Disc integration

Disc integrationMain

Community hub

Disc integration

8 pages, 0 posts

0 subscribers

Recent from talks

Be the first to start a discussion here.

Recent from talks

Be the first to start a discussion here.

Contribute something

About hubMembersContent overviewUpdatesRules

Main reference articles

Disc integration

View on Wikipedia

from Wikipedia

Differential

Definitions
Derivative (generalizations) Differential infinitesimal of a function total
Concepts
Differentiation notation Second derivative Implicit differentiation Logarithmic differentiation Related rates Taylor's theorem
Rules and identities
Sum Product Chain Power Quotient L'Hôpital's rule Inverse General Leibniz Faà di Bruno's formula Reynolds

Integral

Definitions
Lists of integrals Integral transform Leibniz integral rule
Antiderivative Integral (improper) Riemann integral Lebesgue integration Contour integration Integral of inverse functions
Integration by
Parts Discs Cylindrical shells Substitution (trigonometric, tangent half-angle, Euler) Euler's formula Partial fractions (Heaviside's method) Changing order Reduction formulae Differentiating under the integral sign Risch algorithm

Series

Convergence tests
Geometric (arithmetico-geometric) Harmonic Alternating Power Binomial Taylor
Summand limit (term test) Ratio Root Integral Direct comparison Limit comparison Alternating series Cauchy condensation Dirichlet Abel

Disc integration, also known in integral calculus as the disc method, is a method for calculating the volume of a solid of revolution of a solid-state material when integrating along an axis "parallel" to the axis of revolution. This method models the resulting three-dimensional shape as a stack of an infinite number of discs of varying radius and infinitesimal thickness. It is also possible to use the same principles with rings instead of discs (the "washer method") to obtain hollow solids of revolution. This is in contrast to shell integration, which integrates along an axis perpendicular to the axis of revolution.

Definition

[edit]

Function of $x$

[edit]

If the function to be revolved is a function of $x$ , the following integral represents the volume of the solid of revolution:

\pi \int _{a}^{b}R(x)^{2}\,dx

where $R (x)$ is the distance between the function and the axis of rotation. This works only if the axis of rotation is horizontal (example: $y = 3$ or some other constant).

Function of $y$

[edit]

If the function to be revolved is a function of $y$ , the following integral will obtain the volume of the solid of revolution:

\pi \int _{c}^{d}R(y)^{2}\,dy

where $R (y)$ is the distance between the function and the axis of rotation. This works only if the axis of rotation is vertical (example: $x = 4$ or some other constant).

Washer method

[edit]

To obtain a hollow solid of revolution (the “washer method”), the procedure would be to take the volume of the inner solid of revolution and subtract it from the volume of the outer solid of revolution. This can be calculated in a single integral similar to the following:

\pi \int _{a}^{b}\left(R_{\mathrm {O} }(x)^{2}-R_{\mathrm {I} }(x)^{2}\right)\,dx

where $R O (x)$ is the function that is furthest from the axis of rotation and $R I (x)$ is the function that is closest to the axis of rotation. For example, the next figure shows the rotation along the $x$ -axis of the red "leaf" enclosed between the square-root and quadratic curves:

The volume of this solid is:

\pi \int _{0}^{1}\left(\left({\sqrt {x}}\right)^{2}-\left(x^{2}\right)^{2}\right)\,dx\,.

One should take caution not to evaluate the square of the difference of the two functions, but to evaluate the difference of the squares of the two functions.

R_{\mathrm {O} }(x)^{2}-R_{\mathrm {I} }(x)^{2}\neq \left(R_{\mathrm {O} }(x)-R_{\mathrm {I} }(x)\right)^{2}

(This formula only works for revolutions about the $x$ -axis.)

To rotate about any horizontal axis, simply subtract from that axis from each formula. If $h$ is the value of a horizontal axis, then the volume equals

\pi \int _{a}^{b}\left(\left(h-R_{\mathrm {O} }(x)\right)^{2}-\left(h-R_{\mathrm {I} }(x)\right)^{2}\right)\,dx\,.

For example, to rotate the region between $y = -2 x + x 2$ and $y = x$ along the axis $y = 4$ , one would integrate as follows:

\pi \int _{0}^{3}\left(\left(4-\left(-2x+x^{2}\right)\right)^{2}-(4-x)^{2}\right)\,dx\,.

The bounds of integration are the zeros of the first equation minus the second. Note that when integrating along an axis other than the $x$ , the graph of the function which is furthest from the axis of rotation may not be obvious. In the previous example, even though the graph of $y = x$ is, with respect to the x-axis, further up than the graph of $y = -2 x + x 2$ , with respect to the axis of rotation the function $y = x$ is the inner function: its graph is closer to $y = 4$ or the equation of the axis of rotation in the example.

The same idea can be applied to both the $y$ -axis and any other vertical axis. One simply must solve each equation for $x$ before one inserts them into the integration formula.

References

[edit]

"Volumes of Solids of Revolution". CliffsNotes.com. Retrieved July 8, 2014.
Weisstein, Eric W. "Method of Disks". MathWorld.
Frank Ayres, Elliott Mendelson. Schaum's Outlines: Calculus. McGraw-Hill Professional 2008, ISBN 978-0-07-150861-2. pp. 244–248 (online copy, p. 244, at Google Books. Retrieved July 12, 2013.)

Calculus

Precalculus

Limits

Differential calculus

Integral calculus

Vector calculus

Derivatives
Basic theorems
- Line integrals
- Green's
- Stokes'
- Gauss'

Multivariable calculus

Sequences and series

Arithmetico-geometric sequence
Types of series
- Alternating
- Binomial
- Fourier
- Geometric
- Harmonic
- Infinite
- Power
  - Maclaurin
  - Taylor
- Telescoping
Tests of convergence

Special functions
and numbers

History of calculus

Lists

Integrals	rational functions irrational algebraic functions exponential functions logarithmic functions hyperbolic functions inverse trigonometric functions inverse Secant Secant cubed
List of limits List of derivatives

Miscellaneous topics

Complex calculus
- Contour integral
Differential geometry
- Manifold
- Curvature
- of curves
- of surfaces
- Tensor
Euler–Maclaurin formula
Gabriel's horn
Integration Bee
Proof that 22/7 exceeds π
Regiomontanus' angle maximization problem
Steinmetz solid

Revisions and contributors Edit on Wikipedia Read on Wikipedia

View on Grokipedia

from Grokipedia

Disc integration, commonly referred to as the disk method, is a fundamental technique in integral calculus for determining the volume of a solid of revolution formed by rotating a region bounded by a continuous, nonnegative function, an axis, and two vertical or horizontal lines around a fixed axis, such as the x-axis or y-axis.^[1] This method approximates the solid's volume by integrating the cross-sectional areas of thin circular disks perpendicular to the axis of rotation, where each disk's radius is the distance from the axis to the curve defining the region.^[2] The disk method relies on the principle that the volume can be found by summing the volumes of infinitesimally thin disks, with the area of each disk given by

\pi r^2

, where

r

is the radius function.^[3] For rotation about the x-axis, if the region is bounded by

y = f(x)

, the x-axis,

x = a

, and

x = b

, the volume

V

is calculated as

V = \pi \int_a^b [f(x)]^2 \, dx

.^[1] Similarly, for rotation about the y-axis, with the region bounded by

x = g(y)

, the y-axis,

y = c

, and

y = d

, the formula becomes

V = \pi \int_c^d [g(y)]^2 \, dy

.^[2] This approach assumes the solid has no internal cavities; when a cavity is present, the method extends to the washer method by subtracting the inner disk volume from the outer.^[4] The disk method is particularly useful for regions where the axis of rotation aligns with the variable of integration, providing an efficient alternative to other techniques like cylindrical shells.^[5]

Introduction

Overview

Disc integration, also known as the disk method, is a fundamental technique in integral calculus for calculating the volume of solids of revolution generated by rotating a region bounded by a continuous function around an axis.^[2] This method approximates the solid's volume by summing the volumes of infinitesimally thin cylindrical disks, whose areas are integrated over the interval of rotation to yield the exact total volume via a definite integral.^[3] The process relies on the geometry of rotation: when a plane region under a curve is revolved around an axis, the resulting solid features circular cross-sections perpendicular to that axis, each forming a disk with radius determined by the distance from the axis to the curve.^[2] These cross-sections are stacked along the axis, and their infinitesimal volumes

\pi [R(x)]^2 \, dx

accumulate to form the solid. The general formula for the volume

V

V = \pi \int_a^b [R(x)]^2 \, dx,

where

R(x)

represents the radius function, and the integration limits

a

b

span the bounded interval along the axis.^[3] This approach assumes the generating function is continuous, the region is bounded, and rotation occurs around a fixed axis external to or along the boundary of the region.^[2]

Historical Context

The origins of disc integration lie in the 17th-century contributions of Italian mathematician Bonaventura Cavalieri, who developed the method of indivisibles as a precursor to integral calculus for approximating areas and volumes. In his seminal work Geometria indivisibilibus continuorum (1635), Cavalieri applied this approach to solids of revolution, such as cones, cylinders, and spheroids generated by rotating conic sections around an axis, by summing collections of infinitesimal planar elements—effectively thin disks—to determine volume ratios, like that of a cone to a cylinder as 1:3. This technique prefigured the disk method by conceptualizing volumes as aggregates of similar cross-sections without invoking explicit limits or infinitesimals.^[6] The method gained rigor through the independent invention of integral calculus by Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in the late 1660s and 1670s. Newton's fluxional calculus, outlined in his unpublished De Analysi (1669) and later works, treated integration as the inverse of differentiation to compute fluents like volumes under curves, directly applicable to revolving regions around an axis to form solids. Similarly, Leibniz's 1675 development of the infinitesimal sum (∫) notation enabled precise summation of cross-sectional areas πy² dx for volumes of revolution, as published in his 1686 paper on integral calculus. Their fundamental theorem linking differentiation and integration provided the theoretical foundation for disc integration as a systematic tool.^[7] Leonhard Euler advanced these ideas in the 18th century, integrating them into a cohesive framework in his Introductio in analysin infinitorum (1748) and the multi-volume Institutionum calculi integralis (1768–1794). Euler explicitly used definite integrals to derive volumes of solids of revolution, such as spheres and paraboloids, by revolving curves and summing disk-like elements, while clarifying notation and extending applications to more complex geometric forms. His treatises emphasized the method's versatility, establishing it as a core component of analytical geometry.^[8] In the 19th century, refinements continued. A key milestone came with William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) and Peter Guthrie Tait's Treatise on Natural Philosophy (1867), which incorporated disc integration into physics education, demonstrating its use for modeling rotational solids in mechanics and fluid dynamics through illustrative examples.^[9] By the early 20th century, disc integration had evolved into a standard topic in calculus textbooks, with concise presentations in works like William F. Osgood's A First Course in the Differential and Integral Calculus (revised edition, 1914).^[10]

Mathematical Prerequisites

Solids of Revolution

A solid of revolution is a three-dimensional geometric figure generated by rotating a two-dimensional region bounded by a curve, such as

y = f(x)

x = g(y)

, and the coordinate axes around a fixed axis, typically the x-axis or y-axis.^[3]^[11] This rotation sweeps out the region to form a solid whose shape depends on the original curve and the axis of rotation.^[12] Solids of revolution can be classified by the extent of rotation and the presence of internal voids. A full rotation, typically 360 degrees, produces complete symmetric shapes like spheres from semicircles or tori from circles offset from the axis, while partial rotations yield incomplete forms such as spherical caps.^[13] Simple solids lack holes and form when the rotated region touches the axis, resulting in filled interiors; those with holes arise when the region is separated from the axis, creating annular voids akin to a doughnut.^[14] To visualize these solids, consider cross-sections taken perpendicular to the axis of rotation, which appear as circles for simple solids or annuli (ring-shaped regions) for those with holes.^[15] These circular slices highlight the radial symmetry inherent in the rotation process.^[16] A key non-integral method for computing volumes of such solids is Pappus's centroid theorem, which states that the volume equals the product of the region's area and the distance traveled by its centroid during rotation.^[17] Specifically, for rotation around an external axis, the volume

V = 2\pi \bar{r} A

, where

A

is the area and

\bar{r}

is the distance from the centroid to the axis.^[18] This theorem provides an alternative to integration-based approaches by leveraging geometric properties of the centroid.^[19]

Basic Integration Review

The definite integral represents the net signed area under the curve of a continuous function

f(x)

over the interval

[a, b]

, denoted as

\int_a^b f(x) \, dx

. When

f(x) \geq 0

[a, b]

, this integral computes the exact area between the curve and the x-axis; for regions where

f(x)

changes sign, positive and negative areas are added algebraically. This foundational concept extends the notion of area from simple geometric shapes to more complex curves, providing a limit-based measure that approximates the region with increasingly fine partitions.^[20] Riemann sums form the basis for defining the definite integral by approximating the area under the curve through finite sums of rectangular areas. For a partition of

[a, b]

into

n

subintervals of width

\Delta x = (b - a)/n

, the Riemann sum is

\sum_{i=1}^n f(x_i^*) \Delta x

, where

x_i^*

is a sample point in the

i

-th subinterval (such as the left endpoint, right endpoint, or midpoint). As

n \to \infty

and

\Delta x \to 0

, the limit of these sums converges to the definite integral

\int_a^b f(x) \, dx

, enabling volume approximations in higher dimensions by integrating cross-sectional areas. This process ensures the integral captures the precise accumulation, regardless of the choice of sample points for Riemann-integrable functions.^[20] Finding antiderivatives, or indefinite integrals, is essential for evaluating definite integrals via the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, with basic rules tailored to polynomial-like functions common in radius expressions. The power rule states that for

n \neq -1

\int x^n \, dx = \frac{x^{n+1}}{n+1} + C

, directly applicable to terms like squared distances where exponents are even integers greater than or equal to 2. Integration by substitution reverses the chain rule: for composites of the form

f(g(x)) g'(x)

, set

u = g(x)

du = g'(x) \, dx

, transforming

\int f(g(x)) g'(x) \, dx

into

\int f(u) \, du

, which is then integrated and substituted back. These techniques simplify expressions involving powers or compositions, such as those arising from radial functions in rotated solids.^[21]^[22] A common pitfall in integration arises with improper integrals over unbounded regions or discontinuous functions, requiring limits to assess convergence. For instance, an integral like

\int_a^\infty f(x) \, dx

is defined as

\lim_{b \to \infty} \int_a^b f(x) \, dx

; if the limit exists and is finite, the improper integral converges to that value, but divergence occurs otherwise, potentially leading to infinite volumes in unbounded solids of revolution. Similarly, integrals with discontinuities inside

[a, b]

split at the point of issue and evaluate limits from both sides. Failing to recognize these cases can yield misleading finite results for inherently divergent accumulations.

Core Methods

Disc Method for X-Axis Rotation

The disc method for x-axis rotation applies to finding the volume of a solid formed by revolving a region bounded by the curve

y = f(x)

, the x-axis, and the vertical lines

x = a

and

x = b

(where

f(x) \geq 0

) around the x-axis.^[1] This generates a solid of revolution composed of stacked circular discs perpendicular to the x-axis, with each disc's radius equal to the function value

f(x)

at that point.^[23] The derivation begins by considering thin rectangular strips of width

\Delta x

along the x-axis, from

x

x + \Delta x

. Revolving the region in this strip around the x-axis generates a thin disk with radius

f(x)

and thickness

\Delta x

. The volume of this disk is

\Delta V = \pi [f(x)]^2 \Delta x

.^[1] Summing these volumes over the interval using Riemann sums and taking the limit as

\Delta x \to 0

yields the definite integral for the total volume:

V = \pi \int_a^b [f(x)]^2 \, dx.

This formula represents the integral of the cross-sectional area

A(x) = \pi [f(x)]^2

along the axis of rotation.^[23] To apply the method, first identify the bounds

a

and

b

as the x-intercepts or specified limits of the region. The radius of each disc is simply the y-value

f(x)

, and no subtraction is needed since the region touches the axis of rotation. Substitute into the integral formula and evaluate using standard techniques such as antiderivative computation or substitution.^[1] A classic example is computing the volume of a sphere of radius

r

, obtained by rotating the semicircle

y = \sqrt{r^2 - x^2}

y=r2−x2

from $x = -r$ to $x = r$ around the x-axis. Substituting gives $V = \pi \int_{-r}^r (r^2 - x^2) \, dx = \pi \left[ r^2 x - \frac{x^3}{3} \right]_{-r}^r = \pi \left( (r^3 - \frac{r^3}{3}) - (-r^3 + \frac{r^3}{3}) \right) = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3,$ confirming the known spherical volume.^[23]

Disc Method for Y-Axis Rotation

The disc method for rotation about the y-axis applies when a region in the first quadrant, bounded by the curve

x = g(y)

, the y-axis, and the horizontal lines

y = c

and

y = d

(with

c < d

), is revolved around the y-axis to form a solid of revolution.^[24] In this configuration, cross-sections perpendicular to the y-axis are circular disks with radius equal to the distance from the y-axis to the curve, which is

g(y)

. The volume

V

of the solid is given by the integral

V = \pi \int_c^d [g(y)]^2 \, dy,

where the integrand represents the area of each disk.^[24]^[3] This formula arises by adapting the disc method for x-axis rotation, where integration is with respect to

x

and the radius is a function of

x

. To handle y-axis rotation, the functions are inverted to express

x

as a function of

y

, and the variable of integration shifts to

y

, ensuring the slices are perpendicular to the axis of rotation.^[24]^[3] This inversion maintains the geometric principle that the volume is the sum of infinitesimal disk areas

\pi r^2 \, dy

, with

r = g(y)

. For example, consider the region bounded by

x = y^2

, the y-axis, and the lines

y = 0

y = 2

, rotated about the y-axis. Here,

g(y) = y^2

, so the radius of each disk is

y^2

. The volume is

V = \pi \int_0^2 (y^2)^2 \, dy = \pi \int_0^2 y^4 \, dy = \pi \left[ \frac{y^5}{5} \right]_0^2 = \pi \cdot \frac{32}{5} = \frac{32\pi}{5}.

^[25] This computation yields the volume of a paraboloid solid, illustrating the method's application to quadratic curves.

Extensions and Variations

Washer Method

The washer method extends the disc method to compute the volume of solids of revolution formed by rotating a region bounded by two curves around an axis, resulting in a solid with a central hole akin to a stack of washers.^[3] When the region lies between an outer curve

y = f(x)

and an inner curve

y = g(x)

where

f(x) \geq g(x) \geq 0

over

[a, b]

, and is rotated about the x-axis, each cross-section perpendicular to the x-axis is an annular washer with outer radius

f(x)

and inner radius

g(x)

.^[26] The derivation follows by subtracting the volume of the inner solid (generated by rotating

y = g(x)

) from the volume of the outer solid (generated by rotating

y = f(x)

), both using the disc method. The cross-sectional area of each washer is the difference between the areas of the outer and inner disks:

\pi [f(x)]^2 - \pi [g(x)]^2 = \pi ([f(x)]^2 - [g(x)]^2)

. Integrating this area along the x-axis from

a

b

yields the total volume.^[3]^[26] The general formula for the volume

V

is thus

V = \pi \int_a^b \left( [f(x)]^2 - [g(x)]^2 \right) \, dx.

^[3] For example, consider the region bounded by

y = x

and

y = x^2

from

x = 0

x = 1

, rotated about the x-axis. Here, the outer radius is

x

and the inner radius is

x^2

, so

V = \pi \int_0^1 (x^2 - (x^2)^2) \, dx = \pi \int_0^1 (x^2 - x^4) \, dx = \pi \left[ \frac{x^3}{3} - \frac{x^5}{5} \right]_0^1 = \pi \left( \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{5} \right) = \frac{2\pi}{15}.

^[27]

Annular Regions in Washers

In advanced applications of the washer method, annular regions arise from rotating bounded areas around axes displaced from the coordinate origins, such as lines parallel to but offset from the x- or y-axis. The perpendicular distances from the curves to this offset axis determine the outer and inner radii, adjusting the cross-sectional area accordingly to account for the shifted geometry. Similarly, washers can form between non-adjacent curves, where the region of interest lies between two functions that do not directly bound the axis, creating an annular structure without an intervening solid core.^[3] When integrating with respect to y for rotation about the y-axis, the volume formula adapts to reflect the horizontal distances of the boundaries, yielding

V = \pi \int_{c}^{d} \left( [x_{\text{outer}}(y)]^{2} - [x_{\text{inner}}(y)]^{2} \right) \, dy,

where

x_{\text{outer}}(y)

and

x_{\text{inner}}(y)

represent the respective rightward and leftward functions defining the annular slice at each y-value. This formulation ensures the subtracted inner area correctly models the hollow portion of the solid.^[3] For solids featuring multiple holes or irregular annular configurations—such as varying inner boundaries along the axis—piecewise integration divides the domain into subintervals where the expressions for the outer and inner radii remain consistent. Within each interval, the standard washer integral applies, and the total volume sums these contributions, accommodating transitions like additional cavities or shape changes in the revolved region.^[28] A representative example involves approximating the volume of a torus via stacked washers, obtained by revolving a disk of radius

r

centered at

(R, 0)

(with

R > r

) around the y-axis. Horizontal slices at height y produce annular washers with outer radius

R + \sqrt{r^2 - y^2}

R+r2−y2

and inner radius $R - \sqrt{r^2 - y^2}$

, integrated from $y = -r$ to $y = r$ : $V = \pi \int_{-r}^{r} \left[ \left( R + \sqrt{r^2 - y^2} \right)^2 - \left( R - \sqrt{r^2 - y^2} \right)^2 \right] \, dy = 2 \pi^2 R r^2.$

)2−(R−r2−y2

)2]dy=2π2Rr2. This yields the exact toroidal volume, illustrating how washer stacks capture the doughnut-like annular structure.^[29]

Practical Applications

Volume Calculations in Geometry

The disc method provides a straightforward approach to computing the volumes of fundamental geometric solids generated by rotating curves about an axis, relying on the integral of cross-sectional areas perpendicular to the axis of rotation. By expressing the radius of each disc as a function of the variable along the axis, the volume is obtained as

V = \pi \int_a^b [R(x)]^2 \, dx

, where

R(x)

is the distance from the axis to the curve. This technique is especially effective for solids with circular cross-sections that vary continuously.^[23] For a sphere of radius

r

, consider the semicircle defined by

y = \sqrt{r^2 - x^2}

y=r2−x2

in the upper half-plane, rotated about the x-axis from $x = -r$ to $x = r$ . The radius of each disc is $R(x) = \sqrt{r^2 - x^2}$

, so the cross-sectional area is $\pi (r^2 - x^2)$ . The volume integral is $V = \pi \int_{-r}^{r} (r^2 - x^2) \, dx.$ Since the integrand is even, symmetry allows simplification to $V = 2\pi \int_0^r (r^2 - x^2) \, dx = 2\pi \left[ r^2 x - \frac{x^3}{3} \right]_0^r = 2\pi \left( r^3 - \frac{r^3}{3} \right) = 2\pi \cdot \frac{2r^3}{3} = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3,$ yielding the standard sphere volume formula.^[23] A cone of height $h$ and base radius $r$ can be formed by rotating the line segment from $(0, 0)$ to $(h, r)$ about the x-axis. The equation of the line is $y = \frac{r}{h} x$ , so the disc radius is $R(x) = \frac{r}{h} x$ . The volume is $V = \pi \int_0^h \left( \frac{r}{h} x \right)^2 \, dx = \pi \frac{r^2}{h^2} \int_0^h x^2 \, dx = \pi \frac{r^2}{h^2} \left[ \frac{x^3}{3} \right]_0^h = \pi \frac{r^2}{h^2} \cdot \frac{h^3}{3} = \frac{1}{3} \pi r^2 h,$ confirming the classical cone volume.^[30] For a paraboloid, rotate the parabola $x = \sqrt{y}$

(or equivalently $y = x^2$ ) about the y-axis from $y = 0$ to $y = a$ . The disc radius is $R(y) = \sqrt{y}$

, and the volume integral becomes $V = \pi \int_0^a y \, dy = \pi \left[ \frac{y^2}{2} \right]_0^a = \pi \frac{a^2}{2}.$ This result holds for the solid paraboloid of revolution with height $a$ and base radius $\sqrt{a}$

. A similar computation arises when rotating $y = k x^2$ about the x-axis, where the integral $V = \pi \int_0^h (k x^2)^2 \, dx$ yields a volume proportional to $h^5$ , highlighting the method's adaptability to quadratic curves.^[31] In these derivations, exploiting symmetry significantly simplifies computations; for instance, when the generating function is even about the axis of rotation, the integral over the full interval can be reduced to twice the integral over the positive half, as demonstrated in the sphere example, thereby halving the evaluation effort without loss of accuracy.^[23]

Real-World Uses in Engineering

In fluid storage systems, the disc and washer methods are applied to determine the volumes of tanks with rotational symmetry, such as cylindrical and conical designs, ensuring precise capacity evaluations for industrial applications. For conical tanks, which are common in silos, hoppers, and chemical processing facilities, the volume is computed by integrating the varying cross-sectional areas along the height, resulting in the formula

V = \frac{1}{3} \pi r^2 h

, where

r

is the base radius and

h

is the height; this approach is essential for optimizing storage efficiency and material flow.^[32] In cases of partially filled tanks or those with irregular profiles, the washer method accounts for annular regions by subtracting inner and outer radii in the integral, providing accurate partial volumes critical for operational safety and inventory management.^[32] In material science, disc integration supports the analysis of cross-sections in components formed by rotation, such as flywheels used in automotive and energy storage systems, where volume calculations directly influence mass distribution and moment of inertia. Flywheels are typically modeled as solids of revolution, allowing engineers to integrate disk areas to compute total volume and assess structural integrity under high-speed rotation; for instance, optimizing the radial profile minimizes material while maximizing energy absorption. This method enables precise quantification of material requirements, reducing weight without compromising performance in applications like regenerative braking systems. Civil engineering leverages disc integration for volume estimation in structures involving surfaces of revolution, such as arched dams and reservoirs, to evaluate concrete quantities and hydrostatic loads. In dam design, integrating cross-sectional areas perpendicular to the axis of rotation approximates the solid's volume, informing stability analyses and construction costs; this is particularly relevant for curved profiles where traditional geometric formulas fall short.^[33] For reservoirs with rotational contours, the technique facilitates capacity computations under varying water levels, enhancing flood control and water resource planning.^[33]

Comparisons and Alternatives

Versus Shell Method

The cylindrical shell method provides an alternative approach to computing volumes of solids of revolution by approximating the solid with thin cylindrical shells parallel to the axis of rotation. For a region bounded by

y = f(x)

, the x-axis, and vertical lines at

x = a

and

x = b

, rotated about the y-axis, the volume is given by

V = 2\pi \int_a^b x f(x) \, dx,

where

x

serves as the radius of each shell and

f(x)

as its height.^[5] This contrasts with the disc and washer methods, which integrate cross-sectional areas perpendicular to the axis of rotation. The disc and washer methods offer advantages in simplicity when the axis of rotation aligns with the variable of integration, such as using

x

for rotation about the x-axis, as the perpendicular slices directly yield circular or annular areas without needing to invert functions.^[34] However, these methods become more challenging for rotations about a perpendicular axis, like the y-axis, where expressing the bounding curves in terms of

y

(e.g., solving

x = g(y)

) may involve cumbersome algebra or non-elementary inverses.^[35] The shell method is preferable in scenarios involving vertical strips for y-axis rotations or regions with complex boundaries, as it avoids function inversion and uses the original

x

-based expressions directly, often simplifying the setup for polynomials or functions defined horizontally.^[5] For instance, revolving a cubic region about the y-axis is more straightforward with shells than discs, which would require integrating with respect to

y

.^[34] Despite their differences, the disc/washer and shell methods are mathematically equivalent, always producing the same volume for a given solid, as both fundamentally partition and integrate over the same three-dimensional space—perpendicular slices in one case and parallel shells in the other—leading to identical results upon evaluation.^[36] This equivalence can be sketched by applying both methods to a simple solid, such as the region under

y = x

from 0 to 1 rotated about the y-axis, where direct computation using the washer method for the disc approach and shells yields

V = \frac{2\pi}{3}

in each case.^[37]

Limitations and Selection Criteria

The disk method exhibits inefficiencies when the axis of rotation necessitates inverting the bounding function to determine the radius, such as expressing

x

as a function of

y

for rotations around the y-axis, which can introduce algebraic complexity or impossibility if inversion is not straightforward.^[3] This limitation is particularly pronounced for regions bounded by vertical lines, where direct integration in terms of

x

becomes cumbersome, often requiring a switch to integration with respect to

y

and careful bound adjustments.^[38] Common errors in applying the disk method include incorrect identification of the radius, such as using the coordinate value instead of the perpendicular distance to the axis of rotation, and mismatches between integration limits and the actual region bounds, which can lead to over- or underestimation of the volume.^[3] Additionally, squaring the radius function in the integrand can amplify small errors in function evaluation, potentially causing numerical instability in computational implementations, though this is mitigated by symbolic integration tools. Selection criteria for the disk method emphasize its suitability for solids formed by horizontal or vertical slices perpendicular to the axis of rotation, particularly when the functions are already expressed in the appropriate variable (e.g.,

y = f(x)

for x-axis rotations using

dx

).^[38] It is preferred over alternatives like the shell method when avoiding function inversion simplifies setup, but for regions requiring both, hybrid approaches integrating disks with shells may be employed to handle varying geometries efficiently.^[38] For verification, computational software such as Mathematica facilitates accurate evaluation by symbolically integrating the disk formula or generating 3D visualizations of the solid of revolution, helping confirm results and identify setup errors.^[39]

History

Media collections

Disc integration

Recent from talks

Recent from talks

Contribute something

Contribute something

Media Pages

Timelines

Articles

Notes collections

Notes

Notes

Days in Chronicle

Disc integration

Definition

Function of x

Function of y

Washer method

See also

References