Hubbry Logo
Junk (ship)Junk (ship)Main
Open search
Junk (ship)
Community hub
Junk (ship)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Junk (ship)
Junk (ship)
Junk (ship)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Junks in Guangzhou, photograph c. 1880 by Lai Afong

A junk (Chinese: 䑸; pinyin: zōng) is a type of Chinese sailing ship characterized by a central rudder, an overhanging flat transom, watertight bulkheads, and a flat-bottomed design.[1][2] They are also characteristically built using iron nails and clamps.[1] The term applies to many types of small coastal or river ships, usually serving as cargo ships, pleasure boats, or houseboats, but also going up in size up to large ocean-going vessels. There can be significant regional variations in the type of rig and the layout of the vessel.

Chinese junks were originally only fluvial and had square sails, but by the Song dynasty (c. 960 to 1279), they adopted ocean-going technologies acquired from Southeast Asian k'un-lun po trade ships. Tanja sails and fully battened junk rigs were introduced to Chinese junks by the 12th century CE.[1][2]

Similar designs to the Chinese junk were also adopted by other East Asian countries, most notably Japan, where junks were used as merchant ships to trade goods with China and Southeast Asia.[3]

Etymology and history of the term

[edit]
Early European illustration of Southeast Asian djongs and other smaller craft (D'Eerste Boeck, c. 1599), note the double rudders which distinguished Southeast Asian ships from the Chinese chuán which had a central rudder[1]

The English word "junk" comes from Portuguese junco from Malay jong. The word originally referred to the Javanese djong, very large trading ships that the Portuguese first encountered in Southeast Asia. It later also included the smaller flat-bottomed Chinese chuán, even though the two were markedly different vessels. After the disappearance of the djong in the 17th century, the meaning of "junk" (and other similar words in European languages) came to refer exclusively to the Chinese ship.[4][5][1][6][7]

The Chinese chuán and the Southeast Asian djong are frequently confused with each other and share some characteristics, including large cargo capacities, multiple (two to three) superimposed layers of hull planks, and multiple masts and sails. However the two are readily distinguishable from each other by two major differences. The first is that Southeast Asian (Austronesian) ships are built exclusively with lugs, dowels, and fiber lashings (lashed lug), in contrast to Chinese ships which are always built with iron nails and clamps. The second is that Chinese ships since the first century AD are all built with a central rudder. In contrast, Southeast Asian ships use double lateral rudders.[1]

The development of the sea-going Chinese chuán (the "junk" in modern usage) in the Song dynasty (c. 960 to 1279) is believed to have been influenced by regular contacts with sea-going Southeast Asian ships (the k'un-lun po of Chinese records) in trading ports in southern China from the 1st millennium CE onward, particularly in terms of the rigging, multiple sails, and the multiple hull sheaths. However, the chuán also incorporates distinctly Chinese innovations from their indigenous river and coastal vessels (namely watertight compartments and the central rudders).[1] "Hybrid" ships (referred to as the "South China Sea tradition") integrating technologies from both the chuán and the djong also started to appear by the 15th century.[2]

Construction

[edit]

Sails

[edit]
Main article: Junk rig
  • Tracing of two ships from Dunhuang cave temple, c. 8th–9th century CE. The ships showed square sails. A stern sculling oar is also present (known as a yuloh, 摇橹).
    Tracing of two ships from Dunhuang cave temple, c. 8th–9th century CE. The ships showed square sails. A stern sculling oar is also present (known as a yuloh, 摇橹).
  • Tracing of a ship on a mirror in the Shaanxi museum (>9th or >12th century CE)
    Tracing of a ship on a mirror in the Shaanxi museum (>9th or >12th century CE)

Iconographic remains show that Chinese ships before the 12th century used square sails. A ship carving from a stone Buddhist stele shows a ship with square sail from the Liu Sung dynasty or the Liang dynasty (c. 5th or 6th century). Dunhuang cave temple no. 45 (from the 8th or 9th century) features large sailboats and sampans with inflated square sails. A wide ship with a single sail is depicted in the Xi'an mirror (after the 9th or 12th century).[8][9] Eastern lug sail, which used battens and is commonly known as "junk rig", was likely not Chinese in origin: The oldest depiction of a battened junk sail comes from the Bayon temple at Angkor Thom, Cambodia.[10]: 460–461  From its characteristics and location, it is likely that the ship depicted in Bayon was a Southeast Asian ship.[11]: 188–189  The Chinese themselves may have adopted them around the 12th century CE.[12]: 21 

The full-length battens of the junk sail keep the sail flatter than ideal in all wind conditions. Consequently, their ability to sail close to the wind is poorer than other fore-and-aft rigs.[13][14]

Hull

[edit]
The Kangxi Emperor (r. 1654–1722) on a tour, seated prominently on the deck of a junk ship

Unlike other major shipbuilding traditions which developed from dugout canoes, the junk evolved from tapering rafts. It is the reason for the unique characteristics of early Chinese junks, like the absence of keels, very low decks, and solid transverse bulkheads rather than ribs or internal frames.[15]

Classic junks were built of softwoods (although after the 17th century teak was used in Guangdong) with the outside shape built first. Then multiple internal compartment/bulkheads accessed by separate hatches and ladders, reminiscent of the interior structure of bamboo, were built in. Traditionally, the hull has a horseshoe-shaped stern supporting a high poop deck. The bottom is flat in a river junk with no keel (similar to a sampan), so that the boat relies on a daggerboard,[16] leeboard or very large rudder to prevent the boat from slipping sideways in the water.[17]

The internal bulkheads are characteristic of junks, providing interior compartments and strengthening the ship. They also controlled flooding in case of holing. Ships built in this manner were written of in Zhu Yu's book Pingzhou Table Talks, published by 1119 during the Song dynasty.[9] Again, this type of construction for Chinese ship hulls was attested to by the Moroccan Muslim Berber traveler Ibn Battuta (1304–1377 CE), who described it in great detail (refer to Technology of the Song dynasty).[18]

Junk near Hong Kong, circa 1880

Benjamin Franklin wrote in a 1787 letter on the project of mail packets between the United States and France:

As these vessels are not to be laden with goods, their holds may without inconvenience be divided into separate apartments, after the Chinese manner, and each of these apartments caulked tight so as to keep out water.

— Benjamin Franklin, 1787[19]

Similar wet wells were also apparent in Roman small craft of the 5th century CE.[20]

Leeboards and centerboards

[edit]

Other innovations included the square-pallet bilge pump, which was adopted by the West during the 16th century for work ashore, the western chain pump, which was adopted for shipboard use, being of a different derivation. Junks also relied on the compass for navigational purposes. However, as with almost all vessels of any culture before the late 19th century, the accuracy of magnetic compasses aboard ship, whether from a failure to understand deviation (the magnetism of the ship's iron fastenings) or poor design of the compass card (the standard drypoint compasses were extremely unstable), meant that they did little to contribute to the accuracy of navigation by dead reckoning. Review of the evidence shows that the Chinese embarked magnetic pointer was only sometimes used for navigation or reorientation. The reasoning is simple. Chinese mariners were as capable as any, having undertaken the journey safely for hundreds of years, had they needed a compass as an essential tool to navigate, they would have been aware of the almost random directional qualities when used at sea of the water bowl compass they used. Yet that design remained unchanged for some half a millennium. Western sailors, coming upon a similar water bowl design (no evidence as to how has yet emerged) very rapidly adapted it in a series of significant changes such that within roughly a century the water bowl had given way to the dry pivot, a rotating compass card a century later, a lubberline a generation later and gimbals seventy or eighty years after that.[21]

Steering

[edit]

Junks employed stern-mounted rudders centuries before their adoption in the West for the simple reason that Western hull forms, with their pointed sterns, obviated a centreline steering system until technical developments in Scandinavia created the first, iron mounted, pintle and gudgeon 'barn door' western examples in the early 12th century CE. A second reason for this slow development was that the side rudders in use were still extremely efficient.[22] Thus the junk rudder's origin, form and construction was completely different in that it was the development of a centrally mounted stern steering oar, examples of which can also be seen in Middle Kingdom (c. 2050–1800 BCE) Egyptian river vessels. It was an innovation which permitted the steering of large ships and due to its design, allowed height adjustment according to the depth of the water and to avoid serious damage should the junk ground. A sizable junk can have a rudder that needed up to twenty members of the crew to control in strong weather. In addition to using the sail plan to balance the junk and take the strain off the hard to operate and mechanically weakly attached rudder, some junks were also equipped with leeboards or dagger boards. The world's oldest known depiction of a stern-mounted rudder can be seen on a pottery model of a junk dating from before the 1st century CE.[23]

History

[edit]

Han to Northern and southern dynasties era (2nd–6th century)

[edit]

Chinese ships at this time were heavily fluvial (riverine) in nature and operation, while a minority was focused on travel on the open seas and oceans.[12]: 20  Chinese ships in the ancient era crossed the East China Sea and visited regions such as Taiwan, Korea, and Japan. Chinese ships did not make regular maritime voyages to Southeast Asia and beyond until the 9th century CE.[24]: 20–21  Heng suggests an even later date (11th century CE) for the beginning of Chinese maritime shipping, when the first actual records of Chinese ships (mostly from Fujian and Guangdong) leaving for foreign trade appear.[24]: 21 

Large Austronesian trading ships docking in Chinese seaports with as many as four sails were recorded by scholars as early as the 3rd century CE. They called them the kunlun bo or kunlun po (崑崙舶; 'ship of the Kunlun people'). They were described as being capable of sailing against strong winds and violent waves, implying that Chinese ships at that time did not have that capacity.[24]: 24  These ships were booked by Chinese Buddhist pilgrims for passage to Southern India and Sri Lanka.[25]: 275 [26]: 32–33 [27]: 34–36  In the 3rd century CE, Chinese envoys were also sent to Southeast Asia ("Nanhai"), all of them explicitly used foreign ships for passage.[24]: 21 

Sui to Tang dynasty (7th century–9th century)

[edit]

In 683 CE, Tang court sent an envoy to Srivijaya, which does not mention a ship or even a mission, implying that like in previous cases, the envoy booked passage in a foreign ship.[24]: 21  Wang (1958) stated that there are no Tang dynasty records that mentioned Chinese junks being used for trading with Southeast Asia.[28]: 107  Kunlun bo trade increased by the 9th century, and were described as arriving regularly in trading ports in southern China in Chinese records.[24]: 24 

Around 770 CE, there was great activity in canal and river boat construction, attributed to Liu Yen, who created 10 shipwright yards and provided competitive rewards. Chu LingYiin, for example, deployed many-decked naval vessels in the Wu Tai Battle of 934 AD.[10]: 460 

Rise of Song dynasty (10th–13th century)

[edit]
Main articles: Huaguangjiao One, Nanhai One, and Quanzhou ship
A Northern Song dynasty (960–1127) era painting of a city with scenery of the surrounding river ships and transports, Zhang Zeduan's (1085–1145) painting Along the River During Qingming Festival

The state of Wuyue established diplomatic and maritime trade relations with Japan and the Korean states since at least 935 CE until Wuyue was absorbed by the Song dynasty in 978 CE. The relations of Wuyue with Japan and Korea were primarily motivated by Buddhism.[29]

In 989 CE, the Song court permitted private Chinese ships to trade overseas, due to the loss of access to the northern trading routes along the Silk Road.[30]: 41 [24]: 21  However regulations required ships to depart and return at specific ports that they were registered to, which stifled early trade. This regulation was modified in 1090, when the Song court decreed that ships could freely register and depart from any port. The first records of Chinese ships leaving for trade abroad appear in the 11th century, mostly to Southeast Asia, but also included records of trade with Japan and the Korean states. A stipulation requiring ships to return within 9 months was added by the second half of the 11th century, which limited the range of Chinese vessels.[24]: 21–22 

Needham's Science and Civilisation in China provided some descriptions of the large junk ship during the Song dynasty. Chin scholar in 1190 described the ships in the form of a poem:

"Through the streets carts and horses are rumbling and thronging-We are back in a year of the Hsüan-Ho reign-period. One day a Han-Lin scholar presented this painting, Worthy of handing down the ways and works of a peaceful time. Going east from the Water-gate one comes to the Canal of the Sui, The streets and the fields are alike incomparable (But Lao Tzu formerly warned against prosperity And today we know it has all become waste-land). Yet the vessels that sail ten thousand li on their voyages. With rudders of timber from Chhu and their masts from Wu, Fine scenery north of the bridge and south of the bridge, Recall for a time the dream of halcyon days, One can hear the flutes and drums; the towers seem close at hand."[31]: 464 

A decade before, in 1178, the Guangzhou customs officer Zhou Qufei wrote in Lingwai Daida about the sea-going ships of Southern China again:

"The ships which sail the southern sea and south of it are like giant houses. When their sails are spread they are like great clouds in the sky. Their rudders are several tens of feet long. A single ship carries several hundred men, and has in the stores a year's supply of grain. Pigs are fed and wine is fermented on board. There is no account of dead or living, no going back to the mainland when once the people have set forth upon the cerulean sea. At daybreak, when the gong sounds aboard the ship, the animals can drink their fill, and crew and passengers alike forget all dangers. To those on board, everything is hidden and lost in space, mountains, landmarks, and the countries of foreigners. The shipmaster may say "To make such and such a country, with a favorable wind, in so many days, we should sight such and such a mountain, (then) the ship must steer in such and such a direction". But suddenly the wind may fall, and may not be strong enough to allow for the sighting of the mountain on the given day; in such a case, bearings may have to be changed. And the ship (on the other hand) may be carried far beyond (the landmark) and may lose its bearings. A gale may spring up, the ship may be blown hither and thither, it may meet with shoals or be driven upon hidden rocks, then it may be broken to the very roofs (of its deckhouses). A great ship with heavy cargo has nothing to fear from the high seas, but rather in shallow water it will come to grief."[31]: 464 

In 1274 CE, according to a resident of Hangzhou, the large Song junks were of 5,000 liao, around 71.1 m (233 ft), and could fit up to 600 passengers; the middle sized ships were between 1,000- 2,000 liao and could carry up to 300 passengers. Smaller ships were known as "wind-piercing" and carried up to a hundred passengers.[32][33] However, historical descriptions (often second-hand) in early Chinese sources tend to greatly exaggerate dimensions, usually to twice or more of the actual lengths.[24]: 24  Shipwrecks of large junks of the period, the Nanhai one and Quanzhou ship, measured 30.4 m (100 ft) and 34.6 metres (114 ft) in length, respectively.[34][35]

Yuan dynasty (14th century)

[edit]
Main article: Shinan ship

The Mongol Yuan dynasty initially lifted the 9-month restriction on maritime shipping at around 1279, resulting in Chinese trade ships displacing Southeast Asian ships in their traditional Indian Ocean routes.[24]: 22  But by 1284, the Yuan court revoked the private trade policy of the Song dynasty, and much of the Chinese maritime trade during this period was monopolized by the state via ortogh partnerships. Most trade expeditions were controlled by foreign merchants, mainly Muslims living in trading cities in southern China, partnered with government officials and the Mongol imperial family. This ban on private trade was intermittently lifted for brief periods until 1323, when it was lifted permanently until the overthrow of the Yuan.[24]: 22 

Chinese ships were also described by Western travelers to the east, such as Ibn Battuta. According to Ibn Battuta, who visited China in 1347:

…We stopped in the port of Calicut, in which there were at the time thirteen Chinese vessels, and disembarked. On the China Sea traveling is done in Chinese ships only, so we shall describe their arrangements. The Chinese vessels are of three kinds; large ships called chunks (junks), middle sized ones called zaws (dhows) [sic] and the small ones kakams. The large ships have anything from twelve down to three sails, which are made of bamboo rods plaited into mats. They are never lowered, but turned according to the direction of the wind; at anchor they are left floating in the wind. A ship carries a complement of a thousand men, six hundred of whom are sailors and four hundred men-at-arms, including archers, men with shields and crossbows, who throw naphtha. Three smaller ones, the "half", the "third" and the "quarter", accompany each large vessel. These vessels are built in the towns of Zaytun (Quanzhou) and Sin-Kalan (Guangzhou). The vessel has four decks and contains rooms, cabins, and saloons for merchants; a cabin has chambers and a lavatory, and can be locked by its occupants. This is the manner after which they are made; two (parallel) walls of very thick wooden (planking) are raised and across the space between them are placed very thick planks (the bulkheads) secured longitudinally and transversely by means of large nails, each three ells in length. When these walls have thus been built the lower deck is fitted in and the ship is launched before the upper works are finished.[36]
—Ibn Battuta

Yuan dynasty ships carry on the tradition of Song; the Yuan navy is essentially Song navy.[37] Both Song and Yuan employed large trading junks. Unlike Ming treasure ships, Song and Yuan great junks are propelled by oars, and have with them smaller junks, probably for maneuvering aids.[38] The largest junks (5,000 liao) may have a hull length twice that of Quanzhou ship (1,000 liao),[39] that is 68 metres (223.1 ft).[33] However, the norm size for trading junks pre-1500 was most likely around 20–30 metres (65.6–98.4 ft) long, with the length of 30 metres (98.4 ft) only becoming the norm after 1500 CE. Large size could be a disadvantage for shallow harbors and many reefs of southeast asian.[40]

The ships of the previous Song, both mercantile and military, became the backbone of the Yuan navy. In particular the failed Mongol invasions of Japan (1274–1281), as well as the failed Mongol invasion of Java (1293), essentially relied on recently acquired Song naval capabilities. Worcester estimates that the large Yuan junks were 36 feet (10.97 m) in width and over 100 feet (30.48 m) long. In general, they had no keel, stempost, or sternpost. They did have centreboards, and a watertight bulkhead to strengthen the hull, which added great weight. This type of vessel may have been common in the 13th century.[41]: 22 [42]: 102  The kind of ships the Mongols used for the invasion wasn't recorded but it was large as they commissioned smaller boats for rivers of Java. David Bade estimated around 50 soldiers each on 400-500 ships with their supplies, weapons and diplomats during the Java campaign,[43]: 46  while John Man estimated around 29–44 soldiers each.[44]: 306 

Ming dynasty (15th–17th century)

[edit]

Expedition of Zheng He

[edit]
Main article: Chinese treasure ship
A large four masted junk from Longjiang Shipyard, c. 1553
Chinese woodblock print of Zheng He ships from early 1600s

The largest junks ever built were possibly those of Admiral Zheng He, for his expeditions in the Indian Ocean (1405 to 1433), although this is disputed as no contemporary records of the sizes of Zheng He's ships are known. Instead the dimensions are based on Sanbao Taijian Xia Xiyang Ji Tongsu Yanyi (Eunuch Sanbao Western Records Popular Romance, published 1597), a romanticized version of the voyages written by Luo Maodeng [zh] nearly two centuries later.[45] Maodeng's novel describes Zheng He's ships as follows:[46][47]

  • "Treasure ships" (寶船; Bǎo Chuán) nine-masted, 44.4 by 18 zhang, about 127 metres (417 feet) long and 52 metres (171 feet) wide.
  • Equine ships (馬船; Mǎ Chuán), carrying horses and tribute goods and repair material for the fleet, eight-masted, 37 by 15 zhang, about 103 m (338 ft) long and 42 m (138 ft) wide.
  • Supply ships (糧船; Liáng Chuán), containing staple for the crew, seven-masted, 28 by 12 zhang, about 78 m (256 ft) long and 35 m (115 ft) wide.
  • Transport ships (坐船; Zuò Chuán), six-masted, 24 by 9.4 zhang, about 67 m (220 ft) long and 25 m (82 ft) wide.
  • Warships (戰船; Zhàn Chuán), five-masted, 18 by 6.8 zhang, about 50 m (160 ft) long.

Louise Levathes suggests that the actual length of the biggest treasure ships may have been between 390–408 feet (119–124 m) long and 160–166 feet (49–51 m) wide.[30] Modern scholars have argued on engineering grounds that it is highly unlikely that Zheng He's ship was 450 ft in length,[48] Guan Jincheng (1947) proposed a much more modest size of 20 zhang long by 2.4 zhang wide (204 ft by 25.5 ft or 62.2 m by 7.8 m)[49] while Xin Yuan'ou (2002) put them as 61–76 m (200–250 feet) in length.[50] Zhao Zhigang claimed that he has solved the debate of the size difference, and stated that Zheng He's largest ship was about 70 m (230 ft) in length.[51]

Comparing to other Ming records, the Chinese seem to have exaggerated their dimensions. European East Indiamen and galleons were said to be 30, 40, 50, and 60 zhang (90, 120, 150, and 180 m) in length.[52][53] It was not until the mid to late 19th century that the length of the largest western wooden ship began to exceed 100 meters, even this was done using modern industrial tools and iron parts.[54][55][56]

International Commerce

[edit]

In Livro de Duarte Barbosa (c. 1516), the Portuguese writer Duarte Barbosa described the Chinese as "great navigators in very large ships which they call jungos, of two masts, of a different make from ours, the sails are of matting, and so also the cordage. There are great corsairs and robbers amongst those islands and ports of China. They go with all these goods to Malacca, where they also carry much iron, saltpetre and many other things, and for the return voyage they ship there Sumatra and Malabar pepper, of which they use a great deal in China, and drugs of Cambay, much anfiam, which we call opium, and wormwood, Levant gall nuts, saffron, coral wrought and unwrought, stuffs from Cambay, Palecate, and Bengal, vermilion, quicksilver, scarlet cloth, and many other things... Many of these Chinese take their wives and children continually on the ships in which they live without possessing any other dwellings."[57]: 206–207 

Sea ban

[edit]
Main article: Haijin

Private trade was banned in 1371 by the Hongwu Emperor, though official state-sponsored trade under the guise of "tribute" missions continued. The ban on private trade was lifted in 1405 during the Zheng He expeditions, but reinstated again in 1479. From the mid-15th to early 16th century, all Chinese maritime trading was banned under the Ming dynasty in what were known as the hai jin laws. The Zheng He expeditions had drained imperial funds and there was increasing threat of invasion from the north, leading the Xuande Emperor to order the immediate cessation of all overseas exploration. The shipping and shipbuilding knowledge acquired during the Song and Yuan dynasties gradually declined during this period.[58]

Capture of Taiwan

[edit]

In 1661, a naval fleet of 400 junks and 25,000 men led by the Ming loyalist Koxinga (pinyin: Zhèng Chénggōng; Wade–Giles: Chêng4 Chʻêng2-kung1), arrived in Taiwan to oust the Dutch from Zeelandia. Following a nine-month siege, Cheng captured the Dutch fortress Fort Zeelandia. A peace treaty between Koxinga and the Dutch Government was signed at Castle Zeelandia on February 1, 1662, and Taiwan became Koxinga's base for the Kingdom of Tungning.

Qing dynasty (17th–19th century)

[edit]
Main articles: Tek Sing and Keying (ship)
Chinese Trading Junk, Guangzhou, 1823

Large, ocean-going junks played a key role in Asian trade until the 19th century. One of these junks, Keying, sailed from China around the Cape of Good Hope to the United States and England between 1846 and 1848. Many junks were fitted out with carronades and other weapons for naval or piratical uses. These vessels were typically called "war junks" or "armed junks" by Western navies which began entering the region more frequently in the 18th century. The British, Americans and French fought several naval battles with war junks in the 19th century, during the First Opium War, Second Opium War and in between.

At sea, junk sailors co-operated with their Western counterparts. For example, in 1870 survivors of the English barque Humberstone shipwrecked off Formosa, were rescued by a junk and landed safely in Macao.[59]

Modern period (20th century)

[edit]
A junk Sin Tong Heng and a lorcha Tek Hwa Seng in the Dutch East Indies (1936)

In 1938, E. Allen Petersen escaped the advancing Japanese armies by sailing a 36-foot (11 m) junk, Hummel Hummel, from Shanghai to California with his wife Tani and two White Russians (Tsar loyalists).[60]

In 1955, six young men sailed a Ming dynasty-style junk from Taiwan to San Francisco. The four-month journey aboard the Free China was captured on film and their arrival into San Francisco made international front-page news. The five Chinese-born friends saw an advertisement for an international trans-Atlantic yacht race, and jumped at the opportunity for adventure. They were joined by the then US Vice-Consul to China, who was tasked with capturing the journey on film. Enduring typhoons and mishaps, the crew, having never sailed a century-old junk before, learned along the way. The crew included Reno Chen, Paul Chow, Loo-chi Hu, Benny Hsu, Calvin Mehlert and were led by skipper Marco Chung. After a journey of 6,000 miles (9,700 km), the Free China and her crew arrived in San Francisco Bay in fog on August 8, 1955. Shortly afterward the footage was featured on ABC television's Bold Journey travelogue. Hosted by John Stephenson and narrated by ship's navigator Paul Chow, the program highlighted the adventures and challenges of the junk's sailing across the Pacific, as well as some humorous moments aboard ship.[61]

A modern junk in La Rochelle in 2009

In 1959 a group of Catalan men, led by Jose Maria Tey, sailed from Hong Kong to Barcelona on a junk named Rubia. After their successful journey this junk was anchored as a tourist attraction at one end of Barcelona harbor, close to where La Rambla meets the sea. Permanently moored along with it was a reproduction of Columbus' caravel Santa Maria during the 1960s and part of the 1970s.[62]

In 1981, Christoph Swoboda had a 65 feet (LoA) Bedar built by the boatyard of Che Ali bin Ngah on Duyong island in the estuary of the Terengganu river on the east coast of Malaysia. The Bedar is one of the two types of Malay junk schooners traditionally built there. He sailed this junk with his family and one friend to the Mediterranean and then continued with changing crew to finally finish a circumnavigation in 1998. He sold this vessel in 2000 and in 2004 he started to build a new junk in Duyong with the same craftsmen, the Pinas (or Pinis) Naga Pelangi, in order to help keep this ancient boat building tradition alive. This boat finished to be fitted out in 2010 and is working as a charter boat in the Andaman and the South China Sea.[63]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Junk (ship)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

A junk is a traditional Chinese sailing vessel characterized by its distinctive junk rig of fully battened lugsails, stern-mounted central rudder, watertight bulkhead construction, and flat-bottomed hull suited for shallow-draft operations in rivers, coasts, and open seas.
Originating during the Han Dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE), the junk evolved from earlier fluvial craft into a versatile design incorporating innovations like bamboo-reinforced sails for efficient wind capture and reduced rigging complexity, enabling widespread use in fishing, trade, and naval expeditions across Asia and beyond.
Its watertight compartments, developed further in Fujian Province by the Jin Dynasty (265–420 CE), provided exceptional damage resistance and buoyancy, allowing large ocean-going junks—some exceeding 200 feet in length and 400 tons—to undertake long voyages, as evidenced by historical accounts from explorers like Marco Polo and Ibn Battuta.
These vessels powered China's Maritime Silk Road trade and Ming Dynasty treasure fleets under Zheng He, demonstrating superior seaworthiness compared to contemporaneous Western ships until the 15th century, though claims of extreme sizes remain debated among naval historians relying on period records rather than archaeological confirmation.

Etymology

Origin and Evolution of the Term

The English term "junk" for a type of vessel entered the lexicon via "junco," borrowed from the Malay and Javanese "jong," referring to large Southeast Asian trading ships encountered by European explorers in the early . These "jong" vessels, originating in as early as the per inscriptions, featured designs akin to Chinese craft, prompting mariners—who established trading posts in by 1511 and reached by 1513—to extend the term to similar Chinese ships observed during voyages along the and routes. The first documented English application dates to 1555, in Eden's translation of de Medina's navigational , describing Asian vessels as "junckes." By the late 16th and 17th centuries, "junk" solidified in European accounts—such as those by Dutch and English traders—as a descriptor for Chinese sailing ships, emphasizing their battened lugsails, flat-bottomed hulls, and stern-mounted rudders, which contrasted with or rigs. This usage persisted through colonial-era texts, evolving into the modern encyclopedic term for traditional Chinese vessels without implying inferiority, despite occasional pejorative connotations in naval comparisons; for instance, British naval logs from the 18th century routinely cataloged "Chinese junks" in and Canton trade records. Chinese historical terminology for these ships lacked a singular equivalent to "junk," instead employing regional and functional designations that trace to ancient prototypes of flat-bottomed, watertight-compartment vessels from the (206 BCE–220 CE). Examples include "fuchuan" (福船), denoting Fujian-built ocean-going types prominent from the (960–1279 CE) onward, and "shachuan" (沙船), for shallow-draft northern coastal variants suited to silted rivers and bays. These terms, rooted in phonetic and descriptive elements like "fu" for or "sha" for sandbars, evolved through imperial records such as (1368–1644 CE) shipbuilding manuals, reflecting adaptations to local waters rather than a pan-Chinese . The maritime "junk" etymology remains unrelated to the coincidental English slang for worthless refuse, which derives separately from Middle English "jonk" (c. 1480s), denoting discarded nautical rope from Old French "junc" (rush or reed used in packing), highlighting how linguistic convergence occurred without shared origins. This distinction preserves the term's precision for historical Chinese and Southeast Asian ship types, avoiding conflation with unrelated vessel forms like Arab dhows or European barges.

Design and Construction

Hull Structure and Bulkheads

The hull of a junk features a flat or rounded bottom without a pronounced , enabling a shallow draft suitable for navigating rivers, estuaries, and coastal waters with varying depths. This prioritizes stability and accessibility over deep-water keeling, allowing the vessel to ground safely on mudflats or sandbars for loading and maintenance. Construction employs softwoods such as , , and , assembled via shell-first methods where planks are rabbet-jointed—grooved and interlocked edge-to-edge—before caulking seams with fiber, lime paste, and for waterproofing. Planks are further secured to transverse bulkheads using treenails or wooden dowels, forming an integral structure under the guidance of a . Watertight bulkheads, a hallmark originating in Province, divide the hull into multiple independent compartments—typically 9 to 14, as seen in excavated Tang and vessels like the Rugao ship (9 cabins) and Quanzhou ship (13 cabins). These partitions, sealed tightly and sometimes equipped with limber holes (cork-sealable drainage ports at the base), contain flooding to affected sections if the hull is holed, preventing total submersion and enhancing . In contrast, contemporaneous European vessels often relied on open-frame framing without such compartmentalization, rendering them vulnerable to progressive flooding from a single breach.

Sails and Rigging

The sails of the junk employ a fully battened lug rig, consisting of horizontal battens that span the width of the sail, providing structural rigidity and maintaining aerodynamic shape under varying wind conditions. These battens, typically 6 to 15 in number per sail, prevent fluttering and wind spillage in choppy seas, enhancing efficiency in wind capture particularly in following and beam winds. The sail panels between battens are constructed from woven matting of reeds or palm fibers in early designs, transitioning to cotton cloth by later periods, stretched taut across the battens for durability and ease of adjustment. Junk vessels typically feature multiple masts—ranging from two to five or more on larger ships—each supporting an independent that can be individually managed for optimal trim. Masts are constructed from flexible , allowing them to bend under stress without stays, which contributes to the rig's simplicity and resistance to damage. This multi-mast configuration enables precise control over sail area and distribution, facilitating quick by partially lowering the yard and bunching the sail along the battens, a process that requires minimal crew intervention. The battened design imparts capability, where the can be angled to spill excess or adjust camber for better upwind performance, outperforming unreinforced sails in stability and . This efficiency stems from the battens' role in distributing loads evenly and allowing the to conform to flow without collapsing, supporting sustained operation in diverse conditions.

Steering and Auxiliary Features

Junk ships employed a sternpost-mounted rudder as the primary steering mechanism, a design originating in China by the 1st century AD that enabled precise control over vessels of varying sizes, including those exceeding 400 feet in length during the Ming era. This pivoting rudder, suspended from the sternpost and operable via tillers or ropes, could be raised to navigate shallow waters, enhancing versatility in coastal and riverine environments compared to fixed side rudders used elsewhere. The robust construction allowed it to withstand significant forces from large sails, scaling effectively for ocean-going junks without requiring deep keels. To counter leeway in their shallow-draft hulls lacking keels, many junks incorporated leeboards or daggerboards, which provided lateral resistance and improved upwind performance, particularly beneficial in variable shallow-water conditions. These retractable boards, deployable from the sides or center, allowed operation in depths inaccessible to keel-based European vessels, though their use varied by regional variants and era, with evidence from Song dynasty depictions onward. Auxiliary maneuvering relied on stern-mounted yuloh sculling oars, long curved oars pivoted over the transom for efficient in harbors, calms, or tight spaces, often handling loads up to 30 tons on larger junks. Larger vessels supplemented with sweeps—extended oars worked by multiple —for additional when sails were insufficient, enabling precise control without engines. This system, documented in artifacts from the 8th–9th centuries, offered reliable redundancy to sail power.

Types and Variants

Coastal and Riverine Junks

Coastal and riverine junks comprised smaller variants of the junk hull form, tailored for shallow-draft in rivers, estuaries, and near-shore waters, distinguishing them from deeper-water designs by their emphasis on versatility over long-range . These vessels typically measured 50 to 57 feet in with beams of 10 to 15 feet, enabling operation in confined tidal zones where larger ships could not venture. Flat-bottomed hulls without keels allowed minimal draft for beaching or traversing silted channels, while a horseshoe-shaped supported a high for and cargo oversight. Regional examples included junks, which facilitated fishing, intra-regional trade, and bulk transport of commodities such as along estuaries and tributaries. With one to three masts rigged with battened lugsails, these junks achieved superior maneuverability, including upwind capabilities essential for countering currents and tidal shifts. A prominent , doubling as a makeshift centerboard, provided precise control in narrow waterways. Cargo capacities reached 20 to 30 tons, prioritizing volume for staples over speed, with internal bulkheads ensuring compartmentalized stability against leaks or collisions. Certain coastal variants incorporated defensive modifications, such as reinforced hull forward sections to withstand or boarding attempts, reflecting their dual roles in and localized suppression or facilitation. In the Pearl River region, some junks served as pirate vessels before repurposing for legitimate , underscoring their adaptability to insecure maritime environments. These features collectively optimized coastal and riverine junks for efficient, low-risk operations in dynamic inland and littoral domains.

Ocean-Going and Specialized Forms

Ocean-going junks, originating from shipyards in and provinces, were constructed with multiple masts—often four or five—to harness monsoon winds for voyages extending to and the . These vessels featured round-bottomed hulls and high decks suited for deep-water navigation, distinguishing them from shallower coastal designs. Watertight bulkhead construction, a hallmark of Fujian-style builds, divided the hull into independent compartments, enhancing survivability against leaks or damage during long sea passages. War junks adapted these ocean-going forms for , incorporating multi-deck structures with fortified upper levels and multiple gun ports to mount cannons for broadside . Specialized variants, such as tower ships, elevated fighting platforms to support archers and boarding parties, leveraging the junk's inherent stability for close-quarters engagements. Stern configurations typically included a horseshoe-shaped transom supporting a high , which afforded commanders superior visibility over the horizon and deck activities. Treasure ships scaled up standard ocean-going junks for imperial service, featuring enlarged hulls with additional masts and decks to accommodate vast crews, provisions, and cargoes on state-sponsored expeditions. These vessels retained core junk traits like battened lug sails and compartmentalized holds but emphasized capacity over speed, with armaments including dozens of cast-bronze cannons for defense. High poops on these enlarged forms further amplified oversight from the admiralty, integrating command functions into the ship's architecture.

Engineering Advantages and Limitations

Structural Innovations and Strengths

The watertight bulkheads of junk ships divided the hull into multiple independent compartments sealed with and fitted with limber holes for drainage, enabling the vessel to sustain damage such as collisions or hull breaches without catastrophic flooding, as water ingress was confined to affected sections while preserving buoyancy in intact areas. This compartmentalization, originating in Fujian Province during the (618–907 CE), provided a structural resilience grounded in , where localized flooding minimized overall weight gain and trim alterations compared to pre-1500s European clinker-built hulls lacking such divisions, which risked progressive sinking upon breach. Junk sails, reinforced with full-length bamboo battens spanning from luff to leech, formed a semi-rigid, rectangular airfoil that distributed wind pressure evenly across multiple masts, yielding a low center of effort close to the waterline and thereby reducing the heeling moment and capsize torque in high winds or beam seas. The battens facilitated rapid reefing via a simple brailing system, allowing crews to depower sails sheet-in without leaving shelter, which empirically enhanced stability by maintaining a balanced sail plan and minimizing dynamic instability during gusts. The flat-bottomed hull with a wide beam and minimal draft optimized hydrostatic stability and volumetric efficiency, accommodating large cargo holds—often exceeding 1,000 tons displacement in larger variants—and extensive crew quarters without compromising maneuverability in shallow coastal or riverine environments. This design leveraged Archimedean principles for high fractions, where the broad cross-section maximized displacement for given length while distributing loads evenly via internal framing, supporting operational dominance through sustained load-bearing capacity over extended voyages.

Operational Constraints and Comparisons to European Vessels

The flat-bottomed hull design of Chinese junks, which facilitated navigation in shallow coastal and riverine waters, imposed significant constraints on performance in deep-ocean environments by providing insufficient lateral resistance against leeward drift during upwind , unlike the deep keels of European vessels such as caravels that enhanced and reduced . This shallow draft also rendered junks more susceptible to rolling and broaching in heavy seas, as the absence of a pronounced limited the vessel's ability to maintain course against crosswinds and swells, prioritizing versatility in sheltered waters over blue-water resilience. Junk rigs, characterized by fully battened lug sails, excelled in downwind and beam-reach conditions but demonstrated inferior upwind capabilities compared to European fore-and-aft rigs, such as sails on caravels, due to the battens extending forward of the mast, which disrupted and maintained a flatter sail profile less conducive to generating aerodynamic lift. Consequently, junks required broader tacking angles, increasing voyage durations in headwind scenarios prevalent in regions like the Atlantic, where European ships could point higher into the wind. Operational patterns reflected these design trade-offs, with junk fleets, including those during Zheng He's expeditions (1405–1433), predominantly exploiting predictable monsoon winds in the for seasonal outbound and return legs, limiting sustained autonomy in variable or adverse conditions without auxiliary propulsion or adaptations. In contrast, European vessels enabled exploratory voyages across unpredictable wind regimes, such as Vasco da Gama's 1497–1499 route around , underscoring junks' efficacy within Asia's coastal empires but relative constraints in global-scale navigation absent favorable seasonal patterns. Historical records indicate no equivalent Chinese circumnavigations or trans-Pacific crossings, highlighting how these hull and rig limitations confined junk applications to route-specific trade rather than open-ocean adventuring.

Historical Development

Origins in Han and Early Dynasties (2nd–6th Century)

The earliest prototypes of junk ships developed from (206 BCE–220 CE) riverine vessels designed for navigating shallow inland waterways, particularly the , where flat-bottomed hulls with minimal keel depth allowed for effective operation in silty, variable conditions. These hulls, often constructed from wooden planks lashed or nailed together, prioritized cargo capacity over deep-water stability, reflecting adaptations to China's extensive river networks rather than oceanic demands. Archaeological findings, including models and reliefs from Han tombs, depict multi-level boats with broad beams, sometimes configured as catamaran-like rafts for stability during transport or combat on rivers. By the late Han period, around the 2nd century CE, these vessels incorporated initial battened sail designs, using woven grass or reed mats reinforced with horizontal strips (battens) for structural integrity and ease of , marking a shift from purely oar-dependent . This , distinct from rigid square sails, enabled better wind-handling in variable riverine gusts, though early forms lacked the fully developed of later eras. Textual accounts, such as those in historical records, describe small, shallow-draft boats with one or two masts used for freight and , underscoring their fluvial origins before broader adaptations. Trade interactions with Austronesian seafaring groups during the Han era introduced potential influences on sail configuration and hull outrigger concepts, as Chinese scholars documented large Austronesian merchant vessels with up to four sails docking at ports, facilitating technology exchange amid growing maritime commerce. However, core junk features like the flat hull and battened sails remained indigenous developments, with Austronesian impacts more evident in multi-mast scaling than fundamental . These early vessels supported trade and limited coastal navigation, including defensive patrols against nomadic incursions, though extensive ocean-going use awaited subsequent dynasties.

Evolution in Sui, Tang, and Song Dynasties (7th–13th Century)

The Sui dynasty's (581–618 CE) ambitious Grand Canal project, completed between 605 and 610 CE, linked northern and southern China, boosting internal commerce and necessitating robust vessel designs capable of handling diverse waterway conditions. This infrastructure spurred refinements in junk construction, particularly the widespread adoption of watertight bulkheads, which divided hulls into independent compartments to prevent total flooding from leaks and enhance load-bearing for bulk goods like grain. These features improved safety and efficiency in canal navigation, aligning with the dynasty's economic unification efforts despite its short duration. In the (618–907 CE), expanding maritime trade routes to and beyond introduced external influences on junk rigging, with evidence of square sails and stern sculling oars depicted in contemporary art from caves around the 8th–9th centuries. International exchanges facilitated gradual integration of sail designs akin to tanja rigs from Austronesian vessels, enhancing wind-handling for coastal voyages, though full battened junk sails solidified later. Shipwrecks from this era, such as those off laden with Tang ceramics, underscore the shift toward ocean-capable junks supporting export-driven economies. The (960–1279 CE) marked a peak in junk proliferation amid commercial expansion, with innovations like multi-masted configurations and potential iron elements for structural reinforcement enabling larger fleets for and piracy control. Economic records indicate dense riverine , with ports like those on the Yangzi supporting thousands of vessels that fueled urban centers through , , and exchanges. State-sponsored naval operations against pirates further standardized durable junk forms, linking shipbuilding advances directly to fiscal policies promoting overseas commerce over land routes.

Peak in Yuan and Early Ming (14th–15th Century)

The Yuan dynasty (1271–1368) inherited and expanded the Song navy's use of large junks for military purposes, deploying them in campaigns such as the 1293 invasion of Java, where war junks featured four masts, over 60 cabins, and crews exceeding 300 men. These vessels supported Mongol conquest fleets, notably in the invasions of Japan in 1274 and 1281, which assembled fleets incorporating Korean-built ships alongside Chinese designs, culminating in over 4,000 vessels for the second attempt to enhance naval capacity through regional expertise. This integration reflected pragmatic adaptations for amphibious operations, leveraging junk hulls' stability and watertight bulkheads for troop transport across East Asian waters. In the early (1368–early ), scaled dramatically with the establishment of major facilities like the Longjiang Shipyard in around 1368, which relocated 400 families to sustain large-scale production of military vessels, including junks for coastal defense. The adjacent Treasure Shipyard, operational from 1403, exemplified this expansion by constructing ocean-going junks using advanced techniques, such as mortise-and-tenon supplemented by iron staples (averaging 154–181 mm in length) and , with excavations yielding 292 staples and 258 to reinforce wooden structures against stresses. These hybrid fastenings improved hull over purely wooden methods, enabling fleets to effectively. Junk-equipped navies in this era played a key role in suppressing pirate raids, which had intensified from late Yuan disruptions along Chinese coasts into early Ming vulnerabilities, with imperial fleets patrolling and intercepting raiders to secure maritime trade routes. Such operations underscored the junk's versatility in , where shallow drafts and maneuverability allowed rapid responses to hit-and-run threats, maintaining order without the deep-water focus of later expeditions.

Zheng He's Expeditions and Military Applications (1405–1433)

Zheng He's seven maritime expeditions, conducted between 1405 and 1433 under the Ming dynasty's Yongle and Xuande emperors, prominently featured large fleets composed primarily of junk-type vessels designed for ocean-going operations. These fleets included baochuan (treasure ships) as flagships, alongside combat junks, supply ships, and horse transports, all characterized by their multi-masted rigs with battened sails and compartmentalized hulls for stability and watertight integrity. The first expedition in 1405 comprised over 60 large vessels and 255 smaller ones, crewed by approximately 27,800 personnel, demonstrating the scale of Ming naval mobilization using junk designs optimized for long-distance voyages. Subsequent voyages maintained similar compositions, with records indicating up to 317 ships in later fleets, emphasizing the junk's versatility in supporting extended campaigns across the Indian Ocean. The military applications of these junk fleets extended beyond exploration and diplomacy to coercive enforcement and direct combat, serving as instruments of Ming hegemony to secure tribute and suppress resistance. Junks were equipped with artillery, including cannons and trebuchets, enabling them to project firepower effectively in naval engagements; for instance, during interventions in , the fleets bombarded coastal fortifications and engaged pirate strongholds. In 1407, off , Zheng He's forces defeated the pirate lord , capturing and executing him after a siege involving junk-based assaults, which stabilized regional trade routes under Ming influence. Similarly, in , the fleet intervened in a local succession dispute in 1407, deploying troops from junks to install a favorable ruler, illustrating the amphibious capabilities of these vessels. Further military actions highlighted the junks' role in overriding local opposition, as seen in the 1411 campaign in Ceylon (Sri Lanka), where Chinese forces from the fleet captured the resistant king Alagakkonara after he attempted to ambush , transporting him to as a prisoner. This operation involved landing troops supported by junk gunfire, underscoring the fleets' integration of naval bombardment and infantry deployment. In , the expeditions backed Cochin against the more powerful Calicut in 1411, using junk fleets to deliver and deter aggression, thereby altering local power dynamics without full-scale occupation. These engagements, drawn from Ming annals and participant accounts like those of , reveal that while the voyages prioritized tribute missions, junk armadas were prepared for and executed targeted violence to enforce compliance, contrasting with purely mercantile operations. The fleets' ability to sustain prolonged presence through onboard provisions and repair facilities in junk hulls facilitated such applications, though they avoided permanent territorial expansion in favor of symbolic dominance.

Decline in Late Ming, Qing, and Modern Era (16th–20th Century)

The Ming dynasty's haijin (sea ban) policies, initiated in 1368 and reinforced after the 1433 cessation of Zheng He's voyages, prohibited private overseas trade and restricted vessel construction to coastal and riverine types, limiting junk hulls to under 50 tons and banning large ocean-going rigs. This regulatory framework, aimed at curbing piracy and foreign influence, curtailed maritime innovation by dismantling state shipyards and suppressing technological experimentation, resulting in junk designs that prioritized watertight bulkheads for short-haul reliability over advancements in speed or armament scalability. Enforcement varied, with smuggling persisting via smaller junks, but the overall stagnation in naval architecture left Chinese fleets unprepared for evolving global threats, as shipbuilding shifted inward to agrarian priorities amid fiscal conservatism. Under the (1644–1912), junks remained staples for coastal patrols and operations, with imperial fleets deploying armed variants—often 40-gun war junks—to combat rampant Southeast Asian in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, though these efforts frequently faltered against numerically superior pirate flotillas equipped with similar vessels. The (1839–1842) starkly revealed junks' obsolescence when British iron-hulled steam gunboats, such as HMS Nemesis, outmaneuvered and sank multiple Qing junks in engagements like the January 7, 1841, action in Anson's Bay, exploiting vulnerabilities in sail-dependent propulsion, wooden construction susceptible to explosive shells, and inferior gunnery ranges. Qing attempts at modernization, including sporadic adoption of steam technology post-1842 , prioritized land armies and failed to overhaul junk-centric fleets, accelerating a shift toward Western-style ironclads by the , rendering traditional junks marginal for military use. In the , sailing junks persisted primarily in along southern coasts like Hong Kong's , where fleets of sampan-derived junks supported inshore operations until the 1950s, valued for low-cost masts and battened sails adaptable to monsoons. Post-1949 collectivization in the accelerated their decline through widespread motorization of vessels, introducing diesel engines that offered superior reliability and range, reducing junk usage to isolated rural enclaves by the 1970s as subsidies and state mechanization programs prioritized efficiency over traditional sailcraft. By the late , economic reforms further marginalized junks, with global trade favoring steel trawlers, though remnants endured in niche coastal fisheries until supplanted entirely by powered alternatives amid rising operational costs.

Controversies and Empirical Evidence

Debates on Ship Dimensions and Capabilities

Historians debate the dimensions of Ming-era treasure ships commanded by Zheng He, with official records claiming lengths up to 44 zhang (approximately 137 meters or 450 feet, depending on the variable length of the chi unit), widths of 18 zhang, and capacities for hundreds of crew and tribute cargoes. These figures, derived from texts like the Ming shi, have faced skepticism due to the absence of corroborating archaeological evidence and potential inflationary tendencies in imperial annals to enhance the Yongle Emperor's prestige. The earliest detailed size claims appear over a century after the voyages, in sources blending history with embellishment, raising questions of reliability amid Ming propaganda practices that amplified feats for political legitimacy. From a structural physics perspective, unframed wooden hulls like those of junks face severe longitudinal stresses in wave troughs, leading to hogging and potential without iron , which Chinese shipbuilders lacked until later centuries. Analyses of wreck data indicate practical upper limits for such vessels around 60-70 meters (200-230 feet), beyond which outer fiber tensions exceed wood's compressive and tensile moduli, as evidenced by European ' maximum sizes before metal framing. Empirical counters include the Quanzhou shipwreck from the late (circa 1270s), measuring approximately 34 meters (111 feet) in length—the largest verified pre-Ming Chinese vessel—suggesting technological continuity rather than sudden leaps to gigantic scales unsupported by dockyard remnants or drydock capacities at . While treasure ships likely exceeded 100 meters in select cases, enabling effective power projection across the Indian Ocean, their capabilities did not confer oceanic supremacy; fleets relied on numerous escorts for stability, and designs prioritized compartmentalized coastal endurance over trans-Pacific endurance, aligning with observed wreck patterns and hydrodynamic models. This balanced assessment tempers nationalist exaggerations in some modern Chinese scholarship with Western maritime engineering critiques, underscoring junks' regional efficacy without implying unmatched global dominance.

Archaeological Findings and Origins

Archaeological excavations have yielded limited but confirmatory evidence of junk ship features, particularly watertight bulkheads, from the Song dynasty onward. The Quanzhou ship, unearthed in 1973 at the Houzhu port site in Fujian Province, represents a well-preserved 13th-century example measuring 34.4 meters in length and 9.8 meters in beam, with twelve transverse bulkheads creating thirteen watertight compartments. This construction, using iron nails and wooden tenons, demonstrates the junk's compartmentalized design for enhanced seaworthiness and cargo segregation, a technological innovation distinct to Chinese vessel building. The , recovered in 1998 from the off and dated to circa 830 CE during the , carried over 63,000 alongside Arab trade goods, evidencing direct Sino-Arab maritime exchange. While the vessel's lashed-lug, sewn-plank hull aligns more closely with Persian Gulf or Southeast Asian styles rather than fully compartmentalized junks, its hybrid form—potentially built in with regional influences—illustrates selective adaptations in early ocean-going craft, countering claims of purely exogenous diffusion. Pre-Tang archaeological evidence for junk origins remains scarce, with no intact ocean-going wrecks from the (206 BCE–220 CE), where proto-junk forms likely evolved from flat-bottomed river boats equipped with square sails and stern oars, as inferred from textual records and models rather than direct maritime finds. This evidentiary gap, exacerbated by poor wood preservation in coastal sediments, supports an indigenous Chinese trajectory from needs—prioritizing stability via early bulkheading—over wholesale borrowing from Austronesian or prototypes, though battened sail refinements show pragmatic regional exchanges.

Legacy

Influence on Maritime Technology

The watertight bulkhead system in Chinese junks, enabling compartmentalized flooding control and structural reinforcement, was documented by European observers like in the 13th century and noted by travelers in the for its superiority in damage resistance compared to contemporary Western vessels lacking such features. However, indicates no widespread adoption in until the mid-19th century, when transverse bulkheads became standard in iron and steel steamships for safety regulations following disasters like the sinking of the in , driven by material advances rather than direct emulation of junk construction techniques. Claims of 17th-century transmission via Dutch traders, who encountered junks during East Indies voyages, remain speculative without corroborated shipyard records or archaeological confirmation of hybrid designs in Dutch fluyt or hulls. The junk rig's fully battened lugsails, which facilitate efficient and wind-handling without complex winches, exerted a discernible influence on 20th-century yacht innovations, particularly in cruising vessels where simplicity outweighs peak performance; designers like Herbert "Blondie" Hasler adapted it for Folkboats in the , inspiring ongoing use in rigs emphasizing low-maintenance operation over speed. Western reluctance to integrate junk hull principles stemmed from environmental and operational mismatches: Atlantic trade routes demanded vessels with deep keels for stability and upwind capability against westerly gales, whereas junk flat-bottoms and detachable centerboards excelled in monsoon-driven, shallow-draft Asian waters but underperformed in open-ocean beating, as evidenced by European and evolutions prioritizing hydrodynamic efficiency over compartmentalization until enabled both. In , junk elements like battened sails persisted in regional hybrids, such as Indonesian prahus blending local hulls with Chinese-inspired for coastal trade, sustaining adaptations into the colonial era without supplanting dhow-style sails in Arabian domains, where monsoonal patterns favored sewn-plank constructions over junk watertightness.

Modern Replicas and Contemporary Uses

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, full-scale replicas of Chinese junks have been constructed primarily for and to demonstrate historical seaworthiness, rather than commercial revival. A notable example is an engineless junk replica built in and sailed across the Pacific to the in 2008, replicating 15th-century trading vessels to validate their capability for long-distance voyages along the ; however, the vessel was later sunk in a collision with a freighter. Shipwrights in , such as Au Wei, have continued building junks into the 2010s for over 60 years, but these are now limited to tourist attractions and private events, underscoring a shift from working vessels to ornamental ones. Contemporary uses emphasize leisure and niche operations over practical utility. In , replica junks offer sightseeing tours and harbor cruises, capitalizing on their cultural symbolism while accommodating modern amenities like motors for reliability. Similarly, in Vietnam's Halong Bay, wooden junk-style boats, inspired by traditional designs with multiple watertight compartments and battened sails, serve fleets, providing overnight cruises amid limestone karsts; operators like those in Bai Tu Long Bay maintain fleets of up to 24 cabins for nearly 50 passengers. Niche persists in regions like and parts of , where motorized junks supplement sails for coastal operations, though pure sailing versions have largely vanished due to engine adoption by the 1970s. Engineering assessments of replicas confirm inherent design strengths, such as hull stability from watertight bulkheads and balanced lug rigs enabling average speeds of six knots with low heeling, but reveal practical drawbacks. Maintenance of bamboo battens, wooden hulls, and rigging proves labor-intensive and costly compared to steel motor vessels, contributing to their economic obsolescence in favor of diesel-powered alternatives that offer greater speed and reduced crew needs. No widespread programs utilize junks today, as modern yachts and simulators prioritize efficiency over historical authenticity in maritime education.

References

  1. https://exploration.marinersmuseum.org/watercraft/junk-ship/
  2. https://ich.unesco.org/en/USL/watertight-bulkhead-technology-of-chinese-junks-00321
  3. https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=66278
  4. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1933/august/pioneer-builders-giant-ships
  5. https://www.etymonline.com/word/junk
  6. https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/article/2008869/where-did-word-junk-come
  7. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/junk_n3
  8. https://www.roots.gov.sg/Collection-Landing/listing/1083853
  9. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/1993328/junk-boats-turn-tourist-icons-hong-kong-waters
  10. https://greatmingmilitary.blogspot.com/2022/09/guang-chuan.html
  11. https://www.theshipyardblog.com/chinese-junks-emperors-of-the-east/
  12. https://jonquedeplaisance.net/en/traditional-chinese-sailing-junks/
  13. https://junkrigassociation.org/racingforum/7003361
  14. https://www.quora.com/Were-medieval-Chinese-junks-clinker-built-or-carvel-built
  15. http://www.shipwreckasia.org/wp-content/uploads/Chapter2.pdf
  16. https://www.burkemuseum.org/news/model-chinese-junks-sail
  17. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/the-chinese-junk
  18. https://www.pbo.co.uk/boats/junk-boat-design-explained-ancient-sailplan-performance-72509
  19. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/the-chinese-war-junk-i
  20. http://www.thecheappages.com/junk/tutorial.html
  21. https://www.lookandlearn.com/blog/4697/the-chinese-junk-ship-master-of-the-seas/
  22. https://www.europeana.eu/en/stories/designed-for-adventure-the-chinese-junk
  23. https://jonquedeplaisance.net/en/junk-rig/
  24. https://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~vaucher/History/Ships/Asia/index.html
  25. https://proporzionedivina.wordpress.com/2003/09/26/ancient-chinese-sail-design-2000-years-old-and-still-going-strong-%25E5%258F%25A4%25E8%2580%2581%25E4%25B8%25AD%25E5%259C%258B%25E9%25A2%25A8%25E5%25B8%2586%25E8%25A8%25AD%25E8%25A8%2588/
  26. https://forum.woodenboat.com/forum/designs-plans/135705-on-the-origin-of-centerboards
  27. https://www.boatdesign.net/threads/can-chinese-junk-actually-circumnavigate.11449/page-2
  28. https://www.boatdesign.net/threads/yuloh-and-sculling-oar-auxiliary-power-for-sailboats.47554/
  29. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803125656992
  30. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00253359.1950.10657578
  31. https://www.shipsonstamps.org/Topics/html/junk.htm
  32. https://socks-studio.com/2016/11/13/boats-of-the-pearl-river-1800-1820/
  33. https://maritimecyprus.com/2024/06/01/maritime-infographic-the-amazing-chinese-junk-boat-4/
  34. https://zolimacitymag.com/hong-kong-maritime-trade-foreign-junks-on-the-pearl-river/
  35. http://www.themua.org/collections/files/original/9a1e41dea317e7fd983a93e635e087f1.pdf
  36. https://www.shipwreckasia.org/wp-content/uploads/China.pdf
  37. https://greatmingmilitary.blogspot.com/2022/10/fu-chuan.html
  38. https://warhistory.org/ru/%40msw/article/war-junks
  39. https://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1093&context=undergrad_rev
  40. https://govt.chinadaily.com.cn/s/201807/31/WS5bfe3856498eefb3fe46d55e/watertight-bulkhead-technology-of-chinese-junks.html
  41. https://intheboatshed.net/2015/11/23/junk-building-and-their-water-tight-bulkheads/
  42. https://omhusa.com/blog/76-how-did-the-chinese-junks-benefit-ocean-travel
  43. https://www.boatdesign.net/threads/can-chinese-junk-actually-circumnavigate.11449/page-4
  44. https://www.morganscloud.com/jhhtips/the-two-hidden-problems-with-the-junk-rig/
  45. https://maineboats.com/print/issue-193/junk-journeys
  46. https://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/f47/junk-rig-why-advantages-216562.html
  47. https://museum.wa.gov.au/maritime-archaeology-db/sites/default/files/no._1_china_1997.pdf
  48. https://chiculture.org.hk/en/china-five-thousand-years/2588
  49. https://www.facebook.com/100064043315489/posts/the-river-battle-fleet-of-the-earlier-or-western-han-dynasty-is-attacked-by-rebe/823568073121296/
  50. http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1258
  51. https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/20027/1169
  52. https://ari.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2003/12/200312-WPS-16.pdf
  53. https://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/texts/weilue/appendices.html
  54. https://www.ancient-origins.net/artifacts-ancient-technology/chinas-grand-canal-0017046
  55. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3327698/artefacts-tang-dynasty-shipwreck-ancient-replica-chinese-sailboat-meet-western-art
  56. https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/songdynasty-module/tech-compass.html
  57. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/war-junks
  58. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/history-japan/mongol-korean-fleet
  59. https://www.medievalists.net/2011/04/the-origin-of-the-lost-fleet-of-the-mongol-empire/
  60. http://www.shipwreckasia.org/wp-content/uploads/Chapter3.pdf
  61. https://greatmingmilitary.blogspot.com/2024/10/classical-oared-warships-of-pre-modern.html
  62. https://factsanddetails.com/japan/cat16/sub107/entry-5320.html
  63. https://samurai-archives.com/wiki/Wako
  64. https://www.chinaheritagequarterly.org/articles.php?searchterm=002_zhenghe.inc&issue=002
  65. https://www.thoughtco.com/zheng-hes-treasure-ships-195235
  66. https://www.asianstudies.org/publications/eaa/archives/admiral-zheng-hes-voyages-to-the-west-oceans/
  67. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2037&context=nwc-review
  68. https://www.academia.edu/41409061/Zheng_Hes_Military_Interventions_in_South_Asia_1405_1433
  69. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2006/october/soft-power-sea-zheng-he-and-chinese-maritime-strategy
  70. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-economic-history/article/autarky-and-the-rise-and-fall-of-piracy-in-ming-china/DFA290E2C6550AF9F29E24039B3314AC
  71. https://chichengma.weebly.com/uploads/9/4/2/0/9420741/autarky-and-piracy-web.pdf
  72. https://oxfordre.com/asianhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277727-e-620
  73. https://brill.com/view/journals/arwh/8/1/article-p83_6.xml
  74. https://strategicspace.nbr.org/the-qing-conception-of-strategic-space/
  75. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1086&context=pandion_unf
  76. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/02/world/asia/china-junk-builders-hong-kong.html
  77. https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/short-reads/article/3239215/its-surely-time-drop-sailing-junk-symbol-hong-kong-who-knows-desperate-tourism-chiefs-may-have-them
  78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261905911_ZHENG_HE_AN_INVESTIGATION_INTO_THE_PLAUSIBILITY_OF_450-FT_TREASURE_SHIPS
  79. https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-debates-around-the-actual-size-of-Zheng-Hes-Treasure-Ships-and-why-do-some-experts-disagree-with-the-450-foot-claim
  80. https://www.boatdesign.net/threads/size-limits-of-big-wooden-ships-global-strength-issues-why-not-use-metal-frames.49306/
  81. https://sarahward.org/zheng-he-treasure-ships/
  82. https://www.academia.edu/61269427/The_ship_from_Quanzhou_Fujian_Province_Peoples_Republic_of_China
  83. https://www.twcenter.net/threads/zheng-hes-voyages-were-they-as-large-as-claimed.760779/
  84. https://www.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.5744/florida/9780813061184.001.0001/upso-9780813061184-chapter-4
  85. http://indigenousboats.blogspot.com/2012/08/chinas-quanzhou-ship-full-of-surprises.html
  86. https://asia.si.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/shipwrecked-07-flecker.pdf
  87. https://www.npr.org/2011/05/04/135956044/from-beneath-a-smithsonian-shipwreck-controversy
  88. https://www.quora.com/What-made-Chinese-junks-successful-compared-to-Western-ships-at-that-time
  89. http://www.kastenmarine.com/junk_rig.htm
  90. https://www.britannica.com/technology/ship/Sailing-ships
  91. https://www.icm.gov.mo/rc/viewer/20027/1168
  92. https://www.latitude38.com/lectronic/engineless-replica-junk-arrives-from-china/
  93. https://www.sailworldcruising.com/-56248/
  94. https://dantatmonster.com/2017/02/05/au-wei-shipwright-junk-builder/
  95. https://baithojunks.com/traditional-junk-in-halong-bay/
  96. https://www.thewanderlusteffect.com/bai-tu-long-bay-with-indochina-junk/
  97. https://asia.nikkei.com/life-arts/life/vietnam-s-popular-sailing-junks-face-extinction
  98. http://indigenousboats.blogspot.com/2018/03/traditional-fishing-schooner-launched.html
  99. https://gwulo.com/node/28313
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.