Hubbry Logo
Runic magicRunic magicMain
Open search
Runic magic
Community hub
Runic magic
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Runic magic
Runic magic
Runic magic
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of a series on the
Norsemen
Extent of Norse language in AD 900: Western Norse in red and Eastern Norse in orange. Yellow, green and blue denote related Germanic languages.
History
Old Norse religion
Cosmology
Rituals and worship
Society
Events
Sources
WikiProject Norse history and culture

There is some evidence[citation needed] that, in addition to being a writing system, runes historically served purposes of magic. This is the case from the earliest epigraphic evidence of the Roman to the Germanic Iron Age, with non-linguistic inscriptions and the alu word. An erilaz appears to have been a person versed in runes, including their magic applications.

In medieval sources, notably the Poetic Edda, the Sigrdrífumál mentions "victory runes" to be carved on a sword, "some on the grasp and some on the inlay, and name Tyr twice."

In the early modern period and modern history, related folklore and superstition is recorded in the form of the Icelandic magical staves. In the early 20th century, Germanic mysticism coined new forms of "runic magic", some of which were continued or developed further by contemporary adherents of Germanic Neopaganism. Modern systems of runic divination are based on Hermeticism, classical occultism, and the I Ching.

Historical evidence

[edit]
Bracteate G 205 (c. 5th to 7th century), bearing the inscription alu

Tacitus

[edit]

Historically it is known that the Germanic peoples used various forms of divination and means of reading omens. Tacitus (Germania 10) gives a detailed account (98AD):

They attach the highest importance to the taking of auspices and casting lots. Their usual procedure with the lot is simple. They cut off a branch from a nut-bearing tree and slice it into strips these they mark with different signs and throw them at random onto a white cloth. Then the state's priest, if it is an official consultation, or the father of the family, in a private one, offers prayer to the gods and looking up towards heaven picks up three strips, one at a time, and, according to which sign they have previously been marked with, makes his interpretation. If the lots forbid an undertaking, there is no deliberation that day about the matter in question. If they allow it, further confirmation is required by taking auspices.[1]

It is often debated whether "signs" refers specifically to runes or to other marks; both interpretations are plausible and Tacitus does not give enough detail for a definite decision to be made.[2]

Epigraphy

[edit]
See also: Category:Historical runic magic
The inscription on the Kylver stone ends with a stacked bind rune combining six Tiwaz runes used to invoke the god Tyr and four Ansuz runes to invoke the Æsir.[3]

The Ansuz and Tiwaz runes in particular seem to have had magical significance in the early (Elder Futhark) period.[citation needed] The Sigrdrífumál instruction of "name Tyr twice" is reminiscent of the double or triple "stacked Tyr" bindrunes found e.g. on Seeland-II-C or the Lindholm amulet in the aaaaaaaazzznnn-b- muttt, sequence, which besides stacked Tyr involves multiple repetition of Ansuz, but also triple occurrence of Algiz and Naudiz.

Many inscriptions also have apparently meaningless utterances interpreted as magical chants, such as tuwatuwa (Vadstena bracteate), aaduaaaliia (DR BR42) or g͡æg͡og͡æ (Undley bracteate), g͡ag͡ag͡a (Kragehul I).

Alu is a charm word appearing on numerous artifacts found in Central and Northern Europe dating from the Germanic Iron Age. The word is the most common of the early runic charm words and can appear either alone or as part of an apparent formula. The origin and meaning of the word are matters of dispute, though a general agreement exists among scholars that the word either represents amulet magic or is a metaphor (or metonym) for it.[4]

A few Viking Age rings with runic inscriptions of apparently magical nature were found, among them the Kingmoor Ring. The phrase "runes of power" is found on two runestones in Sweden, DR 357 from Stentoften and DR 360 from Björketorp. Runestones with curses include DR 81 in Skjern, DR 83 in Sønder Vinge, DR 209 in Glavendrup, DR 230 from Tryggevælde, DR 338 in Glemminge, and Vg 67 in Saleby.[5]

Medieval sources

[edit]

The most prolific source for runic magic in the Poetic Edda is the Sigrdrífumál, where the valkyrie Sigrdrífa (Brynhild) presents Sigurd with a memory-draught of ale that had been charmed with "gladness runes" (stanza 5):[6]

Biór fori ec þer / brynþings apaldr!
magni blandinn / oc megintíri;
fullr er hann lioþa / oc licnstafa,
godra galdra / oc gamanruna.

Translation:

Beer I bring thee, tree of battle,
Mingled of strength and mighty fame;
Charms it holds and healing signs,
Spells full good, and gladness-runes.

She goes on to give advice on the magical runes in seven further stanzas. In all instances, the runes are used for actual magic (apotropaic or ability-enhancing spells) rather than for divination:

  • "victory runes" to be carved on the sword hilt (stanza 6, presumably referring to the t rune named for Tyr[7]),
  • ølrunar "Ale-runes" (stanza 7, a protective spell against being bewitched by means of ale served by the host's wife; naudiz is to be marked on one's fingernails, and laukaz on the cup),
  • biargrunar "birth-runes" (stanza 8, a spell to facilitate childbirth),
  • brimrunar "wave-runes" (stanza 9, a spell for the protection of ships, with runes to be carved on the stem and on the rudder),
  • limrunar "branch-runes" (stanza 10, a healing spell, the runes to be carved on trees "with boughs to the eastward bent"),[8]
  • malrunar "speech-runes" (stanza 11, the stanza is corrupt, but apparently referred to a spell to improve one's rhetorical ability at the thing),
  • hugrunar "thought-runes" (stanza 12, the stanza is incomplete, but clearly discussed a spell to improve one's wit).[9]

The Poetic Edda also seems to corroborate the magical significance of the runes the Hávamál where Odin mentions runes in contexts of divination,[dubious – discuss] of healing and of necromancy (trans. Bellows):

Certain is that which is sought from runes / That the gods so great have made / And the Master-Poet painted (79)
Of runes heard I words, nor were counsels wanting / At the hall of Hor (111)
Grass cures the scab / and runes the sword-cut (137)
Runes shalt thou find / and fateful signs (143)
if high on a tree / I see a hanged man swing / So do I write and color the runes / That forth he fares / And to me talks. (158)

Other oft cited sources for the practice of runic[dubious – discuss] divination are chapter 38 of Snorri Sturluson's Ynglinga Saga, where Granmar, the king of Södermanland, travels to the Temple at Uppsala for the seasonal blót. "There, the chips fell in a way that said that he would not live long" (Féll honum þá svo spánn sem hann mundi eigi lengi lifa).[10]

Another source is in the Vita Ansgari, the biography of Ansgar the Archbishop of Hamburg-Bremen, which was written by a monk named Rimbert. Rimbert details the custom of casting lots by the pagan Norse (chapters 26–30).[11] The chips and the lots, however, can be explained respectively as a blótspánn (sacrificial chip) and a hlauttein (lot-twig), which according to Foote and Wilson [12] would be "marked, possibly with sacrificial blood, shaken and thrown down like dice, and their positive or negative significance then decided."

Egils Saga features several incidents of runic magic. The most celebrated is the scene where Egil discovers (and destroys) a poisoned drink prepared for him, by cutting his hand and cutting runes on the drinking horn, and painting the runes with blood. While the motif of blood painted runes also appears in other examples of early Norse literature it is uncertain whether the practice of painting runes with blood is merely a literary invention or whether it had precedence in magical practice.[13]

Modern systems

[edit]
Runic divination using ceramic tiles

In the 17th century, Hermeticist and Rosicrucian Johannes Bureus, having been inspired by visions, developed a Runic system based on the Kaballah and the Futhark which he called the Adulruna.[14]

The Armanen runes "revealed" to Guido von List in 1902 were employed for magical purposes in Germanic mysticism by authors such as Friedrich Bernhard Marby and Siegfried Adolf Kummer, and after World War II in a reformed "pansophical" system by Karl Spiesberger. More recently, Stephen Flowers, Adolf Schleipfer, Larry E. Camp and others also build on List's system.[citation needed]

Several modern systems of runic magic and runic divination were published from the 1980s onward. The first book on runic divination, written by Ralph Blum in 1982, led to the development of sets of runes designed for use in several such systems of fortune telling, in which the runes are typically incised in clay, stone tiles, crystals, resin, glass, or polished stones, then either selected one-by-one from a closed bag or thrown down at random for reading.

Later authors such as Diana L. Paxson and Freya Aswynn follow Blum (1989) in drawing a direct correlation between runic divination and tarot divination. They may discuss runes in the context of "spreads" and advocate the usage of "rune cards".

Modern authors like Ralph Blum sometimes include a "blank rune" in their sets. Some were to replace a lost rune, but according to Ralph Blum this was the god Odin's rune, the rune of the beginning and the end, representing "the divine in all human transactions".[15]

Ralph Blum

[edit]

In 1982, a modern usage of the runes for answering life's questions was apparently originated by Ralph Blum in his divination book The Book of Runes: A Handbook for the Use of an Ancient Oracle, which was marketed with a small bag of round tiles with runes stamped on them. This book has remained in print since its first publication. The sources for Blum's divinatory interpretations, as he explained in The Book of Runes itself, drew heavily on then-current books describing the ancient I Ching divination system of China.

Each of Blum's seven books on runic divination deals with a specialized area of life or a varied technique for reading runes:

  • The Book of Runes: A Handbook for the Use of an Ancient Oracle: The Viking Runes (1982); revised 10th Anniversary Edition (1992); revised 25th Anniversary Edition (2007).
  • The Rune Cards: Sacred Play for Self Discovery (1989); reissued as The Rune Cards: Ancient Wisdom For the New Millennium (1997). Rather than rune stones, this book uses images of the runes printed on card stock, much like a set of trading cards or tarot cards.
  • The Healing Runes with co-author Susan Loughan (1995) teaches methods for using runic divination in the context of health and personal integration.
  • Rune Play: A Method of Self Counseling and a Year-Round Rune Casting Record Book (1996)
  • The Serenity Runes: Five Keys to the Serenity Prayer with co-author Susan Loughan (1998); reissued as The Serenity Runes: Five Keys to Spiritual Recovery (2005) utilizes runic divination as a method for assisting self-help and recovery from addictions; the title is a reference to the well-known Serenity prayer widely used in the 12-step program of Alcoholics Anonymous.
  • Ralph H. Blum's Little Book of Runic Wisdom (2002).
  • The Relationship Runes: A Compass for the Heart with co-author Bronwyn Jones (2003) shows how to use runic divination in matters of love and friendship.

Blum has also written books on the Tao Te Ching, Zen Buddhism, and UFOs.

Stephen Flowers

[edit]

In the wake of a 1984 dissertation on "Runes and Magic", Stephen Flowers published a series of books under the pen-name "Edred Thorsson" which detailed his own original method of runic divination and magic, "odianism",[16] which he said was loosely based on historical sources and modern European hermeticism. These books were:

  • Futhark: A Handbook of Rune Magic[17] (1984)
  • Runelore: A Handbook of Esoteric Runology (1987)
  • At The Well of Wyrd (1988) which was later reprinted under the title Runecaster’s Handbook: The Well of Wyrd.
  • Northern Magic: Rune Mysteries and Shamanism (2002).

Runic divination is a component of Flowers' "esoteric runology" course offered to members of his Rune-Gild, as detailed in The Nine Doors of Midgard: A Curriculum of Rune-Work. Besides runic divination, Flowers also advocated the "runic gymnastics" (Runengymnastik) developed in the 1920s by Friedrich Marby, under the name of "Rune-Yoga" (also "Runic Yoga", "Stadhagaldr").[18]

Stephan Grundy

[edit]

In 1990, Stephan Grundy, a.k.a. Kveldulf Gundarsson, described runic magic as the active principle as opposed to passive interpretations based on runic divination. He held that runic magic is more active than the allegedly shamanic practice of seid practiced by the Seiðkona. Runic magic, he states, uses the runes to affect the world outside based on the archetypes they represent.[19]

Most of Gundarsson's runic magic entails being in possession of a physical entity that is engraved with any or all of the individual runes or "staves", so as to practically work with their energies. The individual runes are reddened with either blood, dyes, or paints. The act of possessing the stave in its final form serves the purpose of affecting the world of form with "the rune might" of that particular stave. After use, the staves are discarded or destroyed.[20]

Gundarsson holds that each rune has a certain sound to it, to be chanted or sung; the sound has in common the phonetic value by which it is represented.[21] This act of singing or chanting is supposed to have more or less the same effect of using the staves in their physical form.[22]

Other

[edit]
  • Nigel Pennick proposes "Germanic Runic Astrology" in publications such as Runic Astrology: Starcraft and Timekeeping in the Northern Tradition (1995), ISBN 1-898307-45-8.
  • Freya Aswynn has published interpretations of the runes based on her own meditations in Leaves of Yggdrasil: Runes, Gods, Magic, Feminine Mysteries, and Folklore Llewellyn Worldwide (1990), ISBN 0-87542-024-9 and Northern Mysteries and Magick: Runes, Gods & Feminine Powers (1998), Llewellyn Worldwide ISBN 1-56718-047-7.
  • Adam Byrn Tritt, in Runic Divination in the Welsh Tradition (2011)[23] presents a system based on a 10-stone set, including nine symbols which are unrelated to the historical runes, plus a blank stone, which represents the querent (inquirer).
  • Diana L. Paxson deals with the subject of runic divination and the use of the runes in magical spell-casting in her book Taking Up The Runes: A Complete Guide To Using Runes In Spells, Rituals, Divination, And Magic (2005).[24]
  • Wendy Christine Duke in Spiral of Life (2008)[25] presents a divination system based on organizing a set of 41 "revealed images" based on the runic letters.
  • A. D. Mercer, Runen - The Wisdom of the Runes (2016) reintroduces the Armanen Runes.
  • Saemarr þorsgoði (Peter Seymour), Produced during the 1980s, a tape recording "Runes" giving advice on the use and divination practice of runes, including theoretical Galdrar (chanting) of the rune names of the Elder Futhark for ritual use.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Runic magic

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Runic magic encompasses the historical and literary traditions in which the runes—an alphabetic script used by from the 2nd to the 16th centuries—were employed for protective, curative, divinatory, or cursing purposes within Norse and broader Scandinavian contexts. Primarily attested in archaeological inscriptions and medieval Icelandic sagas, runic magic reflects a that the angular symbols, derived from the (the oldest runic alphabet with 24 characters), held inherent power when carved or invoked, often in association with rituals or incantations. Scholarly analysis distinguishes this from modern neopagan reconstructions, emphasizing that while runes functioned mainly as a practical , select evidence suggests occasional magical applications tied to their form and mythological origins. Archaeological findings provide the earliest tangible evidence of potential runic magic, dating to the (c. 400–550 CE). For instance, the Kylver Stone from , (c. 400 CE), bears a complete sequence of the , interpreted by scholars as a possible protective charm or ritual listing rather than mere practice writing, though its exact intent remains debated. Similarly, the Björketorp Runestone in , (6th–7th century), features a formula inscribed in Proto-Norse: "I, master of the runes, hide/conceal here runes of power... Whoever breaks this monument shall be eternally ," explicitly invoking the ' potency to deter and illustrating their role in apotropaic (warding) magic. The Glavendrup Stone from , (c. 900 CE), combines a with a pagan —"May the man who damages this stone become a "—further demonstrating how blended memorial functions with magical threats to preserve monuments. These examples, among fewer than a dozen ambiguous cases, indicate that magical uses were sporadic and context-specific, not a core feature of runic literacy. In literary sources, particularly the 13th-century Icelandic sagas and Poetic Edda, runic magic is elaborated through mythological and narrative lenses, portraying runes as a divine gift from Odin, the Allfather. The Hávamál (stanzas 138–145) describes Odin acquiring runic knowledge after hanging on the world tree Yggdrasil for nine nights, enabling him to wield runes for healing, harming, or calming seas—establishing a foundational lore of runic sorcery as both practical and esoteric. A prominent example appears in Egils Saga Skallagrímssonar, where the poet-warrior Egill Skallagrímsson counters harmful runes carved by an unskilled practitioner under a girl's pillow, which had induced illness; Egill scrapes them off, carves new healing runes in blood, and places them on her, restoring her health—highlighting themes of rune mastery and the dangers of misuse. Another incident in the same saga involves Egill inscribing runes on a poisoned drinking horn, causing it to shatter and revealing the treachery, underscoring runes' role in detection and defense. Such depictions, while rooted in oral traditions, likely reflect medieval Christian-era embellishments on pre-Christian practices, as Viking Age evidence for elaborate runic rituals is scant. Overall, historical runic magic appears limited in scope, confined to protective curses on durable objects like stones and bones, and amplified in later as a of ancient wisdom. Scholarly consensus holds that while carried symbolic weight—possibly due to their secretive, non-Roman origins—widespread magical employment is unproven, with most inscriptions serving mundane commemorative or ownership purposes. This interplay between artifactual sparsity and textual richness has fueled enduring fascination, influencing perceptions of from the through the medieval period.

Origins and Mythological Foundations

Runic Alphabets and Scripts

Runic alphabets, collectively known as futharks after the sounds of their first six characters, emerged as writing systems among Germanic-speaking peoples in during the early centuries of the . The earliest form, the , consists of 24 designed primarily to represent phonetic values in Proto-Germanic languages, with each rune typically denoting a or sound. These were carved into wood, bone, stone, or metal for inscriptions on artifacts such as brooches, weapons, and amulets, reflecting a practical script suited to angular forms for ease of incision. Scholarly consensus traces the origins of the runic script to adaptations of Old Italic alphabets, possibly Raetic or North Etruscan variants, developed around 150–200 CE by Germanic tribes in contact with Roman-influenced regions, though the exact location of invention remains debated. The oldest known inscriptions appear in and southern , dating from the 2nd century CE, such as the Vimose comb (ca. 160 CE) and the Nydam (ca. 200 CE), which demonstrate the script's initial use for short, often personal or ownership markings. The remained in use through the (ca. 2nd–8th centuries CE), accommodating the phonetic shifts in early Germanic dialects, but it began to evolve regionally as linguistic changes occurred. In , this led to the around the 8th century CE, a streamlined system reduced to 16 runes to better fit the simplified phonology of during the (ca. 793–1066 CE). This reduction meant some runes represented multiple sounds, resulting in more ambiguous spellings, as seen in inscriptions like the (ca. 800 CE) in , which employs the long-branch variant of the . Variants of the include the long-branch (Danish), short-twig (Swedish-Norwegian), and staveless forms, each adapted to local carving traditions and materials. By the late , the script incorporated innovations like dotted runes—marks added to distinguish similar sounds, such as ᛁ (i) dotted to become ᛁ̈ (e)—facilitating adaptations under Christian influences without fully supplanting the Latin alphabet. In Anglo-Saxon England and Frisia, the Elder Futhark expanded into the Futhorc, a variant with 26–33 runes by the 5th–11th centuries CE, incorporating additional characters for sounds unique to Old English, such as ᚪ (āc for /ɑː/) and ᚳ (cēn for /k/). This adaptation is evident in inscriptions like the Franks Casket (ca. 700 CE), which mixes runes with Latin script, and the Ruthwell Cross (ca. 750 CE), showcasing poetic texts. The Futhorc's phonetic inventory covered vowels more comprehensively, with runes like ᚩ (ōs for /oː/) and ᚻ (hægl for /h/), reflecting dialectal developments. Key runes in the Elder Futhark and its descendants include fehu (ᚠ, phonetic /f/, named for Proto-Germanic *fehu meaning "cattle" or "movable wealth," symbolizing prosperity in early economies) and ansuz (ᚨ, phonetic /a/, from *ansuz meaning "god," often linked to divine or ancestral concepts in Germanic lore). These names, preserved in later rune poems, provide insight into the cultural associations of the shapes, though the scripts themselves served utilitarian inscriptional purposes across their evolution into medieval times.

Odin's Role in Rune Lore

In , Odin, the chief god associated with wisdom, war, and poetry, is depicted as the discoverer of the through a profound act of self-sacrifice. According to stanzas 138–145 of the in the , Odin hung himself from the world tree for nine nights and nine days, wounded by his own spear, neither eating nor drinking, to gain knowledge of the . This ordeal, described as peering downward and crying out until the revealed themselves, underscores the as esoteric secrets attained at great personal cost, symbolizing initiation into divine mysteries. The runes, once acquired, represent hidden wisdom integral to Norse cosmology, often termed symbols fashioned by the "high powers" or regin (the gods). In Hávamál stanza 142, Odin states that he "graved" runes for the gods, linking them to supernatural forces that enable insight and manipulation of fate. This divine origin connects runes to practices like seidr (a form of shamanic magic involving trance and prophecy, often attributed to Odin and the goddess Freyja) and galdr (incantatory songs or spells chanted to invoke power), where runes served as focal points for ritual efficacy. Scholarly analysis of Old Norse texts highlights how Odin's rune lore blended these elements, portraying runes not merely as letters but as conduits for godly reginleif—powers or legacies of the divine realm. Mythic narratives further illustrate Odin employing runes for practical divine interventions, such as protection and victory in battle. In Ynglinga saga (chapter 7 of Heimskringla), Odin is said to have taught his followers skills including the carving of runes to effect magic, such as bringing the dead to life or blunting enemies' weapons, emphasizing his role as a bestower of rune-based protections. Allusions to these abilities appear in Egils saga, where the poet-warrior Egill Skallagrímsson, an Odinic figure, carves blood-reddened runes on objects to avert harm or achieve triumph, mirroring Odin's mythic rune use in sagas as a heroic emulation of godly power. Broader Germanic traditions echo these Norse depictions, with parallels in continental sources like the , two 10th-century incantations that invoke gods for healing and release from bonds through formulaic verses akin to runic . These charms, preserved in a manuscript, demonstrate rune-like incantatory as a shared , where divine intervention via spoken or inscribed symbols parallels Odin's rune mastery in Scandinavian lore.

Historical Evidence for Magical Applications

Roman Ethnographic Accounts

The earliest external account of practices potentially related to runic divination appears in the Roman historian ' Germania, written around 98 CE, where he describes Germanic methods of consulting lots for prophetic purposes. notes that the Germani were particularly devoted to divination by omens and lots, with the latter involving the cutting of a twig from a fruit-bearing into small pieces, which were then marked with certain signs (notae) and scattered randomly onto a white garment. The inquirer would draw the first lot, and its outcome—favorable or unfavorable—determined whether further interpretations, such as bird auguries or horse observations, would proceed. These lots were reportedly prepared anew each year and used in both public and private rituals, with interpretation conducted by a priest in communal settings or the family father in domestic ones. Tacitus emphasizes that the Germani most frequently invoked Mercury— the Roman equivalent of the Germanic god Odin—during these divinations, suggesting a ritual invocation to seek divine guidance before casting the marked pieces. This association with Odin aligns with later Norse traditions attributing runic knowledge to him, though Tacitus provides no explicit details on the nature of the notae themselves. Scholars have interpreted these notae as possible precursors or early forms of runic symbols, given the timing and cultural context, but the connection remains speculative due to the absence of archaeological evidence for runes in the first century CE. Tacitus' description, drawn from second-hand Roman sources rather than direct observation, reflects a Roman ethnographic lens that may have conflated or simplified Germanic customs, and it mentions no inscribed objects or permanent runes. Nonetheless, this account has profoundly influenced subsequent scholarship on runic magic, establishing an early literary basis for viewing runes as tools for divination and reinforcing their perceived inherent ritual power in Germanic society.

Epigraphic and Archaeological Finds

Physical evidence for the magical use of runes in pre-Christian primarily comes from inscriptions on portable artifacts discovered through archaeological excavations. These epigraphic finds, dating from the Roman Iron Age through the , include amulets, combs, weapons, and jewelry, often interpreted as serving protective or invocatory purposes. Unlike commemorative runestones, these objects feature short, formulaic sequences that scholars associate with or intent, such as repeated letters or nonsensical words believed to hold power. One of the earliest potential examples of a magical runic inscription is the , a rib-shaped bone piece discovered in Skåne, , dating to approximately the 2nd–4th century CE. The artifact bears a bilingual text in : the first line reads ek erilar sa wilagaR hateka z ("I, the rune-master, am called one skilled in magic"), while the second consists of the repeated formula aaaaaaaarrrnnn[·]bmuttt:alu, where alu is a recurring magical term possibly denoting "ale," , or a potent . This inscription suggests the amulet's role as a charm, potentially invoking aid or warding off harm, and it represents one of the oldest attestations of runic self-reference to magical expertise. Similarly, the Vimose comb, an object unearthed in a deposit on , , and dated to around 160 CE, features the simple inscription harja, which may translate as "" or serve as a , potentially intended for empowerment or identification in a . As the oldest datable runic inscription overall, it highlights the early integration of into everyday items with possible amuletic connotations, though its magical intent remains interpretive based on the site's votive nature. Weapons and tools from the same Vimose assemblage, such as spearheads and scabbards, also bear short runic marks, reinforcing the association of runes with martial or protective functions in depositional rituals. Gold s, thin medallions popular during the 5th–6th centuries CE, provide numerous examples of invocatory and protective runic use, often found in hoards or graves across and Anglo-Saxon . These artifacts frequently feature bind-runes—combined symbols for enhanced potency—and words like laþu (possibly "invitation" or a call to divine forces) or alu, alongside phrases such as gibu auja ("give victory" or "I give luck"). For instance, the Vadstena from includes tuwatuwa followed by a futhark sequence, interpreted as a magical formula for against or promotion of regeneration. Bracteates' , including their imitation of Roman coinage and deposition in funerary settings, underscores their amuletic role in warding or invoking supernatural aid. Curse tablets, typically lead sheets inscribed with runes and folded for ritual burial, appear less frequently but echo Roman defixiones in intent, aiming to bind enemies or compel outcomes; examples from the Migration Period include protective or maledictory formulas on small metal or bone objects. Overall, while over 6,000 runic inscriptions are known from Scandinavia, only a small number exhibit clear magical elements, such as nonsensical repetitions or power words, distributed primarily in Sweden (e.g., Uppland hoards), Norway (e.g., bog finds), and Anglo-Saxon England (e.g., urns and rings). These artifacts' contexts—weapons for battle charms, jewelry for personal protection, and grave goods for the afterlife—suggest runes functioned as amulets to harness symbolic or supernatural power in daily and ritual life.

Medieval Scandinavian Texts

Medieval from the Christian era, particularly the 13th-century Icelandic sagas, preserves retrospective accounts of runic magic, often attributing supernatural powers to in narratives set during the pagan . These texts, composed by Christian authors, blend historical memory with mythological elements, portraying as tools for protection, healing, and harm. While not direct eyewitness reports, they reflect enduring cultural beliefs in runic efficacy, bridging pre-Christian practices with later folk traditions. In the 13th-century Egils saga Skallagrímssonar, the poet-warrior employs for protective and curative purposes. In one episode, harmful runes carved on a whalebone and placed under the pillow of a girl named cause her severe illness; Egill scrapes them off, carves new healing runes on a fresh piece of whalebone using his blood, and places it on her chest, restoring her health. These actions illustrate runes as active agents in warding off supernatural threats and reversing malevolent magic, emphasizing the need for skilled practitioners. Another incident involves Egill inscribing runes on a poisoned during a feast, causing it to shatter and revealing the treachery, underscoring runes' role in detection and defense. Similarly, the legendary (likely 14th century, drawing on earlier traditions) depicts in acts of deception and cursing. A smith, tasked with conveying a runic message of alliance between Queen and King Hrólfr, alters the inscription to proclaim enmity instead, invoking death upon the messengers and escalating conflict. This narrative underscores the perceived potency of in binding oaths or unleashing curses, where even minor changes could invoke fatal consequences. Snorri Sturluson's (c. 1220s), a scholarly compendium of Norse poetics, integrates runic elements into its discussion of skaldic verse. In Skáldskaparmál, Snorri attributes to the invention of used in incantatory songs for victory in battle and , suggesting that poets and priests chanted runic formulas to enhance their power. These references frame not only as script but as integral to ritualistic , preserving pagan lore within a Christian framework. Under Christian influence, adapted and endured in vernacular magic, particularly in . The 16th-17th century Galdrabók compiles spells incorporating for practical ends, such as healing ailments through inscribed sigils or inflicting harm via formulas blending Norse and Christian elements. These texts demonstrate runic survival in syncretic folk magic, where pagan symbols coexisted with prayers to saints. By the , Christian authorities in prohibited pagan as idolatrous, promoting in ecclesiastical and legal contexts, which accelerated their official decline. Nonetheless, runic knowledge persisted in isolated rural traditions, manifesting in protective charms and oral lore well into the .

Core Concepts and Practices

Symbolic Meanings and Powers Attributed to Runes

In medieval Scandinavian and Anglo-Saxon traditions, rune poems served as key sources for attributing symbolic meanings and supernatural powers to individual runes, often linking them to natural forces, moral qualities, and divine entities. The , preserved in a 10th-century , describes each rune through enigmatic stanzas that evoke its perceived essence and potential influence on human affairs. For instance, the rune os (ᚩ), representing the mouth or speech, is portrayed as the "source of all , a pillar of and a comfort to the wise," symbolizing divine inspiration and the power of eloquent words to invoke higher truths or persuasive authority. Similarly, thorn (ᚦ, corresponding to thurisaz), is depicted as a sharp, painful obstacle that "slashes the flesh of an unlucky man," embodying disruptive forces akin to giants (thursar) in , capable of both harm and protective barriers against chaos. The Norwegian Rune Poem, a 12th-century composition blending pagan and Christian elements, further elaborates these associations, emphasizing runes' ties to gods and cosmic order. Týr (ᛏ, tiwaz) is characterized as "a one-handed god; often has the south wind as his helper," evoking the deity 's sacrifice for and cosmic stability, with the rune invoked for righteous or legal resolution. Íss (ᛁ) and other runes connect to seasonal forces, such as ice representing harsh winter trials that test endurance, while ár (ᛅ) signifies a bountiful year, aligning with agricultural cycles and . Óðal (ᛟ), denoting ancestral land, symbolizes enduring heritage and familial bonds, believed to safeguard inheritance through its invocation in lore. Expanding on individual runes, ansuz (ᚨ) draws from Eddic traditions to represent divine breath or Odin's communicative , as seen in stanzas portraying it as the "oldest of " or a conduit for prophetic insight, enabling seers to channel ly counsel. Ingwaz (ᛝ), linked to the Freyr (also called ), embodies fertility and harmonious growth, described in poems as a seed of prosperity that fosters peace and abundance in human endeavors. These correspondences extend to broader cosmic forces in Eddic poetry, where embody elemental powers—such as laguz (ᛚ) for fluid life forces or eihwaz (ᛇ) for yew's enduring strength—mirroring the universe's interconnected energies as outlined in . Bind-runes, formed by overlapping multiple runes into composite sigils, were attributed amplified powers in historical accounts, particularly for or . Such sigils were believed to concentrate the individual ' energies, as evidenced in references to carved amulets warding off harm by merging symbols of strength and disruption. Phonetic magic, known as , harnessed ' powers through vocalization, where chanting their names or shapes invoked supernatural effects. In the , details Odin's acquisition of runic knowledge, including galdr chants that "sing all songs" to heal, bind, or calm storms, emphasizing sound as a vibrational force tied to creation. The rune óðal (ᛟ), for example, was intoned in galdr to affirm heritage and ancestral protection, its phonetic utterance believed to reinforce familial legacies against misfortune. This practice underscored not merely as letters but as sonic keys to cosmic forces, blending utterance with intent to manifest outcomes like fertility from ingwaz or disruption from .

Types and Methods of Historical Rune Magic

Historical rune magic encompassed a range of practical techniques aimed at invoking , harm, , or foresight, as evidenced by archaeological artifacts and literary accounts from the and earlier Germanic periods. These methods often involved inscribing on various materials to harness their perceived inherent powers, with intentions varying from personal safeguarding to communal rituals. While is fragmentary, combining epigraphic finds with textual descriptions from sagas and Roman ethnographies reveals a structured yet esoteric practice performed in specific social and ritual contexts. Amuletic uses of runes focused primarily on protection against supernatural threats or physical dangers, with inscriptions carved on portable objects or structural elements to ward off harm. For instance, a wooden stick from , , dating to the 12th century but reflecting earlier traditions, bears the inscription "I cut runes of help, I cut runes of , once against the elves, twice against the trolls, thrice against the ogres," intended to shield the user from malevolent beings associated with illness and misfortune. Similarly, lead amulets from medieval , such as those analyzed in studies of exorcistic charms, incorporated runic formulas to counter elf-shot—a condition attributed to elf-induced ailments—demonstrating runes' role in prophylactic magic. Maritime protections appear in inscriptions on ship timbers and related artifacts, where runes were thought to avert drowning or , as inferred from the practical contexts of Viking seafaring and the prevalence of such finds in coastal sites. Curses and bindings employed runes to invoke harm or constrain enemies, often through defixio-like inscriptions that paralleled Roman curse tablets. In literary sources, such as Egil's Saga, the protagonist Egill Skallagrímsson erects a nithing pole topped with a horse's head and carves runes to curse King Eiríkr blóðøx and Queen Gunnhildr, directing harm toward their domain and invoking Odin's wrath to drive them from Norway. These bindings, known as bandrúnir, combined runic sequences with ritual objects to amplify their potency, underscoring runes' dual role in both benevolent and malevolent applications. Healing and empowerment practices utilized to restore vitality or enhance strength, frequently carved on the body, tools, or everyday items to channel restorative energies. In , Egill cures a gravely ill girl by removing harmful carved by an unskilled practitioner on a whalebone beneath her bed, then inscribing fresh on her forehead and palms while reciting incantations, leading to her swift recovery. Archaeological evidence supports this, with on bones and metal objects from sites interpreted as charms for physical empowerment, such as vitality in battle or labor, where were applied to weapons or personal adornments to bolster the bearer's resilience. Divinatory methods involved interpreting runic lots or staves to discern future events or divine will, a practice rooted in early Germanic customs and later elaborated in poetic traditions. The Roman historian , in his 1st-century AD , describes Germanic tribes casting lots by marking fruit-tree branches, dividing them, and interpreting their fall—a method scholars consider a possible precursor to later runic divinatory practices for in or migration. This is echoed in the 8th-9th century Rune Poems, such as the Norwegian and Icelandic versions, which attribute esoteric meanings to individual (e.g., for wealth or for primal force), suggesting their use in meditative or lot-casting rituals to reveal omens, though direct archaeological confirmation remains elusive. Ritual carving enhanced the efficacy of runic magic through preparatory acts and material choices, transforming inscription into a sacred process. Bodily fluids like blood or saliva were applied to runes during carving to infuse them with personal power; in , Egill reddens his carved on a with his own blood to detect poison, while mentions blood mixed with in a on a beam. Specific woods, such as fruit-bearing trees noted by for lot-casting, were preferred for their symbolic fertility and connection to the divine, with carvings often performed on fresh, living material to capture vital essence. These acts were not haphazard but followed esoteric protocols to maximize potency. In social contexts, rune magic was typically executed by specialists known as or rúnmeistari, who held esoteric knowledge and mediated between the mundane and realms. These practitioners, often depicted in sagas as poets or like Egill, operated in both personal healing rites and communal ceremonies, such as erecting memorial stones or protective wards for voyages, reflecting their elevated status in society. Archaeological patterns from rune-stone workshops indicate division of labor, with master carvers overseeing inscriptions that blended memorial, magical, and social functions, underscoring ' integration into elite and collective life.

Modern Revivals and Systems

Early Occult Influences and 19th-Century Developments

The revival of interest in runes during the 19th century was significantly advanced by scholarly efforts in philology and folklore studies, which brought ancient inscriptions to wider attention. Norwegian philologist Sophus Bugge (1833–1907) played a pivotal role through his systematic cataloging of runic inscriptions, beginning in 1864 and culminating in proposals for comprehensive corpus editions that integrated linguistic analysis with cultural context. Similarly, German type designer Rudolf Koch (1876–1934) contributed to popularization in the early 20th century with his 1930 publication The Book of Signs, which illustrated runes alongside other historical symbols, making them accessible for artistic and cultural applications. A key figure in the esoteric reinterpretation of runes was Austrian occultist (1848–1919), who in 1902 introduced the , an invented 18-rune futhark purportedly derived from ancient Germanic sources but deeply infused with nationalist and mystical ideologies. presented this system as a received during a period of blindness following , linking the runes to a supposed primordial wisdom and promoting their use in spiritual and nationalistic rituals. His seminal work, Das Geheimnis der Runen (1908), elaborated on these ideas by fabricating connections to lost ancient lore, blending with symbolism to envision runes as tools for personal and racial enlightenment. These concepts gained traction within the völkisch movements of late 19th- and early 20th-century and , where symbolized ethnic purity and mystical heritage in various societies. The , established in in 1918 as a völkisch group, incorporated runic motifs into its rituals and , drawing on List's Armanen to foster a sense of Germanic revival amid post-World War I turmoil and influencing broader esoteric currents. As the 19th century transitioned into the 20th, Theosophy's emphasis on ancient wisdom traditions indirectly bolstered the runic revival by inspiring , a Germanic offshoot that wove into theories of spirituality and cosmic evolution. Likewise, Aleister Crowley's (1875–1947) broader contributions to , through his Thelemic system and synthesis of global occult practices, provided an indirect catalyst for renewed interest in Germanic elements like within emerging revivalist frameworks.

Divination-Focused Approaches

One prominent example of a divination-focused approach to runic magic emerged in the late 20th century through the work of cultural anthropologist Ralph H. Blum, whose The Book of Runes (1982) popularized rune casting as a tool for personal insight and guidance. Blum adapted the Elder Futhark runes into a set of 25 smooth ceramic or stone tiles, including his innovative addition of a blank rune known as Wyrd, symbolizing the unknown or fate beyond human control. Each rune carries meanings that can be interpreted in upright or reversed positions, emphasizing psychological self-reflection rather than ritual invocation or supernatural intervention. The method outlined by Blum involves drawing a single rune for daily guidance, scattering multiple runes and interpreting their positions relative to each other, or using structured spreads analogous to layouts for deeper inquiries into life's situations. This approach transforms historical concepts of lots—random draws for oracular advice—into an accessible, repeatable practice suitable for modern contexts, without the need for specialized training or ceremonial preparation. Unlike ancient Germanic lots, which described as being annually renewed by carving fresh pieces from fruit-bearing trees to ensure potency, Blum's system employs a fixed, durable set that requires no periodic replacement or refreshment. The focus remains introspective, encouraging users to view as mirrors of personal and potential outcomes rather than direct prophetic revelations. Blum's book achieved significant popularity within circles, selling over 900,000 copies since its initial publication and inspiring a wide array of commercial rune sets for casual . These adaptations diverged further from historical practices by incorporating flexible, user-defined layouts without ties to seasonal or communal rituals. Critics, including runic scholars, have accused Blum's system of ahistorical invention, noting its heavy reliance on the Chinese I Ching for interpretive structures and the lack of evidence for reversals or a blank rune in ancient sources. Such elements, while effective for contemporary psychological , blend non-Germanic influences and overlook the epigraphic and textual sparsity of pre-Christian runic oracles, leading to debates over authenticity in reconstructionist communities.

Esoteric and Reconstructionist Systems

Esoteric and reconstructionist systems of runic magic seek to revive and adapt historical Germanic practices for contemporary spiritual use within heathenry, drawing on linguistic, textual, and archaeological evidence to inform initiatory and frameworks. These approaches prioritize operative magic—techniques intended to influence reality—over purely symbolic or divinatory uses, often emphasizing personal transformation and communal rites rooted in Ásatrú traditions. Practitioners aim to reconstruct rune work as a disciplined esoteric path, integrating it into heathen while critiquing eclectic or diluted interpretations. A pivotal contributor to this reconstruction is , writing under the pseudonym Edred Thorsson, whose Futhark: A Handbook of Rune Magic (1984) outlines a systematic approach to the , incorporating (physical postures aligned with rune shapes), (constructing runes into personal emblems), and (rhythmic chanting of rune names for ). Grounded in Flowers' doctoral research in Germanic from the , the work interprets as carriers of archetypal forces derived from Proto-Indo-European roots and medieval sources like the Icelandic rune poems. In , Flowers established the Rune-Gild as an initiatory order to foster advanced study and practice of these methods, organizing members into hierarchical degrees focused on rune mastery for esoteric development. The Gild's curriculum stresses historical authenticity, using primary texts such as the to explore ' metaphysical dimensions without modern inventions. Stephan Grundy, also known as Kveldulf Gundarsson, advanced these ideas in Teutonic Magic (1990), emphasizing bind-runes—overlapping rune combinations for amplified effects—and operative magic techniques like carving and charging staves to manifest intentions, directly inspired by saga accounts such as those in the Saga of Egil Skallagrímsson where runes heal or harm. Grundy's framework treats runes as dynamic agents of will, requiring precise historical contextualization from to avoid ahistorical speculation. This operative focus aligns with reconstructionist goals, positioning rune magic as a tool for ethical heathen practice rather than passive symbolism. Within Ásatrú and broader heathen communities, runic magic integrates into blots—sacrificial s honoring gods like , the rune-giver—often for protection against misfortune or manifestation of prosperity, such as inscribing protective bind-runes on ritual tools during seasonal offerings. Advanced techniques include constructing rune rows (sequential inscriptions forming spells for specific outcomes, like or ) and meditative contemplation of rune energies to attune practitioners to their subtle forces, fostering inner discipline and ancestral connection while explicitly rejecting syncretisms that impose unrelated esoteric systems. These practices emphasize scholarly rigor, using sources like Snorri Sturluson's Prose Edda to guide ethical application in personal and group workings. More recent works, such as Jan Fries' Revival of the Runes: The Modern Rediscovery and Reinvention of the Germanic Runes (2021), continue to explore the historical and esoteric revivals of runic systems, bridging scholarly analysis with contemporary applications. Such systems have notably influenced organizations like (formerly the Ring of Troth), founded in 1987 by Flowers and James Chisholm as an inclusive heathen body, where runic elements appear in rituals and study programs since the to promote anti-racist, reconstructionist spirituality. 's resources encourage rune and use in blots for communal empowerment, reflecting the Gild's initiatory model while adapting it for diverse practitioners committed to historical fidelity.

Scholarly Debates and Cultural Impact

Authenticity and Interpretation Challenges

Scholars such as R. I. Page have expressed skepticism regarding the extent of historical , asserting that the majority of serve mundane purposes like memorials, ownership marks, or commercial notations, and that notions of inherent magical power are often projections of modern romantic or biases. Page, in his analysis of Anglo-Saxon and Viking runic materials, acknowledges evidence for occasional ritualistic uses but cautions against overinterpreting ambiguous texts as systematically magical. The scarcity of unequivocal evidence further complicates claims of widespread runic magic, with only a small number of the approximately 6,000 known from and related regions explicitly suggesting magical intent, such as protective formulas or invocations. Terms like alu, appearing in nearly two dozen inscriptions on bracteates and other artifacts, exemplify this ambiguity: while some interpret it as a magical denoting or ecstasy, others link it to "ale" or an intoxicating beverage used in rituals, highlighting the interpretive challenges posed by brief, context-lacking texts. Methodological issues in studying runic magic include the difficulties of translating bind-runes, where multiple rune characters are fused into a single for aesthetic or secretive effect, often rendering them illegible without speculative reconstruction and leading to divergent scholarly readings. Additionally, 19th-century profoundly shaped early runic scholarship, as antiquarians and poets like Thomas Percy and imbued with mystical symbolism to evoke a heroic Nordic past, influencing subsequent interpretations and blurring lines between historical evidence and imaginative reconstruction. Among contemporary scholars, a consensus holds that functioned primarily as a practical alphabetic script for from the 2nd to 12th centuries, with magical or applications limited to specific contexts like amulets or , in contrast to scripts such as , which were explicitly sacralized in their cultural origins. Key studies from the , including Page's comprehensive survey in Runes (1987), emphasize philological rigor over esoteric assumptions, classifying potential magical inscriptions based on linguistic patterns rather than presumed efficacy. This approach underscores the need for interdisciplinary caution, integrating , , and to avoid anachronistic attributions.

Contemporary Controversies and Appropriations

One of the most significant controversies surrounding runic magic in the contemporary era stems from its appropriation by Nazi and neo-Nazi groups during , when the (SS) adopted the sig rune (ᛋ) in a doubled form resembling lightning bolts as its primary insignia to evoke notions of strength and purity. The othala rune (ᛟ), symbolizing heritage and inheritance in its original Germanic context, was similarly co-opted by the SS for unit emblems and later by neo-Nazi organizations to promote ethnonationalist ideologies. This historical misuse has led to legal restrictions in , where modified versions of these , such as the seriffed odal, are banned under Section 86a of the as prohibited Nazi symbols, with penalties up to three years imprisonment for non-educational or artistic uses. Ongoing far-right symbolism persists globally, with groups like the Azov Battalion in facing disputed claims of employing rune-like motifs in symbolism amid debates as of 2024, prompting international concerns over their weaponization in conflicts. Within modern Heathenry and Ásatrú communities, debates intensify over the authenticity of occult-inspired rune magic, with many reconstructionist groups rejecting 19th- and 20th-century esoteric systems as inauthentic inventions disconnected from historical Germanic practices. Organizations like emphasize evidence-based rituals drawn from archaeological and textual sources, viewing contemporary magical appropriations—such as those influenced by Guido von List's —as a dilution of pre-Christian traditions rather than genuine revivals. This tension highlights a broader schism, where inclusive Heathen factions actively distance themselves from occult revivals tainted by völkisch , prioritizing communal over individualistic spellwork. Cultural appropriation of extends to their commercialization in tattoos, jewelry, and merchandise, often stripped of and marketed as generic "Viking" aesthetics, which dilutes their cultural significance for Scandinavian descendants. In contrast, indigenous Scandinavian and Heathen reclamation efforts focus on restoring to educational and roles within Nordic heritage contexts, such as through festivals and museums that highlight their pre-Nazi meanings to counter superficial trends. This raises ethical questions about profit-driven uses versus community-led preservation, with scholars noting that non-contextual adoptions exacerbate the symbols' stigmatization. Recent developments from 2024 to 2025 underscore efforts to "decontaminate" through public discourse, including articles and podcasts that delineate historical from neopagan interpretations to reclaim their scholarly value. For instance, analyses in outlets like highlight how bans on overt Nazi symbols in places like have shifted far-right groups toward rune-based iconography, spurring Heathen advocates to promote awareness campaigns distinguishing authentic uses. These initiatives emphasize historical accuracy over syncretic magic, aiming to mitigate ongoing misappropriations in online and geopolitical spaces. Rune scholars and runologists advocate ethical guidelines for their use in , recommending contextual framing that prioritizes archaeological and to prevent reinforcement of harmful stereotypes. The American Association for Runic Studies, for example, promotes lectures and resources that integrate into academic curricula as linguistic artifacts rather than mystical tools, urging educators to address Nazi associations explicitly to foster informed, non-exploitative engagement. Such approaches ensure runic studies contribute to cultural understanding without perpetuating controversies.

References

  1. https://en.natmus.dk/historical-knowledge/denmark/prehistoric-period-until-1050-ad/the-viking-age/religion-magic-death-and-rituals/runic-magic/
  2. https://www.academia.edu/27132258/_Many_a_man_goes_astray_around_those_dark_letters_rune_magic_between_historical_evidence_and_modern_fabrications
  3. https://www.academia.edu/143082260/Rune_Magic_in_the_Sagas_and_H%25C3%25A1vam%25C3%25A1l
  4. https://brill.com/display/title/7539
  5. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history/article/runes-and-rye-administration-in-denmark-and-the-emergence-of-the-younger-futhark-500800/093DF9254A85EB1C206AFC22CBFBD8EA
  6. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:512974/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  7. https://www.academia.edu/52547748/The_Ordering_of_the_Futhark
  8. https://sites.pitt.edu/~dash/havamal.html
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336700650_Inscriptions_In_Old_Norse_Literature
  10. https://wevikings.com/library/ynglinga-saga
  11. https://www.academia.edu/88534775/Beer_Vomit_Blood_and_Poetry_Egils_saga_Chapters_44_45
  12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43343874
  13. https://www.germanicmythology.com/works/merseburgcharms.html
  14. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0083%3Achapter%3D10
  15. https://www.academia.edu/1011850/Runes_in_the_first_century
  16. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Journals/Speculum/32/2/Runes_Yews_and_Magic*.html
  17. https://www.arild-hauge.com/PDF/Runes_And_Runic_Inscriptions_R.I.Page.pdf
  18. https://en.natmus.dk/historical-knowledge/denmark/prehistoric-period-until-1050-ad/the-early-iron-age/the-weapon-deposit-from-vimose/the-soldiers-personal-equipment/
  19. https://www.academia.edu/4146351/_Bracteates_and_Runes_with_Henrik_Williams_Futhark_International_Journal_of_Runic_Studies_3_2012_2013_151_213
  20. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2046&context=honorstheses
  21. https://sagadb.org/egils_saga.en
  22. https://www.academia.edu/62587524/Persistent_Motifs_of_Cursing_from_Old_Norse_Literature_in_Buslub%25C5%2593n
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fh7tt
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48611800
  25. https://www.academia.edu/23726645/Galdrabok_an_icelandic_grimoire
  26. https://www.academia.edu/12929585/Medieval_Scandinavia_From_Conversion_to_Reformation_circa_800_1500
  27. https://oldenglishpoetry.camden.rutgers.edu/the-rune-poem/
  28. https://www.academia.edu/37327594/The_Norwegian_Rune_Poem_in_context_structure_style_and_imagery
  29. https://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0308.pdf
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48612322
  31. https://storage.googleapis.com/mnhs-org-support/mn_history_articles/40/v40i02p049-058.pdf
  32. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Elves-and-Exorcism%253A-Runic-and-Other-Lead-Amulets-in-Simek/33b1c743650bc16b622680740017d7a1c98d3f69
  33. https://katalogue.anoma.li/documents/macleod-runic.pdf
  34. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004486805/B9789004486805_s005.pdf
  35. https://sagy.vikingove.cz/en/i-carve-healing-runes/
  36. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:381122/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  37. https://academic.oup.com/book/48033/chapter/420466979
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249414874_OPIR_-_A_VIKING_AGE_WORKSHOP_FOR_RUNE_STONE_PRODUCTION_IN_CENTRAL_SWEDEN_A_Study_of_Division_of_Labour_by_Surface_Structure_Analysis
  39. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1722790/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  40. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/DGWO/DGWE-212.xml?language=en
  41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1899474
  42. https://academic.oup.com/book/8721
  43. https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780312536763/thebookofrunes25thanniversaryedition/
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317228575_Runecasting_Runic_Guidebooks_as_Gothic_Literature_and_the_Other_Gothic_Revival
  45. https://stephenedredflowers.substack.com/p/on-the-runic-revival
  46. https://www.rune-gild.org/
  47. https://www.amazon.com/Futhark-Handbook-Magic-Edred-Thorsson/dp/0877285489
  48. https://www.runa-raven.co.uk/
  49. https://library.runestone.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Runestone_-June-2023_Njordshof.pdf
  50. https://heathensoullore.net/the-mood-of-the-runes/
  51. https://www.amazon.com/Revival-Runes-Rediscovery-Reinvention-Germanic/dp/1644111780
  52. https://thetroth.org/
  53. https://thetroth.org/resources/beliefs/
  54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27706432
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248934761_Letters_in_a_Strange_Character_Runes_Rocks_and_Romanticism
  56. https://archive.org/details/runes0000page
  57. https://www.vikingrune.com/2009/07/norse-runic-third-reich-symbols/
  58. https://www.adl.org/resources/hate-symbol/othala-rune
  59. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/29513
  60. https://www.propastop.org/en/2024/06/13/runes-in-modern-warfare-ideological-and-propaganda-weapon/
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345180524_Creating_a_Religion_The_Emergence_and_Development_of_Late_Twentieth_Century_Asatru
  62. https://www.norsemyth.org/2021/09/articles-of-faith-american-heathenry.html
  63. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=irj
  64. https://www.norwegianamerican.com/viking-symbols-stolen-racists/
  65. https://journal.fi/ar/article/view/131412
  66. https://www.uslanguageservices.com/blog/the-modern-application-of-runes-futhark-in-the-21st-century/
  67. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/sep/13/rune-megaphone-number-88-australia-neo-nazi-symbols-after-swastikas-banned-ntwnfb
  68. https://runicstudies.org/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.