Hubbry Logo
Ruthenium tetroxideRuthenium tetroxideMain
Open search
Ruthenium tetroxide
Community hub
Ruthenium tetroxide
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Ruthenium tetroxide
Ruthenium tetroxide
Ruthenium tetroxide
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Ruthenium(VIII) oxide
Names
IUPAC name
Ruthenium(VIII) oxide
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
ChemSpider
ECHA InfoCard 100.039.815 Edit this at Wikidata
EC Number
  • 243-813-8
UNII
  • InChI=1S/4O.Ru
    Key: GJFMDWMEOCWXGJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
  • O=[Ru](=O)(=O)=O
Properties
RuO4
Molar mass 165.07 g/mol
Appearance yellow easily melting solid
Odor pungent ozone like
Density 3.29 g/cm3
Melting point 25.5[1] °C (77.9 °F; 298.6 K)
Boiling point 129.6[2] °C (265.3 °F; 402.8 K)
2% w/v at 20 °C
Solubility in other solvents Soluble in
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Structure
tetrahedral
zero
Hazards
NFPA 704 (fire diamond)
NFPA 704 four-colored diamondHealth 3: Short exposure could cause serious temporary or residual injury. E.g. chlorine gasFlammability 0: Will not burn. E.g. waterInstability 1: Normally stable, but can become unstable at elevated temperatures and pressures. E.g. calciumSpecial hazards (white): no code
3
0
1
Safety data sheet (SDS) external MSDS sheet
Related compounds
Related compounds
 Ruthenium dioxide
Ruthenium trichloride
Osmium tetroxide
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
checkY verify (what is checkY☒N ?)

Ruthenium tetroxide is the inorganic compound with the formula RuO4. It is a yellow volatile solid that melts near room temperature.[3] It has the odor of ozone.[4] Samples are typically black due to impurities. The analogous OsO4 is more widely used and better known. It is also the anhydride of hyperruthenic acid (H2RuO5). One of the few solvents in which RuO4 forms stable solutions is CCl4.[5]

Preparation

[edit]

RuO4 is prepared by oxidation of ruthenium(III) chloride with NaIO4.[3] The reaction initially produces sodium diperiodo­dihydroxo­ruthenate(VI), which then decomposes in acid solution to the tetroxide:[6]

2 Ru3+(aq) + 5 IO4−(aq) + 3 H2O(l) → 2 RuO4(s) + 5 IO3−(aq) + 6 H+(aq)[7]

Due to its challenging reactivity, RuO4 is always generated in situ and used in catalytic quantities, at least in organic reactions.[5]

Structure

[edit]

RuO4 forms two crystal structures, one with cubic symmetry and another with monoclinic symmetry, isotypic to OsO4. The molecule adopts a tetrahedral geometry, with the Ru–O distances ranging from 169 to 170 pm.[8]

Uses

[edit]

Isolation of ruthenium from ores

[edit]

The main commercial value of RuO4 is as an intermediate in the production of ruthenium compounds and metal from ores. Like other platinum group metals (PGMs), ruthenium occurs at low concentrations and often mixed with other PGMs. Together with OsO4, it is separated from other PGMs by distillation of a chlorine-oxidized extract. Ruthenium is separated from OsO4 by reducing RuO4 with hydrochloric acid, a process that exploits the highly positive reduction potential for the [RuO4]0/- couple.[9][10]

Organic chemistry

[edit]

RuO4 is of specialized value in organic chemistry because it oxidizes virtually any hydrocarbon.[11] For example, it will oxidize adamantane to 1-adamantanol. Because it is such an aggressive oxidant, reaction conditions must be mild, generally room temperature. Although a strong oxidant, RuO4 oxidations do not perturb stereocenters that are not oxidized. Illustrative is the oxidation of the following diol to a carboxylic acid:

Oxidation of epoxy alcohols also occurs without degradation of the epoxide ring:

Under milder conditions, oxidative reaction yields aldehydes instead. RuO4 readily converts secondary alcohols into ketones. Although similar results can be achieved with other cheaper oxidants such as PCC- or DMSO-based oxidants, RuO4 is ideal when a very vigorous oxidant is needed, but mild conditions must be maintained. It is used in organic synthesis to oxidize internal alkynes to 1,2-diketones, and terminal alkynes along with primary alcohols to carboxylic acids. When used in this fashion, the ruthenium(VIII) oxide is used in catalytic amounts and regenerated by the addition of sodium periodate to ruthenium(III) chloride and a solvent mixture of acetonitrile, water and carbon tetrachloride. RuO4 readily cleaves double bonds to yield carbonyl products, in a manner similar to ozonolysis. OsO4, a more familiar oxidant that is structurally similar to RuO4, does not cleave double bonds, instead producing vicinal diol products. However, with short reaction times and carefully controlled conditions, RuO4 can also be used for dihydroxylation.[12]

Because RuO4 degrades the "double bonds" of arenes (especially electron-rich ones) by dihydroxylation and cleavage of the C-C bond in a way few other reagents can, it is useful as a "deprotection" reagent for carboxylic acids that are masked as aryl groups (typically phenyl or p-methoxyphenyl). Because the fragments formed are themselves readily oxidizable by RuO4, a substantial fraction of the arene carbon atoms undergo exhaustive oxidation to form carbon dioxide. Consequently, multiple equivalents of the terminal oxidant (often in excess of 10 equivalents per aryl ring) are required to achieve complete conversion to the carboxylic acid, limiting the practicality of the transformation.[13][14][15]

Although used as a direct oxidant, due to the relatively high cost of RuO4 it is also used catalytically with a cooxidant. For an oxidation of cyclic alcohols with RuO4 as a catalyst and bromate as oxidant under basic conditions, RuO4 is first activated by hydroxide, turning into the hyperruthenate anion:[16]

RuO4 + OH− → HRuO5−

The reaction proceeds via a glycolate complex.

Other uses

[edit]

Ruthenium tetroxide is a potential staining agent. It is used to expose latent fingerprints by turning to the brown/black ruthenium dioxide when in contact with fatty oils or fats contained in sebaceous contaminants of the print.[17]

Gaseous release by nuclear accidents

[edit]

Because of the very high volatility of ruthenium tetroxide (RuO
4) ruthenium radioactive isotopes with their relative short half-life are considered as the second most hazardous gaseous isotopes after iodine-131 in case of release by a nuclear accident.[18][4][19] The two most important radioactive isotopes of ruthenium are 103Ru and 106Ru. They have half-lives of 39.6 days and 373.6 days, respectively.[4]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ruthenium tetroxide

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Ruthenium tetroxide is an inorganic compound with the chemical formula RuO₄, featuring a tetrahedral structure where a central ruthenium(VIII) atom is bonded to four oxygen atoms. It manifests as a yellow, diamagnetic crystalline solid that sublimes at room temperature and melts at approximately 25.4 °C, rendering it highly volatile with an ozone-like odor. As a potent oxidizing agent, it finds primary application in organic synthesis for selective oxidations, such as converting internal alkynes to 1,2-diketones, cleaving carbon-carbon bonds in alkenes, and facilitating dihydroxylation or epoxidation reactions under controlled conditions. Typically generated in situ from ruthenium(III) precursors like ruthenium trichloride and co-oxidants such as sodium periodate or sodium hypochlorite to minimize handling risks, its reactivity stems from the high oxidation state of ruthenium, enabling mild yet efficient transformations. However, its extreme reactivity poses significant hazards, including explosiveness upon contact with organic matter, toxicity comparable to but less severe than osmium tetroxide, and irritation to eyes and respiratory tract from vapors, necessitating strict ventilation and precautionary measures. Beyond synthesis, it serves niche roles in electron microscopy for staining polymers and biological tissues due to its ability to degrade and contrast organic materials.

Properties

Physical properties

Ruthenium tetroxide is a golden- crystalline solid at temperatures below its of 25.4 °C. It transitions to a upon and boils at 129.6 °C under standard pressure. The compound exhibits high volatility, sublimes at , and possesses a of approximately 6.4 at 20 °C. The of solid tetroxide is 3.29 g/cm³. It shows limited in , approximately 2% w/v (or 2.03 g/100 mL) at 20 °C, but is freely soluble in nonpolar solvents such as and . These properties contribute to its characteristic acrid and ease of , necessitating careful handling in controlled environments.

Chemical properties

Ruthenium tetroxide (RuO4) functions as a highly potent , capable of reacting with virtually any , including the oxidative cleavage of alkenes and even rings under appropriate conditions. This reactivity extends to the conversion of secondary alcohols to ketones in neutral media, as demonstrated in oxidations, and the degradation of tertiary amines as an alternative to traditional methods like von Braun degradation. In catalytic applications, RuO4 facilitates selective oxidations such as of olefins and cleavage of carbon-carbon double bonds when generated from precursors like trichloride and . The compound exhibits limited stability, being thermodynamically less stable than RuO2 and prone to decomposition, particularly in gaseous form under air or steam conditions, with half-lives reported as 5 hours at 363 K and 9 hours at 313 K. Explosive decomposition has been observed at temperatures around 381 K (108°C), attributed to rapid release of oxygen. Despite this instability, decomposition kinetics are relatively slow at ambient containment conditions, allowing short-term handling in controlled environments. RuO4 reacts vigorously with organic materials and reducing agents, necessitating isolation from incompatibles to prevent spontaneous ignition or violent reactions. In aqueous media, it shows sparing solubility and slow hydrolysis tendencies, often employed in biphasic systems for oxidations without rapid decomposition.

Synthesis and preparation

Laboratory methods

Ruthenium tetroxide is commonly prepared in the laboratory by oxidizing ruthenium(III) chloride hydrate (RuCl₃·xH₂O) with sodium metaperiodate (NaIO₄) in a biphasic solvent system of (CCl₄), (CH₃CN), and water (typically in a 2:2:3 volume ratio). This method, developed by Carlsen, Pinnick, and Sharpless in , generates RuO₄ in situ at , yielding the yellow, volatile compound that partitions into the organic phase for extraction or immediate use. The reaction proceeds via initial formation of a perruthenate(VII) intermediate, followed by or further oxidation to Ru(VIII), with NaIO₄ serving as both oxidant and phase-transfer facilitator. For stoichiometric preparation, equimolar amounts of RuCl₃ and excess NaIO₄ (e.g., 1.5–2 equivalents) are employed in aqueous media at 0–25°C, allowing RuO₄ to be isolated by distillation under reduced pressure due to its low boiling point (approximately 40°C). Alternatively, ruthenium dioxide (RuO₂) can substitute as the ruthenium source, oxidized directly with NaIO₄ in water or acetone-water mixtures, often at mildly elevated temperatures (25–40°C) to enhance solubility and reaction rate. These conditions minimize over-oxidation side products, such as CO₂ from solvent decomposition, by maintaining open systems and controlling oxidant stoichiometry. Other laboratory routes include oxidation of ruthenates (e.g., NaRuO₄) with in at ambient conditions, producing RuO₄ quantitatively for . Less common variants employ or as oxidants with RuCl₃ in acidic media, though these require careful pH control (typically 1–3) to prevent of ruthenium oxides. All methods emphasize handling under fume hoods due to RuO₄'s and explosivity in concentrated form.

Industrial production

Ruthenium tetroxide (RuO4) is generated industrially mainly as a volatile intermediate during the recovery and purification of from metal ores, concentrates, or spent catalysts, leveraging its high volatility ( approximately 40 °C) for separation from less volatile impurities. A key method involves oxidizing crude powder by introducing ozone-containing gas while simultaneously adding (HOCl), which forms RuO4 for subsequent and purification steps to yield high-purity metal (up to 99.999% purity). In another approach, ruthenium-bearing alkaline solutions (e.g., containing ruthenate ions, RuO42-) are acidified with and treated with an oxidant such as or to produce RuO4, which is then distilled under controlled conditions (typically at temperatures around 100–110 °C) to isolate it from other metals like and . The distilled RuO4 is rarely isolated as a stable product due to its instability and ; instead, it is immediately reduced (e.g., via or ) to ruthenium metal or hydrated ruthenium dioxide (RuO2·xH2O) for commercial applications in and .

Structure and bonding

Molecular geometry

Ruthenium tetroxide (RuO₄) exhibits a , with the central ruthenium(VIII) atom coordinated to four oxygen atoms at the vertices of a regular . This structure is characteristic of group 8 tetroxides, analogous to (OsO₄), and is confirmed by vibrational and computational modeling assuming Td symmetry. In the gas phase, RuO₄ exists as discrete monomeric molecules, with Ru–O bond lengths approximately 1.72 Å based on calculations and data. In the solid state, two crystalline modifications of RuO₄ have been identified, both comprising isolated tetrahedral RuO₄ molecules packed in a cubic (RuO₄-I, P4₃32, a = 8.509 ) or monoclinic (RuO₄-II) lattice, without significant intermolecular bonding distortions. The tetrahedral arrangement minimizes steric repulsion among the electronegative oxygen ligands and stabilizes the high of through multiple bonding interactions, including σ and π contributions. Bond angles are close to the ideal tetrahedral value of 109.5°, with minor deviations in the crystal due to packing effects reported as 109.34° to 109.47° in structural refinements.

Spectroscopic characterization

Ruthenium tetroxide (RuO₄) possesses tetrahedral (T_d) symmetry, resulting in four fundamental vibrational modes: ν₁ (A₁, symmetric stretch, Raman active), ν₂ (E, symmetric bend, Raman active), ν₃ (F₂, asymmetric stretch, IR and Raman active), and ν₄ (F₂, asymmetric bend, IR and Raman active). Infrared and Raman spectroscopy have been primary techniques for characterization, with gas-phase IR spectra providing data on the ν₃ mode, including Coriolis coupling effects and isotopic shifts for ¹⁶O and ¹⁸O variants. The ν₃ asymmetric stretching band centers near 921 cm⁻¹ in the IR spectrum, as determined by high-resolution Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy using synchrotron radiation at 0.001 cm⁻¹ resolution. This analysis covers the five primary stable Ru isotopologues (⁹⁹RuO₄, ¹⁰⁰RuO₄, ¹⁰¹RuO₄, ¹⁰²RuO₄, ¹⁰⁴RuO₄), with effective Hamiltonian models fitting rovibrational lines to derive precise parameters and estimate centers for minor (⁹⁷RuO₄, ⁹⁸RuO₄) and radioactive (¹⁰³RuO₄, ¹⁰⁶RuO₄) species. Raman spectra of liquid and vapor phases confirm active modes, supporting force field calculations that refine bonding interactions. Electronic reveals UV-Vis absorption bands attributable to metal-to-ligand charge transfer transitions in the region. photoelectron further elucidates energies, highlighting the influence of Ru-O on potentials. No routine NMR characterization exists due to Ru's low natural abundance of NMR-active isotopes and quadrupolar broadening effects.

Applications

Ruthenium extraction from ores

Ruthenium is extracted commercially from platinum group metal (PGM) concentrates obtained by processing primary sulfide ores, such as those from the Bushveld Complex in or in , where it co-occurs with , , and other PGMs at concentrations typically below 1 ppm in raw ore. Ore beneficiation via flotation yields a PGM-rich concentrate, which is smelted into a matte and then leached with acids like or to dissolve the metals into solution, producing a or liquor containing mixed PGMs. In this hydrometallurgical refining stage, ruthenium tetroxide (RuO4) plays a central role in ruthenium isolation due to its high volatility ( approximately 40°C), enabling distillation-based separation from less volatile PGM species like , , and . The separation process begins with oxidation of in the PGM liquor, often as potassium ruthenate(VI) (K2RuO4) or hexachlororuthenate(III) (K3RuCl6), using gas (Cl2) at near-neutral to form RuO4. The solution is heated to drive off the yellow RuO4 vapor, which is distilled and absorbed into dilute (typically 1:1 HCl), where it reacts to form water-soluble chlororuthenate complexes such as H3RuCl6. Alternative oxidants like in media have been used in variants, with distillation conducted at temperatures for 1-2 hours to achieve near-complete volatilization. This step is performed early in refining to reduce ruthenium content below 50 ppm in the residue, minimizing contamination in subsequent PGM precipitations or extractions. Recovered ruthenium from the distillate is precipitated as hydrated ruthenium(IV) oxide by adjusting pH to around 6 and adding reducing agents like sulfur dioxide, followed by calcination to RuO2 and hydrogen reduction to metallic ruthenium at high temperatures. Industrial recoveries exceed 99% under optimized conditions, as demonstrated in controlled distillations yielding 100% of input ruthenium with minimal losses to other PGMs. The method's efficacy stems from RuO4's selective volatility under oxidative acidic conditions, though it requires careful handling due to the compound's oxidizing and potentially explosive nature. This distillation remains a cornerstone of ruthenium recovery in PGM refineries, applied to both primary ore-derived feeds and secondary sources like spent catalysts.

Organic synthesis

Ruthenium tetroxide (RuO4) functions as a potent oxidant in , enabling the transformation of various functional groups under controlled conditions. It is commonly generated from (III) chloride or ruthenium dioxide using co-oxidants like (NaIO4) or (NaOCl) in biphasic solvent systems, such as //, to facilitate catalytic use. This approach mitigates the need for stoichiometric RuO4, which is explosive in pure form, while allowing fine-tuning of reaction selectivity through adjustment and solvent choice. A primary application involves the oxidation of primary alcohols to carboxylic acids and secondary alcohols to ketones, often proceeding via intermediates that are further oxidized under the reaction conditions. For instance, RuO4-catalyzed oxidation with NaIO4 converts aliphatic and benzylic alcohols quantitatively to the corresponding acids or ketones, demonstrating high efficiency even for hindered substrates. Unlike milder reagents, RuO4 resists stopping at the stage for primary alcohols unless specific stabilizers are employed. In alkene chemistry, RuO4 mediates syn-dihydroxylation to cis-diols, akin to osmium tetroxide but with broader substrate tolerance under acidic conditions enhanced by additives like cerium(III) chloride. Yields reach 80-95% for terminal and internal alkenes using catalytic RuO4 in brief reaction times. It also performs oxidative cleavage of C=C bonds to carbonyl products, including aldehydes, ketones, or carboxylic acids, particularly effective for electron-deficient alkenes via the Sharpless protocol (RuCl3/NaIO4). For alkynes, internal and terminal variants are cleaved to carboxylic acids using RuO2/Oxone in mixed solvents. Additional transformations include ketohydroxylation of olefins to α-hydroxy ketones with favoring the less substituted carbon, achieving good yields (up to 85%) under Plietker's conditions. RuO4 further enables oxidative cyclizations of dienes and polyenes to tetrahydrofurans or related heterocycles, as seen in the stereoselective polycyclization of geranyl substrates to tris-tetrahydrofuran products. Oxidation of cyclic amines yields lactams, while secondary amines form nitrones, expanding its utility in nitrogen-containing compound synthesis. These reactions underscore RuO4's versatility, though its reactivity demands careful control to avoid over-oxidation of sensitive groups like aromatics or ethers.

Catalytic and other uses

Ruthenium tetroxide acts as a in titrations, for instance facilitating the oxidation of arsenious by ceric , though requiring potentiometric detection for accurate endpoint determination due to the absence of a sharp color change. It has also been applied catalytically to oxidize samples under mild conditions, selectively cleaving aromatic structures to produce identifiable aliphatic, di-, tri-, and tetracarboxylic acids that aid in . Similarly, catalytic amounts enable the oxidation of natural organic macromolecules, regenerating the active species via co-oxidants like . Beyond analytical oxidations, tetroxide catalyzes the destruction of environmental pollutants, including volatile organic compounds in gaseous and aqueous phases, leveraging its high reactivity for complete mineralization. In forensic applications, tetroxide fumes react with organic components of latent fingerprints on diverse substrates, reducing to brown-black dioxide for visualization without requiring subsequent . This method exploits the compound's volatility and selective reactivity with lipids and residues, offering sensitivity on non-porous surfaces where traditional techniques falter.

Safety, toxicity, and hazards

Health effects

Ruthenium tetroxide is highly , primarily through of its volatile vapors, which cause irritation to the eyes and . Direct eye contact results in substantial but temporary injury, while or is harmful, potentially leading to systemic effects requiring medical attention. As a strong , exposure may produce irritation or burns upon contact with moist tissues or , though specific dermal toxicity data are limited. Compared to , ruthenium tetroxide exhibits lower overall toxicity, with fewer reports of permanent damage such as blindness or severe . No quantitative measures like LD50 values or chronic exposure thresholds are established in available safety data, reflecting sparse toxicological research; however, symptoms may be delayed, necessitating observation for at least 48 hours post-exposure. There is no indication of carcinogenicity or specific to the compound.

Handling and storage precautions

Ruthenium tetroxide (RuO4) must be handled exclusively within a chemical equipped for volatile oxidizers, as its vapors are highly toxic and irritating to the eyes and . Operators should wear chemical-resistant gloves, safety goggles, and protective clothing to prevent skin and , while avoiding by maintaining strict ventilation. In case of spillage, the material should be immediately decomposed using a such as solution, followed by thorough decontamination, due to its strong oxidizing properties and reactivity with organic materials like grease, paper, or alcohols. Pure RuO4 is generally unsuitable for long-term storage owing to its volatility—it sublimes readily at (melting point approximately 25°C)—and potential for decomposition, leading most laboratories to generate it from precursors like trichloride rather than storing the neat compound. Stabilized aqueous solutions (e.g., 0.5% RuO4) should be kept in tightly sealed containers in a , shielded from direct and incompatible reducing agents or organics, to minimize and degradation. Storage areas must be cool, dry, and well-ventilated, with containers labeled clearly and segregated from flammables or combustibles to mitigate risks of ignition or violent reaction.

Explosive and reactive risks

Ruthenium tetroxide (RuO4) is classified as a strong oxidizer under GHS criteria, capable of causing fire or explosion through its interaction with combustible materials or reducing agents. Its thermodynamic instability relative to RuO2 and O2 predisposes it to spontaneous decomposition, particularly in solid or undiluted liquid forms, which can occur explosively at upon drying, shocking, or mechanical disturbance. The neat liquid decomposes explosively above 106 °C, and violent reactions ensue with strong reductants such as hydriodic acid or , potentially forming explosive products. Contact with , including , , or fibers, can ignite spontaneously due to its potent oxidizing capacity, amplifying risks in laboratory or industrial settings where such materials are present. In applications, RuO4's reactivity toward aromatic rings, ethers, and other carbon-based functionalities necessitates generation and catalytic use to prevent uncontrolled exothermic oxidations that could escalate to . Pure RuO4 is rarely handled directly owing to these hazards; stabilized aqueous solutions (e.g., 0.5 wt%) are preferred, though even these require ventilation to avoid vapor accumulation that could promote ignition. kinetics are slow at ambient conditions but accelerate with trace impurities or heat, underscoring the need for inert atmospheres and exclusion of reductants during storage or transfer.

Behavior in nuclear environments

Formation in reactor accidents

Ruthenium tetroxide (RuO4) forms in severe accidents when fission products, such as 103Ru and 106Ru embedded in matrix, are released during degradation and subsequently oxidized under highly oxidizing conditions. These conditions typically arise from air ingress into the reactor core, steam-air interactions at elevated temperatures (above 1000°C), or exposure to strong oxidants like oxides or generated in the accident environment. The oxidation process converts metallic ruthenium or ruthenium dioxide (RuO2) into volatile RuO4, particularly in acidic or neutral aqueous phases with dissolved oxygen or in gaseous phases with sufficient oxidant availability; this volatility enables transport beyond the fuel debris. RuO4 begins volatilizing at around 45°C in acidic solutions and achieves near-complete volatilization by 110°C, facilitating its release from fuel fragments heated during core meltdown. In pressurized water reactor (PWR) scenarios, significant ruthenium release as oxides occurs if the fuel cladding fails and air enters the primary circuit, with experimental data indicating release fractions up to several percent under air/steam atmospheres at 1700–2000 K. Historical evidence from the Chernobyl accident on April 26, 1986, demonstrates RuO4 formation through oxidation of released , followed by reduction to refractory particles upon atmospheric deposition, contributing to widespread ruthenium dispersal. Similarly, modeling of generic severe accidents highlights that RuO4 predominates in containment atmospheres with low concentrations, where reducing conditions are insufficient to stabilize lower oxides like RuO2. Experimental studies confirm that RuO4 yield increases with oxygen and temperature, but interactions with containment surfaces (e.g., or paints) can lead to decomposition and deposition, reducing net airborne transport.

Volatility and release mechanisms

Ruthenium tetroxide (RuO₄) exhibits high volatility due to its gaseous nature under oxidizing conditions, with volatilization beginning at approximately 45°C and approaching completion at 110°C in acidic solutions. This property enables its transport as a vapor phase species, distinguishing it from less volatile ruthenium compounds like RuO₂. In , fission products (primarily isotopes such as ¹⁰³Ru and ¹⁰⁶Ru) are initially incorporated into the UO₂ matrix or metallic precipitates; under severe accident conditions involving core degradation and air ingress, these convert to RuO₄ via oxidation by molecular oxygen or other oxidants at temperatures exceeding 1000°C. Release mechanisms from degraded primarily involve the oxidation of metal or dioxide to RuO₄, followed by through fuel debris pores and evaporation into the or atmosphere. In (PWR) severe accidents, oxidative environments in the reactor cooling system—facilitated by or air —promote RuO₄ formation, allowing up to significant fractions of to volatilize, as observed in experimental simulations with irradiated . Air ingress into the vessel exacerbates this by providing O₂ for the reaction Ru + 2O₂ → RuO₄, enabling rapid release rates that exceed those under steam-only conditions. Once released, RuO₄ can traverse primary circuits and containment via convective flow, though deposition on metallic surfaces (e.g., , aluminum) via catalytic decomposition limits full . Quantitative models indicate that RuO₄ release fractions from can reach 10-50% of initial inventory under prolonged high-temperature oxidation, depending on oxygen availability and debris morphology, as derived from out-of-pile and in-pile experiments. Mechanisms are influenced by kinetic barriers, such as the need for gaseous O₂ penetration into fuel fragments, and thermodynamic favorability of RuO₄ over solid oxides at partial pressures above 10⁻³ . In containment, further release to the environment occurs if systems fail to trap the volatile , as evidenced by post-accident analyses attributing ruthenium plumes to incomplete scrubbing.

Mitigation strategies and research

Mitigation strategies for ruthenium tetroxide (RuO₄) in nuclear environments primarily focus on preventing its release, promoting deposition within structures, and capturing it via or systems to minimize radiological dispersal during severe or reprocessing. In buildings, RuO₄ deposition on metallic surfaces such as aluminum, , and has been identified as a natural retention mechanism, with experimental studies showing varying adsorption efficiencies depending on surface oxidation states and temperature; for instance, oxidized aluminum surfaces exhibit higher retention rates under dry conditions. Filtered venting systems, incorporating iodine filters or metal oxide sorbents, are employed to trap volatile RuO₄, though their efficacy is limited by RuO₄'s strong oxidizing nature, which can degrade organic filter media. In spent reprocessing, evaporation-to-dryness includes off-gas treatment with condensers and designed to condense and neutralize RuO₄, informed by analyses confirming ~90% of released as RuO₄ between 140–170°C alongside oxides. Research on RuO₄ mitigation emphasizes experimental characterization of its volatility, transport, and chemical interactions to refine severe accident source term models. The OECD-NEA Source Term Evaluation and Mitigation (STEM) project conducted vaporization tests at 1200°C, revealing that >95% of Ru deposits as RuO₂ in thermal gradient tubes under steam-air atmospheres, with gaseous RuO₄ comprising ~2% of downstream transport, and abrupt temperature profiles increasing aerosol formation over pure gas-phase release. These findings support integration into codes like ASTEC for probabilistic safety assessments, highlighting RuO₄'s potential for prolonged revaporization over hours without saturation. Complementary studies investigate sorbent performance under varying humidity and temperature, showing enhanced RuO₄ retention on metal oxides at elevated moisture levels, though high temperatures (>200°C) reduce efficacy due to desorption. Ongoing efforts also explore RuO₄ decomposition kinetics in atmospheres mimicking containment conditions, with UV-visible spectroscopy enabling real-time speciation for targeted trapping technologies. International collaborations, including post-Fukushima analyses, prioritize reducing modeling uncertainties in Ru speciation to optimize accident management, such as coolant injection to suppress oxide formation.

References

  1. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Ruthenium-tetroxide
  2. https://www.chemeurope.com/en/encyclopedia/Ruthenium_tetroxide.html
  3. https://www.webelements.com/compounds/ruthenium/ruthenium_tetraoxide.html
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6270930/
  5. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jo00332a045
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/ruthenium-tetroxide
  7. https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_EN_CB1121685.htm
  8. https://www.drugfuture.com/chemdata/ruthenium-tetroxide.html
  9. https://hal.science/hal-04098610/document
  10. https://chemister.ru/Databases/Chemdatabase/properties-en.php?dbid=1&id=4080
  11. https://www.lookchem.com/ProductWholeProperty_LCPL568193.htm
  12. https://www.guidechem.com/encyclopedia/ruthenium-tetroxide-dic419992.html
  13. https://en.chem-station.com/reactions-2/2014/06/ruthenium-tetroxide-ruo4.html
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/244568319_Selectivity_versus_Reactivity_-_Recent_Advances_in_RuO_4_-Catalyzed_Oxidations
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0040402063850097
  16. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jo00878a034
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878535222003793
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0364591622001110
  19. https://asnr.hal.science/file/index/docid/177621/filename/A_Literature_Review_on_Ruthenium_Behaviour_in_Nuclear_Power_Plant_Severe_Accidents_.pdf
  20. https://research.chalmers.se/publication/241683/file/241683_Fulltext.pdf
  21. https://www.lociforensics.nl/images/MSDS_RTX_-_Developer.pdf
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040403910006404
  23. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5248496A/en
  24. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6036741A/en
  25. https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2096084A1/en
  26. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120058043A1/en
  27. https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2023217568A1/en
  28. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1268103
  29. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/50/11/4860/11009617/4860_1_online.pdf
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022459605003373
  31. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991JMoSp.150..218H/abstract
  32. https://wiki.aalto.fi/display/SSC/RuO4
  33. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/50/11/4860/84400/Vibrational-Spectra-and-Force-Field-of-Ruthenium
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022285215000387
  35. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00801a010
  36. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00826a065
  37. https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstreams/395eac0c-0942-4131-af92-c4b303cdd2b5/download
  38. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/8/4/203
  39. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/12/jresv12n3p283_a2b.pdf
  40. https://www.halwachs.de/pgm-refining.htm
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1381514805000830
  42. https://www.organic-chemistry.org/chemicals/oxidations/ruthenium-compounds.shtm
  43. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01557a053
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0039914061801525
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0016236186903327
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0009254191900926
  47. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/matthey/pmr/1983/00000027/00000003/art00006
  48. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/latent-fingerprint-processing-ruthenium-tetroxide-method
  49. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jasti/2/1/2_1_21/_article
  50. https://web.mit.edu/cohengroup/safety/RuO4012010.pdf
  51. https://www.agarscientific.com/media/import/AGR1027_-_Ruthenium_Tetroxide_0_5_%28GB%29.pdf
  52. https://www.echemi.com/sds/ruthenium-tetroxide-pd180521113833.html
  53. https://boeckeler.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/AN_Powertome-and-LN-Ultra_Ruthenium-Tertroxide-Staining-of-Polymers.pdf
  54. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/047084289X.rr009.pub2
  55. https://www.emsdiasum.com/docs/technical/datasheet/20700
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S0364591622001110
  57. https://periodic.lanl.gov/44.shtml
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0016236186902322
  59. https://asnr.hal.science/irsn-00177621v2/document
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022311509004644
  61. https://www.nks.org/scripts/getdocument.php?file=111010111119882
  62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00223131.2015.1120245
  63. https://arhiv.djs.si/proc/bled2009/htm/pdf/0402.pdf
  64. https://cris.vtt.fi/en/publications/ruthenium-behaviour-in-severe-nuclear-accident-conditions-final-r
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0265931X19303911
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0149197009001577
  67. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223131.2015.1120245
  68. https://asnr.hal.science/irsn-00177621v1/document
  69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306454914003417
  70. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024JRNC..333..235O/abstract
  71. https://asnr.hal.science/irsn-04113171/document
  72. https://asnr.hal.science/irsn-04433720/document
  73. https://rdreview.jaea.go.jp/navi_en/rd_e2024_12-1.html
  74. https://www.oecd-nea.org/upload/docs/application/pdf/2021-02/csni-r2018-6.pdf
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S0022311524000436
  76. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00223131.2020.1780991
  77. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/nuclearengineering/article/4/2/020903/442455/Research-Works-on-Iodine-and-Ruthenium-Behavior-in
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.