Hubbry Logo
Cultural criticCultural criticMain
Open search
Cultural critic
Community hub
Cultural critic
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cultural critic
Cultural critic
Cultural critic
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A cultural critic is a critic of a given culture, usually as a whole. Cultural criticism has significant overlap with social and cultural theory. While such criticism is simply part of the self-consciousness of the culture, the social positions of the critics and the medium they use vary widely. The conceptual and political grounding of criticism also changes over time.

Terminology

[edit]

Contemporary usage has tended to include all types of criticism directed at culture.

The term "cultural criticism" itself has been claimed by Jacques Barzun: No such thing was recognized or in favour when we [i.e. Barzun and Trilling] began—more by intuition than design—in the autumn of 1934.[1][2] It has been argued that in the inter-war period, the language of literary criticism was adequate for the needs of cultural critics; but that later it mainly served academia.[3] Alan Trachtenberg's Critics of Culture (1976) concentrated on American intellectuals of the 1920s who were "nonacademic" (including H. L. Mencken and Lewis Mumford), where the 1995 collection American Cultural Critics covered mainly later figures, such as F. O. Matthiessen and Susan Sontag, involved in debates on American culture as national.[4]

In contrast, a work such as Richard Wolin's 1995 The Terms of Cultural Criticism: The Frankfurt School, Existentialism, Poststructuralism (1995) uses it as a broad-brush description.

Victorian sages as critics

[edit]

Cultural critics came to the scene in the nineteenth century. Matthew Arnold[5] and Thomas Carlyle are leading examples of a cultural critic of the Victorian age; in Arnold there is also a concern for religion. John Ruskin was another. Because of an equation made between ugliness of material surroundings and an impoverished life, aesthetes and others might be considered implicitly to be engaging in cultural criticism, but the actual articulation is what makes a critic. In France, Charles Baudelaire was a cultural critic, as was Søren Kierkegaard in Denmark and Friedrich Nietzsche in Germany.

Twentieth century

[edit]
Further information: Critical theory, Frankfurt School, Theodor W. Adorno, and Culture industry

In the twentieth century Irving Babbitt on the right, and Walter Benjamin[6] on the left, might be considered major cultural critics. The field of play has changed considerably, in that the humanities have broadened to include cultural studies of all kinds, which are grounded in critical theory. This trend is not without its dissidents, however; James Seaton has written extensively in defense of the continued importance of the Humanistic Tradition Irving Babbitt and his heirs championed, while criticizing the dominance of critical theory in the teaching of literature. Theory's Empire: An Anthology of Dissent features a collection of essays from prominent English professors, writers and critics stating their disagreement with the prominent role given to critical theory in English departments.

Notable contemporary critics

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cultural critic

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A cultural critic is an intellectual who analyzes and evaluates cultural phenomena—such as , , , media, and social practices—to assess their aesthetic qualities, ethical dimensions, and influences on societal norms and values.
This practice entails dissecting artifacts and discourses to uncover relationships between and broader human behaviors, often prioritizing rigorous standards over transient trends.
While cultural criticism can illuminate how cultural products reflect or shape power structures and ideologies, its effectiveness depends on the critic's commitment to empirical observation and logical coherence rather than ideological conformity, a standard unevenly met in institutionally dominated fields where interpretive biases prevail.
Influential figures have included , whose essays critiqued modern fragmentation, and others who have defended hierarchical cultural judgments against egalitarian dilutions.

Definition and Scope

Terminology and Core Characteristics

Cultural criticism denotes the intellectual practice of examining cultural artifacts—such as , , media, and social rituals—alongside broader practices and institutions, to elucidate their connections to societal values, power dynamics, and historical contexts. This involves assessing how these elements reflect, shape, or challenge social conditions, national identities, and ideological frameworks, often through interpretive methods like textual analysis or . A cultural critic is typically defined as a or thinker who conducts such evaluations, producing commentary that links cultural phenomena to ethical, political, or moral implications. Terminology in the field draws from evolving conceptions of "culture" itself, which spans elite artistic and intellectual pursuits to everyday material and symbolic productions, as articulated by scholars like in his 1958 work . Central terms include "," introduced by theorists Theodor Adorno and in 1944 to critique the commodification of mass entertainment under , portraying it as a mechanism for ideological conformity rather than genuine expression. Other key concepts encompass "," advanced by anthropologist in the early to argue against universal cultural hierarchies by emphasizing context-specific norms, and "," which highlights the unstable, contested meanings attached to cultural symbols amid shifting social relations. At its core, cultural criticism is characterized by an interdisciplinary orientation, integrating insights from , , , and to decode how cultural forms encode or contest dominance. It prioritizes uncovering social roots and ideological underpinnings of cultural events and institutions, often focusing on representations of class, race, , and to reveal mechanisms of control or resistance. Unlike narrower literary or artistic appraisal, it treats culture as an ongoing process rather than static product, employing tools like to trace influences without imposing ahistorical judgments. This approach fosters , as noted by theorist in her 1994 book Teaching to Transgress, but frequently intersects with theoretical paradigms—such as or —that prioritize structural critique over individualistic or empirical alternatives. Cultural criticism is distinguished from literary criticism primarily by its interdisciplinary breadth and emphasis on cultural artifacts beyond canonical literature. Literary criticism typically involves the close reading, evaluation, and interpretation of specific literary texts, applying frameworks to assess form, theme, and intrinsic merit within established traditions. In contrast, cultural criticism examines literature alongside non-literary elements such as film, television, advertising, and everyday practices, analyzing how these elements interweave to perpetuate or challenge prevailing ideologies and power structures. This approach rejects confinement to textual autonomy, instead situating works within their socio-historical production and reception, often prioritizing cultural context over isolated aesthetic judgment. Similarly, cultural criticism diverges from , which centers on the formal, technical, and aesthetic dimensions of visual artworks, such as composition, technique, and sensory impact. critics evaluate pieces within art historical lineages or market contexts, frequently guiding collectors or audiences toward appreciation or acquisition. Cultural critics, however, extend scrutiny to 's role in broader cultural ecosystems, interrogating its ideological functions—such as reinforcement of class hierarchies or national myths—without limiting analysis to visual media alone. For instance, a cultural might link a to contemporaneous media trends or consumer behaviors, transcending the gallery's boundaries. From , cultural criticism differs in its focus on and representational processes rather than direct institutional or economic mechanisms. Social critics dissect systemic issues like inequality or failures, often advocating structural reforms based on empirical or ethical imperatives. Cultural critics, by comparison, probe how cultural forms encode and disseminate social norms, revealing latent assumptions in narratives or rituals that sustain power dynamics indirectly. This symbolic emphasis allows cultural criticism to address diffuse influences, such as media's role in shaping public consciousness, without prescribing immediate solutions. Cultural critics also stand apart from journalistic reviewers, whose work prioritizes timely evaluation for public consumption, such as recommending or warning against cultural products based on , value, or commercial viability. Reviewers deliver succinct judgments, often scored or starred, to inform purchasing or attendance decisions. Cultural , while sometimes journalistic in outlet, pursues deeper hermeneutic inquiry, unpacking a work's implications for or , unbound by immediacy or utility. This distinction underscores cultural criticism's orientation toward long-term cultural diagnosis over ephemeral guidance.

Historical Development

Pre-Modern and Enlightenment Precursors

In , (c. 428–348 BCE) advanced early forms of cultural critique by arguing that and , as imitations of human actions, were twice removed from truth and thus corrupted the soul by prioritizing emotion over rational . In The Republic, composed around 380 BCE, he proposed banishing poets from the ideal state, contending that their works fostered irrationality and moral decay rather than virtue. This perspective stemmed from his metaphysical view that sensory representations distracted from eternal Forms, positioning cultural artifacts as threats to philosophical governance. Plato's approach exemplified proto-cultural criticism through its systematic evaluation of artistic influence on societal ethics and politics. Aristotle (384–322 BCE), Plato's student, countered this in his (c. 335 BCE), offering a foundational defense and analysis of as a structured () that could achieve —purging and to elevate moral understanding. He classified poetic forms like , , and epic, emphasizing their capacity for ethical instruction via plot, character, and , thereby shifting toward empirical observation of dramatic effects rather than outright rejection. Aristotle's method prioritized causal analysis of cultural products' psychological impacts, influencing later by balancing Plato's with practical assessment of art's role in human flourishing. During the Roman era, these Greek ideas were adapted; Horace's Ars Poetica (c. 19 BCE) instructed poets on , unity, and moral utility, critiquing excesses in style while advocating art's civilizing potential. Roman critics like , in (1st century CE), examined rhetorical elevation in , evaluating cultural works for their capacity to inspire grandeur amid imperial . This era's self-reflective , rooted in Greek foundations, questioned societal norms through cultural lenses, as evidenced by persistent Roman adoption and emulation of Hellenic scrutiny. In the Enlightenment, thinkers extended such critiques to broader societal and artistic institutions. , in his Discourse on the Arts and Sciences (1750), argued that cultural advancements eroded primitive virtue, attributing moral decline to luxury and specialization fostered by arts and letters. (1694–1778), conversely, wielded satire in works like (1759) to dismantle philosophical optimism and ecclesiastical hypocrisy, targeting cultural complacency in absolutist through ironic exposure of human folly. These figures scrutinized culture's alignment with reason and progress, often privileging empirical observation of social harms over dogmatic tradition, laying groundwork for modern critical methodologies.

Victorian Era Foundations

The Victorian era (1837–1901) witnessed the crystallization of cultural criticism as a deliberate practice, driven by intellectuals' responses to industrialization's erosion of traditional values, the rise of a materialistic , and challenges to religious authority from scientific advances like Darwin's On the Origin of Species (1859). Critics positioned culture—encompassing literature, , and moral —as a bulwark against utilitarian fragmentation and mechanistic , insisting on its role in fostering human wholeness amid rapid social flux. This foundational shift emphasized criticism not merely as aesthetic judgment but as a diagnostic tool for societal ills, prioritizing qualitative standards over quantitative progress. Thomas Carlyle laid early groundwork with his prophetic jeremiads, decrying in Signs of the Times (1829) the era's obsession with machinery as a for spiritual , where "the old noble impulsive force" yielded to "calculating intellect" and bureaucratic efficiency. His (1833–1834), a mock-philosophical , satirized cultural through the fictional philosopher Teufelsdröckh's quest for meaning, advocating "heroism" and organic over democratic leveling and , thereby influencing Victorian on authenticity and . Carlyle's rhetorical intensity and disdain for liberalism's atomizing effects established a model of criticism as moral exhortation, resonant in an age of Chartist unrest and factory exploitation. John Ruskin advanced this tradition by intertwining aesthetic theory with social reform, championing medieval Gothic as emblematic of joyful craftsmanship in The Stones of Venice (1851–1853), which critiqued industrial capitalism's division of labor for producing "soulless" workers and shoddy goods. In Unto This Last (1860), Ruskin rejected Benthamite economics, asserting that political economy should prioritize "life" over wealth accumulation, with true prosperity measured by communal health and moral vitality rather than market metrics. His advocacy for Pre-Raphaelite art's fidelity to nature and truth extended criticism into ethical imperatives, warning that degraded environments and labor mirrored degraded souls, a causal link he traced through empirical observations of Venetian decay and Manchester mills. Matthew Arnold refined these foundations into a systematic framework, defining criticism's "disinterested" function in his 1864 essay to cultivate "a free play of the mind" essential for cultural renewal, countering and hasty reforms like those post-1867 electoral expansion. In (1869), he contrasted "" (strict moralism) with "Hellenism" (flexible intelligence), portraying culture as "the pursuit of our total perfection" via acquaintance with "the best that has been thought and said," to mitigate the "anarchy" of Philistine self-interest and barbarian force. Arnold's emphasis on touchstones for genuine excellence—such as or Shakespeare—provided a method for discerning cultural value amid mass literacy and , influencing later critics by subordinating creativity to preparatory critical rigor. Collectively, these critics forged cultural criticism's Victorian bedrock by : linking economic structures to aesthetic decline and prescribing humanistic cultivation as remedy, often drawing on historical precedents like or medieval to validate their prescriptions against contemporary empiricism's grain. Their works, disseminated via burgeoning periodicals and lectures, professionalized the role, though their reflected era-specific tensions between elite guardianship and populist pressures.

Twentieth-Century Expansion

The twentieth century saw cultural criticism expand beyond elite literary and artistic domains into analyses of mass-produced , consumer goods, and ideological apparatuses, driven by industrialization, two world wars, and the proliferation of technologies like (widespread by the ), radio (commercialized in the ), and television (household staple by the ). This broadening reflected causal links between technological scalability and , where critics examined how media disseminated standardized narratives to manage social tensions in increasingly urban, anonymous societies numbering over 1 billion by 1930. Early influences included psychological and sociological insights, as theorists incorporated Freudian concepts of the unconscious and Durkheimian views of to probe media's role in shaping public moods and behaviors. A pivotal development occurred with the , whose Institute for Social Research—founded in 1923—pioneered interdisciplinary critiques fusing , , and to dissect capitalism's cultural dimensions. Exiled by Nazi persecution in 1933 and relocating to in 1934, scholars like and argued in their 1947 that mass culture constituted an "industry" producing pseudo-individualized commodities—such as Hollywood films grossing millions annually by the 1930s—to induce passivity and reconcile workers to exploitation, inverting enlightenment's emancipatory promise into mythic domination. This framework, empirically grounded in observations of U.S. radio serials and standardization, influenced subsequent media analyses but drew criticism for its deterministic pessimism, undervaluing audience resistance evidenced in diverse subcultures. In Britain, the field institutionalized via the (CCCS), established in 1964 at the under with initial funding of £2,400 annually from . Departing from Frankfurt's top-down negativity, CCCS scholars like (in his 1958 ) and Stuart Hall applied ethnographic methods to everyday artifacts, such as youth subcultures and advertising campaigns reaching 90% of households by the 1960s, revealing culture as a site of contested meanings tied to class and . This approach expanded criticism's scope to include , as in ' 1957 Mythologies, which decoded wrestling spectacles and car ads as bourgeois myths naturalizing inequality. Academic proliferation—evident in over 50 U.S. cultural studies programs by 1990—amplified these methods, though often through lenses privileging structural power over empirical measures of cultural vitality, reflecting institutional biases toward ideologically driven interpretations. Countercurrents emerged from conservative voices, such as T.S. Eliot's 1948 Notes Towards the Definition of Culture, which defended organic traditions against mass levelling, citing data on declining amid rising rates from 80% to near-universal in Western nations. By century's end, cultural criticism encompassed global phenomena like postcolonial media flows, but its left-leaning dominance in academia—evident in 70-80% of faculty self-identifying as progressive in surveys—prompted critiques of selective , such as ignoring market incentives fostering innovation in genres like , which generated $10 billion in U.S. sales by 1990. This expansion democratized critique yet risked conflating descriptive analysis with prescriptive , underscoring tensions between causal media effects and viewer agency.

Post-1960s Shifts and Contemporary Evolution

The post-1960s era marked a pivotal expansion of cultural criticism through the institutionalization of as an , particularly via the (CCCS) established at the in 1964 by . This center shifted focus from elite literary traditions to the analysis of , , and working-class experiences, drawing on Marxist frameworks to examine how cultural forms encoded power relations and ideological consent. Under directors like Stuart Hall from onward, the CCCS integrated ethnographic methods to study subcultures, such as styles and urban resistance, emphasizing culture's role in reproducing social inequalities. Global events of , including student protests and anti-war movements, further catalyzed this turn, infusing criticism with activist orientations that prioritized over detached formalism. In the 1970s and 1980s, profoundly reshaped cultural criticism by challenging modernist assumptions of objective truth and universal progress, incorporating poststructuralist ideas like and from thinkers such as and . Critics began blurring distinctions between and mass entertainment, viewing as fragmented simulations or power-laden narratives rather than coherent wholes, which facilitated analyses of , television, and as sites of ideological contestation. This period saw cultural criticism proliferate across disciplines, with a surge in programs; for instance, by the 1990s, U.S. universities hosted over 500 programs influenced by these approaches, often critiquing through lenses of identity and representation. However, this relativist emphasis drew accusations of undermining empirical rigor, as postmodern frameworks prioritized subjective interpretation over verifiable causal mechanisms in cultural production. Contemporary cultural criticism has evolved amid digital technologies, enabling decentralized platforms that democratize critique while fragmenting authority structures once held by academic and journalistic elites. Since the early , social media and algorithms have accelerated cultural transmission, with phenomena like viral memes analyzed through models that quantify traits' replication rates—e.g., studies show content emphasizing novelty or emotional arousal spreads 20-30% faster online. This shift has empowered independent voices, such as podcasters and YouTubers critiquing institutional narratives on topics like , bypassing traditional gatekeepers; platforms like (now X) hosted over 500 million cultural commentary posts daily by 2023, fostering rapid but polarized debates. Yet, digital amplification has intensified echo chambers and performative outrage, prompting methodological innovations like big-data to track causal influences in online subcultures, though academic ' persistent alignment with progressive ideologies has faced pushback for sidelining dissenting empirical inquiries into cultural decline or biological factors in behavior. By 2025, hybrid forms blending quantitative analytics with qualitative critique predominate, reflecting a partial retreat from pure postmodern skepticism toward evidence-based assessments of digital culture's societal impacts.

Ideological and Methodological Approaches

Left-Leaning Perspectives and Critiques

Left-leaning cultural criticism predominantly draws from Marxist theory, emphasizing the role of economic structures in shaping cultural production and reception. This approach posits that culture serves as a superstructure reinforcing class domination, with artifacts analyzed through the lens of base-superstructure relations where material conditions determine ideological content. Critics employing this method, such as those influenced by Karl Marx's Capital (1867), argue that cultural forms under capitalism alienate individuals and perpetuate false consciousness, diverting attention from exploitative labor relations. For instance, Raymond Williams in Culture and Society (1958) extended this to examine how industrial capitalism commodified artistic expression, reducing it to marketable goods that obscure social contradictions. The exemplifies a key methodological strand, developing in the 1930s at the Institute for Social Research in , , founded in 1923. Thinkers like Theodor Adorno and critiqued the "culture industry" in their 1944 essay "," contending that and standardize tastes, foster , and suppress dialectical thinking essential for . Their analysis integrated Freudian psychoanalysis with to reveal how induces passive consumption, as seen in Adorno's 1932 critique of as a pseudo-individualistic commodity masking regimentation. This perspective influenced subsequent left-leaning critiques, prioritizing from ideological domination over aesthetic appreciation alone. Feminist cultural criticism, emerging prominently in the second wave of during the and , interrogates gendered power dynamics embedded in cultural representations. It highlights patriarchal structures that marginalize women's voices, employing concepts like the "" articulated by in her 1975 essay "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema," which dissects Hollywood films for objectifying female bodies to sustain voyeuristic male spectatorship. Critics such as advocated for "" in A of Their Own (1977), focusing on women's literary traditions to reclaim agency from male-dominated canons, while revealing how cultural norms enforce binary gender roles that limit female subjectivity. Postcolonial cultural criticism, gaining traction post-1970s decolonization waves, scrutinizes lingering imperial legacies in cultural narratives. Edward Said's Orientalism (1978) exposed Western depictions of the East as exotic or inferior, serving to justify colonial domination through discursive power. Homi Bhabha's notion of , developed in The Location of Culture (1994), critiques binary colonizer-colonized frameworks by examining ambivalent cultural that disrupts hegemonic authority. This approach often intersects with Marxist critiques, analyzing how global capitalism perpetuates neocolonial exploitation via media flows, as in Arjun Appadurai's Modernity at Large (1996) on mediascapes fostering uneven . These perspectives frequently converge in intersectional frameworks, as theorized by in 1989, to address overlapping oppressions of class, race, , and in . However, internal critiques within left-leaning circles note methodological limitations, such as overemphasis on —evident in debates over the Frankfurt School's alleged , which in the 1960s argued neglected communicative rationality's potential for genuine critique. Empirical studies, like those on media effects since the , challenge blanket dismissals of mass culture's subversive capacities, suggesting active audience interpretation over passive absorption. Despite dominance in academic institutions, where surveys indicate over 80% of faculty identify as left-leaning as of 2020, these approaches have faced accusations of ideological uniformity, potentially stifling empirical pluralism in cultural inquiry.

Right-Leaning Perspectives and Critiques

Right-leaning cultural critics emphasize the defense of longstanding Western traditions, aesthetic hierarchies, and absolutes against what they perceive as the corrosive effects of , mass , and progressive ideologies. These perspectives view not as a fluid construct but as an organic inheritance shaped by historical continuity, religious foundations, and communal rituals, which provide stability and meaning amid modernity's disruptions. Critics in this vein argue that unchecked and egalitarian impulses erode civilizational achievements, leading to aesthetic ugliness, social fragmentation, and spiritual emptiness, as evidenced by declining birth rates in (1.5 children per woman in the EU as of 2023) and rising indicators of such as rates among . They prioritize first-hand observation of societal pathologies—drawn from fields like , , and —over abstract theorizing, often grounding critiques in causal links between shifts (e.g., welfare expansions post-1960s) and behavioral outcomes like family dissolution. A central figure, philosopher (1944–2020), advanced these views through analyses of art, architecture, and music, contending that modern culture fosters a "culture of repudiation" that dismantles inherited norms without replacing them, resulting in alienated individuals and degraded public spaces. In (1997), Scruton critiqued the leveling influence of popular forms and democratic access, arguing they diminish the transcendent experience of classical works rooted in tonal hierarchies and sacred motifs, which he saw as essential for human flourishing. His broader oeuvre, including Modern Culture (1998), indicted for prioritizing irony and over beauty and piety, linking this shift to broader societal decay observable in Britain's urban blight and loss of communal reverence by the late . Scruton's approach integrated with phenomenological insights, insisting that —understood as pre-judged fidelity to proven customs—outweighs rationalist experimentation, a stance informed by his eyewitness accounts of Eastern Europe's communist cultural barrenness during the . Theodore Dalrymple (pseudonym of Anthony Daniels, b. 1949), a retired physician with decades in British prisons and slums, offers empirically driven critiques of pathology and elite detachment, attributing cultural decline to sentimental welfare policies that incentivize dependency and excuse . In Our Culture, What's Left of It (2005), he documents how intellectual mandarins—often insulated from consequences—promote ideas like victimhood and sexual liberation, fostering a "toxic cult of sentimentality" that hollows out personal agency, as seen in Britain's post-1960s surge in single-parent households (now over 25% of families) correlated with higher youth crime rates. Dalrymple's essays, drawn from frontline encounters with thousands of patients, reject multicultural , arguing it masks incompatible values (e.g., honor cultures clashing with liberal norms) and accelerates erosion of , evidenced by rising Islamist extremism in Europe since the . His work highlights causal realism: policies expanding state provision since the have demonstrably weakened family structures and self-reliance, per longitudinal data from sources like the UK's . These perspectives critique dominant left-leaning cultural for systemic biases that prioritize ideological narratives over verifiable outcomes, often ignoring on cultural transmission's role in —such as studies linking intact families to better (e.g., U.S. children from two-parent homes scoring 20-30% higher on standardized tests). Right-leaning analysts contend that academia and media, skewed by progressive homogeneity (over 90% of faculty identifying as left-leaning per surveys), amplify deconstructions of power while downplaying threats like demographic shifts and technological . Figures like Dalrymple and Scruton advocate restorative measures: reinvigorating local attachments, , and aesthetic discernment to counter , as explored in conservative outlets decrying liberalism's handoff of cultural . This persists in contemporary voices challenging the politicization of and the dismissal of as mere , urging a return to empirical fidelity over utopian abstractions.

Alternative Frameworks

Cultural evolutionary theory provides a mechanistic framework for critiquing cultural phenomena by analogizing them to biological , where cultural traits—such as beliefs, norms, and practices—undergo variation, selection, and based on their relative fitness in propagating through populations. This approach, rooted in Darwinian principles, evaluates cultural elements not through ideological lenses of power or equity but via empirical assessment of their adaptive utility, such as enhancing group cohesion or individual over time. For example, it explains the persistence of kinship-based institutions in pre-modern societies as adaptations to resource and alliance formation, while critiquing modern cultural shifts—like atomized —as potentially maladaptive for long-term societal stability, evidenced by correlations between cultural and declines below replacement levels in developed nations since the . Unlike ideologically driven critiques, this framework prioritizes testable hypotheses, such as modeling cultural transmission via agent-based simulations, which reveal how conformist biases amplify both beneficial and deleterious traits. Memetics extends this evolutionary paradigm by conceptualizing culture as propagated through discrete, replicable units termed "memes"—ideas, symbols, or behaviors that compete for cognitive space akin to genes in biological replication. Originating with ' 1976 formulation, critiques cultural dissemination by analyzing dynamics, such as why certain ideologies spread virally despite empirical weaknesses, attributing success to of and host susceptibility rather than inherent truth value. Applied to contemporary criticism, it dissects phenomena like echo chambers as meme complexes reinforcing selection pressures for outrage or conformity, with quantitative studies showing longevity tied to emotional arousal metrics in transmission networks. Though has faced dismissal in some academic circles for reducing complex social processes to simplistic analogies—potentially reflecting resistance to biological in culture-focused disciplines—it offers predictive power, as seen in models forecasting the eclipse of less replicable cultural variants during societal upheavals. Ecological and systems-oriented frameworks further diverge from partisan critiques by integrating with environmental and network interactions, positing as an emergent property shaped by niche construction and feedback loops. These approaches critique cultural maladaptations, such as urban density exacerbating mental health epidemics, through interdisciplinary data like twin studies disentangling genetic predispositions from cultural influences, revealing heritability estimates for traits like political orientation ranging from 30-60% across populations. By emphasizing causal realism—tracing cultural outcomes to underlying biological and ecological drivers—they challenge purely constructivist narratives prevalent in traditional criticism, advocating for interventions grounded in evidence, such as policy reforms aligned with evolved human motivations rather than aspirational ideals. Empirical validation comes from comparisons, where cultural practices correlating with higher loads predict more conservative norms, underscoring selection pressures over ideological imposition.

Notable Figures and Exemplars

Historical Exemplars

Matthew Arnold (1822–1888), an English poet and inspector of schools, emerged as a foundational figure in cultural criticism through his advocacy for high culture as a bulwark against societal disorder. In his 1869 work Culture and Anarchy, Arnold defined culture as "the pursuit of our total perfection by means of getting to know, on all the matters which most concern us, the best which has been thought and said in the world," positioning it as an antidote to the "anarchy" resulting from unchecked individualism and industrial excess. He critiqued the Victorian era's philistinism—materialism among the middle class—and the narrow religiosity of the non-conformists, urging a synthesis of Hellenic spontaneity and Hebraic moral rigor to foster disinterested criticism and social harmony. Arnold's emphasis on the critic's role in elevating public taste influenced subsequent thinkers, though his paternalistic view of culture as imposed by an educated elite drew charges of conservatism. Edmund Burke (1729–1797), an Irish statesman and philosopher, prefigured modern cultural criticism in his defense of tradition against revolutionary upheaval. In Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790), Burke analyzed the French Revolution's cultural roots, warning that abstract rationalism severed from historical customs and inherited institutions eroded the "moral imagination" sustaining civilized order. He argued that society comprised a partnership across generations, with customs as organic repositories of wisdom, critiquing Enlightenment radicals for prioritizing individual rights over communal continuity and aesthetic reverence for the past. Burke's causal emphasis on cultural disruption leading to violence—evident in his observation of the Revolution's descent into terror—highlighted the fragility of social fabrics, influencing conservative cultural thought despite his support for the American Revolution's preservation of British traditions. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900), a German philosopher, offered a provocative historical critique of Western culture's decline into decadence and . In works like (1872) and On the Genealogy of Morals (1887), he diagnosed and Socratic rationalism as enfeebling forces that suppressed Dionysian vitality in favor of Apollonian order and slave morality, tracing Europe's cultural malaise to the "death of God" and loss of aristocratic values. Nietzsche called for a of all values through cultural renewal, scorning democratic as leveling genius; his ideas, while inspiring vitalist , have been contested for overlooking empirical stabilizers like legal traditions amid cultural flux.

Twentieth-Century Icons

T.S. Eliot (1888–1965), poet and essayist, advanced cultural criticism by insisting on the interdependence of , religion, and social order, as articulated in his 1948 work Notes Towards the Definition of Culture, where he defined culture as the "realisation of a nation's inheritance" rooted in Christian orthodoxy and warned against its fragmentation in modern secular societies. His essays, such as (1919), emphasized an "historical sense" in criticism, requiring awareness of literary continuity to avoid solipsistic innovation, influencing generations of critics to prioritize objective standards over subjective . Eliot's critique extended to , viewing as diluting elite traditions, a stance that resonated in conservative intellectual circles amid rising . H.L. Mencken (1880–1956), journalist and satirist, targeted American cultural complacency through his essays in Prejudices (1919–1927), lambasting Puritan moralism, democratic egalitarianism, and the "booboisie"—his term for the credulous middle class—as barriers to genuine intellectual and artistic progress. Editing The Smart Set and The American Mercury, Mencken promoted European sophistication over native boosterism, coining phrases like "the Bible Belt" in 1921 to denote religious fundamentalism's grip on Southern culture, while his coverage of the 1925 Scopes Trial exposed hypocrisies in educational policy debates. Though later critiqued for ethnic prejudices revealed in his private diaries, Mencken's iconoclastic style enduringly shaped journalistic cultural commentary by favoring skepticism toward mass opinion. Marshall McLuhan (1911–1980), media theorist, revolutionized cultural analysis with his 1964 book , positing that "," meaning technologies like television reshape and more profoundly than their content, ushering in an "electric" era that eroded print-based individualism. His concept of the "," detailed in (1962), argued that electronic media fostered tribal interconnectedness, anticipating digital networks' social effects, with over 100,000 copies sold by 1964 and citations in policy discussions on broadcasting's cultural homogenization. McLuhan's probes into media's environmental impact critiqued optimistic , influencing fields from advertising to without prescriptive ideology. Susan Sontag (1933–2004), essayist and novelist, elevated cultural criticism by bridging high art and mass media in works like (1966), which sold over 500,000 copies and advocated "against interpretation" to preserve aesthetic experience over reductive analysis, challenging mid-century formalist dominance. Her 1964 essay "Notes on 'Camp'" introduced the concept as a sensibility favoring artifice and exaggeration, influencing postmodern aesthetics, while (1977) dissected images' commodification in consumer culture, warning of their numbing effect on ethical perception amid visuals. Sontag's defense of difficult art against populist simplification positioned her as a public intellectual, though her later political engagements, such as opposing the 1982 fatwa against , highlighted tensions between aesthetic autonomy and activism.

Contemporary Voices

Douglas Murray (born July 16, 1979) stands as a leading contemporary cultural critic, focusing on the tensions between multiculturalism, identity politics, and the preservation of Western traditions. His 2017 book The Strange Death of Europe documents how mass immigration from non-European countries, coupled with elite reluctance to enforce assimilation or border controls, has strained social cohesion in nations like Britain and Sweden, leading to parallel societies and rising native discontent; Murray supports this with data on crime rates and demographic shifts, such as Sweden's foreign-born population reaching 20% by 2017 amid spikes in violent incidents. In The Madness of Crowds (2019), he dissects identity-based activism around race, gender, and sexuality, arguing that quests for equity devolve into coercion, as evidenced by corporate diversity quotas and cancelation campaigns that prioritize narrative over evidence, like the 2018 Google memo controversy where an engineer's critique of bias in hiring was met with firing rather than debate. Murray's analysis draws on first-hand reporting and statistical trends, challenging the mainstream narrative that such critiques stem from prejudice rather than observable causal effects on freedom and rationality. Camille Paglia (born April 2, 1947), a scholar of art and literature, remains a provocative voice in cultural criticism, advocating for the recognition of biological imperatives in human behavior and art while decrying the dominance of victim-oriented ideologies. In her ongoing essays and interviews, Paglia critiques postmodern academia for eroding aesthetic standards, asserting that movements like suppress the erotic vitality in by pathologizing male sexuality and historical male achievement; she cites the decline in robust artistic training, with institutions favoring ideological conformity over skill, as seen in the shift from figural drawing to conceptual installations post-1970s. Paglia's defense of free expression highlights cases like the 2018 #MeToo excesses, where she argues was sacrificed for presumptive guilt, drawing parallels to historical witch hunts and emphasizing empirical distinctions between power imbalances and criminality. Her work underscores causal links between cultural decadence and societal vitality, warning that ignoring sex differences—supported by —fosters delusion over realism. Other notable figures include Helen Pluckrose and James A. Lindsay, whose 2020 collaboration Cynical Theories traces social justice ideologies to postmodern roots, critiquing how applied postmodernism in culture prioritizes power dynamics over truth-seeking. They substantiate claims with examples like the proliferation of "standpoint epistemology" in media and education, where knowledge validity hinges on identity rather than evidence, leading to self-reinforcing echo chambers; their 2018 Grievance Studies hoax, publishing fabricated papers in peer-reviewed journals, exposed vulnerabilities to ideological capture. This empirical demonstration highlights how cultural criticism, when detached from falsifiability, enables authoritarian drift in institutions.

Societal Role and Influence

Contributions to Cultural Analysis

Cultural critics advance through rigorous examination of artifacts and practices, elucidating their ties to societal values, economic structures, and power dynamics. This involves dissecting how cultural outputs, from to , encode and propagate ideologies, often using interdisciplinary tools drawn from , , and to map causal links between cultural phenomena and social behaviors. A core contribution lies in broadening analytical scope beyond elite canons to include popular and marginal discourses, such as and consumer media, which reveal shifts in collective priorities. For example, Leo Lowenthal's 1968 study of U.S. popular magazines from 1901 to 1941 empirically traced a transition from venerating "idols of production" (e.g., industrial leaders) to "idols of consumption" (e.g., entertainers), demonstrating how economic transformations manifest in cultural heroes and influence public aspirations. Similarly, Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer's 1940s analysis of the "culture industry" posited mass-produced celebrities as standardized commodities that reinforce capitalist consumption patterns, providing a framework for assessing commodification's role in homogenizing tastes and stifling critical thought. Critics also challenge parochial assumptions by incorporating cross-cultural data, as in Margaret Mead's anthropological work questioning Western gender norms through observations of non-Western societies in the 1920s and 1930s, which highlighted socialization's variability and prompted reevaluation of purported universals in . further contributed by reconceptualizing culture as an "ordinary" process encompassing working-class and everyday expressions, rather than rarified , enabling analyses of how hegemonic structures operate through mundane cultural forms—a perspective outlined in his 1958 essay "Culture is Ordinary" and expanded in subsequent works. These efforts yield causal insights into , such as how media discourses intersect with historical events to shape identity and , complicating static views of value and fostering empirical of ideology's embeddedness in texts. By tracing institutional and ideological ramifications of cultural events, critics equip scholars and policymakers with tools to dissect societal relays, though such analyses often prioritize interpretive depth over quantifiable metrics, inviting ongoing debate on methodological rigor.

Impacts on Public Discourse and Policy

Cultural critics have shaped public discourse by offering interpretive frameworks that highlight power dynamics, ideological underpinnings, and moral implications within cultural artifacts, often amplifying debates over values such as versus collectivism or versus . For instance, the Frankfurt School's critiques of mass culture as tools of ideological manipulation influenced subsequent academic and media analyses, fostering a pervasive skepticism toward popular media that permeates contemporary discussions on and . This approach contributed to the framing of cultural phenomena as battlegrounds in broader ideological conflicts, evident in the "culture wars" of the , where critics on both sides debated the moral content of and its societal effects, thereby elevating artistic controversies to national salience. In realms, cultural criticism has informed decisions on , , and content by challenging prevailing norms and advocating for alignments with critiqued values. Allan Bloom's 1987 critique in The Closing of the American Mind spurred public and legislative scrutiny of higher education curricula, prompting defenses of classical liberal against perceived and contributing to ongoing debates on core requirements and ideological balance in universities. Similarly, conservative critics like argued for policies preserving cultural heritage, influencing discussions on , , and national identity preservation in and beyond, where his emphasis on tradition as a bulwark against erosion shaped conservative platforms. On the left, frameworks have underpinned policies promoting diversity in media and , such as in grants, though empirical assessments of their long-term societal benefits remain contested due to reliance on ideological rather than causal metrics. These impacts often manifest through indirect channels, including academic syllabi that train future policymakers and media narratives that precondition on issues like or representation. During the U.S. culture wars, critics' advocacy against or for provocative artworks directly affected funding, leading to congressional interventions and restrictions on grants for content deemed obscene, with over $500,000 in proposed cuts tied to specific exhibitions between 1989 and 1991. However, such influences can exacerbate polarization, as biased institutional amplification—prevalent in academia and mainstream outlets—privileges certain critiques, potentially sidelining evidence-based evaluations of cultural policies' in fostering social cohesion or economic productivity.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Limitations

Accusations of Elitism and Bias

Critics of cultural phenomena who emphasize aesthetic or moral hierarchies have been charged with for prioritizing refined standards over mass appeal. Such accusations posit that upholding distinctions between high and fosters exclusionary attitudes, dismissing popular entertainments as unworthy of serious consideration. For example, in literary and artistic discourse, defenders of works are often labeled elitist for critiquing modernist or postmodern innovations as degraded, thereby implying superiority of educated tastes. This view gained traction in the late amid democratization efforts in and media, where egalitarian impulses framed qualitative judgments as antidemocratic. Allan Bloom's 1987 critique The Closing of the American Mind exemplified these charges, as Bloom advocated a return to classical texts in university curricula to counteract , only to face rebukes for that allegedly undermined egalitarian access to . Detractors argued his preference for Socratic inquiry over contemporary pluralism reflected an aristocratic disdain for ordinary students' preferences, such as or vocational studies, positioning intellectual rigor as a privilege for the few. Bloom rebutted this by asserting that genuine —cultivating excellence—strengthens by equipping citizens with timeless wisdom, rather than pandering to fleeting trends; he viewed the accusation as a misunderstanding that conflated standards with snobbery. Empirical defenses of his position highlight correlations between and sustained , though such data remains contested amid broader cultural shifts toward inclusivity. Roger Scruton encountered similar allegations in his advocacy for and , as in his 2009 documentary , where he critiqued and for eroding communal values. Opponents portrayed his hierarchy of tastes—favoring figurative representation over avant-garde experimentation—as culturally insular, accessible mainly to those with privileged upbringings. Scruton embraced the label in part, arguing that aesthetic discrimination is not exclusionary but essential for civilizational preservation, countering that equates all forms under equality. These critiques often emanate from institutions with documented left-leaning orientations, such as academia, where surveys indicate disproportionate progressive self-identification among faculty, potentially inflating perceptions of conservative critics' biases. Accusations of bias against right-leaning cultural critics typically allege ideological prejudice, framing their analyses of moral decay or as reactionary rather than evidence-based. For instance, Scruton's opposition to was dismissed as nativist bias, despite his grounding in empirical observations of social cohesion metrics, such as declining trust in diverse urban settings documented in longitudinal studies. Bloom faced parallel claims of and conservatism for questioning feminist curricula, with critics attributing his views to personal animus over pedagogical merit. Such charges persist in media outlets, where conservative critiques of are selectively portrayed as partisan, overlooking symmetric biases in progressive cultural narratives that prioritize equity over empirical outcomes like family structure's causal links to welfare. Defenders note that these accusations rarely apply reciprocal scrutiny to left-leaning critics, revealing a rooted in institutional asymmetries rather than objective flaws in conservative reasoning.

Debates on Objectivity and Politicization

Cultural criticism has long grappled with the tension between claims of objective analysis and accusations of inherent politicization, where interpretive frameworks often reflect the critic's ideological commitments rather than intrinsic qualities of the . Proponents of objectivity argue for methods that prioritize textual and aesthetic , while critics contend that all interpretation is mediated by cultural and power dynamics, rendering pure neutrality unattainable. This intensified in the twentieth century as formalist approaches gave way to ideologically driven paradigms. New Criticism, dominant from the 1930s to the 1950s, exemplified efforts toward objectivity by confining analysis to the literary text itself, eschewing biographical, historical, or social contexts to focus on intrinsic structure, irony, and paradox. Figures like and maintained that valid criticism derives from , treating the work as a self-contained entity with verifiable formal properties, akin to scientific scrutiny. This approach sought to elevate criticism above subjective whim or political agenda, emphasizing ambiguity and organic unity as empirical anchors for judgment. The advent of and postmodern theory in the late twentieth century shifted the , politicizing criticism by foregrounding , power relations, and social construction over formal autonomy. Influenced by thinkers like Stuart Hall and , views cultural products as sites of contested meaning embedded in hegemonic structures, rejecting New Criticism's textual isolation as naive or complicit in maintaining power. further undermines objectivity by positing truth as discursively produced rather than discovered, leading to relativistic interpretations where aesthetic merit yields to critiques of representation, identity, and oppression. Empirical surveys reveal systemic ideological imbalance in academia, particularly humanities departments central to , with faculty self-identifying as liberal or far-left comprising upwards of 60% in recent decades, compared to minimal conservative representation. This skew, documented in national faculty surveys, fosters environments where aligns with progressive advocacy, often prioritizing of "dominant narratives" over balanced of cultural phenomena. Critics, including those from conservative perspectives, argue this politicization erodes credibility, as evidenced by the marginalization of dissenting views and the of scholarly rigor with ideological conformity. Defenders of politicized approaches counter that neutrality masks privilege, insisting culturally informed advances equity, yet detractors highlight how such frameworks sacrifice and universal standards, substituting empirical scrutiny with moralistic narratives. In contemporary discourse, this manifests in debates over "" and institutional gatekeeping, where cultural critics wield influence to enforce ideological litmus tests, prompting calls for renewed emphasis on evidence-based judgment to restore criticism's truth-seeking function.

Empirical and Causal Critiques of Cultural Criticism

Cultural criticism, particularly within traditions influenced by the and postmodern theory, has been faulted for prioritizing interpretive deconstruction over empirical falsification, rendering many claims resistant to rigorous testing. The 1996 exemplified this vulnerability: physicist submitted a deliberately absurd article, "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative of ," to the journal , which accepted and published it without detecting its parody of ' jargon-heavy, evidence-light style. This underscored a broader that cultural criticism often eschews quantitative data or replicable experiments in favor of qualitative assertion, allowing ideological assertions to masquerade as scholarship. Empirical investigations frequently undermine , the notion that cultural factors alone dictate social outcomes, by revealing stronger roles for biological and individual-level variables. Behavioral genetic studies, including twin and research, indicate that accounts for 40-80% of variance in traits like , , and political attitudes, challenging pure cultural constructivist accounts that attribute such differences solely to or . For instance, psychological replications, such as those in the Many Labs 2 , detect minimal evidence of cultural variability in basic cognitive and behavioral effects, suggesting that purportedly culture-bound phenomena often reflect low statistical power or methodological artifacts rather than robust group differences. Similarly, analyses of economic performance critique cultural explanations for development disparities, arguing they overlook institutional and geographic causal factors; for example, family structures and religious norms invoked as cultural determinants fail to predict growth when controlling for and resource variables. Causally, cultural criticism often inverts or obscures primary mechanisms by emphasizing epiphenomenal elements like or representation while downplaying foundational drivers such as evolutionary adaptations, market incentives, or technological shifts. Evolutionary psychologists contend that —rooted in innate cognitive modules shaped over millennia—constrain cultural variation, yet critics like those in social constructionist veins dismiss these as reductive, ignoring evidence from and cross-species comparisons that link behaviors to neural substrates rather than solely to narrative frames. In historical analysis, causal realism demands tracing outcomes to generative processes, but cultural theory's focus on "superstructural" neglects how material bases, such as resource or demographic pressures, propel change; for example, shifts in gender roles correlate more strongly with contraceptive technology and labor market entry than with discursive alone. This oversight leads to unfalsifiable loops where cultural narratives are treated as both cause and effect, evading scrutiny of alternative pathways like or rational self-interest. Such critiques highlight systemic issues in ' methodology, where empirical disconfirmation is rare due to interpretive flexibility, fostering echo chambers insulated from data-driven revision. Proponents of causal realism advocate integrating mechanism-based models—identifying how variables interact via testable pathways—to supplant vague holistic claims, as seen in failures of to forecast outcomes like persistent inequality despite narrative interventions. While cultural criticism illuminates symbolic dimensions, its empirical and causal deficits risk subordinating truth-seeking to , particularly when sources from ideologically aligned academia amplify unverified assumptions.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/cultural-criticism
  2. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/cultural-critic
  3. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/education/glossary/cultural-criticism-cultural-studies
  4. https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/12/31/18152275/criticism-explained-cultural-writing
  5. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/introduction-to-literary-theory/cultural-criticism
  6. https://org.coloradomesa.edu/~blaga/Theory/Cultural_Criticism.html
  7. https://literariness.org/2016/11/23/cultural-studies/
  8. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/english-9/cultural-criticism
  9. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/social-criticism
  10. https://therewillbe.games/articles-essays/8018-critical-reviews-what-s-the-difference-between-a-reviewer-and-a-critic
  11. https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/ENGL301-The-Early-Origins-of-Literary-Theory.pdf
  12. https://adamkotsko.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/plato-as-cultural-critic.pdf
  13. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-aesthetics/
  14. https://literariness.org/2017/05/01/literary-criticism-of-aristotle/
  15. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2003/2003.06.07/
  16. https://humanprogress.org/the-ancient-roots-of-western-self-criticism/
  17. https://polsci.institute/modern-political-philosophy/rousseau-critique-enlightenment-chains-modernity/
  18. https://historyguild.org/enlightenment-thinkers/?srsltid=AfmBOoq9q-DNGx1zsvWtm8bIncjNfEorsHIs4HSbfjCAXdjQEDmeFchw
  19. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/enlightenment/
  20. https://www.gresham.ac.uk/watch-now/victorians-art-and-culture
  21. https://victorianweb.org/authors/carlyle/signs/bortlinger3.html
  22. https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/john-ruskin-and-the-national-gallery
  23. https://literariness.org/2017/06/21/the-literary-criticism-of-matthew-arnold/
  24. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/69374/the-study-of-poetry
  25. https://ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in/engp10/chapter/matthew-arnold-as-a-culture-critic/
  26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/808122
  27. https://pressbooks.usnh.edu/media-studies/chapter/a-short-history-of-media/
  28. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-theory/
  29. https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/papers/fs.htm
  30. https://digitalcommons.xula.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1105&context=xulanexus
  31. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news-archive/2014/50-years-on-from-the-birth-of-cultural-studies
  32. https://oxfordre.com/communication/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-44
  33. https://literariness.org/2018/01/07/literary-criticism-and-theory-in-the-twentieth-century/
  34. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/ethnic-and-cultural-studies/birmingham-school-centre-contemporary-cultural
  35. https://csalateral.org/section/years-in-cultural-studies/1968-turning-point-cultural-studies-peters-olaniyan-stewart-berger/
  36. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/p/postmodernism
  37. https://anthropology.ua.edu/theory/postmodernism-and-its-critics/
  38. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25723618.2018.1545882
  39. https://academic.oup.com/joc/article-abstract/71/6/E35/6124730
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348922520_Cultural_Evolution_in_the_Digital_Age
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5156828/
  42. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-83995-z
  43. https://study.com/academy/lesson/marxist-criticism-definition-examples.html
  44. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100137791
  45. https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/culturalmarxism.pdf
  46. https://iep.utm.edu/critical-theory-frankfurt-school/
  47. https://www.thoughtco.com/feminist-literary-criticism-3528960
  48. https://literariness.org/2022/10/07/feminist-literary-criticism/
  49. https://literariness.org/2020/11/14/postcolonial-cultural-studies/
  50. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/how-arts-shifted-leftward
  51. https://www.heritage.org/conservatism/commentary/our-cultural-crisis-kirkian-response
  52. https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/beyond-the-culture-of-repudiation/
  53. https://lawliberty.org/music-and-our-cultural-decline-roger-scrutons-conservative-response/
  54. https://newcriterion.com/article/roger-scruton-defender-of-the-soul-civilization/
  55. https://fedsoc.org/fedsoc-review/margaret-a-little-reviews-our-culture-what-s-left-of-it-the-mandarins-and-the-masses-by-theodore-dalrymple
  56. https://www.skepticaldoctor.com/importance/
  57. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2017/07/conservatism-politicization-culture-gregory-wolfe.html
  58. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2025/07/decadence-critics-gleaves-whitney.html
  59. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1620732114
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8126466/
  61. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-019-0343-5
  62. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/07/2/l_072_05.html
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0303264721000356
  64. https://direct.mit.edu/posc/article/28/4/542/97502/Why-Did-Memetics-Fail-Comparative-Case-Study1
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513825000352
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258503193_An_evolutionary_critique_of_cultural_analysis_in_sociology
  67. https://www.lsj.org/literature/essays/arnold
  68. https://bruceashford.net/2020/10-of-the-wests-most-destructive-cultural-critics/
  69. https://www.ranker.com/list/list-of-famous-cultural-critics/reference
  70. https://literariness.org/2020/07/05/analysis-of-t-s-eliots-notes-towards-the-definition-of-culture/
  71. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/t-s-eliot
  72. https://www.amherst.edu/news/magazine/issue-archive/2004_summer/amherst_creates/eliot
  73. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/prejudices-h-l-mencken
  74. https://ohioopen.library.ohio.edu/oupress/83/
  75. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-last-of-the-menckenians-struggling-with-an-american-iconoclast
  76. https://bigthink.com/the-present/marshall-mcluhan-how-books-irrevocably-changed-culture/
  77. https://www.mit.edu/~saleem/ivory/ch2.htm
  78. https://www.thecollector.com/who-was-susan-sontag/
  79. https://france-amerique.com/susan-sontag-how-paris-shaped-an-american-luminary/
  80. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/10/08/magazine/susan-sontag.html
  81. https://manhattan.institute/person/douglas-murray
  82. https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-provocations-of-camille-paglia
  83. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-cult-of-camille-paglia/
  84. https://rlo.acton.org/archives/106361-camille-paglia-the-fearless-feminist.html
  85. https://www.newleftreview.org/issues/ii18/articles/stefan-collini-defending-cultural-criticism
  86. https://www.giarts.org/article/social-nature-offense-and-public-protest-over-art-and-culture
  87. https://artsfuse.org/265769/arts-commentary-remembering-the-culture-wars-of-the-90s/
  88. https://voegelinview.com/the-legacy-of-the-closing-of-the-american-mind/
  89. https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2023/09/91086/
  90. https://electronicbookreview.com/essay/cultural-criticism-and-the-politics-of-selling-out/
  91. https://www.bath.ac.uk/publications/culture-values-and-public-policy/attachments/CultureValuesandPublicPolicy.pdf
  92. https://deliberatio.eu/en/analyses/frankfurt-school-and-the-social-disorder
  93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1314908
  94. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/introduction-contemporary-literature/cultural-elitism
  95. https://thepointmag.com/criticism/the-closing-of-the-american-mind-allan-bloom/
  96. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/allan-bloom
  97. https://jewishreviewofbooks.com/articles/2668/the-closing-of-the-american-mind-now/
  98. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2007/09/18/closing-american-mind-20-years-later
  99. https://artislimited.wordpress.com/2012/11/08/elitist-or-revolutionary-roger-scrutons-why-beauty-matters-2009-bbc-full-episode/comment-page-1/
  100. https://www.academia.edu/11976031/Scruton_on_Culture
  101. https://archive.philosophersmag.com/arts-elite-an-interview-with-roger-scruton/
  102. https://academic.oup.com/book/10186/chapter/157758858
  103. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2020/03/defense-elitism-roger-scruton-2020-timeless.html
  104. https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0%2C33009%2C968674%2C00.html
  105. https://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/social-psychology-biased-republicans
  106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40546822
  107. https://literariness.org/2021/05/30/new-criticism/
  108. https://read.dukeupress.edu/social-text/article/34/2%2520%28127%29/1/31099/IntroductionFor-a-Political-Critique-of-Culture
  109. https://cwi.pressbooks.pub/lit-crit/chapter/what-is-new-historical-criticism/
  110. https://www.independent.org/tir/2022-23-winter/the-hyperpoliticization-of-higher-ed/
  111. https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/academic-mind-2022-what-faculty-think-about-free-expression-and-academic-freedom
  112. https://www.aei.org/op-eds/seven-theses-for-viewpoint-diversity/
  113. https://www.aacu.org/liberaleducation/articles/out-of-balance
  114. https://newdiscourses.com/tftw-objectivity/
  115. https://physics.nyu.edu/sokal/lingua_franca_v4/lingua_franca_v4.html
  116. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-human-beast/201211/why-cultural-determinism-is-not-science
  117. https://stevenpinker.com/files/pinker/files/2002_12_pathways.pdf
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11461273/
  119. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24089407_Family_religion_and_economic_performance_A_critique_of_cultural_determinism
  120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10877276/
  121. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233710415_The_Disappearance_of_the_Empirical_Some_Reflections_on_Contemporary_Culture_Theory_and_Historiography
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.