Community hub
Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Intercontinental ballistic missile
View on Wikipedia
An intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) is a ballistic missile with a range greater than 5,500 kilometres (3,400 mi),[1] primarily designed for nuclear weapons delivery (delivering one or more thermonuclear warheads). Conventional, chemical, and biological weapons can also be delivered with varying effectiveness but have never been deployed on ICBMs. Most modern designs support multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), allowing a single missile to carry several warheads, each of which can strike a different target. The United States, Russia, China, France, India, the United Kingdom, Israel, and North Korea are the only countries known to have operational ICBMs. Pakistan is the only nuclear-armed state that does not possess ICBMs.
Early ICBMs had limited precision, which made them suitable for use only against the largest targets, such as cities. They were seen as a "safe" basing option, one that would keep the deterrent force close to home where it would be difficult to attack. Attacks against military targets (especially hardened ones) demanded the use of a more precise, crewed bomber. Second- and third-generation designs (such as the LGM-118 Peacekeeper) dramatically improved accuracy to the point where even the smallest point targets can be successfully attacked.
ICBMs are differentiated by having greater range and speed than other ballistic missiles: intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs), medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs), short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs) and tactical ballistic missiles.
History
[edit]World War II
[edit]_misil.svg)
The first practical design for an ICBM grew out of Nazi Germany's V-2 rocket program. The liquid-fueled V-2, designed by Wernher von Braun and his team, was then widely used by Nazi Germany from mid-1944 until March 1945 to bomb British and Belgian cities, particularly Antwerp and London.
Under Projekt Amerika, von Braun's team developed the A9/10 ICBM, intended for use in bombing New York and other American cities. Initially intended to be guided by radio, it was changed to be a piloted craft after the failure of Operation Elster. The second stage of the A9/A10 rocket was tested a few times in January and February 1945.
After the war, the US executed Operation Paperclip, which took von Braun and hundreds of other leading Nazi scientists to the United States to develop IRBMs, ICBMs, and launchers for the US Army.
This technology was predicted by US General of the Army Hap Arnold, who wrote in 1943:
Someday, not too distant, there can come streaking out of somewhere – we won't be able to hear it, it will come so fast – some kind of gadget with an explosive so powerful that one projectile will be able to wipe out completely this city of Washington.[2][3]
Cold War
[edit]
After World War II, the Americans and the Soviets started rocket research programs based on the V-2 and other German wartime designs. Each branch of the US military started its own programs, leading to considerable duplication of effort. In the Soviet Union, rocket research was centrally organized although several teams worked on different designs.
The US initiated ICBM research in 1946 with the RTV-A-2 Hiroc project. This was a three-stage effort with the ICBM development not starting until the third stage. However, funding was cut in 1948 after only three partially successful launches of the second stage design, that was used to test variations of the V-2 design.[4] With overwhelming air superiority and truly intercontinental bombers, the newly formed US Air Force did not take the problem of ICBM development seriously. Things changed in 1953 with the Soviet testing of their first thermonuclear weapon, but it was not until 1954 that the Atlas missile program was given the highest national priority. The Atlas A first flew on 11 June 1957; the flight lasted only about 24 seconds before the rocket exploded. The first successful flight of an Atlas missile to full range occurred 28 November 1958.[5] The first armed version of the Atlas, the Atlas D, was declared operational in January 1959 at Vandenberg, although it had not yet flown. The first test flight was carried out on 9 July 1959,[6] and the missile was accepted for service on 1 September. The Titan I was another US multistage ICBM, with a successful launch February 5, 1959, with Titan I A3. Unlike the Atlas, the Titan I was a two-stage missile, rather than three. The Titan was larger, yet lighter, than the Atlas. Due to the improvements in engine technology and guidance systems the Titan I overtook the Atlas.[7]
In the Soviet Union, early development was focused on missiles able to attack European targets. That changed in 1953, when Sergei Korolev was directed to start development of a true ICBM able to deliver newly developed hydrogen bombs. Given steady funding throughout, the R-7 developed with some speed. The first launch took place on 15 May 1957 and led to an unintended crash 400 km (250 mi) from the site. The first successful test followed on 21 August 1957; the R-7 flew over 6,000 km (3,700 mi) and became the world's first ICBM.[8] The first strategic-missile unit became operational on 9 February 1959 at Plesetsk in north-west Russia.[9]
It was the same R-7 launch vehicle that placed the first artificial satellite in space, Sputnik, on 4 October 1957. The first human spaceflight in history was accomplished on a derivative of R-7, Vostok, on 12 April 1961, by Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin. A heavily modernized version of the R-7 is still used as the launch vehicle for the Soviet/Russian Soyuz spacecraft, marking more than 60 years of operational history of Sergei Korolyov's original rocket design.
The R-7 and Atlas each required a large launch facility, making them vulnerable to attack, and could not be kept in a ready state. Failure rates were very high throughout the early years of ICBM technology. Human spaceflight programs (Vostok, Mercury, Voskhod, Gemini, etc.) served as a highly visible means of demonstrating confidence in reliability, with successes translating directly to national defense implications. The US was well behind the Soviets in the Space Race and so US President John F. Kennedy increased the stakes with the Apollo program, which used Saturn rocket technology that had been funded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower.
.png)
These early ICBMs also formed the basis of many space launch systems. Examples include R-7, Atlas, Redstone, Titan, and Proton, which was derived from the earlier ICBMs but never deployed as an ICBM. The Eisenhower administration supported the development of solid-fueled missiles such as the LGM-30 Minuteman, Polaris and Skybolt. Modern ICBMs tend to be smaller than their ancestors, due to increased accuracy and smaller and lighter warheads, and use solid fuels, making them less useful as orbital launch vehicles.
The Western view of the deployment of these systems was governed by the strategic theory of mutual assured destruction. In the 1950s and 1960s, development began on anti-ballistic missile systems by both the Americans and Soviets. Such systems were restricted by the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. The first successful ABM test was conducted by the Soviets in 1961, which later deployed a fully operational system defending Moscow in the 1970s (see Moscow ABM system).
The 1972 SALT treaty froze the number of ICBM launchers of both the Americans and the Soviets at existing levels and allowed new submarine-based SLBM launchers only if an equal number of land-based ICBM launchers were dismantled. Subsequent talks, called SALT II, were held from 1972 to 1979 and actually reduced the number of nuclear warheads held by the US and Soviets. SALT II was never ratified by the US Senate, but its terms were honored by both sides until 1986, when the Reagan administration "withdrew" after it had accused the Soviets of violating the pact.
In the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan launched the Strategic Defense Initiative as well as the MX and Midgetman ICBM programs.
China developed a minimal independent nuclear deterrent entering its own cold war after an ideological split with the Soviet Union beginning in the early 1960s. After first testing a domestic built nuclear weapon in 1964, it went on to develop various warheads and missiles. Beginning in the early 1970s, the liquid fueled DF-5 ICBM was developed and used as a satellite launch vehicle in 1975. The DF-5, with a range of 10,000 to 12,000 km (6,200 to 7,500 mi)—long enough to strike the Western United States and the Soviet Union—was silo deployed, with the first pair in service by 1981 and possibly twenty missiles in service by the late 1990s.[10] China also deployed the JL-1 Medium-range ballistic missile with a reach of 1,700 kilometres (1,100 mi) aboard the ultimately unsuccessful Type 092 submarine.[11]
Post–Cold War
[edit]
In 1991, the United States and the Soviet Union agreed in the START I treaty to reduce their deployed ICBMs and attributed warheads.
As of 2016[update], all five of the nations with permanent seats on the United Nations Security Council have fully operational long-range ballistic missile systems; Russia, the United States, and China also have land-based ICBMs (the US missiles are silo-based, while China and Russia have both silo and road-mobile (DF-31, RT-2PM2 Topol-M missiles).
Israel is believed to have deployed a road mobile nuclear ICBM, the Jericho III, which entered service in 2008; an upgraded version is in development.[12][13]
India successfully test fired Agni V, with a strike range of more than 5,000 km (3,100 mi) on 19 April 2012, claiming entry into the ICBM club.[14] The missile's actual range is speculated by foreign researchers to be up to 8,000 km (5,000 mi) with India having downplayed its capabilities to avoid causing concern to other countries.[15] On 15 December 2022, first night trial of Agni-V was successfully carried out by SFC from Abdul Kalam Island, Odisha. The missile is now 20 percent lighter because the use of composite materials rather than steel material. The range has been increased to 7,000 km.[16]
By 2012 there was speculation by some intelligence agencies that North Korea is developing an ICBM.[17] North Korea successfully put a satellite into space on 12 December 2012 using the 32-metre-tall (105 ft) Unha-3 rocket. The United States claimed that the launch was in fact a way to test an ICBM.[18] (See Timeline of first orbital launches by country.) In early July 2017, North Korea claimed for the first time to have tested successfully an ICBM capable of carrying a large thermonuclear warhead.
In July 2014, China announced the development of its newest generation of ICBM, the Dongfeng-41 (DF-41), which has a range of 12,000 kilometres (7,500 miles), capable of reaching the United States, and which analysts believe is capable of being outfitted with MIRV technology.[19]
Most countries in the early stages of developing ICBMs have used liquid propellants, with the known exceptions being the Indian Agni-V, the planned but cancelled[20] South African RSA-4 ICBM, and the now in service Israeli Jericho III.[21]
The RS-28 Sarmat[22] (Russian: РС-28 Сармат; NATO reporting name: SATAN 2), is a Russian liquid-fueled, MIRV-equipped, super-heavy thermonuclear armed intercontinental ballistic missile in development by the Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau[22] from 2009,[23] intended to replace the previous R-36 missile. Its large payload would allow for up to 10 heavy warheads or 15 lighter ones or up to 24 hypersonic glide vehicles Yu-74,[24] or a combination of warheads and massive amounts of countermeasures designed to defeat anti-missile systems;[25] it was announced by the Russian military as a response to the US Prompt Global Strike.[26]
In July 2023, North Korea fired a suspected intercontinental ballistic missile that landed short of Japanese waters. The launch follows North Korea's threat to retaliate against the US for alleged spy plane incursions.[27]
Flight phases
[edit]The following flight phases can be distinguished:[28][29]
- Boost phase, which can last from 3 to 5 minutes. It is shorter for a solid-fuel rocket than for a liquid-propellant rocket. Depending on the trajectory chosen, typical burnout speed is 4 km/s (2.5 mi/s), up to 7.8 km/s (4.8 mi/s). The altitude of the missile at the end of this phase is typically 150 to 400 km (90 to 250 mi).
- Midcourse phase, which lasts approximately 25 minutes, is sub-orbital spaceflight with the flightpath being a part of an ellipse with a vertical major axis. The apogee (halfway through the midcourse phase) is at an altitude of approximately 1,200 km (750 mi). The semi-major axis is between 3,186 and 6,372 km (1,980 and 3,959 mi) and the projection of the flightpath on the Earth's surface is close to a great circle, though slightly displaced due to earth rotation during the time of flight. In this phase, the missile may release several independent warheads and penetration aids, such as metallic-coated balloons, aluminum chaff, and full-scale warhead decoys.
- Reentry/Terminal phase, which lasts two minutes starting at an altitude of 100 km; 62 mi. At the end of this phase, the missile's payload will impact the target, with impact at a speed of up to 7 km/s (4.3 mi/s) (for early ICBMs less than 1 km/s (0.62 mi/s)); see also maneuverable reentry vehicle.
ICBMs usually use the trajectory which optimizes range for a given amount of payload (the minimum-energy trajectory); an alternative is a depressed trajectory, which allows less payload, shorter flight time, and has a much lower apogee.[30]
Modern ICBMs
[edit] | This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2022) |
Modern ICBMs typically carry multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), each of which carries a separate nuclear warhead, allowing a single missile to hit multiple targets. MIRV was an outgrowth of the rapidly shrinking size and weight of modern warheads and the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaties (SALT I and SALT II), which imposed limitations on the number of launch vehicles. It has also proved to be an "easy answer" to proposed deployments of anti-ballistic missile (ABM) systems: It is far less expensive to add more warheads to an existing missile system than to build an ABM system capable of shooting down the additional warheads; hence, most ABM system proposals have been judged to be impractical. The first operational ABM systems were deployed in the United States during the 1970s. The Safeguard ABM facility, located in North Dakota, was operational from 1975 to 1976. The Soviets deployed their ABM-1 Galosh system around Moscow in the 1970s, which remains in service. Israel deployed a national ABM system based on the Arrow missile in 1998,[31] but it is mainly designed to intercept shorter-ranged theater ballistic missiles, not ICBMs. The Alaska-based United States national missile defense system attained initial operational capability in 2004.[32]
ICBMs can be deployed from multiple platforms:
- In missile silos, which offer some protection from military attack (including, the designers hope, some protection from a nuclear first strike)
- On submarines: submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs); most or all SLBMs have the long range of ICBMs (as opposed to IRBMs)
- On heavy trucks: this applies to one version of the Topol which may be deployed from a self-propelled mobile launcher, capable of moving through roadless terrain, and launching a missile from any point along its route
- Mobile launchers on rails; this applies, for example, to РТ-23УТТХ "Молодец" (RT-23UTTH "Molodets" – SS-24 "Scalpel")
The last three kinds are mobile and therefore hard to detect prior to a missile launch. During storage, one of the most important features of the missile is its serviceability. One of the key features of the first computer-controlled ICBM, the Minuteman missile, was that it could quickly and easily use its computer to test itself.
After launch, a booster pushes the missile and then falls away. Most modern boosters are solid-propellant rocket motors, which can be stored easily for long periods of time. Early missiles used liquid-fueled rocket motors. Many liquid-fueled ICBMs could not be kept fueled at all times as the cryogenic fuel liquid oxygen boiled off and caused ice formation, and therefore fueling the rocket was necessary before launch. This procedure was a source of significant operational delay and might allow the missiles to be destroyed by enemy counterparts before they could be used. To resolve this problem Nazi Germany invented the missile silo that protected the missile from strategic bombing and also hid fueling operations underground.[citation needed]
Although the USSR/Russia preferred ICBM designs that use hypergolic liquid fuels, which can be stored at room temperature for more than a few years.
Once the booster falls away, the remaining "bus" releases several warheads, each of which continues on its own unpowered ballistic trajectory, much like an artillery shell or cannonball. The warhead is encased in a cone-shaped reentry vehicle and is difficult to detect in this phase of flight as there is no rocket exhaust or other emissions to mark its position to defenders. The high speeds of the warheads make them difficult to intercept and allow for little warning, striking targets many thousands of kilometers away from the launch site (and due to the possible locations of the submarines: anywhere in the world) within approximately 30 minutes.[citation needed]
Many[who?] authorities say that missiles also release aluminized balloons, electronic noisemakers, and other decoys intended to confuse interception devices and radars.[citation needed]
As the nuclear warhead reenters the Earth's atmosphere, its high speed causes compression of the air, leading to a dramatic rise in temperature which would destroy it, if it were not shielded in some way. In one design, warhead components are contained within an aluminium honeycomb substructure, sheathed in a pyrolytic carbon-epoxy synthetic resin composite material heat shield.[citation needed] Warheads are also often radiation-hardened (to protect against nuclear armed ABMs or the nearby detonation of friendly warheads), one neutron-resistant material developed for this purpose in the UK is three-dimensional quartz phenolic.[citation needed]
Circular error probable is crucial, because halving the circular error probable decreases the needed warhead energy by a factor of four. Accuracy is limited by the accuracy of the navigation system and the available geodetic information.
Strategic missile systems are thought to use custom integrated circuits designed to calculate navigational differential equations thousands to millions of FLOPS in order to reduce navigational errors caused by calculation alone. These circuits are usually a network of binary addition circuits that continually recalculate the missile's position. The inputs to the navigation circuit are set by a general-purpose computer according to a navigational input schedule loaded into the missile before launch.
One particular weapon developed by the Soviet Union – the Fractional Orbital Bombardment System – had a partial orbital trajectory, and unlike most ICBMs its target could not be deduced from its orbital flight path. It was decommissioned in compliance with arms control agreements, which address the maximum range of ICBMs and prohibit orbital or fractional-orbital weapons. However, according to President Putin, Russia is working on the new Sarmat ICBM which leverages Fractional Orbital Bombardment concepts[citation needed] to use a southern polar approach instead of flying over the northern polar regions.[33] It is theorized that, by using that approach, it could potentially avoid the American missile defense batteries in California and Alaska.
New development of ICBM technology are ICBMs able to carry hypersonic glide vehicles as a payload such as RS-28 Sarmat.
On 12 March 2024 India announced that it had joined a very limited group of countries, which are capable of firing multiple warheads on a single ICBM. The announcement came after successfully testing multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) technology.[34]
Specific ICBMs
[edit]Land-based ICBMs
[edit]
Russia, the United States, China, North Korea, India and Israel are the only countries currently known to possess land-based ICBMs.[37][38]
The United States currently operates 405 ICBMs in three USAF bases.[39] The only model deployed is LGM-30G Minuteman-III. All previous USAF Minuteman II missiles were destroyed in accordance with START II, and their launch silos have been sealed or sold to the public. The powerful MIRV-capable Peacekeeper missiles were phased out in 2005.[40]
The Russian Strategic Rocket Forces have 286 ICBMs able to deliver 958 nuclear warheads: 46 silo-based R-36M2 (SS-18), 30 silo-based UR-100N (SS-19), 36 mobile RT-2PM "Topol" (SS-25), 60 silo-based RT-2UTTH "Topol M" (SS-27), 18 mobile RT-2UTTH "Topol M" (SS-27), 84 mobile RS-24 "Yars" (SS-29), and 12 silo-based RS-24 "Yars" (SS-29).[41]
China has developed several long-range ICBMs, like the DF-31. The Dongfeng 5 or DF-5 is a 3-stage liquid fuel ICBM and has an estimated range of 13,000 kilometers. The DF-5 had its first flight in 1971 and was in operational service 10 years later. One of the downsides of the missile was that it took between 30 and 60 minutes to fuel. The Dong Feng 31 (a.k.a. CSS-10) is a medium-range, three-stage, solid-propellant intercontinental ballistic missile, and is a land-based variant of the submarine-launched JL-2.
The DF-41 or CSS-X-10 can carry up to 10 nuclear warheads, which are MIRVs and has a range of approximately 12,000–14,000 km (7,500–8,700 mi).[42][43][44] The DF-41 deployed underground in Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu and Inner Mongolia. The mysterious underground subway ICBM carrier systems are called the "Underground Great Wall Project".[45]
Israel is believed to have deployed a road mobile nuclear ICBM, the Jericho III, which entered service in 2008. It is possible for the missile to be equipped with a single 750 kg (1,650 lb) nuclear warhead or up to three MIRV warheads. It is believed to be based on the Shavit space launch vehicle and is estimated to have a range of 4,800 to 11,500 km (3,000 to 7,100 mi).[12] In November 2011 Israel tested an ICBM believed to be an upgraded version of the Jericho III.[13]
India has a series of ballistic missiles called Agni. On 19 April 2012, India successfully test fired its first Agni-V, a three-stage solid fueled missile, with a strike range of more than 7,500 km (4,700 mi). Missile was test-fired for the second time on 15 September 2013.[14] On 31 January 2015, India conducted a third successful test flight of the Agni-V from the Abdul Kalam Island facility. The test used a canisterised version of the missile, mounted over a Tata truck.[46] On 15 December 2022, first night trial of Agni-V was successfully carried out by SFC from Abdul Kalam Island, Odisha. The missile is now 20 percent lighter because the use of composite materials rather than steel material. The range has been increased to 7,000 km.[16]
Submarine-launched ICBMs
[edit]| Type | Minimum range (km) | Maximum range (km) | Country |
|---|---|---|---|
| UGM-133 Trident II (D5) | 12,000 |  United States
| |
| RSM-54 R-29RMU "Sineva" | 11,500 |  Russia
| |
| RSM-54 R-29RMU2 "Layner" | 8,300 | 12,000 | Russia
|
| RSM-56 R-30 "Bulava" | 8,000 | 9,300 | Russia
|
| M51 | 8,000 | 10,000 |  France
|
| JL-2 | 7,400 | 8,000 |  China
|
| JL-3 | 10,000 | 12,000 | China
|
| K-5 | 5,000 |  India
| |
| K-6 | 8,000 | 12,000 | India
|
| Pukguksong-6 | 4,000 | 12,000 |  North Korea
|
| M45[47] | 6,000 | France
| |
| UGM-96 Trident I (C-4) | 12,000 | United States
| |
| RSM-40[48] R-29 "Vysota" | 7,700 |  Soviet Union
| |
| RSM-50[48] R-29R "Vysota" | 6,500 | Soviet Union
| |
| RSM-52[48] R-39 "Rif" | 8,300 | Soviet Union
| |
| RSM-54 R-29RM "Shtil" | 8,300 | Soviet Union
|
Missile defense
[edit]An anti-ballistic missile is a missile which can be deployed to counter an incoming nuclear or non-nuclear ICBM. ICBMs can be intercepted in three regions of their trajectory: boost phase, mid-course phase or terminal phase. The United States, Russia, India, France, Israel, and China[49] have now developed anti-ballistic missile systems, of which the Russian A-135 anti-ballistic missile system, the American Ground-Based Midcourse Defense, the Indian Prithvi Defence Vehicle Mark-II and the Israeli Arrow 3 are the only systems having the capability to intercept and shoot down ICBMs carrying nuclear, chemical, biological, or conventional warheads.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles". Special Weapons Primer. Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 26 November 2015. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
- ^ Dolman, Everett C.; Cooper, Henry F. Jr. "19: Increasing the Military Uses of Space". Toward a Theory of Space Power. NDU Press. Archived from the original on 15 February 2012. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
- ^ Correll, John T. "World's most powerful ballistic missile". GK Padho. Archived from the original on 22 February 2018. Retrieved 22 February 2018.
- ^ "Convair RTV-A-2 Hiroc". www.designation-systems.net. Retrieved 8 August 2025.
- ^ "Atlas". The Exploration of Space. Century of Flight. Archived from the original on 11 October 2011. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
- ^ "Atlas D". Missile Threat. Archived from the original on 10 February 2012. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
- ^ "Air Force Space & Missile Museum". Archived from the original on 21 October 2021. Retrieved 29 June 2022.
- ^ Siddiqi, Asif (2000). Challenge to Apollo: the Soviet Union and the space race, 1945–1974 (PDF). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA History Div. pp. 160–161. Retrieved 17 August 2023.
- ^ "This Week in EUCOM History: February 6–12, 1959". EUCOM. 6 February 2012. Archived from the original on 21 September 2012. Retrieved 8 February 2012.
- ^ "DF-5". Weapons of Mass Destruction / WMD Around the World. Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 16 April 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
- ^ "Type 92 Xia". Weapons of Mass Destruction Around the World. Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 19 February 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
- ^ a b Feickert, Andrew (5 March 2004). Missile Survey: Ballistic and Cruise Missiles of Foreign Countries (PDF). Congressional Research Service (Report). Library of Congress. RL30427. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 March 2012. Retrieved 21 June 2010.
- ^ a b Pfeffer, Anshel (2 November 2011). "IDF test-fires ballistic missile in central Israel". Haaretz. Reuters. Archived from the original on 3 November 2011. Retrieved 3 November 2011.
- ^ a b Mallikarjun, Y; Subramanian, TS (19 April 2012). "Agni-V successfully test-fired". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 24 April 2012. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
- ^ "India downplayed Agni-V's capacity: Chinese experts". Hindustan Times. Beijing, China. Indo-Asian News Service. 20 April 2012. Archived from the original on 7 June 2014. Retrieved 13 July 2014.
- ^ a b "If India wants, Agni missiles can now strike targets beyond 7,000 kms". ANI News. 17 December 2022.
- ^ "North Korea's Taepodong and Unha Missiles". Programs. Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 26 November 2015. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
- ^ "North Korea says it successfully launched satellite into orbit". NBC News. 12 December 2012. Archived from the original on 14 April 2013. Retrieved 13 April 2013.
- ^ "China 'confirms new generation long range missiles'". The Telegraph. 1 August 2014. Archived from the original on 19 March 2015. Retrieved 1 April 2015.
- ^ "South Africa". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Archived from the original on 20 August 2016. Retrieved 8 July 2016.
- ^ "Jericho". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Astronautix. Archived from the original on 22 October 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
- ^ a b Новую тяжелую ракету "Сармат" будут делать в Красноярске Archived 6 September 2017 at the Wayback Machine Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 2 February 2015.
- ^ "РС-28 / ОКР Сармат, ракета 15А28 – SS-X-30 (проект) – MilitaryRussia.Ru – отечественная военная техника (после 1945г.)". militaryrussia.ru. Archived from the original on 15 September 2013. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
- ^ Batchelor, Tom (15 June 2016). "Russia testing hypersonic nuclear glider that holds 24 warheads and travels at 7,000mph". Archived from the original on 30 March 2018. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
- ^ "Russia plans new ICBM to replace Cold War 'Satan' missile". Reuters. 17 December 2013. Archived from the original on 18 January 2015. Retrieved 17 January 2015.
- ^ "Минобороны рассказало о тяжелой баллистической ракете – неуязвимом для ПРО ответе США". 31 May 2014. Archived from the original on 15 September 2017. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
- ^ "North Korea fires intercontinental ballistic missile after threatening US". BBC News. 12 July 2023. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
- ^ Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles https://fas.org/nuke/intro/missile/icbm.htm Archived 26 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Three Stages of the Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) Flight Archived 13 March 2019 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Science & Global Security, 1992, Volume 3, pp. 101–159 Depressed Trajectory SLBMs: A Technical Evaluation and Arms Control Possibilities [1] Archived 18 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Israeli Arrow ABM System is Operational as War Butts Darken". Israel High-Tech & Investment Report. November 2002. Archived from the original on 7 May 2006. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
- ^ "Fort Greely". Systems. Missile Threat. 8 December 1998. Archived from the original on 30 January 2012. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
- ^ "Nuclear Challenges: The Growing Capabilities of Strategic Competitors and Regional Rivals" (PDF). dia.mil. Defense Intelligence Agency. 14 August 2024. Retrieved 3 July 2025.
- ^ Lendon, Brad; Mogul, Rhea (12 March 2024). "India joins select group of nations able to fire multiple warheads on a single ICBM". CNN. Retrieved 12 March 2024.
- ^ "Israel Tests the Jericho Missile System; Iran Claims They're Being Targeted". 7 December 2019.
- ^ Colin Zwirko (2 September 2025). "North Korea announces new Hwasong-20 nuclear missile as Kim arrives in China". NK News. Retrieved 2 September 2025.
- ^ "ICBM". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 30 November 2009. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
- ^ "India test launches Agni-V long-range missile", BBC News, UK, 19 April 2012, archived from the original on 27 July 2018, retrieved 11 March 2016.
- ^ "New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms". U.S. Department of State. Archived from the original on 4 July 2017. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
- ^ Edwards, Joshua S. (20 September 2005). "Peacekeeper missile mission ends during ceremony". US: Air force. Archived from the original on 18 October 2012. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
- ^ Podvig, Pavel (13 December 2007). "Strategic Rocket Forces". Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
- ^ "Five types of missiles to debut on National Day". Xinhua. 2 September 2009. Archived from the original on 10 January 2015. Retrieved 6 April 2010.
- ^ "DF-41 (CSS-X-10; China)". Jane's Strategic Weapon Systems. Jane's Information Group. 2 July 2009. Archived from the original on 26 March 2011. Retrieved 6 April 2010.
- ^ "DF-41 (CSS-X-10)". Missile Threat. Archived from the original on 8 April 2016. Retrieved 26 January 2015.
- ^ Zhang, Hui. "China's underground Great Wall: subterranean ballistic missile". Power & Policy. Power and Policy, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Archived from the original on 29 January 2016. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
- ^ "Agni 5, India's Longest Range Ballistic Missile, Successfully Test-Fired". NDTV.com. Archived from the original on 14 January 2016. Retrieved 8 February 2016.
- ^ Kristensen, Hans M.; Korda, Matt (2 January 2019). "French nuclear forces, 2019". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 75 (1): 51–55. Bibcode:2019BuAtS..75a..51K. doi:10.1080/00963402.2019.1556003. ISSN 0096-3402. S2CID 151142543.
- ^ a b c Korabli VMF SSSR, Vol. 1, Part 1, Yu. Apalkov, Sankt Peterburg, 2003, ISBN 5-8172-0069-4
- ^ "China conducts successful interception of ballistic missile". News. Archived from the original on 22 February 2018. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
Further reading
[edit]- J. K. Golovanov, M., "Korolev: Facts and myths", Nauka, 1994, ISBN 5-02-000822-2.
- "Rockets and people" – B. E. Chertok, M: "mechanical engineering", 1999. ISBN 5-217-02942-0 (in Russian).
- "Testing of rocket and space technology – the business of my life" Events and facts – A.I. Ostashev, Korolyov, 2001. Bibliography 1996–2004
- "Nesterenko" series Lives of great people – Authors: Gregory Sukhina A., Ivkin, Vladimir Ivanovich, publishing house "Young guard" in 2015, ISBN 978-5-235-03801-1.
External links
[edit]
Intercontinental ballistic missile
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Characteristics
Operational Definition and Criteria
An intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) is a land-based ballistic missile with a range in excess of 5,500 kilometers, designed to deliver warheads over intercontinental distances following a ballistic trajectory.[8] This definition, established in arms control agreements such as the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), distinguishes ICBMs from shorter-range systems like intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs), which have ranges between 1,000 and 5,500 kilometers.[1] The 5,500-kilometer threshold ensures capability to strike targets across continents, such as from North America to Eurasia, reflecting operational requirements for strategic deterrence during the Cold War era when the term was formalized.[8] Key criteria include the missile's propulsion-limited boost phase, after which it follows an unpowered parabolic arc determined by gravity and initial velocity, achieving speeds exceeding 7 kilometers per second during reentry.[9] Launch platforms are ground-based, either from hardened silos for survivability or mobile transporters for dispersal, excluding sea-launched variants classified separately as submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) despite comparable ranges.[8] Payloads typically consist of nuclear warheads, often in multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) to enhance penetration against defenses, though conventional warheads have been tested in limited contexts.[10] Operational deployment requires integration into national strategic command systems for rapid launch on warning or preemptive use, with accuracy measured in circular error probable (CEP) metrics often under 200 meters for modern systems to ensure target destruction.[9] Verification under treaties like New START involves on-site inspections and telemetry data exchange to confirm compliance with range and launcher limits, emphasizing land-based infrastructure as a core criterion.[11] Systems failing to meet the range threshold or deviating to powered glide trajectories, such as hypersonic boost-glide vehicles, are categorized differently to avoid blurring strategic classifications.[1]Key Technical Parameters
An intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) is defined by its capability to deliver payloads over distances exceeding 5,500 kilometers, distinguishing it from shorter-range ballistic missiles.[12][13] This range threshold, established in arms control contexts such as the New START Treaty, enables strikes across continents from land-based launchers. Typical operational ranges for deployed ICBMs extend from 8,000 to 13,000 kilometers, influenced by factors including payload mass, launch trajectory, and atmospheric conditions.[9] ICBM flight profiles involve three primary phases: boost, midcourse, and terminal reentry. During the boost phase, lasting 2-5 minutes, multi-stage solid- or liquid-fueled rockets accelerate the missile to burnout velocities of approximately 6-7 kilometers per second, sufficient for suborbital insertion.[9] The midcourse phase, comprising the majority of flight time (around 20-25 minutes for full intercontinental ranges), follows an elliptical ballistic arc with apogees typically reaching 1,200-1,500 kilometers altitude, where the payload coasts in near-vacuum conditions.[14] Total flight duration for a 10,000-kilometer trajectory approximates 30 minutes.[14] In the terminal phase, reentry vehicles descend hypersonically at speeds up to 7 kilometers per second (approximately Mach 20), generating intense plasma sheaths that challenge guidance and communication.[9] Payloads, optimized for nuclear delivery, often employ multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), with capacities supporting 3-10 warheads per missile alongside penetration aids and decoys; total throw-weight ranges from 1,000 to 10,000 kilograms in modern designs.[15] Accuracy is quantified by circular error probable (CEP), with contemporary systems achieving CEPs under 200 meters through inertial navigation augmented by stellar or GPS updates, though exact figures remain classified and vary by missile variant.[13] Launch platforms include hardened silos, mobile transporters, or rail systems to enhance survivability against preemptive strikes.Physics and Flight Dynamics
Trajectory and Boost Phases
The boost phase marks the initial segment of an intercontinental ballistic missile's (ICBM) overall ballistic trajectory, encompassing the powered ascent from launch until engine burnout. During this period, the missile's multi-stage rocket engines generate thrust to accelerate the vehicle, overcoming gravity and atmospheric drag while following a guidance-directed path. The trajectory commences with a near-vertical liftoff to minimize time in dense lower atmosphere, transitioning via thrust vector control or aerodynamic surfaces to a gravity turn that pitches the nose over toward the target azimuth, optimizing ascent efficiency.[16][17] This phase typically endures 3 to 5 minutes, varying by propulsion type: liquid-fueled ICBMs exhibit longer burns of approximately 4 minutes (240 seconds), while solid-propellant variants conclude in about 3 minutes (170 seconds) due to higher thrust densities.[17][12] By burnout, the missile attains hypersonic velocities exceeding 6 km/s (over 24,000 km/h), with horizontal displacement limited to roughly 500–1000 km from the launch site.[9][16] Altitudes at cutoff range from 200 to 400 km, though the majority of the phase transpires below 100 km within the atmosphere, yielding a bright exhaust plume detectable by infrared sensors.[17][18] Guidance systems, primarily inertial with possible stellar or GPS augmentation in modern designs, continuously adjust the trajectory during boost to account for errors and achieve precise burnout conditions—velocity vector, altitude, and orientation—that define the subsequent unpowered elliptical arc governed by gravitational forces alone.[17] Variations in boost trajectory, such as lofted profiles for shorter times-of-flight or depressed paths for evasion, can alter apogee and range but remain constrained by launch site geometry and payload mass.[17] Spent stages are jettisoned sequentially, reducing mass and enhancing efficiency, before the post-boost vehicle deploys payloads, marking the end of powered flight.[16]Midcourse and Reentry Phases
The midcourse phase of an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) flight begins after the termination of the boost phase, typically lasting 20 to 25 minutes as the payload travels along a suborbital ballistic trajectory in the upper atmosphere and near-space environment.[19] [20] During this period, the missile reaches apogee altitudes of approximately 1,000 to 1,200 kilometers, with velocities on the order of 6 to 7 kilometers per second, governed primarily by gravitational forces and residual momentum in a vacuum-like regime where aerodynamic drag is negligible.[9] The post-boost vehicle (PBV), also known as the bus, separates from the upper stage and employs small liquid- or solid-fueled thrusters for precise maneuvering, enabling the sequential release of multiple reentry vehicles (RVs), decoys, and penetration aids such as chaff or balloons to complicate enemy discrimination radars.[21] [22] This dispersion exploits the extended timeframe and predictability of the phase, which lacks atmospheric interference, allowing for targeted delivery of independently routable warheads in multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) configurations.[23] The PBV's maneuverability derives from its onboard guidance systems, which refine trajectories based on inertial measurements and stellar or GPS updates where applicable, achieving positioning accuracies within tens of meters before RV release.[24] In this exoatmospheric environment, the absence of drag permits efficient use of low-thrust propulsion for orbit adjustments, but the phase also exposes payloads to potential interception, prompting the deployment of lightweight decoys that mimic RV radar cross-sections to overwhelm defenses through sheer volume.[9] For instance, advanced PBVs can execute velocity changes of several hundred meters per second to separate warhead packages by kilometers, ensuring temporal and spatial staggering upon atmospheric reentry.[25] Transitioning to the reentry phase, individual RVs descend from altitudes above 100 kilometers at hypersonic velocities exceeding 7 kilometers per second, compressing incoming air to generate a plasma sheath around the vehicle due to intense frictional heating from shock wave formation.[9] This phase endures less than one minute for ICBM-class missiles, during which peak heating rates reach thousands of kilowatts per square meter, with surface temperatures surpassing 2,000 Kelvin, primarily dissipated through ablation of the RV's heat shield material.[20] [25] Ablative shields, typically composed of phenolic resins or carbon-based composites, undergo controlled pyrolysis and charring, vaporizing surface layers to carry away thermal energy via mass loss and radiation, while the underlying structure experiences decelerations up to 60 g-forces from atmospheric drag.[9] [26] Ballistic RVs follow unpowered, predetermined paths with no active propulsion or steering during reentry to minimize mass and complexity, relying on midcourse targeting for accuracy; any plasma-induced blackouts disrupt communications, but inertial guidance suffices for terminal precision within hundreds of meters.[27] Advanced designs incorporate blunt-body geometries to distribute heat loads, reducing peak fluxes compared to slender shapes, though maneuvering reentry vehicles (MaRVs) with post-release thrusters can evade defenses at the cost of added weight and reduced payload.[25] Survival hinges on the causal interplay of entry angle, velocity, and shield mass, where steeper trajectories amplify drag but risk structural overload, while shallower ones extend heating durations.[28]Historical Evolution
Origins in Early Rocketry
The earliest known rockets originated in China during the 13th century, where gunpowder-propelled fire arrows were deployed as incendiary weapons against Mongol invaders in 1232 AD, marking the initial application of rocketry for military purposes.[29] These primitive solid-fuel devices, consisting of bamboo tubes filled with gunpowder attached to arrows, provided short-range propulsion but lacked precision or significant payload capacity.[30] Rocketry saw limited military revival in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, particularly through iron-cased rockets developed in the Kingdom of Mysore under Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan, which achieved ranges of up to 2.5 kilometers and influenced British adaptations.[30] British engineer William Congreve refined these into the Congreve rocket in 1804, employing solid propellant for naval and land barrages during the Napoleonic Wars and the War of 1812, though accuracy remained poor due to unguided trajectories and variable thrust.[30] American inventor William Hale introduced stabilizing spin via angled exhaust nozzles in the 1840s, enhancing stability but not addressing fundamental limitations in range or control.[30] Theoretical foundations for advanced rocketry emerged in the early 20th century, with Konstantin Tsiolkovsky's 1903 publication deriving the rocket equation, which mathematically demonstrated the potential for multi-stage liquid-fueled vehicles to escape Earth's gravity through efficient propellant mass ratios.[31] Hermann Oberth expanded on these principles in his 1923 book Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen, advocating liquid propellants for sustained thrust and outlining spaceflight applications.[30] In the United States, Robert Goddard patented a liquid-fueled rocket design in 1914 and achieved the first successful launch of such a device on March 16, 1926, from Auburn, Massachusetts, reaching an altitude of 41 feet (12.5 meters) with gasoline and liquid oxygen, proving the viability of pump-fed liquid propulsion over solid fuels.[32] Amateur rocketry societies advanced experimentation in the interwar period; Germany's Verein für Raumschiffahrt (VfR), founded in 1927 under Wernher von Braun's early involvement, conducted over 300 test launches, including the first European liquid-fueled rocket in 1929 using liquid oxygen and triethanolamine.[30] These efforts transitioned to state-sponsored programs amid rising militarization, culminating in Germany's development of the Aggregat-4 (A-4), redesignated V-2, under von Braun's Army Ordnance team starting in 1936.[30] The V-2, first successfully launched on October 3, 1942, from Peenemünde, featured a 320-kilometer range, supersonic speeds exceeding Mach 5, and inertial guidance, becoming the world's first long-range ballistic missile and the initial human-made object to reach space at 80-100 km altitude, though production totaled about 5,800 units with high failure rates due to rushed wartime deployment.[30] This technology directly informed postwar ballistic missile programs, as captured V-2 components and expertise enabled scaling to intercontinental ranges via enhanced staging and thrust.[30]Cold War Development and Deployment
The Soviet Union pioneered the first operational intercontinental ballistic missile with the R-7 Semyorka, which achieved its initial successful full-range test flight on August 21, 1957, demonstrating the capability to reach targets over 8,000 kilometers away.[33] Development of the R-7 began in the early 1950s under Sergei Korolev's leadership, building on captured German V-2 technology and domestic rocketry advances, with the program's urgency heightened by post-World War II competition in long-range missile technology.[34] Following completion of flight tests in December 1959, the first R-7 launch complexes entered alert status, and operational deployment commenced in early 1960, though limited to a small number of fixed launch sites—peaking at approximately 28 missiles across six sites by 1962.[35] The R-7's liquid-fueled design and lengthy preparation time restricted its strategic utility, leading to its rapid phase-out in favor of more advanced systems. In response to the Soviet R-7 and the October 1957 Sputnik launch, the United States accelerated its ICBM program, with the SM-65 Atlas becoming the first American missile to achieve operational status on October 31, 1959, at Vandenberg Air Force Base.[36] The Atlas, developed since 1954 by Convair, featured a multistage liquid-propellant configuration and was initially deployed in "soft" above-ground silos vulnerable to preemptive strikes; by 1962, the U.S. had 126 Atlas missiles operational across various bases, though the system was retired by 1965 due to reliability issues and the advent of superior designs.[37] Concurrently, the U.S. introduced the Titan I in 1962, with 54 missiles in hardened underground silos by 1963, and pioneered solid-fuel technology with the Minuteman I, which entered service in 1962 offering rapid launch readiness and greater survivability—eventually expanding to over 1,000 Minuteman missiles at peak deployment in the 1970s and 1980s.[38] The ICBM arms race intensified through the 1960s and 1970s, as the Soviet Union deployed successive generations to match and surpass U.S. capabilities. The USSR's R-16 (SS-7 Saddler) entered service in 1961 with 186 missiles by its peak, followed by the silo-based R-36 (SS-9 Scarp) in the late 1960s and its MIRV-capable R-36M (SS-18 Satan) variant from 1974, contributing to a Soviet ICBM force that reached approximately 1,600 launchers by the mid-1970s.[39][40] U.S. deployments emphasized accuracy and multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), with Minuteman III operational from 1970 carrying up to three warheads each, and the MX Peacekeeper (LGM-118) added in 1986 with 50 missiles featuring 10 MIRVs for enhanced penetration against hardened targets.[3] This escalation reflected mutual deterrence strategies, though early U.S. fears of a "missile gap" in 1959–1960 proved exaggerated, as Soviet numbers initially lagged before overtaking in raw launcher counts by the 1970s.[41] Both superpowers maintained forces on high alert, with U.S. ICBMs peaking above 1,200 and Soviet forces emphasizing larger payloads and silo basing for counterforce potential.[3]Post-Cold War Modernization
In the United States, post-Cold War ICBM modernization initially focused on extending the service life of the LGM-30G Minuteman III, which entered operational service in 1970 and has undergone three major service-life extension programs to maintain reliability amid deferred new developments.[42][43] These upgrades addressed aging propulsion, guidance, and reentry systems, enabling the missile to remain deployable beyond its original 10-year design life, with sustainment projected through at least 2030 despite increasing maintenance challenges.[44] To replace it, the U.S. Air Force initiated the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent program, redesignated LGM-35A Sentinel in 2020, awarding the engineering and manufacturing development contract to Northrop Grumman that year for a silo-based, solid-fueled ICBM with enhanced accuracy, survivability, and command integration.[45] Initial deployment was targeted for 2029, though recent assessments indicate potential delays and cost overruns exceeding $100 billion, prompting evaluations of further Minuteman III extensions to 2050 as a contingency.[46][47] Russia pursued aggressive ICBM upgrades post-1991 to counter perceived vulnerabilities in fixed silos and maintain parity, deploying the RT-2PM2 Topol-M (SS-27 Sickle B) as its first post-Soviet design, with initial silo-based tests in 1994 and operational deployment starting in 1997 at Tatishchevo.[48][49] This single-warhead, solid-fueled missile, later adapted for road-mobile launchers, emphasized mobility and countermeasures against missile defenses, achieving full regiment activation by 2000.[50] Building on this, the RS-24 Yars (SS-27 Mod 2) entered service in 2010 as a MIRV-capable evolution, deployable in both silo and mobile configurations to enhance payload flexibility and survivability, with over 100 units fielded by the mid-2010s.[51] More recently, the RS-28 Sarmat heavy ICBM, intended to supersede the Soviet-era R-36M (SS-18 Satan), began state testing in 2022 but encountered multiple failures, including a catastrophic silo explosion in September 2024, delaying combat readiness beyond initial 2021 targets despite ongoing development efforts.[52][53] China shifted from a minimal deterrent posture to rapid ICBM expansion post-Cold War, deploying the DF-31 solid-fueled mobile missile in the late 1990s and advancing to the DF-41 by 2017, a road- and rail-mobile system capable of carrying up to 10 MIRVs with a range exceeding 12,000 km.[54] Officially unveiled during the October 1, 2019, National Day parade, the DF-41 integrates advanced guidance for improved accuracy and evasion, supporting China's arsenal growth from around 100 warheads in 2000 to over 500 by 2024, including new silo fields for fixed variants.[55] This modernization reflects doctrinal evolution toward greater retaliatory depth, with satellite imagery confirming hundreds of new construction sites since 2021.[56] North Korea achieved its first viable ICBM capabilities in the 2010s, culminating in the solid-fueled Hwasong-18, tested successfully on April 13, 2023, as a road-mobile system marking a shift from liquid-fueled predecessors like the Hwasong-15.[57] Subsequent launches, including lofted trajectories in July and December 2023, demonstrated reliability and potential ranges up to 15,000 km, enabling operational deployment by late 2023 with MIRV potential and countermeasures.[58] These advances, built on reverse-engineered foreign engines, prioritize mobility to evade preemptive strikes, though reentry vehicle durability remains unverified in full-range tests.[59]Engineering and Technology
Propulsion Systems
Intercontinental ballistic missiles achieve intercontinental ranges through multi-stage rocket propulsion systems that accelerate payloads to velocities exceeding 7 kilometers per second during the initial boost phase, which typically lasts 3 to 5 minutes.[17] These systems rely on chemical rocket engines expelling high-temperature gases to generate thrust, with staging employed to discard empty propellant tanks and engines, thereby reducing mass and increasing efficiency as the missile ascends.[60] The propulsion must provide sufficient delta-v to overcome Earth's gravity and atmospheric drag before transitioning to a ballistic trajectory. The two dominant propellant types are liquid and solid, each with distinct engineering trade-offs. Liquid-propellant rockets, used in early systems like the Atlas, pair fuels such as refined kerosene (RP-1) with liquid oxygen or employ storable hypergolic propellants like unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) and nitrogen tetroxide (N2O4), delivering specific impulses around 300-450 seconds but necessitating complex cryogenic storage, fueling procedures, and turbopump assemblies that introduce potential failure points and pre-launch preparation times of hours.[61] In contrast, solid-propellant motors, standard in later U.S. designs such as the Minuteman III's three-stage configuration using composite ammonium perchlorate-based grains, ignite instantaneously upon command, offering specific impulses of 250-300 seconds with simpler construction, no moving parts in the combustion chamber, and indefinite shelf life under controlled conditions.[62] Solid propellants excel in rapid response scenarios due to their pre-loaded, maintenance-light nature, enabling silo-based or mobile launches without vulnerable fueling stages that could be detected or disrupted, though they sacrifice some throttle control and efficiency compared to liquids, which allow variable thrust and higher payload fractions in optimized designs.[63][64] Thrust vector control in both types often involves gimbaled nozzles or jet vanes to steer during ascent, with solids favoring flexible nozzles for reliability. Hybrid propellants, combining solid fuel and liquid oxidizer, remain experimental for ICBMs due to added complexity without proportional gains in performance or storability.[60] Post-boost propulsion, distinct from the main boost phase, utilizes smaller liquid or solid motors on the post-boost vehicle to dispense multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) or penetration aids, providing precise delta-v adjustments of tens to hundreds of meters per second after main engine cutoff.[23] For instance, the Minuteman III incorporates a liquid-propellant post-boost rocket engine for cross-range and down-range corrections, ensuring accurate payload deployment amid varying orbital insertions.[62] Overall, the shift toward solid-fuel dominance in many inventories reflects priorities for survivability and operational tempo, balancing raw performance with strategic imperatives.[63]Guidance and Accuracy Systems
Intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) primarily employ inertial guidance systems (INS) to achieve the precision required for intercontinental ranges, as these systems are self-contained and immune to external jamming or spoofing during flight.[14] INS relies on gyroscopes to maintain orientation and accelerometers to measure specific forces, enabling an onboard computer to integrate velocity and position data from launch.[65] This method traces its origins to early ballistic missile developments, such as the German V-2, but has evolved with advancements in sensor technology, including ring laser gyros and fiber-optic gyros, which reduce drift errors over the 30-40 minute flight times typical of ICBM trajectories.[66] Guidance computations occur mainly during the boost phase, where thrust vector control adjusts the missile's path, followed by midcourse corrections if needed via small onboard thrusters.[67] Accuracy is quantified by circular error probable (CEP), the radius within which 50% of warheads are expected to land, influenced by factors like initial alignment errors, sensor precision, and atmospheric reentry perturbations. Modern INS achieves CEPs under 200 meters for hardened targets, a vast improvement from early systems exceeding kilometers, due to redundant sensors and pre-launch alignment using ground-based references.[43] In the United States, the LGM-30G Minuteman III uses an updated NS-20 INS with digital computing, yielding a CEP of approximately 120 meters.[43] Russian systems like the RS-24 Yars integrate inertial guidance with GLONASS satellite updates for terminal refinement, attaining a CEP around 250 meters despite potential vulnerabilities to satellite denial.[68] China's DF-41 employs inertial systems augmented by stellar or Beidou satellite corrections, with estimated CEPs of 100 meters from silos, reflecting investments in microelectronics for error compensation.[54] These accuracies enable counterforce targeting of silos and command centers, though reentry vehicle dispersion and decoys complicate defensive interception. While some proposals explore jam-resistant GPS for boost-phase updates, operational ICBMs prioritize autonomous INS to ensure reliability under electromagnetic attack.[69]Payload Configurations
The payload of an intercontinental ballistic missile consists primarily of reentry vehicles carrying nuclear warheads, along with a post-boost vehicle that dispenses them during the midcourse phase to achieve independent trajectories toward targets. Configurations are designed to maximize destructive potential against hardened or dispersed targets while incorporating countermeasures against ballistic missile defenses. Unitary payloads feature a single reentry vehicle with one warhead, optimizing for yield concentration on a primary target, whereas multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) systems enable one missile to deliver 3 to 10 or more warheads to separate locations, enhancing efficiency against multiple sites.[5][70] In MIRV setups, the post-boost vehicle—a maneuverable platform powered by small thrusters—releases warheads sequentially after boost phase, using velocity changes and orientation adjustments to impart distinct ballistic paths, with each reentry vehicle then relying on inertial guidance for terminal accuracy. Warhead yields typically range from 100 to 750 kilotons of TNT equivalent, selected based on target hardness; for instance, high-yield options like 550-750 kt warheads have been associated with heavy Russian systems capable of 10 MIRVs. Penetration aids, including lightweight decoy reentry vehicles, metallic chaff dispensers, and radar-reflective balloons, are integrated to saturate defenses by generating false targets that mimic genuine warheads in mass, heat signature, and radar cross-section but disperse or fail upon reentry.[71][72]| Configuration Type | Description | Typical Warhead Count | Example Aids |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unitary | Single reentry vehicle for focused strike | 1 | Minimal; optional chaff |
| MIRV | Multiple dispensable warheads for dispersed targeting | 3-10 | Decoys, balloons, chaff[73][51] |
Strategic and Operational Role
Deterrence Theory and MAD
Deterrence theory in the nuclear era holds that a state possessing weapons capable of inflicting massive retaliation can prevent aggression by making the prospective costs to an attacker exceed any conceivable benefits, thereby maintaining strategic stability through the credible threat of unacceptable damage.[75] This framework emerged prominently after the United States' atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, which demonstrated nuclear weapons' destructive potential, but evolved into mutual deterrence as the Soviet Union tested its first atomic bomb on August 29, 1949, ending the U.S. monopoly.[76] Empirical evidence from the Cold War period supports the theory's efficacy, as no direct nuclear exchange occurred between superpowers despite intense geopolitical tensions, including crises like the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962.[77] Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), a subset of deterrence doctrine, posits that full-scale nuclear war would result in the near-total annihilation of both combatants' populations, infrastructure, and military capabilities due to reciprocal second-strike forces, rendering initiation irrational.[78] The concept gained formal articulation in U.S. strategy under Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, who in a February 1965 speech outlined "Assured Destruction" as the ability to destroy 20-25% of the Soviet population and 50-75% of its industrial capacity even after absorbing a first strike, shifting from earlier counterforce emphases on targeting enemy military assets.[77] This approach acknowledged the limitations of preemptive strategies, given advancements in Soviet rocketry; the USSR's R-7 Semyorka ICBM became operational in 1959, enabling intercontinental reach shortly after the U.S. Atlas missile's deployment in 1959.[79] While MAD was never explicitly adopted as official U.S. policy—McNamara himself critiqued it as overly simplistic—it underpinned arsenal sizing and deployment decisions, with declassified documents revealing calculations tied to Soviet urban and economic targets rather than pure military decapitation.[76] ICBMs are central to MAD's operationalization, providing the volume, speed, and range necessary for a survivable second-strike salvo that ensures an attacker's societal collapse.[80] Fixed-silo deployments, hardened against blasts, housed the majority of U.S. strategic warheads during peak Cold War buildup; by 1970, Minuteman ICBMs alone carried over 1,000 warheads capable of striking Soviet targets within 30 minutes of launch.[81] Their role counters first-strike incentives by complicating complete disarmament—multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) on systems like the U.S. Peacekeeper (deployed 1986) multiplied warhead counts per missile, demanding an attacker expend disproportionate resources to neutralize them all.[82] Road-mobile variants, such as Russia's SS-25 Topol introduced in 1985, further enhance survivability by dispersing assets, reducing vulnerability to counterforce attacks and bolstering the credibility of retaliation even under surprise assault.[83] Quantitatively, U.S. ICBM forces today comprise 400 Minuteman III missiles with approximately 400 warheads under New START limits, calibrated to preserve MAD thresholds against peer adversaries like Russia and China.[84] Critiques of MAD highlight its reliance on rational actor assumptions and potential for escalation miscalculation, yet historical data shows it stabilized U.S.-Soviet relations by aligning incentives against nuclear use; for instance, both sides maintained rough parity in deliverable warheads by the 1970s, with ICBMs forming 60-70% of strategic inventories.[85] Sources from defense establishments, such as U.S. Department of Defense analyses, affirm ICBMs' enduring deterrence value, though academic and think-tank assessments often note biases toward maintaining status quo arsenals amid institutional pressures for continuity.[86] In practice, ICBMs integrate with the nuclear triad to distribute risks, but their fixed or semi-mobile basing offers prompt response times unattainable by sea- or air-based legs, ensuring the temporal credibility of massive retaliation.[87]Integration in Nuclear Triad
ICBMs constitute the land-based leg of the nuclear triad, alongside submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and strategic bombers, enabling nuclear powers to maintain diverse, survivable second-strike capabilities that complicate adversary preemptive targeting.[87] This integration ensures redundancy, as no single leg can be fully neutralized without exposing the attacker to retaliation from the others; ICBMs specifically provide the fastest response times—typically under 30 minutes from alert to launch—while SLBMs offer stealth and bombers allow recallability.[88] Their fixed or mobile basing disperses warheads across numerous sites, forcing potential aggressors to expend disproportionate resources on counterforce strikes, thereby enhancing overall strategic stability.[89] ICBMs are designed for strategic nuclear deterrence and retaliation against peer adversaries, rather than tactical strikes on limited targets such as infrastructure or bridges. Such applications would involve overkill, as conventional alternatives—including cruise missiles, short- and medium-range ballistic missiles, precision-guided munitions, and drones—offer greater flexibility, lower costs, and reduced escalation risks for localized operations. Employing ICBMs, particularly with nuclear payloads, could trigger rapid escalation to strategic nuclear exchange, violating deterrence principles by eroding the distinction between conventional and nuclear thresholds. No historical combat use of ICBMs against non-strategic targets exists, reinforcing their specialized role in assured destruction scenarios.[90][91] In the United States, ICBMs integrate into the triad through approximately 400 deployed Minuteman III missiles housed in hardened silos at bases in Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming, forming a prompt counterstrike option that pairs with Ohio-class SLBMs and B-52/B-2 bombers.[92] This configuration exploits ICBM advantages in accuracy (circular error probable under 200 meters) and payload capacity for multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), targeting hardened enemy assets like silos that SLBMs or bombers might less efficiently address.[93] Modernization efforts, such as the Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent (Sentinel) program, aim to sustain this leg's reliability amid aging infrastructure, preserving the triad's balance against peer competitors.[94] Russia's triad heavily emphasizes ICBMs, with around 306 strategic launchers—including silo-based RS-24 Yars and Topol-M variants—comprising over half its deployed strategic warheads and integrating with Borei-class SLBMs and Tu-95/Tu-160 bombers.[95] Mobile ICBMs enhance survivability by evading satellite detection, allowing flexible deployment that counters fixed-site vulnerabilities while providing rapid salvoes in escalation scenarios.[96] This structure supports Russia's doctrine of escalate-to-de-escalate, where ICBMs enable calibrated responses short of full SLBM or bomber commitment.[97] China's emerging triad incorporates limited ICBMs like the DF-41, deployed in silos and on transporters, to bolster credibility against U.S. forces, though SLBMs via Jin-class submarines remain developmental.[93] Across these systems, ICBMs' integration promotes deterrence by imposing high costs on disarming strikes—requiring near-perfect execution across thousands of targets—while their test-proven reliability (e.g., Minuteman III's 100% success rate in operational launches) underpins assured retaliation.[89]Basing, Survivability, and Command
ICBMs are deployed in fixed silo-based or mobile configurations to balance launch readiness with protection against preemptive strikes. In the United States, the land-based leg of the nuclear triad consists of approximately 400 Minuteman III missiles housed in hardened underground silos dispersed across bases in Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming, enabling rapid response times on the order of minutes following presidential authorization.[88] Russian forces emphasize mobility, with systems like the RT-2PM2 Topol-M (SS-27 Sickle B) deployed on transporter-erector-launcher (TEL) vehicles capable of off-road travel and repositioning to evade targeting, a doctrine shaped by concerns over fixed-site vulnerabilities observed in Cold War assessments.[98] [99] China employs a mix of silo and mobile basing for its DF-41 and DF-31 series, prioritizing road-mobile launchers for strategic depth amid limited silo infrastructure.[100] Survivability hinges on physical hardening, dispersal, and operational tactics tailored to basing mode. Silo-based systems achieve resilience through reinforced concrete structures buried underground, designed to withstand overpressures from nearby nuclear detonations—typically rated to endure blasts equivalent to several hundred pounds per square inch from indirect hits—but remain susceptible to direct strikes or coordinated salvos from high-accuracy multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), as highlighted in 1970s analyses of Soviet counterforce potential that raised fears of a U.S. "window of vulnerability."[101] [102] Mobile ICBMs enhance survivability via constant relocation and low observability; the Topol-M's TELs, for instance, facilitate launches from unprepared positions after short setup times, complicating preemptive targeting by denying adversaries reliable intelligence on positions.[98] Uncertainties in enemy targeting accuracy, warhead reliability, and post-boost vehicle maneuvers further bolster overall force endurance, though fixed silos demand reliance on early warning to enable launch-on-warning protocols.[103] Command and control (C2) systems ensure authoritative execution amid potential disruptions, integrating detection, decision-making, and transmission redundancies. U.S. nuclear C2, part of the broader NC3 architecture, routes presidential orders through secure channels including airborne platforms like the E-6B Mercury for post-attack continuity, with underground launch control centers linked to silos via hardened fiber-optic networks originating from Minuteman-era digital upgrades in the 1960s.[104] [105] These systems support functions such as attack assessment via satellite and radar inputs, selective targeting options, and permissive action links to prevent unauthorized use, while enabling rapid silo launches if warning of inbound threats is confirmed.[106] Russian C2 emphasizes decentralized elements for mobile forces, allowing regimental commanders limited autonomy under strict central oversight, with survivable communications adapting lessons from silo hardening to TEL-integrated controls.[107] Ongoing modernizations, including digital enhancements and AI-assisted processing, aim to counter cyber and electronic warfare threats without compromising human-in-the-loop safeguards.[108]Major Systems and Inventories
United States ICBMs
The United States initiated ICBM development in the 1950s amid Cold War tensions, achieving the first operational deployment with the SM-65 Atlas in September 1959. This liquid-fueled missile, with a range of about 14,000 km and capacity for a single W49 thermonuclear warhead yielding up to 1.5 megatons, was initially based in above-ground gantries before transitioning to hardened underground silos. Approximately 72 Atlas D and E/F variants were deployed across sites in California, Wyoming, and Nebraska, but vulnerability to pre-launch detection and fueling requirements led to its deactivation by April 1965. The HGM-25A Titan I, operational from 1962 to 1965, marked the U.S.'s first multistage ICBM with underground silo basing for 54 missiles across three bases in Washington, California, and South Dakota. Featuring liquid oxygen and RP-1 propellants, it achieved a 10,000-11,000 km range and carried a W53 warhead of 9 megatons. Its complexity and explosion risks during fueling contributed to short service life. The successor Titan II (LGM-25C), deployed from 1963 to 1987, improved with storable hypergolic fuels enabling faster launches, a 15,000 km range, and a W53 warhead, with 54 silos in Arizona, Arkansas, and Kansas supporting 9-megaton yields for countervalue targeting. The LGM-30 Minuteman series introduced solid-propellant technology for rapid response and high reliability, with Minuteman I deploying 800 missiles by 1965 across Malmstrom AFB (Montana), Minot AFB (North Dakota), and Francis E. Warren AFB (Wyoming). Upgraded to Minuteman II in 1965-1967 with improved penetration aids and a 13,000 km range, it supported up to three warheads before MIRV limitations. Minuteman III, entering service in 1970, added true MIRV capability with up to three W62 or later W78/W87 warheads, though arms control now limits most to single warheads; over 500 remain in inventory, with 400 deployed in silos as of the latest New START data. These missiles, with a maximum speed of Mach 23 and accuracy of 100-200 meters CEP, undergo periodic life-extension programs to maintain readiness amid aging components. The LGM-118 Peacekeeper, deployed from 1986 to 2005, addressed hardened Soviet targets with 50 missiles in Minuteman silos, each carrying 10 W87 warheads (300 kilotons each) on post-boost vehicles for independent targeting over 13,000 km. Its high accuracy (90 meters CEP) and MIRV loadout enhanced counterforce capabilities, but START II treaty constraints and silo basing vulnerabilities prompted retirement, with reentry vehicles repurposed for Minuteman III. No mobile or rail-based U.S. ICBMs have been operationally fielded, emphasizing fixed silo survivability through dispersion and hardening. To replace the Minuteman III, projected to exceed service life by the 2030s, the U.S. Air Force's Sentinel program (formerly Ground Based Strategic Deterrent) began development in 2017, with Northrop Grumman selected as prime contractor in 2020. Initial operational capability is targeted for 2029, featuring enhanced command-and-control integration, potential for future MIRVs, and a range exceeding 15,000 km, though estimated costs have risen to $140 billion amid congressional scrutiny over affordability and technical risks.| ICBM System | Deployment Years | Range (km) | Warhead Capacity | Propellant Type | Peak Inventory |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas (SM-65) | 1959-1965 | 14,000 | 1 (W49, 1.5 Mt) | Liquid | 72 |
| Titan I (HGM-25A) | 1962-1965 | 10,000-11,000 | 1 (W53, 9 Mt) | Liquid | 54 |
| Titan II (LGM-25C) | 1963-1987 | 15,000 | 1 (W53, 9 Mt) | Liquid (hypergolic) | 54 |
| Minuteman III (LGM-30G) | 1970-present | 13,000+ | 1-3 (W87/W78, 300-475 kt) | Solid | 500+ |
| Peacekeeper (LGM-118A) | 1986-2005 | 13,000 | 10 (W87, 300 kt) | Solid | 50 |
Russian ICBMs
Russia's intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) arsenal forms a cornerstone of its strategic nuclear forces, operated by the Strategic Rocket Forces. As of 2025, Russia deploys approximately 330 ICBMs capable of delivering 1,254 nuclear warheads, emphasizing mobile launchers to enhance survivability against preemptive strikes.[109] These systems are designed for ranges exceeding 10,000 kilometers, with payloads configured for multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) to penetrate defenses and ensure mutual assured destruction.[110] The inventory includes legacy liquid-fueled silo-based missiles alongside newer solid-fueled mobile and silo variants, reflecting ongoing modernization to replace Soviet-era systems like the R-36M2 (SS-18 Satan). The SS-18, with a range of about 11,000 km and capacity for up to 10 MIRVs, remains in service but faces phase-out due to age and vulnerability.[111] Solid-propellant missiles, such as the RT-2PM2 Topol-M (SS-27 Sickle B) and RS-24 Yars (SS-27 Mod 2), dominate new deployments for their rapid launch readiness and reduced detection signatures.[110]| Missile | Type | Range (km) | Warheads | Status/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-36M2 (SS-18) | Liquid, silo | ~11,000 | Up to 10 MIRV | Operational; ~40 deployed, replacement underway.[112] |
| RT-2PM2 Topol-M (SS-27) | Solid, mobile/silo | ~11,000 | 1-6 MIRV | Deployed since 1997; limited numbers as bridge to Yars. |
| RS-24 Yars (SS-27 Mod 2) | Solid, mobile/silo | 10,500-12,000 | 3-6 MIRV | Primary system; ~200+ launchers, key to mobile survivability.[113][51] |
| RS-28 Sarmat (SS-X-30) | Liquid, silo | ~18,000 | Up to 10+ MIRV or hypersonic | In testing; delays from failures, intended SS-18 successor.[52][114] |