Hubbry Logo
Aquaculture of salmonidsAquaculture of salmonidsMain
Open search
Aquaculture of salmonids
Community hub
Aquaculture of salmonids
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Aquaculture of salmonids
Aquaculture of salmonids
from Wikipedia
Aquaculture production of salmonids in tonnes
1950–2010 as reported by the FAO[1]
Salmon farm in the archipelago of Finland

The aquaculture of salmonids is the farming and harvesting of salmonid fish under controlled conditions for both commercial and recreational purposes. Salmonids (particularly salmon and rainbow trout), along with carp and tilapia, are the three most important fish groups in aquaculture.[2] The most commonly commercially farmed salmonid is the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

In the United States, Chinook salmon and rainbow trout are the most commonly farmed salmonids for recreational and subsistence fishing through the National Fish Hatchery System.[3] In Europe, brown trout are the most commonly reared fish for recreational restocking.[4] Commonly farmed non-salmonid fish groups include tilapia, catfish, black sea bass and bream. In 2007, the aquaculture of salmonids was worth USD $10.7 billion globally. Salmonid aquaculture production grew over ten-fold during the 25 years from 1982 to 2007. In 2012, the leading producers of salmonids were Norway, Chile, Scotland and Canada.[5]

Much controversy exists about the ecological and health impacts of intensive salmonids aquaculture. Of particular concern are the impacts on wild salmon and other marine life.

Methods

[edit]
Assynt salmon hatchery, near Inchnadamph in the Scottish Highlands
Very young fertilised salmon eggs, notice the developing eyes and vertebral column.
Salmon egg hatching: In about 24 hr, it will be a fry without the yolk sac.

The aquaculture or farming of salmonids can be contrasted with capturing wild salmonids using commercial fishing techniques. However, the concept of "wild" salmon as used by the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute includes stock enhancement fish produced in hatcheries that have historically been considered ocean ranching. The percentage of the Alaska salmon harvest resulting from ocean ranching depends upon the species of salmon and location.[6][not specific enough to verify] Methods of salmonid aquaculture originated in late 18th-century fertilization trials in Europe. In the late 19th century, salmon hatcheries were used in Europe and North America. From the late 1950s, enhancement programs based on hatcheries were established in the United States, Canada, Japan, and the USSR. The contemporary technique using floating sea cages originated in Norway in the late 1960s.[7]

Salmonids are usually farmed in two stages and in some places maybe more. First, the salmon are hatched from eggs and raised on land in freshwater tanks. Increasing the accumulated thermal units of water during incubation reduces time to hatching.[8] When they are 12 to 18 months old, the smolt (juvenile salmon) are transferred to floating sea cages or net pens anchored in sheltered bays or fjords along a coast. This farming in a marine environment is known as mariculture. There they are fed pelleted feed for another 12 to 24 months, when they are harvested.[9]

Norway produces 33% of the world's farmed salmonids, and Chile produces 31%.[10] The coastlines of these countries have suitable water temperatures and many areas well protected from storms. Chile is close to large forage fisheries which supply fish meal for salmon aquaculture. Scotland and Canada are also significant producers;[11][failed verification] and it was reported in 2012 that the Norwegian government at that time controlled a significant fraction of the Canadian industry.[12]

Modern salmonid farming systems are intensive. Their ownership is often under the control of huge agribusiness corporations, operating mechanized assembly lines on an industrial scale. In 2003, nearly half of the world’s farmed salmon was produced by just five companies.[13]

Hatcheries

[edit]

Modern commercial hatcheries for supplying salmon smolts to aquaculture net pens have been shifting to recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS)s where the water is recycled within the hatchery. This allows location of the hatchery to be independent of a significant fresh water supply and allows economical temperature control to both speed up and slow down the growth rate to match the needs of the net pens.

Conventional hatchery systems operate flow-through, where spring water or other water sources flow into the hatchery. The eggs are then hatched in trays and the salmon smolts are produced in raceways. The waste products from the growing salmon fry and the feed are usually discharged into the local river. Conventional flow-through hatcheries, for example the majority of Alaska's enhancement hatcheries, use more than 100 tonnes (16,000 st) of water to produce a kg of smolts.

An alternative method to hatching in freshwater tanks is to use spawning channels. These are artificial streams, usually parallel to an existing stream with concrete or rip-rap sides and gravel bottoms. Water from the adjacent stream is piped into the top of the channel, sometimes via a header pond to settle out sediment. Spawning success is often much better in channels than in adjacent streams due to the control of floods which in some years can wash out the natural redds. Because of the lack of floods, spawning channels must sometimes be cleaned out to remove accumulated sediment. The same floods which destroy natural redds also clean them out. Spawning channels preserve the natural selection of natural streams as no temptation exists, as in hatcheries, to use prophylactic chemicals to control diseases. However, exposing fish to wild parasites and pathogens using uncontrolled water supplies, combined with the high cost of spawning channels, makes this technology unsuitable for salmon aquaculture businesses. This type of technology is only useful for stock enhancement programs.

Sea cages

[edit]

Sea cages, also called sea pens or net pens, are usually made of mesh framed with steel or plastic. They can be square or circular, 10 to 32 m (33 to 105 ft) across and 10 m (33 ft) deep, with volumes between 1,000 and 10,000 m3 (35,000 and 353,000 cu ft). A large sea cage can contain up to 90,000 fish.

They are usually placed side by side to form a system called a seafarm or seasite, with a floating wharf and walkways along the net boundaries. Additional nets can also surround the seafarm to keep out predatory marine mammals. Stocking densities range from 8 to 18 kg (18 to 40 lb)/m3 for Atlantic salmon and 5 to 10 kilograms (11 to 22 lb)/m3 for Chinook salmon.[9][14]

In contrast to closed or recirculating systems, the open net cages of salmonid farming lower production costs, but provide no effective barrier to the discharge of wastes, parasites, and disease into the surrounding coastal waters.[13] Farmed salmon in open net cages can escape into wild habitats, for example, during storms.

An emerging wave in aquaculture is applying the same farming methods used for salmonids to other carnivorous finfish species, such as cod, bluefin tuna, halibut, and snapper. However, this is likely to have the same environmental drawbacks as salmon farming.[13][15]

A second emerging wave in aquaculture is the development of copper alloys as netting materials. Copper alloys have become important netting materials because they are antimicrobial (i.e., they destroy bacteria, viruses, fungi, algae, and other microbes), so they prevent biofouling (i.e., the undesirable accumulation, adhesion, and growth of microorganisms, plants, algae, tubeworms, barnacles, mollusks, and other organisms). By inhibiting microbial growth, copper alloy aquaculture cages avoid costly net changes that are necessary with other materials. The resistance of organism growth on copper alloy nets also provides a cleaner and healthier environment for farmed fish to grow and thrive.

Feeding

[edit]

With the amount of worldwide fish meal production being almost a constant amount for the last 30+ years and at maximum sustainable yield, much of the fish meal market has shifted from chicken and pig feed to fish and shrimp feeds as aquaculture has grown in this time.[16]

Work continues on developing salmonid diet made from concentrated plant protein.[17] As of 2014, an enzymatic process can be used to lower the carbohydrate content of barley, making it a high-protein fish feed suitable for salmon.[18] Many other substitutions for fish meal are known, and diets containing zero fish meal are possible. For example, a planned closed-containment salmon fish farm in Scotland uses ragworms, algae, and amino acids as feed.[19] Some of the eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in Omega-3 fatty acids may be replaced by land-based (non-marine) algae oil, reducing the harvest of wild fish as fish meal.[20]

However, commercial economic animal diets are determined by least-cost linear programming models that are effectively competing with similar models for chicken and pig feeds for the same feed ingredients, and these models show that fish meal is more useful in aquatic diets than in chicken diets, where they can make the chickens taste like fish.[21] Unfortunately, this substitution can result in lower levels of the highly valued omega-3 content in the farmed product. However, when vegetable oil is used in the growing diet as an energy source and a different finishing diet containing high omega-3 content fatty acids from either fish oil, algae oils, or some vegetable oils are used a few months before harvest, this problem is eliminated.[22]

On a dry-dry basis, 2–4 kg of wild-caught fish are needed to produce 1 kg of salmon.[23] The ratio may be reduced if non-fish sources are added.[20] Wild salmon require about 10 kg of forage fish to produce 1 kg of salmon, as part of the normal trophic level energy transfer. The difference between the two numbers is related to farmed salmon feed containing other ingredients beyond fish meal and because farmed fish do not expend energy hunting.

In 2017 it was reported that the American company Cargill has been researching and developing alternative feeds with EWOS through its internal COMPASS programs in Norway, resulting in the proprietary RAPID feed blend. These methods studied macronutrient profiles of fish feed based upon geography and season. Using RAPID feed, salmon farms reduced the time to maturity of salmon to about 15 months, in a period one-fifth faster than usual.[24][25]

Other feed additives

[edit]

As of 2008, 50-80% of the world fish oil production is fed to farmed salmonids.[26][27]

Farm raised salmonids are also fed the carotenoids astaxanthin and canthaxanthin, so their flesh colour matches wild salmon, which also contain the same carotenoid pigments from their diet in the wild.[28]

Harvesting

[edit]

Modern harvesting methods are shifting towards using wet-well ships to transport live salmon to the processing plant. This allows the fish to be killed, bled, and filleted before rigor has occurred. This results in superior product quality to the customer, along with more humane processing. To obtain maximum quality, minimizing the level of stress is necessary in the live salmon until actually being electrically and percussively killed and the gills slit for bleeding.[29] These improvements in processing time and freshness to the final customer are commercially significant and forcing the commercial wild fisheries to upgrade their processing to the benefit of all seafood consumers.

An older method of harvesting is to use a sweep net, which operates a bit like a purse seine net. The sweep net is a big net with weights along the bottom edge. It is stretched across the pen with the bottom edge extending to the bottom of the pen. Lines attached to the bottom corners are raised, herding some fish into the purse, where they are netted. Before killing, the fish are usually rendered unconscious in water saturated in carbon dioxide, although this practice is being phased out in some countries due to ethical and product quality concerns. More advanced systems use a percussive-stun harvest system that kills the fish instantly and humanely with a blow to the head from a pneumatic piston. They are then bled by cutting the gill arches and immediately immersing them in iced water. Harvesting and killing methods are designed to minimize scale loss, and avoid the fish releasing stress hormones, which negatively affect flesh quality.[14]

Wild versus farmed

[edit]

Wild salmonids are captured from wild habitats using commercial fishing techniques. Most wild salmonids are caught in North American, Japanese, and Russian fisheries. The following table shows the changes in production of wild salmonids and farmed salmonids over a period of 25 years, as reported by the FAO.[30] Russia, Japan and Alaska all operate major hatchery based stock enhancement programs. The resulting fish hatchery fish are defined as "wild" for FAO and marketing purposes.

Salmonid production in tonnes by species
Species 1982 2007 2013
Wild Farmed Wild Farmed
Atlantic salmon 10,326 13,265 2,989 1,433,708 2,087,110[31]
Steelhead 171,946 604,695
Coho salmon 42,281 2,921 17,200 115,376
Chinook salmon 25,147 8,906 11,542
Pink salmon 170,373 495,986
Chum salmon 182,561 303,205
Sockeye salmon 128,176 164,222
Total salmonid production
1982 2007
tonnes percent tonnes percent
Wild 558,864 75 992,508 31
Farmed 188,132 25 2,165,321 69
Overall 746,996 3,157,831

Issues

[edit]

The US in their dietary guidelines for 2010 recommends eating 8 ounces per week of a variety of seafood and 12 ounces for lactating mothers, with no upper limits set and no restrictions on eating farmed or wild salmon.[32] In 2018, Canadian dietary guidelines recommended eating at least two servings of fish each week and choosing fish such as char, herring, mackerel, salmon, sardines, and trout.[33]

Currently, much controversy exists about the ecological and health impacts of intensive salmonid aquaculture. Of particular concern are the impacts on wild salmonids and other marine life and on the incomes of commercial salmonid fishermen.[34] However, the 'enhanced' production of salmon juveniles – which for instance lead to a double-digit proportion (20-50%) of the Alaska's yearly ‘wild’ salmon harvest - is not void of controversy, and the Alaska salmon harvest are highly dependent on the operation of Alaska’s Regional Aquaculture Associations. Furthermore, the sustainability of enhanced/hatchery-based ‘wild’ caught salmon has long been hotly debated,[35] both from a scientific and political/marketing perspective. Such debate and positions were central to a 'halt' in the re-certification of Alaska salmon fisheries by the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) in 2012.[36] The Alaska salmon fisheries subsequently re-attained MSC-certification status; however the heavily hatchery-dependent Prince William Sound (PWS) unit of certification (“one of the most valuable fishing area in the State”[37]) was for several years excluded from the MSC-certification (it remained ‘under assessment’ pending further analysis).

Disease and parasites

[edit]

In 1972, Gyrodactylus, a monogenean parasite, was introduced with live trout and salmon from Sweden (Baltic stocks are resistant to it) into government-operated hatcheries in Norway. From the hatcheries, infected eggs, smolt, and fry were implanted in many rivers with the goal to strengthen the wild salmon stocks, but caused instead devastation to some of the wild salmon populations affected.[38]

In 1984, infectious salmon anemia (ISAv) was discovered in Norway in an Atlantic salmon hatchery. Eighty percent of the fish in the outbreak died. ISAv, a viral disease, is now a major threat to the viability of Atlantic salmon farming. It is now the first of the diseases classified on List One of the European Commission’s fish health regimen. Amongst other measures, this requires the total eradication of the entire fish stock should an outbreak of the disease be confirmed on any farm. ISAv seriously affects salmon farms in Chile, Norway, Scotland, and Canada, causing major economic losses to infected farms.[39] As the name implies, it causes severe anemia of infected fish. Unlike mammals, the red blood cells of fish have ribosomes, and can become infected with viruses. The fish develop pale gills, and may swim close to the water surface, gulping for air. However, the disease can also develop without the fish showing any external signs of illness, the fish maintain a normal appetite, and then they suddenly die. The disease can progress slowly throughout an infected farm, and in the worst cases, death rates may approach 100%. It is also a threat to the dwindling stocks of wild salmon. Management strategies include developing a vaccine and improving genetic resistance to the disease.[40]

In the wild, diseases and parasites are normally at low levels, and kept in check by natural predation on weakened individuals. In crowded net pens, they can become epidemics. Diseases and parasites also transfer from farmed to wild salmon populations. A recent study in British Columbia links the spread of parasitic sea lice from river salmon farms to wild pink salmon in the same river.[13] The European Commission (2002) concluded, "The reduction of wild salmonid abundance is also linked to other factors but there is more and more scientific evidence establishing a direct link between the number of lice-infested wild fish and the presence of cages in the same estuary."[41] It is reported that wild salmon on the west coast of Canada are being driven to extinction by sea lice from nearby salmon farms.[42] These predictions have been disputed by other scientists[43] and recent harvests have indicated that the predictions were in error. In 2011, Scottish salmon farming introduced the use of farmed ballan wrasse for the purpose of cleaning farmed salmon of ectoparasites.[44][45]

Globally, salmon production fell around 9% in 2015, in large part due to acute outbreaks of sea lice in Scotland and Norway.[46][47][48] Lasers are used to reduce lice infections.[49]

In the mid 1980s to the 1990s, bacterial kidney disease (BKD) caused by Renibacterium salmoninarum heavily impacted Chinook hatcheries in Idaho.[50] The disease causes granulomatous inflammation that can lead to abscesses in the liver, spleen, and kidneys.[51]

Pollution and contaminants

[edit]

Salmonid farms are typically sited in marine ecosystems with good water quality, high water exchange rates, current speeds fast enough to prevent pollution of the bottom but slow enough to prevent pen damage, protection from major storms, reasonable water depth, and a reasonable distance from major infrastructure such as ports, processing plants, and logistical facilities such as airports. Logistical considerations are significant, and feed and maintenance labor must be transported to the facility and the product returned. Siting decisions are complicated by complex, politically driven permit problems in many countries that prevents optimal locations for the farms.

In sites without adequate currents, heavy metals can accumulate on the benthos (seafloor) near the salmon farms, particularly copper and zinc.[14]

Contaminants are commonly found in the flesh of farmed and wild salmon.[52] Health Canada in 2002 published measurements of PCBs, dioxins, furans, and PDBEs in several varieties of fish. The farmed salmonids population had nearly 3 times the level of PCBs, more than 3 times the level of PDBEs, and nearly twice the level of dioxins and furans seen in the wild population.[53] On the other hand, "Update of the monitoring of levels of dioxins and PCBs in food and feed", a 2012 study from the European Food Safety Authority, stated that farmed salmon and trout contained on average a many times lesser fraction of dioxins and PCBs than wild-caught salmon and trout."[54]

A 2004 study, reported in Science, analysed farmed and wild salmon for organochlorine contaminants. They found the contaminants were higher in farmed salmon. Within the farmed salmon, European (particularly Scottish) salmon had the highest levels, and Chilean salmon the lowest.[55] The FDA and Health Canada have established a tolerance/limit for PCBs in commercial fish of 2000 ppb[56] A follow-up study confirmed this, and found levels of dioxins, chlorinated pesticides, PCBs and other contaminants up to ten times greater in farmed salmon than wild Pacific salmon.[57] On a positive note, further research using the same fish samples used in the previous study, showed that farmed salmon contained levels of beneficial fatty acids that were two to three times higher than wild salmon.[58] A follow-up benefit-risk analysis on salmon consumption balanced the cancer risks with the (n–3) fatty acid advantages of salmon consumption. For this reason, current methods for this type of analysis take into consideration the lipid content of the sample in question. PCBs specifically are lipophilic, so are found in higher concentrations in fattier fish in general,[59] thus the higher level of PCB in the farmed fish is in relation to the higher content of beneficial n–3 and n–6 lipids they contain. They found that recommended levels of (n-3) fatty acid consumption can be achieved eating farmed salmon with acceptable carcinogenic risks, but recommended levels of (n-3) EPA+DHA intake cannot be achieved solely from farmed (or wild) salmon without unacceptable carcinogenic risks.[60] The conclusions of this paper from 2005 were that

"...consumers should not eat farmed fish from Scotland, Norway and eastern Canada more than three times a year; farmed fish from Maine, western Canada and Washington state no more than three to six times a year; and farmed fish from Chile no more than about six times a year. Wild chum salmon can be consumed safely as often as once a week, pink salmon, Sockeye and Coho about twice a month and Chinook just under once a month."[52]

In 2005, Russia banned importing chilled fish from Norway, after samples of Norwegian farmed fish showed high levels of heavy metals. According to the Russian Minister of Agriculture Aleksey Gordeyev, levels of lead in the fish were 10 to 18 times higher than Russian safety standards and cadmium levels were almost four times higher.[61]

Pollutants or toxins introduced by pisciculturists

[edit]

In 2006, eight Norwegian salmon producers were caught in unauthorized and unlabeled use of nitrite in smoked and cured salmon. Norway applies EU regulations on food additives, according to which nitrite is allowed as a food additive in certain types of meat, but not fish. Fresh salmon was not affected.[62]

Kurt Oddekalv, leader of the Green Warriors of Norway, argues that the scale of fish farming in Norway is unsustainable. Huge volumes of uneaten feed and fish excrement pollute the seabed, while chemicals designed to fight sea lice find their way into the food chain. He says: "If people knew this, they wouldn’t eat salmon", describing the farmed fish as "the most toxic food in the world".[63] Don Staniford—the former scientist turned activist/investigator and head of a small Global Alliance Against Industrial Aquaculture—agrees, saying that a 10-fold increase in the use of some chemicals was seen in the 2016-2017 timeframe. The use of the toxic drug emamectin is rising fast. The levels of chemicals used to kill sea lice have breached environmental safety limits more than 100 times in the last 10 years.[64]

Impact on wild salmonids

[edit]

Farmed salmonids can, and often do, escape from sea cages. If the farmed salmonid is not native, it can compete with native wild species for food and habitat.[65][66] If the farmed salmonid is native, it can interbreed with the wild native salmonids. Such interbreeding can reduce genetic diversity, disease resistance, and adaptability.[67] In 2004, about 500,000 salmon and trout escaped from ocean net pens off Norway. Around Scotland, 600,000 salmon were released during storms.[13] Commercial fishermen targeting wild salmon frequently catch escaped farm salmon. At one stage, in the Faroe Islands, 20 to 40 percent of all fish caught were escaped farm salmon.[68] In 2017, about 263,000 farmed non-native Atlantic salmon escaped from a net in Washington waters in the 2017 Cypress Island Atlantic salmon pen break.[69]

Sea lice, particularly Lepeophtheirus salmonis and various Caligus species, including C. clemensi and C. rogercresseyi, can cause deadly infestations of both farm-grown and wild salmon.[70][71] Sea lice are naturally occurring and abundant ectoparasites which feed on mucus, blood, and skin, and migrate and latch onto the skin of salmon during planktonic nauplii and copepodid larval stages, which can persist for several days.[72][73][74] Large numbers of highly populated, open-net salmon farms can create exceptionally large concentrations of sea lice; when exposed in river estuaries containing large numbers of open-net farms, many young wild salmon are infected, and do not survive as a result.[75][76] Adult salmon may survive otherwise critical numbers of sea lice, but small, thin-skinned juvenile salmon migrating to sea are highly vulnerable. In 2007, mathematical studies of data available from the Pacific coast of Canada indicated the louse-induced mortality of pink salmon in some regions was over 80%.[42] Later that year, in reaction to the 2007 mathematical study mentioned above, Canadian federal fisheries scientists Kenneth Brooks and Simon Jones published a critique titled "Perspectives on Pink Salmon and Sea Lice: Scientific Evidence Fails to Support the Extinction Hypothesis "[77] The time since these studies has shown a general increase in abundance of Pink Salmon in the Broughton Archipelago. Another comment in the scientific literature by Canadian Government Fisheries scientists Brian Riddell and Richard Beamish et al. came to the conclusion that there is no correlation between farmed salmon louse numbers and returns of pink salmon to the Broughton Archipelago. And in relation to the 2007 Krkosek extinction theory: "the data was [sic] used selectively and conclusions do not match with recent observations of returning salmon".[43]

A 2008 meta-analysis of available data shows that salmonid farming reduces the survival of associated wild salmonid populations. This relationship has been shown to hold for Atlantic, steelhead, pink, chum, and coho salmon. The decrease in survival or abundance often exceeds 50%.[78] However, these studies are all correlation analysis and correlation doesn't equal causation, especially when similar salmon declines were occurring in Oregon and California, which have no salmon aquaculture or marine net pens. Independent of the predictions of the failure of salmon runs in Canada indicated by these studies, the wild salmon run in 2010 was a record harvest.[79]

A 2010 study that made the first use of sea lice count and fish production data from all salmon farms on the Broughton Archipelago found no correlation between the farm lice counts and wild salmon survival. The authors conclude that the 2002 stock collapse was not caused by the farm sea lice population: although the farm sea lice population during the out-migration of juvenile pink salmon was greater in 2000 than that of 2001, there was a record salmon returning to spawn in 2001 (from the juveniles in 2000) compared with a 97% collapse in 2002 (from the juveniles in 2001). The authors also note that initial studies had not investigated bacterial and viral causes for the event despite reports of bleeding at the base of the fins, a symptom often associated with infections, but not with sea lice exposure under laboratory conditions. [80]

Wild salmon are anadromous. They spawn inland in fresh water and when young migrate to the ocean where they grow up. Most salmon return to the river where they were born, although some stray to other rivers. Concern exists about of the role of genetic diversity within salmon runs. The resilience of the population depends on some fish being able to survive environmental shocks, such as unusual temperature extremes. The effect of hatchery production on the genetic diversity of salmon is also unclear.[7]

Genetic modification

[edit]

Salmon have been genetically modified in laboratories so they can grow faster. A company, Aqua Bounty Farms, has developed a modified Atlantic salmon which grows nearly twice as fast (yielding a fully grown fish at 16–18 months rather than 30), and is more disease resistant, and cold tolerant. It also requires 10% less food. This was achieved using a chinook salmon gene sequence affecting growth hormones, and a promoter sequence from the ocean pout affecting antifreeze production.[81] Normally, salmon produce growth hormones only in the presence of light. The modified salmon does not switch growth hormone production off. The company first submitted the salmon for FDA approval in 1996.[82] In 2015, FDA has approved the AquAdvantage Salmon for commercial production.[83] A concern with transgenic salmon is what might happen if they escape into the wild. One study, in a laboratory setting, found that modified salmon mixed with their wild cohorts were aggressive in competing, but ultimately failed.[84]

Impact on wild predatory species

[edit]

Sea cages can attract a variety of wild predators which can sometimes become entangled in associated netting, leading to injury or death. In Tasmania, Australian salmon-farming sea cages have entangled white-bellied sea eagles. This has prompted one company, Huon Aquaculture, to sponsor a bird rehabilitation centre and try more robust netting.[85]

Ecological

[edit]

Juvenile farmed Chinook have been shown to have higher rates of predation due to their larger size than wild juveniles upon release into marine environments. Their size correlates with the preferred size of prey for predators like birds, seals, and fish. This may have ecological implications because of the effect on feeding.[86]

Impact on forage fish

[edit]

The use of forage fish for fish meal production has been almost a constant for the last 30 years and at the maximum sustainable yield, while the market for fish meal has shifted from chicken, pig, and pet food to aquaculture diets.[16] This market shift at constant production appears an economic decision implying that the development of salmon aquaculture had no impact on forage fish harvest rates.

Fish do not actually produce omega-3 fatty acids, but instead accumulate them from either consuming microalgae that produce these fatty acids, as is the case with forage fish like herring and sardines, or consuming forage fish, as is the case with fatty predatory fish like salmon. To satisfy this requirement, more than 50% of the world fish oil production is fed to farmed salmon.[26]

In addition, salmon require nutritional intakes of protein, which is often supplied in the form of fish meal as the lowest-cost alternative. Consequently, farmed salmon consume more fish than they generate as a final product, though considerably more preferred as food.

Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue and ASC Salmon Standard

[edit]

In 2004, the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)-USA initiated the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue, one of several Aquaculture Dialogues.[11] The aim of the dialogues was to produce an environmental and social standard for farmed salmon and other species (12 species currently, as of 2018). Since 2012, the standards elaborated by the multi-stakeholder Dialogues were passed-on to the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) which was created in 2010 to administer and developed them further. The first such standard was the ASC Salmon Standard[87] (June 2012, and revised in 2017 after comprehensive public consultation). The WWF had originally identified what they called "seven key environmental and social impacts", characterised as:

  1. Benthic impacts and siting: Chemicals and excess nutrients from food and feces associated with salmon farms can disturb the flora and fauna on the ocean bottom (benthos).[88]
  2. Chemical inputs: Excessive use of chemicals – such as antibiotics, anti-foulants and pesticides – or the use of banned chemicals can have unintended consequences for marine organisms and human health.[89]
  3. Disease/parasites: Viruses and parasites can transfer between farmed and wild fish, as well as among farms.[90][91]
  4. Escapes: Escaped farmed salmon can compete with wild fish and interbreed with local wild stocks of the same population, altering the overall pool of genetic diversity.[92]
  5. Feed: A growing salmon farming business must control and reduce its dependency upon fishmeal and fishoil – a primary ingredient in salmon feed—so as not to put additional pressure on the world's fisheries. Fish caught to make fishmeal and oil currently represent one-third of the global fish harvest.[93]
  6. Nutrient loading and carrying capacity: Excess food and fish waste in the water have the potential to increase the levels of nutrients in the water. This can cause the growth of algae, which consumes oxygen that is meant for other plant and animal life.[94]
  7. Social issues: Salmon farming often employs a large number of workers on farms and in processing plants, potentially placing labor practices and worker rights under public scrutiny. Additionally, conflicts can arise among users of the shared coastal environment.

— World Wide Fund for Nature, [11]

Land-raised salmon

[edit]

Recirculating aquaculture systems make it possible to farm salmon entirely on land, which as of 2019 is an ongoing initiative in the industry.[95] However, large farmed salmon companies such as Mowi and Cermaq were not investing in such systems beyond the hatchery stage.[96] In the United States, a major investor in the effort was Atlantic Sapphire, which plans to bring salmon raised in Florida to market in 2021.[96][97] Other companies investing in the effort include Nordic Acquafarms[98] and Whole Oceans.[99]

Challenges

[edit]

Nephrocalcinosis is an emerging issue in salmon aquaculture with the increased use of recirculating aquaculture systems. One key driver of nephrocalcinosis is exposure to high levels of CO2 in the rearing water.[100]

Species

[edit]

Atlantic salmon

[edit]
Atlantic salmon

In their natal streams, Atlantic salmon are considered a prized recreational fish, pursued by avid fly anglers during its annual runs. At one time, the species supported an important commercial fishery and a supplemental food fishery. However, the wild Atlantic salmon fishery is commercially dead; after extensive habitat damage and overfishing, wild fish make up only 0.5% of the Atlantic salmon available in world fish markets. The rest are farmed, predominantly from aquaculture in Chile, Canada, Norway, Russia, the United Kingdom, and Tasmania.[101]

Atlantic salmon is, by far, the species most often chosen for farming. It is easy to handle, grows well in sea cages, commands a high market value, and adapts well to being farmed away from its native habitats.[7]

Adult male and female fish are anesthetized. Eggs and sperm are "stripped", after the fish are cleaned and cloth dried. Sperm and eggs are mixed, washed, and placed into fresh water. Adults recover in flowing, clean, well-aerated water.[102] Some researchers have studied cryopreservation of the eggs.[103]

Fry are generally reared in large freshwater tanks for 12 to 20 months. Once the fish have reached the smolt phase, they are taken out to sea, where they are held for up to two years. During this time, the fish grow and mature in large cages off the coasts of Canada, the United States, or parts of Europe.[101] Generally, cages are made of two nets; inner nets, which wrap around the cages, hold the salmon while outer nets, which are held by floats, keep predators out.[102]

Many Atlantic salmon escape from cages at sea. Those salmon that further breed tend to lessen the genetic diversity of the species leading to lower survival rates, and lower catch rates. On the West Coast of North America, the non-native salmon could be an invasive threat, especially in Alaska and parts of Canada. This could cause them to compete with native salmon for resources. Extensive efforts are underway to prevent escapes and the potential spread of Atlantic salmon in the Pacific and elsewhere.[104] The risk of Atlantic Salmon becoming a legitimate invasive threat on the Pacific Coast of N. America is questionable in light of both Canadian and American governments deliberately introducing this species by the millions for a 100-year period starting in the 1900s. Despite these deliberate attempts to establish this species on the Pacific coast; no established populations have been reported.[105][106]

In 2007, 1,433,708 tonnes of Atlantic salmon were harvested worldwide with a value of $7.58 billion.[107] Ten years later, in 2017, over 2 million tonnes of farmed Atlantic salmon were harvested.[108]

Steelhead

[edit]
Rainbow trout
Male ocean phase steelhead salmon

In 1989, steelhead were reclassified into the Pacific trout as Oncorhynchus mykiss from the former binominals of Salmo gairdneri (Columbia River redband trout) and S. irideus (coastal rainbow trout). Steelhead are an anadromous form of rainbow trout that migrate between lakes and rivers and the ocean, and are also known as steelhead salmon or ocean trout.

Steelhead are raised in many countries throughout the world. Since the 1950s, production has grown exponentially, particularly in Europe and recently in Chile. Worldwide, in 2007, 604,695 tonnes of farmed steelhead were harvested, with a value of $2.59 billion.[109] The largest producer is Chile. In Chile and Norway, the ocean-cage production of steelhead has expanded to supply export markets. Inland production of rainbow trout to supply domestic markets has increased strongly in countries such as Italy, France, Germany, Denmark, and Spain. Other significant producing countries include the United States, Iran, Germany, and the UK.[109] Rainbow trout, including juvenile steelhead in fresh water, routinely feed on larval, pupal, and adult forms of aquatic insects (typically caddisflies, stoneflies, mayflies, and aquatic dipterana). They also eat fish eggs and adult forms of terrestrial insects (typically ants, beetles, grasshoppers, and crickets) that fall into the water. Other prey include small fish up to one-third of their length, crayfish, shrimp, and other crustaceans. As rainbow trout grow, the proportion of fish consumed increases in most populations. Some lake-dwelling forms may become planktonic feeders. In rivers and streams populated with other salmonid species, rainbow trout eat varied fish eggs, including those of salmon, brown and cutthroat trout, mountain whitefish, and the eggs of other rainbow trout. Rainbows also consume decomposing flesh from carcasses of other fish. Adult steelhead in the ocean feed primarily on other fish, squid, and amphipods.[110] Cultured steelhead are fed a diet formulated to closely resemble their natural diet that includes fish meal, fish oil, vitamins and minerals, and the carotenoid asthaxanthin for pigmentation.

The steelhead is especially susceptible to enteric redmouth disease. Considerable research has been conducted on redmouth disease, as its implications for steelhead farmers are significant. The disease does not affect humans.[111]

Coho salmon

[edit]
Male ocean phase Coho salmon

The Coho salmon[14] is the state animal of Chiba, Japan.[failed verification]

Coho salmon mature after only one year in the sea, so two separate broodstocks (spawners) are needed, alternating each year.[dubiousdiscuss] Broodfish are selected from the salmon in the seasites and transferred to freshwater tanks for maturation and spawning.[14]

Worldwide, in 2007, 115,376 tonnes of farmed Coho salmon were harvested with a value of $456 million.[112] Chile, with about 90 percent of world production, is the primary producer with Japan and Canada producing the rest.[14]

Chinook salmon

[edit]
Male ocean-phase Chinook
Male freshwater-phase Chinook

Chinook salmon are the state fish of Oregon, and are known as "king salmon" because of their large size and flavourful flesh. Those from the Copper River in Alaska are particularly known for their color, rich flavor, firm texture, and high omega-3 oil content.[113] Alaska has a long-standing ban on finfish aquaculture that was enacted in 1989. (Alaska Stat. § 16.40.210[114])

Worldwide, in 2007, 11,542 tonnes (1,817,600 st) of farmed Chinook salmon were harvested with a value of $83 million.[115] New Zealand is the largest producer of farmed king salmon, accounting for over half of world production (7,400 tonnes in 2005).[116] Most of the salmon are farmed in the sea (mariculture) using a method sometimes called sea-cage ranching, which takes place in large floating net cages, about 25 m across and 15 m deep, moored to the sea floor in clean, fast-flowing coastal waters. Smolt (young fish) from freshwater hatcheries are transferred to cages containing several thousand salmon, and remain there for the rest of their lives. They are fed fishmeal pellets high in protein and oil.[116]

Chinook salmon are also farmed in net cages placed in freshwater rivers or raceways, using techniques similar to those used for sea-farmed salmon. A unique form of freshwater salmon farming occurs in some hydroelectric canals in New Zealand. A site in Tekapo, fed by fast, cold waters from the Southern Alps, is the highest salmon farm in the world, 677 m (2,221 ft) above sea level.[117]

Before they are killed, cage salmon are sometimes anaesthetised with a herbal extract. They are then spiked in the brain. The heart beats for a time as the animal is bled from its sliced gills. This method of relaxing the salmon when it is killed produces firm, long-keeping flesh.[116] Lack of disease in wild populations and low stocking densities used in the cages means that New Zealand salmon farmers do not use antibiotics and chemicals that are often needed elsewhere.[118]

Timeline

[edit]
  • 1527: The life history of the Atlantic salmon is described by Hector Boece of the University of Aberdeen, Scotland.[81]
  • 1763: Fertilization trials for Atlantic salmon take place in Germany. Later biologists refined these in Scotland and France.[81]
  • 1854: Salmon spawing beds and rearing ponds built along the bank of a river by the Dohulla Fishery, Ballyconneely, Ireland.[119]
  • 1864: Hatchery raised Atlantic salmon fry were released in the River Plenty, Tasmania in a failed attempt to establish a population in Australia[120]
  • 1892: Hatchery raised Atlantic salmon fry were released in the Umkomass river in South Africa in a failed attempt to establish a population in Africa.[121]
  • Late 19th century: Salmon hatcheries are used in Europe, North America, and Japan to enhance wild populations.
  • 1961: Hatchery raised Atlantic salmon fry were released in the rivers of the Falkland Islands in a failed attempt to establish a population in the South Atlantic.[122]
  • Late 1960s: First salmon farms established in Norway and Scotland.
  • 1970: Hatchery raised Atlantic salmon fry were released in the rivers of the Kerguelen Islands in a failed attempt to establish a population in the Indian Ocean.[123]
  • Early 1970s: Salmon farms established in North America.
  • 1973: Rainbow trout was first bred in Thailand on Doi Inthanon, the highest mountain in Thailand, as part of the Royal Project, an initiative of King Bhumibol Adulyadej (Rama IX).[124]
  • 1975: Gyrodactylus, a small monogenean parasite, spreads from Norwegian hatcheries to wild salmon, probably by means of fishing gear, and devastates some wild salmon populations.[38]
  • Late 1970s: Salmon farms established in Chile and New Zealand.
  • 1984: Infectious salmon anemia, a viral disease, is discovered in a Norwegian salmon hatchery. Eighty percent of the involved fish die.
  • 1985: Salmon farms established in Australia.
  • 1987: First reports of escaped Atlantic salmon being caught in wild Pacific salmon fisheries.
  • 1988: A storm hits the Faroe Islands releasing millions of Atlantic salmon.
  • 1989: Furunculosis, a bacterial disease, spreads through Norwegian salmon farms and wild salmon.
  • 1996: World farmed salmon production exceeds wild salmon harvest.
  • 2007: A 10-square-mile (26 km2) swarm of Pelagia noctiluca jellyfish wipes out a 100,000 fish salmon farm in Northern Ireland.[125]
  • 2019: The first salmon fish farm in the Middle East is established in the United Arab Emirates.[126]
  • 2021: Open-net salmon farming is banned in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.[127]
[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Aquaculture of salmonids involves the controlled cultivation of fish from the family, predominantly (Salmo salar) and (Oncorhynchus mykiss), through sequential stages in freshwater hatcheries for early development and marine net pens or onshore systems for grow-out to market size, yielding high-density production of nutrient-dense . Global output of farmed alone approached 2 million tonnes in the first nine months of 2024, underscoring its dominance in finfish and contribution to over half of for consumption. Originating with experimental efforts in the and scaling commercially from in the 1970s, the sector now centers in temperate regions including , , , and , where it generates substantial economic value through exports exceeding billions annually while supplying omega-3-rich protein amid declining wild captures. Key innovations like for disease resistance and feed optimization have boosted yields and efficiency, yet persistent challenges include escapes leading to genetic dilution of wild stocks, proliferation of sea lice and pathogens affecting nearby fisheries, and nutrient effluents altering benthic habitats, prompting regulatory scrutiny and shifts toward closed systems. These dynamics highlight salmonid farming's role in alongside demands for mitigating ecological externalities through evidence-based management.

History and Development

Origins and Early Practices

The origins of salmonid aquaculture trace to artificial fertilization experiments in during the second half of the eighteenth century, aimed at propagating and to replenish declining wild stocks depleted by and habitat loss. These initial practices involved collecting ripe eggs and from wild fish during spawning runs, manually fertilizing them in controlled settings, and incubating the embryos in simple troughs or gravel beds mimicking natural redds, with survival rates often low due to fungal infections and poor water quality management. By the mid-nineteenth century, dedicated hatcheries emerged, marking the transition from propagation to systematic rearing. In 1852, the first salmon hatchery was established on the River in , focusing on (Salmo salar) egg production and distribution to restock rivers. French efforts followed, with the National Hatchery at Huningue producing and shipping approximately 40 million salmon eggs between 1852 and 1870 for river enhancement programs. Early rearing techniques emphasized freshwater raceways or ponds for fry and fingerlings, fed natural diets like ground liver or , before release into wild systems; full grow-out to market size remained impractical due to high mortality in smolt-to-adult phases and lack of sea-cage technology. In North America, trout hatcheries pioneered commercial-scale propagation, beginning with Seth Green's establishment of the first successful U.S. fish hatchery in 1864 at Caledonia, New York, initially targeting brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and later brown trout (Salmo trutta). Green's methods improved upon European techniques by using artificial incubation boxes with flowing spring water to achieve higher hatch rates—up to 80% in controlled trials—and emphasized selective breeding for faster growth, laying groundwork for domestication. The first public salmon hatchery in the United States opened in 1871 at Craig's Pond Brook, Maine, funded by private and state interests to propagate Atlantic salmon for coastal fisheries restoration. These operations prioritized stocking over harvest, producing millions of juveniles annually by the 1880s, though genetic dilution from hatchery releases later raised concerns about wild population fitness. Early practices across regions shared common challenges, including disease outbreaks from dense rearing and nutritional deficiencies, addressed rudimentary through oxygenation via waterfalls or weirs and of weak individuals. By the late nineteenth century, over 18 hatcheries operated in alone, distributing eyed eggs and fry to support anadromous runs, while U.S. federal involvement via the 1871 U.S. Commission scaled production for inland stocking. These foundational efforts, driven by conservation imperatives rather than profit, evolved into modern only after mid-twentieth-century advances in and feeds.

Commercial Expansion (1970s–1990s)

Commercial expansion of salmonid aquaculture began in the 1970s, primarily in Norway and Scotland, where sea-cage systems enabled the rearing of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) at scale. In Norway, production started from a baseline of approximately 500 metric tons in 1970, driven by government subsidies, advancements in floating net-pen technology pioneered in the late 1950s, and the development of dry pelleted feeds that improved growth efficiency and reduced reliance on raw fish. By 1980, Norwegian output had reached 8,000 metric tons, supported by over 300 small-scale farms entering the sector amid declining wild stocks and rising demand for protein. In Scotland, the first commercial harvest occurred in 1971, building on earlier freshwater trout farming experiments, with production scaling through similar cage innovations and access to cold coastal waters. The 1980s marked rapid proliferation, fueled by export-oriented growth and biological improvements like for faster growth and disease resistance. Norwegian production surged to 15,500 metric tons by 1983 and continued expanding, while Scotland's output grew from modest levels in the late 1970s to contribute significantly to European supply by decade's end. Globally, farmed volumes overtook certain wild Pacific harvests by the mid-1980s, with new operations emerging in (late 1970s), , and the , often transferring Norwegian expertise. This era saw farm numbers peak, with alone hosting over 500 sites by the mid-1980s, though high densities began revealing challenges like sea lice and bacterial infections, prompting early veterinary interventions. Into the 1990s, production consolidated amid overcapacity and price volatility, yet overall volumes climbed, reaching 170,000 metric tons in by 1990 and contributing to global farmed exceeding 400,000 metric tons by the decade's close. Regulatory reforms in , including license reductions and limits post-1989 crisis, shifted the industry toward larger, more efficient operations, enhancing and export competitiveness to markets in and . Scotland's harvest approached 115,000 metric tons by 1998, underscoring the North Atlantic's dominance, while Pacific species like coho and chinook saw limited but growing culturing in the . This period's expansion was underpinned by causal factors such as technological scalability and market incentives, though it also highlighted vulnerabilities to density-related pathologies absent in .

Modern Milestones and Global Growth (2000s–Present)

Global production of farmed , the dominant salmonid in , expanded substantially from the 2000s onward, reaching approximately 2.7 million metric tons by 2023, more than double the combined farmed and wild output of 1.89 million metric tons recorded in 2000. This growth was driven primarily by , which accounted for over half of worldwide farmed output, followed by , the , , and the . Industry consolidation played a key role, with leading firms like , SalMar, and Cermaq achieving multi-national scale through organic expansion and acquisitions, enabling efficiencies in scale and technology deployment. A pivotal challenge in the 2000s was the infectious salmon anemia (ISA) virus outbreak in Chile starting in 2007, which halved production and prompted regulatory reforms including fallowing periods, site rotations, and improved biosecurity, facilitating a rebound to pre-crisis levels by the mid-2010s. Concurrently, advancements in feed formulation reduced reliance on marine ingredients; Norwegian salmon feeds, for instance, decreased marine protein content from 33.5% in 2000 to 14.5% by 2016 through incorporation of plant-based alternatives and novel proteins, mitigating pressure on while maintaining growth rates. Disease management innovations, such as vaccines against sea lice and bacterial infections, alongside programs enhancing disease resistance and feed conversion efficiency, further supported productivity gains across major producing regions. In the and , technological shifts included the adoption of larger ocean pens, automated feeding systems with real-time monitoring via cameras and sensors, and extended freshwater post-smolt rearing to minimize early marine exposure to pathogens. Emerging closed-containment systems, such as recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) and semi-closed pens, gained traction amid environmental pressures, with mandating a transition away from open net-pens in by 2029 to address concerns over escapes, waste, and interactions with wild stocks. These developments, coupled with market demand for premium protein, positioned as a of global supply, comprising about 80% of total availability despite ongoing debates over ecological impacts.

Production Methods

Hatchery and Broodstock Management

Broodstock management in salmonid aquaculture involves selecting and maintaining mature fish to produce high-quality gametes while preserving genetic diversity. For Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), broodstock are typically chosen randomly from returning adults, prioritizing first-time spawners to maximize egg viability and minimize genetic risks associated with repeat spawning. Single-pair matings are employed to track parentage and limit inbreeding, with a minimum of 50 mating pairs recommended to keep inbreeding rates below 0.5% per generation. Holding conditions include water temperatures of 13–16°C, near-saturation oxygen levels, and high water flow rates, such as 400 L/min for groups in large pools, to reduce stress and support health. Artificial diets are provided to satiation, with photoperiod manipulation used to advance maturation timing. Spawning protocols utilize the dry method in controlled environments, where females are stripped of eggs and males of , followed by fertilization; milt viability persists for up to 12 hours when stored on ice. Eggs are water-hardened post-fertilization and disinfected using solutions to eliminate bacterial and viral contaminants, a standard practice especially for eggs from wild or multiple sources. Incubation occurs in vertical-flow incubators or troughs under to minimize photonegative responses and fungal growth, with water temperatures maintained at 2–8°C and flows of 1 L/min per liter of eggs to ensure oxygen delivery above 90% saturation and low CO₂ (<6 mg/L). Egg densities range from 10,000 to 80,000 per m², with hatching typically at 480–520 degree-days. Post-hatch, alevins are reared in incubators until yolk sac absorption, with temperatures gradually increased to 10°C 10–14 days before first feeding to promote development. Fry rearing begins at 850–920 degree-days in larger tanks at densities around 10,000 per m², with water exchange rates of at least 60% per hour and temperatures of 11–13.5°C. Initial feeding involves small, floating dry pellets (50% protein, 16–20% fat) administered 6–12 times daily, matched to fry size (particle size 0.025 times fork length). Disease prevention emphasizes biosecurity measures, including UV or ozone water treatment, equipment disinfection, and veterinary health monitoring to mitigate risks like fungal infections or bacterial outbreaks. Genetic programs in commercial hatcheries, such as balanced breeding for growth and disease resistance, integrate with these practices to optimize smolt production. These protocols, derived from industry standards and governmental guidelines, prioritize empirical optimization of survival rates, which can exceed 90% under controlled conditions, though challenges like genetic drift and environmental stressors require ongoing adaptation.

Grow-Out Systems

Grow-out systems in salmonid aquaculture encompass the rearing phase from juveniles, such as smolts or fingerlings, to market-sized fish, typically lasting 12 to 24 months depending on species and conditions. For anadromous species like Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), the dominant method involves transferring parr from freshwater hatcheries to marine net pens or sea cages in coastal waters, where higher salinity and temperature gradients promote rapid growth compared to freshwater environments. These systems leverage natural ocean currents for water exchange, with fish stocked at densities that allow biomass accumulation to 10-25 kg per cubic meter before harvest at 3-6 kg individual weight. Marine net pens consist of floating enclosures constructed from high-density polyethylene (HDPE) netting, anchored to the seabed via mooring systems, often in configurations spanning 50-200 meters in circumference and 10-30 meters in depth to accommodate salmon schooling behavior. Gravity-based designs maintain net shape through weighted sinker systems, preventing collapse under fish pressure or currents, while allowing waste efflux into surrounding waters. This open-water approach accounts for the majority of global production, enabling efficient scaling in regions like Norway, Chile, and Scotland, though it requires site selection based on water depth exceeding 100 meters, current speeds of 0.5-1.5 m/s, and temperatures of 8-16°C for optimal growth. For non-anadromous or freshwater-adapted salmonids like rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), grow-out occurs predominantly in land-based flow-through systems such as concrete raceways, earthen ponds, or tanks, utilizing gravity-fed or pumped freshwater sources to maintain oxygen levels and remove wastes. Fingerlings of 8-10 cm are transferred to larger tanks (5-25 m³) or ponds, achieving harvest sizes of 0.3-1 kg in 12-18 months at densities up to 50-100 kg/m³ in intensive setups. In some regions, such as Ontario, Canada, open-water net pens in lakes supplement these systems for steelhead trout variants, mirroring marine designs but in freshwater. Emerging alternatives, including recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), are increasingly applied for salmonid grow-out to mitigate environmental discharges and disease risks, with closed-loop filtration recycling 90-99% of water in tank-based facilities. RAS has demonstrated viability for full-cycle Atlantic salmon production on land, though adoption remains limited to pilot scales due to high capital costs exceeding $10-20 per kg capacity, compared to conventional net pens. For rainbow trout, tank-based RAS supports bio-secure growth with comparable health outcomes to flow-through methods. Pacific species like coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) salmon employ similar net pen systems in marine environments where farmed, though production volumes are lower than Atlantic salmon.

Feeding and Nutrition

Salmonids, being carnivorous fish, require diets high in protein and lipids to support rapid growth and maintain flesh quality in aquaculture settings. Optimal protein levels in feeds for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), the dominant farmed salmonid, typically range from 40-50% for juveniles and smolt, decreasing to 34-40% for larger grow-out stages to balance energy from lipids and minimize excess nitrogen excretion. These requirements include 10 essential amino acids, with deficiencies leading to reduced growth rates and immune function; commercial formulations often incorporate fishmeal or soy-based proteins to meet them, though plant sources necessitate supplementation for methionine and lysine. Lipid content is similarly stage-dependent, at 20-30% for early stages and up to 35-40% for on-growing fish, providing dense energy (twice that of protein per gram) and essential omega-3 fatty acids like EPA and DHA, which constitute 1-2% of the diet for optimal flesh deposition. Feeds are formulated as extruded, slow-sinking pellets, typically 2-10 mm in diameter depending on fish size, with a post-extrusion vacuum coating to infuse up to 30% additional lipids for palatability and nutrient density. Key ingredients historically centered on marine-derived fishmeal (providing 60-70% protein) and fish oil (rich in long-chain omega-3s), but formulations have evolved to include 10-20% plant proteins such as soy concentrate, wheat gluten, and rapeseed meal to address supply constraints from wild fisheries. Alternative proteins like insect meal, microbial biomass, and processed animal by-products are increasingly tested, offering comparable digestibility when defatted or enzymatically treated, though high inclusion rates (>20%) can introduce anti-nutritional factors reducing feed efficiency. Micronutrients, including vitamins (e.g., elevated B-vitamins at 200-300 mg/kg for stress resistance) and minerals like (0.8-1.2% available), are added to prevent deficiencies observed in , such as heart from low or . Feed efficiency in salmonid aquaculture is measured by the (FCR), averaging 1.1-1.5 kg of dry feed per kg of biomass gain, among the lowest in livestock production due to cold-water and precise rationing via automated feeders. This efficiency supports growth from 50 g smolts to 4-6 kg market size in 18-24 months, but varies with water (optimal 12-18°C), oxygen levels, and diet digestibility; higher protein-to-lipid ratios (e.g., 1.2:1) improve FCR and survival during disease challenges like pancreas disease. efforts have reduced fishmeal inclusion from 65% in the to under 20% by 2020, replacing it with oils and algae-derived oils to maintain omega-3 levels, though excessive lipids can lower EPA/DHA in fillets by 20-30% without , impacting . Peer-reviewed trials confirm that balanced formulations prioritizing marine ingredients for essential nutrients yield superior growth over fully plant-based diets, underscoring trade-offs between resource use and product quality.

Harvesting and Processing

In salmonid aquaculture, harvesting primarily targets reared in marine net pens, where fish are crowded using barriers to concentrate them near the pen's edge before being pumped alive into well-boats for live transport to onshore slaughter facilities, minimizing stress and mortality during transfer. This method predominates in major producers like and , with well-boats holding up to 1,000 tonnes of fish per load to enable efficient, large-scale operations. For freshwater-reared species like , harvesting often involves partial or full pond draining followed by seining or pumping, allowing direct access for immediate processing on-site or nearby. Slaughter techniques emphasize rapid insensibility to comply with standards, with percussive stunning via pneumatic or mechanical blow to the head or electrical using pulsed currents applied through water baths being the most common methods for salmonids, followed by severance of the arches or for . These approaches achieve high stun success rates—over 95% for well-calibrated electrical systems in —but can vary in efficacy due to factors like water salinity and fish size, potentially leading to incomplete if equipment malfunctions. Regulations in the and mandate pre-slaughter for all farmed fish since 2010, prohibiting live chilling as a standalone method due to prolonged suffering. Post-slaughter processing begins with to remove blood for improved and , typically lasting 10-20 minutes in controlled chilling environments at 0-4°C to prevent and onset. are then eviscerated, heads removed, and carcasses filleted using automated lines capable of processing thousands of per hour, with yields averaging 60-70% fillet weight from a 4-6 kg harvest-sized . Further steps include skinning, portioning, smoking, or freezing, with products often vacuum-packed and blast-frozen at -30°C or below for export; in 2023, over 80% of global farmed volume underwent such primary processing before market distribution. during processing monitors for contaminants like lice residues, with head-off gutted inspected for color and fat content using to meet standards like the Norwegian "Extra" grade requiring levels of 20-30 mg/kg. Chilling immediately post-harvest, often by immersion in ice slurry, preserves freshness during to secondary processors, reducing spoilage rates to under 1% in optimized chains. By-products such as heads, viscera, and trimmings are recovered for production, enhancing in an industry where constitutes 30-40% of whole fish .

Cultured Species

Atlantic Salmon

Salmo salar, the , constitutes the predominant species in global salmonid aquaculture, accounting for the vast majority of farmed production. In 2023, worldwide farmed salmonid output exceeded 2.8 million metric tons, with comprising over 90% of this volume. leads as the primary producer, generating more than 50% of global supply, followed by at approximately 27%, with , , and the as significant contributors. Production has expanded dramatically since 1990, rising from 230,000 tons to over 2.2 million tons annually by the early 2020s, driven by advancements in techniques and open-net pen systems. Farming begins with broodstock management in controlled freshwater hatcheries, where eggs are fertilized and incubated at temperatures around 8–10°C to mimic conditions. Eyed eggs hatch into alevins after 200–300 degree-days, transitioning to fry fed specialized diets until they develop into parr, then smolts ready for transfer after 12–18 months. Smolts, weighing 70–150 grams, are transported to marine net pens for grow-out, where they reach harvest size of 4–6 kilograms over 12–24 months, depending on site conditions and feed efficiency. Open ocean cages, typically 50–120 meters in circumference, dominate grow-out due to cost-effectiveness, though closed systems are emerging to mitigate risks. Key challenges include sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) infestations, which proliferate in high-density pens and inflict economic losses exceeding hundreds of millions annually while potentially elevating mortality in wild conspecifics through transmission. Disease outbreaks, such as infectious salmon anemia (ISA) and pancreas disease, necessitate vigilant biosecurity, with vaccination and selective breeding reducing incidence but not eliminating risks. Escapes from net pens, estimated at 0.001–0.1% of stock, pose genetic dilution threats to wild populations via interbreeding, compounded by antibiotic and nutrient discharges altering local benthic ecosystems. While industry reports emphasize improvements in survival rates to 90%+, independent assessments highlight persistent ecological pressures, underscoring the need for site-specific monitoring and technological innovations like submerged pens.

Steelhead Trout

Steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), the anadromous form of rainbow trout, is cultured in marine or brackish environments to produce larger fish akin to wild ocean-run individuals, distinguishing it from the predominantly freshwater-resident rainbow trout aquaculture. Commercial steelhead farming leverages the species' adaptability to seawater, though it faces challenges like variable smoltification success and higher stress sensitivity compared to Atlantic salmon. Production emphasizes sterile triploid fish to minimize escape risks and genetic interactions with wild populations. Global output remains modest relative to other salmonids, with Norway leading seawater-reared O. mykiss harvests at 94,660 metric tons in 2021, up from 14,367 tons in 1994. In the United States, aquaculture occurs via net pens in rivers like the Columbia, where fish are reared in controlled freshwater flows mimicking natural conditions, using vaccinated, hormone-free fingerlings fed soy-free diets derived from fish byproducts. Facilities such as Hudson Valley Fisheries employ recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) in New York, targeting 1,000–1,200 metric tons annually from 54 tanks, prioritizing low-carbon over open-ocean methods. has expanded steelhead cage culture, though volumes lag Norway's due to feed costs and disease pressures. U.S. production broadly reached 583 million pounds in 2022, but steelhead-specific volumes are subsets, often certified under Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP) for traceability and welfare. Culturing involves hatchery-reared parr smoltified for seawater transfer, with growth rates of 0.32% per day and feed conversion ratios around 1.24 in integrated systems pairing with mussels and for waste mitigation. Seawater adaptability improves with size, enabling parr-smolt independent transfers, but prolonged submergence beyond three weeks in cages risks mortality from tidal stresses. Harvests target 3–5 kg after 12–18 months at sea, yielding products for fresh markets with sales growth in U.S. supermarkets averaging 8.3% annually from 2016–2021. Challenges include disease outbreaks like bacterial coldwater disease, contributing to U.S. losses valued at $8.09 million in 2021, and environmental concerns over escapes hybridizing with wild stocks amid declining marine linked to climate variability. Innovations like RAS reduce these risks but elevate energy inputs, while multi-trophic integration shows promise for , producing 416 kg alongside extractive species in trials. Overall, aquaculture supplies premium, nutrient-dense protein with omega-3 profiles comparable to wild counterparts, though scaled expansion hinges on resolving physiological and regulatory hurdles.

Coho and Chinook Salmon

(Oncorhynchus kisutch) aquaculture developed significantly in the late , with global production rising from approximately 1 tonne in 1981 to over 90,000 tonnes by 2000, driven primarily by marine net-pen systems in temperate coastal waters. dominates production, accounting for about 90% of worldwide farmed coho output, leveraging its southern fjords for grow-out phases after hatchery-reared smolts are transferred to cages. In 2022, Chilean coho harvest reached 204,740 metric tons, comprising 19% of the country's total salmonid production. Global estimates for coho indicate 234,600 metric tons in the 2022/2023 salmon year, with projections for growth to 296,500 metric tons in 2023/2024 amid recovering market demand. Cultivation follows a 18-24 month cycle, with freshwater rearing to smolt stage before saltwater transfer, yielding market sizes of 3-5 kg; feeds mirror those for other salmonids, emphasizing fishmeal and oil alternatives to reduce wild pressure. Challenges include periodic declines from diseases like infectious and sea lice outbreaks, as seen in Chile's 2020 coho production drop of 650 metric tons, though improvements have supported recent rebounds. Limited farming occurs in , with no active commercial Pacific net-pens on the U.S. West Coast due to regulatory and environmental constraints. Chinook salmon ( tshawytscha), also known as king salmon, supports far smaller operations globally, with commercial production concentrated in New Zealand's marine cage systems and experimental efforts elsewhere. Farming there emphasizes low parasite vulnerability and minimal use, but expansion is curtailed by social opposition, legislative barriers to new sites, and competition from higher-yield like . The ' longer growth cycle—often 2-3 years to reach 5-10 kg market weights—combined with higher feed conversion demands, limits economic viability compared to coho or Atlantic variants. Research focuses on recirculating aquaculture systems for juveniles, demonstrating comparable growth to traditional flow-through methods while reducing use by up to 21-fold, though full-scale commercial adoption remains rare. Wild catches exceed farmed volumes, underscoring chinook's niche role in amid habitat and migration challenges affecting sourcing. In regions like the U.S. , efforts prioritize restoration over farming due to endangered status of some stocks and stringent needs.

Economic and Nutritional Importance

Global Production and Market Dynamics

Global production of farmed salmonids, primarily (Salmo salar) and (Oncorhynchus mykiss), exceeded 3.8 million metric tons in 2023, with accounting for over 2.79 million metric tons of harvested biomass, down 2 percent from the prior year due to biological challenges such as sea lice and disease outbreaks in key regions. production contributed approximately 1 million metric tons globally in 2024, driven largely by inland freshwater systems in and . Norway dominates as the leading producer, harvesting around 1.5 million metric tons of in 2023, followed by with about 800,000 metric tons, () at roughly 200,000 metric tons, and contributing over 150,000 metric tons; these four countries together represent over 90 percent of global output. Production growth has averaged 3-5 percent annually over the past decade, supported by technological advances in feed efficiency and net-pen systems, though 2024 volumes for through September totaled 2.02 million metric tons, a 1 percent decline year-over-year amid regulatory restrictions and environmental pressures in and . Forecasts project a rebound to 3 million metric tons for alone in 2024, with overall salmonid production expanding due to rising demand in emerging markets. The global salmon market, encompassing both farmed and wild but dominated by aquaculture, was valued at approximately USD 19.1 billion in 2024, with farmed Atlantic salmon commanding premium prices averaging USD 7 per kilogram amid supply tightness. Trade dynamics favor exports from Norway, which shipped record volumes in 2023 valued at over USD 15 billion, primarily to the European Union, United States, and Asia, where consumer preferences for omega-3-rich protein drive consumption growth at 4-5 percent annually. Market volatility persists, with 2024 prices fluctuating due to reduced Chilean output from algal blooms and Norwegian harvest delays, yet long-term projections indicate the salmon sector reaching USD 44.4 billion by 2034, fueled by health-conscious demand and innovations in sustainable feeds reducing reliance on wild fishmeal. Trout markets, valued lower at around USD 5-6 billion, focus on domestic consumption in producing regions like Turkey and Iran, with less international trade intensity.

Contributions to Employment and Regional Economies

Salmonid aquaculture, dominated by production, sustains direct and indirect employment in coastal and rural communities across major producing nations, leveraging local labor for operations such as site maintenance, feeding, and harvesting. In , the sector directly employs around 12,000 individuals in salmon farming activities, while the broader industry, heavily driven by , supported 93,600 jobs including supply chain and induced effects in 2020. This contributes approximately 2% to the national GDP via exports valued at $11.2 billion in 2023, fostering economic stability in northern rural regions where alternative industries are limited. In , the second-largest producer, salmon farming generates 45,000 direct jobs and 41,000 indirect positions as of 2025, primarily in the Los Lagos and Aysén regions, where the industry serves as a key economic driver second only to copper and has spurred infrastructure development in otherwise isolated southern areas. The sector's exports reached $6.5 billion in 2023, amplifying regional income through multipliers in , , and services. Scotland's salmon farms contribute over £760 million annually to the economy through direct output, supply chains, and impacts, supporting around 2,000-3,000 direct jobs in fragile Highland and island communities that face depopulation risks without such industries. Each direct position generates additional in ancillary sectors, with total gross value added rising to £362 million by 2020, a 76% increase from 2011 levels. In , particularly , farmed operations employ about 5,000-6,000 people directly within a national workforce of roughly 14,000, concentrating benefits in coastal First Nations and rural districts where the activity offsets seasonal declines. farming, a smaller salmonid segment, adds modest employment in inland U.S. and European freshwater systems, contributing to the overall U.S. total of 22,000 supported jobs and $4 billion in economic output as of 2022, though with lower regional multipliers than marine due to less intensive supply chains. These contributions underscore 's role in countering in peripheral areas, though sustained growth depends on managing operational challenges like disease control to preserve job stability.

Nutritional Profile and Health Benefits

Farmed salmonids, such as (Salmo salar) and (Oncorhynchus mykiss), provide high-quality animal protein, comprising approximately 20 grams per 100 grams of raw fillet for both species, with low carbohydrate content (near 0 grams). These fish are rich in essential micronutrients, including (up to 4 µg per 100 grams in rainbow trout, exceeding 179% of daily value), , , and niacin, which support metabolic and immune functions. Fat content varies by species and feed, typically 10-13 grams per 100 grams in farmed , predominantly unsaturated fats including long-chain omega-3 fatty acids like (EPA) and (DHA), averaging 2.3 grams per 100 grams—higher than in wild counterparts due to dietary supplementation.
Nutrient (per 100g raw)Farmed Farmed
Calories182-208 kcal141 kcal
Protein20 g19.9 g
Total Fat12-13 g6.2 g
Omega-3 (EPA+DHA)~2.3 g~1.0-1.5 g
~3-5 µg4 µg
High (best source)Moderate
Data compiled from USDA-derived analyses; values approximate and subject to variation by feed and harvest conditions. Regular consumption of farmed salmonids contributes to through elevated omega-3 , with studies showing that 250 mg daily of EPA and DHA—achievable from a 85-gram farmed serving—associates with reduced risk and lower levels (e.g., 5.9 mg/dL reduction per 1 gram daily increment). Farmed specifically raises blood omega-3 concentrations more effectively than some plant sources, supporting anti-inflammatory effects and potentially mitigating incidence. Observational data link fatty , including farmed varieties, to decreased depression and anxiety symptoms, attributed to DHA's role in neural membrane integrity. While farmed salmonids contain higher total than wild (up to threefold), their omega-3 density often exceeds wild , yielding net benefits when contaminant levels remain below regulatory thresholds, as confirmed in risk assessments balancing cancer risks against cardioprotective gains.

Farmed vs. Wild Salmon Comparisons

Production Efficiency and Yields

Farmed salmonids, particularly Salmo salar (Atlantic salmon), demonstrate superior production efficiency compared to wild counterparts due to controlled environmental conditions, selective breeding, and optimized feeding regimes that enable rapid growth and high biomass accumulation. Global aquaculture production of Atlantic salmon exceeded 2.7 million metric tons in 2020, with estimates approaching 3 million tons annually by 2023, primarily from marine net-pen systems in Norway, Chile, and Scotland. These yields reflect stocking densities of 15-25 kg per cubic meter in sea cages, allowing sites covering mere hectares to produce thousands of tons per cycle, far surpassing the diffuse, low-density distribution of wild salmonid populations across vast oceanic and riverine habitats. A key metric of efficiency is the (FCR), which quantifies biomass gain per unit of feed input; for farmed , modern formulations yield an FCR of 1.15-1.35 kg feed per kg of fish growth, reflecting improvements from plant-based alternatives reducing reliance on marine proteins. In contrast, wild salmonids exhibit an effective FCR approximating 10:1, as approximately 10 kg of prey biomass—primarily smaller —is required to support 1 kg of adult salmon growth through the , driven by ecological inefficiencies like predation losses and energy dissipation across trophic levels. This disparity underscores aquaculture's capacity to produce 5-10 times more edible protein per caloric input than wild capture, with farmed systems achieving harvest weights of 4-6 kg per in 18-24 months versus variable wild maturation cycles yielding lower average sizes amid natural mortality rates exceeding 90% in early life stages. Yield per unit area further highlights farmed advantages, as coastal net-pen operations concentrate production in localized volumes equivalent to a few square kilometers per major farm, generating densities orders of magnitude higher than , where Pacific salmon catches (e.g., sockeye, coho, chinook) total under 500,000 tons annually across millions of square kilometers of with biomasses rarely exceeding 1-2 kg per in spawning grounds. For steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and other Pacific species under , yields mirror Atlantic efficiencies in freshwater and marine phases, though wild equivalents remain capture-dependent with stagnant or declining outputs due to and constraints. Overall, these metrics position salmonid as a high-throughput system, scaling global supply to meet demand while wild yields remain capped by reproductive and environmental limits.

Quality, Safety, and Nutritional Differences

Farmed salmonids typically exhibit higher lipid content than their wild counterparts, with studies reporting averages of 18% fat in farmed Atlantic salmon compared to 6% in wild specimens, attributed to controlled feeding regimes rich in vegetable oils and fishmeal. This elevated fat profile contributes to higher concentrations of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, such as EPA and DHA, in farmed salmon, often exceeding levels in wild salmon due to formulated diets optimized for nutrient enhancement. However, farmed salmon also display elevated omega-6 fatty acids relative to omega-3, potentially altering the beneficial ratio observed in wild fish, which derive nutrients from natural prey with lower omega-6 inputs. Protein content remains comparable across both, averaging around 20% in farmed and slightly higher in wild due to leaner composition. Sensory quality evaluations indicate that farmed often matches or exceeds wild in consumer acceptability for attributes like appearance, , flavor, and overall , with blind taste tests showing no significant preference for wild when origin is undisclosed. Texture differences arise from fat content, yielding a softer, more tender fillet in farmed versus the firmer, leaner texture of wild , which some attribute to greater in natural habitats. Flavor profiles in farmed can be milder and less "fishy," influenced by feed composition, while wild may present bolder, earthier notes from diverse wild diets; roasting has been shown to mitigate these perceptual gaps by altering volatiles and tenderness. Safety profiles reveal farmed salmonids carrying higher residues of certain persistent organic pollutants (POPs) like PCBs and dioxins in older datasets from regions with less regulated feeds, with lipid-adjusted levels up to 16 times those in wild Pacific salmon, though benefits from omega-3 intake may offset risks at moderate consumption. Recent analyses from regulated producers, such as Norway, report lower POPs and mercury in farmed versus wild Atlantic salmon, reflecting improvements in feed sourcing and depuration practices. Antibiotic residues appear exclusively in farmed salmon, ranging from 0.35 to 51.52 ng/g in muscle tissue, stemming from therapeutic uses against bacterial infections, but concentrations remain below established regulatory thresholds like EU maximum residue limits; wild salmon show negligible such residues absent aquaculture exposure. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) occur at trace levels (0.19-34.51 ng/g) in both, with no exceedance of safety benchmarks. Variability underscores the influence of production region and species over farmed-wild dichotomy alone.

Resource Inputs and Sustainability Metrics

Farmed salmonids exhibit a (FCR) of approximately 1.1 to 1.5 kilograms of feed per kilogram of harvested fish, with recent averages around 1.15 for , reflecting improvements from alternative plant-based and by-product ingredients that have reduced reliance on marine proteins. In contrast, wild salmonids effectively require a higher input from the marine , as their natural diet of and translates to an implicit FCR exceeding 2-3 when accounting for trophic transfer efficiencies, though direct quantification is challenging due to ecosystem variability. This efficiency advantage in aquaculture stems from controlled and , enabling farmed to convert feed into edible protein more directly than capture fisheries, which depend on unpredictable wild . Fishmeal and fish oil from wild-caught pelagic constitute a key input for farmed feeds, but inclusion rates have declined from 19% in 2000 to about 9-17% by 2022-2023, supplemented by soy, , and meals to mitigate pressure on stocks. However, global demand, including salmonids, consumes the majority of fishmeal production—around 78-84% projected by 2034—prompting estimates that the wild input-to-output ratio may be 27-307% higher than prior figures, ranging from 0.36 to 3.06 kilograms of wild per kilogram of farmed carnivorous . Wild production avoids direct feed inputs but indirectly depletes the same base through predation, with farmed systems potentially amplifying total wild use when scaled to meet demand, as critiqued in analyses of displacement effects on pelagic fisheries. Other resource inputs differ markedly: aquaculture operations, primarily in net pens, utilize negligible freshwater (relying on ambient circulation) but demand for feed production, , and oxygenation, estimated at 10-20 MJ per kg of . Wild harvest relies on fuel-intensive vessels, with fuel consumption varying by gear and distance but often lower per unit due to no supplemental feeding, though overexploitation risks deplete stocks without yield gains. for feed crops in aquaculture adds indirect inputs, though minimized compared to terrestrial proteins like , which require vastly more arable resources. Sustainability metrics highlight trade-offs. Farmed 's greenhouse gas footprint averages 2.9-4 kg CO₂-equivalent per kg edible product, driven by feed and energy, lower than but potentially higher than some wild harvests (12-86% lower emissions for certain products versus Norwegian farmed). potential from uneaten feed and is managed through site fallowing and modeling, but remains a concern in high-density areas. Overall, aquaculture's scalability relieves wild stock pressure—farmed production now exceeds wild by over 3:1—yet hinges on further reducing marine ingredient dependency and verifying health, with metrics like the dependency ratio improving but still debated amid rising global output.
MetricFarmed SalmonidsWild Salmonids
FCR (kg feed/kg fish)1.1-1.5>2-3 (effective trophic)
Wild Fish Input Ratio0.36-3.06 kg/kg (disputed)1:1 direct predation equivalent
GHG (kg CO₂e/kg)2.9-41-3 (varies by )
Primary Water Use (low freshwater)None direct

Environmental and Ecological Aspects

Disease, Parasites, and Biosecurity Measures

Salmonid aquaculture faces significant challenges from bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens, which can cause substantial mortality and economic losses. Bacterial diseases such as furunculosis, caused by , and vibriosis, primarily from species including V. salmonicida, affect both freshwater and marine stages, leading to hemorrhaging, ulcers, and septicemia with mortality rates up to 50-90% in untreated outbreaks. Viral pathogens like infectious salmon anemia virus (ISAV) induce , organ necrosis, and hemorrhaging, with outbreaks documented in since 1984 and subsequent spread to , , and , resulting in farm-level mortalities exceeding 90% in severe cases. Parasitic infestations, particularly by sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus spp.), damage skin and gills, impair , and facilitate secondary bacterial infections, with global economic costs estimated at $480 million USD annually due to treatment, reduced growth, and premature harvests. Biosecurity measures emphasize prevention through site zoning, of new stock, and disinfection protocols to minimize introduction. Egg disinfection with iodophors and UV treatment reduces risks for viruses like ISAV, while strict traffic controls—limiting vessel and personnel movements between farms—have been linked to lower ISA spread in modeled scenarios from Scottish farms in the early 2000s. is a cornerstone for bacterial control; oil-adjuvanted multivalent vaccines against furunculosis and vibriosis, administered via injection or immersion, achieve relative percent survival (RPS) rates of 70-95% in challenge trials, significantly reducing antibiotic reliance since their widespread adoption in the 1990s. For sea lice, includes fallowing sites for 2-6 months post-harvest to break life cycles, deployment of like lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) which remove up to 80% of lice in co-cultured systems, and chemical treatments such as or benzoate, though resistance has emerged in Norwegian farms since 2000. Monitoring and early detection protocols, including regular sampling for clinical signs and PCR-based diagnostics, enable rapid response; for ISA, mandatory reporting and coordinated in have contained outbreaks, averting wider epidemics as evidenced by epidemiological models showing reduced inter-farm transmission with timely interventions. Farm-level practices also incorporate treatments like or UV filtration in recirculation systems to curb loads, alongside clean feed sourcing to avoid vectors. Despite these measures, high stocking densities in net pens amplify amplification, with empirical data indicating lice densities exceeding treatment thresholds (0.5-1 mobile female per ) in 20-30% of Norwegian sites annually, underscoring the need for ongoing genetic selection of resistant strains.

Water Quality, Waste Management, and Pollution Claims

Salmonid aquaculture, particularly in open net-pen systems, generates waste primarily from uneaten feed, , and metabolic byproducts, consisting mainly of (N) and (P) compounds that can influence local . Approximately 62% of feed nitrogen and 70% of feed phosphorus are released into the environment, with global annual discharges from salmon farming estimated at around 50,600 tonnes of N and 11,500 tonnes of P as of assessments in the early 2010s. These nutrients contribute to localized beneath farms, potentially elevating dissolved oxygen demand and altering benthic communities through organic enrichment, though effects are typically confined to within 50-100 meters of pens and diminish with distance due to tidal flushing in coastal sites. Waste management practices include precise feed monitoring via automated systems to minimize uneaten pellets, site fallowing periods of 1-2 years to allow recovery, and regulatory monitoring of benthic conditions using metrics like and levels. In the United States, federal and state oversight ensures compliance with standards, with studies indicating that regulated net-pen operations result in temporary, recoverable impacts rather than persistent degradation. use efficiency in production, including smolt and grow-out phases, averages about 19%, reflecting ongoing improvements in feed formulation to reduce waste loads. Pollution claims against salmonid farming often emphasize nutrient discharges as a major coastal threat, with some advocacy reports alleging billions in damages from and algal blooms; however, empirical data from peer-reviewed monitoring shows no strong between farm proximity and widespread decline or prevalence in regions like and . For instance, analyses of biotoxin-producing found no marked impact from current farming densities, attributing localized effects to site-specific factors rather than systemic . Critics, including environmental NGOs, frequently amplify risks without accounting for dilution in high-flow environments or comparisons to terrestrial , which discharges far higher nutrient loads globally—e.g., salmon farming's N output is less than 1% of total anthropogenic coastal inputs in many areas. Regulatory frameworks, such as those in the and U.S., mandate environmental impact assessments and , supporting claims that modern practices mitigate rather than exacerbate broader when sited appropriately.

Interactions with Wild Salmonid Populations

Escaped farmed salmonids, particularly (Salmo salar), frequently interact with wild populations through interbreeding, disease transmission, and resource competition, often to the detriment of wild stocks. Annual escape events from net-pen have been documented globally, with reporting over 1 million escapes in some years, leading to widespread into wild rivers. In 105 Norwegian populations studied, from farmed escapees affected early life history traits, growth, and , with 28% of populations showing 10-50% farmed genetic ancestry, correlating with reduced wild fitness. Genetic studies confirm that farmed salmon exhibit lower lifetime fitness than wild counterparts, with hybrid offspring displaying 20-50% reduced to smolt stage in natural rivers, exerting selective pressure against introgressed individuals and potentially lowering overall population productivity. Disease and parasite spillover represents another key interaction pathway, with farmed salmon serving as reservoirs for pathogens that amplify in high-density pens and transmit to migrating wild salmonids. In British Columbia, three pathogens—Piscine orthoreovirus (PRV), sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis), and Moritella viscosa—prevalent in Atlantic salmon farms have spilled over to wild Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), linking to elevated mortality and population declines. Molecular epidemiology traces aquaculture-mediated global spread of infectious salmon anemia virus (ISAV) and other agents to wild hosts, with escaped or farm-origin fish facilitating local epidemics. Salmon lice from farms impose significant burdens on wild juvenile salmon during outmigration; Norwegian models estimate lice-induced mortality at 39% for sea trout and up to 80% for salmon smolts in high-infestation areas, though debate persists on transmission dynamics, with some 2025 analyses indicating lower-than-expected farm-to-wild pathogen transfer rates under improved management. Ecological competition arises when escaped farmed salmon enter wild rivers, spawning or foraging alongside natives and altering habitat use or resource availability. In eastern North American rivers, escaped Atlantic salmon comprised up to 20-30% of adults in some systems post-escape events, posing risks to endemic stocks through direct competition for spawning sites and invertebrate prey, potentially reducing wild recruitment by 10-20% in affected populations. In the Pacific Northwest, escaped Atlantic salmon have established feral populations and hybridized with steelhead (O. mykiss), though evidence of broad competitive displacement remains limited compared to genetic and disease effects; a U.S. Forest Service assessment found potential for invasion into freshwater streams but low natural reproduction success due to maladapted traits. Overall, a global review of 50+ studies concludes that cumulative interactions from escapes—genetic dilution, pathogen amplification, and competitive interference—have contributed to documented declines in wild salmonid abundance, with introgression effects being irreversible without aggressive culling or breeding programs.

Feed Resources and Forage Fish Usage

Feeds for farmed salmonids, particularly Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), are formulated dry pellets providing high-protein (40-50%) and lipid (20-35%) content to support carnivorous growth requirements, with marine ingredients historically central for essential nutrients like long-chain omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA) and methionine. Fishmeal and fish oil, derived mainly from reduction fisheries targeting abundant forage species such as Peruvian anchoveta (Engraulis ringens), Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus), and capelin (Mallotus villosus), constitute key components, yielding concentrated proteins (60-70% in fishmeal) and oils rich in marine lipids. Inclusion levels of fishmeal in commercial diets have decreased from peaks of 30-50% in the 1990s to under 10-15% in recent years (as of 2023-2024 formulations), alongside fish oil at 4-6%, due to cost pressures, supply constraints, and substitution with plant-based alternatives including concentrate, rapeseed meal, and wheat gluten, which now comprise 60-70% of feeds. This shift maintains growth performance via improved feed efficiency (feed conversion ratios of 1.1-1.3 kg feed per kg gain) but requires supplementation for gaps, as plant sources lack sufficient marine-derived profiles. Global production, exceeding 2 million tonnes in early 2024, demands approximately 2.5-3 million tonnes of feed annually, incorporating 200,000-400,000 tonnes of fishmeal based on average inclusions. The fish-in-fish-out (FIFO) ratio quantifies dependency, calculated as wild fish equivalents input divided by farmed output; for , traditional metrics yield 1.2-3.0 (varying by allocation method), reflecting a decline from historical 5:1 ratios, while economic allocation accounting for co-products (e.g., human-grade fillets from trimmings) lowers it to 0.6-1.9, implying net marine protein amplification. Salmonids account for about 20-25% of global fishmeal use (from 5-6 million tonnes annual production) and higher for , but 's share of forage catch remains 10-15%, with stocks in key fisheries (e.g., biomass >10 million tonnes) sustained via -linked quotas under frameworks like the IFFO Responsible Sourcing standard. Sustainability assessments highlight stable yields despite salmon growth, bolstered by by-product utilization (30% of fishmeal, 51% of from processing waste as of 2021), yet critics argue FIFO understates ecological costs, as farmed retains only 20-50% of key nutrients like EPA/DHA from inputs, potentially favoring direct consumption for over conversion losses. Ongoing innovations, including microbial oils and meals, aim to further decouple feeds from wild stocks, with trials showing viable 0-5% marine inclusion without welfare impacts.

Certifications, Standards, and Regulatory Frameworks

The Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) Salmon Standard, updated to version 1.4.1 in May 2024, sets criteria for farmed production, emphasizing compliance with principles on , protection of wild populations, efficient resource use, and social responsibility, with over 150 indicators audited by third-party certifiers. Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP), administered by the Global Seafood Alliance, certifies salmon farms under its Salmon Farm Standard Issue 3.0 released in August 2025, covering environmental impacts, , , and across the production chain from to processing. GLOBALG.A.P. provides an additional certification framework for salmonid aquaculture, focusing on integrated farm assurance with requirements for ecological sustainability, worker welfare, and product . These certifications are voluntary and market-driven, with ASC claiming alignment with science-based benchmarks that deems recommendable for salmon, though independent reviews indicate variable compliance; for instance, a 2018 global audit found 95% of ASC-certified farms meeting certain environmental indicators like escaped limits, but ongoing critiques highlight insufficient enforcement on sea lice thresholds, such as a 2023 adjustment in raising the allowable mature female lice per to 0.5 from prior stricter levels, potentially exacerbating risks to wild stocks. BAP standards have faced similar scrutiny from environmental groups for not adequately mitigating interactions with wild salmonids, despite updates aimed at enhancing and . Empirical data from certified operations show reduced use and improved feed efficiency compared to non-certified farms, but certifications do not universally prevent outbreaks or escapes, as evidenced by persistent sea lice and genetic incidents in certified Norwegian and Canadian sites. Regulatory frameworks vary by jurisdiction, with Norway's Aquaculture Act governing the world's largest salmonid producer through mandatory licensing, biomass limits, and a system that adjusts production zones based on sea lice counts and mortality rates to protect wild ; as of 2025, this system mandates delousing when exceeding 0.2 adult female lice per fish in some areas, though new comprehensive regulations were postponed to at least 2026 amid industry and governmental negotiations. In the , salmonid aquaculture falls under shared competence with directives on environmental protection (e.g., ) and animal health (Regulation (EU) 2016/429), requiring permits for water use, waste discharge, and , alongside organic production rules under Regulation (EU) 2018/848 that limit stocking densities to 20-25 kg/m³ and prohibit synthetic chemicals in feed. The United States regulates via the and Food and Drug Administration, enforcing the Magnuson-Stevens Act for habitat protection and Endangered Act consultations for Pacific salmonids, with over 1,300 federal, state, and local laws applying, including effluent standards under the Clean Water Act. Compliance with these frameworks has driven measurable outcomes, such as 's reduction in use to under 1 gram per tonne of produced by 2023 through regulatory incentives for and strategies, yet challenges persist, including judicial challenges to open-net pen approvals due to cumulative impacts on wild populations, underscoring that regulations prioritize production growth alongside mitigation rather than elimination of risks like transfer. In regions like , post-2016 infectious outbreaks prompted tightened under national fisheries laws, aligning with international standards but lagging in welfare metrics compared to . Overall, while certifications and regulations have improved and reduced some inputs, their effectiveness in curbing ecological externalities remains debated, with peer-reviewed analyses indicating that stricter enforcement correlates with slower production growth but better wild stock preservation.

Health, Safety, and Welfare Considerations

Contaminants and Chemical Residues

Farmed salmonids, particularly (Salmo salar), have historically accumulated persistent organic pollutants (POPs) such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and from marine-derived feeds rich in and meal contaminated by environmental legacies. Early assessments, including a 2004 global study of over 700 samples, found elevated POP concentrations in European-farmed —up to five times higher than in North American farmed or wild counterparts—prompting consumption advisories limited to once monthly for certain origins. However, feed reformulations since the mid-2000s, incorporating vegetable oils and purified marine ingredients, have substantially reduced these levels; Norwegian farmed showed and dl-PCB concentrations dropping to 0.57 pg TEQ/g wet weight by 2019, compared to 1.48 pg TEQ/g in wild from the same regions. Recent peer-reviewed analyses confirm that contemporary farmed POP burdens are often comparable to or lower than wild , with no significant differences observed between open net-pen, recirculating systems (RAS), and wild samples in total PCBs or dioxins/furans as of 2025 evaluations. Regulatory monitoring in major producers like and verifies compliance with strict maximum residue limits (MRLs), such as the EU's 3.5 pg TEQ/g for dioxins plus dl-PCBs, with exceedances rare and attributable to batch-specific feed variability rather than systemic issues. These reductions reflect causal improvements in purification, not merely dilution, though legacy in wild from oceanic foraging persists. Heavy metals like mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), and lead (Pb) occur at low concentrations in farmed salmonids, typically below human health thresholds and often lower than in wild counterparts due to controlled feed sourcing and site-specific water quality. In Norwegian Atlantic salmon from 1999–2011, Hg levels declined from 0.024 to 0.018 mg/kg, As from 0.48 to 0.32 mg/kg, and Cd remained under 0.01 mg/kg, all far below Codex Alimentarius standards (e.g., 0.5 mg/kg for Hg). Spanish-market salmonid products (trout and salmon) analyzed in 2024 showed mean Hg at 0.012 mg/kg, Cd at 0.002 mg/kg, and Pb at 0.015 mg/kg, posing negligible risk via estimated weekly intakes. RAS systems may elevate Cd and Pb slightly from equipment leaching, but open-ocean net-pens minimize bioaccumulation through dilution and regulatory effluent controls. Chemical residues from sea lice treatments, including avermectins (e.g., benzoate) and pyrethroids (e.g., , ), are detected in farmed muscle at trace levels post-withdrawal periods, enforced to ensure residues fall below MRLs like the EU's 100 μg/kg for . A 2017 study of Chilean farmed found pyrethroids comprising 77% of total residues but at concentrations averaging 0.5–5 μg/kg, well under toxicological reference doses and not bioaccumulating significantly in consumers. shifts toward non-chemical methods (e.g., mechanical delousing, ) further limit reliance on these compounds, with monitoring data from producers indicating <1% of samples exceeding limits annually. Overall, risk assessments affirm that contaminant exposures from farmed salmonids do not detract from nutritional benefits at moderate consumption levels (2–3 servings weekly), contrasting alarmist narratives from earlier decades.

Antibiotic and Therapeutic Use

In salmonid aquaculture, antibiotics are primarily administered to treat bacterial infections such as Piscirickettsia salmonis (piscirickettsiosis) in species like Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), with usage levels varying significantly by region and management practices. In Norway, a leading producer, antibiotic use has remained negligible, often below 0.01 grams per tonne of harvested fish since the widespread adoption of vaccines in the 1990s, reflecting effective biosecurity and selective breeding for disease resistance. Scotland reported a record-low usage of 5.1 milligrams per kilogram (equivalent to 5.1 grams per tonne) in 2024, a 79% decline from 24.8 mg/kg in 2023, with only 8% of farms requiring treatment, attributed to improved vaccines and non-medicinal interventions. In contrast, Chile, the second-largest producer, recorded higher volumes, with 334 grams per tonne in 2019 and a 22.6% increase in the first half of 2024 compared to 2023, driven by recurrent bacterial outbreaks in net-pen systems. Therapeutic interventions extend beyond antibiotics to address parasitic threats, particularly sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus spp.), which impose substantial economic costs estimated at over $500 million annually across the industry. Chemical treatments include emamectin benzoate (an avermectin fed via medicated pellets), hydrogen peroxide baths, and organophosphates like azamethiphos, with efficacy declining due to emerging resistance documented in multiple regions since the early 2000s. Non-chemical methods, such as mechanical delousing (e.g., warm-water showers) and biological controls using cleaner fish like lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus), have gained traction, reducing reliance on pharmaceuticals; for instance, Canadian farms in British Columbia applied over 10,000 sea lice treatments in 2024, increasingly favoring integrated strategies. Vaccines against bacterial pathogens, such as those for Aeromonas salmonicida and Vibrio species, are routinely used preventively in freshwater stages, minimizing therapeutic needs in seawater grow-out. Regulatory frameworks enforce strict controls to mitigate risks, with the European Union prohibiting antibiotics for growth promotion since 2006 and setting maximum residue limits (MRLs) such as 50 μg/kg for amoxicillin and 100 μg/kg for sulfonamides in fish muscle. In the United States, only three antibiotics (florfenicol, oxytetracycline, and sulfadimethoxine) are approved for aquaculture, with no routine preventive use permitted, and residues monitored to ensure withdrawal periods prevent human exposure. Empirical assessments indicate low probabilities of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) transmission to consumers via farmed salmon fillets, as resistant bacteria from farms show limited adaptation to human pathogens, though environmental dissemination in coastal sediments has been observed near high-use sites like Chilean farms.

Fish Welfare in Aquaculture Systems

Fish welfare in salmonid aquaculture is evaluated through a combination of physiological, behavioral, and pathological indicators, including plasma cortisol concentrations, heart rate variability, swimming activity patterns, fin erosion, gill pathology, and growth rates. Elevated cortisol and heart rate, often persisting for hours after acute stressors like handling or reduced water levels, serve as reliable proxies for stress responses in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). These metrics reflect the fish's ability to cope with environmental challenges, with chronic elevation linked to immunosuppression, reduced feed intake, and higher mortality risks. Behavioral observations, such as increased aggression or abnormal swimming, further indicate compromised welfare, though interpretations require context-specific validation. Stocking density influences welfare outcomes but functions primarily as a management tool rather than an isolated indicator, with effects modulated by water quality, oxygenation, feeding regimes, and enclosure design. In sea cages, densities exceeding 100 kg/m³ have been associated with heightened stress, fin damage, and pathogen transmission in some experimental settings, yet field data from commercial operations maintaining 15-25 kg/m³ with adequate currents show minimal adverse impacts when other parameters are optimized. Norwegian regulations cap biomass at levels ensuring fish swim against currents without exhaustion, preventing density-related welfare deficits observed at extremes. Critics arguing against density thresholds overlook evidence from regulated systems, where limits correlate with reduced morbidity and align with consumer preferences for transparent welfare standards. Parasites and diseases, particularly sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis), impose significant welfare burdens through skin lesions, osmotic stress, and secondary infections, elevating cortisol and reducing growth by up to 20% in untreated infestations. Chemical or thermal treatments for lice can induce acute stress, highlighting gaps in non-invasive control methods. Sub-lethal lice burdens exacerbate handling stress during delousing, underscoring the need for integrated biosecurity to mitigate cumulative effects. Handling and transport phases trigger acute physiological responses, including spikes in lactate, glucose, and osmolality, which can impair smolt quality and post-transfer survival if not minimized through sedation or optimized protocols. In contrast, well-managed systems incorporating environmental enrichment, such as structured substrates, and circadian lighting reduce chronic stress and aggression. Slaughter methods prioritize rapid unconsciousness to avert suffering, with percussive stunning (delivering a concussive blow to the head) or electrical stunning preferred for salmonids, achieving insensibility in under 1 second when equipment is calibrated correctly. Regulations in Norway and Scotland mandate pre-slaughter stunning followed by exsanguination, phasing out asphyxiation or ice slurry immersion alone, which prolong distress via hypoxia. Food-grade anesthetics like MS-222 offer alternatives for smaller-scale operations but require residue monitoring. Despite advancements, inconsistent application in some regions persists, though industry adoption of automated systems has improved compliance since the early 2010s. Ongoing innovations, including real-time biometric sensors for stress monitoring and selective breeding for robust genotypes, enhance welfare by addressing vulnerabilities like density intolerance or disease susceptibility. Recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) further alleviate open-net pen stressors through stable conditions, though scalability remains limited. Empirical data indicate welfare improvements over decades, with mortality rates in Norwegian salmon farming dropping from 20% in the 1990s to under 15% by 2020, attributable to these evidence-based practices rather than unsubstantiated advocacy claims.

Innovations and Technological Advances

Genetic Selection and Improvement

Selective breeding programs for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) originated in Norway during the 1970s, establishing foundational populations from wild stocks and achieving cumulative genetic gains in growth rate of approximately 10-15% per generation through family-based selection on traits such as body weight and feed efficiency. These programs, exemplified by the Norwegian national breeding effort, have resulted in domesticated strains that exhibit roughly twice the growth rate of wild counterparts under farmed conditions, alongside reduced feed requirements by up to 25%. Similar initiatives in and the United States have maintained genetic diversity across multiple generations while targeting production enhancements, with Tasmanian programs incorporating genomic tools since 2004 to sustain broad-based improvement. Advancements in genomic selection, implemented commercially in salmon breeding since 2009, utilize dense marker panels to predict breeding values for polygenic traits like disease resistance and fillet quality, yielding accuracy improvements of 10-20% over traditional methods and enabling selection at earlier life stages. In Atlantic salmon, genomic approaches have facilitated gains in resistance to pathogens such as infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV), where specific alleles confer major effects on survival rates during outbreaks. Multi-population genomic prediction models further enhance accuracy by integrating data across breeding cohorts, though cross-population predictions remain challenged by genetic drift and environment-specific effects. For rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), genetic selection programs have focused on fillet yield, firmness, and feed conversion ratio, with realized gains reducing production costs by 18.3% and nutrient loading through improved efficiency compared to base populations. Genomic predictions for these traits achieve heritabilities of 0.3-0.5, allowing indirect selection for feed efficiency via correlated metrics like body lipid percentage, which supports sustainable intensification amid shifts to plant-based diets. Despite these progresses, balanced mating strategies are essential to mitigate inbreeding depression, as unchecked selection for growth can erode fitness-related traits; Norwegian programs over 50 years demonstrate sustained productivity without significant inbreeding accumulation through controlled effective population sizes. Challenges persist in maintaining genetic variation for resilience against emerging diseases and environmental stressors, necessitating ongoing integration of wild germplasm where feasible, though domestication effects may reduce adaptability outside controlled aquaculture settings.

Alternative Feeds and Feed Efficiency

In salmonid aquaculture, particularly for Salmo salar (Atlantic salmon), traditional feeds have historically relied on fishmeal (FM) and fish oil (FO) derived from wild-caught forage fish such as anchoveta and capelin, which provide essential amino acids, lipids, and omega-3 fatty acids like EPA and DHA. However, the finite supply of these marine ingredients, coupled with concerns over overexploitation of wild stocks—evidenced by fluctuating FM production tied to events like El Niño—has driven the development of alternative feeds to achieve sustainability goals, including fish-in-fish-out (FIFO) ratios below 1. By 2023, FM and FO inclusions in grower diets for farmed Atlantic salmon had declined to often less than 10%, reflecting successful partial substitutions without broadly compromising production metrics. Key alternative protein sources include plant-based ingredients like soy protein concentrate, rapeseed meal, and pea protein; animal by-products such as poultry by-product meal; and novel options like insect meals (e.g., from black soldier fly larvae), single-cell proteins (SCPs) from yeast, bacteria, or microalgae, and microbial proteins from waste streams. Poultry by-product meal can be incorporated up to 10% in Atlantic salmon diets without affecting growth performance, health, or product quality, as demonstrated in trials maintaining feed intake and fillet yield. Insect-based feeds, such as those from black soldier fly, support comparable growth and feed utilization to FM, with potential benefits for gut health and reduced reliance on marine resources, though scalability and cost remain barriers. SCPs, produced via fermentation of substrates like methane or agricultural waste, offer high protein content (up to 70%) and sustainability advantages, including lower carbon footprints in some cases, and have shown viability in partial FM replacement for salmonids, enhancing nutrient digestibility when fortified. Microalgae and algal oils address EPA/DHA deficits in plant-heavy diets, enabling near-complete FO replacement in long-term grow-out trials with minimal impacts on performance or fatty acid profiles. Feed efficiency, measured by the feed conversion ratio (FCR)—the kilograms of feed required per kilogram of biomass gain—has improved markedly in salmonid aquaculture, dropping to an industry average of around 1.12 for by recent estimates, with site-specific records as low as 1.002 achieved through optimized formulations and management. This represents a 53% improvement in farm-level FCR since the 1980s, driven by genetic selection for efficient metabolism, precise rationing via acoustic feeders, and balanced alternative feeds that maintain or enhance digestibility of proteins and lipids. In recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), FCRs as low as 1.0-1.1 have been reported, outperforming sea-cage averages due to controlled environments minimizing waste. These gains reduce overall feed input for a given yield—e.g., producing 1 kg of salmon now requires about 1.1-1.2 kg of feed versus higher historical figures—and lower nutrient loading, though challenges persist in ensuring alternatives fully replicate FM/FO's bioavailability for optimal omega-3 deposition and immune function, necessitating ongoing supplementation and breeding for better utilization traits.

Closed Containment and Recirculating Systems

Closed containment systems in salmonid aquaculture encompass technologies designed to physically isolate farmed fish from the surrounding aquatic environment, thereby minimizing interactions such as escapes, pathogen transmission, and waste discharge into open waters. These include floating semi-closed containment systems (SCCS), such as flexible bag or rigid pen enclosures deployed in marine sites, and fully land-based recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), which recirculate up to 99% of water through biofilters, mechanical filtration, and oxygenation processes to maintain optimal conditions. For (Salmo salar), the primary salmonid species farmed commercially, these systems enable controlled rearing from smolt to harvest, contrasting with traditional open net-pen methods. A key advantage of closed containment is enhanced biosecurity and reduced ecological risks; for instance, SCCS trials in Norway have demonstrated near-zero escape rates and significantly lower sea lice infestations by preventing direct contact with wild populations, addressing a primary criticism of open net pens where escapes numbered over 300,000 annually in Norway during peak years. RAS further mitigates marine impacts by eliminating effluent discharge, with studies indicating a carbon footprint for U.S.-delivered RAS salmon roughly half that of net-pen equivalents when accounting for full life-cycle transport and avoided marine pollution. These systems also allow precise management of water quality, feed conversion, and disease, potentially improving fish health outcomes, as evidenced by Cermaq Canada's 2025 completion of a full production cycle in a floating closed system without mechanical delousing. Despite these benefits, scalability remains a persistent challenge, with closed systems comprising less than 1% of global salmon production as of 2024 due to high capital and operational costs—RAS facilities can require investments exceeding $10-15 per kg of annual capacity, driven by energy demands for pumping, aeration, and temperature control in cold-water salmonids. Technical hurdles include maintaining water quality at commercial densities (e.g., 50-100 kg/m³ in RAS), where biofilter inefficiencies or equipment failures can lead to ammonia spikes and fish stress, potentially compromising welfare. Fish growth rates in enclosed systems may lag behind open pens by 10-20% without optimized lighting and flow regimes, and economic viability is debated, with some RAS operations reporting losses until production scales beyond 10,000 tonnes annually. Commercial examples illustrate gradual adoption: In Norway, the Preline SCCS has supported pilot harvests exceeding 1,000 tonnes since 2022 with lice levels below treatment thresholds, while land-based RAS pioneer Atlantic Sapphire in the U.S. ramped to 2,700 tonnes in 2024, projecting profitability over $1.5 million. In Canada, regulatory shifts mandate transitioning from open net pens in by 2029, spurring projects like Akvafuture's planned floating closed farm with First Nations partnerships. Globally, RAS-farmed salmon markets are forecasted to reach $3.295 billion by 2025, signaling investor interest but underscoring that widespread replacement of open systems requires cost reductions through technological refinement and policy support. Empirical reviews emphasize that while closed containment resolves specific externalities like escapes, its net environmental superiority depends on site-specific energy sourcing and efficiency gains, not inherent to the technology alone.

Emerging Technologies and Scalability Challenges

Land-based recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) represent a key emerging technology for salmonid production, enabling closed-loop farming with up to 99% water reuse and enhanced biosecurity by isolating fish from marine pathogens like sea lice. These systems support year-round production in controlled environments, with the global land-based salmon market projected to expand from US$4.2 billion in 2024 to US$6.5 billion by 2033, driven by investments in facilities for post-smolt and full-cycle growth. However, RAS scalability is constrained by high energy demands for water treatment and oxygenation, often requiring optimization through technologies like deep deterministic policy gradient algorithms for feeding efficiency. Sea-based innovations, including semi-closed containment and submersible cages, address limitations of traditional net pens by minimizing exposure to surface parasites and expanding into offshore sites. Examples include SalMar's Ocean Farm 1, operational since 2017, and Lerøy's submersible systems, which achieved 44% harvest volume in the Midt facility and 49% in Sjøtroll during Q2 2025, reducing mortality from lice treatments. Hybrid flow-through systems combine elements of open and closed designs to improve efficiency, while offshore platforms modeled on oil rigs enable larger-scale operations in deeper waters with colder currents that lower disease risks. Scalability challenges persist across these technologies, primarily due to elevated capital expenditures (CAPEX) in RAS, where facilities often operate at only 50-60% of design capacity owing to biofilter inefficiencies, such as hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) production in fixed-bed systems—over 100 incidents reported since 2016—and suboptimal fish growth from elevated temperatures exceeding 16°C, leading to early maturation and weights below 2 kg. Offshore systems face structural vulnerabilities in harsh conditions, regulatory delays for site approvals, and operational risks including personnel safety and unproven long-term fish welfare impacts from confinement or submersion. Industry representatives highlight that while these innovations promise reduced environmental interactions, they introduce complexities like water quality management in semi-closed setups and the need for advanced sensors, potentially offsetting gains unless integrated with proven biofiltration like moving bed bioreactors.

Controversies and Stakeholder Perspectives

Debates on Ecological Impacts and Evidence Reviews

Debates center on whether open-net pen salmonid aquaculture, particularly Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), causes significant ecological harm to wild populations and marine ecosystems, with evidence varying by impact type and region. Proponents of regulation argue that farms amplify parasites, diseases, and genetic dilution, citing correlations between farm proximity and wild salmon declines in areas like Norway, Scotland, and British Columbia. Critics, including some industry-funded analyses, contend that attributions often overlook multifactorial stressors like climate change, habitat loss, and overfishing, and that meta-analyses show mixed causal evidence. Systematic reviews, such as those by the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization (NASCO), highlight data gaps and biases in monitoring, noting that while exposure risks exist, quantifying population-level effects requires longitudinal studies controlling for confounders. Sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus spp.) infestations from farms are a focal point, as dense host populations in net pens boost lice proliferation, increasing infection risks for outmigrating wild smolts. A 2025 review found salmon lice from aquaculture reduce wild Atlantic salmon marine survival by elevating mortality during migration, with models estimating 10-39% additional losses in exposed cohorts. However, a 2024 analysis of Pacific salmon data argued that sea lice impacts from farms are overestimated, as wild population trends correlate more strongly with oceanographic factors than farm density, and treatments like cleaner fish mitigate farm lice loads. Evidence from Norway indicates farmed lice contribute to higher infestation rates on wild fish near farms, but natural lice cycles and predation also drive variability, complicating isolation of aquaculture's role. Escapes of farmed salmon, estimated at 0.1-1% of stock annually in regions like Norway, lead to genetic introgression via interbreeding with wild conspecifics, altering traits like growth rate and maturation timing. A 2021 study across 105 Norwegian populations showed introgressed fish exhibit faster growth and earlier seaward migration, potentially reducing fitness in natural selection pressures. Genetic monitoring in 2016 revealed high introgression levels (>20% farmed ancestry) in 73% of assessed rivers, with population-specific persistence despite selection against hybrids. Non-native escapes, as in Chile and Patagonia, pose additional risks of establishment and hybridization, though empirical establishment rates remain low due to environmental mismatches. Reviews emphasize that while introgression is widespread, its long-term demographic impacts depend on escape rates and wild population resilience, with some evidence of stabilizing selection purging maladapted genes over generations. Pathogen spillover, including viruses like infectious salmon anemia (ISA) and piscine reovirus (PRV), represents another contested vector, with aquaculture amplifying reservoirs for transmission to wild . A 2021 phylogeographic analysis traced PRV global spread to farmed salmon movements, linking it to heart in wild Pacific stocks. In , a 2024 review identified three prevalent farm spilling over to wild salmon, correlating with elevated mortality, though directionality debates persist due to bidirectional potential. Norwegian data show escaped farmed fish carrying dual infections, facilitating wild exposure, but management like has reduced outbreak frequency since 2010. Critics note that wild fish harbor endemic strains, and farm-wild attribution relies on correlative rather than controlled experiments. Nutrient discharges from uneaten feed and feces cause localized benthic eutrophication under net pens, with oxygen depletion and sediment anoxia documented in high-density sites. A Norwegian assessment rated farm eutrophication risks low beyond immediate zones, as dispersion models predict dilution in coastal currents. In Chile, excess nitrogen/phosphorus has intensified algal blooms, but paleolimnological proxies indicate variable impacts tied to site-specific hydrology rather than universal causation. Evidence reviews underscore that while farms contribute to nutrient loads—equivalent to 10-20% of regional agriculture in some fjords—broader coastal eutrophication stems from terrestrial runoff, and carrying capacity models now inform site fallowing to limit accumulation.

Economic Benefits vs. Alleged External Costs

Salmonid , particularly farming, generates substantial economic value through high-volume production and export revenues. In 2022, the global market was valued at approximately USD 20 billion, with projections reaching USD 44.4 billion by 2034, driven by demand for its nutritional profile including omega-3 fatty acids. , the largest producer, saw its aquaculture sector contribute 2.3% to mainland GDP in 2022, up from 1.5% in the early , with exports forming the bulk of this impact. The industry supported around 22,700 direct jobs in as of recent assessments, alongside ripple effects creating additional in , , and ancillary services, totaling over 208,000 global jobs in production that yield about 18 billion meals annually. These benefits extend to and efficiency, as farmed provides a scalable protein source with lower resource intensity than many alternatives; for instance, farming in generated 69 billion in direct GDP value in 2019, with 33 billion from indirect effects. Cost-benefit analyses of operations, such as submerged versus surface cages in regions like the , demonstrate net profits exceeding $685,000 annually per site for optimized systems, indicating low-risk viability for producers. In the U.S., contributes $3.8 billion in economic output yearly, with a multiplier effect where each dollar invested generates $0.73 in broader economic activity. Alleged external costs, including ecological impacts like , escaped fish interbreeding with wild stocks, and disease transmission such as sea lice, are frequently cited by advocacy groups but often lack robust quantification relative to benefits. A 2024 report commissioned by the Changing Markets Foundation estimated global farming externalities at USD 50 billion since 2013, encompassing treatment costs and alleged losses; however, this draws from selective data and advocacy perspectives, potentially inflating figures without causal attribution to farming versus baseline environmental pressures. Empirical studies show some externalities are internalized as operational costs, such as sea lice management estimated at $480 million globally in peak years, primarily borne by farmers through treatments rather than unmitigated societal harm. Peer-reviewed analyses of spatial farm densities reveal proximity-driven cost increases from disease risks, yet these are firm-level rather than net societal losses, with regulations like Norway's limits adapting to contain them. Net assessments favor benefits outweighing alleged costs in most frameworks. Sustainability evaluations across economic, environmental, and social pillars rank aquaculture highly in profitability and global trade contributions, outperforming other despite foreign critiques. Cost-benefit models for expansions, such as in , project positive municipal returns when accounting for localized externalities, while disease mitigation innovations further enhance margins by reducing mortality. Claims of outsized external burdens, often amplified in media narratives from environmental NGOs, contrast with data showing farmed 's efficiency—producing more per input than —and minimal evidence of irreversible wild stock collapses attributable solely to escapes, as genetic impacts vary by region and . Overall, empirical economic modeling, including partial budget approaches, confirms positive net social benefits, underscoring aquaculture's role in rural development and protein supply amid declining wild catches.

Public and Media Narratives vs. Empirical Data

Public and media coverage of salmonid frequently emphasizes environmental risks, portraying open-net-pen farming as a primary driver of sea lice infestations on wild , resistance, and localized from waste and uneaten feed. For instance, reports highlight chemical treatments for sea lice and potential transfers to wild populations, often amplifying advocacy claims of without quantifying long-term population effects. overuse narratives draw from earlier high-usage periods, linking farms to broader resistance concerns, while debates frame carnivorous like as inherently resource-intensive compared to wild capture. These portrayals, prevalent in outlets like and , tend to prioritize episodic scandals over trend data, with negative tones in nearly 40% of analyzed Atlantic Canadian articles. Empirical data, however, reveal substantial improvements and nuanced impacts. Antimicrobial use in salmon aquaculture has declined markedly across major producers: in Scotland, it reached 5.1 mg per kilogram of fish in 2024, reflecting ongoing reductions; Canada saw a drop from 110.97 mg/kg in 2016 to 45.62 mg/kg in 2021; and global trends show salmon as the lowest-use species group among farmed fish. Peer-reviewed analyses attribute this to better husbandry, vaccines, and selective breeding, outpacing production growth, contrary to persistent media associations with unchecked resistance. On sea lice, while farm-origin infestations can elevate loads on nearby wild juveniles, long-term studies in British Columbia found no consistent decline in wild Pacific salmon lice levels post-farm closures, suggesting overestimation of farm attribution amid natural variability. A 20-year global review indicates positive shifts in aquaculture's environmental performance, including reduced habitat conversion and lower feed conversion ratios for salmonids, supporting FAO assessments of aquaculture's role in sustainable protein supply amid rising demand. Discrepancies often stem from source selection: advocacy-driven reports, such as those from NGOs, emphasize worst-case scenarios and may underweight industry-funded mitigations, while systematic reviews favor data-driven outcomes like decreased treatment needs. For example, claims of rampant genetic pollution from escapes persist in media, yet evidence reviews show limited introgression in wild Atlantic salmon populations due to low fitness of farmed strains. Overall, salmonid aquaculture's empirical footprint—contributing over 2.5 million tonnes annually with improving metrics—contrasts with narratives implying systemic unsustainability, highlighting the need for causal attribution beyond correlation in impact assessments.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.