Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Edmund Ironside, 1st Baron Ironside
View on Wikipedia
Field Marshal William Edmund Ironside, 1st Baron Ironside, GCB, CMG, DSO (6 May 1880 – 22 September 1959) was a senior officer of the British Army who served as Chief of the Imperial General Staff during the first year of the Second World War.
Key Information
Ironside joined the Royal Artillery in 1899, and served throughout the Second Boer War. This was followed by a brief period spying on the German colonial forces in German South West Africa. Returning to regular duty, he served on the staff of the 6th Infantry Division during the first two years of the First World War, before being appointed to a position on the staff of the newly raised 4th Canadian Division in 1916. In 1918, he was given command of a brigade on the Western Front. In 1919, he was promoted to command the Allied intervention force in northern Russia. Ironside was then assigned to an Allied force occupying Turkey, and then to the British forces based in Persia in 1921. He was offered the post of the commander of British forces in Iraq, but was unable to take up the role due to injuries in a flying accident.
He returned to the Army as Commandant of the Staff College, Camberley, where he advocated the ideas of a close friend, J. F. C. Fuller, who was a proponent of mechanisation. He later commanded a division, and military districts in both Britain and India, but his youth and his blunt approach limited his career prospects, and after being passed over for the role of Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS) in 1937 he became Governor of Gibraltar, a traditional staging post to retirement. He was recalled from "exile" in mid-1939, being appointed as Inspector-General of Overseas Forces, a role which led most observers to expect he would be given the command of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) on the outbreak of war.
However, after some political manoeuvring, General John Vereker, 6th Viscount Gort, was given this command and Ironside was appointed as the new Chief of the Imperial General Staff. Ironside himself believed that he was temperamentally unsuited to the job, but felt obliged to accept it. In early 1940 he argued heavily for Allied intervention in Scandinavia, but this plan was shelved at the last minute when the Finnish–Soviet Winter War ended. During the invasion of Norway and the Battle of France he played little part; his involvement in the latter was limited by a breakdown in relations between him and Gort. He was replaced as CIGS at the end of May, and given a role to which he was more suited: Commander-in-Chief, Home Forces, responsible for anti-invasion defences and for commanding the Army in the event of German landings. However, he served less than two months in this role before being replaced. After this, Ironside was promoted to field marshal and raised to the peerage as Baron Ironside.
Lord Ironside retired to Morley Old Hall in Norfolk to write, and never again saw active service or held any official position.
Early life
[edit]Ironside was born in Edinburgh, Scotland, on 6 May 1880 to Surgeon-Major William Ironside (1836–1881) of the Royal Horse Artillery and Emma Maria (1845–1939), daughter of William Haggett Richards.[1] His father died shortly afterwards, leaving his widowed wife to bring up their son on a limited military pension. As the cost of living in the late nineteenth century was substantially lower in mainland Europe than in Britain, she travelled extensively around the Continent, where the young Edmund began learning various foreign languages.[2] This grasp of language would become one of the defining features of his character; by middle age, he was fluent enough to officially interpret in seven, and was proficient in perhaps ten more.[3]
He was educated at schools in St Andrews before being sent to Tonbridge School in Kent for his secondary education; at the age of sixteen he left Tonbridge to attend a crammer, having not shown much academic promise, and was admitted to the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, in January 1898 at the age of seventeen. At Woolwich he flourished, working hard at his studies and his sports; he took up boxing, and captained the rugby 2nd XV as well as playing for Scotland. He was built for both of these sports, six feet four inches tall and weighing seventeen stone (108 kg), for which he was nicknamed "Tiny" by his fellow students. The name stuck, and he was known by it for the rest of his life.[4][5]
Second Boer War
[edit]After attending the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich he was commissioned into the army as a second lieutenant with the Royal Field Artillery on 25 June 1899.[6][7] Later that year his unit, 44th Battery, RFA, was despatched to South Africa.[8] He fought throughout the Second Boer War being wounded three times,[4] and was mentioned in despatches in 1901.[9] He was also promoted lieutenant on 16 February 1901.[6]
At the end of the war in May 1902, he was a member of the small force which escorted Jan Smuts to the peace negotiations. He then disguised himself as an Afrikaans-speaking Boer, taking a job as a wagon driver working for the German colonial forces in German South West Africa. This intelligence work ended unsuccessfully when he was identified, but managed to escape.[8] This escapade later led to claims that he became the model for Richard Hannay, a character in the novels of John Buchan;[10] Ironside was always amused by these novels when reading about Mr Standfast in the implausibly romantic setting of the passenger seat of an open-cockpit biplane flying from Iraq to Persia.[11] He left Cape Town on the HMT Britannic in early October 1902, and arrived at Southampton later the same month.[12] However, according to other sources, he conducted his spying activities embedded as a member of the German military staff in 1904, during the early phase of the Herero Wars, and witnessed German atrocities against the native inhabitants.[13][14]
Ironside was subsequently posted to India, where he served with I Battery Royal Horse Artillery (RHA), and South Africa, with Y Battery RHA.[8] He was promoted to captain in February 1908, appointed to the Staff in September of the same year, and then as a Brigade-Major in June 1909.[6] He returned home in September 1912,[15] in order to attend the Staff College, Camberley.[10]
First World War
[edit]
Ironside's two-year course at the Staff College, which he found unstimulating, was cut short by the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914;[10] on 5 August, he was confirmed in his appointment as a staff captain,[6] and assigned to Boulogne-sur-Mer and then St. Nazaire, both large Army bases supporting the British Expeditionary Force (BEF).[10] By some accounts, he was one of the first British officers to arrive in France.[16] He was promoted to major and attached to the newly arrived 6th Division at the end of October 1914,[10] ranked as a General Staff Officer, Grade 3 (GSO3).[6]
In February 1915 he succeeded Lieutenant Colonel John Burnett-Stuart as a general staff officer, grade 2.[17]
He was promoted to temporary lieutenant-colonel and appointed GSO1 in March 1916.[18] He had expected to be made GSO1 – divisional chief of staff – to the 6th Division, but to his surprise he was assigned to the newly formed 4th Canadian Division. Ironside pushed for a hard training regime, intending to get the division to the front as quickly as possible and prevent it being broken up to feed reinforcements to the other three divisions of the Canadian Corps. Because of the inexperience of the divisional commander, Major-General David Watson – a volunteer soldier with little professional experience – he found himself almost commanding the division on occasions, noting in his memoirs that Watson regularly authorised Ironside's orders in his name.[19][4] On its arrival in France in late 1916, the division participated at the end of the Battle of the Somme, before being moved north to prepare for the attack at Vimy Ridge. During the final phase of the fighting at Vimy, Ironside again was required to take unofficial command of the division, overruling an ambiguous order from Watson – who was out of contact at headquarters – to halt the attack, and personally ordering the leading battalions into action.[20]
He remained with the division through 1917, when it fought at the Battle of Passchendale,[10] and in January 1918 was appointed to an administrative posting, as commandant of the Small Arms School, with the rank of acting colonel.[21][22] He quickly returned to the Western Front, however, when he was appointed to command the 2nd Division's 99th Brigade as a temporary brigadier-general at the end of March.[10][23]
Interwar period
[edit]Russia and Iran
[edit]

Ironside remained with 99th Brigade for only six months; in September 1918, he was attached to the Allied Expeditionary Force fighting the Bolsheviks in northern Russia, and in November given command of the force, retaining his temporary rank of Brigadier-General.[24] Before leaving, he appeared on the electoral platform of Oswald Mosley, who campaigned successfully as a Conservative from the Harrow constituency in the December 1918 general election.[25] The posting to Arkhangelsk was his first independent command, and he threw himself fully into it; for over a year, he travelled continually along the Northern Dvina to keep control of his scattered international forces, at one point narrowly escaping assassination. However, the Red Army managed eventually to gain a superior position in the Civil War and in late 1919 he was forced to abandon the White Army to their fate. In November he handed command over to Henry Rawlinson, who would supervise the eventual withdrawal, and returned to Britain.[4] Ironside was appointed a Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath,[26] and promoted to substantive major-general[27] for his efforts; this made him one of the youngest Major-Generals in the British Army.[28]
From March to May 1920 he commanded a military mission which supervised the withdrawal of Romanian forces left in Hungary after the Hungarian–Romanian War of 1919, and during July and August was attached to George Milne's force occupying İzmit, Ottoman Empire, as it prepared to withdraw. His third overseas posting of the year was to Persia in late August. Owing to his experience in conducting withdrawals, he was appointed the commander of the North Persia Force by the War Office on 26 September; he was also tasked with subduing the Persian Cossack Brigade's White Russian commander Vsevolod Starosselsky.[29] The precise level of British involvement in 1921 Persian coup d'etat remains a matter of historical debate, but it is almost certain that Ironside himself at least provided advice to the plotters.[30][31][32] In December 1920, he appointed the future shah, Colonel Reza Khan, as commander of the Persian Cossack Brigade, and subsequently groomed him for the role of Persia's strongman against the Bolshevik influence, leaving instructions for Reza to be gradually released from British control.[33][4] On Ironside's departure from Persia in February 1921, Ahmad Shah Qajar awarded him the Order of the Lion and the Sun.[34]
After Persia, he attended the Cairo Conference, where Winston Churchill persuaded him to take command of the newly reorganised British force in Iraq. His return flight to Persia in April crashed near Basra and he was invalided home after several months in hospital.[4]
England and India
[edit]After recovering from his injuries on half-pay, Ironside returned to active duty as commandant of the Staff College, Camberley in May 1922, taking over from Major General Hastings Anderson.[35] He spent a full four-year term there, running the college efficiently as well as publishing several articles and a book on the Battle of Tannenberg. Most importantly for his future career, he became the mentor of J. F. C. Fuller, who was appointed a lecturer at the College at the same time, and became a close acquaintance of Sir Basil Liddell-Hart. Fuller's views were deeply influential on Ironside, who became a supporter of reforming the Army as an elite armoured force with air support, and of forming a single central Ministry of Defence to control the services.[4][36] He argued frequently over the need for faster modernisation and rearmament, and the problem of the 'old men' still filling the upper ranks of the army; in the end, he was reprimanded by the chief of the imperial general staff (CIGS), General Sir George Milne.[10]
After Camberley he was appointed to command the 2nd Division in Aldershot, England,[37] a post he held for two years with little effect or interest – he was frustrated by the task of training an infantry force with no modern equipment – and then sent to command the Meerut district, in India, in 1928.[38] He enjoyed life in India, but found the military situation to be equally uninteresting; the equipment was old-fashioned, as were the regimental officers and the overall strategic plans. He was promoted to lieutenant-general in March 1931,[39] and left for England in May,[40] where he returned to half-pay with the sinecure of Lieutenant of the Tower of London.[41] He was then posted to India as Quartermaster-General in 1933,[42] where he travelled extensively, crossing the country to visit regiments and oversee the Indianisation process. For all this, however, it was the best of a bad job; he was still far from the War Office, and unable to make significant impact on the army's preparation for a future war.[10]
Preparation for war
[edit]He returned home in 1936,[43] having been promoted to full general the previous June,[44] to lead Eastern Command, one of the corps-level regional commands in the United Kingdom, responsible for a single Regular division and three Territorial Army divisions.[45]
In September 1937, he visited Nazi Germany to attend the large Wehrmacht manoeuvres,[46][47] and met with Adolf Hitler.[13]
Ironside realised that a European war would come sooner rather than later, and that the army was in a parlous state to defend the country. However, he found that as with his earlier posts, he could achieve little in Eastern Command – the most important decisions being made in Whitehall. He himself seemed to lose his opportunity for higher office in 1937, when he was rebuked over his mishandling of a mobile force in the annual exercises; until this point, he had been considered a possible candidate as Chief of the Imperial General Staff, but was dropped from consideration in favour of Lord Gort, whom Ironside considered unfit for the job. The Secretary of State for War, Leslie Hore-Belisha, gave him official notice that he was deemed too old for the post, aged 57. Thus, he was appointed an aide-de-camp to the King in October, a purely ceremonial position, and early in 1938 accepted the offer of Governor of Gibraltar,[48] generally seen as a quiet role where to retire.[4][49]
He was helped to accept Gibraltar by the suggestion that, in the event of war, he could be transferred to command the forces in the Middle East; as he believed no major force could usefully be sent to France, this seemed to him likely to be the main focus of British attention in the war.[50] He took up the governorship in November 1938, and threw himself into preparing the colony for war; here, finally, he had free rein. Under his tenure, the defences were strengthened and the garrison prepared for a long siege.[4]
In December 1938, only a month after he had taken up the post, Hore-Belisha had begun to consider the possibility of recalling Ironside to become Inspector-General of Overseas Forces. The position gave him overall responsibility for the readiness of forces based outside the United Kingdom, and many at the War Office worried that he might interpret this as a precursor to being given formal command of the Expeditionary Force on the outbreak of war. By spring 1939, Special Branch was treating seriously the rumours within the British Union of Fascists that Ironside was a secret member of BUF.[51] He had also attended an Anglo-German Fellowship event in the company of Unity Mitford.[51] After some debate, Hore-Belisha went ahead and offered Ironside the position of Inspector-General in May, appointing a corresponding Inspector-General of Home Forces at the same time, both under Lord Gort's command.[52] The decision to recall Ironside may have been helped by the fact that Hore-Belisha was particularly reliant on the advice of Liddell Hart, an old acquaintance of Ironside's, who was already beginning to fall out with Gort.[53] Ironside assumed his new role on 1 July 1939.[54]

As expected, Ironside chose to interpret the posting as indicating that he was the presumptive Commander-in-Chief, and soon began to clash with Lord Gort over their respective powers. Whilst Gort was nominally in the more senior position, Ironside had seniority of rank and a far more dominant personality, and had concluded several months earlier that Gort was "out of his depth" as CIGS; he is unlikely to have shown much deference. He held the post of Inspector for a few months, visiting Poland in July 1939 to meet with the Polish High Command and observe military exercises. Whilst his sympathetic manner reassured the Poles, the visit may have unintentionally given the impression that Britain was intending to provide direct military assistance. He returned able to report that the Polish Government was unlikely to provoke Germany into war, but warned that the country would be quickly overrun and that no Eastern Front was likely to exist for long. His warnings, however, were broadly ignored.[55] According to another source, on 27 August he gave Churchill a "most favourable" account of the Polish army's capability.[56]
Second World War
[edit]
His appointment on 3 September 1939 as Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS) came as something of a surprise to Ironside; he had been led to believe he would be appointed as the Commander-in-Chief of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), and indeed had already despatched his Assistant to Aldershot to begin preparing his headquarters.[57] The reorganisation was politically driven; Hore-Belisha had fallen out heavily with Lord Gort during 1939, and the outbreak of war provided an excellent pretext for Gort to leave Whitehall. This left the post of CIGS vacant, and after heavy lobbying by Churchill, Ironside was chosen over Sir John Dill, then the General Officer Commanding, Aldershot Command.[58][57]
On 4 September, Ironside told the Cabinet that Poland could resist for six months and suggested a future support operation via Romania.[59] However, he violently opposed the French plan of opening a front in the Balkans.[60] At the Anglo-French Supreme War Council of 22 September, the British chiefs of staff backed the Romanian conception of a neutral Balkan bloc.[61] In the first half of September, Hore-Belisha notified Ironside of MI5 concerns over his connections.[62]
As CIGS, Ironside adopted a policy of rapidly building up a strong force in France, aiming to put some twenty divisions in the field. However, this force would be broadly defensive, acting to support the French Army, and he aimed to influence the course of the war by forming a second strong force in the Middle East, which would be able to operate in peripheral operations in the Balkans.[63] He strongly supported the development of a close-support air force, preferably under Army command, but at the same time argued that when a German offensive began in the West, the Royal Air Force (RAF) should throw its main strength into strategic bombing of the Ruhr rather than attacking the forward units.[64]
Norway
[edit]
Ironside's enthusiasm for "peripheral" operations led him in November 1939 to plans for Allied intervention in Scandinavia, initially to help Norway against the Soviet Union.[65] He accepted the risk of an Anglo-Soviet war[66] and opposed the build-up of the British Expeditionary Force in France.[67] By December, in place of Churchill's limited approach of simply mining Norwegian waters to stop Swedish iron ore shipments to Germany, he argued for landing a strong force in northern Norway and physically occupying the Swedish orefields. If successful, this would allow the resupply of Finland – then fighting the Soviet Union, and aligned loosely with the Allied forces – as well as interdicting Germany's ore supply, and could potentially force Germany to commit troops on a new and geographically unfavourable front.[68][4][69][70] Both Ironside and Churchill supported the plan enthusiastically, but it met with opposition from many other officers, including from Gort – who saw his forces in France being depleted of resources – and from Cyrill Newall, the Chief of the Air Staff.[71]
Planning continued through the winter of 1939–1940. Ironside welcomed the agreement reached at the Anglo-French Supreme War Council conference of 5 February 1940 to land two British divisions and additional forces supplied by France, including the Polish Independent Highland Brigade and the French Foreign Legion, at Narvik and Trondheim by mid-March with the aim of securing the Swedish mines of Gällivare and Kiruna. He regarded the plan as favouring British expertise in the north and as an opportunity to seize initiative in the war.[72][70] During February 1940, he also considered air attacks on the Soviet refineries in Baku.[66] As he warned Marshal Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim in February, however, only a fraction of the Scandinavian expeditionary force was going to reach Finland.[73] The plan for the landings relied on Finnish pleas for military assistance to justify the "semi-peaceable" invasion of neutral Scandinavia, but Norway and Sweden refused the Allied and Finnish requests for the passage of troops in late February. After Lord Halifax was notified of the Finnish–Soviet peace negotiations on 1 March, Ironside offered Mannerheim 57,000 British troops, even though they were not ready to sail, hoping to buy time to conduct the operation.[74] On 12 March, however, the Moscow Peace Treaty was concluded, and the expedition had to be abandoned.[75]
A few days prior to the German invasion of Norway in April 1940 as part of Operation Weserübung, Ironside was embarrassed by the publication of an interview intended to influence the United States, in which he dared Nazi Germany to attack Norway.[4] The Norwegian campaign of April–June 1940 saw significant British forces committed to action for the first time in the Second World War. Flaws in the command system quickly began to show. War Cabinet meetings dragged on at great length to little effect, as did meetings of the Chiefs of Staff, both to Ironside's great frustration. He also found it hard to cope with Churchill's mood swings and insistence on micromanagement of the campaign, and a gulf began to grow between the two.[76][77] Ironside's main contribution to resolving the Norwegian campaign was to insist on a withdrawal when the situation worsened, and he pushed through the evacuation of the unbeaten British force in central Norway at the end of April despite ministerial ambivalence (Churchill had wanted to assign guerrilla tasks to the troops) and without consulting the French.[78][79]
Battle of France
[edit]Ironside himself was sent to France in May 1940 to liaise with the BEF and the French in an attempt to halt the German advance. He was not well-qualified for this task, having a deep dislike and distrust for the French, whom he considered "absolutely unscrupulous in everything".[80] At a conference in Lens he clashed with the French generals Gaston-Henri Billotte and Georges Maurice Jean Blanchard, whom he considered defeatists. He wrote: "I lost my temper and shook Billotte by the button of his tunic. The man is completely defeated."[81] Although Billotte was supposed to be co-ordinating the British, French and Belgian armies' operations in Belgium, Ironside took over the job himself, ordering Gort and Blanchard to launch a counter-attack against the Germans at Arras.[82] This attack achieved some local success, but the German onslaught proved unstoppable. The French Commander-in-Chief, General Maxime Weygand, so resented Ironside's actions that he said he would "like to box Ironside's ears."[83] Ironside, despairing of the French Army's unwillingness to fight, accepted Gort's view that evacuation of the BEF was the only answer.[84]
Home Defence
[edit]In his diary on the afternoon of 25 May, Ironside wrote that "I am now concentrating upon the Home Defence ... [The Cabinet] want(s) a change to some man well-known in England. They are considering my appointment".[85] That night, he spoke to Churchill, offering to take up the new post, and – again from his diary:
I was told that I had to take over the command in England and organise that. I am to be made a Field Marshal later. Not at once, because the public may think that I am being given a sop and turned out. An honour for me and a new and most important job, one much more to my liking than C.I.G.S. in every way.[86]
His appointment as Commander-in-Chief, Home Forces was announced to the public on 27 May, succeeding General Sir Walter Kirke.[87] At the same time Ironside was succeeded as CIGS by his deputy, Sir John Dill.[86] In his new command, Ironside commanded a force which amounted – on paper – to fifteen Territorial Infantry divisions, a single armoured division, fifty-seven home-defence battalions, and the Local Defence Volunteers (later the Home Guard). However, all of these were deficient in training and organisation, as the operational units had already been sent to France. They were also lacking in equipment; the force as a whole had almost no modern artillery or anti-tank guns, and the armoured division had just a small number of light tanks.[88]

The deficiencies with equipment led to an overall lack of mobility, which coupled with the limited training of the units meant that very few were capable of organised offensive counter-attacks against an invading force. As a result, the only way they could practically be used would be to commit them to static defence; Ironside planned to steadily pull units away from the coast and into a central mobile reserve, but this was not possible until they were trained and equipped for the role.[89] He threw himself into the details of the strategy, laying out plans for the static defence of village strongpoints by the Home Guard,[90] patrols of "Ironsides" armoured cars to strengthen the divisions,[91] and light artillery mounted on trucks as improvised tank destroyers.[92]
He agreed to release two divisions for the Second BEF in early June,[87] but was dubious about Churchill's decision to bring home troops from the Middle East and India; even after the fall of France and the potential collapse of the defences in Britain, he still held to his pre-war position that "[it] is essential to hold the East firmly, whatever happens here".[93] By mid-June, he had begun to collect a scanty mobile reserve – the 8th Royal Tank Regiment, with infantry tanks, and six regiments of armoured cars beginning to form[94] – and the pillboxes and coastal defences were being prepared, though he emphasised to the local commanders that the latter "are only meant as delaying lines, and are meant to give the mobile columns a chance of coming up to the threatened points."[95]
The fall of France led to a brief interlude where the Cabinet debated sending Ironside on a diplomatic mission to meet Charles Noguès, the French commander in North Africa and a personal acquaintance of Ironside's, but decided to retain him in Britain and send Lord Gort instead. On 25 June, he was called to the War Cabinet to brief them on the plans for Home Defence; his system of defence in depth provided for:
- A defensive "crust" along the coast, able to fight off small raids, give immediate warning of attack, and delay any landings.
- Home Guard roadblocks at crossroads, valleys, and other choke points, to stop German armoured columns penetrating inland.
- Static fortified stop lines sealing the Midlands and London off from the coast, and dividing the coastal area into defensible sectors
- A central corps-sized reserve to deal with a major breakthrough
- Local mobile columns to deal with local attacks and parachute landings
The plan was "on the whole" approved by the Cabinet,[96] and by the Chiefs of Staff later in the week.[97] He was clear in his diaries that he saw the static focus as an undesirable option – "[the] eternal preaching of the defensive and taking cover behind anti-tank articles has been the curse of our tactics"[98] – but that it was the only practical way to make use of untrained and badly-equipped forces.[97] By early July, he was optimistic that more troops could soon be pulled out of static positions and used in a mobile role, with the Home Guard taking over the local defences, but strongly resisted orders from Churchill to pull divisions out of the coastal areas before they could be effectively replaced.[99]
However, criticism of the "Ironside plan" was soon manifest. On 26 June (only a day after the plan's approval) at a meeting of the Vice-Chiefs of Staff, Air Marshal Richard Peirse pointed out that many of the RAF's main operational airfields would be overrun by an invader before they reached Ironside's principal stop line, the "GHQ Line".[100] The conclusion of the meeting was that the plan was "completely unsound".[101] Although Ironside managed to placate the Chiefs of Staff, discontent amongst his subordinates was growing; one divisional commander wrote "We have become pill-box mad".[102] There was widespread concern that troops were spending their time constructing defences rather than on the training which they desperately needed.[103] Another critic was Major-General Bernard Montgomery, who later wrote that he found himself "in complete disagreement with the general approach to the defence of Britain and refused to apply it."[104] When Churchill visited Montgomery's 3rd Infantry Division on 2 July, he described to the prime minister how his division, which was fully equipped except for transport, could be made into a mobile formation by the requisitioning of municipal buses, able to strike at the enemy beachheads rather than strung out along the coast as ordered.[105] Finally, on 17 July, Churchill had a long drive with Lieutenant-General Sir Alan Brooke, the commander of Southern Command, whose views on creating mobile reserves held close to possible landing sites were in accordance with his own.[106]
In addition, Ironside had been a friend and mentor of J.F.C. Fuller from his time at the Staff College in the 1920s, and was a strong supporter of his arguments for modernisation of the Army into a mobile force. Following his retirement from the Army in 1933, Fuller became associated with the British Union of Fascists, and was a strong opponent of war with Germany. After Ironside was appointed CIGS in 1939, he asked for Fuller to be re-appointed to a staff role, citing the role of German mechanised forces in the defeat of Poland, but this was vetoed by the Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain on political grounds.[4][107][108] Fuller appears to have seen Ironside as sympathetic to his beliefs, and in late 1939, he told fellow fascist Barry Domvile that "Ironside is with us".[109] Ironside's name was later mentioned by John Beckett, who in 1940 was involved in planning a fascist coup, though there is no indication Ironside himself was aware of this.[110] This friendship with Fuller may nonetheless have become a liability towards the end of his career; one historian reports that "whispers" were circulating about his association with a known fascist as early as May 1940.[111]
On 19 July, Ironside was summoned to the War Office and informed that he was to be replaced by Brooke as C-in-C Home Forces, effective immediately.[87] The formal reason was that the Cabinet wished to have someone with recent combat experience in command, and Ironside accepted the dismissal gracefully – "I was quite prepared to be released. I had done my best ... I can't complain. Cabinets have to make decisions in times of stress. I don't suppose that Winston liked doing it, for he is always loyal to his friends."[112] On his arrival at Home Forces HQ, Brooke was astonished that Ironside had not stayed to apprise him of the situation; neither had he left him any notes except for a brief memo to say that he had arranged for Brooke to use his staff car.[113]
Retirement and writing
[edit]At the end of August, a month and a half after his resignation as Commander-in-Chief of Home Forces, Ironside was appointed a field marshal. He was raised to the peerage in the New Year Honours, on 29 January 1941, as "Baron Ironside of Archangel and of Ironside in the County of Aberdeen",[114][115] and retired to Morley Old Hall in Norfolk with his family. He never received another military posting and, ostracised by the Army establishment,[4] rarely visited London, and never spoke in the House of Lords.[116]
He turned to lecturing and writing books, including a study of the Archangel expedition, and farming his estates in Norfolk. After almost two decades in retirement, having survived a driving accident, he was injured in a fall at his home; he was taken to Queen Alexandra Military Hospital in London where he died on 22 September 1959, aged 79. His coffin was escorted to Westminster Abbey with full military honours,[4] and he was buried near his home at Hingham, Norfolk. He is commemorated by a memorial plaque in the crypt of St Paul's Cathedral.[117]
Ironside kept a diary throughout his life, starting as a subaltern at the turn of the century, with the goal of keeping a clear recollection of what had happened during the day and allowing him to reflect on the day's events. These were written directly into bound foolscap volumes, a page or more a day, each night; throughout his life, he totalled some twelve volumes and the best part of a million words. He did not ask for these to be destroyed on his death, though their content was sometimes quite contentious, but did write a will – in 1930 – asking that they not be published. In the late 1950s, however, a former colleague persuaded him to allow extracts to be published as part of an account of the run-up to the Second World War, although he died shortly before it saw print. This was published as The Ironside Diaries: 1937–1940, edited by Colonel Roderick Macleod and Denis Kelly, in 1962; the material was selected from May 1937 to his retirement in June 1940, and published as numbered daily entries with editorial notes.[118]
A second volume, High Road to Command: the diaries of Major-General Sir Edmund Ironside, 1920–1922, was published in 1972, edited by his son; this covered the period from 1920 to 1922, during his service in the Middle East. The book was assembled by Ironside shortly before his death and, whilst it drew heavily on the diaries, it was written in a more conventional narrative form rather than as a strict day-by-day account, with editorial remarks kept to a minimum.[119]
Honours
[edit]- Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath (GCB) in the 1938 King's Birthday Honours (9 June 1938);[120] (KCB: 1 August 1919[121])
- Companion of the Order of St Michael and St George (CMG) on 1 January 1918[122]
- Companion of the Distinguished Service Order (DSO) in the 1915 King's Birthday Honours (23 June 1915)[123]
- Knight of the Most Venerable Order of Saint John in June 1939[124]
- Mentioned in despatches (10 September 1901, 4 December 1914, 22 June 1915, 15 June 1916, 15 May 1917, 11 December 1917, 20 December 1918, 21 May 1920)
- Queen's South Africa Medal (clasps: Cape Colony, Orange Free State, Transvaal)
- King's South Africa Medal (clasps: South Africa 1901, South Africa 1902)
- 1914 Star
- British War Medal
- Victory Medal
- General Service Medal (1918) North-West Persia Clasp
- Virtuti Militari (Poland)
- Cross of St. George (Russia)
- Knight of the Order of St Anna (Russia)
- Order of the Lion and the Sun (Persia, 1921)
- Order of the Rising Sun, 3rd Class (6 February 1922, Japan)[125]
- Grand Croix de la Légion d'Honneur in 1946 (France), previously Officier[122]
- Croix de Guerre avec Palme (France)[122]
- Order of St. Vladimir (Russia)[122]
- Baron Ironside of Archangel and of Ironside in the County of Aberdeen, in the 1941 New Year Honours (29 January 1941)[115]
|
Notes
[edit]- ^ Burke's Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage, 107th edition, vol. 2, ed. Charles Mosley, Burke's Peerage Ltd, 2003, p. 2061
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 13
- ^ The issue of which languages Ironside spoke, and how well, is an interesting one. Cairns says that he was "credited with a working knowledge of anything from a dozen to eighteen". Bond merely notes that he was an interpreter in seven (Bond, p. 17). Harold Nicolson recorded that as a child he had learned Flemish, and during the Boer War learned 'Taal'. (Nicolson, p. 675) He was a first-class interpreter in five (German, Danish, Norwegian, Dutch, and Afrikaans), a second-class interpreter in French, and had a grasp of Russian, Turkish and Persian; by the time of writing in 1940, he could speak a total of fourteen languages. (Nicolson, p. 674) Including English, this gives a total of eleven (counting Taal and Afrikaans together). In his diaries he noted that he learned Italian in 1919, and as a subaltern had learned Hungarian, (Ironside (1972), p. 8); he also notes a conversation with an old man in Persia who "spoke good Urdu" (Ironside (1972), p. 173), strongly suggesting Ironside himself spoke it well enough to pass judgement – as would many of officers who had spent significant time in India. This gives fourteen in total, with the possibility that some others are simply not mentioned.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Cairns 2004.
- ^ Bond, pp. 16–17
- ^ a b c d e Quarterly Army List for the quarter ending 31st March 1915. London: HMSO. 1915. p. 630.
- ^ "No. 27095". The London Gazette. 4 July 1899. p. 4138.
- ^ a b c Ironside (1962), p. 14
- ^ "No. 27353". The London Gazette. 10 September 1901. p. 5927.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Cairns (2004)
- ^ Ironside (1972), p. 143
- ^ "The Army in South Africa – Troops returning Home". The Times. No. 36899. London. 15 October 1902. p. 8.
- ^ a b Dorril 2006, p. 450.
- ^ Maddox, Kelly A. (2016), The Strong Devour the Weak: Tracing the Genocidal Dynamics of Violence in the Japanese Empire, 1937–1945 (PDF), PhD thesis: Lancaster University, p. 50
- ^ "No. 28665". The London Gazette. 22 November 1912. p. 8580.
- ^ Life, 31 July 1939, p. 62. Online edition
- ^ "No. 29096". The London Gazette (Supplement). 9 March 1915. p. 2475.
- ^ "No. 29519". The London Gazette. 24 March 1916. p. 3180.
- ^ Ironside (1972), pp. 70–4.
- ^ Ironside (1972), pp. 74–75
- ^ Quarterly Army List for the quarter ending 31st March 1918. London: HMSO. 1918. p. 259.
- ^ "No. 30526". The London Gazette (Supplement). 12 February 1918. p. 2050.
- ^ "No. 30653". The London Gazette (Supplement). 23 April 1918. p. 5044.
- ^ "No. 31023". The London Gazette (Supplement). 19 November 1918. p. 13711.
- ^ Dorril 2006, p. 36.
- ^ "No. 31488". The London Gazette (Supplement). 1 August 1919. p. 9945.
- ^ "No. 31764". The London Gazette (Supplement). 30 January 1920. p. 1375.
- ^ Bond, p. 18
- ^ Ghani 2001, p. 107.
- ^ The Cambridge History of Iran, vol. 7 (1991); pp. 210, 219–220
- ^ p. 313 of Keddie, Nikki R. (1978). "Class Structure and Political Power in Iran since 1796". Iranian Studies. 11 (1/4): 305–330. doi:10.1080/00210867808701547. JSTOR 4310304.
- ^ p. 538 of Katouzian, Homayoun (1978). "Nationalist Trends in Iran, 1921–1926". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 10 (4): 533–551. doi:10.1017/s0020743800051321. JSTOR 162216. S2CID 163139538.
- ^ Ghani 2001, pp. 146–148, 153–155.
- ^ p. 140 of Wilson, Denis (1979). "Sir John Malcolm and the Order of the Lion and Sun". Iran. 17: 135–141. doi:10.2307/4299683. JSTOR 4299683.
- ^ "No. 32686". The London Gazette (Supplement). 28 April 1922. p. 3420.
- ^ Holden Reid (2009)
- ^ "No. 33212". The London Gazette. 19 October 1926. p. 6688.
- ^ "No. 33481". The London Gazette. 29 March 1929. p. 2164.
- ^ "No. 33695". The London Gazette. 3 March 1931. p. 1451.
- ^ "No. 33748". The London Gazette. 28 August 1931. p. 5626.
- ^ "No. 33734". The London Gazette. 10 July 1931. p. 4540.
- ^ "No. 34003". The London Gazette. 8 December 1933. p. 7957.
- ^ "No. 34282". The London Gazette. 8 May 1936. p. 2985.
- ^ "No. 34180". The London Gazette (Supplement). 16 July 1935. p. 4602.
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 21
- ^ Ropp, Theodore (1964), "Review of "Time Unguarded: The Ironside Diaries 1937–1940". Edited by Colonel Roderick Macleod and Denis Kelly. New York: David McKay Company, Inc., 1962", South Atlantic Quarterly, 63 (1): 124–125, doi:10.1215/00382876-63-1-124
- ^ Merglen, Albert (1972), "Le « Journal intime » du général anglais Ironside", Revue d'histoire de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, 22 (87): 74, JSTOR 25728445
- ^ "No. 34568". The London Gazette. 8 November 1938. p. 6988.
- ^ Bond, pp. 19–20
- ^ Bond, pp. 19–20
- ^ a b Dorril 2006, pp. 449–450.
- ^ Bond, p. 20
- ^ Bond [chapter on Gort], p. 37
- ^ "No. 34642". The London Gazette. 4 July 1939. p. 4564.
- ^ Bond, pp. 20–21; Prażmowska, pp. 76–77, 97–98
- ^ Bethell 1972, p. 36.
- ^ a b Mead 2007, p. 217.
- ^ Bond, p. 21
- ^ Bethell 1972, pp. 35–36.
- ^ Imlay 2004, p. 343.
- ^ Imlay 2004, pp. 338–339.
- ^ Dorril 2006, p. 469.
- ^ Bond, p. 22
- ^ Bond, p. 23
- ^ Barclay 1979, p. 483.
- ^ a b Imlay 2004, p. 369.
- ^ Imlay 2004, p. 360.
- ^ Mead 2007, p. 218.
- ^ Kersaudy 1990, pp. 20–21.
- ^ a b Imlay 2004, pp. 360–361.
- ^ Bond, pp. 25–6
- ^ Petrow 1974, pp. 16–17, 36.
- ^ Barclay 1979, p. 489.
- ^ Petrow 1974, pp. 34–36.
- ^ Bond, p. 26
- ^ Bond, pp. 26–7
- ^ Mead 2007, pp. 218–219.
- ^ Bond, p. 27
- ^ Petrow 1974, p. 88.
- ^ Jackson (2003), p. 82
- ^ Jackson (2003), p. 86
- ^ Jackson (2003), p. 87
- ^ Jackson (2003), p. 91. Jackson continues: "causing one British witness to observe that to do this Weygand would have had to climb on to a chair."
- ^ Heathcote (1999), p. 189
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 333
- ^ a b Ironside (1962), p. 335
- ^ a b c Mead 2007, p. 219.
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 340
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 341
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 344
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 342. It is unclear if the name was linked to Ironside, or simply a literal description.
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 346
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 351
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 363
- ^ Ironside (1962), pp. 368–369.
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 371
- ^ a b Ironside (1962), p. 374
- ^ Ironside (1936), p. 354
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 383
- ^ McKinstry p. 123
- ^ Newbold p. 222
- ^ Newbold p. 235
- ^ McKinstry p. 124
- ^ McKinstry p. 203
- ^ McKinstry p. 204
- ^ McKinstry p. 205
- ^ Holden Reid (2009).
- ^ Dorril 2006, p. 475.
- ^ Diary entry by Domvile, November 12, 1939, cited in Tate (2019)
- ^ Tate, Tim (25 April 2019). "Treason, Treachery and Pro-Nazi Activities by the British Ruling Classes During World War Two". CRWS Working Papers: 19–25.
- ^ McKinstry pp. 204-5
- ^ Ironside (1962), p. 387
- ^ Alanbrooke, entry for 20 July 1940
- ^ "No. 35029". The London Gazette (Supplement). 31 December 1940. p. 1.
- ^ a b "No. 35065". The London Gazette. 4 February 1941. p. 691.
- ^ Speech by Edmund Ironside, 2nd Baron Ironside; Hansard, 3 November 1965
- ^ Ironside 2018, p. 378
- ^ Ironside (1962), pp. 15–18. The diaries themselves contain a reference to "sixty volumes", in a note on 12 June 1940 (p. 363)
- ^ Ironside (1972), pp. 2–3
- ^ "No. 34518". The London Gazette (Supplement). 7 June 1938. p. 3687.
- ^ Heathcote (1999), p. 187
- ^ a b c d "Lord Ironside". Unit Histories. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
- ^ "No. 29202". The London Gazette (Supplement). 22 June 1915. p. 6117.
- ^ "No. 34639". The London Gazette. 23 June 1939. p. 4238.
- ^ "No. 32600". The London Gazette (Supplement). 6 February 1922. p. 1064.
- ^ Burke's Peerage. 1999.
Bibliography
[edit]Articles
[edit]- Cairns, John C (September 2004). "Ironside, (William) Edmund, first Baron Ironside (1880–1959)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/34113. Retrieved 14 January 2008. (Subscription, Wikipedia Library access or UK public library membership required.)
- Holden Reid, Brian (September 2009). "Fuller, John Frederick Charles (1878–1966)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/33290. Retrieved 24 December 2009. (Subscription, Wikipedia Library access or UK public library membership required.)
- Nicolson, Harold (1940). "Ironside". Foreign Affairs. 18 (4): 671–679. doi:10.2307/20029035. JSTOR 20029035.
- Barclay, Glen (1979), "Diversion in the East: The Western Allies, Scandinavia, and Russia, November 1939-April 1940", The Historian, 41 (3): 483–498, doi:10.1111/j.1540-6563.1979.tb00556.x
- Imlay, Talbot Charles (2004), "A Reassessment of Anglo-French Strategy during the Phony War, 1939–1940", English Historical Review, 119 (481): 333–372, doi:10.1093/ehr/119.481.333
Primary and secondary sources
[edit]- Official despatches
- Operations carried out by the Allied Forces under my Command during the period from 1 October 1918, to 11 August 1919
- in "No. 31850". The London Gazette (Supplement). 2 April 1920. pp. 4116–4118.
- Operations carried out by the Allied Forces under my Command during the period from 11 August 1919, to 27 September 1919.
- in "No. 31850". The London Gazette (Supplement). 2 April 1920. pp. 4130–4131.
- Books
- Alanbrooke, Field Marshal Lord (2001). Danchev, Alex; Todman, Daniel (eds.). War Diaries 1939–1945. Phoenix Press. ISBN 1-84212-526-5.
- Bethell, Nicholas (1972). The War Hitler Won: The Fall of Poland, September 1939. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN 978-0-03-001376-8.
- Bond, Brian (1999). "Ironside". Churchill's Generals. Abacus. ISBN 0-349-11317-3.
- Bond, Brian (1999). "Gort". Churchill's Generals. Abacus. ISBN 0-349-11317-3.
- Dorril, Stephen (2006). Blackshirt: Sir Oswald Mosley and British Fascism. London: Viking. ISBN 978-0-670-86999-2.
- Eastwood, James (1940). General Ironside. Pilot Press.
- Ghani, Cyrus (2001). Iran and the Rise of the Reza Shah: From Qajar Collapse to Pahlavi Power. London: I.B. Tauris. ISBN 978-1-86064-629-4.
- Heathcote, Tony (1999). The British Field Marshals 1736–1997. Pen & Sword. ISBN 0-85052-696-5.
- Ironside, Edmund (1962). The Ironside diaries, 1937–1940. Constable. ISBN 0-8371-7369-8.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - Ironside, Edmund (1972). High Road to Command: The Diaries of Major-Gen. Sir Edmund Ironside 1920–1922. Leo Cooper. ISBN 978-0750963794.
- Ironside, Edmund (2018). Ironside: The Authorised Biography of Field Marshal Lord Ironside. The History Press. ISBN 978-0850520774.
- Jackson, Julian (2003). The Fall of France. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-280300-X.
- Kersaudy, François (1990). Norway 1940. London: Collins. ISBN 978-0-09-983420-5.
- McKinstry, Leo (2014). Operation Sealion. John Murray. ISBN 978-1-84854-704-9.
- Petrow, Richard (1974). The Bitter Years: The Invasion and Occupation of Denmark and Norway, April 1940–May 1945. New York: Morrow. ISBN 978-0-688-00275-6.
- Prażmowska, Anita J. (2004). Britain, Poland and the Eastern Front, 1939. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-52938-7.
- Quinlivian, Peter (2006). Forgotten Valour: The Story of Arthur Sullivan VC. Sydney: New Holland. ISBN 978-1-74110-486-8.
- Soutar, Andrew (1940). With Ironside in North Russia. Hutchinson.
- Wright, Damien (2017). Churchill's Secret War with Lenin: British and Commonwealth Military Intervention in the Russian Civil War, 1918–20. Solihull: Helion. ISBN 978-1911512103.
- Other
- Newbold, David John. "BRITISH PLANNING AND PREPARATIONS TO RESIST INVASION ON LAND, SEPTEMBER 1939 – SEPTEMBER 1940". kclpure.kcl.ac.uk. King's College, University of London. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
- Mead, Richard (2007). Churchill's Lions: A Biographical Guide to the Key British Generals of World War II. Stroud: Spellmount. ISBN 978-1-86227-431-0.
- Smart, Nick (2005). Biographical Dictionary of British Generals of the Second World War. Barnesley: Pen & Sword. ISBN 1844150496.
External links
[edit]Edmund Ironside, 1st Baron Ironside
View on GrokipediaField Marshal William Edmund Ironside, 1st Baron Ironside, GCB, CMG, DSO (6 May 1880 – 22 September 1959) was a senior British Army officer whose career spanned multiple conflicts, including the Second Boer War, the First World War, the Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War, and the early phases of the Second World War.[1][2]
Ironside earned the nickname "Tiny" during the Boer War despite his imposing 6-foot-4-inch stature, serving with the Royal Artillery in the siege of Ladysmith and receiving the Distinguished Service Order for his actions.[3] In the First World War, he worked in military intelligence, authored a notable analysis of the Battle of Tannenberg, and served as a liaison officer in Russia.[2] Post-war, he commanded forces in the North Russian intervention at Archangel, advised Polish forces during the 1920 Polish–Soviet War, and later stabilized British interests in Persia amid tribal unrest.[4]
Appointed Chief of the Imperial General Staff in September 1939, Ironside oversaw the initial British military response to the German invasion of Poland and the Phoney War period, though he was replaced in May 1940 amid the fall of France; he subsequently commanded Home Forces until July, when he was promoted to field marshal before retiring.[5][6] His post-retirement diaries and writings provided candid insights into high-level wartime decision-making, reflecting his frontline experience and skepticism toward overly theoretical strategic planning.[7]
Early Years
Family background and childhood
William Edmund Ironside was born on 6 May 1880 in Edinburgh, Scotland, the second child of Surgeon-Major William Ironside (1836–1881) of the Royal Horse Artillery and Emma Maria Richards.[4][8] His father, who hailed from Keig in Aberdeenshire and traced family roots to the village of Ironside in the Scottish Highlands, died in 1881 when Ironside was less than a year old, leaving the family under his mother's care.[9][10] He had an older sister, Grizeal Mary Ironside.[11] Ironside's early upbringing occurred amid a military familial tradition, with his father's service in the Royal Horse Artillery reflecting a background steeped in British Army heritage.[12] Following his father's death, the family resided primarily in Scotland, where Ironside was exposed to the values of discipline and service characteristic of officer-class households of the era.[4] Limited records detail specific childhood experiences, but his subsequent pursuit of a military career suggests an environment fostering martial inclinations from a young age.[8]Education and initial military training
Ironside received his initial schooling at institutions in St Andrews, Scotland, prior to attending Tonbridge School in Kent, England.[12] In January 1898, he gained admission to the Royal Military Academy (RMA) at Woolwich, the primary training establishment for British Army officers destined for the Royal Artillery and Royal Engineers.[13] During his time at the RMA Woolwich, Ironside demonstrated strong performance in both scholarly pursuits and athletic activities, reflecting the academy's emphasis on developing disciplined, technically proficient artillery officers through rigorous instruction in gunnery, mathematics, fortification, and physical drill.[12] [13] The curriculum, spanning approximately 18 months for cadets, prepared entrants for frontline service by combining theoretical education with practical field exercises and equitation training.[4] Upon successful completion of his course, Ironside was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Royal Artillery on 25 June 1899, marking the end of his formal initial military training and the beginning of active regimental duty.[13] This commission positioned him for immediate deployment, underscoring the RMA's role in rapidly producing officers capable of operational effectiveness in imperial conflicts.[14]Pre-First World War Service
Second Boer War engagements
Ironside was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Royal Artillery on 25 June 1899 and promptly assigned to the 44th Battery, Royal Field Artillery, with mobilization for service in South Africa occurring ahead of the Second Boer War's outbreak on 11 October 1899.[6][12] His battery arrived at the Cape on 12 February 1900, enabling participation in subsequent conventional operations against Boer forces.[15] The 44th Battery's initial major engagement under Ironside's service was the Battle of Paardeberg (18–27 February 1900), where it formed part of the artillery contingent supporting Lord Roberts's encirclement of approximately 4,000 Boer troops led by General Piet Cronjé.[16] The battery provided sustained fire from field guns, contributing to the bombardment that forced Cronjé's surrender on 27 February after heavy casualties and supply shortages on the Boer side, marking a pivotal British victory with over 1,000 British casualties but the capture of 4,000 prisoners and significant materiel.[16] Following Paardeberg, the battery conducted operations in the Kheis district along the lower Orange River in May 1900, targeting Boer commandos disrupting supply lines, before shifting to the western Orange River Colony for anti-guerrilla sweeps.[15] In July and August 1901, two of its guns supported Colonel Peakman's mobile column in pursuits against Boer General Christiaan De Wet's forces, engaging in skirmishes amid the war's protracted guerrilla phase.[15] Ironside served throughout these actions in an artillery capacity, sustaining three wounds during combat.[14] His conduct earned a mention in despatches in 1901, reflecting distinguished service amid the battery's demanding field operations, and resulted in promotion to lieutenant that year.[15] These engagements honed Ironside's experience in mobile artillery tactics against irregular forces, foreshadowing his later intelligence roles.[6]Intelligence operations in German South-West Africa
Following the conclusion of the Second Boer War in May 1902, Ironside, then a subaltern in the Royal Artillery, conducted undercover intelligence operations in the neighboring German colony of South-West Africa (modern Namibia) from approximately 1902 to 1904.[17] Posing as an Afrikaans-speaking Boer transport manager, he infiltrated German colonial forces to gather information on their military capabilities and movements, amid British concerns over German colonial ambitions in southern Africa.[18][17] Ironside's proficiency in seven languages, including Dutch and German dialects learned from childhood interactions with fishermen in Scotland and further honed in South Africa, enabled him to blend seamlessly into local environments.[17] His operations coincided with escalating tensions leading to the Herero and Namaqua uprisings against German rule, beginning in 1904; he reportedly joined German patrols undercover to observe tactics and logistics during this period of rebellion suppression.[19] At over six feet tall and of robust build, Ironside's physical presence aided his disguise without arousing immediate suspicion, allowing him to report on German fortifications, troop dispositions, and supply lines back to British authorities.[14][18] These missions, conducted with minimal formal support and relying on personal initiative, provided valuable insights into German colonial military methods, which British intelligence deemed useful for potential future contingencies in the region.[17] Ironside's experiences in South-West Africa, including evasion of detection while traversing arid terrains, later served as a partial inspiration for John Buchan's fictional spy Richard Hannay in the 1915 novel The Thirty-Nine Steps, as Buchan had encountered Ironside during wartime staff work in South Africa and learned of his exploits.[20] By 1904, Ironside returned to regular British Army duties, having completed this brief but hazardous intelligence stint without capture.[17]First World War Contributions
Deployment to the Western Front
Ironside, serving as a captain in the Royal Artillery at the outbreak of the First World War on 4 August 1914, was promoted to Staff Captain the following day and attached to the headquarters of the newly formed 6th Division of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF).[12] The 6th Division, under Major-General John Keir, underwent rapid mobilization in the United Kingdom before embarking for France, with advance elements departing Southampton on 7 September 1914 and the bulk of the division landing at Rouen between 10 and 16 September.[14] Ironside, functioning initially as General Staff Officer Grade 3 (GSO3) responsible for intelligence and operational planning, accompanied the division's early contingents and was among the first British officers to arrive on the continent, contributing to the coordination of logistics and reconnaissance amid the fluid opening phases of the campaign.[1] Promoted to temporary major on 17 October 1914, Ironside continued staff duties with the 6th Division as it advanced into Belgium and northern France, participating in the Race to the Sea from late September through October, where British forces sought to outflank the advancing German armies before the front stabilized into trench lines.[12] His role involved analyzing enemy movements and supporting divisional maneuvers during the First Battle of Ypres (19 October to 22 November 1914), where the BEF, including the 6th Division's eventual integration into III Corps, faced intense pressure from German assaults aimed at capturing Channel ports.[14] Ironside's early exposure to the Western Front's attritional nature, marked by hasty entrenchments and improvised defenses, informed his later assessments of modern warfare, though his primary contributions remained behind the lines in staff coordination rather than direct combat command.[1] By early 1915, as the 6th Division repositioned for operations including the Battle of Neuve Chapelle (10–13 March 1915), Ironside's service earned him mention in despatches on 22 June 1915 and the Distinguished Service Order on 23 June 1915, gazetted for "distinguished service in the field" with the division's headquarters.[1] These awards reflected his effectiveness in managing intelligence flows and operational staff work during the BEF's transition from mobile warfare to static defense, amid high casualties and logistical strains that characterized the front's first winter.[14] Ironside remained with the 6th Division through 1916, supporting actions at the Somme, before transitioning to higher staff roles.[12]Staff and command roles in key battles
Ironside assumed the role of General Staff Officer Grade 1 (GSO1) to the 4th Canadian Division on the Western Front on 3 March 1916, a position he held until 6 January 1918.[2] As the division's senior staff officer, he was instrumental in operational planning and coordination during several major engagements, including the Battle of the Somme from July to November 1916, where the division saw heavy fighting; the successful assault on Vimy Ridge on 9 April 1917, a pivotal Canadian victory that captured the ridge from German forces; and the Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele) from July to November 1917, marked by intense attrition in muddy terrain.[14] [21] Under the command of Major-General David Watson, whose leadership was criticized for weaknesses, Ironside effectively managed divisional affairs, directing staff functions and compensating for command shortcomings to maintain operational effectiveness.[22] From 7 January to 26 March 1918, Ironside served as Commandant of the Small Arms School at Camiers, France, where he oversaw training in rifle and machine gun tactics for British and Allied troops preparing for renewed offensives.[2] On 27 March 1918, shortly before the German Spring Offensive began on 21 March, he took command of the 99th Infantry Brigade as a temporary brigadier-general, leading it until 19 September 1918.[2] In this capacity, the brigade defended against the initial German advances in the Battles of the Lys and other sectors, then participated in the Allied Hundred Days Offensive, including advances in the Somme area during August and September 1918.[14] During these 1918 operations on the Somme front, Ironside, acting as colonel, directed a machine gun corps, employing concentrated fire to support infantry assaults and repel counterattacks.[14]Promotions and military decorations
Ironside served in the First World War initially as a major on the staff of the 6th Division upon its deployment to France in September 1914.[14] He was promoted to temporary lieutenant-colonel on 3 March 1916 while acting as General Staff Officer Grade 1 to the 4th Canadian Division.[2] On 3 June 1916, he received the brevet rank of lieutenant-colonel in recognition of his service.[2] Further promotions followed in 1918: temporary colonel on 7 January, temporary brigadier-general on 27 March upon assuming command of the 99th Infantry Brigade, and temporary major-general on 17 November.[2]| Date | Promotion |
|---|---|
| 3 March 1916 | Temporary Lieutenant-Colonel |
| 3 June 1916 | Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel |
| 7 January 1918 | Temporary Colonel |
| 27 March 1918 | Temporary Brigadier-General |
| 17 November 1918 | Temporary Major-General |
Interwar Engagements and Commands
North Russia intervention against Bolsheviks
In October 1918, Major General William Edmund Ironside arrived in Archangel to assume command of Allied forces in the North Russian theater, replacing the previous leadership amid deteriorating conditions against Bolshevik advances.[24] His command spanned from 1 October 1918 to 11 August 1919, overseeing a multinational force comprising approximately 6,000 British troops, 5,000 Americans from the 339th Infantry Regiment and other units, smaller contingents from France, Italy, and Serbia, supplemented by locally raised White Russian formations totaling around 15,000-18,000 combatants in the Archangel sector.[25] [26] The intervention's initial aims had shifted from safeguarding Allied munitions stores post-Brest-Litovsk Treaty to actively supporting anti-Bolshevik forces, though hampered by divided Allied political objectives and the Armistice ending World War I hostilities with Germany.[27] Ironside prioritized reorganizing and training unreliable White Russian units under British officers to bolster the front lines along the Dvina and Vaga Rivers, where harsh Arctic conditions, swampy terrain, and dependence on riverine supply lines constrained operations.[25] In late 1918, his forces repelled Bolshevik probes, including a significant offensive on Armistice Day 11 November that was halted by 14 November through coordinated Allied counterattacks.[27] Winter stalemate followed, with Ironside advocating for a spring 1919 offensive to seize Kotlas, approximately 400 miles southeast, to disrupt Bolshevik rail communications and link with Admiral Kolchak's Siberian armies—a strategic gambit to enable a White Russian advance on Moscow.[25] [28] The May-June 1919 offensive advanced Allied positions, capturing key villages like Troitsa and Zolotinka on the Dvina, but faltered short of Kotlas due to Bolshevik reinforcements, mutinies among Russian troops (e.g., the 8th North Russian Regiment), and logistical breakdowns exacerbated by seasonal floods and artillery shortages.[26] [28] Ironside's forces inflicted notable casualties—estimated Bolshevik losses exceeding 10,000 during the campaign—while tying down Red Army divisions that might otherwise reinforce southern fronts, though the failure to achieve junction with Kolchak underscored the intervention's overextension.[25] Facing mounting pressure from London to withdraw without indefinite commitment, Ironside orchestrated an orderly evacuation starting in July 1919, employing deception, rearguard actions, and naval support to disengage over 14,000 troops and civilians by September, averting encirclement despite Bolshevik numerical superiority of roughly 50,000.[24] [27] Ironside's tenure demonstrated tactical competence in a politically untenable venture, where Allied half-measures—lacking unified resolve to eradicate Bolshevik control—doomed broader success, as he later reflected in operational despatches emphasizing the necessity of full-spectrum commitment absent in the enterprise.[25] The withdrawal preserved forces for postwar duties, but the Bolshevik consolidation in North Russia facilitated their eventual dominance, highlighting causal limits of expeditionary interventions without sustained political backing.[26]Reorganization of Persian Cossack forces
In October 1920, Major-General Edmund Ironside assumed command of NORPERFORCE, the British contingent of approximately 6,000 troops stationed in northern Persia to counter Bolshevik incursions and maintain regional stability amid the post-World War I power vacuum.[4] The Persian Cossack Brigade, a cavalry unit originally established in 1879 and officered predominantly by Russian personnel, had deteriorated into a demoralized force plagued by corruption, inadequate training, and unreliable leadership following the Bolshevik Revolution, which disrupted its Russian cadre.[29] Ironside, recognizing the brigade's potential as a bulwark against Soviet expansion, initiated its reorganization from his Qazvin headquarters, prioritizing the dismissal of over 100 corrupt Russian officers and non-commissioned officers who had compromised operational effectiveness.[4] Assisted by British officers including Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Smyth, Ironside revived the brigade's structure in November 1920 by purging foreign influences, streamlining administration and finances, and promoting Persian personnel to fill leadership voids, thereby fostering a more cohesive and loyal unit under nominal Iranian oversight.[29] This reform addressed chronic issues such as embezzlement and absenteeism, documented in brigade records reviewed by Ironside, who expressed contempt for the prevailing graft among the ousted officers.[30] By late December 1920, as part of these efforts, Ironside personally selected and appointed Lieutenant-Colonel Reza Khan—a capable Cossack officer noted for his discipline and success in prior engagements—to command the reorganized brigade, replacing the shah-appointed Sardar-i Humayun, whose tenure had proven ineffective.[4] Reza Khan's Hamadan contingent, inspected by Ironside on 29 January 1921, exemplified the improved readiness, with the general endorsing the command shift around 15 February 1921 to ensure the force's viability during NORPERFORCE's impending withdrawal.[4] The reorganization transformed the brigade into a more disciplined entity capable of independent action, aligning with British strategic imperatives to withdraw forces by early 1921 without ceding ground to Bolshevik-aligned elements, though Ironside's diaries reveal his broader intent to cultivate Persian military self-reliance under vetted leadership.[29] This intervention, conducted without formal Iranian governmental consent for the officer purges, underscored NORPERFORCE's de facto authority in northern Persia but yielded a professionalized unit that later played a pivotal role in internal power shifts.[31]Commands in India and strategic postings
In November 1928, Ironside assumed command as District Officer Commanding (DOC) of the Meerut District in British India, a role he held until May 1931.[2] The Meerut District encompassed significant infantry and artillery units within the United Provinces, contributing to the broader Indian Army's maintenance of internal security and frontier preparedness amid ongoing tribal unrest on the North-West Frontier.[32] His responsibilities included troop training, administrative oversight, and coordination with local civil authorities to ensure operational readiness, though no major campaigns directly under his district command are recorded during this tenure.[2] Following a brief interlude that included his appointment as Lieutenant of the Tower of London in 1931, Ironside returned to India in October 1933 as Quartermaster-General at Army Headquarters, serving until March 1936.[2] In this strategic staff position, he directed logistics, supply chains, and organizational reforms for the entire Indian Army, which numbered over 150,000 troops at the time and faced demands from frontier skirmishes and internal policing duties.[32] The role involved assessing and procuring equipment, managing transport infrastructure, and advising on resource allocation to sustain imperial defenses in a region vulnerable to Soviet influence and Afghan border threats, reflecting the interwar emphasis on cost-effective modernization amid fiscal constraints.[2] These Indian postings honed Ironside's expertise in large-scale command and logistical strategy, preparing him for higher Imperial General Staff roles upon his return to Britain in 1936.[32]Pre-Second World War Preparations
Quartermaster-General duties
Ironside served as Quartermaster-General at Army Headquarters, India, from 4 October 1933 to 15 March 1936.[2] In this position, he directed the logistical operations of the British Indian Army, encompassing the procurement, distribution, and maintenance of supplies including equipment, rations, ammunition, fuels, and medical stores to support over 200,000 troops across diverse terrains from the North-West Frontier to Burma.[2] [33] His responsibilities extended to coordinating transport infrastructure, such as rail and road networks vital for rapid mobilization, and standardizing administrative procedures to enhance efficiency amid the army's expansion under the 1930s Indian Defence Expenditure Committee recommendations, which allocated funds for mechanized units and artillery upgrades.[2] During his tenure, Ironside prioritized field inspections, traversing thousands of miles by train, motor vehicle, and horseback to evaluate supply depots, regimental stores, and frontier outposts, identifying deficiencies in obsolete horse-drawn logistics and advocating for partial mechanization to align with emerging motorized warfare doctrines observed in Europe.[2] These efforts addressed vulnerabilities exposed by tribal incursions on the North-West Frontier, where inadequate supply lines had previously hampered operations, such as the 1930s Mohmand expeditions requiring sustained ammunition flows over rugged passes. By 1935, under his oversight, the Quartermaster-General's branch had improved stockpile reserves by approximately 20 percent for key items like small-arms ammunition and vehicle spares, bolstering readiness for imperial contingencies.[2] [33] Ironside's work contributed to pre-Second World War preparations by fortifying India's strategic depth as a manpower and resource base for the British Empire, enabling the eventual dispatch of Indian divisions to the Middle East and Far East theaters. He emphasized empirical assessments over theoretical planning, critiquing bureaucratic delays in London that slowed equipment deliveries, and pushed for localized production of uniforms and basic munitions to reduce dependence on sea-lanes vulnerable to naval threats.[2] This pragmatic approach, rooted in his prior frontline experience, enhanced causal resilience in supply chains, though constrained by the era's fiscal austerity and political debates over Indian self-governance under the Government of India Act 1935.[2]Warnings on German rearmament and army modernization
In September 1937, Ironside attended the inaugural large-scale Wehrmacht maneuvers near Berlin, observing the integration of infantry, artillery, and emerging mechanized elements in coordinated operations.[34] During the visit, he met Adolf Hitler and noted the German army's high morale and tactical proficiency, which demonstrated significant advances in training and equipment since the Treaty of Versailles restrictions.[34] On 27 September 1937, Ironside recorded in his diary that the German army "has developed in a marvelous way. It is madly enthusiastic and very efficient," adding that observers were "terrified" by its potential, as "nothing will stand up to it when the moment comes."[34] He qualified this by stating there was "no danger now but there will be in, say, five years," explicitly warning of the trajectory of German army modernization toward offensive capability by the early 1940s.[34] By August 1938, amid escalating tensions over Czechoslovakia, Ironside assessed the German army's strength at 104 divisions, reflecting accelerated rearmament that included expanded conscription, increased production of tanks and artillery, and doctrinal shifts toward mobile warfare informed by Spanish Civil War experiences.[35] These evaluations, drawn from intelligence reports and personal observations, underscored Germany's violation of disarmament treaties and its prioritization of military expansion, which Ironside contrasted with Britain's slower modernization efforts.[35]Second World War Leadership
Chief of the Imperial General Staff tenure
Ironside assumed the role of Chief of the Imperial General Staff on 4 September 1939, shortly after Britain's entry into the Second World War, succeeding General Sir Cyril Deverell.[2] As CIGS, he served as the senior professional military adviser to the Secretary of State for War, Anthony Eden, and coordinated army operations, strategy, and mobilization efforts amid the early phases of the conflict known as the Phoney War. His responsibilities included directing the rapid expansion of the Territorial Army from 205,000 to over 1.5 million men by mid-1940 and overseeing the deployment of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) to France, starting with four divisions in October 1939 and growing to ten by May 1940.[2] Throughout his tenure, Ironside emphasized a continental commitment, advocating for a strong defensive posture in alliance with France against potential German offensives, as reflected in his strategic memoranda, such as the 17 January 1940 assessment of Britain's war aims and resource allocation.[36] He engaged in high-level discussions with French counterparts, including General Maurice Gamelin, to align Allied plans, while expressing private frustrations in his diaries over French hesitancy and the limited scale of British reinforcements compared to his recommendations for up to twenty divisions.[12] Ironside also initiated early preparations for home defense against possible invasion, anticipating German moves in Scandinavia and the Low Countries based on intelligence indicators by November 1939.[37] His nine-month term ended on 26 May 1940 amid the BEF's retreat to Dunkirk, with Ironside replaced by Lieutenant-General Sir John Dill as part of Prime Minister Winston Churchill's reorganization of high command following the German breakthroughs in France.[2] Evaluations of his leadership highlight effective initial mobilization despite pre-war underfunding, though critics, including some postwar analyses, faulted the army's equipment shortages and doctrinal rigidity, issues Ironside had previously warned against but could not fully resolve in the short timeframe.[38]Norway campaign planning and execution
As Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS), Ironside contributed to pre-invasion planning for Norway, emphasizing the strategic importance of disrupting Swedish iron ore shipments through Narvik, which supplied 40% of Germany's ore imports during winter months.[39] In November 1939, he supported Operation Wilfred, involving the mining of Norwegian coastal Leads to force shipping into international waters for interception, alongside Plan R 4 for potential Allied landings at key ports including Narvik, Trondheim, and Bergen to secure bases and deny German access.[40] These measures were approved by the War Cabinet, with mining scheduled for April 5, 1940, but stood down temporarily after the Soviet-Finnish armistice on March 13, 1940, before reactivation on March 28 amid intelligence of German preparations.[39] Ironside's advocacy reflected first-principles prioritization of resource denial over strict neutrality concerns, though execution was constrained by limited trained troops—only three fully equipped battalions available initially—and divided naval-military priorities.[40] The German invasion on April 9, 1940, preempted Allied moves, landing 10,000 troops across Norway and capturing Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim, and Narvik, with destroyers securing the latter port despite naval losses.[39] Ironside, convening the Chiefs of Staff Committee at 6:00 a.m. that day, initially underestimated German presence at Narvik but shifted to prioritize it over central ports by evening, citing resource limits of approximately 13,000 troops including partially trained units and a French Chasseurs Alpins brigade.[40] On April 10, he informed the War Cabinet of deployments, instructing Major-General P. J. Mackesy to sail from Scapa Flow on April 11 with half a battalion for Narvik, aiming arrival by April 13, reinforced by four battalions on April 15; delays from naval reallocations postponed this to April 12.[40] Similarly, on April 14, Ironside directed Major-General A. R. Carton de Wiart for operations from Namsos against Trondheim, emphasizing landings avoiding direct opposition and cooperation with Norwegian forces, with the 146th Infantry Brigade landing by April 15.[41] Execution faltered due to logistical delays, harsh weather, and Mackesy's cautious interpretation of orders, which prohibited assaults against opposition, contrasting Ironside's April 11 handwritten directive estimating 3,000 German defenders and urging boldness from a Harstad base with phased reinforcements—two battalions immediately, four within 30 hours, and two more weekly.[39] By April 16, Ironside authorized Brigadier H. de R. Morgan's landing at Åndalsnes to support central operations, but German air superiority—unopposed by absent Allied fighters—halted advances, as noted in subsequent command assessments.[41] On April 20, he telegraphed Morgan to cancel northward pushes from Dombås, endorsing Norwegian collaboration instead.[39] As setbacks mounted, Ironside signed evacuation orders on April 27 for Åndalsnes and Namsos, insisting on withdrawal to preserve forces amid unsustainable positions, a decision credited in operational records with enabling organized retreats despite losses of equipment and initial chaos.[39] Ironside's later directives included appointing General Sir Claude Auchinleck on May 5, 1940, to unify Narvik command, effective May 13, amid criticisms in official reviews of ad hoc planning yielding insufficient forces—exacerbated by divided Admiralty-War Office control—and intelligence gaps on German dispositions.[39] The campaign's failure, culminating in Allied evacuation by June 8 after destroying Narvik port facilities, stemmed causally from German initiative, air dominance, and Allied dispersal across fronts rather than singular command errors, though Ironside's focus on Narvik secured temporary ore denial at the cost of central Norway.[40] His diaries later reflected frustration with inter-service frictions and execution shortfalls, underscoring systemic unpreparedness for combined operations.[39]Battle of France and Dunkirk evacuation
During the German offensive in the west, launched on 10 May 1940, Ironside, as Chief of the Imperial General Staff, coordinated British strategic responses from London while making personal visits to the front. On 19 May, amid reports of the Panzer breakthrough at Sedan and the rapid advance toward the Channel, Ironside traveled to France to confer with General Lord Gort, commander of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), and French commanders. Arriving early on 20 May at Gort's command post, he delivered War Cabinet Order A, which directed the BEF to execute vigorous attacks southward in cooperation with French forces to sever the German corridor between Army Group A and Army Group B.[42] Gort briefed Ironside on the precarious Allied position, including the need to close gaps north of the Somme and the deployment of British divisions for a counterattack south of Arras planned for 21 May, emphasizing reliance on French support that proved unreliable.[42] Ironside then proceeded to Lens to urge General Billotte, commander of the French 1st Army Group, to launch immediate counterattacks, coordinating with British efforts such as the Arras offensive involving the British 5th and 50th Divisions. Despite these exhortations, Ironside became convinced by Gort's assessment that large-scale southward operations were infeasible due to the collapse of French cohesion and the BEF's exposure on the left flank. He reported back to London a pervasive defeatism among French generals, which undermined joint Allied action and contributed to the encirclement of Allied forces in Flanders.[42] [43] As German forces compressed the Allied pocket, Ironside's tenure as CIGS ended on 27 May 1940, when he was replaced by General Sir John Dill amid the escalating crisis, though he remained involved in high-level deliberations. Operation Dynamo, the Dunkirk evacuation, commenced on 26 May under Admiralty direction, with Ironside having signed related communications assessing evacuation feasibility in the preceding days. By 4 June, approximately 338,000 British and Allied troops had been rescued, preserving the core of the British Army despite the loss of most heavy equipment. Ironside's efforts highlighted the limitations of British influence over French command and the rapid German operational superiority, factors rooted in Allied strategic dispersal and underestimation of blitzkrieg tactics.[44][43]Commander-in-Chief of Home Forces
Ironside was appointed Commander-in-Chief of Home Forces on 27 May 1940, immediately following his replacement as Chief of the Imperial General Staff amid the Dunkirk evacuation and the collapse of Allied forces in France.[2] In this role, he directed the reorganization of Britain's ground defenses against an anticipated German invasion, commanding a force comprising remnants of the British Expeditionary Force, Territorial Army divisions, and emerging auxiliary units like the Local Defence Volunteers (later renamed the Home Guard).[45] His immediate priorities included halting the disintegration of army discipline, redistributing scarce equipment, and fortifying vulnerable coastal sectors, with an emphasis on East Anglia as a probable invasion target due to its flat terrain and proximity to German air bases.[46] By 25 June 1940, Ironside had formulated and presented to the War Cabinet Home Forces Operations Instruction Number 3, a comprehensive anti-invasion plan that divided operations into phases: detection of enemy assembly and embarkation, sea transit interdiction via Royal Navy and RAF actions, and ground resistance upon landing.[45] The directive mandated demolitions of ports and infrastructure, deployment of anti-tank obstacles and minefields along beaches, and the creation of mobile counter-attack reserves to contain beachheads before they expanded inland.[47] Under his oversight, defensive "stop lines"—such as the Ghoul Line across eastern England—were surveyed and partially implemented, relying on natural barriers like rivers and canals supplemented by pillboxes and field fortifications, though material shortages limited full execution.[48] Ironside conducted extensive inspections of commands, urging rapid training and integration of the Home Guard into regular formations to bolster manpower, which had swelled to over 1.5 million volunteers by mid-July.[49] Despite these efforts, Ironside's tenure lasted only until 19 July 1940, when Prime Minister Winston Churchill replaced him with Lieutenant-General Alan Brooke, citing the need for a commander with recent operational experience against German forces, as Brooke had demonstrated during the retreat to Dunkirk.[50][51] Upon relinquishing command, Ironside was promoted to field marshal, the first such elevation during the war, recognizing his prior service though not extending his active role in Home Forces preparations.[52] His brief leadership stabilized initial defenses but faced constraints from equipment deficits and the army's post-Dunkirk disarray, with Brooke inheriting a framework that emphasized elastic defense over rigid coastal holdings.[53]Later Career and Retirement
Resignation, peerage, and advisory roles
Ironside was relieved as Commander-in-Chief, Home Forces, on 19 July 1940, with General Sir Alan Brooke assuming the role effective immediately following a summons to the War Office.[54] The replacement reflected Prime Minister Winston Churchill's preference for a leader deemed more vigorous in organizing anti-invasion defenses amid the threat of Operation Sea Lion.[55] Concurrent with his departure from active command, Ironside received promotion to field marshal on 20 July 1940, a supernumerary appointment recognizing his long service despite the abrupt end to his wartime leadership postings.[56] In recognition of his contributions, particularly in earlier anti-Bolshevik operations and pre-war warnings on rearmament, Ironside was elevated to the peerage on 29 January 1941 as Baron Ironside, of Archangel and of Ironside in the County of Aberdeen.[12] This life peerage granted him a seat in the House of Lords, where he occasionally contributed to discussions on military strategy and imperial defense, drawing on his frontline experience in Russia and Persia.[14] Post-retirement, he maintained informal advisory contacts within military circles but held no formal governmental or command positions, focusing instead on personal reflection and documentation of his career.[55]Published writings and diaries
Ironside authored Tannenberg: The First Thirty Days in East Prussia, a historical analysis of the 1914 German victory over Russian forces in the opening phase of the First World War on the Eastern Front, published by William Blackwood and Sons in 1928.[57] The book, written during his tenure as commandant of the Royal Military College of Canada from 1922 to 1926, drew on German operational records and tactical assessments to examine the maneuvers leading to the encirclement and destruction of the Russian Second Army under General Alexander Samsonov, emphasizing the role of superior German staff coordination under Paul von Hindenburg and Erich Ludendorff.[58] A second impression followed shortly after initial release, reflecting contemporary interest in the battle's strategic lessons for professional officers.[59] Ironside maintained extensive personal diaries spanning much of his career, comprising 73 bound volumes that documented military operations, political intrigues, and personal reflections, with selections published posthumously.[60] The most prominent volume, Time Unguarded: The Ironside Diaries, 1937–1940, edited by Colonel Roderick Macleod and Denis Kelly, appeared in 1962 from Constable & Co. (UK) and David McKay Company (US), covering entries from May 1937 through his July 1940 resignation as Chief of the Imperial General Staff.[61] These diaries reveal Ironside's candid assessments of British rearmament delays, inter-service rivalries, and early war planning, including frustrations with political leadership and warnings on German capabilities, as permitted by his 1930 will authorizing selective publication.[62] Additional diary excerpts from High Road to Command: The Diaries of Major-General Sir Edmund Ironside, 1920–1922, edited and published in 1972, detail his post-First World War assignments in Iraq and North Russia, highlighting logistical challenges in anti-Bolshevik interventions and his rise through staff roles.[63] These works, drawn from original manuscripts held in archives such as King's College London, provide primary-source insights into Ironside's operational thinking but have been critiqued for selective editing that omits broader contextual correspondence.[64] No further writings by Ironside were published during his lifetime beyond Tannenberg and periodic military articles in professional journals.[65]Legacy and Evaluations
Honours and peerage details
Ironside was elevated to the peerage as Baron Ironside, of Archangel and of Ironside in the County of Aberdeen, on 29 January 1941, following his resignation from active command roles.[8] This life peerage recognized his long service, particularly his leadership in anti-Bolshevik operations and early World War II preparations, allowing him to continue advisory contributions in the House of Lords.[8] His principal British honours, reflecting gallantry and senior command, are summarized below:| Honour | Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Distinguished Service Order (DSO) | 1915 | For distinguished service in the First World War, including actions on the Western Front.[8] |
| Companion of the Order of St Michael and St George (CMG) | 1918 | Awarded for services in North Russia and Allied interventions.[8] |
| Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath (KCB) | 1919 | Promotion upon return from command in Archangel.[8] |
| Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath (GCB) | 1938 | Advanced for overall contributions to army staff and intelligence roles.[8] |
| Knight of the Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem (KStJ) | 1939 | Honorary knighthood linked to military welfare and command duties.[1] |


