Hubbry Logo
EpilepsyEpilepsyMain
Open search
Epilepsy
Community hub
Epilepsy
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Epilepsy
Epilepsy
from Wikipedia

Epilepsy
Other namesSeizure disorder
Neurological disability
The electroencephalogram recording of a person with childhood absence epilepsy showing a seizure. The waves are black on a white background.
Generalized 3 Hz spike-and-wave discharges on an electroencephalogram
SpecialtyNeurology
SymptomsPeriods of loss of consciousness, abnormal shaking, staring, change in vision, mood changes and/or other cognitive disturbances [1]
DurationLong term[1]
CausesUnknown, brain injury, stroke, brain tumors, infections of the brain, birth defects[1][2][3]
Diagnostic methodElectroencephalogram, ruling out other possible causes[4]
Differential diagnosisFainting, alcohol withdrawal, electrolyte problems[4]
TreatmentMedication, surgery, neurostimulation, dietary changes[5][6]
PrognosisControllable in 69%[7]
Frequency51.7 million/0.68% (2021)[8]
Deaths140,000 (2021)[9]

Epilepsy is a group of neurological disorders characterized by a tendency for recurrent, unprovoked seizures.[10] A seizure is a sudden burst of abnormal electrical activity in the brain that can cause a variety of symptoms, ranging from brief lapses of awareness or muscle jerks to prolonged convulsions.[1] These episodes can result in physical injuries, either directly, such as broken bones, or through causing accidents. The diagnosis of epilepsy typically requires at least two unprovoked seizures occurring more than 24 hours apart.[11] In some cases, however, it may be diagnosed after a single unprovoked seizure if clinical evidence suggests a high risk of recurrence.[10] Isolated seizures that occur without recurrence risk or are provoked by identifiable causes are not considered indicative of epilepsy.[12]

The underlying cause is often unknown,[11] but epilepsy can result from brain injury, stroke, infections, tumors, genetic conditions, or developmental abnormalities.[13][2][3] Epilepsy that occurs as a result of other issues may be preventable.[1] Diagnosis involves ruling out other conditions that can resemble seizures, and may include neuroimaging, blood tests, and electroencephalography (EEG).[4]

Most cases of epilepsy — approximately 69% — can be effectively controlled with anti-seizure medications,[7] and inexpensive treatment options are widely available. For those whose seizures do not respond to drugs, other approaches, such as surgery, neurostimulation or dietary changes, may be considered.[5][6] Not all cases of epilepsy are lifelong, and many people improve to the point that treatment is no longer needed.[1]

As of 2024, approximately 50 million people worldwide have epilepsy, with nearly 80% of cases occurring in low- and middle-income countries.[1] The burden of epilepsy in low-income countries is more than twice that in high-income countries, likely due to higher exposure to risk factors such as perinatal injury, infections, and traumatic brain injury, combined with limited access to healthcare.[14] In 2021, epilepsy was responsible for an estimated 140,000 deaths, an increase from 125,000 in 1990.[9]

Epilepsy is more common in both children and older adults.[15][16] About 5–10% of people will have an unprovoked seizure by the age of 80.[17] The chance of experiencing a second seizure within two years after the first is around 40%.[18][19]

People with epilepsy may be treated differently in various areas of the world and experience varying degrees of social stigma due to the alarming nature of their symptoms.[11][20] In many countries, people with epilepsy face driving restrictions and must be seizure-free for a set period before regaining eligibility to drive.[21] The word epilepsy is from Ancient Greek ἐπιλαμβάνειν, 'to seize, possess, or afflict'.[22]

Signs and symptoms

[edit]
A still image of a generalized seizure

Epilepsy is characterized by a long-term tendency to experience recurrent, unprovoked seizures.[23] They may vary widely in their presentation depending on the affected brain regions, age of onset, and type of epilepsy.[24]

Seizures

[edit]

According to the 2025 classification by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), seizures are grouped into four main classes: focal, generalized, unknown (whether focal or generalized), and unclassified.[25]

Focal seizures

[edit]

Focal seizures originate in one area of the brain and may involve localized or distributed networks.[23] For a given seizure type, the site of onset tends to be consistent across episodes. Once initiated, the seizure may remain localized or spread to adjacent areas, and in some cases, may propagate to the opposite hemisphere (contralateral spread).[25]

They are further classified based on the state of consciousness during the episode:[25]

  • Focal preserved consciousness seizure: the person remains aware and responsive.
  • Focal impaired consciousness seizure: awareness and/or responsiveness are affected.

Experiences known as auras often precede focal seizures.[26] The seizures can include sensory (visual, hearing, or smell), psychic, autonomic, and motor phenomena depending on which part of the brain is involved.[23][27] Muscle jerks may start in a specific muscle group and spread to surrounding muscle groups, a pattern known as a Jacksonian march.[28] Automatisms, or non-consciously generated activities, may occur; these may be simple repetitive movements like smacking the lips or more complex activities such as attempts to pick up something.[28] Some focal seizures can evolve into focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, where abnormal brain activity spreads to both hemispheres.[25]

Generalized seizures

[edit]

Generalized seizures originate at a specific point within, and quickly spread across both hemispheres through interconnected brain networks. Although the spread is rapid, the onset may appear asymmetric in some cases. These seizures typically impair consciousness from the outset and can take several forms, including:[25]

Tonic–clonic seizures are among the most recognizable seizure types, typically involving sudden loss of consciousness, stiffening (tonic phase), and rhythmic jerking (clonic phase) of the limbs.[29] This form of seizure — whether focal to bilateral, generalized, or of unknown onset — is given particular emphasis due to their clinical severity; they are associated with the highest risk of injury, medical complications, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP).[25]

Myoclonic seizures involve sudden, brief muscle jerks, which may affect specific muscle groups or the whole body.[30][31] They can cause falls and injury.[30] Absence seizures are characterized by brief lapses in awareness, sometimes accompanied by subtle movements such as blinking or slight head turning.[2] The person typically recovers immediately afterward without confusion. Atonic seizures involve a sudden loss of muscle tone, often resulting in falls.[26]

Triggers and reflex seizures

[edit]

Certain external or internal factors may increase the likelihood of a seizure in individuals with epilepsy. These triggers do not cause epilepsy but can lower the seizure threshold in people who are already susceptible. Common triggers include sleep deprivation, stress, fever, illness, menstruation, alcohol, and certain medications. These do not cause seizures by themselves, but lower the threshold in people who are already susceptible.[32][33][34][35]

A small subset of individuals have reflex epilepsy, in which seizures are reliably provoked by specific stimuli. These reflex seizures account for about 6% of epilepsy cases.[36][37] Common triggers include flashing lights (photosensitive epilepsy), sudden sounds, or specific cognitive tasks such as reading or performing calculations. In some epilepsy syndromes, seizures occur more frequently during sleep or upon awakening.[38][39]

Seizure clusters

[edit]

Seizure clusters refer to multiple seizures occurring over a short period of time, with incomplete recovery between events. They are distinct from status epilepticus, though the two may overlap. Definitions vary across studies, but seizure clusters are typically described as two or more seizures within 24 hours or a noticeable increase in seizure frequency over a person's usual baseline. Estimates of their prevalence range widely — from 5% to 50% of people with epilepsy — largely due to differing definitions and populations studied.[40][41] Seizure clusters are more common in individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy, high baseline seizure frequency, or certain epilepsy syndromes.[42] They are associated with increased emergency care utilization, worse quality of life, impaired psychosocial functioning, and possibly elevated risk of mortality.[43]

Postictal state

[edit]

After the active portion of a seizure (the ictal state) there is typically a period of recovery during which there is confusion, referred to as the postictal state, before a normal level of consciousness returns,[44] lasting minutes to days.[27] This period is marked by confusion, headache, fatigue, or speech and motor disturbances. Some may experience Todd's paralysis, a transient focal weakness.[45] Postictal psychosis occurs in approximately 2% of individuals with epilepsy, particularly after clusters of generalized tonic–clonic seizures.[46][47]

Psychosocial

[edit]

Epilepsy can have substantial effects on psychological and social well-being. People with the condition may experience social isolation, stigma, or functional disability, which can contribute to lower educational attainment and reduced employment opportunities. These challenges often extend to family members, who may also encounter stigma and increased caregiving burden.[48]

Several psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders are more common in individuals with epilepsy. These include depression, anxiety, obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD),[49] and migraine.[50] Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is particularly prevalent among children with epilepsy, occurring three to five times more often than in the general population. ADHD and epilepsy together can markedly affect behavior, learning, and social development.[51] Epilepsy is also more common in children with autism spectrum disorder.[52]

Approximately, one-in-three people with epilepsy have a lifetime history of a psychiatric disorder.[53] This association is thought to reflect a combination of shared neurobiological mechanisms and the psychosocial impact of living with a chronic neurological condition.[54] Some research also suggests that psychiatric conditions such as depression may precede the onset of epilepsy in certain individuals, particularly those with focal epilepsy. However, the nature of this association remains under investigation and may involve shared pathways, diagnostic overlap, or other confounding factors.[55]

Comorbid depression and anxiety are associated with poorer quality of life,[56] increased healthcare utilization, reduced treatment response (including to surgery), and higher mortality.[57] Some studies suggest that these psychiatric conditions may influence quality of life more than seizure type or frequency.[58] Despite their clinical importance, depression and anxiety often go underdiagnosed and undertreated in people with epilepsy.[59]

Causes

[edit]

Epilepsy can result from a wide range of genetic and acquired factors, and in many cases, both play a role.[60][61] Acquired causes include serious traumatic brain injury, stroke, brain tumors, and central nervous system infections.[60] Despite advances in diagnostic tools, no clear cause is identified in approximately 50% of cases.[1] The distribution of causes often varies with age. Epilepsies associated with genetic, congenital, or developmental conditions are more common in children, while epilepsy related to stroke or tumors is more frequently seen in older adults.[48]

Seizures may also occur as a direct response to acute health conditions such as stroke, head trauma, metabolic disturbances, or toxic exposures.[62] These are known as acute symptomatic seizures and are distinct from epilepsy, which involves a recurrent tendency to have unprovoked seizures over time.[63]

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classifies the causes of epilepsy into six broad categories: structural, genetic, infectious, metabolic, immune, and unknown. These categories are not mutually exclusive, and more than one may apply in an individual case.[64]

Structural

[edit]

Structural causes of epilepsy refer to abnormalities in the anatomy of the brain that increase the risk of seizures. These may be acquired — such as from a stroke, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor, or central nervous system infection — or developmental and genetic in origin, as seen in conditions like focal cortical dysplasia or certain congenital brain malformations. A major example is mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), a common cause of temporal lobe epilepsy.[65][64]

Traumatic brain injury is estimated to cause between 6% and 20% of epilepsy cases, depending on severity, mechanism, and study population. Mild brain injury increases the risk about two-fold, while severe brain injury increases the risk seven-fold. In those who have experienced a high-powered gunshot wound to the head, the risk is about 50%.[66] Stroke is a major cause of epilepsy, particularly in older adults.[67] Approximately 6% to 10% of individuals who experience a stroke develop epilepsy, most often within the first few years after the event. The risk is highest following severe strokes that involve cortical regions, especially in cases of intracerebral hemorrhage.[68] Brain tumors are implicated in approximately 4% of epilepsy cases, with seizures occurring in nearly 30% of individuals with intracranial neoplasms.[66]

In clinical practice, a structural cause is typically identified through neuroimaging (such as MRI), which reveals an abnormality that plausibly accounts for the individual's seizure semiology and EEG findings. The lesion must be epileptogenic, meaning that it is capable of generating seizures. Infections like encephalitis or brain abscess may lead to permanent structural damage, increasing the risk of epilepsy even after the infection resolves.[64]

Structural damage can also result from perinatal brain injury, such as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, especially in low- and middle-income countries where access to prenatal and neonatal care may be limited. When seizures are linked to a clearly defined structural lesion, epilepsy surgery may be considered — particularly in individuals whose seizures do not respond to medication.[64]

Genetics

[edit]

Genetic causes of epilepsy are those in which a person's genes directly contribute to the development of seizures. This includes cases where a specific mutation has been identified, as well as situations where the family history and clinical features strongly suggest a genetic basis, even if no known mutation is found. In the updated classification by the ILAE, the term genetic replaces the older term idiopathic, to highlight that these epilepsies arise from inherited or spontaneous changes in a person's biology — not from injury or infection.[64]

Genetic factors are believed to contribute to many cases of epilepsy, either directly or by increasing vulnerability to other causes.[69] Some forms are caused by a single gene defect, which account for around 1–2% of cases. However, most are due to a combination of multiple genes and environmental influences.[13] Many of the genes known to play a role in epilepsy affect how brain cells send electrical signals, especially those involved in ion channels, receptors, or signaling proteins.[30]

Genetics is believed to play an important role in epilepsies by a number of mechanisms. Simple and complex modes of inheritance have been identified for some of them. However, extensive screening have failed to identify many single gene variants of large effect.[70] More recent exome and genome sequencing studies have begun to reveal a number of de novo gene mutations that are responsible for some epileptic encephalopathies, including CHD2 and SYNGAP1[71][72][73] and DNM1, GABBR2, FASN and RYR3.[74]

Some genetic disorders, including phakomatoses such as tuberous sclerosis complex and Sturge–Weber syndrome, are strongly associated with epilepsy.[75]

Infectious

[edit]

Infectious causes include infections of the central nervous system that directly affect brain tissue and lead to long-term seizure susceptibility.[66] Examples include herpes simplex encephalitis, which carries a high risk of developing epilepsy, and neurocysticercosis, a major preventable cause of epilepsy in endemic regions. Other infections such as cerebral malaria, toxoplasmosis, and toxocariasis.[66]

Immune

[edit]

Immune causes include conditions like autoimmune encephalitis, in which the immune system attacks brain tissue, often presenting with seizures. Certain autoimmune epilepsies are associated with specific autoantibodies, including those against the NMDA receptor, LGI1, and CASPR2. These cases often present with rapid-onset, difficult-to-treat seizures.[64]

Celiac disease has also been associated with epilepsy in rare syndromic forms, such as the triad of epilepsy, cerebral calcifications, and celiac disease.[76][77]

Metabolic

[edit]

Metabolic causes of epilepsy include metabolic disorders that disrupt the brain's normal function. In rare cases, epilepsy may result from inborn errors of metabolism, such as mitochondrial diseases, urea cycle disorders, or glucose transporter type 1 (GLUT1) deficiency. These often present early in life and may be associated with developmental delays, movement disorders, or other neurological symptoms.[64]

Seizures can also occur in the context of acquired metabolic disturbances, such as hypoglycemia, hyponatremia, or hypocalcemia. These seizures are often considered acute symptomatic seizures, and are not epilepsy.[78]

Some forms of malnutrition, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, have been associated with a higher risk of epilepsy, although it remains unclear whether the relationship is causal or due to other contributing factors.[14]

Unknown

[edit]

Unknown causes of epilepsy refer to cases where no clear structural, genetic, infectious, immune, or metabolic origin can be identified despite thorough evaluation. This category acknowledges the limits of current diagnostic techniques and scientific understanding. A substantial proportion of epilepsy cases still fall into this group, particularly in regions with limited access to advanced testing.[64]

Mechanism

[edit]

Understanding the mechanism of epilepsy involves two related but distinct questions: how the brain develops a long-term tendency to generate seizures (epileptogenesis), and how individual seizures begin and spread (ictogenesis). While these processes are not yet fully understood, research has identified a number of cellular, molecular, and network-level changes that contribute to each.[79]

Seizures

[edit]

In a healthy brain, neurons communicate through electrical signals that are generally desynchronized. This activity is tightly regulated by a balance between excitatory and inhibitory influences. Intracellular factors that influence neuronal excitability include the type, number, and distribution of ion channels, as well as alterations in receptor function and gene expression. Extracellular factors include ionic concentrations in the surrounding environment, synaptic plasticity, and the regulation of neurotransmitter breakdown by glial cells.[80][81]

During a seizure, this balance breaks down, leading to a sudden and excessive synchronization of neuronal firing. A localized group of neurons may begin firing together in an abnormal and repetitive pattern, overwhelming normal inhibitory controls. This abnormal activity can remain confined to a specific region of the brain or propagate to other areas. The process by which this transition occurs is known as ictogenesis. It involves a shift in network dynamics, typically beginning with excessive excitatory activity in a susceptible area of cortex — known as a seizure focus — and failure of inhibitory mechanisms to contain it. At the cellular level, ictogenesis is often marked by a paroxysmal depolarizing shift, a characteristic pattern of sustained neuronal depolarization followed by rapid repetitive firing.[82] As excitatory feedback loops engage and inhibition further declines, the seizure may become self-sustaining and spread to other regions of the brain.[83]

There is evidence that epileptic seizures are usually not a random event. Seizures are often brought on by factors (also known as triggers) such as stress, excessive alcohol use, flickering light, or a lack of sleep, among others. The term seizure threshold is used to indicate the amount of stimulus necessary to bring about a seizure; this threshold is lowered in epilepsy.[84] The seizures can be described on different scales, from the cellular level[85] to the whole brain.[86]

Epilepsy

[edit]

While ictogenesis explains how individual seizures arise, it does not account for why the brain develops a persistent tendency to generate them. This longer-term process is known as epileptogenesis — the sequence of biological events that transforms a previously non-epileptic brain into one capable of producing spontaneous seizures. It can occur after a wide range of brain insults, including traumatic brain injury, stroke, central nervous system infections, brain tumors, or prolonged seizures (such as status epilepticus). In most cases, no clear cause is identified. Although not fully understood, it involves a range of biological changes, including neuronal loss, synaptic reorganization, gliosis, neuroinflammation, and disruption of the blood–brain barrier.[79][87]

Together, these changes contribute to the formation of hyperexcitable neural networks, often anchored around a seizure focus. Once established, this pathological network increases the brain's susceptibility to seizures, even in the absence of ongoing injury. Although many of the processes underlying ictogenesis and epileptogenesis have been identified, the exact mechanisms by which the brain transitions into a seizure or becomes epileptic remain unknown.[87]

Diagnosis

[edit]

The diagnosis of epilepsy is primarily clinical, based on a thorough evaluation of the person's history, seizure features, and risk of recurrence. Diagnostic tests such as electroencephalograms and neuroimaging can support the diagnosis. Clinicians must also distinguish epileptic seizures from other conditions that can mimic them and determine whether the event was provoked by an acute, reversible cause or if it suggests a long-term tendency for unprovoked seizures.[26][23]

Definition

[edit]

According to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), a diagnosis of epilepsy can be made when any one of the following criteria is met:[10]

  1. At least two unprovoked (or reflex) seizures occurring more than 24 hours apart
  2. One unprovoked (or reflex) seizure and a probability of further seizures similar to the general recurrence risk (at least 60%) after two unprovoked seizures, occurring over the next 10 years
  3. Diagnosis of an epilepsy syndrome

The ILAE also introduced the concept of resolved epilepsy, which applies to individuals who are past the typical age range for an age-dependent syndrome, or who have remained seizure-free for at least 10 years, including the last 5 years without medication.[10]

This 2014 practical definition built upon the broader 2005 conceptual framework, which defined epilepsy as a disorder involving an enduring predisposition to generate epileptic seizures. The updated criteria incorporated recurrence risk and reflected the realities of clinical decision-making. While widely adopted in clinical settings, other definitions—such as the traditional "two unprovoked seizures" rule still used by the World Health Organization — remain appropriate in epidemiology and public health contexts, provided they are clearly stated. The 2014 revision also shifted terminology, referring to epilepsy as a disease rather than a disorder, to reflect its medical seriousness and public health impact.[88][10]

Classification

[edit]
Revised operational scheme of seizure classification, ILAE, 2017

Once epilepsy is diagnosed, the ILAE recommends a three-level framework to guide further classification and management:[64]

  • Identify the seizure type, based on clinical features and EEG (e.g., focal aware seizure, generalized absence)
  • Determine the epilepsy type, such as focal, generalized, combined, or unknown
  • Identify an epilepsy syndrome, if applicable

Not all levels can always be determined; in some cases, only the seizure type is identifiable. The etiology — whether structural, genetic, infectious, metabolic, immune, or unknown — should be considered at each stage of classification, as it often influences treatment and prognosis.[89][64]

The classification of epilepsies has evolved significantly over time.[90] Earlier systems emphasized seizure location and used terms such as "partial" or "cryptogenic," which have been replaced in the modern framework.[91][92] The current system, introduced in 2017, reflects advances in neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical understanding, and allows for a more individualized and dynamic diagnostic approach.[93]

Syndromes

[edit]

An epilepsy syndrome is a specific diagnosis based on a combination of features, including seizure types, age of onset, EEG patterns, imaging findings, and associated symptoms or comorbidities. In many cases, a known genetic or structural cause may also support the diagnosis. Recognizing a syndrome can guide treatment decisions, inform prognosis, and provide clarity for individuals and families navigating an epilepsy diagnosis.[94][95]

Some syndromes are self-limited and age-dependent, such as childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, and self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes.[63] These typically respond well to treatment or remit with age. In contrast, more severe syndromes fall under the category of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs).[96] These include Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, West syndrome, and Dravet syndrome, which are associated with early onset, drug-resistant seizures, and significant neurodevelopmental impairments.[97]

Some epilepsy syndromes do not yet fit neatly within current etiological categories, particularly when no definitive cause has been identified. In many cases, a genetic cause is presumed based on age of onset, family history, and electroclinical features, even if no mutation has been found. As genetic and neuroimaging technologies continue to evolve, the classification of epilepsy syndromes is expected to become more precise.[89]

Tests

[edit]
An EEG can aid in locating the focus of the epileptic seizure.

The diagnostic evaluation of epilepsy begins with confirming whether the reported event was in fact a seizure. A detailed clinical history remains essential, supported by eyewitness accounts and, when possible, video recordings. The initial assessment aims to distinguish epileptic seizures from common mimics such as syncope, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, or transient ischemic attacks.[98][99]

Following clinical evaluation, selected tests may be used to rule out acute causes and seizure mimics. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is recommended for all individuals presenting with a first seizure, to screen for cardiac arrhythmias and other cardiovascular conditions that may resemble epilepsy. Blood tests may be performed to identify metabolic disturbances such as hypoglycemia, electrolyte imbalances, or renal and hepatic dysfunction, particularly in acute settings.[100]

Once epilepsy is suspected, electroencephalography (EEG) is used to support the diagnosis, classify seizure types, and help identify specific epilepsy syndromes. A routine EEG may include activation techniques such as hyperventilation or photic stimulation. However, a normal EEG does not rule out epilepsy. When initial EEG findings are inconclusive, further studies such as sleep-deprived EEG, ambulatory EEG, or long-term video EEG monitoring may be considered.[100]

Neuroimaging, usually with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is recommended to detect structural causes of epilepsy. If MRI is contraindicated or unavailable, computed tomography (CT) may be considered. Imaging should be interpreted by radiologists with expertise in epilepsy.[100]

Additional tests may be guided by clinical context. Genetic testing may be considered in individuals with early-onset epilepsy, developmental delay, or features of a known genetic epilepsy syndrome. Testing for neuronal antibodies may be appropriate in suspected cases of autoimmune encephalitis, particularly when seizures are new-onset, rapidly progressive, or resistant to standard treatment. Metabolic testing may be pursued in infants or children with unexplained epilepsy, especially when developmental regression or multisystem involvement is present.[100]

Serum prolactin may occasionally be measured after a suspected seizure, particularly to help distinguish epileptic seizures from non-epileptic events. While it can be elevated following certain seizure types, the test lacks sufficient sensitivity and specificity and is not recommended for routine use.[101]

Differential diagnosis

[edit]

A number of conditions can resemble epileptic seizures, leading to potential misdiagnosis. Accurate diagnosis is essential, as inappropriate treatment may delay effective care or cause harm. Common mimics include fainting (syncope), psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), transient ischemic attacks, migraine, narcolepsy, and various sleep or movement disorders.[102][103] In children, reflux, breath-holding spells, and parasomnias such as night terrors may also resemble seizures.[103]

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) are a particularly important consideration, especially in individuals with refractory epilepsy. PNES are involuntary episodes that resemble epileptic seizures but are not associated with abnormal electrical discharges. They are classified as functional neurological disorders and are typically associated with psychological distress or trauma. Studies suggest that approximately 20% of individuals referred to epilepsy centers are diagnosed with PNES,[17] and up to 10% of these individuals also have coexisting epilepsy.[104] Differentiating between the two can be difficult and often requires prolonged video EEG monitoring.[104]

Misdiagnosis remains a significant concern in epilepsy. Reported rates vary widely — from 2% to 71% — depending on factors such as clinical setting, patient population, diagnostic criteria, and physician expertise.[105][106]

Prevention

[edit]

Although many causes of epilepsy are not preventable, several known risk factors are modifiable. Perinatal care, including prevention of birth trauma, hypoxia, and maternal infections, can lower the risk of epilepsy in infants.[7] Vaccination programs, especially against neurotropic infections such as measles and meningitis, play a key role in preventing epilepsy caused by central nervous system infections. In low- and middle-income countries, neurocysticercosis remains a major preventable cause of epilepsy, which can be reduced through improved sanitation and food safety.[14][20] Eliminating or reducing risk factors for seizures in older adults such as inactivity, smoking, diabetes, high blood pressure, and excessive alcohol consumption have been suggested as strategies to help prevent epilepsy in older adults.[107]

Complications

[edit]

Epilepsy can lead to a range of medical, psychological, and social complications, particularly when seizures are frequent or uncontrolled.[11] One of the most serious risks is injury during a seizure, including falls, burns, or accidents while driving, swimming, or operating machinery.[108][109] The risk of drowning is significantly increased in people with epilepsy, especially those with poor seizure control.[110]

People with epilepsy are at greater risk for mental health conditions, including depression, anxiety, and social isolation. These challenges are often compounded by stigma, employment difficulties, and driving restrictions.[111][112] In children, epilepsy — especially when drug-resistant — can interfere with cognitive development and academic performance.[113]

A rare but serious complication is sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), which is most often associated with uncontrolled generalized tonic–clonic seizures, particularly during sleep.[114]

Management

[edit]
Wristbands or bracelets denoting their condition are occasionally worn by people with epilepsy should they need medical assistance.

The primary goals of epilepsy management are to control seizures, minimize treatment side effects, and optimize quality of life. Management strategies are individualized based on the type of seizures or epilepsy syndrome, the underlying cause when known, the person's age and comorbidities, and their preferences and life circumstances.[100]

Supporting people's self-management of their condition may be useful.[115] In drug-resistant cases different management options may be considered, including special diets, the implantation of a neurostimulator, or neurosurgery.[23]

First aid and acute management of seizures

[edit]

During a generalized tonic–clonic seizure, the primary goals are to ensure safety and prevent injury. The following steps should be taken:[116]

  • Stay calm and remove any potential hazards from the area. Clear the space of sharp objects, furniture, or anything that might cause injury.
  • If the person is standing, gently guide them to the ground to avoid a fall.
  • Position the person on their side and into the recovery position, which helps keep the airway clear and reduces the risk of choking. If possible, place something soft (e.g., a jacket or cushion) under their head to prevent injury.
  • Do not restrain their movements or attempt to hold them down. Do not put anything in their mouth, as this may cause harm.[44][116]

If the seizure lasts longer than 5 minutes or if multiple seizures occur without full recovery in between, it is important to call for emergency medical assistance immediately, as it is considered a medical emergency known as status epilepticus.[117]

Convulsive status epilepticus requires immediate medical attention to prevent serious complications. In a community setting (such as at home or in the ambulance), first-line treatment includes the administration of benzodiazepines. If the person has an individualized emergency management plan — which may have been developed with healthcare providers and outlines personalized treatment steps (such as the use of buccal midazolam or rectal diazepam) — this plan should be followed immediately.[100] In hospital, intravenous lorazepam is preferred.[100]

If seizures continue after the first dose of benzodiazepine, emergency medical services should be contacted, and further doses can be given. For ongoing seizures, levetiracetam, phenytoin, or sodium valproate may be used as second-line treatments, with levetiracetam preferred for its quicker action and fewer side effects.[100]

Most institutions have a preferred pathway or protocol to be used in a seizure emergency like status epilepticus. These protocols have been found to be effective in reducing time to delivery of treatment.[100]

Medications

[edit]
Anticonvulsant

The primary treatment for epilepsy involves the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs), which aim to control seizures while minimizing side effects. Treatment plans should be individualized, taking into account the seizure type, epilepsy syndrome, patient age, sex, comorbidities, lifestyle factors, and the potential for drug interactions.[100]

First-line treatment for most individuals with epilepsy is monotherapy with a single ASM. For many people with epilepsy, seizure control is achieved with a single medication, but some may require combination therapy if seizures are not well-controlled with monotherapy.[100]

There are a number of medications available including phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproate. Evidence suggests that these drugs are similarly effective for both focal and generalized seizures, although their side-effect profiles vary.[118][119] Controlled release carbamazepine appears to work as well as immediate release carbamazepine, and may have fewer side effects.[120] In the UK, carbamazepine or lamotrigine are recommended as first-line treatments for focal seizures, with levetiracetam and valproate used as second-line treatments due to concerns about cost and side effects. Valproate is the first-line choice for generalized seizures, while lamotrigine is used as second-line. For absence seizures, ethosuximide or valproate are recommended, with valproate also being effective for myoclonic and tonic–clonic seizures.[100][121]

Controlled-release formulations of carbamazepine may be preferred in some cases, as they appear to be equally effective as immediate-release carbamazepine but may have fewer side effects. Once a person's seizures are well-controlled on a specific treatment, it is generally not necessary to routinely check medication blood levels, unless there are concerns about side effects or toxicity.[100]

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the management of epilepsy is often hindered by limited access to medications, diagnostic tools, and specialized care.[14] While phenytoin and carbamazepine are commonly used as first-line treatments due to their availability and low cost, newer drugs like levetiracetam and lamotrigine may not be accessible. Additionally, surgical options and advanced therapies, such as vagus nerve stimulation or resective surgery, are typically inaccessible due to high costs and lack of infrastructure.

The least expensive anticonvulsant is phenobarbital at around US$5 a year.[14] The World Health Organization gives it a first-line recommendation in LMICs and it is commonly used in these countries.[122][123] Access, however, may be difficult as some countries label it as a controlled drug.[14]

Adverse effects from medications are reported in 10% to 90% of people, depending on how and from whom the data is collected.[124] Most adverse effects are dose-related and mild.[124] Some examples include mood changes, sleepiness, or an unsteadiness in gait.[124] Certain medications have side effects that are not related to dose such as rashes, liver toxicity, or suppression of the bone marrow.[124] Up to a quarter of people stop treatment due to adverse effects.[124] Some medications are associated with birth defects when used in pregnancy.[125] Many of the common used medications, such as valproate, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and gabapentin have been reported to cause increased risk of birth defects,[126] especially when used during the first trimester.[127] Despite this, treatment is often continued once effective, because the risk of untreated epilepsy is believed to be greater than the risk of the medications.[127] Among the antiepileptic medications, levetiracetam and lamotrigine seem to carry the lowest risk of causing birth defects.[126]

Slowly stopping medications may be reasonable in some people who do not have a seizure for two to four years; however, around a third of people have a recurrence, most often during the first six months.[125][128] Stopping is possible in about 70% of children and 60% of adults.[20] Measuring medication levels is not generally needed in those whose seizures are well controlled.[129]

Surgery

[edit]

Epilepsy surgery is an important treatment option for individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy,[15][130] typically defined as the failure of at least two appropriately chosen and tolerated antiseizure medications.[131] Surgery is most effective in cases of focal epilepsy, where seizures originate from a specific area of the brain that can be safely removed.[132][133]

Although epilepsy surgery has demonstrated strong evidence of efficacy — especially in drug-resistant focal epilepsy — it remains underutilized worldwide and is often reserved for individuals whose condition has reached an advanced or chronic stage.[130] Early consideration and referral for surgical evaluation can improve long-term outcomes and quality of life. This evaluation, conducted in specialized epilepsy centers, includes seizure classification, long-term video EEG monitoring, high-resolution MRI with epilepsy-specific protocols, neuropsychological assessment, and sometimes functional imaging or invasive monitoring. Early referral improves the likelihood of successful outcomes and avoids prolonged periods of unnecessary disability.[134]

The primary goal of epilepsy surgery is to achieve seizure freedom,[135] but even when that is not possible, palliative procedures that significantly reduce seizure frequency can lead to meaningful improvements in quality of life and development — particularly in children. Studies suggest that 60-70% of individuals with drug-resistant focal epilepsy experience a substantial reduction in seizures following surgery.[136]

Common procedures include anterior temporal lobe resection, which often involves removal of the hippocampus in cases of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, as well as lesionectomy for tumors or cortical dysplasia, and lobectomy for larger seizure foci.[136] In cases where resection is not possible, procedures such as corpus callosotomy may help reduce the severity and spread of seizures. In addition to traditional resective techniques, minimally invasive approaches such as MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) have gained traction as safer alternatives in select cases, particularly where reducing cognitive impact and recovery time is a priority.[137] In many cases, antiseizure medications can be tapered following successful surgery, though long-term monitoring remains essential.[133][136] Surgical treatment is not limited to adults. A 2023 systematic review found that early surgery in children under 3 years with drug-resistant epilepsy can result in meaningful seizure reduction or freedom when other treatments have failed.[138]

Although epilepsy surgery has demonstrated efficacy, it is still rarely used around the world, and is typically reserved for cases where the condition has reached an advanced stage.[130]

Neuromodulation

[edit]

Neurotherapy or Neuromodulation therapies, including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), Neuromodulation through Radiotherapy (e.g. Leksell Gamma Knife) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), are treatment options for individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates for resective surgery, or for whom previous surgery has not resulted in seizure freedom.[139][140][141] These neurotherapies aim to reduce seizure frequency and severity by delivering controlled electrical stimulation to targeted neural circuits.

Diet

[edit]

Dietary therapy, particularly the ketogenic diet (high-fat, low-carbohydrate, adequate-protein), is a non-pharmacological treatment option used primarily in children with drug-resistant epilepsy. Evidence suggests that children on a classical ketogenic diet may be up to three times more likely to achieve seizure freedom and up to six times more likely to experience a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared to those receiving standard care. Modified versions of the diet, such as the modified Atkins diet, are better tolerated but may be less effective.[6][142] In adults, the ketogenic diet has shown limited evidence of achieving seizure freedom, though it may increase the likelihood of seizure reduction. However, further research is necessary.[6]

It is typically supervised by a multidisciplinary team, including neurologists and dietitians, due to its restrictive nature and potential side effects, such as vomiting, constipation and diarrhoea. Regular monitoring of nutritional status, blood parameters, and growth is recommended.[6] It is unclear why this diet works.[143] A gluten-free diet has been proposed in rare cases of epilepsy associated with celiac disease and occipital calcifications, though evidence is limited and based on small case series.[76]

Adjunctive and complementary therapies

[edit]

There is moderate-quality evidence supporting the use of psychological interventions — such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), relaxation techniques, and self-management training — alongside standard treatment.[144] These approaches may improve quality of life, emotional wellbeing, and treatment adherence; however, evidences targeting seizure control are uncertain.[145] Avoidance therapy consists of minimizing or eliminating triggers. For example, those who are sensitive to light may have success with using a small television, avoiding video games, or wearing dark glasses.[146] Biofeedback, particularly EEG-based operant conditioning, has shown preliminary benefit in some people with drug-resistant epilepsy.[147] However, these methods are considered adjunctive and are not recommended as standalone treatments.

Cannabidiol (CBD) has shown benefit as an add-on therapy in certain severe childhood epilepsies. A purified form of CBD was approved by the U.S. FDA in 2018 and by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2020 for the treatment of Dravet syndrome, Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, and tuberous sclerosis complex.[148][149][150]

Regular physical activity is generally considered safe and may have beneficial effects on seizure frequency, mood, and overall wellbeing.[151] While evidence remains limited, some studies suggest that moderate exercise can reduce seizure burden in certain individuals.[152] Seizure response dogs have been trained to assist individuals during or after seizures by providing physical support or alerting others.[153][154] Although anecdotal reports claim that some dogs can anticipate seizures, there is no conclusive scientific evidence supporting the consistent ability of dogs to predict seizures before they occur.[155]

Various forms of alternative medicine, including acupuncture,[156] routine vitamins,[157] and yoga,[158] have no reliable evidence to support their use in epilepsy. Melatonin, as of 2016, is insufficiently supported by evidence.[159] The trials were of poor methodological quality and it was not possible to draw any definitive conclusions.[159]

Contraception and pregnancy

[edit]

Women of child-bearing age, including those with epilepsy, are at risk of unintended pregnancies if they are not using an effective form of contraception.[160] Women with epilepsy may experience a temporary increase in seizure frequency when they begin hormonal contraception.[160]

Some anti-seizure medications interact with enzymes in the liver and cause the drugs in hormonal contraception to be broken down more quickly. These enzyme inducing drugs make hormonal contraception less effective, and this is particularly hazardous if the anti-seizure medication is associated with birth defects.[161] Potent enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medications include carbamazepine, eslicarbazepine acetate, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and rufinamide. The drugs perampanel and topiramate can be enzyme-inducing at higher doses.[162] Conversely, hormonal contraception can lower the amount of the anti-seizure medication lamotrigine circulating in the body, making it less effective.[160] The failure rate of oral contraceptives, when used correctly, is 1%, but this increases to between 3–6% in women with epilepsy.[161] Overall, intrauterine devices (IUDs) are preferred for women with epilepsy who are not intending to become pregnant.[160]

Women with epilepsy, especially if they have other medical conditions, may have a slightly lower, but still high, chance of becoming pregnant.[160] Women with infertility have about the same chance of success with in vitro fertilisation or other forms of assisted reproductive technology as women without epilepsy.[160] There may be a higher risk of pregnancy loss.[160]

Once pregnant, there are two main concerns related to pregnancy. The first concern is about the risk of seizures during pregnancy, and the second concern is that the anti-seizure medications may result in birth defects.[126] Most women with epilepsy must continue treatment with anti-seizure drugs, and the treatment goal is to balance the need to prevent seizures with the need to prevent drug-induced birth defects.[160][163]

Pregnancy does not seem to change seizure frequency very much.[160] When seizures happen, however, they can cause some pregnancy complications, such as pre-term births or the babies being smaller than usual when they are born.[160]

All pregnancies have a risk of birth defects, e.g., due to smoking during pregnancy.[160] In addition to this typical level of risk, some anti-seizure drugs significantly increase the risk of birth defects and intrauterine growth restriction, as well as developmental, neurocognitive, and behavioral disorders.[163] Most women with epilepsy receive safe and effective treatment and have typical, healthy children.[163] The highest risks are associated with specific anti-seizure drugs, such as valproic acid and carbamazepine, and with higher doses.[126][160] Folic acid supplementation, such as through prenatal vitamins, reduced the risk.[160] Planning pregnancies in advance gives women with epilepsy an opportunity to switch to a lower-risk treatment program and reduced drug doses.[160]

Although anti-seizure drugs can be found in breast milk, women with epilepsy can breastfeed their babies, and the benefits usually outweigh the risks.[160]

Prognosis

[edit]

Epilepsy is generally considered a chronic neurological condition, but its long-term course can vary widely depending on factors such as seizure type, underlying cause, and response to treatment. Although epilepsy is not typically "cured," in many cases it may be considered resolved. According to the ILAE, epilepsy is considered to be resolved in individuals who have been seizure-free for at least 10 years, with no antiseizure medications for the last 5 of those years.[10]

Approximately 60–70% of individuals with epilepsy achieve good seizure control with appropriate antiseizure medications, and many can maintain long-term remission.[7] However, outcomes vary significantly by epilepsy type and etiology. Early treatment response is one of the strongest predictors of long-term outcome, with poor early control correlating with lower chances of remission. Several factors — such as structural brain abnormalities, comorbid developmental disorders, or a high frequency of seizures at onset — have been associated with worse outcomes, although findings are not always consistent.[164]

Epilepsy disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries, where nearly 80% of the global epilepsy population resides.[165] In these countries, to 75% of individuals with epilepsy do not receive the treatment they need.[11] Untreated epilepsy is associated with elevated risk of injury, psychiatric comorbidities, and early death, including sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP).

Cognition

[edit]

Cognitive impairment frequently accompanies epilepsy, although it is difficult to determine to what extant it is caused by the epilepsy itself.[166][167] This is because observed cognitive decline could be a result of the cause of the epilepsy (e.g. epilepsy caused by mesial temporal sclerosis), or be secondary to the epilepsy (e.g. brain damage from falling due to a seizure, or impairment from pharmacological or surgical treatment of the epilepsy).[166][167]

In the majority of people who achieve seizure control, there is no associated progressive cognitive decline.[166] However, severe intractable epilepsy does cause negative cognitive effects.[166] Due to its variability, it is unclear whether any given case of epilepsy will lead to cognitive decline, but a few points are noted:

  • Longer seizures cause more damage than shorter seizures.[166]

Mortality

[edit]

People with epilepsy may have a higher risk of premature death compared to those without the condition.[168] This risk is estimated to be between 1.6 and 4.1 times greater than that of the general population.[169] The greatest increase in mortality from epilepsy is among the elderly.[169] Those with epilepsy due to an unknown cause have a relatively low increase in risk.[169]

Mortality is often related to the underlying cause of the seizures, status epilepticus, suicide, trauma, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP).[168] Death from status epilepticus is primarily due to an underlying problem rather than missing doses of medications.[168] The risk of suicide is between two and six times higher in those with epilepsy;[170][171] the cause of this is unclear.[170] SUDEP appears to be partly related to the frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizures[172] and accounts for about 15% of epilepsy-related deaths;[173] it is unclear how to decrease its risk.[172] Risk factors for SUDEP include nocturnal generalized tonic-clonic seizures, seizures, sleeping alone and medically intractable epilepsy.[174]

In the United Kingdom, it is estimated that 40–60% of deaths are possibly preventable.[48] In the developing world, many deaths are due to untreated epilepsy leading to falls or status epilepticus.[14]

Epidemiology

[edit]

Epilepsy is one of the most common serious neurological disorders, affecting approximately 50 million people globally as of 2021,[8][175] with the majority living in low- and middle-income countries.[11][176] The point prevalence of active epilepsy is generally reported between 5 and 7 per 1,000 people, while lifetime prevalence is slightly higher, typically between 6 and 9 per 1,000.[177] Both prevalence and incidence are higher in low-income regions. The annual incidence of epilepsy — the rate of new diagnoses each year — is estimated at 50 to 70 new cases per 100,000 people globally, based on population studies.[177] Rates are significantly higher in low- and middle-income countries, and, within high-income countries, higher incidence has also been observed among lower socioeconomic groups and some ethnic minorities.

Epilepsy can develop at any age, but its incidence is highest in early infancy and in older adults, following a bimodal distribution. In high-income countries, the incidence peaks during the first year of life, declines during adulthood, and rises again in people over age 85. The increase in older adults is associated with age-related conditions such as stroke, brain tumors, and neurodegenerative diseases. In low- and middle-income countries, incidence more often peaks in older children and young adults, which may reflect the effects of trauma, infections, and underdiagnosis in the elderly. Epilepsy is slightly more common in males than females, a difference that may be influenced by risk factor exposure and underreporting in women in some regions due to sociocultural factors.[178]

Beyond prevalence and incidence, epilepsy imposes a significant global burden in terms of disability, stigma, and premature mortality. The disorder is responsible for an estimated 13 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) worldwide each year, with the majority of this burden falling on individuals in low-resource settings where access to diagnosis and treatment remains limited.[175]

History

[edit]
Hippocrates, 17th century engraving by Peter Paul Rubens of an antique bust

The oldest medical records show that epilepsy has been affecting people at least since the beginning of recorded history.[179] Throughout ancient history, the condition was thought to be of a spiritual cause.[179] The world's oldest description of an epileptic seizure comes from a text in Akkadian (a language used in ancient Mesopotamia) and was written around 2000 BC.[22] The person described in the text was diagnosed as being under the influence of a moon god, and underwent an exorcism.[22] Epileptic seizures are listed in the Code of Hammurabi (c. 1790 BC) as reason for which a purchased slave may be returned for a refund,[22] and the Edwin Smith Papyrus (c. 1700 BC) describes cases of individuals with epileptic convulsions.[22]

The oldest known detailed record of the condition itself is in the Sakikku, a Babylonian cuneiform medical text from 1067–1046 BC.[179] This text gives signs and symptoms, details treatment and likely outcomes,[22] and describes many features of the different seizure types.[179] As the Babylonians had no biomedical understanding of the nature of epilepsy, they attributed the seizures to possession by evil spirits and called for treating the condition through spiritual means.[179] Around 900 BC, Punarvasu Atreya described epilepsy as loss of consciousness;[180] this definition was carried forward into the Ayurvedic text of Charaka Samhita (c. 400 BC).[181]

The ancient Greeks had contradictory views of the condition. They thought of epilepsy as a form of spiritual possession, but also associated the condition with genius and the divine. One of the names they gave to it was the sacred disease (Ancient Greek: ἠ ἱερὰ νόσος).[22][182] Epilepsy appears in Greek mythology: it is associated with the Moon goddesses Selene and Artemis, who afflicted those who upset them. The Greeks thought that important figures such as Julius Caesar and Hercules had the condition.[22] The notable exception to this divine and spiritual view was that of the school of Hippocrates. In the fifth century BC, Hippocrates rejected the idea that the condition was caused by spirits. In his landmark work On the Sacred Disease, he proposed that epilepsy was not divine in origin and instead was a medically treatable problem originating in the brain.[22][179] He accused those of attributing a sacred cause to the condition of spreading ignorance through a belief in superstitious magic.[22] Hippocrates proposed that heredity was important as a cause, described worse outcomes if the condition presents at an early age, and made note of the physical characteristics as well as the social shame associated with it.[22] Instead of referring to it as the sacred disease, he used the term great disease, giving rise to the modern term grand mal, used for tonic–clonic seizures.[22] Despite his work detailing the physical origins of the condition, his view was not accepted at the time.[179] Evil spirits continued to be blamed until at least the 17th century.[179]

In Ancient Rome people did not eat or drink with the same pottery as that used by someone who was affected.[183] People of the time would spit on their chest believing that this would keep the problem from affecting them.[183] According to Apuleius and other ancient physicians, to detect epilepsy, it was common to light a piece of gagates, whose smoke would trigger the seizure.[184] Occasionally a spinning potter's wheel was used, perhaps a reference to photosensitive epilepsy.[185]

In most cultures, persons with epilepsy have been stigmatized, shunned, or even imprisoned. As late as in the second half of the 20th century, in Tanzania and other parts of Africa epilepsy was associated with possession by evil spirits, witchcraft, or poisoning and was believed by many to be contagious.[186] In the Salpêtrière, the birthplace of modern neurology, Jean-Martin Charcot found people with epilepsy side by side with the mentally ill, those with chronic syphilis, and the criminally insane.[187] In Ancient Rome, epilepsy was known as the morbus comitialis or 'disease of the assembly hall' and was seen as a curse from the gods. In northern Italy, epilepsy was traditionally known as Saint Valentine's malady.[188] In at least the 1840s in the United States of America, epilepsy was known as the falling sickness or the falling fits, and was considered a form of medical insanity.[189] Around the same time period, epilepsy was known in France as the haut-mal lit.'high evil', mal-de terre lit.'earthen sickness', mal de Saint Jean lit.'Saint John's sickness', mal des enfans lit.'child sickness', and mal-caduc lit.'falling sickness'.[189] People of epilepsy in France were also known as tombeurs lit.'people who fall', due to the seizures and loss of consciousness in an epileptic episode.[189]

In the mid-19th century, the first effective anti-seizure medication, bromide, was introduced.[124] The first modern treatment, phenobarbital, was developed in 1912, with phenytoin coming into use in 1938.[190]

Society and culture

[edit]

Epilepsy has significant social and cultural implications that vary across regions and contexts. People with epilepsy may experience social stigma, legal restrictions, economic disadvantage, and barriers to education and employment. Public perceptions of the condition are shaped by cultural beliefs, media portrayals, and the level of awareness in a given society. Efforts by advocacy groups and international organizations aim to improve public understanding, reduce stigma, and promote access to care. Social consequences, such as educational exclusion, unemployment, and social isolation, further compound the impact on quality of life. Despite the availability of effective antiseizure medications and cost-effective treatment strategies, a large treatment gap persists in many countries, underscoring the need for strengthened health systems and public health interventions.

Stigma

[edit]

Social stigma is commonly experienced by people with epilepsy worldwide, and it can have economic, social, and cultural consequences.[11][191] Misconceptions about the condition — including beliefs that it is contagious, a form of madness, or caused by supernatural forces — persist in many communities. In parts of Africa, including Tanzania and Uganda, epilepsy is sometimes associated with spirit possession, witchcraft, or poisoning, and is incorrectly believed to be contagious.[186][192] Similar stigmatizing beliefs have been reported in other regions, such as India and China, where epilepsy may be cited as grounds for denying marriage.[20] In the United Kingdom, epilepsy was legally considered valid grounds for annulling a marriage until 1971.[63]

Stigma can also affect how people respond to a diagnosis. Some individuals with epilepsy may deny having had seizures, fearing discrimination.[63] A 2024 cross-sectional study found that 64.8% of relatives of people with epilepsy reported experiencing moderate levels of stigma, which was associated with more negative attitudes toward the condition. Greater stigma was observed among relatives of patients with more frequent seizures or poor medication adherence.[193]

Negative perceptions of epilepsy can also affect educational opportunities and academic outcomes.[194] Children with epilepsy are at increased risk of underachievement in school due to a combination of neurological factors, medication side effects, and the effects of social exclusion.[195]

In adulthood, stigma can result in reduced employment opportunities and workplace discrimination. Adults with epilepsy are more likely to be unemployed or underemployed than the general population, a disparity often driven by employer concerns about safety, productivity, or liability.[194] Disclosure of an epilepsy diagnosis in job applications or interviews may lead to discrimination, although nondisclosure can limit access to workplace accommodations.[196]

Economic impact

[edit]

Epilepsy is associated with a substantial economic burden at both the individual and societal levels. Direct costs include expenses related to diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management, such as antiseizure medications and hospitalizations. Indirect costs may arise from lost productivity, unemployment, and premature death. In many countries, especially those with limited health infrastructure, individuals with epilepsy and their families often bear the majority of healthcare expenses out of pocket. A 2021 modeling study estimated the total global cost of epilepsy at approximately $119.27 billion annually, based on per capita cost projections applied to an estimated 52.51 million people living with epilepsy worldwide, while accounting for the treatment gap.[197] The treatment gap — referring to the proportion of people with epilepsy who do not receive appropriate care — remains high in low- and middle-income countries, exacerbating the economic burden through avoidable seizures, injuries, and emergency care. Seizures result in direct economic costs of about one billion dollars in the United States.[17] Epilepsy resulted in economic costs in Europe of around 15.5 billion euros in 2004.[48] In India, epilepsy is estimated to result in costs of US$1.7 billion or 0.5% of the GDP.[20] It is the cause of about 1% of emergency department visits (2% for emergency departments for children) in the United States.[198]

[edit]

Those with epilepsy are at about twice the risk of being involved in a motor vehicular collision and thus in many areas of the world are not allowed to drive or able to drive only if certain conditions are met.[21] Diagnostic delay has been suggested to be a cause of some potentially avoidable motor vehicle collisions since at least one study showed that most motor vehicle accidents occurred in those with undiagnosed non-motor seizures as opposed to those with motor seizures at epilepsy onset.[199] In some places physicians are required by law to report if a person has had a seizure to the licensing body while in others the requirement is only that they encourage the person in question to report it themselves.[21] Countries that require physician reporting include Sweden, Austria, Denmark and Spain.[21] Countries that require the individual to report include the UK and New Zealand, and physicians may report if they believe the individual has not already.[21] In Canada, the United States and Australia the requirements around reporting vary by province or state.[21] If seizures are well controlled most feel allowing driving is reasonable.[200] The amount of time a person must be free from seizures before they can drive varies by country.[200] Many countries require one to three years without seizures.[200] In the United States the time needed without a seizure is determined by each state and is between three months and one year.[200]

Those with epilepsy or seizures are typically denied a pilot license.[201]

  • In Canada if an individual has had no more than one seizure, they may be considered after five years for a limited license if all other testing is normal.[202] Those with febrile seizures and drug related seizures may also be considered.[202]
  • In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration does not allow those with epilepsy to get a commercial pilot license.[203] Rarely, exceptions can be made for persons who have had an isolated seizure or febrile seizures and have remained free of seizures into adulthood without medication.[204]
  • In the United Kingdom, a full National Private Pilot Licence requires the same standards as a professional driver's license.[205] This requires a period of ten years without seizures while off medications.[206] Those who do not meet this requirement may acquire a restricted license if free from seizures for five years.[205]

Advocacy and support organizations

[edit]

There are organizations that provide support for people and families affected by epilepsy. In 1997 the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE), the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the World Health Organization launched the Global Campaign Against Epilepsy (GCAE) to bring epilepsy 'out of the shadows' by raising awareness of, and improving treatment and services for epilepsy.[1][207] In the United States, the Epilepsy Foundation is a national organization that works to increase the acceptance of those with the disorder, their ability to function in society and to promote research for a cure.[208] The Epilepsy Foundation, some hospitals, and some individuals also run support groups in the United States.[209] In Australia, the Epilepsy Foundation provides support, delivers education and training and funds research for people living with epilepsy.

International Epilepsy Day (World Epilepsy Day) began in 2015 and occurs on the second Monday in February.[210][211]

Purple Day, a different world-wide epilepsy awareness day for epilepsy, was initiated by a nine-year-old Canadian named Cassidy Megan in 2008, and is every year on 26 March.[212]

Research directions

[edit]

Epilepsy research aims to uncover the causes of seizures, improve diagnosis, and develop more effective treatments. It spans genetics, neuroscience, pharmacology, and biomedical engineering, with the shared goal of reducing the burden of disease. Researchers also study how epilepsy develops (epileptogenesis), seeking ways to prevent it entirely.

Animal models

[edit]

Animal models are widely used in epilepsy research, providing insight into seizure mechanisms, disease progression, and treatment effects. Rodents are most commonly used, with models based on chemical induction (e.g. kainic acid, pilocarpine), electrical stimulation (e.g. kindling), genetic mutations, and others.[213] Other species, including zebrafish, dogs, and non-human primates, are also employed to capture features not easily replicated in rodents, such as complex behaviors or chronic seizure patterns. These models help researchers study epileptogenesis, test antiseizure drugs, and explore surgical or neuromodulatory interventions. While no model captures the full complexity of human epilepsy, they remain essential for translational research.[214]

Genetics and molecular research

[edit]

Advances in genetics have transformed the understanding of epilepsy, particularly in early-onset and treatment-resistant forms. Mutations in genes affecting ion channels, synaptic transmission, and mTOR signaling pathways have been linked to a growing number of epilepsy syndromes, including Dravet syndrome (SCN1A), PCDH19-related epilepsy, and familial focal epilepsies. High-throughput sequencing has enabled the discovery of de novo mutations in severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. In parallel, research into polygenic risk and epigenetic mechanisms is expanding the view of common epilepsies as complex traits. Molecular studies also support the development of targeted therapies, such as precision treatments for specific genetic subtypes.[215] Variations within the sodium channel SCN3A, and Na+/K+,ATPase (ATP1A3), has been implicated some of earliest onset epilepsies with cortical malformations.[216][217]

Epileptogenesis and biomarkers

[edit]

Understanding how epilepsy develops (epileptogenesis) is a major focus of current research. This includes identifying biomarkers that predict who is at risk of developing epilepsy. EEG patterns, neuroimaging features, and molecular signals in blood or cerebrospinal fluid are being investigated as early indicators. The goal is to detect epilepsy before chronic seizures begin and to develop interventions that prevent or halt this process. While no validated biomarker is yet in clinical use, this area holds promise for future disease-modifying therapies.[218]

Antiseizure drug development

[edit]

The development of new antiseizure medications remains a priority, especially for people with drug-resistant epilepsy. Current research focuses on compounds with novel mechanisms of action, better safety profiles, and disease-modifying potential. High-throughput screening, including zebrafish and organoid models, accelerates early-stage discovery, while pharmacogenomic studies aim to personalize drug selection. Cannabinoids and neurosteroids are also under investigation for specific syndromes and seizure types.[219][220]

Seizure prediction

[edit]

The unpredictability of seizures is a major concern for many people with epilepsy, and seizure prediction has been a longstanding focus of research. Early efforts were limited by small datasets and inconsistent results; however, advances in computational modeling, long-term EEG recording, and machine learning have led to renewed interest in the field. Public EEG databases and algorithm competitions have helped standardize evaluation and fostered the development of more accurate methods. In one clinical trial, prospective seizure prediction using intracranial EEG was achieved in a small group of participants. Current approaches often integrate network models of brain activity, multimodal data sources, and closed-loop systems capable of both detecting and responding to pre-ictal changes. These developments have laid the groundwork for future large-scale clinical trials and the potential integration of seizure forecasting into clinical practice.[221]

Mechanistic modeling and alternative pathways

[edit]

Mathematical and computational models are increasingly used to simulate the neural dynamics underlying seizures. Reductionist models such as the Epileptor use ordinary differential equations to replicate interictal and ictal discharges observed in experimental data.[222] More detailed versions, including the Epileptor-2, incorporate physiological variables such as ion concentrations and synaptic resource availability.[223] These models suggest that fluctuations in extracellular potassium and intracellular sodium levels may play a key role in the emergence and termination of seizures.[224]

Potential future therapies

[edit]

Several novel therapeutic strategies are under investigation for epilepsy. Gene therapy is being studied in some types of epilepsy.[225] Medications that alter immune function, such as intravenous immunoglobulins, may reduce the frequency of seizures when including in normal care as an add-on therapy; however, further research is required to determine whether these medications are very well tolerated in children and in adults with epilepsy.[226] Noninvasive stereotactic radiosurgery is, as of 2012, being compared to standard surgery for certain types of epilepsy.[227]

Other animals

[edit]

Epilepsy has also been documented in several animal species, particularly dogs and cats.[228] Veterinary treatments often use similar antiepileptic drugs, such as phenobarbital or levetiracetam. In horses, diagnosis can be challenging, especially in focal seizures,[229] and such conditions as juvenile idiopathic epilepsy have been reported in foals.[230]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Epilepsy is a chronic defined by the occurrence of at least two unprovoked more than 24 hours apart, resulting from abnormal excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the . These manifest as transient episodes of signs or symptoms, such as convulsions, loss of , or altered sensations, stemming from disrupted electrical signaling among groups of neurons. Affecting approximately 50 million worldwide, epilepsy imposes a substantial burden, with prevalence rates varying by region but consistently higher in low- and middle-income countries due to factors like limited access to care and higher rates of underlying causes such as infections and perinatal injuries. The condition arises from diverse etiologies, including genetic mutations, structural abnormalities, metabolic disturbances, or acquired insults like trauma and , all converging on impaired neuronal excitability and network synchronization. While many cases are idiopathic with no identifiable cause, underscores that epilepsy reflects underlying dysfunction rather than a unified , challenging oversimplified narratives of purely genetic or environmental origins. Seizures can be focal, originating in one region, or generalized, involving both hemispheres, with (EEG) often revealing characteristic patterns like discharges that confirm the . Management primarily relies on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), which achieve freedom in about 60-70% of patients, though 30-40% develop drug-resistant epilepsy necessitating alternatives like or . Historical recognition dates to , who attributed seizures to brain disease rather than divine intervention, laying groundwork for modern causal understanding over supernatural explanations. Despite advances, controversies persist around of provoked events as epilepsy and the variable efficacy of newer AEDs, which generally match but do not surpass older agents in controlled trials, highlighting the need for personalized, evidence-based approaches grounded in neurophysiological mechanisms.

Clinical Manifestations

Seizure Characteristics

Epileptic seizures are transient episodes of signs and/or symptoms attributable to abnormally excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the , distinguishing them from nonepileptic events through their recurrent, unprovoked nature and association with epileptiform electroencephalographic patterns. These events typically onset abruptly, last from seconds to a few minutes—most commonly 30 seconds to 2 minutes—and resolve spontaneously, though durations exceeding 5 minutes constitute requiring urgent intervention. Characteristics include stereotyped manifestations that vary by seizure type, influenced by the brain regions involved, with symptoms ranging from subtle behavioral changes to overt motor convulsions or altered . The (ILAE) classifies seizures primarily by onset: focal (originating in networks limited to one hemisphere), generalized (involving both hemispheres from the outset), unknown (insufficient information to determine), or unclassified (atypical features). Focal onset seizures may preserve awareness (focal aware) or impair it (focal impaired awareness), manifesting as motor phenomena like jerking or posturing in one body part, or non-motor features such as sensory auras (e.g., tingling, déjà vu), autonomic changes (e.g., , piloerection), or cognitive disturbances (e.g., forced thinking). If focal seizures evolve to bilateral tonic-clonic activity, they exhibit stiffening (tonic phase) followed by rhythmic jerking (clonic phase), often with loss of postural control, , and . Generalized onset seizures engage bilaterally distributed networks immediately, bypassing focal origins, and include absence seizures characterized by brief staring spells with subtle automatisms like eye blinking or lip smacking, lasting 5-10 seconds without post-event confusion. Myoclonic seizures involve sudden, shock-like jerks of limbs, often upon awakening, while tonic seizures feature abrupt muscle stiffening leading to falls, and atonic seizures cause sudden loss of muscle tone resulting in head drops or collapses. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures, previously termed grand mal, encompass widespread convulsions with potential tongue biting and frothing, reflecting diffuse cortical involvement. Unknown onset seizures, such as those observed during sleep without video-EEG capture of onset, may later be reclassified with additional data, underscoring the diagnostic value of prolonged monitoring. Variability in presentation necessitates individualized assessment, as semiological features like versive head turning or gelastic laughter can localize seizure foci precisely in presurgical evaluations.

Postictal Period

The postictal period refers to the transitional phase immediately following the cessation of a , during which the recovers toward baseline function, often manifesting as transient neurological deficits. This state typically begins when clinical activity ends and persists until the individual regains normal alertness and , with symptoms including , drowsiness, , for the event, and sometimes sensory or impairments. In generalized tonic-clonic seizures, the postictal phase is often more pronounced, featuring profound and disorientation due to widespread cortical involvement, whereas focal seizures may produce localized deficits such as unilateral . Duration of the varies widely, averaging 5 to 30 minutes but extending to hours or even days in severe cases, influenced by factors like length, age, and baseline neurological status. A study of postictal scalp EEG suppression after focal s reported a mean duration of 275 seconds (ranging from 7 seconds to over 40 minutes), with longer s correlating to slower EEG recovery and more persistent abnormalities compared to pre- baselines. Approximately 60% of postictal episodes resolve within one hour, while 10% last longer, and symptoms such as can persist up to 24 hours on average. A notable postictal phenomenon is Todd's paralysis (or paresis), characterized by temporary focal weakness or hemiplegia affecting one side of the body or a limb, typically emerging in the recovery phase after focal motor seizures. This deficit, first described by Robert Bentley Todd in 1849, usually lasts from 30 minutes to 36 hours (mean around 15 hours) and resolves without permanent damage, distinguishing it from stroke via EEG evidence of epileptiform activity or clinical history. It occurs in up to 13% of seizure patients and may follow either the first or recurrent events, with pathophysiology linked to transient neuronal exhaustion in the epileptogenic zone rather than structural injury. Underlying mechanisms involve cerebral hypoperfusion, imbalances (e.g., inhibition overpowering excitation), and metabolic disruptions akin to hypoxic-ischemic states, leading to slowed neural firing and impaired synaptic function. Postictal EEG often shows polymorphic delta activity or suppression, reflecting widespread cortical depression, while reveals reduced blood flow in affected regions that normalizes over time. These processes underscore the postictal state's role as a protective recovery mechanism, though prolonged impairments can mimic ongoing and necessitate differentiation from non-epileptic events via clinical correlation and diagnostics.

Psychosocial Consequences

People with epilepsy often experience significant psychosocial challenges, including perceived stigma, which affects up to 80% of patients and correlates with lower and reduced . Stigma manifests as in social interactions, , and relationships, leading to isolation and diminished . Empirical studies indicate that perceived stigma is approximately 35%, strongly linked to depressive symptoms and poorer . Comorbid mental health disorders are prevalent, with depression affecting 23-34% of patients and anxiety impacting 31-56%, rates substantially higher than in the general . These conditions arise from factors such as unpredictable seizures, medication side effects, and societal misconceptions about epilepsy as a mental , exacerbating overall psychological burden. risk is elevated 2-5 times compared to individuals without epilepsy, accounting for about 11.5% of deaths in chronic epilepsy cases versus 1.6% in the general . Employment challenges compound these issues, with epilepsy associated with higher rates, job layoffs, and perceptions of unfitness for work, independent of seizure control. metrics, such as those from the QOLIE-31 survey, reveal low scores in domains like seizure worry (mean 46.05) and overall (mean 44.21), influenced by ongoing s, , and low household income. About one-third of patients exhibit poor , primarily due to adverse effects from antiseizure medications and stigma-related barriers. Social consequences extend to family dynamics and , where unpredictable seizures hinder participation and foster dependency, though resilience factors like strong can mitigate depressive and anxious symptoms. Interventions targeting stigma reduction and screening are critical, as untreated psychosocial burdens independently predict suicidality and treatment non-adherence.

Etiology

Genetic Contributions

Epilepsy exhibits a substantial genetic component, with estimates derived from twin studies ranging from 25% to 70%, indicating that genetic factors significantly influence susceptibility across various . Monozygotic twins demonstrate higher concordance rates for epilepsy than dizygotic twins, with 83% of affected monozygotic pairs sharing the same major epilepsy compared to 65% in dizygotic pairs, underscoring the role of shared over environmental influences alone. These findings affirm that while epilepsy often follows complex inheritance patterns involving multiple genes and environmental interactions, inherited variants account for a large proportion of , particularly in idiopathic generalized epilepsies where common genetic variants explain 39.6% to 90% of the genetic liability. Monogenic forms of epilepsy, characterized by mutations in single genes, predominate in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, often involving genes that disrupt neuronal excitability. For instance, mutations in SCN1A, encoding a subunit, cause over 80% of cases, a severe infantile-onset epilepsy with refractory seizures and cognitive impairment, and also contribute to milder phenotypes like genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+). Similarly, variants in KCNQ2 and KCNQ3, which encode potassium channels, underlie benign familial neonatal seizures and sometimes progress to more severe epileptic encephalopathies. Other notable genes include SCN2A for early infantile developmental epileptic encephalopathy and CDKL5 for deficiency disorder, which disproportionately affects females due to X-linked inheritance patterns. Over 900 epilepsy-associated genes have been identified, categorized by their roles in transport, synaptic function, and neuronal development, with ion channelopathies representing the most common class in non-structural epilepsies. In contrast, common epilepsies like genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE) arise from polygenic risk, where genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have pinpointed 26 loci, implicating 29 causal genes such as SV2A and NRXN1 that influence neuronal signaling pathways. Familial aggregation studies further reveal enrichment of common risk variants in multiplex families, supporting a threshold model where cumulative genetic burden lowers seizure threshold in the presence of triggers. Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation and histone alterations, may modulate these genetic risks, potentially explaining variable expressivity, though empirical data linking specific epigenetic changes to epilepsy onset remain preliminary. Genetic testing, such as targeted panels or exome sequencing, confirms diagnoses in up to 40% of suspected genetic cases, guiding precision therapies like sodium channel blockers tailored to SCN1A-related disorders. Despite advances, the "missing heritability" persists, with rare variants and gene-environment interactions accounting for unresolved variance in population-level risk.

Structural Abnormalities

Structural abnormalities encompass congenital malformations of cortical development, acquired lesions such as , neoplasms, and vascular anomalies that disrupt normal architecture and neuronal excitability, thereby contributing to epileptogenesis. These lesions often manifest as focal epilepsies, with seizures originating from the irritative focus created by the abnormality. (MRI) detects many such structures, guiding diagnosis and surgical planning in cases. Malformations of cortical development, particularly focal cortical dysplasia (FCD), involve localized disruptions in neuronal migration, proliferation, or organization during embryogenesis. FCD is characterized by abnormal cortical lamination, giant neurons, or balloon cells, depending on subtype (type I-III per Taylor classification). It accounts for up to 25-40% of pediatric epilepsy surgery cases and is a leading cause of intractable focal seizures in children. Surgical resection of FCD lesions achieves seizure freedom in 50-70% of cases, underscoring the direct causal role of the malformation. Hippocampal sclerosis (HS), also termed mesial temporal sclerosis, features neuronal loss and primarily in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus, often bilateral but more epileptogenic when unilateral. It predominates in mesial , comprising 50-75% of temporal lobectomy specimens in surgical series. Population prevalence estimates for HS-associated epilepsy range from 19.4 per 100,000 adults, with annual incidence around 2.3 per 100,000. Early febrile seizures or prolonged may precipitate HS via excitotoxic mechanisms, though causality remains debated as imaging often reveals sclerosis post-onset. Neoplastic causes include low-grade gliomas, gangliogliomas, and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors (DNETs), which irritate surrounding cortex through , peritumoral , or dysregulation. Seizures herald 30-80% of supratentorial tumors, particularly in temporal or frontal lobes, and may precede radiographic detection by years in slow-growing lesions. Resection yields seizure control in 60-90% of cases for benign tumors, contrasting poorer outcomes in high-grade malignancies where epileptogenicity stems from rapid invasion. Vascular malformations, such as cavernous malformations (cavernomas) and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), provoke epilepsy via chronic hemorrhage, ischemia, or in adjacent . Cavernomas associate with in 30-70% of supratentorial cases, often supratentorial and presenting with focal . AVMs yield epilepsy in 20-50% of patients, linked to hemodynamic steal or perilesional scarring. Microsurgical or radiosurgical intervention reduces seizure recurrence, with lesionectomy achieving 60-80% freedom rates in select cohorts.

Infectious and Immune Factors

Infections of the (CNS) constitute a significant etiology of acquired epilepsy, primarily through mechanisms involving acute , neuronal injury, and chronic structural changes such as or cortical scarring that lower seizure thresholds. Bacterial, viral, parasitic, and fungal pathogens can initiate these processes, with the risk of epileptogenesis persisting months to years post-infection due to persistent or . In developed countries, post-infectious epilepsy affects approximately 7-8% of adult survivors of CNS infections, while in resource-limited settings, infectious etiologies account for up to 30-50% of new-onset epilepsy cases, driven by endemic pathogens. Parasitic infections, particularly neurocysticercosis caused by the larval stage of , represent the most common identifiable infectious cause of epilepsy globally, especially in , , and where prevalence exceeds 10% in endemic porcine farming communities. Cysts in the parenchyma provoke perilesional and upon degeneration, fostering epileptogenic foci; surgical or antiparasitic treatment reduces recurrence by 50-70% in symptomatic cases. Other parasites like and cerebral () contribute via vascular occlusion or granuloma formation, with malaria-associated epilepsy reported in 5-10% of severe pediatric cases in endemic regions. Viral encephalitides, including type 1 (HSV-1), Japanese encephalitis virus, and emerging pathogens like , induce epilepsy through direct cytopathic effects and secondary . HSV-1 encephalitis carries a 20-50% risk of refractory in survivors, often linked to mesial temporal sclerosis identifiable on MRI. Bacterial meningitides, such as those from Streptococcus pneumoniae or Neisseria meningitidis, yield epilepsy in 5-10% of pediatric survivors, exacerbated by or formation. , prevalent in high-burden areas, associates with chronic epilepsy in up to 25% of cases due to basal exudates and infarcts. Immune-mediated factors in epilepsy encompass autoimmune encephalitides where autoantibodies target neuronal surface antigens, disrupting synaptic transmission and provoking independent of prior in many instances. , often affecting young females and linked to ovarian teratomas in 50% of cases, manifests with refractory seizures in 70-80% of patients, responsive to like rituximab or . Other antibodies, such as anti-LGI1 or anti-CASPR2, predominate in with faciobrachial dystonic seizures, yielding chronic epilepsy if untreated but remission rates exceeding 70% with early steroids and IVIG. Mechanisms include complement activation and T-cell infiltration, with molecular mimicry from infections like HSV proposed but not universally required; Rasmussen's encephalitis exemplifies a unihemispheric autoimmune process with progressive . Diagnosis relies on serum/CSF antibody panels, as EEG often shows extreme delta brush patterns, and delays beyond 4 weeks correlate with poorer seizure control.

Metabolic and Environmental Influences

Metabolic disorders contribute to epilepsy through disruptions in production, synthesis, or accumulation of toxic metabolites, often manifesting as early-onset seizures. (IEMs) account for approximately 1-7% of neonatal seizures and are a core feature in certain inherited metabolic diseases, where epilepsy arises directly from the underlying biochemical defect rather than secondary effects. Examples include glucose transporter 1 () deficiency syndrome, caused by variants in the SLC2A1 gene that impair glucose transport across the blood-brain barrier, leading to hypoglycorrhachia and pharmacoresistant epilepsy typically presenting in infancy with absence or myoclonic seizures. disorders, such as deficiency, result in , which triggers and seizures through excitotoxic mechanisms, with epilepsy persisting in up to 50% of survivors despite treatment. Mitochondrial disorders, affecting , and pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy from ALDH7A1 variants, which disrupt metabolism and GABA synthesis, further exemplify how metabolic pathway failures drive epileptogenesis via neuronal hyperexcitability and energy failure. Acute metabolic derangements, such as , , or , can provoke seizures but rarely lead to chronic epilepsy unless recurrent or associated with an underlying IEM; for instance, nonketotic hyperglycinemia from defects causes intractable neonatal epilepsy due to glycine-mediated overstimulation. Early identification via or targeted metabolic testing is critical, as some forms, like biotinidase deficiency or cerebral folate transporter deficiency, respond to cofactor supplementation (e.g., or ), potentially halting epileptogenesis. However, many IEM-related epilepsies remain refractory, underscoring the need for causal intervention over symptomatic therapy alone. Environmental exposures to neurotoxins represent modifiable risk factors for epilepsy, particularly through , , or disruption of neuronal signaling pathways. Chronic occupational exposure to pesticides has been associated with elevated epilepsy risk, with a 2023 study reporting odds ratios up to 2.5 for generalized and focal seizures in exposed agricultural workers, likely due to organophosphate-induced inhibition and subsequent glutamate dysregulation. Organic solvents, such as or derivatives, correlate with new-onset epilepsy in case series, where solvent-induced inhibition and kindling-like effects precipitate recurrent seizures following prolonged inhalation or dermal contact. , including fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and (NO2), exacerbates epileptogenesis; a 2025 analysis found PM2.5 exposure increases epilepsy incidence by promoting and via Nrf2 pathway impairment, with relative risks rising 1.1-1.3 per 10 μg/m³ increment in urban cohorts. , from environmental contamination like fish consumption, acts as a gene-environment interactor, potentiating seizures in susceptible individuals through cerebellar and hippocampal damage. These influences highlight preventable , though causality requires longitudinal evidence beyond , as most exposures provoke isolated seizures rather than idiopathic epilepsy syndromes.

Cases of Unknown Origin

Cases of unknown origin, also known as idiopathic or cryptogenic epilepsy, encompass instances where recurrent seizures occur without identifiable structural, genetic, metabolic, infectious, or immune abnormalities following comprehensive evaluation, including , EEG, and laboratory tests. These cases are distinguished by the absence of evident lesions or systemic disorders that could precipitate epileptiform activity, often aligning with age-specific generalized syndromes such as childhood absence epilepsy or . In such epilepsies, seizures typically manifest as generalized tonic-clonic, absence, or myoclonic types, with patients exhibiting normal interictal neurological function and no progressive cognitive decline. Globally, the remains unknown in approximately 50% of epilepsy cases, affecting an estimated 24.2 million individuals with idiopathic epilepsy as of recent burden assessments. This proportion varies by age and region; in children, up to 65-70% of cases may lack a discernible cause, while in adults, structural factors like reduce the unknown category to around one-third. High-income countries report slightly lower rates of unknown due to advanced diagnostics, yet the figure persists at 40-50% even with , underscoring gaps in causal identification. Although labeled "unknown," many such cases implicate subtle genetic susceptibilities, evidenced by familial clustering and polygenic risk factors, though specific are not always pinpointed without whole-genome sequencing. EEG patterns in these epilepsies often show generalized discharges without focal abnormalities, supporting a primary cortical hyperexcitability origin rather than secondary propagation from lesions. Ongoing research highlights the need for deeper genomic and environmental interaction studies, as current classifications like those from the (ILAE) increasingly reassign some "unknown" cases to genetic categories upon molecular discovery, yet a substantial remainder defies etiological assignment. This diagnostic uncertainty complicates prognosis, with unknown-origin epilepsies generally responding well to antiepileptic drugs but carrying risks of pharmacoresistance in 20-30% of instances.

Pathophysiology

Seizure Generation Mechanisms

Seizure generation, or ictogenesis, involves the abrupt transition from interictal to ictal states through hypersynchronous neuronal firing, primarily driven by an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission. At the cellular level, this arises from ion channel dysfunctions, such as mutations or dysregulation in voltage-gated sodium channels (e.g., NaV1.1), which prolong action potentials via persistent sodium currents, reducing the threshold for depolarization. Potassium channel impairments, including reduced Kir4.1 expression in astrocytes, fail to buffer extracellular K⁺ effectively, leading to elevated [K⁺]ₒ levels (8–16 mM) that depolarize neurons and promote hyperexcitability, as demonstrated in hippocampal slice models. Synaptic mechanisms contribute via excessive glutamate release activating NMDA and receptors, causing calcium influx and , while inhibition paradoxically facilitates at high frequencies due to chloride accumulation and depolarizing shifts. Homeostatic synaptic plasticity, such as upregulation following insults like , further amplifies excitatory drive, with computational models showing bistable network states where small perturbations trigger seizure-like activity. In focal epilepsies, interictal spikes recruit adjacent neurons through ephaptic interactions and endogenous , independent of chemical synapses, escalating to ictal onset. Network-level dynamics involve preictal changes, including progressive desynchronization followed by hypersynchrony in thalamocortical circuits for generalized seizures or localized cortical networks for focal ones. Empirical data from rodent models and human intracranial EEG reveal that short-term over seconds—either facilitation or depression—can initiate ictal bursts, with Na⁺/K⁺ ATPase activation eventually terminating seizures via postictal hyperpolarization. These processes differ from epileptogenesis, which establishes chronic susceptibility, but share causal roots in ionic disruption and synaptic reorganization.

Processes of Epileptogenesis

Epileptogenesis refers to the dynamic, multifactorial process by which a previously normal develops the capacity for spontaneous recurrent seizures, often following an initial precipitating insult such as trauma, , or , though it can occur without identifiable triggers in genetic forms. This transformation involves progressive molecular, cellular, and network-level alterations that lower the and promote hyperexcitability, culminating in chronic epilepsy. The process typically unfolds over a latent period—a seizure-free interval lasting days to years—during which maladaptive changes accumulate without overt clinical manifestations, challenging the notion of a discrete "silent" phase as subclinical events may contribute to progression. At the molecular level, epileptogenesis entails transcriptomic and epigenetic reprogramming, including dysregulation of microRNAs such as miR-134 and miR-106b-5p, which modulate immune responses and neuronal excitability. Hyperactivation of pathways like disrupts , formation, and neuronal survival, as seen in models with TSC1/TSC2 mutations. Ion channel genes, including SCN1A (voltage-gated sodium) and KCNQ2/KCNQ3 (potassium), exhibit mutations or altered expression, shifting membrane potentials toward and reducing refractory periods. amplifies these effects through cytokines like IL-1β and TNF-α, released by activated and , which upregulate subunits (e.g., GluN2B) and downregulate GABA receptors, fostering a pro-excitatory milieu. Cellular changes during epileptogenesis include selective neuronal loss, particularly in hippocampal regions like CA1 and CA3, coupled with aberrant in the , where newborn neurons migrate ectopically to hyperexcitable zones such as the hilus or molecular layer. Axonal sprouting, exemplified by mossy fiber collaterals from granule cells synapsing onto neighboring granule cells, creates recurrent excitatory loops that bypass inhibitory . Dendritic remodeling and further contribute, with reactive impairing buffering and glutamate uptake, while blood-brain barrier leakage permits inflammatory cell infiltration. Loss of inhibition, via reduced KCC2 expression or NKCC1 upregulation, shifts chloride gradients to depolarizing levels in immature or injured neurons. Network-level reorganization manifests as imbalanced excitation-inhibition dynamics and rewired circuits, with diminished interneuronal control allowing synchronized population bursts. In animal models of , these changes progressively increase seizure frequency and severity over weeks, reflecting a vicious cycle where early seizures reinforce hyperexcitability through and mitochondrial dysfunction. Human studies corroborate this, showing upregulated like in intractable epilepsy tissues, linking to sustained circuit pathology. Despite advances in models, the precise causality remains debated, as interventions targeting single mechanisms (e.g., like rapamycin) show promise in preclinical latent-phase blockade but limited translation to humans.

Diagnosis

Definitional Criteria

Epilepsy is operationally defined by the (ILAE) as a brain disorder characterized by at least two unprovoked (or reflex) seizures occurring more than 24 hours apart, reflecting an enduring predisposition to generate epileptic seizures and associated cognitive, psychological, and social consequences. This criterion distinguishes epilepsy from isolated or provoked seizures, where immediate causes such as acute metabolic disturbances, toxins, or structural insults are identifiable and transient. Unprovoked seizures lack such identifiable proximate triggers, implying an underlying chronic dysfunction. An alternative diagnostic pathway applies when only one unprovoked seizure occurs but with a confirmed probability of recurrence comparable to the general risk after two unprovoked events—at least 60% over the subsequent 10 years—or when an is diagnosed based on characteristic clinical, electroencephalographic, and genetic features. diagnosis is particularly relevant in pediatric cases, such as infantile spasms or Lennox-Gastaut , where seizure patterns, onset, and EEG abnormalities align with established epileptic entities independent of seizure count. Reflex , triggered by specific stimuli like flashing lights or reading, are incorporated if unprovoked by acute factors and recurrent. The definition excludes conditions resolved by time or intervention, such as childhood absence epilepsy after adolescence or post-surgical remission, to focus on active disease states requiring management. Diagnosis hinges on clinical history corroborated by (EEG) to confirm epileptiform activity, though normal interictal EEG does not preclude epilepsy if history meets criteria. This operational framework, updated in 2014, prioritizes practical clinical utility over purely conceptual descriptions, enabling earlier intervention while minimizing overdiagnosis from nonepileptic events like syncope or psychogenic seizures.

Classification Systems

The (ILAE) provides the predominant frameworks for classifying epileptic seizures and epilepsies, emphasizing observable features, onset location, and clinical utility to support , treatment, and . These systems evolved from earlier iterations, such as the 1981 classifications, to incorporate advances in , , and , prioritizing biological classifiers that influence management over purely descriptive terms. The operational of , revised in 2017 and updated in 2025, categorizes seizures into four main classes: focal (originating in networks limited to one ), generalized (involving bilateral networks from onset), unknown (insufficient evidence to determine focal or generalized), and unclassified (lacking sufficient features for any class). The 2025 update refines the 2017 framework by reducing named from 63 to 21, removing "onset" from class , replacing "" with "" (defined by both and ), and substituting "" (e.g., visible movements or behaviors) for "motor" and "non-" (e.g., subjective sensations) for "non-motor" manifestations. Seizures are further described chronologically by semiology () using ILAE glossary terms, with additions like epileptic negative (brief interruption of ongoing muscle activity) as a distinct type; neonatal seizures are excluded and addressed separately. Examples include focal seizures with impaired and clonic manifestations, generalized absence seizures (brief non- lapses), and unknown-onset tonic-clonic seizures. The 2017 ILAE classification of epilepsies builds on seizure type identification to delineate three hierarchical levels: seizure types (per the seizure classification), epilepsy types (focal, generalized, combined generalized and focal, or unknown), and epilepsy syndromes (specific clusters with defined age of onset, , EEG patterns, and ). Focal epilepsy involves seizures from one hemisphere, often linked to structural lesions; features bilateral onset without focal features; combined types exhibit both; unknown applies when data are inadequate. —spanning genetic, structural, metabolic, immune, infectious, or unknown—is evaluated at each level to inform prognosis and therapy, such as targeting mutations in genetic generalized epilepsies. recognition, the highest level, applies to entities like Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (multiple , , specific EEG) only when criteria are met, avoiding overgeneralization. These frameworks integrate comorbidities and precision approaches, though ongoing refinements address gaps in unknown etiologies and atypical presentations.

Syndrome Recognition

An epilepsy is defined as a characteristic cluster of electroclinical features, encompassing specific , age at onset, , comorbidities, and or genetic findings, which collectively predict treatment response and . Recognition requires integration of clinical history, including seizure semiology and developmental status, with ancillary data such as interictal and ictal (EEG) patterns, which often exhibit syndrome-specific signatures like generalized 3 Hz discharges. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) positions syndrome identification as the highest tier in its diagnostic framework, following type and epilepsy type , to enable targeted . Diagnosis typically begins with a thorough and to establish frequency, triggers, and associated neurological or cognitive impairments, supplemented by prolonged video-EEG monitoring to correlate behavioral events with electrophysiological abnormalities. Structural imaging via MRI identifies lesions in focal syndromes, while confirms etiologies in developmental syndromes, such as SCN1A mutations in . Syndrome recognition is prognostically critical: benign syndromes like childhood absence epilepsy (onset ages 4-10 years, characterized by brief spells and 3 Hz generalized spike-wave EEG, with >70% remission by adolescence) contrast with refractory ones like Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (onset 1-8 years, multiple seizure types including tonic and atonic, slow spike-wave EEG <2.5 Hz, poor seizure control in 80-90% of cases). Common syndromes illustrate recognition patterns: Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (onset adolescence, myoclonic jerks on awakening, photosensitivity, 4-6 Hz polyspike-wave EEG, lifetime persistence but >90% seizure freedom with ) relies on EEG confirmation of generalized epileptiform discharges. Infantile spasms (West syndrome, onset 3-12 months, flexor/extensor spasms in clusters, on EEG, etiology-specific prognosis with 50% developmental delay if untreated) demand early EEG to differentiate from mimics and guide ACTH or therapy. Failure to recognize syndromes promptly can delay etiology-directed interventions, as in genetic generalized epilepsies where misclassification as focal delays broad-spectrum antiseizure medications. ILAE classifications, updated through 2022 for neonatal/infant onset, underscore age-stratified criteria to refine diagnostic accuracy across the lifespan.

Diagnostic Testing

(EEG) serves as the cornerstone electrophysiological test in epilepsy , detecting abnormal electrical activity indicative of epileptiform discharges. Routine scalp EEG exhibits low sensitivity of approximately 17% for identifying interictal epileptiform discharges in adults following a first unprovoked , though specificity reaches 94.7%. Despite this, EEG remains essential for classifying and supporting clinical suspicion, as up to 50% of epilepsy patients may have normal interictal recordings. Prolonged or EEG improves yield, with sensitivity for detecting abnormalities rising to 72% compared to 11% for initial routine sessions. Video-EEG monitoring combines EEG with synchronized video to capture ictal events, enabling differentiation between epileptic seizures and nonepileptic events, which is critical given that psychogenic nonepileptic seizures mimic epilepsy in up to 20-30% of cases referred for evaluation. or activation procedures, such as and photic stimulation, enhance diagnostic utility during EEG by provoking discharges in susceptible individuals. Intracranial EEG, involving invasive electrodes, is reserved for presurgical localization in drug-resistant epilepsy, offering higher spatial resolution for focal onset identification. Neuroimaging, particularly (MRI), is recommended for all newly diagnosed patients except those with confirmed to identify structural lesions such as , tumors, or malformations contributing to seizures. surpasses computed tomography (CT) in sensitivity for epileptogenic foci, detecting subtle cortical or mesial temporal sclerosis missed by CT, which is preferred only in acute settings for rapid exclusion of hemorrhage or due to its speed and availability. Advanced techniques like functional MRI (fMRI) coupled with EEG or (PET) aid in noninvasive localization for surgical candidates but are not routine for initial . Laboratory evaluations, including , electrolytes, glucose, and toxicology screens, rule out acute symptomatic causes like or drug intoxication precipitating seizures. is indicated for suspected syndromes, such as Dravet or Lennox-Gastaut, where mutations in SCN1A or other genes confirm etiology in 10-20% of pediatric cases. may be performed if or is suspected, particularly in new-onset seizures with fever or altered mental status. In summary, no single test confirms epilepsy definitively; integration of EEG findings, , and laboratory results with detailed clinical history optimizes accuracy, as isolated normal tests do not exclude the . Guidelines emphasize early EEG within 24 hours post- and MRI for comprehensive evaluation, reducing misdiagnosis rates that can exceed 30% without multimodal assessment.

Differential Considerations

Accurate diagnosis of epilepsy requires distinguishing true epileptic seizures, characterized by transient hypersynchronous neuronal discharges, from other paroxysmal events that mimic them clinically. Misdiagnosis is common, with up to 20-30% of patients referred to epilepsy centers ultimately found to have nonepileptic conditions, leading to unnecessary antiepileptic drug exposure and delayed appropriate treatment. Key differentials include syncope, psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), migraines, transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), metabolic derangements, movement disorders, and sleep-related phenomena, differentiated primarily through detailed history, eyewitness accounts, and confirmatory testing like video-electroencephalography (EEG). Syncope, the second most common epilepsy mimic after PNES, involves transient cerebral hypoperfusion leading to loss of consciousness, often with brief myoclonic jerks in convulsive forms that resemble tonic-clonic seizures. Precipitants include vasovagal triggers, orthostatic changes, or cardiac arrhythmias, with characteristic prodromal symptoms such as , , diaphoresis, and visual blurring preceding collapse; recovery is rapid without postictal confusion, unlike epilepsy. Distinction relies on absence of epileptiform EEG changes during events and cardiovascular evaluation, such as tilt-table testing or Holter monitoring. Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), the leading misdiagnosis in epilepsy referrals, manifest as episodes of involuntary movements, unresponsiveness, or convulsions driven by psychological factors rather than cerebral electrical abnormalities. Semiology often includes asynchronous thrashing, pelvic thrusting, side-to-side head shaking, and preserved or eye-opening, contrasting with the stereotyped progression and in epileptic seizures; events may be prolonged, occur in crowds, or cease with distraction. Video-EEG captures normal background rhythms without ictal epileptiform activity, confirming PNES, which affects 2-33% of epilepsy clinic patients depending on setting. Migraines, particularly those with auras, can imitate focal aware or focal impaired awareness seizures through transient visual scintillations, sensory paresthesias, or , but symptoms build gradually over 5-20 minutes, last 20-60 minutes, and frequently progress to with —features atypical for seizures. Basilar-type or hemiplegic migraines may cause confusion or mimicking complex partial seizures, yet EEG remains normal, and response to migraine prophylactics supports the diagnosis over antiepileptics. Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) produce focal neurological deficits like or speech arrest that may resemble focal seizures, but TIAs feature negative symptoms (e.g., weakness without clonic activity) with abrupt onset and resolution within 24 hours, often linked to vascular risk factors; reveals ischemia without epileptogenic lesions, and EEG lacks seizure correlates. Metabolic disturbances, such as (blood glucose <50 mg/dL) or electrolyte imbalances like hyponatremia, provoke altered mentation, tremors, or focal deficits mimicking seizures, particularly in diabetics or those on diuretics; urgent laboratory testing reveals reversible biochemical abnormalities, with EEG showing diffuse slowing rather than focal epileptiform discharges. Movement disorders including paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia or tics present with episodic dystonia, chorea, or tremors without loss of consciousness, differing from seizures by trigger association (e.g., sudden movement) and retained awareness; normal interictal EEG and response to specific therapies like carbamazepine aid differentiation. Sleep disorders such as narcolepsy with cataplexy or parasomnias (e.g., night terrors) cause sudden atonia or confusional arousals mimicking absence or myoclonic seizures, but polysomnography demonstrates REM intrusions or non-rapid eye movement disruptions without epileptiform activity, with episodes confined to sleep-wake transitions. Prolonged video-EEG monitoring, capturing stereotypical versus variable event patterns, remains the gold standard for resolving ambiguities, reducing misdiagnosis rates from 30% to under 10% in specialized centers.

Prevention

Primary Prevention Measures

Preventing traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents the most effective primary prevention strategy for epilepsy, as TBI is a leading cause of acquired epilepsy, contributing to up to 20% of cases in high-income countries. Measures include mandatory seatbelt and child restraint use in vehicles, helmet wearing during cycling, motorcycling, and contact sports, and environmental modifications to reduce falls, particularly among children and the elderly, such as installing handrails and non-slip flooring. These interventions have demonstrated reductions in TBI incidence; for instance, helmet laws correlate with a 13-29% decrease in motorcycle-related head injuries. Immunization programs targeting pathogens that cause central nervous system infections are critical, as such infections like bacterial meningitis and viral encephalitis precede approximately 10-20% of epilepsy cases globally. Vaccines against Haemophilus influenzae type b, pneumococcus, meningococcus, measles, mumps, and rubella have lowered post-infectious epilepsy rates; measles vaccination alone has prevented millions of encephalitis cases since its introduction in 1963. In endemic regions, deworming and sanitation improvements to curb neurocysticercosis from Taenia solium—responsible for up to 30% of epilepsy in parts of Latin America, Africa, and Asia—have shown efficacy, with mass treatment campaigns reducing prevalence by 50% in pilot areas. Perinatal care interventions address birth-related insults, which cause 10-15% of epilepsy, particularly in low-resource settings. Folic acid supplementation (400-800 mcg daily) preconception and during early pregnancy reduces neural tube defects by 50-70%, some of which progress to epilepsy syndromes like infantile spasms. Optimizing maternal health to avoid complications such as prolonged labor or hypoxia, through skilled birth attendance and emergency obstetric care, further mitigates risks; programs in developing countries have halved perinatal asphyxia-related epilepsy. Preventing cerebrovascular events like stroke, which underlie 10-15% of new-onset epilepsy in adults over 50, involves controlling modifiable risk factors. Lifestyle measures such as smoking cessation, blood pressure management below 130/80 mmHg, diabetes control (HbA1c <7%), and statin use in high-risk individuals reduce stroke incidence by 20-30%, thereby averting post-stroke epilepsy. Public health efforts emphasizing these, including community screening, yield long-term benefits, as evidenced by declines in stroke-related epilepsy following antihypertensive campaigns. For genetic epilepsies, comprising 40-50% of cases with known familial patterns, primary prevention is limited to preconception counseling and prenatal testing in high-risk pedigrees, such as those with linked to SCN1A mutations, though ethical and technical barriers persist. Overall, integrated public health approaches combining these strategies could prevent up to 25% of epilepsy cases worldwide, per modeling from the .

Secondary Prophylaxis

Secondary prophylaxis in epilepsy refers to interventions aimed at preventing seizure recurrence following an initial unprovoked seizure, prior to a formal diagnosis of epilepsy, which requires at least two such events separated by more than 24 hours. The rationale centers on mitigating the risk of early relapse, which, without treatment, stands at approximately 40-50% within two years of the first seizure, with the highest probability occurring in the initial 6-12 months. Factors elevating recurrence risk include abnormal electroencephalogram (EEG) findings, structural brain lesions identifiable on neuroimaging, a history of remote symptomatic seizures, or seizures arising from sleep, with hazard ratios for recurrence ranging from 1.4 to 3.0 depending on the predictor. Initiation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) immediately after a first unprovoked seizure reduces the two-year recurrence risk by about 35% compared to deferred treatment, achieving absolute risk reductions of 15-20% in adults, though this does not alter the long-term probability of developing epilepsy (defined as recurrent unprovoked seizures). Evidence from randomized controlled trials, such as the First Seizure Trial Group study involving 1,078 adults, supports this short-term benefit, with treated patients experiencing seizure-free rates of 75% at two years versus 58% in untreated groups; however, quality-of-life measures and cognitive side effects of AEDs, including sedation and mood alterations, must be weighed, as these can offset gains in seizure control. The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) recommends counseling patients on these trade-offs, favoring immediate AEDs in high-risk cases (e.g., abnormal EEG or epileptiform discharges) but deferring in low-risk scenarios where recurrence odds are below 25% at two years. In pediatric populations, guidelines generally advise against routine AED initiation after a single seizure, as recurrence rates mirror adults but remit spontaneously in up to 70% of cases without intervention, and early treatment does not prevent epilepsy development. Decisions should incorporate patient-specific elements, such as seizure semiology (e.g., focal vs. generalized), comorbidities, and lifestyle impacts; for instance, immediate treatment may be prioritized for those in high-stakes occupations like driving or operating machinery, where a second seizure could pose immediate safety risks. Once a second seizure occurs, transitioning to definitive epilepsy management with sustained AED therapy becomes standard, as cumulative recurrence risk exceeds 60-90%. Non-pharmacological secondary prophylaxis lacks robust evidence in this context, though lifestyle modifications—such as avoiding sleep deprivation, alcohol excess, and triggers like flashing lights—are universally advised as adjuncts, supported by observational data linking these factors to lowered seizure thresholds in susceptible individuals. Ongoing monitoring via follow-up EEG or neuroimaging refines risk stratification, but prophylactic AEDs beyond seven days are not endorsed in provoked seizures (e.g., post-traumatic or metabolic), where addressing the underlying cause suffices. Overall, secondary prophylaxis emphasizes individualized assessment over blanket application, prioritizing empirical risk data to balance seizure prevention against treatment burdens.

Management

Acute Intervention Protocols

For witnessed tonic-clonic seizures without immediate life-threatening features, initial interventions prioritize safety and monitoring rather than active pharmacological suppression. Caregivers should remain calm, stay with the individual, time the seizure duration, clear the area of hazards, cushion the head, and avoid restraining movements or inserting objects into the mouth, as these actions risk injury without altering seizure progression. Once convulsions cease, position the person in the recovery position on their side to maintain airway patency and monitor breathing and responsiveness. Emergency medical services should be activated if the seizure exceeds 5 minutes, repeats without recovery, involves respiratory compromise, or occurs in someone without known epilepsy. Status epilepticus, defined as continuous seizure activity lasting at least 5 minutes or recurrent seizures without recovery between episodes, requires urgent escalation to abort neuronal injury from prolonged excitotoxicity. Protocols begin with stabilization of airway, breathing, and circulation (ABCs), including oxygen administration and intravenous access, within the first 0-5 minutes. First-line treatment involves benzodiazepines: intravenous lorazepam at 0.1 mg/kg (maximum 4 mg per dose, repeatable once after 5 minutes) achieves seizure cessation in approximately 60-80% of cases due to enhancement of GABA-mediated inhibition. Alternatives include intramuscular midazolam 10 mg (adults) or intranasal/buccal midazolam if IV access is delayed, with comparable efficacy in prehospital settings. If seizures persist after two benzodiazepine doses (typically by 10-20 minutes), second-line therapies target sustained antiseizure effects: fosphenytoin 20 mg PE/kg IV (maximum 150 mg/min rate) or alternatives like levetiracetam 60 mg/kg IV (maximum 4500 mg) or valproate 40 mg/kg IV, selected based on patient factors such as age, comorbidities, and etiology. These agents reduce recurrence risk by 40-60% in this phase, though evidence from randomized trials shows no single drug superior. For refractory cases (>30-60 minutes), transfer to intensive care with continuous EEG monitoring; induce general using (1-2 mg/kg bolus then 2-10 mg/kg/h infusion) or (0.2 mg/kg bolus then 0.4 mg/kg/h), titrated to on EEG to halt subclinical activity. Underlying causes, such as metabolic derangements or infections, must be addressed concurrently, as untreated precipitants like contribute to 20-30% of cases.

Pharmacological Treatments

Antiseizure medications (ASMs), formerly known as , constitute the cornerstone of pharmacological management for , targeting the suppression of abnormal neuronal excitability to achieve freedom or significant reduction in frequency. Selection of an ASM is guided by type, , age, comorbidities, and potential adverse effects, with monotherapy preferred initially for newly diagnosed cases. Approximately 47% of patients become -free on the first ASM, rising to 62% with a second agent, though around 30% develop drug-resistant requiring alternative strategies. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) recommends antiseizure over antiepileptic terminology to reflect that these agents primarily control without addressing underlying epileptogenic processes. ASMs are classified by predominant mechanisms of action, including modulation of voltage-gated channels, enhancement of inhibitory , or reduction of excitatory signaling. , such as and , stabilize neuronal membranes by prolonging the inactive state of voltage-gated sodium channels, proving effective for focal seizures with response rates of 60-70% in monotherapy trials. agents like and benzodiazepines augment gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated inhibition; , a broad-spectrum option, achieves control in 50-60% of cases but carries risks of and teratogenicity, limiting use in women of childbearing potential. , targeting T-type calcium channels, remains first-line for absence seizures, with 70% efficacy in controlled studies compared to 50% for broader agents like . Newer ASMs, including ( modulator) and ( and CRMP-2 binder), offer improved tolerability and fewer drug interactions, suitable for focal and generalized epilepsies. controls seizures in 40-60% of cases as add-on , with behavioral side effects like in 10-15% of users. , an antagonist, reduces focal seizure frequency by 20-30% in adjunctive use but is associated with and psychiatric effects. Polytherapy for drug-resistant epilepsy involves rational combinations leveraging complementary mechanisms, though it increases risks of adverse events and interactions; for instance, enzyme-inducing ASMs like can reduce efficacy of oral contraceptives by accelerating .
ASM Class/ExamplePrimary MechanismKey IndicationsCommon Adverse EffectsEfficacy Notes
(e.g., , )Prolong inactivationFocal seizures, (: 5-10% Stevens-Johnson risk)60-70% response in focal epilepsy monotherapy
GABA Enhancers (e.g., , )Increase GABA levels or receptor affinityGeneralized tonic-clonic, myoclonicWeight gain, , ()Broad-spectrum; 50-60% control in
(e.g., )Block T-type calcium currentsAbsence seizuresGastrointestinal upset, Superior to for absence (70% vs. 50%)
Modulators (e.g., )Bind protein 2AFocal, generalized, 40-60% add-on efficacy in refractory cases
Therapeutic drug monitoring is advised for ASMs with narrow therapeutic indices like , where levels correlate with efficacy and toxicity; target ranges vary, e.g., 10-20 mcg/mL for . Discontinuation is considered after 2-5 years of seizure freedom, with relapse risk of 20-40% upon withdrawal, higher in symptomatic etiologies. Long-term use necessitates monitoring for , with enzyme inducers like linked to reduced bone density via metabolism interference. Supplementation with vitamin D (and calcium) is often recommended to mitigate bone loss risks from enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, though it does not improve seizure control.

Surgical Options

Surgical interventions are considered for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, defined as failure to achieve control after adequate trials of at least two appropriately chosen antiepileptic drugs, affecting approximately 30% to 40% of individuals with epilepsy. These procedures aim to either resect or ablate the epileptogenic zone, disconnect propagation pathways, or modulate neural activity through implanted devices, with candidacy determined by presurgical evaluation including video-EEG monitoring, MRI, and sometimes invasive recordings to localize the focus. Outcomes vary by procedure type, epilepsy , and patient factors, but successful can yield freedom rates of 50% to 80% in select cases, alongside reductions in antiepileptic drug requirements and improved . Resective surgery involves excision of the seizure-onset zone, most commonly temporal for mesial temporal sclerosis, achieving seizure freedom in about 60% to 70% of patients at long-term follow-up. Frontal or parietal resections yield lower rates, around 40% to 50%, due to broader networks involved. Risks include deficits, language impairments, or cognitive changes, occurring in 5% to 10% of cases, though mortality is under 1%. Ablative techniques, such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), use MRI-guided laser probes to thermally destroy deep or eloquent-area foci via small burr holes, offering a minimally invasive alternative to open resection with seizure freedom in 50% to 65% of mesial patients. LITT reduces operative time and hospital stay compared to but may require repeat procedures in 10% to 20% of cases for incomplete ablation. Disconnective procedures like sever interhemispheric connections to halt bilateral synchrony in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or atonic drop attacks, reducing generalized tonic-clonic or atonic seizures by 70% to 90% without eliminating focal origins. Anterior two-thirds callosotomy minimizes risks like alien hand, while full section is reserved for refractory cases. Neuromodulation devices provide palliative options for multifocal or non-resectable epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) implants electrodes on the to deliver intermittent pulses, yielding 50% to 65% seizure reduction in responders after 6 to 12 months, with efficacy increasing over time. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) detects electrocorticographic abnormalities and delivers targeted cortical stimulation, reducing disabling s by 50% to 75% over years in focal epilepsy. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the anterior thalamic nucleus, FDA-approved in 2018, achieves median 50% frequency decrease at 5 years, particularly for tonic-clonic events. These devices carry infection risks (2% to 5%) and require battery replacements but avoid tissue resection. Patient selection emphasizes comprehensive evaluation to balance potential benefits against procedural morbidity.

Dietary Interventions

The , a high-fat, low-carbohydrate regimen that induces by mimicking states, has been employed as a treatment for epilepsy since the and is particularly indicated for drug-resistant cases after failure of two or more antiepileptic drugs. Clinical evidence from multicenter studies demonstrates that approximately 51% of patients achieve greater than 50% reduction, with 32% experiencing over 90% reduction, across various types and patient ages. A reports a 53% combined efficacy rate for reduction and 13% for seizure freedom in drug-resistant epilepsy. The diet's multimodal mechanisms, including altered neuronal excitability and enhanced inhibition, contribute to its antiseizure effects, though long-term adherence remains challenging due to gastrointestinal side effects like and potential risks such as kidney stones or , necessitating medical supervision. Variants of the ketogenic diet offer less restrictive alternatives, improving tolerability while maintaining efficacy. The classic ketogenic diet enforces a strict 3:1 or 4:1 ratio of fat to combined protein and carbohydrates by weight, typically limiting carbohydrates to 10-20 grams daily. The modified (MAD), allowing 15-20 grams of net carbohydrates per day with emphasis on high-fat intake but without precise weighing, achieves at least 50% reduction in 70% of pediatric patients in small cohorts and is preferred for adolescents and adults due to its and reduced monitoring burden. The low treatment (LGIT), restricting intake to carbohydrates with a below 50 and totaling 40-60 grams daily, stabilizes blood glucose fluctuations and yields reductions comparable to MAD with fewer adverse events, as evidenced in comparative studies of pediatric epilepsy. Guidelines from epilepsy specialists recommend initiating these therapies under multidisciplinary oversight, including neurologists and dietitians, with baseline assessments of nutritional status, , and bone health, followed by periodic monitoring to mitigate complications like growth delays in children or in adults. Efficacy persists in select cohorts beyond one year, with freedom rates of 10-15% in cases, though outcomes vary by epilepsy , such as superior responses in myoclonic-astatic epilepsy. Discontinuation is considered after two years of , with risks assessed individually. Emerging data suggest modulation may enhance benefits, but causal links require further validation. In contrast to the ketogenic diet and its variants, which have established clinical evidence for treating drug-resistant epilepsy, no dietary supplements are conclusively proven by high-quality scientific evidence to effectively treat epilepsy or reduce seizures as a standard therapy. Systematic reviews, including Cochrane reviews, have found insufficient or no reliable evidence for common supplements such as omega-3 fatty acids (polyunsaturated fatty acids), vitamin E, folic acid, thiamine, or vitamin D in improving seizure control. Vitamin D may be recommended to prevent bone loss associated with antiepileptic drugs, but not for seizure reduction. Herbal supplements lack evidence of effectiveness and may worsen seizures or interact with medications. The ketogenic diet has evidence for some drug-resistant cases but is not a supplement. Consult a healthcare professional before using any supplements.

Adjunctive Approaches

(VNS) serves as an FDA-approved therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy, involving surgical implantation of a in the chest that delivers intermittent electrical impulses to the left via an , thereby modulating thalamocortical networks to suppress activity. Approved in 1997 for patients aged 12 and older with refractory partial-onset s, VNS has demonstrated seizure frequency reductions of approximately 50% in responsive patients, with long-term data from randomized controlled trials indicating sustained benefits over multiple years without curing the underlying condition. Adverse effects include hoarseness, , and risk at implantation, occurring in up to 20-30% of cases initially but often diminishing with time. Responsive (RNS) represents a closed-loop device system implanted intracranially to detect patterns in real-time and deliver targeted electrical to interrupt abnormal activity, primarily for adults with focal epilepsy to medications and ineligible for resective surgery. FDA-cleared in 2013, pivotal trials reported a median 37.9% reduction in frequency at one year and 75% at nine years in open-label extensions, with freedom achieved in subsets of patients through adaptive programming. Risks encompass surgical complications like hemorrhage (1-2%) and device malfunction, alongside potential cognitive effects monitored via integrated recording. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the provides another adjunctive option, where bilateral electrodes deliver continuous high-frequency pulses to disrupt epileptogenic circuits, suitable for multifocal or generalized refractory epilepsy. FDA-approved in 2018 based on the SANTE trial, which showed a 56% seizure reduction at seven years in randomized and long-term follow-up cohorts, though efficacy varies by epilepsy type and electrode placement precision. Common side effects include stimulation-induced , , and mood alterations, with infection rates below 5% in experienced centers. These therapies, while supported by level I evidence from double-blind trials, function palliatively alongside continued antiseizure medications rather than as standalone cures.

Reproductive and Familial Aspects

Contraceptive Interactions

Certain antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), particularly enzyme-inducing agents such as , , , , , eslicarbazepine acetate, and topiramate (at doses exceeding 200 mg/day), accelerate the hepatic metabolism of hormonal contraceptives via induction of 3A4 enzymes, thereby reducing serum concentrations of and progestins by 40-50% or more.00076-X/fulltext) This pharmacokinetic interaction diminishes the efficacy of combined oral contraceptives (OCs), progestin-only pills, implants, and depot (DMPA) injections, elevating the risk of and . In contrast, non-enzyme-inducing AEDs like , , (at standard doses), , and do not significantly impair hormonal contraceptive effectiveness. Bidirectional interactions occur with , where estrogen-containing contraceptives can halve lamotrigine plasma levels through enhanced , potentially precipitating breakthrough seizures in women stabilized on this AED.00076-X/fulltext) For women on enzyme-inducing AEDs, guidelines recommend non-hormonal methods such as intrauterine devices (IUDs), which remain unaffected, or barrier methods; if hormonal options are preferred, higher-dose OCs (≥50 μg ) with shortened pill-free intervals or continuous regimens may partially mitigate reduced efficacy, though failure rates can still exceed 3-6% annually without additional measures. Progestin-only methods like implants or DMPA show variable attenuation with inducers, often warranting avoidance or dual protection. Emergency contraception, including or pills and copper IUDs, can be used without restriction in women with epilepsy, as AEDs do not substantially alter their . Counseling should emphasize preconception planning, as unintended pregnancies in this population carry risks of fetal malformations from teratogenic AEDs like . Clinicians must verify specific AED profiles, as newer agents like or may exhibit partial induction, and monitor for clinical outcomes rather than relying solely on theoretical predictions.00076-X/fulltext)

Pregnancy Management

Women with epilepsy face elevated risks during pregnancy, including potential increases in frequency and teratogenic effects from antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), which necessitate preconception planning and multidisciplinary care to balance maternal control against fetal harm. Uncontrolled s, particularly tonic-clonic types, pose dangers such as maternal injury, hypoxia, and fetal distress, underscoring the need to maintain effective AED therapy rather than discontinuation. Approximately 15-30% of women experience worsened control during , often attributable to physiological changes like altered AED , sleep disruption, or hormonal fluctuations, while most maintain stable frequencies. Preconception counseling should prioritize switching from high-risk AEDs like , which carries the highest teratogenic potential—including up to 10% risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) such as defects, cardiac anomalies, and cleft palate—toward lower-risk options like , , or , associated with MCM rates closer to 2-3%. Polytherapy further elevates risks, so monotherapy is preferred when feasible. Folic acid supplementation at minimum 0.4 mg daily, and up to 4-5 mg for those on AEDs, is recommended preconceptionally and throughout to mitigate risks, though evidence for higher doses preventing other AED-related malformations remains inconclusive. During , is essential due to increased AED clearance—e.g., levels may drop by 50-100%—requiring dose adjustments to sustain efficacy without excessive dosing. Fetal ultrasonography and anomaly scans are advised, particularly in the second trimester, to detect MCMs, with overall malformation rates in epilepsy pregnancies ranging 4-8% versus 2-3% in the general population. precipitants like and nonadherence should be addressed through lifestyle measures, including consistent and avoidance of triggers. Labor and delivery typically favor vaginal routes unless obstetric indications dictate otherwise; epidural anesthesia is safe but may lower slightly, and operative interventions like should be minimized to reduce maternal stress. Postpartum, risk surges due to sleep deprivation and rapid AED clearance reversal, warranting close monitoring and prompt dose optimization. is generally compatible with most AEDs, as infant exposure remains low (e.g., <10% of maternal dose for lamotrigine or levetiracetam), with no demonstrated adverse neurodevelopmental effects and potential benefits for maternal-infant bonding; however, infants of mothers on phenobarbital or benzodiazepines require observation for sedation.

Prognosis

Long-Term Outcomes

Approximately 60-68% of individuals with newly diagnosed epilepsy achieve long-term remission, defined as seizure freedom for at least one to five years, depending on the study cohort and duration of follow-up. In a cohort of patients followed for 20 years post-onset, two-thirds entered terminal remission, with half achieving this without antiepileptic medications. Remission rates are higher for idiopathic epilepsy compared to structural or symptomatic causes, with early response to initial antiepileptic drugs serving as a strong predictor of sustained seizure control. In childhood-onset epilepsy, outcomes are favorable for many, with 64% of survivors seizure-free for at least five years by adulthood, including 47% off medications; however, psychosocial challenges such as reduced educational attainment and employment persist even among those in remission. Adult-onset cases show similar patterns, with about two-thirds entering five-year terminal remission long-term, though chronic epilepsy affects roughly one-third, often featuring relapsing-remitting seizure patterns rather than unremitting activity. Prognosis varies by syndrome; for instance, benign childhood epilepsies like yield near-complete remission by adolescence, whereas temporal lobe epilepsy in children may resolve in over half but carries risks of persistence into adulthood. Relapse risk remains elevated post-remission, with 40% of patients experiencing seizure recurrence five years after entering remission, and 25% developing drug-resistant epilepsy thereafter. Defining sufficient remission duration for low relapse probability improves with longer seizure-free periods: from two to five years markedly reduces risk, stabilizing further beyond five years. Surgical interventions in refractory cases enhance long-term remission, with patterns of initial post-surgical seizure control predicting sustained outcomes in up to 73% without medication adjustments. Long-term quality of life is compromised by comorbidities, even in seizure-controlled patients, including cognitive deficits (e.g., memory difficulties in 55.8% of adults with active epilepsy), chronic pain (40.2%), obesity (38.6%), and psychiatric conditions like depression and anxiety, which exacerbate unemployment, social isolation, and reduced independence. Multimorbidity amplifies these effects, correlating with poorer health-related quality of life, higher suicide risk, and premature mortality independent of seizures. In children transitioning to adulthood, neurodevelopmental and psychiatric comorbidities contribute to enduring behavioral and social impairments.

Mortality Risks

Individuals with epilepsy experience a standardized mortality ratio (SMR) approximately 1.6 to 9.3 times higher than the general population, depending on epilepsy type, duration, and control, with higher ratios observed in those with remote symptomatic etiologies or frequent seizures. Premature mortality arises from both direct epilepsy-related mechanisms, such as seizure-induced physiological disruptions, and indirect factors including comorbidities, accidents, and treatment side effects. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) constitutes a primary direct risk, defined as sudden, witnessed or unwitnessed, nontraumatic, and nondrowning death in epilepsy patients without a toxicological or anatomic explanation after thorough postmortem examination. The incidence of SUDEP is estimated at 0.22 per 1,000 patient-years in children with epilepsy, rising to 1.2 per 1,000 patient-years in adults, with rates escalating to 3-9 per 1,000 in those with refractory, frequent generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Key risk factors include uncontrolled seizures, polytherapy with antiepileptic drugs, intellectual disability, and young adult male sex, while seizure freedom reduces risk near general population levels. Mechanistically, SUDEP often links to postictal respiratory arrest, central apnea, or cardiorespiratory instability during or after a generalized seizure, supported by witnessed cases and animal models demonstrating seizure-induced brainstem dysfunction. Beyond SUDEP, status epilepticus accounts for significant mortality, contributing to 16-23% of epilepsy-related deaths, often via neuronal injury, systemic complications like rhabdomyolysis, or cerebral edema. Seizure-associated accidents, including drowning (up to 25% of non-SUDEP epilepsy deaths in some cohorts) and trauma from falls, elevate risks particularly in unsupervised settings or with nocturnal seizures. Suicide rates are 3-10 times higher, driven by psychosocial stressors, medication side effects, and comorbid psychiatric conditions rather than seizures per se. Indirect causes encompass exacerbated comorbidities, such as cerebrovascular disease (SMR 4.50) and pneumonia, where seizures impair airway protection or mobility. In the United States from 2011-2021, epilepsy was listed in 43,231 deaths, underlying in 39% and contributing in 61%, underscoring its pervasive role.
Cause of DeathApproximate Proportion in Epilepsy CohortsKey Notes
SUDEP20-23% of epilepsy-related deathsHighest in refractory cases; postictal cardiorespiratory failure predominant.
Status Epilepticus16-23%Often leads to multiorgan failure; prompt treatment critical.
Accidents (e.g., drowning, falls)25%Preventable with supervision and seizure alerts.
SuicideElevated 3-10x general rateLinked to depression, not directly to seizures.
Cerebrovascular/Neoplasms15-19%Underlying etiologies amplify risk.

Epidemiology

Global Prevalence

Approximately 51.7 million individuals worldwide were living with epilepsy in 2021, corresponding to an age-standardized prevalence rate of 658 cases per 100,000 population.00302-5/fulltext) This estimate encompasses both idiopathic and secondary forms, derived from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, which aggregates data from epidemiological surveys, registries, and modeling to account for underdiagnosis in resource-limited settings.00302-5/fulltext) Earlier assessments similarly report over 50 million affected persons, with point prevalence for active epilepsy—defined as ongoing seizures or recent treatment—averaging 6.38 per 1,000 persons based on meta-analyses of 197 studies spanning multiple continents. Prevalence varies substantially by economic development, with nearly 80% of cases concentrated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where rates reach 139 incident cases per 100,000 annually compared to 49 per 100,000 in high-income nations. This disparity stems from higher burdens of etiological factors such as parasitic infections (e.g., neurocysticercosis), perinatal trauma, and stroke in LMICs, rather than diagnostic differences alone, as evidenced by community-based studies adjusting for case ascertainment. Globally, annual incidence hovers around 61-68 new cases per 100,000 person-years, with lifetime risk estimates indicating one in 26 individuals may develop epilepsy.
Region/Income GroupPrevalence (per 1,000)Key Notes
Global6.38 (active)Pooled from 197 studies; higher for lifetime (10.98).
High-Income~5.0Lower incidence due to better perinatal care and infection control.
Low/Middle-Income~12.080% of global cases; driven by preventable causes.
These figures underscore epilepsy's status as the fourth most common neurological disorder, contributing over 0.5% to the global disease burden, though underreporting persists in areas with limited healthcare access.

Demographic Distributions

Epilepsy exhibits a bimodal age distribution in incidence, with peaks in the first year of life and after age 65, while prevalence tends to increase steadily in adulthood due to cumulative cases. In the United States, approximately 456,000 children aged 0-17 years have active epilepsy, representing about 0.6% prevalence, whereas 2.9 million adults (1% of the adult population) report active epilepsy as of 2021-2022 data. Among older adults, those over 65 account for nearly a quarter of new-onset cases, often linked to cerebrovascular events or neurodegeneration. Incidence rates are marginally higher in males than females globally, with male-to-female ratios around 1.1-1.5 in various studies, potentially attributable to greater exposure to traumatic etiologies. Prevalence shows similar patterns, with males exhibiting higher overall rates in population analyses, though idiopathic forms display minimal sex differences. Racial and ethnic disparities in the US reveal higher prevalence among Black individuals (2.13% lifetime prevalence) compared to Whites (0.77%), with nearly threefold elevated active epilepsy rates in . Incidence is also elevated in Black populations relative to Whites and Hispanics, alongside increased late-onset epilepsy post-stroke in non-Hispanic Blacks. Some broader studies find no significant race/ethnicity differences after adjustment, but unadjusted data consistently indicate disproportionate burden in minorities. Prevalence correlates inversely with socioeconomic status, with lower-income groups and neighborhoods showing higher rates, potentially due to increased etiological risks like perinatal complications or trauma. In pediatric cohorts, children from higher-income households have 30% lower odds of epilepsy diagnosis. Lower SES also associates with greater healthcare utilization disparities and non-adherence to treatment.
Demographic FactorKey ObservationExample Rate (US unless noted)
Age <1 yearHigh incidence peakBimodal distribution start
Age >65 yearsHighest new-onset incidence~25% of cases
vs. Higher male incidenceRatio 1.1-1.5 globally
vs. Higher Black prevalence2.13% vs. 0.77% lifetime
Low SESElevated prevalenceInverse correlation

History

Pre-Modern Conceptions

![Hippocrates, depicted in a painting by Peter Paul Rubens]float-right The earliest documented conceptions of epilepsy appear in Mesopotamian texts from around 2000 BC, where seizures were attributed to supernatural forces such as demonic influences or divine displeasure, with treatments involving incantations and rituals to appease gods. In ancient Egypt, the Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus, dating to circa 1700 BC, describes seizure symptoms alongside recommendations for herbal remedies and fumigation, though underlying causes were likely viewed through a lens of mystical intervention by deities. Biblical accounts, spanning Old and New Testaments, frequently portrayed seizures as manifestations of demonic possession or spiritual affliction, as seen in descriptions of afflicted individuals healed through by , such as the boy in Mark 9:14-29 who convulsed and foamed at the mouth. In , Greek thinkers initially termed epilepsy the "sacred disease," implying divine origin, but of (c. 460–370 BC) rejected this in his treatise , positing instead a naturalistic rooted in an excess of accumulating in the brain's veins, which blocked vessels and caused hereditary convulsions akin to other bodily disorders. This humoral pathology emphasized cerebral origins and rational treatment over supernatural explanations, influencing subsequent medical thought despite prevailing cultural superstitions. Roman conceptions blended Greek rationalism with persistent ; (129–216 AD) adhered to Hippocratic principles, attributing epilepsy to or black bile stagnating in cerebral ventricles, yet popular remedies included consuming gladiators' blood or liver, believed to transfer vital strength from the dying. During medieval , Christian interpretations largely reverted to viewing epilepsy as demonic possession or divine punishment for sin, prompting exorcisms and social ostracism, with texts like those of suggesting interactions between humoral imbalances and satanic influences. This era's dominance of theological over empirical frameworks perpetuated stigma, contrasting earlier Greek demystification efforts.

Twentieth-Century Advances

The twentieth century brought pivotal pharmacological breakthroughs for epilepsy management, beginning with the introduction of in 1912 by Alfred , who observed its anticonvulsant effects in patients experiencing restlessness from bromide therapy. This offered superior efficacy and tolerability compared to , the primary treatment since 1857, markedly reducing frequency in many cases. In 1938, H. Merritt and Tracy Putnam introduced , demonstrating its ability to control convulsions without the sedative effects of barbiturates through systematic testing in animal models and clinical trials. These developments shifted epilepsy treatment from symptomatic palliation to targeted suppression, laying the foundation for modern antiepileptic drug therapy. Diagnostic advancements centered on (EEG), pioneered by , who recorded the first human brain electrical activity in 1924 and published findings in 1929, enabling objective identification of epileptiform discharges. Frederic Gibbs, Erna Gibbs, and William Lennox further refined EEG application by describing the 3 Hz pattern in absence seizures in 1935 and correlating psychomotor seizures with abnormalities in 1937, facilitating precise localization and classification of epileptic activity. These techniques transformed epilepsy from a clinical reliant on observation to one grounded in measurable neurophysiological evidence, improving from conditions like or syncope. Non-pharmacological options gained traction with the , formalized in 1921 by Russell Wilder at the as a means to replicate fasting's benefits through high-fat, low-carbohydrate intake inducing . Widely adopted in the 1920s and 1930s, particularly for children with refractory , it achieved seizure freedom in about 50% of cases before declining with AED availability. Surgical interventions advanced through Wilder Penfield's Montreal procedure, established in the 1930s at the founded in 1934, which employed intraoperative cortical stimulation under to map epileptogenic zones and resect foci, yielding seizure control in up to 60% of focal epilepsy patients. These innovations collectively reduced epilepsy's institutionalization rates and enhanced , though challenges like drug side effects and surgical risks persisted.

Societal Dimensions

Stigma and Public Perception

Public misconceptions about epilepsy, including beliefs that it is contagious, a form of , or caused by supernatural forces, contribute to widespread stigma against people with epilepsy (PWE). These attitudes manifest in reluctance to employ, marry, or socially interact with PWE, with surveys in regions like revealing that 20-30% of respondents hold views associating epilepsy with or danger. Globally, enacted stigma—such as in workplaces or schools—affects up to 50% of PWE, exacerbating isolation and reducing , as evidenced by meta-analyses linking stigma to higher rates of depression and anxiety. Perceived stigma, where PWE internalize negative societal views, is reported by 44% in East African studies and correlates with lower and . Self-stigma, involving and avoidance of disclosure, affects about 30% of PWE in similar cohorts, often stemming from fears of judgment during unpredictable s. Cross-cultural comparisons show higher stigma in developing regions, where cultural attributions to spirits or punishment amplify , though urban education levels mitigate some biases. In contrast, awareness campaigns in and have modestly improved attitudes, with post-intervention surveys indicating reduced misconceptions about first and contagion. Stigma's persistence despite medical advances reflects incomplete public understanding of epilepsy as a rather than a , leading to tangible barriers like —PWE face rates 2-3 times higher than the general in stigmatizing contexts. Empirical data from validated scales, such as the Public Attitudes Toward Epilepsy (PATE), consistently demonstrate that knowledge gaps fuel negative perceptions, with only 40-60% of respondents in global surveys correctly identifying epilepsy's non-contagious, treatable nature. Efforts to counter this include targeted , yet residual caution around seizure unpredictability—rational in safety-critical roles—sometimes blurs into irrational , as distinguished in research. Overall, stigma diminishes help-seeking and adherence to treatment, perpetuating a cycle of poorer outcomes verifiable through longitudinal studies. Individuals with epilepsy face legal restrictions on operating motor vehicles in most jurisdictions, primarily to mitigate risks of -induced accidents. In the United States, regulations vary by state, but typically require a minimum seizure-free period of 3 to 12 months without antiseizure changes before licensing, with physicians required to report non-compliance in some states. In , the majority of countries mandate at least one year of seizure freedom for ordinary vehicle licenses (), while commercial () often requires two years or lifelong exemptions in cases of uncontrolled epilepsy. Globally, some nations such as , , and impose bans on after even a single , reflecting stricter interpretations of public safety imperatives grounded in seizure unpredictability data showing elevated crash risks. Occupational constraints similarly prioritize safety in roles involving machinery, heights, or public welfare, where a could precipitate harm. Professions like commercial piloting, train operation, and are often prohibited for those with active epilepsy under federal aviation or transportation regulations in the and equivalent bodies elsewhere, as seizure incidence correlates with operational failures in empirical studies of high-risk environments. Employers may lawfully exclude candidates from such positions if epilepsy poses a "direct threat" to , even if controlled, per assessments balancing individual capability against documented seizure relapse rates of 20-50% post-remission. Anti-discrimination laws provide counterbalances, prohibiting blanket exclusions based solely on epilepsy diagnosis. Under the US Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), employers must offer reasonable accommodations—such as schedule flexibility or seizure monitoring—unless they impose undue hardship, with violations actionable via Equal Employment Opportunity Commission enforcement. Similar protections exist in the EU via the Employment Equality Directive, mandating individualized risk evaluations rather than presumptive bans, though compliance varies due to interpretive differences in national courts. These frameworks stem from recognition that many with well-managed epilepsy (seizure-free for years) perform equivalently to peers, as evidenced by longitudinal employment data, yet enforcement hinges on verifiable medical evidence over self-reported stability.

Economic Consequences

Epilepsy imposes a substantial economic burden on individuals, healthcare systems, and societies worldwide, encompassing both direct medical expenditures and from lost . A systematic review estimated the global annual cost of epilepsy at $179.4 billion, with accounting for 54.8% and 45.2%; adjusting for the treatment gap raised the figure to $334.4 billion. In the United States, annual direct healthcare costs per person with epilepsy ranged from $10,192 to $47,862 across studies of general populations. These costs reflect epilepsy's contribution to over 0.5% of the global burden of disease, as measured by disability-adjusted life years. Direct costs primarily arise from pharmacological treatments, hospitalizations, diagnostic procedures, and . In the US, a 2014 analysis of claims data reported average annual per-person costs of $15,414, including outpatient visits, emergency care, and medications. Antiepileptic costs for brand-name formulations escalated from $2,800 per patient annually in 2008 to $10,700 in 2018. Hospitalizations represent a major driver, with median health plan-paid costs of $22,305 per epilepsy-related inpatient stay among commercially insured patients. Patients with epilepsy incur higher expenses, with recent studies indicating ranges of $8,412 to $11,354 annually, driven by frequent seizures necessitating intensive interventions. Indirect costs stem from reduced workforce participation, , , and caregiving demands, often exceeding in magnitude. data from 2011 showed productivity losses of $9,504 per person with epilepsy compared to those without, attributable to seizure-related disabilities and barriers. Systematic reviews confirm that , including early and reduced work hours, substantially surpass direct medical outlays across multiple studies. In contexts like , productivity losses constituted 18% of total economic costs in 2025 estimates, equivalent to 2.3 billion AUD, due to lower rates and sickness absences among affected individuals. Caregiving further amplifies these losses, with annual productivity reductions for caregivers of children with uncontrolled epilepsy reaching $19,557. Economic impacts vary by seizure control, socioeconomic factors, and regional healthcare access, with higher burdens in low-income settings due to untreated cases. Per-person annual costs ranged from $204 in low-income countries to $11,432 in high-income ones in extrapolations. Refractory cases and comorbidities elevate both direct and indirect expenditures, underscoring the need for effective seizure management to mitigate societal costs.

Research Directions

Genetic and Biomarker Studies

Genetic studies have established that epilepsy involves both rare monogenic variants and common polygenic contributions, with estimates ranging from 23% for focal epilepsy to 36% for non-focal forms, and 32% overall. Over 200 genes have been implicated in epilepsy, often affecting ion channels, systems, or neuronal excitability, as validated through targeted sequencing and family-based analyses. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have further identified 26 risk loci in a of over 29,000 individuals, demonstrating that common single polymorphisms (SNPs) account for 39.6% to 90% of genetic risk in genetic (GGE) subtypes. Polygenic risk scores (PRS), derived from GWAS data, quantify cumulative effects of multiple common variants and have shown utility in stratifying epilepsy risk across populations, including elevated PRS in familial cases and associations with poststroke epilepsy onset. These scores predict phenotypic severity within families and highlight subtype-specific architectures, such as higher genetic burden in GGE compared to focal epilepsies, though their clinical translation remains limited by ancestry-specific training data and modest effect sizes. Integrative analyses of epilepsy-associated genes emphasize pathways like synaptic transmission and neuronal development, informing precision diagnostics for pediatric cohorts where genetic testing yields actionable findings in up to 40% of developmental epileptic encephalopathies. Biomarker research complements by targeting epileptogenesis, seizure prediction, and treatment response, with candidates including microRNAs (miRNAs), inflammatory cytokines, and signatures. Circulating miRNAs, such as miR-134 and miR-146a, show differential expression in epileptic brain tissue and serum, correlating with frequency and potential as non-invasive diagnostics, though reproducibility across studies varies due to heterogeneous etiologies. Inflammatory markers like IL-6 and TNF-α elevate post-, linking to blood-brain barrier disruption, while components (e.g., C3) indicate in animal models of . Neurogenetic biomarkers, integrating genetic variants with EEG or MRI phenotypes, aid in refining diagnoses and predicting ; for instance, variants in SCN1A combined with high-frequency oscillations on EEG signal poor prognosis in . Advanced imaging biomarkers, such as normative modeling of MRI deviations, detect subtle cortical abnormalities in idiopathic epilepsies, surpassing traditional volumetrics in specificity. Despite progress, challenges persist in validating biomarkers for epileptogenesis prevention, as most studies report post-hoc associations rather than prospective utility, necessitating larger longitudinal cohorts to disentangle causal mechanisms from epiphenomena.

Novel Therapeutic Developments

Recent approvals of antiseizure medications (ASMs) include extended-release (Motpoly XR) in May 2023 for focal-onset seizures in patients aged 4 years and older, offering once-daily dosing to improve adherence in pediatric and adult populations. , approved earlier but with expanded evidence from 2023-2025 studies, demonstrates seizure freedom rates up to 21% in drug-resistant focal epilepsy when initiated early, targeting modulation with a dual mechanism involving persistent and fast-inactivating currents. Pipeline candidates emphasize precision mechanisms, such as enhancers and protein inhibitors, with phase III trials reporting 50-60% responder rates in refractory cases, though failures like overly narrow therapeutic windows highlight risks in translation from preclinical models. Neuromodulation devices have advanced toward responsive systems, including the NeuroPace RNS System updates enabling closed-loop detection and stimulation of epileptiform activity, reducing seizures by 70% over five years in multicenter trials for focal epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paradigms now incorporate autostimulation triggered by electrocorticography-detected ictal events, achieving 50-75% seizure reduction in drug-resistant patients, with transcutaneous auricular VNS (ta-VNS) emerging as a non-invasive alternative modulating brainstem nuclei without surgical implantation. In April 2025, the FDA cleared Minder iCEM, a breakthrough intracranial EEG monitoring device for real-time seizure prediction and therapy adjustment in drug-resistant epilepsy, integrating AI for pattern recognition to preempt ictal onset. Gene therapies target monogenic epilepsies via adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors delivering genes like KCNQ2, restoring neuronal excitability in preclinical models of neonatal epilepsy with sustained suppression of spontaneous seizures for over a year post-injection. CRISPR/Cas9 editing approaches correct mutations in SCN1A-associated , achieving 80-90% reduction in seizure frequency in models by precise allele-specific knockdown, though off-target effects and delivery challenges limit human translation as of 2025. grafts, including transplants, modulate hyperexcitable networks in models, secreting neuromodulators to dampen aberrant synchronization and repair seizure-induced damage, with phase I trials initiating in 2024 showing preliminary safety in patients. These modalities prioritize causal intervention at and circuit levels over symptomatic suppression, yet long-term efficacy data remain pending larger randomized trials.

Predictive and Mechanistic Models

Predictive models for epilepsy leverage and to analyze biosignals, particularly (EEG), for anticipating seizures before clinical manifestation. These models identify preictal biomarkers—subtle changes in brain dynamics preceding ictal activity—enabling forecasts with horizons ranging from seconds to hours, though performance metrics like sensitivity (often 70-90% in controlled datasets) and false positive rates (variable, up to several per day) depend on patient-specific factors and data quality. Early approaches used statistical methods on intracranial EEG, but recent advancements incorporate recurrent neural networks such as bidirectional LSTM for temporal , achieving patient-tuned predictions on long-term datasets. Hybrid architectures, including multidimensional transformers fused with LSTM-GRU layers, process multichannel EEG to classify preictal states with enhanced accuracy, as demonstrated in studies on diverse epilepsy cohorts. Pretrained vision transformers adapted for EEG spectrograms further improve generalization across patients, with preliminary evaluations showing feasibility for wearable devices to reduce unpredictability. Distinctions from mere detection—focusing on via preictal horizon estimation—highlight ongoing challenges, including to interictal variability and the need for prospective validation beyond retrospective analyses. Mechanistic models simulate epilepsy's core , modeling seizures as emergent properties of neuronal network instability rather than isolated cellular events. At the biophysical level, these frameworks mathematically depict kinetics, , and circuit-level feedback loops, revealing how hyperexcitability arises from disrupted excitation-inhibition balance in cortical and hippocampal regions. Computational implementations, evolving from phenomenological descriptions of ictal rhythms to detailed Hodgkin-Huxley-type simulations, predict initiation thresholds and propagation patterns, validated against rodent data from models like kainic acid-induced . Personalized mechanistic approaches, such as virtual epileptic patient simulations, integrate structural MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and epileptogenic zone estimates to forecast stimulation outcomes, with 2025 workflows demonstrating improved localization of seizure foci over empirical methods alone. These models underscore causal roles of and in epileptogenesis, where microglial activation amplifies synaptic remodeling, though empirical constraints like species-specific differences limit direct . By prioritizing causal chain reconstructions over correlative associations, such simulations guide precision interventions, emphasizing testable hypotheses on network resilience rather than unverified molecular cascades.

Epilepsy in Animals

Comparative Pathophysiology

Epilepsy pathophysiology across mammalian species, including humans, dogs, , and non-human , fundamentally involves an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory , resulting in neuronal hyperexcitability and hypersynchronous discharges that manifest as . This core mechanism—disrupted in glutamate-mediated excitation versus inhibition—is conserved, with shared cellular underpinnings such as voltage-gated sodium and dysfunctions leading to prolonged and burst firing. In genetic epilepsies, mutations in genes like SCN1A produce similar gain- or loss-of-function effects across species, causing channelopathies that lower seizure thresholds through altered dynamics. Comparative studies highlight pathophysiological parallels in epileptogenesis, the process transitioning normal brains to epileptic states. In both temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and rodent kainic acid or models, emerges via excitotoxic neuronal loss, , and mossy fiber sprouting, fostering recurrent circuit hyperexcitability. , involving microglial activation and release (e.g., IL-1β), exacerbates this in humans and canines alike, contributing to chronicity. Dogs with idiopathic epilepsy exhibit spontaneous recurrent seizures akin to focal epilepsies, with EEG patterns showing interictal spikes and ictal rhythms mirroring human polyspike-wave complexes, underscoring translational fidelity in network-level . Differences arise from species-specific neuroanatomy, genetics, and experimental induction. Rodent models often replicate acute insults (e.g., via chemoconvulsants) leading to rapid latent-period epileptogenesis, contrasting s' slower progression influenced by comorbidities like aging or vascular factors; for instance, rodent brains lack the and tracts that modulate seizure propagation. Canine epilepsies show breed-specific genetic loci (e.g., in Border Collies), paralleling monogenic forms but with higher prevalence of drug-resistant cases due to differing . Non-mammalian models like reveal conserved genetic pathways (e.g., via scn1lab mutants) but diverge in lacking complex cortical layering, limiting direct applicability to mammalian circuit dynamics. These variances necessitate caution in extrapolating mechanisms, as animal-induced models may overestimate acute while underrepresenting chronic elements like blood-brain barrier alterations.

Veterinary Management

Veterinary management of epilepsy in animals primarily focuses on dogs and cats, where idiopathic epilepsy is most commonly diagnosed after excluding structural, metabolic, or reactive causes through a tiered diagnostic approach. The International Veterinary Epilepsy Task Force (IVETF) proposes a three-tier system: Tier I involves history, clinical signs, and basic blood work to confirm recurrent seizures unprovoked by acute metabolic or toxic factors; Tier II adds advanced imaging like MRI and cerebrospinal fluid analysis; Tier III includes video-EEG monitoring for definitive epileptic seizure confirmation. Diagnosis is ultimately one of exclusion, as idiopathic epilepsy lacks identifiable biomarkers, with incidence rates of 0.5-5% in dogs. Pharmacological treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs, formerly termed antiepileptic drugs) is the cornerstone for controlling recurrent s in idiopathic cases, initiated typically after two or more generalized seizures or clusters. remains the first-line ASM for dogs due to its efficacy in reducing frequency by over 50% in many patients, dosed at 2-4 mg/kg orally twice daily with therapeutic serum levels of 20-40 mcg/mL monitored to avoid . (20-30 mg/kg/day) is added for refractory cases in dogs, offering no hepatic but risking with or . (20-60 mg/kg every 8 hours) and zonisamide (5-10 mg/kg every 12 hours) serve as adjuncts or alternatives, particularly in cats where is preferred but avoids enzyme induction. In cats, or topiramate may be trialed for focal seizures, though evidence is limited to case series. For emergency management of (SE, seizures >5 minutes) or clusters, intravenous benzodiazepines like (0.2 mg/kg) or (0.5 mg/kg) provide rapid cessation in 60-80% of canine cases, followed by IV (20-60 mg/kg) if refractory. The American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) consensus recommends loading (12-24 mg/kg IV divided over 4-8 hours) for non-responders, with or infusions for super-refractory SE to achieve on EEG. Rectal or intranasal serves as owner-administered rescue for home clusters. Non-pharmacological interventions include (MCT) enriched ketogenic diets, which reduce frequency by 50% in some drug-resistant dogs by promoting and altering neuronal excitability. (VNS) shows promise in pilot studies, decreasing burden in canine models akin to applications, though availability is limited to research settings. Surgical options are reserved for structural epilepsy identifiable via MRI, such as lesionectomy for focal cortical dysplasia or , achieving seizure freedom in select cases but carrying risks of postoperative deficits. For idiopathic epilepsy, intracranial resection lacks routine applicability due to multifocal origins, with human-adapted techniques like unproven in veterinary practice. Long-term monitoring involves serial ASM level checks, liver function tests every 6-12 months, and seizure diaries to assess efficacy, with 60-70% of dogs achieving good control but 20-30% developing pharmacoresistance necessitating polytherapy. Prognosis varies by etiology; idiopathic cases often stabilize with early intervention, but structural or progressive causes like neoplasia worsen despite treatment. Owners should neuter affected animals post-diagnosis, as hormonal influences may exacerbate seizures in intact individuals.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.