Hubbry Logo
SteelSteelMain
Open search
Steel
Community hub
Steel
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Steel
Steel
Steel
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Steels
Phases
Microstructures
Classes
Other iron-based materials

Steel is an alloy of iron and carbon that demonstrates improved mechanical properties compared to the pure form of iron. Due to its high elastic modulus, yield strength, fracture strength and low raw material cost, steel is one of the most commonly manufactured materials in the world. Steel is used in structures (as concrete reinforcing rods or steel beams), in bridges, infrastructure, tools, ships, trains, cars, bicycles, machines, electrical appliances, furniture, and weapons.

Iron is always the main element in steel, but other elements are used to produce various grades of steel, demonstrating altered material, mechanical, and microstructural properties. Stainless steels, for example, typically contain 18% chromium and exhibit improved corrosion and oxidation resistance versus their carbon steel counterpart. Under atmospheric pressures, steels generally take on two crystalline forms: body-centered cubic and face-centered cubic; however, depending on the thermal history and alloying, the microstructure may contain the distorted martensite phase or the carbon-rich cementite phase, which are tetragonal and orthorhombic, respectively. In the case of alloyed iron, the strengthening is primarily due to the introduction of carbon in the primarily-iron lattice, inhibiting deformation under mechanical stress. Alloying may also induce additional phases that affect the mechanical properties. In most cases, the engineered mechanical properties are at the expense of the ductility and elongation of the pure iron state, which decrease upon the addition of carbon.

Steel was produced in bloomery furnaces for thousands of years, but its large-scale, industrial use began only after more efficient production methods were devised in the 17th century, with the introduction of the blast furnace and production of crucible steel. This was followed by the Bessemer process in England in the mid-19th century, and then by the open-hearth furnace. With the invention of the Bessemer process, a new era of mass-produced steel began. Mild steel replaced wrought iron. The German states were the major steel producers in Europe in the 19th century.[1] American steel production was centred in Pittsburgh; Bethlehem, Pennsylvania; and Cleveland until the late 20th century. Currently, world steel production is centered in China, which produced 54% of the world's steel in 2023.

Further refinements in the process, such as basic oxygen steelmaking (BOS), largely replaced earlier methods by further lowering the cost of production and increasing the quality of the final product. Today, more than 1.6 billion tons of steel are produced annually. Modern steel is generally identified by various grades defined by assorted standards organizations. The modern steel industry is one of the largest manufacturing industries in the world, but also one of the most energy and greenhouse gas emission intense industries, contributing 8% of global emissions.[2] However, steel is also very reusable: it is one of the world's most-recycled materials, with a recycling rate of over 60% globally.[3]

Structural steel bars of different shapes used in construction
[edit]
See also: Steel grades
Steel cable of a colliery headframe

The noun steel originates from the Proto-Germanic adjective *stahliją or *stakhlijan 'made of steel', which is related to *stahlaz or *stahliją 'standing firm'.[4]

The carbon content of steel is between 0.02% and 2.14% by weight for plain carbon steel (iron-carbon alloys). Alloy steel is steel to which other alloying elements have been intentionally added to modify the characteristics of steel. Common alloying elements include: manganese, nickel, chromium, molybdenum, boron, titanium, vanadium, tungsten, cobalt, and niobium.[5] Additional elements, most frequently considered undesirable, are also important in steel: phosphorus, sulphur, silicon, and traces of oxygen, nitrogen, and copper.[6]

Plain iron–carbon alloys with a higher than 2.1% carbon content are known as cast iron. With modern steelmaking techniques such as powder metal forming, it is possible to make very high-carbon (and other alloy material) steels, but such are not common. Cast iron is not malleable even when hot, but it can be formed by casting as it has a lower melting point than steel and good castability properties.[5] Certain compositions of cast iron, while retaining the economies of melting and casting, can be heat treated after casting to make malleable iron or ductile iron objects. Steel is distinguishable from wrought iron (now largely obsolete), which may contain a small amount of carbon A (<0.1 %) but large amounts of slag (around 1–2%).[7]

Material properties

[edit]

Origins and production

[edit]
An iron-carbon phase diagram showing the conditions necessary to form different phases
An incandescent steel workpiece in a blacksmith's art

Iron is commonly found in the Earth's crust in the form of an ore, usually an iron oxide, such as magnetite or hematite. Iron is extracted from iron ore under reductive conditions, where oxygen reacts with carbon in the fuel to produce carbon monoxide, which then reduces the iron oxide into metallic iron.[8] This process, known as smelting, was first applied to metals with lower melting points, such as tin, which melts at about 250 °C (482 °F), and copper, which melts at about 1,100 °C (2,010 °F), and the combination, bronze, which has a melting point lower than 1,083 °C (1,981 °F). In comparison, iron melts at about 1,540 °C (2,800 °F), a temperature not attainable at the start of the Iron Age. Small quantities of iron were smelted in ancient times in a semi-liquid state by repeatedly heating the ore in a charcoal fire and then welding the resulting clumps together with a hammer. The process eliminated much of the impurities, resulting in the production of wrought iron. As furnaces reached higher temperatures due to bellows improvements leading to increased airflow, iron with higher carbon contents were able to be produced.[9] Unlike copper and tin,[10][11] liquid or solid iron dissolves carbon quite readily.[12]

All of these temperatures could be reached with ancient methods used since the Bronze Age. Since the oxidation rate of iron increases rapidly beyond 800 °C (1,470 °F), it is important that smelting takes place in a low-oxygen environment. Smelting, using carbon to reduce iron oxides, results in an alloy (pig iron) that retains too much carbon to be called steel.[9] The excess carbon and other impurities are removed via further processing.[13]

Other materials are often added to the iron/carbon mixture to produce steel with the desired properties. Nickel and manganese in steel add to its tensile strength and make the austenite form of the iron-carbon solution more stable, chromium increases hardness and melting temperature, and vanadium also increases hardness while making it less prone to metal fatigue.[14]

To inhibit corrosion, at least 11% chromium can be added to steel so that a hard oxide forms on the metal surface; this is known as stainless steel. Tungsten slows the formation of cementite, keeping carbon in the iron matrix and allowing martensite to preferentially form at slower quench rates, resulting in high-speed steel. The addition of lead and sulphur decrease grain size, thereby making the steel easier to turn, but also more brittle and prone to corrosion. Such alloys are nevertheless frequently used for components such as nuts, bolts, and washers in applications where toughness and corrosion resistance are not paramount. For the most part, however, p-block elements such as sulphur, nitrogen, phosphorus, and lead are considered contaminants that make steel more brittle and are therefore removed from steel during the melting processing.[14]

Properties

[edit]
Fe-C phase diagram for carbon steels, showing the A0, A1, A2 and A3 critical temperatures for heat treatments

The density of steel varies based on the alloying constituents but usually ranges between 7,750 and 8,050 kg/m3 (484 and 503 lb/cu ft), or 7.75 and 8.05 g/cm3 (4.48 and 4.65 oz/cu in).[15]

Even in a narrow range of concentrations of mixtures of carbon and iron that make steel, several different metallurgical structures, with very different properties can form. Understanding such properties is essential to making quality steel. At room temperature, the most stable form of pure iron is the body-centred cubic (BCC) structure called alpha iron or α-iron. It is a fairly soft metal that can dissolve only a small concentration of carbon, no more than 0.005% at 0 °C (32 °F) and 0.021 wt% at 723 °C (1,333 °F). The inclusion of carbon in alpha iron is called ferrite. At 910 °C, pure iron transforms into a face-centred cubic (FCC) structure, called gamma iron or γ-iron. The inclusion of carbon in gamma iron is called austenite. The more open FCC structure of austenite can dissolve considerably more carbon, as much as 2.1% (38 times that of ferrite),[16] at 1,148 °C (2,098 °F), which reflects the upper carbon content of steel, beyond which is cast iron.[17] When carbon moves out of solution with iron, it forms a very hard, but brittle material called cementite (Fe3C).[12]

When steels with exactly 0.8% carbon (known as a eutectoid steel), are cooled, the austenitic phase (FCC) of the mixture attempts to revert to the ferrite phase (BCC). The carbon no longer fits within the FCC austenite structure, resulting in an excess of carbon. One way for carbon to leave the austenite is for it to precipitate out of solution as cementite, leaving behind a surrounding phase of BCC iron called ferrite with a small percentage of carbon in solution. The two, cementite and ferrite, precipitate simultaneously producing a layered structure called pearlite, named for its resemblance to mother of pearl.[18] In a hypereutectoid composition (greater than 0.8% carbon), the carbon will first precipitate out as large inclusions of cementite at the austenite grain boundaries until the percentage of carbon in the grains has decreased to the eutectoid composition (0.8% carbon), at which point the pearlite structure forms.[19] For steels that have less than 0.8% carbon (hypoeutectoid), ferrite will first form within the grains until the remaining composition rises to 0.8% of carbon, at which point the pearlite structure will form. No large inclusions of cementite will form at the boundaries in hypoeutectoid steel. The above assumes that the cooling process is very slow, allowing enough time for the carbon to migrate.[20]

As the rate of cooling is increased the carbon will have less time to migrate to form carbide at the grain boundaries but will have increasingly large amounts of pearlite of a finer and finer structure within the grains; hence the carbide is more widely dispersed and acts to prevent slip of defects within those grains, resulting in hardening of the steel. At the very high cooling rates produced by quenching, the carbon has no time to migrate but is locked within the face-centred austenite and forms martensite.[21] Martensite is a highly strained and stressed, supersaturated form of carbon and iron and is exceedingly hard but brittle. Depending on the carbon content, the martensitic phase takes different forms. Below 0.2% carbon, it takes on a ferrite BCC crystal form, but at higher carbon content it takes a body-centred tetragonal (BCT) structure. There is no thermal activation energy barrier which prevents transformation from austenite to martensite. There is no compositional change, so the atoms generally retain their same neighbours.[22]

Martensite has a lower density (it expands during the cooling) than does austenite, so that the transformation between them results in a change of volume. In this case, expansion occurs. Internal stresses from this expansion generally take the form of compression on the crystals of martensite and tension on the remaining ferrite, with a fair amount of shear on both constituents. If quenching is done improperly, the internal stresses can cause a part to shatter as it cools. At the very least, they cause internal work hardening and other microscopic imperfections. It is common for quench cracks to form when steel is water quenched, although they may not always be visible.[23]

Heat treatment

[edit]
Main article: Heat treating

There are many types of heat treating processes available to steel, such as annealing, quenching, and tempering.

Annealing is the process of heating the steel to a sufficiently high temperature to relieve local internal stresses. It does not create a general softening of the product but only locally relieves strains and stresses locked up within the material. Annealing goes through three phases: recovery, recrystallization, and grain growth. The temperature required to anneal a particular steel depends on the type of annealing to be achieved and the alloying constituents.[24]

Quenching involves heating the steel to create the austenite phase then quenching it in water or oil. This rapid cooling results in a hard but brittle martensitic structure.[22] The steel is then tempered, which is just a specialized type of annealing, to reduce brittleness. In this application the annealing (tempering) process transforms some of the martensite into cementite, or spheroidite, and hence it reduces the internal stresses and defects. The result is a more ductile and fracture-resistant steel.[25]

Production

[edit]
Main article: Steelmaking
See also: List of countries by steel production
Iron ore pellets used in the production of steel

When iron is smelted from its ore, it contains more carbon than is desirable. To become steel, it must be reprocessed to reduce the carbon to the correct amount, at which point other elements can be added. In the past, steel facilities would cast the raw steel product into ingots which would be stored until use in further refinement processes that resulted in the finished product. In modern facilities, the initial product is close to the final composition and is continuously cast into long slabs, cut and shaped into bars and extrusions and heat treated to produce a final product. Today, approximately 96% of steel is continuously cast, while only 4% is produced as ingots.[26]

The ingots are then heated in a soaking pit and hot rolled into slabs, billets, or blooms. Slabs are hot or cold rolled into sheet metal or plates. Billets are hot or cold rolled into bars, rods, and wire. Blooms are hot or cold rolled into structural steel, such as I-beams and rails. In modern steel mills these processes often occur in one assembly line, with ore coming in and finished steel products coming out.[27] Sometimes after a steel's final rolling, it is heat treated for strength; however, this is relatively rare.[28]

History

[edit]
Main articles: History of ferrous metallurgy and History of the steel industry (1850–1970)

Ancient

[edit]
Bloomery smelting during the Middle Ages in the 5th to 15th centuries

Steel was known in antiquity and was produced in bloomeries and crucibles.[29][30]

The earliest known production of steel is seen in pieces of ironware excavated from an archaeological site in Anatolia (Kaman-Kalehöyük) which are nearly 4,000 years old, dating from 1800 BC.[31][32]

Wootz steel was developed in Southern India and Sri Lanka in the 1st millennium BCE.[30] Metal production sites in Sri Lanka employed wind furnaces driven by the monsoon winds, capable of producing high-carbon steel. Large-scale wootz steel production in India using crucibles occurred by the sixth century BC, the pioneering precursor to modern steel production and metallurgy.[29][30]

High-carbon steel was produced in Britain at Broxmouth Hillfort from 490 to 375 BC,[33][34] and ultrahigh-carbon steel was produced in the Netherlands from the 2nd to 4th centuries AD.[35] The Roman author Horace identifies steel weapons such as the falcata in the Iberian Peninsula, while Noric steel was used by the Roman military.[36]

The Chinese of the Warring States period (403–221 BC) had quench-hardened steel,[37] while Chinese of the Han dynasty (202 BC – AD 220) created steel by melting together wrought iron with cast iron, thus producing a carbon-intermediate steel by the 1st century AD.[38][39]

There is evidence that carbon steel was made in Western Tanzania by the ancestors of the Haya people as early as 2,000 years ago by a complex process of "pre-heating" allowing temperatures inside a furnace to reach 1300 to 1400 °C.[40][41][42][43][44][45]

Wootz and Damascus

[edit]
Main articles: Wootz steel and Damascus steel

Evidence of the earliest production of high carbon steel in South Asia is found in Kodumanal in Tamil Nadu, the Golconda area in Telangana and Karnataka, regions of India, as well as in Samanalawewa and Dehigaha Alakanda, regions of Sri Lanka.[46] This came to be known as wootz steel, produced in South India by about the sixth century BC and exported globally.[47][48] The steel technology existed prior to 326 BC in the region as they are mentioned in literature of Sangam Tamil, Arabic, and Latin as the finest steel in the world exported to the Roman, Egyptian, Chinese and Arab worlds at that time – what they called Seric iron.[49] A 200 BC Tamil trade guild in Tissamaharama, in the South East of Sri Lanka, brought with them some of the oldest iron and steel artifacts and production processes to the island from the classical period.[50][51][52] The Chinese and locals in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka had also adopted the production methods of creating wootz steel from the Chera Dynasty Tamils of South India by the 5th century AD.[53][54] In Sri Lanka, this early steel-making method employed a unique wind furnace, driven by the monsoon winds, capable of producing high-carbon steel.[55][56] Since the technology was acquired from the Tamilians from South India,[57] the origin of steel technology in India can be conservatively estimated at 400–500 BC.[47][56]

The manufacture of wootz steel and Damascus steel, famous for its durability and ability to hold an edge, may have been taken by the Arabs from Persia, who took it from India. In 327 BC, Alexander the Great was rewarded by the defeated King Porus, not with gold or silver but with 30 pounds of steel.[58] The Greek alchemist Zosimos of Panopolis attested to the Indian origin of wootz steel, stating that "Indians made high quality swords by melting soft iron in crucibles."[59] A recent study has speculated that carbon nanotubes were included in its structure, which might explain some of its legendary qualities, though, given the technology of that time, such qualities were produced by chance rather than by design.[60] Natural wind was used where the soil containing iron was heated by the use of wood. The ancient Sinhalese managed to extract a ton of steel for every 2 tons of soil,[55] a remarkable feat at the time. One such furnace was found in Samanalawewa and archaeologists were able to produce steel as the ancients did.[55][61]

Crucible steel, formed by slowly heating and cooling pure iron and carbon (typically in the form of charcoal) in a crucible, was produced in Merv by the 9th to 10th century AD.[48] In the 11th century, there is evidence of the production of steel in Song China using two techniques: a "berganesque" method that produced inferior, inhomogeneous steel, and a precursor to the modern Bessemer process that used partial decarburization via repeated forging under a cold blast.[62]

Modern

[edit]
A Bessemer converter in Sheffield, England

Since the 17th century, the first step in European steel production has been the smelting of iron ore into pig iron in a blast furnace.[63] Originally employing charcoal, modern methods use coke, which has proven more economical.[64][page needed][65][page needed][66][page needed]

Processes starting from bar iron

[edit]
Main articles: Blister steel and Crucible steel

In these processes, pig iron made from raw iron ore was refined (fined) in a finery forge to produce bar iron, which was then used in steel-making.[63]

The production of steel by the cementation process was described in a treatise published in Prague in 1574 and was in use in Nuremberg from 1601. A similar process for case hardening armour and files was described in a book published in Naples in 1589. The process was introduced to England in about 1614 and used to produce such steel by Sir Basil Brooke at Coalbrookdale during the 1610s.[67]

The raw material for this process were bars of iron. During the 17th century, it was realized that the best steel came from oregrounds iron of a region north of Stockholm, Sweden. This was still the usual raw material source in the 19th century, almost as long as the process was used.[68][69]

Crucible steel is steel that has been melted in a crucible rather than having been forged, with the result that it is more homogeneous. Most previous furnaces could not reach high enough temperatures to melt the steel. The early modern crucible steel industry resulted from the invention of Benjamin Huntsman in the 1740s. Blister steel (made as above) was melted in a crucible or in a furnace, and cast (usually) into ingots.[69][70][page needed]

Processes starting from pig iron

[edit]
An open hearth furnace in the Museum of Industry in Brandenburg, Germany
White-hot steel pouring out of an electric arc furnace in Brackenridge, Pennsylvania

The modern era in steelmaking began with the introduction of Henry Bessemer's process in 1855, the raw material for which was pig iron.[71] His method let him produce steel in large quantities cheaply, thus mild steel came to be used for most purposes for which wrought iron was formerly used.[72] The Gilchrist-Thomas process (or basic Bessemer process) was an improvement to the Bessemer process, made by lining the converter with a basic material to remove phosphorus.[73]

Another 19th-century steelmaking process was the Siemens-Martin process, which complemented the Bessemer process,[69] which originally consisted of co-melting wrought-iron scrap with pig iron.[74]

These methods of steel production were rendered obsolete by the Linz-Donawitz process of basic oxygen steelmaking (BOS), developed in 1952,[75] and other oxygen steel making methods. Basic oxygen steelmaking is superior to previous steelmaking methods because the oxygen pumped into the furnace limited impurities, primarily nitrogen, that previously had entered from the air used,[76] and because, with respect to the open hearth process, the same quantity of steel from a BOS process is manufactured in one-twelfth the time.[75] Today, electric arc furnaces (EAF) are a common method of reprocessing scrap metal to create new steel. They can also be used for converting pig iron to steel, but they use a lot of electrical energy (about 440 kWh per metric ton), and are thus generally only economical when there is a plentiful supply of cheap electricity.[77]

Industry

[edit]
See also: History of the steel industry (1850–1970), History of the steel industry (1970–present), Global steel industry trends, Steel production by country, and List of steel producers
Steel production (in million tons) by country as of 2023

The steel industry is often considered an indicator of economic progress, because of the critical role played by steel in infrastructural and overall economic development.[78] In 1980, there were more than 500,000 U.S. steelworkers. By 2000, the number of steelworkers had fallen to 224,000.[79]

The economic boom in China and India caused a massive increase in the demand for steel. Between 2000 and 2005, world steel demand increased by 6%. Since 2000, several Indian[80] and Chinese[81] steel firms have expanded to meet demand, such as Tata Steel (which bought Corus Group in 2007), Baosteel Group and Shagang Group. As of 2017, though, ArcelorMittal is the world's largest steel producer.[82]

In 2005, the British Geological Survey stated China was the top steel producer with about one-third of the world share; Japan, Russia, and the United States were second, third, and fourth, respectively, according to the survey.[83] Steelmaking is a significant contributor to climate change, accounting for around 7% of global greenhouse gas emissions as of 2024.[84]

At the end of 2008, the steel industry faced a sharp downturn that led to many cut-backs.[85]

In 2021, it was estimated that around 7% of the global greenhouse gas emissions resulted from the steel industry.[86][87] Potential ways to reduce emissions include replacing coke-based production methods with hydrogen, increasing recycling of steel, and applying carbon capture and storage technology.[84]

Recycling

[edit]
Main article: Ferrous metal recycling

Steel is one of the world's most-recycled materials, with a recycling rate of over 60% globally;[3] in the United States alone, over 82,000,000 metric tons (81,000,000 long tons; 90,000,000 short tons) were recycled in the year 2008, for an overall recycling rate of 83%.[88]

As more steel is produced than is scrapped, the amount of recycled raw materials is about 40% of the total of steel produced – in 2016, 1,628,000,000 tonnes (1.602×109 long tons; 1.795×109 short tons) of crude steel was produced globally, with 630,000,000 tonnes (620,000,000 long tons; 690,000,000 short tons) recycled.[89]

Contemporary

[edit]
See also: Steel grades
Bethlehem Steel in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania was one of the world's largest manufacturers of steel before its closure in 2003.

Carbon

[edit]
Main article: Carbon steel

Modern steels are made with varying combinations of alloy metals to fulfil many purposes.[14] Carbon steel, composed simply of iron and carbon, accounts for 90% of steel production.[5] Low alloy steel is alloyed with other elements, usually molybdenum, manganese, chromium, or nickel, in amounts of up to 10% by weight to improve the hardenability of thick sections.[5] High strength low alloy steel has small additions (usually < 2% by weight) of other elements, typically 1.5% manganese, to provide additional strength for a modest price increase.[90]

Recent corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) regulations have given rise to a new variety of steel known as Advanced High Strength Steel (AHSS). This material is both strong and ductile so that vehicle structures can maintain their current safety levels while using less material. There are several commercially available grades of AHSS, such as dual-phase steel, which is heat treated to contain both a ferritic and martensitic microstructure to produce a formable, high strength steel.[91] Transformation Induced Plasticity (TRIP) steel involves special alloying and heat treatments to stabilize amounts of austenite at room temperature in normally austenite-free low-alloy ferritic steels. By applying strain, the austenite undergoes a phase transition to martensite without the addition of heat.[92] Twinning Induced Plasticity (TWIP) steel uses a specific type of strain to increase the effectiveness of work hardening on the alloy.[93]

Carbon steels are often galvanized, through hot-dip or electroplating in zinc for protection against rust.[94]

Alloy

[edit]
Main article: Alloy
Forging a structural member out of steel
Cor-Ten rust coating

Stainless steel contains a minimum of 11% chromium, often combined with nickel, to resist corrosion. Some stainless steels, such as the ferritic stainless steels are magnetic, while others, such as the austenitic, are nonmagnetic.[95] Corrosion-resistant steels are abbreviated as CRES.[96]

Alloy steels are plain-carbon steels in which small amounts of alloying elements like chromium and vanadium have been added. Some more modern steels include tool steels, which are alloyed with large amounts of tungsten and cobalt or other elements to maximize solution hardening. This also allows the use of precipitation hardening and improves the alloy's temperature resistance.[5] Tool steel is generally used in axes, drills, and other devices that need a sharp, long-lasting cutting edge. Other special-purpose alloys include weathering steels such as Cor-ten, which weather by acquiring a stable, rusted surface, and so can be used un-painted.[97] Maraging steel is alloyed with nickel and other elements, but unlike most steel contains little carbon (0.01%). This creates a very strong but still malleable steel.[98]

Eglin steel uses a combination of over a dozen different elements in varying amounts to create a relatively low-cost steel for use in bunker buster weapons. Hadfield steel, named after Robert Hadfield, or manganese steel, contains 12–14% manganese which, when abraded, strain-hardens to form a very hard skin which resists wearing. Uses of this particular alloy include tank tracks, bulldozer blade edges, and cutting blades on the jaws of life.[99]

Standards

[edit]

Most of the more commonly used steel alloys are categorized into various grades by standards organizations. For example, the Society of Automotive Engineers has a series of grades defining many types of steel.[100] The American Society for Testing and Materials has a separate set of standards, which define alloys such as A36 steel, the most commonly used structural steel in the United States.[101] The JIS also defines a series of steel grades[102] that are used extensively in Japan and surrounding countries.[103]

Uses

[edit]
A roll of steel wool

Iron and steel are used widely in the construction of roads, railways, other infrastructure, appliances, and buildings. Most large modern structures, such as stadiums and skyscrapers, bridges, and airports, are supported by a steel skeleton. Even those with a concrete structure employ steel for reinforcing. It sees widespread use in major appliances and cars. Despite the growth in usage of aluminium, steel is still the main material for car bodies. Steel is used in a variety of other construction materials, such as bolts, nails and screws, and other household products and cooking utensils.[104]

Other common applications include shipbuilding,[105] pipelines, mining, offshore construction, aerospace, white goods (e.g. washing machines), heavy equipment such as bulldozers, office furniture, steel wool, tool,[106][107] and armour in the form of personal vests and helmets[108] or vehicle armour (better known as rolled homogeneous armour in this role).[109]

Historical

[edit]
A carbon steel knife

Before the introduction of the Bessemer process and other modern production techniques, steel was expensive and was only used where no cheaper alternative existed, particularly for the cutting edge of knives, razors, swords, and other items where a hard, sharp edge was needed. It was also used for springs, including those used in clocks and watches.[69]

With the advent of faster and cheaper production methods, steel has become easier to obtain and much cheaper. It has replaced wrought iron for a multitude of purposes. However, the availability of plastics in the latter part of the 20th century allowed these materials to replace steel in some applications due to their lower fabrication cost and weight.[110] Carbon fibre is replacing steel in reinforcement-based applications owing to its high modulus value (up to 5 times higher than steel), but its high cost is a barrier to widespread use in transportation.[111]

Long

[edit]
A steel bridge
A steel pylon suspending overhead power lines

Flat carbon

[edit]

Weathering (COR-TEN)

[edit]
Main article: Weathering steel

Stainless

[edit]
Main article: Stainless steel
See also: List of applications of stainless steel
A stainless steel gravy boat

Low-background

[edit]
Main article: Low-background steel

Steel manufactured after World War II is contaminated with radionuclides, because steel production uses air, and the atmosphere is contaminated with radioactive dust produced by nuclear weapons testing. Low-background steel, steel manufactured prior to 1945, is used for certain radiation-sensitive applications such as Geiger counters and radiation shielding.[132]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Steel

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Steel is an consisting primarily of and up to 2.1 percent by weight, with the carbon content distinguishing it from (below 0.08 percent carbon) and (above 2.1 percent), imparting enhanced strength, hardness, and through controlled phase transformations in the iron-carbon system. Other elements such as , , or may be added in varying amounts to tailor properties like resistance or , enabling diverse applications while maintaining iron as the base matrix. The production of steel evolved from ancient crucible methods, such as wootz steel smelted with charcoal around the third century BCE, to modern industrial processes dominated by the basic oxygen furnace (using pig iron and scrap) and electric arc furnace (primarily from recycled scrap), which together account for over 90 percent of global output. These methods reduce iron ore via coke in blast furnaces or melt scrap electrically, followed by refining to achieve precise compositions, with innovations like the Bessemer process in 1856 enabling mass production that fueled the . In 2023, worldwide crude steel production reached approximately 1.892 billion metric tons, underscoring its scale as an energy-intensive process reliant on abundant iron ore, coal, and electricity. Steel underpins modern and , forming the structural backbone of buildings, bridges, vehicles, machinery, and appliances due to its high tensile strength-to-weight ratio and recyclability, with up to 90 percent of steel produced today incorporating recycled content. Its economic significance is profound, supporting millions of jobs and contributing over $500 billion annually to economies like the through direct output and supply chains, while enabling advancements in sectors from automotive to energy without which contemporary civilization's scale would be infeasible. Despite challenges like susceptibility requiring protective measures, steel's versatility and abundance have made it indispensable, with ongoing shifts toward low-carbon production methods addressing environmental demands driven by empirical emissions data.

Definition and Fundamentals

Composition and Alloying

Steel is defined as an of iron containing between 0.02% and 2.1% carbon by weight, a range that enables a balance of and strength not achievable in purer forms of iron. This distinguishes steel from , which has negligible carbon content below 0.08%, resulting in high but low , and from , which exceeds 2.1% carbon up to 4.5%, promoting brittleness due to excess formation. The carbon atoms primarily occupy interstitial sites in the iron lattice, altering phase stability as shown in the iron-carbon phase diagram, which maps equilibrium phases across temperature and composition. Key phases include ferrite (α-Fe), a body-centered cubic structure with maximum carbon solubility of about 0.02% at 727°C; austenite (γ-Fe), a face-centered cubic phase stable at higher temperatures with solubility up to 2.14% carbon; and cementite (Fe₃C), a hard, brittle orthorhombic compound representing the solubility limit. These phases determine the causal mechanisms behind steel's transformability, with transformations like the eutectoid reaction at 0.76% carbon and 727°C decomposing austenite into ferrite and cementite (pearlite). Beyond carbon, steel incorporates alloying elements to modify phase diagrams and enhance specific attributes through or precipitation. Manganese, typically 0.3–1.5%, deoxidizes the melt and increases by expanding the field. Silicon, at 0.2–0.6%, aids deoxidation and boosts tensile strength via ferrite strengthening. Chromium, added at 0.5–2% or higher in stainless variants, stabilizes ferrite and forms carbides for improved hardness and oxidation resistance. , up to 5% in low-alloy steels, refines grain structure and elevates toughness by lowering the martensite start temperature. These elements' effects stem from their atomic size mismatches and thermodynamic interactions with iron and carbon, enabling precise control over microstructure without exceeding the base iron-carbon framework.

Classification Systems

The AISI/SAE classification system employs a four-digit numeric code for designating carbon and steels, where the first two digits specify the alloying elements (e.g., 10xx for plain carbon steels, 43xx for nickel-chromium-molybdenum alloys) and the last two digits approximate the average carbon content in hundredths of a percent. For instance, SAE 1018 represents a low-carbon steel with 0.15-0.20% carbon and minimal alloying, suitable for applications requiring formability and due to its . In contrast, SAE 4340 is a with approximately 0.40% carbon plus additions of 1.65-2.00% , 0.60-0.80% , and 0.20-0.30% , enabling superior toughness after . This system, originally developed for automotive applications, facilitates precise by correlating composition to expected performance without implying rigid property boundaries. European Norm (EN) standards, such as EN 10027, classify steels using alphanumeric designations that denote chemical composition, mechanical properties, and intended use, often harmonized under the Eurocode framework for structural applications. For example, S355J2 indicates a non-alloy structural steel with a minimum yield strength of 355 MPa, while alloy steels like EN 1.6582 (equivalent to 34CrNiMo6) specify precise limits on chromium, nickel, and molybdenum for high-stress components. ASTM International standards complement these by providing specification documents (e.g., ASTM A36 for carbon structural steel or AISI 4140 equivalents under ASTM A29), focusing on testable criteria like tensile strength and chemical analysis to ensure compliance across manufacturing processes. These systems promote global interoperability through established equivalency tables, allowing, for instance, EN S235JR to substitute for ASTM A283 Grade C in piping or fabrication where mechanical requirements align, thus minimizing trade barriers via verifiable cross-references rather than proprietary silos. Classifications extend beyond binary categorizations like "mild" (low-carbon) versus "high-strength" steels, as empirical composition data reveals a continuum of properties influenced by incremental variations and processing; for example, yield strengths range continuously from under 200 MPa in normalized low-carbon grades to over 1000 MPa in quenched-and-tempered alloys, defying simplistic dichotomies and necessitating grade-specific testing for causal prediction of behavior. This granularity underscores the systems' emphasis on compositional precision over vague labels, enabling engineers to select grades based on quantitative thresholds rather than qualitative approximations.
Classification SystemExample GradeKey FeaturesTypical Applications
AISI/SAE10180.15-0.20% C, plain carbon, welding
AISI/SAE43400.40% C, Ni-Cr-Mo Gears, shafts
ENS355J2Non-alloy, 355 MPa yieldStructural beams
ASTMA36≤0.29% C, structural carbonBridges, buildings

Material Properties

Mechanical and Physical Characteristics

Steel exhibits a wide range of mechanical properties depending on composition and , with yield strengths typically spanning 200 to over 1500 MPa across grades; for instance, low-carbon structural steels like A36 offer 220-250 MPa, while advanced high-strength alloys exceed 1000 MPa. Ultimate tensile strengths correspondingly range from 400 MPa in mild steels to 2000 MPa or more in specialized grades, enabling steel to withstand significant loads before fracture. , measured by elongation at break, varies inversely with strength; low-carbon steels achieve 20-30% elongation, providing formability, whereas high-strength variants may drop to under 10% for enhanced rigidity. Hardness, assessed via Rockwell C (HRC) or Brinell (HB) scales, quantifies resistance to indentation and ; annealed low-carbon steels register 10-20 HRC (around 120 HB), while hardened tool steels reach 60-65 HRC (up to 650 HB). resistance, critical for cyclic loading, approximates half the for most steels, often 200-700 MPa, with an upper limit near 290 MPa for conventional alloys due to microstructural limits on crack initiation. These properties surpass pure iron's, which yields at approximately 150-200 MPa with higher but inferior strength, as carbon atoms in steel pin dislocations, impeding deformation via solid-solution strengthening and precipitation effects. Physically, steel's lies between 7.75 and 8.05 g/cm³, averaging 7.85 g/cm³, conferring substantial per for without excessive weight. Thermal conductivity ranges from 15 W/m·K in austenitic stainless grades to 50 W/m·K in ferritic carbon steels, facilitating dissipation in applications while retaining structural integrity under thermal gradients. These attributes, rooted in iron's body-centered cubic lattice modified by alloying, underpin steel's efficacy in load-bearing roles, where empirical tests confirm superior absorption per unit compared to less dense alternatives like aluminum.
PropertyTypical RangeExample Grades
Yield Strength (MPa)200-1500+A36: 220-250; AHSS: 500-1000+
Tensile Strength (MPa)400-2000+Mild: 400-550; Tool: 1500+
(HRC)10-65Annealed: 10-20; Hardened: 60+
(g/cm³)7.75-8.05Carbon steels: ~7.85
Conductivity (W/m·K)15-50Carbon: ~45; Stainless: ~15

Chemical Behavior and Corrosion

Steel, primarily an of iron and carbon, exhibits reactivity through electrochemical when exposed to oxygen and moisture, forming primarily as hydrated ferric oxide (Fe₂O₃·nH₂O). This process involves anodic oxidation of iron (Fe → Fe²⁺ + 2e⁻) and cathodic reduction of oxygen (O₂ + 2 + 4e⁻ → 4OH⁻), with subsequent precipitation of iron hydroxides that dehydrate to ; acts as an , accelerating the reaction in humid or saline conditions./22:_Oxidation-Reduction_Reactions/22.05:_Corrosion) The rate increases with higher oxygen availability and lower , as acidic environments enhance involvement, though neutral atmospheric exposure yields slower progression compared to immersion. In the , occupies an active position (approximately -0.6 to -0.2 V relative to ), rendering it anodic to nobler metals like or , thus accelerating its when coupled in conductive media. Empirical data indicate atmospheric rates for unprotected ranging from 0.02 to 0.1 mm/year in rural or urban air, escalating to 0.1-0.5 mm/year in marine atmospheres due to ions disrupting protective layers and promoting pitting. These rates underscore steel's vulnerability without mitigation but also its predictability, allowing engineered responses like barriers or sacrificial anodes. Alloying elements modify this behavior; for instance, stainless steels with at least 10.5-13% form a thin, adherent (Cr₂O₃) passive layer upon oxidation, which self-heals in oxygenated environments by diffusion to exposed sites, markedly reducing further iron dissolution. This passivation confers resilience in aggressive settings, though chloride-rich marine exposures can initiate localized breakdown at concentrations exceeding critical thresholds (e.g., >1000 ppm), necessitating higher alloyed grades like duplex for sustained protection. Despite corrosion risks, steel's chemical behavior enables robust performance in , with protected structures routinely achieving 50-100 years of through coatings and , outperforming unproven composite alternatives in verified cost-effectiveness for large-scale applications where scalability and reparability prevail over selective claims. Narratives amplifying steel's vulnerabilities often overlook these empirical mitigations and real-world data from bridges and marine installations, which demonstrate superior value retention absent the high upfront costs and limited track record of composites.

Processing and Heat Treatment

Heat treatment of steel involves controlled heating and cooling cycles that induce phase transformations in the iron-carbon microstructure, altering mechanical properties such as , strength, and toughness through changes in and defect density. These transformations, driven by thermodynamic principles and kinetics, convert —the face-centered cubic phase stable at high temperatures—into ferrite, , bainite, or depending on cooling rates and composition. For instance, slow cooling allows carbon to form lamellar , while rapid suppresses diffusion, yielding supersaturated with a body-centered tetragonal lattice distorted by trapped carbon atoms, which generates internal stresses and high dislocation densities responsible for elevated . Annealing heats steel above the upper critical temperature (typically 800–900°C for hypoeutectoid steels) to form , followed by furnace cooling at rates of 10–50°C per hour to promote soft, equiaxed ferrite and coarse microstructures that relieve internal stresses and enhance . Normalizing employs similar austenitization but uses (around 100–200°C per hour), producing finer and more uniform grain structures that improve yield strength and without excessive softness; this process is applied to structural steels to ensure consistent properties after or rolling. Quenching from the austenitic state, often in oil, water, or polymer solutions at rates exceeding 200°C per second, forms martensite by shear transformation without diffusional carbon redistribution, achieving hardness values up to 65 HRC in high-carbon steels (0.8–1.0% C) due to the volume expansion and lattice strain impeding dislocation motion. Subsequent tempering reheats the quenched steel to 150–650°C, allowing controlled precipitation of carbides and annihilation of excess dislocations, which trades peak hardness for improved ductility and toughness— for example, tempering at 200°C retains over 60 HRC while mitigating brittleness in tool steels. Time-temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams map these kinetics for specific alloys, showing "C-curves" where transformation noses indicate optimal isothermal holds; crossing the martensite start line (Ms, often 200–400°C) during continuous cooling predicts phase fractions via undercooling-driven nucleation rates. In practice, normalized low-alloy steels exhibit Charpy V-notch exceeding 50 J at , making them suitable for bridge girders where resistance and impact absorption outweigh needs, whereas quench-and-tempered high-strength low-alloy (HSLA) variants balance yield strengths of 500–700 MPa with elongation over 15% for welded structures. These outcomes stem from causal links between cooling rate, solute partitioning, and resulting defect populations, verifiable through dilatometry and , enabling tailored properties without altering bulk chemistry.

Historical Evolution

Pre-Industrial and Ancient Techniques

The production of steel in antiquity relied primarily on furnaces, which smelted using as fuel and a to yield a spongy mass known as a bloom, consisting of with inclusions and variable carbon content achieved through carburization. The term "wrought iron" derives from the hammering or mechanical working of this hot spongy bloom by blacksmiths, which consolidates the iron particles, welds them together, expels much of the slag impurities, and results in a more homogeneous, ductile material suitable for fabrication. Archaeological evidence indicates that the in developed around 1500 BCE, with instances of carburized steel—produced by reheating blooms in contact with carbon-rich to diffuse carbon into the surface—appearing by approximately 1400 BCE, resulting in heterogeneous blades featuring a hard, high-carbon exterior over a tougher core. This process, confirmed through metallographic analysis of artifacts, produced steel with localized carbon contents sufficient for superior hardness compared to pure or , though outputs remained artisanal, typically yielding blooms of only a few kilograms per furnace operation due to the solid-state reduction below iron's melting point. In regions such as ancient and , bloomery variants enabled higher average carbon incorporation, up to 1.5% in some blooms, through prolonged exposure to in the furnace atmosphere, yielding steels suitable for tools and weapons without extensive post-processing; Indian sites dating to 1800 BCE show early smelted iron, evolving into crucible-like methods for more uniform high-carbon products by the late . These techniques contrasted with later European pre-industrial approaches, such as the introduced around the 15th century CE, which decarburized cast (produced in small blast furnaces) into via oxidation in a , followed by selective carburization for steel, but maintained low yields—often under 1 ton per day across operations—owing to manual , intermittent firing, and high losses. The carbon diffusion in carburized blooms created and structures that enhanced edge retention, allowing steel implements to withstand repeated sharpening and use far better than softer or equivalents, thereby facilitating military advantages through durable swords and agricultural progress via resilient plowshares and sickles that improved tilling efficiency in varied soils. This material superiority, evidenced by wear patterns on artifacts, underpinned expansions in warfare and farming productivity, countering notions of these methods as inherently inferior by demonstrating causal links to technological and societal advancements predating large-scale industrialization.

Medieval and Early Modern Innovations

In the medieval era, crucible steelmaking reached notable sophistication through the production of in southern and , where was melted with in sealed clay crucibles at temperatures exceeding 1,500°C, yielding hypereutectoid alloys with 1.2-1.8% carbon content that formed distinctive banded microstructures upon slow cooling. This process homogenized the melt, minimizing slag inclusions compared to forging, and produced ingots prized for their hardness and edge retention in blades, as evidenced by metallographic examinations revealing networks of carbides that enhanced wear resistance without brittleness. Wootz ingots were traded northward along routes connecting to the and beyond, reaching Persian smiths by the CE for forging into blades that combined superior sharpness with flexibility, driven by demand for elite weaponry amid expanding Islamic caliphates. In regions like , where large-scale bloomeries were fuel-intensive due to limitations from forested areas, the compact method conserved resources while achieving purer carbon , reflecting adaptive tailored to local qualities and sparse high-temperature . So-called emerged primarily from two techniques applied to such high-carbon stocks: etching wootz to expose banding patterns formed by dendritic segregation during solidification, or , which layered and twisted with higher-carbon edges before hammer-forging into composite bars. , widespread in early medieval from the onward, mitigated inconsistencies in iron by diffusion-welding disparate layers, yielding visually striated blades with improved , as confirmed by mechanical tests on replicas showing reduced propensity under impact. Crucible steel also reached Northern Europe through trade, notably in the form of ingots used for Viking-era Ulfberht swords (9th-11th centuries CE), which exhibited fewer embrittling impurities due to the homogenized melt, providing superior flexibility and durability compared to local bloomery products. These innovations peaked in output and refinement between the 8th and 17th centuries, particularly in Syrian and Persian workshops, where wootz-derived blades achieved legendary status for cleaving armor, underscoring empirical mastery of alloy gradients amid pre-industrial constraints.

Industrial Era Breakthroughs

The , patented by British inventor in 1856, marked a pivotal advancement in by converting molten into steel through the injection of air into a tilted, pear-shaped converter, oxidizing excess carbon and impurities in a self-sustaining . This innovation enabled the processing of batches typically ranging from 8 to 30 tons in roughly 20 minutes, slashing production costs to about one-tenth of prior methods, from £50–60 per ton to £6–7 per ton, thereby making steel viable for mass applications such as rails and structural beams. Initial limitations included incompatibility with high-phosphorus , prevalent in many European ores, which restricted feedstock options and prompted further refinements. The -Martin open-hearth process, pioneered in the 1860s by German-British engineer William and French metallurgist Pierre-Émile Martin, addressed these constraints by employing a regenerative gas-fired furnace where and steel scrap were melted on a shallow , allowing extended refining cycles for precise compositional control. Regenerative heating—preheating combustion air and fuel via exhaust heat recovery—enhanced , supporting batches of up to several hundred tons over 8–12 hours and yielding superior steel quality for demanding uses. This method supplanted the in many applications due to its flexibility and reliability, dominating global steel output for much of the 20th century until displaced by faster oxygen-based techniques in the 1960s and 1970s. In 1878, cousins Sidney Gilchrist Thomas and Percy Carlyle Gilchrist extended the Bessemer process's applicability by developing a basic lining of calcined dolomite for the converter, which neutralized and removed oxides from high- pig iron, unlocking vast ore reserves in areas like Britain's district and Germany's region. Empirical trials demonstrated reduction from up to 2% to under 0.1%, empirically validating the approach and enabling cost-effective scaling without reliance on scarce low- inputs. These privately patented innovations, motivated by competitive market pressures for affordable, high-volume steel, drove exponential production growth—evident in U.S. output rising from 1.25 million tons in 1880 to over 10 million tons by 1900—fueling railway expansion and without state-directed mandates.

Post-WWII Advancements

The Linz-Donawitz (LD) process, commercialized in 1952 by Austrian steelmakers , represented a pivotal gain over prior methods by directing a supersonic jet of high-purity oxygen via lance into a vessel charged with molten and , oxidizing carbon and impurities in a controlled . This refinement of 19th-century converter techniques like Bessemer avoided air-blown contamination, achieving refining times of 20 to 40 minutes per —versus 6 to 8 hours in dominant open-hearth furnaces—while supporting larger charges up to 100 tons initially. By 1960, the process had proliferated globally, supplanting open-hearth operations and enabling higher throughput with lower refractory wear and energy demands per ton. Complementing LD steelmaking, continuous casting gained traction from the mid-1950s, particularly in and , by continuously feeding molten steel from the ladle into an oscillating, water-cooled mold to form semi-finished shapes like slabs or billets, followed by secondary cooling and cutting. Unlike ingot casting, which suffered from pipe shrinkage, segregation, and cropping losses yielding 80-85% usable metal, continuous casting minimized internal defects and surface cracks, boosting yields to 95% or higher through uniform solidification and reduced hot-topping needs. Adoption accelerated in the , with early installations at plants like those of Concast AG demonstrating 10-15% yield advantages and enabling direct feeding to rolling mills, thereby cutting intermediate handling and inventory costs. These innovations underpinned a quadrupling of global crude steel output from 189 million tonnes in to 850 million tonnes in , as efficiency improvements decoupled production growth from raw material escalation, yielding more steel per unit of input for postwar infrastructure like highways, bridges, and housing booms. In the United States, steel demand surged amid suburban expansion and automotive proliferation, while Europe's reconstruction and Japan's export-led recovery relied on such scalable, defect-reduced supply to rebuild industrial bases without excessive waste. This empirical expansion affirmed steel's causal role in mid-century prosperity, with process yields and cycle times enabling capital reallocation toward value-added sectors rather than mere volume chasing.

Production Methods

Blast Furnace and Basic Oxygen Processes

The blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) route represents the dominant primary method for steel production from , accounting for approximately 70% of global crude steel output in recent years. In the , , primarily in the form of sinter or pellets, is reduced to molten using coke as the reducing agent and as . Sintering agglomerates fine ore particles with coke breeze and to form porous lumps suitable for charging, enhancing gas permeability and reduction efficiency. The process begins with coke combustion in the presence of preheated air blast, generating (via C + O₂ → CO₂ followed by CO₂ + C → 2CO) that reduces iron oxides: for example, Fe₂O₃ + 3CO → 2Fe + 3CO₂. This yields with 4-5% carbon content and temperatures around 1500°C. Typical material inputs for the BF-BOF route per metric ton of steel include 1.37 tons of , 0.78 tons of (primarily for coke production), 0.27 tons of , and about 0.125 tons of scrap steel incorporated in the BOF stage. Stoichiometric verifies outputs: reduction in the BF consumes oxygen from ore (e.g., 1.43 tons O per ton Fe from Fe₂O₃), with coke providing both reductant and heat; approximately 1.0-1.1 tons of per ton of steel emerges, alongside (300-400 kg per ton ) containing CaO, SiO₂, and impurities. audits indicate the BF requires about 12-15 GJ per ton of hot metal, dominated by coke's combustion heat, enabling high throughput capacities exceeding 10,000 tons daily per furnace. In the subsequent basic oxygen furnace (BOF), molten is charged with (10-30% of mix) into a vessel, where high-purity oxygen is lanced at supersonic speeds to oxidize excess carbon and impurities. proceeds via C + O → [C] + O (dissolved) followed by [C] + [O] → CO, reducing carbon to below 0.05% within 15-20 minutes per . Oxidation of , , , and other elements forms slag with basic fluxes like lime (CaO) to bind them, achieving yields of 90-95%. The process's demands roughly 50-60 Nm³ of O₂ per ton of steel, with exothermic reactions supplying most refining . This integrated sequence's scale—facilities producing millions of annually—yields efficiencies unattainable in smaller alternatives, as fixed costs and recoveries (e.g., top gas reuse) amortize over vast outputs, substantiating its persistence despite CO₂ emissions from coke (about 1.8-2.0 CO₂ per steel). Empirical data from operational plants confirm these balances, with variations tied to quality and pulverized injection reducing coke needs by up to 30%.

Electric Arc Furnace and Scrap-Based Production

Electric arc furnaces (EAFs) melt ferrous scrap as the primary feedstock to produce steel, utilizing electric arcs from electrodes to generate heat reaching approximately 1,800 °C, sufficient to liquefy the charge at around 1,600 °C. The process typically relies on 70-90% scrap input, with potential supplements like for quality control, emphasizing of post-consumer and obsolete steel sources. Foaming slag practices enhance efficiency by injecting carbon and oxygen to produce bubbles, which foam the layer, protecting the lining, electrodes, and arcs from excessive wear while improving to the melt. EAF operations exhibit lower than blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) routes, consuming 400-500 kWh per metric ton of steel versus 13-20 GJ per ton for BF-BOF, reflecting the avoidance of reduction steps and reliance on pre-reduced . This efficiency supports rapid tap-to-tap cycles of 35-60 minutes, enabling high throughput in mini-mill configurations compared to the multi-hour durations in integrated BF-BOF plants. Lifecycle assessments confirm the scrap-EAF pathway's superior , with demand roughly half that of BF-BOF due to minimized extraction and . Economically, EAF-scrap production offers flexibility through quick alloy adjustments and grade switching via scrap selection, suiting variable market demands without large-scale ore dependencies, though scrap quality and supply costs—often 60-70% of operating expenses—dictate viability. Capital requirements for EAF mini-mills are lower, fostering ; in the , EAFs comprised over 70% of steel output in 2023, while in the they accounted for about 45%, underscoring empirical dominance in scrap-abundant regions despite global overcapacity narratives focused elsewhere. This prevalence counters claims of inherent limitations, as EAFs leverage existing urban stocks for sustained, adaptable production.

Emerging Direct Reduction Technologies

Direct reduced iron (DRI) production circumvents the blast furnace's reliance on coke by using reducing gases to convert pellets or lumps into porous sponge iron, typically achieving metallization degrees exceeding 90%. Processes like Midrex employ shaft furnaces with reformed (primarily and ) at temperatures around 800–1,000°C, yielding DRI with 93–96% metallization and carbon contents of 1–3% for subsequent (EAF) melting. Similarly, the HYL (now Energiron) process utilizes a moving-bed reactor with -derived , producing DRI or hot briquetted iron (HBI) suitable for EAF charging while minimizing liquid formation inherent to blast furnaces. Emerging variants shift toward as the primary reductant to further slash CO2 emissions, with pilots demonstrating up to 90% reductions compared to coal-based routes by avoiding carbon-intensive reforming. The HYBRIT initiative in , operational since 2020, produced trial batches of fossil-free steel in 2021 using from to directly reduce , outputting nearly carbon-free sponge iron for EAF processing. Adaptations like Midrex-H2 integrate up to 100% , maintaining high metallization but requiring substantial gas volumes—equivalent to 55–60 Nm³ per kg of iron for full reduction. Pilot data underscores feasibility hurdles beyond emissions gains: hydrogen-DRI costs 2–3 times more than natural gas-based DRI due to expenses and intermittent renewable power needs, with CO2 abatement priced at $64–180 per ton depending on configuration. faces causal constraints from supply chains, as global production capacity lags demand for gigawatt-scale plants; empirical tests reveal quality trade-offs, including higher impurities (e.g., silica, alumina) in sponge iron that necessitate EAF adjustments for consistent . While storage innovations could trim variable costs by 40% via off-peak , widespread adoption remains bottlenecked by and suitability for fluid-bed or shaft reactors.

Varieties of Steel

Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels

Carbon steels consist primarily of iron and carbon, with carbon content typically ranging from 0.05% to 2.0% by weight, and minimal other alloying elements such as manganese up to 1.65%. They are classified into low-carbon (less than 0.3% C), medium-carbon (0.3% to 0.6% C), and high-carbon (greater than 0.6% C) variants, with properties determined by the carbon level's influence on microstructure and phase transformations, as depicted in the iron-carbon phase diagram. Low-carbon steels exhibit high ductility and formability due to a ferritic-pearlitic structure, enabling extensive cold working for applications like sheet metal and piping. Increasing carbon content enhances tensile strength and hardness through greater pearlite and cementite formation but reduces weldability and toughness, making medium-carbon steels suitable for components requiring balanced strength, such as railway rails and gears, where heat treatment refines the microstructure for improved wear resistance. Manganese, universally present at 0.3% to 1.0%, deoxidizes the melt and boosts hardenability by stabilizing austenite, while vanadium additions (up to 0.1%) in low amounts refine grain size and promote precipitation hardening for enhanced yield strength in structural grades. For instance, ASTM A36 steel, a low-carbon grade with approximately 0.25% C and 0.6-0.9% Mn, achieves a minimum yield strength of 250 MPa, supporting its widespread use in buildings and bridges due to cost-effective fabricability. Low-alloy steels extend capabilities with controlled additions of elements like , , , or totaling less than 5% by weight, improving toughness, fatigue resistance, and atmospheric performance without the expense of high-alloy variants. These alloys maintain dominance in volume production, comprising over 80% of global steel output, owing to their empirical superiority in cost-sensitive sectors like and automotive , where basic mechanical demands favor economical compositions over specialized or heat resistance. Empirical data from phase equilibria and underscore their utility, as alloying refines transformation kinetics during cooling, yielding microstructures optimized for under load in high-volume applications.

High-Alloy and Stainless Steels

High-alloy steels, including stainless variants, derive their durability from alloying elements such as , , and , with Cr exceeding 10.5% to enable spontaneous passivation via a thin, adherent Cr₂O₃ film that impedes anodic dissolution. Pourbaix diagrams for Cr-H₂O systems illustrate this causal mechanism: in aerated neutral solutions ( 6-8, potentials 0 to 1 V vs. SHE), Cr₂O₃ occupies a broad stability domain, shifting the corrosion potential above the active-passive transition and promoting self-healing upon mechanical breach, unlike Fe-dominated systems where Fe³⁺/Fe(OH)₃ lacks equivalent protectiveness. Mo enhances repassivation kinetics in chloride-laden environments by enriching the film, while Ni stabilizes the austenitic matrix for toughness. Austenitic grades like AISI 304 (nominally 18% Cr, 8% Ni, <0.08% C) prioritize weldability and cryogenic toughness, retaining austenitic structure post-heat input without carbide precipitation in stabilized forms, enabling seamless fabrication for pressure vessels and piping. Ferritic (e.g., 430: 16-18% Cr, Ni-free) and martensitic (e.g., 410: 11.5-13.5% Cr, heat-treatable to 200-300 HB) grades reduce costs by eliminating Ni, yielding magnetic ferritic ductility or martensitic hardness for cutlery and shafts, though ferritics suffer 475°C embrittlement and martensitics lower pitting resistance absent Mo. Duplex stainless steels (e.g., 2205: 22% Cr, 5% Ni, 3% Mo, 0.16-0.2% N) integrate ~50% ferritic and austenitic phases for yield strengths of 450-550 MPa—double that of austenitics—while matching or exceeding general corrosion resistance via balanced microstructure. The Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN = %Cr + 3.3×%Mo + 16×%N) empirically correlates with critical pitting temperature; PREN >35 (as in superduplex grades) forecasts resistance in seawater, validated against ASTM G48 tests where higher PREN delays initiation. In accelerated salt spray exposure (ASTM B117), stainless alloys sustain 1000-5000+ hours to first red rust or pitting depending on grade and finish, versus <100 hours for bare carbon steels, as the passive film withstands cyclic wetting while carbon steels undergo uniform anodic attack. This quantified superiority—rooted in Cr-driven kinetics—underpins premiums of 2-5× over carbon equivalents in marine and chemical sectors, with field data from oil platforms confirming decades-long service absent coatings.

Specialty and Advanced Steels

Specialty and advanced steels represent engineered alloys optimized for demanding performance criteria, such as superior wear resistance, ultra-high strength, or enhanced formability under strain, often achieved through precise microalloying and heat treatments tailored to niche applications. These materials extend beyond conventional carbon and stainless variants by incorporating elements like , nickel-cobalt-molybdenum combinations, or metastable austenite structures to enable properties unattainable in standard compositions. Innovations in these steels, including patented formulations for transformation behaviors, have driven their adoption in precision tooling and lightweight structural components. Tool steels, exemplified by D2 grade, derive their exceptional abrasion resistance from a composition featuring 1.4-1.6% carbon and 11-13% chromium, which forms hard carbides during air hardening. This yields Rockwell hardness levels up to 62 HRC after heat treatment, making D2 suitable for high-wear scenarios like blanking dies, thread rolling tools, and shear knives in manufacturing. The steel's deep hardening capability minimizes distortion in complex geometries, supporting long tool life in cold-work operations. High-strength low-alloy (HSLA) steels, microalloyed with niobium at levels around 0.02-0.05%, leverage precipitation strengthening and grain refinement to boost yield strengths to 500-700 MPa, facilitating thickness reductions in automotive frames and panels. Niobium's role in pinning grain boundaries during rolling enhances toughness, enabling up to 20-30% material savings in vehicle underbodies without compromising fatigue resistance. This contributes to overall weight reduction, as demonstrated in structural analyses where HSLA components replace mild steel equivalents. Maraging steels, characterized by low carbon (under 0.03%) and high nickel content (17-19%) alloyed with 8-10% cobalt and 4-5% molybdenum, achieve ultimate tensile strengths exceeding 2000 MPa through precipitation aging at 480-510°C. This process forms intermetallic phases like Ni3Mo, providing a martensitic matrix with retained ductility (elongation >5%) and up to 100 MPa√m, ideal for landing gear struts and rocket motor casings. Their and minimal distortion during aging support precision fabrication in high-stress environments. Advanced high-strength steels (AHSS), particularly transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) variants with 0.2-0.4% carbon, 1-2% , and additions, exhibit strain-hardening via austenite-to-martensite phase change, yielding strengths of 600-1000 MPa combined with 20-30% elongation. This enables 25% vehicle weight reductions when substituting conventional steels in body-in-white structures, as verified by finite element simulations aligning with crash protocols. Crash tests confirm AHSS panels absorb impact comparably or better, with a 10% cut correlating to 5.5% gains through reduced inertial loads. TRIP innovations, rooted in 1990s research on retained stability, have been commercialized via patents optimizing stability for automotive forming lines.

Applications

Structural and Infrastructure Uses

Steel serves as a primary for load-bearing elements in buildings and bridges, including wide-flange beams, columns, and reinforcing bars () embedded in . Structural beams, such as those conforming to ASTM A992 specifications, exhibit a minimum yield strength of 50 (345 MPa), providing high tensile and compressive capacities essential for supporting vertical and lateral loads. , typically Grade 60 with a yield strength of 60 (414 MPa), counters 's weakness in tension, forming composites used in over 90% of modern bridge decks and building foundations globally. These applications leverage steel's , which allows deformation without brittle failure, contributing to seismic resilience as demonstrated in structures designed under AISC 341 provisions for earthquake-resistant systems. Approximately 50% of global steel production, equating to over 900 million tonnes annually as of , is allocated to and sectors, underscoring steel's role in enabling rapid and large-scale projects like and highways. This allocation supports the erection of high-rise buildings, where steel framing permits spans up to 100 feet without intermediate columns, far exceeding 's practical limits without excessive self-weight. Steel's of 200 GPa ensures stiff yet lightweight members, with a strength-to-weight ratio eight times that of , optimizing material efficiency for long-span bridges and reducing foundation demands. Engineering standards, such as those from the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), incorporate load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methods with safety factors (e.g., φ = 0.90 for yielding), verifying capacities through rigorous testing and to exceed actual demands by margins typically 1.5 to 2.0, countering concerns over material fragility with empirically validated performance. In , steel towers and trusses facilitate elevated roadways and rail viaducts, as seen in projects spanning challenging terrains, where the material's resistance under cyclic loading ensures longevity beyond 100 years with minimal maintenance. This combination of properties has driven global expansion, with steel-intensive designs correlating to faster timelines—up to 30% quicker than all-concrete alternatives—facilitating in developing regions.

Manufacturing and Transportation

Steel constitutes approximately 60% of the body and frame weight in modern automobiles, providing essential structural integrity and crash energy absorption. Advanced high-strength steels (AHSS), such as dual-phase and martensitic grades, allow for 10-20% mass reductions in these components compared to conventional mild steels, maintaining or enhancing safety performance through higher yield strengths exceeding 440 MPa while enabling thinner gauges. These reductions directly contribute to fuel savings, with each kilogram of vehicle weight cut yielding measurable improvements in efficiency—empirically linked to lower rolling resistance and energy demands during operation. Steel's superior formability, characterized by high work-hardening exponents and elongation values, supports stamping and deep-drawing processes critical for high-volume automotive , enabling the global production of over 90 million light vehicles annually as of 2024. This manufacturability contrasts with less ductile alternatives, allowing complex geometries in , panels, and reinforcements without excessive defects or secondary operations. In rail transportation, pearlitic steels with roughly 0.7% carbon content predominate for railheads due to their fine lamellar microstructure, which confers exceptional abrasion resistance and endurance under rolling contact loads exceeding millions of tons annually per track section. These grades' hardness from lamellae minimizes rates, extending service life to 20-30 years in high-traffic corridors. relies on abrasion-resistant and high-strength low-alloy steels, such as EH36 and DH36 grades, for hull plating and high-wear zones like holds, where they withstand corrosive and erosive marine environments while meeting yield strengths of 355 MPa or higher. Pearlitic variants or hardened abrasion-resistant steels (e.g., AR400 equivalents) further enhance longevity in shafts and deck fittings subjected to constant .

Tools, Appliances, and Niche Applications

High-carbon steels, hardened through to Rockwell hardness levels of 58-66 HRC, are employed in and saw blades for their superior edge retention and , enabling prolonged sharpness under repeated use. knives, when properly maintained, demonstrate multi-decade lifespans, as evidenced by family heirlooms retaining functionality after generations of service. Similarly, high-carbon steel saw blades provide durable precision cutting in , resisting wear from materials and outperforming lower-carbon alternatives in during industrial operations. Stainless steels, particularly austenitic grades like 304 and 316, dominate kitchen appliances such as sinks, countertops, and exteriors due to their non-porous surfaces that inhibit bacterial and facilitate , reducing risks in food preparation environments. Their corrosion resistance and dent tolerance yield service lives exceeding 20-30 years under typical conditions, minimizing replacement frequency compared to coated alternatives prone to chipping or peeling. In medical applications, low-carbon variant 316L serves as a biocompatible material for implants like hip joints and orthopedic fixation devices, offering high , yield strengths around 200-500 MPa, and pitting resistance in physiological fluids that supports decades-long performance without systemic toxicity. For radiation-sensitive niche uses, pre-1945 "low-background" steel—lacking isotopes from nuclear testing—constructs shielding and housings for detectors and Geiger counters, achieving levels orders of magnitude below post-war steels to enable precise low-level measurements in experiments and . Weathering steels like COR-TEN, alloyed with and , form a stable oxide that self-limits further , extending unpainted bridge component lifespans to 120 years with nominal maintenance—approximately four times the effective of traditional painted structural steels requiring frequent recoating. This empirical durability stems from atmospheric exposure data showing corrosion rates dropping to 1/10th of uncoated after stabilization, applied in niche outdoor fixtures where aesthetic integration with natural oxidation is prioritized over coatings.

Industry Dynamics

Global Supply Chains and Major Players

Global crude steel production totaled 1,870 million metric tons in 2023, with output rising slightly to approximately 1,886 million metric tons in 2024. dominated production, accounting for over 53% of the total with 1,005 million metric tons in 2024, far exceeding other nations and contributing to persistent overcapacity that has driven export volumes to record highs of 118 million metric tons in 2024, exerting downward pressure on international prices. ranked second at 149 million metric tons, followed by at 84 million metric tons, reflecting concentrated output in amid varying regional demand tied to and growth rates. Key raw material supply chains underpin this geography, with —essential for blast furnace-based production—primarily sourced from and , which together supplied the bulk of global exports in 2023. led as the largest exporter, shipping over 890 million metric tons historically, while Brazil's output from regions like Carajás supported steady volumes despite logistical challenges. supplies faced disruptions in 2022 from the , a significant exporter, which reduced availability and spiked prices, compounding input cost volatility for integrated steelmakers reliant on seaborne imports. These vulnerabilities highlight the interdependence of concentrated mining regions and steel-producing hubs, where delays or geopolitical events can ripple through global chains. Among major players, state-backed Chinese firms like China Baowu Group led with 130 million metric tons of output in 2024, leveraging domestic scale for cost advantages. , the largest non-Chinese producer at 65 million metric tons, exemplifies through ownership of mines, assets, and downstream facilities across , the , and , enabling resilience against supply shocks. Similarly, South Korea's maintains integrated operations from raw materials to finished products, producing around 40-50 million metric tons annually with emphasis on efficiency and technology to mitigate raw input dependencies. This structure contrasts with more fragmented players, underscoring how integration buffers against ore and coal market fluctuations while China's excess capacity amplifies competitive distortions in downstream markets.
Top Steel-Producing Countries (2024, million metric tons)Output
China1,005
India149
Japan84
United States79.5
Russia~72
Steel demand remains closely linked to global GDP expansion, particularly in emerging economies driving construction booms, though China's overproduction—forecast to persist amid subdued domestic consumption—poses risks of sustained export surges that could undermine profitability for higher-cost producers elsewhere. Key factors influencing steel prices include supply and demand dynamics; costs of raw materials such as iron ore, coking coal, and scrap; energy costs; trade policies and tariffs; and global and regional events. Hot-rolled coil (HRC) steel prices fluctuated between approximately $800 and $850 per metric ton in late 2024 and 2025, reflecting supply-demand imbalances exacerbated by costs and regional production variations. expenses, comprising 20-40% of total production costs depending on the process route, have driven much of this volatility, as higher and prices elevate marginal costs for producers, particularly in energy-intensive operations. Demand-side pressures from and in developing economies have partially offset weaker consumption in mature markets like , where slowdowns reduced import needs. Global steel demand is projected to grow at an average annual rate of around 1-2% through 2030, primarily propelled by and industrialization in and , though short-term forecasts indicate flat or minimal expansion in 2025 amid economic uncertainties. The steel industry's investment in , focusing on process efficiencies and new products, averaged about 6.3% of in recent years, underscoring efforts to mitigate pressures through technological rather than external subsidies. In Western markets, a pronounced shift toward (EAF) production—reaching 70-72% of U.S. output—has enhanced supply responsiveness by leveraging availability and lower energy demands relative to traditional blast furnaces, thereby stabilizing regional supply amid fluctuating prices. This transition reflects causal dynamics of and , enabling producers to ramp output more flexibly in response to demand spikes without the capital intensity of integrated mills. Overall market trends point to sustained but moderated growth, with supply capacity expansions in low-cost regions potentially capping price recoveries unless demand from emerging sectors like renewables accelerates beyond baseline projections.

Trade Policies, Tariffs, and Protectionism Debates

In March 2018, the United States imposed 25% tariffs on steel imports under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, citing national security concerns over reliance on foreign supplies. These measures reduced steel imports by approximately 27% from 2018 levels by 2019, while domestic crude steel production rose from 86.6 million short tons in 2017 to 87.8 million short tons in 2019, before stabilizing around 80 million short tons annually through 2024. However, the tariffs increased U.S. steel prices by 20-25% in the short term, raising input costs for downstream industries like automotive and construction, which employ far more workers than steel production itself. Economic analyses, including from the U.S. International Trade Commission, indicate that while domestic steel sourcing expanded, overall production in steel-using sectors contracted, resulting in net employment losses estimated at 75,000 jobs across manufacturing. China's state subsidies have fueled persistent overcapacity in its steel sector, estimated at over 500 million metric tons globally attributable to excess Chinese output, enabling exports priced below production costs and distorting international markets. In 2023, China's steel exports surged 39% year-over-year, with further 27% growth in 2024, often at margins insufficient to cover unsubsidized costs, prompting antidumping complaints from the U.S. and others. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development () reports Chinese steel subsidies exceed those of other major producers by factors of five to ten, hindering fair and global capacity rationalization. The European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), phased in from 2023 with full implementation by 2026, imposes tariffs on embedded carbon emissions in imported steel to prevent "" from less-regulated producers like . For steel, CBAM adds costs equivalent to about 9% of import value from high-emission sources, reducing incentives for low-carbon EU production to relocate while targeting non-compliant imports. Early market responses included decreased futures prices for affected commodities, signaling anticipated trade shifts, though empirical effects remain limited as transitional free allowances phase out. Debates over center on balancing industry preservation against consumer costs, with proponents arguing tariffs safeguard domestic technological capacity and jobs—evidenced by modest employment gains of about 1,000-2,000 post-2018—while opponents cite broader economic drags, such as a 0.27% GDP reduction from tariff-induced inefficiencies. In the case of Nippon Steel's proposed 2023 acquisition of , President Biden blocked the deal on January 3, 2025, invoking risks to domestic production capabilities, a decision later modified under President Trump to include a "golden share" granting U.S. power over key operational choices. from targeted antidumping measures suggests they effectively curb subsidized inflows without the broader distortions of blanket tariffs, yielding localized capacity retention amid global overcapacity pressures, though comprehensive studies consistently find net GDP costs from untargeted due to retaliatory effects and disruptions.

Environmental Considerations

Resource Consumption and Emissions Profile

The steel industry accounts for approximately 7-8% of global anthropogenic CO2 emissions, equivalent to 2.0-2.8 gigatonnes annually as of recent estimates, with emissions arising primarily from the energy-intensive reduction of in blast furnaces. In the dominant blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) route, which produces about 70% of global crude steel, coal combustion and use as a reductant generate roughly 70% of process emissions, as carbon is essential for removing oxygen from at temperatures exceeding 1500°C. Additional air pollutants, including particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (), and sulfur oxides (), emanate from stack gases during , , and , though these are subject to regulatory controls varying by jurisdiction. Annual global mining exceeds 2.5 billion metric tons to support roughly 1.8-1.9 billion metric tons of crude steel production, with extraction concentrated in regions like , , and , where open-pit and underground methods predominate. usage in integrated steel plants averages 20-30 cubic meters per metric ton of steel for cooling, , and gas cleaning, but recycling rates often exceed 95%, resulting in net consumption of 1-3 cubic meters per ton primarily through and product incorporation. Emissions intensity has declined through process optimizations such as improved furnace controls and heat recovery, with global CO2 emissions per tonne of steel dropping by approximately 20% since 1990 despite rising production volumes; for instance, U.S. steelmakers achieved a 36% reduction in GHG intensity over the same period via energy efficiency measures. These reductions stem from the thermodynamic imperatives of ironmaking—high energy density required for ore reduction and melting—rather than any avoidable inefficiency inherent to steel as a material, underscoring that per capita steel use (around 200-220 kg annually worldwide) reflects its foundational role in durable infrastructure amid finite resource constraints.

Recycling Efficacy and Waste Management

Steel exhibits one of the highest end-of-life input rates among materials, reaching approximately 85% globally as of 2019, meaning the vast majority of steel products at the end of their are collected and reprocessed rather than discarded. This rate reflects efficient collection systems, driven by steel's magnetic properties and economic value as , enabling a near-closed-loop system where serves as the primary input for () production. In , which accounts for a growing share of global output, can be recycled indefinitely with negligible degradation per cycle—typically less than 1% loss from or dilution of alloying elements—preserving mechanical properties without the need for virgin inputs. Byproduct management further enhances steel's recycling efficacy, with steelmaking —generated at rates of 100-150 kg per ton of steel—routinely repurposed to avoid waste accumulation. Globally, hundreds of millions of tons of are reused annually in applications such as production, road base aggregates, and , substituting for natural aggregates and closing material loops in . For instance, in regions with advanced processing, over 90% of finds productive reuse, minimizing use and leveraging its hydraulic and pozzolanic properties for durable . Scale and dust from rolling and processing are similarly valorized, often sintered back into furnace feed or used in fertilizers, ensuring favors over disposal. Empirically, recycling one of steel via EAF avoids approximately 1.4 s of CO2 emissions compared to primary blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace routes, which emit 1.8-2.0 s per due to coke reduction and processing. This saving stems from reduced intensity—recycling requires 60-74% less —and elimination of mining-related inputs like 1.4 s of and 0.8 s of per recycled. Such metrics counter misconceptions of steel waste overwhelming landfills, as high recovery rates and byproduct utilization demonstrate systemic superiority to virgin production in and emissions profiles, independent of downstream decarbonization efforts.

Decarbonization Initiatives and Empirical Challenges

Direct reduced iron (DRI) processes using (H2-DRI) represent a primary pathway for low-carbon steel production, with pilots such as SSAB's HYBRIT initiative demonstrating feasibility in trials through 2024, including successful large-scale for industrial application. However, these processes rely on from intermittent renewable electricity, leading to supply variability that complicates consistent DRI quality and requires substantial for storage and . Production costs for H2-DRI-electric arc furnace (EAF) steel exceed $800 per metric ton in current assessments, compared to approximately $500 per metric ton for traditional blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) routes, driven by prices above $1.4 per kg needed for parity. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) offers another abatement option, with pilot projects in steel facilities achieving up to 90% CO2 capture rates from gases. Yet, the technology imposes a 20-30% penalty due to compression, separation, and requirements, elevating operational costs by 20% or more without compensatory carbon pricing or subsidies exceeding $50 per ton of CO2. Economic viability remains contingent on support, as unsubsidized implementations face market disadvantages amid global competition from lower-cost conventional production. Achieving full net-zero steel production by 2050 faces empirical hurdles, including readiness levels below full commercial scale for key pathways like H2-DRI, as outlined in analyses requiring accelerated deployment beyond current trajectories. Higher production costs from these transitions—potentially 20-30% premiums—risk suppressing steel demand in price-sensitive sectors, thereby constraining reinvestment in further innovations unless driven by market signals rather than mandates. Subsidies, while enabling pilots, distort resource allocation and delay efficiency gains from competitive pressures, underscoring the need for incremental advancements in material efficiency and utilization over rushed overhauls.

Contemporary Innovations

Technological and Process Advancements

integration in steel mills enables through real-time data analysis from sensors on equipment like furnaces and rolling mills, forecasting failures and reducing unplanned by 30-50%. This approach has demonstrated up to 25% reductions in overall maintenance costs for steel producers by prioritizing condition-based interventions over scheduled overhauls. Additive manufacturing advancements, including direct metal sintering for steel components, produce intricate parts with near-net-shape precision, supporting applications in and automotive sectors where traditional falls short. The metal 3D printing market, encompassing steel alloys, is expanding with a projected of approximately 25% through 2030, driven by improved powder bed fusion techniques and post-processing for enhanced surface finishes. Nanostructuring and reinforcement in steel alloys yield substantial mechanical enhancements; for example, controlled nanopowder integration in increases by 19% while preserving . Core-shell arrays further impede coarsening during processing, effectively doubling strength in experimental steels without proportional weight gains. Ultrafine grains combined with nanosized carbides in medium-carbon steels also synergistically boost yield strength and toughness for demanding mold applications. Hydrogen direct reduction iron (H-DRI) processes are advancing via operational pilots in 2025, substituting fossil fuels with to produce reduced iron with minimal carbon emissions; China's Ansteel completed a 10,000-ton annual capacity line achieving 95% metallization rates. Metso's similarly tests pre-reduction of pellets, validating scalability for integration with electric arc furnaces. Advanced sorting technologies, including spectroscopic and AI-driven separation, elevate scrap quality, enabling steel products with 90-97% recycled content while maintaining alloy specifications. This empirical progress in scrap beneficiation supports higher circularity rates, as producers like Ovako achieve over 99% iron sourcing from recycled inputs, reducing reliance on primary ores.

Policy and Market Influences on Future Production

Trade policies such as tariffs and the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) are influencing the relocation of steel production capacities. Implemented in phases starting in 2023, CBAM imposes carbon costs on imported steel, aiming to prevent by equalizing emissions pricing between domestic EU producers and foreign suppliers with laxer regulations; this has led to anticipated reductions in high-emission steel exports to the EU, potentially redirecting flows to less regulated markets rather than widespread facility relocation. In the United States, tariffs on steel imports, escalated under recent administrations to levels up to 50% on certain products by mid-2025, have contributed to a sharp decline in imports—dropping 27.7% year-over-year in August 2025—bolstering domestic output amid infrastructure investments spurred by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and provisions for manufacturing revival. Market demand projections indicate sustained growth, driven by electric vehicles (EVs), renewable energy infrastructure, and in emerging economies, with global crude steel demand forecasted to reach approximately 2.5-2.6 billion metric tons by 2050 under baseline scenarios assuming continued economic expansion. EV production and associated charging networks are elevating requirements for specialty steels, including electrical steels for motors and high-strength variants for lightweighting structures, contributing to a projected in related metal demands. Persistent challenges include elevated energy costs in developed markets, which comprise 20-40% of production expenses, contrasting with subsidized operations in dominant producers like , which accounted for over 50% of global output in 2023 and maintained around 1.005 billion tons in 2024 despite domestic demand slowdowns. China's projected decline in demand share to 31% by 2050 may alleviate some overcapacity pressures, yet its scale continues to suppress prices and hinder Western competitiveness without equivalent policy offsets. Efficiency improvements, historically achieving 1-2% annual reductions in through process s like enhanced and furnace optimizations, remain the primary causal driver of cost reductions rather than regulatory mandates alone, as evidenced by stagnation in global averages amid capacity expansions in inefficient regions. Future production trajectories will thus hinge on geopolitical stability, incentives, and market signals prioritizing economic viability over unsubstantiated decarbonization timelines.

References

  1. https://us.misumi-ec.com/blog/what-is-steel/
  2. https://www.econsteel.com/blog/what-is-steel-and-how-is-it-made
  3. https://steelindustry.news/steel-guide/
  4. https://worldsteel.org/about-steel/steel-story/
  5. https://www.thoughtco.com/steel-history-2340172
  6. https://www.bir.org/en/members-area/world-mirrors/mirrors-ferrous/1000030286-world-steel-recycling-in-figures-january-december-2023-update
  7. https://worldsteel.org/steel-people/steel-industry-economic-impact/
  8. https://www.aii.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Americas-Backbone_The-importance-of-steel-and-its-evolving-demand.pdf
  9. https://www.steel.org/2018/05/economic-impact-study/
  10. https://www.raycandersonfoundation.org/articles/the-history-of-steelmaking-and-why-it-has-a-long-way-to-go
  11. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=23259
  12. https://www.metalsupermarkets.com/wrought-vs-cast-iron-what-is-the-difference/
  13. https://www.quora.com/Which-has-a-higher-iron-percentage-cast-iron-or-wrought-iron
  14. https://fractory.com/iron-carbon-phase-diagram/
  15. https://www.substech.com/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=iron-carbon_phase_diagram
  16. https://www.metalsupermarkets.com/5-common-alloying-elements/
  17. https://www.diehlsteel.com/technical-information/effects-of-common-alloying-elements-in-steel/
  18. https://www.ispatguru.com/alloying-elements-and-their-influence-on-properties-of-steel/
  19. https://www.astmsteel.com/steel-knowledge/sae-steel-aisi-carbon-alloy-steel-name/
  20. https://tiimg.tistatic.com/fm/1127997/appendices.pdf
  21. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/aisi-sae-steel-numbering-system-d_1449.html
  22. https://www.servicesteel.org/resources/steel-grades
  23. https://vmsteel.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/material_comparaisons.pdf
  24. https://www.metalbook.com/blogs/decoding-metal-standards-what-isi-astm-and-en-certifications-really-mean/
  25. https://www.astm.org/astm-tpt-726.html
  26. https://www-eng.lbl.gov/~shuman/NEXT/MATERIALS&COMPONENTS/Pressure_vessels/US_vs_EU_material_strengths.pdf
  27. https://hkfabrication.com/steel-grades-different-types/
  28. https://www.taylorfenn.com/understanding-steel-grades-and-terminology/
  29. https://amesweb.info/Materials/Steel-Tensile-Yield-Strength-Chart.aspx
  30. https://www.steelwarehouse.com/high-strength-steels/
  31. https://www.econsteel.com/blog/tensile-strength-of-steel
  32. https://www.steelexpress.co.uk/steel-hardness-conversion.html
  33. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/steel-endurance-limit-d_1781.html
  34. https://www.totalmateria.com/en-us/articles/the-strengthening-of-iron-and-steel/
  35. https://www.themonsterbuilder.com/why-are-alloys-stronger-than-pure-metals/
  36. https://www.servicesteel.org/resources/density-of-steel
  37. https://thermtest.com/thermal-conductivity-of-steel
  38. https://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Experiments/rust-chemistry.htm
  39. https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/59285/how-could-i-cause-metal-to-rust-rapidly
  40. https://armoloy.com/understanding-galvanic-corrosion-causes-prevention-and-solutions/
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5506973/
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387246769_Atmospheric_Corrosion_of_Different_Steel_Types_in_Urban_and_Marine_Exposure
  43. https://www.mgnewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Passivation-of-stainless-steel.pdf
  44. https://www.unionfab.com/blog/2024/09/passivation-of-stainless-steel
  45. https://sdi.org/resources/news-and-blog/steel-deck-vs-wood-and-concrete-a-comprehensive-guide-for-architects-and-engineers/
  46. https://galvanizeit.org/hot-dip-galvanized-steel-bridges-online-seminar/hdg-bridge-design/dissimilar-metals
  47. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=314
  48. https://knifesteelnerds.com/2018/04/10/what-makes-quenched-steel-so-hard/
  49. https://www.xometry.com/resources/materials/normalizing/
  50. https://gearsolutions.com/departments/hot-seat/understanding-the-different-types-of-heat-treating/
  51. https://files.engineering.com/download.aspx?folder=5a657d54-ee5b-4ebc-a9dc-4a4aed69b3be&file=STEEL_-Material-Selection-2010%5B1%5D.pdf
  52. https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/nsba/design-resources/steel-bridge-design-handbook/b901_sbdh_chapter1.pdf
  53. https://acoup.blog/2020/09/25/collections-iron-how-did-they-make-it-part-ii-trees-for-blooms/
  54. https://www.britannica.com/technology/bloomery-process
  55. https://www.periclespress.net/Hittites_iron.html
  56. https://answersingenesis.org/archaeology/iron-technology-patriarchal-era/
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353429591_Ancient_High-Carbon_Steel_from_Southern_Tamil_Nadu_India_Microstructural_and_Elemental_Analysis
  58. https://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue69/14/ia.69.14.pdf
  59. https://www.isis.stfc.ac.uk/Pages/a-germanic-ultrahigh-carbon-steel-punch-of-the-late-roman-iron-age.pdf
  60. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/53126/Diana%2520Haidar.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  61. https://www.africanhistoryextra.com/p/a-general-history-of-iron-technology
  62. http://dtrinkle.matse.illinois.edu/MatSE584/articles/wootz_advanced_material/wootz_steel.html
  63. https://nobliecustomknives.com/what-is-wootz-steel/
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044580396000198
  65. https://www.chemistryworld.com/features/raiders-of-the-lost-steel/9344.article
  66. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/93654/1/Rehren_Cutting_edge_technology_-_the_Ferghana_p.pdf
  67. https://knifesteelnerds.com/2024/04/22/wootz-the-true-damascus-steel/
  68. https://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/9809/verhoeven-9809.html
  69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264777965_The_Role_of_Pattern-Welding_in_Historical_Swords-Mechanical_Testing_of_Materials_Used_in_Their_Manufacture
  70. https://www.ancient-origins.net/artifacts-ancient-technology/step-closer-mysterious-origin-viking-sword-ulfberht-002455
  71. https://endura-steel.com/the-bessemer-process-revolutionizing-steelmaking-and-industrialization/
  72. https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/features/cewctw-henry-bessemer-man-of-steel/
  73. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Bessemer_Process
  74. https://www.invent.org/inductees/henry-bessemer
  75. https://www.pulmans.co.uk/article/carl-wilhelm-siemens-regenerative-furnace
  76. https://metalzenith.com/blogs/steel-production-processing-terms/open-hearth-process-key-steelmaking-method-its-role-in-steel-production
  77. https://www.mccreathlabs.com/blog/people-of-steel-sidney-gilchrist-thomas-and-percy-gilchrist/
  78. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/bessemers-steel-processing-method
  79. https://www.nationalmaterial.com/brief-history-american-steel-industry/
  80. https://reibus.com/reibusu/lessons/steelmaking/basic-oxygen-furnace/
  81. https://www.ispatguru.com/history-of-basic-oxygen-steelmaking/
  82. https://www.primetals.com/en/portfolio/solutions/steelmaking/ld-converter/
  83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/continuous-casting
  84. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/12/5/862
  85. https://worldsteel.org/data/world-steel-in-figures/world-steel-in-figures-2025/
  86. https://www.theworldcounts.com/challenges/planet-earth/mining/environmental-impact-of-steel-production
  87. https://www.cmpionline.com/the-evolution-of-the-american-steel-industry
  88. https://globalgauge.com/blog/the-us-steel-industry-and-its-growth-since-wwii/
  89. https://www.britannica.com/technology/steel/Basic-oxygen-steelmaking
  90. https://iea-etsap.org/E-TechDS/PDF/I02-Iron&Steel-GS-AD-gct.pdf
  91. https://www.ispatguru.com/chemistry-of-steelmaking-by-basic-oxygen-furnace/
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262300121X
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/blast-furnace-process
  94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/basic-oxygen-furnace
  95. https://worldsteel.org/wp-content/uploads/Fact-sheet-raw-materials-2023-1.pdf
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/electric-arc-furnace-process
  97. https://hammer.purdue.edu/ndownloader/files/40514555
  98. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/isijinternational/49/10/49_10_1530/_pdf
  99. https://www.nemag.com/dry-bulk-blog/how-switching-to-an-electric-arc-furnace-affects-your-grab-productivity
  100. https://www.ispatguru.com/understanding-electric-arc-furnace-steel-making-operations/
  101. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14131
  102. https://www.frcglobal.com/blog/the-costs-of-producing-steel-with-electric-arc-furnaces
  103. https://www.stout.com/en/insights/article/current-state-us-steel-market
  104. https://www.seaisi.org/details/25179?type=news-rooms
  105. https://www.chartersteel.com/about/news/eaf-vs-bof-furnaces-in-steelmaking
  106. https://www.midrex.com/tech-article/midrex-direct-reduction-plants-2023-operations-summary/
  107. https://www.midrex.com/tech-article/midrex-direct-reduction-plants-2024-operations-summary/
  108. https://www.ispatguru.com/hyl-process-for-direct-reduction-of-iron-ore/
  109. https://group.vattenfall.com/sustainability/climate-transition-plan/industry-decarbonisation/hybrit
  110. https://www.hybritdevelopment.se/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/hybrit-broschure-fossil-free-steel-production-ready-for-industrialisation.pdf
  111. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/12/9/1829
  112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652622009659
  113. https://ieefa.org/resources/hydrogen-unleashed-opportunities-and-challenges-evolving-h2-dri-eaf-pathway-beyond-2024
  114. https://www.gasworld.com/story/swedish-pilot-proves-hydrogen-storage-can-cut-cost-of-fossil-free-steelmaking/2152244.article/
  115. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=6117
  116. https://www.essentracomponents.com/en-us/news/solutions/access-hardware/low-medium-high-carbon-steel
  117. https://www.thefabricator.com/thewelder/article/consumables/understanding-low-alloy-steel
  118. https://us.misumi-ec.com/blog/what-is-difference-between-carbon-steels-low-medium-high/
  119. https://www.baileymetalprocessing.com/techmatters/blog-category-1/2017/09/28/chemical-composition-of-steel
  120. https://www.metalsupermarkets.com/grade-guide-a36-steel/
  121. https://www.totalmateria.com/en-us/articles/classification-carbon-and-low-alloy-steels/
  122. https://www.datamintelligence.com/research-report/steel-market
  123. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Standard-pourbaix-diagram-for-Cr-H-2-O-system_fig4_339661880
  124. https://neelectropolishing.com/passivation-of-stainless-steel/
  125. https://www.valvemagazine.com/articles/ni-cr-mo-alloys
  126. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=2867
  127. https://asm.matweb.com/search/specificmaterial.asp?bassnum=mq304a
  128. https://www.ambicasteels.com/blog/about-stainless-steel/
  129. https://eagletube.com/about-us/news/austenitic-martensitic-ferritic-stainless-steel/
  130. https://www.gpss.com/duplex-steel-austenitic-ferritic/
  131. https://www.nickel-systems.com/resources/technical-information/pren/
  132. https://bssa.org.uk/bssa_articles/calculation-of-pitting-resistance-equivalent-numbers-pren/
  133. https://muxbolts.com/how-long-does-the-salt-spray-test-of-bolts/
  134. https://www.jcfasteners.com/corrosion-analysis-of-stainless-and-plated-fasteners/
  135. https://uk.spirol.com/assets/files/mat-wp-comparative-analysis-of-stainless-steel-and-plated-coated-carbon-steel-uk.pdf
  136. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=6214
  137. https://patents.google.com/patent/US8092620B2/en
  138. https://www.steelexpress.co.uk/toolsteel/D2-Steel-properties.html
  139. https://www.hudsontoolsteel.com/technical-data/steelD2
  140. https://www.carpentertechnology.com/alloy-finder/d2
  141. https://niobium.tech/-/media/niobiumtech/attachments-biblioteca-tecnica/nt_hot-rolled-hsla-strip-steels-for-automotive-and-construction-applications.pdf
  142. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092401360101130X
  143. https://rawmaterialoutlook.org/niobium
  144. https://metalzenith.com/blogs/steel-properties/maraging-steel-properties-and-key-applications
  145. https://www.mststeel.com/maraging-steel-unique-properties-uses/
  146. https://dynamicmetalsltd.com/metal-industry-news/which-maraging-steel-grade-is-the-toughest/
  147. https://steelprogroup.com/automotive-steel/trip/
  148. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/12/6/1051
  149. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320520945_Improving_automotive_crashworthiness_using_advanced_high_strength_steels
  150. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adem.202402016?af=R
  151. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Chronological-development-of-research-work-on-steels-utilizing-TRIP-effect_fig4_319049919
  152. https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/modern-steel/archives/2018/04/areyouproperlyspecifyingmaterials.pdf
  153. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/us-steel-rebar-market-report
  154. https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/aisc/publications/standards/a360-16w-rev-june-2019.pdf
  155. https://worldsteel.org/data/steel-use-by-sector/
  156. https://amesweb.info/Materials/Youngs-Modulus-of-Steel.aspx
  157. https://www.aisc.org/architecture-center/design-principles/comparison-to-other-materials/
  158. https://www.escpile.com/single-post/steel-structures-or-reinforced-concrete
  159. https://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/Files/Pub158668.pdf
  160. https://bergsen.com/automotive-industry/
  161. https://worldsteel.org/media/steel-stories/automotive/advanced-high-strength-steel-lightens-automotive-load/
  162. https://inpressco.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Paper151001-1005.pdf
  163. https://www.statista.com/topics/1487/automotive-industry/
  164. https://www.phase-trans.msm.cam.ac.uk/2002/rail.pdf
  165. https://steelprogroup.com/shipbuilding-steel/grades/
  166. https://www.ssab.com/en-us/brands-and-products/steel-categories/abrasion-resistant-steel
  167. https://knifesteelnerds.com/2021/10/19/knife-steels-rated-by-a-metallurgist-toughness-edge-retention-and-corrosion-resistance/
  168. https://www.kitchenknifeforums.com/threads/knife-steel-guide-for-the-average-line-cook-of-below-average-intelligence.61584/
  169. https://www.bridgetownforge.com/care-of-carbon-steel-blades/
  170. https://www.amazon.com/Durable-Precision-Metalworking-Hardness-Flexible/dp/B0F8G2SC5Y
  171. https://www.yorksaw.com/all-about-rustproof-carbide-saw-blades/
  172. https://endura-steel.com/stainless-steel-in-the-kitchen-the-hygienic-and-durable-choice/
  173. https://therestaurantwarehouse.com/blogs/restaurant-equipment/commercial-kitchen-stainless-steel-guide
  174. https://ecozoi.com/blogs/blog/the-benefits-of-choosing-stainless-steel-for-your-kitchen-needs
  175. https://dalcinistainless.com/blogs/food/why-stainless-steel-is-used-in-kitchens
  176. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9027153/
  177. https://stainless-steel-world.net/stainless-316l-popular-for-orthopaedic-surgical-implants/
  178. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0927776520308250
  179. https://www.chemistryworld.com/podcasts/low-background-steel/3009874.article
  180. https://interestingengineering.com/science/what-is-pre-war-steel
  181. https://www.centralsteelservice.com/faq-how-long-does-weathering-steel-last/
  182. https://steelconstruction.info/Weathering_steel
  183. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12347768/
  184. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-raw-steel-production-in-2023/
  185. https://worldsteel.org/media/press-releases/2025/december-2024-crude-steel-production-and-2024-global-totals/
  186. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/largest-steel-producing-countries-in-the-world/
  187. https://www.oecd.org/en/about/news/press-releases/2025/05/surging-excess-capacity-threatens-steel-market-stability-employment-and-decarbonisation-plans.html
  188. https://www.miningvisuals.com/post/australia-brazil-reinforce-dominance-in-global-iron-ore-production
  189. https://minerals.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Best-in-Class-Australian-Iron-Ore-2021.pdf
  190. https://rmis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/2200629_JRC129975_briefing_coking_coal.pdf
  191. https://constructiondigital.com/top10/top-10-largest-steel-companies
  192. https://merics.org/en/report/beyond-overcapacity-chinese-style-modernization-and-clash-economic-models
  193. https://westfieldsteel.com/2024/02/what-factors-impact-steel-supplier-pricing-and-value/
  194. https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/hrc-steel
  195. https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/future/hrn00
  196. https://worldsteel.org/wp-content/uploads/Fact-sheet-Energy-use-in-the-steel-industry.pdf
  197. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/industry/steel
  198. https://www.steelonthenet.com/resources/market-data/market-outlook.html
  199. https://worldsteel.org/data/world-steel-in-figures/world-steel-in-figures-2024/
  200. https://www.opis.com/blog/making-the-americas-green-decarbonisztion-in-regional-steelmaking/
  201. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/05/oecd-steel-outlook-2025_bf2b6109.html
  202. https://www.cfr.org/article/guide-trumps-section-232-tariffs-nine-maps
  203. https://www.progressivepolicy.org/trade-fact-of-the-week-american-steel-output-lower-in-2023-than-in-2017-aluminum-about-the-same-as-2017/
  204. https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2025/trumps-tariffs-enrich-steel-barons-high-cost-us-manufacturers-and
  205. https://www.factcheck.org/2019/08/trumps-steel-industry-claims/
  206. https://www.usitc.gov/press_room/news_release/2023/er0315_63679.htm
  207. https://www.bbvaresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/aranceles_aceroalum_250211_eng.pdf
  208. https://www.steel.org/public-policy/trade/
  209. https://www.wiley.law/article-Chinas-subsidies-threaten-harsh-winter-for-global-steel-industry
  210. https://rhg.com/research/how-chinas-overcapacity-holds-back-emerging-economies/
  211. https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/world-news/china-steel-subsidies-distort-global-market-oecd/articleshow/121434063.cms
  212. https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-steel-and-aluminum-tariffs-wont-solve-chinese-dumping-problem
  213. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en
  214. https://www.carbonchain.com/cbam/eu-cbam-metals
  215. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301421523001581
  216. https://www.remi.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/869-Measuring-the-Impact-of-the-Steel-Tariffs-on-the-US-Economy.pdf
  217. https://www.linklaters.com/en-us/insights/blogs/foreigninvestmentlinks/2025/january/biden-blocks-nippon-steel-us-steel
  218. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/26/trump-golden-share-us-steel-nippon-merger.html
  219. https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub5405.pdf
  220. https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/trump-tariffs-trade-war/
  221. https://www.iea.org/reports/emissions-measurement-and-data-collection-for-a-net-zero-steel-industry/executive-summary
  222. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/IIF_industrial/
  223. https://ieefa.org/sites/default/files/2022-06/steel-fact-sheet.pdf
  224. https://worldsteel.org/climate-action/climate-change-and-the-production-of-iron-and-steel/
  225. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/10/all-tonnes-metals-ores-mined-in-one-year/
  226. https://redawater.com/steel-mills/
  227. https://worldsteel.org/wp-content/uploads/Water-management-in-the-steel-industry.pdf
  228. https://www.shortspansteelbridges.org/leadership-of-the-american-steel-industry-in-the-green-economy/
  229. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002423
  230. https://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/The-Global-Potential-for-More-Scrap-Steel-Recycling_December-2021_2.pdf
  231. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755581725000380
  232. https://nucor.com/newsroom/the-circularity-in-steel-series-part-3-benefits-of-electric-arc-furnace-eaf
  233. https://www.nipponsteel.com/en/tech/report/nsc/pdf/104-20.pdf
  234. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921344919301168
  235. https://www.sustainable-ships.org/stories/2022/carbon-footprint-steel
  236. https://www.stenarecycling.com/news-insights/insights-inspiration/guides-articles/the-value-of-recycling-metals/
  237. https://ecam.com/security-blog/how-steel-recyclers-contribute-to-lowering-carbon-emissions
  238. https://group.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/pressreleases/2025/hybrit-large-scale-storage-of-fossil-free-hydrogen-gas-successfully-proven
  239. https://futuresteelforum.com/content-images/main/20240618-SSAB-Transformation-to-a-Fossil-Free-Steel-Company-with-HYBRIT-Technology_Future-Steel-Forum.pdf
  240. https://www.globalefficiencyintel.com/green-h2-dri-steelmaking-15-challenges-and-solutions
  241. https://transitionasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Green_Steel_Economics_240725.pdf
  242. https://transitionasia.org/green-steel-economics-us-factsheet/
  243. https://ieefa.org/sites/default/files/2024-11/BN_Steel%2520CCUS%2520update-%2520Carbon%2520capture%2520technology%2520looks%2520ever%2520less%2520convincing_Nov24.pdf
  244. https://transitionasia.org/explainer-carbon-capture-in-the-steel-sector/
  245. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/eb0c8ec1-3665-4959-97d0-187ceca189a8/Iron_and_Steel_Technology_Roadmap.pdf
  246. https://www.steelhub.com/green-hydrogen-based-steel-production-hype-and-reality/
  247. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/11/the-quantitative-impacts-of-subsidies-on-steel-firms_03001183/cb4e21a6-en.pdf
  248. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152500014X
  249. https://www.nexastack.ai/blog/predictive-maintenance-agentic-ai
  250. https://www.iiot-world.com/predictive-analytics/predictive-maintenance/predictive-maintenance-cost-savings/
  251. https://growthlenz.com/DigitalSync360/unplanned-downtime-a-multi-million-dollar-drain-in-steel-manufacturing/
  252. https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/9/5/169
  253. https://ultimaker.com/learn/3d-metal-printing-revolutionizing-manufacturing-with-advanced-metal-parts/
  254. https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=6835
  255. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep42547
  256. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/13/5/956
  257. https://gmk.center/en/news/china-s-ansteel-completes-pilot-project-for-hydrogen-based-dri-production/
  258. https://www.steelorbis.com/steel-news/latest-news/metso-launches-hydrogen-dri-pilot-plant-in-germany-to-advance-green-steel-transition-1409382.htm
  259. https://www.h2-international.com/news/technology-metso-tests-hydrogen-based-pre-reduction-iron-ore-new-pilot-plant
  260. https://www.shortspansteelbridges.org/sustainable-steel/
  261. https://www.ovako.com/en/sustainability/environment/recyclability-and-recycled-content/
  262. https://www.globalefficiencyintel.com/the-impact-of-the-eu-cbam-on-global-steel-trade
  263. https://eurometal.net/end-user-relocation-unlikely-turkey-studying-cbam-impact/
  264. https://steelindustry.news/u-s-steel-imports-drop-to-record-lows/
  265. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2025/june-2025-update-impact-us-tariffs-50-percent-on-steel-aluminum
  266. https://www.oliverwyman.com/our-expertise/insights/2024/jan/revitalizing-us-manufacturing-growth.html
  267. https://www.aist.org/getmedia/edc9d6c0-5856-485d-9ba5-146962e25c75/070-089_June-2025.pdf
  268. https://corporate.arcelormittal.com/climate-action/steel-s-sustainability-credentials/
  269. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/electrical-steel-rising-demand-driven-ev-renewable-energy-sharma-rqmbc
  270. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22245-6
  271. https://worldsteel.org/wp-content/uploads/World-Steel-in-Figures-2024.pdf
  272. https://www.woodmac.com/press-releases/steel-demand-growth-decline-in-china/
  273. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/manufacturing/briefs/steel/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.