Hubbry Logo
Bourbon Restoration in FranceBourbon Restoration in FranceMain
Open search
Bourbon Restoration in France
Community hub
Bourbon Restoration in France
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bourbon Restoration in France
Bourbon Restoration in France
from Wikipedia

Key Information

The Bourbon Restoration was the period of French history during which the House of Bourbon returned to power after the fall of Napoleon Bonaparte in 1814 and 1815. The second Bourbon Restoration lasted until the July Revolution of 1830, during the reigns of Louis XVIII (1814–1815, 1815–1824) and Charles X (1824–1830), brothers of the late King Louis XVI. Exiled supporters of the monarchy returned to France, which had been profoundly changed by the French Revolution. Exhausted by the Napoleonic Wars, the kingdom experienced a period of internal and external peace, stable economic prosperity and the preliminaries of industrialisation.[4]

Background

[edit]

Following the collapse of the Directory in the Coup of 18 Brumaire (9 November 1799), Napoleon Bonaparte became ruler of France as leader of the Consulate. By the Consulate's end with the creation of the First French Empire on 18 May 1804, Napoleon had consolidated his power into an authoritarian personal rule. After Napoleon spent the next ten years expanding his empire by successive military victories, a coalition of European powers defeated him in the War of the Sixth Coalition, ended the First Empire in 1814, and restored the monarchy to the brothers of Louis XVI. The first Bourbon Restoration lasted from 6 April 1814 to 20 March 1815, when Napoleon managed to escape from exile on the island of Elba and seized power once more. Following Napoleon's final defeat at Waterloo, he was exiled to Saint Helena for the rest of his life. On 8 July 1815 the kingdom was restored, existing until 2 August 1830, after the July Revolution.[citation needed]

At the Congress of Vienna, the Bourbons were treated politely by the victorious monarchies, but had to give up nearly all the territorial gains made by Revolutionary and Napoleonic France since 1789.[5]

Constitutional monarchy

[edit]

Unlike the absolutist Ancien Régime, the Restoration government was a constitutional monarchy, which limited the King's power. The new King, Louis XVIII, had been sober enough to realize during two decades in exile that France would not tolerate an attempt to resurrect the 18th century. He accepted the vast majority of reforms instituted from 1792 to 1814. Continuity was his basic policy. He did not try to recover land and property taken from the émigrés. He continued in peaceful fashion the main objectives of Napoleon's foreign policy, such as the limitation of Austrian influence. He reversed Napoleon's actions regarding Spain and the Ottoman Empire, restoring the friendships that had prevailed until 1792.[6]

Politically, the period was characterised by a conservative reaction, and consequent minor but persistent civil unrest and disturbances.[7] Otherwise, the political establishment was stable until the subsequent reign of Charles X.[4] It also saw the reestablishment of the Catholic Church as a major power in French politics.[8] Throughout the Bourbon Restoration, France experienced a period of stable economic prosperity and the preliminaries of industrialisation.[4]

Permanent changes in French society

[edit]

The eras of the French Revolution and Empire brought a series of major changes to France which the Bourbon Restoration did not reverse.[9][10][11]

Administration: First, France was now highly centralised, with all important decisions made in Paris. The political geography was completely reorganised and made uniform, dividing the country into more than 80 départements which have endured into the 21st century. Each department had an identical administrative structure, and was tightly controlled by a prefect appointed by the government in Paris. The thicket of overlapping legal jurisdictions of the pre-Revolutionary regime had all been abolished, and there was now one standardised legal code, administered by judges appointed by Paris, and supported by police under national control.[citation needed]

The Church: The Revolutionary governments had confiscated all the lands and buildings of the Catholic Church, selling them to innumerable buyers, and it was politically impossible to restore them. The bishop still ruled his diocese (which was aligned with the new department boundaries) and communicated with the Pope through the government. Bishops, priests, nuns, and other religious, once severely persecuted, were paid state salaries.[citation needed]

All the old religious rites and ceremonies were retained, and the government maintained France's religious buildings. The Church was allowed to operate its own seminaries and to some extent local schools as well, although this became a central political issue into the 20th century. Bishops were much less powerful than before, and had no political voice. The Catholic Church refocused on a new emphasis on personal piety, influencing the faithful.[12]

Education: Public education was centralised, with the Grand Master of the University of France controlling every element of the national educational system from Paris. New technical universities were opened in Paris which to this day have a critical role in training the elite.[13]

The aristocracy: Conservatism was bitterly split into the returning ancient aristocracy and the new elite arising under Napoleon after 1796. The new elite, the 'noblesse d'empire', ridiculed the older group as an outdated remnant of a discredited regime that had led the nation to disaster. Both groups shared a fear of social disorder, but the level of distrust as well as the cultural differences were too great for political cooperation to be possible.[14]

The returning old aristocracy recovered much of the land they had owned directly. However, they lost all their old seigneurial rights to the rest of the farmland, and the peasants were no longer under their control. The pre-Revolutionary aristocracy had dallied with the ideas of the Enlightenment, but now was much more conservative and supportive of the Catholic Church. For the best jobs, meritocracy was the new policy, and aristocrats had to compete directly with the growing business and professional class.[citation needed]

Citizens' rights: Public anti-clerical sentiment in Paris became stronger, but was now based in certain elements of the middle class and even the peasantry; the greatest masses of French people, who were peasants in the countryside, supported the Church. Citizens gained new rights and a new sense of possibilities. Although relieved of many of the old burdens, controls, and taxes, the peasantry was still highly traditional in its social and economic behaviour. Many eagerly took on mortgages to buy as much land as possible for their children, so debt was an important factor in their calculations. The working class in the cities was a small element, freed of many restrictions imposed by mediaeval guilds. However, France was very slow to industrialise, and much of the work remained drudgery without machinery or technology to help. France was still split into localities, especially in terms of language, but now there was an emerging French nationalism that focused on national pride in the army and foreign affairs.[15]

Political overview

[edit]
The allied armies parading on the Place de la Concorde, 1814

In April 1814, the Armies of the Sixth Coalition restored Louis XVIII to the throne, the brother and heir of the late Louis XVI. A popular constitution was granted by the King: the Charter of 1814. It presented all Frenchmen as equal before the law[16] while retaining substantial prerogatives for the King and nobility and limited voting to those paying at least 300 francs a year in direct taxes.

The King was the supreme head of the state. He commanded the land and sea forces, declared war, made treaties of peace, alliance, and commerce, appointed all public officials, and made the necessary regulations and ordinances for the execution of the laws and the security of the state.[17] Louis XVIII was relatively liberal and willing to compromise, choosing many centrist cabinets.[18]

Louis XVIII died in September 1824 and was succeeded by his brother, who reigned as Charles X. The new King pursued a more conservative form of governance than Louis XVIII. His laws included the Anti-Sacrilege Act (1825–1830). Exasperated by Parisian resistance and disrespect, the King and his ministers attempted to curb liberalism by intervening in the general election of 1830 through the July Ordinances. This sparked a revolution in the streets of Paris, Charles X abdicated along with his son the Dauphin in favour of Henri, Duke of Bordeaux, appointing Louis Philippe, Duke of Orléans regent. Instead, Louis Philippe hid the King's request and allowed the Chamber of Deputies to proclaim him 'King of the French', ushering in the July Monarchy, which would collapse in 1848.

Louis XVIII, 1814–1824

[edit]
Louis XVIII Raising France from Its Ruins by Louis-Philippe Crépin
Louis XVIII making a return at the Hôtel de Ville de Paris on 29 August 1814

First Restoration (1814)

[edit]

Louis XVIII's restoration to the throne in 1814 was effected largely through the support of Napoleon's former foreign minister, Talleyrand, who convinced the victorious Allied Powers of the desirability of a Bourbon Restoration.[19] The Allies had initially split on the best candidate for the throne: Britain favoured the Bourbons, the Austrian Habsburgs considered a regency for Napoleon's son (as his Habsburg mother would have been the regent), and the Russians were open to either the Duke of Orléans, Louis Philippe, or Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte, Napoleon's former Marshal, who was heir-presumptive to the Swedish throne. Napoleon was offered to keep the throne in February 1814, on the condition that France return to its 1792 frontiers, but he refused.[19] The feasibility of the Restoration was in doubt, but the allure of peace to a war-weary French public, and demonstrations of support for the Bourbons in Paris, Bordeaux, Marseille, and Lyon, helped reassure the Allies.[20]

Louis, in accordance with the Declaration of Saint-Ouen,[21] granted a written constitution, the Charter of 1814, which guaranteed a bicameral legislature with a hereditary/appointive Chamber of Peers and an elected Chamber of Deputies – their role was consultative (except on taxation), as only the King had the power to propose or sanction laws, and appoint or recall ministers.[22] The franchise was limited to men with considerable property holdings, and just 1% of people could vote.[22] Many of the legal, administrative, and economic reforms of the Revolutionary period were left intact; the Napoleonic Code,[22] which guaranteed legal equality and civil liberties, the peasants' biens nationaux, and the new system of dividing the country into départments were not undone by the King. Relations between Church and state remained regulated by the Concordat of 1801. The constitution was not imposed on the King, the preamble declaring it to be a 'concession and grant', given 'by the free exercise of our royal authority'.[23]

The Hundred Days

[edit]

Napoleon, on 20 March 1815, returned to Paris from Elba to find the city indifferent or even against his return. On his route, most troops sent to stop his march, including some that were nominally royalist, felt more inclined to join the former Emperor than to stop him.[24] Louis XVIII left Paris for Ghent on 19 March where he established the Ghent government-in-exile.[25][26]

After Napoleon was defeated in the Battle of Waterloo and sent again into exile, Louis XVIII returned. During his absence a small revolt in the traditionally pro-royalist Vendée was put down, but there were otherwise few subversive acts favouring the Restoration, even though Napoleon's popularity was low.[27]

Second Restoration (1815)

[edit]
Louis XVIII, asked if he intends to include anyone from the House of Bonaparte in his royal services, responds "I will take none." (18 July 1815)

Talleyrand was again influential in seeing that the Bourbons were restored to power, as was Joseph Fouché,[28][29] Napoleon's minister of police during the Hundred Days. This Second Restoration saw the beginning of the Second White Terror, largely in the south, where unofficial groups supporting the monarchy sought revenge against those who had aided Napoleon's return: about 200–300 were killed while thousands fled. About 70,000 government officials were dismissed. The pro-Bourbon perpetrators were often known as the Verdets because of their green cockets, which was the colour of the Count of Artois – this being the title of the future Charles X at the time, who was associated with the hardline ultra-royalists, or Ultras. After a period in which local authorities did not stop the violence, the King and his ministers sent out officials to restore order.[30]

Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, who served under several regimes, depicted "floating with the tide". Note the high heel of his left shoe, alluding both to his limp and the Devil's hoof.

A new Treaty of Paris was signed on 20 November 1815, which had more punitive terms than the 1814 treaty. France was ordered to pay 700 million francs in indemnities and the country's borders were reduced to their 1790 status, rather than 1792 as in the previous treaty. Until 1818, France was occupied by 1.2 million foreign soldiers, including around 200,000 under the command of the Duke of Wellington, and France was made to pay the costs of their accommodation and rations.[31][32] The promise of tax cuts, prominent in 1814, was impracticable because of these payments. The legacy of this, and the White Terror, left Louis XVIII with a formidable opposition.[31]

Élie, 1st comte Decazes, remained loyal to the Bourbons during the Hundred Days and was the most powerful minister from 1818 to 1820.

Louis's chief ministers were at first moderate,[33] including Talleyrand, the Duke of Richelieu, and Élie, Duke of Decazes; Louis XVIII himself followed a cautious policy.[34] The chambre introuvable, elected in 1815, given the nickname 'unobtainable' by Louis, was dominated by an overwhelming ultra-royalist majority which quickly acquired the reputation of being 'more royalist than the King'. The legislature threw out the Talleyrand-Fouché government and sought to legitimize the White Terror, passing judgement against enemies of the state, sacking 50,000–80,000 civil servants, and dismissing 15,000 army officers.[31] Richelieu, an émigré who had left in October 1789, who 'had nothing at all to do with the new France',[34] was appointed Prime Minister. The chambre introuvable, meanwhile, continued to aggressively uphold the place of the monarchy and the Church, and called for more commemorations for historical royal figures.[b] Over the course of the parliamentary term, the ultra-royalists increasingly began to fuse their brand of politics with state ceremony, much to Louis' distress.[36] Decazes, perhaps the most moderate minister, moved to stop the politicisation of the National Guard (many Verdets had been drafted in) by banning political demonstrations by the militia in July 1816.[37]

Owing to tension between the King's government and the ultra-royalist Chamber of Deputies, the latter began to assert their rights. After they attempted to obstruct the 1816 budget, the government conceded that the chamber had the right to approve state expenditure. However, they were unable to gain a guarantee from the King that his cabinets would represent the majority in parliament.[38]

In September 1816, the chamber was dissolved by Louis XVIII, and electoral manipulation[citation needed] resulted in a more liberal chamber in 1816. Richelieu served until 29 December 1818, followed by Jean-Joseph, Marquis Dessolles until 19 November 1819, and then Decazes (in reality the dominant minister from 1818 to 1820)[39][40] until 20 February 1820. This was the era in which the Doctrinaires dominated policy, hoping to reconcile the monarchy with the French Revolution. The following year, the government changed the electoral laws, resorting to gerrymandering, and altering the franchise to allow some rich men of trade and industry to vote,[41] in an attempt to prevent the ultras from winning a majority in future elections. Press censorship was clarified and relaxed, some positions in the military hierarchy were made open to competition, and mutual schools were set up that encroached on the Catholic monopoly of public primary education.[42][43] Decazes purged a number of ultra-royalist prefects and sub-prefects, and in by-elections, an unusually high proportion of Bonapartists and republicans were elected, some of whom were backed by ultras resorting to tactical voting.[39] The ultras were strongly critical of the practice of giving civil service employment or promotions to deputies, as the government continued to consolidate its position.[44]

By 1820, the opposition liberals—who, with the ultras, made up half the chamber—proved unmanageable, and Decazes and the king were looking for ways to revise the electoral laws again, to ensure a more tractable conservative majority. In February 1820, the assassination by a Bonapartist of the Duc de Berry, the ultrareactionary son of Louis' ultrareactionary brother and heir-presumptive, the future Charles X, triggered Decazes' fall from power and the triumph of the Ultras.[45]

François-René de Chateaubriand, a Romantic writer who sat in the Chamber of Peers

Richelieu returned to power for a short interval, from 1820 to 1821. The press was more strongly censored, detention without trial was reintroduced, and Doctrinaire leaders, such as François Guizot, were banned from teaching at the École Normale Supérieure.[45][46] Under Richelieu, the franchise was changed to give the wealthiest electors a double vote, in time for the November 1820 election. After a resounding victory, a new Ultra ministry was formed, headed by Jean-Baptiste de Villèle, a leading Ultra who served for six years. The ultras found themselves back in power in favourable circumstances: Berry's wife, the duchesse de Berry, gave birth to a "miracle child", Henri, seven months after the duc's death; Napoleon died on Saint Helena in 1821, and his son, the duc de Reichstadt, remained interned in Austrian hands. Literary figures, most notably Chateaubriand, but also Hugo, Lamartine, Vigny, and Nodier, rallied to the ultras' cause. Both Hugo and Lamartine later became republicans, whilst Nodier was formerly.[47][48] Soon, however, Villèle proved himself to be nearly as cautious as his master, and, so long as Louis lived, overtly reactionary policies were kept to a minimum.[citation needed]

Caricature of Louis preparing for the Spanish expedition, by George Cruikshank

The ultras broadened their support, and put a stop to growing military dissent in 1823, when intervention in Spain, in favour of Spanish Bourbon King Ferdinand VII, and against the Liberal Spanish Government, fomented popular patriotic fervour. Despite British backing for the military action, the intervention was widely seen as an attempt to win back influence in Spain, which had been lost to the British under Napoleon. The French expeditionary army, called the Hundred Thousand Sons of Saint Louis, was led by the duc d'Angoulême, the comte d'Artois's son. The French troops marched to Madrid and then to Cádiz, ousting the Liberals with little fighting (April to September 1823), and would remain in Spain for five years. Support for the ultras amongst the voting rich was further strengthened by doling out favours in a similar fashion to the 1816 chamber, and fears over the charbonnerie, the French equivalent of the carbonari. In the 1824 election, another large majority was secured.[49]

Louis XVIII died on 16 September 1824 and was succeeded by his brother, the Comte d'Artois, who took the title of Charles X.[citation needed]

Charles X

[edit]
Portrait of Charles X by Thomas Lawrence, 1825.

1824–1830: Conservative turn

[edit]

The accession to the throne of Charles X, the leader of the ultra-royalist faction, coincided with the ultras' control of power in the Chamber of Deputies; thus, the ministry of the comte de Villèle was able to continue. The restraint Louis had exercised on the ultra-royalists was removed.[citation needed]

As the country underwent a Christian revival in the post-revolutionary years, the ultras worked to raise the status of the Roman Catholic Church once more. The Church and State Concordat of 11 June 1817 was set to replace the Concordat of 1801, but, despite being signed, it was never validated. The Villèle government, under pressure from the Chevaliers de la Foi including many deputies, voted in the Anti-Sacrilege Act in January 1825, which punished by death the theft of consecrated hosts. The law was unenforceable and only enacted for symbolic purposes, though the act's passing caused a considerable uproar, particularly among the Doctrinaires.[50] Much more controversial was the introduction of the Jesuits, who set up a network of colleges for elite youth outside the official university system. The Jesuits were noted for their loyalty to the Pope and gave much less support to Gallican traditions. Inside and outside the Church they had enemies, and the king ended their institutional role in 1828.[51]

New legislation paid an indemnity to royalists whose lands had been confiscated during the Revolution. Although this law had been engineered by Louis, Charles was influential in seeing that it was passed. A bill to finance this compensation, by converting government debt (the rente) from 5% to 3% bonds, which would save the state 30 million francs a year in interest payments, was also put before the chambers. Villèle's government argued that rentiers had seen their returns grow disproportionately to their original investment, and that the redistribution was just. The final law allocated state funds of 988 million francs for compensation (le milliard des émigrés), financed by government bonds at a value of 600 million francs at 3% interest. Around 18 million francs were paid per year.[52] Unexpected beneficiaries of the law were some one million owners of biens nationaux, the old confiscated lands, whose property rights were now confirmed by the new law, leading to a sharp rise in its value.[53]

On 29 May 1825 the Coronation of Charles X took place at Reims Cathedral, the traditional site of French coronations. In 1826, Villèle introduced a bill reestablishing the law of primogeniture, at least for owners of large estates, unless they chose otherwise. The liberals and the press rebelled, as did some dissident ultras, such as Chateaubriand. Their vociferous criticism prompted the government to introduce a bill to restrict the press in December, having largely withdrawn censorship in 1824. This only inflamed the opposition even more, and the bill was withdrawn.[54]

The Villèle cabinet faced increasing pressure in 1827 from the liberal press, including the Journal des débats, which sponsored Chateaubriand's articles. Chateaubriand, the most prominent of the anti-Villèle ultras, had combined with other opponents of press censorship (a new law had reimposed it on 24 July 1827) to form the Société des amis de la liberté de la presse; Choiseul-Stainville, Salvandy and Villemain were among the contributors.[55] Another influential society was the Société Aide-toi, le ciel t'aidera, which worked within the confines of legislation banning the unauthorized meetings of more than 20 members. The group, emboldened by the rising tide of opposition, was of a more liberal composition (associated with Le Globe) and included members such as Guizot, Rémusat, and Barrot.[56] Pamphlets were sent out which evaded the censorship laws, and the group provided organizational assistance to liberal candidates against pro-government state officials in the November 1827 election.[57]

Eugène-Louis Lami, Grenadier of the Royal Guard, ca. 1817, showing the uniform of a Grenadier of the Royal Guard under Charles X

In April 1827, the King and Villèle were confronted by an unruly National Guard. The garrison which Charles reviewed, under orders to express deference to the king but disapproval of his government, instead shouted derogatory anti-Jesuit remarks at his devoutly Catholic niece and daughter in law, Marie Thérèse, Madame la Dauphine. Villèle suffered worse treatment, as liberal officers led troops to protest at his office. In response, the Guard was disbanded.[57] Pamphlets continued to proliferate, which included accusations in September that Charles, on a trip to Saint-Omer, was colluding with the Pope and planned to reinstate the tithe, and had suspended the Charter under the protection of a loyal garrison army.[58]

By the time of the election, the moderate royalists (constitutionalists) were also beginning to turn against Charles, as was the business community, in part due to a financial crisis in 1825, which they blamed on the government's law of indemnification.[59][60] Hugo and a number of other writers, dissatisfied with the reality of life under Charles X, also began to criticize the regime.[61] In preparation for the 30 September registration cut-off for the election, opposition committees worked furiously to get as many voters as possible signed up, countering the actions of préfects, who began removing certain voters who had failed to provide up-to-date documents since the 1824 election. 18,000 voters were added to the 60,000 on the first list; despite préfect attempts to register those who met the franchise and were supporters of the government, this can mainly be attributed to opposition activity.[62] Organization was mainly divided behind Chateaubriand's Friends and the Aide-toi, which backed liberals, constitutionnels, and the contre-opposition (constitutional monarchists).[63]

The new chamber did not result in a clear majority for any side. Villèle's successor, the vicomte de Martignac, who began his term in January 1828, tried to steer a middle course, appeasing liberals by loosening press controls, expelling Jesuits, modifying electoral registration, and restricting the formation of Catholic schools.[64] Charles, unhappy with the new government, surrounded himself with men from the Chevaliers de la Foi and other ultras, such as the Prince de Polignac and La Bourdonnaye. Martignac was deposed when his government lost a bill on local government. Charles and his advisers believed a new government could be formed with the support of the Villèle, Chateaubriand, and Decazes monarchist factions, but chose a chief minister, Polignac, in November 1829 who was repellent to the liberals and, worse, Chateaubriand. Though Charles remained nonchalant, the deadlock led some royalists to call for a coup, and prominent liberals for a tax strike.[65]

At the opening of the session in March 1830, the King delivered a speech that contained veiled threats to the opposition; in response, 221 deputies (an absolute majority) condemned the government, and Charles subsequently prorogued and then dissolved parliament. Charles retained a belief that he was popular amongst the unenfranchised mass of the people, and he and Polignac chose to pursue an ambitious foreign policy of colonialism and expansionism, with the assistance of Russia. France had intervened in the Mediterranean a number of times after Villèle's resignation, and expeditions were now sent to Greece and Madagascar. Polignac also initiated the French conquest of Algeria; victory was announced over the Dey of Algiers in early July. Plans were drawn up to invade Belgium, which was shortly to undergo its own revolution. However, foreign policy did not prove sufficient to divert attention from domestic problems.[66][67]

Charles's dissolution of the Chamber of Deputies, his July Ordinances which set up rigid control of the press, and his restriction of suffrage resulted in the July Revolution of 1830. The major cause of the regime's downfall, however, was that, while it managed to keep the support of the aristocracy, the Catholic Church and even much of the peasantry, the ultras' cause was deeply unpopular outside of parliament and with those who did not hold the franchise,[68] especially the industrial workers and the bourgeoisie.[69] A major reason was a sharp rise in food prices, caused by a series of bad harvests 1827–1830. Workers living on the margin were very hard-pressed, and angry that the government paid little attention to their urgent needs.[70]

Charles abdicated in favor of his grandson, the Comte de Chambord, and left for England. However, the liberal, bourgeois-controlled Chamber of Deputies refused to confirm the Comte de Chambord as Henry V. In a vote largely boycotted by conservative deputies, the body declared the French throne vacant, and elevated Louis-Philippe, Duke of Orléans, to power.[citation needed]

1827–1830: Tensions

[edit]
Charles X Distributing Awards to Artists by François Joseph Heim, 1827.

There is still considerable debate among historians as to the actual cause of the downfall of Charles X. What is generally conceded, though, is that between 1820 and 1830, a series of economic downturns combined with the rise of a liberal opposition within the Chamber of Deputies, ultimately felled the conservative Bourbons.[71]

Between 1827 and 1830, France faced an economic downturn, industrial and agricultural, that was possibly worse than the one that sparked the revolution. A series of progressively worsening grain harvests in the late 1820s pushed up the prices on various staple foods and cash crops.[72] In response, the rural peasantry throughout France lobbied for the relaxation of protective tariffs on grain to lower prices and ease their economic situation. However, Charles X, bowing to pressure from wealthier landowners, kept the tariffs in place. He did so based upon the Bourbon response to the "Year Without a Summer" in 1816, during which Louis XVIII relaxed tariffs during a series of famines, caused a downturn in prices, and incurred the ire of wealthy landowners, who were the traditional source of Bourbon legitimacy. Thus, between 1827 and 1830, peasants throughout France faced a period of relative economic hardship and rising prices.

At the same time, international pressures, combined with weakened purchasing power from the provinces, led to decreased economic activity in urban centers. This industrial downturn contributed to the rising poverty levels among Parisian artisans. Thus, by 1830, multiple demographics had suffered from the economic policies of Charles X.[citation needed]

While the French economy faltered, a series of elections brought a relatively powerful liberal bloc into the Chamber of Deputies. The 17-strong liberal bloc of 1824 grew to 180 in 1827, and 274 in 1830. This liberal majority grew increasingly dissatisfied with the policies of the centrist Martignac and the ultra-royalist Polignac, seeking to protect the limited protections of the Charter of 1814. They sought both the expansion of the franchise, and more liberal economic policies. They also demanded the right, as the majority bloc, to appoint the Prime Minister and the Cabinet.[citation needed]

Also, the growth of the liberal bloc within the Chamber of Deputies corresponded roughly with the rise of a liberal press within France. Generally centered around Paris, this press provided a counterpoint to the government's journalistic services, and to the newspapers of the right. It grew increasingly important in conveying political opinions and the political situation to the Parisian public, and can thus be seen as a crucial link between the rise of the liberals and the increasingly agitated and economically suffering French masses.[citation needed]

By 1830, the Restoration government of Charles X faced difficulties on all sides. The new liberal majority clearly had no intention of budging in the face of Polignac's aggressive policies. The rise of a liberal press within Paris which outsold the official government newspaper indicated a general shift in Parisian politics towards the left. And yet, Charles' base of power was certainly toward the right of the political spectrum, as were his own views. He simply could not yield to the growing demands from within the Chamber of Deputies. The situation would soon come to a head.[citation needed]

The Great Nutcracker of 25 July. In this caricature, Charles X attempts to break a billiard ball marked "charter" with his teeth, but finds the nut too hard to crack.

1830: The July Revolution

[edit]
Liberty Leading the People (Eugène Delacroix) commemorates the July Revolution of 1830, which led to the abdication of Charles X and the end of the Bourbon Restoration.

The Charter of 1814 had made France a constitutional monarchy. While the king retained extensive power over policy-making, as well as the sole power of the Executive, he was, nonetheless, reliant upon the Parliament to accept and pass his legal decrees.[73] The Charter also fixed the method of election of the Deputies, their rights within the Chamber of Deputies, and the rights of the majority bloc. Thus, in 1830, Charles X faced a significant problem. He could not overstep his constitutional bounds, and yet, he could not pursue his policies with a liberal majority within the Chamber of Deputies. He was ready for stark action and made his move after a final no-confidence vote by the liberal house majority, in March 1830. He set about to alter the Charter of 1814 by decree. These decrees, known as the "Four Ordinances", dissolved the Chamber of Deputies, suspended the liberty of the press, excluded the more liberal commercial middle-class from future elections, and called for new elections.[74]

Opinion was outraged. On 10 July 1830, before the king had even made his declarations, a group of wealthy, liberal journalists and newspaper proprietors, led by Adolphe Thiers, met in Paris to decide upon a strategy to counter Charles X. It was decided then, nearly three weeks before the Revolution, that in the event of Charles' expected proclamations, the journalistic establishment of Paris would publish vitriolic criticisms of the king's policies in an attempt to mobilise the masses. Thus, when Charles X made his declarations on 25 July 1830, the liberal journalism machine mobilised, publishing articles and complaints decrying the despotism of the king's actions.[75]

The urban mobs of Paris also mobilised, driven by patriotic fervour and economic hardship, assembling barricades and attacking the infrastructure of Charles X. Within days, the situation escalated beyond the ability of the monarchy to control it. As the Crown moved to shut down liberal periodicals, the radical Parisian masses defended those publications. They also launched attacks against pro-Bourbon presses, and paralysed the coercive apparatus of the monarchy. Seizing the opportunity, the liberals in Parliament began drafting resolutions, complaints, and censures against the king. The king finally abdicated on 30 July 1830. Twenty minutes later, his son, Louis Antoine, Duke of Angoulême, who had nominally succeeded as Louis XIX, also abdicated. The Crown nominally then fell upon the son of Louis Antoine's younger brother, who was in line to become Henry V. However, the newly empowered Chamber of Deputies declared the throne vacant, and on 9 August, elevated Louis-Philippe, to the throne. Thus, the July Monarchy began.[76]

Louis-Philippe and the House of Orléans

[edit]
Louis-Philippe going from the Palais-Royal to city hall, 31 July

Louis Philippe I ascended the throne on the strength of the July Revolution of 1830, and ruled, not as "King of France" but as "King of the French", marking the shift to national sovereignty. The Orléanists remained in power until 1848. Following the ousting of the last king to rule France during the February 1848 Revolution, the French Second Republic was formed with the election of Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte as President (1848–1852). In the French coup of 1851, Napoleon declared himself Emperor Napoleon III of the Second Empire, which lasted from 1852 to 1870.[citation needed]

Political parties under Restoration

[edit]

Political parties saw substantial changes of alignment and membership under the Restoration. The Chamber of Deputies oscillated between repressive ultra-royalist phases and progressive liberal phases. The repression of the White Terror excluded opponents of the monarchy from the political scene, but individuals of influence who had different visions of the French constitutional monarchy still clashed.[77][78]

All parties remained fearful of the common people, who had no voting rights and whom Adolphe Thiers later referred to by the term "cheap multitude". Their political sights were set on a class favoritism. Political changes in the Chamber were due to abuse by the majority tendency, involving a dissolution and then an inversion of the majority, or critical events; for example, the assassination of the Duc de Berry in 1820.[citation needed]

Disputes were a power struggle between the powerful (royalty against deputies) rather than a fight between royalty and populism. Although the deputies claimed to defend the interests of the people, most had an important fear of common people, of innovations, of socialism and even of simple measures, such as the extension of voting rights.[citation needed]

The principal political parties during the Restoration are described below.

Ultra-royalists

[edit]
Prince Jules de Polignac, 1830

The Ultra-royalists wished for a return to the Ancien Régime which prevailed before 1789: absolute monarchy, domination by the nobility, and the monopoly of politics by "devoted Christians". They were anti-Republican, anti-democratic, and preached Government on High. Although they tolerated vote censitaire, a form of democracy limited to those paying taxes above a high threshold, they found the Charter of 1814 to be too revolutionary. They wanted a re-establishment of privileges, a major political role for the Catholic Church, and a politically active, rather than ceremonial, king: Charles X.[79]

Prominent ultra-royalist theorists were Louis de Bonald and Joseph de Maistre. Their parliamentary leaders were François Régis de La Bourdonnaye, comte de La Bretèche and, in 1829, Jules de Polignac. The main royalist newspapers were La Quotidienne and La Gazette, supplemented by the Drapeau Blanc, named after the Bourbon white flag, and the Oriflamme, named after the battle standard of France.[citation needed]

Doctrinaires

[edit]

The Doctrinaires were mostly rich and educated middle-class men: lawyers, senior officials of the Empire, and academics. They feared the triumph of the aristocracy, as much as that of the democrats. They accepted the Royal Charter as a guarantee of freedom and civil equality which nevertheless reined in the ignorant and excitable masses. Ideologically they were classical liberals who formed the centre-right of the Restoration's political spectrum: they upheld both capitalism and Catholicism, and attempted to reconcile parliamentarism (in an elite, wealth-based form) and monarchism (in a constitutional, ceremonial form), while rejecting both the absolutism and clericalism of the Ultra-Royalists, and the universal suffrage of the liberal left and republicans. Important personalities were Pierre Paul Royer-Collard, François Guizot, and the count of Serre. Their newspapers were Le Courrier français and Le Censeur.[80]

Liberal Left

[edit]
Gilbert du Motier, marquis de Lafayette, 1825

The Liberals were mostly petite-bourgeoisie: doctors and lawyers, men of law, and, in rural constituencies, merchants and traders of national goods. Electorally they benefitted from the slow emergence of a new middle-class elite, due to the start of the Industrial Revolution.[citation needed]

Some of them accepted the principle of monarchy, in a strictly ceremonial and parliamentary form, while others were moderate republicans. Constitutional issues aside, they agreed on seeking to restore the democratic principles of the French Revolution, such as the weakening of clerical and aristocratic power, and therefore thought the constitutional Charter was not sufficiently democratic, and disliked the peace treaties of 1815, the White Terror and the return to pre-eminence of clergy and of nobility. They wished to lower the taxable quota to support the middle-class as a whole, to the detriment of the aristocracy, and thus they supported universal suffrage or at least a wide opening-up of the electoral system to the modest middle-classes such as farmers and craftsmen. Important personalities were parliamentary monarchist Benjamin Constant, officer of the Empire Maximilien Sebastien Foy, republican lawyer Jacques-Antoine Manuel, and the Marquis de Lafayette. Their newspapers were La Minerve, Le Constitutionnel, and Le Globe.[81]

Republicans and Socialists

[edit]

The only active Republicans were on the left to far-left, based among the workers. Workers had no vote and were not listened to. Their demonstrations were repressed or diverted, causing, at most, a reinforcement of parliamentarism, which did not mean democratic evolution, only wider taxation. For some, such as Blanqui, revolution seemed the only solution. Garnier-Pagès, and Louis-Eugène and Éléonore-Louis Godefroi Cavaignac considered themselves to be Republicans, while Cabet and Raspail were active as socialists. Saint-Simon was also active during this period, and made direct appeals to Louis XVIII before his death in 1824.[82]

Religion

[edit]
The Pious Monarch, a caricature of Charles X

By 1800 the Catholic Church was poor, dilapidated and disorganised, with a depleted and aging clergy. The younger generation had received little religious instruction, and was unfamiliar with traditional worship.[83] However, in response to the external pressures of foreign wars, religious fervour was strong, especially among women.[84] Napoleon's Concordat of 1801 provided stability and ended attacks on the Church.

With the Restoration, the Catholic Church again became the state religion, supported financially and politically by the government. Its lands and financial endowments were not returned, but the government paid salaries and maintenance costs for normal church activities. The bishops regained control of Catholic affairs. The aristocracy before the Revolution was lukewarm to religious doctrine and practice, but the decades of exile created an alliance of throne and altar. The royalists who returned were much more devout, and much more aware of their need for a close alliance with the Church. They had discarded fashionable skepticism and now promoted the wave of Catholic religiosity that was sweeping Europe, with a new reverence for the Virgin Mary, the saints, and popular religious rituals such as praying the rosary. Devotion was far stronger and more visible in rural areas than in Paris and other cities. The population of 32 million included about 680,000 Protestants and 60,000 Jews, who were extended toleration. The anti-clericalism of Voltaire and the Enlightenment had not disappeared, but it was in abeyance.[85]

At the elite level, there was a dramatic change in intellectual climate from intellectual classicism to passionate romanticism. An 1802 book by François-René de Chateaubriand entitled Génie du christianisme ("The Genius of Christianity") had an enormous influence in reshaping French literature and intellectual life, emphasising the centrality of religion in creating European high culture. Chateaubriand's book "did more than any other single work to restore the credibility and prestige of Christianity in intellectual circles and launched a fashionable rediscovery of the Middle Ages and their Christian civilisation. The revival was by no means confined to an intellectual elite, however, but was evident in the real, if uneven, rechristianisation of the French countryside."[86]

Economy

[edit]

With the restoration of the Bourbons in 1814, the reactionary aristocracy with its disdain for entrepreneurship returned to power. British goods flooded the market, and France responded with high tariffs and protectionism to protect its established businesses, especially handcrafts and small-scale manufacturing such as textiles. The tariff on iron goods reached 120%.[87] Agriculture had never needed protection, but now demanded it due to the lower prices of imported foodstuffs, such as Russian grain. French winegrowers strongly supported the tariff – their wines did not need it, but they insisted on a high tariff on the import of tea. One agrarian deputy explained: "Tea breaks down our national character by converting those who use it often into cold and stuffy Nordic types, while wine arouses in the soul that gentle gaiety that gives Frenchmen their amiable and witty national character."[88] The French government falsified official statistics to claim that exports and imports were growing – actually there was stagnation, and the economic crisis of 1826–29 disillusioned the business community and readied them to support the revolution in 1830.[89]

Art and literature

[edit]

Romanticism reshaped art and literature.[90] It stimulated the emergence of a wide new middle class audience.[91] Among the most popular works were:

Paris

[edit]

The city grew slowly in population from 714,000 in 1817 to 786,000 in 1831. During the period Parisians saw the first public transport system, the first gas street lights, and the first uniformed Paris policemen. In July 1830, a popular uprising in the streets of Paris brought down the Bourbon monarchy.[92]

Memory and historical evaluation

[edit]

After two decades of war and revolution, the restoration brought peace and quiet, and general prosperity. Gordon Wright says, "Frenchmen were, on the whole, well governed, prosperous, contented during the 15-year period; one historian even describes the restoration era as 'one of the happiest periods in [France's] history.[93]

France had recovered from the strain and disorganization, the wars, the killings, the horrors, of two decades of disruption. It was at peace throughout the period. It paid a large war indemnity to the winners, but managed to finance that without distress; the occupation soldiers left peacefully. France's population increased by three million, and prosperity was strong from 1815 to 1825, with the depression of 1825 caused by bad harvests. The national credit was strong, there was significant increase in public wealth, and the national budget showed a surplus every year. In the private sector, banking grew dramatically, making Paris a world center for finance, along with London. The Rothschild family was world-famous, with the French branch led by James Mayer de Rothschild (1792–1868). The communication system was improved, as roads were upgraded, canals were lengthened, and steamboat traffic became common. Industrialization was delayed in comparison to Britain and Belgium. The railway system had yet to make an appearance. Industry was heavily protected with tariffs, so there was little demand for entrepreneurship or innovation.[94][95]

Culture flourished with the new romantic impulses. Oratory was highly regarded, and sophisticated debate flourished. Châteaubriand and Madame de Stael (1766–1817) enjoyed Europe-wide reputations for their innovations in romantic literature. She made important contributions to political sociology, and the sociology of literature.[96] History flourished; François Guizot, Benjamin Constant and Madame de Staël drew lessons from the past to guide the future.[97] The paintings of Eugène Delacroix set the standards for romantic art. Music, theater, science, and philosophy all flourished.[98] Higher learning flourished at the Sorbonne. Major new institutions gave France world leadership in numerous advanced fields, as typified by the École Nationale des Chartes (1821) for historiography, the École Centrale des Arts et Manufactures in 1829 for innovative engineering; and the École des Beaux-Arts for the fine arts, reestablished in 1830.[99]

Charles X repeatedly exacerbated internal tensions, and tried to neutralize his enemies with repressive measures. They totally failed and forced him into exile for the third time. However the government's handling of foreign affairs was a success. France kept a low profile, and Europe forgot its animosities. Louis and Charles had little interest in foreign affairs, so France played only minor roles. For example, it helped the other powers deal with Greece and Turkey. Charles X mistakenly thought that foreign glory would cover domestic frustration, so he made an all-out effort to conquer Algiers in 1830. He sent a massive force of 38,000 soldiers and 4,500 horses carried by 103 warships and 469 merchant ships. The expedition was a dramatic military success.[100] It even paid for itself with captured treasures. The episode launched the second French colonial empire, but it did not provide desperately needed political support for the King at home.[101]

[edit]

The 2007 French historical film Jacquou le Croquant, directed by Laurent Boutonnat and starring Gaspard Ulliel and Marie-Josée Croze, is based on the Bourbon Restoration.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Bourbon Restoration (1814–1830), officially the Kingdom of France, was the interval in French history when the Bourbon dynasty regained the throne after Napoleon's , establishing a that sought to balance monarchical authority with post-revolutionary realities under kings and Charles X. This era commenced with 's return in April 1814 following the Allied occupation of and the Treaty of Paris, which restored French borders to those of 1792 while imposing no reparations, only requiring the return of . The king's promulgation of the Constitutional Charter on 4 June 1814 created a hereditary limited with a bicameral consisting of a hereditary Chamber of Peers and an elected , guaranteeing civil liberties like and while subordinating to the king. The period was disrupted by Napoleon's return during the in 1815, prompting a Second Restoration after his defeat at Waterloo and the of Vienna's territorial settlements, which reduced 's influence but preserved its great power status. Economically, achieved stability and growth, reducing national debt through fiscal reforms, fostering agricultural recovery, and initiating industrialization via infrastructure projects and banking innovations, with from 29 million in 1815 to 32 million by 1830. Politically, however, tensions arose from ultra-royalists' efforts to compensate émigrés by confiscating national lands and imposing censorship, culminating in the White Terror purges of former revolutionaries and Bonapartists. Under Charles X's more absolutist rule from 1824, policies like the 1825 law indemnifying nobles for revolutionary losses and increasing clerical influence alienated liberals and the , while the appointment of the ultra-royalist Prince de Polignac in 1829 led to the dissolving the , curtailing press freedom, and altering elections—sparking the that forced Charles's and the shift to the under Louis Philippe. Despite these conflicts, the Restoration maintained relative internal peace, avoided major wars, and embedded constitutional precedents that influenced subsequent French regimes, though scholarly accounts often emphasize its reactionary elements over pragmatic adaptations to revolutionary legacies.

Historical Prelude

Legacy of Revolution and Empire

The French Revolution dismantled the feudal system through the August Decrees of 4 August 1789, which abolished noble privileges, seigneurial dues, and clerical exemptions, fundamentally reshaping property relations and taxation. This was reinforced by the confiscation and sale of church lands as biens nationaux starting in 1790, amounting to roughly 6-10% of France's territory and generating over 2 billion livres in revenue to service national debt, thereby creating a broad base of new landowners among peasants and urban bourgeoisie who opposed any rollback. These changes entrenched a property-owning society less amenable to aristocratic restoration, as the diffusion of land ownership—often in small parcels—aligned incentives with individual rights over communal or noble claims, a causal dynamic that persisted into 1814 despite royalist aspirations. The Napoleonic Empire codified revolutionary gains in the of 21 March 1804, establishing uniform legal , protection of private property, and secular administration, which supplanted the patchwork of ancien régime customs and privileges. Retained intact during the Restoration, the Code's emphasis on merit over birth and its facilitation of contractual freedom bolstered the rising , while the centralized departmental structure—initiated in 1790 and refined with prefectural oversight in 1800—provided an efficient apparatus for governance that pragmatically adopted rather than dismantle. Socially, the era's upheavals included the of approximately 129,000-150,000 individuals, predominantly and clergy, between 1789 and 1795, depleting traditional elites but allowing partial returns after 1802 amnesties and full reintegration post-Waterloo, though émigrés numbered only about 5 per 1,000 of the population. Demographically, France's population expanded from around 28 million in 1789 to approximately 31 million by 1815, reflecting underlying growth amid disruptions, yet this masked the era's human costs: an estimated 1.7 million military fatalities from 1804-1815 alone, alongside civilian tolls from conscription and economic strain. Economically, chronic wartime indebtedness—exacerbated by Revolutionary deficits and Napoleonic campaigns—left France with a fiscal burden exceeding 1 billion francs by 1814, but stabilized property regimes and agricultural output from redistributed lands supported recovery, compelling the Bourbons to forgo punitive reversals in favor of moderated rule to avoid alienating vested interests forged over 25 years. These legacies thus imposed causal constraints on monarchical revival, prioritizing empirical continuity in law and administration over ideological purity, as absolute restoration risked reigniting class conflicts rooted in irreversible material changes.

Fall of Napoleon and Allied Demands

Following the decisive defeat of French forces at the in October 1813, the Allied coalition—comprising , , , and —launched a coordinated invasion of in early 1814. By March, Allied armies numbering over 300,000 troops advanced on , facing a depleted French defense under , who commanded fewer than 100,000 men scattered across the front. On March 30–31, 1814, Auguste Marmont's of approximately 36,000 surrendered to superior Allied forces exceeding 100,000, marking the effective collapse of Napoleonic resistance in the capital. Upon entering on , the Allies issued a declaring their occupation temporary and aimed at liberating from 's tyranny, portraying him as the sole barrier to European peace and the restoration of French sovereignty within its natural borders. The document emphasized respect for French property, institutions, and the will of the people, while rejecting any negotiation with or his regime. This stance aligned with the signed on March 1, 1814, by which the Allies committed to mutual subsidies and military support until 's complete overthrow, explicitly barring peace with him or his dynasty and aiming to reduce to its 1792 frontiers. In response to the Allied advance and the fall of , French leader Charles Maurice de Talleyrand orchestrated the formation of a on April 1, 1814. On April 2, the passed the Acte de déchéance de l'Empereur, formally deposing and his family, nullifying the Napoleonic constitution, and calling for a national government based on monarchical principles. , isolated at , initially abdicated in favor of his son on April 4 but renounced this on April 6 under Allied pressure for unconditional surrender. The Treaty of , signed April 11, 1814, confirmed his abdication, granting him sovereignty over , a of 2 million francs, and retention of his title as emperor. The Allies' demands extended beyond Napoleon's personal removal to the eradication of Bonapartist rule, insisting on the restoration of a legitimate to ensure long-term stability and prevent revolutionary excesses. Tsar Alexander I, initially open to alternatives, was persuaded by Talleyrand and French royalists to endorse , brother of the executed , as the rightful successor, formalized in secret agreements and paving the way for Bourbon reinstatement at the impending . This causal sequence—military defeat enabling internal defection and Allied insistence on dynastic change—directly precipitated the end of the Napoleonic .

Establishment of the Monarchy

First Restoration and Louis XVIII's Return

The First Restoration commenced after the Allied coalition forces entered on March 31, 1814, prompting I's abdication on April 6, 1814. A , led by , negotiated with the Allies to restore the Bourbon monarchy, convincing them to support , the brother of the executed , as the legitimate successor. On April 6, the French Senate formally invited to resume the throne, and he signed his accession declaration from exile in , pledging to uphold constitutional principles and the achievements of the Revolution in property rights and civil equality. Louis XVIII departed from Hartwell House in and landed at on April 24, 1814, receiving enthusiastic welcomes from local populations weary of . He proceeded southward through , stopping in cities like and Compiègne, where crowds demonstrated support amid a mix of enthusiasm and pragmatic acceptance of monarchical return to stabilize the nation. On May 3, 1814, made a triumphal entry into through the , greeted by cheering multitudes and military honors, marking the symbolic restoration of Bourbon rule after over two decades of and imperial upheaval. The king's return was facilitated by the Treaty of Paris signed on May 30, 1814, which restored France's borders to those of 1792, exempted the nation from indemnities, and returned artworks looted during the , reflecting the Allies' relatively lenient terms influenced by Talleyrand's diplomacy to prevent further instability. This agreement preserved French sovereignty while reinstating the , though it sowed seeds of resentment among ultra-royalists who viewed the concessions as insufficiently punitive toward revolutionary legacies. Initial governance focused on reconciliation, with appointing moderate ministers and preparing a constitutional framework to balance royal authority with parliamentary elements, averting immediate counter-revolutionary excesses.

The Constitutional Charter of 1814

The was promulgated by on 4 June 1814 as a royal grant, framing it as a benevolent concession from the restored monarch rather than a popular or contractual . This document rejected the Sénat conservateur's earlier proposed Constitution sénatoriale of 6 April 1814, which had aimed for greater senatorial influence, and instead positioned the king as the ultimate source of authority while incorporating select revolutionary-era reforms to legitimize the Bourbon return. Drafted by a committee of 22 members appointed by on 18 May 1814—excluding figures like Talleyrand due to the king's wariness—the Charter sought to balance monarchical prerogative with limited representative elements amid Allied occupation demands for constitutional limits on absolutism. Under the Charter's provisions on the form of government, France was declared a hereditary constitutional monarchy vested in the senior Bourbon line, with the king's person declared sacred and inviolable. Executive power resided solely with the king, who commanded the army and navy, directed foreign affairs, negotiated treaties, appointed ministers and officials, coined money, and held the exclusive right to propose laws, grant amnesties, and exercise an absolute veto over legislation. Legislative authority was collective, exercised by the king alongside two chambers: the appointed Chamber of Peers and the elected Chamber of Deputies, but the king alone could sanction and promulgate laws, ensuring royal dominance over the process. The Peers, numbering variably but including royal princes, high clergy, and prominent notables, were nominated for life by the king, with hereditary privileges extending to male descendants; they deliberated from age 25 and gained full voice at 30, also serving as a high court for impeachments and treason. The consisted of representatives elected for five-year terms, with one-fifth renewed annually, requiring deputies to be at least 40 years old and pay 1,000 francs in direct taxes annually. Elections operated under a census-based system, where voters were qualified by substantial property and tax-paying thresholds, implemented via indirect voting in two stages—college electors chosen by local assemblies then selecting deputies—yielding an electorate limited to roughly the wealthiest 1% of adult males, emphasizing elite representation over broad . Chambers could not be dissolved by the king, met publicly under a president appointed by him, and held deliberative but not initiatory power except for budget items originating in the Deputies; taxes required annual renewal, though the deferred detailed electoral laws to future statutes. The Charter's public law section enshrined basic guarantees, affirming equality of all Frenchmen before the law regardless of rank, proportional taxation by fortune, no arbitrary imprisonment without cause, inviolability of domicile and property (with eminent domain requiring compensation), and freedom to publish opinions subject to laws curbing abuses. Religious policy designated the Catholic Apostolic Roman faith as the state religion, with free exercise tolerated for other cults but state funding restricted to Catholic and Protestant clergy; full civil equality extended to non-Catholics only after later revisions. Judicial independence was upheld through irremovable judges appointed by the king, public criminal trials by jury (retaining Napoleonic Code elements), and prohibitions on arbitrary confiscation or retroactive laws. Overall, while preserving civil equality and property rights from the Revolution, the Charter prioritized royal sovereignty, subordinating parliamentary roles to prevent challenges to the throne's causal primacy in governance.

Hundred Days and Napoleon's Return

Napoleon Bonaparte, exiled to the island of following his abdication on April 6, 1814, escaped on the evening of February 26, 1815, aboard the brig Inconstant with approximately 1,000 loyal followers, including members of his Old Guard. He evaded British patrols and landed at , between and , on March 1, 1815, initiating a rapid advance northward along what became known as the to bypass royalist strongholds in . As Napoleon progressed, royalist forces dispatched to oppose him repeatedly defected; on March 7 near Laffrey, a under Labédoyère joined him, shouting "Vive l'Empereur!" which triggered widespread support and civilian enthusiasm in . , dubbed the "bravest of the brave" for his Napoleonic campaigns and initially dispatched by with orders to seize the former emperor, encountered Napoleon's advancing column near on March 18, 1815, and defected with his 6,000-man corps, declaring his allegiance restored. This high-profile reversal demoralized Bourbon loyalists and swelled Napoleon's ranks to over 30,000 by mid-March. Napoleon entered on March 10, 1815, where local authorities and troops acclaimed him, further eroding the fragile First Restoration regime. , facing collapsing support in , fled the on March 19 for , , accompanied by key ministers and ultra-royalist advisors, effectively ending Bourbon control after less than a year. arrived triumphantly in on March 20, 1815, greeted by cheering crowds and assemblies that dissolved the provisional Bourbon government, marking the onset of the —a period of renewed imperial rule lasting until his second abdication on June 22 following defeat at Waterloo on June 18. The Allies, alarmed by the resurgence, had declared Napoleon an outlaw on March 13 at the and mobilized the Seventh Coalition, comprising Britain, , , and , with over 700,000 troops converging on by June. To legitimize his return and avert total isolation, Napoleon promulgated liberal concessions via the Additional Act of April 22, expanding and establishing a bicameral , though these were viewed skeptically as tactical maneuvers rather than genuine commitments to . The episode exposed the unpopularity of the Bourbons among military and popular elements still attached to Napoleonic achievements, yet it unified European monarchies against remnants, paving the way for a more punitive Second Restoration upon Louis XVIII's return to on July 8, 1815.

Second Restoration Post-Waterloo

Following Napoleon's defeat at the on June 18, 1815, and his subsequent abdication on June 22, returned to on July 8, 1815, marking the onset of the Second Restoration and solidifying Bourbon rule under Allied military auspices. The Allies, led by figures such as the Duke of Wellington, escorted the king back, emphasizing foreign imposition over domestic consensus, as had crumbled but Bonapartist sympathies lingered among troops and officials. This restoration contrasted with the First by its punitive context: the Second Treaty of Paris, signed November 20, 1815, confined to its 1790 borders—ceding territories gained since 1789—imposed a 700 million indemnity payable over five years, and authorized Allied occupation of key fortresses until 1818, with 150,000 troops stationed initially to enforce compliance. Elections to the in August 1815 yielded the , overwhelmingly dominated by ultra-royalists—approximately 350 of 402 seats—who advocated revenge against revolutionaries and Bonapartists, rejecting Louis XVIII's preference for moderation. This assembly pressured the government, prompting Foreign Minister Talleyrand's resignation on September 20, 1815, and the appointment of the as to navigate ultra demands while averting total reaction. Official purges ensued via royal ordinances, including one on July 24, 1815, targeting 47 high-profile Bonapartists for arrest or exile, such as Marshals and Grouchy; thousands were dismissed from civil service and military posts, with over 11,000 officers affected by 1816. Parallel to state actions, the White Terror erupted from June to November 1815, primarily in (e.g., , ), where royalist militias and mobs exacted unofficial reprisals against perceived , Bonapartists, and occasionally Protestants, claiming around 300 lives through lynchings and assassinations. Notable victims included Marshal Brune, lynched in on August 2, 1815, and General Ramel, killed by a mob in ; these acts, often led by local nobles and veterans, bypassed courts despite royal calls for order. , wary of alienating the broader populace, condemned excesses but issued no blanket pardons initially, allowing trials like that of Marshal Ney—convicted of treason for rejoining and executed by firing squad on December 7, 1815, after refusing a . By 1816, facing ultra intransigence and economic strain from occupation costs (exceeding 100 million francs annually), the king proclaimed a limited amnesty for "traitors," curbed further violence, and dissolved the Chamber on September 5, 1816, via electoral adjustments to secure a less radical successor assembly. These measures preserved the Charter of 1814's framework amid tensions, prioritizing stability over vengeance to mitigate risks of renewed republican or Bonapartist resurgence.

Reign of Louis XVIII

Initial Governance and Moderation

Upon his return to on April 6, 1814, established a led by , who served as president of the council and foreign minister, facilitating the transition from Napoleonic rule. Talleyrand, having negotiated France's favorable terms at the Treaty of Paris on May 30, 1814, which restored borders to those of 1792 without reparations, helped secure Allied recognition of the Bourbon monarchy. On June 4, 1814, promulgated the Constitutional Charter, establishing a with a bicameral , including a Chamber of Peers appointed by the king and an elected , while retaining key Napoleonic reforms such as and property rights. Louis XVIII adopted a policy of moderation to foster national reconciliation, issuing a general amnesty on June 4, 1814, that exempted only a small number of regicides and major Napoleonic officials from prosecution, thereby limiting reprisals against former revolutionaries and Bonapartists. This approach, emphasizing "union and oblivion" to heal divisions from the Revolution and Empire, preserved administrative continuity by retaining many civil servants and the Napoleonic administrative structure, avoiding the instability of radical purges. Following Napoleon's and defeat at Waterloo, the Second Restoration on July 8, 1815, brought pressure from Ultra-royalists demanding vengeance, leading to the White Terror with extralegal executions and trials targeting Bonapartists. countered this extremism by proroguing the reactionary elected in August 1815 and dissolving it on September 5, 1816, after it pushed for severe measures like mass dismissals of officials; new elections yielded a more moderate assembly, enabling policies of stabilization from 1816 to 1820. This restraint prevented broader civil unrest and maintained the Charter's framework against Ultra-royalist absolutism.

Political Factions and Electoral System

The established a bicameral consisting of the appointed Chamber of Peers and an elected , with the latter comprising representatives chosen through a highly restricted . Eligibility to vote required males to be at least 30 years old and pay a equivalent to 300 francs annually, while candidates for deputy needed to be at least 40 years old and pay 1,000 francs in direct taxes. This system yielded roughly 88,000 to 100,000 electors nationwide by the late 1820s, representing less than 0.3% of France's population exceeding 30 million, concentrated among property owners and excluding the vast majority of urban workers and rural peasants. Elections for the , initially set at 258 members with one-fifth renewed annually over five-year terms, employed an indirect two-stage process until : arrondissement-level colleges selected candidates, and departmental colleges chose deputies from those lists. Direct departmental voting was briefly introduced in to broaden participation slightly, but the 1820 Law of the Double Vote reverted to indirect elections, granting an extra vote to the wealthiest electors (those paying at least 1,000 francs in taxes) to favor conservative outcomes; this expanded the chamber to 430 seats, with 172 chosen by departmental colleges and 258 by ones. Government influence permeated the process, as prefects controlled voter lists, intimidated opponents, and the king could appoint college presidents or add up to 20 "supernumerary" electors per departmental college for "special services," often to secure ministerial candidates. Turnout remained low, frequently below 50%, as in the 1815 election where only 48,478 of 72,199 registered electors participated. The 1824 Septennial Act further altered terms to full renewals every seven years, reducing electoral frequency amid rising tensions. Political factions within the Chamber of Deputies reflected divisions over the extent of monarchical authority and revolutionary legacies, with the Ultra-royalists emerging as the dominant conservative force after the Second Restoration in 1815. Ultras, drawing from émigré nobles and clerical allies, advocated stricter enforcement of royal prerogatives, partial reversal of land sales from the Revolution, and suppression of liberal influences, securing over 90% of seats in the August 1815 election through anti-Bonapartist fervor and administrative pressure. King Louis XVIII, wary of their extremism, dissolved the chamber in 1816 to curb their "White Terror" reprisals and assembled a more moderate cabinet under the duc de Richelieu, fostering a brief equilibrium. Opposing the were the , a centrist group of constitutional royalists led by figures like Pierre Paul Royer-Collard, who upheld the Charter as a balanced framework limiting absolute rule while rejecting radical change. They gained influence during the 1816–1820 period of moderation under ministers like Élie Decazes, emphasizing legal stability and economic recovery over ideological purity. Liberals, including independents like , formed a smaller but vocal opposition on the left, pushing for expanded , press freedoms, and reduced clerical power; their growth prompted Ultras to advocate even narrower voting restrictions post-1820, following the assassination of duc de Berry which shifted power back to conservatives. These factions' clashes, exacerbated by electoral manipulations, underscored the system's fragility, as royal interventions often dissolved chambers (four times between 1815 and 1824) to realign majorities.

Economic Stabilization and Growth

The Bourbon Restoration government prioritized fiscal orthodoxy to address the war-ravaged economy, beginning with the fulfillment of the Second Treaty of Paris (1815), which mandated a 700 million franc indemnity payable in five annual installments while sustaining allied occupation forces at French expense. Through rigorous tax enforcement, avoidance of monetary debasement, and loans arranged by international financiers like Baring Brothers and the Rothschilds, France liquidated the indemnity by September 1818—two years early—prompting the evacuation of 150,000 occupation troops and restoring territorial sovereignty. This achievement, orchestrated under ministers such as the Duke of Richelieu, averted default and rebuilt creditor confidence, as the regime honored Napoleonic-era debts without confiscations, thereby stabilizing public credit and enabling domestic investment. The Banque de France, restructured under royal oversight, played a pivotal role by regulating note circulation and extending short-term advances to the treasury, which curbed and supported amid postwar contraction. Protectionist measures, including the April 1816 hikes enacted by the , imposed duties up to 30% on British manufactures flooding continental markets post-Continental System, shielding nascent industries like textiles and from cheap imports while penalizing . These policies, rooted in mercantilist caution rather than free-trade optimism, preserved artisanal workshops and encouraged , though they limited export competitiveness. Agriculture, employing over 70% of the populace, rebounded from Napoleonic depredations and the 1816-1817 "year without summer" famines through peacetime incentives like secure and market liberalization, yielding production gains of approximately 20-30% in grains and wine by the early s. Industrial output, starting from 60% of pre-1789 levels due to wartime destruction, exhibited modest recovery in (rising from 0.4 million tonnes in 1815 to 0.7 million by 1824) and iron, fueled by state contracts and tariff barriers, marking the onset of mechanization precursors like pumping in mines. Overall, these efforts yielded stable prosperity and growth estimated at 0.5-1% annually through , outpacing revolutionary volatility but trailing Britain's acceleration, as France's fragmented markets and rural dominance constrained rapid transformation.

Reign of Charles X

Ascension and Ultra-Royalist Shift

Louis XVIII died on September 16, 1824, from complications of gout and gangrene, leaving no direct heirs and paving the way for his younger brother, Charles Philippe, the former Count of Artois, to ascend the throne as Charles X. Born in 1757, Charles had spent much of his life in exile after the Revolution, emerging as the leader of the Ultra-Royalist faction during the Second Restoration in 1815, advocating for a strong monarchy, clerical privileges, and reversal of revolutionary reforms. His immediate accession marked a potential shift from the pragmatic moderation of Louis XVIII's reign, as Charles's longstanding sympathies aligned closely with the Ultras' reactionary agenda. Charles X's coronation on May 29, 1825, at —the first such ceremony since 1775—symbolized a deliberate revival of pre-revolutionary traditions, including sacred anointing and oaths to uphold Catholic orthodoxy, reinforcing the monarchy's divine-right foundations. Initially, the new king enjoyed passing popularity due to his dignified bearing and gestures like easing press censorship, suggesting a tempered approach. However, the 1824 elections, held shortly before Louis's death, delivered a majority to the Ultra-Royalists in the , emboldening their influence and aligning parliamentary power with Charles's inclinations. This Ultra-Royalist dominance facilitated an early shift toward conservatism, as Charles supported policies favoring noble and clerical restitution, departing from the Charter of 1814's constitutional limits. The , who had gained traction after the 1820 assassination of the , pushed for measures to entrench aristocratic privileges and counter liberal elements, with Charles's regime increasingly prioritizing reactionary reforms over the balanced governance of his predecessor. This pivot, while consolidating monarchical authority in the short term, sowed seeds of opposition from moderates and liberals wary of eroding the post-Napoleonic settlement.

Key Policies: Indemnification and Sacrilege Law

The Law of Indemnity, enacted on March 28, 1825, under the ministry of Joseph de Villèle, compensated former émigrés, nobles, and clergy for properties confiscated and sold as biens nationaux during the and . It authorized the issuance of government bonds totaling 988 million francs in rentes at 5% interest, redeemable over 30 years, to reimburse approximately 40,000 claimants whose assets had been alienated without full restitution under prior regimes. Originally proposed by in 1815 but delayed due to fiscal constraints, the measure fulfilled ultra-royalist demands for rectification of revolutionary injustices, yet it imposed a significant burden on the national debt, equivalent to about one-third of the annual budget, and was financed partly through new taxes on wine and salt. Critics, including liberals and , decried it as a retroactive subsidy to a privileged class at the expense of taxpayers, exacerbating perceptions of aristocratic favoritism and contributing to electoral backlash against the government. Closely following, the Anti-Sacrilege Act (Loi sur le sacrilège), promulgated on April 20, 1825, criminalized offenses against sacred objects and places of worship, reflecting the ultra-royalist emphasis on restoring ecclesiastical authority post-Revolution. The law's 18 articles distinguished degrees of sacrilege: profanation of consecrated hosts carried a mandatory penalty, preceded by amende honorable ( in a shroud); of sacred vessels warranted forced labor or if accompanied by ; and lesser acts in churches, such as or , incurred or fines. Intended to deter anticlerical amid rising church thefts—over 200 reported desecrations since 1815—it invoked medieval precedents like the amende honorable but was never enforced, as no executions occurred before its repeal on October 11, 1830. Opponents in the Chamber of Peers and press argued it violated constitutional guarantees of and civil equality, viewing it as an anachronistic fusion of throne and altar that alienated moderate Catholics and fueled liberal agitation. Both policies, enacted amid X's in May 1825, underscored the regime's pivot toward confessional conservatism, prioritizing symbolic restitution over pragmatic governance.

Escalating Tensions and July Ordinances

Charles X's shift toward ultra-royalist policies intensified political divisions after he dismissed the moderate ministry of de Martignac in August 1829 and appointed Jules, Prince de Polignac, as on August 8. Polignac's ultra-conservative stance alienated the , which had already shown liberal leanings in prior elections; by January 1830, the chamber approved an address censuring the government for undermining constitutional principles. In response, Charles invoked Article 50 of the to dissolve the chamber on May 16, 1830, hoping to secure a more compliant assembly. Subsequent elections in June and July yielded a decisive liberal majority, with approximately 274 opposition deputies against 143 royalists, scheduled to convene on August 3. Compounding these parliamentary frictions was a severe economic downturn from 1827 to 1830, marked by poor harvests, industrial stagnation, and widespread distress surpassing the crises preceding the 1789 Revolution, which fueled urban unemployment and . This backdrop of fiscal strain and liberal electoral gains prompted and Polignac to act preemptively, viewing the opposition as a threat to monarchical authority. On July 25, 1830, at the , signed the —four decrees countersigned by Polignac—that effectively amounted to a royal coup. The first ordinance suspended press liberty, prohibiting periodical publications without government authorization or caution deposits ranging from 20,000 to 50,000 francs, with prior censorship for political content and liability for printers and editors. The second dissolved the newly elected before it could meet. The third mandated revised electoral rolls under a stricter , raising the direct tax threshold and reducing eligible voters from about 100,000 to roughly 25,000, favoring wealthier conservatives. The fourth scheduled new elections within three months and a chamber session for September 15, bypassing normal procedures. Published in the Moniteur on , the ordinances provoked immediate outrage among liberals, journalists, and the Parisian bourgeoisie, who decried them as violations of the Charter's guarantees of representative government and free expression. Newspapers like Le National and defied the press curbs by printing protests and ceasing operations in solidarity, igniting strikes and demonstrations that escalated into barricade fighting by July 27. The government's failure to anticipate the scale of resistance—stemming from underestimation of liberal mobilization and military loyalty—causally precipitated the , as armed crowds overwhelmed troops and forced Charles's on August 2.

The July Revolution and Fall

The July Ordinances, issued by King Charles X on 25 July 1830 and published the following day, dissolved the Chamber of Deputies, suspended freedom of the press, restricted suffrage by raising the property qualification, and scheduled new elections for September. These measures, drafted under the influence of Prime Minister Jules de Polignac, directly contravened the Charter of 1814 by bypassing parliamentary consent, igniting widespread liberal and moderate opposition in Paris. Journalists from liberal newspapers, including Le National and Le Constitutionnel, refused to print the decrees, framing them as a coup d'état and mobilizing public outrage through handbills and gatherings. Protests escalated on 27 July, the first of the Trois Glorieuses, as crowds numbering in the thousands assembled in central , clashing with and cavalry units loyal to the king; by afternoon, demonstrators had seized weapons from armories and erected over 4,000 barricades across the city. Troops fired on unarmed protesters near the Tuileries, killing several dozen and radicalizing the unrest, while workshop owners closed factories, swelling the ranks of insurgents with unemployed workers and students. On 28 July, fighting intensified as revolutionaries captured the Hôtel de Ville and key bridges, with defections mounting among the and line troops; Marshal , commanding royal forces, reported his inability to hold . The decisive clashes of 29 July saw insurgents overrun military positions, including the Louvre stables, forcing remaining loyalist units to retreat; tricolor flags reappeared en masse, symbolizing republican sentiments amid the chaos. Casualties totaled approximately 800 civilians and 200 soldiers killed, with thousands wounded, primarily from street combat and artillery fire. Charles X, retreating to Rambouillet on 30 July, ordered a withdrawal to avert further bloodshed but refused initial demands for ministerial changes, prompting the Chamber of Deputies—reconvened illicitly—to declare the ordinances null and urge . On 2 August 1830, Charles X abdicated the throne in favor of his grandson, Henri, duc de Bordeaux, with his son, the Dauphin Louis Antoine, also renouncing claims; the royal family departed for exile in the via . Parisian authorities and the , led by figures like Lafayette and , rejected the Bourbon succession, instead proclaiming Louis Philippe, duc d'Orléans, as Lieutenant-General of the Kingdom on 31 July and enthroning him as "King of the French" on 9 August, marking the end of the Bourbon Restoration and the advent of the . This shift preserved but narrowed political power to the , excluding broader popular demands for .

Political and Ideological Landscape

Ultra-Royalists and Conservative Restoration

The , or , formed the most reactionary faction within the Bourbon Restoration's political spectrum, seeking to revive the absolutist elements of the through dominance by the , clergy, and while curtailing revolutionary legacies. Their emphasized hierarchical , Catholic primacy, and limited , rejecting the Charter's liberal concessions as overly accommodating to egalitarian principles. Led by figures such as the Comte d'Artois (later Charles X), François de La Bourdonnaye, and Jean-Baptiste de Villèle, the Ultras positioned themselves against moderate royalists and liberals, advocating policies that prioritized retribution and traditional privileges. In the wake of Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo on 18 June 1815, the capitalized on royalist fervor to secure a supermajority in the , dubbed the for its unyielding . This assembly enacted reprisals via the Second White Terror, targeting Bonapartists and revolutionaries; official executions and vigilante killings claimed 200 to 300 lives, while purges dismissed 50,000 to 80,000 civil servants suspected of disloyalty. Provincial ultras, often organized as verdets militias, enforced these measures, particularly in , where anti-revolutionary violence peaked. King , cautious of alienating broader support, intervened minimally but dissolved the chamber on 5 September 1816 when it obstructed his moderate policies under the Richelieu ministry. The ' influence waned temporarily under subsequent elections favoring and constitutional royalists, but resurged following the assassination of the Duc de Berry on 13 February 1820, which eroded confidence in Élie Decazes' liberal-leaning administration. Villèle assumed effective control by 1821, forming a ministry that balanced fiscal —reducing national debt through budget surpluses—with conservative reforms, including enhanced oversight of and press restrictions. This period marked a conservative consolidation, as ultras leveraged electoral laws favoring high-property voters to maintain parliamentary strength. Upon Louis XVIII's death on 16 September 1824 and X's ascension, ultra dominance intensified, enacting emblematic legislation such as the 8 1825 indemnity bill compensating émigrés for seized properties at 988 million francs (financed via state loans and taxes) and the 29 January 1825 Anti-Sacrilege Law, mandating for to safeguard religious symbols. reflected their zeal, culminating in the 1823 invasion of with 100,000 troops to reinstate absolutist , bolstering France's Catholic monarchist credentials. These measures entrenched a conservative restoration but alienated commercial classes and liberals, sowing seeds for confrontation. By the late 1820s, internal ultra divisions and Villèle's 1828 resignation under Charles X's pressure toward harder-line ministers like signaled policy rigidity, evident in the 25 July 1830 ordinances dissolving the chamber, censoring the press, and altering —actions that directly precipitated the and the Bourbon downfall.

Doctrinaires and Constitutional Moderates

The constituted a centrist faction within the Bourbon Restoration's political landscape, emerging as a to both ultra-royalists and radical liberals by advocating a strict adherence to the as the foundational constitutional document. Formed prominently in late 1817 amid tensions following the dissolution of the ultra-dominated on 5 September 1816, they positioned themselves as defenders of , seeking to integrate elements of revolutionary liberty with monarchical authority while prioritizing over unchecked . Their intellectual framework emphasized that true sovereignty resided in as expressed through parliament, rather than absolute , thereby limiting the king's ability to dissolve the at will or override legislative will. Key figures included Pierre-Paul Royer-Collard, who served as the leader in the from 1815 onward and orchestrated the faction's parliamentary strategy; , appointed secretary-general of the Ministry of the Interior in 1814 and a chief ideologue promoting doctrinal consistency in governance; and the Count of Serre, whose legal expertise influenced early ministerial appointments. These leaders, often supported by publications such as Le Courrier français and Le Censeur européen, rejected ministerial responsibility to parliament—insisting instead on the king's ultimate authority in appointments—but pushed for balanced policies to stabilize the regime against ultra-royalist revanche and liberal agitation. Under their influence, the faction dominated the elections of 1816 and 1820, securing a moderate that enabled ministries like those of the (1815–1818, 1820–1821) to pursue pragmatic reforms, including electoral adjustments in 1820 to broaden the voter base slightly toward propertied non-nobles and thereby dilute ultra influence. Politically, the Doctrinaires facilitated a period of relative moderation from 1816 to 1820, collaborating with Élie Decazes, Louis XVIII's favored minister until his resignation in 1820 following the assassination attempt on the king by Pierre Louis Louvel on 13 February. Their policies underscored a distinction between stable social hierarchies—preserving elite capacities for —and political liberties constrained by constitutional mechanisms, arguing that required educated intermediaries to prevent chaos, as articulated in Guizot's early writings and Royer-Collard's speeches critiquing aristocratic defeatism toward popular elements. Achievements included influencing the 1819 press under Richelieu, which, while imposing securities and stamps to curb seditious publications, represented a compromise against ultra demands for outright , allowing moderate outlets to flourish compared to the era. However, their aversion to broad electoral expansion and emphasis on doctrinal rigidity—viewing the as immutable—limited deeper , contributing to factional isolation as ultras regrouped post-1820 via doubled appointments and escalations that sidelined Doctrinaire educators like Guizot from posts. The faction's decline accelerated after 1820, as ultra-royalists capitalized on security fears to enact laws like the 1820 double-vote system favoring large landowners, reducing Doctrinaire seats in subsequent elections. By 1828, brief resurgence under Martignac's ministry saw Royer-Collard and allies advocate partial press freedoms, but Charles X's ascension and ultra dominance marginalized them until the . Their legacy lay in tempering absolutist impulses, fostering a parliamentary culture that influenced later governance, though critics from both extremes faulted their elitism for failing to address underlying social fractures empirically evident in persistent Bonapartist and republican undercurrents.

Liberal Opposition and Republican Elements

The liberal opposition to the Bourbon Restoration monarchy emphasized adherence to the constitutional , advocating for expanded parliamentary authority, , and reduced clerical influence in . These groups, often comprising revolutionaries, Napoleonic officials, and enlightened nobles, criticized ultra-royalist dominance for undermining representative institutions and reviving absolutist tendencies. In the , liberals formed a vocal minority after the elections, pushing back against laws and electoral manipulations that favored conservative landowners. Benjamin Constant de Rebecque (1767–1830) stood as a principal architect of liberal resistance, leading the Indépendants faction and authoring key texts on representative government that influenced opposition rhetoric. Elected in 1819, Constant repeatedly challenged ministerial policies, notably decrying the 1820s press restrictions as violations of constitutional guarantees, and defended the against royal encroachments. His efforts culminated in liberal gains during the November 1827 elections, where opposition candidates secured approximately 180 seats, prompting King Charles X to appoint a more moderate ministry under Jean-Baptiste de Martignac before dissolving the chamber in 1829. The Marquis de Lafayette (1757–1834), revered for his roles in the and early , embodied liberal defiance as a from 1818 onward, consistently voting against ultra-royalist measures like the 1825 sacrilege law and supporting reforms to curb executive overreach. Lafayette's public stature amplified liberal critiques, as he rallied support for amid growing discontent with policies perceived as regressive, including indemnification for émigrés that burdened taxpayers without reciprocal gains in stability. Republican elements, representing a more radical fringe, rejected monarchy altogether and organized clandestinely through societies like the Charbonnerie, modeled on Italian networks and active from around 1820. This , drawing disaffected officers, intellectuals, and provincial notables, plotted insurrections—such as the March 1820 uprisings in the south and east—to establish a , though most efforts faltered due to poor coordination and government infiltration, resulting in hundreds of arrests by 1823. Figures like Jacques-Antoine Manuel and Dupont de l'Eure bridged liberal and republican circles, with the Charbonnerie initially attracting liberals like Lafayette before evolving toward explicit anti-monarchical aims amid suppressed freedoms. Despite their limited electoral success—republicans held few seats—their agitation contributed to broader opposition by highlighting the regime's intolerance for dissent, fostering alliances that intensified by the late 1820s.

Social, Religious, and Cultural Dimensions

Restoration of Church Influence and Religious Policy

The Bourbon Restoration marked a concerted effort to reverse the French Revolution's assault on the Catholic Church, which had included the Civil Constitution of the Clergy in 1790, widespread dechristianization campaigns, and the seizure of ecclesiastical properties. Louis XVIII, upon his return in 1814, balanced monarchical legitimacy with pragmatic governance by enshrining Catholicism as the religion of the state in the Constitutional Charter of 1814, while upholding the Napoleonic Concordat of 1801 as the framework for Church-state relations; this preserved state oversight of clerical appointments and salaries but allowed the Church to regain administrative autonomy in parishes. A supplementary Concordat signed on June 11, 1817, between Louis XVIII and Pope Pius VII sought to restore 32 additional bishoprics suppressed under Napoleon, though implementation was partial due to fiscal constraints and Gallican resistance, affecting only about half the proposed sees by 1820. These measures facilitated the rehabilitation of émigré clergy, with over 40,000 priests returning or being appointed by 1815, enabling the Church to rebuild its hierarchy amid lingering revolutionary schisms between constitutional and refractory priests. The global restoration of the Society of Jesus by Pius VII on August 7, 1814, directly bolstered clerical influence in France, as Jesuits reestablished colleges and seminaries, emphasizing ultramontane piety and countering liberal education; by 1820, they operated over a dozen institutions, training future priests and elites in doctrines opposing Enlightenment rationalism. Missionary congregations, such as the Congregation of the Mission (Lazarists), expanded rural preaching campaigns from 1816 onward, targeting dechristianized regions in the west and south where church attendance had plummeted to below 10% in some dioceses during the Revolution; these efforts, supported by state subsidies under the Richelieu ministry, reconverted thousands through public processions and catechesis, though they provoked local anticlerical backlash. Louis XVIII's policies remained tempered, rejecting full restitution of Church lands seized and sold during the Revolution—instead opting for budgetary allocations equivalent to pre-1789 tithe revenues, totaling around 30 million francs annually by 1820—to avoid alienating property holders and maintain fiscal stability. Under Charles X, who ascended in 1824 with ultra-royalist backing, religious policy intensified toward explicit clerical empowerment, reflecting his personal devotion and view of divine-right monarchy intertwined with Catholic orthodoxy. The Villèle ministry (1821–1828) enacted the on April 14, 1825, prescribing for profaning the or sacred vessels, and hard labor for lesser desecrations, explicitly to deter revolutionary-era ; this built on earlier indemnities but symbolized a shift toward symbolic protection of sacraments over pragmatic compromise. Concurrently, a 1825 law granted civil recognition and property rights to religious orders, reversing suppressions and enabling monastic revivals, with Jesuit numbers swelling to over 1,000 members in by 1828. These policies, including royal patronage of that dispatched 500 priests annually by the mid-1820s, aimed to embed Church authority in and morality, yet they exacerbated divisions: liberals decried them as theocratic overreach, citing the law's unenforced severity—never applied before its 1830 repeal—as evidence of reactionary intent rather than genuine . Protestant communities, numbering about 500,000, faced heightened marginalization, with sporadic expulsions and restrictions on worship, underscoring Catholicism's privileged status despite nominal .

Societal Changes and Class Dynamics

The Bourbon Restoration preserved key Revolutionary and Napoleonic reforms that had dismantled feudal privileges, ensuring legal equality under the Napoleonic Code and preventing a wholesale revival of pre-1789 class hierarchies. This continuity meant that while the nobility regained ceremonial honors and political influence, particularly through Ultra-royalist dominance after 1824, their economic dominance remained curtailed by irreversible land redistributions during the Revolution. Peasants, who comprised roughly 70-80% of the population and owned about half of arable land by 1815 due to prior sales of church and émigré properties, resisted attempts to restore seigneurial dues, maintaining smallholder proprietorship amid ongoing agrarian challenges like high taxes and variable harvests. The , including merchants, manufacturers, and professionals, expanded economically during the period of relative stability and nascent industrialization, benefiting from protectionist tariffs and growth in commerce and banking, though trailed Britain's industrial output. This class, often aligned with constitutional moderates, clashed with aristocratic Ultra-royalists over policies favoring noble indemnification—totaling 988 million francs by 1825, funded by state bonds and taxes that strained broader society—fostering resentment among urban workers and rural proprietors who bore the fiscal burden without proportional gains. Urban laborers, concentrated in and , faced persistent hardships from economic disparities, with wages lagging behind rising food prices during slumps like 1816-1817, contributing to social friction that simmered until the . Overall, class dynamics reflected a tension between conservative restoration efforts and irreversible egalitarian shifts: the sought to reassert cultural preeminence, as articulated by figures like Chateaubriand who divided into idle and laboring masses, yet the and peasants leveraged preserved property rights to assert independence, underscoring the era's hybrid character of reaction amid modernization. Population growth from 29.8 million in 1815 to 32.5 million by 1830 amplified these pressures, with rural stagnation contrasting urban commercial vitality, but without feudal reversals, persisted through titles granted to merit-based elites, numbering over 1,000 hereditary creations between 1814 and 1830.

Artistic, Literary, and Urban Developments in Paris

![Charles X distributing rewards to artists at the salon of 1824][float-right] During the Bourbon Restoration, artistic production in continued under the auspices of the Royal Academy, with biennial Salons held at the serving as central venues for exhibition and royal patronage. The Salon of 1824, for instance, featured works by emerging artists such as and , marking early manifestations of amid persistent , though official commissions emphasized monarchical legitimacy through historical and allegorical themes. King Charles X personally distributed awards to exhibitors on January 15, 1825, underscoring state support for art that aligned with Restoration ideals of continuity and piety. Literary developments reflected a burgeoning Romantic movement, challenging classical norms and embracing emotion, individualism, and national history. François-René de Chateaubriand, a prominent and , influenced this shift through works like his memoirs and political essays that reconciled Catholic revival with monarchical restoration, positioning literature as a counter to revolutionary . Critics such as advocated for Shakespearean drama over Racinian restraint in essays published between 1823 and 1825, fostering debates that propelled Romantic authors like toward prominence by the late 1820s. These currents gained traction in Parisian salons and periodicals, despite limiting overt political critique. Urban advancements in Paris during this era focused on infrastructural enhancements to accommodate from approximately 714,000 in 1817 to over 780,000 by 1830, with the introduction of revolutionizing nocturnal activity. Experimental gas lamps appeared in the by 1820, expanding to streets like the Rue de la Paix by 1828, supplanting oil reverbères and enabling safer, more vibrant public spaces. The launch of horse-drawn omnibus services in 1828 provided the city's first regular public conveyance routes, easing mobility amid expanding boulevards and private constructions in the neoclassical Restoration style, though large-scale renovations awaited later regimes. These changes, coupled with uniformed policing reforms, aimed to restore order and modernity to the capital scarred by prior conflicts.

Major Controversies

White Terror and Post-Revolutionary Retribution

The White Terror, also known as the Second White Terror, erupted in France following the defeat of at the on 18 June 1815 and the subsequent Second Restoration of on 8 July 1815. It consisted of widespread royalist reprisals against individuals perceived as supporters of the Revolution, Bonapartists, or , particularly those who had rallied to during his brief return in the (20 March to 22 June 1815). Violence was most intense in , including regions like , , and the department, where local royalist militias and mobs targeted former revolutionaries, Protestant communities, and Napoleonic officials in acts of vigilante justice. Extrajudicial killings claimed several hundred lives between June and November 1815, with estimates placing the death toll at around 300 in the south alone. In and the , royalist leader Jean-François Froment incited attacks that killed approximately 200 Protestants, framing them as lingering Jacobin sympathizers. Notable victims included two of Napoleon's marshals—, assassinated in on 2 August 1815 by a mob while en route to , and Jean-Mathieu-Philibert Sérurier, though the latter survived initial threats—and at least six generals, often lynched or shot without trial. These acts were driven by local grudges from the period, including memories of anti-clerical and Protestant-Catholic tensions exacerbated by Napoleon's policies. Beyond mob violence, official retribution involved purges and legal proceedings. The ultra-royalist , elected in August 1815, enacted the Ordinances of 24 July 1815, establishing extraordinary provost courts to expedite trials of "terrorists" and Napoleonic adherents without appeals. These courts convicted hundreds, with arrests numbering in the thousands—up to 10,000 individuals detained nationwide for political crimes, leading to executions, deportations, and property seizures. In and surrounding areas, royalist crowds acted with tacit elite approval, though leaders like the duc d'Angoulême occasionally reined in excesses to prevent . Purges extended to the and administration, dismissing thousands of Bonapartists and replacing them with royalists. Louis XVIII sought to curb the Terror by dissolving the ultra-royalist chamber on 5 September 1816 and issuing amnesties, framing the violence as spontaneous popular vengeance rather than state policy to maintain monarchical legitimacy. However, the events deepened sectional divides, alienating moderates and liberals who viewed the retribution as disproportionate, while royalists justified it as necessary counterbalance to the Revolutionary Terror's tens of thousands of victims. The White Terror's scale, though limited compared to prior upheavals, underscored the fragility of reconciliation and fueled ongoing polarization between legitimists and constitutionalists.

Compensation for Emigrés and Nobility

During the French Revolution, properties belonging to émigrés—primarily nobility and clergy who fled the country—and those confiscated from the Church were sold as biens nationaux to fund the state and redistribute wealth to new owners, often bourgeoisie and peasants. Upon Louis XVIII's return in 1814, the Constitutional Charter of 1814 explicitly confirmed the inviolability of these sales, prioritizing social stability over restitution to avoid alienating the propertied classes who had purchased the lands. Emigrés were permitted to return and reclaim unsold properties or receive limited pensions, but no systematic compensation was provided under Louis XVIII's reign (1814–1824), reflecting his pragmatic approach to reconciling revolutionary gains with monarchical restoration. Ultra-royalists, dominant after , intensified demands for redress, viewing the lack of compensation as an unresolved injustice that perpetuated revolutionary depredations. Under Charles X (r. 1824–1830) and Joseph de Villèle, this culminated in the Law of Indemnity (Loi d'indemnité) promulgated on April 27, 1825, which allocated approximately 988 million francs—derisively dubbed le milliard des émigrés by opponents who exaggerated the figure for rhetorical effect—to compensate eligible emigrés and ecclesiastical victims for lost properties. The compensation took the form of state-issued rentes (perpetual annuities) at 3% interest, funded primarily through the reduction of existing national debt obligations and issuance of government bonds valued at around 600 million francs, thereby shifting the burden to taxpayers without direct property restitution. Eligibility required proof of emigration status and property loss, with valuations based on pre-revolutionary assessments adjusted for sales proceeds already received by some claimants; however, recipients often deemed the payments inadequate, as confiscated estates had frequently appreciated in value under new management. The explicitly reaffirmed the legal security of held by purchasers, preventing any rollback of revolutionary land transfers while addressing ultra-royalist grievances. This measure, enacted by a favoring conservatives, exacerbated divisions: liberals decried it as fiscally irresponsible and aristocratic favoritism, arguing it inflated public debt and neglected broader economic needs amid post-Napoleonic recovery. The indemnity's implementation involved commissions to verify claims, disbursing funds over subsequent years, but it fueled portraying the regime as retrograde, contributing to the erosion of support among the middle classes and press restrictions that followed. While restoring some financial equity for approximately 10,000–12,000 major claimants, the policy underscored the Restoration's tension between legitimist restitution and the entrenched realities of post-revolutionary property distribution, ultimately alienating moderates without fully satisfying noble expectations.

Restrictions on Press and Elections

The Constitutional Charter of 1814 established a highly restricted electoral system, limiting active citizenship to men aged 30 or older who paid at least 300 francs annually in direct taxes, thereby enfranchising approximately 90,000 to 100,000 voters out of a population exceeding 30 million. Eligibility to serve as electors—who selected deputies from departmental colleges—required paying 1,000 francs in taxes and being aged 30 or older, while deputies themselves needed to be 40 or older with the same tax threshold, ensuring representation by a narrow propertied elite presumed capable of rational governance. This census-based suffrage, coupled with indirect elections via primary assemblies, aimed to insulate the monarchy from revolutionary excesses by excluding the lower classes and urban laborers, whose participation had fueled prior instability. In response to a February 1820 assassination attempt on and rising liberal agitation, the government enacted the Law of the Double Vote on June 22, 1820, granting individuals paying 1,000 francs or more in taxes a second vote in electoral colleges, effectively weighting outcomes toward the wealthiest conservatives and amplifying ultra-royalist influence. This measure reduced the effective sway of moderate and liberal voters, as the top payers—numbering around 25,000—could dominate selections, though it faced opposition for undermining the Charter's equality principle among the enfranchised. Electoral manipulations, including prefectural influence over voter lists and dissolution threats, further skewed outcomes toward royalist majorities during ministries like that of Jean-Baptiste de Villèle (). Press freedoms, proclaimed in Article 8 of the 1814 Charter as subject only to subsequent legal penalties rather than prior , initially permitted a surge in publications criticizing the regime, prompting regulatory responses to curb perceived threats to . The Serre Laws of May 1819 abolished Napoleonic-era prior restraints, replacing them with mandatory securities (15,000–48,000 francs deposits for periodicals), stamp duties, and severe fines or imprisonment for offenses like libel against the king or to disorder, thus formalizing accountability while deterring radical journalism. Under Villèle's ultra-royalist administration, the 1822 press law intensified restrictions by increasing caution money requirements, authorizing prosecutions for vaguely defined attacks on or , and enabling seizures, which suppressed over 100 opposition journals by the mid-1820s. The brief Martignac ministry (1828–1829) eased penalties and reduced deposits, fostering a temporary revival of liberal periodicals, but Charles X's Polignac government reversed this with the of 1830, which reinstated prior authorization for publications, imposed unlimited fines, and empowered prefects to suppress presses deemed seditious. Paralleling electoral curbs, these ordinances annulled recent elections, mandated prefect-appointed electoral presidents, and narrowed by altering college compositions to favor royalists, directly precipitating the through elite alienation and public outrage over eroded constitutional guarantees. Such measures reflected a causal prioritization of monarchical stability over broader participation, viewing unrestricted expression and voting as vectors for revolutionary recurrence.

Legacy and Evaluation

Immediate Aftermath and Orleanist Succession

On July 25, 1830, King Charles X issued the , which dissolved the elected in 1827, suspended , restricted to the wealthiest 25% of voters by increasing the tax qualification, and scheduled new elections for September. These measures, drafted by Prime Minister , aimed to counter the liberal opposition's growing influence but violated the by bypassing parliamentary consent. The ordinances sparked immediate protests in , escalating into the Three Glorious Days of revolution from July 27 to 29, 1830. Barricades rose across the city, with workers, students, and units defecting to the insurgents; clashes resulted in approximately 800 to 1,000 deaths among revolutionaries and 200 to 300 soldiers. Charles X withdrew troops from the capital on July 29 and attempted to rescind the ordinances on July 30, but the damage was irreversible as crowds acclaimed Louis Philippe, Duke of Orléans, as a liberal alternative. Facing mounting unrest, Charles X abdicated on August 2, 1830, at Rambouillet, initially designating his grandson Henri, Duke of , as successor under a regency, though this was rejected by revolutionary leaders. On August 7, the elected Louis Philippe as Lieutenant General of the Kingdom, and on August 9, he accepted the throne as , "King of the French," shifting from divine-right legitimacy to . The Orleanist succession established the , with a revised promulgated on August 14, 1830, expanding the electorate to about 200,000 voters while retaining censitary favoring the , reducing royal veto power, and affirming parliamentary supremacy. Charles X and his family exiled to , ending the elder Bourbon line's direct rule, while Louis Philippe's regime prioritized and order, sidelining republican and legitimist claims. Initial stability followed, with Adolphe Thiers and François Guizot emerging as key figures, though underlying tensions persisted among workers excluded from the bourgeois-dominated government.

Long-Term Impacts on French Institutions

The , promulgated by on June 4, 1814, established France's first , introducing a bicameral legislature comprising an elected and a hereditary Chamber of Peers appointed by the king, with limited to approximately 100,000 men paying at least 300 francs in direct taxes, representing about 1% of the adult male population. This framework limited royal absolutism by requiring parliamentary approval for taxation and budgets, a provision that persisted in the Charter of 1830 under the and influenced subsequent French constitutional developments by normalizing legislative oversight of finances. Unlike the Ancien Régime's unchecked monarchy, the Restoration's hybrid system blended royal initiative in lawmaking with representative elements, preventing a complete reversion to and embedding egalitarian principles such as and inviolability of property, which derived from revolutionary gains and endured beyond 1830. Administrative and legal institutions from the Napoleonic era were largely retained, including the Civil Code of 1804, which codified secular legal equality and individual rights, and the departmental prefecture system that centralized governance through appointed officials overseeing 83 departments. These structures, un-reversed despite ultra-royalist pressures, facilitated efficient state control and economic recovery, forming the backbone of French public administration into the Third Republic and modern era, as they prioritized merit-based bureaucracy over feudal privileges. The decision not to restitute biens nationaux—lands sold during the Revolution—preserved property holdings among the bourgeoisie and peasantry, solidifying a propertied class supportive of constitutional order and contributing to long-term political stability by averting widespread agrarian unrest. Relations between church and state saw the reaffirmation of the 1801 , designating Catholicism the religion of the majority while guaranteeing for Protestants and , alongside state funding for salaries and indemnification for emigrant and losses estimated at over 1 billion francs by 1820. This bolstered influence in , with the church regaining control over secondary schools and universities, a policy that entrenched confessional education until the Ferry Laws of the 1880s began secularization. However, the Restoration's failure to fully reconcile clerical with liberal sentiments fueled ongoing tensions, manifesting in the July Monarchy's reduced church subsidies and culminating in the 1905 . In the military, the Restoration reduced forces to 200,000 men by from Napoleonic peaks, purging Bonapartist officers while retaining the professional cadre and framework, which ensured institutional continuity and prevented aristocratic dominance. This model of a state-controlled, merit-influenced influenced Orleanist reforms, emphasizing to civilian authority over dynastic , and contributed to France's capacity for colonial expansion in the without reverting to pre-revolutionary privatized regiments. Overall, the period's moderation under , contrasted with Charles X's ultra-royalism, demonstrated the viability of constrained , shaping a legacy of institutional that bridged centralization with monarchical legitimacy until republican ascendancy.

Historiographical Debates: Stability vs. Reaction

Historians have long debated the character of the Bourbon Restoration (1814–1830), weighing its achievements in fostering stability after the turmoil of the Revolution and against perceptions of it as a reactionary regime intent on reversing liberal reforms. Early interpretations, often penned by or Republican writers in the wake of the , emphasized reactionary elements such as the White Terror of 1815, which resulted in over 300 executions and thousands of exiles targeting former revolutionaries, and the ultra-royalist dominance after 1824, exemplified by laws indemnifying émigrés at a cost of 988 million francs and criminalizing in 1825. These accounts, including Achille de Vaulabelle's multi-volume history (1844–1860), portrayed the regime as stifling press freedom—evident in over 80 censorship ordinances between 1815 and 1820—and electoral manipulations that limited liberal representation, arguing such policies alienated the bourgeoisie and precipitated the 1830 uprising. In contrast, revisionist scholarship from the mid-20th century, notably Guillaume de Bertier de Sauvigny's analyses, reframed the Restoration as a era of moderation and consolidation under (r. 1814–1824), who promulgated the establishing a with bicameral , peerage appointments, and retention of key revolutionary gains like civil equality and property rights from the . Bertier highlighted empirical indicators of stability, including balanced budgets by 1817, annual averaging 2–3% in agriculture and nascent industry, and the absence of major internal conflicts or famines, attributing these to pragmatic ministries like those of Decazes (1815–1820) that prioritized reconciliation over retribution. This view posits the regime's longevity—15 years without revolution—as evidence of adaptive governance, with X's (r. 1824–1830) ultra policies, such as the 1827 dissolution of the liberal-leaning chamber, representing aberrations rather than the norm, driven by factional overreach rather than inherent flaws. The debate reflects partisan biases in earlier historiography, where Orléanist authors like Duvergier de Hauranne (1857–1871) downplayed monarchical successes to legitimize the , selectively emphasizing clerical influence and noble privileges while ignoring broader societal integration. Later positivist works, such as Charléty's (1921), incorporated economic data to underscore the period's role in transitioning to industrial modernity, with coal production rising 50% and road networks expanding, countering narratives of stagnation. Critics of the reactionary argue it overlooks causal factors like post-Napoleonic exhaustion favoring compromise, evidenced by consistent voter turnout in restricted elections (e.g., 1827 polls yielding 20% liberal seats despite weighting). Ultimately, while ultra-royalist excesses eroded support—culminating in ordinances suspending the in July 1830—the regime's foundational stability under suggests its failure stemmed more from inflexible responses to liberal gains than systemic reactionism.

References

  1. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/France_since_1814/Chapter_3
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.