Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Qocho
View on Wikipedia
Key Information

Qocho or Kara-Khoja (Chinese: 高昌回鶻; pinyin: Gāochāng Huíhú; lit. 'Gaochang Uyghurs'),[4] also known as Idiqut,[5][6][7][8] ("holy wealth"; "glory"; "lord of fortune"[9]) was a Uyghur kingdom created in 843, with strong Chinese Buddhist and Tocharian influences. It was founded by refugees fleeing the destruction of the Uyghur Khaganate after being driven out by the Yenisei Kirghiz. They made their winter capital in Qocho (also called Gaochang or Qara-Khoja, near modern Turpan) and summer capital in Beshbalik (modern Jimsar County, also known as Tingzhou).[10] Its population is referred to as the "Xizhou Uyghurs" after the old Tang Chinese name for Gaochang, the "Qocho Uyghurs" after their capital, the "Kucha Uyghurs" after another city they controlled, or the "Arslan ("Lion") Uyghurs" after their king's title.
History
[edit]In 843, a group of Uyghurs migrated southward under the leadership of Pangtele, and occupied Karasahr and Kucha, taking them from the Tibetan Empire.[11]
In 856, this group of Uyghurs received royal recognition from the Tang dynasty.[12] At this time, their capital was in Karasahr (Yanqi).[13]
The land of the Uighurs is very large, so large that to the west it appears boundless. In the fourth and fifth months, all vegetation dries up as if it were winter. The mountains are snow-covered even in summer. When the sun rises it becomes hot, but as soon as it sets, it grows cold. Even in the sixth lunar month (i.e., the peak of summer), people must use wadded coverlets to sleep. It does not rain in summer. The rain only starts to fall in autumn, and then the vegetation begins to sprout. Come winter, the rivers and plains are like our spring, with flowers in full bloom.[14]
— Wugusun Zhongduan
In 866, Pugu Jun declared himself khan and adopted the title of idiqut. The Kingdom of Qocho captured Xizhou (Gaochang), Tingzhou (Beshbalik, or Beiting), Changbaliq (near Ürümqi) and Luntai (Bugur) from the Guiyi Circuit. The Uyghur capital was moved to Xizhou, which the Uyghurs called Idiqutshari. Beshbalik became their summer residence.[11][15]
On the southern end of the Altai Mountains is a city of the Uighurs, called Bieshiba (Beshbaliq). There is a Tang-era stele there that identifies it as the former Vast Sea (Hanhai) Military Prefecture. The Vast Sea is several hundred li northwest of this city. In that sea is a small island covered with feathers shed by birds. Over two hundred li west of this city is the county of Luntai, which also has a Tang-era stele. Five hundred li south of this city (Beshbaliq) is Hezhou (Qocho), known as Gaochang in the Tang. It is also known as Yizhou. Three to four thousand li west of Gaochang is the city of Wuduan (Khotan), which was known as the kingdom of Yutian in the Tang. The two rivers that produce black and white jade are located there.[14]
In 869 and 870, the Kingdom of Qocho attacked the Guiyi Circuit but was repelled.[16] In 876, the Kingdom of Qocho seized Yizhou from the Guiyi Circuit.[16] In 880, Qocho attacked Shazhou (Dunhuang) but was repelled.[15] By 887, they were settled under an agrarian lifestyle in Qocho.
In 904, Zhang Chengfeng of the Guiyi Circuit (later renamed Jinshan Kingdom) attacked Qocho and seized Yizhou (Hami/Kumul) and Xizhou (Gaochang).[17] This occupation ended after the Jinshan Kingdom's loss to the Ganzhou Uyghur Kingdom in 911.[15] In 954, Ilig Bilgä Tengri rose to power.[11] In 981, Arslan Bilgä Tengri ilig rose to power.[11] From 981, the Idiqut of Qocho sent tribute missions to the Song dynasty under the title "Nephew Lion King Arslan Khan of the West Prefecture." The addition of the title "Nephew" (外甥) was intended as a show of sincerity to the Han people of the Central Plains, as "nephew" referred to the traditional relationship between the Uyghur Khans and the previous Tang dynasty, who referred to each other as uncle and nephew. Meanwhile, West Prefecture (西州) referred to Qocho's designation under Tang administration.[18] In 984, Arslan Bilgä Tengri ilig became Süngülüg Khagan.[11] In the same year, a Song Chinese envoy reached Qocho and gave an account of the city:
There is no rain or snow here and it is extremely hot. Each year at the hottest time, the inhabitants dig holes in the ground to live in ... The earth here produces all the five grains except buckwheat. The nobility eat horseflesh, while the rest eat mutton, wild ducks and geese. Their music is largely played on the pipa and harp. They produce sables, fine white cotton cloth, and an embroidered cloth made from flower stamens. By custom they enjoy horseback riding and archery ... They use the [Tang] calendar produced in the seventh year of the Kaiyuan reign (719). They fashion pipes of silver or brass and channel flowing water to shoot at each other; or they sprinkle water on each other as a game, which they call pressing out the sun's heat to chase off sickness. They like to take walks, and the strollers always carry a musical instrument with them. There are over fifty Buddhist temples here, the names inscribed over their gates all presented by the Tang court. The temples house copies of the Buddhist scriptures (da zang jing) and the dictionaries Tang yun, Yupian and Jingyun. On spring nights the locals pass the time milling about between the temples. There's an "Imperial Writings Tower' which houses edicts written by the Tang emperor Taizong kept carefully secured. There's also a Manichaean temple, with Persian monks who keep their own religious law and call the Buddhist scriptures the 'foreign Way' ... In this land there are no poor people; anyone short of food is given public aid. People live to an advanced age, generally over one hundred years. No one dies young.[19]
In 996, Bügü Bilgä Tengri ilig succeeded Süngülüg Khagan.[11]


In 1007, Alp Arsla Qutlugh Kül Bilgä Tengri Khan succeeded Bügü Bilgä Tengri ilig.[11] In 1008, Manichaean temples were converted to Buddhist temples.[21] In 1024, Kül Bilgä Tengri Khan succeeded Alp Arsla Qutlugh Kül Bilgä Tengri Khan.[11] In 1068, Tengri Bügü il Bilgä Arslan Tengri Uighur Tärkän succeeded Kül Bilgä Tengri Khan.[11] By 1096, Qocho had lost Aksu, Tumshuk, and Kucha to the Kara-Khanid Khanate.[15]
In 1123, Bilgä rose to power. He was succeeded by Yur Temur at some point.[11] In 1128, the Kingdom of Qocho became a vassal of the Qara Khitai.[22]
In 1128, during the reign of Bilge Tekin, the Uighur Kingdom became a vassal state of the Western Liao established by the Khitan. Originally the Western Liao exercised only a loose control over the Uighur state, but soon started to extort excessive taxes and levies in the Uighur lands. In 1209, the Uighur Iduq-qut ("Lord of happiness") Barchuk Art Tegin ordered the death of the Khitan magistrate (shangjian) in an attempt to free his people from the rule of the Western Liao. It just so happened that Chinggis Khan's envoys arrived at this juncture, and fearing retaliation from the Liao, he immediately sent envoys to Mongolia to express his willingness to acknowledge allegiance to Chinggis in exchange from protection.[22]
— George Qingzhi Zhao
In 1209, the Kingdom of Qocho became a vassal of the Mongol Empire.[9]
I must, however, point out that, although Chinggis Khan adopted the ruler of the Uighur state Barchukh Art Tegin as his "fifth son", the Uighur state never became the "fifth khanate", as has been suggested by some scholars. The Uighur state was not independent, but was part of the Mongol empire. During the early Yuan dynasty, at least before the Princes' rebellions, the Yuan central government exercised a tight control over the Uighur state. Although the Mongol royal family maintained a marriage relationship with the Uighur Idu-qut family for almost a century, the women who were married into Uighurstan were not the daughters of the Yuan emperors, but were mostly descendants of Ogedei Khan who had lost the throne to the descendants of Tolui, his younger brother. At the same time, although the Mongol royal family continued to marry their Princesses to the Uighur Iduqut, not a single one of the Mongol Khans or Yuan Emperors married a Uighur Princess.[23]
— George Qingzhi Zhao
In 1229, Barčuq Art iduq-qut succeeded Yur Temur.[11] In, 1242 Kesmez iduq-qut succeeded Barčuq Art iduq-qut.[11] In 1246, Salïndï Tigin iduq-qut succeeded Kesmez iduq-qut.[11] In 1253, Ögrünch Tigin iduq-qut succeeded Salïndï Tigin iduq-qut.[11] In 1257, Mamuraq Tigin iduq-qut succeeded Ögrünch Tigin iduq-qut, who was executed for supporting the Ogodeid branch of the Genghisid family.[11] In 1266, Qosqar Tigin iduq-qut succeeded Mamuraq Tigin iduq-qut.[11] In 1280, Negüril Tigin iduq-qut succeeded Qosqar Tigin iduq-qut.[11]
In 1318, Negüril Tigin iduq-qut died.[11] Later, the Kingdom of Qocho became part of the Chagatai Khanate. In 1322, Tämir Buqa iduq-qut rose to power.[11] In 1330, Senggi iduq-qut succeeded Tämir Buqa iduq-qut.[11] In 1332, Taipindu iduq-qut succeeded Senggi iduq-qut.[11] In 1352, Ching Timür iduq-qut succeeded Taipindu iduq-qut and was the last known ruler governor of the kingdom.[11] By the 1370s, the Kingdom of Qocho ceased to exist.
Religion
[edit]

Mainly Turkic and Tocharian, but also Chinese and Iranian peoples such as the Sogdians were assimilated into the Uyghur Kingdom of Qocho.[24] Chinese were among the population of Qocho.[25] Peter B. Golden writes that the Uyghurs not only adopted the writing system and religious faiths of the Sogdians, such as Manichaeism, Buddhism, and Christianity, but also looked to the Sogdians as "mentors" while gradually replacing them in their roles as Silk Road traders and purveyors of culture.[26]
During the rule of the Qocho Kingdom, some of their subjects also began adopting Islam, as evident when the Idiqut threatened to retaliate against the Muslims of his lands and "destroy the mosques" if Manichaeans were persecuted in neighbouring Khorasan. He emphasized that Muslims in Qocho were "more numerous" than Manichaeans under Islamic rule, and he was ultimately successful in staying the persecutions in Khorasan. This episode was recorded by Arab bibliographer Ibn Al-Nadim, although he referred to the Qocho Idiqut as the "King of China".[27][28]
Manichaeism
[edit]The Uyghur ruling family of Qocho were mainly practitioners of Manichaeism until the early 11th century, although by the 960s, they also supported Buddhism. When Al-Muqtadir (r. 908–932) of the Abbasid Caliphate began persecuting Manichaeans in what is now Iraq, the ruler of Qocho sent a letter to Nasr II of the Samanid Empire threatening to retaliate against Muslims in his realm.[27][28] Manichaean monks accompanied Uyghur embassies from 934 to 951, while between 965 and 1022, the accompanying monks were Buddhists. Manichaeism in Qocho probably reached its peak in 866 and was gradually replaced by Buddhism afterward. This shift was noticeable by 1008 when Manichaean temples were converted to Buddhist temples. Part of the reason for Manichaeism's decline may have been the lifestyle of the Manichaean clergy. A decree discovered in Turpan reports that Manichaean clerics lived in great comfort, possessed estates with serfs and slaves, ate fine food, and wore expensive garments.[29] One of the most important medieval Uyghur documents is a 9th-century decree to a Manichaean monastery affixed with 11 seals in Chinese characters saying: "Seal of the cabinet minister and of the Il Ugasi ministers of the great, fortunate Uyghur government." The document details a dramatized dialogue between Mani and a prince, and testifies to the rich cultural life of the Qocho kingdom.[30]
Chinese Buddhism
[edit]Tang rule over Qocho and Turfan left a lasting Chinese Buddhist influence on the area. Tang names remained on more than 50 Buddhist temples with Emperor Taizong of Tang's edicts stored in the "Imperial Writings Tower" and Chinese dictionaries like Jingyun, Yupian, Tang yun, and da zang jing (Buddhist scriptures) stored inside the Buddhist temples. Uyghur Buddhists studied the Chinese language and used Chinese books like the Thousand Character Classic and the Qieyun. It was written that "In Qocho city were more than fifty monasteries, all titles of which are granted by the emperors of the Tang dynasty, which keep many Buddhist texts as the Tripiṭaka, Tangyun, Yupuan, Jingyin etc."[31]
The Uyghurs of Qocho continued to produce the Chinese Qieyun rime dictionary and developed their own pronunciations of Chinese characters.[32][better source needed] They viewed the Chinese script as "very prestigious" so when they developed the Old Uyghur alphabet, based on the Syriac script, they deliberately switched it to vertical like Chinese writing from its original horizontal position in Syriac.[33]
While Persian monks still maintained a Manichaean temple in the kingdom, there was continued respect for Tang dynasty legacies and Buddhism. There were over fifty Buddhist temples, the name inscriptions on their gates all presented by the Tang court. The edicts of Emperor Taizong of Tang were carefully stored in an "Imperial Writings Tower." Indeed, the 10th century Persian geography book Hudud al-'Alam called Qocho, the capital city, "Chinese town".[34]
Ethnicity
[edit]This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (July 2018) |
James A. Millward claimed that the Uyghurs were generally "Mongoloid" (a term meaning "appearing ethnically Eastern or Inner Asian"), giving as an example the images of Uyghur patrons of Buddhism in Bezeklik, temple 9, until they began to mix with the Tarim Basin's original, Indo-European-speaking "Caucasoid" inhabitants,[35] such as the so-called Tocharians. Buddhist Uyghurs created the Bezeklik murals.[36]
Religious conflict
[edit]

Kara-Khanid Khanate
[edit]The Uyghurs of Qocho were Buddhists whose religious identity were intertwined with their religion. Qocho was a Buddhist state with both state-sponsored Mahayana Buddhism and Manichaeism. The Uyghurs sponsored the construction of many of the temple-caves in what is now called the Bezeklik Caves. Although they retained some of their culture, they were heavily influenced by the indigenous peoples of western China and abandoned the Old Turkic alphabet in favor of a modified Sogdian alphabet, which later came to be known as the Old Uyghur alphabet.[38] The Idiquts (the title of the Qocho rulers) ruled independently until they become a vassal state of the Qara Khitai (Chinese: "Western Liao").
They do not cremate their dead, but bury the dead without coffins. They always bury the dead with the head facing west. Their monks do not shave their heads, and there are no painted or sculpted images in their temples. The language of their scriptures is also unintelligible to us. Only in Hezhou (i.e., Gaochang/Qocho) and Shazhou (i.e., Dunhuang) are the temples and images like those of the Central Lands, and in those temples they recite Buddhist scriptures written in the Chinese (Han) script.[14]
— Wugusun Zhongduan
The Buddhist Uyghurs frequently came into conflict with their western Muslim neighbors.[39] Muslim Turks described the Uyghurs in a number of derogatory ways. For example, the "Compendium of the Turkic Dialects" by Mahmud al-Kashgari states that "just as the thorn should be cut at its root, so the Uighur should be struck on the eye".[40] They also used the derogatory word "Tat" to describe the Buddhist Uyghurs, which means "infidels". Uyghurs were also called dogs.[41][42][43] While al-Kashgari displayed a different attitude towards the Turk diviners beliefs and "national customs", he expressed towards Buddhism a hatred in his Diwan where he wrote the verse cycle on the war against Uyghur Buddhists. Buddhist origin words like toyin (a cleric or priest) and Burxān or Furxan[44][45] (meaning Buddha,[46][47] acquiring the generic meaning of "idol" in the Turkic language of Kashgari) had negative connotations to Muslim Turks.[48][49]
The Uyghurs were subjected to attacks by Muslim Turks, according to Kashgari's work.[50] The Kara-Khanid Khanate's ruler Sultan Satuq Bughra Khan razed Qocho's Buddhist temples in the Minglaq province across the Ili region.[51][52][53][54] Buddhist murals at the Bezeklik Thousand Buddha Caves were damaged by local Muslim population whose religion proscribed figurative images of sentient beings, the eyes and mouths in particular were often gouged out. Pieces of murals were also broken off for use as fertilizer by the locals.[55] The Islamic–Buddhist conflict from the 11th to 12th centuries is still recalled in the forms of the Khotan Imam Asim Sufi shrine celebration and other Sufi holy site celebrations. Bezeklik's Thousand Buddha Caves are an example of religiously motivated vandalism against portraits of religious and human figures.[56]
According to Kashgari's Three Turkic Verse Cycles, the "infidel tribes" suffered three defeats, one at the hands of the Karakhanids in the Irtysh Valley, one by unspecified Muslim Turks, and one inflicted upon "a city between the Tangut and China", Qatun Sini, at the hands of the Tangut Khan.[57][58] The war against Buddhist, shamanist, and Manichaean Uyghurs was considered a jihad by the Kara-Khanids.[59][60][61][62] Imams and soldiers who died in the battles against the Uyghur Buddhists and Khotan are revered as saints.[63] It is possible the Muslims drove some Uyghur Buddhist monks towards taking asylum in the Tangut Western Xia dynasty.[64]
There are many varieties of people in that country. Their hair and beards are thick and curly like wool, and vary widely in shade from black to yellow. One sees only the eyes and noses on their faces [because of all the facial hair]. Their tastes and habits are also different from ours. There are Mosuluman (Muslim) Uighurs who are cruel by nature and eat only meat from animals that they have just killed with their own hands. Even when fasting, they drink wine and eat without any sense of unease. There are Yilizhu (Christian) Uighurs who are quite weak and cowardly and dislike killing; when fasting, they do not eat meat. There are Yindu (Indian) Uighurs who have black skin and are simple and honest. There are too many other kinds for me to list them all. Their king selects his eunuchs from those of the Yindu (Indians) who are dark and ugly and uses fire to brand their faces.[14]
— Wugusun Zhongduan
Mongol rule
[edit]
In 1209, the Kara-Khoja ruler Baurchuk Art Tekin declared his allegiance to the Mongols under Genghis Khan and the kingdom existed as a vassal state until 1335. After submitting to the Mongols, the Uyghurs served the Mongol rulers as bureaucrats, providing the expertise that the initially illiterate nomads lacked.[65] Qocho continued exist as a vassal to the Mongols of the Yuan dynasty, and were allied to the Yuan against the Chagatai Khanate. Eventually the Chagatai khan Ghiyas-ud-din Baraq eliminated Yuan influence over Qocho. When the Mongols placed the Uyghurs in control of the Koreans at court, the Korean king objected. Emperor Kublai Khan rebuked the Korean king, saying that the Uyghur king ranked higher than the Karluk Kara-Khanid ruler, who in turn was ranked higher than the Korean King, who was ranked last, because the Uyghurs surrendered to the Mongols first, the Karluks surrendered after the Uyghurs, and the Koreans surrendered last, and that the Uyghurs surrendered peacefully without violently resisting.[66][67] A hybrid court was used when Han Chinese and Uyghurs were in involved in legal issues.[68]
Alans were recruited into the Mongol forces with one unit called the Asud or "Right Alan Guard", which was combined with "recently surrendered" soldiers, Mongols, and Chinese soldiers stationed in the area of the former kingdom of Qocho. In Beshbalik (now Jimsar County), the Mongols established a Chinese military colony led by Chinese general Qi Kongzhi.[69]
Conquest by Muslim Chagatais
[edit]The last Buddhist Uyghurs of Qocho and Turpan were converted to Islam by force during a Jihad (holy war) at the hands of the Chagatai Khanate ruler Khizr Khoja (r. 1389–1399).[70] Mirza Haidar Dughlat's Tarikh-i-Rashidi (c. 1540, in Persian) wrote, "(Khizr Khoja) undertook a campaign against Karakhodja [Qocho] and Turfan, two very important towns in China, and forced their inhabitants to become Muslims".[71] The Chagatai Khanate also conquered Hami, where the Buddhist religion was also purged and replaced with Islam.[72] Ironically after being converted to Islam, the descendants of the Uyghurs in Turpan failed to retain memory of their Buddhist legacy and were led to believe that the "infidel Kalmuks" (Dzungar people) were the ones who built Buddhist monuments in their area. The Encyclopaedia of Islam wrote "By then the Turks of the Turfan ... forgetting all the other highlights of their past, they attributed the Buddhist and other monuments to the 'infidel Kalmuks'."[73][74][75][76]
The Islamic conversion forced on the Buddhist city of Hami was the final blow to Uyghur Buddhism,[59][77][78] although some Buddhist influence in the names of Turpan Muslims still remained.[79] Since Islam reached them much after other cities in the Tarim Basin, personal names of pre-Islamic Old Uyghur origin are still used in Hami and Turpan while Uyghurs to the west use mostly Islamic names of Arabic origin.[80] Cherrypicking of history of Xinjiang with the intention of projecting an image of either irreligiosity or piousness of Islam in Uyghur culture has been done for various reasons.[81]
After the conversion to Islam by Uyghurs, the term "Uyghur" fell out of use until it was revived in 1921.[82][83]
List of kings (idiquts)
[edit]| History of the Turkic peoples pre–14th century |
|---|
| History of Xinjiang |
|---|
The Kingdom of Qocho's rulers trace their lineage to Qutlugh of the Ediz dynasty of the Uyghur Khaganate. There are numerous gaps in our knowledge of the Uyghur rulers of Qocho prior to the thirteenth century. The title of the ruler of Qocho was idiqut or iduq qut. In 1308, Nolen Tekin was granted the title Prince of Gaochang by the Yuan Emperor Ayurbarwada. The following list of rulers is drawn mostly from Turghun Almas, Uyghurlar (Almaty, 1992), vol. 1, pp. 180–85.[84] Named rulers based on various sources of other languages are also included.[85][11]
- 850–866: Pan Tekin (Pangtele)
- 866–871: Boko Tekin
... - 940–948: Irdimin Khan
- 948–985: Arslan (Zhihai) Khan
... - 954: Ilig Bilgä T[e]ngri
- 981: Arslan Bilgä T[e]ngri ilig
- 996-1007: Bügü Bilgä T[e]ngri ilig
- 1007-1024: Alp Arsla Qutlugh Kül Bilgä T[e]ngri Qan
- 1024: Kül Bilgä T[e]ngri Qan
- 1068: T[e]ngri Bügü il Bilgä Arslan Tngri Uighur Tärkän
- 1123: Bilgä
- 1126–????: Bilge (Biliege/Bilgä) Tekin
... - ????–????: Isen Tomur
... - 1208/1229–1235/1241: Baurchuq (Barchukh) Art Tekin
- 1229: Yue-er Tie-mu-er
- 1235/1242–1245/1246: Qusmayin (Kesmez)
- 1246–1253/1255: Salun (Salindi) Tekin
- 1253/1255–1257/1265: Oghrunzh (Ogrunch) Tekin
- 1257/1265–1265/1266: Mamuraq Tekin
- 1266–1276/1280: Qozhighar (Qosqar) Tekin
- 1276/1280–1318: Nolen (Neguril) Tekin
- 1309/1318: Kiräsiz iduq-qut
- 1309/1318-1326/1334: Köncök iduq-qut
- 1318/1322–1327/1330: Tomur (Tamir) Buqa
- 1327/1330–1331/1332: Sunggi (Senggi) Tekin
- 1331/1332–1335/1352: Taypan (Taipingnu)
- 1335–1353: Yuelutiemur
- 1352-1360: Ching Timür iduq-qut
- 1353–????: Sangge
Image gallery
[edit]-
Uyghur king from Turfan
-
Uyghur Prince from the Bezeklik murals
-
Uyghur noble from the Bezeklik murals
-
Uyghur Manichaean Elect depicted on a temple banner from Qocho
-
Uyghur Princesses from the Bezeklik murals
-
Uyghur Princes from the Bezeklik murals
-
Uyghur donor from the Bezeklik murals
-
Uyghur Manichaean Electae from Qocho
-
Uyghur Manichaean clergymen from Qocho
-
Manicheans from Qocho
See also
[edit]References
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ Trombert, Éric; de La Vaissière, Étienne (2005). Les sogdiens en Chine. École française d'Extrême-Orient. p. 299. ISBN 978-2-85539-653-8.
- ^ Hansen, Valerie. "The Impact of the Silk Road Trade on a Local Community: The Turfan Oasis, 500–800" (PDF). Les Sogdiens en Chine.
- ^ Teiser, Stephen F. (April 1, 2003). The Scripture on the Ten Kings: And the Making of Purgatory in Medieval Chinese Buddhism. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 55ff. ISBN 978-0-8248-2776-2.
- ^ Jin, Yijiu (January 9, 2017). Islam. Brill. p. 105. ISBN 978-90-474-2800-8.
- ^ Joint Centre for Asia Pacific Studies (1996). Cultural contact, history and ethnicity in inner Asia: papers presented at the Central and Inner Asian Seminar, University of Toronto, March 4, 1994 and March 3, 1995. Joint Centre for Asia Pacific Studies. p. 137. ISBN 9781895296228.
- ^ Sir Charles Eliot (January 4, 2016). Hinduism and Buddhism: An Historical Sketch. Sai. pp. 1075ff. GGKEY:4TQAY7XLN48.
- ^ Baij Nath Puri (1987). Buddhism in Central Asia. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 77ff. ISBN 978-81-208-0372-5.
- ^ Eliot, Charles (1998). Hinduism and Buddhism: An Historical Sketch. Psychology Press. pp. 205ff. ISBN 978-0-7007-0679-2.
- ^ a b Zhao 2008, p. 163.
- ^ Millward 2007, p. 46.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w "Huihe 回紇, Huihu 回鶻, Weiwur 維吾爾, Uyghurs (www.chinaknowledge.de)".
- ^ Drompp 2005, p. 198.
- ^ Baumer 2012, p. 313.
- ^ a b c d "Story Map Journal".
- ^ a b c d Baumer 2012, p. 314.
- ^ a b Rong 2013, p. 42.
- ^ Baumer 2012, p. 312.
- ^ Hua Tao (2015). "THE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE QOCHO UYGHURS AND THE QITAY-LIAO DYNASTY". Eurasian Studies. III: 440–454.
- ^ Millward 2007, p. 48-49.
- ^ Rong, Xinjian (October 24, 2022). "Gaochang in the Second Half of the 5th Century and Its Relations with the Rouran Qaghanate and the Kingdoms of the Western Regions". The Silk Road and Cultural Exchanges between East and West. Brill. pp. 577–578. doi:10.1163/9789004512597_006. ISBN 978-90-04-51259-7.
- ^ Baumer 2012, p. 315-316.
- ^ a b Zhao 2008, p. 166.
- ^ Zhao 2008, p. 164-165.
- ^ Millward 2007, pp. 47ff.
- ^ Millward 2007, pp. 53ff.
- ^ Golden, Peter B. (2011). Central Asia in World History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 47. ISBN 978-0-19-515947-9.
- ^ a b Michal Biran (2005). The Empire of the Qara Khitai in Eurasian History Between China and the Islamic World. Cambridge University Press. p. 177. ISBN 9780521842266.
- ^ a b BeDuhn, J (2009). New Light on Manichaeism. BRILL. p. 143. ISBN 9789004172852.
- ^ Baumer 2012, p. 315–316.
- ^ Kamberi, Dolkun (1999). "A survey of Uyghur documents from Turpan and their importance for Asian and Central Eurasian history". Central Asian Survey. 18 (3): 276–401. doi:10.1080/02634939995588.
- ^ Abdurishid Yakup (2005). The Turfan Dialect of Uyghur. Otto Harrassowitz. pp. 180ff. ISBN 978-3-447-05233-7.
- ^ Takata, Tokio. "The Chinese Language in Turfan with a special focus on the Qieyun fragments" (PDF). Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University. pp. 7–9. Retrieved September 15, 2015.
- ^ Gorelova, Liliya (2002). Manchu Grammar. Brill. p. 49. ISBN 978-90-04-12307-6.
- ^ Millward 2007, pp. 49ff.
- ^ Millward 2007, p. 43.
- ^ Modern Chinese Religion I (2 vol.set): Song-Liao-Jin-Yuan (960-1368 AD). BRILL. December 8, 2014. pp. 895–. ISBN 978-90-04-27164-7.
- ^ SKUPNIEWICZ, Patryk (Siedlce University, Poland) (2017). Crowns, hats, turbans and helmets. The headgear in Iranian history volume I: Pre-Islamic Period. Siedlce-Tehran: K. Maksymiuk & G. Karamian. p. 253. ISBN 9788362447190.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Souček 2000, pp. 49, 79.
- ^ Devin DeWeese (November 1, 2010). Islamization and Native Religion in the Golden Horde: Baba TŸkles and Conversion to Islam in Historical and Epic Tradition. Penn State Press. pp. 152–. ISBN 978-0-271-04445-3.
- ^ Herzig, Edmund (November 30, 2014). The Age of the Seljuqs. I.B.Tauris. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-78076-947-9.
- ^ Edmund Herzig (November 30, 2014). The Age of the Seljuqs. I.B.Tauris. pp. 13ff. ISBN 978-1-78076-947-9.
- ^ Essays harvard.edu p. 160.
- ^ Harvard Ukrainian studies. Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute. 1980. p. 160.
- ^ Giovanni Stary (1996). Proceedings of the 38th Permanent International Altaistic Conference (PIAC): Kawasaki, Japan, August 7–12, 1995. Harrassowitz Verlag in Kommission. pp. 17, 27. ISBN 978-3-447-03801-0.
- ^ Hamilton, James Russell (1971). Conte bouddhique du bon et du mauvais prince. Éditions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique. p. 114.
- ^ Linguistica Brunensia. Masaryk University. 2009. p. 66.
- ^ Schmalzriedt, Egidius; Haussig, Hans Wilhelm (2004). Die Mythologie der mongolischen Volksreligion. Klett-Cotta. p. 956. ISBN 978-3-12-909814-1.
- ^ Dankoff, Robert (January–March 1975). "Kāšġarī on the Beliefs and Superstitions of the Turks". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 95 (1). American Oriental Society: 69. doi:10.2307/599159. JSTOR 599159.
- ^ Dankoff, Robert (2008). From Mahmud Kaşgari to Evliya Çelebi. Isis Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-975-428-366-2.
- ^ Harvard Ukrainian studies. Harvard Ukrainian Research Instituteb. 1980. p. 159.
- ^ Dust in the Wind: Retracing Dharma Master Xuanzang's Western Pilgrimage. Rhythms Monthly. 2006. p. 479. ISBN 978-986-81419-8-8.
- ^ Dankoff, Robert (2008). From Mahmud Kaşgari to Evliya Çelebi. Isis Press. p. 35. ISBN 978-975-428-366-2.
- ^ Dankoff, Robert (2008). From Mahmud Kaşgari to Evliya Çelebi. Isis Press. p. 35. ISBN 978-975-428-366-2.
- ^ Harvard Ukrainian studies. Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute. 1980. p. 160.
- ^ Whitfield, Susan (2010). "A place of safekeeping? The vicissitudes of the Bezeklik murals". In Agnew, Neville (ed.). Conservation of ancient sites on the Silk Road: proceedings of the second International Conference on the Conservation of Grotto Sites, Mogao Grottoes, Dunhuang, People's Republic of China (PDF). Getty. pp. 95–106. ISBN 978-1-60606-013-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 30, 2012.
- ^ Dillon, Michael (August 1, 2014). Xinjiang and the Expansion of Chinese Communist Power: Kashgar in the Early Twentieth Century. Routledge. pp. 17ff. ISBN 978-1-317-64721-8.
- ^ Dankoff, Robert (2008). From Mahmud Kaşgari to Evliya Çelebi. Isis Press. p. 27. ISBN 978-975-428-366-2.
- ^ Harvard Ukrainian studies. Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute. 1980. p. 151.
- ^ a b Jiangping Wang (October 12, 2012). Glossary of Chinese Islamic Terms 中国伊斯兰教词汇表 [Chinese Islamic Glossary]. Routledge. pp. xvi ff. ISBN 978-1-136-10650-7.
- ^ Jiangping Wang (October 12, 2012). Glossary of Chinese Islamic Terms. Routledge. pp. xvi. ISBN 978-1-136-10658-3.
- ^ Jianping Wang (2001). 中国伊斯兰教词汇表 [Chinese Islamic Glossary]. Psychology Press. pp. xvi. ISBN 978-0-7007-0620-4.
- ^ Millward (2007), p. 43.
- ^ David, Brophy (April 4, 2016). Uyghur Nation: Reform and Revolution on the Russia–China Frontier. Harvard University Press. pp. 29ff. ISBN 978-0-674-97046-5.
- ^ Dunnell, Ruth W. (January 1996). The Great State of White and High: Buddhism and State Formation in Eleventh-Century Xia. University of Hawaii Press. p. 54. ISBN 978-0-8248-1719-0.
- ^ Souček 2000, p. 105.
- ^ Rossabi, Morris (1983). China Among Equals: The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th–14th Centuries. University of California Press. p. 247ff. ISBN 978-0-520-04562-0.
- ^ Yuan Empire Haw 2014p. 4.
- ^ Twitchett, Denis C.; Franke, Herbert; King Fairbank, John (1994). The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 6: Alien Regimes and Border States, 907–1368. Cambridge University Press. p. 29. ISBN 978-0-521-24331-5.
- ^ Rossabi, Morris (1983). China Among Equals: The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th–14th Centuries. University of California Press. pp. 255ff. ISBN 978-0-520-04562-0.
- ^ Millward 2007, pp. 69ff.
- ^ Soucek, Priscilia P. (2000). Bearman, Peri (ed.). The Encyclopaedia of Islam. Vol. X: T–U (new ed.). Brill. p. 677.
- ^ Dust in the Wind: Retracing Dharma Master Xuanzang's Western Pilgrimage. Rhythms Monthly. 2006. pp. 480ff. ISBN 978-986-81419-8-8.
- ^ Soucek, Priscilia P. (2000). Bearman, Peri (ed.). The Encyclopaedia of Islam. Vol. X: T–U (new ed.). Brill. p. 677.
- ^ "The Encyclopaedia of Islam". December 8, 2009. Retrieved July 18, 2022.[full citation needed]
- ^ "The Encyclopaedia of Islam". December 8, 2009. Retrieved July 18, 2022.[full citation needed]
- ^ "The Encyclopaedia of Islam". December 8, 2009. Retrieved July 18, 2022.[full citation needed]
- ^ Jiangping Wang (October 12, 2012). Glossary of Chinese Islamic Terms. Routledge. pp. xvi ff. ISBN 978-1-136-10658-3.
- ^ Jianping Wang (2001). 中国伊斯兰教词汇表 [Chinese Islamic Glossary]. Psychology Press. pp. xvi–. ISBN 978-0-7007-0620-4.
- ^ Lee, Adela C. Y. "Viticulture and Viniculture in the Turfan Region". Silkroad Foundation. Archived from the original on August 7, 2018. Retrieved June 22, 2016.
- ^ Bellér-Hann, Ildikó (2007). Situating the Uyghurs Between China and Central Asia. Ashgate. pp. 113ff. ISBN 978-0-7546-7041-4.
- ^ Dillon, Michael (August 1, 2014). Xinjiang and the Expansion of Chinese Communist Power: Kashgar in the Early Twentieth Century. Routledge. pp. 4ff. ISBN 978-1-317-64721-8.
- ^ Gladney 2004, p. 213.
- ^ Bellér-Hann 2008, p. 50-51.
- ^ George Qingzhi Zhao (June 2008). Marriage as Political Strategy and Cultural Expression: Mongolian Royal Marriages from World Empire to Yuan Dynasty. Asian thought and culture. Vol. 60. Peter Lang. pp. 165–66, 174–76. ISBN 978-1433102752. OCLC 192134589.
- ^ 西州回鶻統治者稱號研究 Archived April 7, 2023, at the Wayback Machine ihp.sinica.edu.tw
Sources
[edit]- Asimov, M.S. (1998), History of civilizations of Central Asia Volume IV The age of achievement: A.D. 750 to the end of the fifteenth century Part One The historical, social and economic setting, UNESCO Publishing
- Barfield, Thomas (1989), The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China, Basil Blackwell
- Baumer, Christoph (2012), The History of Central Asia: The Age of the Steppe Warriors
- Bellér-Hann, Ildikó (2008). Community Matters in Xinjiang, 1880-1949: Towards a Historical Anthropology of the Uyghur. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-16675-2.
- Benson, Linda (1998), China's last Nomads: the history and culture of China's Kazaks, M.E. Sharpe
- Bregel, Yuri (2003), An Historical Atlas of Central Asia, Brill
- Bosworth, Clifford Edmund (2000), The Age of Achievement: A.D. 750 to the End of the Fifteenth Century - Vol. 4, Part II : The Achievements (History of Civilizations of Central Asia), UNESCO Publishing
- Bughra, Imin (1983), The history of East Turkestan, Istanbul: Istanbul publications
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link) - Drompp, Michael Robert (2005), Tang China And The Collapse Of The Uighur Empire: A Documentary History, Brill
- Gladney, Dru (2004). Dislocating China: Reflections on Muslims, Minorities, and Other Subaltern Subjects. C. Hurst.
- Golden, Peter B. (2011), Central Asia in World History, Oxford University Press
- Haywood, John (1998), Historical Atlas of the Medieval World, AD 600-1492, Barnes & Noble
- Latourette, Kenneth Scott (1964), The Chinese, their history and culture, Volumes 1-2, Macmillan
- Mackerras, Colin (1990), "Chapter 12 - The Uighurs", in Sinor, Denis (ed.), The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, Cambridge University Press, pp. 317–342, ISBN 0-521-24304-1
- Mergid, Toqto'a (1344), History of Liao
- Millward, James A. (2007), Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang, Columbia University Press
- Mackerras, Colin (1972). The Uighur Empire: According to the T'ang Dynastic Histories, A Study in Sino-Uighur Relations, 744–840. Australian National University Press. ISBN 0-7081-0457-6.
- Rong, Xinjiang (2013), Eighteen Lectures on Dunhuang, Brill
- Sinor, Denis (1990), The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-24304-9
- Souček, Svat (2000), A History of Inner Asia, Cambridge University Press
- Xiong, Victor (2008), Historical Dictionary of Medieval China, United States of America: Scarecrow Press, Inc., ISBN 978-0810860537
- Xue, Zongzheng (1992), Turkic peoples, 中国社会科学出版社
- Zhao, George Qingzhi (2008), Marriage as Political Strategy and Cultural Expression
Further reading
[edit]- Chotscho : vol.1.
- Moriyasu Takao (2004). "The Sha-Chou [Dunhuang] Uighurs and the West Uighur Kingdom". Acta Asiatica. 78. ISBN 9780813535333.
Qocho
View on GrokipediaOrigins and Historical Development
Collapse of the Uyghur Khaganate and Migration Westward
The Uyghur Khaganate, which had dominated the Mongolian steppe since its establishment in 744 AD, disintegrated in 840 AD following a catastrophic invasion by the Yenisei Kyrgyz. A severe winter in 839–840 AD caused widespread livestock deaths, triggering famine, disease, and social unrest among the nomadic Uyghur population, whose economy relied heavily on pastoralism.[5] This environmental shock eroded military cohesion and invited external aggression; the Kyrgyz, originating from southern Siberia, capitalized on the disarray to launch a decisive campaign, sacking the Uyghur capital of Ordu-Baliq and executing the reigning khagan, possibly Culay or his successor.[5] [6] The Khaganate's fall marked the end of Uyghur hegemony in the eastern steppes, with the Kyrgyz assuming control over former Uyghur territories by 840–842 AD. Surviving Uyghur elites and tribes, facing enslavement or subjugation, initiated mass migrations southward and westward to evade Kyrgyz pursuit.[7] These movements dispersed Uyghur groups across regions including northern China, the Gansu corridor, and Central Asia, but a substantial faction directed toward the Tarim Basin's eastern oases, particularly Turfan and the abandoned city of Gaochang (later Qocho).[8] In the Turfan depression, Uyghur refugees occupied depopulated urban sites previously held by Tibetan forces or Tang Chinese garrisons, leveraging the region's irrigation systems and agricultural potential for sedentary settlement.[8] This migration, occurring primarily in the decade following 840 AD, transplanted steppe administrative practices, Manichaean religious institutions, and Rung script usage into an oasis environment, laying the groundwork for the independent Qocho polity by the mid-9th century.[5] The influx destabilized local dynamics, displacing indigenous Tocharian and Sogdian communities while fostering Uyghur cultural dominance in the eastern Tian Shan.[9]Foundation as an Independent Kingdom
The Uyghur Khaganate collapsed in 840 CE following a devastating invasion by the Yenisei Kyrgyz, who sacked the capital Ordu-Baliq and killed the last khagan, leading to the dispersal of Uyghur elites and populations.[7] Various Uyghur factions migrated southward and westward, seeking refuge in regions previously influenced by their empire, including the Hexi Corridor and the eastern Tarim Basin.[7] One such group, led by Pan Tekin of the Ädiz clan, relocated to the Turpan Depression, where they seized control of the oases around Gaochang (ancient Qocho) from local rulers and Tibetan garrisons weakened by prior conflicts.[10] This migration capitalized on earlier Uyghur military expeditions, such as the 792 CE campaign that temporarily captured Gaochang from Tibetan forces, facilitating a permanent settlement.[11] By approximately 850 CE, Pan Tekin had consolidated power, establishing the foundations of an independent Uyghur polity with administrative centers at Qocho (winter capital, near modern Turpan) and Beshbalik (summer capital).[12] The kingdom's formal independence crystallized around 866 CE, when the ruler—likely Pan Tekin or his successor—adopted the title Idiqut ("fortunate sovereign" or "lord of happiness"), signifying sovereignty and drawing on pre-existing Turkic titulature.[1] This marked Qocho's emergence as a sedentary state blending nomadic Uyghur traditions with local Buddhist and Manichaean influences, distinct from the Ganzhou Uyghur kingdom established concurrently in Gansu by another migrant faction.[11] The new realm controlled key Silk Road routes, leveraging agriculture in fertile oases and trade to sustain its autonomy amid regional powers like the Tibetan Empire and emerging Qarakhanids.[10]Diplomatic and Economic Ties with Chinese Dynasties
Following the migration of Uyghur remnants to the Turfan region after the Uyghur Khaganate's collapse in 840 CE, the newly founded Kingdom of Qocho maintained de facto independence amid the Tang dynasty's (618–907 CE) internal fragmentation and loss of western control, with no documented formal tribute or envoys exchanged specifically between Qocho rulers and the Tang court. Earlier Khaganate-era alliances, including military aid against the An Lushan Rebellion (755–763 CE), had elevated Uyghur prestige but dissolved post-840, leaving Qocho to consolidate power locally without Tang suzerainty. Tang cultural legacies, such as administrative scripts and Buddhist iconography, influenced Qocho's sedentary economy and governance, yet diplomatic records emphasize autonomy rather than subordination.[13][8] Diplomatic engagement intensified with the Song dynasty (960–1279 CE), beginning in 981 CE when Idiqut Arslan Khan dispatched tribute missions to the Song court, adopting the self-designated title "Nephew Lion King Arslan Khan of the West Prefecture" to signal hierarchical deference within the Sinocentric tribute framework. The Song emperor was styled as "Uncle," a rhetorical device framing Qocho as a peripheral kin-state, which secured imperial recognition, calendar bestowal, and prestige titles in exchange for nominal tribute goods like horses and regional products. The Song reciprocated by sending official envoy Wang Yande to Gaochang (Qocho's capital) in 981 CE, marking formal reciprocity and periodic embassies thereafter, though interactions waned amid Song's northern threats from Liao and Jin. These ties persisted until Qocho's Mongol submission circa 1209 CE, underscoring pragmatic diplomacy over ideological alignment.[14][15] Economically, Song-Qocho relations channeled Silk Road commerce, with Qocho's oasis agriculture—producing grapes, melons, and grains—and control of eastern Tarim routes enabling exports of horses, furs, jade, and spices to China in tribute convoys, offset by Song gifts of silk bolts, porcelain, and monetary silver that exceeded tribute value, effectively subsidizing bilateral trade. This exchange bolstered Qocho's mercantile prosperity, integrating it into Song's expansive market networks, where western luxuries supplemented domestic shortages, while Qocho accessed Chinese manufactures to diversify beyond pastoral-nomadic dependencies. Tribute missions doubled as trade fairs, fostering merchant networks despite intermittent disruptions from steppe rivals, and highlighting Qocho's role as a buffer facilitating China's indirect access to Central Asian goods without direct territorial overextension.[14][16]Submission and Role under Mongol Rule
In 1209, Idiqut Barchuq Art Tegin of Qocho received an envoy from Genghis Khan and pledged voluntary allegiance, becoming one of the earliest states to submit to Mongol authority without conquest.[17] This submission included executing the Kara-Khitai-appointed overseer (shiḥna) to demonstrate loyalty, thereby ending Qocho's nominal vassalage to the Qara Khitai.[18] In recognition, Genghis Khan adopted Barchuq as a fictive son and granted the kingdom privileged status, allowing the Idiqut line to continue ruling semi-autonomously while providing tribute, troops, and administrative expertise to the Mongols.[7] Qocho's Uyghurs played a pivotal role in Mongol governance due to their established bureaucratic traditions and literacy in the Old Uyghur script, which was adapted into the vertical Mongolian script for imperial records, decrees, and diplomacy.[19] Uyghur elites served as baghshi (teachers and administrators) and secretaries across the empire, contributing to the organization of vast territories from scribes in the imperial chancery to provincial overseers.[19] Under the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368), this integration deepened, with at least six Uyghurs appointed as provincial governors among seventy such positions, reflecting their reliability in fiscal and judicial roles.[2] The kingdom allied with the Yuan against the Chagatai Khanate, supplying military contingents and logistical support during conflicts in Central Asia.[20] This vassal relationship preserved Qocho's internal administration and religious practices until 1335, when it was annexed by Chagatai forces amid Mongol successor state rivalries, ending the Idiqut dynasty's rule.[20]Governance and Administration
The Idiqut Title and Royal Lineage
The Idiqut (Old Uyghur: Iduq Qut), meaning "sacred fortune" or "holy majesty," served as the primary title for Qocho's rulers, marking a departure from the imperial khagan designation used by their Khaganate predecessors to signify the kingdom's more localized authority after the 840 CE collapse.[21][6] This title, a compound of iduq ("sacred" or "fortunate") and qut ("fortune" or "glory"), reflected the ruler's perceived divine favor and wealth, aligning with Manichaean and later Buddhist influences in the court's religious syncretism.[22] The royal lineage of the Idiquts descended from Qutlugh of the Ediz clan, the second imperial dynasty of the Uyghur Khaganate, rather than the primary Yaghlakar line that dominated the eastern steppe empire.[12][5] Ediz migrants, fleeing the Kirghiz conquest in 840, established Qocho around Gaochang by the 850s, with the clan's hereditary claims legitimizing their rule over settled Uyghur populations and assimilated locals.[7] This descent preserved Khaganate prestige, evidenced by inscriptions and diplomatic ties asserting continuity from steppe khagans to Tarim basin sovereigns. Succession followed patrilineal hereditary patterns typical of Turkic dynasties, passing from father to son or close male kin, though records indicate occasional interregnums due to external pressures like Qara Khitai vassalage (1120s–1210s), during which Idiqut family members resided as hostages in the suzerain's court.[7] Post-1209 Mongol overlordship reinforced the lineage's stability, as Idiqut Barchuq's allegiance to Genghis Khan integrated the family into the imperial network without disrupting internal heredity.[5] The dynasty endured until Qocho's conquest by the Chagatai Khanate in 1318, after which surviving Ediz descendants dispersed or assimilated.[12]List of Idiquts and Key Rulers
The idiqut (also spelled idiqut or iduq qut, meaning "lord of fortune" or "holy wealth") was the title borne by the rulers of Qocho, tracing descent from the Ediz dynasty of the earlier Uyghur Khaganate. Historical records for the kingdom's rulers are fragmentary, with significant gaps especially before the 13th century due to limited surviving inscriptions and chronicles; no comprehensive chronology exists from primary sources. Known Idiquts are primarily attested in Mongol-era contexts following the kingdom's vassalage.| Name | Approximate Reign | Key Events and Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Barchuq Art Tegin | c. 1208–1235 | Submitted allegiance to Genghis Khan in 1209, facilitating Uyghur administrative roles in the Mongol Empire; adopted as Genghis's symbolic fifth son, solidifying Qocho's vassal status.[23][10] |
| Qochkar Tegin | Late 13th century | Allied with Kublai Khan through dynastic marriage, reinforcing ties during Yuan oversight; involved in regional conflicts against Chaghadaid forces.[24] |
| Nolen Tekin | Early 14th century | Granted the Chinese title "Prince of Gaochang" by Yuan Emperor Ayurbarwada in 1308, reflecting formalized Mongol-Yuan integration of Qocho's governance.[12] |
Administrative and Military Organization
The Kingdom of Qocho was ruled by an idiqut, a title denoting "holy majesty" or "glory," who exercised centralized authority over the realm.[21] This position succeeded the earlier kaghan title and may have been adopted from the Basmil tribe.[21] The administrative framework drew from the Gök Türk model, lacking the east-west divisions seen in the prior Uyghur Khaganate.[21] A hierarchy of officials supported the idiqut, including ministers with titles such as sängün, ülchi, tutuq, tarqan, bägi, and älchi, though their specific duties are not well-documented.[21] Tutuqs, frequently kin to the ruler, oversaw 11 principal tribes—comprising the nine Tokuz Oghuz groups alongside the Basmil and Karluk—and managed tax collection.[21] The idiqut and nobility maintained a semi-nomadic lifestyle, wintering in Qocho while summering in higher elevations.[25] Militarily, Qocho relied on tribal levies organized along ethnic lines, akin to Gök Türk and earlier Uyghur forces, with an emphasis on cavalry suited to their steppe origins.[21] Detailed records of army composition are scarce, but the kingdom prioritized diplomacy and trade over expansion, subordinating military endeavors after defeats by powers like the Kara-Khitai in the 12th century.[7] Following submission to the Mongols around 1211, Qocho shifted focus to bureaucratic roles, supplying scribes and administrators who adapted the Uyghur script for imperial records rather than fielding large contingents.[10][21]Society and Ethnicity
Ethnic Composition and Assimilation
The Kingdom of Qocho's population was primarily composed of Uyghurs, a Turkic ethnic group that migrated westward from the Mongolian steppes following the collapse of the Uyghur Khaganate in 840 CE. These migrants, numbering in the tens of thousands, settled in the Turfan oasis and Gaochang region, establishing themselves as the dominant group by 843 CE when the kingdom was founded.[14] The ruling idiquts and nobility were Uyghur, maintaining a distinct Turkic identity evidenced in contemporary art and inscriptions.[26] Pre-existing inhabitants included remnants of Tocharian-speaking populations and other oasis dwellers of Indo-European descent, who had occupied the Tarim Basin prior to Uyghur arrival. These groups, along with Sogdian merchants and Buddhist communities, formed a multicultural substrate that the incoming Uyghurs gradually assimilated through intermarriage, language replacement with Old Uyghur (a Turkic script and dialect), and shared economic reliance on agriculture and Silk Road trade.[26] This assimilation process fused local Indo-European elements with Turkic migrants, laying the foundation for the ethnogenesis of the historical Uyghur people in eastern Central Asia.[14] By the 13th century, under Mongol suzerainty after Qocho's submission in 1209 CE, limited Mongol integration occurred, but Uyghurs constituted the majority, with the Turfan area's population estimated at approximately 200,000 individuals predominantly of Uyghur stock. Religious diversity, including Manichaeism, Buddhism, and Nestorian Christianity, reflected ethnic mixing but did not alter the overarching Turkic dominance.[27] The kingdom's end in the 14th century via Chagatai conquest accelerated further blending, as surviving Uyghur communities retained their identity amid shifting overlords.[26]Social Hierarchy and Daily Life
The social hierarchy of Qocho society retained elements of Turkic nomadic traditions while adapting to a sedentary oasis-based structure, with the Idiqut and aristocracy at the apex, followed by religious elites, free commoners including merchants and peasants, and slaves at the base..pdf) The ruling class consisted of the royal lineage and nobles, often bearing titles like tegin, who held administrative and military roles, as evidenced by inscriptions and documents from Turfan. Religious leaders, such as Manichaean elect or Buddhist monks, occupied a privileged stratum due to their spiritual authority and land holdings, influencing both elite and popular customs. Free commoners formed the bulk of the population, comprising urban artisans, merchants active in Silk Road trade, and rural peasants reliant on oasis agriculture. Society was patriarchal, with extended paternal families as the basic unit; males dominated economic transactions, serving as primary debtors and guarantors in contracts, while women had limited independent agency.[28] Property was often shared among brothers, and kinship ties structured social obligations, as seen in Old Uyghur legal documents.[28] Slavery persisted, with individuals, including relatives, bought, sold, or mortgaged for debts; for instance, one contract records a father selling his son for 60 gold coins, reflecting economic pressures and inherited practices from earlier Turkic societies.[28] Marriage was predominantly monogamous among civilians, though patriarchal testaments allowed husbands to restrict widows' remarriage.[28] Daily life centered on oasis settlements like Gaochang and Turfan, where inhabitants maintained irrigation systems for cultivating wheat, grapes, and melons, supplemented by pastoralism among semi-nomadic groups. Civil documents from Turfan reveal routine activities such as loan agreements, property disputes, and trade dealings, particularly illuminating lower-class existence through contracts and testaments. Urban dwellers engaged in craftsmanship and commerce, while religious observances and community festivals integrated spiritual and social elements, as depicted in cave frescoes portraying hierarchical lifestyles from nobility to laborers.[29] Family-centric routines emphasized collective labor and kin support, with secular literacy enabling widespread documentation of personal and economic matters.Linguistic Identity and Old Uyghur Language
The inhabitants of Qocho, known as Gaochang Uyghurs, maintained a distinct Turkic linguistic identity through Old Uyghur, the primary language spoken and written from the kingdom's founding around 843 CE until the 14th century. This language, a direct descendant of the Old Turkic dialects used in the preceding Uyghur Khaganate, functioned as the medium for administration, diplomacy, and daily communication among the ruling elite and populace, reinforcing their ethnic cohesion amid assimilation of local Indo-European groups like Tocharians.[2][30] Old Uyghur exhibited phonological and morphological traits typical of early Turkic languages, including vowel harmony, agglutinative structure, and subject-object-verb word order, though it incorporated loanwords from Sogdian, Chinese, and Sanskrit due to trade and religious exchanges along the Silk Road.[31] The script employed was the Old Uyghur alphabet, an adaptation of the Sogdian cursive derived ultimately from Aramaic, which replaced earlier runic forms after the Uyghurs' migration to the Tarim Basin post-840 CE; this vertical script enabled the transcription of phonetic values suited to Turkic sounds, facilitating widespread literacy in religious contexts.[32] Extant manuscripts from Turfan sites, numbering in the thousands, attest to Old Uyghur's role as a literary language, particularly in translating Buddhist sutras from Chinese and Tocharian into Uyghur for dissemination under royal patronage after the shift from Manichaeism around 965 CE. These texts, including commentaries and hagiographies, preserved phonological shifts and syntactic innovations distinguishing Old Uyghur from its northern antecedents, while administrative documents in Old Uyghur script underscore its use in governance and legal affairs.[33][34] The persistence of Old Uyghur into the Mongol era, even as Middle Chinese influences grew through tributary relations, highlights its centrality to Uyghur cultural continuity until Turkic migrations introduced Karluk dialects, altering the linguistic landscape by the 15th century.[30]Religion
Persistence of Manichaeism
Manichaeism, adopted as the state religion of the Uyghur Khaganate in 762 CE under Bögü Khagan following his encounter with Sogdian Manichaean priests during a campaign in Tang China, persisted after the Khaganate's collapse in 840 CE and the Uyghur migration to the Turim Basin.[35] The refugees established Qocho around 850 CE, transplanting Manichaean institutions including temples, a clerical hierarchy of Elect (priests adhering to strict asceticism) and Hearers (lay supporters), and doctrinal texts translated into the Old Uyghur script.[36] This continuity is evidenced by archaeological finds from Turfan, such as wall paintings, silk fragments, and manuscript leaves depicting Manichaean rituals like the Bema festival, dating primarily from the 8th to 10th centuries CE.[37] In Qocho, Manichaeism retained royal patronage and cultural influence among the Uyghur elite, coexisting with indigenous practices and emerging Buddhist communities, though it faced gradual erosion from the 10th century onward as Mahayana Buddhism gained prominence through local adoption and Silk Road exchanges.[35] Uyghur Manichaean texts, including cosmological treatises and hymnals, continued production into the 11th century, reflecting doctrinal adaptation and syncretic elements with Tengrism and Buddhism, as seen in bilingual manuscripts and artistic motifs blending light-dark dualism with native motifs.[38] Temples near Kocho served as centers for Elect communities, with epitaphs and banners illustrating armored devotees and ritual scenes, underscoring institutional vitality despite demographic shifts toward Buddhism.[37] The religion's decline accelerated under Mongol overlordship from the 13th century, as imperial policies favored Buddhism and shamanism, though isolated Manichaean practices lingered until the Chagatai Khanate's Islamic conquests in the 14th century supplanted remaining dualist holdouts.[39] No records indicate forced suppression in Qocho prior to these external pressures; instead, persistence stemmed from Uyghur cultural inertia and the faith's adaptability, evidenced by over 1,000 Manichaean fragments recovered from Turfan sites, far outnumbering steppe-era survivals.[36] This archaeological corpus, analyzed through radiocarbon dating and paleography, confirms Manichaeism's role as a bridge between imperial Uyghur identity and oasis settlement, even as it yielded to Buddhist dominance by the 11th century.[37]

