Hubbry Logo
CommandoCommandoMain
Open search
Commando
Community hub
Commando
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Commando
Commando
from Wikipedia
Royal Marines from 40 Commando on patrol in the Sangin area of Afghanistan are pictured

A commando is a combatant, or operative of an elite light infantry or special operations force, specially trained for carrying out raids and operating in small teams behind enemy lines.[1]

Etymology

[edit]
Cape Mounted Burghers, or "kommando," assembling for action in 1846 during the Seventh Xhosa War. The term originally referred to the mounted infantry of this type.

The term commando derives from the Latin word commendare ("to recommend") via the Dutch word kommando, which translates as "a command or order" and or roughly to "mobile infantry unit".[1] Kommando in turn originated from the Portuguese word comando, which was used in Portuguese India to refer to an early type of special forces. The word was adopted into Afrikaans from Boer interactions with the Portuguese in neighboring African colonies.[2] In Southern Africa, the term originally referred to units of locally raised mounted infantry which fought during the Xhosa Wars, Anglo-Zulu War and the First and Second Boer Wars.[3] The British were exposed to the concept during the 19th and 20th centuries, in particular during the Boer Wars. During World War II, the British military established the Commandos, a formation of special forces units which engaged in raids against German-occupied Europe. Wehrmacht special forces units were also referred to as "kommandos". Some historians have argued the term is a High German loan word originating from German colonists who settled in the Dutch Cape Colony.[2]

The Oxford English Dictionary ties the English use of the word meaning "[a] member of a body of picked men ..." directly into its Afrikaans' origins:[4]

1943 Combined Operations (Min. of Information) i. Lt. Lieutenant-Colonel D. W. Clarke... produced the outline of a scheme.... The men for this type of irregular warfare should, he suggested, be formed into units to be known as Commandos.... Nor was the historical parallel far-fetched. After the victories of Roberts and Kitchener had scattered the Boer army, the guerrilla tactics of its individual units (which were styled 'Commandos')... prevented decisive victory.... His [sc. Lt.-Col. D. W. Clarke's] ideas were accepted; so also, with some hesitation, was the name Commando.

During World War II, newspaper reports of the deeds of "the commandos" only in the plural led to readers thinking that the singular meant one man rather than one military unit, and this new usage became established.

Originally, "a commando" was a type of combat unit, as opposed to an individual in that unit although the term today can be used in both senses, in addition to referring to guerrilla warfare carried out by small units.[5][6] In English, to distinguish between an individual commando and a commando unit, the unit is occasionally capitalized.[2] In China, the term does not necessarily refer to a military unit as country's People's Armed Police also has commando units such as the Snow Leopards and Falcons.[7][8]

The term "para-commando" may be used to combine the roles of paratrooper and commando.

Selection

[edit]
Turkish Land Forces commando units with their distinctive blue berets

Due to the special mental and physiological requirements made of the applicants, there are restrictions entering "commando" units. Applicants have to fulfil special requirements. Selecting applicants with the highest motivation, modern special forces run special selection processes.

Historically there is evidence of selection for the Otdelnly Gwardieskij Batalion Minerow, predecessors of the modern Russian spetsnaz. Soldiers had to be younger than 30 years, were mostly athletes or hunters and had to show the highest motivation. During training and selection some participants died since they were exhausted and left to their devices.[9]

The German Kommando Spezialkräfte (KSK) demands from their applicants high levels of physical resilience, teamwork, willingness to learn, mental resilience, willpower, sense of responsibility, flexibility, secrecy and adaptation. These skills are proven during assessment.[10]

The fitness test of the U.S. Navy SEALs tests swimming speed over 500 yards, number of push-ups and sit-ups within 2 minutes, pull-ups and running 1.5 miles.[11]

Long Range Desert Group hired their personnel after a very long interrogation. First SAS members had to complete a march of 50km, and the Royal Marine commandos tested their applicants' motivation during an obstacle course using real explosives and machine gun fire close to Achnacary in Scotland. The French Foreign Legion assesses their applicants through medical, intelligence, logic, and fitness tests as well as interrogations, small drills and solving small tasks.

Commando soldiers are supposed to think independently. This is unusual in the context of most military training, but is necessary for work in small groups and avoiding enemies' reconnaissance.[12]

Boer name origin and adoption by Britain

[edit]
The first appearance and use of the term "commando" was taken from the Afrikaner guerilla units known as "Kommandos" in South Africa during the Second Boer War of 1899–1902

After the Dutch Cape Colony was established in 1652, the word was used to describe bands of militia. The first "Commando Law" was instated by the original Dutch East India Company chartered settlements, and similar laws were maintained through the independent Boer Orange Free State and South African Republic. The law compelled burghers to equip themselves with horses and firearms when required in defense. The implementation of these laws was called the "Commando System". A group of mounted militiamen was organized in a unit known as a commando and headed by a commandant, who was normally elected from inside the unit.[2] Men called up to serve were said to be "on commando".[13] British experience with this system led to the widespread adoption of the word "commandeer" into English in the 1880s.[14]

During the Great Trek, conflicts with Southern African peoples such as the Xhosa and the Zulu caused the Boers to retain the commando system despite being free of colonial laws. Also, the word became used to describe any armed raid. During this period, the Boers also developed guerrilla techniques for use against numerically superior but less mobile bands of natives such as the Zulu, who fought in large, complex formations.[2]

In the First Boer War, Boer commandos utilised superior marksmanship, fieldcraft, camouflage and mobility to great effect against British forces, who wore conspicuous red uniforms and were poorly trained in marksmanship. These tactics continued to be used during the Second Boer War. In the final phase of the war, 25,000 Boer commandos engaged in asymmetric warfare against British Imperial forces numbering 450,000 strong for two years after the British had captured the capitals of the two Boer republics. During these conflicts the word entered the English language, retaining its general Afrikaans meaning of a "militia unit" or a "raid". Robert Baden-Powell recognised the importance of fieldcraft and was inspired to form the scouting movement.

The "commando" name was permanently established with the introduction of the British Commandos in 1942 the elite special forces units of the British Army in World War II

In 1941, Lieutenant-Colonel D. W. Clarke of the British Imperial General Staff, suggested the name commando for specialized raiding units of the British Army Special Service in evocation of the effectiveness and tactics of the Boer commandos.[2] During World War II, American and British publications, confused over the use of the plural "commandos" for that type of British military units, gave rise to the modern common habit of using "a commando" to mean one member of such a unit, or one man engaged on a raiding-type operation.[2]

Green berets and training

[edit]
The French Navy commando unit Jaubert storms a naval vessel in a training assault

Since the 20th century and World War II in particular, commandos have been set apart from other military units by virtue of their extreme training regimes; these are usually associated with the awarding of green berets which originated with British Commandos. The British Commandos were instrumental in founding many other international commando units during World War II. Some international commando units were formed from members who served as part of or alongside British Commandos, such as the Dutch Korps Commandotroepen (who still wear the recognition flash insignia of the British Fairbairn–Sykes fighting knife), the Belgian 5th Special Air Service, or Greek Sacred Band. In 1944 the SAS Brigade was formed from the British 1st and 2nd SAS, the French 3rd and 4th SAS, and the Belgian 5th SAS. The French Army special forces (1er RPIMa) still use the motto Qui Ose Gagne, a translation of the SAS motto "Who Dares Wins".

In addition, many Commonwealth nations were part of the original British Commando units. They developed their own national traditions, including the Australian Special Air Service Regiment, the New Zealand Special Air Service, and the Rhodesian Special Air Service, all of whom share (or used to) the same insignia and motto as their British counterparts. During the Second World War, the British SAS quickly adopted sand-coloured berets, since they were almost entirely based in the North African theatre; they used these rather than green berets to distinguish themselves from other British Commando units. (See History of the Special Air Service). Other Commonwealth commando units were formed after the Second World War directly based on the British Commando units, such as the Australian Army Reserve 1st Commando Regiment (Australia), distinct from the Regular Army 2nd Commando Regiment (Australia), who originated from the 4th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment in 1997 .

The US Rangers were founded by Major General Lucian Truscott of the US Army, a liaison officer with the British General Staff. In 1942, he submitted a proposal to General George Marshall that an American unit be set up "along the lines of the British Commandos". The original US Rangers trained at the British Commandos centre at Achnacarry Castle. The US Navy SEALs' original formation, the Observer Group, was also trained and influenced by British Commandos.[15] The US Special Forces originated with the First Special Service Force, formed under British Combined Operations. The First Special Service Force was a joint American-Canadian unit and modern Canadian special operations forces also trace their lineage to this unit and through it to British Commandos, despite existing in their modern incarnation only since 2006.

Malaysian green beret special forces PASKAL[16] and Grup Gerak Khas (who still wear the Blue Lanyard of the Royal Marines) were originally trained by British Commandos. The Portuguese Marine Corps Fuzileiros were originally trained by British Commandos in 1961. Other British units, such as the SAS, led to the development of many international special operations units that are now typically referred to as commandos, including the Bangladeshi Para-Commando Brigade, Pakistani Special Services Group, the Indian MARCOS, Jordanian Special Operation Forces and Philippine National Police Special Action Force.

A Dutch study found that a sampling of Dutch male special forces operators were more emotionally stable, conscientious, but also more closed minded than matched civilian controls and other types of soldiers.[17]

World War I

[edit]

Austro-Hungarian assault units

[edit]

During the winter of 1914–1915 large parts of the Eastern Front switched to trench warfare. To cope with the new situation many Austro-Hungarian regiments spontaneously formed infantry squads called Jagdkommandos. These squads were named after the specially trained forces of Russian army formed in 1886 and were used to protect against ambushes, to perform reconnaissance and for low intensity fights in no-man's-land.

Austro-Hungarian High army command (Armeeoberkommando, AOK) realized the need for special forces and decided to draw on German experience. Starting in September–October 1916 about 120 officers and 300 NCOs were trained in the German training area in Beuville (near the village of Doncourt) to be the main cadre of the newly raised Austro-Hungarian army assault battalions. The former Jagdkommandos were incorporated into these battalions.

Italy

[edit]

The first country to establish commando troops was Italy, in the summer 1917, shortly before Germany.[citation needed]

Italy used specialist trench-raiding teams to break the stalemate of static fighting against Austria-Hungary, in the Alpine battles of World War I. These teams were called "Arditi" (meaning "daring, brave ones"); they were almost always men under 25 in top physical condition and, possibly at first, bachelors (due to fear of very high casualty rates). Actually the Arditi (who were led to the lines just a few hours before the assault, having been familiarised with the terrain via photo-reconnaissance and trained on trench systems re-created ad hoc for them) suffered fewer casualties than regular line infantry and were highly successful in their tasks. Many volunteered for extreme-right formations in the turbulent years after the war and (the Fascist Party took pride in this and adopted the style and the mannerism of Arditi), but some of left-wing political persuasions created the "Arditi del Popolo" (People's Arditi) and for some years held the fascist raids in check, defending Socialist and Communist Party sections, buildings, rallies and meeting places.[18]

World War II

[edit]

Australia

[edit]

The Australian Army formed commando units, known as Australian independent companies in the early stages of World War II. They first saw action in early 1942 during the Japanese assault on New Ireland, and in the Battle of Timor. Part of the 2/1st Independent Company was wiped out on New Ireland, but on Timor, the 2/2nd Independent Company formed the heart of an Allied force that engaged Japanese forces in a guerrilla campaign. The Japanese commander on the island drew parallels with the Boer War, and decided that it would require a 10:1 numerical advantage to defeat the Allies. The campaign occupied the attention of an entire Japanese division for almost a year. The independent companies were later renamed commando squadrons, and they saw widespread action in the South West Pacific Area, especially in New Guinea and Borneo. In 1943, all the commando squadrons except the 2/2nd and 2/8th were grouped into the 2/6th, 2/7th and 2/9th Cavalry Commando Regiments.

Later in the war the Royal Australian Navy also formed commando units along the lines of the Royal Naval Commandos to go ashore with the first waves of major amphibious assaults, to signpost the beaches and carry out other naval tasks. These were known as RAN Commandos. Four were formed—lettered A, B, C and D like their British counterparts—and they took part in the Borneo campaign.

Z Force, an Australian-British-New Zealand military intelligence commando unit, formed by the Australian Services Reconnaissance Department, also carried out many raiding and reconnaissance operations in the South West Pacific theatre, most notably Operation Jaywick, in which they destroyed tonnes of Japanese shipping at Singapore Harbour. An attempt to replicate this success, with Operation Rimau, resulted in the death of almost all those involved. However, Z Force and other SRD units continued operations until the war's end.

Canada

[edit]

A joint Canadian-American Commando unit, the 1st Special Service Force, nicknamed the Devil's Brigade, was formed in 1942 under the command of Colonel Robert Frederick.[19] The unit initially saw service in the Pacific, in August 1943 at Kiska in the Aleutians campaign. However most of its operations occurred during the Italian campaign and in southern France. Its most famous raid, which was documented in the film Devil's Brigade, was the battle of Monte la Difensa. In 1945, the unit was disbanded; some of the Canadian members were sent to the 1st Canadian Parachute Battalion as replacements, and the American members were sent to either the 101st Airborne Division or the 82nd Airborne Division as replacements or the 474th Regimental Combat Team. Ironically they were sent to serve in Norway in 1945, the country they were formed to raid.[20]

Finland

[edit]

The Finns fielded the Erillinen Pataljoona 4 and about 150 men were trained before the beginning of summer 1941. At first, the units had as few as 15 men, but during the war this was increased to 60. On July 1, 1943, the units were organised in the 4th Detached Battalion. In 1944, a special unit with amphibious He 115 planes was founded to support the battalion. The total strength of the battalion was 678 men and 76 women (see Lotta Svärd).

In the Battle of Ilomantsi, soldiers of the 4th disrupted the supply lines of the Soviet artillery, preventing effective fire support. The battalion made over 50 missions in 1943 and just under 100 in 1944, and was disbanded on November 30 of that same year.

Sissiosasto/5.D is another Finnish Commando unit of the World War Two era. The Detachment was founded on August 20, 1941, under the Lynx Division (5th Division, Finnish VI Corps). It was a self-contained unit for reconnaissance patrolling, sabotage and guerrilla warfare operations behind enemy lines.

Germany

[edit]
Skorzeny with soldiers of the 500th SS Parachute Battalion (1945)

In December 1939, following the success of German infiltration and sabotage operations in the Polish campaign, the German Office for Foreign and Counter-Intelligence (OKW Amt Ausland/Abwehr) formed the Brandenburger Regiment (known officially as the 800th Special Purpose Training and Construction Company).[21] The Brandenburgers conducted a mixture of covert and conventional operations but became increasingly involved in ordinary infantry actions and were eventually converted into a Panzer-Grenadier Division, suffering heavy losses in Russia. Otto Skorzeny (most famed for his rescue of Benito Mussolini) conducted many special operations for Adolf Hitler. Skorzeny commanded Sonderlehrgang z.b.V. Oranienburg, Sonderverband z.b.V. Friedenthal, and SS-Jäger-Bataillon 502, 500th SS Parachute Battalion, SS-Jagdverband Mitte and all other SS commando units.

The German Fallschirmjäger were famous for their elite skills and their use in rapid commando style raids and as elite "fire brigade" infantrymen.[22][full citation needed] Fort Eben-Emael on the Belgian border was captured in 1940 by Fallschirmjäger troops as part of the German invasion and occupation of Belgium.[23][24]

A report written by Major-General Robert Laycock in 1947 claimed that there was a German raid on a radar station on the Isle of Wight in 1941.[25][26]

Greece

[edit]

The Sacred band (Greek: Ιερός Λόχος) was a Greek special forces unit formed in 1942 in the Middle East, composed entirely of Greek officers and officer cadets under the command of Col. Christodoulos Tsigantes. It fought alongside the SAS in the Libyan Desert and with the SBS in the Aegean, as well as with General Leclerc's Free French Forces in Tunisia. It was disbanded in August 1945.

Italy

[edit]

Italy's most renowned commando unit of World War II was Decima Flottiglia MAS ("10th Assault Vehicle Flotilla"), which, from mid-1940, sank or damaged a considerable tonnage of Allied ships in the Mediterranean.

After Italy surrendered in 1943, some of the Decima Flottiglia MAS were on the Allied side of the battle line and fought with the Allies, renaming themselves the Mariassalto. The others fought on the German side and kept their original name but did not operate at sea after 1943, being mostly employed against Italian partisans; some of its men were involved in atrocities against civilians.

In post-war years the Italian marine commandos were re-organised as the "Comsubin" (an abbreviation of Comando Subacqueo Incursori, or Underwater Raiders Command). They wear the green Commando beret.

Japan

[edit]

In 1944–45, Japanese Teishin Shudan ("Raiding Group") and Giretsu ("heroic") detachments made airborne assaults on Allied airfields in the Philippines, Marianas and Okinawa. The attacking forces varied in size from a few paratroopers to several companies. Due to the balance of forces concerned, these raids achieved little in the way of damage or casualties, and resulted in the destruction of the Japanese units concerned. Considering that there were no plans to extract these forces, and the reluctance to surrender by Japanese personnel during that era, they are often seen in the same light as kamikaze pilots of 1944–45.

Nakano School trained intelligence and commando officers and organized commando teams for sabotage and guerrilla warfare.

The navy had commando units "S-toku" (Submarine special attack units, see Kure 101st JSNLF(in Japanese) ) for infiltrating enemy areas by submarine. It was called the Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces of Kure 101st, Sasebo 101st and 102nd.

New Zealand

[edit]

New Zealand formed the Southern Independent Commando in Fiji 1942.[citation needed]

Poland

[edit]

Cichociemni (Polish pronunciation: [t͡ɕixɔˈt͡ɕɛmɲi]; the "Silent Unseen") were elite special-operations paratroopers of the Polish Army in exile, created in Great Britain during World War II to operate in occupied Poland (Cichociemni Spadochroniarze Armii Krajowej).[27]

Soviet Union

[edit]

Voyennaya Razvyedka (Razvedchiki Scouts) are "Military intelligence" personnel/units within larger formations in ground troops, airborne troops and marines. Intelligence battalion in the division, reconnaissance company in the brigade, a reconnaissance platoon in the regiment.[28][page needed]

Soviet Naval Frogmen The legendary Soviet Naval Scout Viktor Leonov commanded an elite unit of naval Commandos. The 4th Special Volunteer Detachment was a unit of 70 veterans.[28] Initially they were confined to performing small scale reconnaissance missions, platoon sized insertions by sea and on occasion on land into Finland and later Norway.[28] Later they were renamed the 181st Special Reconnaissance Detachment.[28] They began conducting sabotage missions and raids to snatch prisoners for interrogation.[28] They would also destroy German ammunition and supply depots, communication centers, and harass enemy troop concentrations along the Finnish and Russian coasts.[29][page needed] After the European conflict ended, Leonov and his men were sent to the Pacific theatre to conduct operations against the Japanese.

United Kingdom

[edit]
Men wading ashore from a landing craft
British Commandos wearing the green beret and carrying the Bergen rucksack during the Normandy landings, June 1944.

In 1940, the British Army formed "independent companies", later reformed as battalion sized "commandos", thereby reviving the word. The British intended that their commandos be small, highly mobile surprise raiding and military reconnaissance forces. They intended them to carry all they needed and not remain in field operations for more than 36 hours. Army Commandos were all volunteers selected from existing soldiers still in Britain.

During the war the British Army Commandos spawned several other famous British units such as the Special Air Service, the Special Boat Service and the Parachute Regiment. The British Army Commandos themselves were never regimented and were disbanded at the end of the war.

The Special Operations Executive (SOE) also formed commando units from British and displaced European personnel (e.g., Cichociemni) to conduct raiding operations in occupied Europe. They also worked in small teams, such as the SAS, which was composed of ten or fewer commandos because that was better for special operations. One example is Norwegian Independent Company 1, which destroyed heavy water facilities in Norway in 1941.

The Royal Navy also controlled Royal Navy Beach Parties, based on teams formed to control the evacuation of Dunkirk in 1940.[30] These were later known simply as RN Commandos, and they did not see action until they successfully fought for control of the landing beaches (as in the disastrous Dieppe Raid of 19 August 1942). The RN Commandos, including Commando "W" from the Royal Canadian Navy, saw action on D-Day.[31]

The Commando Memorial unveiled in 1952 in Scotland is dedicated to the British Commandos of the Second World War.

In 1942, the Royal Navy's nine Royal Marines infantry battalions were reorganized as Commandos, numbered from 40 to 48, joining the British Army Commandos in combined Commando Brigades. After the war the Army Commandos were disbanded. The Royal Marines form an enduring Brigade-strength capability as 3 Commando Brigade with supporting Army units.[32]

The Royal Air Force also formed 15 commando units in 1942, each of which was 150 strong. These units consisted of trained technicians, armourers and maintainers who had volunteered to undertake the commando course. These Royal Air Force Commandos accompanied the Allied invasion forces in all theatres; their main role was to allow the forward operation of friendly fighters by servicing and arming them from captured air fields. However, due to the forward position of these airfields, the RAF Commandos were also trained to secure and make safe these airfields and to help defend them from enemy counterattack.[33]

United States

[edit]

During 1941, the United States Marine Corps formed commando battalions. The USMC commandos were known collectively as Marine Raiders. On orders from President Franklin D. Roosevelt through a proposal from OSS Director Colonel William J. Donovan and the former Commander of the United States Marine Detachment Major Evans F Carlson, directed the formation of what became the Marine Raiders. Initially this unit was to be called Marine Commandos and were to be the counterpart to the British Commandos. The name Marine Commandos met with much controversy within the Marine Corps leading Commandant Thomas J. Holcomb to state, "the term 'Marine' is sufficient to indicate a man ready for duty at any time, and the injection of a special name, such as commando, would be undesirable and superfluous." President Roosevelt's son James Roosevelt served with the Marine Raiders. The Raiders initially saw action at the Battle of Tulagi and the Battle of Makin, as well as the Battle of Guadalcanal, the Battle of Empress Augusta Bay, and other parts of the Pacific Ocean Areas. In February 1944 the four Raider battalions were converted to regular Marine units. Additionally, as parachuting special forces units, Paramarines arguably also qualified as commandos[34]- though they too were assimilated into regular Marine units in 1944.

In mid-1942, the United States Army formed its Army Rangers in Northern Ireland under William O. (Bill) Darby. The Rangers were designed along similar lines to the British Commandos. The first sizable Ranger action took place in August 1942 at the Dieppe Raid, where 50 Rangers from the 1st Ranger Battalion were dispersed among Canadian regulars and British Commandos. The first full Ranger action took place in November 1942 during the invasion of Algiers in Northwest Africa in Operation Torch, again by members of the 1st Ranger Battalion.[35][page needed]

After 1945

[edit]

Israeli

[edit]

The primary commando units of the Israel Defense Forces include Shayetet 13, Sayeret Matkal, and the Shaldag Unit, as well as the Oz Brigade (which contains the subordinate commando units Duvdevan Unit, Egoz Reconnaissance Unit, and Maglan).

Shayetet 13 is the elite naval commando unit of the Israeli Navy. S'13 specializes in sea-to-land incursions, counter-terrorism, sabotage, maritime intelligence gathering, maritime hostage rescue, and boarding. The unit is one of the world's most well reputed special forces units.[36]

Sayeret Matkal (General Staff Reconnaissance Unit) is a special forces unit of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) directly subordinate to the Directorate of Military Intelligence. Primarily a field intelligence-gathering unit specializing in special reconnaissance behind enemy lines, Sayeret Matkal is also tasked with counter-terrorism, hostage rescue, and foreign espionage. Modeled after the British Army's Special Air Service—from which it emulated the motto, "Who Dares, Wins"—the unit is considered to be the Israeli equivalent to the Delta Force of the United States.[37] As one of Israel's most important commando units, the Sayeret Matkal has reputedly been involved in almost every major counter-terrorism operation since its inception in 1957.[38]

The Egoz Reconnaissance Unit is a special forces commando unit in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Egoz specializes in guerrilla and anti-guerrilla warfare, intelligence gathering behind enemy lines, and more complicated ground activity. Egoz is part of the Commando Brigade but still completes basic training with the Golani Brigade.[39]

Maglan (also known as Unit 212) is an Israeli special forces unit which specializes in operating behind enemy lines and deep in enemy territory using advanced technologies and weaponry.

Unit 217, frequently called Duvdevan, is an elite special operations force within the Israel Defense Forces, part of the Oz Brigade. Duvdevan are noted for undercover operations in urban areas, during which they often wear Arab civilian clothes as a disguise.[40]

Shaldag Unit, also known as Unit 5101, is an elite Israeli Air Force commando unit. Shaldag's mission is to deploy undetected into combat and hostile environments to conduct special reconnaissance, establish assault zones or airfields, while simultaneously conducting air traffic control and commando actions.

Philippines

[edit]

The Special Action Force (SAF) is the elite commando unit of the Philippine National Police. SAF candidates are required to undergo the SAF Commando Course to be allowed to wear the SAF Beret. It also serves as the foundation course or requisite for other SAF specialization trainings such as Explosives and Ordnance Disposal (EOD), Basic Airborne Course (BAC), Urban Counter Revolutionary Warfare Course (SURESHOCK), SCUBA-BUSROC (Basic Under-Water Search and Rescue Operations Course), SAF Seaborne Warfare Course (SSWC) and others.

Turkey

[edit]
Turkish paratrooper commandos in Cyprus War

In 1963, the 1st Commando Brigade of Turkish Land Forces was officially established in Kayseri, marking the formal beginning of Turkey’s modern commando forces. Initially structured to handle high-altitude and unconventional warfare, these units quickly gained prominence within the Turkish Armed Forces. By the 1970s, the commandos had already demonstrated their operational value, most notably during the 1974 Cyprus War, where they executed airborne and amphibious landings under combat conditions.[41]

Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, as the insurgency led by the PKK escalated, Turkish Army Commandos were heavily deployed in southeastern Turkey and northern Iraq. This period saw the expansion of commando units, including the formation of mountain and special operations brigades specifically trained for counter-terrorism, high-mobility engagements, and night operations in rugged terrain.[41]

In the 2000s and 2010s, Turkish commandos participated in several cross-border military campaigns, including Operation Sun (2008), and later, Operation Euphrates Shield (2016), Operation Olive Branch (2018), and Operation Peace Spring (2019) in Syria. These missions aimed to secure Turkey’s borders, eliminate terrorist threats, and establish safe zones. The role of the commandos in these operations often involved spearheading assaults, securing urban areas, and conducting joint missions with armored and air support units.[41]

UK

[edit]

3 Commando Brigade, Royal Marines is under the command of the Royal Navy's Commander-in-Chief Fleet. All Royal Marines (other than those in the Royal Marines Band Service) are commando trained on entry to the Corps, with supporting units and individuals from the other armed services undertaking the All Arms Commando Course as required.

The Brigade is made up of 30 (IX) Commando, 40 Commando (home base: Taunton), 42 Commando (Bickleigh, South Hams, Plymouth), 43 Commando Fleet Protection Group (HMNB Clyde, Argyll and Bute), 45 Commando (Arbroath, Scotland), the Commando Logistic Regiment, the Royal Marines Armoured Support Group (Bovington Camp (Royal Armoured Corps Centre), Dorset), 539 Assault Squadron RM, 29 Commando Regiment Royal Artillery and 24 Commando Regiment Royal Engineers.

The Royal Marines is the largest force of its type in Europe and the second largest in NATO.

US

[edit]

The United States continues to have no designated "commando" units; however, the closest equivalents remain the U.S. Army's 75th Ranger Regiment and United States Marine Corps Reconnaissance Battalions, which specialize in most of the same tasks and missions.[42]

During the Vietnam War the U.S. Army's 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne) instituted, "Special Operations Augmentation Recondo School," an acronym for Reconnaissance Commando. The school was at Nha Trang Air Base, north of the massive U.S. Navy and Air Force Base at Cam Ranh Bay. Recondo School trained small, heavily armed long-range reconnaissance teams the art of patrolling deep in enemy-held territory. All students were combat veterans and came from the ranks of the U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corps Force Recon Battalions, and the Army of the Republic of South Korea. The Army of the Republic of Vietnam had their own school. The modern U.S. Army's dismounted reconnaissance troops and former long-range surveillance (LRS) teams, as well as United States Marine Air-Ground Task Force Reconnaissance, derive some portion of their legacies from the Recondo program and utilize the name "Recondos" informally.[43][44][45][46][47]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

A is a combatant in an elite or force trained for executing surprise raids, , and missions, often operating in small, highly mobile teams behind enemy lines. The term derives from the kommando, referring to Boer irregular mounted units in 19th-century , where burghers were legally commandeered into citizen militias for rapid-response defense and against colonial forces. These Boer commandos emphasized mobility, marksmanship, and decentralized tactics, traveling light on horseback and employing long-range to outmaneuver larger British armies during conflicts like the Anglo-Boer Wars (1880–1881 and 1899–1902).
The commando concept was adapted by the during , when Prime Minister directed the formation of specialized raiding units in , shortly after the , to inspire aggressive action and harass Axis forces. These British Commandos underwent rigorous in amphibious assaults, unarmed , and survival, conducting high-risk operations such as the (1942), which destroyed a key , and assaults during the D-Day landings (1944), where they scaled cliffs at and secured beachheads despite heavy casualties. Their success in influenced postwar special forces worldwide, including units like the U.S. Rangers and modern commando formations in nations, though early raids like (1942) highlighted the perils of such operations, resulting in over 60% casualties for some units due to inadequate intelligence and support. Today, "commando" denotes versatile elite troops prioritizing speed, initiative, and precision strikes, distinct from conventional .

Terminology and Concept

Definition and Characteristics

A is a soldier belonging to an elite or unit trained primarily for conducting raids, , and operations in small, highly mobile teams, often behind enemy lines or in hostile territory. This role emphasizes , surprise assaults, and rapid disengagement, distinguishing commandos from conventional focused on sustained positional warfare. The term originated with Boer volunteer militias in during the late 19th century, where commandos functioned as irregular guerrilla forces capable of mounting swift, decentralized attacks against superior British conventional armies. Key characteristics include rigorous volunteer selection, advanced physical and tactical training exceeding standard military standards, and versatility in amphibious, airborne, or overland insertions. Commando units typically operate in troops or sections of 10 to 30 personnel, prioritizing individual initiative, marksmanship, and endurance over heavy armament, with equipment tailored for stealth and speed such as lightweight weapons, demolitions, and survival gear. They excel in missions like targeting enemy —such as docks, factories, or command posts—while minimizing exposure to prolonged engagements, a refined by British forces in to counter static defenses. Unlike broader emphasizing long-term or , commandos historically focus on overt, high-intensity raids with immediate strategic impact, as evidenced by their employment in operations requiring precision demolition and intelligence gathering under extreme risk. This specialization demands exceptional discipline and adaptability, with units maintaining high operational tempo through decentralized command structures that empower junior leaders.

Distinction from Conventional Forces

Commando units distinguish themselves from conventional forces through their focus on small-scale, high-precision operations that prioritize strategic impact over territorial control or massed firepower. Unlike conventional , which operates in larger formations to conduct sustained engagements, seize and hold objectives, and integrate tactics such as support and armored maneuvers, commandos emphasize raids, ambushes, , and conducted by teams of 4 to 40 personnel in denied or hostile environments far from logistical bases. This operational paradigm requires operator-level initiative in planning, execution, and adaptation, often under clandestine conditions with minimal external support, contrasting with the hierarchical command structures and resupply chains typical of conventional units. Training and personnel selection further underscore these differences, as commandos undergo regimens that develop multifaceted skills in unconventional warfare, cultural immersion, and survival in austere settings, enabling missions like direct action or unconventional warfare that exceed the doctrinal scope of regular forces. Conventional forces, by contrast, prioritize collective discipline, weapons proficiency, and integration within mechanized or line infantry roles suited to symmetric conflicts, with less emphasis on individual autonomy or specialized insertions such as HALO jumps or maritime approaches. Equipment for commandos is lightweight and versatile—favoring personal weapons, demolitions, and surveillance gear over heavy crew-served systems—to facilitate rapid deployment and exfiltration, reflecting an economy-of-force principle where limited numbers achieve disproportionate effects against high-value targets. These distinctions arise from doctrinal necessities in asymmetric or , where commandos exploit enemy vulnerabilities through surprise and mobility rather than attrition, often integrating with or enabling conventional operations without assuming their roles. Historical examples, such as British Commandos during , demonstrate this by executing hit-and-run assaults like the 1942 , which disrupted naval assets using 612 men against fortified defenses, a feat impractical for conventional battalions reliant on overwhelming force. In modern contexts, this separation preserves commando units for politically sensitive or high-risk tasks, avoiding dilution in routine duties or frontline attrition that characterize conventional deployments.

Etymology and Historical Origins

Boer War Commandos

The system emerged in the among Dutch-descended settlers in the as a decentralized to counter threats from indigenous tribes, compensating for the absence of a . It drew from earlier expeditionary traditions, organizing armed parties for rapid mobilization against local adversaries. By the late , this structure had evolved into the primary defense mechanism of the independent Boer republics—the (Transvaal) and the —relying on citizen-soldiers who provided their own horses and rifles. In the Second Boer War, which began on October 11, 1899, commandos formed the core of Boer forces, with burghers aged 16 to 60 legally obligated to serve upon call-up. Organized by geographic districts, each commando varied in size from under 100 men in rural areas to over 2,800 in urban centers like ; subunits known as wards or corps typically comprised 20 to 60 fighters led by elected veldcornets (field cornets). Commandants, chosen democratically by commando members, oversaw district-level operations, while higher generals coordinated across republics. Initial mobilization yielded approximately 45,000 disposable burghers from a potential force of around 61,000, supplemented by crews, police, and foreign volunteers. Boer commandos emphasized mobility and marksmanship, employing tactics suited to their agrarian : small detachments of 5 to 20 horsemen conducted skirmishes, outflanking maneuvers, and long-range from concealed positions using smokeless-powder rifles. They avoided close-quarters combat, favoring hit-and-run raids, ambushes on supply lines, and defensive use of terrain in early conventional engagements such as the battles of Colenso (December 15, 1899), Magersfontein (December 11, 1899), and Stormberg (December 10, 1899), which inflicted significant British casualties during "." As the war shifted to guerrilla warfare after British advances in 1900, commandos fragmented into smaller, elusive bands, disrupting communications and logistics until attrition from scorched-earth policies and blockhouses eroded their effectiveness by 1902. Armed with modern artillery like Creusot 155mm "Long Toms" and Krupp field guns, they demonstrated proficiency in sieges at Ladysmith, Kimberley, and Mafeking early in the conflict.

British Adoption and Early Use

The British military first encountered the term "commando" during the Second Boer War (1899–1902), where it described the ' citizen militias—mobile, mounted irregular forces organized by district for rapid mobilization, emphasizing marksmanship, horsemanship, and guerrilla tactics that inflicted significant attrition on British conventional armies despite numerical inferiority. These units, typically numbering 1,000–3,000 men per commando under elected field cornets and commandants, operated with high autonomy, living off the land and avoiding pitched battles in favor of hit-and-run ambushes, which frustrated British supply lines and sieges like Ladysmith (October 1899–February 1900). The effectiveness stemmed from the ' intimate terrain knowledge and cultural adaptation to warfare, prompting British adaptations such as columns and systems by 1901, though the war ended with Boer surrender on May 31, 1902, after 22,000 British deaths. Post-war analyses highlighted the commandos' decentralized structure and raiding prowess as lessons for , influencing British doctrinal shifts toward mobile forces, though immediate unit adoption was absent amid reforms focusing on and territorial . The term persisted in British to denote Boer-style raiders, embedding the of , versatile troops capable of offensive . Formal British adoption occurred on June 5, 1940, when Prime Minister , responding to the evacuation's strategic reversal, issued a directive via Chief of the Imperial General Staff Gen. Sir for "independent companies" of 250–300 volunteers each to conduct hit-and-run raids on occupied Europe, aiming to harass German forces and boost morale. Lt. Col. Dudley W. Clarke, tasked with implementation and born in to British parents familiar with Boer tactics, proposed naming these units "Commandos" to evoke the Boer predecessors' guerrilla mobility and shock value, rejecting alternatives like "Raiders" for their historical resonance. By July 1940, the first four Army Commandos (Nos. 1–4) were raised from 2,000 volunteers at deals like Lochailort, Scotland, undergoing intensive training in amphibious assault, silent killing, and endurance marches, with early raids such as Operation Ambassador (, July 4–5, 1940) testing small-scale infiltration despite limited success due to intelligence failures. These initial formations, consolidated into the by November 1940 under Brig. , marked the shift from ad hoc Independent Companies to a dedicated raiding capability, with 10 Commandos operational by year's end, totaling over 3,000 men selected for physical rigor and initiative. Early employment emphasized coastal sabotage, as in the Islands raid (March 4, 1941), where No. 3 and No. 4 Commandos destroyed fish oil factories and captured 225 with minimal losses, validating the Boer-inspired model of surprise and withdrawal. The adoption prioritized empirical adaptation over rigid convention, reflecting causal lessons from Boer asymmetry where conventional superiority yielded to agile disruption.

Selection and Training

Volunteer Selection Processes

Volunteers for commando units, particularly the British formations established during , were drawn exclusively from serving personnel in existing regiments rather than conscripts, ensuring a self-selected cadre motivated for and raiding missions. This approach prioritized individuals with inherent resilience for hazardous duties, as commandos operated behind enemy lines with minimal support, demanding exceptional initiative and endurance. The process began with a War Office circular in soliciting volunteers for undisclosed "special service," allowing commanding generals to nominate suitable officers and men without revealing operational details to maintain . Prospective volunteers underwent a personal with an officer to assess suitability, with an option for private withdrawal if doubts arose post-briefing. Key criteria included youth and peak , , , independence, proficiency, resistance to seasickness, and prior completion of standard training; officers were limited to those under 40 years old possessing tactical acumen, , and boldness. These attributes were deemed essential for tasks involving amphibious assaults, , and evasion, where failure often meant capture or death. Following initial acceptance, candidates entered a three-month basic course at Depot, where approximately 50% were retained based on demonstrated and physical performance, with the remainder returned to their original units (RTU) for inadequacy or disciplinary issues. This probationary phase served as a de facto extended screening, filtering for those capable of mastering advanced skills like close-quarters combat and survival under duress. Subsequent unit-specific training at Scottish centers such as further weeded out unfit personnel via progressive tests, reinforcing the volunteer ethos by emphasizing voluntary perseverance amid high attrition. This model influenced allied counterparts, such as U.S. Army Rangers formed in , who similarly required volunteers meeting stringent physical and psychological standards, including timed marches and combat proficiency evaluations, to emulate British commando raiding tactics. Across formations, the process underscored causal links between rigorous pre-training vetting and operational success, as unmotivated or ill-suited individuals posed risks in small, elite teams reliant on cohesion and adaptability.

Rigorous Training Regimens and Green Berets

The originated as the official headgear for British Commandos during , with becoming the first unit to wear it in battle during operations in . It symbolizes the completion of demanding training that instills the "Commando Spirit"—characterized by courage, determination, unselfishness, and cheerfulness in adversity—and grants wearers qualification for elite raiding and roles. This tradition influenced other forces, including the U.S. Army , which unofficially adopted the green beret in 1953 under Major Herbert Brucker, a of the Office of Strategic Services, before formal authorization by President Kennedy in 1961. In the British Armed Forces, rigorous commando training for non-Royal Marines personnel occurs via the All Arms Commando Course (AACC) at the Commando Training Centre Royal Marines in Lympstone, Devon, lasting 7 weeks and held four times annually. Prerequisites include medical deployability, passing a basic swimming test (40-meter swim and 3-minute water tread), annual combat fitness assessments, and proficiency in weapons handling and navigation. The syllabus covers infantry fundamentals like patrolling and small-unit tactics, alongside specialized commando elements such as amphibious assaults, cliff climbing, helicopter insertions, and survival skills, with a 4-week preparation phase focusing on battle physical training and field exercises. Central to qualification are the four Commando Tests, testing speed, strength, stamina, and load-bearing under fatigue:
  • Endurance Course: 6 miles navigated in 73 minutes while carrying 9.6 kg of equipment and a personal weapon, incorporating obstacles and terrain challenges.
  • Tarzan Assault Course: Completed in 13 minutes with 9.6 kg load and weapon, emphasizing agility over aerial obstacles like walls and ropes.
  • 9-Mile Speed March: Covered in 90 minutes bearing 18 kg of equipment, prioritizing rapid movement across varied ground.
  • 12-Mile Loaded March: Finished in under 4 hours with a 31 kg load, simulating prolonged operational endurance often conducted at night on .
The course culminates in a multi-day final exercise integrating tactics, , and amphibious operations. Successful graduates receive the and , authorizing assignment to units like the or Army Commando regiments. For recruits, the regimen extends to a 32-week initial training program incorporating these tests after basic phases. The U.S. Army Qualification Course (Q Course), spanning 53 weeks after a 24-day assessment and 6-week , similarly demands extreme physical and mental resilience to earn the and . Phases include small-unit tactics, language immersion, survival training, and a culminating exercise (), focusing on skills like , , and . Attrition is high, with candidates required to maintain airborne qualification and security clearances throughout. This pipeline produces operators capable of operating in austere environments, reflecting the commando ethos of versatility and initiative adapted to modern asymmetric threats.

World War I Developments

Austro-Hungarian Stormtroopers

The Austro-Hungarian Sturmtruppen, or assault troops, represented an elite evolution of during , emerging as specialized units for infiltration and shock assaults on entrenched positions. Formed in , these units drew directly from German Sturmtruppen experiences on the Western Front, where Austro-Hungarian officers and NCOs underwent courses starting in September-October , followed by larger cohorts of 120 officers and 300 NCOs in Beuville from November to January 1917. Initial formations arose organically as regimental Jagdkommandos ("hunting commandos") for raiding and reconnaissance, reflecting adaptations to static on the Italian front. Organizationally, Sturmtruppen were standardized into divisional assault battalions by June 1917, allocating one per division, each comprising four companies aligned with regimental numbers (e.g., k.u.k. Assault Nr. 14), a machine-gun , mortar sections, detachments, and squads for obstacle breaching. Training emphasized close-quarters combat, grenade throwing, wire-cutting, and rapid movement across , conducted at dedicated grounds to instill offensive aggression amid the empire's multi-ethnic army challenges. By June 1918, every frontline integrated at least two assault patrols for decentralized operations. Equipment prioritized mobility and firepower, including light machine guns, hand grenades, wire cutters, 37 mm guns, mortars, and s; post-1917, captured Italian submachine guns and other weapons supplemented shortages. Tactics focused on small-group infiltration to bypass strongpoints, penetrate enemy trenches, and disrupt rear areas, avoiding massed frontal assaults that had proven costly in earlier Isonzo battles. Sturmtruppen led with squads advancing under cover, employing grenades and close combat to clear positions, then supporting follow-on waves or executing counterattacks. This approach contrasted with rigid pre-1916 linear attacks, prioritizing speed and surprise to exploit breakthroughs in the mountainous Italian theater. Notable deployments included the in May-June 1917, where mixed results highlighted organizational teething issues, and the Twelfth Battle (Caporetto offensive) in October 1917, where assault units, reinforced by German elements, achieved rapid penetration of Italian lines, capturing vast and contributing to the rout of over 300,000 Italian troops. However, the June 1918 Piave offensive exposed limitations against deepened defenses, with units suffering disarray from machine-gun fire and . Disbanded in , these formations prefigured modern operations through their emphasis on specialized raiding, selection, and tactical innovation amid conventional .

Italian Arditi Units

The Italian Arditi emerged as specialized assault troops within the Royal Italian Army during World War I, designed to penetrate and disrupt enemy trench lines through rapid, aggressive infiltration tactics akin to those of German Sturmtruppen. Formed in June 1917 amid the crisis following the Caporetto defeat on October 24, 1917, the units were initiated in the Second Army by key officers including Luigi Capello, Francesco Grazioli, and Giuseppe Bassi, building on earlier experimental formations such as Captain Cristoforo Baseggio's 1915 company of "explorers" in the Alpini corps. At the time of Caporetto, approximately 20 Arditi reparti were either operational or in training, reflecting an urgent response to the need for forces capable of countering mobile enemy breakthroughs. Selection prioritized volunteers from infantry and bersaglieri regiments, supplemented by designated personnel, with incentives including higher pay and improved rations to ensure commitment to high-risk missions. Training, centralized at facilities like Sdricca di Manzano from mid-1917 and later standardized via Reparti d'assalto di marcia in May 1918, emphasized physical endurance, knife fighting, mass grenade assaults, and small-unit coordination for breaching wire and capturing positions ahead of main infantry advances. Equipment focused on mobility and lethality in confined spaces: the distinctive pugnale combat dagger, bombe a mano (hand grenades), Carcano rifles, light machine guns like the Villar-Perosa, and occasionally flamethrowers or body armor prototypes, eschewing heavy artillery reliance in favor of shock effect. The Arditi first saw combat in the Eleventh Battle of the Isonzo on August 18–19, 1917, where their tactics proved effective in localized penetrations despite the battle's overall stalemate. They contributed decisively to the Italian stabilization during the Austro-German offensives of June 1918 along the Piave River and the broader counteroffensive, with reparti infiltrating enemy lines to sow chaos and secure bridgeheads. In the final Battle of Vittorio Veneto from October 24 to November 4, 1918, Arditi units—organized into the 1st and 2nd Divisione d'Assalto comprising around 30 reparti by war's end—spearheaded assaults that shattered Austro-Hungarian cohesion, capturing key positions and facilitating the advance that led to over 350,000 enemy prisoners and the empire's dissolution. Operating as a distinct combat arm outside standard divisions, their high casualties underscored the trade-off for breakthroughs in static warfare, yet their success validated small, elite groups trained for raiding and disruption as a model for future commando-style operations. The units were disbanded after the Armistice on November 11, 1918.

Other Precursor Formations

The Russian Empire formed shock battalions, known as udarniki or Battalions of Death, starting in May 1917 under the Provisional Government to counter collapsing morale and desertions in the Imperial Army. These all-volunteer units, including the 1st Women's Battalion of Death led by Maria Bochkareva, numbered around 15 formations by summer 1917 and spearheaded assaults during the Kerensky Offensive in July 1917, employing rapid infiltration and close-quarters combat to penetrate German lines. Selected for physical fitness and ideological commitment, they operated under black banners with skull motifs, emphasizing no-retreat discipline, which influenced subsequent elite assault doctrines despite their limited strategic impact amid the Bolshevik Revolution. The Ottoman Empire's Teşkilât-ı Mahsusa (Special Organization), established in 1913 under , functioned as a intelligence and guerrilla force during , conducting , , and irregular raids across fronts like Sinai-Palestine and from 1914 onward. Comprising tribal irregulars, officers, and agents totaling several thousand by 1915, it targeted enemy supply lines and incited revolts, such as operations in and against Arab tribes, using adapted from experience. Though marred by involvement in atrocities and internal rivalries, its decentralized raiding model prefigured by prioritizing mobility, local alliances, and disruption over conventional engagements. British forces on the Western Front relied on ad hoc parties from , evolving into structured operations by 1916–1918, where small teams of 10–50 men from conducted nighttime incursions to capture prisoners, disrupt positions, and gather intelligence. Supported by and gas, these raids—such as those by the 20th Division—inflicted psychological pressure and tested tactics like wire-cutting and assaults, laying groundwork for formalized raiding without dedicated elite formations until .

World War II Operations

British and Commonwealth Commandos

The British Commandos originated from Prime Minister Winston Churchill's memorandum of 6 June 1940, issued in the aftermath of the Dunkirk evacuation, calling for the creation of "a corps of hardened troops, 5,000 strong," to mount aggressive raids against Axis-occupied Europe and inspire resistance. Volunteers were solicited from existing British Army units, with the first independent companies forming by July 1940 under Combined Operations Headquarters, led initially by Admiral Sir Roger Keyes. Training emphasized physical endurance, close-quarters combat, and amphibious assault tactics, conducted at sites like Invervar in Scotland before centralization at Achnacarry Castle in 1942, where recruits underwent a grueling four-week course including cliff assaults, speed marches, and live-fire exercises. The distinctive green beret was adopted in 1941 as a mark of completion, symbolizing elite status. Initially comprising Army Commandos numbered 1 through 12, plus specialized units like in the (formed September 1940 under Lieutenant-Colonel , which saw action in and before heavy losses), the force expanded to include Royal Marine Commandos starting in February 1942, with units such as 40 RM Commando participating in early raids. contributions integrated personnel from , , and ; for instance, incorporated Australian volunteers, while featured Canadian officers like Captain Graeme Black in operations such as the Glomfjord raid. These multinational elements enhanced the Commandos' operational flexibility, though command structures remained under or Royal Marine oversight. Key early operations demonstrated the Commandos' raiding doctrine. Operation Chariot at St. Nazaire on 28 March 1942 involved 612 men, primarily from , who successfully demolished the Normandie dry dock using HMS Campbeltown as a vessel, denying its use to German battleships like Tirpitz; the raid resulted in 169 British fatalities and 215 captured, but achieved its strategic objective. Operation Jubilee at Dieppe on 19 August 1942 saw and elements of 40 RM Commando land on the flanks, destroying coastal batteries before withdrawal, though the main assault failed disastrously; suffered near-total casualties, with only 23 of 100 returning unwounded. Smaller raids like (Lofoten Islands, 27 March 1941) and (Vaagso, 27 December 1941) disrupted fish oil production and garrison forces, yielding intelligence and boosting morale. In major amphibious campaigns, Commandos played pivotal roles in securing beachheads and objectives. During the Sicily invasion (Operation , July 1943), Nos. 3 and 40 RM Commandos captured coastal defenses; in , they fought at and . On D-Day, 4 June 1944, 177 French and British Commandos from No. 4 scaled cliffs at to neutralize gun emplacements, while 1st Special Service Brigade (including 6 RM and Nos. 3, 45, 46 RM Commandos) assaulted and Juno beaches, clearing strongpoints amid heavy fire. Later actions included the Walcheren assault (Operation , November 1944) by 4th Special Service Brigade, breaching German-held estuary defenses. By war's end, Commandos had inflicted disproportionate casualties—over 3,000 Axis killed or captured in raids alone—while sustaining high losses, with many units reformed multiple times due to attrition exceeding 50% in some engagements.

United States Rangers and Marine Raiders

The United States Army Rangers were established in June 1942 under Major William O. Darby, drawing inspiration from British Commando training methods to create elite light infantry units capable of raiding and reconnaissance behind enemy lines. The 1st Ranger Battalion, initially comprising volunteers from the 34th Infantry Division, underwent rigorous selection and training at Achnacarry, Scotland, emphasizing physical endurance, small-unit tactics, and amphibious operations. By August 1942, elements of the battalion participated in the Dieppe Raid on August 19, marking the first U.S. ground combat in Europe, where 50 Rangers supported Canadian and British forces in assaults on coastal defenses, suffering casualties but gaining valuable experience in combined operations. Subsequent Ranger battalions (1st through 6th, plus a provisional unit) expanded to approximately 4,000 men total, focusing on shock assaults and disruption. In during on November 8, 1942, spearheaded landings at Arzew, , capturing key docks and Vichy French batteries with minimal losses through surprise night assaults. They later raided Sened Station in on February 11, 1943, destroying an Italian garrison and , demonstrating that inflicted disproportionate casualties. In the Sicilian campaign of July 1943, Rangers scaled cliffs at to secure beachheads against German counterattacks, while in , the 3rd and 4th Battalions fought at and in 1944, though the latter suffered near annihilation on January 30, 1944, against fortified German positions. The 2nd and 5th Battalions participated in the Normandy invasion on June 6, 1944, destroying gun emplacements at , echoing Commando-style vertical assaults. Parallel to the Rangers, the U.S. Marine Corps formed Raider battalions in February 1942 as specialized units for offensive operations in the Pacific, with the 1st Raider Battalion under Lieutenant Colonel and the 2nd under Colonel Evans F. Carlson, totaling around 1,000-2,000 personnel across four battalions by mid-1943. These volunteers emphasized guerrilla tactics, including Carlson's adoption of Chinese Communist-inspired "" methods of political education and decentralized leadership. The 2nd Raiders conducted the Makin Island Raid on August 17-18, 1942, landing via to assault a Japanese garrison, killing approximately 83-90 defenders while sustaining 30 casualties, though nine Marines were captured and later executed by the Japanese. Raiders saw extensive action at , where Edson's 1st Battalion defended "Bloody Ridge" on September 12-14, 1942, repelling waves of attacks with fixed bayonets and machine guns, earning the Presidential Unit Citation for halting a potential breakthrough. Carlson's 2nd Raiders executed a 29-day from November 6 to December 4, 1942, traversing 150 miles inland to Japanese forces, killing over 400 enemies through hit-and-fade tactics while avoiding decisive engagements. Later operations included in 1943, where Raiders cleared Japanese outposts, and Bougainville, but evolving Japanese defenses—fortified bunkers and —shifted their role toward conventional infantry assaults. All Raider units were disbanded by February 1, 1944, and personnel redistributed to regular Marine regiments, as the Corps prioritized massed amphibious landings over specialized raids amid large-scale island-hopping campaigns.

Other Allied Units

No. 10 (Inter-Allied) Commando, raised within the in 1943, incorporated volunteers from multiple Allied nations under occupation, including France, Belgium, the , , , and , totaling around 500 personnel organized into specialized troops. These multinational subunits, such as the French Nos. 1 and 8 Troops, Dutch No. 2 Troop, Norwegian No. 5 Troop, Polish No. 6 Troop, and Belgian elements within No. 7 Troop, completed the standard six-week commando training regimen at Achnacarry Castle before deployment. The unit conducted raiding, reconnaissance, and intelligence operations across theaters, including attachments to larger formations in , , and , with detachments also serving in for guerrilla support against Japanese forces. French contributions extended beyond No. 10 Commando to the 1er Bataillon de Fusiliers-Marins Commandos (Kieffer Commando), formed in 1942 from Free French naval fusiliers under , who trained alongside British commandos in . On June 6, 1944, 177 members of this unit landed at during the Normandy invasion as part of , advancing inland to capture enemy positions near casino despite sustaining 20 killed and 70 wounded out of the contingent. Their role marked the only French ground combat force on D-Day, emphasizing close-quarters tactics adapted from British models. Polish personnel formed No. 6 Troop within No. 10 Commando, comprising exiled soldiers who participated in operations like the assault in November 1944, where they provided linguistic and sabotage expertise against German defenses. Smaller detachments from other Allies, such as Norwegian troops focused on coastal raiding and Dutch elements aiding in reconnaissance, operated in hit-and-run missions to disrupt Axis supply lines, though their numbers remained limited compared to British or American counterparts. These units demonstrated the adaptability of commando doctrine to multinational integration, leveraging local knowledge for targeted strikes while relying on British command structures for and oversight.

Axis Special Forces Equivalents

The German , established in 1939 under the , functioned as the primary Axis equivalent to Allied commandos through infiltration, , and seizure of key objectives behind enemy lines, often employing personnel fluent in local languages and dressed in enemy uniforms. These units conducted operations from the onward, such as securing bridges and disrupting communications in the in 1940, and later in in 1943 by glider assaults on supply lines. By 1943, expanded into a division, the Brandenburgers increasingly served in conventional roles due to high casualties and operational demands, diminishing their specialized focus. SS commando operations, particularly under , provided another parallel, emphasizing bold raids and deception. On September 12, 1943, Skorzeny's SS-Jäger Battalion 502 executed the , using gliders to land on a mountaintop hotel and rescue without firing a shot, involving approximately 100 paratroopers and SS troops. In December 1944, during the , Skorzeny commanded with the 150th SS Panzer Brigade, deploying about 2,000 English-speaking troops in U.S. uniforms to capture bridges, spread misinformation, and assassinate Allied leaders, though limited success resulted in arrests and executions of many infiltrators. Italy's , formed in 1939 as a naval assault unit, specialized in underwater sabotage and raiding Allied harbors using human torpedoes and , sinking or damaging warships totaling 78,000 tons and 20 merchant vessels between 1941 and 1943. Notable actions included attacks on and , where divers affixed mines to British battleships, demonstrating tactical innovation in maritime commando warfare despite Italy's overall naval constraints. Japan's (SNLF), elite naval infantry units raised from 1932, conducted amphibious assaults and raids across the Pacific, with specialized training in landings and some paratroop elements in units like the 1st and 3rd SNLF. These forces spearheaded invasions such as those on Malaya, the , and in 1941-1942, emphasizing rapid seizure of beachheads and defensive fortifications, though they operated more as expeditionary troops than independent raiders, suffering heavy attrition in prolonged island campaigns.

Key Raids and Tactical Innovations

British Commandos executed Operation Chariot at St. Nazaire on March 28, 1942, deploying 611 personnel in a flotilla led by HMS Campbeltown, which was packed with delayed-action explosives and rammed into the gates to prevent repairs to German battleships like Tirpitz. The raid succeeded in rendering the dock unusable for the war's duration, though at high cost with 169 killed and most survivors captured. In the on August 19, 1942, under destroyed the Hess coastal battery east of the town, while elements of with attached U.S. Rangers targeted the Goebbels battery, achieving their objectives amid the broader operation's 60% casualties. On the Axis side, SS Hauptsturmführer orchestrated Operation Eiche on September 12, 1943, using gliders to land 102 paratroopers and SS commandos on the Gran Sasso plateau, freeing from captivity without firing a shot and extracting him by Fieseler Storch aircraft. U.S. Army Rangers from the 2nd Battalion, led by Lt. Col. James E. Rudder, assaulted on June 6, 1944, scaling 100-foot cliffs with ropes and grapnels to neutralize six 155mm guns threatening landings; though the guns had been relocated inland, the Rangers destroyed casemates and held the position against counterattacks for two days, suffering 70% casualties. Commando tactics innovated stealthy small-boat insertions, as in where paddled folbot kayaks up the in December 1942 to attach mines to cargo ships, sinking or disabling multiple vessels despite only four survivors from ten men. Raids emphasized rapid sabotage and intelligence gathering, such as the Bruneval operation on February 27, 1942, where paratroopers and Commandos captured a component for analysis, informing Allied countermeasures. These operations pioneered independent small-unit actions with surprise, speed, and overwhelming initial force, influencing post-war doctrines by validating hit-and-run disruptions over sustained engagements.

Post-1945 Evolution

Cold War Era Conflicts

In the Malayan Emergency from 1948 to 1960, British forces reformed the Special Air Service (SAS) as the Malayan Scouts SAS Regiment in 1950, employing small, mobile teams for long-range reconnaissance and ambushes against Malayan National Liberation Army insurgents in dense jungle terrain. These units, numbering around 100-200 personnel at peak, conducted "hearts and minds" operations alongside targeted strikes, contributing to the isolation and eventual defeat of communist guerrillas through intelligence-driven patrols that disrupted supply lines and captured key leaders. During the (1950-1953), the activated eight Ranger Infantry Companies, totaling approximately 700 airborne-trained personnel, to perform raids, , and flank security for conventional divisions amid North Korean infiltration tactics. Attached to units like the 2nd Infantry Division, these companies executed over 100 missions, including the defense of Hill 205 in November 1950, where Rangers repelled Chinese assaults despite being outnumbered, though high casualties—up to 50% in some engagements—led to their disbandment by 1951 as a "luxury" asset in sustained positional warfare. In the (1955-1975), U.S. units such as the –Studies and Observations Group (MACV-SOG), comprising about 2,000 personnel including Green Berets and SEALs, ran cross-border reconnaissance and sabotage raids into and , inserting small teams via helicopter to interdict North Vietnamese supply routes along the . These operations, which inflicted disproportionate casualties—claiming over 100,000 enemy killed at a cost of 500 U.S. losses—demonstrated commando-style disruption but faced challenges from superior enemy numbers and terrain, with teams often relying on indigenous Montagnard recruits for survival. Soviet forces, specialized units estimated at 15,000-20,000 operatives by the 1980s, prepared for sabotage in rear areas through airborne insertions and demolition training, while in the Afghan War (1979-1989), they conducted interdiction raids that destroyed 990 mujahedin supply caravans and eliminated 17,000 insurgents, though ambushes by Stinger-armed fighters exposed vulnerabilities in open operations. The 1982 Falklands War highlighted British commando tactics when SAS and (SBS) teams, totaling around 200 operators, executed reconnaissance patrols and the Pebble Island raid on , destroying 11 Argentine aircraft with minimal losses, enabling naval superiority; however, operations like the failed Pebble Island follow-up underscored risks of weather-dependent insertions in austere environments.

Post-Cold War Interventions

In the of 1991, British (SAS) regiments deployed multiple patrols deep into to disrupt Iraqi command-and-control infrastructure and hunt mobile launchers threatening coalition forces. One notable operation, , involved an eight-man SAS patrol inserted on January 22, 1991, near the Iraqi-Saudi border to observe and sabotage Scud activities; the team was compromised after three days, leading to three deaths, four captures, and one evasion success amid harsh desert conditions and enemy pursuit. U.S. special operations forces, including operators and 5th Special Forces Group teams under , conducted similar deep reconnaissance, laser designation for airstrikes, and Scud-hunting missions alongside SAS elements, contributing to the neutralization of over 40 launchers and enabling rapid coalition ground advances. During in from August to October 1993, U.S. deployed Task Force Ranger, comprising assault teams and elements, to capture lieutenants of warlord amid escalating clan violence and famine relief efforts. The pivotal raid on October 3 targeted two key figures in but escalated into the Battle of Mogadishu when two MH-60 Black Hawk helicopters were shot down, resulting in 18 U.S. fatalities, 73 wounded, and an estimated 300-500 Somali militia casualties after 15-19 hours of urban combat involving close-quarters fighting and casualty extractions. This operation highlighted vulnerabilities in light infantry tactics against irregular forces without armored support, prompting U.S. withdrawal from direct intervention by March 1994. In the Balkans conflicts of the , U.S. Army teams from the 10th and 18th Groups conducted and intelligence-gathering missions in following NATO's deployment in December 1995, training local forces, monitoring ceasefires under the Dayton Accords, and liaising with ethnic factions to stabilize post-war divisions. Similar roles extended to in 1999, where units supported NATO's Operation Allied Force air campaign through target identification and post-conflict stabilization, though direct raids were limited compared to earlier theaters. British and other NATO provided analogous support in extraction operations and during the Bosnian Serb of enclaves like in 1995. Australian Special Air Service Regiment (SASR) troops spearheaded the (INTERFET) intervention on September 20, 1999, securing Dili's airport and conducting reconnaissance patrols amid pro-Indonesian militia violence following East Timor's . A six-man SASR patrol engaged militia forces in the Battle of Aidabasalala on October 16, 1999, near the border, killing two insurgents and wounding none of their own in a brief firefight that demonstrated the unit's effectiveness in shaping conditions for follow-on conventional forces. These operations underscored the evolving role of commando units in rapid-response , transitioning from offensive raids to force enablers in multinational coalitions.

Global War on Terror Engagements

British Royal Marine Commandos played a pivotal role in the early phases of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, with 40 Commando deploying in November 2001 to secure Bagram airfield near Kabul following its capture from Taliban forces. This unit, numbering around 200 personnel, conducted patrols and supported U.S.-led coalition efforts against al-Qaeda and Taliban remnants shortly after the 9/11 attacks. Their operations emphasized rapid response and airfield security, contributing to the establishment of a forward operating base critical for subsequent troop insertions and logistics. Under from 2002 to 2014, rotated through , engaging in intense ground combat against insurgents, particularly in districts like where they established patrol bases and conducted deliberate fighting patrols. In 2009, elements participated in Operation Panther's Claw, a large-scale clearance operation to secure areas ahead of Afghanistan's , involving joint efforts with Afghan National Army units to disrupt insurgent supply lines and strongholds. These engagements resulted in significant casualties for the , with operations accounting for a disproportionate share of British fatalities due to the province's status as a heartland. U.S. Army Rangers from the conducted airborne assaults and direct action raids throughout both and theaters of the Global War on Terror. In , they executed high-risk missions such as the initial seizure of key objectives during the 2001 invasion and subsequent raids targeting high-value and leaders. The Regiment amassed over 7,000 days of continuous combat deployment, rotating battalions for 90-day tours that supported task forces in mounted infiltrations and airfield captures. In Operation Iraqi Freedom, Rangers spearheaded airfield seizures, including the rapid capture of Objective Rhino at H-1 airfield in western on March 29, 2003, enabling air operations deep into enemy territory. Their role evolved to include precision strikes against insurgent networks, often in support of task forces, demonstrating adaptability from conventional assaults to tactics amid prolonged urban and rural fighting. This sustained operational tempo underscored the Rangers' function as a scalable force multiplier for rapid intervention and leadership in high-threat environments.

Modern Developments and Operations

Technological and Doctrinal Advances

Advances in doctrine since the early 2000s have emphasized decentralized execution through principles, enabling small commando teams to adapt rapidly in fluid environments like and scenarios. This shift, formalized in U.S. doctrine updates around 2012, prioritizes presence for while delegating tactical decisions to subordinates, contrasting earlier centralized approaches and drawing from lessons in and where rigid hierarchies hindered responsiveness. Such doctrines integrate with conventional units for hybrid operations, including and , as seen in models that enhance partner-nation capacity building. Technological integration has amplified these doctrinal changes, with U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) prioritizing for real-time intelligence analysis and predictive targeting by 2025, including software tools that process battlefield data faster than human operators alone. Autonomous drone swarms and low-cost unmanned systems, often AI-enabled, enable units to conduct persistent and kinetic strikes with minimal exposure, as outlined in SOCOM's 2025 broad agency announcements for countering peer adversaries' technological edges. Wearable systems and tactical further support doctrinal autonomy by overlaying digital intelligence onto operators' fields of view, reducing during raids and improving in denied areas. Satellite and cyber tools have extended commando reach into contested domains, allowing integration of space-based with ground teams for operations in or orbital-adjacent environments, tested in exercises post-2020. However, doctrinal adaptations acknowledge risks, such as adversaries' faster tech adoption in hypersonics and electronic warfare, prompting SOF to evolve toward pre-conflict shaping via partner alliances and information operations rather than sole reliance on . These advances, while enhancing lethality, demand rigorous training to mitigate overdependence on tech, as evidenced by post-GWOT analyses stressing human judgment in AI-assisted decisions.

Recent Operations and International Exercises

In 2025, British Commandos reinforced NATO's northern flank through deployments to the , emphasizing cold-weather operations and deterrence against Russian aggression in the High North. This included preparations for winter training in , where commandos from 3 Commando Brigade conducted exercises to maintain high readiness for rapid response missions. These deployments built on ongoing commitments under NATO's enhanced Forward Presence, integrating commando units with allied forces for joint maritime and land operations. A key operation involved the formation of the UK's Maritime Task Group, drawn from units, to support NATO's global special operations taskforce deployable on land and sea. In July 2025, conducted fast-rope insertion training at Scraesdon Fort, , to prepare for NATO's Very High Readiness (VJTF) raiding missions. International exercises highlighted commando . During Exercise Joint Viking 2025 in March, from executed night raids on Island, , launching from the amphibious ship as part of a 10,000-strong from nine nations, focusing on surveillance, reconnaissance, and neutralization of simulated enemy positions. In October 2025, Exercise Arctic Tide extended these efforts, with commandos conducting raids amid the largest drills in the Joint Expeditionary Force's history, testing advanced force operations in extreme conditions. The biennial further demonstrated commando capabilities in the . In 2023, over 150 personnel, including , participated alongside Australian and forces in amphibious assaults and high-end warfare simulations across , enhancing trust and seamless integration among allies. The 2025 iteration involved and Gurkhas in Australia's largest-ever military drill, emphasizing littoral strike and multi-domain operations with more than 30,000 troops from multiple nations.

Recruitment and Structural Challenges

Modern commando units, such as the British Royal Marines and equivalents in other NATO forces, face acute recruitment difficulties amid broader military enlistment shortfalls. In the UK, the Royal Marines experienced a manpower deficit of approximately 600 personnel as of early 2024, contributing to a shrinking force structure and operational strain. This crisis stems from diminished interest among Generation Z recruits, competition from higher civilian wages, and a cultural shift away from military service in peacetime economies with low unemployment rates below 4%. Similar patterns affect U.S. special operations recruiting, where overall Army shortfalls of 25% in fiscal year 2022 reduced the pool for elite assessment and selection, lagging special operations force growth. Selection processes impose exceptionally high attrition rates, filtering candidates through prolonged physical and psychological trials that deter applicants and amplify shortages. For the UK's (SAS), a commando-derived unit, pass rates hover below 10%, with failure rates reaching 90% due to demands like extended marches over 40 miles with heavy loads in adverse terrain. Commando training, lasting 32-45 weeks, sees overall completion rates of 40-50%, with initial potential courses failing 50-60% and subsequent phases emphasizing endurance tests like the 30-mile "yomp" carrying 50-pound loads. These rigorous standards ensure operational resilience but exacerbate recruitment pipelines, as only volunteers from serving personnel or direct entrants meet prerequisites like age under 33 and superior fitness benchmarks. Structurally, units contend with limited inherent to their , volunteer-only composition, which restricts rapid expansion during surges in demand. U.S. , for instance, grapple with over-structured formations where insufficient personnel fill authorized slots, driven more by institutional inertia than strategic needs, leading to underutilized capabilities. High operational tempos from persistent deployments foster retention issues, with burnout and rates elevated among small, high-skill cohorts; retention-focused reforms, such as improved post-service benefits, are proposed to mitigate the need for constant influxes. In contexts, forces' decentralized, adaptable structures—often brigade-sized or smaller—excel in asymmetric missions but strain integration with conventional units, complicating and command chains in large-scale conflicts. These challenges underscore a causal tension: selectivity yields superior tactical outcomes but vulnerabilities in manpower amid voluntary service models and societal shifts prioritizing individual over .

Controversies, Criticisms, and Effectiveness

Ethical Misconduct and War Crimes Allegations

The Australian (SASR) faced significant scrutiny following the 2020 , an official inquiry by the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force into allegations of misconduct during deployments in from 2005 to 2016. The report documented credible evidence of 39 unlawful killings, primarily by SASR troops, involving the execution of unarmed prisoners, civilians, and non-combatants, often followed by the planting of "throwdown" weapons to fabricate combat scenarios. These acts were linked to a pervasive "warrior culture" within the unit that prioritized blooding junior soldiers through kills and tolerated breaches of the s of armed conflict, with potential for officers who failed to prevent or report them. Outcomes included the referral of 23 cases for , the charging of at least one former SASR with as a war crime in 2023, and the of distinguished service medals from implicated personnel in September 2024 by Defence Minister . The inquiry emphasized systemic failures in and , though it noted no broader institutional endorsement of such conduct within the Australian Defence Force. Allegations against the British Special Air Service (SAS) in (2010–2013) and Iraq mirror similar patterns of detainee executions and killings of unarmed individuals during night raids. Former SAS and (SBS) personnel provided eyewitness accounts to investigations in 2025, describing routine murders of handcuffed prisoners, children, and sleeping civilians, attributed to a culture of impunity and psychopathic traits among some operators. The UK's Operation Northmoor (2014–2019) and the ongoing Independent Inquiry Relating to probed these claims, with the conceding in 2024 that reporting on systemic unlawful killings was "broadly accurate." No prosecutions had resulted by late 2025, amid criticisms of inadequate oversight, falsified reports, and that enabled excessive force. These cases illustrate how the operational autonomy, high lethality, and prolonged of units can erode ethical boundaries, prompting internal reviews that attribute misconduct to unit-specific cultures rather than doctrinal flaws. Earlier historical examples, such as isolated WWII incidents, lack comparable scale or documentation of systemic issues among Allied forces.

Strategic Overreliance and Operational Failures

The strategic overreliance on commando and forces (SOF) in post-Cold War conflicts, particularly during the Global War on Terror (GWOT), has drawn criticism for substituting tactical proficiency for comprehensive national strategy, often resulting in pyrrhic victories or prolonged insurgencies without enduring stability. In , U.S. SOF conducted over 1,800 operations in 2010 alone, focusing on raids that temporarily disrupted networks but failed to address underlying and economic deficits, allowing insurgents to regenerate in ungoverned spaces. This approach, exemplified by (JSOC) missions, prioritized kinetic effects over population-centric , contributing to a strategic where tactical successes—such as the killing of mid-level commanders—did not translate to political control, as evidenced by the Taliban's resurgence post-2009 surge. Analysts argue that this overdependence eroded conventional force readiness for hybrid threats and fostered a doctrinal bias toward SOF as a "force multiplier" without sufficient integration, leading to gaps that hampered joint operations. Operational failures stemming from such reliance often highlight planning oversights, logistical vulnerabilities, and the limits of elite units in asymmetric environments. The 1980 , aimed at rescuing U.S. hostages in , collapsed due to malfunctions in desert conditions and inadequate , resulting in eight American deaths and no rescue, underscoring early SOF challenges in executing complex, high-altitude insertions without robust conventional support. Similarly, in the 2001 campaign, and other SOF elements pursued but relied on unreliable Afghan militias for blocking positions, enabling his escape into amid insufficient U.S. troop commitments, a shortfall attributed to optimistic assessments of local ally reliability over proven sealing tactics. In , SOF-led hunter-killer teams neutralized thousands of insurgents by 2007, yet adaptive enemy tactics—such as decentralized cells and IED proliferation—exposed the unsustainability of raid-centric operations, with SOF attrition rates exceeding 20% annually by the mid-2000s due to relentless deployment cycles. These patterns reveal causal limitations: commandos excel in disruption but cannot hold territory or build legitimacy, leading to "mowing the grass" cycles where operational tempo masks strategic voids. High sustainment costs—SOF comprising 2-3% of U.S. forces yet consuming disproportionate budgets—further strained resources, diverting funds from intelligence and civil affairs needed for holistic victory. Critics from military think tanks contend that without recalibrating to support broader campaigns, such overreliance risks repeating GWOT-era outcomes, where empirical gains in enemy casualties (e.g., 50,000+ insurgents killed by SOF in Afghanistan) yielded negligible causal impact on conflict termination. This has prompted doctrinal shifts, such as U.S. Special Operations Command's emphasis on great-power competition since 2018, acknowledging SOF's niche role over universal applicability.

Empirical Achievements and Causal Impact

Commando units have demonstrated high tactical success rates in raid operations, with empirical analyses of post-World War II engagements showing an overall accomplishment rate of 77% across 100 documented raids from 1946 to 1983. Elite commando and forces achieved an 88% success rate in 49 missions, compared to 66% for irregular forces in 51 operations, attributing superior outcomes to specialized , equipment, and intelligence support. These disparities highlight the causal role of rigorous selection and preparation in enabling precise, high-risk interventions that disrupt enemy logistics and command structures without committing large conventional forces. In specific cases, such as Rhodesian operations, 16 of 19 raids succeeded (84% rate), including the 1976 Nyadzonya camp assault that eliminated over 1,000 insurgents, significantly degrading guerrilla capabilities and buying time for defensive consolidations. Similarly, raids, like the 1981 operation targeting bases, achieved 100% success in three engagements, neutralizing key personnel and infrastructure to curb cross-border threats. These outcomes illustrate causal impacts through : small teams inflicted disproportionate casualties and forced adversaries to divert resources to internal security, reducing offensive momentum. World War II British Commando raids, while lacking aggregated quantitative studies comparable to later data, yielded verifiable strategic effects, such as the March 28, 1942, St. Nazaire operation (Operation Chariot), where destroyers and commandos demolished the Normandie dry dock—the only Atlantic facility capable of servicing Germany's battleship Tirpitz—rendering it inoperable for the war's duration and confining the vessel to Norwegian waters, thereby mitigating threats to Allied convoys. High casualties (169 British killed, 215 captured) underscored risks, but the dock's irreplaceable loss imposed long-term causal constraints on Kriegsmarine operations. Coastal reconnaissance and sabotage further compelled German occupation forces to allocate thousands of troops to static defenses along occupied Europe, diluting frontline strength ahead of major invasions like Normandy. In the Global War on Terror, special operations raids maintained elevated effectiveness, with U.S. and allied commandos conducting thousands of direct-action missions yielding capture or elimination of high-value targets, though comprehensive causal attribution to broader war termination remains contested due to insurgent adaptability. Methodological frameworks for assessing such impacts emphasize lines-of-effort metrics—tracking objective fulfillment via operational —revealing consistent tactical efficacy but variable strategic leverage absent integrated conventional follow-through. Overall, positions commandos as enablers of asymmetric advantages, where hinges on permissive environments, tactics (100% efficacy in 15 analyzed cases), and avoidance of overextension into denied areas.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.