Hubbry Logo
IrradiationIrradiationMain
Open search
Irradiation
Community hub
Irradiation
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Irradiation
Irradiation
Irradiation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Irradiation is the process by which an object is exposed to radiation. An irradiator is a device used to expose an object to radiation,[1] most often gamma radiation,[2] for a variety of purposes. Irradiators may be used for sterilizing medical and pharmaceutical supplies, preserving foodstuffs, alteration of gemstone colors, studying radiation effects, eradicating insects through sterile male release programs, or calibrating thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).[3]

The exposure can originate from various sources, including natural sources. Most frequently the term refers to ionizing radiation, and to a level of radiation that will serve a specific purpose, rather than radiation exposure to normal levels of background radiation. The term irradiation usually excludes the exposure to non-ionizing radiation, such as infrared, visible light, microwaves from cellular phones or electromagnetic waves emitted by radio and television receivers and power supplies.

Applications

[edit]

Sterilization

[edit]

If administered at appropriate levels, all forms of ionizing radiation can sterilize objects, including medical instruments, disposables such as syringes, and food. Ionizing radiation (electron beams, X-rays and gamma rays)[4] may be used to kill bacteria in food or other organic material, including blood.[citation needed] Food irradiation, while effective, is seldom used due to lack of public acceptance.[5]

Medicine

[edit]
See also: Blood irradiation therapy

Irradiation is used in diagnostic imaging, cancer therapy and blood transfusion.[6]

In 2011 researchers found that irradiation was successful in the novel theranostic technique involving co-treatment with heptamethine dyes to elucidate tumor cells and attenuate their growth with minimal side effects.[7][8]

Ion implantation

[edit]
Main article: Ion implantation

Ion irradiation is routinely used to implant impurities atoms into materials, especially semiconductors, to modify their properties. This process, usually known as ion implantation, is an important step in the manufacture of silicon integrated circuits.[9]

Ion irradiation

[edit]

Ion irradiation means in general using particle accelerators to shoot energetic ions on a material. Ion implantation is a variety of ion irradiation, as is swift heavy ions irradiation from particle accelerators induces ion tracks that can be used for nanotechnology.[10][11]

Industrial chemistry

[edit]
Main article: Gemstone irradiation
A
B
B
B
C
C
The image above contains clickable links
Pure diamonds, before and after irradiation treatment
A Initial (2×2 mm size)
B Irradiated by different doses of 2 MeV electrons
C Irradiated by different doses and then annealed at 800 °C (1,470 °F)

The irradiation process is widely practiced in jewelry industry[12] and enabled the creation of gemstone colors that do not exist or are extremely rare in nature.[13] However, particularly when done in a nuclear reactor, the processes can make gemstones radioactive. Health risks related to the residual radioactivity of the treated gemstones have led to government regulations in many countries.[13][14]

Irradiation is used to cross-link plastics. Due to its efficiency, electron beam processing is often used in the irradiation treatment of polymer-based products to improve their mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties, and often to add unique properties. Cross-linked polyethylene pipe (PEX), high-temperature products such as tubing and gaskets, wire and cable jacket curing, curing of composite materials, and crosslinking of tires are a few examples.

Agriculture

[edit]
Main articles: Atomic gardening and Food irradiation
Further information: Mutation breeding

After its discovery by Lewis Stadler at the University of Missouri, irradiation of seed and plant germplasm has resulted in creating many widely-grown cultivars of food crops worldwide.[15] The process, which consists of striking plant seeds or germplasm with radiation in the form of X-rays, UV waves, heavy-ion beams, or gamma rays, essentially induce lesions of the DNA, leading to mutations in the genome. The UN has been an active participant through the International Atomic Energy Agency. Irradiation is also employed to prevent the sprouting of certain cereals, onions, potatoes and garlic.[16] Appropriate irradiation doses are also used to produce insects for use in the sterile insect technique of pest control.[17]

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) recognizes irradiation as an important technology to protect consumers. Fresh meat and poultry including whole or cut up birds, skinless poultry, pork chops, roasts, stew meat, liver, hamburgers, ground meat, and ground poultry are approved for irradiation.[18]

Assassination

[edit]
Further information: Poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko
See also: Category:Deaths by acute radiation syndrome

Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej, who died of lung cancer in Bucharest on March 19, 1965, may have been intentionally irradiated during a visit to Moscow, due to his political stance.[19]

In 1999, an article in Der Spiegel alleged that the East German MfS intentionally irradiated political prisoners with high-dose radiation, possibly to provoke cancer.[20][21]

Alexander Litvinenko, a secret serviceman who was tackling organized crime in Russia, was intentionally poisoned with polonium-210; the very large internal doses of radiation he received caused his death.

Nuclear industry

[edit]

In the nuclear industry, irradiation may refer to the phenomenon of exposure of the structure of a nuclear reactor to neutron flux, making the material radioactive and causing irradiation embrittlement,[22][23] or irradiation of the nuclear fuel.

Security

[edit]

During the 2001 anthrax attacks, the US Postal Service irradiated mail to protect members of the US government and other possible targets. This was of some concern to people who send digital media through the mail, including artists. According to the ART in Embassies program, "incoming mail is irradiated, and the process destroys slides, transparencies and disks."[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Irradiation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Irradiation is the process of exposing a material to ionizing radiation, such as gamma rays, accelerated electrons, or X-rays, which transfers energy to the target without rendering it radioactive. This physical interaction ionizes atoms and molecules within the material, disrupting biological structures like microbial DNA or chemical bonds, thereby enabling applications in preservation, sterilization, and material modification. Unlike contamination, where radioactive particles adhere to a surface and emit ongoing radiation, irradiation ceases once the source is removed, posing no residual radioactivity risk to the treated item. Key applications include food treatment to eliminate pathogens such as and E. coli, extending by inhibiting spoilage organisms and delaying without significantly altering nutritional content or sensory qualities at approved doses. In , it sterilizes disposable equipment and single-use medical supplies, reducing infection risks in healthcare settings. Industrial uses encompass cross-linking polymers to enhance durability, as in , and phytosanitary treatment of agricultural exports to control pests without chemical residues. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and WHO endorse these methods based on decades of dosimetric and toxicological data confirming efficacy and safety. Although irradiation demonstrably mitigates foodborne illnesses—responsible for millions of cases annually—its adoption, particularly for foods, has been limited by public apprehension over perceived risks like radiolytic compound formation or long-term health effects, despite peer-reviewed studies across generations of animal trials showing no adverse outcomes or mutagenicity. These concerns often stem from conflation with nuclear accidents rather than , with nutritional analyses indicating minimal vitamin degradation comparable to conventional processing like . Ongoing research focuses on optimizing doses for maximal microbial kill while preserving quality, underscoring irradiation's role as a non-thermal, residue-free alternative to chemical preservatives.

Fundamentals

Definition and Physical Principles

Irradiation is the exposure of materials, substances, or organisms to , defined as electromagnetic waves or subatomic particles possessing sufficient energy—typically exceeding 10-12 electron volts—to eject electrons from atoms or molecules, thereby producing ions and triggering subsequent chemical and biological changes. This process does not render the exposed item radioactive, as irradiation involves external energy deposition rather than nuclear activation, distinguishing it from neutron bombardment techniques. In practical applications, such as food treatment or sterilization, doses are controlled to achieve specific outcomes like microbial inactivation while minimizing bulk heating, with absorbed energy quantified in grays (1 Gy = 1 joule per kilogram). The core physical principles stem from the interactions of with matter, governed by and . Gamma rays (from isotopes like ) and X-rays interact via three dominant photon-matter processes: the , dominant at lower energies (<0.5 MeV) where photons are fully absorbed and eject inner-shell electrons; Compton scattering, prevalent at intermediate energies (0.1-10 MeV) involving inelastic collisions that transfer partial photon energy to electrons; and pair production above 1.02 MeV, creating electron-positron pairs in the nuclear field. Accelerated electron beams, used for shallower penetration, deposit energy through Coulomb interactions, creating a dense ionization track via excitation and direct electron removal from target atoms. These interactions generate secondary electrons and excited states, leading to bond scission and free radical formation without equilibrium thermal effects, as the process is non-adiabatic and localized. In biological and organic matrices, the principles extend to indirect effects via radiolysis, particularly of water, which constitutes 70-80% of many foods and cells. Ionizing events produce transient species such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH, highly oxidizing), hydrated electrons (e⁻_aq, reducing), and molecular products like H₂O₂, with yields quantified by G-values (e.g., G(•OH) ≈ 2.7 molecules per 100 eV absorbed in neutral water). These radicals diffuse short distances (nanometers to micrometers) to attack DNA, proteins, and lipids, causing strand breaks, base damage, or cross-linking that inhibit microbial replication or enzyme function, with efficacy scaling logarithmically with dose due to microbial repair mechanisms. Penetration depth varies inversely with material density and radiation type—gamma rays achieve tens of centimeters in food, electrons limited to 3-5 cm for 10 MeV beams—necessitating product geometry considerations for uniform dosing.

Types of Ionizing Radiation Employed

Gamma rays, produced by the radioactive decay of isotopes such as cobalt-60 (emitting photons at approximately 1.17 MeV and 1.33 MeV) or cesium-137 (0.662 MeV), are widely used in irradiation due to their high penetration depth, enabling treatment of bulk or densely packaged materials. This type of electromagnetic radiation is commonly applied in food preservation to inhibit sprouting and pathogens, as well as in medical device sterilization where uniform dosing through thick barriers is required. Facilities using gamma sources operate continuously but require secure handling of radioactive materials, with cobalt-60 preferred for its longer half-life of about 5.27 years compared to cesium-137's 30.17 years. Electron beam (e-beam) irradiation utilizes accelerated streams of electrons generated by linear accelerators, typically with energies up to 10 MeV for applications like food treatment. This method delivers rapid, high-dose exposure without producing residual radioactivity, making it suitable for thin or surface-level processing in industrial modification, pharmaceutical sterilization, and quarantine treatments for agricultural products. However, its penetration is limited to a few centimeters in dense materials, restricting use to unpackaged or shallow items, though it allows for precise control and immediate start-stop operation. X-rays, generated by directing high-energy electron beams (often exceeding 5 MeV) onto a heavy metal target to produce bremsstrahlung radiation, provide penetration comparable to gamma rays while using non-radioactive machine sources. Employed in and material processing, X-rays facilitate treatment of pallet-scale loads with energies up to 7.5 MeV approved for certain uses, offering flexibility for security screening and pathogen reduction without the logistical challenges of isotopic sources. Emerging as an alternative to gamma facilities, X-ray systems support higher throughput in commercial settings. These types—gamma, electron beam, and X-ray—constitute the approved ionizing radiations for irradiation under regulatory frameworks like those from the FDA and IAEA, selected for their ability to disrupt microbial DNA without significantly altering bulk nutritional or sensory properties when doses are controlled (e.g., up to 4.5 kGy for some foods). Alpha particles and unaccelerated beta emissions are not employed due to insufficient penetration for practical applications.

Historical Development

Early Scientific Foundations (19th-early 20th Century)

In 1895, Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen discovered X-rays while investigating cathode ray tubes, observing that these previously unknown rays could penetrate opaque materials, produce fluorescence in certain screens, and ionize gases, thereby revealing their high-energy electromagnetic nature and interaction with matter at the atomic scale. This breakthrough demonstrated radiation's ability to traverse soft tissues while being absorbed by denser structures like bone, laying groundwork for understanding differential absorption and scattering effects essential to later irradiation applications. The following year, Henri Becquerel identified natural radioactivity when uranium salts spontaneously emitted penetrating radiation capable of fogging photographic plates and discharging electroscopes, independent of external stimulation and akin to X-rays in ionizing properties but originating from atomic decay processes. This phenomenon, confirmed through experiments showing continuous emission unaffected by temperature or light, established the existence of intrinsic atomic instability and provided the first evidence of subatomic particles and rays (later classified as alpha, beta, and gamma) that could alter chemical and biological matter via ionization. Building on Becquerel's work, Marie and Pierre Curie isolated polonium and radium from uranium ore in 1898, yielding highly radioactive sources that intensified studies of radiation's penetrating power and chemical effects, including the ability to induce luminescence and decomposition in surrounding materials. Ernest Rutherford's subsequent experiments in the late 1890s and early 1900s differentiated alpha particles (helium nuclei), beta particles (electrons), and gamma rays (high-energy photons), elucidating their distinct interactions—such as alpha's strong ionization over short ranges and gamma's deep penetration—which formed the basis for controlled radiation exposure techniques. These foundational insights into radiation's capacity to eject electrons from atoms and disrupt molecular bonds foreshadowed its utility in modifying materials, though early observations also noted adverse biological effects like skin erythema from prolonged exposure.

Mid-20th Century Advancements and Initial Applications

During World War II, the United States military initiated research into food irradiation to extend the shelf life of rations for troops, motivated by the need to combat bacterial contamination and spoilage without refrigeration. Experiments conducted by the U.S. Army in the early 1940s demonstrated that gamma rays from radium sources could inhibit sprouting in potatoes and reduce microbial loads in meats, though challenges like off-flavors limited immediate scalability. Postwar advancements accelerated with the production of cobalt-60 (Co-60) isotopes in nuclear reactors, enabling high-intensity gamma irradiation sources suitable for industrial-scale applications. By 1951, the first Co-60 teletherapy units were deployed for medical use, but the technology quickly extended to non-therapeutic irradiation, with facilities emerging for material processing and sterilization. In the late 1950s, commercial gamma irradiators using Co-60 became viable for sterilizing heat-sensitive medical devices, such as syringes and surgical tools, replacing ethylene oxide methods and facilitating the rise of single-use plastics. This shift was driven by empirical validation that doses around 25 kGy effectively eliminated pathogens without significantly degrading polymers. Initial industrial applications included radiation-induced crosslinking of polymers, pioneered by companies like in the 1950s, which produced heat-shrinkable tubing and insulated wiring with enhanced durability for aerospace and electronics. Food irradiation trials expanded in the 1950s under U.S. Army auspices, targeting pathogen reduction in pork and grains, with pilot facilities processing thousands of pounds annually by 1956, though regulatory hurdles delayed widespread adoption. These developments laid the groundwork for irradiation as a cold-pasteurization technique, verified through dosimetry studies confirming uniform dose penetration in bulk materials.

Post-1950s Commercialization and Global Expansion

The commercialization of irradiation technology accelerated in the late 1950s, driven by advancements in electron accelerators and gamma sources like . In 1957, the first commercial food irradiation facility opened in Stuttgart, Germany, using a Van de Graaff electron accelerator to treat spices for microbial reduction, though it operated only until 1959. Concurrently, industrial applications emerged, with Raychem Corporation pioneering radiation-induced cross-linking of polymers for heat-shrinkable tubing and wire insulation, leveraging high-energy electron beams developed in the early 1950s. These efforts built on U.S. military research into ration preservation, which tested low- and high-dose irradiation on foods during the 1950s and 1960s. Medical sterilization saw rapid adoption post-1950s, as gamma irradiation with cobalt-60 sources proved effective for heat-sensitive disposables without residues. Commercial radiation sterilization facilities proliferated from the late 1950s, initially using electron beams before gamma methods dominated due to penetration depth. By the 1960s, this process became standard for pharmaceuticals and single-use medical devices, expanding globally as regulatory bodies recognized its efficacy in achieving sterility assurance levels of 10^{-6}. In parallel, food applications grew: the Soviet Union approved potato sprout inhibition in 1958 at doses up to 0.1 kGy, followed by Canada in 1960 for similar uses, processing up to 15,000 tons monthly before temporary cessation. Global expansion intensified in the 1960s–1980s through international standards and bilateral approvals. The U.S. FDA cleared wheat irradiation for insect disinfestation in 1963, while Canada extended approvals to onions by the same decade. The Codex Alimentarius Commission established irradiation guidelines in 1984, facilitating harmonization across members and influencing legislation in over 60 countries. Facilities multiplied in Europe (e.g., Netherlands for spices), South Africa for fruits, and Asia for grains, with electron beam and gamma plants enabling diverse doses from 0.1 kGy for quarantine to 10 kGy for sterilization. By the 1990s, North America's first dedicated food irradiation plant opened in Florida in 1991, treating strawberries and citrus, amid FDA approvals for poultry (1990), meat (1997), and eggs/seeds (2000). Industrial uses diversified to polymer modification, flue gas treatment, and gem coloration, with electron accelerators supporting high-throughput processing. Today, irradiation processes approximately 500,000 metric tons of food annually in 26 countries, while sterilizing 40–50% of disposable medical products in developed nations, reflecting sustained infrastructure investment despite public skepticism in some markets.

Core Applications

Food Preservation and Pathogen Reduction

Food irradiation employs ionizing radiation, such as gamma rays from cobalt-60 or cesium-137 sources, electron beams, or X-rays, to inactivate microorganisms, parasites, and insects in food products, thereby extending shelf life and reducing pathogen loads without inducing radioactivity in the treated items. This process targets DNA in microbial cells, disrupting replication and leading to cell death, with efficacy depending on dose, food composition, temperature, and water activity. Typical doses range from low levels (0.1–1 kGy) for inhibiting sprouting in tubers or disinfesting fruits of insects, to medium doses (1–10 kGy) for pasteurization-like pathogen reduction in meats, poultry, and spices, and higher doses (>10 kGy) for radappertization, which sterilizes low-acid foods like meats for ambient storage. Empirical studies demonstrate substantial pathogen reduction; for instance, doses of 1–3 kGy can achieve 5–6 log reductions in Salmonella and Escherichia coli on poultry and beef, comparable to or exceeding thermal pasteurization in microbial kill while avoiding heat-induced texture changes. Analysis of U.S. foodborne outbreaks from 2010–2020 indicates that irradiation could have prevented approximately 155 incidents involving eligible foods like ground beef and shellfish by targeting pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes and Cyclospora cayetanensis. In spices and dry seasonings, irradiation at 10 kGy eliminates Salmonella more reliably than fumigation with ethylene oxide, which has faced regulatory restrictions due to carcinogenicity concerns. Unlike chemical preservatives or heat treatments, irradiation penetrates packaging and provides volumetric treatment, minimizing surface-only effects and preserving sensory qualities in irregular-shaped products like fruits. Nutritional impacts at approved doses are minimal and akin to those from cooking or freezing; for example, losses in at 1 kGy are about 10–20%, less than from , with no significant protein denaturation or formation of unique toxicants beyond those in non-irradiated foods. Peer-reviewed assessments confirm no adverse health effects from irradiated foods in multi-generational animal feeding trials or human consumption data spanning decades, with regulatory bodies like the FDA and WHO affirming wholesomeness up to 10 kGy for most foods. Over 60 countries, including the , , , and , have approved irradiation for specific foods, processing around 500,000 metric tons annually worldwide, though adoption remains limited in the to dried herbs, spices, and certain dehydrated products due to labeling and facility approval requirements. In the U.S., the FDA has authorized doses up to 4.5 kGy for fresh meats since 1990 and 7 kGy for since 1992, enabling reduced reliance on and antibiotics in . This method complements traditional preservation by addressing post-harvest contamination without residues, though its underutilization stems partly from consumer unfamiliarity and mandatory labeling.

Sterilization in Medicine and Pharmaceuticals

Irradiation serves as a key method for sterilizing single-use medical devices, such as syringes, catheters, surgical implants, and gloves, by exposing them to ionizing radiation that disrupts microbial DNA and prevents replication. This cold process avoids heat damage to temperature-sensitive materials and penetrates packaging without leaving chemical residues, unlike ethylene oxide or autoclaving. Gamma rays from cobalt-60 sources predominate, with approximately 200 facilities worldwide dedicated primarily to medical device sterilization. The (ISO) 11137 outlines validation requirements, including assessment and to ensure sterility assurance levels (SAL) of 10^{-6}, meaning fewer than one viable per million units processed. Sterilization doses typically range from 15 to 35 kGy, with 25 kGy historically established as a conservative minimum for many products based on empirical testing against resistant spores like Bacillus pumilus. The U.S. (FDA) recognizes these standards and supports innovations like master file pilots for alternative radiation sources to address supply chain vulnerabilities in cobalt-60. Electron beam (E-beam) irradiation complements gamma for shallower penetration needs, delivering high-dose rates (up to 10 kGy per second) suitable for thin-profile items like wound dressings or pharmaceutical blister packs. First commercialized in the , E-beam systems accelerate electrons to 3-10 MeV, achieving rapid processing without radioactive sources, though limited depth (typically <20 cm in water-equivalent materials) restricts its use compared to gamma. In pharmaceuticals, irradiation sterilizes select heat-labile products like certain injectables, heparin solutions, and biologicals, where gamma rays ionize molecules to inactivate contaminants without filtration or chemical additives. However, it can induce radiolysis, generating free radicals that degrade active ingredients or excipients, necessitating stability studies per pharmacopeial guidelines. Validation follows ISO 11137 principles adapted for drugs, with doses optimized via VDmax^{25} methods to balance efficacy and product integrity, often below 25 kGy for sensitive formulations. Regulatory bodies like the FDA require demonstrated absence of adverse effects on potency, purity, and safety post-irradiation.

Industrial Material Modification

Irradiation modifies industrial materials by inducing chemical and structural changes, such as crosslinking, chain scission, grafting, and surface patterning, primarily using electron beams, gamma rays, or ion beams to alter properties like mechanical strength, thermal resistance, and durability. These processes enable precise control over material behavior without chemical additives, leveraging ionizing radiation to generate free radicals that form covalent bonds between polymer chains or break them selectively. Electron beam irradiation predominates in high-throughput applications due to its rapid penetration and scalability, while gamma irradiation suits bulk treatments requiring deep penetration. In polymer modification, radiation-induced crosslinking transforms thermoplastics like and into thermosets with enhanced performance. For wire and cable insulation, electron beam doses typically crosslink , improving heat resistance up to 150°C and reducing deformation under electrical stress, as implemented commercially since the mid-20th century. This yields materials for automotive wiring, nuclear cables, and high-voltage applications, where crosslinked polymers exhibit superior tensile strength and elongation retention compared to uncrosslinked variants. Chain scission, conversely, degrades polymers like to produce lubricants or micronized powders with reduced viscosity. Gamma irradiation processes bulk resins and powders to adjust molecular weights, enhancing flow properties or rigidity for applications in pipes, foams, and tires. Crosslinked polyethylene foams, produced via electron or gamma exposure, provide superior cushioning and recovery in packaging and insulation, outperforming chemically crosslinked alternatives in uniformity and absence of residual peroxides. Radiation grafting onto polymer surfaces introduces functional groups for adhesion or compatibility, used in composites and coatings. For non-polymeric materials, electron beam irradiation modifies semiconductors by defect engineering, improving carrier mobility and radiation tolerance in power devices for electronics and aerospace. Ion irradiation alters metal and ceramic surfaces, inducing phase transformations or amorphization for wear-resistant tools, though scalability limits its industrial prevalence compared to polymer uses. Overall, these modifications support sectors demanding high-reliability materials, with annual global processing exceeding millions of tons of polymers.

Agriculture and Quarantine Treatments

Irradiation serves as a non-chemical method for sprout inhibition in stored tubers and bulbs, such as potatoes and onions, by disrupting cell division and hormone signaling at doses typically ranging from 50 to 200 Gy. For potatoes, gamma irradiation at 100-200 Gy has been shown to suppress sprouting for up to 200 days under commercial storage conditions while preserving tuber quality, including firmness and processing attributes like fry color. Similar doses applied to onions inhibit sprouting for 30-60 days post-treatment, outperforming untreated controls where sprouting reaches 100%. This treatment reduces reliance on chemical inhibitors like chlorpropham, minimizing residues and enabling longer market availability without significant impacts on nutritional content or greening resistance. In seed treatment, low-dose gamma irradiation (1-5 Gy) enhances germination rates, seedling vigor, and abiotic stress tolerance in crops like wheat and sesame by stimulating antioxidant enzyme activity, such as superoxide dismutase and peroxidase, and altering gene expression for better establishment. Higher doses up to 1 kGy control fungal pathogens in stored seeds without compromising viability, as demonstrated in sesame where irradiation eliminated microbial loads while preserving oil properties. These effects stem from radiation-induced DNA repair mechanisms and metabolic shifts, though optimal doses vary by species and moisture content to avoid reduced survival at excessive levels. For quarantine treatments, irradiation disinfests fresh produce of pests like tephritid fruit flies and mango seed weevils at minimum absorbed doses of 150-400 Gy, achieving phytosanitary security by sterilizing insects and preventing progeny without requiring immediate mortality. This method has facilitated exports of commodities such as Hawaiian papayas and Mexican mangoes to the United States since approvals in 1989 and 2002, respectively, protecting agriculture from exotic pests while retaining fruit quality at doses below those causing sensory changes. Unlike fumigation, irradiation penetrates packaging and applies broadly across pest stages and hosts, with efficacy validated against at 250 Gy, though research gaps persist for non-fruit-fly arthropods. Regulatory protocols from agencies like the USDA ensure dose verification throughout the commodity, supporting its use in over 60 countries for international trade.

Security and Detection Technologies

Large-scale gamma-ray and X-ray imaging systems expose cargo containers, vehicles, and rail cars to ionizing radiation to generate radiographic images of contents, enabling detection of dense materials suggestive of smuggled weapons, contraband, or nuclear threats without physical opening. These systems typically employ high-intensity sources such as cobalt-60 for gamma rays, which penetrate steel-walled containers up to 40 feet long, producing transmission images based on differential attenuation that reveal anomalies like high-density shielding around special nuclear materials. For instance, gamma-ray scanners can inspect a standard 40-foot container in seconds, achieving scan times under one minute while maintaining radiation doses below occupational limits set by regulatory bodies. Active interrogation techniques utilize neutron or photon irradiation to probe suspicious cargo or vehicles, inducing measurable signatures from concealed threats such as explosives, narcotics, or fissile materials. In neutron-based systems, moderated neutron beams irradiate targets, prompting fission in uranium or plutonium via (n,f) reactions or gamma emission from nitrogen in organics, which detectors then identify through time-correlated signatures to distinguish threats from benign cargo. These methods enhance specificity over passive detection, reducing false positives; for example, associated particle tracking in deuterium-tritium neutron generators allows tomographic imaging of induced radiation, effective for detecting shielded nuclear materials at ports or borders. Radiation portal monitors and handheld detectors, while primarily passive for emitted gamma or neutron flux, often integrate with irradiation protocols in layered security, such as pre-screening vehicles before active scanning to confirm radioactive anomalies. Advanced systems combine gamma spectroscopy with irradiation-induced activation analysis, categorizing isotopes in real-time to flag illicit nuclear sources, as deployed by agencies like the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for border interdiction. Empirical deployments since the early 2000s have demonstrated detection probabilities exceeding 90% for plutonium sources at 10 meters, though challenges persist in high-throughput environments due to cosmic ray interference and source shielding.

Safety and Biological Effects

Mechanisms of Interaction with Matter

Ionizing radiation used in irradiation processes, such as gamma rays from cobalt-60 sources (typically 1.17–1.33 MeV photons) or electron beams (up to 10 MeV), interacts with matter primarily through energy deposition mechanisms that result in ionization and excitation of atoms. These interactions occur via electromagnetic forces, where photons indirectly ionize by ejecting electrons, while charged particles like electrons directly transfer energy through Coulomb collisions. The dominant processes depend on photon energy, atomic number (Z) of the material, and density, with energy loss quantified by mass attenuation coefficients that peak in the 0.1–10 MeV range relevant to irradiation. For photons, the photoelectric effect predominates at lower energies (<0.5 MeV in low-Z materials like water or organic matter), wherein the incident photon is fully absorbed by an inner-shell atomic electron, ejecting it as a photoelectron with kinetic energy equal to the photon energy minus the binding energy; the resulting atomic vacancy is filled by outer electrons, emitting characteristic X-rays or Auger electrons. This process scales with Z^3/E^{3.5}, making it more probable in higher-Z elements, and contributes significantly to dose in heterogeneous materials. At intermediate energies (0.1–10 MeV), Compton scattering becomes the primary mechanism, involving inelastic collision between the photon and a loosely bound orbital electron; the photon scatters at an angle with reduced energy, while the recoil electron carries away a fraction of the energy (maximum at 180° backscattering), leading to secondary ionizations along the electron's path. The Compton cross-section is roughly independent of Z but proportional to electron density, explaining its uniformity in soft tissues. At higher photon energies (>1.022 MeV, above the electron-positron rest mass), occurs in the strong field of the nucleus or atomic electrons, converting the into an electron-positron pair with excess energy shared as ; the positron later annihilates with an , producing two 0.511 MeV that may undergo further interactions. This threshold-limited process scales with Z^2 and dominates above 5 MeV, though less relevant for standard food or medical irradiation sources limited to ~1–3 MeV. Coherent (, elastic and non-ionizing, occurs at very low energies but contributes negligibly to energy deposition. Overall, these photon interactions generate (photo-, Compton-, or pair-produced) that deposit most of the via tracks, with (LET) values typically low (~0.2 keV/μm in ), producing sparse tracks suitable for uniform penetration in bulk matter. Electron beams, as directly , interact via inelastic collisions with atomic , exciting or ionizing target atoms through electrostatic repulsion; the incident transfers energy in discrete amounts, creating delta rays ( >100 eV) that extend the interaction range. Energy loss follows the Bethe-Bloch formula, dE/dx ∝ (Z/A) * (ln(2m_e v^2 / I (1-β^2)) - β^2), where I is the mean excitation potential (~10–100 eV for biological materials), β = v/c, emphasizing and dependence; at irradiation energies (1–10 MeV), have ranges of millimeters to centimeters in -equivalent materials, with ~80–90% of energy lost to ionization/excitation and the rest to (radiative losses scaling with Z^2 E^2). Elastic with nuclei causes angular deflection but minimal energy loss, while radiative processes become significant above 1 MeV, generating X-rays that can penetrate further. Unlike photons, exhibit higher surface dose and rapid attenuation due to multiple scattering (Gaussian angular spread), limiting depth but enabling precise shallow treatments. These mechanisms collectively induce free radicals (e.g., H•, OH• in ) via , underpinning applications like inactivation without residue.

Empirical Data on Health Risks and Benefits

Irradiation of food at approved doses effectively reduces microbial pathogens, thereby lowering the incidence of foodborne illnesses. Studies demonstrate that doses of 2.5–5 kGy (radicidation) can reduce non-spore-forming pathogens, yeasts, and molds to undetectable levels in various foods, including meats and produce. For instance, gamma or electron beam irradiation has been shown to inactivate O157:H7 on and eliminate and in and spices, contributing to extended without inducing or leaving toxic residues. The U.S. (FDA), after over 30 years of evaluation, confirms that such treatments minimize risks from pathogens like and while preserving nutritional quality, with minimal impacts on taste, texture, or vitamins compared to untreated foods. Regulatory bodies including the (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) endorse irradiation for these benefits, noting its role in preventing outbreaks, as supported by CDC-funded research indicating potential reductions in illness cases from contaminated meats and produce. Extensive animal feeding studies, spanning over half a century, provide of safety. Hundreds of trials, including multi-generational studies on rats, mice, dogs, and other fed irradiated diets up to 35% of intake, have shown no evidence of , genetic , reproductive issues, or increased cancer rates attributable to irradiation. For example, long-term feeding of irradiated and dry milk powder at doses exceeding approved maximums (e.g., >4 times standard levels) revealed no adverse health effects across generations. These wholesomeness studies align with conclusions from the FDA and (EFSA), which find no special nutritional, toxicological, or microbiological risks at typical doses (<10 kGy for most foods). Potential health risks primarily involve radiolytic products formed during irradiation, such as 2-alkylcyclobutanones (2-ACBs) in fat-containing foods. These markers, unique to irradiated lipids, have prompted toxicity investigations; in vitro studies indicate possible DNA damage, and one rat study showed a threefold increase in colon tumors when 2-ACBs were administered alongside a chemical carcinogen. However, collaborative toxicological assessments conclude that 2-ACB levels in irradiated foods are minute and unlikely to pose health risks, as they do not migrate significantly or exceed those from thermal processing, and no promotion of tumorigenesis occurs without added carcinogens. Isolated cases, such as leukoencephalomyelopathy in cats fed highly irradiated diets (>30 kGy), highlight species-specific sensitivities, but mechanistic links remain unclear and irrelevant to human consumption patterns. No human epidemiological data indicate harm, reflecting limited widespread adoption rather than evidence of risk, with overall consensus from peer-reviewed wholesomeness data affirming safety outweighs theoretical concerns.

Comparative Risk Assessment

Irradiation processes, when applied to , demonstrate a favorable risk profile compared to thermal methods like or , as they induce minimal nutritional degradation while effectively eliminating pathogens such as and E. coli without introducing chemical residues. Empirical studies, including long-term feeding trials on animals and humans, have found no evidence of carcinogenic, genotoxic, or reproductive effects from consuming irradiated foods at doses up to 10 kGy, contrasting with chemical preservatives like nitrites, which are linked to formation and potential risks in processed meats. For instance, the and U.S. affirm that irradiation reduces incidence—responsible for approximately 48 million cases annually in the U.S.—more reliably than preservatives alone, without the allergenicity concerns of additives like sulfites. In medical device sterilization, gamma irradiation offers advantages over (EtO) by avoiding toxic gas residues that require extensive and pose occupational exposure risks, as EtO is classified as a probable by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with documented associations in workers. While irradiation can cause oxidative damage to certain polymers like , leading to embrittlement at doses above 25 kGy, this is mitigated through and , resulting in sterility assurance levels (SAL) of 10^{-6} comparable to EtO without environmental emissions. Steam autoclaving, an alternative for heat-stable devices, risks protein denaturation in biologics and incomplete penetration in complex assemblies, whereas irradiation achieves uniform lethality through packaged items, reducing recontamination risks post-sterilization.
Preservation/Sterilization MethodKey RisksMitigation/Comparative Benefits of Irradiation
Thermal (e.g., )Nutrient loss (e.g., 20-50% reduction in juices); uneven kill in solidsIrradiation preserves heat-labile vitamins better; no cooking odors or textures changes
Chemical (e.g., EtO, nitrites)Residue ; carcinogenicity (EtO: 10-20 ppm residuals possible)No residues; lower chronic exposure risks per FDA validations
Untreated/ConventionalHigh foodborne rates (e.g., 600,000 annual U.S. hospitalizations) reduction by 5-6 log cycles; extends without spoilage microbes
Across applications, irradiation's primary risks—such as potential radiolytic products like 2-alkylcyclobutanones in fats—are present at levels orders of magnitude below those inducing harm in studies (e.g., >100 mg/kg body weight), far lower than naturally occurring toxins in unprocessed foods like in potatoes. Regulatory bodies like the set dose limits (e.g., 10 kGy max for most foods) based on toxicological data showing equivalence or superiority to alternatives in benefit-risk ratios, though material compatibility testing remains essential to avoid functionality losses in industrial uses. metrics indicate that scaling irradiation could avert millions of illnesses yearly, outweighing hypothetical long-term risks unsupported by 50+ years of global data.

Controversies and Societal Debates

Scientific and Regulatory Disputes

Scientific disputes over irradiation primarily center on its safety for , with critics alleging the formation of unique radiolytic products (URPs) such as and , which are known or suspected carcinogens, potentially increasing risks like cancer or reproductive . However, extensive empirical testing by regulatory bodies, including over 500 studies reviewed by the , has found no evidence of toxicological, microbiological, or nutritional problems from these products at approved doses, with URP levels often lower than those occurring naturally in foods or from cooking processes. Long-term animal feeding studies spanning multiple generations have similarly shown no adverse effects, supporting the view that irradiation does not introduce unique hazards beyond those of thermal treatments like . Debates also arise regarding nutritional degradation and microbial safety, where opponents argue that irradiation destroys vitamins and may mask spoilage, potentially leading to consumption of harmful bacteria. In contrast, controlled studies demonstrate that nutrient losses are comparable to or less than those from conventional methods, and irradiation effectively reduces pathogens like Salmonella and E. coli by damaging their DNA without rendering food radioactive or significantly altering texture, taste, or appearance. The scientific consensus, endorsed by agencies like the FDA and IAEA, holds that benefits in pathogen reduction outweigh minor drawbacks, with no verified human health risks after decades of evaluation since the 1950s. Regulatory disputes stem from varying international standards, with approximately 60 countries approving irradiation for at least one category under harmonized guidelines, yet implementation differs sharply. In the United States, the FDA has authorized it for products like spices (since 1981), (1990), and (2000), emphasizing evidence-based approvals after radiological, toxicological, and microbiological assessments. The permits it mainly for dried herbs and spices up to 10 kGy under Directive 1999/2/EC but restricts broader use due to precautionary concerns over long-term effects, requiring mandatory labeling and import controls that create trade barriers. These discrepancies, highlighted in global harmonization efforts, reflect tensions between risk-assessment approaches favoring empirical data and stricter precautionary frameworks, impeding international despite endorsements from bodies like the WHO. In medical and industrial applications, regulatory consensus is stronger, with fewer disputes as sterilization efficacy is well-documented and doses are tightly controlled for worker and environmental .

Public Opposition and Misinformation

Public opposition to food irradiation has historically stemmed from concerns over perceived health risks, despite endorsements from regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and (WHO), which affirm its safety at approved doses. Surveys indicate that while acceptance has risen from 33% in 1992 to 67% in 2024 across global studies, a significant portion of consumers remains wary, often citing fears of long-term carcinogenic effects or nutritional degradation unsupported by empirical data from controlled trials. This resistance is amplified by activist groups, such as the Center for Food Safety, which argue that irradiation masks unsanitary processing conditions in meat production without addressing root causes like carriers in livestock. A prevalent form of misinformation posits that irradiation renders food radioactive, a claim refuted by physics: the process uses ionizing radiation to disrupt microbial DNA but does not induce radioactivity in treated products, as confirmed by dosimetry studies and regulatory approvals. Similarly, assertions that irradiated foods produce uniquely hazardous by-products like elevated benzene or formaldehyde levels overlook that such compounds occur naturally in many foods and remain below safety thresholds post-irradiation, per toxicological analyses. Consumer surveys from 2020-2025 reveal that misconceptions, including beliefs in inevitable health detriments, correlate with lower purchase intent, particularly among older demographics less exposed to corrective education. Opposition also draws from sensory and ethical critiques, with some reports noting off-flavors or color changes in irradiated meats at higher doses, though these are dose-dependent and not indicative of failures. Broader anti-nuclear sentiments, linking irradiation to despite mechanistic differences, contribute to distrust, as evidenced by public campaigns framing it as an unnatural intervention akin to genetic modification. , derived from decades of peer-reviewed research showing no increased cancer risk in animal models or human , contrasts sharply with public perception shaped by selective advocacy rather than comprehensive risk assessments comparing irradiation to alternatives like chemical fumigants. Efforts to bridge this gap, such as mandatory labeling, have faced pushback from both sides, with opponents viewing disclosure as stigmatizing and proponents as essential for informed choice.

Economic and Policy Implications

The adoption of irradiation technologies in and agricultural applications has demonstrated potential economic benefits through reduced post-harvest losses and enhanced . For instance, irradiation can extend and control pests, mitigating annual economic losses estimated at $4 billion from infestations in stored grains alone. In developing economies, where spoilage rates can exceed 30% for perishable goods, irradiation facilitates by meeting stringent standards, as evidenced by increased exports of irradiated mangoes from and spices from following facility expansions in the early . These gains are particularly pronounced in high-volume commodities, where treatment costs range from 1 to 15 U.S. cents per , offset by minimized waste and reduced reliance on chemical fumigants. However, upfront capital investments pose significant economic barriers, with irradiation facilities requiring $5-20 million for or systems, leading to higher per-unit costs for low-volume processors. Cost-benefit analyses indicate viability at scales above 10,000 tons annually, where societal benefits—for example, in irradiation—can exceed industry costs by $49 million when factoring in averted health expenses from pathogens like E. coli. Smaller operators often face uncompetitive pricing due to limited consumer demand, perpetuating underutilization despite proven efficacy in reducing microbial loads by 5-6 log cycles. Policy frameworks have shaped irradiation's economic trajectory, with the U.S. (FDA) regulating it under 21 CFR Part 179 since 1980, permitting doses up to 4.5 kGy for fresh produce and 7 kGy for poultry to ensure safety without nutritional degradation. Internationally, the Commission, informed by assessments, endorses irradiation for over 60 food categories, yet implementation varies; the restricts it to spices and dried herbs at doses below 10 kGy, citing precautionary principles despite empirical safety data. These regulations mandate labeling (e.g., the radura symbol) and facility licensing, which, while ensuring radiological safety, impose compliance costs that deter small-scale adoption. Public opposition, often amplified by advocacy groups emphasizing unsubstantiated risks over longitudinal studies showing no increased carcinogenicity, has influenced conservatism, resulting in bans in countries like for most fresh foods until partial lifts in 2012 post-Fukushima. This reluctance translates to economic opportunity costs, as non-adoption sustains reliance on costlier alternatives like heat pasteurization, which yield inferior shelf-life extensions. Policy incentives, such as since 2001, have boosted facility numbers to over 10, correlating with a 20% rise in irradiated product exports, underscoring how supportive regulations can align economic incentives with technological capabilities. Conversely, persistent —despite clearance by bodies like the IAEA—exacerbates market fragmentation, limiting and global harmonization.

References

  1. https://www.savemyexams.com/igcse/physics/edexcel/19/revision-notes/7-radioactivity-and-particles/7-2-radioactivity-uses-and-dangers/7-2-4-contamination-and-irradiation/
  2. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-physics/chapter/32-4-food-irradiation/
  3. https://www.savemyexams.com/gcse/physics/aqa/18/revision-notes/4-atomic-structure/4-2-atoms-and-nuclear-radiation/4-2-10-contamination-and-irradiation/
  4. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/7/7/01-7706_article
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7329293/
  6. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/what-is-food-irradiation-and-why-is-it-important
  7. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/30200530/pdf/10552_2011.pdf
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10178114/
  9. http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/what-is-radiation
  10. https://www.fda.gov/food/buy-store-serve-safe-food/food-irradiation-what-you-need-know
  11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK401323/
  12. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/55/056/55056115.pdf
  13. https://irispublishers.com/mcms/fulltext/a-brief-review-on-the-food-irradiation-process-radiolysis-of-water-by-irradiation.ID.000574.php
  14. http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/what-is-food-irradiation-and-why-is-it-important
  15. https://www.cdc.gov/radiation-health/food-irradiation/index.html
  16. https://www.epa.gov/radtown/food-irradiation
  17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573888/
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7151773/
  19. https://www.iaea.org/projects/crp/d61024
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/radiation-sterilization
  21. https://inis.iaea.org/records/7v7h6-92x53
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10439058/
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8696882/
  24. https://www.mirion.com/discover/knowledge-hub/articles/education/the-history-of-radiation
  25. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/magazines/bulletin/bull23-4/23405043136.pdf
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1631070517300786
  27. https://www2.lbl.gov/abc/wallchart/chapters/03/4.html
  28. https://www.britannica.com/science/atom/Discovery-of-radioactivity
  29. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Supplemental_Modules_%28Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry%29/Nuclear_Chemistry/Radioactivity/Discovery_of_Radioactivity
  30. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-18810-7_1
  31. https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/from-the-front-line-to-the-freezer-aisle/
  32. https://ccr.ucdavis.edu/food-irradiation/history-food-irradiation
  33. https://ethw.org/Milestones:Cobalt-60_Radiation_Cancer_Treatment_Machines%2C_1951
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344445141_A_Retrospective_of_Cobalt-60_radiation_therapy_The_Atom_Bomb_that_Saves_Lives
  35. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2018/ph241/goronzy2/
  36. https://www.mddionline.com/sterilization/the-future-of-gamma-irradiation-for-medical-device-sterilization
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4840193/
  38. https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/radiationchemistry.html
  39. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07341510500103776
  40. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1313_web.pdf
  41. https://www.nordion.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/GT_History-of-Food-Irradiation.pdf
  42. https://www.fda.gov/food/irradiation-food-packaging/overview-irradiation-food-and-packaging
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119395525
  44. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/30/6/23-0922_article
  45. https://www.food-safety.com/articles/9467-cdc-irradiation-could-have-helped-prevent-155-foodborne-illness-outbreaks-in-the-past-decade
  46. https://www.gao.gov/assets/rced-00-217.pdf
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128172407000139
  48. https://www.ifst.org/resources/information-statements/food-irradiation
  49. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub530web.pdf
  50. https://food.ec.europa.eu/food-safety/biological-safety/food-irradiation/legislation_en
  51. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-devices-news-and-events/cdrh-announces-radiation-sterilization-master-file-pilot-program
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5820857/
  53. https://www.greenlight.guru/blog/iso-11137
  54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16821106/
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969806X98002060
  56. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-devices-news-and-events/cdrh-announces-new-standards-recognition-support-innovation-medical-device-sterilization
  57. https://sterigenics.com/technologies/electron-beam/
  58. https://ebeamservices.com/e-beam-sterilization/
  59. https://news.fnal.gov/2024/03/researchers-at-fermilab-develop-electron-beam-accelerator-to-sterilize-medical-equipment/
  60. https://www.mddionline.com/sterilization/electron-beam-systems-for-medical-device-sterilization
  61. https://www.pharmtech.com/view/gamma-irradiation-pharmaceutical-manufacturing-environment
  62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24668600/
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969806X2100445X
  64. https://www.steris-ast.com/resources/techtips/gamma-sterilization-validations-vdmax-25-and-method-1
  65. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfStandards/detail.cfm?standard__identification_no=46252
  66. http://www.iaea.org/topics/material-modification
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12030313/
  68. https://ebeammachine.com/understanding-electron-beam-irradiation-in-modern-industries/
  69. https://www.champcable.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Irradiation-Cross-Linking-of-Polymers-Short.pdf
  70. http://www.ichtj.waw.pl/ichtj/publ/monogr/sun2017/sun-chapter11.pdf
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168583X05004799
  72. https://sterigenics.com/industries/advanced-radiation-processing/polymer-material-modification/
  73. https://www.sekisuivoltek.com/differences-between-irradiation-and-chemically-cross-linked-foams
  74. https://sterigenics.com/industries/advanced-radiation-processing/semiconductor-material-modification/
  75. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apr/article/7/4/041307/832255/Ion-irradiation-and-modification-The-role-of
  76. http://www.iaea.org/bulletin/industrial-irradiation-for-a-better-world
  77. https://www.ijcmas.com/9-7-2020/Pranay%2520Sarkar%2C%2520et%2520al.pdf
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146572479901134
  79. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_0937_scr.pdf
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9737873/
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X22000343
  82. https://cbgg.hapres.com/htmls/CBGG_1615_Detail.html
  83. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-14949-6
  84. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2002/10/23/02-27027/irradiation-phytosanitary-treatment-of-imported-fruits-and-vegetables
  85. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub873.pdf
  86. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-73095-3
  87. https://www.ippc.int/static/media/files/publications/en/2013/06/05/1368450968_2012-009_Reference_Hallman_2000_.pdf
  88. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3775&context=icwdm_usdanwrc
  89. https://www.epa.gov/radtown/radiation-and-shipping-port-security
  90. https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/august-2010/cargo-scanning
  91. https://tsi-mag.com/seeing-the-unseeable-todays-cargo-screening/
  92. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AIPC.1099..656B/abstract
  93. https://www.ornl.gov/publication/gamma-ray-and-cosmic-ray-muon-modalities-cargo-inspection
  94. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/neutron-detection
  95. https://www.darpa.mil/news/features/sigma
  96. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1121/ML11210B520.pdf
  97. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232435/
  98. https://ehs.stanford.edu/manual/radiation-safety-manual/interactions-photons-matter
  99. https://howradiologyworks.com/x-ray-interactions/
  100. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ml1122/ML11229A667.pdf
  101. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/22-55j-principles-of-radiation-interactions-fall-2004/91d07afcf726613b748e07aebb4f1eb5_ener_depo_photon.pdf
  102. https://www.fe.infn.it/radioactivity/educational/detection.html
  103. https://fxmasse.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/3.0-Module-3-Interaction-of-Radiation-With-Matter-Branded-V6.pdf
  104. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2674116/files/660.pdf
  105. https://radiologykey.com/interactions-of-ionizing-radiation/
  106. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/106/6/1505/63248/Technical-Report-Irradiation-of-Food
  107. http://www.nordion.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/GT_FoodIrradiation_QA_Sterigenics.pdf
  108. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1930
  109. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12734067/
  110. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969806X0400369X
  111. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269726201_Food_irradiation_is_safe_Half_a_century_of_studies
  112. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1298644/
  113. https://www.meridian-medical.com/the-difference-between-ethylene-oxide-and-gamma-sterilization/
  114. https://ebeammachine.com/ethylene-oxide-sterilization-vs-gamma-what-you-need-to-know/
  115. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338670188_What_is_the_Benefit_of_Irradiation_Compared_to_Other_Methods_of_Food_Preservation
  116. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/general-hospital-devices-and-supplies/sterilization-medical-devices
  117. https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/issues/1039/food-irradiation/about-food-irradiation
  118. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article-abstract/33/3/376/278043
  119. https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijrsmb/v3-i4/2.pdf
  120. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969806X16301815
  121. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X22123938/pdf?md5=c4bdad6feb0353b1361581b2f96b60f9&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X22123938-main.pdf
  122. https://booksite.elsevier.com/samplechapters/9780123747181/9780123747181.pdf
  123. https://www.globalharmonization.net/sites/default/files/pdf/member-presentations/GHI_Irradiation-improves-food-safety-and-security-but-faces-regulatory-restrictions.pdf
  124. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12172617/
  125. https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/files/food_irradiation_gross_failure.pdf
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11157695/
  127. https://ccr.ucdavis.edu/food-irradiation/who-opposes-food-irradiation-and-why
  128. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001893
  129. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/health-you-asked/food-irradiation-dangerous
  130. https://consensus.app/questions/food-irradiation-safety/
  131. https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/issues/1039/food-irradiation/press-releases/859/video
  132. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/non-power-nuclear-applications/radioisotopes-research/radioisotopes-in-food-agriculture
  133. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5302430/
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/135901979090295S
  135. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/47172/50400_tb1762.pdf
  136. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Net-Benefits-of-Irradiating-Ground-Beef-Depend-on-Costs-1_tbl1_313514994
  137. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-179
  138. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-179/subpart-B/section-179.25
  139. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/latest-developments-in-food-irradiation-help-to-make-food-safer-and-easier-to-trade-worldwide
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.