Hubbry Logo
ReutersReutersMain
Open search
Reuters
Community hub
Reuters
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Reuters
Reuters
Reuters
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Reuters (/ˈrɔɪtərz/ ⓘ ROY-tərz) is a news agency owned by Thomson Reuters.[4][5] It employs around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in about 200 locations worldwide writing in 16 languages.[6] Reuters is one of the largest news agencies in the world.[7][8]

Key Information

The agency was established in London in 1851 by the German baron Paul Reuter. The Thomson Corporation of Canada acquired the agency in a 2008 corporate merger, resulting in the formation of the Thomson Reuters Corporation.[8]

In December 2024, Reuters was ranked as the 27th most visited news site in the world, with over 105 million monthly readers.[9]

History

[edit]

19th century

[edit]
Paul Reuter, the founder of Reuters (photographed by Nadar, c. 1865)

Paul Julius Reuter worked at a book-publishing firm in Berlin and was involved in distributing radical pamphlets at the beginning of the revolutions of 1848. These publications brought much attention to Reuter, who in 1850 developed a prototype news service in Aachen using homing pigeons and electric telegraphy from 1851 on, in order to transmit messages between Brussels and Aachen,[10] in what today is Aachen's Reuters House.

Reuter moved to London in 1851 and established a news wire agency at the London Royal Exchange. Headquartered in London, Reuter's company initially covered commercial news, serving banks, brokerage houses, and business firms.[11] The first newspaper client to subscribe was the London Morning Advertiser in 1858, and more began to subscribe soon after.[11][12] According to the Encyclopædia Britannica: "the value of Reuters to newspapers lay not only in the financial news it provided but in its ability to be the first to report on stories of international importance."[11] It was the first to report Abraham Lincoln's assassination in Europe, for instance, in 1865.[11][13]

In 1865, Reuter incorporated his private business, under the name Reuter's Telegram Company Limited; Reuter was appointed managing director of the company.[14]

In 1870 the press agencies French Havas (founded in 1835), British Reuter's (founded in 1851) and German Wolff (founded in 1849) signed an agreement (known as the Ring Combination) that set 'reserved territories' for the three agencies. Each agency made its own separate contracts with national agencies or other subscribers within its territory. In practice, Reuters, who came up with the idea, tended to dominate the Ring Combination. Its influence was greatest because its reserved territories were larger or of greater news importance than most others. It also had more staff and stringers throughout the world and thus contributed more original news to the pool. British control of cable lines made London itself an unrivalled centre for world news, further enhanced by Britain's wide-ranging commercial, financial and imperial activities.[15]

In 1872, Reuter's expanded into the Far East, followed by South America in 1874. Both expansions were made possible by advances in overland telegraphs and undersea cables.[13] In 1878, Reuter retired as managing director, and was succeeded by his eldest son, Herbert de Reuter.[14] In 1883, Reuter's began transmitting messages electrically to London newspapers.[13]

20th century

[edit]
Roderick Jones, general manager 1915–1941

Reuter's son Herbert de Reuter continued as general manager until his death by suicide in 1915. The company returned to private ownership in 1916, when all shares were purchased by Roderick Jones and Mark Napier; they renamed the company "Reuters Limited" and dropped the apostrophe.[14] In 1919, a number of Reuters reports falsely described the anti-colonial March 1st Movement protests in Korea as violent Bolshevik uprisings. South Korean researchers found that a number of the reports were cited in a number of international newspapers and possibly negatively influenced international opinion on Korea.[16] In 1923, Reuters began using radio to transmit news internationally, a pioneering act.[13] In 1925, the Press Association (PA) of Great Britain acquired a majority interest in Reuters, and full ownership some years later.[11]

During the world wars, The Manchester Guardian reported that Reuters: "came under pressure from the British government to serve national interests. In 1941, Reuters deflected the pressure by restructuring itself as a private company."[13] In 1941, the PA sold half of Reuters to the Newspaper Proprietors' Association, and co-ownership was expanded in 1947 to associations that represented daily newspapers in New Zealand and Australia.[11] The new owners formed the Reuters Trust. The Reuters Trust Principles were put in place to maintain the company's independence.[17] At that point, Reuters had become "one of the world's major news agencies, supplying both text and images to newspapers, other news agencies, and radio and television broadcasters."[11] Also at that point, it directly or through national news agencies provided service to most countries, reaching virtually all the world's leading newspapers and many thousands of smaller ones, according to Britannica.[11]

In 1961, Reuters scooped news of the erection of the Berlin Wall.[18] Reuters was one of the first news agencies to transmit financial data over oceans via computers in the 1960s.[11] In 1973, Reuters "began making computer-terminal displays of foreign-exchange rates available to clients."[11] In 1981, Reuters began supporting electronic transactions on its computer network and afterwards developed a number of electronic brokerage and trading services.[11] Reuters was floated as a public company in 1984,[18] when Reuters Trust was listed on stock exchanges[13] including the London Stock Exchange (LSE) and NASDAQ.[11] Reuters later published the first story of the Berlin Wall being breached in 1989.[18]

Reuters was the dominant news service on the Internet in the 1990s. It earned this position by developing a partnership with ClariNet and PointCast, two early Internet-based news providers.[19]

21st century

[edit]

Reuters' share price grew during the dotcom boom, then fell after the banking troubles in 2001.[13] In 2002, Britannica wrote that most news throughout the world came from three major agencies: the Associated Press, Reuters, and Agence France-Presse.[7]

Until 2008, the Reuters news agency formed part of an independent company, Reuters Group plc. Reuters was acquired by Thomson Corporation in Canada in 2008, forming Thomson Reuters.[11] In 2009, Thomson Reuters withdrew from the LSE and the NASDAQ, instead listing its shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).[11] The last surviving member of the Reuters family founders, Marguerite, Baroness de Reuter, died at age 96 on 25 January 2009.[20] The parent company Thomson Reuters is headquartered in Toronto, and provides financial information to clients while also maintaining its traditional news-agency business.[11]

In 2012, Thomson Reuters appointed Jim Smith as CEO.[17] In July 2016, Thomson Reuters agreed to sell its intellectual property and science operation for $3.55 billion to private equity firms.[21] In October 2016, Thomson Reuters announced expansions and relocations to Toronto.[21] As part of cuts and restructuring, in November 2016, Thomson Reuters Corp. eliminated 2,000 jobs worldwide out of its estimated 50,000 employees.[21] On 15 March 2020, Steve Hasker was appointed president and CEO.[22]

In April 2021, Reuters announced that its website would go behind a paywall, following rivals who have done the same.[23][24]

In March 2024, Gannett, the largest newspaper publisher in the United States, signed an agreement with Reuters to use the wire service's global content after cancelling its contract with the Associated Press.[25]

In 2024, Reuters staff won the Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting for their work on Elon Musk and misconduct at his businesses, including SpaceX, Tesla, and Neuralink, as well as the Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News Photography for coverage of the Gaza war.[26]

Journalists

[edit]

Reuters employs some 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists[27] in about 200 locations worldwide.[28][29][8] Reuters journalists use the Standards and Values as a guide for fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests, to "maintain the values of integrity and freedom upon which their reputation for reliability, accuracy, speed and exclusivity relies."[30][31]

In May 2000, Kurt Schork, an American reporter, was killed in an ambush while on assignment in Sierra Leone. In April and August 2003, news cameramen Taras Protsyuk and Mazen Dana were killed in separate incidents by U.S. troops in Iraq. In July 2007, Namir Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh were killed when they were struck by fire from a U.S. military Apache helicopter in Baghdad.[32][33] During 2004, cameramen Adlan Khasanov was killed by Chechen separatists, and Dhia Najim was killed in Iraq. In April 2008, cameraman Fadel Shana was killed in the Gaza Strip after being hit by an Israeli tank.[34][35] On 27 August 2025, cameraman Hussam al-Masri was killed at Nasser Hospital in the Gaza Strip by an Israeli air strike.[36]

While covering China's Cultural Revolution in Peking in the late 1960s for Reuters, journalist Anthony Grey was detained by the Chinese government in response to the jailing of several Chinese journalists by the colonial British government of Hong Kong.[37] He was released after being imprisoned for 27 months from 1967 to 1969 and was awarded an OBE by the British Government. After his release, he went on to become a best-selling historical novelist.[38]

In May 2016, the Ukrainian website Myrotvorets published the names and personal data of 4,508 journalists, including Reuters reporters, and other media staff from all over the world, who were accredited by the self-proclaimed authorities in the separatist-controlled regions of eastern Ukraine.[39]

In 2018, two Reuters journalists were convicted in Myanmar of obtaining state secrets while investigating a massacre in a Rohingya village.[40] The arrest and convictions were widely condemned as an attack on press freedom. The journalists, Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo, received several awards, including the Foreign Press Association Media Award and the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting, and were named as part of the Time Person of the Year for 2018 along with other persecuted journalists.[41][42][43] After 511 days in prison, Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo were freed on 7 May 2019 after receiving a presidential pardon.[44]

In February 2023, a team of Reuters journalists won the Selden Ring Award for their investigation that exposed human-rights abuses by the Nigerian military.[45]

Killed on assignment

[edit]
Name Nationality Location Date Responsible party
Kenneth Stonehouse British Bay of Biscay 1 June 1943 German Aircraft
Hos Maina Kenyan Somalia 12 July 1993
Dan Eldon Kenyan Somalia 12 July 1993
Kurt Schork American Sierra Leone 24 May 2000
Taras Protsyuk Ukrainian Iraq 8 April 2003 U.S. troops
Mazen Dana Palestinian Iraq 17 August 2003 U.S. troops
Adlan Khasanov Russian Chechnya 9 May 2004 Chechen Separatists
Waleed Khaled Iraqi Iraq 28 August 2005 U.S. troops
Namir Noor-Eldeen Iraqi Iraq 12 July 2007[46] U.S. military Apache helicopter
Saeed Chmagh Iraqi Iraq 12 July 2007[46] U.S. military Apache helicopter
Fadel Shana'a Palestinian Gaza Strip 16 April 2008 Israeli Troops
Hiro Muramoto Japanese Thailand 10 April 2010 Thai Troops
Molhem Barakat Syrian Syria 20 December 2013 Syrian Forces/Rebels
Danish Siddiqui Indian Afghanistan 16 July 2021 Taliban
Issam Abdallah Lebanese Lebanon 13 October 2023 Israeli Troops

Controversies

[edit]

Accusation of collaboration with the CIA

[edit]

In 1977, Rolling Stone and The New York Times said that according to information from CIA officials, Reuters cooperated with the CIA.[47][48][49] In response to that, Reuters' then-managing director, Gerald Long, had asked for evidence of the charges, but none was provided, according to Reuters' then-managing editor for North America,[49] Desmond Maberly.[50][51]

Policy of objective language

[edit]
Reuters building entrance in New York City

Reuters has a policy of taking a "value-neutral approach," which extends to not using the word terrorist in its stories. The practice attracted criticism following the September 11 attacks.[52] Reuters' editorial policy states: "Reuters may refer without attribution to terrorism and counterterrorism in general, but do not refer to specific events as terrorism. Nor does Reuters use the word terrorist without attribution to qualify specific individuals, groups or events."[53] By contrast, the Associated Press uses the term terrorist in reference to non-governmental organizations that carry out attacks on civilian populations.[52] In 2004, Reuters asked CanWest Global Communications, a Canadian newspaper chain, to remove Reuters' bylines, as the chain had edited Reuters articles to insert the word terrorist. A spokesman for Reuters stated: "My goal is to protect my reporters and protect our editorial integrity."[54]

Climate change reporting

[edit]

In July 2013, David Fogarty, former Reuters climate change correspondent in Asia, resigned after a career of almost 20 years with the company and wrote that "progressively, getting any climate change-themed story published got harder" after comments from then-deputy editor-in-chief Paul Ingrassia that he was a "climate change sceptic." In his comments, Fogarty stated:[55][56][57]

By mid-October, I was informed that climate change just wasn't a big story for the present, but that it would be if there was a significant shift in global policy, such as the US introducing an emissions cap-and-trade system. Very soon after that conversation I was told my climate change role was abolished.

Ingrassia, formerly Reuters' managing editor, previously worked for The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones for 31 years.[58][59] Reuters responded to Fogarty's piece by stating: "Reuters has a number of staff dedicated to covering this story, including a team of specialist reporters at Point Carbon and a columnist. There has been no change in our editorial policy."[60]

Subsequently, climate blogger Joe Romm cited a Reuters article on climate as having a "false balance" and quoted Stefan Rahmstorf, co-chair of Earth System Analysis at the Potsdam Institute that "[s]imply, a lot of unrelated climate sceptics nonsense has been added to this Reuters piece. In the words of the late Steve Schneider, this is like adding some nonsense from the Flat Earth Society to a report about the latest generation of telecommunication satellites. It is absurd." Romm opined: "We can't know for certain who insisted on cramming this absurd and non-germane 'climate sceptics nonsense' into the piece, but we have a strong clue. If it had been part of the reporter's original reporting, you would have expected direct quotes from actual sceptics, because that is journalism 101. The fact that the blather was all inserted without attribution suggests it was added at the insistence of an editor."[61]

Photograph controversies

[edit]

According to Ynetnews, Reuters was accused of bias against Israel in its coverage of the 2006 Israel–Lebanon conflict after the wire service used two doctored photos by a Lebanese freelance photographer, Adnan Hajj.[62] In August 2006, Reuters announced it had severed all ties with Hajj and said his photographs would be removed from its database.[63][64]

In 2010, Reuters was criticised again by Haaretz for "anti-Israeli" bias when it cropped the edges of photos, removing commandos' knives held by activists and a naval commando's blood from photographs taken aboard the Mavi Marmara during the 2010 Gaza flotilla, a raid that left nine Turkish activists dead. It has been alleged that in two separate photographs, knives held by the activists were cropped out of the versions of the pictures published by Reuters.[65] Reuters said it is standard operating procedure to crop photos at the margins, and replaced the cropped images with the original ones after it was brought to the agency's attention.[65]

Indian man falsely accused of cybercrime

[edit]

On 9 June 2020, three Reuters journalists (Jack Stubbs, Raphael Satter and Christopher Bing) incorrectly used the image of an Indian herbal medicine entrepreneur in an exclusive story titled "Obscure Indian cyber firm spied on politicians, investors worldwide."[66] Indian local media picked up the report, and the man whose image was wrongly used was invited and interrogated for nine hours by Indian police. Reuters admitted to the error, but Raphael Satter claimed that it had mistaken the man for the suspected hacker Sumit Gupta because both men share the same business address. A check by local media, however, showed that both men were in different buildings and not as claimed by Raphael Satter.[67][68] As the report of the inaccurate reporting trickled out to the public, Reuters' senior director of communication Heather Carpenter contacted media outlets to ask them to take down their posts.[68]

Fernando Henrique Cardoso interview

[edit]

In March 2015, the Brazilian affiliate of Reuters released an excerpt from an interview with Brazilian ex-president Fernando Henrique Cardoso about Operation Car Wash (Portuguese: Operação Lava Jato). In 2014, several politicians from Brazil were found to be involved in corruption, by accepting bribes from different corporations in exchange for government contracts. After the scandal, the excerpt from Brazil's president Fernando Henrique's interview was released. One paragraph by a former Petrobras manager mentioned a comment in which he suggested corruption in the company may date back to Cardoso's presidency. Attached, was a comment between parenthesis: "Podemos tirar se achar melhor" ("we can take it out if 'you' think better"),[69] which was removed from the current version of the text.[70] This confused readers, and suggested that the former president was involved in corruption and the comment was attributed to him. Reuters later confirmed the error, and explained that the comment, originating from one of the local editors, was actually intended for the journalist who wrote the original text in English, and that it should not have been published.[71]

Funding by the UK Government

[edit]

In November 2019, the UK Foreign Office released archive documents confirming that it had provided funding to Reuters during the 1960s and 1970s so that Reuters could expand its coverage in the Middle East. An agreement was made between the Information Research Department (IRD) and Reuters for the UK Treasury to provide £350,000 over four years to fund Reuters' expansion. The UK government had already been funding the Latin American department of Reuters through a shell company, but that method was discounted for the Middle East operation since the accounting of the shell company looked suspicious, and the IRD stated that the company "already looks queer to anyone who might wish to investigate why such an inactive and unprofitable company continues to run."[72] Instead, the BBC was used to fund the project by paying for enhanced subscriptions to the news organisation for which the Treasury would reimburse the BBC at a later date. The IRD acknowledged that this agreement would not give them editorial control over Reuters, although the IRD believed it would give them political influence over Reuters' work, stating "this influence would flow, at the top level, from Reuters' willingness to consult and to listen to views expressed on the results of its work."[72][73]

Partnership with TASS

[edit]

On 1 June 2020, Reuters announced that Russian news agency TASS had joined its "Reuters Connect" programme, comprising a then-total of 18 partner agencies. Reuters president Michael Friedenberg said he was "delighted that TASS and Reuters are building upon our valued partnership."[74] Two years later, TASS's membership in Reuters Connect came under scrutiny in the wake of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine; Politico reported that Reuters staff members were "frustrated and embarrassed" that their agency had not suspended its partnership with TASS.[75]

On 23 March 2022, Reuters removed TASS from its "content marketplace." Matthew Keen, interim CEO of Reuters said "we believe making TASS content available on Reuters Connect is not aligned with the Thomson Reuters Trust Principles."[76]

Fossil fuel advertising

[edit]

An investigation by The Intercept, The Nation, and DeSmog found that Reuters is one of the leading media outlets that publishes advertising for the fossil fuel industry.[77] Journalists who cover climate change for Reuters are concerned that conflicts of interest with the companies and industries that caused climate change and obstructed action will reduce the credibility of their reporting on climate change and cause readers to downplay the climate crisis.[77]

Allegations of journalism in India without authorization

[edit]

In December 2023, the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs revoked the Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) status of a Reuters cybersecurity journalist Raphael Satter, alleging unauthorized journalistic activities in India. The ministry claimed the journalist violated regulations requiring OCI cardholders to obtain prior approval for such work. According to The Sunday Guardian, in a related incident, Satter faced legal scrutiny in Goa, India where the journalist allegedly engaging in journalistic activities without permission, contacted individuals in India for interviews during visits, despite claiming the trips were for personal purposes.[78] Reuters supported the journalist's denial of conducting journalism in India, and a legal petition was filed in the Delhi High Court to challenge the OCI cancellation, with a hearing scheduled for May 22, 2025, though specific charges were not detailed. Reuters contested the allegations, asserting the journalist's activities were personal although The Indian government maintained that the journalist violated regulations requiring OCI cardholders to obtain prior approval for journalistic work.[79]

Valerie Zink resignation

[edit]

In August 2025, Valerie Zink, a photo journalist who had been working with Reuters for 8 years, announced her resignation from the agency after accusing it of perpetuating Israel's propaganda over its war in Gaza, at the expense of other journalists including its own reporters. She further accused Reuters of publishing Israel's baseless claims that Anas Al-Sharif (a journalist working in Gaza) was a Hamas operative. She also stated that five more journalists, including Reuters cameraman Hossam Al-Masri, were among 20 people killed in an attack on Nasser hospital in the Gaza Strip.[80]

See also

[edit]
[edit]
[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Reuters

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Reuters is a global news agency founded in 1851 by Paul Julius Reuter in , initially leveraging homing pigeons and telegraph technology to disseminate commercial and financial information rapidly across and beyond. The agency evolved into a primary wire service supplying factual, real-time reporting to media outlets, corporations, governments, and financial markets worldwide, emphasizing speed, accuracy, and independence under the Trust Principles, which require separation from commercial interests to maintain editorial integrity. Following its 2008 merger with the to form Corporation—majority-owned by —Reuters operates as the news and media division, serving over 1,000 newspapers and 750 broadcasters across more than 100 countries. Pioneering innovations such as international radio news transmission in 1923 and later digital and multimedia platforms, Reuters has shaped modern journalism by prioritizing empirical event reporting over opinion, though it has faced scrutiny for occasional lapses in neutrality, including allegations of selective framing in politically charged coverage like elections and international conflicts, amid broader institutional biases in mainstream media toward left-leaning narratives. Despite such criticisms, independent assessments often rank it highly for factual reliability, with low bias scores in quantitative analyses of article content. Its defining characteristics include a vast network of correspondents and a focus on financial data services, contributing to key achievements like breaking major global stories and earning journalism awards for investigative and multimedia work.

Overview

Description and Core Mission

Reuters is a multinational specializing in real-time reporting, financial data, and multimedia content, serving media outlets, businesses, and governments worldwide. Founded on August 16, 1851, by Paul Julius Reuter in as a service transmitting stock prices and commercial news via telegraph and carrier pigeons, it evolved into one of the first global wire services. Today, operating under following the 2008 merger, Reuters employs over 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists across nearly 200 locations, producing content in multiple languages for distribution to subscribers. The agency's core mission centers on delivering accurate, unbiased news to foster an informed society, as articulated in its commitment to providing "the news it needs to be free, prosperous and informed." This objective is underpinned by the Reuters Trust Principles, established in 1941 and enshrined in its governance structure through a Founders Share Company, which mandates from commercial or political influences, in reporting, and freedom from bias. These principles require journalists to prioritize accuracy, balance, and transparency, prohibiting fabrication, unattributed opinions, or conflicts of interest, while ensuring no single entity dominates control to preserve editorial autonomy. In practice, Reuters emphasizes rapid, fact-based dissemination of information, particularly in and , positioning itself as a neutral conduit rather than an opinion provider, with editorial standards dictating corrections for errors and striving for fairness in sourcing diverse viewpoints. The mission extends beyond traditional to include data analytics and verification services, reflecting adaptations to digital demands while upholding the foundational goal of reliable information supply.

Ownership and Corporate Structure

Reuters operates as the news and media division of , a multinational publicly traded formed in 2008 through the acquisition of PLC by the for approximately $17.2 billion. is listed on the (TSX: TRI) and (NYSE: TRI), with its corporate headquarters in , . The controlling ownership of resides with The Woodbridge Company Limited, a private Canadian serving as the primary investment vehicle for the Thomson family, founded by Roy Thomson. As of recent filings, Woodbridge holds approximately 69.6% of ' outstanding common shares, granting the family decisive influence over strategic decisions. David Thomson, chairman of both Woodbridge and , along with family members such as Peter J. Thomson, maintains this oversight through Woodbridge's structure. This majority stake classifies as a "controlled " under rules, allowing exemptions from certain requirements like independent board majorities. A distinctive element of the is the Founders Share Company Limited, a non-profit entity limited by guarantee that holds a single Founders Share in . This share provides veto authority over any amendments to the 's constitution or Trust Principles that could compromise Reuters' editorial integrity and independence, as established post-merger to perpetuate the original Reuters Trust Principles from 1941. The Founders Share Company, governed by independent trustees from , , and , does not confer economic ownership but enforces perpetual safeguards against commercial interference in news operations. Woodbridge, as controlling , has agreed to uphold these principles in binding commitments.

Historical Development

Founding and 19th-Century Expansion

Paul Julius Reuter, born Israel Beer Josaphat in 1816 in , , to a rabbinical family, converted to in 1844 and adopted his new name. After working as a bookseller and printer in and participating in the distribution of radical materials during the 1848 revolutions, which prompted his flight from , Reuter relocated to in 1849, where he briefly published a news sheet. In 1850, operating from , he pioneered the use of carrier pigeons to bridge gaps in telegraph lines, transmitting commercial news between and . This method underscored his focus on speed in information delivery, a principle that defined his enterprise. In 1851, Reuter established his news service in at 1 Royal Exchange Buildings, initially employing an 11-year-old office boy and leveraging the newly laid Dover-Calais telegraph cable to transmit stock prices and commercial intelligence between and . Where telegraph coverage was incomplete, he supplemented with over 200 carrier pigeons, enabling faster dissemination than competitors reliant on mail. This operation, dubbed the Submarine Telegraph Office, quickly gained traction among financial circles for its reliability and velocity, laying the groundwork for Reuters as a specialized provider of . Reuters expanded its scope in the mid-1850s by securing contracts, including one in 1857 with a Russian telegraphic agency and, by 1858, agreements with major daily newspapers for general news distribution. The service's reputation solidified in 1859 when it honored an embargo on III's speech, demonstrating integrity amid competitive pressures. Formal incorporation occurred in 1865 as Reuter's Telegram Company Limited, with £250,000 in capital, marking a shift toward structured growth. That year, Reuters opened its first office outside Europe in , , followed by Bombay in 1866 and extensions to other Indian cities, capitalizing on British imperial telegraph networks. By the 1870s, expansion accelerated with offices in and in 1871 and in 1872, transforming Reuters into an international news exchange hub that pooled and redistributed dispatches via undersea cables. This network emphasized impartiality and speed, serving as a clearinghouse for global financial and political intelligence, which enhanced its indispensability to press and markets alike. Reuter's innovations in exploiting drove causal efficiencies in information flow, outpacing traditional postal systems and establishing dominance in 19th-century wire services. By century's end, the agency had evolved from a pigeon-assisted ticker into a cornerstone of worldwide journalism and commerce.

20th-Century Growth and World Wars

In the early , Reuters continued its expansion by enhancing its global network and adopting for faster dissemination. The agency maintained its focus on financial and commercial , providing timely stock prices and market updates to subscribers worldwide. By 1920, following advancements in wireless technology post-World War I, Reuters launched a dedicated trade service that strengthened its position in business distribution. During , Reuters faced significant challenges due to its ownership structure, which included a large number of German shareholders as the agency was a at the war's outbreak in 1914. To secure control and align operations with British interests, the government intervened, providing funding to Reuters starting at its board meeting on December 14, 1916, effectively using the agency for wartime news propagation. Under general manager Roderick Jones, appointed in 1912, Reuters served as the primary news channel for the , though subject to governmental oversight that prioritized over unrestricted reporting. In the , Reuters recovered and grew by diversifying services, including price quotations introduced in 1923, which bolstered its financial data offerings amid recovering global markets. The agency expanded its bureau network and adapted to , enabling broader reach despite economic disruptions like the . This period solidified Reuters' reputation for speed, as demonstrated by its early reporting on key events such as the 1911 , where it preceded competitors by two hours. World War II imposed stricter censorship on Reuters than the previous conflict, with operations heavily regulated under British wartime controls to prevent sensitive information leakage. Despite these constraints, Reuters correspondents gathered battlefield news through pooled resources with allied agencies, contributing to public understanding of events like the fall of in 1940 and the . In 1941, amid rising threats of propaganda and governmental interference, Reuters' owners—the Press Association of —established the Trust Principles to safeguard the agency's independence, integrity, and freedom from bias, ensuring news remained untainted by ownership or political pressures. This foundational commitment, born from wartime exigencies, influenced Reuters' post-war trajectory while the agency continued disseminating verified dispatches under censorship until 1945.

Post-War Reorganization and 21st-Century Mergers

Following , Reuters continued to operate under the 1941 corporate restructuring, which had converted it from a into a , primarily owned by British national and provincial newspaper publishers. This arrangement, formalized through the Reuters Trust Principles in agreement with the UK Newspaper Publishers Association, aimed to insulate the agency from governmental interference experienced during wartime, mandating editorial integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. The structure facilitated post-war recovery by enabling collaborative funding from member publishers, supporting the rebuilding of disrupted news transmission networks and expansion into emerging markets amid decolonization challenges, such as the impending of in 1947, which threatened Reuters' dominance in news flows. During the and , Reuters invested in staffing and technology to enhance its global reach, opening new bureaus in and while diversifying beyond general news into specialized financial reporting. By the late 1970s, these efforts propelled Reuters past rivals like in revenue and the by 1978, reversing a 1945 disparity where the AP's revenue exceeded Reuters' by a factor of four. The agency launched early electronic services, such as the 1981 Reuter Monitor for real-time financial , but the ownership model constrained capital for competing in computerized trading and against U.S.-based firms. To address these limitations, Reuters reorganized in 1984 through an on the London Stock Exchange and NASDAQ, raising £398 million to fund technological advancements and acquisitions. This demutualization ended direct press ownership, transitioning to a publicly traded entity ( PLC), but preserved the Trust Principles via the newly formed Reuters Founders Share Company, which held veto powers over ownership changes and editorial matters to prevent any single interest from dominating. The IPO, completed on February 22, 1984, marked a pivotal shift toward , enabling rapid post-IPO growth in financial products like Dealing 2000-2 for trading. The defining 21st-century merger occurred in 2008, when announced on May 15, 2007, its acquisition of for 147 pence per share in an all-share deal valued at £8.7 billion (about $17.2 billion USD). Completed on April 17, 2008, the transaction created , with Thomson shareholders controlling roughly 55% and the Thomson family retaining influence through special voting shares; Reuters' Trust Principles were contractually embedded in the new entity's governance, overseen by an independent committee. The merger synergized Reuters' real-time news with Thomson's analytics platforms, capturing over 30% of the global financial data market and bolstering resilience against digital disruption, though it drew antitrust scrutiny in cleared in March 2008. Subsequent internal restructurings, such as the 2011 merger of Markets and Professional divisions, optimized operations but did not alter core ownership.

Operations and Services

News Gathering and Distribution

Reuters maintains an extensive global network of approximately 2,600 journalists deployed across more than 200 locations worldwide, enabling on-the-ground reporting from key political, economic, and conflict zones. Correspondents focus on direct sourcing, including eyewitness accounts, official statements, and interviews, while adhering to the agency's Trust Principles that emphasize independence and freedom from bias. This infrastructure supports coverage in 16 languages, with specialized teams for , investigative reporting, and multimedia content such as photography and video from 600 dedicated photojournalists. To enhance efficiency, Reuters integrates advanced technologies into its gathering process, notably the Tracer platform introduced in , which employs to scan social media feeds like for real-time event detection, filtering vast data volumes to identify credible leads for human verification. Traditional methods persist, with bureau chiefs coordinating local stringers and partnerships for remote areas, ensuring comprehensive sourcing that prioritizes verifiable facts over unconfirmed rumors. Distribution operates as a wire service model, supplying subscribers—including newspapers, broadcasters, and digital platforms—with real-time feeds via dedicated APIs and platforms like the Eikon terminal. The agency generates over 1 million stories annually, available in up to 12 languages with English as the primary access point, alongside video packages, live broadcasts, and graphics for integration. This B2B structure allows clients to republish content under their branding, reaching billions indirectly while Reuters avoids direct consumer-facing editorializing in its agency output. Premium services, such as customized alerts and , cater to financial markets for time-sensitive .

Financial Data and Analytics

Reuters has provided financial market data since its founding in 1851, initially disseminating stock prices from the London Stock Exchange via telegraph and carrier pigeons, establishing an early infrastructure for real-time information dissemination. By the , Reuters pioneered computerized transmission of financial data across borders, marking a shift from manual to automated services. In 1973, the agency introduced subscriber-accessible computer terminals, enabling direct delivery of quotes, news, and trading tools to financial professionals. Following the 2008 merger forming , financial data operations expanded under the division, which developed platforms like Reuters 3000 and for integrated news, pricing, and analytics. This division was rebranded in 2018 and majority sold to a Blackstone-led , with full acquisition by the London Group (LSEG) completed in 2021, integrating Reuters-branded content into LSEG's ecosystem while retained a minority stake and editorial control over news. Today, Reuters financial data and analytics are delivered primarily through LSEG Data & Analytics, which serves as the exclusive provider of Reuters news to global financial markets, combining it with proprietary datasets for over 40,000 customers and 400,000 end users across 190 markets. Core offerings include LSEG Workspace, a successor to , offering real-time , pricing across , indices, and AI-driven integrated with Reuters , analysis from over 10,000 sources, and customizable workflows for trading, , and research. Reuters News within this platform delivers market-sensitive headlines, political feeds, and specialized commentary like Breakingviews, emphasizing agenda-setting financial insights verified through rigorous editorial standards. Additional tools encompass data feeds for , sustainability metrics, and cloud-based infrastructure via partnerships like , enabling scalable access to historical and real-time datasets dating back decades. These services prioritize accuracy and speed, with Reuters' 170-year legacy underpinning trust in data integrity amid competition from platforms like , though independent assessments note Reuters' edge in news integration over aggregation. Empirical reliance on verified sources and low-latency delivery supports causal in volatile markets, such as during seasons or geopolitical events, where timely correlate with reduced trading latencies reported by users. LSEG's extend to and risk intelligence, formerly Refinitiv features, enhancing without unsubstantiated predictive modeling.

Technological Innovations and Global Reach

Reuters pioneered early innovations in rapid news transmission, beginning with the use of carrier pigeons in 1850 to relay stock market prices across unconnected telegraph lines between , , and , , enabling a 45-minute advantage over competitors. In 1851, following the establishment of its London office, the agency integrated electric telegraph technology, which allowed for near-real-time dissemination of commercial and financial intelligence across , marking one of the first systematic applications of for organized news services. By the 1870s, Reuters leveraged expanding overland telegraph networks and undersea cable infrastructure to extend its operations beyond , inaugurating services to the in 1872 and shortly thereafter, which facilitated the global arbitrage of prices and exchange rates. In the financial domain, the agency developed electronic data delivery systems, including the introduction of stock tickers in the late and, later, the Reuters Monitor in —a computerized dealing system for foreign exchange markets that automated quote matching and transaction execution, fundamentally altering global trading efficiency by reducing reliance on voice . In the digital era, Reuters advanced multimedia and data analytics capabilities, launching initiatives like the Greenhouse Fund in 1995 to invest in such as internet-based news distribution and financial software startups. More recently, the agency has incorporated and for tasks including automated translation, content personalization, and data-driven insights via tools like Lynx Insight, which analyzes vast datasets to generate visualizations and forecasts, while maintaining human editorial oversight to ensure accuracy and adherence to journalistic standards. Reuters maintains extensive global reach, employing around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists operating from approximately 200 bureaus and locations worldwide, producing original content in 16 languages that reaches over 1 billion people daily across platforms including websites, television, and mobile applications. This network supports comprehensive coverage of international events, with dedicated correspondents in major capitals and conflict zones, enabling real-time reporting on financial markets, , and from over 100 countries. The agency's infrastructure, bolstered by satellite and digital transmission technologies, ensures low-latency delivery, with financial data services alone serving more than 1,000 clients globally through dedicated terminals and APIs.

Editorial Policies and Standards

Trust Principles and Objectivity Guidelines

The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles, originally established as the Reuters Trust Principles in 1941 amid World War II threats of censorship and propaganda, were agreed upon between Reuters shareholders and the UK Newspaper Proprietors' Association to safeguard the agency's independence. These principles were formalized to ensure no single commercial or political interest could dominate the organization, with a special "Founders Share" held by the Thomson Reuters Founders Share Company granting veto power over newsroom decisions that might compromise integrity. The five core tenets include: (1) preventing control by any single interest; (2) preserving the organization's integrity, independence, and freedom from bias; (3) delivering unbiased and reliable news services; (4) balancing the interests of the news-consuming public, employees, shareholders, and commercial customers; and (5) actively developing and expanding high-quality news operations globally. Objectivity guidelines stem directly from these principles, mandating that Reuters journalists operate with utmost , , and absence of in all news-gathering activities. The Reuters Handbook of Journalism emphasizes that editorial content must prioritize accuracy as sacrosanct, seek fair and balanced commentary, transparently correct errors, and strive for neutrality by presenting facts without advocacy for any side. This includes prohibitions on anonymous sourcing unless essential and justified, requirements for multiple verification sources, and avoidance of or masquerading as fact, all enforced through internal editorial oversight independent of Thomson Reuters' broader commercial divisions like legal or . Enforcement relies on the Founders Share Company's non-executive board, comprising independent trustees who monitor adherence and can intervene in mergers, acquisitions, or policies affecting integrity, as seen in the 2008 Thomson-Reuters merger where the principles were explicitly extended to protect the division. Journalists are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves if personal views might influence reporting, with violations subject to disciplinary action up to termination. These mechanisms aim to insulate factual reporting from corporate pressures, though critics have questioned their efficacy in practice, citing instances of perceived selective framing in coverage of geopolitical events.

Fact-Checking and Verification Protocols

Reuters' and verification protocols are fundamentally guided by the Trust Principles established in , which mandate , , and freedom from bias in news gathering and dissemination. These principles require journalists to prioritize accuracy as sacrosanct, prohibiting fabrication, , or alteration of images and video beyond standard editorial adjustments, while demanding transparent corrections for any errors. Sourcing protocols emphasize multiple independent corroborations, with single-source stories requiring special editorial authorization and sources maintaining confidentiality compact directly with the organization rather than individual reporters. In practice, verification involves rigorous cross-checking against primary evidence, including geolocation of events, metadata analysis for visuals, and consultation with experts or eyewitnesses to trace origins and validate claims. Journalists must disclose potential conflicts of interest to managers, avoid payments for information, and ensure balance by seeking opposing viewpoints where feasible, while prohibiting unattributed opinions in straight news reporting. This process aligns with broader journalistic standards that forbid trading on non-public information or accepting inducements that could compromise objectivity. The dedicated Reuters Fact Check unit, integrated within the news editorial department and operational since 2020, specializes in scrutinizing on platforms, particularly visual content and factual claims in categories such as general news, , and , and environment. It monitors digital platforms, identifies claims presented as facts with public relevance, evaluates potential harm and reach, and applies consistent methodology: extracting key assertions, verifying through evidence linkage, expert input, and origin tracing, while rating outcomes as true, false, or nuanced. In 2025 and 2026, the unit debunked numerous AI-generated deepfakes, fake videos, and fabricated images, including videos falsely depicting apocalyptic wildfires in Los Angeles and Israel, AI-altered images of political figures like Nicolas Maduro and Zohran Mamdani with Jeffrey Epstein, a fake UK Commons speech, and a manipulated poolside photo with Epstein. Opposing perspectives are actively sought, and exclusions apply to opinions, anonymous sourcing, or low-impact assertions; findings are archived transparently on Reuters.com with linked evidence or screenshots, subject to a formal . As a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) Code of Principles since February 2020, Reuters commits to non-partisanship, transparency in funding and methods, and open corrections, with the unit's work undergoing periodic IFCN assessments to confirm adherence. Verification methods prioritize corroboration over reliance on single inputs, and staff details are disclosed, enabling public accountability; contact for challenges is provided via dedicated channels. These protocols extend to partnerships, such as with Meta for platform-specific checks, maintaining throughout.

Media Bias Assessments and Reliability Ratings

Media bias rating organizations generally assess Reuters as centrist or least biased with high factual reliability. AllSides rates Reuters as Center based on editorial reviews, blind bias surveys, and community feedback, though a 2023 blind survey indicated an average rating of -0.73 on a -9 to +9 scale (Center category), with right-leaning respondents perceiving a slight Lean Left bias. Media Bias/Fact Check classifies Reuters as Least Biased due to story selection, wording, and sourcing that minimize editorializing, assigning it a Very High factual reporting score for proper sourcing and rare failed fact checks. Ad Fontes Media positions Reuters in the Middle for bias (scale of -42 to +42, with neutral near zero) and as Reliable for /fact reporting, based on analyst ratings of article reliability above 40 (indicating strong adherence to journalistic standards). awards Reuters a of 100/100, meeting all nine criteria including transparency, , and separation of from opinion. A 2019 study ranked Reuters highest in accuracy among major outlets and neutral on , analyzing over 3,000 articles for factual errors and slant.
OrganizationBias RatingReliability RatingMethodology Notes
Center (-0.73 avg.)High (community/expert consensus)Blind surveys, editorial reviews
Least BiasedVery High factual reportingSourcing analysis, failed fact check rate [ongoing]
Middle (neutral)Reliable (score >40)Analyst ratings of articles [ongoing]
N/A (focus on trust)100/100 (all criteria met)9-point checklist including transparency [2019+]
Economist studyNeutralHighest accuracy3,000+ articles reviewed
Perceptions of bias vary by audience ideology, with conservative respondents in surveys more likely to detect left-leaning tendencies in topic selection or framing, potentially reflecting broader distrust in wire services amid polarized media environments. Isolated academic critiques, such as a analysis alleging systematic pro-Palestinian framing in coverage, suggest potential selective emphasis but lack replication in broader empirical studies of Reuters' output. Overall, Reuters maintains strong empirical standing in reliability metrics, with low error rates (estimated 1-5% in general news studies) and adherence to its Trust Principles emphasizing independence.

Achievements and Impact

Major Awards and Investigative Successes

Reuters has earned multiple Pulitzer Prizes, among the most prestigious awards in , recognizing excellence in investigative and other categories. In 2025, it received the Pulitzer for Investigative Reporting for the "Fentanyl Express" series, which detailed the in precursor chemicals from that enable illicit production, highlighting regulatory failures contributing to over 100,000 annual U.S. overdose deaths linked to the drug. The investigation involved undercover reporting in and , revealing how loosely regulated exports evade controls despite U.S. diplomatic efforts. This work also secured an Overseas Press Club Award in the and Morton Frank category for best business, financial, and economic reporting abroad. Earlier, in 2019, Reuters won the for "Duterte's War," a series exposing the Philippine government's campaign against illegal drugs, which resulted in over 6,000 deaths in the first nine months, including extrajudicial killings by police. The reporting combined , accounts, and video evidence to document patterns of abuse under President Rodrigo Duterte's policies. In another investigative triumph, Reuters staff received a Pulitzer for a series on workplace at Elon Musk's companies, uncovering over 600 unreported injuries at —including crushed limbs, amputations, and electrocutions—and safety lapses at Tesla factories. This accountability journalism drew on internal documents, employee interviews, and regulatory filings to illustrate systemic risks in high-profile industries. Beyond Pulitzers, Reuters investigations have garnered other honors, such as the 2023 Selden Ring Award for Investigative Reporting for "Nightmare in Nigeria," a four-part series probing abuses, , and infrastructure failures exacerbating poverty in Africa's largest economy. Since 2017, the agency has accumulated over 175 journalism awards, including finalists in Pulitzer categories and recognitions from bodies like the Overseas Press Club, underscoring its capacity for resource-intensive global probes. These successes stem from Reuters' emphasis on original sourcing, data verification, and persistence in adversarial environments, though outcomes have occasionally prompted policy scrutiny without immediate reforms.

Influence on Global News Ecosystems

Reuters functions as a cornerstone wire service in the ecosystem, supplying real-time textual, video, and content to over 1,000 newspaper clients and more than 750 television broadcasters across 115 countries. Employing around 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists in approximately 200 locations worldwide, the agency facilitates the aggregation and distribution of , international events, and investigative reports, which are then republished or cited by subscribing outlets lacking equivalent on-the-ground resources. This syndication model reaches billions of people daily through downstream media, amplifying Reuters' selections and framings across print, broadcast, and digital platforms. The agency's agenda-setting role stems from its capacity to identify and prioritize stories via extensive bureaus and correspondent networks, often dictating the initial wave of coverage on global crises, elections, and conflicts. For instance, Reuters' early reporting on events like the 2022 Russia-Ukraine conflict or escalations in 2023-2024 has been widely adopted by national media, homogenizing narratives and reducing incentives for independent verification by resource-constrained outlets. Wire services such as Reuters effectively filter the volume of potential news into digestible feeds, influencing which topics enter public discourse and debates, as evidenced by tiered subscription access that grants premium clients faster, more detailed dispatches. In developing regions and smaller markets, reliance on Reuters exacerbates dependencies, where local media incorporate its feeds to fill gaps in domestic reporting, potentially sidelining indigenous perspectives in favor of a London- or New York-centric lens. This dynamic contributes to a centralized flow, where Reuters' editorial judgments—guided by its Trust Principles emphasizing independence and factual accuracy—nonetheless propagate selectively across ecosystems, as seen in the uniform adoption of its financial and geopolitical dispatches by outlets from to . While fostering efficiency in information dissemination, such influence raises concerns over narrative uniformity, particularly when client media echo unexamined elements without cross-sourcing, underscoring the agency's outsized leverage in an interconnected media landscape.

Journalists and Field Operations

Notable Journalists and Correspondents

Andrew R.C. Marshall, a special correspondent for , has earned three Pulitzer Prizes for International Reporting during his tenure at Reuters, beginning in 2012. His awards include the 2014 prize, shared with colleagues including Jason Szep, for exposing the Rohingya Muslim minority's systematic persecution and mass killings in . Additional Pulitzers recognized his investigations into the Philippines' "war on drugs" campaign under President , documenting thousands of extrajudicial killings. Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo, Myanmar-based reporters, contributed to Reuters' for Explanatory Reporting through their documentation of military atrocities against the Rohingya, including mass graves and village burnings. Arrested in December 2017 on charges shortly after receiving documents on , they were imprisoned for 511 days before their conviction was overturned by Myanmar's in , highlighting risks faced by Reuters correspondents in authoritarian regimes. Jeff Mason serves as Reuters' White House , having covered the administrations of Presidents , , and since joining the bureau in 2009, providing on-the-ground reporting from key political events and policy developments. Andrew Chung, a legal focused on the U.S. , co-led a 2018 Pulitzer-winning series on the Trump administration's family separation policy at the U.S.- border, revealing over 2,800 children separated from parents and systemic failures in reunification efforts based on government data and interviews. Historically, Arthur Spiegelman exemplified Reuters' commitment to on-the-scene reporting over four decades, covering major events from the to conflicts as a Los Angeles-based correspondent until his death in 2008 at age 68. Tom Heneghan, after 40 years with the agency, held roles including global religion editor and bureau chief in and , contributing to coverage of international and faith-related stories.

Risks and Fatalities in Reporting

Reuters journalists and support staff operate in high-risk environments, particularly conflict zones such as , , , , and Gaza, where they face threats from crossfire, targeted attacks, improvised explosive devices, and military operations. These risks are inherent to field reporting in active war areas, where correspondents often embed with forces or work independently to document events, exposing them to hostile fire without combatant status protections under . Reuters maintains safety training, risk assessments, and evacuation protocols for its teams, yet the nature of on-the-ground coverage—requiring proximity to combat—has resulted in multiple fatalities since the early . The (2003–2011) represented the deadliest period for Reuters personnel, with seven staff members killed amid intense urban combat and . These deaths included both international and local Iraqi freelancers, highlighting the disproportionate risks borne by local hires who navigate cultural and access challenges in unstable regions. A U.S. military helicopter strike on July 12, 2007, in eastern killed photographer , 22, and driver , 40, during clashes; leaked footage later confirmed the crew fired on the vehicle after mistaking cameras for weapons. Earlier incidents involved U.S. forces: cameraman Taras Protsyuk died from a tank shell at the Palestine Hotel on April 8, 2003, and Mazen Dana was shot near on August 17, 2003. Other losses included soundman Waleed Khaled in a 2005 shooting and freelance cameraman Dhia Najim in in 2004.
DateNameRoleLocation/Circumstance
April 8, 2003Taras ProtsyukCameraman (Ukrainian)Killed by U.S. shell at Palestine Hotel, .
August 17, 2003Mazen DanaCameraman (Palestinian)Shot by U.S. troops near .
November 1, 2004Dhia NajimFreelance cameraman (Iraqi)Killed in , possibly by sniper fire.
August 28, 2005Waleed KhaledSoundman (Iraqi)Shot in 's Hay al-Adil district.
July 12, 2007Photographer (Iraqi)Killed in U.S. strike, .
July 12, 2007Driver (Iraqi)Killed in same U.S. strike, .
In more recent conflicts, fatalities have continued amid escalated hostilities. On October 13, 2023, video journalist Issam Abdallah was killed and six other reporters wounded by Israeli tank shells near the Lebanon-Israel border during Hezbollah-Israel exchanges; a Reuters investigation concluded the fire originated from an Israeli Merkava tank 900 meters away. In Ukraine, a Russian missile strike on August 23, 2024, at a Kramatorsk hotel killed safety adviser Ryan Evans and injured three Reuters journalists, underscoring vulnerabilities even for non-combat support roles in rear areas. In Gaza, contractor cameraman Hussam al-Masri and occasional contributor Moaz Abu Taha died on August 25, 2025, in an Israeli airstrike on Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, alongside three other journalists; contractor Hatem Khaled was wounded. These incidents reflect ongoing perils from aerial bombardments and ground operations in densely populated zones. Beyond fatalities, Reuters staff endure frequent injuries, kidnappings, and detentions, with local freelancers often facing additional threats from non-state actors or reprisals for perceived affiliations. The notes that such risks have intensified in settings, where distinguishing journalists from combatants proves challenging, contributing to impunity in many cases. Reuters' commitment to covering underreported conflicts necessitates these exposures, balancing editorial imperatives against personnel safety.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of External Influences and Partnerships

In the and , declassified British government documents revealed that Reuters received secret subsidies from the (IRD), a covert anti-communist unit linked to , totaling around £130,000 (equivalent to millions today) to expand its news services in , , and as part of information operations against Soviet influence. The funding, channeled through front organizations, aimed to promote Western narratives in developing regions, raising concerns about potential editorial compromises despite Reuters' claims of operational independence; the agency later acknowledged the payments but maintained they did not affect news content. In March 2022, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Reuters employees publicly criticized the organization's longstanding content-sharing and syndication partnership with TASS, Russia's state-owned news agency, which dated back decades and involved distributing TASS material to Reuters clients. Journalists argued that continuing the tie during active hostilities with a Kremlin-controlled entity risked legitimizing state propaganda and eroding trust, with internal memos highlighting embarrassment over unfiltered TASS feeds; Reuters management defended it as a neutral commercial arrangement common among wire services, though no immediate severance occurred. In February 2025, , Reuters' parent company, drew scrutiny over a $9 million U.S. Department of Defense contract awarded in 2023 for analytics and surveillance tools, which and others alleged enabled "large-scale social deception" or psychological operations targeting foreign audiences. Critics pointed to contract descriptions involving monitoring and influence mapping as evidence of sway over corporate practices, potentially blurring lines between commercial services and military objectives; countered that portrayals distorted the work, which focused on lawful intelligence support without involvement in , and emphasized compliance with ethical guidelines.

Reporting Errors and Ethical Lapses

In 2006, Reuters severed ties with freelance photographer Adnan Hajj after he digitally manipulated images from the Israel-Hezbollah War, including one exaggerating smoke plumes from an Israeli on by and intensifying the effect via Photoshop, and another adding missiles to an Israeli F-16 jet that were absent in the original. The agency withdrew all 920 of Hajj's images from its archive, issued corrections, and revised its photo-handling protocols to prohibit substantive alterations beyond basic adjustments like cropping or . In February 2018, Reuters fully retracted a report claiming Australian billionaire had covertly funded a to oust , conceding the piece "failed to meet the standards of fair, accurate and reliable " owing to inadequate sourcing, lack of subject verification, and insufficient contextual balance. Ethical questions arose in 2010 when Reuters suppressed an investigative article on CNN correspondent Tom Cohen after he protested to senior executives, alleging biased coverage; the decision, made without standard editorial review, highlighted potential conflicts between journalistic independence and internal pressures from influential figures. Media watchdogs have cataloged recurring corrections in Reuters' Middle East reporting, such as initial uncritical adoption of Hamas-provided casualty data later revised downward upon independent verification, underscoring challenges in sourcing from conflict zones with restricted access. In February 2025, Reuters withdrew a news alert featuring a truncated quote from a political figure, later admitting the omission rendered it misleading and required prompt correction to align with accuracy standards.

Debates Over Bias in Specialized Coverage

Critics have accused Reuters of exhibiting bias in its coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict, a specialized area of foreign policy reporting, with allegations spanning both pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian leanings. In August 2025, multiple current and former Reuters journalists anonymously alleged pro-Israel bias among editors and management, claiming that coverage of the Gaza war "silenced Palestinian suffering" by downplaying civilian casualties and emphasizing Israeli security narratives, as reported by Declassified UK based on whistleblower accounts. These insiders pointed to editorial interventions that altered headlines and story angles to favor Israeli perspectives, such as minimizing reports on events like the killing of Palestinian journalist Anas al-Sharif in July 2025. Conversely, external analyses, including a 2016 research paper examining Reuters' framing over decades, argued for systematic pro-Arab/Palestinian bias through selective storytelling that portrayed Israel negatively while humanizing Palestinian narratives, potentially undermining the agency's Trust Principles. Such conflicting claims highlight ongoing debates, exacerbated by incidents like top Reuters editors sharing social media content perceived as anti-Israel during the 2023-2024 war, as documented by media watchdogs. In environmental and climate change reporting, Reuters has faced scrutiny for perceived alignment with advocacy-driven narratives over empirical balance. A 2023 analysis in Ross Clark's book Not Zero criticized Reuters for endorsing the "Covering Climate Now" initiative, a pact signed by over 400 media outlets in 2019 that commits participants to prioritize climate crisis framing, which Clark argued introduces bias by sidelining dissenting data on economic impacts or model uncertainties. Earlier, in 2013, Reuters' appointment of a climate skeptic editor led to a reported 50% drop in climate coverage volume, prompting accusations from outlets like The Guardian of injecting fringe skepticism into stories, though defenders viewed it as an attempt at viewpoint diversity amid dominant consensus narratives. A 2025 review noted occasional criticisms of Reuters giving undue space to climate denialism or understating crisis severity, contrasting with broader media trends of amplified alarmism, but empirical audits like The Economist's 2019 study rated Reuters highly for accuracy in such topics with minimal partisan skew. These debates reflect tensions between Reuters' stated independence and pressures from institutional alignments in climate journalism, where source selection often favors IPCC-aligned experts over contrarian analyses. Debates in other specialized fields, such as and , are less pronounced but include historical critiques of foreign policy-adjacent errors. During the , some analysts faulted Reuters for framing that allegedly amplified anti-coalition narratives without sufficient verification, contributing to perceptions of in conflict reporting. Independent bias raters like and consistently score Reuters as center-leaning with high factual reliability across these domains, attributing lower controversy to rigorous sourcing protocols, though skeptics argue this overlooks subtle framing in global health crises like origins, where early coverage aligned closely with official WHO narratives amid emerging lab-leak evidence. Overall, while Reuters maintains defenses via its editorial standards emphasizing freedom from , specialized coverage debates underscore challenges in balancing empirical rigor against geopolitical and ideological influences.

References

  1. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=46
  2. https://academic.oup.com/book/1811/chapter/141500740
  3. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/about-us/company-history
  4. https://reutersagency.com/about/
  5. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/content/dam/openweb/documents/pdf/reuters-news-agency/fact-sheet/reuters-fact-sheet.pdf
  6. https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/-reuters-from-pigeons-to-multimedia-player-idUSN16471733/
  7. https://thehill.com/opinion/international/5182813-biased-journalism-terrorism-propaganda/
  8. https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/biased-reuters-makes-it-personal-and-gets-election-fraud-completely
  9. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/
  10. https://www.reuters.com/article/technology/reuters-features-in-economist-study-on-accuracy-and-bias-idUSKCN1TW35P/
  11. https://reutersagency.com/media-centre/reuters-names-2023-journalists-of-the-year-awards-winners
  12. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/may/04/reuters.pressandpublishing
  13. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/about-us/trust-principles
  14. https://reutersagency.com/about/our-trust-principles/
  15. https://reutersagency.com/about/standards-values/
  16. https://ir.thomsonreuters.com/news-releases/news-release-details/thomson-completes-acquisition-reuters-thomson-reuters-shares
  17. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/media-telecom/update-2-thomson-agrees-to-buy-reuters-for-172-billion-idUSL15334467/
  18. https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/THOMSON-REUTERS-CORP-1411972/company/
  19. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/about-us/board-of-directors
  20. https://www.dealpointdata.com/rj?vb=Action.downloadPDF&app=corp&id=000119312524103801_d763322dex991htm
  21. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/content/dam/ewp-m/documents/thomsonreuters/en/pdf/corporate-responsibility/thomson-reuters-founders-share-company-limited-1218.pdf
  22. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/content/dam/openweb/documents/pdf/corporate/misc/thomson-reuters-founders-share-company-limited.pdf
  23. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/about-us/trust-principles/trustee-directors
  24. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Paul-Julius-Freiherr-von-Reuter
  25. https://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/reuters-group-plc-history/
  26. https://www.masscommunicationtalk.com/the-rise-of-reuters-the-era-of-news-agencies.html
  27. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13688800802176771
  28. https://thebaron.info/archives/in-the-first-world-war-whose-side-was-reuters-on
  29. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/the-long-history-of-speed-at-reuters-idUSKBN2761WD/
  30. https://academic.oup.com/book/1811/chapter/141515610
  31. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/full-text-alessandra-gallonis-2022-reuters-memorial-lecture-tanks-tiktok-and-trust-journalism
  32. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/reuters-from-pigeons-to-multimedia-merger-idUSL18491006/
  33. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/factbox-a-chronology-of-thomson-reuters-corp-idUSKBN1FK0HO/
  34. https://www.trust.org/legal/trust-principles/
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343605107_Reuters_and_the_idea_of_a_British_Commonwealth_news_agency_in_the_aftermath_of_World_War_II
  36. https://academic.oup.com/book/1811/chapter/141524292
  37. https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/chronology-reuters-from-pigeons-to-multimedia-merger-idUSL15416857/
  38. https://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/reuters-group-plc
  39. https://www.nytimes.com/1984/02/23/business/the-restructuring-of-reuters.html
  40. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/16/business/media/16thomson.html
  41. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/europe/factbox-a-chronology-of-thomson-reuters-corp-idUSKBN1FK085/
  42. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/factbox-thomson-reuters-the-history-and-purpose-of-the-trust-principles-idUSKBN1FK0DZ/
  43. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/timeline-tom-glocer-s-career-at-thomson-reuters-idUSTRE7B1031/
  44. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/about-us/trust-principles.html
  45. https://www.technologyreview.com/2017/11/27/241656/how-reuterss-revolutionary-ai-system-gathers-global-news/
  46. https://reutersagency.com/content/content-types/text/
  47. https://reutersagency.com/who-we-serve/broadcasters/
  48. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/reuters.asp
  49. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/press-releases/2018/july/thomson-reuters-financial-and-risk-business-announces-new-company-name-refinitiv
  50. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/press-releases/2021/january/thomson-reuters-announces-closing-of-sale-of-refinitiv-to-london-stock-exchange-group
  51. https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics
  52. https://www.reuters.com/lseg/
  53. https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/financial-data/news/reuters-news
  54. https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/financial-data/financial-news-coverage/political-news-feeds-analysis/reuters-top-news
  55. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/052815/financial-news-comparison-bloomberg-vs-reuters.asp
  56. https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/refinitiv
  57. https://www.johnjessop.com/tales-from-the-south-pier/reuters-history/
  58. https://reutersagency.com/media-centre/how-ai-helps-power-trusted-news-at-reuters
  59. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/content/dam/ewp-m/documents/careers/en/pdf/fact-sheets/reutersfactsheet_spring2018.pdf
  60. https://www.thebaron.info/archives/technology/reuters-technical-development-chronology
  61. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/europe/factbox-thomson-reuters-the-history-and-purpose-of-the-trust-principles-idUSKBN1FK08R/
  62. https://news.trust.org/trust-principles/
  63. https://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Reuters_Handbook_of_Journalism.pdf
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290347859_Reuters_Principles_Of_Trust_Or_Propaganda
  65. https://reutersagency.com/solutions/verification-services/
  66. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/about/
  67. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/ai-generated-video-purports-show-apocalyptic-scenes-los-angeles-wildfires-2025-01-16/
  68. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/ai-generated-video-shared-footage-wildfires-israel-2025-05-06/
  69. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/ai-creates-fake-image-zohran-mamdani-with-mother-epstein-2026-02-05/
  70. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/ai-watermarked-clip-shows-fake-commons-speech-maduro-netanyahu-2026-01-12/
  71. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/poolside-image-jeffrey-epstein-with-prominent-figures-is-ai-generated-2026-02-13/
  72. https://ifcncodeofprinciples.poynter.org/application/public/reuters/661a8b04ba7689d4814192d8
  73. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/reuters-launches-fact-checking-initiative-to-identify-misinformation-in-partner-idUSKBN2061SO/
  74. https://www.allsides.com/news-source/reuters-media-bias
  75. https://www.allsides.com/blind-survey/survey-rating-media-bias-associated-press-ijr-reuters-time-theblaze-may-2023
  76. https://adfontesmedia.com/reuters-bias-and-reliability/
  77. https://x.com/i/grok/share/erR75nRywwmw0M5TtLCdrMMKn
  78. https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/staff-reuters
  79. https://reutersagency.com/media-centre/reuters-wins-2025-pulitzer-prize-for-investigative-reporting
  80. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/reuters-wins-pulitzer-investigation-fentanyl-trade-2025-05-05/
  81. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reuters-wins-2025-pulitzer-prize-for-investigative-reporting-302446371.html
  82. https://reutersagency.com/media-centre/reuters-receives-three-overseas-press-club-award-recognitions
  83. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/section/philippines-drugs/
  84. https://annenberg.usc.edu/news/spotlight/reuters-team-wins-2023-selden-ring-award-nightmare-nigeria
  85. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/content/dam/ewp-m/documents/careers/en/pdf/fact-sheets/reuters-fact-sheet-2018.pdf
  86. https://reuters.com/
  87. https://nationalassociationawards.co.uk/international-news-wire-services-reuters-ap-and-global-information-flow
  88. https://fiveable.me/media-politics/unit-14/global-news-agencies-international-reporting/study-guide/Ye5EBsft42YHATfr
  89. https://dontbuythesun.co.uk/the-reuters-story-how-one-agency-shapes-global-news-coverage
  90. https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3jy4kl/eli5_why_do_so_many_news_agencies_cite_reuters/
  91. https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/clare-baldwin-andrew-rc-marshall-and-manuel-mogato-reuters
  92. https://www.reuters.com/authors/andrew-r-c-marshall/
  93. https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/staff-reuters-notable-contributions-wa-lone-and-kyaw-soe-oo
  94. https://www.reuters.com/authors/jeff-mason/
  95. https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/andrew-chung-lawrence-hurley-andrea-januta-jaimi-dowdell-and-jackie-botts-reuters
  96. https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/renowned-journalist-arthur-spiegelman-dies-at-68-idUSTRE4BK0ZH/
  97. https://news-decoder.com/about-us/correspondents/
  98. https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/factbox-details-of-reuters-staff-killed-in-iraq-idUSN16267969/
  99. https://cpj.org/2024/08/reuters-safety-adviser-killed-3-journalists-injured-in-ukraine/
  100. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/leaked-us-video-shows-deaths-of-reuters-iraqi-staffers-idUSTRE6344FW/
  101. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/ISRAEL-LEBANON/JOURNALIST/akveabxrzvr/
  102. https://www.reuters.com/world/gaza-live-updates-least-15-killed-including-journalists-after-israeli-strikes-2025-08-25/
  103. https://rsf.org/en/us-defence-department-releases-report-fatal-shooting-reuters-journalist
  104. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/1/13/britain-secretly-funded-reuters-in-1960s-and-70s
  105. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/20/reuters-staff-partnership-russian-wire-service-00018779
  106. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/thomson-reuters-9m-contract-with-us-defense-department-draws-ire-from-trump-musk/3481308
  107. https://www.reuters.com/business/us-defense-department-contract-inaccurately-represented-social-media-says-2025-02-13/
  108. https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/reuters-toughens-rules-after-altered-photo-affair-idUSL18678707/
  109. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/aug/07/reuters.pressandpublishing
  110. https://www.npr.org/2006/08/08/5625098/reuters-retracts-altered-beirut-photo
  111. https://www.imediaethics.org/reuters-retracts-story-failed-meet-standards-fair-accurate-reliable-journalism/
  112. https://www.imediaethics.org/reuters-kills-story-what-are-the-ethical-issues/
  113. https://www.camera.org/article/topic/media-corrections/outlet/reuters/page/8/
  114. https://jordantimes.com/opinion/khaled-shaqran/reuters-and-misleading-news-alert-questions-about-timing-acknowledging
  115. https://www.declassifieduk.org/reuters-journalists-accuse-newswire-of-pro-israel-bias/
  116. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/reuters-journalists-blow-the-whistle-on-pro-israel-bias-report/3666439
  117. https://honestreporting.com/systemic-bias-top-reuters-editors-share-disturbing-content-online/
  118. https://www.thebaron.info/comment/reuters-accused-of-climate-reporting-bias
  119. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jul/26/reuters-climate-change-scepticism-coverage
  120. https://stattistics.com/blog/reuters-news-bias-separating-facts
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.