Hubbry Logo
Global TimesGlobal TimesMain
Open search
Global Times
Community hub
Global Times
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Global Times
Global Times
Global Times
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

The Global Times is a daily tabloid under the auspices of the Chinese Communist Party's flagship newspaper, the People's Daily, commenting on international issues from a nationalistic perspective.[1][2]

Established as a publication in 1993, its English version was launched in 2009. The editor-in-chief of Global Times was Hu Xijin until December 2021, who has been described as an early adopter of the "wolf warrior" communication strategy of loudly denouncing perceived criticism of the Chinese government and its policies.[3] The newspaper has been the source of various incidents, including fabrications, conspiracy theories, and disinformation.[note 1] It is part of a broader set of Chinese state media outlets that constitute the Chinese government's propaganda apparatus.[11][12]

History

[edit]

Established as a Chinese-language weekly publication in 1993, an English-language version was launched on 20 April 2009 as part of a Chinese government campaign to compete with overseas media.[13][14][15] In 2009, Hu Xijin, the editor-in-chief of both Chinese and English versions at the time, stated that he expected it to make a loss of 20 million yuan in its first year as an English-language publication.[16] In 2016, Hu said the Global Times was profitable but faced difficulties that would be familiar to other newspaper editors.[17]

The Global Times launched its Sina Weibo account in 2010.[18]: 303  The Global Times launched its US edition in 2013.[15] In 2016, it was reported that the English-language edition then had approximately 20 "foreign experts" who were involved with assigning stories and copyediting, "as long as the coverage [wa]s not about politics".[19] In April 2017, the Global Times signed a personnel exchange deal with Sputnik, a Russian state media outlet.[20]

In 2019, the Global Times won a three-year contract with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to monitor overseas social media and provide regular briefings and "comprehensive response plans."[21] In 2020, the Global Times had total revenue of 176 million RMB and net profit of 24.5 million RMB.[18]: 304  In December 2021, Hu Xijin announced that he would be stepping down as editor-in-chief.[3][22] As of at least 2024, the Global Times has a daily circulation of over 2 million copies.[18]: 303  It has consistently been regarded as one of China's top media brands.[18]: 303  It employs approximately 500 journalists in more than 150 countries.[18]: 303 

Content

[edit]

The Global Times has several sub-brands, including the Chinese version and English version of the Global Times, Global Times Online, the Global Public Opinion Research Center, Life Times, and Satire and Humor. The Global Times is owned by the People's Daily Press, which also publishes People's Daily.[23] The Global Times Online is run by the People's Daily Online; ownership of the newspaper is split 60–40, respectively, between the People's Daily Online and the Global Times Press.[24] Global Times has a public opinion research subsidiary, the Global Times Research Center.[25]: 124 

Editorial stance

[edit]

The Chinese-language version has been known to have a pro-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) slant, attracting a nationalistic readership since its inception in 1993.[16][26][27] It has also been described as Chinese nationalist,[28] conservative[29][30] and ultranationalist.[31] Launched in 2009, the English-language version initially took a notably less nationalistic stance than its Chinese-language counterpart, featuring interviews with Chinese dissidents, activists, and LGBT-friendly content. It later aligned more closely with the Chinese version.[32] The publication is sometimes called "China's Fox News" for its propaganda and the monetization of nationalism.[33][26][34][35]

Sources both in mainland China and abroad have said that the Global Times is not generally representative of the Chinese government's political positions, while the People's Daily is considered more representative.[36][37][38] Others have stated that the Global Times' editorial stance has been viewed as channeling the views of the hardline faction of top leadership.[39] Some scholars have noted that Global Times' more nationalistic stance permits other official state-run media to appear more moderate in tone.[40] According to its former editor Hu Xijin, the Global Times publishes what CCP officials think privately but do not say publicly.[41] According to Asia Society, the Global Times is "not considered an authoritative source of insight into the views of the central leadership".[23]

Hu Xijin has been described as an early adopter of the "wolf warrior" communication strategy of aggressively hitting back at criticism of the Chinese government.[3] His departure in December 2021, reportedly due to Beijing "strengthening the paper's political guidance", was (according to The Diplomat) connected to efforts of toning down overly confrontational rhetoric, following a deterioration of China's international reputation and CCP general secretary Xi Jinping calling for improvements in the country's international communication at a May 2021 CCP Political Bureau session.[3]

Journalist Joshua Kurlantzick wrote in 2022 that the Global Times "has taken approaches like the provocative, argumentative, and conspiracy-minded Russian outlets, mixing nationalism with efforts to mock the United States and other countries". He added, "Outside China, Global Times has used its uber-hawkish editorials and its top editor's skill at sparking controversies to make it relevant on social media internationally, in part because its content elicits responses from foreign officials and opinion leaders."[20]

Incidents

[edit]

U.S.-China trade war

[edit]

In the early stages of the U.S.-China trade war, the Global Times' coverage of the disagreements between the two countries focused narrowly on trade issues.[18]: 303  Following the December 2018 arrest of Meng Wanzhou in Canada, Global Times increasingly discussed the trade war as part of a possibly developing new Cold War between the U.S. and China.[18]: 303 

COVID-19 disinformation

[edit]
Main article: COVID-19 misinformation by China

The Global Times has spread unfounded conspiracy theories and disinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic.[note 2] In January 2021, the Global Times urged Australia not to use the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.[50][51] In March 2022, the Global Times republished an article by the British conspiracist website The Exposé which falsely claimed COVID-19 was created by Moderna.[52]

Astroturfing allegations

[edit]

Richard Burger, a former editor at Global Times, alleges that in the wake of the 2011 arrest of Ai Weiwei, the Chinese staff of the Global Times were ordered by the Chinese Communist Party to conduct an "astroturfing" campaign against "maverick" Ai Weiwei.[53]

Fabricated quotes

[edit]

In October 2015, Roderick MacFarquhar, a China expert at Harvard University, spoke at a conference on Marxism in Beijing. He said that Chinese leader Xi Jinping's talk of the so-called Chinese Dream was "not the intellectually coherent, robust and wide-ranging philosophy needed to stand up to Western ideas." The Global Times reported his speech as saying that the "Chinese Dream" would "make great contributions and exert a positive impact on human development." MacFarquhar said that the paraphrasing was a "total fabrication". The line was later removed by the newspaper from its story.[4]

Australia

[edit]

In 2016, the Global Times referred to Australia as a "paper cat" in relation to the South China Sea, and a former "offshore prison" in relation to an Olympic champion Mack Horton calling out rival Sun Yang as a drug cheat (in reference to the country's former status as a British penal colony).[54][55]

Hong Kong

[edit]

In May 2016, the Global Times ran a boycott campaign denigrating Hong Kong pro-democracy singer Denise Ho for allegedly advocating independence for Hong Kong and Tibet.[56][57] On 5 June, Lancôme cancelled a promotional concert by the Cantopop star that was scheduled to be held on 19 June in Sheung Wan.[57] Lancôme also added, in a Facebook post, that Ho was not a spokesperson for the brand.[58] The Tibet allegation appeared to have stemmed from Ho's May 2016 meeting with the Dalai Lama.[57] The cancellation drew a heavy backlash in Hong Kong.[57][56] Some Lancôme shops in Hong Kong were shut down during the protests.[59] Listerine, another brand that Ho represents, retained the singer despite the fact that the Global Times also criticized that company hiring Ho as its public face in Hong Kong.[57]

In August 2019, Global Times editor Hu Xijin accused the United States of instigating the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests.[60] On 13 August, protestors tied up and beat Global Times journalist Fu Guohao while Fu was attempting to conduct interviews at the Hong Kong Airport.[61]: 10–12  A common mainland perspective is that protestors' attack on Fu marked a peak in the violence of the protests.[61]: 148 

Taiwan

[edit]

During China's Justice Mission 2025 military exercises around Taiwan, the Global Times falsely stated that the China Coast Guard had quarantined the ports of Keelung, Tainan, Kaohsiung, and Hualien.[62]

Xinjiang

[edit]
See also: Persecution of Uyghurs in China § Denial

In 2018, the English edition of the Global Times acknowledged "counter-terrorism education" in Xinjiang, even as Chinese spokespeople denied the existence of the Xinjiang internment camps. The Economist noted: "Strikingly, rather than claiming that Western journalists misreport Xinjiang, the Global Times prefers to troll them, accusing foreign correspondents of hoping to 'profit' from negative China coverage, while asserting that the Western press is 'nowhere near as influential as it once was' and gleefully noting Mr Trump's attacks on 'fake news'."[63]

In 2019, the Global Times was criticized for perceived bias in its portrayal of Uyghurs and of disinformation campaigns regarding the Xinjiang internment camps, which led Twitter to ban it and other state-sponsored media outlets from ad purchases.[64][65][66] In 2021, ProPublica and The New York Times reported that Global Times was part of a coordinated state campaign to deny human rights abuses in Xinjiang.[67]

"Final solution" tweet

[edit]

In October 2021, a tweet from the Global Times which called for a "Final Solution to the Taiwan Question" was condemned by German politician Frank Müller-Rosentritt of the Free Democratic Party for its similarity to the "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" which resulted in the Holocaust.[68][69]

Russian invasion of Ukraine

[edit]
Further information: Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine and China and the Russian invasion of Ukraine

In March 2022, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Global Times promoted unsubstantiated Russian claims of biological weapons labs in Ukraine.[70][71][72] The Global Times also echoed Russian state media claims that the Bucha massacre was staged.[73] In May 2022, the Global Times said that a Canadian sniper who volunteered to fight in defense of Ukraine had "accused the Ukrainian army of inadequate weaponry, poor training, heavy losses, profiteering and desertion", citing a report by Russian state media outlet RT. The fact-checking website Polygraph.info found that RT and the Global Times had cherry-picked a report published by the Canadian newspaper La Presse to make the claim.[74]

Fake news about protest in Belgium

[edit]

On 23 June 2022, the Global Times claimed that thousands of protesters marched in Brussels condemning NATO's aid for Ukraine during the Russian invasion of Ukraine on 20 June; however, the protest was aimed at inflation as well as high costs of living; no evidence was found that it was linked to NATO. The Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the claim as disinformation.[75][76]

Wagner Group rebellion

[edit]

In June 2023, the Global Times accused Western media of "hyping" the Wagner Group rebellion and did not report on Yevgeny Prigozhin's claims that Russians were deceived into believing NATO was responsible for the invasion.[77]

Crocus City Hall attack

[edit]

In March 2024, the Global Times repeated false Russian claims that the United States was behind the Crocus City Hall attack.[78]

Reception

[edit]

In China

[edit]

In May 2016, the Global Times was criticized domestically by the Cyberspace Administration of China for "fabricating" news on the US, the South China Sea, North Korea, and Hong Kong, and "disturbing" the order of the cyberspace.[5] In September 2018, The Economist wrote that it was "not fashionable in China to take the Global Times seriously", with a retired Chinese ambassador in 2016 comparing it to an angry toddler, along with Chinese intellectuals who deplored "its sabre-rattling towards Taiwan and Japan, and its deep reservoirs of grievance".[63]

In India

[edit]

In September 2020, India's Ministry of External Affairs issued a statement saying that comments made by the Global Times were falsely attributed to Ajit Doval.[6] In May 2025, following the 2025 India–Pakistan conflict, the Twitter account of Global Times, along with that of Xinhua News Agency, were blocked in India after both continuously published Pakistani claims of Indian military losses during the conflict.[79] Prior to its Twitter account being blocked in India, the Twitter account of the Embassy of India, Beijing rejected Global Times reports, stating "when media outlets share such information without verifying sources, it reflects a serious lapse in responsibility and journalistic ethics."[80] The block on Global Times' account was lifted later on the same day it was imposed.[81]

In Singapore

[edit]

In September 2016, the Global Times published an article, titled "Singapore's Delusional Reference to the South China Sea Arbitration During the Non-Aligned Movement Summit". Stanley Loh Ka Leung, then Singapore's ambassador to China, criticized the article as fake news. Loh also asked the Global Times to publish in full, in both English and Chinese, a letter he wrote to the newspaper's then editor-in-chief, Hu Xijin containing evidence which debunked the Global Times' assertions. Loh pointed out that Global Times did not attend the meeting and China was not a member of NAM. Hu refuted the ambassador by saying that the Global Times' reports were reliable and based on information from people who attended the meeting, without publishing the letter that Loh had requested to be published. Loh's letter was widely carried by reputable international newspapers like the Straits Times and South China Morning Post, forcing Global Times to eventually publish Loh's letter online. This was the first time that Global Times published a clarification by a foreign Ambassador.[7][8][9][10]

In the United States

[edit]

In June 2020, the United States Department of State designated Global Times as a foreign mission.[82][83] In February 2023, the US-China Business Council (USCBC) released a statement refuting a Global Times article that claimed USCBC representatives had criticized the US Ambassador to China, Nicholas Burns. The USCBC said that the claims in the report were false and expressed appreciation for Burns' work in Beijing.[84]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Global Times

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Global Times (Chinese: 环球时报; pinyin: Huánqiú Shíbào) is a state-owned newspaper published under the auspices of the , the official mouthpiece of the (CCP), with a primary focus on international , , and nationalist commentary. It operates both in Chinese (launched as a weekly supplement in 1993 and later expanded) and English editions (introduced in 2009), serving as a platform to articulate and promote Beijing's perspectives on global affairs. Established to provide a more accessible and opinionated voice compared to the staid People's Daily, the Global Times has gained prominence for its hawkish editorials and confrontational tone toward perceived adversaries, particularly in the West, reflecting shifts in China's assertive foreign policy under . Its content often emphasizes Chinese , criticizes U.S. , and defends CCP actions on issues like territorial disputes and , functioning as a tool for agenda-building and countering foreign narratives. While domestically popular for stoking , it faces international criticism as a conduit for state , with editorials frequently employing inflammatory to rally support for official positions. The outlet's influence extends beyond through its English-language version and presence, where it amplifies wolf-warrior and challenges biases, though its credibility is undermined by mandatory alignment with CCP directives, limiting independent journalism. Notable controversies include unsubstantiated claims during geopolitical tensions and defenses of policies like those in and , which align with state rather than empirical scrutiny.

Establishment and Development

Founding as Huanqiu Shibao

Huanqiu Shibao (环球时报), the Chinese-language precursor to the Global Times, was established on January 3, 1993, by the , the official organ of the (CCP). Initially launched as a weekly titled Huanqiu Wencui (环球文萃), it focused on compiling and translating international news to inform Chinese readers amid the country's post-1978 economic reforms and increasing global engagement. The publication emerged as part of efforts to enhance domestic awareness of , drawing content from overseas media while aligning with CCP editorial guidelines. In its early years, Huanqiu Shibao operated as a supplement to the , with limited circulation and a format emphasizing curated global reports rather than original reporting. By 1997, it was renamed Huanqiu Shibao and expanded into a standalone tabloid, reflecting growing demand for accessible international coverage in . This rebranding coincided with 's deepening integration into the world economy, including preparations for accession, positioning the paper as a voice for nationalist interpretations of global events. The founding reflected the CCP's strategic intent to shape public discourse on , with content vetted to support official narratives rather than independent journalism. Early issues prioritized translated excerpts from Western outlets, but under state oversight, avoiding critiques of . Circulation began modestly but grew steadily, reaching over 2 million copies per issue by the through its shift to daily publication from to .

Launch of English-Language Edition

The English-language edition of the Global Times was launched on , 2009, marking the expansion of the tabloid-format newspaper from its original Chinese-language weekly, which had debuted in 1993 as a supplement to the . This move positioned it as the second nationwide English-language daily newspaper in , following the , and was designed to disseminate Chinese government perspectives on international affairs to global readers. The launch occurred amid Beijing's multibillion-yuan campaign to bolster 's overseas reach, aiming to counter narratives by offering direct commentary on China-related news and global events from a nationalist viewpoint. Under Hu Xijin, who had led the paper since 2005, the English edition adopted a bolder, more confrontational style than typical , emphasizing "objective" reporting while prioritizing China's interests and critiquing perceived foreign biases. Initial distribution targeted urban centers in and select international markets, with content focusing on interpreted through a Chinese lens, including editorials that defended state policies and highlighted perceived hypocrisies in Western coverage of issues like and territorial disputes. By its first anniversary in 2010, the edition had established a digital presence alongside print, facilitating broader online dissemination and reader engagement.

Digital Expansion and Recent Adaptations

The English-language edition of the Global Times initiated its digital expansion with the launch of its website, globaltimes., in April 2009, simultaneous with the print newspaper's debut, enabling broader dissemination of content to international audiences as part of China's efforts to counter foreign narratives. This move marked a departure from traditional print-focused , incorporating formats to reach non-Chinese speakers and expand beyond the domestic Huanqiu Shibao. Building on this foundation, the Global Times extended its online presence to major social media platforms, including , , (now X), , , and (via international channels), accumulating a reported cumulative following in the tens of millions across these outlets by the mid-2020s. The outlet also introduced a , which by 2023 had attracted over 2.5 million users, supporting real-time news alerts, multimedia content, and user interaction to enhance engagement with global readers. In adaptations from 2020 onward, amid the and escalating U.S.- tensions, the Global Times intensified digital operations, prioritizing video content, live streams, and algorithm-optimized posts on international platforms to amplify nationalist viewpoints and projection, while navigating platform restrictions such as of state-affiliated accounts in 2020. This shift reflected broader Chinese media strategies to leverage digital tools for rapid response to global events, with reported growth in overseas app downloads and social interactions during key periods like the 2022 Ukraine conflict coverage. By 2025, these efforts sustained a multichannel approach, integrating apps and to maintain influence despite print circulation stabilizing around 100,000 for the English edition.

Editorial Approach and Content

Core Editorial Stance

The Global Times espouses a firmly pro-Chinese (CCP) editorial position, prioritizing the defense of China's core interests, , and socialist model under the of the CCP. As an outlet affiliated with the , it aligns with official narratives, portraying CCP policies—such as those on , the , and domestic stability—as essential responses to external threats aimed at curbing China's ascent. This stance manifests in editorials that celebrate national achievements, like alleviation and technological , while dismissing foreign critiques as ideologically driven interference. Central to its ideology is a nationalist worldview that frames the and Western institutions as hegemonic forces seeking to contain through alliances, sanctions, and media narratives. The publication frequently advocates for assertive "" diplomacy, urging to reject concessions and instead project strength to deter perceived aggressors, as seen in its coverage of trade wars and military exercises. Under former editor-in-chief , who stepped down on December 31, 2021, this approach intensified, with commentary blending factual reporting and speculative assertions to rally domestic support and challenge international opinion. The outlet promotes a vision of global multipolarity where leads the Global South against , critiquing Western liberal values as decadent or hypocritical—evident in its portrayals of events like the 2019 Hong Kong protests or U.S. elections as evidence of systemic failures abroad. While presenting itself as a voice for "internationalist ," its content often subordinates empirical to ideological fidelity, selectively amplifying sources that bolster CCP positions and marginalizing dissenting views, which reflects the structural imperatives of in a one-party system.

Content Style and Formats

The Global Times employs a tabloid format in its print editions, characterized by compact page sizes, bold and provocative headlines, and prominent use of large photographs to capture reader attention immediately. This design draws from Western tabloid traditions but adapts them to emphasize nationalist themes, with articles often structured around short, punchy paragraphs interspersed with opinionated commentary rather than in-depth investigative reporting. In terms of editorial presentation, the outlet favors aggressive, confrontational in its s and commentaries, frequently framing international events through a lens of Chinese exceptionalism or criticism of perceived adversaries, which has led to accusations of from regulators and observers. Content formats include a mix of straight news summaries, but these are outnumbered by signed pieces, cartoons, and "viewpoint" sections that blend with , often prioritizing rhetorical impact over neutral sourcing. Digitally, on its website (globaltimes.cn), articles follow a similar style with eye-catching thumbnails, embedded videos, and infographics to enhance engagement, alongside categorized sections like "Editorials" and "Global Minds" that host provocative essays and interviews. This multimedia integration supports rapid dissemination, with formats optimized for mobile viewing, including short-form videos and social media embeds that amplify viral, polemical content. The overall approach prioritizes accessibility and emotional resonance, using declarative subheadings and bullet-point summaries in longer pieces to maintain a fast-paced, persuasive flow.

Key Themes in Coverage

The Global Times consistently promotes , framing the country's rise as a counter to perceived Western decline and emphasizing patriotic unity in response to external pressures. Its reporting often highlights domestic achievements in , , and to bolster national pride, such as coverage of rapid modernization and contributions to global development under the Chinese Communist Party's . This nationalist tone, shaped by editorials under figures like , positions China as a resilient victim of foreign interference, fostering a "chest-thumping" that appeals to popular sentiments amid tensions like the U.S.-China trade war. A prominent theme is criticism of U.S. and Western interventionism, portraying America as the instigator of global instability. In coverage of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, for instance, articles reframe the event as a "U.S.-Russia ," depicting the U.S. as the protagonist provoking escalation while defending 's actions as sovereignty protection and faulting for internal divisions. This anti-Western stance has intensified since 2018, aligning with state media's broader shift toward confrontational narratives on issues like trade disputes and alliances, often attributing economic woes or conflicts to American "containment" strategies. Coverage of sovereignty issues, including , , and , defends Chinese territorial claims and internal policies against international scrutiny. On , reporting stresses economic growth, ethnic harmony, and anti-terrorism measures as evidence of successful governance, dismissing Western allegations as smears aimed at . Similarly, articles oppose "Taiwan independence" or separatism, advocating strict enforcement of laws and portraying such challenges as foreign-orchestrated threats to unity. These themes integrate strategic narratives that prioritize China's "core interests," rejecting multilateral pressures in favor of unilateral assertions of authority. The outlet also underscores China's global initiatives, such as the Belt and Road, as benevolent alternatives to Western dominance, promoting multilateral cooperation while critiquing . This includes celebratory accounts of technological amid "global technological " and cultural among youth. Overall, these recurring motifs serve to align public discourse with official positions, emphasizing resilience, progress, and righteous resistance over neutral analysis.

Operational Role and Influence

Relationship with CCP and State Media

The Global Times is published under the auspices of the People's Daily, the official newspaper of the (CCP) , which positions it firmly within the apparatus. The People's Daily functions as the CCP's primary organ, tasked with disseminating party ideology, policy directives, and narratives aligned with the leadership's objectives. As a subsidiary publication launched in 1993, the Global Times inherits this structural dependency, operating without from CCP oversight, including adherence to censorship enforced by the Central Propaganda Department. This affiliation manifests in the Global Times' content production, where reporting must conform to the "principle of the party leading the media," a foundational tenet of Chinese media control ensuring alignment with CCP goals such as bolstering nationalism and countering perceived foreign criticisms. Unlike the more formal tone of the People's Daily, the Global Times adopts a sensationalist, tabloid style to amplify hawkish viewpoints on international affairs, yet this divergence in presentation does not alter its subordination; former editor-in-chief Hu Xijin, who retired on December 16, 2021, explicitly described the outlet as advancing the party's interests through aggressive rhetoric. State directives, such as those promoting "wolf warrior" diplomacy under Xi Jinping since 2019, have guided its coverage, prioritizing narratives that defend CCP policies over objective analysis. The outlet's role extends to international propagation of CCP perspectives, often in coordination with other state entities like and , forming a unified front for projection. In June 2020, the U.S. State Department designated the —and by extension its affiliates including the Global Times—as a foreign mission of the , citing its function as an extension of government influence rather than independent journalism. This classification underscores the absence of autonomy, with operational funding, staffing, and content approvals tied to party structures, rendering the Global Times a tool for narrative control amid China's broader media ecosystem, where all outlets submit to CCP authority.

Domestic Impact and Popularity

The Global Times enjoys substantial domestic circulation in China, with single-issue print runs exceeding 2 million copies weekly from Monday to Saturday, supplemented by over 10,000 complimentary air-distributed copies. This positions it as one of the country's leading newspapers by readership volume, particularly for international affairs coverage, a metric that surged to 2 million following its 2001 reporting on the . Its core audience comprises mid-career and younger demographics, including civil servants, mid- to high-level corporate managers, white-collar professionals, and specialists, accounting for 89% of readers who typically exhibit high , income, and consumption patterns. Among professionals in eight surveyed Chinese cities, the newspaper's reading rate reached 10.7%, surpassing other political news publications and underscoring its resonance in urban, decision-making circles. The outlet's tabloid format and unapologetically nationalist editorial tone amplify its influence on domestic , fostering assertive interpretations of global events that align with official narratives while appealing to patriotic sentiments. This approach has sustained growing issuance amid external critiques, establishing it as a key shaper of discourse on among informed readers, though its state affiliation limits independent verification of attitudinal shifts.

International Outreach and Soft Power

The English-language edition of the Global Times, launched on April 20, 2009, targets international audiences to convey 's viewpoints on global events, serving as a key element in Beijing's media expansion abroad. This edition, produced alongside the Chinese-language version under the , aims to reach non-Chinese speakers, including overseas communities estimated at around 50 million, primarily in . By offering commentary on topics like U.S.-China relations and territorial disputes, it seeks to shape foreign perceptions and challenge what Chinese officials describe as biased Western coverage. In alignment with China's state-directed initiatives, the Global Times disseminates narratives emphasizing economic achievements, cultural heritage, and diplomatic stances to foster global affinity for the . Its content often highlights initiatives such as the Belt and Road, portraying them as mutual benefit frameworks, while critiquing adversaries to defend national sovereignty. Digital dissemination via websites, apps, and platforms like X (formerly Twitter), where it maintains an active presence with millions of followers, amplifies these messages to real-time global audiences. However, assessments of its efficacy reveal constraints, as the outlet's nationalist and combative editorial style—characterized by editorials mocking foreign policies or asserting dominance—frequently garners attention through controversy rather than persuasion. Independent surveys, such as those from , indicate persistent unfavorable views of China in advanced economies like the U.S. and , with favorability declining from 2011 levels despite media investments exceeding billions annually. Analyses attribute this to the Global Times' role reinforcing perceptions of assertiveness over appeal, distinguishing it from traditional tools like cultural exchanges. While it influences discourse in select regions, such as through narrative alignment observed in Australian media threat perceptions, broader impact remains limited by credibility concerns tied to its state affiliation.

Controversies and Criticisms

Disinformation Allegations

The Global Times has been repeatedly accused by foreign governments, agencies, and organizations of disseminating as part of coordinated Chinese state efforts to shape global narratives favorable to the (CCP). These allegations center on the outlet's promotion of that contradict verifiable evidence or international investigations, often amplifying theories or deflecting of Chinese policies. Critics, including U.S. officials, argue that such content exemplifies a broader pattern of state-sponsored information operations designed to undermine adversaries and sow doubt, with the Global Times serving as a key amplifier due to its aggressive editorial style and international reach. A prominent example involves the outlet's role in promoting the theory that originated from the U.S. Army's laboratory, a narrative pushed extensively in 2020–2021 despite lacking scientific backing. On June 28, 2021, the Global Times published an article explicitly calling for investigation into as the virus's source, citing unverified epidemiological data and aligning with CCP deflections from Wuhan lab-leak inquiries. This claim was labeled baseless by U.S. intelligence assessments, the World Health Organization's joint studies (which dismissed lab-leak conspiracies without from ), and multiple outlets, with Chinese including the Global Times accused of weaponizing it to shift blame amid suppressed domestic reporting on early outbreaks. The narrative gained traction in Chinese but was debunked by genomic sequencing pointing to natural zoonotic origins or potential Wuhan lab accidents, not U.S. bioweapons programs. In May 2025, the Indian government blocked the Global Times' X (formerly ) account for spreading "unverified claims" and aimed at undermining India's military credibility, specifically false narratives about ' capabilities and operations. This followed earlier warnings, such as on May 7, 2025, when the Indian Embassy rebuked the outlet for on "Operation Sindoor," alleged cross-border strikes against Pakistan-linked targets. Indian authorities cited the content as part of a pattern of fabricated reports eroding discourse, leading to the permanent suspension of the handle under cybersecurity regulations. The incident highlighted tensions in India-China relations, with viewing such outputs as tactics rather than . Media bias evaluators have rated the Global Times as promoting pro-CCP with mixed factual accuracy, citing repeated instances of selective reporting, unverified sourcing, and alignment with official lines over , such as in coverage of (framed as vocational training despite satellite imagery and defector testimonies indicating mass detention) or Hong Kong protests (portrayed as foreign-orchestrated chaos while downplaying police actions documented in videos). These practices, per analyses, prioritize narrative control over verification, contributing to its classification as a vector for state rather than independent analysis.

Fabrications and Specific Incidents

In August 2021, Global Times published an article citing "Wilson Edwards," described as a Swiss biologist, who alleged that the United States was intimidating the World Health Organization to prioritize a lab-leak theory for COVID-19 origins over other investigations. The piece amplified Edwards' claims of U.S. politicization, but Swiss authorities, including the embassy in Beijing, confirmed no such individual existed and urged removal of the "false" reports. Global Times and other state outlets subsequently deleted the articles, while Meta identified a coordinated Chinese network promoting the fabricated persona across platforms to deflect blame from China. Global Times has promoted misleading narratives on timelines to suggest non-Chinese origins, including amplified reports in January 2021 claiming serological evidence of the virus in as early as 2019, predating Wuhan's outbreak. These stories distorted preliminary Italian studies on antibodies in and patient samples, which fact-checkers and subsequent analyses determined were inconclusive, potentially reflecting cross-reactivity with other coronaviruses rather than SARS-CoV-2. Independent reviews, such as those from Wired, highlighted methodological flaws in the underlying research, noting insufficient genetic sequencing to confirm the virus strain. The outlet has also disseminated unverified assertions linking the pandemic's emergence to U.S. facilities like , echoing unsubstantiated theories without empirical backing, as part of broader deflection efforts documented in U.S. intelligence assessments and WHO critiques. Such incidents align with patterns of selective sourcing and omission critiqued by media watchdogs, contributing to Global Times' mixed factual rating due to repeated reliance on state-aligned or fabricated elements over verifiable data.

Responses to Accusations and Broader Context

The Global Times typically counters allegations of and fabrication by framing them as politically motivated attacks from Western powers seeking to contain China's rise, while redirecting scrutiny toward perceived biases and hypocrisies in accusers' own media ecosystems. In response to U.S. claims of Chinese cyber activities, Chinese officials, as reported by the outlet, affirmed opposition to "spreading out of " and emphasized lawful countermeasures against foreign interference. Similarly, following accusations from Philippine officials regarding , the Global Times described such narratives as "political manipulation" designed to provoke regional tensions, without addressing underlying evidentiary concerns raised by critics. These rebuttals often invoke reciprocity, portraying the outlet's role as defensive against adversarial framing rather than independent verification. In broader retorts to critiques, the Global Times accuses entities like of operating as a " machine" that sows global discord by amplifying anti-China narratives, drawing on historical U.S. information operations during the . On topics such as disputes, the publication has published investigations claiming to expose U.S.-led "" tactics, including and instigation of , positioning its coverage as evidence-based patriotism. Such responses rarely concede methodological flaws in their own reporting, instead attributing external skepticism to entrenched ideological conflicts, as seen in editorials decrying U.S. media as "discredited" among Chinese audiences for selective outrage. This pattern reflects the outlet's integration within China's apparatus, where editorial content aligns with directives on narrative sovereignty, prioritizing national unity and counter-hegemony over detached protocols common in non-state . Critics, including reports from outlets like the , contend that this structural dependency fosters systemic selectivity, as the Global Times—lacking operational independence—mirrors state positions without internal pluralism, rendering its denials circular within a controlled information environment. Proponents, however, contextualize it as a legitimate to what they term Western "malicious politicization," evident in coverage of initiatives like the Belt and Road, where alleged foreign smears are met with assertions of empirical vindication through project outcomes. Empirical analyses of media ecosystems indicate that while the Global Times engages in aggressive rebuttals, its reliance on official sources limits , contrasting with adversarial models that emphasize source diversity and error correction.

Reception and Legacy

Views Within China

The Global Times garners substantial domestic support in China for its nationalist tone and confrontational stance toward perceived foreign threats, appealing primarily to young, urban readers who favor assertive positions. Its coverage often amplifies public sentiments on issues like territorial disputes and Western criticism, contributing to its role as a voice for patriotic discourse. With a daily of approximately 2.6 million copies and around 8 million digital page views, the outlet maintains broad reach among Chinese audiences, bolstered by spikes in readership during high-profile international events such as the 2001 World Trade Center attacks, when circulation hit 2 million. This popularity aligns with the Chinese Communist Party's emphasis on media that reinforces national unity and sovereignty, positioning the Global Times as a key platform for disseminating approved narratives on global affairs. Former editor-in-chief , who led the paper from 2005 to 2021, cultivated a large following—over 25 million on by his retirement—for his outspoken defenses of Chinese policies, though he faced occasional backlash for comments perceived as inconsistent with evolving party lines, such as recent criticisms of public "silence" on domestic issues. Such reactions highlight pockets of within online communities, but overt remains constrained by state , limiting widespread critical views. Intellectual and dissident circles within , where accessible, often regard the Global Times as overt propaganda due to its direct subordination to the and fidelity to CCP directives, prioritizing ideological alignment over independent analysis. However, empirical indicators like sustained circulation and engagement metrics suggest it resonates with mainstream patriotic audiences, reflecting broader societal approval of media that counters external narratives.

International Perceptions

The Global Times is predominantly perceived in Western democracies as a state-controlled propaganda outlet rather than a credible news source, with its content viewed as serving the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) agenda through aggressive nationalism and selective reporting. Analysts describe it as a tool for "agenda building" that prioritizes narratives aligning with Beijing's foreign policy, often amplifying confrontational stances in line with "wolf warrior" diplomacy, which emphasizes combative responses to perceived Western criticisms. This perception stems from its explicit ties to the CCP's and documented instances of echoing state directives, leading to widespread skepticism about its factual reliability on topics like territorial disputes, human rights, and international conflicts. In the United States and , think tanks and policymakers frequently cite the Global Times as exemplifying China's broader information operations, including campaigns that mirror tactics seen in Russian , such as denying atrocities or promoting alternative geopolitical framings. For instance, during the 2022 , it aligned with narratives questioning evidence of Ukrainian civilian deaths, reinforcing views of it as a conduit for authoritarian-aligned rather than balanced . Studies indicate that its English-language editions, aimed at global audiences, struggle to gain traction due to overt partisanship, with audiences in free societies associating it with low trustworthiness compared to independent outlets. Perceptions in other regions vary; in parts of the Global South, it may resonate more as a counter-narrative to Western dominance, but even there, its state affiliation prompts caution among media watchdogs. The outlet itself attributes negative international views to Western "" and "malice," claiming reports distort reality through ideological lenses—a stance that international observers counter by pointing to verifiable CCP and editorial controls as the primary deficit. Overall, empirical assessments from non-partisan monitors underscore its role in projection but highlight limited influence where audiences prioritize source independence.

Comparative Analysis with Global Media

The Global Times, as a tabloid subsidiary of the and under explicit (CCP) control, exemplifies state-directed media with no , a feature distinguishing it from outlets in liberal democracies. In contrast, Western broadcasters like the operate under public charters mandating impartiality and independence from government interference, though subject to funding pressures and accusations of systemic institutional favoring progressive viewpoints. Similarly, U.S. networks such as maintain private ownership with legal protections for journalistic autonomy, enabling investigative reporting that occasionally critiques their own governments, albeit often through lenses of partisan framing rated as left-leaning by bias evaluators. Comparisons with other authoritarian state media, such as Russia's RT, reveal operational parallels: both employ sensationalist, nationalist rhetoric to amplify government narratives abroad, often mimicking styles to undermine adversarial coverage—RT via a "partisan parasite" model imitating U.S. outlets, and Global Times through tabloid trolling and agenda-building . Empirical analyses of coverage, for instance, show RT and China's CGTN (a sister outlet to Global Times) prioritizing narratives that highlight Western democratic flaws, contrasting with the pluralistic, market-driven competition in ecosystems where multiple viewpoints, including right-leaning ones like , coexist despite dominant left-leaning institutional influences. This state monopoly in ensures uniform pro-CCP alignment, whereas Western biases arise from cultural, academic, and corporate incentives rather than top-down directives. Credibility assessments underscore these disparities; rates Global Times as "Questionable" for promoting pro-Chinese with mixed factual accuracy, citing repeated distortions in international reporting, while rating the BBC as least biased with high factual reporting and CNN as left-biased but mostly factual. Such ratings reflect Global Times' role in campaigns, as documented in cases like origin blame-shifting, versus Western media's accountability mechanisms, including and lawsuits, though the latter face for selective omissions driven by ideological echo chambers rather than state . These structural differences highlight causal realities: direct state control in outlets like Global Times precludes dissent, fostering lower trust globally, while Western media's competitive pluralism, imperfect as it is, allows for self-correction absent in CCP-supervised .

References

  1. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-13017881
  2. https://libguides.usc.edu/chinese_studies/newspapers
  3. https://qz.com/745577/inside-the-global-times-chinas-hawkish-belligerent-state-tabloid
  4. https://www.globaltimes.cn/about-us/
  5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11366-021-09754-3
  6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27036520
  7. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/how-china-uses-news-media-weapon-its-propaganda-war-against-west
  8. https://freedomhouse.org/report/special-report/2020/beijings-global-megaphone
  9. https://hd.globaltimes.cn/abouthq
  10. https://www.thechinastory.org/yearbooks/yearbook-2013/forum-spoken-and-unspoken/the-global-times-huanqiu-shibao-%25E7%258E%25AF%25E7%2590%2583%25E6%2597%25B6%25E6%258A%25A5-in-retrospect/
  11. https://www.oriprobe.com/GlobalTimes_en.shtml
  12. https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/524197.shtml
  13. https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/16/media/hu-xijin-global-times-retiring-intl-hnk
  14. https://www.globaltimes.cn/adv.html
  15. https://twitter.com/globaltimesnews
  16. https://www.facebook.com/globaltimesnews/
  17. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17427665251328117
  18. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/dec/14/china-troll-king-hu-xijin-tabloid-editor-became-voice-chinese-nationalism
  19. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/global-times-china/
  20. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/global-times-beijing-nuanced-relationship
  21. https://www.economist.com/china/2018/09/20/chinas-global-times-plays-a-peculiar-role
  22. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/1944459/chinese-newspaper-global-times-blasted-over-editorial
  23. https://www.globaltimes.cn/opinion/
  24. https://www.globaltimes.cn/pdf/media-kit.pdf
  25. https://qz.com/748244/the-foreign-experts-inside-chinas-feisty-state-tabloid-the-global-times
  26. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202406/1313987.shtml
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336263913_Popular_nationalism_Global_Times_and_the_US-China_trade_war
  28. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01296612.2023.2246721
  29. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/uploads/documents/2024-WCF_Carothers.pdf
  30. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202509/1344527.shtml
  31. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202506/1336240.shtml
  32. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-times-chinese-science-and-technology-continue-to-advance-despite-increasing-global-technological-nationalism-302104065.html
  33. https://enmobile.prnasia.com/releases/global/global-times-china-sees-boom-in-cultural-prosperity-amid-growing-confidence-among-youth-451924.shtml
  34. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/16/editor-of-chinese-state-tabloid-global-times-retires
  35. https://2017-2021.state.gov/designation-of-additional-chinese-media-entities-as-foreign-missions/
  36. http://www.infomorning.com/home/Index/details/pid/5/cid/22/id/59184.html
  37. http://www.bzadw.com/html/list1142.html
  38. http://paper.people.com.cn/xwzx/html/2013-11/01/content_1422866.htm
  39. https://chinadigitaltimes.net/chinese/295981.html
  40. https://www.linkedin.com/company/global-times/
  41. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-big-bet-soft-power
  42. https://apnews.com/article/disinformation-china-us-xinjiang-global-opinion-c9e033f22622841935a2b1bc1060c01b
  43. https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/06/china/china-covid-origin-mic-intl-hnk
  44. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202106/1227219.shtml
  45. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/25/world/asia/china-coronavirus-covid-conspiracy-theory.html
  46. https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/data-void-china-covid-disinformation/
  47. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/govt-bans-chinas-global-times-x-handle-for-spreading-unverified-claims-on-indian-armed-forces/articleshow/121154530.cms
  48. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/operation-sindoor-indian-embassy-warns-chinas-global-times-over-disinformation-on-military-strikes-targeting-pakistan/articleshow/120964525.cms
  49. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/2884217/misleading-a-pandemic-the-viral-effects-of-chinese-propaganda-and-the-coronavir/
  50. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/8/11/fictitious-swiss-scientist-entangles
  51. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/11/chinese-media-fake-news-claims-swiss-scientist-wilson-edwards-critical-of-us
  52. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-59456548
  53. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202101/1212656.shtml
  54. https://chinapower.csis.org/china-covid-disinformation-global-narratives/
  55. https://www.wired.com/story/flawed-covid-19-origin-theory-italy/
  56. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58273322
  57. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202508/1342052.shtml
  58. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202502/1327848.shtml
  59. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202502/1328526.shtml
  60. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202510/1345438.shtml
  61. https://www.chinausfocus.com/society-culture/rethinking-the-foreign-medias-china-coverage-is-it-biased-
  62. https://www.bbc.com/news/56364952
  63. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202408/1318134.shtml
  64. https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2025/10/netizen-voices-stop-complaining-hu-xijin-you-played-a-part-in-this/
  65. https://www.voanews.com/a/chinese-commentator-goes-silent-on-social-media-after-controversial-post/7728529.html
  66. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/china-quarterly/article/aggressive-journalistic-questioning-and-chinas-wolf-warrior-diplomacy/63E37E068C77A450A0B522F3CEC65CA3
  67. https://cepa.org/comprehensive-reports/sino-russian-convergence-in-foreign-information-manipulation-and-interference/
  68. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/state-media-tagging-does-not-affect-perceived-tweet-accuracy-evidence-from-a-u-s-twitter-experiment-in-2022/
  69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-021-09754-3
  70. https://orcasia.org/article/715/between-perception-and-propaganda
  71. https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1200585.shtml
  72. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/pandemics-propaganda-how-chinese-state-media-creates-and-propagates-ccp-coronavirus-narratives/
  73. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/behind-news-inside-china-global-television-network
  74. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17512786.2022.2086157
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Comparison-of-how-CGTN-and-RTs-websites-covered-the-US-electoral-process_tbl3_361292941
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.