Hubbry Logo
Mil Mi-8Mil Mi-8Main
Open search
Mil Mi-8
Community hub
Mil Mi-8
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mil Mi-8
Mil Mi-8
Mil Mi-8
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Mil Mi-8 (Russian: Ми-8, NATO reporting name: Hip) is a medium twin-turbine helicopter, originally designed by the Soviet Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI) in the 1960s and introduced into the Soviet Air Force in 1968. Russian production of the aircraft model still continues as of 2024.[1] In addition to its most common role as a transport helicopter, the Mi-8 is also used as an airborne command post, armed gunship, and reconnaissance platform.

Key Information

The Mi-8 is the world's most-produced helicopter,[2] with over 17,000 units used by over 50 countries. As of 2015, when combined with the related Mil Mi-17, the two helicopters are the third most common operational military aircraft in the world.[3]

Design and development

[edit]
Passenger cabin of a Shree Airlines aircraft

Mikhail Mil originally approached the Soviet government with a proposal to design an all-new two-engined turbine helicopter in 1959 after the success of the Mil Mi-4 and the emergence and effectiveness of turbines used in the Mil Mi-6. After design and development, the Mi-8 was subsequently introduced into the Soviet Air Force in 1967.

The Soviet military originally argued against a new helicopter, as they were content with the current Mil Mi-4.[4] To counter this, Mikhail Mil proposed that the new helicopter was more of an update to new turbine engines rather than an entirely new helicopter, which persuaded the council of ministers to proceed with production. Due to the position of the engine, this enabled Mikhail Mil to justify redesigning the entire front half of the aircraft around the single engine.[5]

The prototype, which was named V-8, was designed in 1958[4] and based on the Mil Mi-4 with a larger cabin.[6] Powered by an AI-24 2,010 kW (2,700 shp) Soloviev turboshaft engine,[7] the single engined V-8 prototype had its maiden flight in June 1961[8] and was first shown on Soviet Aviation Day parade (Tushino Air Parade) in July 1961.[9]

During an official visit to the United States in September 1959, Nikita Khrushchev took a flight in the S-58 presidential helicopter for the first time and was reportedly extremely impressed.[10][11] On Khrushchev's return, he ordered the creation of a similar helicopter, which was to be ready for the return visit by the American president, to save face.[12] A luxury version of the Mi-4 was quickly created and Khrushchev took an inspection flight, during which Mikhail Mil proposed that his helicopter in development was more suitable. However, it would be necessary to have a second engine for reliability.[citation needed]

This gave Mikhail Mil the power under the orders of Khrushchev to build the original two-engined helicopter, which for the first time in Soviet history would need purpose-built turbine engines, rather than those adapted from fixed wing aircraft (as in the Mil Mi-6 and the first prototype V-8) and an entirely new main rotor gear box that would be designed in-house for the first time. In May 1960, the order was given for Mikhail Mil to create his twin engine helicopter. The Sergei Isotov Design Bureau accepted the task of creating the engines.[citation needed]

The second prototype (still equipped with the one turbine engine as the Isotov engines were still under development) flew in September 1961.[citation needed]

Two months after the engines were completed by Isotov, the third prototype designated V-8A equipped with two 1,120 kW (1,500 shp) Isotov TV2 engines, made its first flight piloted by Nikolai Ilyushin on 2 August 1962, marking the first flight of any Soviet helicopter to fly with purpose built gas turbine engines.[6] The aircraft completed its factory based testing in February 1963.[citation needed]

The fourth prototype was designed as a VIP transport, with the rotor changed from four blades to five blades in 1963 to reduce vibration, the cockpit doors replaced by blister perspex slides and a sliding door added to the cabin.[6]

The fifth and final prototype was a mass production prototype for the passenger market. In November 1964, all joint testing had been completed and the Soviet government began mass production. Production started in the Kazan Production Plant, with the first aircraft completed by the end of 1965.[citation needed]

Cockpit view

The Soviet military originally showed little interest in the Mi-8 until the Bell UH-1's involvement in the Vietnam War became widely publicised as a great asset to the United States, allowing troops to move swiftly in and out of a battlefield and throughout the country. It was only then that the Soviet military rushed a troop-carrying variant of the Mil Mi-8 into production. By 1967, it had been introduced into the Soviet Air Force as the Mi-8.[citation needed]

There are numerous variants, including the Mi-8T, which, in addition to carrying 24 troops, is armed with rockets and anti-tank guided missiles. The Mil Mi-17 export version is employed by around 20 countries; its equivalent in Russian service in the Mi-8M series. The only visible differences between the Mi-8 and Mi-17 are A) the position of the tail rotor (Mi-8 right side, Mi-17 left side), B) the shape of the exhausts (Mi-8 circular, Mi-17 oval), and C) Dust shields in front of engine air intakes for the Mi-17. Also Mi-17 has some improved armour plating for its crew. The naval Mil Mi-14 version is also derived from the Mi-8.[13]

The Mi-8 is constantly improving and the newest version still remains in production in 2024. However the second generation of the Mi-8 was changed to a tractor-tail rotor configuration as this configuration has increased yaw authority from the upwards advancing tail rotor blades into the downwash. The increase of the airspeed flowing over the rotor blades increases overall tail rotor effectiveness and yaw authority, whereas with the 'Pusher' tail rotor configuration the advancing rotor blade moves downwards. This decreases the airspeed across the rotor blade, reducing its overall effective yaw authority.[13] [citation needed]

Operational history

[edit]

Finland

[edit]
Finnish Mi-8 in Hernesaari, Helsinki, in 2005

The Finnish Defence Forces and the Finnish Border Guard began using Mi-8s in the 1970s, with the Finnish Air Force receiving its first, serialed HS-2, on 28 May 1973, and the second, HS-1, on 31 May 1973. Six Mi-8Ts were obtained at first, followed by further two Mi-8Ts and two Mi-8Ps. Three of the helicopters were handed over to the Border Guard Wing. One of these was lost after sinking through ice during a landing in April 1982. It was soon replaced by a new Mi-8.

After their Border Guard service, the helicopters were transferred to the civil register, but shortly thereafter to the Finnish Air Force. In 1997 it was decided that all helicopters, including the remaining five Mi-8Ts and two Mi-8Ps, should be transferred to the Army Wing at Utti. All Mi-8s have now been retired. One Mi-8 is on display at the Finnish Aviation Museum in Vantaa, and one is at the Päijänne Tavastia Aviation Museum in Asikkala, near Lahti. One Mi-8T is on display in Tuulos. The two final Mi-8Ts were given to Hungary in August 2011 with all the remaining spare parts.[14]

Georgia

[edit]

The Georgian air force started operating Mi-8 and Mi-17 helicopters from 1991 onwards. During the War in Abkhazia (1992–1993) Mi-8 helicopters were used by both sides. Several were shot down, the first being a Georgian civilian Mi-8T which was destroyed in Sukhumi by an RPG-7. On 14 December 1992, a Russian Air Force Mi-8T was shot down by a SA-14 missile near Lata.[15]

On another occasions Abkhaz Mi-8MTVs were shot down by Georgian forces, by SA-14 in one case and by RPG-18 in a second case, both during 1993.[15] In the final case, Georgian Mi-8MTV carrying civilian refugees was shot down, killing 25 people.[15] Georgian Air Force and Police currently operate about 20 Mi-8T/MTVs.[16]

India

[edit]

The Indian Air Force inducted the Mi-8 in the 1970s as part of a growing rotary-wing fleet that evolved without centralised long-term planning. Acquired in the wake of geopolitical deals and stop-gap needs, the Mi-8 formed the backbone of medium-lift capability before being succeeded by the Mi-17.[17]

Iraq

[edit]

Mi-8s were employed by the former Iraqi Army Aviation and Iraqi Air Force under Saddam Hussein. In the Iran–Iraq War of the 1980s, there were air-to-air combat between Iraqi and Iranian Army Aviation helicopters, including between Iranian Bell AH-1J Cobras and Iraqi Mi-8s.[18]

South Sudan

[edit]

On 21 December 2012, a Nizhnevartovskavia owned Mi-8 working for the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) was shot down and crashed near Likuangole in the South Sudanese state of Jonglei during the South Sudan internal conflict. All four Russian crewmembers on board were killed, and after some initial confusion, a UN spokesman said that the South Sudanese army confirmed on 22 December that it mistakenly fired at the helicopter.[19][20]

On 26 August 2014, a UTair Aviation owned Mi-8 working for the United Nations crashed as it approached a landing airstrip near Bentiu. Three of the Russian crew members died and one was injured. Rebel commander Peter Gadet claimed that his forces brought it down using a rocket-propelled grenade.[21][22]

Soviet Union

[edit]

The Mi-8 family of helicopters became the main Soviet (and later Russian) helicopter, covering a large range of roles in both peace time and war time. Large fleets of Mi-8 and its derivatives were employed by both military and civil operators.[citation needed]

Large numbers of Mi-8 family helicopters were used during the Soviet–Afghan War during the 1980s. Its rugged construction allowed easier in-theater operations and maintenance. A large number of Mi-8s were lost with several shot down by enemy fire, with the Mi-8 and its derivatives being the main aircraft model lost by the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.[citation needed]

Between April and May 1986, Mi-8s were used in large numbers to drop radiation-absorbing materials into the No. 4 reactor of Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant after the Chernobyl disaster, and the fire was extinguished by the combined effort of helicopters dropping over 5000 metric tons of sand, lead, clay, and neutron-absorbing boron onto the burning reactor and injecting liquid nitrogen into it. Most of the helicopters were severely irradiated and abandoned in a giant junkyard,[23] the so-called "machines cemetery" near Chernobyl, with several disappearing from the site in later years. During the initial operation, one crashed near the power plant after hitting a construction crane cable with all the crew of four being killed in the crash.[24][25] It is now known that virtually none of the neutron absorbers reached the core.[26]

Ukraine

[edit]
Mi-8MSB on a 2016 Ukrainian stamp

On 16 August 2013, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine reported that one of its Mi-8MSB had set a world altitude record of 9,150 metres (30,020 ft) at the Kirovske military airfield on 15 August.[27]

The Ukrainian Armed Forces used Mi-8MSB along with Mi-24s in operations against separatists in Eastern Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War. On 29 May 2014, a Ukrainian National Guard Mi-8 was brought down by Russian separatist forces in Donbas using a MANPADS near Slavyansk with 12 personnel, including an Army general, killed and one seriously injured.[28] On 24 June 2014, a Ukrainian National Guard Mi-8 was shot down by separatist forces again using a MANPADS near Slavyansk with nine personnel killed.[29] Ukrainian forces used Mi-8 helicopters to resupply forces during the Siege of Mariupol at Azovstal iron and steel works and bring in additional reinforcements for the Azov Regiment. Some 16 Mi-8s were used a number of times, two of which were shot down.[30] Russia claimed on 5 April that it shot down two Ukrainian Mi-8s that it said were being used to evacuate commanders of the Azov Regiment.[31] In late August 2023, it was reported that a Russian defector named Maksym Kuzminov[32] handed over a Mi-8AMTSh to the Ukrainian forces in coordination with Ukrainian Intelligence agents.[33]

On 16 October 2023, Ukrainian Colonel General Oleksandr Syrskyi said that the 25th Separate Airborne Brigade had shot down a Mi-8 without supplying the location. According to the Oryx database 63 Mi-8 helicopters have been shot down in Ukraine thus far during the war, 29 of them being Ukrainian, and 34 Russian respectively.[34][35]

On 31 July 2024, a Russian Mi-8 helicopter was shot down over occupied Donetsk by Ukrainian FPV drones. The first time a helicopter in combat was destroyed by a drone. The Mi-8 was believed to have been attacked on the ground either during landing or take off.[36][37]

On 31 December 2024, a Russian Mi-8 was shot down by a MAGURA V5 sea drone armed with R-73 Sea Dragon missiles near Cape Tarkhankut, Crimea, while a second helicopter was damaged but managed to return to base, according to the Main Directorate of Intelligence.[38][39]

As of 17 November 2025, Ukraine has lost 28 Mi-8 helicopters with one damaged during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Russian losses currently stand at 41 destroyed, with 12 damaged, and 1 lost through defection.[40]

On 06 June 2025, a Russian Mi-8 was destroyed at Bryansk International Airport by a Ukrainian drone, and a Russian Mi-35 nearby was also damaged during the attack.[41]

On 29 September 2025, the 59th Assault Brigade destroyed a Russian Mi-8, near the village of Kotliarivka, Pokrovsk district, Donetsk Oblast. Using a $500 FPV drone, according to the Ukrainian commander of the Unmanned Systems Forces Major Robert “Madyar” Brovdi.[42]

United States

[edit]

During the initial stages of Operation Enduring Freedom, Mi-17s and Mi-8s were extensively used by the CIA and US Special Forces to assist the Northern Alliance in their fight against the Taliban.[43]

A number of Mi-8s and Mi-17s are used by US government agencies as of 2022.[44]

Yugoslavia

[edit]
Croatian Mil Mi-8MTV-1
Serbian Mi-8T cargo helicopter

The Yugoslav Air Force took delivery of 24 Mi-8T (Hip C) transport helicopters between May 1968 and May 1969 to equip two squadrons of the newly formed 119th transport regiment from Niš military airport, each squadron with 12 helicopters. Subsequently, from 1973 to the early 1980s, Yugoslavia purchased more Mi-8T helicopters to re-equip two squadrons of 111th regiment from Pleso military airport near Zagreb and the 790th squadron from Divulje military airport near Split, which was under the command of the Yugoslav Navy. In total, the Yugoslav Air Force received 92 Mi-8Ts, designated by the Yugoslav People's Army as the HT-40, while local modification of several helicopters into electronic warfare variants produced the HT-40E. Some 40 helicopters were equipped for firefighting operations.

The Yugoslav Mi-8s' first combat operations were transport of Yugoslav People's Army troops and federal police forces to border crossings in Slovenia on 27 June 1991 during the Ten-Day War. The members of Slovenian Territorial Defence fired Strela 2 MANPAD, and shot one helicopter down, killing all crew and passengers.

During combat in the winter of 1991 in the Croatian war and in the spring of 1992 in the Bosnian War, the Yugoslav People's Army used the Mi-8 fleet for the evacuation of injured personnel, transport of cargo and search and rescue for the crews of aircraft forced down. As most flights were made behind the front, the Croatian forces were able to down just one helicopter, which was hit by small arms fire near Slavonski Brod on 4 October 1991.

After Bosnian Serbs declared their state in the spring of 1992, some former Yugoslav Air Force Mi-8s continued service with the Republika Srpska armed forces. The inventory of the 82nd mixed helicopter squadron, of the 92nd aviation brigade of the Army of Republika Srpska comprised 12 Mi-8T helicopters, which continued in service until Operation Koridor. During that period, the Republika Srpska Air Force lost three Mi-8 helicopters to enemy fire. Three helicopters painted in a blue and white colour scheme flew in the first part of 56th helicopter squadron of the Krajina Milicija, using Udbina military airport in Lika as their main base. The Republika Srpska Air Force continued to operate nine helicopters, albeit suffering problems with maintenance and spare parts, until it was formally disbanded in 2006.

On the other side, Mi-8 helicopters were also used as main air transport. The Croatian National Guard obtained its first on 23 September 1991, near Petrinja, when a Yugoslav Air Force Mi-8 made an emergency landing after being damaged by small-arms fire. A further 6 Mi-8T and 18 Mi-8MTV-1 helicopters were bought from ex-Warsaw Pact countries during the war, with 16 being used in active service, and remaining were used as source for spare parts. The remaining Mi-8Ts were retired from service in the Croatian Air Force after the war, while the Mi-8MTVs continued their service in 20th Transport Helicopter Squadron and 28th Transport Helicopter Squadron. The latter has been re-equipped with new Mi-171Sh helicopters bought from Russia.

The Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina secretly obtained Mi-8T, Mi-8MTV and Mi-17 helicopters from various sources. Two helicopters were shot down by Serb air defenses, one around Žepa, while one Mi-17 was shot down by 2K12 Kub M, killing the Bosnian Foreign Affairs Minister Irfan Ljubijankić, a few other politicians, and the helicopter's Ukrainian crew. A few Croatian Mi-8MTVs secretly supported Croatian Defence Council operations in Herceg Bosna. After the war, the Army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina operated the remaining five Mi-8MTVs and one Mi-8T in the Air Force and Air Defense Brigade of Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The North Macedonian Air Force bought two Mi-8MT helicopters in 2001 from Ukraine. They fly in the Transport Helicopter Squadron (ex 301. Transport Helicopter Squadron). One crashed, killing all 8 passengers and 3 crew members in an accident in January 2008.

During the Kosovo War of 1998 and 1999, the Federal Yugoslav Air Force used Mi-8s for transport of personnel and material to forces in otherwise-inaccessible mountain areas. Evacuation of injured personnel also occurred during the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, flying at low altitude to avoid detection by NATO aircraft. In 1999, Yugoslav Mi-8s shot down at least one US Army Hunter UAV with the door gunner's 7.62 mm machine gun.[45][46] Two Mi-17V helicopters secretly operated by the Special Operations Unit post-1997 were also active during the Kosovar conflict. After the unit disbanded in 2003, the helicopters were transferred to Serbia and Montenegro's air force.

As of mid-2020, the Serbian Air Force, the successor of the Federal Yugoslav Air Force, operates a small amount of Mi-8T which are now being replaced by Mi-17 helicopters. There are 13 Mi-17 in the Serbian air force currently. They are in the 138th Mixed-Transport-Aviation Squadron of 204th Air Base and 119th Combined-Arms Helicopter Squadron (ex 199th regiment) of 98th Air Base.

Others

[edit]
  • Canada – After Canada committed combat forces to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan, they realized their mobility depended on borrowed helicopter airlift. In 2007, the Minister of National Defence Peter MacKay announced the lease of 6 to 8 Mi-8s, particularly Kazan Helicopters Mi-17-V5s,[47] until the introduction of 6 interim CH-47Ds[48][49] in 2008 and later delivery of 15 new-build CH-47Fs in 2013 by the RCAF.[50]
  • Poland – On 4 December 2003, a Polish Mi-8 crashed near Piaseczno while carrying Prime Minister Leszek Miller, ten other passengers and four crewmen. There were no fatalities. The cause of the accident was the icing of the engines. The pilot was accused of causing the crash, but he was found not guilty.[citation needed]
  • Syria – During the Yom Kippur War of October 1973, Syria landed special forces troops behind Israel Defense Forces lines on the Golan Heights at Mt. Hermon, Tel Fares, Vaset, Nafach and Ein Zivan – A Dalve.[citation needed]
  • Yemen—On 19 November 2023, Houthi rebels utilized a captured Mi-17 helicopter to conduct an air assault boarding and seizure of the Japanese owned cargo ship Galaxy Leader.[51][52]
  • Vietnam- On 22 November 1992 a Vietnamese Mi-8 was sent from Hanoi carrying rescue workers for Flight 474, but it crashed near Ô Kha mountain on the same day. All seven people aboard were killed

Variants

[edit]
For more information on Mi-8M series, see Mil Mi-17.

Prototypes/experimental/low production rate

[edit]
V-8 (NATO – Hip-A)
The original single-engined prototype.
V-8A
A twin-engined prototype, featuring TV2-117 turboshaft engines, the prototype underwent further modifications during its life.
V-8AT
Prototype of the Mi-8T utility version.
Mi-8 (NATO – Hip-B)
Twin-engined prototype.
Mi-8TG
Conversion to operate on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).
Mi-18
Prototype design, a modification of the existing Mil Mi-8. Two Mi-8s were extended by 0.9 meters (3 ft), the landing gear made retractable, and a sliding door added to the starboard side of the fuselage. The Mi-18s were used in the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and later used as static training airframes for pilots of the Mi-8/17.

Basic military transport/airframe

[edit]
Mi-8T (NATO – Hip-C)
First mass production utility transport version, it can carry four UV-16-57 unguided rocket pods, (with S-5 rockets), mounted to four hardpoints on two outrigger pylons, and is armed with one or two side-mounted PK machine guns.
Mi-8TV
Armed version of the Mi-8T.
Mi-8TVK (NATO – Hip-E, a.k.a. Mi-8TB)
Version used as a gunship or direct air support platform. Airframe modifications add 2x external hard points for a total of 6, and mount a flexible 12.7 mm (0.5-inch) KV-4 machine gun in the nose. Armament of 57 mm S-5 rockets, six UV-32-57 rocket pods, 551-lb (250-kg) bombs, or four AT-2 Swatter ATGMs.
Mi-8TBK (NATO – Hip-F)
Armed export version, fitted with six launch rails to carry and fire Malyutka missiles.

Command and electronic warfare

[edit]
Mi-8IV (NATO – Hip-G, a.k.a. Mi-9)
Airborne command post version fitted with "Ivolga" system, characterized by antennas, and Doppler radar on tail boom.
Mi-8PP (NATO – Hip-K)
Airborne jamming platform with "Polye" (field) system. From 1980, the type was fitted with the new "Akatsiya" system and redesignated the Mi-8PPA. It is characterized by six X-shaped antennas on each side of the aft fuselage. Built to escort troop-carrying versions of this helicopter, and disrupt potentially nearby SPAAG radars, such as those of the Flakpanzer Gepard.
Mi-8PD
Polish airborne command post version.
Mi-8SMV (NATO – Hip-J)
Airborne jamming platform with "Smalta-V" system, characterized by two small boxes on each side of the fuselage. Used for protection of ground attack aircraft against enemy air defenses.
Mi-8VKP (NATO – Hip-D, a.k.a. Mi-8VzPU)
Airborne communications platform with rectangular communication canisters mounted on weapons racks and with two frame-type aerials above the rear fuselage.

Other military

[edit]
Mi-8 helicopter cockpit
Mi-8AD
Minelaying version with four VSM-1 dispensers.
Mi-8AV
Minelaying version with VMR-1 or −2 system for 64 or 200 anti-tank mines.
Mi-8BT
Mine-clearing version.
Mi-8MB "Bissektrisa"
Military ambulance version.
Mi-8R (a.k.a. Mi-8GR)
Tactical reconnaissance version with Elint system "Grebeshok-5".[53]
Mi-8K
Artillery observation, reconnaissance version.
Mi-8SMT
Military staff transport version, fitted with improved radio equipment R-832 and R-111.
Mi-8SKA
Photo-reconnaissance version.
Mi-8SP
Spacecraft tracking and recovery version.[54]
Mi-8T(K)
Photo-reconnaissance version.
Mi-8TZ
Fuel transport tanker version.
Mi-8TB
The Mi-8TB was developed in the GDR and specially adapted to the military needs there. It was equipped with various missile and bomb systems, including S-5 missiles and FAB-500 bombs, which could be used to attack ground targets. These adjustments made them a type of "transport bomber," which explained the "TB" designation.[55][56]
Mi-8MTYu
Only one was built and used by the Ukrainian Air Force, based at AB "Kirovske". Intended for detection of re-entry vehicles, and small surface targets. In the nose radar antenna.
Mi-8MSB
Modernized passenger-transport version for civil aviation.[57]
Mi-8MSB-V
Modernized multipurpose helicopter for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.[58]

Civil

[edit]
Ukrainian Ministry of Emergency Situations Mi-8MSB picking up water for aerial firefighting purposes.
Mi-8T (NATO – Hip-C)
Civilian and military utility transport version, with accommodation for 24 passengers, fitted with tip-up seats along the cabin walls, circular cabin windows and large rear clamshell doors with a sloping hinge line. The Mi-8T is powered by two 1,677 shp (1,251 kW) Klimov TV2-117A turboshaft engines, giving the helicopter a maximum speed of 155 mph (249 km/h) at sea level.
Mi-8P
Civilian passenger transport version, with accommodation for between 28 and 32 passengers, fitted with square cabin windows, small rear clamshell doors with a vertical hinge line and a horizontally split rear airstair door in between; powered by two 1,700 hp (1,300 kW) Klimov TV2-117A turboshaft engines.
Mi-8S "Salon"
Civilian VIP transport version, with accommodation for between 9 and 11 passengers, equipped with a galley and toilet.
Mi-8MPS
Search and rescue version (operated usually in Malaysia for Fire and Rescue Department services).
Mi-8MA
Polar exploration version for use in the Arctic.
Mi-8MT
Flying crane version.
Mi-8AT
Civilian transport version, fitted with two improved TV2-117AG turboshaft engines.
Mi-8ATS
Agricultural version, fitted with a hopper and spray bars.
Mi-8TL
Air accident investigation version.
Mi-8TM
Upgraded transport version, fitted with a weather radar.
Mi-8TS
Hot and high desert version.
Mi-8VIP
Deluxe VIP transport version, with accommodation for between 7 and 9 passengers.
Mi-8PA
Modified version for Japanese regulations. One only was built, in 1980. It was used by Aero Asahi for heavy material transport in a mountainous region. It was retired in 1993 and later moved to the Tokorozawa Aviation Museum.

Accidents and incidents

[edit]
Date Model Incident Location Casualties
1 November 1974 Mil Mi-8T collided with a Antonov An-2 Surgut, Soviet Union, killing all 24 people on the helicopter and all 14 people on the Antonov An-2.[59]
18 September 1981 Mil Mi-8T collided with a Yakovlev Yak-40 east of Zheleznogorsk-Ilimsky, Russia, killing all seven crew on the helicopter and all thirty-three people on the Yak-40.[60]
2 October 1986 Mil Mi-8 collided with crane cables due to the pilot being blinded by the sun. used to disperse boron and sand over the Chernobyl reactor 4 killing all 4 crew members.
17 September 2001 Mil Mi-8 shotdown by a Chechen group in Grozny, Chechnya, Russia, killing all 13 people on board.[61]
27 January 2002 Mil Mi-8 shotdown Shelkovskaya, Nadterechny District, Russia, killing all 14 people on board.[62]
4 December 2003 Mil Mi-8P crashed near Piaseczno, Poland, injuring 8 or 14 people on board, including Polish Prime Minister Leszek Miller.[63]
11 September 2006 Mil Mi-8 shotdown by militant group Kataib al-Khoul near Vladikavkaz, Russia, killing 12 of the 16 people on board.[64]
23 September 2006 Mil Mi-8 MTV 1 crashed Ghunsa, Nepal, killing all 24 people on board.[65]
27 April 2007 Mil Mi-8 crashed near Shatoy, Chechnya, Russia, killing all 20 people on board.[66]
3 June 2007 Mil Mi-8 crashed Lungi, Sierra Leone, killing all 22 people on board.[67]
7 April 2013 Mil Mi-8PS crashed Loreto, Peru, killing all 13 people on board.[68]
2 July 2013 Mil Mi-8 crashed near Deputatsky, Sakha Republic, Russia, killing 24 of the 28 people on board.[69]
21 October 2016 Mil Mi-8T crashed Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Yamal Peninsula, Siberia, Russia, killing 19 of the 22 people on board.[70]
12 August 2021 Mil Mi-8T crashed [es] into Kurile Lake, Kamchatka Krai, Russia, killing eight people.[71]
31 August 2024 Mil Mi-8T crashed Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia, killing all 22 people onboard.[72]
28 September 2024 Mil Mi-8 MTV-1 crashed Waziristan, Pakistan, killing 6 people out of the 15 onboard.[73]

Operators

[edit]
Main article: List of Mil Mi-8/17 operators
Operators
  Current
  Former

Former operators

[edit]

Specifications (Mi-8MT)

[edit]
Mil Mi-8 3-view drawing

Data from Jane's All The World's Aircraft 1992–93[93]

General characteristics

  • Crew: 3 (pilot, copilot, flight engineer)
  • Capacity: 24 passengers or 12 stretchers and seat for 1 medical attendant or 4,000 kg (8,800 lb) on internal/external hardpoints
  • Length: 18.4 m (60 ft 4 in)
  • Height: 5.5 m (18 ft 1 in)
  • Empty weight: 7,100 kg (15,653 lb)
  • Gross weight: 11,100 kg (24,471 lb)
  • Max takeoff weight: 13,000 kg (28,660 lb)
  • Fuel capacity: 3,700 L (980 US gal; 810 imp gal)
  • Powerplant: 2 × Klimov TV3-117MT turboshaft engines, 1,454 kW (1,950 hp) each
  • Main rotor diameter: 21.29 m (69 ft 10 in)
  • Main rotor area: 356 m2 (3,830 sq ft)
  • Blade section: NACA 23012[94]

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 250 km/h (160 mph, 130 kn)
  • Cruise speed: 240 km/h (150 mph, 130 kn)
  • Range: 495 km (308 mi, 267 nmi)
  • Ferry range: 960 km (600 mi, 520 nmi)
  • Service ceiling: 5,000 m (16,000 ft)

Armament

See also

[edit]

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mil Mi-8

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Mil Mi-8 (Russian: Ми-8; NATO reporting name Hip) is a medium-lift, twin-turbine helicopter originally developed in the Soviet Union as a successor to the piston-engined Mi-4, with its prototype achieving first flight on 9 June 1961 and entering production shortly thereafter. Designed primarily for military transport but adaptable for civilian roles, it features a five-bladed main rotor, twin Klimov TV3-117 turboshaft engines providing up to 2,200 shp each, and capacity for 24 passengers or 3,000 kg of cargo, with a maximum speed of approximately 250 km/h and range exceeding 500 km. Introduced into Soviet service in the mid-1960s, the Mi-8 rapidly became a cornerstone of rotary-wing due to its rugged reliability in diverse environments, from operations to , and has been produced in numerous variants including troop transports, armed assault models like the Mi-8TP, configurations, and maritime search-and-rescue types. Over 17,000 units have been built across factories in and , with ongoing production in and licensed manufacturing in countries like and , establishing it as the most prolifically manufactured model in history. Employed by more than 50 nations for tasks ranging from personnel evacuation and in conflicts—such as Soviet operations in —to disaster relief and oil rig support, the Mi-8's versatility and low operating costs have sustained its global dominance despite the emergence of newer designs, though its aging airframes have prompted modernization programs incorporating advanced and engines. While not without operational losses in combat and accidents attributable to mechanical wear or harsh conditions, its empirical track record underscores effective prioritizing durability over complexity.

Development

Origins and design requirements

In the late 1950s, following the operational limitations of the piston-engined in supporting Soviet military logistics across vast and remote territories during the , the Soviet government sought a more capable medium transport powered by engines for improved performance, range, and reliability in diverse environments. The , while successful since its introduction in , struggled with power output and vulnerability to single-engine failure in isolated operations, prompting requirements for enhanced redundancy and ruggedness suitable for , mountainous, and frontline duties. Mikhail Mil's OKB-329 design bureau, based at the , received authorization in May 1960 to develop a twin-engine , initially presented as an upgrade to the Mi-4 to overcome military reluctance toward entirely new designs and secure funding. This framing allowed Mil to mount two engines above the cabin, enabling a full redesign of the forward while retaining some Mi-4 external resemblance, with twin engines specifically chosen for operational through in engine-out scenarios over unpopulated regions. Design priorities emphasized durability against extreme conditions, incorporating early Soviet turbine technology such as the TV2-117 engines from the Isotov bureau, which provided higher power-to-weight ratios than alternatives and better tolerance for , , and high-altitude operations inherent to Soviet . These requirements reflected pragmatic needs over experimental features, focusing on a versatile platform for troop transport, cargo, and utility roles with a capacity exceeding the Mi-4's while maintaining simplicity for .

Prototyping and testing phase

The V-8 single-engine , approved for development in 1959 following review of the advanced development project and full-scale mock-up, performed its on June 24, 1961, at the . Powered by a single Ivchenko AI-24V rated at 1,420 kW, the incorporated Mi-4-derived components, including an 18-seat cabin configuration, and initially demonstrated a short tethered hover before progressing to free flight. This validated core design elements, achieving roughly double the lift capacity of the Mi-4 while highlighting the need for twin-engine redundancy to meet reliability requirements under varying load and environmental conditions. Transition to the twin-engine V-8A prototype, approved on May 30, 1960, addressed power and safety limitations observed in single-engine trials. The V-8A conducted its first flight on August 2, 1962, powered by two Isotov TV2-117 engines each delivering 930 kW, with a five-bladed main rotor adopted to mitigate vibration levels encountered in early tests. Empirical data from these flights confirmed approximately 50% higher cruise speeds than the Mi-4, alongside enhanced payload capabilities up to 3,000 kg in hover out of ground effect, informing iterative refinements such as hydraulic rotor dampers and tricycle landing gear for improved ground handling and stability. Extensive through 1963 resolved dynamic issues, including rotor-induced vibrations, via adjustments to transmission gearing and blade pitch controls, establishing quantifiable reliability metrics like exceeding 100 hours in initial evaluations. Factory-based trials concluded in February 1963, accumulating data on structural integrity under high-altitude and icing conditions. A V-8A crashed in 1966 during ongoing evaluations, killing all three crew members; investigations attributed it to mechanical failure, prompting reinforced tail assemblies and control linkages, though the incident occurred post-initial milestones. These tests empirically confirmed the design's robustness, with subsequent incorporating uprated TV3-117 engines for further power gains averaging 20% over TV2-117 outputs.

Initial production and certification

Serial production of the Mil Mi-8 transitioned from prototyping with the first serial aircraft assembled at the Helicopter Plant (Factory No. 387) in March 1965, following state trials that validated the design for mass manufacturing. The inaugural production Mi-8 completed its on 26 October 1965, initiating output focused initially on the Mi-8T transport variant (NATO designation Hip-C), which incorporated twin TV2-117 engines for enhanced reliability over the piston-powered Mi-4 it replaced. Soviet state acceptance, conducted through rigorous military evaluations, certified the Mi-8 for service by 1967, with initial deliveries commencing that year to equip and squadrons. Production prioritization emphasized the Mi-8T for its 3,000 kg payload capacity and ability to operate in diverse conditions, including troop for up to 24 soldiers or cargo sling loads. Early output rates at reached dozens of units annually by 1966, driven by demand exceeding projections and supported by standardized assembly lines. To meet growing requirements, production expanded, with Kazan achieving over 100 units per year by the late ; the joined in 1970, diversifying manufacturing across Siberian facilities for resilience against potential disruptions. Preliminary export discussions targeted allies, with the first foreign deliveries, including to the German Democratic Republic, occurring in 1967 as Mi-8T models, reflecting early confidence in the type's robustness despite initial teething issues reported in field trials. User feedback from Soviet deployments in remote areas prompted to intake filters and rotor wash dynamics for better performance in dusty terrains, though comprehensive redesigns awaited later variants.

Design features

Airframe and structural elements

The Mil Mi-8 features an all-metal semi-monocoque fuselage in a conventional pod-and-boom configuration, providing structural integrity through a load-bearing skin supported by internal frames and longerons. This design enables the helicopter to accommodate up to 24 fully armed troops or 28 passengers in civilian configuration, with a cargo hold measuring approximately 5.34 meters in length, 2.32 meters in width, and 1.8 meters in height. The airframe is engineered for operations across extreme temperatures from -50°C to +50°C, incorporating de-icing systems for all-weather capability. Military variants incorporate armored plating in the compartment, including internal and external shields on the nose and to enhance protection against small-arms fire and shrapnel. Fuel tanks are fitted with self-sealing or explosive-resistant inserts, reducing the risk of post-impact fires by containing leaks and suppressing . The tricycle landing gear, with oleo-pneumatic shock absorbers on main and nose units, contributes to structural resilience during rough-field landings. The cabin's modular design facilitates rapid reconfiguration for transport, , or roles, featuring tip-up seats, cargo tie-down rings, and a rear clamshell with optional ramp for efficient loading. evaluations, including full-scale drop tests on instrumented Mi-8 airframes, have demonstrated the fuselage's ability to absorb vertical impacts while maintaining occupant survivability through energy-attenuating structures and redundant systems. These tests validate the airframe's capacity to withstand controlled crashes at velocities representative of operational emergencies, underscoring its robust load-bearing elements derived from aluminum alloys and reinforced framing.

Powerplant and propulsion

The Mil Mi-8 employs a twin-turboshaft powerplant configuration, with engines mounted in a streamlined fairing above the for optimal airflow and reduced drag. Initial production variants, such as the Mi-8T, were equipped with two TV2-117A engines, each rated at 1,250 kW (1,677 shp) for takeoff. This setup provided sufficient torque output to drive the main rotor system while offering redundancy absent in single-engine predecessors like the Mi-4, thereby enhancing operational safety and enabling consistent propulsion under partial power loss scenarios. Subsequent upgrades standardized the family, introduced in 1974, which delivers 1,700 to 2,200 shp per depending on the variant (e.g., TV3-117A at 1,700 hp or TV3-117MT at 1,950 hp). The increased power margins directly supported a capacity of up to 3,000 kg by improving available and at the transmission input, particularly during hover and climb phases where output critically influences lift generation. Fuel efficiency remains a key advantage, with consumption rates of 600-700 kg per hour across variants, outperforming single- designs in long-endurance roles by distributing load across two units for better specific fuel consumption under sustained power demands. For hot-and-high operations, TV3-117 derivatives incorporate adaptations such as flat-rated power to ambient temperatures up to +60°C and optimized staging, yielding derated but reliable curves that maintain performance in low-density air. These features were validated through Soviet high-altitude trials, demonstrating sustained output equivalent to sea-level ratings at elevations exceeding 3,500 m, which mitigates power lapse and supports missions in regions like the Pamirs or .

Rotor system and transmission

The Mil Mi-8 employs a five-bladed main rotor system with a of 21.3 meters, optimizing lift through articulated hubs that accommodate , feathering, and lead-lag motions essential for stability in forward flight and hover. This configuration, increased from the four blades of the V-8 prototype during development, enhances aerodynamic efficiency and payload capacity by distributing loads more evenly and reducing vibration-induced stress. The all-metal blades feature extruded light-alloy spars with honeycomb-filled trailing-edge sections, providing high durability against fatigue and impact while incorporating electrothermal de-icing to maintain integrity in icing conditions by shedding accretions via heat from engine bleed air. The main transmission gearbox, designed to handle combined engine output up to approximately 2,200 kW, employs a planetary gear arrangement for torque multiplication and speed reduction from the turboshaft engines to the rotor. Critical for safety, it integrates freewheeling clutches on the input quills, which automatically disengage a failed engine, allowing the rotor to freewheel and sustain autorotation for controlled descent without power. This mechanism, grounded in causal principles of momentum conservation, has proven effective in empirical crash data where engine-out scenarios were survivable due to preserved rotor inertia. The three-bladed , with a 3.91-meter , counters main rotor via variable pitch control, mounted on the vertical fin for streamlined airflow interaction. Post-introduction refinements in the addressed early -related failures through empirical analysis of operational data, incorporating enhanced materials and shaft alignments to mitigate resonant frequencies and extend component life under high-cycle loading. These changes, validated by ground testing, reduced drive failures by improving tolerance to aerodynamic and mechanical stresses inherent in counter-rotating systems.

Avionics and crew accommodations

The Mil Mi-8 cockpit employs a dual-pilot configuration with space for a third crew member acting as or , particularly in operations. This setup accommodates three personnel—commander, , and flight —with integrated heating and air conditioning to maintain operational comfort during extended missions. Early production models feature analog instrumentation, including a for navigation and basic radio systems for communication, optimized to distribute workload between pilots and engineer without advanced automation. Subsequent upgrades introduce enhanced avionics for reduced pilot workload, such as NVG-compatible cockpit lighting that supports low-altitude night operations when combined with night vision goggles. Modification kits specifically designed for Mi-8 and related variants replace legacy lighting with NVIS-compliant systems adhering to MIL-STD-3009 standards, minimizing glare and bloom effects under NVG use. These improvements stem from ergonomic assessments addressing visibility and control demands in diverse environments. Flight controls incorporate hydraulic servo-boosters for cyclic, , and anti-torque pedals, backed by redundant hydraulic circuits to ensure continued authority in the event of single-system failure. This duplication, activated mechanically in tandem, has been confirmed effective through operational testing and simulation of failure modes, thereby sustaining crew manageability during critical phases.

Variants

Prototype and low-rate variants

The V-8 prototype, developed as a turbine-powered successor to the Mi-4, featured a single AI-24V engine and a four-blade main rotor system, achieving its first flight in June 1961 to demonstrate the feasibility of turboshaft propulsion in a medium-lift . This single-engine configuration, limited to a small number of airframes for flight and static testing, focused exclusively on proof-of-concept validation without any operational role. Transitioning to a twin-engine layout for improved safety and redundancy, the second incorporated two TV2-117 engines and a five-blade main rotor, with initial flights conducted in 1962 to refine the design parameters that would define production models. Only a handful of such early twin-engine were built, serving developmental testing purposes prior to . Low-rate production in the encompassed the Mi-8U dual-control trainer variant, with around 100 units manufactured specifically for crew familiarization and handling qualification, distinct from full-scale transport series. Experimental tests of a pressurized cabin variant were undertaken to assess potential benefits for high-altitude operations, but the concept was not advanced into production owing to constraints.

Basic transport variants

The Mi-8T served as the foundational variant of the Mi-8 series, entering service with Soviet forces in 1967 following initial production starting in 1965. Designed primarily for troop and , it accommodated up to 24 passengers or 12 stretchers with space for a medical attendant in configuration, alongside a maximum internal of 4,000 kilograms. External sling load capacity reached 3,000 to 4,000 kilograms depending on configuration, enabling carriage of light vehicles or pieces over ranges typically exceeding 400 kilometers with standard fuel. In the , the Mi-8MT variant emerged to address operational limitations in arid and high-altitude environments, incorporating dust-protective intake deflectors and filters—such as hemispherical caps over engine inlets—to mitigate particulate ingestion during in sandy conditions. Production of the Mi-8MT began in 1975, with enhanced engine performance supporting sustained operations in hot-and-high scenarios, while retaining core capacities identical to the Mi-8T: 24 troops or equivalent loads. For markets, the Mi-8MT received the designation Mi-17, distinguishing it from domestic Soviet nomenclature while featuring minor adaptations like reversed positioning for certain configurations. These basic models demonstrated robust logistics utility, with the Mi-8MT/Mi-17 proving particularly effective in rugged terrains; operators in regions like the utilized them for supply ferrying to elevations exceeding 4,000 meters, leveraging improved high-altitude handling for missions unattainable by earlier piston-engined helicopters. Typical ferry range extended to approximately 960 kilometers with auxiliary tanks, underscoring their versatility in extending operational reach without fixed infrastructure.

Armed and combat variants

The Mil Mi-8 was adapted for armed roles primarily through the integration of external weapon pylons and door-mounted guns, allowing it to provide while retaining its core transport capacity, unlike dedicated attack helicopters such as the Mi-24. These modifications included four to six underwing hardpoints capable of carrying unguided rocket pods like the UV-32-57 (32 x 57 mm S-5 rockets) or B-8V20 (20 x 80 mm S-8 rockets), as well as gun pods such as 23 mm UPK-23-250 or 12.7 mm units. Door gunners typically operated PK or PKT 7.62 mm machine guns or larger 12.7 mm weapons from side ports, enabling during troop insertions in low-threat environments. The Mi-8TV, derived from the baseline Mi-8T transport in the late 1970s, represented an early armed variant with provisions for anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs) including the (AT-3 Sagger) and limited trials of the (AT-6 Spiral) system, though full integration of wire-guided or radio-command ATGMs was constrained by the Mi-8's and remained experimental rather than standard. The Mi-8TVK (export Mi-8TB, "Hip-E") enhanced this with reinforced cockpit armor plating up to 5-10 mm thick and capacity for up to four AT-2 Swatter (3M11 Fagot) missiles alongside rocket pods, positioning it as a hybrid for anti-armor and missions. These adaptations emphasized modular weapon loads over specialized attack design, with total combat payload limited to around 1,500 kg to preserve lift and range. Later evolutions like the Mi-8MTV-2 (and export Mi-17 equivalents) incorporated advanced fire control via cockpit sights for aiming rockets and guns, plus optional grenade launchers such as 30 mm AG-17A on pylons, achieving hit probabilities of 20-40% for rockets in empirical tests under operational conditions, outperforming fixed-wing alternatives in terrain-hugging strikes but lagging behind laser-guided systems in precision. This versatility proved effective in asymmetric scenarios requiring rapid deployment of mixed transport and suppression capabilities, where the Mi-8's larger cabin allowed simultaneous carriage of troops and munitions, though vulnerability to MANPADS and RPGs necessitated low-altitude tactics and escorted formations.

Electronic warfare and specialized military variants

The Mi-8PP, an electronic warfare variant of the Mi-8T transport , was equipped with the Polye jamming system to disrupt enemy communications and signals, enabling suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) during operations. This configuration featured podded jammers mounted on the , allowing the to accompany transport formations in contested while generating active interference across multiple bands. Introduced in the 1970s, the Mi-8PP underwent testing in Soviet exercises, where it demonstrated the ability to degrade detection ranges, though production remained limited due to the specialized nature of the mission equipment. An upgraded iteration, the Mi-8PPA (NATO Hip-K), incorporated the Azaliya electronic countermeasures suite, including SPS-63 or SPS-66 jamming pods weighing approximately 200 kg each, positioned on either side of the for jamming. Deployed operationally by Russian forces in the 2008 war with Georgia, the Mi-8PPA reportedly reduced the effective range of Georgian ground-based search radars from up to 300 km to 30-50 km through targeted electronic interference. These systems operated by emitting high-power noise signals to overload enemy receivers, supporting SEAD tasks in low-threat environments, with over 30 distinct EW adaptations derived from Mi-8T and Mi-8MT airframes reported across Soviet and post-Soviet inventories. Specialized military variants included the Mi-8S, a VIP transport modification of the Mi-8T featuring a reconfigured interior with reinforced flooring, luxury seating for up to nine passengers, and enhanced communications for high-level officials, entering series production around 1969. Similarly, the Mi-8MB (also known as "Bissektrisa" or Bisector) served as a dedicated medevac platform, introduced in the mid-1970s with onboard medical facilities including operating capabilities, stretcher racks for up to 12 casualties, and specialized equipment for handling nuclear or chemical exposure victims, based on the Mi-8T airframe. Anti-submarine prototypes derived from the Mi-8T existed in limited numbers, incorporating dipping and lightweight torpedoes for littoral ASW roles, but saw minimal production as the purpose-built Mi-14 superseded them for naval operations due to superior amphibious and sensor integration.

Civil and utility variants

The Mi-8T represents the primary civil utility transport variant of the Mi-8 series, entering production in late 1965 at the Helicopter Plant and in 1970 at . It accommodates up to 24 passengers on tip-up seats or 4,000 kg of internal , with an external sling load capacity of 3,000 kg, enabling flexible commercial operations such as shuttling personnel and equipment to offshore . The Mi-8P serves as a dedicated passenger configuration, featuring rectangular windows and seating for up to 28 individuals, optimized for aeroflot-style commercial roles with a range supporting 500 km flights. Utility adaptations include ski landing gear for environments, allowing operations on snow-covered terrain in regions like where wheeled gear proves impractical due to causal factors such as deep snow accumulation and low temperatures affecting ground firmness. modifications involve suspending external buckets beneath the , enabling drops of up to 3,500 liters of water or retardant per sortie, as demonstrated in Russian operations where such systems have proven effective in accessing remote zones inaccessible by ground vehicles.

Upgrade and modernized variants

The Mi-8AMTSh-V, a post-2000s modernization of the Mi-8AMTSh assault-transport helicopter, incorporates two VK-2500-03 engines rated at 2,400 shaft horsepower each, surpassing the 2,200 shp output of the prior TV3-117VM engines and enabling sustained performance gains of up to 14% in nominal power, with further advantages in hot-and-high conditions due to improved and airflow design. This upgrade, certified for Russian military use by 2010, also integrates digital flight instrumentation, enhanced countermeasures, and modular armor kits, extending operational viability for troop transport and in export-oriented markets such as and . Subvariants like the Mi-8AMTSh-VA, tailored for operations since 2016, retain the VK-2500 powerplants while adding cold-weather adaptations including reinforced and a TA-14 for reliable startups in sub-zero temperatures down to -60°C. The Mi-8AMTSh-VN further refines these with a four-bladed composite derived from the Mi-28 design, boosting anti-torque efficiency and reducing vibration by 20-30% during high-speed maneuvers up to 270 km/h. These enhancements collectively improve by 10-15% over baseline Mi-8MT models through optimized engine management and reduced drag. Addressing supply chain vulnerabilities, upgrades from 2014 onward replaced Ukrainian-sourced AI-9V auxiliary units with domestically produced TA-14 equivalents, achieving full import substitution for critical subsystems by 2015. Post-2022 Western sanctions prompted accelerated localization, with expanding VK-2500 production to over 300 units annually by 2023—exceeding prior Ukrainian TV3-117 reliance—and integrating Russian avionics like the PrVK-10 flight director to eliminate foreign electronics dependencies. As of 2025, these measures sustain upgrade programs for legacy fleets, incorporating modular kits for glass cockpits and GPS/INS navigation without compromising airframe certification.

Operational roles

Military transport and logistics

The Mil Mi-8 functions as a primary military transport helicopter, with a standard internal payload capacity of up to 4,000 kg for cargo or accommodations for 24 troops, facilitating efficient movement of personnel and supplies over short to medium ranges. This capability supported rapid logistical throughput in Soviet and Warsaw Pact operations, where the helicopter enabled airborne insertion and rotation of forces to forward positions, often in conjunction with fixed-wing assets for larger-scale deployments. Its twin-turbine design provided reliable performance in diverse environments, including high-altitude and cold-weather conditions prevalent in Eastern Bloc exercises during the late 1960s and 1970s. Equipped for external sling loads rated at 3,000 to 5,000 kg, the Mi-8 extended its role to underslung delivery of , such as pieces or materials, enhancing resupply in areas lacking ground . In Soviet applications, this adaptability proved essential for sustaining operations in remote theaters, with the helicopter routinely transporting ammunition, fuel, and other to isolated units. The Mi-8's modular cabin configuration allowed quick reconfiguration between troop carrier and cargo hauler modes, optimizing throughput metrics—typically achieving cycle times of under 30 minutes for loading and unloading in field conditions—while its widespread production enabled that favored high-volume usage over more specialized platforms. Operating costs, influenced by simpler maintenance requirements compared to advanced Western designs like the UH-60 Black Hawk (which incurs approximately $3,100 per flight hour), further promoted the Mi-8's deployment in mass scenarios.

Combat support and assault operations

The Mil Mi-8 performs and operations primarily through the rapid insertion and extraction of troops into contested landing zones, where its medium lift capacity enables the deployment of up to 24 combat-equipped personnel per . Door-mounted PKM 7.62 mm machine guns, operated by dedicated gunners, provide to protect against ground threats during these high-risk maneuvers. The helicopter's design emphasizes in hostile environments, featuring armored plating in the crew cabin, explosion-resistant foam in fuel tanks, and redundant systems that allow it to withstand small-arms fire and continue missions. Declassified operational data highlights its exceptional resilience, with small-arms impacts posing minimal threat to structural integrity or flight capability in documented engagements. Upgrades from the onward incorporated countermeasures and electro-optical systems, including IR searchlights and goggles compatibility, extending its effectiveness to low-light operations for surprise insertions. variants further support offensive roles by mounting external pods, pods, and guns to deliver synchronized with ground assaults.

Search and rescue and civilian applications

The Mil Mi-8 helicopter is configured for search and rescue operations, enabling round-the-clock missions in adverse weather conditions through variants equipped with hoist systems. These systems include electric hoists capable of handling loads up to 200 kilograms for personnel recovery from remote or inaccessible sites. In medical evacuation roles, medevac-adapted Mi-8s accommodate up to twelve stretchers, supporting rapid transport of injured individuals from emergency zones. Civilian applications of the Mi-8 extend to utility missions, including support for oil and gas operations where it transports personnel and supplies to offshore rigs and remote settlements. The helicopter's versatility facilitates passenger and cargo carriage in challenging environments, contributing to its dominance in the civilian heavy market with approximately 90% share in its weight class. In disaster relief efforts, Mi-8 variants have been utilized for delivery and rescue operations under diverse climatic conditions. The Mi-8's reliability in non-military roles is evidenced by its accumulation of over 50 million flight hours across global fleets, underscoring its durability for sustained civilian and demands.

Combat and operational history

Soviet-era deployments

The Mil Mi-8 entered Soviet in 1967, rapidly becoming the backbone of medium-lift operations for troop transport, , and rapid deployment across the USSR's expansive frontiers, which enhanced strategic deterrence by enabling swift reinforcement against perceived threats from or during the era. Its versatility supported internal security and border patrols, with over 5,200 helicopters, including numerous Mi-8s, available to Soviet forces by the early 1980s for conventional . During the Soviet-Afghan War from December 1979 to February 1989, Mi-8s served as the primary workhorse for inserting and extracting troops, medical evacuations, and , with the first Mi-8T squadron deployed in summer 1979; Soviet records indicate 329 helicopters lost overall, the majority Mi-8 family variants due to their ubiquity and exposure to MANPADS, yet these operations facilitated disproportionate enemy attrition through suppressive fire and mobility advantages in rugged terrain. By May 1988, the 40th Army's air component retained 331 helicopters, underscoring the type's sustained operational tempo despite attrition rates exceeding 300 airframes in peak years from combat and accidents. In and Siberian patrols throughout the 1960s-1980s, Mi-8s logged millions of flight hours in extreme conditions, proving reliable for resupplying remote outposts, surveys, and without inherent design flaws leading to systemic failures, thereby securing Soviet control over northern territories critical for deterrence. The USSR further exported Mi-8s to allies, such as over 100 units to by the 1970s, bolstering alliance-wide logistics for collective defense exercises and rapid response capabilities against Western incursions.

Post-Soviet conflicts and Russian use

In the (1994–1996), Russian forces employed the Mi-8 extensively for troop transport and logistics in urban and mountainous terrain, where its medium-lift capacity facilitated rapid insertions despite vulnerabilities to man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS) and small arms fire wielded by Chechen fighters. At least two Mi-8 helicopters were lost in the initial of the conflict, contributing to five total helicopter losses during that period, highlighting early operational risks from inadequate low-level flying tactics and limited countermeasures. By the war's end, Russian aviation had suffered 47 helicopter losses, including 13 Mi-8s, underscoring the platform's exposure in contested airspace without sufficient electronic warfare upgrades or escort protocols at the time. During the Second Chechen War (1999–2009), Russian military aviation adapted lessons from the first conflict, emphasizing night operations, improved route planning, and integration with ground forces to reduce Mi-8 attrition, though specific loss figures for the variant remain less documented than fixed-wing casualties. The Mi-8 supported counterinsurgency rotations, evacuations, and resupply in and surrounding areas, with upgraded variants like the Mi-8AMT incorporating enhanced armor and infrared suppressors that mitigated some MANPADS threats compared to earlier models. These adaptations, combined with greater reliance on Mi-24 gunship escorts, enabled sustained utility despite ongoing risks from guerrilla ambushes, as evidenced by fewer proportional rotary-wing losses relative to the intensified ground campaign. In the Russian intervention in starting September 2015, Mi-8 variants, including the Mi-8AMTSh assault model, conducted , , and limited precision strikes using unguided rockets and guided missiles from external pylons, benefiting from Russia's air superiority over rebel-held areas that minimized drone and MANPADS encounters. Attrition remained low, with only one confirmed Mi-8AMTSh downed by ground fire on , 2016, while returning from a delivery to , killing all five aboard due to a malfunctioning onboard defense system. The platform's role in rear-area sustainment and insertion proved resilient, as Russian forces reported no further verified Mi-8 losses amid thousands of sorties, contrasting sharply with higher-exposure environments. Amid the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Mi-8/17 family has endured heavy losses—visually confirmed at over 50 units by mid-2022, predominantly to Ukrainian MANPADS like the Igla and systems during low-altitude assaults and logistics runs in the war's opening phases—yet remains indispensable for rear-echelon troop movements, medical evacuations, and supply chains away from front-line air defenses. Additional strikes, such as the Ukrainian HUR's destruction of three Mi-8s at an occupied Crimean airfield on September 21, 2025, via drone and attacks, illustrate persistent vulnerabilities despite modernizations like the Mi-8MTV-5 with improved survivability kits. These losses, totaling dozens amid broader attrition exceeding 100 helicopters, reflect causal trade-offs: the Mi-8's availability in large numbers (hundreds in Russian inventory) sustains operations where faster fixed-wing alternatives risk higher intercepts, prioritizing volume over individual protection in protracted conflicts.

International conflicts and proxy wars

In the Iran–Iraq War (1980–1988), Iraqi forces employed Mil Mi-8 helicopters in offensive roles, including chemical weapons delivery against Iranian positions; Iraq executed around 120 sorties using Mi-8s fitted for such attacks to halt Iranian offensives. These operations underscored the Mi-8's adaptability for improvised combat support in a high-intensity conventional conflict, where it supplemented dedicated attack helicopters like the Mi-24. During the Angolan Civil War (1975–2002), a major proxy conflict pitting Soviet- and Cuban-backed People's Armed Forces for the Liberation of Angola (FAPLA) against U.S.- and South African-supported rebels, FAPLA integrated Mi-8 and Mi-17 variants into assault and logistics operations. The helicopters facilitated rapid troop insertions, capable of transporting up to 28 soldiers or 4.4 tons of cargo over a 300-mile radius, enabling FAPLA's mobile fighting columns in rugged terrain against guerrilla forces. This utility proved critical in asymmetric engagements, where the Mi-8's ruggedness and ease of maintenance sustained operations despite supply chain vulnerabilities. In contemporary African insurgencies, such as Mali's ongoing jihadist conflict since 2012, the acquired Russian-supplied Mi-8-series helicopters, including deliveries in October 2021, to enhance troop mobility and sustain counter-insurgency patrols in vast, austere regions. The platform's low operational costs and —relative to more expensive Western medium-lift helicopters like the UH-60—allowed prolonged field presence for government forces combating groups affiliated with and the , compensating for limited air infrastructure and maintenance resources in proxy-influenced instability.

Production and proliferation

Manufacturing timeline and facilities

The Mil Mi-8 entered serial production at the Helicopter Plant in 1965, following its on June 24, 1961, with the facility serving as the primary manufacturing site for the and later . Between 1965 and 1996, produced approximately 4,500 units of the Mi-8 and its variants, contributing to cumulative output exceeding 12,000 helicopters across all facilities by 2000. In 1970, production expanded to the to meet rising demand, with the site focusing on additional capacity including export-oriented assembly and eventually manufacturing around 4,500 Mi-8 family helicopters. Soviet-era output reached peak annual rates of several hundred units across the two plants, supporting widespread and deployment. Following the 1991 , production dipped sharply due to economic disruptions and reduced state funding, but revived in the 2000s under the holding company, stabilizing at 50-100 units per year by the . As of 2025, assembly lines at and remain operational despite imposed since 2014 and intensified post-2022, enabling ongoing deliveries of modernized like the Mi-8MTV-1 to Russian forces. The series has surpassed 17,000 total units built, maintaining its status as the most-produced globally.

Export success and global distribution

The Mil Mi-8 helicopter family, including its export-oriented Mi-17 variants, has proliferated extensively, with over 50 countries operating the type as of recent assessments. This global distribution stems from its adaptability for , , and roles, supported by cumulative production exceeding 17,000 units, a substantial portion of which has been delivered abroad. Export designations like Mi-17 distinguish upgraded models such as the Mi-8MTV for international markets, featuring enhanced engines for hot-and-high performance, which have driven sales to diverse operators. Major recipients include , which has procured hundreds of Mi-17s through serial contracts; for instance, 151 Mi-17V-5 units were delivered by 2016, with additional orders for 48 more approved in 2015, reflecting ongoing reliance on the platform for high-altitude operations. ranks among other significant buyers in and the , leveraging the Mi-8/17 for logistical needs in varied terrains. The Mi-17/171 remains a cornerstone of Russian helicopter exports, with annual deliveries of 90 to 110 units to foreign customers as of , underscoring sustained demand despite geopolitical shifts. In developing regions, the family's parts commonality across variants reduces logistical burdens, enabling operators to maintain fleets with shared spares and training, in contrast to Western alternatives often involving fragmented support ecosystems. This has cemented dominance in areas like , , and , where over 3,500 export Mi-17s had been produced by 2014, many serving in austere conditions.

Economic factors and comparative advantages

The Mil Mi-8 maintains market endurance through substantially lower lifecycle costs compared to Western counterparts like the UH-60 Black Hawk, driven by cheaper acquisition prices and reduced operating expenses. Unit costs for the Mi-8 typically range from $9 million to $11 million, roughly half the $17-20 million for a new UH-60M Black Hawk. Operating costs per flight hour for the Mi-8 have been reported as low as $1,050 in operational contexts, significantly below the UH-60's $3,000-6,000 range, owing to simpler maintenance requirements and less expensive fuel and parts. These factors contribute to overall lifecycle expenses 40-50% lower for the Mi-8, as its robust design minimizes downtime and leverages economies from exceeding 17,000 units. A key lies in the Mi-8's extensive spare parts ecosystem, enabled by licensed production in multiple countries including , , and , which sustains operations even under Western sanctions. This contrasts with U.S. helicopters, where strict controls and ITAR restrictions limit parts access for non-allied users, often grounding fleets in sanctioned regimes like or . Networks of third-party suppliers and reverse-engineering further ensure availability, allowing Mi-8 operators to maintain high readiness without reliance on original manufacturers. Empirical data on underscores the Mi-8's , with airframes achieving over 20,000 flight hours and engines supporting 2,000-3,000 hours between overhauls, enabling 30+ years of service with periodic rather than frequent replacements. Narratives portraying the Mi-8 as inherently unreliable often stem from accidents in under-maintained fleets in developing nations, not flaws; properly serviced units demonstrate comparable or superior endurance to the Black Hawk in austere environments, as evidenced by sustained global operations since the .

Safety and reliability

Statistical overview of accidents

The Mil Mi-8/17 family has accumulated over 100 million flight hours since entering service in 1961 across military, civilian, and paramilitary operations in diverse environments. The Aviation Safety Network database documents hundreds of accidents and incidents involving the type, including hull losses and fatal events, though comprehensive totals are complicated by varying reporting standards for military combat losses versus civilian occurrences. When normalized against total flight hours, the fatal accident rate remains below 1 per 100,000 hours overall, aligning with or exceeding the global helicopter industry average of approximately 0.63 fatal accidents per 100,000 flight hours as reported for U.S. operations. Accident peaks occurred during the and amid extensive combat deployments, particularly in the Soviet-Afghan War (1979–1989), where the Mi-8 served as the primary troop transport and logistics , contributing to heavy attrition rates; Soviet forces lost over 300 aircraft in 1984–1985 alone, with nearly 90% being helicopters amid intense operational demands and enemy engagements. Total helicopter losses across the decade exceeded several hundred, with the Mi-8 comprising the bulk due to its ubiquity in forward-area missions. Non-combat civilian and training flights have shown steadier but persistent incident rates, influenced by factors like aging fleets and high-altitude operations in remote regions. Recent examples include the 31 August 2024 crash of a Vityaz-Aero Mi-8T (RA-25656) near Vachkazhets volcano in Russia's , where the helicopter struck a mountainside shortly after takeoff, killing all 22 passengers and crew en route to a sightseeing tour. Other 2024 incidents encompass military losses, such as a Russian Mi-8 downed over occupied on 31 July by Ukrainian FPV drones and a training crash in on 23 May that killed the crew of three. These underscore ongoing risks in both operational theaters, though the type's robust design supports continued widespread use despite accumulated airframe hours.

Common causes and mitigation efforts

Early models of the Mil Mi-8 experienced driveshaft fractures due to fatigue and torsional loads, particularly during operations in the when the initial pusher-type configuration was prone to -induced stress. These failures often stemmed from mechanical imbalances or inadequate damping, leading to loss of yaw control. By the 1970s, redesigns including a shift to a on the left side of the tailboom and installation of dampers above the main rotor hub significantly reduced such incidents by enhancing stability and load distribution. Engine overspeed events in Mi-8 helicopters have been linked to fuel contamination, especially in dusty environments like Afghanistan, where airborne particles entered the TV3-117 engines, causing irregular combustion and power surges. Mitigation involved retrofitting high-efficiency air and fuel filters to prevent ingress of particulates, alongside stricter pre-flight fuel quality checks, which improved engine reliability in harsh conditions. Additionally, protected fuel tanks with crash-resistant features minimize post-impact fire propagation, allowing up to 30 minutes of fire containment in some upgraded variants to enhance survivability. A substantial portion of Mi-8 accidents in developing nations arises from operator training deficiencies and inconsistent maintenance practices rather than inherent design flaws, as evidenced by higher incident rates in regions with limited . Efforts to address this include mandatory enhanced pilot certification programs emphasizing authority limits and procedures, alongside international maintenance standardization initiatives by manufacturers like .

Comparative assessment versus Western counterparts

The Mil Mi-8's twin-turboshaft engine configuration provides inherent redundancy over the single-engine , enhancing operational reliability in contaminated environments such as dust and sand, where single-engine ingestion risks can ground aircraft or lead to failures. Soviet design philosophy prioritized ruggedness and simplicity for austere operations, allowing the Mi-8 to maintain higher dispatch rates—often cited as approximately double in dusty conditions compared to the UH-1—due to reduced vulnerability to engine-out scenarios and robust particle separation in the TV2-series engines. This contrasts with Western narratives that sometimes overlook such utilitarian advantages in favor of emphasizing sophistication, despite empirical evidence from prolonged deployments in regions like demonstrating the Mi-8's lower per-sortie attrition in combat relative to Vietnam-era UH-1 losses, attributable to overbuilt structural margins and multi-engine . Against modern counterparts like the Leonardo AW139, the Mi-8 offers acquisition costs roughly half as high—typically $6-10 million per unit for export variants versus $14-20 million for the AW139—while delivering comparable or superior capacities in extreme altitudes and temperatures, up to 4,000 kg external load. The Mi-8's heavier and conservative engineering enable sustained performance in high-hot conditions where lighter Western designs may derate, facilitating broader adoption in developing militaries despite less advanced composites. In terms of longevity, Mi-8 routinely achieve 50+ years of service through modular overhauls extending time-between-overhauls (TBO) to 2,000 hours and total lifespans beyond 10,000 flight hours, outpacing the 20-30 year typical for unupgraded U.S. types like the UH-1 without equivalent margin for deferred in resource-constrained settings. This stems from Soviet-era overdesign for , with safety factors exceeding Western norms to tolerate battle damage and environmental abuse, as evidenced by over 50 million cumulative flight hours across global operators.

Current status

Ongoing operations and upgrades

The Mil Mi-8 and its remain in active service across more than 50 countries in the 2020s, supporting military transport, search-and-rescue, and civilian operations in diverse environments from the to high-altitude regions. In , ChukotAVIA received a specialized Mi-8 optimized for extreme cold-weather missions on August 22, 2025, featuring enhancements for reliable performance in sub-zero conditions. These helicopters' robustness continues to underpin in remote and contested areas, with global fleets exceeding 3,000 units as of recent assessments. Amid the Ukraine conflict, Ukrainian Mi-8 gunships underwent modifications including integration of U.S.-sourced M134 Miniguns and advanced thermal optics, enabling effective interception of Iranian-designed Shahed-136 drones as demonstrated in operational footage from mid-2025. These upgrades, which boost night-time detection and firing rates up to 6,000 rounds per minute, address vulnerabilities exposed by drone swarms, allowing crews to neutralize up to 40% of incoming threats in covered sectors according to Ukrainian military reports. Such adaptations highlight the platform's flexibility for countering low-cost unmanned aerial vehicles in peer conflicts. The has implemented life-extension programs for its Mi-17V5 fleet, a Mi-8 derivative optimized for high-altitude operations, extending total technical life to 40 years and upgrading time-between-overhaul intervals to improve reliability in Himalayan border zones. These enhancements, including locally developed electronic warfare suites contracted in April 2025 at a cost of approximately $260 million, sustain medium-lift capacity along the into the 2040s without requiring full fleet replacement.

Production continuation as of 2025

As of 2025, production of Mil Mi-8 family helicopters persists in under the holding, with facilities such as the Helicopter Plant actively assembling variants like the Mi-8MTV-1 for civilian and regional operations. In January 2025, the company delivered 14 new Mi-8MTV-1 units to five Russian airlines, fulfilling contracts for transport roles and signaling continued output to meet domestic needs. Further deliveries of Mi-8 series helicopters to airlines and other customers are planned for the remainder of 2025, supporting fleet sustainment amid operational demands. Western sanctions have prompted adaptations including greater reliance on indigenous components and supply chain localization, enabling sustained manufacturing without full disruption to Mi-8 lines. Exports face restrictions, particularly for spares to markets in , the , and , yet upgraded variants like the Mi-171A3 continue to attract interest for their cost-effectiveness in roles. Demand in developing regions emphasizes affordable modernization over new acquisitions, preserving the type's proliferation despite geopolitical pressures.

Planned successors like Mi-80

In July 2025, Russian holding company announced the initiation of the Mi-80 project, a next-generation multirole intended to succeed the Mi-8/17 family by standardizing production and addressing the aging fleet's operational demands. The design targets a of 14 tons, incorporating advanced composite rotor blades, an X-shaped for reduced noise, and a polymer-composite to enhance durability and reduce maintenance costs, while simplifying to mitigate integration challenges seen in prior Russian programs. Despite these ambitions, the Mi-80 builds on the Mi-171A3 variant's core airframe, reflecting the Mi-8/17 lineage's entrenched economic advantages, including low lifecycle costs and proven reliability in austere environments that deter radical redesigns. Plans include more powerful engines to achieve approximately 30% greater payload capacity over the Mi-8T baseline, with production consolidation at and facilities to streamline logistics by 2030. However, early-stage technical hurdles, such as engine development under Western sanctions limiting access to , echo delays in projects like the Ansat light helicopter, underscoring risks of overcomplexity that could prolong reliance on iterative Mi-8 evolutions rather than full replacement. The Mi-8's irreplaceability stems from its causal robustness—decades of empirical data showing high dispatch rates and adaptability across , , and roles—making successors viable only if they replicate this without introducing unproven vulnerabilities, a threshold the Mi-80 has yet to demonstrate beyond conceptual outlines.

Operators

Current military operators

The Mil Mi-8 family, encompassing variants such as the Mi-17, remains integral to military operations globally in 2025, providing reliable medium-lift capabilities for troop transport, cargo delivery, and support in conflict zones including high-altitude regions, deserts, and counter-insurgency theaters. Its enduring utility stems from proven ruggedness, ease of maintenance, and adaptability to austere environments, sustaining roles despite emerging replacements.
CountryEstimated Fleet SizePrimary Roles
Over 700 (Aerospace Forces) + 800 in other servicesAirborne assault for VDV, logistics in conflict; extensive combat deployments demonstrate resilience under fire.
Over 200 Mi-17 variantsHigh-altitude operations in , counter-insurgency; upgrades with electronic warfare suites enhance survivability in border hotspots.
Approximately 140Counter-insurgency, border patrol in ; recent upgrades to Mi-171SH variants bolster desert warfare utility.
Around 40 Mi-17sCounter-terrorism against remnants; active despite ongoing replacement with Western models, retaining value in urban and desert ops.
Additional operators include , with hundreds of Mi-8/17 units supporting aviation in transport and utility missions across vast territories. These fleets underscore the Mi-8's continued relevance in and rapid response scenarios, where its payload capacity and short takeoff performance outperform alternatives in resource-constrained settings.

Former military operators

Finland acquired eight Mi-8T and two Mi-8PS variants starting in 1973, retiring its Mi-8 fleet from army service in 2010, with the last two aircraft decommissioned to make way for NH90 tactical transports under a broader modernization program aimed at replacing aging Soviet-era equipment. The fleet accumulated over 36,000 flight hours, with one helicopter lost in 1982 after sinking through ice during a landing attempt on a rescue mission; post-military, some transitioned to Border Guard and civilian roles. Successor states to , including , phased out Mi-8 operations amid post-conflict fleet attrition and alignment with Western standards for EU integration and membership; specifically retired and donated 14 Mi-8s to between 2022 and 2023, replacing them with UH-60M Black Hawks. The decommissioned its final Mi-8 helicopters on October 15, 2023, at the 22nd Helicopter Base, shifting to U.S.-origin UH-1Y and AH-1Z models to enhance interoperability and divest from Russian-sourced platforms. Georgia's Mi-8 inventory suffered attrition during the 2008 , with losses prompting a phase-out announced in 2013 in favor of Western to bolster defense diversification post-conflict. Such transfers, as seen with Croatian donations to Ukraine, have extended operational life for some airframes through proxy use despite originating operators' retirements.

Civilian and paramilitary operators

The Mil Mi-8 serves civilian operators primarily for passenger and cargo transport in challenging environments, including remote industrial sites. In Russia's oil and gas sector, particularly in Siberia, Mi-8 helicopters frequently shuttle workers to offshore and northern oilfields, such as Rosneft's Vankor field, supporting operations in harsh weather conditions. Multiple incidents, including crashes carrying oil personnel, underscore their routine deployment in these regions. Recent deliveries of new Mi-8 family variants to Russian airlines further bolster these roles, including medevac and cargo services for energy infrastructure. Paramilitary applications include in various countries, where Mi-8 variants provide aerial and support capabilities. In , nations like received Mi-8 helicopters as Soviet , with ongoing use in security operations. has upgraded fleets of Mi-8 and Mi-17 helicopters, employing them for internal security tasks beyond strict military roles. Non-governmental organizations and international bodies, such as the , utilize Mi-8 helicopters for humanitarian relief and logistics in conflict zones. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, UN Mi-8 operations have demonstrated reliability in adverse weather and complex terrain, described as "workhorses" capable of diverse tasks with high operational tempo. Despite occasional accidents, such as a 2013 crash attributed to weather, the type's robustness supports sustained missions in regions like eastern Congo.

Specifications

General characteristics (Mi-8T)

The Mil Mi-8T, the original transport variant of the Mi-8 medium-lift family developed by the , accommodates a crew of three: pilot, copilot, and . It has a passenger capacity of 24 troops or equivalent internal cargo load of up to 4,000 kg, with provisions for 12 stretchers and one medical attendant in configurations. Key dimensions include a length of 18.3 m, an overall length with rotors turning of 25.3 m, a main rotor of 21.3 m, and an overall of 5.65 m. The cargo cabin measures approximately 5.34 m in length, 2.34 m in width, and 1.8 m in . Empty weight stands at 7,200 kg, with a of 12,000 kg. Internal fuel capacity is approximately 3,000 kg. Power is provided by two TV2-117 turboshaft engines, each rated at 1,500 hp. The design features a five-bladed main rotor and a three-bladed with a of 3.9 m.

(Mi-8T)

The Mil Mi-8T, as the baseline transport variant of the Mi-8 series, exhibits performance characteristics optimized for medium-range troop and cargo transport rather than high-speed or extreme-altitude operations, with limits validated through developmental test flights by the in the . Maximum speed attains 250 km/h at sea level, while cruising speed is 225 km/h, reflecting a design favoring capacity—up to 3,000 kg internally or slung—over velocity. Operational range stands at 425 km with standard fuel loads, extending to 925 km in ferry configuration with auxiliary tanks, enabling effective support for tactical insertions over varied terrain. The service ceiling reaches 4,500 m, with hover in ground effect (IGE) capability up to 1,800 m and out of ground effect (OGE) to 850 m at maximum takeoff weight of 12,000 kg, as confirmed in certification envelope expansions accounting for TV2-117 engines' power output under ISA conditions. Rate of climb averages 8–9 m/s, supporting rapid ascents from unprepared sites. Typical endurance approximates 2.5 hours, prioritizing reliable loiter and payload delivery in utility roles over extended high-speed dashes.
ParameterValue
Maximum speed250 km/h
Cruising speed225 km/h
Range (standard)425 km
Ferry range925 km
Service ceiling4,500 m
Hover ceiling IGE1,800 m
Hover ceiling OGE850 m
8–9 m/s
(typical)2.5 hours
These metrics derive from Soviet-era flight tests emphasizing hot-and-high performance for operational theaters like , where the Mi-8T's envelope proved robust under combat loading despite engine limitations compared to later variants.

References

  1. https://www.mo.gov.cz/scripts/detail.php?id=6304
  2. https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.php?aircraft_id=150
  3. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mi-8.htm
  4. https://www.army-technology.com/projects/mi8t/
  5. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mi-8-var.htm
  6. https://planehistoria.com/mi-8/
  7. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mi-8-afghan.htm
  8. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mi-8-dev.htm
  9. https://rostec.ru/en/media/news/helicopter-of-100-professions-eight-facts-about-the-mi-8/
  10. http://www.aviastar.org/helicopters_eng/mi-8.php
  11. https://helihub.com/2021/10/13/evolution-of-the-mi-8/
  12. https://vertipedia.vtol.org/milestones/getMilestone/milestoneID/328
  13. https://www.airvectors.net/avmil8_1.html
  14. https://verticalmag.com/press-releases/russian-helicopters-eighth-model-keeps-up-with-the-times/
  15. https://helihub.com/2021/06/25/mi-8-made-its-first-flight-60-years-ago/
  16. https://www.airhistory.net/files/st/mil_mi8_mi171.pdf
  17. https://aeromugs.com/blogs/news/the-enduring-legacy-of-the-mil-mi-8-helicopter-a-true-workhorse-of-the-skies
  18. https://m5dergi.com/defence-news/mi-8-evolution-how-the-legendary-eighth-model-manages-to-keep-up-with-the-times/
  19. https://www.helicopter-database.de/report-mi8-eastgermany.php
  20. https://www.helicopterspecs.com/2019/12/mil-mi-8amt.html
  21. https://www.16va.be/4.5_les_mi-8_part3_eng.html
  22. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/upload/iblock/3a2/DCS-Mi-8MTV2_FlightManual_EN.pdf
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7248906/
  24. https://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/mil-mi817/280
  25. https://globalflyaviation.com/mi-8-helicopter/
  26. https://vietnam.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/mi8.html
  27. https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/186762-why-not-operating-russian-helicopter.html
  28. https://monk-of-war.medium.com/the-mil-mi-8-hip-helicopter-should-be-as-famous-as-the-uh-1-huey-5c7eb9454ce9
  29. https://vertipedia.vtol.org/aircraft/getAircraft/aircraftID/117
  30. http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_mi8_en.php
  31. http://server.3rd-wing.net/public/Manuels%2520DCS/DCS%2520Mi-8MTV2%2520FlightManual%2520EN.pdf
  32. https://www.businessaviation.com/aircraft-guide/helicopters/transport-helicopter/mil-mi-8/index.html
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309034205_CONTRIBUTION_TO_THE_MAINTENANCE_OF_MI-8_HELICOPTER_IN_THE_SERBIAN_AIR_FORCE
  34. https://www.consolite.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Datasheets/OtherDatasheets/CTL-Datasheet-14-Mil-Helicopter-NVG-Upgrades-Datasheet-Rev-3.pdf
  35. http://alverstokeaviation.blogspot.com/2016/01/mil-mi-8-transport-helicopter-tech-tour.html
  36. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/199833-control-linkages-and-hydraulics-question/
  37. https://weaponsystems.net/system/298-Mil%2BMi-8T
  38. https://vertidev.vtol.org/aircraft/getAircraft/aircraftID/483
  39. https://vertipedia.vtol.org/aircraft/getAircraft/aircraftID/483
  40. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mi-17.htm
  41. https://defence24.com/donbas-experience-ukrainian-mi-8-modernization-programmes
  42. https://pickledwings.com/2024/11/10/mil-mi-8-17-hip-rotary-all-rounder/
  43. http://www.16va.be/4.5_les_mi-8_part4_eng.html
  44. https://www.twz.com/this-is-russias-electronic-warfare-helicopter-jamming-in-ukraine
  45. https://airsps.com/stock/aircraft-for-sale/helicopters/2020-transport-helicopter-mi-8amt-for-sale-245/
  46. https://wildfiretoday.com/tag/aerial-firefighting/
  47. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mi-8amtsh.htm
  48. https://www.key.aero/article/evolution-russias-famous-hip-heavy-duty-helicopter-family
  49. https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/first-flight-special-forces-mi-8amtsh-vn
  50. https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/mi-8amtsh-va-arctic-helicopter/
  51. https://warthunder.com/en/news/9153-development-mi-8amtsh-vn-upgraded-assault-en
  52. https://defensemirror.com/news/30185/Special_Forces_Mi_8_Helicopter__AMTSh_VN_Makes_First_Flight
  53. https://www.airforce-technology.com/news/newsrussia-completes-mi-8amtsh-v-helicopter-upgrades-domestic-equipment-4425285/
  54. https://ruavia.su/vk-2500-engines-are-not-enough-for-production-of-mi-8-17-helicopters/
  55. https://ruavia.su/five-airlines-take-delivery-of-new-mi-8-family-helicopters/
  56. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mi-8-action.htm
  57. https://en.defence-ua.com/news/what_is_the_price_of_a_10_fighter_or_black_hawk_helicopter_flying_an_hour_modern_costs_for_us_aviation-4898.html
  58. https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/PK_Machine_Gun
  59. https://man.fas.org/dod-101/sys/ac/row/mi-8.htm
  60. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/mi-8-17-multipurpose-helicopter
  61. https://afterburner.com.pl/close-up-mi-8-medevac/
  62. https://reliefweb.int/report/serbia/emergency-ministry-s-mi-8-helicopter-takes-carry-out-humanitarian-operation-serbia
  63. https://www.quora.com/How-is-the-reliability-of-Russian-made-military-helicopters-compared-with-American-helicopters
  64. https://www.airvectors.net/avmil8_2.html
  65. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA114153.pdf
  66. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000499320.pdf
  67. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85T00313R000300110007-2.pdf
  68. https://read.aviationnewsjournal.com/articles/mil-mi-8
  69. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/sa/sa_aug00bag01.html
  70. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2016-02/20030900_cscp_art_officer_haas.pdf
  71. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/02/world/middleeast/russia-syria-helicopter.html
  72. https://tass.com/politics/891847
  73. https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/03/list-of-aircraft-losses-during-2022.html
  74. https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/09/21/ukraine-strikes-three-russian-helicopters-and-a-radar-in-occupied-crimea-satellite-confirms-at-least-one-mi-8-destroyed-video/
  75. https://bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com/2021/11/24/what-was-the-iran-iraq-war-1980-1988/
  76. http://m.warinangola.com/
  77. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA526489.pdf
  78. https://www.france24.com/en/africa/20211001-mali-receives-russian-helicopters-and-weapons-lauds-moscow-partnership
  79. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mi-8-world.htm
  80. https://tass.com/defense/981354
  81. https://www.ruaviation.com/news/2014/5/30/2349/
  82. https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2021-05-18/ruggedness-reliability-keep-russian-vip-helicopters-vogue
  83. https://armyrecognition.com/news/aerospace-news/2024/russia-delivers-new-mi-8mtv-1-transport-helicopters-to-its-army
  84. https://www.slashgear.com/1946046/most-produced-helicopter-in-the-world/
  85. https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/Mi-8_%28Hip%29_Russian_Medium_Transport_Helicopter
  86. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mi-171.htm
  87. https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/india-receives-final-batch-of-russian-mi-17-helicopters/
  88. https://thediplomat.com/2015/09/india-approves-1-1-billion-helicopter-contract-for-additional-russian-mi-17s/
  89. https://www.key.aero/article/russias-helicopter-portfolio-tail-spin
  90. http://www.spsmai.com/aerospace/?id=2833&q=The-3500th-Mi-17-delivered-to-India-by-Rosoboronexport-and-Russian-Helicopters
  91. https://aerocorner.com/aircraft/mil-mi-8-hip/
  92. https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/06/21/an-investors-guide-to-top-10-military-helicopters.aspx
  93. https://www.facebook.com/100090302745488/posts/how-much-does-a-uh-60m-black-hawk-costthe-cost-of-a-uh-60m-black-hawk-helicopter/454586760894745/
  94. https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-UH-60-Blackhawk-helicopter-compare-to-its-Soviet-counterparts-Mi-8-and-Mi-17-transport-helicopters
  95. https://iranfocus.com/economy/55647-trail-of-a-helicopter-parts-supply-network-for-irans-regime-spanning-the-u-s-uae-portugal-and-sweden/
  96. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mi-8-mods.htm
  97. https://en.defence-ua.com/analysis/how_russia_lost_a_mi_8_helicopter_near_oryol_due_to_engine_failure_fifth_incident_in_five_months_highlights_critical_engine_shortage-14617.html
  98. https://www.key.aero/article/mother-invention
  99. https://www.businessaviation.com/aircraft-guide/helicopters/transport-helicopter/russian-helicopter-mi-8amt/index.html
  100. https://asn.flightsafety.org/asndb/type/Mi8
  101. https://www.faa.gov/speeches/helicopter-safety-time-think-outside-box
  102. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB57/us8.pdf
  103. https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/419142
  104. https://euromaidanpress.com/2024/09/01/russian-mi-8-helicopter-crash-in-kamchatka-claims-22-lives/
  105. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/russian-military-mi-8-helicopter-crashes-in-oryol-region-killing-all-crew/3577680
  106. https://skybrary.aero/sites/default/files/bookshelf/5442.pdf
  107. https://www.pall.com/content/dam/pall/aerospace-defense/literature-library/non-gated/AEMI17AFGEN.pdf
  108. https://www.hsc-copter.com/storage/file23016548/0000000013BF7297
  109. https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-Mi-8-helicopter-have-such-a-bad-reputation
  110. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373210429_FLIGHT_SAFETY_OF_MI-8_HELICOPTERS_AND_THEIR_MODIFICATIONS
  111. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19830010377/downloads/19830010377.pdf
  112. https://idrw.org/why-russian-helicopters-look-big-rough-and-ugly-and-why-thats-their-strength/
  113. https://www.aircraftcostcalculator.com/AircraftOperatingCosts/424/Leonardo%2BAW139
  114. https://saflyer.com/mils-amazing-helicopters-the-heavy-lift-champions-part-1/
  115. https://www.justgorussia.com/us/helicopter_mi8.html
  116. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Mil_Mi-8
  117. https://deagel.com/news/n000025968
  118. https://tass.com/defense/1376555
  119. https://united24media.com/latest-news/ukrainian-mi-8-gunships-now-pack-us-m134-miniguns-to-take-down-russian-shahed-drones-10744
  120. https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/ukrainian_mi_8s_modernized_for_successful_shahed_hunting_with_the_legendary_minigun-15471.html
  121. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/ukraine-leaning-helicopter-crews-hunt-162404124.html
  122. https://idrw.org/iaf-chief-confirms-mi-17-helicopter-upgrades-to-bolster-indias-medium-lift-capabilities/
  123. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/india/mod-signs-2k-cr-pact-to-upgrade-mi-17-v5-copters/
  124. https://defensemirror.com/news/39237
  125. https://rostec.ru/en/media/news/rostec-has-supplied-14-new-helicopters-to-russian-airlines/
  126. https://www.globaldefensecorp.com/2025/07/15/russia-shut-down-mi-8-mi-17-series-helicopter-production-and-spare-parts-supplies/
  127. https://ruavia.su/mi-171a3-helicopter-featuring-smart-engine-control-system-showcased-at-lima-2025/
  128. https://armyrecognition.com/news/aerospace-news/2025/russias-mi-80-multirole-helicopter-project-aims-to-replace-legendary-mi-8-17-transport-fleet
  129. https://defence-blog.com/russia-develops-mi-80-to-replace-iconic-hip-helicopter/
  130. https://defensemirror.com/news/39875/Russia_Planning_All_New_Helicopter__Mi_80_to_Replace_Legendary_Mi_8
  131. https://militarnyi.com/en/news/mi-80-russia-launches-mi-8-helicopter-replacement-program/
  132. https://vpk.name/en/1029529_the-mi-80-helicopter-project.html
  133. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/why-russia-building-new-multirole-helicopter-bw
  134. https://thedefensepost.com/2025/07/15/russia-helicopter-replacement/
  135. https://united24media.com/latest-news/russia-unveils-mi-80-helicopter-to-replace-the-mi-8-just-one-problem-its-still-imaginary-9840
  136. https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/mil-mi-80-multirole-helicopter.47268/
  137. https://www.slashgear.com/1926929/military-most-helicopters-in-service-ranked/
  138. https://en.defence-ua.com/news/iraq_choosing_h225m_eurocopter_to_replace_its_40_strong_mi_17_fleet_is_making_moscow_sweat_bullets-14395.html
  139. https://ceoworld.biz/2024/04/04/ranked-countries-with-the-largest-active-combat-helicopter-fleet-worldwide-in-2024/
  140. https://verticalmag.com/features/a-look-at-the-only-helicopter-battalion-of-finland-natos-newest-member/
  141. https://www.flightglobal.com/pictures-finnish-army-to-retire-last-mi-8-transports/93521.article
  142. https://aircosmosinternational.com/article/croatia-to-send-14-mi-8-helicopters-to-ukraine-3657
  143. https://www.globaldefensecorp.com/2022/11/23/croatia-donates-fourteen-mi-8-transport-helicopters-to-ukraine/
  144. https://www.janes.com/osint-insights/defence-news/defence/czechs-retire-russian-built-helicopters
  145. https://defense-update.com/20131229_georgian_helicopters.html
  146. https://www.key.aero/article/first-nine-croatian-mi-8-hip-helicopters-head-ukraine
  147. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34931374
  148. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/22/nineteen-people-die-in-helicopter-crash-in-northern-russia-staryi-urengoi
  149. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-04/eighteen-killed-in-russian-helicopter-crash-in-siberia/10074214
  150. https://www.zona-militar.com/en/2024/02/27/why-the-peruvian-armed-forces-cannot-and-should-not-get-rid-of-their-russian-origin-hip-helicopters/
  151. https://helihub.com/2014/07/14/mexico-upgrading-21-mi-8-and-mi-17s/
  152. https://interactive.rotorandwing.com/the-uns-helo-fleet/
  153. https://digitaledition.rotorandwing.com/may-june-2019/the-uns-helo-fleet/
  154. https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/20/is-it-still-safe-to-fly-on-a-u-n-helicopter/
  155. https://abakanair.ru/en/aircrafts/mi-8/
  156. https://weaponsystems.net/system/298-Mil+Mi-8T
  157. https://www.airborneops.com/assets/AC/ao-mi8t.pdf
  158. https://vertipedia.vtol.org/aircraft/getAircraft/aircraftID/378
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.