Hubbry Logo
Environmental humanitiesEnvironmental humanitiesMain
Open search
Environmental humanities
Community hub
Environmental humanities
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Environmental humanities
Environmental humanities
Environmental humanities
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Earth seen from Apollo 17
Environment
Environment in

The environmental humanities (also ecological humanities) is an interdisciplinary area of research, drawing on the many environmental sub-disciplines that have emerged in the humanities over the past several decades, in particular environmental literature, environmental philosophy, environmental history, science and technology studies, environmental anthropology,[1] and environmental communication.[2]

Environmental humanities employs humanistic questions about meaning, culture, values, ethics, and responsibilities to address pressing environmental problems. The environmental humanities aim to help bridge traditional divides between the sciences and the humanities, as well as between Western, Eastern, and Indigenous ways of relating to the natural world and the place of humans within it. The field also resists the traditional divide between "nature" and "culture," showing how many "environmental" issues have always been entangled in human questions of justice, labor, and politics. Environmental humanities is also a way of synthesizing methods from different fields to create new ways of thinking through environmental problems.[3]

Emergence of environmental humanities

[edit]

Although the concepts and ideas underpinning environmental humanities date back centuries, the field consolidated under the name "environmental humanities" in the 2000s following steady developments of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s in humanities and social science fields such as literature, history, philosophy, gender studies, and anthropology. A group of Australian researchers used the name "ecological humanities" to describe their work in the 1990s; the field consolidated under the name "environmental humanities" around 2010.[4] The journal Environmental Humanities[5] was founded in 2012 and Resilience: A Journal of the Environmental Humanities[6] in 2014, indicating the development of the field and the consolidation around this terminology.

There are dozens of environmental humanities centers, programs, and institutions around the world. Some of the more prominent ones are the fully funded[7] Environmental Humanities Graduate Program at the University of Utah, the oldest environmental humanities graduate program in America,[8] the Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society (RCC) at LMU Munich, the Center for Culture, History, and Environment (CHE) at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, The Center for Energy and Environmental Research in the Human Sciences at Rice University, the Penn Program in Environmental Humanities at the University of Pennsylvania (2014-2024), the KTH Environmental Humanities Laboratory at KTH Royal Institute of Technology, The Greenhouse at the University of Stavanger, and the international Humanities for the Environment[9] observatories.

Dozens of universities offer PhDs, Masters of Arts degrees, graduate certificates, and Bachelor of Arts degrees in environmental humanities.[10] Courses in environmental humanities are taught on every continent.[8]

The environmental humanities did not just emerge from Western academic thinkers: indigenous, postcolonial, and feminist thinkers have provided major contributions. These contributions include challenging the human-centered viewpoints that separate "nature" and "culture" and the white, male, European- and North American-centric viewpoints of what constitutes "nature"; revising the literary genre of "nature writing"; and creating new concepts and fields that bridge the academic and the political, such as "environmental justice," "environmental racism," "the environmentalism of the poor," "naturecultures," and "the posthuman."[4]

Connectivity ontology

[edit]

The environmental humanities are characterised by a connectivity ontology and a commitment to two fundamental axioms relating to the need to submit to ecological laws and to see humanity as part of a larger living system.

One of the fundamental ontological presuppositions of environmental humanities is that the organic world and its inorganic parts are seen as a single system whereby each part is linked to each other part. This world view in turn shares an intimate connection with Lotka's physiological philosophy and the associated concept of the "World Engine".[1] When we see everything as connected, then the traditional questions of the humanities concerning economic and political justice become enlarged, into a consideration of how justice is connected with our transformation of our environment and ecosystems.

The consequence of such connectivity ontology is, as proponents of the environmental humanities argue, that we begin to seek out a more inclusive concept of justice that includes non-humans within the domain of those to whom rights are owing. This broadened conception of justice involves "enlarged" or "ecological thinking", which presupposes the enhancement of knowledge sharing within fields of plural and diverse ‘knowledges’. This kind of knowledge sharing is called transdisciplinarity. It has links with the political philosophy of Hannah Arendt and the works of Italo Calvino. As Calvino put it, "enlarge[s] the sphere of what we can imagine". It also has connections with Leibniz's Enlightenment project where the sciences are simultaneously abridged while also being enlarged.[2]

The situation is complicated, however, by the recognition of the fact that connections are both non-linear and linear. The environmental humanities, therefore, require both linear and non-linear modes of language through which reasoning about justice can be done. Thus there is a motivation to find linguistic modes which can adequately express both linear and non-linear connectivities.

Axioms

[edit]

According to some thinkers, there are three axioms of environmental humanities:

  1. The axiom of submission to ecosystem laws;
  2. The axiom of ecological kinship, which situates humanity as a participant in a larger living system; and
  3. The axiom of the social construction of ecosystems and ecological unity, which states that ecosystems and nature may be merely convenient conceptual entities (Marshall, 2002).

Putting the first and second axioms another way, the connections between and among living things are the basis for how ecosystems are understood to work, and thus constitute laws of existence and guidelines for behaviour (Rose 2004).

The first of these axioms has a tradition in social sciences (see Marx, 1968: 3). From the second axiom the notions of "ecological embodiment/ embeddedness" and "habitat" have emerged from Political Theory with a fundamental connectivity to rights, democracy, and ecologism (Eckersley 1996: 222, 225; Eckersley 1998).

The third axiom comes from the strong 'self-reflective' tradition of all 'humanities' scholarship and it encourages the environmental humanities to investigate its own theoretical basis (and without which, the environmental humanities is just 'ecology').

Contemporary ideas

[edit]

Political economic ecology

[edit]
See also: Political ecology

Some theorists have suggested that the inclusion of non-humans in the consideration of justice links ecocentric philosophy with political economics. This is because the theorising of justice is a central activity of political economic philosophy. If in accordance with the axioms of environmental humanities, theories of justice are enlarged to include ecological values, then the necessary result is the synthesis of the concerns of ecology with that of political economy: i.e. political economic ecology.

Energy systems language

[edit]

The question of what language can best depict the linear and non-linear causal connections of ecological systems appears to have been taken up by the school of ecology known as systems ecology. To depict the linear and non-linear internal relatedness of ecosystems where the laws of thermodynamics hold significant consequences (Hannon et al. 1991: 80), Systems Ecologist H.T. Odum (1994) predicated the Energy Systems Language on the principles of ecological energetics. In ecological energetics, just as in environmental humanities, the causal bond between connections is considered an ontic category (see Patten et al. 1976: 460). Moreover, as a result of simulating ecological systems with the energy systems language, H.T. Odum made the controversial suggestion that embodied energy could be understood as value, which in itself is a step into the field of Political Economic Ecology noted above.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Environmental humanities

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Environmental humanities is an interdisciplinary field that applies methods from the —such as literary analysis, historical inquiry, philosophical reflection, and artistic interpretation—to examine the entangled relationships between human and the material environment. It emerged as a distinct area of study in the early , building on foundational work in from the 1990s, to address environmental challenges through perspectives on meaning, values, , and cultural representations rather than solely quantitative data. Key concepts in environmental humanities include the of anthropocentric worldviews, the exploration of nonhuman agency in ecological systems, and the analysis of how narratives and discourses influence and public perception. Scholars in the field investigate topics such as the historical construction of in literature, ethical responsibilities toward , and the cultural implications of , often emphasizing connectivity across human and nonhuman realms. This approach seeks to humanize ecological crises by revealing how cultural practices and power structures contribute to , while advocating for transformative responses grounded in interpretive understanding. While praised for broadening environmental discourse beyond scientific metrics to include societal values and historical contingencies, the field operates within academic institutions where interpretive methods sometimes prioritize narrative frameworks over empirical causation, potentially reflecting broader ideological tendencies in humanities scholarship toward . Notable achievements include interdisciplinary collaborations that inform policy through ethical and historical insights, as seen in peer-reviewed journals and dedicated programs, though critics note risks of conflating with objective analysis in addressing global issues like .

Definition and Scope

Core Principles and Objectives

The environmental humanities field emphasizes the integration of humanistic disciplines—such as , , , and —with environmental inquiry to explore human perceptions, values, and narratives shaping ecological relations. Core principles include "thinking through" environmental issues via critical examination of cultural representations, "unsettling" dominant anthropocentric or nature-culture binaries, and "bridge-building" across disciplinary narratives to foster holistic understanding. These principles aim to move beyond ecocriticism's textual focus toward "ecoaction," addressing ecological crises through simultaneous critique and practical engagement, including decolonizing educational approaches and alternative stewardship models. A key objective is to complement natural and social sciences by illuminating human motivations and cultural differences that drive , particularly in the era marked by human dominance over planetary systems. This involves organizing interdisciplinary research to challenge static concepts of "" and influence public discourse, policy, and efforts, as seen in initiatives like the Humanities for the Environment observatories established in 2013 to promote regional collaborations across , , , , and . By focusing on ethical, historical, and representational dimensions, the field seeks to enhance and hope in addressing complex social-ecological challenges, countering the limitations of purely quantitative models. These principles and objectives distinguish environmental humanities from environmental sciences by prioritizing interpretive tools over empirical measurement alone, though this humanistic emphasis has been critiqued for potentially prioritizing narrative over verifiable causal mechanisms in policy contexts. The field's aspirational nature supports its evolution, with goals including stewardship of amid environmental shifts and fostering pro-environmental behaviors through insights into diverse knowledge systems.

Interdisciplinary Boundaries and Distinctions

Environmental humanities delineates its scope by prioritizing interpretive and qualitative analyses of human-environment interactions, focusing on cultural narratives, ethical dimensions, and value systems rather than the predictive modeling and empirical measurement central to environmental sciences. While environmental sciences emphasize quantifiable data on ecological processes—such as rates or climate modeling—environmental humanities critiques these through lenses of representation and , often revealing how scientific discourses shape public perceptions without assuming their neutrality. This boundary maintains methodological integrity, as humanities scholars typically lack the contributory expertise for direct scientific experimentation, leading to collaborative models that position as complementary interpreters of social and ethical implications. In relation to literary-focused subfields like , environmental humanities extends beyond textual singularity and aesthetic interpretation to encompass broader interdisciplinary synthesis, integrating , , and . , emerging in the 1990s, primarily examines environmental themes in literature—such as nature writing's portrayal of rural landscapes—prioritizing over historical or scientific integration. Environmental humanities, by contrast, treats literary works as one node in a network of cultural expressions, fostering "environing" analyses that trace material-symbolic transformations across media, while advocating for transdisciplinary to address gaps like ecocriticism's occasional U.S.-centric focus. Environmental history overlaps with environmental humanities in chronicling human impacts on landscapes, such as the Tambora eruption's 1815 climatic effects on Romantic literature, but diverges by treating cultural artifacts as evidentiary documents amenable to corroboration, rather than sites of irreducible interpretive depth. Environmental humanities distinguishes itself by emphasizing ethical responsibilities and non-human agency through new materialist frameworks, which challenge anthropocentric boundaries without relying on archival alone, thus enabling critiques of historical narratives' embedded power dynamics. This integration supports areas like , where both fields converge on inequality in risk distribution—evident in studies of toxic siting disparities—but environmental humanities prioritizes narrative-driven public engagement over history's chronological rigor. These boundaries facilitate targeted collaborations, such as four-stage models involving disciplinary panels and inter-humanities reports, which articulate humanities contributions to issues like low-carbon transitions without subsuming qualitative insights under scientific paradigms. Yet, persistent distinctions underscore environmental humanities' role in questioning causal assumptions in allied fields, ensuring cultural and ethical pluralism informs environmental discourse amid interdisciplinary aspirations.

Historical Development

, particularly , emerged as an early precursor in the 1970s, addressing moral relations between humans and nonhuman nature through frameworks like Arne Naess's , articulated in his 1973 essay distinguishing "shallow" resource-management ecology from "deep" recognition of intrinsic ecological value. This approach challenged anthropocentric views, influencing later humanistic inquiries into human-nature interdependence by prioritizing biospherical over utilitarian conservation. Environmental history developed as a distinct subdiscipline in the , building on concerns amid rising , with scholars examining human impacts on landscapes through archival and narrative methods, as seen in works tracing long-term ecological changes like or species loss. Pioneering texts, such as those by Alfred Crosby on ecological in 1986, integrated historical analysis with biogeographical evidence to reveal causal patterns in human-driven environmental transformations, providing empirical foundations for later humanities-based critiques of progress narratives. Ecocriticism arose in literary studies during the early 1990s, focusing on representations of nature in texts, with the Association for the Study of Literature and Environment (ASLE) founded in 1992 to formalize this approach. Influenced by figures like Aldo Leopold's 1949 , ecocritics analyzed how literature shapes environmental perceptions, employing to uncover cultural attitudes toward or , thus bridging and in ways that prefigured interdisciplinary environmental humanities. These fields collectively supplied conceptual tools—ontological shifts from , causal historical reconstructions, and interpretive literary methods—that environmental humanities later synthesized to address anthropogenic crises beyond scientific metrics alone.

Emergence and Institutionalization (2000s–2010s)

The environmental humanities emerged in the early 2000s as an interdisciplinary field integrating humanities perspectives with environmental concerns, primarily originating from ecocriticism in literature departments and environmental history. This development responded to growing recognition of the limitations of scientific and policy approaches in addressing cultural, ethical, and narrative dimensions of environmental issues. Early scholarship emphasized humanistic inquiry into human-nature relations, with foundational texts and conferences laying groundwork for formalized structures. A pivotal institutional milestone occurred in 2005 with the establishment of the world's first dedicated master's program in environmental humanities at the , which trained students in interdisciplinary analysis of environmental challenges through humanities lenses such as , , and . This program, housed in the College of , drew faculty from multiple departments and focused on research-intensive, community-engaged work addressing topics like . The 2010s saw accelerated institutionalization, marked by the 2012 launch of the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Humanities at the (later published by ), which provided a dedicated platform for interdisciplinary scholarship on environmental narratives, ethics, and cultural representations. Additional programs emerged at institutions including , the , and , often as graduate initiatives or research centers emphasizing integration of arts, humanities, and social sciences. International networks further solidified the field, with initiatives like the 2013 founding of State University's Humanities for the Environment, which fostered global collaborations among over 20 observatories to bridge humanities with environmental action. By the mid-2010s, environmental humanities had gained traction in and , with centers promoting dialogue on anthropogenic impacts and through and historical analysis, though growth remained uneven due to reliance on humanities funding amid competing scientific priorities.

Recent Expansions and Shifts (2020s)

In the early , environmental humanities experienced a pronounced shift toward policy-engaged and actionable scholarship, driven by the escalating urgency of climate and socio-ecological crises. Scholars advocated for humanities contributions to evidence-based , exemplified by the BRIDGES Coalition for , launched in 2021 with initial workshops in 2019–2021 across and , which mapped humanities-led initiatives in over 30 countries by 2023 and co-organized sessions at COP27 in and the UN of the Future in 2024. This coalition grew to include 45 member organizations and established global hubs, demonstrating humanities' capacity for direct policy influence through interdisciplinary collaborations. Similarly, the Oceans Past Initiative utilized historical ecological data to inform marine restoration, with 2024 research on oyster reefs supporting coastal protection strategies in and by reconstructing pre-industrial habitats. These efforts marked a departure from purely interpretive work, emphasizing empirical humanities inputs to counter technocratic policy dominance. Concurrently, the field expanded post-disciplinarily, integrating beyond traditional representation in and to encompass material , narrative justice for entities, and transdisciplinary interfaces with sciences and . New journals like Ecocene, launched in 2020, and initiatives such as the ToxicBios project on reflected this evolution, addressing unequal burdens of toxicity and pollution in . The decade also saw reflections on the pandemic's implications for environmental narratives, prompting inquiries into how crises reshape humanities writing and research priorities. Decolonial perspectives gained traction, challenging anthropocentric and Eurocentric frameworks by prioritizing diverse inherited histories and Global South epistemologies. In 2023, calls emphasized decolonizing environmental humanities to seriously engage epistemic differences, as seen in Asia-specific approaches like Environmental Humanities South, originating from Himalayan borderlands to reframe human-nature relations beyond Western paradigms. By 2025, indigenous and decolonial lenses informed environmental learning, highlighting paradoxes in ecological responses while unsettling settler-colonial ecologies. These shifts underscore a broader reorientation toward transformative, justice-oriented interventions amid 21st-century .

Theoretical Foundations

Ontological Frameworks

Environmental humanities scholars interrogate ontological frameworks to challenge dominant Western assumptions of human exceptionalism and as inert matter, positing instead that emerges from dynamic entanglements between humans, nonhumans, and environments. These frameworks draw from , , and to reframe as relational and processual, critiquing Cartesian dualisms that separate subject from object or from . Central to this is the "," which emphasizes multiple ways of being rather than universal truths, often incorporating indigenous perspectives to highlight how Western ontologies marginalize alternative realities. Relational ontologies constitute a core approach, viewing entities not as isolated substances but as interdependent assemblages where agency is distributed across human and nonhuman actors. Influenced by thinkers like Bruno Latour's actor-network theory, this framework posits hybrid politics in environmental issues, such as , where outcomes arise from socio-ecological networks rather than human dominion alone. For instance, in analyzing or , relational ontology underscores causal chains involving materials, technologies, and biota, rejecting anthropocentric hierarchies. Critics, however, argue this flattens distinctions between intentional agents and passive objects, potentially undermining empirical accountability in causal analysis. New materialist ontologies, associated with Jane Bennett and , extend this by attributing vibrancy and intra-action to matter itself, framing the as an era demanding recognition of nonhuman forces' causal efficacy. Bennett's concept of "thing-power" illustrates how assemblages like electrical grids exert political influence independently of human intent, informing by urging humility toward material agencies. 's , rooted in quantum physics interpretations, posits reality as performative enactments through apparatuses, applied in humanities to deconstruct fixed environmental categories like "." Empirical validations remain contested, as these rely on interpretive extensions of rather than direct falsifiable predictions, with some scholars noting their alignment with speculative rather than strictly causal realism. Indigenous ontologies, increasingly integrated since the , offer relational cosmologies where humans, animals, and landscapes co-constitute kin networks, contrasting extractive Western paradigms. For example, or Maori frameworks emphasize reciprocal obligations, influencing environmental humanities discourses on land rights and by prioritizing lived practices over abstracted universals. This approach critiques academic appropriations, advocating enactment through rematriation—returning lands and knowledge to indigenous stewards—over mere scholarly citation. While empirically grounded in ethnographic records of sustainable practices predating industrialization, such as pre-colonial fire management regimes, integration risks romanticization without rigorous cross-verification against historical data. Object-oriented ontology (OOO), per Graham Harman, provides a speculative counterpoint by insisting on withdrawn essences of objects, human and nonhuman alike, resisting reduction to relations or perceptions. In environmental contexts, OOO critiques relationalism for overemphasizing connections, arguing that ecological crises stem from ignored object-realities, like the intrinsic temporality of forests beyond human narratives. Though influential in humanities for decentering , its abstract formalism draws for lacking empirical traction, prioritizing metaphysical speculation over observable causal mechanisms. Overall, these frameworks enable nuanced analyses of environmental phenomena but require scrutiny against first-principles tests of coherence with physical laws and historical evidence to avoid ideological overreach.

Epistemological and Causal Assumptions

Environmental humanities posits that knowledge of environmental phenomena is inherently situated and constructed through cultural, historical, and social lenses, rejecting positivist claims to universal, value-neutral truths in favor of interpretive approaches that foreground power relations and contextual meanings. This epistemological stance draws from critical social sciences, emphasizing subjective, context-dependent understandings that challenge dominant paradigms and integrate marginalized perspectives, such as indigenous and postcolonial knowledges, over technocratic or Eurocentric frameworks. Such assumptions prioritize narrative and aesthetic forms of knowledge production, viewing them as revealing the imbrication of human and nonhuman worlds shaped by historical forces like and , rather than deriving solely from empirical measurement. Epistemologically, the field critiques nature/culture binaries as artifacts of Western thought, advocating hybrid methodologies that blend inquiry with selective scientific data to address as products of uneven global power dynamics. Causally, environmental humanities assumes relational and distributed processes over linear, anthropocentric models, incorporating nonhuman agency through frameworks like actor-network theory and new materialism, where emerges from intra-actions and assemblages of human and material elements. This view posits matter as vibrantly agentive, co-producing environmental outcomes via dynamic entanglements rather than unidirectional human impacts, as seen in concepts of "" linking ecological degradation to imperial histories. In ecological contexts, causality is framed as emergent and indeterminate, prioritizing adaptive world-making amid damaged environments over predictive risk assessments.

Methodologies and Approaches

Humanities-Based Analytical Tools

Humanities-based analytical tools in environmental humanities draw from interpretive traditions in , , , and to examine how texts, discourses, and artifacts mediate human understandings of the environment. These methods emphasize qualitative interpretation of meanings, values, and power dynamics rather than empirical measurement, enabling analysis of cultural influences on environmental perceptions and behaviors. For example, they facilitate scrutiny of how historical narratives or policy language construct notions of as resource or sacred entity, often revealing anthropocentric assumptions embedded in Western traditions. Ecocriticism stands as a foundational tool, originating in the 1990s with works like Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm's The Ecocriticism Reader (1996), which applies literary analysis to environmental themes in , , and . It interrogates representations of nonhuman elements—such as landscapes or animals—to uncover ethical implications, as seen in studies of Romantic poetry's idealization of versus industrial-era depictions of . Ecocriticism has evolved to include postcolonial variants, examining how colonial literatures justified resource extraction in non-Western contexts, though critics argue it sometimes prioritizes aesthetic over causal explanations of ecological harm. Critical discourse analysis (CDA) dissects linguistic structures in environmental media, reports, and activism to expose ideological underpinnings, such as how framing "global warming" as a shifts focus from economic causation to militarized responses. Developed from Foucault-inspired linguistics, CDA in this field has analyzed UN climate documents from the 1990s onward, identifying patterns where corporate interests dilute accountability through euphemistic language like "." While effective for highlighting power asymmetries, CDA's reliance on researcher interpretation risks confirming preconceived biases, particularly in academically dominant progressive paradigms. Narrative analysis evaluates storytelling forms—from indigenous oral traditions to cli-fi novels—to trace how plots and archetypes influence environmental agency and foresight. Applied to events like the 1986 , it reveals how survivor accounts blend personal trauma with ecological motifs, fostering cultural memory that informs policy. In environmental humanities, this tool, informed by structuralist since the 1970s, underscores narratives' role in mobilizing action, yet empirical studies show limited direct causation between stories and behavioral change, with effects mediated by socioeconomic factors. Hermeneutic methods, including ecological hermeneutics, involve iterative interpretation of texts like biblical passages or scientific treatises to reframe , as in the Earth Bible Project's 2000s rereading of Genesis for anti-exploitative readings. Rooted in Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics (1960), these tools prioritize historical context and reader dialogue, applied to reinterpret 19th-century conservation laws as products of imperial expansion. Their strength lies in surfacing overlooked ethical dimensions, but they often yield pluralistic conclusions lacking , contrasting with data-driven . Critical theory frameworks, drawing from Frankfurt School traditions, critique structural drivers of environmental issues like capitalism's commodification of nature, as in analyses of 20th-century industrial fiction exposing alienation from ecosystems. In environmental humanities, this manifests in ecocultural studies questioning technological optimism, with applications to post-2010s debates. Proponents claim it unmasks causal ideologies, but applications frequently align with institutional left-leaning biases, sidelining market-based solutions evidenced in emissions reductions via cap-and-trade systems since the .

Integration with Empirical and Scientific Data

The environmental humanities (EH) incorporate empirical and scientific data by using them as substrates for interpretive analysis, rather than as primary evidentiary bases, to elucidate the cultural, ethical, and historical dimensions of environmental change. Scientific findings, such as metrics from ecological surveys or climate projections from models like those in the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report (2021–2023), are reframed through humanities lenses to examine how societies perceive and respond to these realities. This integration posits that empirical data alone insufficiently addresses human agency or value systems, complementing quantitative science with qualitative narratives drawn from , , and history. For instance, EH scholars analyze historical texts alongside paleoclimatic records to trace evolving human-nature ontologies, arguing that such synthesis reveals contingencies overlooked by positivist science. Institutional programs exemplify this approach through mandated interdisciplinary coursework and collaborative projects. At , the Environmental Humanities Initiative, launched around 2010, requires students to engage scientific disciplines like and in tandem with humanities topics such as , aiming to harness "the full powers of empirical observation" with cultural wisdom for challenges. Similarly, transdisciplinary methodologies, as outlined in a 2019 study, apply ecocritical tools to literary works informed by ecological data, using scientific concepts to ground interpretations of environmental themes in fiction. These efforts often involve mixed-methods frameworks where empirical datasets—e.g., of rates from sources like NASA's Observatory (ongoing since 1999)—inform discourse analyses of policy documents or media representations. Challenges in this integration stem from epistemological asymmetries: environmental science prioritizes falsifiable hypotheses and replicable experiments, whereas favors hermeneutic and normative inquiry, which can introduce interpretive subjectivity not subject to empirical falsification. Initial mistrust between disciplines has been noted, with scientific communities viewing humanities contributions as less rigorous for policy applications, while critiques for underemphasizing socio-cultural drivers of . Gaps persist, as evidenced by science mapping analyses showing compartmentalization between sustainability 's focus on measurable outcomes and 's emphasis on relational values, potentially limiting mutual advancement without structured bridging protocols. Despite these, proponents argue that enhances scientific data's societal uptake by embedding it in accessible narratives, as in artistic renderings of datasets that evoke emotional responses alongside factual accuracy.

Major Themes

Ethics, Values, and Human-Nature Relations

Environmental humanities scholars interrogate the ethical foundations of human-nature relations, often critiquing anthropocentric paradigms that prioritize human interests as the root of ecological degradation. This perspective posits that Western philosophical traditions, emphasizing human exceptionalism and nature's instrumental value, have justified exploitation leading to crises like biodiversity loss and climate change. However, critics within and beyond the field argue that such critiques conflate descriptive human-centered analysis with normative prescriptions, noting that anthropocentrism, when "enlightened" by empirical evidence of mutual dependencies, can support sustainable practices without requiring a wholesale rejection of human welfare. Central to EH ethics is the advocacy for relational values, which frame human-nature interactions as interdependent rather than hierarchical, drawing from ecofeminist and posthumanist thought to dismantle dualisms like culture/nature or subject/object. For instance, thinkers like highlight how historical shifts in valuing nature—from organic partnerships to mechanistic domination—inform contemporary ethical reorientations toward reciprocity and care. These approaches emphasize intrinsic values in non-human entities, challenging instrumental ethics where nature serves solely human ends, and instead promote ecocentric principles that extend moral consideration to ecosystems. Yet, empirical assessments reveal limited causal evidence linking directly to environmental harm, as technological innovations and policy reforms under human-centered frameworks have demonstrably reduced impacts, such as through efficiency gains in resource use since the 1970s. In addressing values, EH underscores stewardship ethics, influenced by indigenous and non-Western ontologies that view humans as embedded in, rather than dominant over, natural systems, fostering attitudes of humility and responsibility. This contrasts with utilitarian valuations, advocating for pluralistic frameworks that integrate relational and third-category values beyond mere preference or utility. Nonetheless, such ethical shifts risk undervaluing human developmental needs; for example, strict has been critiqued for potentially hindering poverty alleviation in developing regions, where anthropocentric priorities enable access to and essential for welfare gains observed in metrics like increases from 50 years in 1950 to over 70 by 2020. EH responses often counter by linking ethical transformation to cultural narratives that cultivate pro-environmental behaviors, though studies indicate these rely more on and incentives than ontological upheaval. Human-nature relations in EH are reconceived through lenses of entanglement, particularly in discourses, where ethical imperatives arise from recognizing co-constitutive bonds blurred by industrialization. This informs calls for "more-than-human" , extending agency and moral status to non-humans, as in companion species manifestos that reject mastery for multispecies flourishing. Empirical grounding remains contested, with relational showing promise in fostering behaviors like conservation volunteering but lacking robust quantification of causal impacts on global metrics such as rates, which declined 20% in managed forests from 2000 to 2020 due to rather than value shifts alone. Ultimately, EH's ethical contributions lie in historicizing values to reveal contingencies, yet their normative force depends on integration with causal analyses of human incentives, avoiding unsubstantiated blame on for outcomes better explained by institutional failures.

Cultural Representations and Narratives

Cultural representations and narratives in environmental humanities examine how artistic, literary, and media forms depict human interactions with the natural world, thereby influencing perceptions of ecological crises and potential responses. These analyses trace historical shifts, such as Romantic-era idealizations of wilderness in 19th-century European painting, which contrasted pristine nature with industrial encroachment, to contemporary cli-fi (climate fiction) novels that project anthropogenic disruptions like sea-level rise. Scholars argue that such narratives often embed cultural values, framing environment not as empirical fact but as interpreted phenomena, with Western traditions historically prioritizing anthropocentric dominance over relational ontologies found in indigenous storytelling. However, empirical studies reveal limited causal efficacy; for instance, exposure to dystopian environmental narratives in literature yields short-term attitude shifts but negligible long-term behavioral changes in pro-environmental actions among readers. Ecocriticism, a core methodological precursor integrated into environmental humanities since the early , dissects literary texts for embedded environmental ideologies, as seen in analyses of works like Amitav Ghosh's The Great Derangement (2016), which critiques modern fiction's evasion of probabilistic climate calamities in favor of deterministic plots. representations, from paintings emphasizing sublime wilderness in the 1830s–1850s to 21st-century installations like Olafur Eliasson's simulations, serve to evoke affective responses rather than convey measurable , often amplifying perceptions of urgency without corresponding evidentiary rigor. In media, documentaries and news framing—such as BBC's Planet Earth series (2006 onward), viewed by over 500 million globally—construct narratives of through selective storytelling, prioritizing emotive visuals over quantitative trends like recovery rates in managed ecosystems. Emerging subfields like econarratology apply narrative theory to energy transitions, scrutinizing how cultural texts portray fuels versus renewables; for example, a 2019 anthology identifies recurring motifs of in oil-dependent stories that overlook technological adaptations documented in production data from 1970–2020. Empirical , gaining traction post-2015, tests these representations' impacts via experiments, finding that optimistic narratives (e.g., restoration successes in Barbara Kingsolver's , 2012) foster greater efficacy beliefs than apocalyptic ones, challenging assumptions in humanities scholarship that doom-laden tales alone spur action. Critics within the field note systemic biases in source selection, where academic analyses favor decolonial or anti-capitalist framings over data-driven accounts of human adaptation, potentially skewing toward ideologically driven interpretations rather than causal mechanisms like market incentives in emission reductions.

Political-Economic and Technological Dimensions

Environmental humanities scholars frequently examine political-economic structures as central drivers of ecological degradation, positing that capitalist imperatives of perpetual growth and accumulation exacerbate resource extraction and emissions. Drawing on eco-Marxist traditions, analyses highlight how of nature under disrupts socio-ecological relations, with historical enclosures and colonial expansions serving as precedents for contemporary inequalities in environmental burdens. Such critiques, prevalent in academic discourse since the field's consolidation around 2010, often attribute planetary crises to systemic profit motives rather than isolated policy failures, though of emissions decoupling from GDP growth in advanced economies—via efficiency gains and market incentives—receives limited engagement in these narratives. Proponents advocate alternatives like , which rejects endless expansion in favor of scaled-down production and consumption to align with biophysical limits, or "post-capitalist" models emphasizing communal stewardship over . These frameworks integrate to unpack power asymmetries, such as how global supply chains shift to the Global South, informed by relational analyses of capital's metabolic rifts with ecosystems. However, such prescriptions, rooted in humanities' interpretive methods, face scrutiny for underemphasizing causal evidence from showing under market systems correlating with environmental improvements through , a gap attributable to the field's institutional skew toward anti-growth ideologies. On technological dimensions, environmental humanities expresses caution toward "techno-optimism," arguing that reliance on innovations like geoengineering or carbon capture perpetuates anthropocentric without addressing underlying cultural narratives of domination over nature. Analyses critique technological fixes as deferring accountability, potentially entrenching inequalities by favoring elite-driven solutions over adaptations, as seen in debates over solar radiation management proposals since the mid-2010s. This stance contrasts with historical precedents where technologies, paired with property rights and incentives, resolved issues like via and cap-and-trade by the 1990s, outcomes often sidelined in favor of calls for ethical reconfiguration of human-tech relations. Digital tools, however, find selective embrace in "digital environmental humanities," enabling mapping of socio-technical networks or archival recoveries of indigenous knowledge, yet these applications prioritize humanistic critique over predictive modeling. Overall, the field posits technology as embedded in political economies of power, urging narrative interventions to foster restraint rather than acceleration toward unproven scalability. Empirical assessments of tech's net benefits, such as nuclear energy's low lifecycle emissions documented in lifecycle analyses since 2000, are critiqued as overlooking social disruptions, reflecting a broader preference for qualitative over quantitative causal chains.

Criticisms and Controversies

Ideological and Political Biases

, a foundational approach within environmental humanities, has faced criticism for embedding political and ideological biases that prioritize advocacy for environmental causes over impartial textual analysis. Scholars argue that this can result in selective interpretations of and culture, favoring narratives that align with progressive agendas on and while marginalizing alternative viewpoints. The field's practitioners, operating within humanities disciplines where faculty political orientations skew heavily leftward— with surveys indicating social sciences and humanities professors are more likely to identify as left-leaning than those in STEM fields—often emphasize critiques of , , and as root causes of ecological degradation. This orientation manifests in thematic priorities such as decolonial environmental narratives and anti-industrial framings, which critics contend introduce systemic biases by framing predominantly through lenses of social inequity and rather than integrating causal analyses of resource or technological adaptation. Such biases are evident in the relative scarcity of engagement with conservative or libertarian environmental perspectives, including rights-based conservation or innovation-driven solutions, which empirical studies link to effective in contexts like private land management. For instance, analyses of academic output show environmental humanities scholarship rarely interrogates the trade-offs of ideologies or over-relies on Romantic ideals of nature, potentially perpetuating an ideological that undervalues data on human adaptability and market incentives in mitigating environmental risks. This has drawn rebuke for fostering alarmist cultural representations that conflate empirical uncertainties in modeling with moral imperatives, sidelining first-principles evaluations of .

Methodological and Evidentiary Weaknesses

Critics have noted that environmental humanities methodologies, drawing heavily from , historical interpretation, and philosophical inquiry, emphasize qualitative tools like textual analysis and discourse critique, which often lack the and replicability central to scientific inquiry. These approaches prioritize hermeneutic depth—unpacking meanings in cultural artifacts—over quantitative metrics or controlled experiments, potentially undermining claims about causal links between narratives and real-world environmental outcomes. For instance, assertions regarding how shapes ecological attitudes frequently go untested against behavioral , leading to reliance on anecdotal or interpretive rather than systematic validation. This evidentiary shortfall is exemplified by the field's limited engagement with empirical methods, prompting the development of empirical as a corrective sub-discipline since around 2018. Empirical applies tools from and —such as surveys, experiments, and audience response studies—to scrutinize environmental humanities hypotheses, revealing that many unverified assumptions about art's persuasive power on pro-environmental action overestimate its effects. A 2023 volume on the topic highlights how traditional environmental humanities claims, such as those linking fictional narratives to sustained behavioral change, often fail under empirical scrutiny, with studies showing minimal long-term impact on readers' environmental practices. Integration challenges further compound these weaknesses, as humanities-derived evidence tends to be context-bound and non-generalizable, clashing with the scalable, probabilistic models favored in environmental sciences. In , for example, qualitative humanities analyses of cultural representations may illuminate local values but struggle to inform predictive policy without triangulation with quantitative data like metrics or econometric modeling; surveys indicate only 3% of conservation professionals have humanities training, reflecting broader institutional silos that prioritize empirical rigor. This methodological divergence can foster interpretive subjectivity, where evidentiary selection risks , particularly in ideologically aligned academic environments, though proponents argue such reflexivity enhances critical depth over sterile quantification. Evidentiary gaps also manifest in the field's aversion to (law-generalizing) frameworks, eschewing objectivist standards that could yield testable propositions about human-nature interactions. Without robust —via methods like randomized trials or longitudinal tracking—environmental humanities contributions risk remaining speculative, as seen in debates over narrative-driven "environmental storytelling," where efficacy claims outpace supporting data. Critics contend this hampers the field's policy relevance, as decision-makers demand verifiable impacts amid urgent crises like , documented at rates of 1 million threatened per 2019 IPBES assessments, yet unlinked causally to humanities interventions.

Competing Perspectives on Environmental Stewardship

Anthropocentric perspectives on environmental stewardship prioritize human welfare as the primary rationale for conservation, viewing nature as a to be managed for sustained benefits like , economic prosperity, and health, often through pragmatic, human-centered policies that balance development with preservation. In contrast, ecocentric views assert the intrinsic value of ecosystems and independent of human utility, advocating for minimal human interference to maintain ecological processes, which can lead to policies restricting even if they impose costs on human populations. This tension is evident in debates over extraction, where anthropocentrists cite empirical data showing that human-driven innovations, such as improved agricultural yields, have reduced rates in developed nations since the 1990s, while ecocentrists warn of long-term from such intensification. Free-market environmentalism represents another competing framework, emphasizing rights and voluntary exchanges over centralized regulation to incentivize stewardship, arguing that owners of defined resources invest in their long-term viability to maximize value, as demonstrated by cases like the recovery of herds through private ranching after near-extinction in the . Critics from regulatory perspectives, prevalent in many academic and policy circles, contend that markets undervalue externalities like without government intervention, yet studies indicate that property-based approaches have outperformed top-down mandates in , where individual transferable quotas reduced by up to 50% in implemented regions since the . Environmental humanities scholarship often aligns with regulatory views, potentially reflecting institutional biases toward state-led solutions, but overlooks evidence that regulatory rigidity can delay adaptations, as seen in the inefficiencies of the U.S. Endangered Species Act's habitat designations without economic incentives. Ecomodernist approaches further diverge by promoting technological decoupling of human progress from natural limits, positing that innovations like nuclear energy and enable through land-sparing—concentrating human impacts to protect —supported by data showing global cropland per capita halving since 1960 alongside rising yields. This competes with deep ecology's advocacy for reduced consumption and population growth to align human scale with ecological , drawing on philosophical critiques of anthropogenic dominance but lacking comparable empirical validation for . In environmental humanities contexts, deep ecological narratives dominate cultural analyses, yet ecomodernism highlights causal realities like poverty's role in , where in correlated with forest regrowth and pollution declines post-1990s liberalization. These perspectives underscore broader controversies: models grounded in human agency and markets have empirically advanced outcomes like cleaner air in high-income economies, challenging humanities' frequent emphasis on de-growth or relational without equivalent measurable impacts.

Impact and Reception

Academic and Institutional Influence

The environmental humanities has gained footing in academia primarily through dedicated programs, concentrations, and interdisciplinary initiatives at select universities, often as a response to declining enrollment in traditional humanities fields amid efforts to address environmental concerns. For instance, Stony Brook University offers a Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Humanities, integrating disciplines like literature, history, and philosophy to examine human-environment interactions. Similarly, the University of Utah provides a fully funded master's program emphasizing research-intensive and community-engaged curricula. Other institutions, including Yale University, New York University, Cornell University, and Princeton's High Meadows Environmental Institute—which engages nearly 40 scholars—have established centers or concentrations that blend humanities with environmental studies, fostering transdisciplinary approaches since the early 2010s. This expansion reflects a broader trend, with the field emerging prominently around 2012 and experiencing rapid institutionalization, including dedicated funding from bodies like Sweden's Mistra Forum for research programs. Peer-reviewed journals and professional associations have further solidified its academic presence, providing platforms for scholarship that critiques cultural and ethical dimensions of . The journal Environmental Humanities, launched in 2012 by as an open-access, international outlet, publishes interdisciplinary work on topics like values, conflicts, and representations in human-nature relations. Complementary publications include ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, affiliated with the Association for the Study of Literature and Environment (ASLE), which promotes and environmental arts since its founding in 1993, though with heightened focus on humanities integration post-2010. ASLE, with thousands of members globally, hosts biennial conferences and supports networks that influence hiring and curricula in literature and related fields. These outlets have proliferated alongside the field's growth, involving tens of thousands of researchers worldwide by 2017, though concentrated in Western institutions. Institutionally, the field has influenced university structures through initiatives like Humanities for the Environment, a global network launched in 2013 that bridges with and via observatories at over 20 sites, emphasizing collaborative on . Funding from foundations, such as Mistra's 2013 investment in environmental humanities programs, has supported centers at places like the Australian National University and the , enabling grants for projects on topics like climate narratives and resource ethics. Despite this, adoption remains uneven, often as minors or add-ons rather than standalone departments, with critiques noting its roots in humanities' prestige challenges and potential overemphasis on interpretive methods over empirical . In policy-adjacent institutions, it has prompted integrations like environmental assessments incorporating humanities perspectives, though measurable impacts on core scientific or economic curricula are limited.

Contributions to Policy and Public Discourse

Environmental humanities scholars and initiatives have sought to influence environmental policy by emphasizing cultural, ethical, and historical dimensions often overlooked in scientific or economic analyses. For instance, the Humanities for the Environment (HfE) network, established in 2013, has promoted interdisciplinary dialogues that integrate humanistic insights into sustainability frameworks, proposing global observatories to foster policy-relevant research. One concrete example is the UNESCO-MOST BRIDGES Coalition, initiated in 2015, which involved EH researchers in workshops from 2015 to 2017 to shape the 2017 UNESCO Guidelines on Sustainability Science; the coalition, launched in 2018, grew to 45 member organizations by 2024 and co-organized sessions at COP27 in 2022 and the UN Summit of the Future in 2024. Similarly, the Oceans Past Initiative, founded in 2000, introduced long-term historical data into marine management, leading to its adoption by the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas in 2010 and informing government baselines for oyster reef restoration in Australia, South Africa, Europe, and North America. In public discourse, EH contributes through narratives and arts-based methods that reframe for broader audiences, such as highlighting inequities in emissions (e.g., the wealthiest 10% accounting for 52% of lifestyle emissions per 2020 data) or incorporating Indigenous , which manages 80% of global biodiversity despite representing 5% of the population. Tools like the 2022 Environmental Humanities Toolkit for Policymakers advocate for deliberative processes, exemplified by the South Australian Citizens’ Jury in 2015, where 35 participants recommended pet desexing and rental reforms over five sessions, influencing amendments to the Management Act. initiatives, such as Berlin's Art Science Exhibits featuring works like Alisi Telengut’s The Fourfold (2020s), pair creative expression with scientific data to promote regeneration discussions. These efforts aim to counter denialism and enrich debates, though measurable causal impacts on outcomes remain context-dependent and often rely on transdisciplinary collaboration.

Evaluations of Achievements and Limitations

The environmental humanities have garnered acclaim for bridging interpretive humanities disciplines with environmental , yielding insights into cultural narratives, ethical frameworks, and historical contingencies that contextualize scientific on ecological crises. By emphasizing human experiences and diverse epistemologies, the field has facilitated transdisciplinary collaborations, as evidenced by the proliferation of dedicated journals like Environmental Humanities launched in 2012 and the establishment of over eight university centers by 2014. These efforts have contributed to policy discourse by highlighting socio-cultural dimensions of issues like the , including how narratives shape public perceptions of and adaptability over scales, such as Pleistocene human-climate interactions. Notwithstanding these advances, the field's growth is partly attributed to the humanities' enrollment decline, with bachelor's degrees comprising only 7.6% of totals by 2010, prompting a pivot toward "practical" environmental relevance to attract students and funding amid waning prestige. Resulting programs, such as those at , often subordinate canonical texts like Shakespeare to advocacy-oriented themes in or green policy, risking a dilution of traditional humanistic rigor. Methodologically, environmental humanities prioritize context-dependence, , and , which enable pluralistic analyses but can engender interpretive flexibility verging on environmental relativism or of empirical universals, as critiqued in contexts dominated by postmodern literary approaches. This stance, while countering , occasionally manifests as anti-scientific postures that challenge dominant paradigms without robust evidentiary alternatives, limiting integration with falsifiable and scaling of case studies to causal policy impacts. Institutional underrepresentation in panels further constrains influence, with calls for enhanced public underscoring persistent gaps in bridging scholarly to actionable outcomes.

References

  1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347623183_Environmental_humanities_an_emerging_field_of_transdisciplinary_research
  2. https://www.cambridge.org/core/publications/elements/environmental-humanities
  3. http://environmental.humanities.ucla.edu/?page_id=52
  4. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities
  5. https://cals.cornell.edu/environment-sustainability/education/concentrations/environmental-humanities
  6. https://read.dukeupress.edu/prism/article/21/1/1/393093/Culture-Nature-and-Environmental-HumanitiesAn
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367469569_Book_Review_Introduction_to_the_Environmental_Humanities
  8. https://research.manchester.ac.uk/files/185546213/wbieg2127.pdf
  9. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/4/1/213/26199/Understanding-of-and-Vision-for-the-Environmental
  10. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/4/4/977
  11. https://liberalarts.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2019/03/libby-robin-envhum.pdf
  12. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/6/4/91
  13. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/5/1/261/8152/Mapping-Common-Ground-Ecocriticism-Environmental
  14. https://ccct.uchicago.edu/events/climate-and-the-humanities-the-shallow-and-the-deep-long-range-environmental-turn-in-the-human-sciences/
  15. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-environmental/
  16. https://stateofthediscipline.acla.org/entry/comparative-literature-and-environmental-humanities
  17. https://seeingthewoods.org/2020/07/06/is-all-environmental-humanities-feminist-environmental-humanities/
  18. https://mistra.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Mistra_Environmental_Humanities_May2013.pdf
  19. https://environmental-humanities.utah.edu/blog/posts/2025/20th_anniversary.php
  20. https://www.instagram.com/p/DPpH88hkm7T/
  21. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/5/1/233/8144/The-Anthropocene-and-the-Environmental-Humanities
  22. https://news.asu.edu/20240404-arts-humanities-and-education-asu-marks-decade-environmental-humanities-networking
  23. https://chcinetwork.org/ideas/humanities-for-the-environment-a-manifesto-of-research-and-action
  24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/public-humanities/article/what-can-the-public-humanities-learn-about-impact-from-the-environmental-humanities/D53DD603F268857F8DC6D98AEF8F17BD
  25. https://ecozona.eu/article/download/3547/4483/17304
  26. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781399505208-020/html
  27. https://niche-canada.org/2020/07/21/what-will-change-writing-in-the-environmental-humanities-before-and-after-covid-19/
  28. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/15/3/2/384014/Decolonizing-Environmental-Humanities
  29. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/11771801251369903
  30. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/15/2/162/380190/A-Commons-beyond-the-Human
  31. https://journals.librarypublishing.arizona.edu/jpe/article/1995/galley/2254/view/
  32. https://contendingmodernities.nd.edu/theorizing-modernities/enacting-indigenous-ontologies/
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240738982_Environmental_issues_Relational_ontologies_and_hybrid_politics
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10359222/
  35. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4062&context=nrj
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352822618_Ecological_Ontologies_Approaching_Human-Environmental_Engagements
  37. https://www.berlin-university-alliance.de/commitments/teaching-learning/sturop/conference/conference-2025/programm/Session-B-3/B3-1/index.html
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395974463_Reclaiming_Indigenous_Ontologies
  39. https://www.qeios.com/read/9ABV0O
  40. https://blog.uvm.edu/aivakhiv/2024/02/09/ontology-101/
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004225009976
  42. https://english.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/DeLoughrey-Didur-Carrigan-Introduction_to_Global_Ecologies_and_the-Environment-Postcolonial-Approaches.pdf
  43. https://ecozona.eu/article/viewFile/452/477
  44. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/17/1/170/399042/To-Live-in-Our-Damaged-WorldsA-Proposal-for
  45. https://ecozona.eu/article/download/3543/4451/17163
  46. https://hiltner.english.ucsb.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Lecture-1_-Intro-to-the-Environmental-Humanities-Ecocriticism-1.-Why-approach-environmental-issues-from-a-literary-perspective_-2.-Why-do-we-read-and-study-literature-at-all_.pdf
  47. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19460171.2024.2326936
  48. https://discourseanalyzer.com/methodologies-of-environmental-discourse-analysis/
  49. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/15/3/83/384004/Minding-the-GapsHow-Humanists-Climate-Scientists
  50. https://www.depts.ttu.edu/education/our-people/Faculty/additional_pages/duemer/epsy_6304_class_materials/Narrative-content-and-semiotic-analysis.pdf
  51. https://academic.oup.com/book/12451/chapter/162066364
  52. https://www.environmentandsociety.org/sites/default/files/key_docs/environmental_humanities-2014-hutchings-213-20.pdf
  53. https://www.uvm.edu/~aivakhiv/eco_cult.htm
  54. https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/1597298/223885/ENVpdf-proofs_book-19-39.pdf
  55. https://www.nas.org/blogs/article/environmental_humanities
  56. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14688417.2019.1583592
  57. https://environmentalhumanities.nd.edu/about/
  58. https://hal.science/hal-04861371v1/file/ms_SDHE_accepted.pdf
  59. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02459-3
  60. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10806-018-9711-1
  61. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/ije/vol3/iss1/4/
  62. https://www.int-res.com/articles/esep2022/22/e022p025.pdf
  63. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/709077
  64. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21550085.2023.2166341
  65. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eas2.70000
  66. https://emilygrubert.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Pre-print-Grubert-2018-COSUST-relational-values.pdf
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12152000/
  68. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26395916.2024.2365232
  69. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10451
  70. https://www.die-erde.org/index.php/die-erde/article/download/618/430/3404
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9691817/
  72. https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1663078/document.pdf
  73. https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/148337/Pitzen_Samuli_opinnayte.pdf?sequence=1
  74. https://edepot.wur.nl/587176
  75. https://www.carsoncenter.uni-muenchen.de/news/news_events/2025-news/mauch-agosta-interview/global-environment-interview.pdf
  76. https://dhjhkxawhe8q4.cloudfront.net/minup-wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/10164204/ump-schneider-mayerson-t-nc-intro.pdf
  77. https://cosmosscholars.com/phms/index.php/ijmst/article/download/3413/2274/6041
  78. https://guides.lib.virginia.edu/engl8005
  79. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/files/192514145/Introduction_COPYEDITED_REVISED.pdf
  80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/jj.1204237
  81. https://seeingthewoods.org/2021/07/21/why-ecocriticism-needs-the-social-sciences-and-vice-versa/
  82. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/15/2/181/380192/New-Materialism-and-the-Eco-Marxist
  83. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/11/1/3/138280/Com-Post-CapitalismCultivating-a-More-than-Human
  84. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/15/3/65/383999/The-Economy-in-MindA-Thematic-Analysis-of-Economic
  85. https://uit.no/tavla/artikkel/862761/uit_environmental_humanities_gathering_34_the_c
  86. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-international-studies/article/reproducing-socioecological-life-from-below-towards-a-planetary-political-economy-of-the-global-majority/EBF49A4FA1E8D4705361A93CC5C8BC41
  87. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/16/2/271/389154/Plotting-a-New-Course-for-Environmental
  88. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/5/1/101/8100/The-Last-Chance-to-Save-the-Planet-An-Analysis-of
  89. https://online.ucpress.edu/elementa/article/doi/10.1525/elementa.378/112506/Can-technology-save-the-environment-Lessons-from
  90. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/9607488
  91. https://dhq-static.digitalhumanities.org/pdf/000714.pdf
  92. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25729861.2024.2305507
  93. https://www.unr.edu/nevada-today/blogs/2024/optimism-series-curb-the-effects-of-climate-change
  94. https://cwi.pressbooks.pub/lit-crit/chapter/what-is-ecocriticism/
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6973015/
  96. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31131008_Ecocriticism_and_Education_for_Sustainability
  97. https://ehc.english.ucsb.edu/?page_id=17766
  98. https://www.hamptonthink.org/read/degrowth-an-environmental-ideology-with-good-intentions-bad-politics
  99. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09644016.2021.1880062
  100. https://empiricalecocriticism.com/about-empirical-ecocriticism/
  101. https://www.upress.umn.edu/9781517915353/empirical-ecocriticism/
  102. https://empiricalecocriticism.com/
  103. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cobi.13824
  104. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/13/2/433/234999/Making-the-Environmental-Humanities-Consequential
  105. https://fiveable.me/environmental-biology/unit-11/anthropocentrism-vs-ecocentrism/study-guide/hGatRLpwoopNz7nv
  106. https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/how-economic-freedom-creates-healthy-environment
  107. https://fee.org/articles/market-based-environmentalism-vs-the-free-market/
  108. https://www.learnliberty.org/blog/what-is-free-market-environmentalism/
  109. https://perc.org/wp-content/uploads/old/fmemain.pdf
  110. https://www.tabledebates.org/building-blocks/ecomodernism
  111. https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/food-agriculture-environment/on-the-differences-between-ecomodernism-and-effective-altruism
  112. https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/somas/education/undergraduate/degrees/ehm
  113. https://environmental-humanities.utah.edu/
  114. https://environmentalhumanities.yale.edu/welcome
  115. https://as.nyu.edu/departments/environment/environmental-humanities.html
  116. https://alumni.princeton.edu/stories/humanities-help-solve-climate-change
  117. https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article/12/2/496/167001/Environmental-HumanitiesEntering-a-New-Time
  118. https://www.environmentandsociety.org/mml/association-study-literature-and-environment-asle
  119. https://www.nas.org/articles/environmental_humanities
  120. https://oceanspast.org/
  121. https://thinkingintheworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/EnvironmentalHumanitiesToolkit_FINAL-3.pdf
  122. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262534208/the-environmental-humanities/
  123. https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.667
  124. https://i2insights.org/2018/09/11/strengthening-environmental-humanities/
  125. https://rse.org.uk/resource/perspectives-from-the-environmental-humanities/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.