Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Field-effect transistor
View on Wikipedia

The field-effect transistor (FET) is a type of transistor that uses an electric field to control the current through a semiconductor. It comes in two types: junction FET (JFET) and metal–oxide–semiconductor FET (MOSFET). FETs have three terminals: source, gate, and drain. FETs control the current by the application of a voltage to the gate, which in turn alters the conductivity between the drain and source.
FETs are also known as unipolar transistors since they involve single-carrier-type operation. That is, FETs use either electrons (n-channel) or holes (p-channel) as charge carriers in their operation, but not both. Many different types of field effect transistors exist. Field effect transistors generally display very high input impedance at low frequencies. The most widely used field-effect transistor is the MOSFET.
History
[edit]
The concept of a field-effect transistor (FET) was first patented by the Austro-Hungarian born physicist Julius Edgar Lilienfeld in 1925[1][2] and by Oskar Heil in 1934, but they were unable to build a working practical semiconducting device based on the concept. The transistor effect was later observed and explained by John Bardeen and Walter Houser Brattain while working under William Shockley at Bell Labs in 1947, shortly after the 17-year patent expired. Shockley initially attempted to build a working FET by trying to modulate the conductivity of a semiconductor, but was unsuccessful, mainly due to problems with the surface states, the dangling bond, and the germanium and copper compound materials. In the course of trying to understand the mysterious reasons behind their failure to build a working FET, it led to Bardeen and Brattain instead inventing the point-contact transistor in 1947, which was followed by Shockley's bipolar junction transistor in 1948.[3][4]
The first FET device to be successfully built was the junction field-effect transistor (JFET).[3] A JFET was first patented by Heinrich Welker in 1945.[5] The static induction transistor (SIT), a type of JFET with a short channel, was invented by Japanese engineers Jun-ichi Nishizawa and Y. Watanabe in 1950. Following Shockley's theoretical treatment on the JFET in 1952, a working practical JFET was built by George C. Dacey and Ian M. Ross in 1953.[6] However, the JFET still had issues affecting junction transistors in general.[7] Junction transistors were relatively bulky devices that were difficult to manufacture on a mass-production basis, which limited them to a number of specialised applications. The insulated-gate field-effect transistor (IGFET) was theorized as a potential alternative to junction transistors, but researchers were unable to build working IGFETs, largely due to the troublesome surface state barrier that prevented the external electric field from penetrating into the material.[7] By the mid-1950s, researchers had largely given up on the FET concept, and instead focused on bipolar junction transistor (BJT) technology.[8]
The foundations of MOSFET technology were laid down by the work of William Shockley, John Bardeen and Walter Brattain. Shockley independently envisioned the FET concept in 1945, but he was unable to build a working device. The next year Bardeen explained his failure in terms of surface states. Bardeen applied the theory of surface states on semiconductors (previous work on surface states was done by Shockley in 1939 and Igor Tamm in 1932) and realized that the external field was blocked at the surface because of extra electrons which are drawn to the semiconductor surface. Electrons become trapped in those localized states forming an inversion layer. Bardeen's hypothesis marked the birth of surface physics. Bardeen then decided to make use of an inversion layer instead of the very thin layer of semiconductor which Shockley had envisioned in his FET designs. Based on his theory, in 1948 Bardeen patented the progenitor of MOSFET, an insulated-gate FET (IGFET) with an inversion layer. The inversion layer confines the flow of minority carriers, increasing modulation and conductivity, although its electron transport depends on the gate's insulator or quality of oxide if used as an insulator, deposited above the inversion layer. Bardeen's patent as well as the concept of an inversion layer forms the basis of CMOS technology today. In 1976 Shockley described Bardeen's surface state hypothesis "as one of the most significant research ideas in the semiconductor program".[9]
After Bardeen's surface state theory the trio tried to overcome the effect of surface states. In late 1947, Robert Gibney and Brattain suggested the use of electrolyte placed between metal and semiconductor to overcome the effects of surface states. Their FET device worked, but amplification was poor. Bardeen went further and suggested to rather focus on the conductivity of the inversion layer. Further experiments led them to replace electrolyte with a solid oxide layer in the hope of getting better results. Their goal was to penetrate the oxide layer and get to the inversion layer. However, Bardeen suggested they switch from silicon to germanium and in the process their oxide got inadvertently washed off. They stumbled upon a completely different transistor, the point-contact transistor. Lillian Hoddeson argues that "had Brattain and Bardeen been working with silicon instead of germanium they would have stumbled across a successful field effect transistor".[9][10][11][12][13]
By the end of the first half of the 1950s, following theoretical and experimental work of Bardeen, Brattain, Kingston, Morrison and others, it became more clear that there were two types of surface states. Fast surface states were found to be associated with the bulk and a semiconductor/oxide interface. Slow surface states were found to be associated with the oxide layer because of adsorption of atoms, molecules and ions by the oxide from the ambient. The latter were found to be much more numerous and to have much longer relaxation times. At the time Philo Farnsworth and others came up with various methods of producing atomically clean semiconductor surfaces.
In 1955, Carl Frosch and Lincoln Derrick accidentally covered the surface of silicon wafer with a layer of silicon dioxide.[14] They showed that oxide layer prevented certain dopants into the silicon wafer, while allowing for others, thus discovering the passivating effect of oxidation on the semiconductor surface. Their further work demonstrated how to etch small openings in the oxide layer to diffuse dopants into selected areas of the silicon wafer. In 1957, they published a research paper and patented their technique summarizing their work. The technique they developed is known as oxide diffusion masking, which would later be used in the fabrication of MOSFET devices.[15] At Bell Labs, the importance of Frosch's technique was immediately realized. Results of their work circulated around Bell Labs in the form of BTL memos before being published in 1957. At Shockley Semiconductor, Shockley had circulated the preprint of their article in December 1956 to all his senior staff, including Jean Hoerni.[7][16][17]
In 1955, Ian Munro Ross filed a patent for a FeFET or MFSFET. Its structure was like that of a modern inversion channel MOSFET, but ferroelectric material was used as a dielectric/insulator instead of oxide. He envisioned it as a form of memory, years before the floating gate MOSFET. In February 1957, John Wallmark filed a patent for FET in which germanium monoxide was used as a gate dielectric, but he didn't pursue the idea. In his other patent filed the same year he described a double gate FET. In March 1957, in his laboratory notebook, Ernesto Labate, a research scientist at Bell Labs, conceived of a device similar to the later proposed MOSFET, although Labate's device didn't explicitly use silicon dioxide as an insulator.[18][19][20][21]
In 1955, Carl Frosch and Lincoln Derrick accidentally grew a layer of silicon dioxide over the silicon wafer, for which they observed surface passivation effects.[22][14] By 1957 Frosch and Derrick, using masking and predeposition, were able to manufacture silicon dioxide transistors and showed that silicon dioxide insulated, protected silicon wafers and prevented dopants from diffusing into the wafer.[22][15] J.R. Ligenza and W.G. Spitzer studied the mechanism of thermally grown oxides and fabricated a high quality Si/SiO2 stack in 1960.[23][24][25]
Metal–oxide–semiconductor FET (MOSFET)
[edit]Following this research, Mohamed Atalla and Dawon Kahng proposed a silicon MOS transistor in 1959[26] and successfully demonstrated a working MOS device with their Bell Labs team in 1960.[27][28] Their team included E. E. LaBate and E. I. Povilonis who fabricated the device; M. O. Thurston, L. A. D’Asaro, and J. R. Ligenza who developed the diffusion processes, and H. K. Gummel and R. Lindner who characterized the device.[29][30]
With its high scalability,[31] and much lower power consumption and higher density than bipolar junction transistors,[32] the MOSFET made it possible to build high-density integrated circuits.[33] The MOSFET is also capable of handling higher power than the JFET.[34] The MOSFET was the first truly compact transistor that could be miniaturised and mass-produced for a wide range of uses.[7] The MOSFET thus became the most common type of transistor in computers, electronics,[35] and communications technology (such as smartphones).[36] The US Patent and Trademark Office calls it a "groundbreaking invention that transformed life and culture around the world".[36]
In 1948, Bardeen and Brattain patented the progenitor of MOSFET, an insulated-gate FET (IGFET) with an inversion layer. Their patent and the concept of an inversion layer, forms the basis of CMOS technology today.[37] CMOS (complementary MOS), a semiconductor device fabrication process for MOSFETs, was developed by Chih-Tang Sah and Frank Wanlass at Fairchild Semiconductor in 1963.[38][39] The first report of a floating-gate MOSFET was made by Dawon Kahng and Simon Sze in 1967.[40] The concept of a double-gate thin-film transistor (TFT) was proposed by H. R. Farrah (Bendix Corporation) and R. F. Steinberg in 1967.[41] A double-gate MOSFET was first demonstrated in 1984 by Electrotechnical Laboratory researchers Toshihiro Sekigawa and Yutaka Hayashi.[42][43] FinFET (fin field-effect transistor), a type of 3D non-planar multi-gate MOSFET, originated from the research of Digh Hisamoto and his team at Hitachi Central Research Laboratory in 1989.[44][45]
Basic information
[edit]FETs can be majority-charge-carrier devices, in which the current is carried predominantly by majority carriers, or minority-charge-carrier devices, in which the current is mainly due to a flow of minority carriers.[46] The device consists of an active channel through which charge carriers, electrons or holes, flow from the source to the drain. Source and drain terminal conductors are connected to the semiconductor through ohmic contacts. The conductivity of the channel is a function of the potential applied across the gate and source terminals.
The FET's three terminals are:[47]
- Source (S), through which the carriers enter the channel. Conventionally, current entering the channel at S is designated by IS.
- Drain (D), through which the carriers leave the channel. Conventionally, current leaving the channel at D is designated by ID. Drain-to-source voltage is VDS.
- Gate (G), the terminal that modulates the channel conductivity. By applying voltage to G, one can control ID.
More about terminals
[edit]
All FETs have source, drain, and gate terminals that correspond roughly to the emitter, collector, and base of BJTs. Most FETs have a fourth terminal called the body, base, bulk, or substrate. This fourth terminal serves to bias the transistor into operation; it is rare to make non-trivial use of the body terminal in circuit designs, but its presence is important when setting up the physical layout of an integrated circuit. The size of the gate, length L in the diagram, is the distance between source and drain. The width is the extension of the transistor, in the direction perpendicular to the cross section in the diagram (i.e., into/out of the screen). Typically the width is much larger than the length of the gate. A gate length of 1 μm limits the upper frequency to about 5 GHz, 0.2 μm to about 30 GHz.
The names of the terminals refer to their functions. The gate terminal may be thought of as controlling the opening and closing of a physical gate. This gate permits electrons to flow through or blocks their passage by creating or eliminating a channel between the source and drain. Electron-flow from the source terminal towards the drain terminal is influenced by an applied voltage. The body simply refers to the bulk of the semiconductor in which the gate, source and drain lie. Usually the body terminal is connected to the highest or lowest voltage within the circuit, depending on the type of the FET. The body terminal and the source terminal are sometimes connected together since the source is often connected to the highest or lowest voltage within the circuit, although there are several uses of FETs which do not have such a configuration, such as transmission gates and cascode circuits.
Unlike BJTs, the vast majority of FETs are electrically symmetrical. The source and drain terminals can thus be interchanged in practical circuits with no change in operating characteristics or function. This can be confusing when FET's appear to be connected "backwards" in schematic diagrams and circuits because the physical orientation of the FET was decided for other reasons, such as printed circuit layout considerations.
Effect of gate voltage on current
[edit]


The FET controls the flow of electrons (or electron holes) from the source to drain by affecting the size and shape of a "conductive channel" created and influenced by voltage (or lack of voltage) applied across the gate and source terminals. (For simplicity, this discussion assumes that the body and source are connected.) This conductive channel is the "stream" through which electrons flow from source to drain.
n-channel FET
[edit]In an n-channel "depletion-mode" device, a negative gate-to-source voltage causes a depletion region to expand in width and encroach on the channel from the sides, narrowing the channel. If the active region expands to completely close the channel, the resistance of the channel from source to drain becomes large, and the FET is effectively turned off like a switch (see right figure, when there is very small current). This is called "pinch-off", and the voltage at which it occurs is called the "pinch-off voltage". Conversely, a positive gate-to-source voltage increases the channel size and allows electrons to flow easily (see right figure, when there is a conduction channel and current is large).
In an n-channel "enhancement-mode" device, a conductive channel does not exist naturally within the transistor, and a positive gate-to-source voltage is necessary to create one. The positive voltage attracts free-floating electrons within the body towards the gate, forming a conductive channel. But first, enough electrons must be attracted near the gate to counter the dopant ions added to the body of the FET; this forms a region with no mobile carriers called a depletion region, and the voltage at which this occurs is referred to as the threshold voltage of the FET. Further gate-to-source voltage increase will attract even more electrons towards the gate which are able to create an active channel from source to drain; this process is called inversion.
p-channel FET
[edit]In a p-channel "depletion-mode" device, a positive voltage from gate to body widens the depletion layer by forcing electrons to the gate-insulator/semiconductor interface, leaving exposed a carrier-free region of immobile, positively charged acceptor ions.
Conversely, in a p-channel "enhancement-mode" device, a conductive region does not exist and negative voltage must be used to generate a conduction channel.
Effect of drain-to-source voltage on channel
[edit]For either enhancement- or depletion-mode devices, at drain-to-source voltages much less than gate-to-source voltages, changing the gate voltage will alter the channel resistance, and drain current will be proportional to drain voltage (referenced to source voltage). In this mode the FET operates like a variable resistor and the FET is said to be operating in a linear mode or ohmic mode.[48][49]
If drain-to-source voltage is increased, this creates a significant asymmetrical change in the shape of the channel due to a gradient of voltage potential from source to drain. The shape of the inversion region becomes "pinched-off" near the drain end of the channel. If drain-to-source voltage is increased further, the pinch-off point of the channel begins to move away from the drain towards the source. The FET is said to be in saturation mode;[50] although some authors refer to it as active mode, for a better analogy with bipolar transistor operating regions.[51][52] The saturation mode, or the region between ohmic and saturation, is used when amplification is needed. The in-between region is sometimes considered to be part of the ohmic or linear region, even where drain current is not approximately linear with drain voltage.
Even though the conductive channel formed by gate-to-source voltage no longer connects source to drain during saturation mode, carriers are not blocked from flowing. Considering again an n-channel enhancement-mode device, a depletion region exists in the p-type body, surrounding the conductive channel and drain and source regions. The electrons which comprise the channel are free to move out of the channel through the depletion region if attracted to the drain by drain-to-source voltage. The depletion region is free of carriers and has a resistance similar to silicon. Any increase of the drain-to-source voltage will increase the distance from drain to the pinch-off point, increasing the resistance of the depletion region in proportion to the drain-to-source voltage applied. This proportional change causes the drain-to-source current to remain relatively fixed, independent of changes to the drain-to-source voltage, quite unlike its ohmic behavior in the linear mode of operation. Thus, in saturation mode, the FET behaves as a constant-current source rather than as a resistor, and can effectively be used as a voltage amplifier. In this case, the gate-to-source voltage determines the level of constant current through the channel.
Composition
[edit]FETs can be constructed from various semiconductors, out of which silicon is by far the most common. Most FETs are made by using conventional bulk semiconductor processing techniques, using a single crystal semiconductor wafer as the active region, or channel.
Among the more unusual body materials are amorphous silicon, polycrystalline silicon or other amorphous semiconductors in thin-film transistors or organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) that are based on organic semiconductors; often, OFET gate insulators and electrodes are made of organic materials, as well. Such FETs are manufactured using a variety of materials such as silicon carbide (SiC), gallium arsenide (GaAs), gallium nitride (GaN), and indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs).
In June 2011, IBM announced that it had successfully used graphene-based FETs in an integrated circuit.[53][54] These transistors are capable of about 2.23 GHz cutoff frequency, much higher than standard silicon FETs.[55]
Types
[edit]
The channel of a FET is doped to produce either an n-type semiconductor or a p-type semiconductor. The drain and source may be doped of opposite type to the channel, in the case of enhancement mode FETs, or doped of similar type to the channel as in depletion mode FETs. Field-effect transistors are also distinguished by the method of insulation between channel and gate. Types of FETs include:
- The MOSFET (metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor) utilizes an insulator (typically SiO2) between the gate and the body. This is by far the most common type of FET.
- The DGMOSFET (dual-gate MOSFET) or DGMOS, a MOSFET with two insulated gates.
- The IGBT (insulated-gate bipolar transistor) is a device for power control. It has a structure akin to a MOSFET coupled with a bipolar-like main conduction channel. These are commonly used for the 200–3000 V drain-to-source voltage range of operation. Power MOSFETs are still the device of choice for drain-to-source voltages of 1 to 200 V.
- The JLNT (junctionless nanowire transistor) is a type of field-effect transistor (FET) which channel is one or multiple nanowires and does not present any junction.
- The MNOS (metal–nitride–oxide–semiconductor transistor) utilizes a nitride-oxide layer insulator between the gate and the body.
- The ISFET (ion-sensitive field-effect transistor) can be used to measure ion concentrations in a solution; when the ion concentration (such as H+, see pH electrode) changes, the current through the transistor will change accordingly.
- The BioFET (Biologically sensitive field-effect transistor) is a class of sensors/biosensors based on ISFET technology which are utilized to detect charged molecules; when a charged molecule is present, changes in the electrostatic field at the BioFET surface result in a measurable change in current through the transistor. These include enzyme modified FETs (EnFETs), immunologically modified FETs (ImmunoFETs), gene-modified FETs (GenFETs), DNAFETs, cell-based BioFETs (CPFETs), beetle/chip FETs (BeetleFETs), and FETs based on ion-channels/protein binding.[56]
- The DNAFET (DNA field-effect transistor) is a specialized FET that acts as a biosensor, by using a gate made of single-strand DNA molecules to detect matching DNA strands.
- finFET, including GAAFET or gate-all-around FET, used on high density processor chips
- The JFET (junction field-effect transistor) uses a reverse biased p–n junction to separate the gate from the body.
- The static induction transistor (SIT) is a type of JFET with a short channel.
- The DEPFET is a FET formed in a fully depleted substrate and acts as a sensor, amplifier and memory node at the same time. It can be used as an image (photon) sensor.
- The FREDFET (fast-reverse or fast-recovery epitaxial diode FET) is a specialized FET designed to provide a very fast recovery (turn-off) of the body diode, making it convenient for driving inductive loads such as electric motors, especially medium-powered brushless DC motors.
- The HIGFET (heterostructure insulated-gate field-effect transistor) is now used mainly in research.[57]
- The MODFET (modulation-doped field-effect transistor) is a high-electron-mobility transistor using a quantum well structure formed by graded doping of the active region.
- The TFET (tunnel field-effect transistor) is based on band-to-band tunneling.[58]
- The TQFET (topological quantum field-effect transistor) switches a 2D material from dissipationless topological insulator ('on' state) to conventional insulator ('off' state) using an applied electric field.[59]
- The HEMT (high-electron-mobility transistor), also called a HFET (heterostructure FET), can be made using bandgap engineering in a ternary semiconductor such as AlGaAs. The fully depleted wide-band-gap material forms the isolation between gate and body.
- The MESFET (metal–semiconductor field-effect transistor) substitutes the p–n junction of the JFET with a Schottky barrier; and is used in GaAs and other III-V semiconductor materials.
- The NOMFET is a nanoparticle organic memory field-effect transistor.[60]
- The GNRFET (graphene nanoribbon field-effect transistor) uses a graphene nanoribbon for its channel.[61]
- The VeSFET (vertical-slit field-effect transistor) is a square-shaped junctionless FET with a narrow slit connecting the source and drain at opposite corners. Two gates occupy the other corners, and control the current through the slit.[62]
- The CNTFET (carbon nanotube field-effect transistor).
- The OFET (organic field-effect transistor) uses an organic semiconductor in its channel.
- The QFET (quantum field effect transistor) takes advantage of quantum tunneling to greatly increase the speed of transistor operation by eliminating the traditional transistor's area of electron conduction.
- The SB-FET (Schottky-barrier field-effect transistor) is a field-effect transistor with metallic source and drain contact electrodes, which create Schottky barriers at both the source-channel and drain-channel interfaces.[63][64]
- The GFET is a highly sensitive graphene-based field effect transistor used as biosensors and chemical sensors. Due to the 2 dimensional structure of graphene, along with its physical properties, GFETs offer increased sensitivity, and reduced instances of 'false positives' in sensing applications[65]
- The Fe FET uses a ferroelectric between the gate, allowing the transistor to retain its state in the absence of bias - such devices may have application as non-volatile memory.
- VTFET, or vertical-transport field-effect transistor, IBM's 2021 modification of FinFET to allow higher density and lower power.[66]
Advantages
[edit]Field-effect transistors have high gate-to-drain current resistance, of the order of 100 MΩ or more, providing a high degree of isolation between control and flow. Because base current noise will increase with shaping time[clarification needed],[67] a FET typically produces less noise than a bipolar junction transistor (BJT), and is found in noise-sensitive electronics such as tuners and low-noise amplifiers for VHF and satellite receivers. It exhibits no offset voltage at zero drain current and makes an excellent signal chopper. It typically has better thermal stability than a BJT.[47]
Because the FETs are controlled by gate charge, once the gate is closed or open, there is no additional power draw, as there would be with a bipolar junction transistor or with non-latching relays in some states. This allows extremely low-power switching, which in turn allows greater miniaturization of circuits because heat dissipation needs are reduced compared to other types of switches.
Disadvantages
[edit]A field-effect transistor has a relatively low gain–bandwidth product compared to a bipolar junction transistor. MOSFETs are very susceptible to overload voltages, thus requiring special handling during installation.[68] The fragile insulating layer of the MOSFET between the gate and the channel makes it vulnerable to electrostatic discharge or changes to threshold voltage during handling. This is not usually a problem after the device has been installed in a properly designed circuit.
FETs often have a very low "on" resistance and have a high "off" resistance. However, the intermediate resistances are significant, and so FETs can dissipate large amounts of power while switching. Thus, efficiency can put a premium on switching quickly, but this can cause transients that can excite stray inductances and generate significant voltages that can couple to the gate and cause unintentional switching. FET circuits can therefore require very careful layout and can involve trades between switching speed and power dissipation. There is also a trade-off between voltage rating and "on" resistance, so high-voltage FETs have a relatively high "on" resistance and hence conduction losses.[69]
Failure modes
[edit]Field-effect transistors are relatively robust, especially when operated within the temperature and electrical limitations defined by the manufacturer (proper derating). However, modern FET devices can often incorporate a body diode. If the characteristics of the body diode are not taken into consideration, the FET can experience slow body diode behavior, where a parasitic transistor will turn on and allow high current to be drawn from drain to source when the FET is off.[70]
Uses
[edit]The most commonly used FET is the MOSFET. The CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) process technology is the basis for modern digital integrated circuits. This process technology uses an arrangement where the (usually "enhancement-mode") p-channel MOSFET and n-channel MOSFET are connected in series such that when one is on, the other is off.
In FETs, electrons can flow in either direction through the channel when operated in the linear mode. The naming convention of drain terminal and source terminal is somewhat arbitrary, as the devices are typically (but not always) built symmetrical from source to drain. This makes FETs suitable for switching analog signals between paths (multiplexing). With this concept, one can construct a solid-state mixing board, for example. FET is commonly used as an amplifier. For example, due to its large input resistance and low output resistance, it is effective as a buffer in common-drain (source follower) configuration.
IGBJTs are used in switching internal combustion engine ignition coils, where fast switching and voltage blocking capabilities are important.
Source-gated transistor
[edit]Source-gated transistors are more robust to manufacturing and environmental issues in large-area electronics such as display screens, but are slower in operation than FETs.[71]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Lilienfeld, J.E. "Method and apparatus for controlling electric current" Archived 2022-04-09 at the Wayback Machine US Patent no. 1,745,175 (filed: 8 October 1926 ; issued: 28 January 1930).
- ^ CA 272437 "Electric current control mechanism", first filed in Canada on October 22, 1925
- ^ a b Lee, Thomas H. (2003). The Design of CMOS Radio-Frequency Integrated Circuits (PDF). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-64377-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-12-09. Retrieved 2019-07-20.
- ^ Puers, Robert; Baldi, Livio; Voorde, Marcel Van de; Nooten, Sebastiaan E. van (2017). Nanoelectronics: Materials, Devices, Applications, 2 Volumes. John Wiley & Sons. p. 14. ISBN 978-3-527-34053-8.
- ^ Grundmann, Marius (2010). The Physics of Semiconductors. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-642-13884-3.
- ^ Nishizawa, Jun-Ichi (1982). "Junction Field-Effect Devices". In Sittig, Roland; Roggwiller, P. (eds.). Semiconductor Devices for Power Conditioning. Springer. pp. 241–272. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7263-9_11. ISBN 978-1-4684-7265-3.
- ^ a b c d Moskowitz, Sanford L. (2016). Advanced Materials Innovation: Managing Global Technology in the 21st century. John Wiley & Sons. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-470-50892-3.
- ^ "The Foundation of Today's Digital World: The Triumph of the MOS Transistor". Computer History Museum. 13 July 2010. Retrieved 21 July 2019.
- ^ a b Howard R. Duff (2001). "John Bardeen and transistor physics". AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 550. pp. 3–32. doi:10.1063/1.1354371.
- ^ Hans Camenzind (2005). Designing Analog Chips.
- ^ Massoud, Hisham Z. (1997). ULSI Science and Technology/1997. The Electrochemical Society. p. 43. ISBN 978-1-56677-130-6.
- ^ Lillian Hoddeson (1994). "Research on crystal rectifiers during World War II and the invention of the transistor". History and Technology. 11 (2): 121–130. doi:10.1080/07341519408581858.
- ^ Michael Riordan; Lillian Hoddeson (1997). Crystal Fire: The Birth of the Information Age. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-04124-8.
- ^ a b US2802760A, Lincoln, Derick & Frosch, Carl J., "Oxidation of semiconductive surfaces for controlled diffusion", issued 1957-08-13
- ^ a b Frosch, C. J.; Derick, L (1957). "Surface Protection and Selective Masking during Diffusion in Silicon". Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 104 (9): 547. doi:10.1149/1.2428650.
- ^ Christophe Lécuyer; David C. Brook; Jay Last (2010). Makers of the Microchip: A Documentary History of Fairchild Semiconductor. MIT Press. pp. 62–63. ISBN 978-0-262-01424-3.
- ^ Claeys, Cor L. (2003). ULSI Process Integration III: Proceedings of the International Symposium. The Electrochemical Society. pp. 27–30. ISBN 978-1-56677-376-8.
- ^ Lojek, Bo (2007). History of Semiconductor Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 324. ISBN 978-3-540-34258-8.
- ^ Stefan Ferdinand Müller (2016). Development of HfO2-Based Ferroelectric Memories for Future CMOS Technology Nodes. BoD – Books on Demand. ISBN 978-3-7392-4894-3.
- ^ B.G Lowe; R.A. Sareen (2013). Semiconductor X-Ray Detectors. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4665-5401-6.
- ^ Bassett, Ross Knox (2007). To the Digital Age: Research Labs, Start-up Companies, and the Rise of MOS Technology. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-8018-8639-3.
- ^ a b Huff, Howard; Riordan, Michael (2007-09-01). "Frosch and Derick: Fifty Years Later (Foreword)". The Electrochemical Society Interface. 16 (3): 29. doi:10.1149/2.F02073IF. ISSN 1064-8208.
- ^ Ligenza, J. R.; Spitzer, W. G. (1960-07-01). "The mechanisms for silicon oxidation in steam and oxygen". Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 14: 131–136. Bibcode:1960JPCS...14..131L. doi:10.1016/0022-3697(60)90219-5. ISSN 0022-3697.
- ^ Deal, Bruce E. (1998). "Highlights Of Silicon Thermal Oxidation Technology". Silicon materials science and technology. The Electrochemical Society. p. 183. ISBN 978-1566771931.
- ^ Lojek, Bo (2007). History of Semiconductor Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 322. ISBN 978-3540342588.
- ^ Bassett, Ross Knox (2007). To the Digital Age: Research Labs, Start-up Companies, and the Rise of MOS Technology. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 22–23. ISBN 978-0-8018-8639-3.
- ^ Atalla, M.; Kahng, D. (1960). "Silicon-silicon dioxide field induced surface devices". IRE-AIEE Solid State Device Research Conference.
- ^ "1960 – Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) Transistor Demonstrated". The Silicon Engine. Computer History Museum. Retrieved 2023-01-16.
- ^ KAHNG, D. (1961). "Silicon-Silicon Dioxide Surface Device". Technical Memorandum of Bell Laboratories: 583–596. doi:10.1142/9789814503464_0076. ISBN 978-981-02-0209-5.
{{cite journal}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ Lojek, Bo (2007). History of Semiconductor Engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. p. 321. ISBN 978-3-540-34258-8.
- ^ Motoyoshi, M. (2009). "Through-Silicon Via (TSV)". Proceedings of the IEEE. 97 (1): 43–48. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2008.2007462. ISSN 0018-9219. S2CID 29105721.
- ^ "Transistors Keep Moore's Law Alive". EETimes. 12 December 2018. Retrieved 18 July 2019.
- ^ "Who Invented the Transistor?". Computer History Museum. 4 December 2013. Retrieved 20 July 2019.
- ^ Duncan, Ben (1996). High Performance Audio Power Amplifiers. Elsevier. p. 177. ISBN 978-0-08-050804-7.
- ^ "Dawon Kahng". National Inventors Hall of Fame. Retrieved 27 June 2019.
- ^ a b "Remarks by Director Iancu at the 2019 International Intellectual Property Conference". United States Patent and Trademark Office. June 10, 2019. Archived from the original on 17 December 2019. Retrieved 20 July 2019.
- ^ Howard R. Duff (2001). "John Bardeen and transistor physics". AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 550. pp. 3–32. doi:10.1063/1.1354371.
- ^ "1963: Complementary MOS Circuit Configuration is Invented". Computer History Museum. Retrieved 6 July 2019.
- ^ U.S. patent 3,102,230, filed in 1960, issued in 1963
- ^ D. Kahng and S. M. Sze, "A floating gate and its application to memory devices", The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 46, no. 4, 1967, pp. 1288–1295
- ^ Farrah, H. R.; Steinberg, R. F. (February 1967). "Analysis of double-gate thin-film transistor". IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 14 (2): 69–74. Bibcode:1967ITED...14...69F. doi:10.1109/T-ED.1967.15901.
- ^ Colinge, J.P. (2008). FinFETs and Other Multi-Gate Transistors. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-387-71751-7.
- ^ Sekigawa, Toshihiro; Hayashi, Yutaka (1 August 1984). "Calculated threshold-voltage characteristics of an XMOS transistor having an additional bottom gate". Solid-State Electronics. 27 (8): 827–828. Bibcode:1984SSEle..27..827S. doi:10.1016/0038-1101(84)90036-4. ISSN 0038-1101.
- ^ "IEEE Andrew S. Grove Award Recipients". IEEE Andrew S. Grove Award. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Archived from the original on September 9, 2018. Retrieved 4 July 2019.
- ^ "The Breakthrough Advantage for FPGAs with Tri-Gate Technology" (PDF). Intel. 2014. Retrieved 4 July 2019.
- ^ Jacob Millman (1985). Electronic devices and circuits. Singapore: McGraw-Hill International. p. 397. ISBN 978-0-07-085505-2.
- ^ a b Jacob Millman (1985). Electronic devices and circuits. Singapore: McGraw-Hill. pp. 384–385. ISBN 978-0-07-085505-2.
- ^ Galup-Montoro, C.; Schneider, M.C. (2007). MOSFET modeling for circuit analysis and design. London/Singapore: World Scientific. p. 83. ISBN 978-981-256-810-6.
- ^ Norbert R Malik (1995). Electronic circuits: analysis, simulation, and design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. pp. 315–316. ISBN 978-0-02-374910-0.
- ^ Spencer, R.R.; Ghausi, M.S. (2001). Microelectronic circuits. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson Education/Prentice-Hall. p. 102. ISBN 978-0-201-36183-4.
- ^ Sedra, A. S.; Smith, K.C. (2004). Microelectronic circuits (Fifth ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 552. ISBN 978-0-19-514251-8.
- ^ PR Gray; PJ Hurst; SH Lewis; RG Meyer (2001). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits (Fourth ed.). New York: Wiley. pp. §1.5.2 p. 45. ISBN 978-0-471-32168-2.
- ^ Bob Yirka (10 January 2011). "IBM creates first graphene based integrated circuit". Phys.org. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
- ^ Lin, Y.-M.; Valdes-Garcia, A.; Han, S.-J.; Farmer, D. B.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y.; Dimitrakopoulos, C.; Grill, A; Avouris, P; Jenkins, K. A. (2011). "Wafer-Scale Graphene Integrated Circuit". Science. 332 (6035): 1294–1297. Bibcode:2011Sci...332.1294L. doi:10.1126/science.1204428. PMID 21659599. S2CID 3020496.
- ^ Belle Dumé (10 December 2012). "Flexible graphene transistor sets new records". Physics World. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
- ^ Schöning, Michael J.; Poghossian, Arshak (2002). "Recent advances in biologically sensitive field-effect transistors (BioFETs)" (PDF). Analyst. 127 (9): 1137–1151. Bibcode:2002Ana...127.1137S. doi:10.1039/B204444G. PMID 12375833.
- ^ freepatentsonline.com, HIGFET and method - Motorola]
- ^ Ionescu, A. M.; Riel, H. (2011). "Tunnel field-effect transistors as energy-efficient electronic switches". Nature. 479 (7373): 329–337. Bibcode:2011Natur.479..329I. doi:10.1038/nature10679. PMID 22094693. S2CID 4322368.
- ^ Dumé, Isabelle (12 December 2018). "Topological off-on switch could make new type of transistor". Physics World. IOP Publishing. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
- ^ "Organic transistor paves way for new generations of neuro-inspired computers". ScienceDaily. January 29, 2010. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
- ^ Sarvari H.; Ghayour, R.; Dastjerdy, E. (2011). "Frequency analysis of graphene nanoribbon FET by Non-Equilibrium Green's Function in mode space". Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures. 43 (8): 1509–1513. Bibcode:2011PhyE...43.1509S. doi:10.1016/j.physe.2011.04.018.
- ^ Jerzy Ruzyllo (2016). Semiconductor Glossary: A Resource for Semiconductor Community. World Scientific. p. 244. ISBN 978-981-4749-56-5.
- ^ Appenzeller J, et al. (November 2008). "Toward Nanowire Electronics". IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 55 (11): 2827–2845. Bibcode:2008ITED...55.2827A. doi:10.1109/ted.2008.2008011. ISSN 0018-9383. OCLC 755663637. S2CID 703393.
- ^ Prakash, Abhijith; Ilatikhameneh, Hesameddin; Wu, Peng; Appenzeller, Joerg (2017). "Understanding contact gating in Schottky barrier transistors from 2D channels". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 12596. arXiv:1707.01459. Bibcode:2017NatSR...712596P. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12816-3. ISSN 2045-2322. OCLC 1010581463. PMC 5626721. PMID 28974712.
- ^ Miklos, Bolza. "What Are Graphene Field Effect Transistors (GFETs)?". Graphenea. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
- ^ Ingle, Prathamesh (December 21, 2021). "IBM Research Unveils 'VTFET': A Revolutionary New Chip Architecture Which is Two Times the Performance finFET".
- ^ "VIII.5. Noise in Transistors" (PDF).
- ^ Allen Mottershead (2004). Electronic devices and siraj circuits. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India. ISBN 978-81-203-0124-5.
- ^ Bhalla, Anup (2021-09-17). "Origins of SiC FETs and Their Evolution Toward the Perfect Switch". Power Electronics News. Retrieved 2022-01-21.
- ^ Slow Body Diode Failures of Field Effect Transistors (FETs): A Case Study.
- ^ Sporea, R.A.; Trainor, M.J.; Young, N.D.; Silva, S.R.P. (2014). "Source-gated transistors for order-of-magnitude performance improvements in thin-film digital circuits". Scientific Reports. 4 4295. Bibcode:2014NatSR...4E4295S. doi:10.1038/srep04295. PMC 3944386. PMID 24599023.
External links
[edit]- PBS The Field Effect Transistor
- How Semiconductors and Transistors Work (MOSFETs) WeCanFigureThisOut.org
- Junction Field Effect Transistor
- CMOS gate circuitry
- Winning the Battle Against Latchup in CMOS Analog Switches
- Field Effect Transistors in Theory and Practice
- The Field Effect Transistor as a Voltage Controlled Resistor
- "The FET (field effect transistor)". rolinychupetin (L.R.Linares). March 30, 2013 – via YouTube.
Field-effect transistor
View on GrokipediaFundamentals
Definition and Operating Principle
A field-effect transistor (FET) is a three-terminal semiconductor device consisting of a gate, drain, and source, in which the voltage applied to the gate terminal controls the conductivity of a channel formed between the drain and source terminals, thereby modulating the current flow through the device.[4] The FET operates as a voltage-controlled device, where the input signal at the gate influences the output current without requiring significant gate current, resulting in high input impedance typically ranging from 10^{10} to 10^{15} \Omega.[5] The operating principle of the FET relies on the field effect, where the electric field generated by the gate voltage either induces or depletes charge carriers in the semiconductor channel, enabling unipolar conduction through either electrons or holes. This field is established across a capacitive structure between the gate electrode and the channel, with the gate acting as one plate and the channel as the other, separated by an insulating layer or junction that prevents direct current flow into the gate. In the channel, the conductivity varies with the gate voltage, allowing the device to function as a controllable resistor or switch for current between the source and drain.[4] In the linear region of operation, where the drain-source voltage is small, the drain current can be approximated by the relation , derived from the channel conductance modulated by the effective gate overdrive voltage, with as carrier mobility, as gate capacitance per unit area, as the channel aspect ratio, as gate-source voltage, as threshold voltage, and as drain-source voltage; this MOSFET-like behavior illustrates the quadratic dependence on gate voltage in saturation but linear in for low voltages.[6] FETs operate in either depletion mode, where a conducting channel exists at zero gate-source voltage and the gate voltage depletes carriers to reduce conductivity, or enhancement mode, where no channel exists at zero bias and a positive (or negative, depending on carrier type) gate voltage enhances carrier density to form the channel. These modes allow versatile applications in amplification and switching, with the transition determined by the threshold voltage at which the channel begins to form or pinch off.[5][4]Comparison to Other Transistors
The field-effect transistor (FET) differs fundamentally from the bipolar junction transistor (BJT) in its operating principle, with FETs being voltage-controlled devices that rely on unipolar conduction through majority carriers in a semiconductor channel, whereas BJTs are current-controlled devices that utilize both electrons and holes for bipolar conduction. This voltage control in FETs results in high input impedance and minimal gate current, enabling low-noise amplification suitable for high-impedance sources, while BJTs require base current for operation, leading to lower input impedance and higher power dissipation due to the need for continuous biasing current. Additionally, FETs exhibit lower noise generation compared to BJTs, which can produce medium levels of thermal and shot noise during operation.[7][8][9]| Parameter | FET (e.g., MOSFET) | BJT |
|---|---|---|
| Input Impedance | >10¹² Ω (negligible gate current) | ~1–10 kΩ (dependent on β and r_e) |
| Power Handling | Up to hundreds of watts in modern devices, but historically lower than BJT | Up to hundreds of watts, traditionally superior for high-power applications |
| Switching Speed | Faster (ns range, no charge storage delay) | Medium (ns range, but slower turn-off due to storage time) |
| Temperature Stability | High (unipolar operation reduces thermal runaway) | Lower (bipolar conduction increases sensitivity to temperature variations) |
Historical Development
Early Concepts and Inventions
The concept of the field-effect transistor (FET) originated in the mid-1920s with theoretical proposals for devices that could control current flow using an electric field applied to a semiconductor or similar material. In 1925, Austrian physicist Julius Edgar Lilienfeld filed a patent describing a three-terminal device where a gate electrode modulates conductivity in a channel of semiconducting material, such as copper oxide or copper sulfide, through an electrolyte interface.[15] This design served as a precursor to modern FETs, though Lilienfeld never constructed a functional prototype due to the era's limitations in semiconductor purity and fabrication techniques.[16] Building on this idea, German engineer Oskar Heil proposed a solid-state variant in 1934 while at Cambridge University. Heil's patent outlined a device using a thin semiconductor layer—potentially copper oxide or similar—with a controlling electrode capacitively coupled to the surface to vary channel resistance without direct contact.[17] Like Lilienfeld's work, Heil's concept remained unrealized, as available materials suffered from high impurity levels and unstable surface properties that disrupted reliable field-effect operation.[18] Post-World War II advancements in semiconductor processing enabled renewed exploration of FET principles. In 1952, William Shockley at Bell Laboratories published a theoretical analysis of the junction field-effect transistor (JFET), describing a device where reverse-biased p-n junctions deplete a channel in n-type or p-type semiconductor material to control current flow.[19] This work built on earlier ideas but incorporated junction isolation to mitigate surface effects. The following year, in 1953, George C. Dacey and Ian M. Ross at Bell Labs demonstrated the first practical JFET using germanium, achieving amplification with measurable transconductance.[20] A primary challenge delaying practical FET realization from the 1920s through the 1940s was achieving sufficient control over semiconductor impurities. Early materials like copper oxide or crude germanium contained excessive contaminants, leading to unpredictable carrier mobility and surface states that masked field effects; purified germanium and silicon, developed during wartime radar research, only became viable in the early 1950s.[17][18]| Year | Milestone | Inventor(s)/Key Figure(s) | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1925 | Patent filing for electrolyte-based FET | Julius Edgar Lilienfeld | Theoretical three-terminal device using field to control conductivity in semiconducting film via electrolyte. | US Patent 1,745,175 |
| 1934 | Patent for solid-state FET concept | Oskar Heil | Capacitive control of current in thin semiconductor layer, avoiding electrolyte. | British Patent 439,457 |
| 1952 | Theoretical paper on JFET | William Shockley | Analysis of junction-depleted channel for unipolar amplification in semiconductors. | Proc. IRE, 1952 |
| 1953 | First practical JFET demonstration | George C. Dacey, Ian M. Ross | Working germanium-based device exhibiting field-effect amplification at Bell Labs. | Proc. IRE, 1953 |
Evolution of MOSFET
The metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) was invented in 1959 by Mohamed M. Atalla and Dawon Kahng at Bell Laboratories, building on Atalla's earlier development of the surface passivation process using thermally grown silicon dioxide to protect silicon surfaces from contamination.[21] Their device featured an insulated gate that controlled current flow through an induced channel in the semiconductor, marking the first practical realization of this structure. The first working MOSFET was demonstrated in late 1960, with characteristics including a threshold voltage of about 3 V and a channel mobility of 200 cm²/V·s, as reported in their seminal paper. A pivotal advancement came in 1963 when Frank Wanlass, working at Fairchild Semiconductor, patented the complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) configuration, which paired n-channel and p-channel MOSFETs to achieve low static power dissipation by allowing only one transistor to conduct at a time.[22] This US Patent 3,356,858 described circuitry with standby power reduced to nanowatts, addressing the high power consumption of early MOSFET logics.[23] Although initial adoption was slow due to fabrication challenges, CMOS became the dominant technology for integrated circuits by the 1980s. Early MOSFETs predominantly used p-channel (PMOS) structures due to greater tolerance to mobile ion contamination in the gate oxide, which improved threshold voltage stability, but these suffered from lower hole mobility compared to electrons, limiting speed.[24] By the mid-1960s, n-channel (NMOS) MOSFETs emerged as a faster alternative, leveraging higher electron mobility for better performance in logic circuits, as seen in early dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) designs. The transition to CMOS in the 1970s combined NMOS speed with PMOS power efficiency, enabling complex, low-power systems.[24] The self-aligned gate process, introduced in the late 1960s, revolutionized MOSFET fabrication by using the gate electrode itself as a mask for dopant implantation, reducing overlap capacitances and enabling smaller feature sizes.[25] Developed by Fairchild Semiconductor in 1964 and refined with polysilicon gates by the end of the decade, this technique achieved gate lengths below 10 μm and supported the integration of thousands of transistors per chip.[25] The 1971 Intel 4004, the first commercial microprocessor, integrated 2,300 PMOS MOSFETs on a 10 μm process, performing 60,000 instructions per second and heralding the era of programmable computing.[26] This device exemplified MOSFETs' role in very-large-scale integration (VLSI), where Gordon Moore's 1965 observation—later known as Moore's Law—predicted transistor density doubling every 18-24 months, driving exponential improvements in performance and cost reduction. By enabling VLSI, MOSFET scaling transformed microelectronics, with transistor counts evolving from thousands in 1970s chips to over 100 billion in modern processors by 2025.[27] As of 2025, MOSFET technology has advanced to 3 nm process nodes, with foundries like Samsung employing gate-all-around (GAA) architectures and TSMC using optimized FinFET at 3 nm to maintain electrostatic control and mitigate short-channel effects. TSMC introduces GAA at its 2 nm node in 2025.[28] These nodes achieve densities exceeding 300 million transistors per mm², but face challenges from quantum tunneling, where electrons leak through thin barriers, increasing off-state current by factors of 10-100 compared to larger nodes.[28] Innovations such as high-k dielectrics and strain engineering address these issues, sustaining Moore's Law into the angstrom era.[29]Device Structure
Semiconductor Materials and Composition
Field-effect transistors (FETs), particularly metal-oxide-semiconductor FETs (MOSFETs), are predominantly fabricated using silicon as the core semiconductor material due to its abundance, well-understood properties, and compatibility with large-scale integrated circuit production.[30] The substrate is typically single-crystal silicon, doped to be either n-type or p-type depending on the device variant; for an n-channel MOSFET, a p-type substrate is used with acceptor impurities like boron at concentrations around 10^{15} to 10^{16} cm^{-3}, creating a lightly doped base that supports the formation of an inversion layer channel.[31] In contrast, p-channel MOSFETs employ an n-type silicon substrate doped with donor impurities such as phosphorus or arsenic at similar low concentrations to enable hole conduction in the channel.[32] The device structure includes distinct layers tailored for charge carrier control and conduction. Source and drain regions are formed by heavily doping the substrate with opposite-type impurities—n-type regions in p-substrates using arsenic or phosphorus at 10^{18} to 10^{20} cm^{-3}, or p-type with boron in n-substrates—creating low-resistance contacts for electrons or holes.[33] The channel region between source and drain remains lightly doped, often matching the substrate concentration (around 10^{15} cm^{-3}) or intrinsic in some designs, to allow gate-induced modulation of conductivity. The gate dielectric, traditionally silicon dioxide (SiO_2) grown to thicknesses of a few nanometers, insulates the gate while enabling capacitive coupling; modern devices replace SiO_2 with high-k materials like hafnium oxide (HfO_2) to reduce leakage currents while maintaining equivalent oxide thickness.[34] The gate electrode overlays the dielectric and is commonly polycrystalline silicon (polysilicon), doped for conductivity, though metal gates (e.g., titanium nitride) are increasingly used in advanced nodes for better work function tuning and reduced resistance.[35] Doping is introduced via ion implantation, where accelerated ions of phosphorus, arsenic, or boron are embedded into the silicon lattice at precise depths and concentrations, followed by annealing to activate the dopants and repair lattice damage.[36] The SiO_2 gate dielectric is formed through thermal oxidation, exposing silicon to oxygen at high temperatures to grow a uniform amorphous layer. While silicon dominates for its cost-effectiveness and scalability in digital and analog applications, variations using III-V compound semiconductors like gallium arsenide (GaAs) offer superior electron mobility for high-speed RF and optoelectronic devices, though their higher production costs limit widespread adoption.[37]Terminal Configurations
The field-effect transistor (FET) features three primary terminals: the gate, drain, and source, each serving distinct roles in controlling and facilitating current flow through the device. The gate terminal applies a control voltage that modulates the conductivity of the channel between the source and drain, enabling the FET to function as a voltage-controlled current source. In metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), the gate is electrically insulated from the channel by a thin oxide layer, preventing direct current flow into the gate and achieving extremely high input impedance. In contrast, junction field-effect transistors (JFETs) employ a reverse-biased p-n junction at the gate, which depletes the channel of charge carriers to regulate conduction without significant gate current.[38][39] The drain terminal connects to the higher-potential end of the channel, where current exits the device toward the load; it defines the drain-to-source voltage , which drives the flow of charge carriers through the channel. The source terminal, at the lower potential, serves as the entry point for charge carriers into the channel and defines the gate-to-source voltage relative to the gate; it typically connects to the input signal or ground in circuit applications. In n-channel devices, electrons flow from source to drain, while in p-channel variants, holes flow from source to drain (under reversed voltage polarities), but the terminal designations remain consistent.[38] Biasing the FET requires careful setup of and to establish the desired operating region. For enhancement-mode FETs, which lack a pre-existing channel, conduction occurs only when exceeds the threshold voltage (typically 0.5–2 V for silicon devices), inducing an inversion layer to form the channel and allowing significant drain current. Depletion-mode FETs, with a built-in channel, conduct at but can be turned off by applying a reverse bias to . Proper biasing ensures the device operates in the active region without entering cutoff or breakdown.[38] FETs are often configured in circuits based on which terminal is common to both input and output signals, analogous to bipolar junction transistor amplifiers. In the common-source configuration, the source is grounded, input is applied to the gate, and output is taken from the drain, providing voltage gain and moderate input/output impedances. The common-drain (or source-follower) setup grounds the drain to the supply voltage, applies input to the gate, and outputs from the source, offering unity voltage gain with high input impedance and low output impedance for buffering. The common-gate arrangement grounds the gate, inputs at the source, and outputs from the drain, yielding current gain with low input impedance and high output impedance, suitable for high-frequency applications. These configurations leverage the terminals' roles to tailor amplification characteristics.[40] Standard circuit symbols distinguish FET types and modes. For an n-channel enhancement-mode MOSFET, the symbol depicts a solid line for the channel broken by the gate, with an arrow on the source pointing outward; a p-channel version reverses the arrow. Depletion-mode symbols show a solid channel line, indicating inherent conduction. JFET symbols similarly use a channel line with the gate connected via a diode symbol to represent the junction, and arrows denote channel type. Pinouts typically label gate (G), drain (D), and source (S) on device packages, with the body/substrate sometimes tied internally to the source.[41]Operation and Characteristics
Gate Voltage Effects on Channel Current
In field-effect transistors (FETs), the gate-source voltage modulates the conductivity of the channel between the drain and source terminals, thereby controlling the drain current . This control is achieved through an electric field generated by the gate voltage, which either induces or depletes charge carriers in the channel without requiring significant gate current, distinguishing FETs from bipolar junction transistors. In enhancement-mode devices like the MOSFET, a positive (for n-channel) attracts electrons to form an inversion layer at the semiconductor-oxide interface, increasing channel conductivity; conversely, in depletion-mode devices like the JFET, a reverse-biased gate depletes carriers from an existing channel, reducing conductivity.[42][38] The threshold voltage is a critical parameter defining the onset of significant channel conduction in enhancement-mode FETs, specifically the minimum required to form a conductive inversion layer. For silicon MOSFETs, typically ranges from 0.5 to 1 V, depending on device scaling and materials. Key factors influencing include oxide thickness , substrate doping concentration , and the work function difference between the gate and semiconductor; thinner oxides and higher doping generally increase , while body bias (source-to-body voltage ) shifts it via the body effect: , where is the body effect coefficient and is the Fermi potential. In depletion-mode JFETs, the analogous parameter is the pinch-off voltage , the gate voltage at which the channel is fully depleted, given by , where is the electron charge, is channel doping, is half-channel thickness, is semiconductor permittivity, and is the built-in potential.[38][42][43] The transfer characteristic, plotting versus at fixed drain-source voltage, illustrates this modulation. Below , in the subthreshold region, is exponentially small due to weak inversion and diffusion-dominated transport, enabling low-power operation. Above , in strong inversion, rises quadratically with for long-channel MOSFETs in saturation, following the gradual channel approximation: where is electron mobility, is oxide capacitance per unit area, and is the channel aspect ratio; this model assumes constant mobility and neglects short-channel effects. For JFETs, the transfer curve shows decreasing parabolically from the maximum sheet saturation current (at ) to zero at pinch-off, described by Shockley's equation: reflecting the progressive narrowing of the conductive channel width by gate-induced depletion. These characteristics highlight the FET's voltage-controlled nature, with transconductance peaking in strong inversion for amplification applications.[38][42]Drain-Source Voltage Effects
In field-effect transistors (FETs), the drain-source voltage (V_DS) plays a critical role in determining the operating region and the resulting drain current (I_D), influencing channel resistance and overall device behavior. For low V_DS values, the device operates in the linear (or triode) region, where the channel acts as a voltage-controlled resistor, and I_D increases linearly with V_DS, exhibiting ohmic behavior. This occurs because the voltage drop along the channel is small, maintaining a uniform inversion layer without significant depletion near the drain.[44] The drain current in the linear region can be described by the equation: where is the carrier mobility, is the oxide capacitance per unit area, is the width-to-length ratio of the channel, is the gate-source voltage, and is the threshold voltage; this model assumes gradual channel approximation and neglects short-channel effects.[44] As V_DS increases beyond a critical value (approximately ), the device transitions to the saturation region, where the inversion layer near the drain "pinches off" due to the high lateral electric field depleting carriers, rendering I_D nearly independent of further V_DS increases and limited by carrier supply from the source.[45] Output characteristics, plotting I_D versus V_DS for various fixed V_GS levels, illustrate these regions: curves show a linear slope at low V_DS followed by flattening in saturation, with higher V_GS shifting curves upward and extending the linear region. In saturation, a slight upward slope persists due to channel length modulation (analogous to the Early effect in bipolar transistors), where the effective channel length shortens as the depletion region encroaches from the drain, increasing I_D proportionally to V_DS and reducing output resistance; this effect is more pronounced in shorter channels and modeled by an output resistance , where is the Early voltage.[46] At sufficiently high V_DS, beyond the rated breakdown voltage, the FET enters breakdown, where excessive electric fields trigger mechanisms such as avalanche multiplication—high-energy carriers ionizing lattice atoms and generating additional carriers—or punch-through, where the drain depletion region extends to the source, creating an unintended conductive path and causing abrupt current rise; these limit safe operation and are mitigated by design features like lightly doped drain extensions.[47] In short-channel devices (typically L < 100 nm), velocity saturation alters these behaviors: carriers reach a maximum drift velocity (around 10^7 cm/s in silicon) under high fields, preventing quadratic I_D scaling with (V_GS - V_T) and causing earlier saturation at lower V_DS, which impacts scaling limits and requires adjusted models for high-performance applications.[48]n-Channel and p-Channel Variants
Field-effect transistors (FETs) are classified into n-channel and p-channel variants based on the type of majority charge carriers in the conductive channel. In n-channel FETs, such as n-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (NMOSFETs), electrons serve as the majority carriers. The device structure features heavily doped n+ regions for the source and drain on a p-type substrate, forming an inversion layer of electrons under the gate when a positive gate-to-source voltage exceeds the threshold voltage.[49] This configuration enables efficient electron transport from source to drain under applied drain-source voltage. In contrast, p-channel FETs, such as p-type MOSFETs (PMOSFETs), utilize holes as the majority carriers. The structure includes p+ source and drain regions on an n-type substrate, creating an inversion layer of holes when a negative gate-to-source voltage surpasses the threshold magnitude.[49] Hole conduction occurs from source to drain, but with inherently lower efficiency compared to electrons due to differences in carrier properties.[50] Performance differences between n-channel and p-channel variants arise primarily from carrier mobilities and effective masses. Electrons in silicon have higher mobility than holes, attributed partly to the lower effective mass of electrons (approximately 0.26 m_0 for conduction band minima) compared to holes (around 0.49 m_0 for heavy holes and 0.16 m_0 for light holes in the valence band), allowing faster drift velocities and switching speeds in n-channel devices.[50] Threshold voltages also differ: n-channel FETs typically require a positive V_T (around 0.5–1 V), while p-channel FETs need a negative V_T (around -0.5 to -1 V) to form the inversion channel. Consequently, n-channel devices exhibit lower on-resistance and higher current drive, making them suitable for high-speed applications, whereas p-channel devices are optimized for complementary pairing.[51] Complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology leverages both n-channel and p-channel FETs in pairs, such as in inverters, where the n-channel transistor pulls the output low and the p-channel pulls it high. This configuration ensures that only one transistor is on at a time during steady-state operation, minimizing static power dissipation to near zero by avoiding a direct path from supply to ground.[52][53]| Parameter | n-Channel (Electrons) | p-Channel (Holes) | Typical Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrier Mobility (bulk Si, cm²/V·s) | ~1400 | ~450 | n-Channel: High-speed logic, drivers; p-Channel: Load devices in CMOS pairs |
| Switching Speed | Faster (higher μ_n) | Slower (lower μ_p) | Balanced in CMOS for low-power digital circuits |
Types of Field-Effect Transistors
Junction Field-Effect Transistor (JFET)
The junction field-effect transistor (JFET) is a unipolar semiconductor device that operates by controlling the conductivity of a channel through an electric field generated by a reverse-biased p-n junction, distinguishing it as a depletion-mode transistor inherently conducting at zero gate bias.[20] Invented theoretically by William Shockley and experimentally demonstrated by G.C. Dacey and I.M. Ross in 1953, the JFET relies on majority carrier flow without the insulating layer found in other field-effect devices.[20] Unlike bipolar transistors, it exhibits high input impedance due to the reverse-biased gate junction, typically in the range of 10^9 to 10^12 ohms, minimizing loading effects in circuits.[56] In an n-channel JFET, the structure consists of a bar of n-type semiconductor material forming the channel between source and drain terminals, with p-type regions diffused or implanted on opposite sides to create the gate, forming p-n junctions that enclose the channel.[4] The p-channel variant reverses the doping, using a p-type channel with n-type gate regions.[4] Absent an insulating oxide layer, the gate directly contacts the semiconductor via the junction, enabling depletion through reverse bias but limiting forward bias to avoid excessive gate current.[20] This configuration results in a normally open channel at zero bias, with conductance modulated solely by voltage. Operation begins with maximum drain current (the saturation current at zero gate-source voltage ) flowing from source to drain under a positive drain-source voltage , as majority carriers (electrons in n-channel) traverse the undepleted channel.[56] Applying a negative (for n-channel) reverse-biases the gate junctions, expanding the depletion regions and narrowing the channel, which reduces the drain current .[4] Pinch-off occurs when the depletion regions meet at the pinch-off voltage (typically 1-10 V in magnitude, negative for n-channel), fully depleting the channel and reducing to near zero, though some current persists via drift in the pinched region.[56] In the saturation region (where ), the drain current follows the Shockley equation: This quadratic relationship highlights the JFET's depletion-mode behavior, where it is "always on" without bias and turned off only by sufficient reverse gate voltage.[56] Key characteristics include operation exclusively in depletion mode, with transconductance typically lower than in MOSFETs (e.g., , often in the range of 1-10 mS for common devices), limiting voltage gain in amplifiers but providing excellent linearity and low noise.[56] The input impedance exceeds that of bipolar transistors but is lower than MOSFETs due to junction capacitance and possible leakage, yet it remains suitable for applications requiring minimal signal distortion, such as RF amplifiers.[57]Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor (MOSFET)
The metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) is the predominant type of field-effect transistor, valued for its high input impedance, low power consumption, and ease of integration into large-scale circuits. Its core structure revolves around an MOS capacitor gate stack, comprising a conductive gate electrode (typically metal or doped polysilicon), a thin insulating oxide layer (usually silicon dioxide), and the underlying semiconductor body (often p-type silicon for n-channel devices), which together enable electrostatic control of channel formation without direct current flow through the gate.[58] The standard configuration is planar, with heavily doped source and drain regions flanking a channel area in the substrate surface, though vertical (trench-gate) structures are employed in power MOSFETs to support higher currents and voltages by orienting the channel perpendicular to the surface.[59] MOSFETs primarily operate in enhancement mode, where the device is off (no channel) at zero gate-to-source voltage (V_{GS} = 0) and requires V_{GS} exceeding the threshold voltage (V_T > 0 for n-channel) to induce an inversion layer channel; this mode dominates due to its compatibility with logic circuits that default to low power states.[46] In contrast, depletion mode MOSFETs are on at V_{GS} = 0, featuring a pre-implanted channel that conducts current unless depleted by a reverse gate voltage (V_T < 0 for n-channel), though this mode is less common owing to higher off-state leakage and fabrication complexity.[60] Key device parameters include the channel aspect ratio W/L (width over length), which proportionally scales the maximum drain current capacity, and the transconductance g_m = \partial I_D / \partial V_{GS}, a measure of how effectively gate voltage modulates channel current, typically peaking in saturation.[61] As channel lengths shrink below ~100 nm to boost performance and density, short-channel effects degrade operation, notably drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL), where elevated drain-to-source voltage (V_{DS}) reduces the potential barrier at the source, lowering V_T and increasing subthreshold leakage, and hot carrier injection, where high lateral fields accelerate carriers into the gate oxide, causing reliability degradation over time.[62] These issues are primarily addressed by thinning the gate oxide to enhance electrostatic gate control over the channel, thereby suppressing charge sharing between source/drain and channel while maintaining sufficient capacitance, though this trades off against gate leakage.[62] In contrast to junction field-effect transistors, the MOSFET's insulated gate provides superior isolation from the channel.[63] The drain current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of a MOSFET are described by region-specific equations for an n-channel enhancement-mode device, assuming long-channel approximation. In the cutoff region (V_{GS} < V_T), I_D = 0, as no inversion channel exists. In the linear (triode) region (V_{GS} \geq V_T and V_{DS} < V_{GS} - V_T), where \mu_n is electron mobility, C_{ox} is gate oxide capacitance per unit area, and the quadratic term accounts for channel resistance variation. In the saturation region (V_{GS} \geq V_T and V_{DS} \geq V_{GS} - V_T), with \lambda representing channel-length modulation, which slightly extends the effective channel under high V_{DS}.[61] The body effect modifies V_T based on source-to-body voltage (V_{SB}), given by where V_{T0} is the zero-bias threshold, \gamma is the body-effect coefficient (typically 0.3–0.5 V^{1/2}), and \phi_F is the surface Fermi potential (~0.3 V for silicon); positive V_{SB} increases V_T by widening the depletion region.[61] For depletion-mode devices, the equations apply similarly but with negative V_T, allowing conduction at V_{GS} = 0.[46]Specialized Variants
The Metal-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor (MESFET) employs a Schottky barrier at the gate formed by a metal-semiconductor junction, typically fabricated on gallium arsenide (GaAs) substrates, which enables operation at high frequencies due to the material's superior electron mobility compared to silicon.[64] Unlike insulated-gate devices, the MESFET's gate controls channel conductivity through depletion without an oxide layer, making it suitable for microwave applications such as radar systems, satellite receivers, and cellular base stations.[65] MESFETs offer faster switching speeds than silicon-based transistors but face challenges in large-scale integration owing to GaAs processing complexities.[66] The High Electron Mobility Transistor (HEMT), also known as a Heterostructure FET, utilizes a heterojunction interface—commonly between gallium arsenide (GaAs) and aluminum gallium arsenide (AlGaAs)—to confine electrons in a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) layer, achieving exceptionally high carrier mobility and velocity saturation resistance.[67] This structure results in low-noise amplification for radio-frequency (RF) applications, including low-noise amplifiers in wireless communication and satellite systems.[68] HEMTs demonstrate noise figures below 1 dB at microwave frequencies, outperforming homojunction devices in sensitivity-critical scenarios.[69] Other specialized variants address niche requirements beyond high-frequency amplification. The Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistor (ISFET) modifies a MOSFET by exposing the gate to an electrolyte solution via a reference electrode and ion-selective membrane, enabling direct detection of ion concentrations such as pH or specific analytes in biochemical sensing.[70] ISFETs are integral to portable biosensors for medical diagnostics and environmental monitoring due to their miniaturization and real-time response.[71] Thin-Film Transistors (TFTs) deposit semiconductor layers, often amorphous silicon or low-temperature polycrystalline silicon, directly onto glass substrates to form active-matrix arrays for large-area displays.[72] These devices control pixel switching in liquid-crystal displays (LCDs) and organic light-emitting diode (OLED) panels, prioritizing uniformity over speed for visual applications.[73] Organic Field-Effect Transistors (OFETs) incorporate solution-processable organic semiconductors, such as pentacene or polymer blends, enabling flexible and low-cost electronics on plastic substrates for wearable sensors and conformable displays.[74] Their niche lies in biocompatible, large-area fabrication, though limited by lower charge mobility compared to inorganic counterparts.[75]| Variant | Primary Materials | Typical Frequency Range | Key Niche Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| MESFET | GaAs | Up to 45 GHz | Microwave amplification (e.g., radar) |
| HEMT | GaAs/AlGaAs, InP | >100 GHz | Low-noise RF receivers |
| ISFET | Silicon with ion-selective membrane | DC to kHz | Ion sensing in solutions |
| TFT | a-Si or LTPS on glass | DC to MHz | Display pixel control |
| OFET | Organic polymers/small molecules | DC to MHz | Flexible electronics |