Hubbry Logo
Luke 3Luke 3Main
Open search
Luke 3
Community hub
Luke 3
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Luke 3
Luke 3
Luke 3
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Luke 3
Luke 3:7–8 with commentary in majuscule on the underwriting of Codex Zacynthius, a palimpsest from 7th-century. The upper writing is 13th-century minuscule of Matthew 26:39–51.
BookGospel of Luke
CategoryGospel
Christian Bible partNew Testament
Order in the Christian part3

Luke 3 is the third chapter of the Gospel of Luke in the New Testament of the Christian Bible, traditionally attributed to Luke the Evangelist, a companion of Paul the Apostle on his missionary journeys.[1] It contains an account of the preaching of John the Baptist as well as a genealogy of Jesus. From the start of this chapter until Luke 9:50, the "shape and outlook" of Luke's Gospel follow closely those of the other synoptic gospels, Matthew and Mark.[2]: 926–7  The Expositor's Greek Testament states that in this chapter "the ministry of the new era opens".[3]

Text

[edit]

The original text was written in Koine Greek and is divided into 38 verses.

Textual witnesses

[edit]

Some early manuscripts containing the text of this chapter are:

Old Testament references

[edit]

John the Baptist

[edit]
Main articles: John the Baptist and Chronology of Jesus
Territories and tetrarchies in the first-century Palestine: Judea, Galilee, Iturea, Trachonitis, Abilene; also Perea, Nabatea, Idumea, Samaria, Decapolis, Chalcis, Phoenicia
Greek inscription mentioning Lysanias, possibly the tetrarch in Luke 3:1

As he has already done in the first two chapters, Luke provides several points of historical data, in this case six, to specify the date of the events in the first century CE.[3]

Verses 1–2

[edit]
1In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar — when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, Herod tetrarch of Galilee, his brother Philip tetrarch of Iturea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of Abilene — 2during the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John son of Zechariah in the desert.[5]

Tiberius' fifteenth year of rule was AD 29 or 30 (calculated from the death of his predecessor, Augustus, in AD 14), so one can date the start of John's preaching to then. New Testament scholar William Ramsay suggests that the year was AD 26, calculated from the time Tiberius was appointed as co-Princeps with Augustus in AD 12.[6] Ramsay notes that this manner of calculation could be "made under an Emperor whose years were reckoned from his association as colleague", such as employed by Titus, whose reign began from his association with his father on July 1, AD 71.[7]

Comparison of Matthew 3:7–10 and Luke 3:7–9. Common text highlighted in red. From Scrivener's posthumous 1894 New Testament.

The rule of Pontius Pilate in Judea during the reign of Tiberius is well attested in history (for example, Tacitus in Annals book 15, chapter 44, written c. AD 116).[8][9] Saint Gregory suggested that the reference to Roman and Jewish rulers anticipated the salvation of "some from among the Jews and many among the gentiles".[10] Reference to the high priesthoods of Annas and Caiaphas creates a difficulty in that a joint high priesthood was not permitted under Jewish law.[2]: 926–7 

Verse 3

[edit]
And he went into all the region around the Jordan, proclaiming a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins.[11]

Although the message from God had come to John "in the wilderness", he may have preached nearer to Jericho,[12] cf: Luke 1:80: "he was in the wilderness until the day of his public appearance to Israel".[13] Eric Franklin states that the connection between John's baptism of repentance and [God's] forgiveness of sins is that baptism "issues in" forgiveness.[2]: 931  Luke connects the same concepts in Acts 2:38 and 22:16.[14]

Verse 4

[edit]
As it is written in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet, saying:
"The voice of one crying in the wilderness:
'Prepare the way of the Lord;
make His paths straight.[15]
  • Citing Isaiah 40:3; also cited in Matthew 3:3, Mark 1:3, and John 1:23.[16]
  • "Wilderness": or "desert"; the syntactic position of the phrase "in the wilderness" could be with "Prepare a way" (Masoretic Text or "MT"), suggesting the place where the preparation should be done, while the Greek Septuagint (or "LXX") connects it to "a voice shouting" indicating the place from where John’s ministry went forth.[17] Jewish documents separately support both renderings: 1QS 8:14 and 9.19–20 support the MT version while some rabbinic texts support the LXX version, but in the final analysis, the 'net effect between the two choices may be minimal'.[17]

Like Mark 1:2–3, Matthew 3:3 and John 1:23, Luke quotes Isaiah 40 in reference to John, but at greater length,[a] possibly in order to include the message that "...all flesh (or all mankind) will see God's salvation" (Luke 3:6) for his Gentile audience.[19]

Verse 5

[edit]
Every valley shall be filled,
and every mountain and hill shall be brought low;
and the crooked shall be made straight,
and the rough ways shall be made smooth;[20]

This verse cites Isaiah 40:4,[21] which the King James Version translates as "every valley shall be exalted".[22] The writer Frederic Farrar notes "a remarkable parallel" in Josephus' description of the march of Vespasian in the Wars of the Jews:

where he ... says that among his vanguard were "such as were to make the road even and straight, and if it were anywhere rough and hard to be passed over, to plane it, and to cut down the woods that hindered their march ... that the army might not be tired".[23][14]

Verse 6

[edit]
And all flesh shall see the salvation of God.[24]

This verse cites Isaiah 40:5:[25] see note above on verse 4.

Verses 7–17

[edit]

John first exhorts the listeners ("brood of snakes") to prove their repentance by the way they lived. Their sincerity was being called into question. As John continues to preach a baptism of repentance, he then tells the crowds that their descent from Abraham will not save them from "the wrath to come", that "...out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham. The axe is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire." (8–9)

The people ask what they should do and John speaks of sharing (verse 11). Specifically to tax collectors (publicans in the King James Version),[26] and to soldiers he says that they should not abuse their positions, adding that soldiers should be "content with their pay". Heinrich Meyer is confident that Jewish soldiers are referred to here, rather than occupying Roman forces.[27] They ask him if he is the Christ, and he replies "I baptize you with water. But one more powerful than I will come, the thongs of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire." (Luke 3:16) also found in Matthew 3:11, Mark 1:7-8 and John 1:26–27. John is then locked up by Herod for rebuking him about his wife Herodias, Herod adding this "crowning iniquity" to all his other misdeeds.[3]

Verse 16

[edit]
Sandals with modern straps, but of a similar style as the sandals in Roman times
John answered, saying to all, “I indeed baptize you with water; but One mightier than I is coming, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to loose. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.[28]

Textual variants are found in a few manuscripts (C D 892 1424 it) which have εἰς μετάνοιαν, eis metanoian, "for repentance", after the phrase "baptize you with water". This addition may be intended for clarification and was probably an attempt to harmonize with Matthew 3:11.[29]

Jesus's baptism

[edit]
Main articles: Baptism of Jesus and Nativity of Jesus
Facsimile edition of Luke 3:22,26–27 of Codex Tischendorfianus III, from 8th or 10th century

Luke then tells us (verse 21) that Jesus was one of the many who were baptised by John. Meyer reads the text as meaning that whilst the assembled people were being baptised, Jesus was also baptised.[27] Nicoll argues that use of the aorist "ought to imply that the bulk of the people had already been baptised before Jesus appeared on the scene, i.e., that John's ministry was drawing to its close",[3] cf. the wording of the Good News Translation, After all the people had been baptized, Jesus also was baptized.[30]

The Holy Spirit appears in bodily form like a dove and tells him "You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased" (cf. Matthew 3:13–17, Mark 1:9–11, John 1:32–34).

Verse 23

[edit]
aAnd Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age,
bbeing (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,[31]

The King James Version's wording is "ungrammatical, a strange expression".[14] Many translations insert reference to his "work" [32] or his "ministry".[33] Luke does not state how many years John baptised for, but this is when most date the start of Jesus's ministry, 29 or 30. He had to be more than thirty years old, as he was born about six months before Jesus was born, as noted in Luke 1. Most probably John was born in 4 BC.

The ancestry of Jesus

[edit]
Main article: Genealogy of Jesus § Luke's genealogy
A part of Luke's genealogy of Jesus (Luke 3:23–26), from the Book of Kells, transcribed by Celtic monks c. 800

Verses 23b–38

[edit]
One of Christ's ancestors depicted in Canterbury Cathedral

Luke sets out here, like Matthew in his opening chapter, a genealogy of Jesus. Luke starts with his legal father Joseph and lists 73 people between Joseph and Adam, who Luke says is "...the Son of God",[34] thus having 75 people between God and Jesus. This genealogy is longer than Matthew's, works retrospectively from Jesus back to Adam,[35] (whereas Matthew's runs chronologically forward from Abraham to Jesus), and has a number of other differences. Luke names Joseph's father and thus Jesus's grandfather as Heli, which could be Mary's father, as noted in the Talmud.[36] On the other hand, Matthew records the name of Joseph's father was Jacob. They then say that Jesus's great grandfather was named Matthat or Matthan, who could be the same person or, as first suggested by Julius Africanus, brothers. The lists then diverge from there, coming together again at David. The list in Luke also differs from Genesis 11:12, which says that Arphaxad was Selah's father, not his grandfather through Cainan.

Patrilineage of Jesus according to Luke
  1. God
  2. Adam
  3. Seth
  4. Enos
  5. Cainan
  6. Maleleel
  7. Jared
  8. Enoch
  9. Mathusala
  10. Lamech
  11. Noah
  12. Shem
  13. Arphaxad
  14. Cainan
  1. Sala
  2. Heber
  3. Phalec
  4. Ragau
  5. Saruch
  6. Nachor
  7. Thara
  8. Abraham
  9. Isaac
  10. Jacob
  11. Juda
  12. Phares
  13. Esrom
  14. Aram
  1. Aminadab
  2. Naasson
  3. Salmon
  4. Boaz
  5. Obed
  6. Jesse
  7. David
  8. Nathan
  9. Mattatha
  10. Menan
  11. Melea
  12. Eliakim
  13. Jonam
  14. Joseph
  1. Judah
  2. Simeon
  3. Levi
  4. Matthat
  5. Jorim
  6. Eliezer
  7. Jose
  8. Er
  9. Elmodam
  10. Cosam
  11. Addi
  12. Melchi
  13. Neri
  14. Salathiel
  1. Zorobabel
  2. Rhesa
  3. Joannan
  4. Juda
  5. Joseph
  6. Semei
  7. Mattathias
  8. Maath
  9. Nagge
  10. Esli
  11. Naum
  12. Amos
  13. Mattathias
  14. Joseph
  1. Jannai
  2. Melchi
  3. Levi
  4. Matthat
  5. Heli
  6. Joseph
  7. Jesus

Verse 33

[edit]
Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda.[37]

Parallel verses: Matthew 1:3–4

Verse 38

[edit]
... the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.[38]

As throughout Luke's genealogy, "son of" is implied but not stated except for "the son of Joseph" in verse 23.[b] Methodist commentator Joseph Benson comments,

Adam, being descended from no human parents, but formed by the power of a divine creating hand, might with peculiar propriety be called the son of God, having, in his original state, received immediately from God, whatever the sons of Adam receive from their parents, sin and misery excepted.[39]

Paul makes reference to the Greek understanding that "we are [all] the offspring of God" in his speech in the Areopagus in Athens, Acts 17:28–29.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Luke 3

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Luke 3 constitutes the third chapter of the Gospel of Luke in the New Testament, detailing the inception of John the Baptist's prophetic ministry amid a precisely dated historical framework, the baptism of Jesus Christ, and a genealogy linking Jesus to Adam.
The chapter opens by situating events in the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar's reign—commonly dated to AD 28 or 29—alongside contemporary Judean authorities including Pontius Pilate as governor, Herod Antipas as tetrarch of Galilee, and Philip as tetrarch of Iturea and Trachonitis. John emerges from the wilderness preaching a baptism of repentance for forgiveness of sins, fulfilling Isaiah's prophecy of preparing the Lord's way, and issuing stark warnings to repentant crowds dubbed a "brood of vipers," coupled with practical directives for tax collectors to avoid extortion and soldiers to abstain from false accusations or extortion. He distinguishes his water baptism from the imminent Messiah's baptism with the Holy Spirit and fire, who will separate wheat from chaff with an unquenchable winnowing fork.
Jesus' baptism follows, marked by prayer, the Holy Spirit's descent as a dove, and a heavenly voice affirming, "You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased," signaling divine endorsement of his mission. The chapter concludes with Jesus, at about thirty years old, initiating his ministry, followed by a genealogy from Joseph through David via Nathan—contrasting Matthew's Solomonic royal line—to Abraham, Noah, and ultimately Adam, son of God, which scholars attribute variously to Mary's biological descent, a levirate or legal lineage, or an emphasis on universal humanity over Jewish kingship. This universalistic tracing underscores Luke's thematic portrayal of Jesus as savior for all peoples, while textual variants in early manuscripts, such as Codex Bezae, highlight transmission complexities in the baptismal declaration.

Historical and Literary Context

Chronological and Political Setting

Luke 3 situates the onset of John the Baptist's ministry in the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar's reign, corresponding to approximately AD 28-29 by standard Roman accession reckoning from AD 14. This period aligns with Tiberius's sole rule as emperor (AD 14-37), during which the eastern provinces experienced centralized Roman administration tempered by local client rulers. The Roman Empire maintained control over Judea through direct provincial governance in the south while permitting semi-autonomous tetrarchies in peripheral regions like Galilee and Iturea. Pontius Pilate served as prefect of from AD 26 to 36, overseeing taxation, military order, and judicial authority in the core province encompassing , , and Idumea. ruled as tetrarch of and from 4 BC to AD 39, exercising local governance under Roman suzerainty, including the execution of later referenced in the chapter. His half-brother held the tetrarchy of and Traconitis from 4 BC until his death in AD 34, managing northeastern territories with relative stability. Lysanias's tetrarchy over Abilene, a district near , is attested by inscriptions dating to the early first century AD, confirming a local ruler during Tiberius's era despite earlier historical associations with a prior Lysanias executed in 36 BC. Religious authority rested with the high priesthood, nominally held by from AD 18 to 36, though his father-in-law (high priest AD 6-15) retained significant influence through family networks and Sadducean alliances with Roman officials. This dual mention in Luke 3:2 reflects the intertwined political-religious dynamics, where s mediated between Jewish temple practices and imperial demands, often prioritizing stability amid messianic expectations and Roman oversight. The tetrarchies and formed a fragmented model, fostering tensions that contextualized prophetic calls for .

Relation to Old Testament Prophecies

Luke 3:4–6 directly quotes :3–5, applying the prophecy of "a voice crying in the " to John the Baptist's ministry of and , portraying him as the herald preparing the path for the Lord's arrival. This fulfillment interprets Isaiah's announcement of Yahweh's redemptive coming after Israel's as realized in John's call to ethical and spiritual straightening of paths, evident in his preaching around AD 28–29. The extended quotation in Luke, unlike shorter versions in Mark 1:3 and Matthew 3:3, emphasizes universal revelation—"all flesh shall see the salvation of "—aligning John's role with Isaiah's vision of cosmic restoration. The narrative's opening in Luke 3:1–2, stating that "the word of came to John," mirrors prophetic commissions, such as those to (:4) and (:3), establishing John within the prophetic tradition as the final herald before the . John's ascetic lifestyle, confrontational preaching against moral crookedness, and expectation of further evoke 3:1 and 4:5–6, where a messenger like refines in preparation for , a connection reinforced by Luke's broader portrayal of John as Elijah's functional successor. The in Luke 3:23–38 traces ' ancestry through (via Nathan) to Judah, Abraham, and , verifying fulfillment of covenants promising an eternal throne to David's seed (2 Samuel 7:12–16) and dominion to Judah's tribe (Genesis 49:10), while extending to —""—to underscore ' universal redemptive scope beyond . This backward tracing, unique to Luke among the Gospels, counters claims of fabricated messianic lineage by anchoring in verifiable figures, including post-exilic names aligning with historical records. ![Genealogy of Christ from the Book of Kells]float-right

Placement Within Luke's Gospel

Luke 3 follows the infancy narratives of chapters 1 and 2, which detail the annunciations to Zechariah and Mary, the births of John the Baptist and Jesus, and events surrounding Jesus' childhood up to his presentation in the temple at age twelve. These opening chapters establish the miraculous origins and divine favor upon both figures, setting a theological foundation through hymns and prophecies that anticipate their roles. In contrast, Luke 3 shifts abruptly to a public, historical framework, commencing with a precise chronological marker in verses 1–2 that lists reigning figures such as Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate, Herod, Philip, Lysanias, and high priests Annas and Caiaphas to anchor events around AD 28–29. This transition underscores Luke's historiographical intent, moving from private divine interventions to the onset of prophetic fulfillment in the wilderness. The chapter's core content—John's preaching of repentance, baptismal ministry, ethical instructions, Jesus' baptism with the descending Spirit and heavenly voice, and the genealogy tracing Jesus back to Adam—functions as a pivotal bridge to the adult ministry narrated from chapter 4 onward. Unlike Matthew's placement of the genealogy at the gospel's outset to emphasize Jewish royal lineage, Luke positions it post-baptism (3:23–38), immediately after the divine affirmation of Jesus as "my beloved Son" (3:22), which prioritizes christological revelation before human ancestry. This sequencing links the birth narratives' messianic promises to Jesus' public identity, portraying John as the forerunner who prepares the way (echoing Isaiah 40:3–5 in 3:4–6) and Jesus as the superior figure whose baptism inaugurates his mission amid shared Synoptic elements with Mark and Matthew but with Luke's unique emphasis on universal salvation via the Adamic genealogy. Scholarly analyses highlight how this placement reflects Luke's ordered narrative (1:3), bridging private preparation with public proclamation while integrating historical verifiability to appeal to a broader, Gentile-inclusive audience. The genealogy's extension to , rather than Abraham, aligns with Luke's thematic focus on humanity's redemption, contrasting the localized Jewish emphasis in prior chapters and the gospel's expansion in Acts. Events in Luke 3–4 parallel other gospels' accounts of John's ministry and ' , but Luke's structuring delays the genealogy to affirm sonship first through baptismal , ensuring theological coherence from origins to mission.

Ministry of John the Baptist

Introduction to John's Calling

In the Gospel of Luke, chapter 3 initiates the public ministry of by framing his calling within a specific historical timeline and divine imperative. The narrative opens in the fifteenth year of the reign of Caesar, corresponding to approximately AD 28–29, when John, son of the priest Zechariah, receives the word of while in the . This commissioning echoes the prophetic traditions of the , where divine messages arrive directly to chosen figures in isolated settings, such as at Horeb or by the brook Cherith, signaling John's role as a bridge between Israelite and messianic fulfillment. Luke's account avoids biographical details of John's ascetic life—such as his camel-hair garment and diet, noted in parallel Synoptic texts—but emphasizes the abrupt transition from obscurity to proclamation, underscoring the sovereignty of 's timing over human preparation. John's calling manifests as a mandate to preach "a of for the forgiveness of sins" throughout the region, directly invoking Isaiah 40:3–5 to portray him as "the voice of one crying in the : 'Prepare the way of the , make his paths straight.'" This baptismal practice, involving immersion symbolizing moral purification, served as a call to ethical renewal among anticipating eschatological judgment, distinct from later Christian tied to ' death and resurrection. Historical corroboration from Flavius confirms John's influence as a urging and for purification, though Josephus attributes his execution to political fears rather than purely religious conflict. Luke presents John's emergence not as self-initiated but as prophetically ordained, fulfilling 3:1 and 4:5–6 by preparing a people "fitted" for the through moral straightening of crooked paths—every valley filled, mountain leveled—metaphorically denoting social and spiritual leveling for divine arrival. The theological weight of this introduction lies in its assertion of universal revelation: "And all flesh shall see the of ," extending John's preparatory work beyond to humanity's redemption. Scholarly analysis notes Luke's deliberate synchronization with Roman imperial chronology to validate the events' against secular records, countering potential dismissals as , while highlighting John's subordination to the coming "mightier" one whose winnowing fork and baptism of fire imply judgment beyond repentance. This calling establishes John as the eschatological herald, his locale evoking 's exodus testing and prophetic solitude, yet grounded in verifiable provincial rulers— in , Herod in , Lysanias in Abilene—affirming the narrative's embeddedness in first-century Judean reality.

Message of Repentance and Baptism

John the Baptist proclaimed a baptism of for the forgiveness of sins throughout the region surrounding the , drawing crowds who underwent immersion as a public sign of turning from sin in anticipation of . This practice, distinct from routine Jewish ritual washings or baptisms limited to converts, extended to native as an eschatological rite symbolizing moral purification and readiness for God's kingdom, rooted in prophetic fulfillment rather than established temple customs. Echoing Isaiah 40:3-5, John declared himself the "voice crying in the wilderness" tasked with preparing the Lord's way by making straight paths—filling valleys, leveling hills, and smoothing rough ground—so all humanity would witness God's salvation. This message challenged ethnic complacency, as John rebuked incoming crowds as a "brood of vipers" fleeing wrath, insisting they bear fruit in keeping with repentance rather than relying on Abrahamic descent, for God could raise faithful children from inert stones. He warned of imminent judgment, likening it to an ax poised at tree roots, where unfruitful ones would be felled and burned, emphasizing ethical transformation over mere ritual. Anticipating inquiries about the , John contrasted his water with the superior of the coming one, who would wield the and fire to purify and judge, separating wheat from with a and consigning refuse to unquenchable flames. This heralded not just individual but a radical reorientation of life toward , underscoring as active change amid impending divine reckoning.

Ethical Exhortations to Specific Groups

Following John's proclamation of and , the assembled crowds inquire about concrete actions to demonstrate genuine , prompting targeted ethical instructions applicable to their social roles. John responds to the multitude by directing them to practice material generosity: "Whoever has two tunics is to share with him who has none, and whoever has food is to do likewise" (Luke 3:11, ESV), framing such sharing as evidence of inner transformation rather than mere ritual observance. This exhortation aligns with calls for justice toward the needy, such as Deuteronomy 15:7-11, but emphasizes voluntary equity over mandatory redistribution, underscoring personal responsibility in alleviating without disrupting existing property norms. Tax collectors, notorious for overcharging to supplement incomes under the Roman system, approach John seeking guidance, and he advises them to "collect no more than you are authorized to do" (Luke 3:13, ESV). This directive mandates adherence to official quotas without excess, effectively curbing while permitting continuation in their , which involved collaboration with occupying authorities. Scholarly examinations highlight this as an ethic, promoting in revenue collection without advocating withdrawal from roles. Such counsel reflects causal realism in reform: ethical lapses stem from individual avarice, addressable through restraint rather than systemic overthrow. Soldiers, possibly auxiliaries in Herod Antipas's forces or Roman enlistees, similarly ask for direction, receiving John's command to "do not extort money from anyone by threats or by , and be content with your wages" (Luke 3:14, ESV). These instructions prohibit , fabricated charges, and dissatisfaction-driven graft, enforcing and satisfaction within duties that often involved in a volatile . Analyses of the passage interpret this as workplace-specific , where fruits of reform include non-exploitative conduct and acceptance of allotted compensation, countering tendencies toward without calling for or . Collectively, John's responses to these groups illustrate as behavioral amendment in everyday vocations—sharing resources, honest administration, and restrained authority—rather than vocational upheaval, prioritizing causal accountability over ideological purity.

Fate Under Herod Antipas

John the Baptist publicly rebuked Herod Antipas, the tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, for marrying Herodias, the wife of his half-brother Herod Philip, an act that contravened Levitical prohibitions against marrying a brother's wife (Leviticus 18:16; 20:21). Luke 3:19-20 records that John also condemned Herod for "all the evils which Herod had done," culminating in the tetrarch's decision to imprison the prophet, framing this as an additional transgression atop prior wrongs. This rebuke occurred amid John's preaching ministry, dated to approximately 28-29 CE in the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar's reign, toward the close of his public activity before transitioning to Jesus' baptism. The historian , writing in (c. 93-94 CE), corroborates the , attributing it not solely to personal rebuke but to Herod's fear that John's growing popularity and moral influence over crowds could incite rebellion against his rule. , a first-century and Roman collaborator whose works provide independent attestation of events, describes Herod as viewing John's ascetic teachings and baptisms—emphasizing —as a potential threat to political stability, prompting preemptive detention rather than immediate execution. This account aligns with Luke's portrayal of Herod's accumulated evils, including the illicit marriage contracted around 28 CE after Antipas divorced his first wife, a Nabatean princess, to wed . Luke omits details of John's eventual execution, focusing instead on the imprisonment as a narrative pivot marking the end of the Baptist's ministry and underscoring the opposition from secular authorities to prophetic critique. Archaeological evidence situates the prison at , a fortified hilltop in rebuilt by and controlled by Antipas, overlooking the Dead Sea; excavations confirm its role as a secure detention site during this period. Herod's reluctance to kill John outright, per , stemmed from public reverence for the prophet as righteous, delaying lethal action until political expediency—such as appeasing —later prevailed, though Luke reserves such developments for later context (:7-9).

Baptism of Jesus Christ

Description of the Baptismal Event

In Luke's account, the baptism of Jesus takes place during the widespread baptismal activity conducted by along the . The narrative states that "when all the people were baptized, and when also had been baptized," indicating ' participation alongside the crowds without specifying the baptizer or the ritual details such as immersion or pouring. Following the baptism, as Jesus was praying, "the heavens were opened," a marking divine intervention unique to this synoptic placement in Luke's prayer-emphasizing . The then descended upon him "in bodily form, like a dove," distinguishing Luke's description by explicitly noting the Spirit's tangible manifestation rather than mere similitude. Concurrently, a voice from heaven proclaimed, "You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased," echoing :7 and Isaiah 42:1 to affirm Jesus' divine sonship and messianic role within the baptismal context. This auditory revelation occurs immediately after the visual sign of the Spirit, compressing the into a succinct sequence absent of dialogue between John and Jesus found in parallel accounts.

Divine Affirmation and Its Immediate Context

In Luke 3:21-22, the divine affirmation follows ' baptism amid the crowds being immersed by John. As prays post-immersion, opens, the descends upon him visibly as a dove, and a voice from proclaims: "You are my beloved Son; in you I am well pleased." This event publicly endorses ' identity, distinct from John's preparatory baptisms of , marking a transition to ' messianic role. The phrasing blends Psalm 2:7 ("You are my Son") with Isaiah 42:1 ("my chosen, in whom my soul delights"), affirming divine sonship and servant obedience without implying sinfulness requiring repentance. Scholarly consensus favors this reading in critical editions, though minority manuscripts and patristic citations (e.g., Justin Martyr, Clement) attest a variant "today I have begotten you," potentially echoing adoptionist interpretations or liturgical influences from Psalm 2. The standard text aligns with Synoptic parallels in Matthew 3:17 and Mark 1:11, emphasizing Trinitarian manifestation: Father attests, Spirit anoints, Son submits. Immediate context in Luke 3:23 specifies Jesus "was about thirty years old when he began his ministry," aligning with cultural norms for assuming public leadership in first-century Judaism, as both rabbinic ordination and the traditional starting age for priestly service, per Numbers 4:3 and historical practices, often occurred around that age. This timing follows John's arrest (implied from Luke 3:20) and precedes Jesus' wilderness temptation in chapter 4, framing the baptism as empowerment for testing and proclamation. The affirmation thus inaugurates Jesus' Spirit-led mission, contrasting John's water baptism with the coming baptism of fire and Spirit (Luke 3:16).

Textual Variants in the Heavenly Voice

In the baptismal account of Luke 3:21–22, the heavenly voice affirming Jesus is rendered in the majority of Greek manuscripts as "You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased" (Σὺ εἶ ὁ υἱός μου ὁ ἀγαπητός, ἐν σοί εὐδόκησα), aligning closely with the parallel declarations in Matthew 3:17 and Mark 1:11. This reading appears in early and diverse witnesses, including the fourth-century Codex Vaticanus (B), Codex Sinaiticus (א), Papyrus 75 (P75, ca. 175–225 CE), and the bulk of the Alexandrian, Western (outside the variant tradition), and Byzantine textual families. A notable textual variant substitutes the latter clause with "today I have begotten you" (σήμερον γεγέννηκά σε), directly quoting :7 and emphasizing a moment of divine generation or adoption at the . This form is attested primarily in the fifth-century (D/05), a key known for its expansions and paraphrastic tendencies, as well as in several versions (e.g., Codex Vercellensis, Codex Sangermanensis) and some Syriac witnesses. Patristic citations supporting it include references attributed to early figures like (ca. 150 CE) and (ca. 200 CE), though these are indirect and debated for potential harmonization with Acts 13:33, where Paul applies the same Psalm to the resurrection. Textual critics generally regard the "begotten" variant as secondary, likely introduced in Western scribal traditions to heighten the dramatic sonship declaration by assimilating it to royal enthronement language, rather than altering an original adoptionist reading to suppress it. The majority reading's presence in the earliest papyri and uncials, coupled with the Western text's propensity for interpretive additions (e.g., expansions elsewhere in Luke), supports its priority in critical editions like the Nestle-Aland 28th edition. However, some scholars, including Bart Ehrman, argue the variant could preserve an older, more adoptionist-friendly Lukan tradition, positing that anti-adoptionist orthodoxy prompted the change to the static "well pleased" formula, though this view lacks broad support beyond isolated Western sources.
Variant ReadingKey ManuscriptsTextual TraditionScholarly Notes
"with you I am well pleased"P75, א, B, L, majority GreekAlexandrian, ByzantinePreferred as original; consistent with synoptic parallels and avoids assimilation.
"today I have begotten you"D (), some (e.g., k, e)WesternSecondary expansion; echoes :7, possibly for theological emphasis on baptismal sonship.
The variant's limited attestation underscores the reliability of the standard text, as Western manuscripts often reflect later harmonizations rather than primitive readings, per standard principles of prioritizing brevity and geographical diversity.

Genealogy of Jesus

Structure and Ascent from Jesus to

The presented in Luke 3:23-38 initiates with at approximately thirty years of age, marking the onset of his public ministry, and identifies him as, according to common supposition, the son of , who in turn is the son of Heli. From this point, the account ascends regressively through paternal links, enumerating 76 intervening ancestors in a continuous sequence totaling 77 generations from to . This unbroken list eschews the segmented groupings of fourteen generations employed in Matthew's parallel , opting instead for a linear catalog that spans from the immediate post-baptismal context back to human origins. Unlike descending genealogies prevalent in ancient Judean and Near Eastern traditions, which trace forward from progenitors to descendants, Luke's formulation inverts this convention by proceeding upward from progeny to forebears, thereby framing ' derivation from antiquity. The sequence passes through verifiable historical convergences such as (verse 31) and Abraham (verse 34), then extends into figures like (verse 36) and (verse 38), culminating in explicitly denoted as the . This ascent structurally links not merely to Israelite royalty but to the entirety of humankind, as represents the inaugural human in biblical narrative. Scholarly analyses note the 77-generation count as potentially symbolic, aligning with septenary patterns in Jewish , such as the Book of Enoch's eschatological framework, where 77 signifies completion or messianic fulfillment, though the text provides no explicit rationale for the precise enumeration. The regressive structure facilitates a theological emphasis on ' full participation in from creation, positioning the genealogy immediately after his to affirm his messianic identity amid divine endorsement. No levirate marriages or adoption mechanisms are invoked in the Lukan text to explain potential discrepancies with Matthew's account, which this section does not address; instead, the ascent prioritizes comprehensive ancestral coverage over selective royal emphasis.

Key Ancestral Figures and Omissions

Luke's genealogy in chapter 3 prominently features Nathan as an ancestor of through (Luke 3:31), representing a non-royal Davidic branch distinct from the Solomonic kings emphasized in other traditions. This choice underscores a potential biological lineage over strictly legal or succession, with Nathan evoking the prophet who covenanted with in 2 Samuel 7. , identified as a descendant (Luke 3:27), served as of Yehud under Persian rule circa 520–518 BCE, symbolizing post-exilic restoration and Davidic continuity amid foreign dominion. Earlier figures include (Luke 3:36), pivotal in Genesis 6–9 for humanity's preservation through the flood, and Abraham (Luke 3:34), the covenant patriarch foundational to Israelite identity in Genesis 12–25. The list culminates at , designated "" (Luke 3:38), linking to universal human origins rather than solely Jewish ancestry. The genealogy exhibits characteristic Semitic telescoping, omitting intermediate generations to emphasize theological lineage over exhaustive , a practice evident in parallels like Ruth 4:18–22, which condenses from Perez to . Between and Zerubbabel, Luke lists approximately 20 names, bypassing many Judahite kings and officials detailed in 1 Chronicles 3:10–24, such as or , to trace a selective path possibly preserved in family records. Post-Zerubbabel to , 21 generations are named, many unattested elsewhere, implying further elisions across roughly 500 years of intertestamental history. This selectivity aligns with ancient genealogical conventions prioritizing prominent progenitors, yielding 77 names total—a multiple of seven symbolizing completeness. A notable variance involves (Luke 3:36), inserted between Arphaxad and , absent from the of Genesis 11:12 and 1 Chronicles 1:18 but present in the version of Genesis 10–11. This inclusion may reflect Luke's reliance on Greek Old Testament traditions or an early Hebrew later omitted in Masoretic transmission, as some manuscripts and patristic sources attest; alternatives posit a scribal gloss harmonizing with LXX or an original figure lost in Hebrew recensions. Such discrepancies highlight textual fluidity in but do not undermine the genealogy's intent to affirm ' ancestral ties to biblical epochs.

Reconciliation with Matthew's Account

The genealogies of Jesus in and Luke 3:23–38 diverge significantly after , with Matthew tracing Joseph's line through —David's successor and the builder of the Temple—to emphasize royal messianic credentials, structured in three symbolic sets of fourteen generations each, while Luke traces backward from through Nathan, another son of , to and , yielding seventy-seven names without such numerological patterning. This discrepancy includes Joseph's father listed as Jacob in Matthew but Heli in Luke, alongside numerous intervening names that rarely align post-. Third-century church writer Julius Africanus, as recorded by Eusebius, attempted reconciliation by invoking the levirate marriage law (Deuteronomy 25:5–6), under which a brother marries his deceased sibling's widow to perpetuate the family line. Africanus posited Jacob and Heli as uterine brothers whose father had two wives; Heli died childless, prompting Jacob to marry Heli's widow and father Joseph, rendering Joseph legally Jacob's heir but biologically Heli's son, thus unifying both lines as Joseph's—one royal/legal via Jacob, the other natural via Heli. This hypothesis, while ingenious for its era, relies on unverified family details and struggles with the broader divergences beyond Joseph. A widely held contemporary evangelical explanation assigns Matthew's account to Joseph's legal patrilineage, affirming ' Davidic kingship, and Luke's to Mary as biological mother, interpreting "the son of Heli" as her father with as son-in-law per Jewish for levirate or customs. Luke's introductory phrase—"... being, as was supposed, the son of , the son of Heli"—is seen as hinting at presumed rather than actual paternity, aligning with the virgin birth narrative in Luke 1. Critics of this view note the absence of explicit maternal reference in Luke and the textual focus on in both Gospels, suggesting it imposes modern assumptions on ancient texts. Scholarly analyses often highlight theological intents over literal historiography: Matthew constructs a abbreviated, stylized pedigree from Abraham to evoke Jewish covenant fulfillment and kingship, omitting generations (e.g., several post-exilic rulers) to achieve its 14x3 schema tied to gematria of David's name; Luke extends to Adam for a universal salvific scope, possibly drawing from Septuagint traditions or Hellenistic influences. Such variances, absent external verification in Josephus or rabbinic records, imply the evangelists prioritized symbolic proclamation—Matthew for Israelite primacy, Luke for humanity's redemption—over precise annalistic records, rendering full empirical reconciliation challenging without assuming authorial error or invention. No single harmonization commands universal assent among historians or theologians.

Textual and Interpretive Analysis

Manuscript Witnesses and Variants

(𝔓⁷⁵), dated to the early third century, provides one of the earliest attestations of Luke 3, preserving text from verse 18 through the chapter's conclusion and aligning with the in its readings. This papyri, along with fourth-century uncials such as (B) and (ℵ), represent high-quality witnesses supporting the predominant phrasing of John's preaching, the baptism narrative, and the . (A, fifth century) further corroborates these Alexandrian forms, while the Byzantine majority text, evident in later minuscules, introduces smoother but often secondary harmonizations. In contrast, (D, fifth century), a primary Western text exemplar, features expansions, omissions, and stylistic divergences characteristic of that . A key variant in Luke 3:22 involves the divine voice at Jesus' baptism: the standard reading, "You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased," appears in 𝔓⁷⁵, B, ℵ, A, and most Greek manuscripts, echoing Matthew 3:17 and Mark 1:11. Codex Bezae and select Old Latin witnesses, however, substitute "You are my Son, today I have begotten you," alluding to Psalm 2:7 and Acts 13:33; this form is isolated among early Greek evidence and deemed a later scribal alteration by textual scholars, potentially influenced by adoptionist interpretations or liturgical adaptation, rather than the autographic text. In the genealogy (Luke 3:23-38), a significant divergence occurs at verse 36, where the majority tradition, including 𝔓⁷⁵, B, ℵ, and Byzantine manuscripts, inserts "" (or Kainan) as son of Arphaxad and father of Shelah, mirroring the Septuagint's extension of Genesis 11:12 over the Masoretic Text's direct linkage. uniquely omits Cainan, possibly to reconcile with the Hebrew genealogy, though this reading lacks broader support and contrasts with the Lukan author's apparent reliance on Septuagintal sources. Such variants, while highlighting transmission differences between text-types, preserve the chapter's core historical and theological assertions without doctrinal disruption.

Theological Implications of the Chapter

Luke 3 underscores the imperative of as a transformative ethical response to impending , exemplified by John's exhortations to produce "fruits worthy of repentance" through acts of , generosity, and contentment rather than mere ritual observance. This theme aligns with prophetic traditions, positioning John's as a preparatory rite for forgiveness of s, distinct from later Christian baptism, and emphasizing a holistic turning from sin toward in anticipation of the Messiah's arrival. The chapter's portrayal of judgment motifs, such as the ax laid to the root of unfruitful trees and unquenchable , reinforces causal : genuine repentance yields observable change, while invites condemnation. The reveals a pivotal Trinitarian affirmation, with the descending in bodily form like a dove and the Father's voice declaring, "You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased," marking ' inauguration into public ministry without implying personal sinfulness. This event signifies divine empowerment for ' messianic role, fulfilling Isaiah's servant imagery and distinguishing his as an act of obedience and identification with humanity, rather than penitence. Theologically, it establishes ' unique sonship—eternal and unadopted—contrasting with human adoption into God's family, while the Spirit's visible descent authenticates his authority amid crowds, grounding claims of divinity in observable phenomena. The genealogy tracing Jesus from Joseph through David, Abraham, to Adam—"the son of God"—theologically positions him as the archetypal human representative, reversing Adam's failure and extending salvation universally beyond Israel to all humankind. Unlike Matthew's descending royal line, Luke's ascending structure emphasizes Jesus' solidarity with creation, portraying him as the obedient "son of Adam" who fulfills God's original intent for humanity, thereby undergirding doctrines of incarnation and atonement. This linkage to Adam invokes themes of federal headship, where Jesus' obedience causally rectifies collective human disobedience, supported by early manuscript traditions preserving the list's integrity. Collectively, these elements cohere in Luke's narrative to affirm Jesus as the divine-human bridge for redemption, with John's preparatory role highlighting the urgency of ethical repentance, the baptism event manifesting Trinitarian reality, and the genealogy anchoring christological universality in historical lineage. Scholarly exegeses note potential tensions with Matthew's genealogy but resolve them through distinct theological intents: Luke's universalism versus Matthew's Jewish particularism, without undermining Jesus' historical Davidic descent. The chapter thus prioritizes empirical fulfillment of prophecy over speculative harmonization, cautioning against over-reliance on later interpretive traditions that may impose anachronistic frameworks.

Historicity and Evidentiary Debates

The historicity of John the Baptist's ministry as described in Luke 3:1-20 is supported by independent corroboration from the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who in Antiquities of the Jews (18.5.2) portrays John as a preacher of moral righteousness through baptism, executed by Herod Antipas due to fears of unrest. This account aligns with the Gospel's depiction of John's ethical exhortations and imprisonment, predating Christian influence and thus providing non-partisan evidence for his existence and activities around AD 28-29, calculated from the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar's reign beginning in AD 14. Luke's reference to Lysanias as tetrarch of Abilene in 3:1 faced early skepticism, as classical sources like mentioned a Lysanias ruling circa 36 BC, seemingly incompatible with ' era. However, an inscription discovered at Abila (ancient Abilene) dedicates a temple to the imperial family under a tetrarch named Lysanias, dated paleographically to the early first century AD, likely referring to a descendant or namesake ruling concurrently with the other officials listed, such as and . This epigraphic evidence resolves the apparent , affirming Luke's precision in regional political against prior assumptions of error. Scholarly consensus holds Jesus' baptism by John (Luke 3:21-22) as historical, resting on multiple attestation across the Synoptics and John, alongside the —early Christians unlikely to fabricate Jesus submitting to a baptism implying . Josephus' allusion to John's followers transferring allegiance further implies Jesus' involvement without Christian interpolation. The accompanying (Spirit's descent and voice) garners less uniform acceptance, often viewed as interpretive embellishment, though the core event's embedding in John's movement aligns with first-century Jewish apocalyptic expectations. Debates surrounding the in Luke 3:23-38 center on its theological rather than literal historical intent, tracing through Nathan to to underscore universal humanity and divine sonship, diverging from Matthew's royal line. Absent external verification for most names beyond Davidic figures, and amid discrepancies with Matthew's list, explanations invoke , adoption, or maternal lineage for Luke's, yet these remain conjectural without corroborative records. While not undermining the chapter's broader , the genealogy reflects stylized ancient pedigree construction over exhaustive biography, a convention in Hellenistic and .

References

  1. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+3&version=ESV
  2. https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/luke-3/
  3. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+3%3A1&version=ESV
  4. https://cbs.mbts.edu/2020/04/08/april-3-ad-33-why-we-believe-we-can-know-the-exact-date-jesus-died/
  5. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+3%3A2-14&version=ESV
  6. https://www.preceptaustin.org/luke-3-commentary
  7. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+3%3A15-17&version=ESV
  8. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+3%3A21-22&version=ESV
  9. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+3%3A23-38&version=ESV
  10. https://www.modernreformation.org/resources/articles/the-two-genealogies-of-the-son-of-man
  11. https://ehrmanblog.org/a-final-post-on-luke-322/
  12. https://biblearchaeology.org/research/the-daniel-9-24-27-project/4363-what-was-the-fifteenth-year-of-tiberius
  13. https://rsc.byu.edu/new-testament-history-culture-society/judea-roman-province-ad-6-66
  14. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Pontius-Pilate
  15. https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2019/10/11/pontius-pilate-an-archaeological-biography/
  16. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Herod-Antipas
  17. https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2020/02/21/herod-antipas-an-archaeological-biography/
  18. https://cccrh.org/publications/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/coins-of-philip-the-tetrarch.pdf
  19. https://uasvbible.org/2025/10/18/inscription-of-lysanias-tetrarch-of-abilene-abila-near-damascus-c-14-29-c-e/
  20. https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/a-brief-sample-of-archaeology-corroborating-the-claims-of-the-new-testament/
  21. https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2025/04/17/caiaphas-an-archaeological-biography/
  22. https://www.blueletterbible.org/faq/don_stewart/don_stewart_1314.cfm
  23. https://enterthebible.org/time-period/judea-during-roman-rule
  24. https://www.gotquestions.org/prepare-the-way-of-the-Lord.html
  25. https://jewsforjesus.org/messianic-prophecies/the-messiah-would-be-preceded-by-a-forerunner
  26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/narrative-predictions-old-testament-prophecies-and-lukes-sense-of-fulfilment/A73974F5738564BE1E1D097881DDF69C
  27. https://byustudies.byu.edu/online-book/the-testimony-of-luke/1933
  28. https://www.psephizo.com/biblical-studies/the-word-of-the-lord-to-john-the-baptist-in-luke-3/
  29. https://www.desiringgod.org/messages/the-baptism-and-the-genealogy-of-jesus
  30. https://biblehub.com/q/Luke_3_genealogy_OT_prophecy_link.htm
  31. https://www.gty.org/sermons/42-48/the-messiahs-royal-lineage
  32. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1038&context=outline_chapters_bible
  33. https://bibleproject.com/guides/book-of-luke/
  34. https://etsjets.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/files_JETS-PDFs_25_25-1_25-1-pp033-039_JETS.pdf
  35. https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1317&context=obsculta
  36. https://www.bartehrman.com/gospel-of-luke/
  37. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3138&context=auss
  38. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+3%3A1-2&version=ESV
  39. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+1%3A80&version=ESV
  40. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah+40%3A3-5&version=ESV
  41. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Malachi+3%3A1%3B+4%3A5-6&version=ESV
  42. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+3%3A7-17&version=ESV
  43. https://www.workingpreacher.org/commentaries/revised-common-lectionary/third-sunday-of-advent-3/commentary-on-luke-37-18-3
  44. https://www.franciscanmedia.org/ask-a-franciscan/why-did-john-the-baptist-baptize/
  45. https://www.gotquestions.org/origin-baptism.html
  46. https://www.psephizo.com/biblical-studies/the-preaching-of-john-the-baptist-in-luke-3/
  47. https://biblehub.com/commentaries/luke/3-3.htm
  48. https://www.psephizo.com/biblical-studies/john-the-baptist-jesus-and-judgement-in-luke-3/
  49. https://www.workingpreacher.org/commentaries/revised-common-lectionary/baptism-of-our-lord-3/commentary-on-luke-315-17-21-22-4
  50. https://cepreaching.org/commentary/2024-12-02/luke-31-6-3/
  51. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%203%3A10-14&version=ESV
  52. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%2015%3A7-11&version=ESV
  53. https://www.theologyofwork.org/new-testament/luke/the-kingdom-of-god-shows-up-at-work-luke/god-at-work/john-the-baptist-teaches-workplace-ethics/
  54. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/371996
  55. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/AJA2548356_518
  56. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/josephus/jewish-antiquities/josephus-on-john-the-baptist/
  57. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-sites-places/biblical-archaeology-sites/machaerus-beyond-the-beheading-of-john-the-baptist/
  58. https://www.workingpreacher.org/commentaries/revised-common-lectionary/baptism-of-our-lord-3/commentary-on-luke-315-17-21-22-5
  59. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/6/763
  60. https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/the-baptism-of-jesus/
  61. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%203%3A21-22&version=ESV
  62. https://research-portal.st-andrews.ac.uk/files/261352679/Resonance_Vol_5_3_Ann_Gillian_Chu_Why_Did_Jesus_Get_Baptized.pdf
  63. https://carm.org/about-the-bible/did-early-christians-change-the-words-to-luke-322/
  64. https://brill.com/abstract/journals/nt/63/1/article-p22_2.xml
  65. https://biblehub.com/q/How_does_Luke_3_22_show_the_Trinity.htm
  66. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%203%3A23&version=ESV
  67. https://biblehub.com/numbers/4-3.htm
  68. https://www.jpost.com/blogs/truth-beyond-price/holy-hebrew-arithmetic-what-age-was-jesus-when-he-became-teacher-priest-542343
  69. https://www.psephizo.com/biblical-studies/the-baptism-of-jesus-john-and-judgement-in-luke-3/
  70. https://ehrmanblog.org/the-oldest-view-of-christ-found-in-only-one-greek-manuscript-of-luke/
  71. https://ehrmanblog.org/more-arguments-over-luke-322/
  72. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1457&context=auss
  73. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1775480886021172/posts/4362279927341242/
  74. https://jamesbradfordpate.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/bart-ehrman-on-luke-322/
  75. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%203%3A23&version=NIV
  76. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%203%3A23-38&version=NIV
  77. https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2014/10/15/lukes-genealogy-compared-with-matthew-and-the-old-testament/
  78. https://shepherds.edu/the-genealogies-of-jesus/
  79. https://theacademic.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/58.pdf
  80. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/bible/lukes-seventy-seven-generations/
  81. https://www.familysearch.org/en/blog/the-genealogy-of-jesus-christ-explained
  82. https://answersingenesis.org/jesus/jesus-genealogies-in-matthew-and-luke/
  83. https://creation.com/jesus-genealogies-royal-vs-biological-lines
  84. https://www.abfboone.com/luke-323-38/
  85. https://www.gotquestions.org/Cainan-genealogy.html
  86. https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/78683/should-cainan-be-included-or-excluded-from-the-geneology-of-jesus
  87. https://www.tbsbibles.org/page/luke3verse36
  88. https://zondervanacademic.com/blog/why-are-jesus-genealogies-in-matthew-and-luke-different
  89. https://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-genealogy.html
  90. https://www.logosbiblestudy.com/blog/2021/5/27/the-genealogy-of-jesus-part-2
  91. https://www.reformedclassicalist.com/home/why-are-there-two-different-genealogies-of-jesus
  92. https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/genealogies-of-jesus
  93. https://ehrmanblog.org/genealogies-of-matthew-and-luke/
  94. https://www.academia.edu/44620396/Luke_3_36_in_P75_A_Misidentified_Fragment
  95. https://rsc.byu.edu/how-new-testament-came-be/new-testament-manuscripts-textual-families-variants
  96. https://bible.usccb.org/bible/luke/3
  97. https://biblearchaeology.org/images/Genesis-5-and-11/New-Evidence-for-Kainan_Henry-Smith-Bible-and-Spade.pdf
  98. https://bible.org/seriespage/8-baptism-and-genealogy-jesus-luke-321-28-1-samuel-161-13-2-samuel-78-13
  99. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/essay/jesus-as-the-son-of-god/
  100. https://www.workingpreacher.org/commentaries/revised-common-lectionary/second-sunday-of-advent-3/commentary-on-luke-31-6-2
  101. https://josephus.org/JohnTBaptist.htm
  102. https://www.bibleplaces.com/blog/2017/05/luke-acts-historical-reliability-5/
  103. https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2016/05/25/three-biblical-archaeological-discoveries-you-probably-never-heard-about/
  104. https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/bbr/jesus_webb.pdf
  105. https://www.bartehrman.com/historically-accurate-jesus/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.