Hubbry Logo
Gray whaleGray whaleMain
Open search
Gray whale
Community hub
Gray whale
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gray whale
Gray whale
from Wikipedia

Gray whale[1]
Temporal range: Late Pleistocene–Recent[2]
Gray whale spy-hopping next to calf
Illustration showing whale next to human diver. The whale is many times larger than the human
Size compared to an average human
CITES Appendix I (CITES)[4]
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Infraorder: Cetacea
Family: Eschrichtiidae
Genus: Eschrichtius
Species:
E. robustus
Binomial name
Eschrichtius robustus
Gray whale range
Synonyms
  • Balaena gibbosa Erxleben, 1777
  • Agaphelus glaucus Cope, 1868
  • Rhachianectes glaucus Cope, 1869
  • Eschrichtius gibbosus Van Deinse & Junge, 1937
  • E. glaucus Maher, 1961

The gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus),[1] also known as the grey whale,[5] is a baleen whale that migrates between feeding and breeding grounds yearly. It reaches a length of 14.9–15.2 m (49–50 ft), a weight of up to 41 to 45 tonnes (45 to 50 short tons; 40 to 44 long tons) and lives between 55 and 70 years, although one female was estimated to be 75–80 years of age.[6][7][8][9] The common name of the whale comes from the gray patches and white mottling on its dark skin.[10] Gray whales were once called devil fish because of their fighting behavior when hunted.[11] The gray whale is the sole living species in the genus Eschrichtius. It is the sole living genus in the family Eschrichtiidae, however some recent studies classify it as a member of the family Balaenopteridae. This mammal is descended from filter-feeding whales that appeared during the Neogene.

The gray whale is distributed in a Northeast Pacific (North American), and an endangered Northwest Pacific (Asian), population. North Atlantic populations were extirpated (perhaps by whaling) on the European coast before 500 CE, and on the American and African Atlantic coasts around the late 17th to early 18th centuries.[12] However, in the 2010s and 2020s there have been rare sightings of gray whales in the North Atlantic,[13][14] Mediterranean,[15][16][17] and even off South Atlantic coasts.[18][19][20][21]

Taxonomy

[edit]
Skeleton

The gray whale is traditionally placed as the only living species in its genus and family, Eschrichtius and Eschrichtiidae,[22] but an extinct species was discovered and placed in the genus in 2017, the Akishima whale (E. akishimaensis).[23] Some recent studies place gray whales as being outside the rorqual clade, but as the closest relatives to the rorquals.[24] But other recent DNA analyses have suggested that certain rorquals of the family Balaenopteridae, such as the humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae, and fin whale, Balaenoptera physalus, are more closely related to the gray whale than they are to some other rorquals, such as the minke whales.[25][26][27][28] The American Society of Mammalogists has followed this classification.[29]

John Edward Gray placed it in its own genus in 1865, naming it in honour of physician and zoologist Daniel Frederik Eschricht.[30] The common name of the whale comes from its coloration. The subfossil remains of now extinct gray whales from the Atlantic coasts of England and Sweden were used by Gray to make the first scientific description of a species then surviving only in Pacific waters.[31] The living Pacific species was described by Cope as Rhachianectes glaucus in 1869.[32] Skeletal comparisons showed the Pacific species to be identical to the Atlantic remains in the 1930s, and Gray's naming has been generally accepted since.[33][34] Although identity between the Atlantic and Pacific populations cannot be proven by anatomical data, its skeleton is distinctive and easy to distinguish from that of all other living whales.[35]

Many other names have been ascribed to the gray whale, including desert whale,[36] devilfish, gray back, mussel digger and rip sack.[37] The name Eschrichtius gibbosus is sometimes seen; this is dependent on the acceptance of a 1777 description by Erxleben.[38]

Taxonomic history

[edit]

A number of 18th century authors[39] described the gray whale as Balaena gibbosa, the "whale with six bosses", apparently based on a brief note by Dudley 1725:[40]

The Scrag Whale is near a kin to the Fin-back, but instead of a Fin upon his Back, the Ridge of the Afterpart of his Back is cragged with half a Dozen Knobs or Nuckles; he is nearest the right Whale in Figure and for Quantity of Oil; his Bone is white, but won't split.[41]

The gray whale was first described as a distinct species by Lilljeborg 1861 based on a subfossil found in the brackish Baltic Sea, apparently a specimen from the now extinct north Atlantic population. Lilljeborg, however, identified it as "Balaenoptera robusta", a species of rorqual.[42] Gray 1864 realized that the rib and scapula of the specimen was different from those of any known rorquals, and therefore erected a new genus for it, Eschrichtius.[43] Van Beneden & Gervais 1868 were convinced that the bones described by Lilljeborg could not belong to a living species but that they were similar to fossils that Van Beneden had described from the harbour of Antwerp (most of his named species are now considered nomina dubia) and therefore named the gray whale Plesiocetus robustus, reducing Lilljeborg's and Gray's names to synonyms.[44]

Charles Melville Scammon produced one of the earliest descriptions of living Pacific gray whales,[45] and notwithstanding that he was among the whalers who nearly drove them to extinction in the lagoons of the Baja California Peninsula, they were and still are associated with him and his description of the species.[46] At this time, however, the extinct Atlantic population was considered a separate species (Eschrischtius robustus) from the living Pacific population (Rhachianectes glaucus).[47]

Things got increasingly confused as 19th century scientists introduced new species at an alarming rate (e.g. Eschrichtius pusillus, E. expansus, E. priscus, E. mysticetoides), often based on fragmentary specimens, and taxonomists started to use several generic and specific names interchangeably and not always correctly (e.g. Agalephus gobbosus, Balaenoptera robustus, Agalephus gibbosus). Things got even worse in the 1930s when it was finally realised that the extinct Atlantic population was the same species as the extant Pacific population, and the new combination Eschrichtius gibbosus was proposed.[40]

Description

[edit]

The gray whale has a dark slate-gray color and is covered by characteristic gray-white patterns, which are scars left by parasites that drop off in its cold feeding grounds. Individual whales are typically identified using photographs of their dorsal surface, matching the scars and patches associated with parasites that have either fallen off or are still attached. They have two blowholes on top of their head, which can create a distinctive heart-shaped blow[48] at the surface in calm wind conditions.

Gray whales measure from 4.9 m (16 ft) in length for newborns to 13–15 m (43–49 ft) for adults (females tend to be slightly larger than adult males). Newborns are a darker gray to black in color. A mature gray whale can reach 40–45 tonnes (44–50 short tons), with a typical range of 15–33 t (17–36 short tons), making them the ninth largest sized species of cetacean.[49][8]

A close-up of a gray whale's double blow hole and some of its encrusted barnacles

Notable features that distinguish the gray whale from other mysticetes include its baleen that is variously described as cream, off-white, or blond in color and is unusually short. Small depressions on the upper jaw each contain a lone stiff hair, but are only visible on close inspection. Its head's ventral surface lacks the numerous prominent furrows of the related rorquals, instead bearing two to five shallow furrows on the throat's underside. The gray whale also lacks a dorsal fin, instead bearing 6 to 12 dorsal crenulations ("knuckles"), which are raised bumps on the midline of its rear quarter, leading to the flukes. This is known as the dorsal ridge. The tail itself is 3–3.5 m (10–11 ft) across and deeply notched at the center while its edges taper to a point.

Pacific groups

[edit]

The two populations of Pacific gray whales (east and west) are morphologically and phylogenically different. Other than DNA structures, differences in proportions of several body parts and body colors including skeletal features, and length ratios of flippers and baleen plates have been confirmed between Eastern and Western populations, and some claims that the original eastern and western groups could have been much more distinct than previously thought, enough to be counted as subspecies.[50][51] Since the original Asian and Atlantic populations have become extinct, it is difficult to determine the unique features among whales in these stocks. However, there have been observations of some whales showing distinctive, blackish body colors in recent years.[52] This corresponds with the DNA analysis of last recorded stranding in China.[53] Differences were also observed between Korean and Chinese specimens.[51]

Populations

[edit]

North Pacific

[edit]
Gray whale breaching
Gray whale spouting along shores of Yachats, Oregon

Two Pacific Ocean populations are known to exist: one population that is very low, whose migratory route is presumed to be between the Sea of Okhotsk and southern Korea, and a larger population numbering about 27,000 individuals in the eastern Pacific, traveling between the waters off northernmost Alaska and Baja California Sur.[54] Mothers make this journey accompanied by their calves, usually hugging the shore in shallow kelp beds, and fight viciously to protect their young if they are attacked, earning gray whales the moniker "devil fish."[55]

The western population has had a very slow growth rate despite heavy conservation action over the years, likely due to their very slow reproduction rate.[56] The state of the population hit an all-time low in 2010, when no new reproductive females were recorded, resulting in a minimum of 26 reproductive females being observed since 1995.[57] Even a very small number of additional annual female deaths will cause the subpopulation to decline.[58] However, as of 2018, evidence has indicated that the western population is markedly increasing in number, especially off Sakhalin Island. Following this, the IUCN downlisted the population's conservation status from critically endangered to endangered.[59][56]

North Atlantic

[edit]

The gray whale became extinct in the North Atlantic in the 18th century.[60] They had been seasonal migrants to coastal waters of both sides of Atlantic, including the Baltic Sea,[61][62] the Wadden Sea, the Gulf of St. Lawrence, the Bay of Fundy, Pamlico Sound and possibly Hudson Bay.[63][64] Radiocarbon dating of subfossil or fossil European (Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom) coastal remains confirms this, with whaling the possible cause for the population's extinction.[35] Remains dating from the Roman epoch were found in the Mediterranean during excavation of the antique harbor of Lattara near Montpellier, France, in 1997, raising the question of whether Atlantic gray whales migrated up and down the coast of Europe from the Wadden Sea to calve in the Mediterranean.[65][66] A 2018 study utilizing ancient DNA barcoding and collagen peptide matrix fingerprinting confirmed that Roman era whale bones east of the Strait of Gibraltar were gray whales (and North Atlantic right whales), confirming that gray whales once ranged into the Mediterranean.[67] Similarly, radiocarbon dating of American east coastal subfossil remains confirm that gray whales existed there at least through the 17th century. This population ranged at least from Southampton, New York, to Jupiter Island, Florida, the latest from 1675.[34] In his 1835 history of Nantucket Island, Obed Macy wrote that in the early pre-1672 colony a whale of the kind called "scragg" entered the harbor and was pursued and killed by the settlers.[68] A. B. Van Deinse points out that the "scrag whale", described by P. Dudley in 1725 as one of the species hunted by the early New England whalers, was almost certainly the gray whale.[69][70]

Since the 2010s, there have been occasional sightings of gray whales in the Atlantic Ocean and in the Mediterranean Sea, including one off the coast of Israel and one off the coast of Namibia.[71][72] These were presumably migrants from the North Pacific population through the Arctic Ocean.[71][72] A 2015 study of DNA from subfossil gray whales indicated that this may not be a historically unique event.[71][72][73] That study suggested that over the past 100,000 years there have been several migrations of gray whales between the Pacific and Atlantic, with the most recent large scale migration of this sort occurring about 5,000 years ago.[71][72][73] These migrations corresponded to times of relatively high temperatures in the Arctic Ocean.[71][72][73] In 2021, one individual was seen in the port of Rabat, Morocco,[74] followed by sightings in Algeria[75] and Italy.[76] In March 2024, New England Aquarium researchers photographed a gray whale 30 miles (48 km) south of Nantucket, Massachusetts.[77]

Pre-whaling abundance

[edit]

Researchers[78] used a genetic approach to estimate pre-whaling abundance based on samples from 42 gray whales, and reported DNA variability at 10 genetic loci consistent with a population size of 76,000–118,000 individuals, three to five times larger than the average census size as measured through 2007. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has collected surveys of gray whale population since at least the 1960s.[79] They state that "the most recent population estimate [from 2007] was approximately 19,000 whales, with a high probability (88%) that the population is at 'optimum sustainable population' size, as defined by the Marine Mammal Protection Act." They speculate that the ocean ecosystem has likely changed since the pre-whaling era, making a return to pre-whaling numbers infeasible.[80] Factors limiting or threatening current population levels include ship strikes, entanglement in fishing gear, and changes in sea-ice coverage associated with climate change.[81]

Integration and recolonization

[edit]
Calf with mouth open showing baleen, Alaska

Several whales seen off Sakhalin and on Kamchatka Peninsula have been confirmed to migrate towards eastern side of Pacific and join the larger eastern population. In January 2011, a gray whale that had been tagged in the western population was tracked as far east as the eastern population range off the coast of British Columbia.[82] Recent findings from either stranded or entangled specimens indicate that the original western population have become functionally extinct, and possibly all the whales that have appeared on Japanese and Chinese coasts in modern times are vagrants or re-colonizers from the eastern population.[50][53]

In mid-1980, there were three gray whale sightings in the eastern Beaufort Sea, placing them 585 kilometers (364 mi) further east than their known range at the time.[83] Recent increases in sightings are confirmed in Arctic areas of the historic range for Atlantic stocks, most notably on several locations in the Laptev Sea including the New Siberian Islands in the East Siberian Sea,[84] and around the marine mammal sanctuary[85] of the Franz Josef Land,[86] indicating possible earlier pioneers of re-colonizations. These whales were darker in body color than those whales seen in Sea of Okhotsk.[52] In May 2010, a gray whale was sighted off the Mediterranean shore of Israel.[87] It has been speculated that this whale crossed from the Pacific to the Atlantic via the Northwest Passage, since an alternative route around Cape Horn would not be contiguous to the whale's established territory. There has been gradual melting and recession of Arctic sea ice with extreme loss in 2007 rendering the Northwest Passage "fully navigable".[88] The same whale was sighted again on May 30, 2010, off the coast of Barcelona, Spain.[89]

In May 2013, a gray whale was sighted off Walvis Bay, Namibia. Scientists from the Namibian Dolphin Project confirmed the whale's identity and thus provides the only sighting of this species in the Southern Hemisphere. Photographic identification suggests that this is a different individual than the one spotted in the Mediterranean in 2010. As of July 2013, the Namibian whale was still being seen regularly.[90]

In March 2021, a gray whale was sighted near Rabat, the capital of Morocco.[74] In April, additional sightings were made off Algeria[75] and Italy.[76]

In December 2023, a gray whale was sighted off Sunny Isles Beach, Florida.[91]

Genetic analysis of fossil and prefossil gray whale remains in the Atlantic Ocean suggests several waves of dispersal from the Pacific to the Atlantic related to successive periods of climactic warming – during the Pleistocene before the last glacial period and the early Holocene immediately following the opening of the Bering Strait. This information and the recent sightings of Pacific gray whales in the Atlantic, suggest that another range expansion to the Atlantic may be starting.[92]

Life history

[edit]
A whale swims off the coast near the Santa Monica Mountains.

Reproduction

[edit]
Embryos of gray whale (1874 illustration) and outline of head showing spouthole

Breeding behavior is complex and often involves three or more animals. Both male and female whales reach puberty between the ages of 6 and 12 with an average of eight to nine years.[93][9][7] Females show highly synchronized reproduction, undergoing oestrus in late November to early December.[94] During the breeding season, it is common for females to have several mates.[95] This single ovulation event is believed to coincide with the species' annual migration patterns, when births can occur in warmer waters.[95] Most females show biennial reproduction, although annual births have been reported.[94] Males also show seasonal changes, experiencing an increase in testes mass that correlates with the time females undergo oestrus.[95] Currently there are no accounts of twin births, although an instance of twins in utero has been reported.[94]

The gestation period for gray whales is approximately 13 12 months, with females giving birth every one to three years.[93][96] In the latter half of the pregnancy, the fetus experiences a rapid growth in length and mass. Similar to the narrow breeding season, most calves are born within a six-week time period in mid January.[93] The calf is born tail first, and measures about 14–16 ft in length, and a weight of 2,000 lbs.[9] Females lactate for approximately seven months following birth, at which point calves are weaned and maternal care begins to decrease.[93] The shallow lagoon waters in which gray whales reproduce are believed to protect the newborn from sharks and orcas.[97][55]

On 7 January 2014, a pair of newborn or aborted conjoined twin gray whale calves were found dead in the Laguna Ojo de Liebre (Scammon's Lagoon), off the west coast of Mexico. They were joined by their bellies.[98]

Feeding

[edit]
Gray whale breaching off the coast of Santa Barbara, California

The whale feeds mainly on benthic crustaceans (such as amphipods and ghost shrimp),[99] which it eats by turning on its side and scooping up sediments from the sea floor. This unique feeding selection makes gray whales one of the most strongly reliant on coastal waters among baleen whales. It is classified as a baleen whale and has baleen, or whalebone, which acts like a sieve, to capture small sea animals, including amphipods taken in along with sand, water and other material. Off Vancouver Island, gray whales commonly feed on shrimp-like mysids. When mysids are abundant gray whales are present in fairly large numbers. Despite mysids being a prey of choice, gray whales are opportunistic feeders and can easily switch from feeding planktonically to benthically. When gray whales feed planktonically, they roll onto their right side while their fluke remains above the surface, or they apply the skimming method seen in other baleen whales (skimming the surface with their mouth open). This skimming behavior mainly seems to be used when gray whales are feeding on crab larvae. Other prey items include polychaete worms, herring eggs, various forms of larvae, and small fish.[99]

Gray whales feed benthically, by diving to the ocean floor and rolling on to their side, (like blue whales, gray whales seem to favor rolling onto their right side) and suck up prey from the sea floor.[100] Gray whales seem to favor feeding planktonically in their feeding grounds, but benthically along their migration route in shallower water.[101] Mostly, the animal feeds in the northern waters during the summer; and opportunistically feeds during its migration, depending primarily on its extensive fat reserves. Another reason for this opportunistic feeding may be the result of population increases, resulting in the whales taking advantage of whatever prey is available, due to increased competition.[102] Feeding areas during migration seem to include the Gulf of California, Monterey Bay and Baja California Sur.[103] Calf gray whales drink 50–80 lb (23–36 kg) of their mothers' 53% fat milk per day.[104]

The main feeding habitat of the western Pacific subpopulation is the shallow (5–15 m (16–49 ft) depth) shelf off northeastern Sakhalin Island, particularly off the southern portion of Piltun Lagoon, where the main prey species appear to be amphipods and isopods.[105] In some years, the whales have also used an offshore feeding ground in 30–35 m (98–115 ft) depth southeast of Chayvo Bay, where benthic amphipods and cumaceans are the main prey species.[106] Some gray whales have also been seen off western Kamchatka, but to date all whales photographed there are also known from the Piltun area.[58][107]

Diagram of the gray whale seafloor feeding strategy

A gray whale feeding near Yaquina Head, Oregon
A gray whale viewed from above

Migration

[edit]

Predicted distribution models indicate that overall range in the last glacial period was broader or more southerly distributed, and inhabitations in waters where species presences lack in present situation, such as in southern hemisphere and south Asian waters and northern Indian Ocean were possible due to feasibility of the environment on those days.[92] Range expansions due to recoveries and re-colonization in the future is likely to happen and the predicted range covers wider than that of today. The gray whale undergoes the longest migration of any mammal.[108][109]

Eastern Pacific population

[edit]
A gray whale breaching in a lagoon on the coast of Mexico

Each October, as the northern ice pushes southward, small groups of eastern gray whales in the eastern Pacific start a two- to three-month, 8,000–11,000 km (5,000–6,800 mi) trip south. Beginning in the Bering and Chukchi seas and ending in the warm-water lagoons of Mexico's Baja California Peninsula and the southern Gulf of California, they travel along the west coast of Canada, the United States and Mexico.[110]

Traveling night and day, the gray whale averages approximately 120 km (75 mi) per day at an average speed of 8 km/h (5 mph). This round trip of 16,000–22,000 km (9,900–13,700 mi) is believed to be the longest annual migration of any mammal.[111] By mid-December to early January, the majority are usually found between Monterey and San Diego such as at Morro bay, often visible from shore.[108] The whale watching industry provides ecotourists and marine mammal enthusiasts the opportunity to see groups of gray whales as they migrate.

By late December to early January, eastern grays begin to arrive in the calving lagoons and bays on the west coast of Baja California Sur. The three most popular are San Ignacio, Magdalena Bay to the south, and, to the north, Laguna Ojo de Liebre (formerly known in English as Scammon's Lagoon after whaleman Charles Melville Scammon, who discovered the lagoons in the 1850s and hunted the grays).[112][113]

Gray whales once ranged into Sea of Cortez and Pacific coasts of continental Mexico south to the Islas Marías, Bahía de Banderas, and Nayarit/Jalisco, and there were two modern calving grounds in Sonora (Tojahui or Yavaros) and Sinaloa (Bahia Santa Maria, Bahia Navachiste, La Reforma, Bahia Altata) until being abandoned in the 1980s.[114][115]

These first whales to arrive are usually pregnant mothers looking for the protection of the lagoons to bear their calves, along with single females seeking mates. By mid-February to mid-March, the bulk of the population has arrived in the lagoons, filling them with nursing, calving and mating gray whales.

Throughout February and March, the first to leave the lagoons are males and females without new calves. Pregnant females and nursing mothers with their newborns are the last to depart, leaving only when their calves are ready for the journey, which is usually from late March to mid-April. Often, a few mothers linger with their young calves well into May. Whale watching in Baja's lagoons is particularly popular because the whales often come close enough to boats for tourists to pet them.[116]

By late March or early April, the returning animals can be seen from Puget Sound to Canada.

Resident groups
[edit]
A gray whale swims near surf on Nootka Island within residential range.

A population of about 200 gray whales stay along the eastern Pacific coast from Canada to California throughout the summer, not making the farther trip to Alaskan waters. This summer resident group is known as the Pacific Coast feeding group.[117]

Any historical or current presence of similar groups of residents among the western population is currently unknown, however, whalers' logbooks and scientific observations indicate that possible year-round occurrences in Chinese waters and Yellow and Bohai basins were likely to be summering grounds.[118][119] Some of the better documented historical catches show that it was common for whales to stay for months in enclosed waters elsewhere, with known records in the Seto Inland Sea[120] and the Gulf of Tosa. Former feeding areas were once spread over large portions on mid-Honshu to northern Hokkaido, and at least whales were recorded for majority of annual seasons including wintering periods at least along east coasts of Korean Peninsula and Yamaguchi Prefecture.[119] Some recent observations indicate that historic presences of resident whales are possible: a group of two or three were observed feeding in Izu Ōshima in 1994 for almost a month,[121] two single individuals stayed in Ise Bay for almost two months in the 1980s and in 2012, the first confirmed living individuals in Japanese EEZ in the Sea of Japan and the first of living cow-calf pairs since the end of whaling stayed for about three weeks on the coastline of Teradomari in 2014.[122][123] One of the pair returned to the same coasts at the same time of the year in 2015 again.[124] Reviewing on other cases on different locations among Japanese coasts and islands observed during 2015 indicate that spatial or seasonal residencies regardless of being temporal or permanental staying once occurred throughout many parts of Japan or on other coastal Asia.[125]

Western population

[edit]
Gray and other whales were depicted on the Bangudae Petroglyphs, indicating their historical presences along Korean Peninsula.[126]
A gray whale in the water off Sakhalin Island.

The current western gray whale population summers in the Sea of Okhotsk, mainly off Piltun Bay region at the northeastern coast of Sakhalin Island (Russian Federation). There are also occasional sightings off the eastern coast of Kamchatka (Russian Federation) and in other coastal waters of the northern Okhotsk Sea.[105][127] Its migration routes and wintering grounds are poorly known, the only recent information being from occasional records on both the eastern and western coasts of Japan[128] and along the Chinese coast.[129] Gray whale had not been observed on Commander Islands until 2016.[130] The northwestern pacific population consists of approximately 300 individuals, based on photo identification collected off of Sakhalin Island and Kamchatka.[9]

The Sea of Japan was once thought not to have been a migration route, until several entanglements were recorded.[131] Any records of the species had not been confirmed since after 1921 on Kyushu.[119] However, there were numerous records of whales along the Genkai Sea off Yamaguchi Prefecture,[132] in Ine Bay in the Gulf of Wakasa, and in Tsushima. Gray whales, along with other species such as right whales and Baird's beaked whales, were common features off the north eastern coast of Hokkaido near Teshio, Ishikari Bay near Otaru, the Shakotan Peninsula, and islands in the La Pérouse Strait such as Rebun Island and Rishiri Island. These areas may also have included feeding grounds.[119] There are shallow, muddy areas favorable for feeding whales off Shiretoko, such as at Shibetsu, the Notsuke Peninsula, Cape Ochiishi on Nemuro Peninsula, Mutsu Bay,[133] along the Tottori Sand Dunes, in the Suou-nada Sea, and Ōmura Bay.

The historical calving grounds were unknown but might have been along southern Chinese coasts from Zhejiang and Fujian Province to Guangdong, especially south of Hailing Island[118] and to near Hong Kong. Possibilities include Daya Bay, Wailou Harbour on Leizhou Peninsula, and possibly as far south as Hainan Province and Guangxi, particularly around Hainan Island. These areas are at the southwestern end of the known range.[58][134] It is unknown whether the whales' normal range once reached further south, to the Gulf of Tonkin. In addition, the existence of historical calving ground on Taiwan and Penghu Islands (with some fossil records[135] and captures[136]), and any presence in other areas outside of the known ranges off Babuyan Islands in Philippines and coastal Vietnamese waters in Gulf of Tonkin are unknown. There is only one confirmed record of accidentally killing of the species in Vietnam, at Ngoc Vung Island off Ha Long Bay in 1994 and the skeleton is on exhibition at the Quang Ninh Provincial Historical Museum.[137][138] Gray whales are known to occur in Taiwan Strait even in recent years.[139]

It is also unknown whether any winter breeding grounds ever existed beyond Chinese coasts. For example, it is not known if the whales visited the southern coasts of the Korean Peninsula, adjacent to the Island of Jeju), Haiyang Island, the Gulf of Shanghai, or the Zhoushan Archipelago.[140] There is no evidence of historical presence in Japan south of Ōsumi Peninsula;[141] only one skeleton has been discovered in Miyazaki Prefecture.[142] Hideo Omura [jp] once considered the Seto Inland Sea to be a historical breeding ground, but only a handful of capture records support this idea, although migrations into the sea have been confirmed. Recent studies using genetics and acoustics, suggest that there are several wintering sites for western gray whales such as Mexico and the East China sea. However, their wintering ground habits in the western North Pacific are still poorly understood and additional research is needed.[120]

Recent migration in Asian waters

[edit]
Gray whale at Aogashima, Izu Islands in March, 2017.

Even though South Korea put the most effort into conservation of the species among the Asian nations, there are no confirmed sightings along the Korean Peninsula or even in the Sea of Japan in recent years.

The last confirmed record in Korean waters was the sighting of a pair off Bangeojin, Ulsan in 1977.[143] Prior to this, the last was of catches of 5 animals[144] off Ulsan in 1966.[118] There was a possible sighting of a whale within the port of Samcheok in 2015.[145]

There had been 24 records along Chinese coasts including sighting, stranding, intended hunts, and bycatches since 1933.[53] The last report of occurrence of the species in Chinese waters was of a stranded semi adult female in the Bohai Sea in 1996,[118] and the only record in Chinese waters in the 21st century was of a fully-grown female being killed by entanglement in Pingtan, China in November, 2007.[139] DNA studies indicated that this individual might have originated from the eastern population rather than the western.[53]

Most notable observations of living whales after the 1980s were of 17 or 18 whales along Primorsky Krai in late October, 1989 (prior to this, a pair was reported swimming in the area in 1987), followed by the record of 14 whales in La Pérouse Strait on 13th, June in 1982 (in this strait, there was another sighting of a pair in October, 1987).[119] In 2011, presences of gray whales were acoustically detected among pelagic waters in East China Sea between Chinese and Japanese waters.[146]

Since the mid-1990s, almost all the confirmed records of living animals in Asian waters were from Japanese coasts.[147] There have been eight to fifteen sightings and stray records including unconfirmed sightings and re-sightings of the same individual, and one later killed by net-entanglement. The most notable of these observations are listed below:

  • The feeding activities of a group of two or three whales that stayed around Izu Ōshima in 1994 for almost a month were recorded underwater[121] by several researchers and whale photographers.[148]
  • A pair of thin juveniles were sighted off Kuroshio, Kōchi, a renowned town for whale-watching tourism of resident and sub-resident populations of Bryde's whales, in 1997.[149] This sighting was unusual because of the location on mid-latitude in summer time.
  • Another pair of sub-adults were confirmed swimming near the mouth of Otani River in Suruga Bay in May, 2003.[133]
  • A sub-adult whale that stayed in the Ise and Mikawa Bay for nearly two months in 2012[150][151][152] was later confirmed to be the same individual as the small whale observed off Tahara near Cape Irago in 2010,[153] making it the first confirmed constant migration out of Russian waters. The juvenile observed off Owase in Kumanonada Sea in 2009 might or might not be the same individual. The Ise and Mikawa Bay region is the only location along Japanese coasts that has several records since the 1980s (a mortal entanglement in 1968, above mentioned short-stay in 1982, self-freeing entanglement in 2005),[120][149] and is also the location where the first commercial whaling started. Other areas with several sighting or stranding records in recent years are off the Kumanonada Sea in Wakayama, off Oshika Peninsula in Tōhoku, and on coastlines close to Tomakomai, Hokkaido.
  • Possibly the first confirmed record of living animals in Japanese waters in the Sea of Japan since the end of whaling occurred on 3 April 2014 at Nodumi Beach, Teradomari, Niigata.[154][155][156] Two individuals, measuring ten and five metres respectively, stayed near the mouth of Shinano River for three weeks.[50] It is unknown whether this was a cow-calf pair, which would have been a first record in Asia. All of the previous modern records in the Sea of Japan were of by-catches.[131]
  • One of the above pair returned on the same beaches at the same time of a year in 2015.[124][157]
  • A juvenile or possibly or not with another larger individual remained in Japanese waters between January or March and May 2015.[158] It was first confirmed occurrences of the species on remote, oceanic islands in Japan. One or more visited waters firstly on Kōzu-shima and Nii-Jima for weeks then adjacent to Miho no Matsubara and behind the Tokai University campus for several weeks.[159] Possibly the same individual was seen off Futo as well.[160] This later was identified as the same individual previously recorded on Sakhalin in 2014, the first re-recording one individual at different Asian locations.[125]
  • A young whale was observed by land-based fishermen at Cape Irago in March, 2015.[161]
  • One of the above pair appeared in 2015 off southeastern Japan and then reappeared off Tateyama in January, 2016.[162] The identity of this whale was confirmed by Nana Takanawa who photographed the same whale on Niijima in 2015.[163] Likely the same individual was sighted off Futo[160] and half an hour later off Akazawa beach in Itō, Shizuoka on the 14th.[164][165][166] The whale then stayed next to a pier on Miyake-jima and later at Habushi beach on Niijima, the same beach the same individual stayed near on the previous year.
  • One whale of 9 metres (30 ft) was beached nearby Wadaura on March 4, 2016.[167] Investigations on the corpse indicate that this was likely a different individual from the above animal.
  • A 7 metres (23 ft) carcass of young female was firstly reported floating along Atami on 4 April then was washed ashore on Ito on the 6th.[168]
  • As of April 20, 2017, one or more whale(s) have been staying within Tokyo Bay since February although at one point another whale if or if not the same individual sighted off Hayama, Kanagawa.[169][170] It is unclear the exact number of whales included in these sightings; two whales reported by fishermen and Japanese coastal guard reported three whales on 20th or 21st.[171]

Whaling

[edit]

North Pacific

[edit]
Charles Melville Scammon's 1874 illustration of a gray whale

Eastern population

[edit]

Humans and orcas are the adult gray whale's only predators, although orcas are the more prominent predator.[172] Aboriginal hunters, including those on Vancouver Island and the Makah in Washington, have hunted gray whales.

Commercial whaling of the species by Europeans in the North Pacific began in the winter of 1845–46, when two United States ships, the Hibernia and the United States, under Captains Smith and Stevens, caught 32 in Magdalena Bay. More ships followed in the two following winters, after which gray whaling in the bay was nearly abandoned because "of the inferior quality and low price of the dark-colored gray whale oil, the low quality and quantity of whalebone from the gray, and the dangers of lagoon whaling."[173]

Gray whaling in Magdalena Bay was revived in the winter of 1855–56 by several vessels, mainly from San Francisco, including the ship Leonore, under Captain Charles Melville Scammon. This was the first of 11 winters from 1855 through 1865 known as the "bonanza period", during which gray whaling along the coast of Baja California reached its peak. Not only were the whales taken in Magdalena Bay, but also by ships anchored along the coast from San Diego south to Cabo San Lucas and from whaling stations from Crescent City in northern California south to San Ignacio Lagoon. During the same period, vessels targeting right and bowhead whales in the Gulf of Alaska, Sea of Okhotsk, and the Western Arctic would take the odd gray whale if neither of the more desirable two species were in sight.[173]

In December 1857, Charles Scammon, in the brig Boston, along with his schooner-tender Marin, entered Laguna Ojo de Liebre (Jack-Rabbit Spring Lagoon) or later known as Scammon's Lagoon (by 1860) and found one of the gray's last refuges. He caught 20 whales.[173] He returned the following winter (1858–59) with the bark Ocean Bird and schooner tenders A.M. Simpson and Kate. In three months, he caught 47 cows, yielding 1,700 barrels (270 m3) of oil.[174] In the winter of 1859–60, Scammon, again in the bark Ocean Bird, along with several other vessels, entered San Ignacio Lagoon to the south where he discovered the last breeding lagoon. Within only a couple of seasons, the lagoon was nearly devoid of whales.[173]

Between 1846 and 1874, an estimated 8,000 gray whales were killed by American and European whalemen, with over half having been killed in the Magdalena Bay complex (Estero Santo Domingo, Magdalena Bay itself, and Almejas Bay) and by shore whalemen in California and Baja California.[173]

Spyhopping off the Alaskan coast

A second, shorter, and less intensive hunt occurred for gray whales in the eastern North Pacific. Only a few were caught from two whaling stations on the coast of California from 1919 to 1926, and a single station in Washington (1911–21) accounted for the capture of another. For the entire west coast of North America for the years 1919 to 1929, 234 gray whales were caught. Only a dozen or so were taken by British Columbian stations, nearly all of them in 1953 at Coal Harbour.[175] A whaling station in Richmond, California, caught 311 gray whales for "scientific purposes" between 1964 and 1969. From 1961 to 1972, the Soviet Union caught 138 gray whales (they originally reported not having taken any). The only other significant catch was made in two seasons by the steam-schooner California off Malibu, California. In the winters of 1934–35 and 1935–36, the California anchored off Point Dume in Paradise Cove, processing gray whales. In 1936, gray whales became protected in the United States.[176]

Western population

[edit]

The Japanese began to catch gray whales beginning in the 1570s. At Kawajiri, Nagato, 169 gray whales were caught between 1698 and 1889. At Tsuro, Shikoku, 201 were taken between 1849 and 1896.[177] Several hundred more were probably caught by American and European whalemen in the Sea of Okhotsk from the 1840s to the early 20th century.[178] Whalemen caught 44 with nets in Japan during the 1890s. The real damage was done between 1911 and 1933, when Japanese whalemen killed 1,449 after Japanese companies established several whaling stations on Korean Peninsula and on Chinese coast such as near the Daya bay and on Hainan Island. By 1934, the western gray whale was near extinction. From 1891 to 1966, an estimated 1,800–2,000 gray whales were caught, with peak catches of between 100 and 200 annually occurring in the 1910s.[178]

As of 2001, the Californian gray whale population had grown to about 26,000. As of 2016, the population of western Pacific (seas near Korea, Japan, and Kamchatka) gray whales was an estimated 200.[54]

North Atlantic

[edit]

The North Atlantic population may have been hunted to extinction in the 18th century. Circumstantial evidence indicates whaling could have contributed to this population's decline, as the increase in whaling activity in the 17th and 18th centuries coincided with the population's disappearance.[34] A. B. Van Deinse points out the "scrag whale", described by P. Dudley in 1725, as one target of early New England whalers, was almost certainly the gray whale.[69][70] In his 1835 history of Nantucket Island, Obed Macy wrote that in the early pre-1672 colony, a whale of the kind called "scragg" entered the harbor and was pursued and killed by the settlers.[68] Gray whales (Icelandic sandlægja) were described in Iceland in the early 17th century.[179] Formations of commercial whaling among the Mediterranean basin(s) have been considered to be feasible as well.[66]

Conservation

[edit]
Joint American-Russian freeing effort of whales entrapped by ice floe in Beaufort Sea as part of Operation Breakthrough.

Gray whales have been granted protection from commercial hunting by the International Whaling Commission (IWC) since 1949, and are no longer hunted on a large scale.

Limited hunting of gray whales has continued since that time, however, primarily in the Chukotka region of northeastern Russia, where large numbers of gray whales spend the summer months. This hunt has been allowed under an "aboriginal/subsistence whaling" exception to the commercial-hunting ban. Anti-whaling groups have protested the hunt, saying the meat from the whales is not for traditional native consumption, but is used instead to feed animals in government-run fur farms; they cite annual catch numbers that rose dramatically during the 1940s, at the time when state-run fur farms were being established in the region. Although the Soviet government denied these charges as recently as 1987, in recent years the Russian government has acknowledged the practice. The Russian IWC delegation has said that the hunt is justified under the aboriginal/subsistence exemption, since the fur farms provide a necessary economic base for the region's native population.[180]

Currently, the annual quota for the gray whale catch in the region is 140 per year. Pursuant to an agreement between the United States and Russia, the Makah tribe of Washington claimed four whales from the IWC quota established at the 1997 meeting. With the exception of a single gray whale killed in 1999, the Makah people have been prevented from hunting by a series of legal challenges, culminating in a United States federal appeals court decision in December 2002 that required the National Marine Fisheries Service to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement. On September 8, 2007, five members of the Makah tribe shot a gray whale using high-powered rifles in spite of the decision. The whale died within 12 hours, sinking while heading out to sea.[181]

A school class in California spots a gray whale in the Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary during a field trip for the Every Kid in a Park program in 2016.

As of 2018, the IUCN regards the gray whale as being of least concern from a conservation perspective. However, the specific subpopulation in the northwest Pacific is regarded as being critically endangered.[3] The northwest Pacific population is also listed as endangered by the U.S. government's National Marine Fisheries Service under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. The IWC Bowhead, Right and Gray Whale subcommittee in 2011 reiterated the conservation risk to western gray whales is large because of the small size of the population and the potential anthropogenic impacts.[57]

Gray whale migrations off of the Pacific Coast were observed, initially, by Marineland of the Pacific in Palos Verdes, California. The Gray Whale Census, an official gray whale migration census that has been recording data on the migration of the Pacific gray whale has been keeping track of the population of the Pacific gray whale since 1985. This census is the longest running census of the Pacific gray whale. Census keepers volunteer from December 1 through May, from sun up to sun down, seven days a week, keeping track of the number of gray whales migrating through the area off of Los Angeles. Information from this census is listed through the American Cetacean Society of Los Angeles (ACSLA).

South Korea and China list gray whales as protected species of high concern. In South Korea, the Gray Whale Migration Site [ko][182] was registered as the 126th national monument in 1962,[183] although illegal hunts have taken place thereafter,[144] and there have been no recent sightings of the species in Korean waters.

Rewilding proposal

[edit]

In 2005, two conservation biologists proposed a plan to airlift 50 gray whales from the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean. They reasoned that, as Californian gray whales had replenished to a suitable population, surplus whales could be transported to repopulate the extinct British population.[184][185] As of 2024 this plan has not been undertaken.[186]

Threats

[edit]

According to the Government of Canada's Management Plan for gray whales, threats to the eastern North Pacific population of gray whales include:[187] increased human activities in their breeding lagoons in Mexico, climate change, acute noise, toxic spills, aboriginal whaling, entanglement with fishing gear, boat collisions, and possible impacts from fossil fuel exploration and extraction.

Western gray whales are facing large-scale offshore oil and gas development programs near their summer feeding grounds, as well as fatal net entrapments off Japan during migration, which pose significant threats to the future survival of the population.[57] The substantial nearshore industrialization and shipping congestion throughout the migratory corridors of the western gray whale population represent potential threats by increasing the likelihood of exposure to ship strikes, chemical pollution, and general disturbance.[58][178]

Offshore gas and oil development in the Okhotsk Sea within 20 km (12 mi) of the primary feeding ground off northeast Sakhalin Island is of particular concern. Activities related to oil and gas exploration, including geophysical seismic surveying, pipelaying and drilling operations, increased vessel traffic, and oil spills, all pose potential threats to western gray whales. Disturbance from underwater industrial noise may displace whales from critical feeding habitat. Physical habitat damage from drilling and dredging operations, combined with possible impacts of oil and chemical spills on benthic prey communities also warrants concern. The western gray whale population is considered to be endangered according to IUCN standards.[58][107]

Along Japanese coasts, four females including a cow-calf pair were trapped and killed in nets in the 2000s. There had been a record of dead whale thought to be harpooned by dolphin-hunters found on Hokkaido in the 1990s.[58][188] Meats for sale were also discovered in Japanese markets as well.[189]

2019 has had a record number of gray whale strandings and deaths, with 122 strandings in United States waters and 214 in Canadian waters. The cause of death in some specimens appears to be related to poor nutritional condition.[190] It is hypothesized that some of these strandings are related to changes in prey abundance or quality in the Arctic feeding grounds, resulting in poor feeding. Some scientists suggest that the lack of sea ice has been preventing the fertilization of amphipods, a main source of food for gray whales, so that they have been hunting krill instead, which is far less nutritious. More research needs to be conducted to understand this issue.[191]

A recent study provides some evidence that solar activity is correlated to gray whale strandings. When there was a high prevalence of sunspots, gray whales were five times more likely to strand. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that solar storms release a large amount of electromagnetic radiation, which disrupts Earth's magnetic field and/or the whale's ability to analyze it.[192] This may apply to the other species of cetaceans, such as sperm whales.[193] However, there is not enough evidence to suggest that whales navigate through the use of magnetoreception (an organism's ability to sense a magnetic field).

Orcas are "a prime predator of gray whale calves."[55] Typically three to four orcas ram a calf from beneath in order to separate it from its mother, who defends it. Humpback whales have been observed defending gray whale calves from orcas.[55] Orcas will often arrive in Monterey Bay to intercept gray whales during their northbound migration, targeting females migrating with newborn calves. They will separate the calf from the mother and hold the calf under water to drown it. The tactic of holding whales under water to drown them is certainly used by orcas on adult gray whales as well.[194] It is roughly estimated that 33% of the gray whales born in a given year might be killed by predation.[195]

Captivity

[edit]
A gray whale in captivity

Because of their size and need to migrate, gray whales have rarely been held in captivity, and then only for brief periods of time. The first captive gray whale, who was captured in Scammon's Lagoon, Baja California in 1965, was named Gigi and died two months later from an infection.[196] The second gray whale, who was captured in 1972 from the same lagoon, was named Gigi II and was released a year later after becoming too large for the facilities.[197] The third gray whale, J.J., first beached herself in 1997 in Marina del Rey, California where she was rushed to SeaWorld San Diego. After 14 months, she was released because she also grew too large to be cared for in the existing facilities. At 19,200 pounds (8,700 kg) and 31 feet (9.4 m) when she was released, J.J. was the largest marine mammal ever to be kept in captivity.[198]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

The gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) is a medium-sized baleen whale in the monotypic family Eschrichtiidae, distinguished by its mottled gray skin often encrusted with barnacles and whale lice, absence of a dorsal fin, and specialized bottom-feeding behavior where it rolls onto its side to suction sediment from the seafloor, filtering small invertebrates through 130 to 180 coarse baleen plates. Adults typically measure 42 to 49 feet in length and weigh around 45 tons. Endemic to the North Pacific Ocean, two extant populations persist: the eastern North Pacific stock, which migrates along the coasts of North America, and the western North Pacific stock, primarily around Sakhalin Island and northeastern Asia.
Gray whales undertake one of the longest annual migrations of any , covering 10,000 to 14,000 miles round-trip between high-latitude summer feeding grounds in the Bering and Chukchi Seas and winter breeding and calving lagoons in for the eastern population, or similar routes for the western group. Their diet consists mainly of benthic amphipods, isopods, and polychaetes, supplemented opportunistically by or mysid shrimp, with individuals consuming up to a ton of prey daily during feeding seasons. Once abundant across the , gray whales were driven to near by intensive 19th- and early 20th-century commercial targeting their oil-rich , with the eastern population reduced to fewer than 2,000 individuals by the 1940s. International protections implemented in the 1930s and 1940s, culminating in the global whaling moratorium, enabled the eastern stock to recover robustly to an estimated 27,000 whales by 2016, leading to its delisting from endangered status in the United States. In contrast, the western population, numbering only 220 to 270 individuals as of recent surveys, remains critically endangered due to ongoing threats including disturbance from oil and gas development, ship strikes, and fishery interactions, despite legal protections.

Taxonomy and Evolution

Taxonomic Classification

The gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) is classified as the only extant within the monotypic genus Eschrichtius and the , distinguishing it from other whales in the parvorder Mysticeti. This family-level isolation reflects unique morphological traits, such as the absence of a and specialized skull features adapted for bottom-feeding, which phylogenetic analyses confirm as derived within mysticetes based on cranial and postcranial evidence. Its full taxonomic hierarchy, updated to incorporate integrating whales with , is as follows:
RankClassification
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumChordata
ClassMammalia
OrderCetartiodactyla
InfraorderCetacea
ParvorderMysticeti
Family
GenusEschrichtius
SpeciesE. robustus
The binomial Eschrichtius robustus derives from the genus honoring Danish zoologist Daniel Frederik Eschricht, who studied cetacean anatomy, and the specific epithet "robustus" denoting the species' robust build, as noted in early descriptions. Scientific synonyms include Balaenoptera robusta (Lilljeborg, 1861) and Eschrichtius glaucus (Cope, 1868), reflecting initial placements in broader rorqual genera before family-level distinction in the late 19th century based on skeletal differences from balaenopterids. No subspecies are currently recognized, as genetic studies of eastern and western North Pacific populations show minimal divergence despite geographic separation, supporting conspecific status under the biological species concept.

Evolutionary History

The gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) represents the only living species in the family , a basal lineage within the whales (Mysticeti). Mysticetes originated around 38 million years ago in the late Eocene, evolving from toothed archaeocete ancestors through adaptations for filter-feeding, including the replacement of teeth with plates derived from gum tissue. This transition enabled efficient exploitation of and small , driving an early among mysticetes from approximately 39 to 28 million years ago. diverged later, forming a with the (Balaenopteridae), as supported by phylogenies that place these families closer to each other than to balaenids (right and bowhead whales) or the (Neobalaenidae). The fossil record of Eschrichtius begins in the epoch (5.3–2.6 million years ago), with specimens dated to 3.9–2.6 million years ago from sites in , , and the eastern North Pacific. The earliest confirmed Eschrichtius from the eastern Pacific occurs in the Lower Pleistocene Rio Dell Formation of , approximately 2 million years old, featuring diagnostic traits like a shortened rostrum and robust zygomatic processes. Preceding relatives, such as the Glaucobalaena inopinata from the western U.S., exhibit eschrichtiid affinities through shared cranial features like a broad, flat and reduced telescoping, indicating Pacific origins for the lineage before global dispersal. These fossils document a relatively conservative morphology, with gray whales retaining primitive mysticete traits such as the absence of a and a bent head profile suited to benthic feeding. Throughout the Pleistocene (2.6 million to 11,700 years ago), gray whales endured over 40 glacial-interglacial cycles, adapting via dietary flexibility: during ice ages, when reduced surface productivity, they shifted from to infaunal stirred from seafloor sediments, a evidenced by isotopic analysis of subfossil bones showing enriched signatures consistent with benthic diets. This opportunistic foraging, rather than specialized lunge-feeding like , likely conferred resilience amid habitat fluctuations. Fossil and subfossil remains also reveal recurrent Pacific-to-Atlantic dispersals via ice-free corridors during interglacials, establishing temporary populations documented by Pleistocene specimens from , , and , though the Atlantic stock was ultimately extirpated by ~1700 CE due to human hunting rather than climatic failure. Modern genetic diversity remains low, reflecting historical bottlenecks and inbreeding, consistent with a shaped by isolation in Pacific refugia.

Physical Characteristics

Morphology and Size


Gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) display a robust, streamlined body with mottled gray skin featuring white patches, often from scars, , and whale lice (Cyamus scammoni). The skin's dark base color transitions to grayish mottling in adults, while newborns appear dark gray to black with occasional white markings.
The head constitutes approximately one-third of the total body length, featuring a narrow, tapered rostrum with a slightly arched upper overlapping the lower and a dimpled surface containing stiff sensory hairs. Two blowholes are positioned centrally on the broad, rounded forehead. Unlike other whales, gray whales possess only 2–5 short ventral throat grooves extending about 1.5 meters, facilitating limited gular expansion during feeding. The body lacks a , replaced by a low dorsal hump followed by 6–12 small knuckles along a . Pectoral fins are small and paddle-shaped with pointed tips, while the tail flukes span 3–3.7 meters across, deeply notched, and dark in color. Adults typically measure 12–15 meters in length, with females slightly larger than males at up to 14–15 meters and males averaging 13.7–14 meters. Body weights range from 27,000–36,000 kilograms for both sexes, though maximum recorded weights approach 40 metric tons. Calves at birth are approximately 4.5–4.6 meters long and weigh 500–680 kilograms. is reached at lengths of 11–12 meters, corresponding to ages of 5–11 years. Recent studies indicate a gradual decline in asymptotic body length since around , averaging 0.05–0.12 meters per year, potentially linked to environmental factors.

Adaptations for Survival

Gray whales possess a thick layer of that provides insulation against cold waters, aids in control, and serves as an energy reserve during long migrations when feeding is minimal. This blubber layer, which can constitute up to 30-40% of their body mass in healthy adults, enables survival in sub-zero temperatures by maintaining core body heat through reduced heat loss. Calves develop sufficient blubber in warm lagoons before northward migration to withstand frigid feeding grounds. As the only baleen whales primarily adapted for bottom feeding, gray whales employ a mechanism to extract prey from seafloor sediments, rolling onto one side and thrusting their head into the mud while using their and plates to filter small like amphipods. Their specialized short, stiff and robust, muscular facilitate this head-down , allowing efficient capture of benthic organisms in shallow coastal areas up to 100 meters deep. The asymmetric and elevated blowholes support this lateral feeding posture, minimizing drag and enhancing force. Behavioral adaptations include an annual migration of 10,000-14,000 miles from summer feeding grounds to subtropical breeding lagoons, timed to maximize energy intake and while avoiding peak predation risks. This route, coastal and nearshore, reduces exposure to open-ocean threats and leverages predictable prey availability, with whales fasting largely on southward trips by relying on stores. In response to prey scarcity, some individuals opportunistically shift to mid-water fish feeding, demonstrating flexibility observed as recently as 2024. Their mottled gray skin provides against sandy bottoms, aiding evasion of predators like orcas during vulnerable calving periods.

Distribution and Habitat

Geographic Range

The gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) is endemic to the North , primarily inhabiting shallow coastal waters, though individuals occasionally traverse deeper offshore areas during migration. Its distribution is divided into two distinct : the larger eastern North Pacific and the smaller, endangered western North Pacific . Historically, gray whales occurred in the North Atlantic but were extirpated there by the , with no confirmed breeding populations remaining. The eastern North Pacific population summers and feeds in the Bering and Chukchi Seas, extending along the coasts of and , before migrating southward along the North American coastline to winter breeding grounds in the lagoons of , , including areas as far south as and . This annual migration covers approximately 11,200 miles round-trip, one of the longest of any mammal, with whales hugging the continental shelf to minimize energy expenditure. Concentrations are highest along the west coasts of , the , and during peak migration periods. The western North Pacific population is primarily associated with summer feeding grounds in the off the Russian coast, with historical ranges extending along the coasts of , Korea, , and . This population remains critically small and endangered, with limited sightings outside its core range, and no confirmed regular migration to southern breeding areas equivalent to those of the eastern population. Vagrant individuals from either population have occasionally been documented far from typical ranges, such as in the eastern Pacific beyond usual limits or rare Atlantic crossings, but these do not indicate established populations.

Habitat Preferences

Gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) primarily inhabit shallow coastal waters of the North Pacific Ocean, favoring depths typically less than 60 meters to facilitate their benthic feeding strategy. They preferentially forage in areas with soft substrates such as mud or sand, where they excavate prey including amphipods and other infaunal organisms, with optimal water depths ranging from 20 to 40 meters. These habitats support high benthic productivity, essential for their energy-intensive migration and reproduction cycles. For calving and nursing, eastern North Pacific populations select protected lagoons in , , featuring shallow waters under 4 meters deep, warm temperatures, and substrates often interspersed with eelgrass beds that offer refuge from predators like sharks and orcas. Summer feeding grounds in the Bering and Chukchi Seas emphasize nearshore zones with muddy bottoms and seasonal edges, which concentrate prey availability. Western North Pacific gray whales show similar preferences, utilizing shallow coastal areas off Sakhalin Island, , for foraging. While capable of crossing deep oceanic waters during migrations, gray whales generally avoid prolonged residence in such environments, as their suction-feeding adaptations are ill-suited to pelagic habitats lacking accessible seafloor prey. selection is driven by prey density and substrate suitability rather than features, reflecting their evolutionary specialization as coastal bottom-feeders.

Populations and Dynamics

Eastern North Pacific Population


The Eastern North Pacific (ENP) population of gray whales represents the largest distinct stock of the species, characterized by an annual migration spanning approximately 12,000 miles round-trip between summer feeding grounds in the Bering and Chukchi Seas of the Arctic and winter breeding and calving lagoons in Baja California, Mexico, such as Laguna Ojo de Liebre and San Ignacio. Southbound migrations occur from October to January, with whales passing nearshore along the U.S. West Coast, while northbound returns take place from March to June, allowing for shore-based observations and counts.
Historically reduced to near by commercial in the 19th and early 20th centuries, the ENP recovered significantly after international protection in 1946, growing from fewer than 2,000 individuals in the 1940s to a peak abundance of around 27,000 by 2015–2016. However, since 2019, an ongoing Unusual Mortality Event has led to a sharp decline, with strandings and emaciated whales observed along the migration route, attributed primarily to ecosystem changes in feeding areas reducing prey availability. Recent abundance estimates from southward migration counts off indicate approximately 14,500 whales in 2022–2023 and 13,000 in 2024–2025, the lowest since the , accompanied by critically low calf production, such as only 85 calves documented in one recent survey. The ENP stock was removed from the U.S. Endangered Species Act list in 1994 due to demonstrated recovery but remains protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, with no allowable human-caused mortality. Current threats include ship strikes, entanglement in fishing gear, underwater noise from human activities, and climate-driven shifts in benthic communities that diminish amphipod populations essential for the whales' intake during summer . Opportunistic feeding on infaunal like ghost shrimp occurs along the coast during migration, supplementing needs amid reduced Arctic productivity. Monitoring efforts by NOAA Fisheries continue to track trends, body condition, and calf counts to inform management responses to these pressures.

Western North Pacific Population

The Western North Pacific population of gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) constitutes a distinct population segment listed as endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and depleted under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. This subpopulation, numbering approximately 200 individuals as of recent assessments, primarily aggregates at summer and fall feeding grounds off Sakhalin Island in the Sea of Okhotsk, Russia, where photo-identification studies have documented consistent site fidelity among adults. The population has exhibited a modest annual growth rate of about 4% since the 1990s, recovering from near extinction following intensive Soviet whaling in the mid-20th century that reduced numbers to fewer than 100 animals by the 1980s. Pre-exploitation abundance is estimated at 1,500 or more, though exact figures remain uncertain due to limited historical data. Feeding activities concentrate in two distinct areas near : a nearshore zone including Piltun Lagoon and an offshore region, with whales targeting benthic amphipods and other invertebrates in shallow, soft-sediment habitats. These grounds are critical for energy accumulation prior to southward migration, as body condition improves predictably during the feeding season, supporting and . Wintering and calving areas remain poorly defined, with historical records suggesting destinations off southern , Korea, or , though contemporary sightings are rare and some individuals have been documented overwintering in the eastern North Pacific, indicating potential migratory flexibility or . Calving rates are low, with documented cow-calf pairs infrequent, contributing to the population's slow demographic recovery. Ongoing threats include industrial activities at , particularly the oil and gas project, which involves seismic surveys, construction, and increased vessel traffic that disrupt foraging and elevate risks of ship strikes and entanglement. Conservation efforts, coordinated through the IUCN's Western Gray Whale Advisory Panel, have led to mitigation measures and monitoring, resulting in an status upgrade from critically endangered to endangered in recent evaluations. Despite these interventions, the population's small size and reliance on a single primary feeding area render it vulnerable to events and anthropogenic disturbances, with genetic analyses indicating elevated levels.

Historical and Extinct Populations

Gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) formerly inhabited both the North Atlantic and North Pacific Oceans, with distinct populations that exhibited broader distributions prior to intensive human exploitation. Subfossil remains and archaeological evidence document their presence in Atlantic coastal regions, including the eastern North Atlantic and , where they were seasonal migrants akin to modern Pacific populations. These Atlantic groups numbered in the thousands before pressures mounted, supported by medieval records of abundant sightings and strandings. The North Atlantic populations faced extirpation primarily from targeted , beginning with medieval Basque operations in the from the and intensifying through the with colonial expansion. Radiocarbon dating of remains indicates that the eastern North Atlantic subpopulation was depleted three to five centuries earlier than the previously estimated mid-18th century extinction date, likely by the 13th to 15th centuries, due to sustained harvesting that reduced numbers below recovery thresholds. By the 1750s, no reliable sightings occurred, confirming functional across the Atlantic, with no breeding populations persisting. Occasional modern vagrants from Pacific stocks, such as a 2024 sighting off , do not indicate population resurgence but highlight potential range expansion via the amid warming. In the North Pacific, historical populations exceeded modern abundances, with genetic analyses of pre-whaling specimens estimating the eastern North Pacific stock at 76,000 to 118,000 individuals, far surpassing the 15,000–30,000 figure derived from catch records. Evidence suggests a pre-human decline from around 96,000 to 22,000 animals occurred 1,100–1,600 years ago, possibly driven by shifts or natural predation dynamics rather than solely anthropogenic factors. The western North Pacific stock, once widespread along Asian coasts from to , supported multiple migratory routes and was hunted to near by 1934, with Soviet and Japanese removing 1,800–2,000 individuals from 1891 to 1966; only 100–150 remnants survive today, confined to the Sakhalin-Amur region. Other peripheral Pacific subpopulations, such as those off Korea and , collapsed similarly, leaving no viable groups beyond the core western remnant.

Life Cycle and Behavior

Reproduction and Calving

Gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) exhibit seasonal reproduction tied to their migration cycle, with mating primarily occurring during the southward migration in fall and continuing into winter in the protected lagoons of , , for the eastern North Pacific population. These lagoons, including San Ignacio and Ojo de Liebre, provide shallow, warm waters suitable for courtship, which often involves multiple males competing for a female, sometimes in groups of two or more males with one female. Females typically reach between 5 and 11 years of age, breeding every 2 to 3 years thereafter. Gestation lasts 12 to 13 months, resulting in the birth of a single calf, though twins occur rarely. Calving peaks in mid-January within the Baja lagoons, where newborns measure 4.3 to 4.9 meters (14 to 16 feet) in length and weigh approximately 900 kilograms (2,000 pounds). Mothers aggressively protect calves from predators and human observers, surfacing frequently for on with about 53% content, which supports rapid growth. Calves remain dependent on maternal milk for 7 to 8 months, during which they accompany the mother on the northward migration to feeding grounds in the Bering and Chukchi Seas, upon arrival or shortly after. This extended period aligns with the ' energy demands, as females forgo feeding during the breeding season to prioritize calf survival. For the critically endangered western North Pacific population, reproductive details remain poorly documented, with calving inferred to occur off Sakhalin Island in summer, but success rates appear low based on limited sightings.

Feeding Ecology

Gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) primarily employ a benthic feeding strategy, on the seafloor in shallow coastal waters to consume infaunal and epibenthic . They utilize feeding, a unique mechanism among whales, by rolling onto one side—typically the right—and inserting their head into the to excavate prey-laden mud, which is then filtered through their plates. This behavior creates visible feeding pits on the ocean bottom, disturbing large areas of substrate and altering local benthic habitats. The diet consists mainly of small crustaceans such as amphipods (e.g., Ampelisca spp.), isopods, and mysids, alongside polychaete worms and other , with amphipods often comprising 54-72% of intake in core feeding grounds. Gray whales are omnivorous generalists, occasionally consuming , , or pelagic prey, particularly in non-traditional areas, demonstrating behavioral plasticity in response to prey availability. Juveniles may exhibit ontogenetic shifts, favoring surface or mid-water feeding before transitioning to benthic methods as they mature. Feeding occurs predominantly during summer months in high-latitude regions like the Bering and Chukchi Seas, where whales target areas of high benthic biomass to accumulate blubber reserves sufficient for migration, breeding, and fasting periods. Minimal feeding happens en route or in winter breeding lagoons, with animals relying on stored energy; lactating females and calves require substantial daily prey intake—up to 1 metric ton or more—to support growth and milk production. The Pacific Coast Feeding Group (PCFG) subset of the eastern North Pacific population forages year-round in temperate coastal waters on mysids and other zooplankton, consuming less energy-dense prey compared to Arctic amphipod beds, potentially influencing body condition and reproductive success. Prey energy density and biomass directly dictate foraging site selection, with gray whales preferring habitats exceeding 312-442 kJ/m² to meet metabolic demands.

Migration and Navigation

The eastern North Pacific population of gray whales conducts an annual migration covering 10,000 to 12,000 miles round-trip, from summer feeding areas in the Bering and Chukchi Seas to winter breeding and calving lagoons in , . Southbound travel occurs from through along the Pacific coast of , at speeds averaging 5 miles per hour and daily distances of about 75 miles. The northward migration follows from to May, with females accompanied by calves progressing more slowly and often farther offshore to minimize predation risks. This coastal route facilitates observation from shore, particularly in during peak periods. In contrast, the western North Pacific population, numbering fewer than 300 individuals and classified as critically endangered, migrates from primary feeding grounds in the to subtropical waters off the coasts of , , Korea, and . Historical records indicate migrations along Asian continental shelves, but contemporary patterns show variability, with not all individuals undertaking full inter-basin journeys and some remaining in northern latitudes year-round. Documented movements include rare crossovers to eastern Pacific areas, suggesting potential connectivity between populations, as in a 22,511 km round-trip recorded for one individual. Navigation during these migrations likely relies on a combination of geomagnetic cues and environmental features, given the whales' fidelity to coastal paths. Studies correlate gray whale strandings with solar storms, which temporarily alter , supporting the hypothesis of as a primary orientation mechanism. Acoustic signals, including clicks and pulsed calls, may aid in obstacle avoidance and prey detection en route, though direct evidence for long-distance via echolocation remains limited. Landmark recognition along familiar shorelines could further guide the coastal segments, consistent with observed route consistency across generations.

Historical Exploitation

Indigenous and Early Whaling

Indigenous peoples of the North Pacific have pursued gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) for subsistence, ceremonial, and cultural purposes over thousands of years, employing specialized techniques adapted to the species' migratory behavior and coastal habits. In the eastern North Pacific, tribes such as the of Washington's targeted gray whales during their northward migration, using large cedar dugout canoes crewed by up to 10-12 hunters, toggling harpoons with stone or bone heads, and lines made from whale sinew or cedar bark. This practice, integral to Makah identity and documented archaeologically through whalebone artifacts at sites like Ozette dating to at least 2,000 years ago, involved rituals invoking spiritual aid and ensured efficient use of the entire animal for meat, , oil, and tools. The Makah's 1855 Treaty with the preserved their whaling rights, though hunts declined by the 1920s amid population crashes from non-indigenous exploitation. Adjacent communities on similarly specialized in gray whale hunting, crafting whaling canoes up to 40 feet long—matching the whales' size—and adorning bows with killer whale motifs symbolizing predatory prowess, though orcas themselves were not hunted. Early 19th-century logs record targeted strikes on gray whales calving or migrating near shore, with villages like securing four whales in 1804 alone through harpooning from canoes followed by communal towing and processing. These hunts emphasized skill in approaching aggressive "" known for counterattacking vessels, relying on captains' training from youth and collective effort rather than advanced weaponry. In the western North Pacific, Chukchi hunters of Chukotka Peninsula have maintained gray whaling as a seasonal subsistence activity, focusing on summer aggregations near shorelines. Traditional methods centered on boats or umiaks for approach, followed by collective hand-harpooning to exhaust the before lancing vital areas, with modern adaptations incorporating rifles for dispatch while preserving elements like spirit . Annual quotas under international agreements reflect historical take levels of a few dozen animals, sustainable given the whales' pre-industrial abundance but constrained today by quota limits averaging 120 gray whales shared among communities. Prior to 19th-century European commercial fleets, these indigenous hunts operated at low intensities—typically 1-5 whales per group annually—prioritizing nutritional yield from and over oil extraction, with no evidence of driving local depletions. In contrast, early non-indigenous efforts in the Atlantic, where gray whales occurred until the 17th-18th centuries, involved medieval European whalers targeting coastal populations, contributing to extirpation through sustained harpooning from small boats, as evidenced by subfossil remains and historical accounts predating Basque right whale specialization. Such practices underscore the whales' vulnerability to persistent near-shore before transoceanic commercial scales amplified impacts.

Commercial Whaling Impacts

Commercial whaling profoundly depleted gray whale populations, particularly through targeted exploitation of vulnerable breeding and calving grounds. In the eastern North Pacific, intensive hunting began in the 1840s, with American whalers focusing on the lagoons of Baja California, Mexico, where gray whales congregate predictably during winter months for reproduction. Charles Melville Scammon, a pioneering whaler, documented and participated in these hunts starting in 1855, targeting females and calves in shallow waters such as Laguna Ojo de Liebre (Scammon's Lagoon), which facilitated easy access and high kill rates despite the whales' aggressive defenses—earning them the moniker "devil fish" for overturning boats when harpooned. Between approximately 1845 and 1874, whalers killed over 8,000 gray whales, disproportionately affecting mothers and young, which accelerated the population crash from pre-whaling estimates of tens of thousands to fewer than 2,000 individuals by the early 20th century. The western North Pacific population faced even more severe impacts from 20th-century commercial operations, including Japanese and especially Soviet whaling fleets that operated extensively in the and other feeding grounds. Soviet whaling from the 1940s to 1970s involved systematic underreporting and illegal catches to circumvent international quotas, contributing to the near-extirpation of this stock; by the late 20th century, sightings were rare, with the population reduced to critically low levels, estimated at fewer than 100 individuals before remnant groups were identified off Sakhalin Island. These depletions created genetic bottlenecks, reducing diversity and increasing vulnerability to stochastic events, as evidenced by DNA analyses showing a contraction from historical abundances that altered population structure and resilience. Beyond numerical declines, commercial whaling induced behavioral shifts and ecosystem repercussions. Selective harvesting of lactating females disrupted calving success rates and migration patterns, with surviving whales exhibiting heightened wariness toward human vessels—a trait that persisted post-protection. The removal of large numbers of benthic feeders like gray whales likely intensified trophic cascades in coastal ecosystems, though quantifying these remains challenging due to confounding factors like overlapping fisheries. Protection under the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling in 1946-1947 halted open-ocean commercial takes, allowing partial recovery in the eastern stock, but the western population's protracted low abundance underscores the lasting demographic scars from unrestrained exploitation.

Pre-Whaling Abundance Estimates

Catch-based models, derived from commercial whaling records and simulations, have estimated the pre-whaling abundance of the eastern North Pacific gray whale population at 15,000 to 30,000 individuals. These figures assume relatively populations prior to intensive 19th-century exploitation and incorporate on documented harvests, but they may underestimate totals by overlooking pre-commercial removals from indigenous hunting and early European voyages, which lacked systematic records. For instance, modeling efforts incorporating trends and exploitation rates yielded ranges of approximately 19,500 to 35,500 animals. Genetic analyses, contrasting with catch data, indicate substantially larger historical populations through assessments of nucleotide diversity and effective population size (Ne). Using ancient and modern DNA from mitochondrial and nuclear loci, researchers estimated long-term pre-whaling abundance for eastern Pacific gray whales at around 78,000 to 116,000 individuals, or a mean of 96,000, based on coalescent simulations adjusted for generation times of 15–22 years and census-to-effective ratios of 3–4. Approximate Bayesian computation on ancient DNA further supported a pre-bottleneck size of about 100,670 (90% highest posterior density interval: 59,940–111,550), suggesting the population endured a severe bottleneck to roughly 9,000 individuals concurrent with commercial whaling peaks around the early 20th century. The disparity between genetic and catch-based estimates—genetic figures implying 3- to 5-fold higher abundances than modeled pre-exploitation levels—highlights potential biases in historical data, such as unrecorded early depletions reducing observed baselines at commercial 's onset. Genetic methods capture millennia-scale dynamics unaffected by short-term events, revealing no recent bottlenecks before (predating 1,100–1,600 years ago) and higher diversity consistent with larger prehistoric stocks across the North Pacific, potentially encompassing now-extinct subpopulations. For the western North Pacific population, pre-whaling estimates remain elusive and likely modest (a few thousand), given its limited recovery and historical extirpation near Sakhalin Island. Overall, these approaches underscore that eastern North Pacific pre-whaling numbers exceeded current abundances (circa 20,000–27,000) by at least a factor of 3, with genetic evidence favoring the upper range absent contradictory demographic data.

Conservation and Management

The gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) received early international protection from commercial whaling through a ban adopted by the League of Nations in the mid-1930s, marking the first such agreement for any whale species. This was followed by the International Whaling Commission (IWC), which in 1946 established legal safeguards prohibiting the hunting of gray whales, with protections entering into force in 1947. The IWC imposed a global moratorium on commercial whaling in 1982, effective from 1986, which continues to ban such activities for gray whales, though limited aboriginal subsistence whaling quotas are permitted under IWC management for certain populations, such as a shared annual limit of 140 strikes for the eastern North Pacific stock between the United States and Russia. In the United States, the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) of 1972 prohibits the take of marine mammals, including gray whales, in U.S. waters or by U.S. citizens on the high seas, with exceptions for scientific research, public display, and limited subsistence uses by . The Endangered Species Act (ESA) listed the eastern North Pacific population as endangered in 1973, but it was delisted in 1994 after recovery to an estimated 20,000–22,000 individuals, exceeding 25–30% of pre-whaling abundance. In contrast, the western North Pacific population remains listed as endangered under the ESA and designated as depleted under the MMPA, reflecting its critically low numbers of fewer than 300 individuals as of recent surveys. Limited waivers under the MMPA have allowed ceremonial hunts, such as the Tribe's request for a to take up to three eastern North Pacific gray whales annually for cultural subsistence, granted in 2024 following IWC quotas and environmental reviews, though implementation remains subject to ongoing legal challenges and tribal protocols. These protections emphasize population-specific management, with the eastern stock's recovery attributed to bans rather than improvements alone, while the western stock's status underscores persistent vulnerabilities despite identical legal frameworks.

Population Recovery Evidence

The eastern North Pacific (ENP) population of gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) provides a prominent example of recovery following intensive commercial , which reduced numbers to approximately 1,000–2,000 individuals by the mid-20th century. International protection began with a commercial ban in 1946 under the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, followed by U.S. Endangered Species Act listing in 1970, enabling a rebound to around 9,000 whales by the late . This growth continued, with annual increases averaging 2–3% through the and , leading to delisting from endangered status in as the population approached estimates of 20,000–30,000. Population surveys, primarily shore-based counts during southward migrations off , document this trajectory. Estimates rose from 21,000 in 1997–1998 to peaks of 26,960–27,000 in 2015–2016, indicating near-historic abundance levels relative to pre-whaling sizes inferred from genetic and ecological models (potentially 3–5 times larger than modern peaks but still evidencing substantial recovery from 20th-century lows). Calf production, a key recovery metric, paralleled this growth, with high ratios observed in the 2000s supporting sustained recruitment despite periodic anomalies like the 1999–2000 unusual mortality event (UME), from which the population rebounded within years. Recent data reflect resilience amid fluctuations, including a post-2019 UME decline to 14,526 in 2022–2023, followed by partial rebound to 19,260 in 2023–2024, though 2024–2025 estimates indicate ~11,700–13,000, the lowest since the 1970s, linked to reduced calf counts since 2019. These swings underscore environmental drivers like prey availability over inherent fragility, as prior downturns resolved without intervention. In contrast, the western North Pacific remains critically endangered at ~100–200 individuals, with no comparable recovery despite protections. The ENP's trajectory affirms effective cessation as a causal factor in large-whale rebound, though ongoing monitoring highlights non- threats.

Monitoring and Research Efforts

NOAA Fisheries' Southwest Fisheries Science Center conducts long-term monitoring of eastern North Pacific gray whale population abundance through annual shore-based counts at migration sites like Granite Canyon, California, and aerial surveys along the breeding lagoons in , , estimating population size at approximately 14,500 individuals in 2023, the lowest since delisting from the U.S. Endangered Species Act in 1994. These efforts track trends, including a post-2019 Unusual Mortality Event decline, with reduced calf production underscoring the need for sustained to inform management. Boat-based surveys collect photo-identification data, tissue biopsies for genetic analysis, and health metrics such as body condition via , revealing insights into population structure, individual movements, and stressors like nutritional deficits observed in stranded whales. Passive acoustic monitoring supplements visual methods by detecting calls during migration, aiding in distribution mapping where sightings are sparse. For the endangered western North Pacific population, photo-identification studies off Sakhalin Island, , since the 1990s have documented fewer than 200 individuals, with (IWC) Scientific Committee reviews integrating these data to assess threats and abundance. Collaborative efforts, including NOAA and Canadian partnerships, monitor satellite-tagged whales to evaluate transboundary movements and responses to entanglements or strandings. Necropsy programs during mortality events, coordinated by NOAA's Health and Stranding Response Program, analyze causes like and biotoxin exposure, with over 600 confirmed deaths from 2019–2022 prompting expanded health surveillance across U.S. and Canadian waters. Genetic studies from samples indicate low diversity and historical bottlenecks, informing conservation by highlighting vulnerability to . These multi-method approaches prioritize empirical tracking over modeling assumptions to detect causal factors in .

Contemporary Threats

Anthropogenic Pressures

Vessel strikes pose a significant threat to gray whales, particularly during their coastal migrations along the Pacific coast of North America, where increasing shipping traffic intersects with migration routes. Gray whales are among the large whale species most vulnerable to collisions with vessels, with documented cases in areas such as California waters and the inland passages of Washington state. During the 2019–2023 Unusual Mortality Event (UME), ship strikes were identified as one of the primary human-related causes of death alongside entanglement and malnutrition, contributing to over 690 strandings across the U.S., Mexico, and Canada. Globally, ship strikes now cause mortality rates exceeding legally permissible levels from anthropogenic sources for many whale populations, exacerbated by faster vessel speeds and proximity to feeding and breeding grounds. Entanglement in fishing gear represents another acute anthropogenic pressure, with gray whales at high risk of becoming ensnared in lines, pots, and nets, leading to injuries, exhaustion, or . On the U.S. West Coast, preliminary data from 2024 recorded multiple confirmed entanglements of gray whales, part of a six-year high of 34 total large whale cases, often involving commercial gear or unidentified ropes. In 13 documented West Coast cases that year, gear removal was unsuccessful or partial, including one instance of a gray whale partially self-releasing. Entanglements have risen sharply since in the region, driven by expanded fishing activities, and can result in chronic wounds, reduced efficiency, and population-level impacts if affecting reproductive females or calves. Underwater noise from vessel traffic, seismic surveys, and industrial activities disrupts gray whale behavior, communication, and stress physiology. Ambient noise levels positively correlate with vessel density, elevating fecal metabolites—a proxy for stress—in feeding gray whales off , . Such noise impairs acoustic signaling over long distances, potentially displacing whales from habitats and increasing energy expenditure during migration. In high-traffic areas like shipping lanes near ports, gray whales exhibit altered swimming paths and reduced vocalizations in response to anthropogenic sound sources exceeding natural background levels. These pressures compound with vessel disturbances, as whales migrating closer to shore—observed since —increase exposure to both noise and collision risks.

Natural and Environmental Factors

Gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) experience periodic population declines linked to fluctuations in prey biomass on their primary feeding grounds, where benthic amphipods constitute the bulk of their diet and depend on produced under . Reductions in cover diminish the export of to the seafloor, leading to lower amphipod densities and nutritional stress for whales during summer . When low prey availability coincides with persistent high cover, restricting access to alternative areas, major mortality events occur, each reducing the eastern North Pacific by 15 to 25%. The ongoing unusual mortality event since , which has resulted in over 700 documented deaths along the U.S. West Coast, correlates with such environmental shifts, including diminished from damaged forests and intermittent patterns. Natural predation by transient killer whales (Orcinus orca) represents a significant mortality factor, particularly for immature gray whales along the northern Alaskan migration route, where it accounts for the primary cause of death in stranded calves and juveniles. These attacks often involve coordinated pods targeting vulnerable migrants, contributing to higher calf mortality rates during southward migrations. Infectious diseases and parasitic loads, exacerbated by weakened body condition from prey shortages, further compound natural risks, as evidenced in necropsies from recent strandings showing alongside presence. Harmful algal blooms, a naturally occurring oceanographic phenomenon, have been investigated as contributors to the 2019–present die-offs, potentially inducing exposure and organ failure in affected individuals.

Human Interactions and Controversies

Whale Watching and Tourism Effects

Whale watching tourism targets the Eastern North Pacific population of gray whales during their annual migration along the coasts of California, Oregon, and Baja California, Mexico, with peak activity from December to April. In regions like central Oregon, vessel traffic from whale watching operations correlates with elevated fecal glucocorticoid concentrations in gray whales, indicating physiological stress responses that lag by approximately 24 hours after exposure. This stress is linked to both vessel noise and proximity, with underwater noise levels positively associated with daily vessel counts (R² = 0.271–0.323, p < 0.001). Behavioral observations in demonstrate that gray whales alter their activity budgets near vessels within 250 meters, increasing transitions from searching or to traveling by up to 23% at sites like Boiler Bay. persistence decreases near kayaks but may increase with motorized vessels in some contexts, suggesting variable tolerance influenced by or vessel type. Short-term disruptions include deeper and more frequent dives to evade boats, potentially reducing feeding efficiency during critical summer periods for the Feeding Group. In lagoons such as San Ignacio and Ojo de Liebre, gray whales exhibit "friendly" behavior by approaching boats, allowing close interactions that drive but risk propeller injuries and from repeated encounters. Mexican regulations limit access to licensed operators, cap the number of pangas at 16 per lagoon, enforce a 5-knot near whales, and prohibit chasing or touching to mitigate disturbances. U.S. guidelines, including those from NOAA, recommend maintaining at least 100 yards (91 meters) from whales, limiting observation to 30 minutes, and avoiding rapid approaches or drones within 300 yards to minimize cumulative impacts. While population-level declines are not directly attributed to tourism—given the species' recovery to over individuals—ongoing monitoring emphasizes evidence-based restrictions on encounter frequency and noise to prevent exacerbation of other threats like vessel strikes.

Indigenous Hunting Rights

Indigenous groups in the United States and hold legal rights to hunt Eastern North Pacific gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) for subsistence and ceremonial purposes, subject to quotas established by national authorities and the (IWC) to maintain population sustainability. These rights stem from historical practices predating commercial whaling, with modern regulations balancing cultural claims against conservation needs following the species' recovery from near-extinction in the mid-20th century. The hunts target healthy populations estimated at 17,400 to 21,300 whales as of recent surveys, with annual removals representing less than 0.02% of the stock. In the United States, the Makah Tribe of Washington State asserts whaling rights reserved under the 1855 Treaty of Neah Bay, which explicitly preserved their "right of taking fish and of whaling or sealing at usual and accustomed grounds." After a commercial whaling moratorium and population rebound, the tribe harvested one gray whale in 1999 under IWC aboriginal subsistence authorization, but subsequent hunts were halted by U.S. court challenges requiring environmental reviews. In June 2024, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issued a waiver under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, permitting up to 25 gray whales over 10 years (averaging 2-3 annually) for ceremonial and subsistence use in U.S. waters off Washington, contingent on tribal training, monitoring, and strike limits tied to IWC guidelines. By March 2025, the tribe submitted a permit application for hunts in July-October 2025 and 2027, with NMFS announcing public comment periods; permits align with finalized 2024 regulations allowing traditional methods supplemented by modern humane dispatch. Opposition from animal welfare groups, such as Sea Shepherd, cites population fluctuations and ethical concerns, though NMFS assessments affirm the quota's negligible impact on the stock's viability. In , indigenous Chukotka communities, including Chukchi and peoples, conduct annual gray whale hunts under federal aboriginal subsistence provisions, re-established in 1994 after Soviet-era restrictions. The IWC sets a strike quota of up to 20 Eastern North Pacific gray whales annually through 2025, with unused strikes carried forward; Chukotka hunters, licensed through regional authorities, typically achieve high harvest efficiency (96-98% in recent years) using traditional coastal methods. These quotas, administered by indigenous organizations since 2003, meet nutritional and cultural demands without exceeding sustainable yields, as verified by IWC scientific reviews. Extensions beyond 2025 remain under , but current data indicate the hunt supports in remote communities amid ongoing stock monitoring.

Captivity, Research, and Ethical Debates

Gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) have rarely been maintained in captivity owing to their large adult size—reaching lengths of up to 14 meters and weights exceeding 36 metric tons—their annual migrations spanning over 16,000 kilometers, and their specialized benthic feeding that requires expansive, sediment-rich habitats incompatible with enclosure constraints. Only immature calves have been temporarily held, primarily for rehabilitation following strandings rather than public display or long-term study. The first documented case involved a calf named Gigi, captured off , , in 1971 for scientific observation and housed at for approximately one year before release on March 13, 1972, about 6 kilometers offshore from Point Loma, . Gigi was fitted with a radio transmitter that malfunctioned shortly after release, but she was visually tracked northward to ; her last confirmed sighting occurred in 1977, leaving uncertainty about her long-term survival and reintegration with wild populations. A subsequent rehabilitation effort centered on a female calf designated JJ, who stranded in a semi-comatose state near , on January 10, 1997, weighing 758 kilograms and measuring 4.2 meters in length, afflicted with lice infestations, cuts, and ulcers. After 14 months of intensive care at , including treatment that restored her to health, JJ was released on March 26, 1998, during the northward migration phase, approximately 11 kilometers offshore from , with two satellite transmitters attached that detached within days. Post-release observations over 48 hours documented natural behaviors such as diving, spyhopping, vocalizing, and traveling at 3.7–5.6 kilometers per hour, but visual contact was lost thereafter, and JJ was never resighted. No gray whales are currently held in captivity, as logistical challenges preclude sustained enclosure, and rehabilitation remains exceptional rather than routine. Research on gray whales emphasizes non-invasive and minimally invasive techniques to track , migration patterns, , and health. Common methods include shore- and aerial-based censuses during migrations, such as annual counts at sites like Piedras Blancas, , which estimate abundance through visual identification of southbound and northbound individuals. Photo-identification catalogs natural markings on flukes and dorsolateral ridges to monitor individuals over time, while satellite tagging—typically using suction-cup or anchor tags—reveals movement corridors and habitat use, as demonstrated in studies of the endangered western North Pacific subpopulation. sampling, involving projectile darts to collect skin and blubber, enables genetic analysis for stock structure and contaminant assessment, alongside acoustic monitoring of calls to study communication and distribution. Fecal and sloughed skin sampling supplements these for hormone profiling, such as levels indicating stress from factors like vessel noise. Ethical debates surrounding gray whale research and center on balancing scientific gains against potential impacts, with emphasis on minimizing harm in migratory species vulnerable to disturbance. Rehabilitation cases like JJ prompted a June 1997 workshop evaluating risks of prolonged , including human imprinting, nutritional deficiencies from artificial feeding, and reduced post-release fitness, ultimately favoring timed release during migration to leverage natural cues while incorporating tracking to assess outcomes. and tagging procedures, though justified for yielding data on and threats without lethality, raise concerns over acute pain, infection from wounds, and behavioral disruption, necessitating committee approvals and adherence to guidelines prioritizing non-lethal alternatives. Critics argue that research-induced stressors, such as approach by vessels for sampling, compound anthropogenic pressures like shipping noise, which elevates levels in gray whales, potentially confounding conservation efforts. Proponents counter that regulated, low-impact methods provide essential empirical data for , outweighing minimal risks when alternatives like opportunistic sampling fail to suffice, though calls persist for standardized welfare assessments in cetacean studies.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.