: 11: Balances, Weights and Measures" (PDF). Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 May 2022. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
  22. ^ a b Zentz, Lorraine C. (2010). "Chapter 1: Fundamentals of Math – Apothecary System". Math for Pharmacy Technicians. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. pp. 7–8. ISBN 978-0-7637-5961-2. OCLC 421360709. Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
  23. ^ a b Boyer, Mary Jo (2009). "UNIT 2 Measurement Systems: The Apothecary System". Math for Nurses: A Pocket Guide to Dosage Calculation and Drug Preparation (7th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. pp. 108–9. ISBN 978-0-7817-6335-6. OCLC 181600928. Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
  24. ^ a b c Royal College of Physicians of Dublin (1850). "Weights and Measures". The Pharmacopœia of the King and Queen's College of Physicians in Ireland. Dublin: Hodges and Smith. p. xlvi. hdl:2027/mdp.39015069402942. OCLC 599509441.
  25. ^ a b c National Institute of Standards and Technology (October 2011). Butcher, Tina; Cook, Steve; Crown, Linda et al. eds. "Appendix C – General Tables of Units of Measurement" Archived 17 June 2016 at the Wayback Machine (PDF). Specifications, Tolerances, and Other Technical Requirements for Weighing and Measuring Devices Archived 3 June 2016 at the Wayback Machine. NIST Handbook. 44 (2012 ed.). Washington, D.C.: US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology. ISSN 0271-4027 Archived 25 December 2022 at the Wayback Machine. OCLC OCLC 58927093. Retrieved 6 July 2012.
  26. ^ a b Rowlett, Russ (13 September 2001). "F". How Many? A Dictionary of Units of Measurement. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. fluid dram or fluidram (fl dr). Archived from the original on 9 July 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2012.
  27. ^ Buchholz, Susan; Henke, Grace (2009). "Chapter 3: Metric, Apothecary, and Household Systems of Measurement – Table 3-1: Apothecary Abbreviations". Henke's Med-Math: Dosage Calculation, Preparation and Administration (6th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 55. ISBN 978-0-7817-7628-8. OCLC 181600929. Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
  28. ^ Pickar, Gloria D.; Swart, Beth; Graham, Hope; Swedish, Margaret (2012). "Appendix B: Apothecary System of Measurement – Apothecary Units of Measurement and Equivalents". Dosage Calculations (2nd Canadian ed.). Toronto: Nelson Education. p. 528. ISBN 978-0-17-650259-1. OCLC 693657704. Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
  29. ^ United Kingdom; Department of Trade and Industry (1995). The Units of Measurement Regulations 1995. London: HMSO. Schedule: Relevant Imperial Units, Corresponding Metric Units and Metric Equivalents. ISBN 978-0-11-053334-6. OCLC 33237616. Archived from the original on 19 December 2021. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  30. ^ Great Britain (1878). Statutes at large ... p. 308.
  31. ^ Chaney, Henry James (1911). "Weights and Measures" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 28 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 477–494, see page 480.
  32. ^ a b Great Britain (1855). A collection of public general statutes passed in the 18th and 19th years of the reign of Her Majesty Queen Victoria. pp. 273–75.
  33. ^ "The Units of Measurement Regulations 1994". legislation.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
  34. ^ "Definition of stone in English from the Oxford dictionary". www.oxforddictionaries.com. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 11 July 2012. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  35. ^ "Bulk densities of some common food products". engineeringtoolbox.com. Archived from the original on 5 July 2020. Retrieved 19 January 2020. The density of wheat is 0.770, and 291*0.770=224 kilograms (494 lb).
  36. ^ a b Weights and Measures Act Archived 16 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  37. ^ "Wolfram-Alpha: Computational Knowledge Engine". Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2015.
  38. ^ a b Kelly, Jon (21 December 2011). "Will British people ever think in metric?". BBC. Archived from the original on 24 April 2012. Retrieved 26 February 2017. ...but today the British remain unique in Europe by holding onto imperial weights and measures. ...the persistent British preference for imperial over metric is particularly noteworthy...
  39. ^ "Height and width road signs to display metric and imperial". BBC. 8 November 2014. Archived from the original on 26 February 2017. Retrieved 26 February 2017. New road signs showing height and width restrictions will use both metric and imperial measurements from March 2015....Road signs for bridges, tunnels and narrow roads can currently show measurements in just feet and inches or only metres. Some already display both.
  40. ^ "BusinessLink: Weights and measures: Rules for pubs, restaurants and cafes". Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. Archived from the original (online) on 20 July 2011. Retrieved 24 August 2009.
  41. ^ "Department for Transport statement on metric road signs" (online). BWMA. 12 July 2002. Archived from the original on 25 May 2009. Retrieved 24 August 2009.
  42. ^ "In praise of ... metric measurements". The Guardian. London. 1 December 2006. Archived from the original on 19 September 2017. Retrieved 29 October 2017.
  43. ^ King, Max (15 February 2021). "Decimalisation: Britain's "new pence" turn 50 years old". MoneyWeek. Archived from the original on 15 May 2021. Retrieved 8 April 2021.
  44. ^ "BMI healthy weight calculator". National Health Service. Archived from the original on 19 January 2016. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  45. ^ Dahlgreen, Will (20 June 2015). "Britain's metric muddle not changing any time soon". Archived from the original on 30 October 2017. Retrieved 29 October 2017. even today [2015] some 18-24-year-olds still do not know how much they weigh in kilograms (60%) or how tall they are in metres and centimetres (54%).
  46. ^ "YouGov Survey Results" (PDF). 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 October 2017. Retrieved 29 October 2017.
  47. ^ "Weights and measures: the law". gov.uk. 7 April 2020. Archived from the original on 2 October 2015. Retrieved 7 April 2020.
  48. ^ "Explanatory memorandum to The weights and measures (metrication amendments) regulations 2009" (PDF). Legislation.gov.uk. 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 3 November 2019. See paragraph 7.4.
  49. ^ "Gas meter readings and bill calculation". gov.uk. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
  50. ^ Velkar, Ashish (May 2018). "Rethinking Metrology, Nationalism and Development in India, 1833–1956" (PDF). Past & Present (239): 143–79. doi:10.1093/pastj/gtx064. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 May 2022. Retrieved 30 April 2022.
  51. ^ a b Acharya, Anil Kumar. History of Decimalisation Movement in India, Auto-Print & Publicity House, 1958.
  52. ^ "CAP 68 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ORDINANCE Sched 2 UNITS OF MEASUREMENT AND PERMITTED SYMBOLS OR ABBREVIATIONS OF UNITS OF MEASUREMENT LAWFUL FOR USE FOR TRADE". Archived from the original on 3 September 2015. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
  53. ^ "Weights and Measures Act: Canadian units of measure". Justice Canada. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 14 November 2007.
  54. ^ "11". Guide to Food Labelling and Advertising. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Archived from the original on 24 January 2008. Retrieved 1 December 2007.
  55. ^ "Consumer Packaging and Labelling Regulations (C.R.C., c. 417)". Justice Canada, Legislative Services Branch. Archived from the original on 27 December 2012. Retrieved 15 November 2012.
  56. ^ "Field Inspection Manual — Automatic Weighing Devices: Part 3, Section A: Abbreviations and Symbols Accepted in Canada". 2 February 2017. Archived from the original on 26 August 2022. Retrieved 21 July 2022.
  57. ^ "A Canadian compromise". CBC. 30 January 1985. Archived from the original on 16 January 2009. Retrieved 11 March 2008.
  58. ^ "Les livres et les pieds, toujours présents (eng:The pounds and feet, always present)" (in French). 5 sur 5, Société Radio-Canada. Archived from the original on 6 June 2011. Retrieved 11 March 2008.
  59. ^ "Imperial Measures - The Origins". BWMAOnline.com. British Weights and Measures Association. 15 February 2021. Archived from the original on 15 May 2011. Retrieved 5 March 2011.
  60. ^ Rosen, Amy (23 February 2011). "Crepes worth savouring". National Post. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 11 July 2019 – via PressReader.com.
  61. ^ Rosen, Amy (2 February 2011). "Scoring brownie points". National Post. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 11 July 2019 – via PressReader.com.
  62. ^ McDowell, Adam (28 February 2011). "Drinking school". National Post.
  63. ^ "Home Hardware - Building Supplies - Building Materials - Fence Products". Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 5 March 2011.
  64. ^ "Canada: Metric System". Archived from the original on 13 February 2020. Retrieved 24 February 2020.
  65. ^ Allard, Marie (25 August 2015). "Système métrique: à quand le virage final?". LaPresse.ca (in French). Archived from the original on 24 February 2020. Retrieved 24 February 2020.
  66. ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Natural Resources. "Fuel Consumption Ratings Search Tool - Conventional Vehicles". Archived from the original on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 15 January 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  67. ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Transportation Safety Board of (9 April 1999). "Railway Investigation Report R96W0171". Archived from the original on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 5 March 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  68. ^ "Canadian Aviation Regulations". Langley Flying School. sec. "Altimeter Rules". Archived from the original on 14 May 2014. Retrieved 14 May 2014.
  69. ^ ""30 Years of the Metric System"". Archived from the original on 9 February 2021. Retrieved 4 February 2021.
  70. ^ "Human use of metric measures of length" Archived 9 February 2013 at the Wayback Machine. Dignan, J. R. E., & O'Shea, R. P. (1995). New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 24, 21–25.
  71. ^ "Republic of Ireland". www.railsigns.uk. Archived from the original on 23 October 2021. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  72. ^ "Network Statement 2022" (PDF). Irish Rail. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 January 2022. Retrieved 24 February 2022.
  73. ^ "Full HRI Directives". Archived from the original on 4 May 2016.
  74. ^ Parliament of the Bahamas. "Weights and Measures Act 2006". Bahamas Bureau of Standards and Quality. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 24 September 2021.
  75. ^ "National Metrology Act, Chapter 294, Revised Edition 2011" (PDF). Government of Belize. Retrieved 11 January 2024.
  76. ^ "The World Factbook, Appendix G: Weights and Measures". Web Pages. Central Intelligence Agency. 2010. Archived from the original on 28 May 2010. Retrieved 10 May 2010.
  77. ^ Gyi, Ko Ko (18–24 July 2011). "Ditch the viss, govt urges traders". Business and Property. The Myanmar Times. Translated by Thit Lwin. Myanmar. Archived from the original on 20 September 2011. Retrieved 4 March 2023.
  78. ^ Kohler, Nicholas (3 March 2014). "Metrication in Myanmar". Mizzima News. Archived from the original on 16 December 2014. Retrieved 20 April 2015.
  79. ^ "Address by Agriculture Minister Gregory Bowen". The Ministry of Agriculture, Government of Grenada. 1 November 2004. Archived from the original on 24 March 2008. Retrieved 15 January 2008. The price of gasoline at the pumps was fixed at EC$7.50 per imperial gallon...
  80. ^ "FAQ". MoF.gov.bz. Belize Ministry of Finance. Archived from the original on 23 January 2008. Retrieved 15 January 2008. • Kerosene per US Gallon (per Imperial gallon) • Gasoline (Regular)(per imperial Gallon) • Gasoline (Premium) (per Imperial Gallon) • Diesel (per Imperial Gallon)
  81. ^ "The High Commission Antigua and Barbuda". Archived from the original on 31 January 2009. Retrieved 15 January 2008.
  82. ^ Metschies, Gerhard P. (6 September 2005). "International Fuel Prices 2005" (PDF). International-Fuel-Prices.com. German Technical Cooperation. p. 96. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 February 2007. Retrieved 15 January 2008.
  83. ^ "Introduction of the Metric System and the Price of Petroleum Products". Sierra Leone Embassy in the United States. Archived from the original on 29 April 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2011.
  84. ^ "Minister Lovell Addresses Metric Conversions". CARIBARENA Antigua. 18 October 2011. Archived from the original on 20 October 2011. Retrieved 23 October 2011.
  85. ^ "DEWA adopts cubic metre as the unit to measure water consumption instead of the imperial gallon starting from March 2025 billing cycle". 9 February 2025. Retrieved 21 July 2025.

General sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Imperial system of units, established by the British Weights and Measures Act of 1824, standardized a collection of customary English measurements for , , capacity, and other quantities to promote uniformity in trade and commerce across the . This system retained traditional units like the yard (defined as 0.9144 meters), the avoirdupois pound (0.453592 kilograms), and the (4.54609 liters), which were derived from medieval antecedents but precisely redefined with brass standards verified against natural prototypes such as water density for volume. While the metric system's base enables straightforward scaling and scientific application, Imperial units' persistence in the United States—via the related but divergent customary system, differing notably in volume measures like the (3.78541 liters)—and residual UK uses such as road distances in miles and in pints reflect entrenched practical familiarity and legislative inertia over rational reform. Efforts to metricate, as in the UK's partial since the , have encountered resistance due to cognitive costs of transition and the empirical adequacy of Imperial for everyday human-scale tasks, underscoring causal factors like in measurement conventions rather than inherent superiority.

Origins and Historical Development

Pre-1824 English Units

The English customary units predating the 1824 standardization emerged organically from Anglo-Saxon practices, drawing on empirical approximations tied to anatomy and natural objects to meet the demands of local trade, , and land division. The inch originated as the approximate width of a or the of three barleycorns laid end-to-end, reflecting a practical subdivision of larger measures derived from everyday materials like barley grains used in farming. The foot approximated the of an adult foot, varying regionally from about 9.75 to 19 inches before broader codification, while the yard stemmed from an arm's span or stride, often specified as the distance from to outstretched tip. These units incorporated Anglo-Saxon influences, such as the ynce based on the barleycorn, with the foot comprising 36 barleycorns and the yard 108, facilitating consistent yet flexible measurements for sowing seeds, plowing fields, and bartering goods without reliance on abstract or imported systems. Early royal interventions aimed to mitigate variations through verifiable prototypes. King Henry I (reigned 1100–1135) decreed the yard as the girth of his own arm, establishing a personal standard close to the later 36-inch measure, while tying it to 108 barleycorns for in cloth trading and . In 1324, Edward II formalized the inch explicitly as three barleycorns end-to-end, the foot as 12 inches, and the yard as three feet, using an iron rod to linear measures amid growing commercial exchanges. Larger units like the rod (5.5 yards), used for furrow spacing in plowing, and the acre (one by one furlong, or 4 by 40 ) directly supported agricultural productivity by aligning with the physical scale of oxen teams and field layouts. The standards, rooted in 10th-century Anglo-Saxon precedents, served as influential national benchmarks for capacity and weight into the 16th century. King Edgar (reigned 959–975) mandated a standard preserved at , positioning the city as a repository for measures like the derived from volumes. By the late , Henry VII (reigned 1485–1509) reaffirmed these customary standards in 1497, issuing brass prototypes such as a of 2,124 cubic inches and a of 272.5 cubic inches, distributed for use in markets to approximate fair exchange in grain and wool. These efforts built on earlier wool trade weights under Edward III (14th century), who standardized the pound at 7,000 grains for bulk commodities, distinct from the pound's 5,760 grains for precious metals. Despite these prototypes, significant regional inconsistencies persisted, underscoring the units' adaptive, bottom-up evolution rather than rigid uniformity. Feet and yards varied by locality due to differing or local rods, while miles ranged up to 2,880 yards in parts of and 2,240 in Ireland, complicating long-distance . Furlongs adjusted to soil types for plowing efficiency, and local market weights deviated from Winchester brass standards, as seen in Elizabethan revisions under (1588) to correct inaccuracies in Henry VII's copies. Nonetheless, this pragmatic variability enabled robust economic activity, with units scaled to human and animal capabilities supporting Britain's expansion in agriculture—via acres for and yields—and commerce, where pounds standardized bulk trade routes without theoretical impositions.

Standardization via the 1824 Weights and Measures Act

The Weights and Measures Act 1824, enacted on 17 June 1824, established a unified system of weights and measures across the to promote commerce by replacing disparate local and historical standards with imperial prototypes. The Act mandated the creation of brass standards for length and mass, defining the imperial yard as the distance between two transverse lines etched into a bronze bar maintained at the in , constructed and verified through empirical comparison to prior national artifacts. Similarly, the pound was standardized as a platinum weighing the equivalent of the existing parliamentary standard, later precisely quantified as 0.45359237 kilograms through subsequent metrological tracing to the original artifact. These definitions prioritized tangible, verifiable physical objects over abstract decimal rationales, ensuring continuity with established trade practices while enabling reproducible precision. The Act also rationalized volume measures by introducing the imperial gallon as the volume occupied by ten avoirdupois pounds of at 62°F, abolishing variants such as the wine, ale, and corn gallons previously in use. It restricted the troy pound and to specialized applications like precious metals and pharmaceuticals, designating weights for general commercial transactions to eliminate confusion in bulk goods. occurred in phases, with prototype standards completed and tested by 1825 for distribution to verification offices, and mandatory use enforced from 1 1826, though local standards required gradual against imperial copies by inspectors. This timeline allowed adaptation without immediate disruption, with full abolition of non-conforming measures by 1835 in some jurisdictions. The legislative push reflected demands from the for consistent measures in expanding manufacturing and interstate trade, where variability in local units had previously hindered accurate contracts and machinery calibration. By codifying empirical standards derived from long-used benchmarks rather than imposing a wholesale decimal overhaul, the Act facilitated causal reliability in economic exchanges, supporting Britain's position as a global trading power without the disruptions associated with revolutionary metric proposals.

Divergence from US Customary Units

The divergence between and customary units arose following American , as the retained definitions rooted in pre-1824 English measures while Britain enacted the Weights and Measures Act of 1824, which standardized and redefined units under the imperial system. This act abolished earlier parliamentary standards dating to the and established new imperial prototypes, such as the imperial gallon defined as the volume occupied by 10 pounds of water at 62°F, equivalent to 277.4194 cubic inches. In contrast, the adhered to the Queen Anne's of 231 cubic inches for liquid measure, a definition codified in British law around 1707 but not revised in the 1824 act's overhaul, resulting in the imperial gallon being approximately 20% larger than its counterpart. The Congress's Act of July 28, 1866 (often referencing earlier efforts to align standards), partially harmonized and units by defining the yard and pound to match British prototypes from the 1758 standards, which predated but closely resembled imperial definitions. However, volume measures like the and ( at 2150.42 cubic inches versus imperial at 2218.192 cubic inches) remained unchanged due to entrenched commercial practices and reluctance to adopt post-independence British revisions, reflecting path-dependent rather than deliberate rejection of functionality. This selective alignment preserved compatibility in avoirdupois weight and linear measures while perpetuating discrepancies in capacity, as lawmakers prioritized domestic consistency over full imperial adoption. Empirical applications in , , and demonstrate both systems' adequacy for practical tasks within their respective economies, with no evidence of inherent superiority driving the split; differences stem from historical timing and institutional rather than causal flaws in logic. For instance, the bushel's fixed supported consistent grain transactions without needing imperial adjustments, underscoring how localized standards sufficed amid 19th-century industrialization.

Core Definitions and Standards

The legal standards for imperial units were established through physical prototypes maintained under controlled conditions to ensure reproducibility and stability in . The Imperial Standard Yard, adopted via the Weights and Measures Act 1824 and refined in subsequent legislation, was embodied in a bar with transverse lines engraved 38 inches apart, defining the unit as the distance between these lines at 62°F (16.66°C) when supported horizontally on two rollers. Between and 1855, multiple copies of this standard were crafted for verification and distribution, with the primary artifact preserved by the government to serve as the authoritative reference for measurements. While the Weights and Measures Act 1855 introduced equivalents linking to metric counterparts for facilitating —such as approximating 1 meter as 39.37 inches—these served as secondary verification tools rather than redefinitions, preserving the primacy of the imperial prototypes. The Act legalized parliamentary copies of the standards and emphasized direct to the original artifacts, underscoring a grounded in empirical physical comparison over abstract derivations. This approach provided causal reliability, as discrepancies could be resolved through meticulous replication and against the master prototypes housed in secure vaults. Recognizing minor variations between national prototypes due to material wear and manufacturing tolerances, representatives from the , , , , , and reached the 1959 International Yard and Pound Agreement, defining the yard exactly as 0.9144 meters based on interferometric measurements against the wavelength of krypton-86 light. This calibration, conducted at institutions like the UK's National Physical Laboratory, maintained continuity with historical artifacts while enhancing precision and uniformity across and customary systems. For mass, analogous prototypes such as the Imperial Standard Pound—a cylinder—underwent similar verification processes, with the agreement setting the avoirdupois pound at exactly 0.45359237 kilograms, derived from empirical assessments of prototype stability. These standards ensured legal enforceability in trade and science by prioritizing reproducible physical references, calibrated through direct metrological techniques rather than solely theoretical constructs.

Equivalents and Conversions to Metric

The imperial system's fundamental units of and were standardized relative to metric units via the 1959 Agreement between the , , , , , and , defining 1 yard as exactly 0.9144 meters and 1 pound as exactly 0.45359237 kilograms. These exact ratios, derived from prior empirical calibrations against metric prototypes, eliminated discrepancies in and science while preserving imperial definitions. Derived units follow directly: 1 foot equals 0.3048 meters exactly, and 1 inch equals 25.4 millimeters exactly. For volume, the —originally the space occupied by 10 pounds of water at maximum density—is codified as exactly 4.54609 liters in British legislation, with the (1/8 ) thus equaling exactly 568.261 milliliters. These values reflect post-1824 standardizations adjusted for metric alignment in the , though they diverge from U.S. customary equivalents (e.g., U.S. pint ≈ 473.176 milliliters), introducing conversion variances in transatlantic contexts. Such precise but non-decimal factors enable verifiable calculations, underscoring imperial units' empirical anchoring in physical constants like water density rather than arbitrary base-10 scaling.
Imperial UnitMetric EquivalentConversion Factor (Exact)
InchMillimeter1 in = 25.4 mm
FootMeter1 ft = 0.3048 m
YardMeter1 yd = 0.9144 m
Pound (avoirdupois)1 lb = 0.45359237 kg
Imperial GallonLiter1 gal = 4.54609 L
Imperial PintMilliliter1 pt = 568.261 mL
While exact for base units, practical conversions for derived measures (e.g., acres to hectares: 1 acre ≈ 0.404686 hectares) often involve irrational multiples, favoring fractional approximations in human-scale applications like construction over decimal exactitude. This stability supports causal consistency in engineering, where imperial fractions (base-12 for length, base-16 for weight/volume) align with binary subdivisions observable in manual divisions, independent of metric's decimal framework.

Primary Units of Measurement

Length Units

The imperial system's length units derive from pre-modern English measures rooted in proportions, such as the foot approximating the length of an foot and the inch the width of a or three barleycorns laid end to end, which historically aided rough estimation in and daily tasks without computational aids. These empirical bases evolved into a standardized hierarchy via the Weights and Measures Act 1824, which defined the yard as the distance at 62°F between two transverse lines on a bar prototype held by the , with the inch as exactly 1/36 of this yard and the foot as 1/3 yard, thereby resolving medieval inconsistencies like varying local feet or miles. Larger units include the rod (also or pole), standardized at 5.5 yards for division and , reflecting agricultural furrow lengths. The statute mile, fixed at 1,760 yards (or 5,280 feet), originated from Roman influences but was codified in 1593 under as eight furlongs, distinguishing it from shorter historical miles and supporting consistent long-distance applications. In 1959, the Agreement redefined the yard as exactly 0.9144 meters, establishing the inch at precisely 25.4 millimeters while maintaining internal ratios like 12 inches per foot and 3 feet per yard for practical decimal-free divisibility in .

Area and Volume Units

Imperial area units derive primarily from squaring primary length measures, yielding square inches (sq in), square feet (sq ft), square yards (sq yd), and square miles (sq mi), which scale for plotting fields, buildings, and territories. Traditional subdivisions like the acre, rood, and perch emerged from medieval English agrarian practices, where land was apportioned for plowing with oxen teams—a single acre represented roughly the daily tillable extent for such a yoke, prioritizing practical yields over decimal uniformity. The acre equals exactly 4,840 square yards or 43,560 square feet, standardized in the British Imperial system to maintain continuity with pre-1824 customs while ensuring reproducibility for deeds and taxation. A rood comprises one-quarter acre or 1,210 square yards, subdivided into 40 perches (also called poles or rods), each perch spanning 30.25 square yards—dimensions tied to the linear perch of 16.5 feet, facilitating chain-based surveying of irregular plots. Volume measures analogously derive from cubing length units, such as cubic inches (cu in) and cubic feet (cu ft), but practical trade standardized the gallon as the base for liquids and bulk dry goods, reflecting capacities of barrels and carts for commodities like ale, wine, and grain. The imperial gallon, fixed at exactly 4.54609 litres since 1824, unified prior fluid and dry variants—eliminating discrepancies where wine gallons (≈4.546 L) differed slightly from corn gallons—to streamline port and market transactions, as volume directly influenced storage and spoilage risks in non-refrigerated eras. The bushel, tailored for dry agricultural hauls, holds 8 gallons or 2,218.192 cubic inches (≈36.37 L), its size calibrated to typical harvest yields and wagon loads rather than weight, accommodating variable densities in crops like wheat or peas without constant re-weighing. This fluid-dry convergence, absent in U.S. customary systems, prioritized causal efficiency in bulk handling over strict separation, as empirical densities often approximated water's for valuation. These units endure in real estate, particularly for land parcels, owing to entrenched historical surveys and legal records predating metric adoption; in the UK, while maps employ meters, acres dominate sales listings and valuations for farms exceeding a hectare, preserving investor familiarity amid partial since 1965. In the U.S., acres similarly govern rural and suburban conveyances, with over 90% of non-urban listings citing them, as converting vast archives would impose disproportionate costs without evident productivity gains in appraisal or subdivision.

Mass and Force Units

The avoirdupois system forms the basis for imperial mass measurements in general commerce, with the pound (lb) as the fundamental unit, defined exactly as 0.45359237 kilograms since the 1959 international agreement. This pound subdivides into 16 ounces (oz), yielding an avoirdupois ounce of exactly 28.349523125 grams, employed for commodities like foodstuffs and bulk goods. Multiples include the stone (st), equivalent to 14 pounds or 6.35029318 kilograms, traditionally used for weighing produce, livestock, and human body mass in the United Kingdom. For precious metals and bullion, the imperial system retains the troy pound, comprising 12 troy ounces rather than 16, totaling approximately 373.241722 grams, to ensure precision in transactions where small differences impact value. This distinction persists in global markets for and silver, prioritizing empirical consistency in assaying over alignment with avoirdupois subdivisions. Imperial force units address gravitational contexts directly through the pound-force (lbf), defined as the gravitational force on one avoirdupois pound-mass under standard of 32.17405 feet per second squared, equating to approximately 4.448221615 newtons. This empirical tie to observed facilitates calculations in fields like structural design and , where measurements in pounds inherently reflect force without requiring separate multiplication by an abstract , as in the SI newton derived from kilogram-mass times meters per second squared. In practice, the dual use of "pound" for both mass and weight underscores causal realism in everyday and industrial applications, where local gravity variations are minor compared to precision.

Specialized and Variant Units

Apothecaries' and Troy Systems

The apothecaries' system comprised specialized Imperial units for pharmaceutical compounding, employing troy-based weights and fluid measures optimized for precise dosing of medicines. Originating from practices documented as early as 1270 in Europe, it divided the pound into 12 ounces to enable fractional divisions—such as thirds (4 ounces) or quarters (3 ounces)—better suited to medicinal recipes than the avoirdupois system's 16-ounce pound for bulk commodities. Key weight units included the (basis for all -derived measures, equivalent to 64.79891 milligrams), scruple (20 grains), dram (60 grains), and (480 grains), with the full pound weighing 5,760 grains or 373.241722 grams—lighter overall than the pound of 7,000 grains but with a heavier individual at 31.1034768 grams. Fluid measures followed suit, with the apothecaries' defined as 28.4130625 milliliters (one-twentieth of the Imperial ), subdivided into 8 drams (3.551 ml each) and further into 480 minims for fine liquid dilutions in elixirs and tinctures. The system, integral to apothecaries' weights, specialized in precious metals assaying, retaining the same 12-ounce pound structure for accuracy in valuing and silver, where even minor discrepancies impact economic assessments. Unlike , this configuration prioritized divisibility by 3 and 4 over binary halvings, yielding empirical advantages in subdividing small quantities without excessive remainders, as evidenced in historical where drams and scruples aligned with therapeutic fractions. Though largely supplanted by metric standards in contemporary , these systems preserve value in legacy formulations and metallurgical assays, where units ensure continuity in empirical verification against historical benchmarks.

Nautical and Surveyor Variants

In nautical measurement, the imperial nautical mile was standardized in the as exactly 6080 feet until the international definition of 1852 meters was adopted in 1970. This derived from empirical approximations of one minute of latitude on the Earth's meridian, facilitating and by aligning distance with angular measurements in . The cable, a subdivision equivalent to one-tenth of the , measured 608 feet, corresponding historically to the of cables and used for shorter-range estimations in maritime operations. These adaptations reflected causal necessities of on a curved , where distances along meridians or parallels require accounting for variance rather than planar assumptions; the nautical mile's basis in arc minutes allowed direct conversion from observations or chronometer-derived to tractable distances without constant metric reconfiguration. For land surveying, —developed by in 1620—measured 66 feet or 22 yards, comprising 100 iron links for portability and precision in chaining terrain. In the United States, this chain became the standard for public land surveys under the established by the , enabling systematic rectangular township grids where 80 chains equaled one mile and ten square chains equaled one acre (43,560 square feet), simplifying computational verification of parcel areas against legal entitlements. The unit's dimensions were selected to integrate seamlessly with imperial acreage computations, minimizing fractional errors in irregular topographies where empirical chaining accounted for slopes and obstructions.

Practical Advantages and Empirical Utility

Human-Scale Intuitiveness

Imperial units originated from anthropometric references tied to the human body, enabling intuitive estimation in daily activities without measurement tools. The foot derives from the approximate length of an adult human foot, standardized historically to about 12 inches, while the inch traces to the width of a thumb or digit, divided as one-twelfth of the foot for finer granularity. Similarly, the hand unit equals four inches, matching the breadth of an open hand, and the pace approximates a double-step distance, roughly five feet. These bases allowed pre-industrial societies to gauge lengths, heights, and spans by direct bodily comparison, fostering a visceral sense of scale aligned with human proportions. This anthropometric foundation supports rapid mental approximations for common objects, such as estimating a person's in feet by visualizing stacked body segments or assessing widths in yards via arm spans. In manual contexts like or , such units permitted quick assessments—e.g., a field's in paces for plowing—without instruments, embedding measurement into physical intuition. Analyses of everyday indicate that units scaled to human dimensions, like feet over smaller increments, better match familiar object sizes for approximation tasks. Fractional divisions in imperial units, particularly binary (halves, quarters, eighths) and duodecimal (thirds, sixths), offer practical utility in trades requiring iterative subdivision without decimal conversions. For instance, dividing a foot into 12 inches facilitates equal parts for materials like or pipe fittings, where halves and quarters align with simple tools like saws or . This structure simplifies on-site adjustments in and , reducing compared to decimal approximations that may demand calculators for non-terminating fractions. Such divisions reflect empirical adaptations from artisanal practices, where repeated halving of lengths or areas—common in —yields precise fits through powers of two.

Efficacy in Engineering and Construction

The , which achieved the first manned lunar landings between 1969 and 1972, relied predominantly on U.S. customary units such as feet, inches, pounds, and nautical miles for design, calculations, and operations, enabling precise engineering without documented unit conversion failures akin to those in later metric-involved missions. Similarly, the , constructed from 1931 to 1936 and standing 726 feet high with a base 660 feet thick, was engineered and built using imperial measurements like feet and inches, contributing to its status as a reliable project that has operated without structural failures attributable to measurement inconsistencies. In machining and iterative construction processes, imperial units facilitate the use of binary fractions (e.g., halves, quarters, sixteenths of an inch), which align with common tooling divisions and minimize rounding errors during repeated subdivisions, as opposed to decimal metric approximations that can compound in multi-step fabrication. This fractional tolerance supports high-precision work in fields like aerospace and civil engineering, where imperial's divisibility by 2, 3, and 4 reduces the need for calculators in on-site adjustments, enhancing efficiency in legacy U.S. manufacturing. Efforts to switch to metric in engineering contexts have incurred significant costs, exemplified by NASA's 1999 Mars Climate Orbiter loss, where a failure to convert imperial pound-force seconds to metric newton-seconds resulted in a $327 million mission due to mismatched units between contractors. Broader analyses indicate that full metric conversion in U.S. industries could require billions in retraining, tooling redesign, and error mitigation, often outweighing benefits in non-research applications where imperial systems have proven stable over decades.

Criticisms and Inherent Limitations

Arithmetic Inconsistencies

The imperial system's mixed radix structure, such as 12 inches per foot and 16 ounces per pound, introduces arithmetic inconsistencies by requiring non-decimal conversions that demand memorization of irregular factors rather than simple shifts in decimal place. The foot's base-12 division originated in ancient Roman and medieval English practices, where 12's multiple divisors (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12) supported fractional halving, thirding, and quartering in trade and construction without tools. Similarly, the 16-ounce pound derived from 13th-century French weights imported to , enabling binary subdivisions suited to weighing commodities like . These bases, while empirically tuned for everyday divisibility, hinder scalability across units—e.g., converting yards to inches yields 36 (not a )—complicating aggregation in or compared to uniform progression. Volume units exemplify historical inconsistencies from pre-standardization variability. Multiple definitions coexisted in Britain before 1824, including the (231 cubic inches) and ale gallon; the Weights and Measures Act of 1824 unified the imperial at exactly 10 pounds of water at 62°F (4.54609 liters), resolving domestic discrepancies through statutory prototypes. In the United States, independence preserved the smaller Queen Anne of 231 cubic inches (3.78541 liters), creating a persistent transatlantic mismatch equivalent to about 17% difference. This divergence, a relic of colonial rather than deliberate imperial design, necessitated separate conversion tables but was mitigated by codified standards rather than systemic overhaul. Such inconsistencies, rooted in accreted practical subdivisions rather than arbitrary chaos, have been managed in imperial contexts via conversion aids like printed tables and mechanical calculators, predating widespread adoption. Empirical records from Britain's industrial era show no documented systemic arithmetic breakdowns tied to unit radices alone, as practitioners adapted through domain-specific and tools, underscoring that the flaws reflect historical pragmatism over engineered uniformity.

Conflicts with Decimal-Based Science

In physics and chemistry, the (SI), based on decimal multiples, is the standard due to its alignment with powers of ten, which simplifies scaling in equations, , and involving exponents like 10^{-3} or 10^6. This structure reduces conversion errors in theoretical modeling and experimental data aggregation, as unit prefixes (e.g., kilo-, -) enable rapid mental or computational shifts without irregular factors. Peer-reviewed literature and international standards bodies emphasize this for reproducibility across global collaborations, where non-decimal systems introduce additional arithmetic steps. Imperial units, however, persist in applied research and engineering interfaces with , such as aerospace tolerances defined in inches and feet by the , where conversions to metric equivalents maintain precision without systemic failure. Historical incidents, like NASA's 1999 Mars Climate Orbiter loss from a pound-to-newton mismatch, highlight risks of inconsistent application rather than inherent imperial flaws, as software tools and protocols now enforce dual-unit verification in U.S. space programs. Empirical reviews of such errors attribute them to human oversight, not unit incompatibility, with no data showing imperial-exclusive contexts yielding lower accuracy in validated outcomes. No causal studies demonstrate that metric adoption directly boosts discovery rates; the , retaining imperial in key engineering sectors interfacing with (e.g., , ), outperforms metric-dominant nations in patents, R&D output, and applied innovations per GDP. This holds despite U.S. pure relying on SI, indicating conversions suffice for integration without productivity loss, as evidenced by NASA's hybrid approaches yielding missions like the . Assertions of decimal superiority often overstate necessities, ignoring imperial fractions' (e.g., 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 inch) exact representation as dyadic rationals in binary arithmetic, which underpins computing and finite-precision simulations in engineering software—avoiding rounding artifacts common in decimal-to-binary conversions for metric subunits. First-principles analysis confirms units as arbitrary scales; causal efficacy derives from rigorous protocols, not base alignment, with U.S. engineering feats (e.g., Boeing aircraft design in customary units) demonstrating viability absent metric uniformity.

Metrication Drives and Resistance

Global Metrication Campaigns

In the 1960s, following the 11th General Conference on Weights and Measures' adoption of the (SI) in 1960, several nations initiated top-down programs to align with emerging global standards for trade and scientific collaboration. These efforts emphasized to reduce conversion errors in international exchanges, though proponents often framed them as steps toward broader rather than purely pragmatic reforms. The United Kingdom's campaign began with a announcement committing to metric conversion within a decade, driven by industry requests for consistency in and exports. A Board was established in 1969 to coordinate the shift, targeting completion by 1975, but implementation encountered delays due to sectoral resistance and incomplete enforcement in areas like road signage. Similarly, Australia's of 1970 mandated a phased transition, with the Metric Conversion Board overseeing changes in , industry, and consumer goods by the early 1980s; however, the process involved significant retraining costs and temporary disruptions in construction and agriculture, where imperial units lingered informally. In the United States, the , signed by President on December 23, established a voluntary national policy and the U.S. Metric Board to promote SI use in federal agencies and commerce, reflecting pressures from global competitors but stopping short of mandates. The advanced harmonization through Directive 71/354/EEC in 1971, requiring member states to adopt SI for economic activities, later refined by Directive 80/181/EEC in 1980 to permit limited supplementary units; critics, including national sovereignty advocates, viewed these as supranational impositions that overlooked varying domestic traditions in favor of bureaucratic uniformity. These campaigns yielded mixed results, with full in some sectors but persistent reliance on imperial measures in everyday trades, highlighting the tension between centralized planning and entrenched practical habits.

Economic and Cultural Barriers to Adoption

The transition to the metric system entails substantial economic costs, including retooling machinery, recalibrating designs, updating consumer packaging, and retrofitting like signage and fuel dispensers. In the United States, a 1995 U.S. General Accounting Office () analysis of highway sign conversion alone highlighted significant expenses, noting that no comprehensive national estimate existed and most states had not calculated their shares, underscoring the fiscal burden of even targeted changes. Industry conversions, such as those estimated for major firms, often represent 0.5% or more of annual revenues over multi-year periods, aggregating to billions across the economy when factoring in supply chains and compliance. These upfront investments yield limited offsetting gains in innovation or efficiency, as imperial units suffice for domestic without the disruptions of systemic overhaul. Cultural entrenchment further impedes metric adoption, with imperial measures deeply embedded in language, education, and daily cognition, fostering intuitive familiarity over abstract decimal alternatives. surveys confirm this preference: a 2022 YouGov poll indicated that , particularly those over 45, favor imperial units for common applications like , weight, and distance, reflecting habitual use reinforced from childhood. Educational curricula in holdout nations perpetuate this through longstanding textbooks and practical training in fields like construction and cooking, where imperial fractions align with traditional tools and recipes, rendering metric equivalents less accessible without retraining generations. Resistance also manifests as a sovereignty-driven pushback against perceived global homogenization, where adopting metric is framed as deference to international bureaucracies rather than national . In the , post-Brexit debates over relaxing EU-imposed metric mandates highlighted this tension, with imperial revival proposals invoking and autonomy, even if public consultations overwhelmingly favored metric continuity for trade. Analogous sentiments in the U.S. prioritize in standards, viewing imperial persistence as emblematic of amid pressures for uniformity from bodies like the or trade partners.

Contemporary Status and Usage

Official Retention in Holdout Nations

The remains the primary nation officially retaining imperial-derived customary units as its of measurement, with no federal mandate requiring exclusive metric adoption despite the voluntary of 1975. tolerates both systems in and industry, while states exhibit variations such as California's allowance of imperial signage alongside metric equivalents on highways. This retention persists into 2025, with customary units dominating sectors like , , and consumer goods, where metric is used supplementally in scientific and international contexts. Liberia and are nominal holdouts, listed alongside the as non-metric nations, but their official retention of imperial units is inconsistent and transitional. In , customary units derived from imperial standards prevail in everyday use, though the government has committed to since 2018 to facilitate trade, resulting in a blended system without full enforcement. similarly maintains traditional and imperial-influenced measures officially, despite a 2013 announcement by the Ministry of to prepare for metric adoption; implementation lags, with imperial units appearing in and local commerce amid uneven national standards. The ' economic and technological preeminence empirically counters claims that metric exclusivity is necessary for advanced development, as it sustains the world's largest GDP—exceeding $28 trillion in —and dominates innovation in sectors like semiconductors and using customary units. This stability holds through -2025, with no abandonments of imperial retention amid global metric pressures, underscoring practical viability over mandates.

Hybrid Systems in Former Imperial Territories

![Canadian canned food labels showing imperial and metric units][center] In , a former British , the became the official standard through legislation enacted in the and 1980s, yet imperial units persist voluntarily in sectors like and consumer goods, reflecting practical familiarity without disrupting overall coherence. Building trades, including , , and the sale of materials such as timber, , , fasteners, pipes, and tubing, predominantly employ imperial measurements, as these align with longstanding supply chains and tools inherited from pre-metrication practices. This duality adds operational flexibility, allowing workers accustomed to imperial dimensions to maintain efficiency, while metric governs official distances, speeds, and packaging labels, as mandated by the Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act of 1971. Australia, another ex-colony, completed metrication in the 1970s under the of 1970, establishing metric as dominant for most applications, but vestiges of imperial units endure informally in areas like reporting and certain or nautical contexts tied to international norms. This limited persistence stems from cultural rather than , enabling seamless integration with global metric standards while accommodating legacy preferences in non-critical domains, thus avoiding the inefficiencies of rigid uniformity. Formal road and scientific measurements remain exclusively metric, underscoring the voluntary nature of residual imperial use. In , metrication proceeded in phases from 1956 to 1962 via the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, supplanting imperial officially, but informal sectors continue leveraging legacy units like inches, feet, and pounds for everyday transactions, tailoring, and small-scale due to entrenched habits among artisans and traders. , post-1997 handover, has largely adopted metric for governance and trade, yet markets and body measurements often blend imperial with traditional Chinese units, such as the catty (approximately 1.33 pounds), preserving practical utility in local commerce without systemic conflict. These hybrids in former territories illustrate how imperial elements endure through user-driven adaptation, prioritizing usability over complete .

Recent Policy Shifts Toward Imperial Revival

In the , post-Brexit regulatory reviews initiated in September 2021 examined opportunities to expand the use of imperial units for domestic sales of loose goods, such as fruits and vegetables in pounds and ounces, as a means of restoring national over measurement standards previously aligned with metric mandates. Prime Minister Boris Johnson's government advanced these discussions in May 2022, announcing a consultation tied to Queen Elizabeth II's that proposed allowing traders greater flexibility to sell using imperial measurements alongside or instead of metric equivalents, framing it as a cultural and economic choice rather than a mandatory shift. Although the December 2023 consultation response retained core metric rules for pre-packaged goods due to overwhelming public and business preference— with 99% of over 2,000 respondents opposing expanded imperial mandates—the initiative highlighted a policy pivot toward voluntary imperial options for certain retail contexts, countering decades of metric inertia. In the United States, regulatory adjustments in the agricultural sector have similarly emphasized flexibility over strict metric adoption. The (FSIS), under the U.S. Department of Agriculture, issued a final rule on August 17, 2022, rescinding mandatory dual labeling requirements for and packages containing at least one pound or one , permitting exclusive use of customary (imperial-derived) units without accompanying metric declarations. This change, effective September 16, 2022, alleviated compliance burdens for producers—estimated at reducing paperwork by thousands of hours annually—and aligned with longstanding public resistance to federal pushes, as evidenced by the U.S. Metric Board's 1980s dissolution amid opposition to top-down conversion. While the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) maintains a policy preferring voluntary metric use under the 1975 , these exemptions reflect a broader trend of de-emphasizing metric mandates in favor of market-driven customary practices. Empirical trends indicate growing accommodation of dual or imperial-preferred labeling in response to consumer demand, particularly in sectors like consumer goods and construction materials. In the U.S., post-2022 FSIS reforms have facilitated imperial-only packaging for qualifying products, correlating with sustained market preference—surveys show over 70% of Americans favor customary units for everyday applications despite educational pushes for metric. Similarly, voluntary dual labeling has proliferated in international trade contexts, such as Canadian canned goods displaying both systems to meet U.S. export needs, underscoring economic incentives overriding elite-driven metric standardization. These developments prioritize practical utility and user familiarity over uniform decimal systems, evidencing a subtle revival through deregulation rather than wholesale reversion.

References

  1. https://handwiki.org/wiki/International_yard_and_pound
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.