Hubbry Logo
LajjunLajjunMain
Open search
Lajjun
Community hub
Lajjun
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Lajjun
Lajjun
Lajjun
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Lajjun or Lejjun (Arabic: اللجّون, el-Lejjūn) was a large Palestinian Arab village located 16 kilometers (9.9 mi) northwest of Jenin and 1 kilometer (0.62 mi) south of the remains of the biblical city of Megiddo. The Israeli kibbutz of Megiddo was built 600 metres north-east of the depopulated village on the hill called Dhahrat ed-Dar starting from 1949.

Key Information

The initial settlement grew next to a Roman legion camp, known simply as "Legio", used by the Legio VI Ferrata, for which it provided services.[3] Named after the camp, Lajjun's history of habitation spanned some 1,800 years, from the 2nd century during the Roman province of Syria Palaestina, to the 20th century.[3] Under Abbasid rule it was the capital of a subdistrict, during Mamluk rule it served as an important station in the postal route, and during Ottoman rule it was the capital of a district that bore its name. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire towards the end of World War I, Lajjun and all of Palestine was placed under the administration of the British Mandate. The village was depopulated during the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, when it was captured by Israel. Most of its residents subsequently fled and settled in the nearby town of Umm al-Fahm.

Etymology

[edit]

The name Lajjun derives from the Roman name Legio, referring to the Roman legion stationed there. In the 3rd century, the town was renamed Maximianopolis ("City of Maximian") by Diocletian in honor of Maximian, his co-emperor,[4] but the inhabitants continued to use the old name. Under the Caliphate, the name was Arabicized into al-Lajjûn or el-Lejjûn,[5] which was used until the Crusaders conquered Palestine in 1099. The Crusaders restored the Roman name Legio, and introduced new names such as Ligum and le Lyon, but after the town was reconquered by the Muslims in 1187,[6] al-Lajjun once again became its name.

Geography

[edit]

Modern Lajjun was built on the slopes of three hills, roughly 135–175 meters above sea level,[7] located on the southwestern edge of the Jezreel Valley (Marj ibn Amer). Jenin, the entire valley, and Nazareth range are visible from it. The village was located on both the banks of a stream, a tributary of Kishon River. The stream flows to the north and then east over 6 kilometres (3.7 mi) before arriving at Lajjun. That section is called Wadi es-Sitt (valley of the lady) in Arabic,[8] The northern quarter was built in close proximity to a number of springs, including 'Ayn al Khalil, 'Ayn Nasir, 'Ayn Sitt Leila, and 'Ayn Jumma, collectively known as 'Uyun Seil Lajjun.[9] The eastern quarter was next to 'Ayn al Hajja.[10] From Lajjun onward the stream is called Wadi al-Lajjun in Arabic.[11][12] In Hebrew, the Israeli Government Naming Committee decided in 1958 to use the name Nahal Qeni (Hebrew: נַחַל קֵינִי) for the entire length of the stream, based on its ancient identification (see below).[13] Lajjun is bordered by Tall al-Mutsallem to the northeast, and by Tall al-Asmar to the northwest. Lajjun, which was linked by secondary roads to the Jenin-Haifa road, and the road that led southwest to the town of Umm al-Fahm, laid close to the junctions of the two highways.[14]

Nearby localities included, the destroyed village of Ayn al-Mansi to the northwest, and the surviving villages of Zalafa to the south, Bayada and Musheirifa to the southwest, and Zububa (part of the Palestinian territories) to the southeast. The largest town near al-Lajjun was Umm al-Fahm, to the south.[15]

History

[edit]

Bronze and Iron Ages

[edit]

Lajjun is about 1 kilometer (0.62 mi) south of Tel Megiddo, Arabic name: Tell al-Mutasallim, which is identified with ancient Megiddo.[6] During the rule of the Canaanites and then the Israelites, Megiddo, located on the military road leading from Asia to Egypt and in a commanding situation, was heavily fortified by both peoples.

Lajjun stream has been identified with the brook Kina, or Qina, which is mentioned in the Egyptian descriptions of Thutmose III's Battle of Megiddo. According to the reconstruction of Harold Hayden Nelson, the entire battle was fought in the valley, between the three quarters of modern Lajjun.[16] However, both Na'aman[17] and Zertal[18][19] suggested alternative locations for Qina. This stream may be the "Waters of Megiddo" in the Song of Deborah[20] In the same context, Judges 4 attests to the presence of a branch of the Kenite clan somewhere in the area; relating this name to Thutmose's Annals, scholars like Shmuel Yeivin theorized that the name Qina derives from qyni (Hebrew: קיני).[21] Donald B. Redford noted that the Egyptian transliteration might be of "qayin".[22]

Roman era

[edit]

Modern-day historical geographers have placed the Second Temple period village of Kefar ʿUthnai (Hebrew: כפר עותנאי) in the confines of the Arab village, and which place-name underwent a change after a Roman Legion had camped there.[23][24] It appears in Latin characters under its old name Caporcotani in the Tabula Peutingeriana Map, and lay along the Roman road from Caesarea to Scythopolis (Beit Shean).[25][26][27] Ptolemy (Geography V, 15: 3) also mentions the site in the second century CE, referring to the place under its Latin appellation, Caporcotani, and where he mentions it as one of the four cities of the Galilee, with Sepphoris, Julias and Tiberias.[28] Among the village's famous personalities was Rabban Gamliel.[29] After the Bar Kochba Revolt—a Jewish uprising against the Roman Empire—had been suppressed in 135 CE, the Roman emperor Hadrian ordered a second Roman legion, Legio VI Ferrata (6th "Ironclad" Legion), to be stationed in the north of the country to guard the Wadi Ara region, a crucial line of communication between the coastal plain of Palestine and the Jezreel Valley.[6][30] The place where it established its camp was known as Legio.

In the 3rd century CE, when the army was removed, Legio became a city and its name was augmented with the adjectival Maximianopolis.[4][30] Eusebius mentions the village in his Onomasticon, under the name Legio.

In 2001 and 2004, the Israel Antiquities Authority conducted archaeological excavations at Kefar ‘Otnay and Legio west of Megiddo Junction, recovering artifacts from the Roman and early Byzantine periods.[31][32]

Early Muslim period

[edit]

Some Muslim historians believe the site of the Battle of Ajnadayn between the Muslim Arabs and the Byzantines in 634 CE was at Lajjun. Following the Muslim victory, Lajjun, along with most of Palestine, and southern Syria were incorporated into the Caliphate.[33] According to medieval geographers Estakhri and Ibn Hawqal, Lajjun was the northernmost town of Jund Filastin (military district of Palestine).[34]

A hoard of dinars dating from the Umayyad era have been found at Lajjun.[35]

The 10th-century Persian geographer Ibn al-Faqih wrote of a local legend related by the people of Lajjun regarding the source of the abundant spring used as the town's primary water source over the ages:

there is just outside al-Lajjun a large stone of round form, over which is built a dome, which they call the Mosque of Abraham. A copious stream of water flows from under the stone and it is reported that Abraham struck the stone with his staff, and there immediately flowed from it water enough to suffice for the supply of the people of the town, and also to water their lands. The spring continues to flow down to the present day.[36]

The Mosque of Ibrahim, referred to in Ibn al-Faqīh's account, was a famous 10th–15th century Islamic shrine. The mosque was attributed to a miracle by the Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham), who is said to have struck the rock with his staff to bring forth water. This association made the site a regional place of pilgrimage for centuries. The mosque disappeared from the historical record by the 16th century, but its memory survived in local oral traditions and place-names. Recent archaeological and historical research has proposed that the mosque may be identified with monumental remains above the ʿAyn al-Sitt spring, including a domed structure with vaulted chambers and reused Roman elements. Scholars interpret the shrine as part of a broader Islamization of sacred geography in the Levant, incorporating local water traditions into the Islamic Abrahamic narrative.[37]

In 940, Ibn Ra'iq, during his conflict over control of Syria with the Ikhshidids of Egypt, fought against them in an indecisive battle at Lajjun. During the battle, Abu Nasr al-Husayn—the Ikhshidid general and brother of the Ikhshidid ruler, Muhammad ibn Tughj—was killed. Ibn Ra'iq was remorseful at the sight of Husayn's dead body and offered his seventeen-year-old son, Abu'l-Fath Muzahim, to Ibn Tughj "to do with him whatever they saw fit". Ibn Tughj was honored by Ibn Ra'iq's gesture; instead of executing Muzahim, he gave the latter several gifts and robes, then married him to his daughter Fatima.[38]

In 945, the Hamdanids of Aleppo and the Ikhshidids fought a battle in Lajjun. It resulted in an Ikhshidid victory putting a halt to Hamdanid expansion southward under the leadership of Sayf al-Dawla.[14] The Jerusalemite geographer, al-Muqaddasi, wrote in 985 that Lajjun was "a city on the frontier of Palestine, and in the mountain country ... it is well situated and is a pleasant place".[39] Moreover, it was the center of a nahiya (subdistrict) of Jund al-Urdunn (military district of Jordan),[40] which also included the towns of Nazareth and Jenin.[41][42]

Crusader, Ayyubid and Mamluk periods

[edit]

When the Crusaders invaded and conquered the Levant from the Fatimids in 1099, al-Lajjun's Roman name, Legio, was restored and the town formed a part of the lordship of Caesarea. During this time, Christian settlement in Legio grew significantly. John of Ibelin records that the community "owed the service of 100 sergeants". Bernard, the archbishop of Nazareth granted some of the tithes of Legio to the hospital of the monastery of St. Mary in 1115, then in 1121, he extended the grant to include all of Legio, including its church as well as the nearby village of Ti'inik. By 1147, the de Lyon family controlled Legio, but by 1168, the town was held by Payen, the lord of Haifa. Legio had markets, a town oven and held other economic activities during this era. In 1182, the Ayyubids raided Legio, and in 1187, it was captured by them under the leadership of Saladin's nephew Husam ad-Din 'Amr and consequently its Arabic name, Lajjun, was restored.[6]

In 1226, Arab geographer Yaqut al-Hamawi writes of the Mosque of Abraham in Lajjun, the town's "copious stream", and that it was a "part of the Jordan Province".[43] A number of Muslim kings and prominent persons passed through the village, including Ayyubid sultan al-Kamil, who gave his daughter 'Ashura' in marriage to his nephew while visiting the town in 1231.[44] The Ayyubids ceded Lajjun to the Crusaders in 1241, but it fell to the Mamluks under Baibars in 1263. A year later, a party of Templars and Hospitallers raided Lajjun and took 300 men and women captives to Acre. In the treaty between Sultan Qalawun and the Crusaders on 4 June 1283, Lajjun was listed as the Mamluk territory.[6]

By 1300, the Levant was entirely in Mamluk hands and divided into several provinces. Lajjun became the center of an ʿAmal (subdistrict) in the Mamlaka of Safad (ultimately becoming one of sixteen[45]). In the 14th century members of a Yamani tribe lived there.[46] Shams al-Din al-'Uthmani, writing probably in the 1370s, reported it was the seat of Marj ibn Amer, and had a great khan for travellers, a "terrace of the sultan" and the Maqam (shrine) of Abraham.[47] The Mamluks fortified it in the 15th century and the town became a major staging post on the postal route (braid) between Egypt and Damascus.[6]

Ottoman era

[edit]

Early rule and the Tarabay family

[edit]

The Ottoman Empire conquered most of Palestine from the Mamluks after the Battle of Marj Dabiq in 1517.

As the army of Sultan Selim I moved south towards Egypt,[48] Tarabay ibn Qaraja, chieftain of the Bani Hareth, a Bedouin tribe from the Hejaz, supported them by contributing guides and scouts.[49] When the Mamluks were completely uprooted and Selim returned to Istanbul, the Tarabays were granted the territory of Lajjun. The town eventually became the capital of the Sanjak ("District") of Lajjun, which was a part of the province of Damascus, and encompassed the Jezreel Valley, northern Samaria, and a part of the north-central coastline of Palestine as its territory.[50][51][52] It was composed of four nahiyas ("sub-districts") (Jinin, Sahel Atlit, Sa'ra, and Shafa), and encompassed a total of 55 villages, including Haifa, Jenin, and Baysan.[53]

After a short period in which the Tarabays were in a state of rebellion, tensions suddenly died down and the Ottomans appointed Ali ibn Tarabay as the governor of Lajjun in 1559. His son Assaf Tarabay ruled Lajjun from 1571 to 1583. During his reign, he extended Tarabay power and influence to Sanjak Nablus.[48] In 1579, Assaf, referred to as the "Sanjaqbey of al-Lajjun," is mentioned as the builder of a mosque in the village of al-Tira.[54] Assaf was deposed and banished in 1583 to the island of Rhodes. Six years later, in 1589, he was pardoned and resettled in the town. At the time, an impostor also named Assaf, had attempted to seize control of Sanjak Lajjun. Known later as Assaf al-Kadhab ("Assaf the Liar"), he was arrested and executed in Damascus where he traveled in attempt to confirm his appointment as governor of the district.[48] In 1596, Lajjun was a part of the nahiya of Sha'ra and paid taxes on a number of crops, including wheat, barley, as well as goats, beehives and water buffaloes.[55]

Assaf Tarabay was not reinstated as governor, but Lajjun remained in Tarabay hands, under the rule of Governor Tarabay ibn Ali who was succeeded upon his death by his son Ahmad in 1601, who also ruled until his death in 1657. Ahmad, known for his courage and hospitality,[48] helped the Ottomans defeat the rebel Ali Janbulad and gave shelter to Yusuf Sayfa—Janbulad's principal rival. Ahmad, in coordination with the governors of Gaza (the Ridwan family) and Jerusalem (the Farrukh family), also fought against Fakhr ad-Din II in a prolonged series of battles,[48] which ended with the victory of the Tarabay-Ridwan-Farrukh alliance after their forces routed Fakhr ad-Din's army at the al-Auja river in central Palestine in 1623.[56]

The Ottoman authorities of Damascus expanded Ahmad's fief as a token of gratitude. Ahmad's son Zayn Tarabay ruled Lajjun for a brief period until his death in 1660. He was succeeded by Ahmad's brother Muhammad Tarabay, who—according to his French secretary—had good intentions for governing Lajjun, but was addicted to opium and as a result had been a weak leader. After his death in 1671, other members of the Tarabay family ruled Lajjun until 1677 when the Ottomans replaced them with a government officer.[49] The main reason behind the Ottoman abandonment of the Tarabays was that their larger tribe, the Bani Hareth, migrated east of Lajjun to the eastern banks of the Jordan River.[57] Later during this century, Sheikh Ziben, ancestor to the Arrabah-based Abd al-Hadi clan, became the leader of Sanjak Lajjun.[53] When Henry Maundrell visited in 1697, he described the place as "an old village near which was a good khan".[58]

Later Ottoman rule

[edit]
Drawing of the remains of the khan and old bridge at Lajjun, 1870s[59]

Much of the Lajjun district territories were actually taxed by the stronger families of Sanjak Nablus by 1723. Later in the 18th century, Lajjun was replaced by Jenin as the administrative capital of the sanjak which now included the Sanjak of Ajlun. By the 19th century it was renamed Sanjak Jenin, although 'Ajlun was separated from it.[60] Zahir al-Umar, who became the effective ruler of the Galilee for a short period during the second half of the 18th century, was reported to have used cannons against Lajjun in the course of his campaign between 1771–1773 to capture Nablus.[61] It is possible that this attack led to the village's decline in the years that followed.[62] By that time, Lajjun's influence was diminished by the increasing strength of Acre's political power and Nablus's economic muscle.[60]

Old bridge of Lajjun, picture taken between 1903 and 1905[63]

Edward Robinson visited in 1838, and noted that the khan, which Maundrell commented on, was for the accommodation of the caravans passing on the great road between Egypt and Damascus which comes from the western plain along the coast, over the hills to Lajjun, and enters the plain of Esdraelon.[64] When the British consul James Finn visited the area in the mid-19th century, he did not see a village.[65] The authors of the Survey of Western Palestine also noticed a khan, south of the ruins of Lajjun in the early 1880s.[66] Gottlieb Schumacher saw caravans resting at the Lajjun stream in the early 1900s.[67]

A herd of camels near a stream in Lajjun, 1908[67]

Andrew Petersen, inspecting the place in 1993, noted that the principal extant buildings at the site are the khan and a bridge. The bridge, which crosses a major tributary of the Kishon River, is approximately 4 meters (13 ft) wide and 16 meters (52 ft) to 20 meters (66 ft) long. It is carried on three arches, the north side has been robbed of its outer face, while the south side is heavily overgrown with vegetation. According to Petersen, the bridge was already in ruins when drawn by Charles William Wilson in the 1870s. The khan is located on a low hill 150 meters (490 ft) to the southwest of the bridge. It is a square enclosure measuring approximately 30 meters (98 ft) per side with a central courtyard. The ruins are covered with vegetation, and only the remains of one room is visible.[68]

The modern village of Lajjun was a satellite village Umm al-Fahm. During its existence it came to eclipse its mother settlement in infrastructure and economic importance.[69] Originally, in the late 19th century, Arabs from Umm al-Fahm started to make use of the Lajjun farmland, settling for the season.[14][44][70] Gradually, they settled in the village, building their houses around the springs. In 1903–1905, Schumacher excavated Tell al-Mutasallim (ancient Megiddo) and some spots in Lajjun. Schumacher wrote that Lajjun ("el-Leddschōn") is properly the name of the stream and surrounding farmlands,[71] and calls the village along the stream Ain es-Sitt. Which, he noted, "consists of only nine shabby huts in the midst of ruins and heaps of dung." and a few more fellahin huts south of the stream.[72] By 1925 some of the inhabitants of Lajjun reused stones from the ancient structure that had been unearthed to build new housing.[73] At some point in the early 20th century the four hamulas ("clans") of Umm al-Fahm divided the land among themselves: al-Mahajina, al-Ghubariyya, al-Jabbarin and al-Mahamid clans.[74][75] Lajjun thus transformed into three ‘Lajjuns’, or administratively separate neighbourhoods  reflecting the Hebronite/Khalīlī settlement pattern of its founders.[76]

Taken more broadly, Lajjun was one of the settlements of the so-called "Fahmawi Commonwealth", a network of interspersed communities connected by ties of kinship, and socially, economically and politically affiliated with Umm al Fahm. The Commonwealth dominated vast sections of Bilad al-Ruha/Ramot Menashe, Wadi 'Ara and Marj Ibn 'Amir/Jezreel Valley during that time.[76]

Map of Tel Megiddo and Lajjun in 1905. The village is at the dark knee of the stream
Map of Tel Megiddo and Lajjun in 1905. The village is at the dark knee of the stream
Aerial photo with Lajjun and Tel Megiddo, 1944
Notice the changes such as a new quarter in the bottom left corner, the roads and the British police station near the intersection.

British Mandate period

[edit]

More people moved to Lajjun during the British mandate period, particularly in the late thirties, due to the British crackdown on participants in the 1936–1939 Arab revolt in Palestine.[62] The tomb of Yusuf Hamdan, a local leader of the revolt, is located in the village.[77] Others moved in as they came to understand that the Mandate authorities planned to turn Lajjun into a county seat.[78] During 1940–1941, a police station belonging to the Tegart forts system was constructed at the road intersection outside Lajjun by the British Mandate government.[79]

Lajjun's economy grew rapidly as a result of the influx of the additional population.[62] As the village expanded, it was divided into three quarters, one to the east, one to the west, and the older one in the north. Each quarter was inhabited by one or more hamula ("clan").[70]

Survey of Palestine map of Lajjun, 1946

Lajjun had a school that was founded in 1937 and that had an enrollment of 83 in 1944. It was located in the quarter belonging to the al-Mahajina al-Fawqa clan, that is, in Khirbat al-Khan. In 1943, one of the large landowners in the village financed the construction of a mosque, built of white stone, in the al-Ghubariyya (eastern) quarter. Another mosque was also established in the al-Mahamid quarter during the same period, and was financed by the residents themselves.[70] It was a four-year elementary school for boys.[80]

In 1945, Lajjun, Umm al-Fahm and seven hamlets had a total land area of 77.24 square kilometres (29.82 sq mi), of which 68.3 square kilometres (26.4 sq mi) was Arab-owned, and the remainder being public property.[81][82] There was a total of 50 km2 (12,000 acres) of land that was cultivated; 4.3 km2 (1,100 acres) were used for plantations and irrigated, and 44.6 km2 (11,000 acres) were planted with cereals (wheat and barley).[83] The built-up area of the villages was 0.128 km2 (32 acres), most of it being in Umm al-Fahm and Lajjun.[84] Former villagers recall they grew wheat and corn in the fields, and irrigated crops such as eggplant, tomato, okra, cowpea and watermelon.[85] A survey map from 1946 shows most of the buildings in the eastern and western quarters as built from stone and mud,[10] but some used mud over wood.[86] Many houses had neighbouring small plots marked as "orchards".[10]

There was a small market place in the village, as well as six grain mills (powered by the numerous springs and wadis in the vicinity), and a health center.[70] The various quarters of Lajjun had many shops. A bus company was established in Lajjun by a villager from Umm al-Fahm; the bus line served Umm al-Fahm, Haifa, and a number of villages, such as Zir'in. In 1937, the line had seven buses. Subsequently, the company was licensed to serve Jenin also, and acquired the name of "al-Lajjun Bus Company".[87]

In addition to agriculture, residents practiced animal husbandry which formed was an important source of income for the town. In 1943, they owned 512 heads of cattle, 834 sheep over a year old, 167 goats over a year old, 26 camels, 85 horses, 13 mules, 481 donkeys, 3822 fowls, 700 pigeons, and 206 pigs.[88]

1948 War

[edit]

Lajjun was allotted to the Arab state in the 1947 proposed United Nations Partition Plan. The village was defended by the Arab Liberation Army (ALA),[12] and was the logistical headquarters of the Iraqi army. It was first assaulted by the Haganah on April 13, during the battle around kibbutz Mishmar HaEmek. ALA commander Fawzi al-Qawuqji claimed Jewish forces ("Haganah") had attempted to reach the crossroads at Lajjun in an outflanking operation, but the attack failed. The New York Times reported that twelve Arabs were killed and fifteen wounded during that Haganah offensive.[89] Palmach units of the Haganah raided and blew up much of Lajjun on the night of April 15–16.[90]

On April 17, it was occupied by the Haganah. According to the newspaper, Lajjun was the "most important place taken by the Jews, whose offensive has carried them through ten villages south and east of Mishmar Ha'emek." The report added that women and children had been removed from the village and that 27 buildings in the village were blown up by the Haganah. However, al-Qawuqji states that attacks resumed on May 6, when ALA positions in the area of Lajjun were attacked by Haganah forces. The ALA's Yarmouk Battalion and other ALA units drove back their forces, but two days later, the ALA commander reported that the Haganah was "trying to cut off the Lajjun area from Tulkarm in preparation of seizing Lajjun and Jenin".[91]

State of Israel

[edit]

On May 30, 1948, in the first stage of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Lajjun was captured by Israel's Golani Brigade in Operation Gideon. The capture was particularly important for the Israelis because of its strategic location at the entrance of the Wadi Ara, which thus, brought their forces closer to Jenin.[92] During the second truce between Israel and the Arab coalition, in early September, a United Nations official fixed the permanent truce line in the area of Lajjun, according to press reports. A 500-yard strip was established on both sides of the line in which Arabs and Jews were allowed to harvest their crops.[14] Lajjun was used as transit place by the Israel Defense Forces to transfer 1,400 Arab women, children and elderly from Ijzim, who then were sent on foot to Jenin.[93]

Kibbutz Megiddo was built on some of Lajjun's village lands starting in 1949. Lajjun's buildings were demolished in the following months.[94]

In November 1953, 34.6 square kilometres (13.4 sq mi) of the lands of Umm al-Fahm were confiscated by the state, invoking the Land Acquisition (Validation of Acts and Compensation) Law, 5713-1953. These included much of the built-up area of Lajjun (at Block 20420, covering 0.2 square kilometres (0.077 sq mi)).[95] It was later planted with forest trees.

In 1992 Walid Khalidi described the remains: "Only the white stone mosque, one village mill, the village health center, and a few partially destroyed houses remain on the site. The mosque has been converted into a carpentry workshop and one of the houses has been made into a chicken coop. The health center and grain mill are deserted, and the school is gone. The cemetery remains, but it is in a neglected state; the tomb of Yusuf al-Hamdan, a prominent nationalist who fell in the 1936 revolt, is clearly visible. The surrounding lands are planted with almond trees, wheat, and barley; they also contain animal sheds, a fodder plant, and a pump installed on the spring of 'Ayn al-Hajja. The site is tightly fenced in and entry is blocked."[94] In 2000 Meron Benvenisti restated the information about the 1943 white mosque.[2] By 2007 it was evacuated and sealed up. [77]

In the 2000s, 486 families from Umm al-Fahm (formerly from Lajjun), through Adalah, motioned to nullify the confiscation of that particular block. The district court ruled against the plaintiffs in 2007,[77] and the supreme court held the decision in 2010.[96]

Lajjun is among the Palestinian villages for which commemorative Marches of Return have taken place, typically as part of Nakba Day, such as the demonstrations organized by the Association for the Defence of the Rights of the Internally Displaced.[97]

In 2013, architect Shadi Habib Allah presented a proposal for a Palestinian village to be rebuilt on Lajjun in areas that are currently a park and inhabited by descendants of its displaced residents. The presentation was made for the "From Truth to Redress" conference organized by Zochrot.[98]

Demographics

[edit]

During early Ottoman rule, in 1596, Lajjun had a population of 226 people.[55] In the British Mandate census in 1922, there were 417 inhabitants.[99] In the 1931 census of Palestine, the population had more than doubled to 857, of which 829 were Muslims, 26 were Christians, as well as two Jews.[44][100] In that year, there were 162 houses in the village.[12][100] At the end of 1940, Lajjun had 1,103 inhabitants.

The prominent families of al-Lajjun were the Jabbarin, Ghubayriyya, Mahamid and the Mahajina. Around 80% of its inhabitants fled to Umm al-Fahm, where they currently live as Arab citizens of Israel and internally displaced Palestinians.[77]

Culture

[edit]

Local tradition centered on 'Ayn al-Hajja, the spring of Lajjun, date back to the 10th century CE when the village was under Islamic rule. According to geographers of that century, as well as the 12th century, the legend was that under the Mosque of Abraham, a "copious stream flowed" which formed immediately after the prophet Abraham struck the stone with his staff.[36] Abraham had entered the town with his flock of sheep on his way towards Egypt, and the people of the village informed him that the village possessed only small quantities of water, thus Abraham should pass on the village to another. According to the legend, Abraham was commanded to strike the rock, resulting in water "bursting out copiously". From then, the village orchards and crops were well-irrigated and the people satisfied with a surplus of drinking water from the spring.[43]

In Lajjun there are tombs for two Mamluk-era Muslim relics who were from the village. The holy men were Ali Shafi'i who died in 1310 and Ali ibn Jalal who died in 1400.[14]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Lajjun

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Al-Lajjun was a Palestinian Arab village in the Jenin Subdistrict of Mandatory Palestine, situated in the Jezreel Valley approximately 1 kilometer south of Tel Megiddo and overlying the remains of the Roman legionary camp Legio, established in the early 2nd century CE by the VI Ferrata Legion. The site held administrative importance as the capital of an Ottoman provincial district (liwa) during the 16th century, one of several such centers in Palestine under Ottoman rule. Modern settlement at al-Lajjun emerged in the late 19th century when families from nearby Umm al-Fahm began cultivating its fertile lands, gradually forming a village that grew to a population of about 1,280 by 1948 and functioned as a key bus station linking eastern and western Palestine during the British Mandate era. During the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, al-Lajjun was captured on 30 May 1948 by the Golani Brigade's Fourth Battalion as part of operations to secure the Beisan Valley, resulting in the depopulation of its inhabitants amid the broader conflict following the UN partition resolution and Arab states' intervention.

Geography and Environment

Location and Topography

Lajjun lies in the , known historically as Marj ibn Amir, a expansive fertile plain in northern spanning roughly 400 square kilometers. The valley features predominantly flat terrain, with elevations averaging 50-100 meters above sea level, bordered by to the southwest, the hills to the north, and Samarian highlands to the south. This lowland corridor, several miles wide, connects the to the , facilitating both agricultural productivity and transit routes. The site of Lajjun occupies low-lying hills rising to approximately 175 meters above on the southwestern edge of the plain, straddling the banks of Wadi al-Lajjun. Positioned about 3 kilometers northeast of and 16 kilometers northwest of , it benefits from the valley's alluvial soils, which support intensive grain cultivation due to seasonal flooding and sediment deposition. Proximity to the and local springs provides essential water resources, enhancing the area's habitability amid the otherwise arid regional climate. The flat expanses of the valley floor, interrupted only by occasional wadis and low rises, have long favored large-scale farming while offering unobstructed visibility and maneuverability across the landscape.

Climate and Resources

The region encompassing Lajjun exhibits a , marked by mild, wet winters and hot, arid summers. Annual precipitation in the ranges from 450 to 650 mm, with the majority occurring between October and April, facilitating rain-fed cultivation of staple cereals such as and . The valley's soils, predominantly Terra Rossa and Brown Rendzina derived from and basaltic , are highly fertile and conducive to intensive , yielding crops that historically supported local populations and taxation. Dry summer conditions, however, necessitated supplemental to maintain productivity beyond the rainy season. Lajjun benefited from perennial springs including ‘Ain al-Khalil and ‘Ain al-Sitt Leila, which supplied water for domestic use, , and watermills, alongside seasonal wadis that channeled runoff into the valley. Ottoman defters from 1596 record agricultural taxes on (7,420 ), barley (1,760 ), (20 ), and miscellaneous summer crops (400 ), reflecting surplus production enabled by these environmental assets. Wetlands in the vicinity also sustained rearing, diversifying resource utilization.

Names and Etymology

Ancient Designations

The designation Legio in Latin sources refers to the Roman legion's presence at the site, with the name directly deriving from the term for a unit and applied to the encampment area. This nomenclature emerged in the early CE, reflecting administrative Latin usage in provincial records and inscriptions associated with the . Pre-Roman Semitic designations for the locale include Kefar 'Othnay, an toponym attested in earlier Jewish texts, potentially signifying "village of the wheels" or a similar occupational reference based on philological analysis of the root components. No direct continuity links this to Legio, as the Roman overlay supplanted local nomenclature without evident Semitic borrowing into the Latin form; claims of deeper Semitic etymological roots for Legio itself lack epigraphic or textual substantiation and appear speculative. Proximity to biblical sites like the Gilboa range prompted occasional associative references in ancient geographic descriptions, but these do not alter the primary philological path from Latin legio. In Byzantine Greek sources, such as ' Onomasticon (c. 325 CE), the name persists as Legiōn (Λεγιών), a straightforward maintaining the Roman core while adapting to Hellenized ecclesiastical and administrative contexts. This form underscores linguistic stability across imperial transitions, with no significant Greek innovation beyond phonetic rendering. Early post-conquest adaptations, appearing in 7th–8th century texts, render it as al-Lajjūn, phonetically preserving Legio's consonants (l-j-n) through intermediary Syriac or vernacular influences, though direct attestation remains sparse in primary conquest-era documents.

Arabic and Modern Usage

The Arabic name al-Lajjun (اللجّون) for the village is first attested in the 10th-century geographical Ahsan al-Taqasim fi Ma'rifat al-Aqalim by the scholar , who noted local traditions including a structure identified by residents as the "mosque of Abraham" built over a round rock. This usage reflects continuity in Islamic-era documentation, with the name applied to the settlement overlying earlier ruins in the . Etymological interpretations within linguistic traditions propose a possible link to the root lajja, connoting or reserve, or alternatively as a localized proper name without deeper semantic derivation specified in period sources. In Ottoman administrative records, the name appears as Lajjun, as in the 1596 tapu defteri (tax register) detailing the of Lajjun, which encompassed 56 settlements, four tribal groups, and 174 agricultural plots, underscoring its role as a provincial administrative center. Subsequent Ottoman censuses and surveys, such as those from the , consistently employed variants like Lajjun or el-Lejjun, maintaining the Arabic form in fiscal and topographic contexts. British Mandate-era cartography, including maps from the 1930s and 1940s, preserved the designation al-Lajjun, depicting the village's layout with surrounding wadis and proximity to Tell al-Mutesellim (Megiddo). These maps, produced under official administration, standardized the Arabic nomenclature for administrative and purposes. Following the village's depopulation in , modern usage in Israeli archaeological literature retains Lajjun or transliterated forms like Lejjun to denote the Arab settlement, often in reference to its superposition on the Roman-period site of Legio, with Hebrew adaptations such as Lajjun appearing in excavation reports and historical analyses post-1948. This convention facilitates distinction between the medieval-to-modern village and underlying ancient strata in scholarly works.

Pre-Modern History

Bronze and Iron Ages

Archaeological sediment analyses at the site of Lajjun (ancient Legio) reveal evidence of human activity extending back to the , indicating limited but continuous occupation likely tied to small-scale Canaanite settlements rather than major urban centers. Micromorphological studies of deposits from the Regional Project suggest early agricultural impacts and resource use, consistent with subsidiary villages supporting the nearby fortified city of Megiddo during the Early and Middle Bronze Ages (c. 3000–1550 BCE). Scattered sherds recovered in surveys point to regional patterns, though no monumental structures or extensive stratigraphic layers attributable to this era have been identified at Lajjun itself. In the (c. 1200–586 BCE), occupation remained sparse at the site, with artifacts such as tools and potential burial remains suggesting intermittent use amid the more robust fortified developments at adjacent , a key Israelite royal center linked to biblical accounts of conflicts in the Armageddon plain. The absence of major defensive architecture or dense habitation layers at Lajjun underscores its role as peripheral to Megiddo's prominence, reflecting broader patterns of in the . By the Persian period (c. 539–332 BCE), evidence of activity diminishes further, with minimal occupation setting the context for subsequent Hellenistic reoccupation.

Hellenistic and Roman Periods

During the , following the Great's conquests around 332 BCE, the region encompassing Lajjun fell under Seleucid control as part of , with administrative and military oversight extending from Antioch. Archaeological evidence from nearby indicates Hellenistic settlements and fortifications, suggesting minor Seleucid garrisons or outposts in the to secure trade routes like the against Ptolemaic incursions, though no substantial structures have been identified specifically at Lajjun itself. The site's prominence emerged in the Roman era with the establishment of a permanent legionary camp under Emperor Hadrian (r. 117–138 CE), who redeployed the ("Ironclad Legion") to the area shortly after suppressing the remnants and amid preparations for the (132–136 CE). Stationed at Legio (modern Lajjun), approximately 2 km south of , the camp housed around 5,000–6,000 soldiers, serving as a strategic base to pacify Jewish resistance in and while controlling the vital highway linking to . Excavations from 2013 onward have uncovered elements of the standard Roman castrum layout, including defensive ramparts enclosing about 22 hectares, a central (principia) for administrative and religious functions, and the north-south via praetoria leading to the main gate (porta praetoria). Inscribed tiles stamped "LEG VI F" and other artifacts, such as military equipment and inscriptions, confirm the legion's presence from the early CE until its relocation or disbandment by the late 3rd or early CE, with the camp's infrastructure supporting rapid troop mobilization for revolt suppression and regional policing.

Byzantine and Early Islamic Eras

The Roman legionary camp at Legio (Lajjun) was abandoned by the late 3rd to early 4th century CE, marking the end of its primary military function under the Legio VI Ferrata. Following this, the site saw continuity in civilian settlement during the Byzantine era (4th–7th centuries CE), with evidence of occupation including wall remains dated to the 3rd–5th centuries CE along the nearby streambed. Archaeological surveys indicate the emergence of an urban center named Maximianopolis around 305 CE, likely serving as a civilian hub adjacent to the disused camp and reflecting adaptation to non-military uses amid regional Christianization. The Byzantine settlement at Lajjun emphasized agricultural and administrative roles rather than fortification, consistent with broader stability in . Proximity to sites like supported ecclesiastical activity, though direct Byzantine remains at Lajjun are sparse, with coinage and pottery suggesting ongoing habitation into the before the Muslim conquests disrupted patterns. Following the early (636–640 CE), Lajjun transitioned under Umayyad (661–750 CE) and Abbasid (750–) rule, functioning on the periphery of the al-Urdunn district as a minor settlement with potential administrative reuse of earlier structures. By the , the site hosted the Mosque of Ibrahim, a dedicated to Abraham documented in contemporary Islamic geographical accounts and later sources, indicating its role as a religious and agricultural village amid caliphal stability with limited defensive needs. This era saw a shift toward rural character, evidenced by the absence of major fortifications and reliance on regional peace for sustenance.

Medieval and Ottoman History

Crusader, Ayyubid, and Mamluk Periods

During the Crusader era, Lajjun functioned as a strategic outpost for the Kingdom of following the Frankish conquest of the region in 1099. Archaeological investigations reveal intermittent settlement by Crusader populations in the 12th and 13th centuries CE, evidenced by a domestic yielding handmade wares, imported ceramics, and faunal remains indicative of Frankish household activities, including and cooking practices distinct from local Muslim traditions. Saladin recaptured Lajjun in 1187 amid his broader campaign after the Crusader defeat at the on July 4, enabling Ayyubid consolidation of northern . The site was temporarily ceded back to Crusader control in 1241 under Ayyubid diplomatic concessions, but forces under Sultan Baibars seized and razed it in April 1263 during systematic efforts to eliminate remaining Frankish holdings in the . Ayyubid and administration incorporated Lajjun into provincial tax structures, leveraging the site's proximity to the fertile Marj ibn Amir for agrarian output, though specific or iqta' allocations emphasized regional grain yields rather than urban revival. The 14th-century traveler described al-Lajjun as a with accessible running water on the pilgrimage route to Karak, suggesting sustained utility amid Mamluk oversight despite intermittent disruptions from regional conflicts.

Early Ottoman Administration

Following the Ottoman conquest of the in 1516–1517, Lajjun was incorporated into the empire's administrative framework as part of the nahiya of Tabariya within the of . Ottoman tax registers (defterler) document the revival of settlement in the area, with early censuses reflecting modest population growth amid primarily agricultural taxation. The 1536 defter recorded 7 households in Lajjun, generating 3,090 akçe in taxes, while the 1538 register listed 23 households—almost entirely Muslim—subject to levies including 3,000 akçe on wheat and 200 akçe on goats. By the 1596 census, the village had expanded to 41 households, with tax revenues from wheat increasing to 7,420 akçe and from goats to 800 akçe, indicating agricultural development and economic integration into the Ottoman fiscal system. In 1559, the of Lajjun was formally established as a distinct sub-province, encompassing the village and surrounding territories. The settlement featured mud-brick housing and infrastructure, such as a khan (caravanserai) and bridge, constructed over remnants of Roman ruins, facilitating local trade and administration. The region encountered security issues from incursions, which disrupted sedentary life and prompted Ottoman efforts to restore order, including nominal taxation of key facilities like the khan at 6,000 akçe in the 1520s to support maintenance and limited protective functions.

Turabay Emirate and Provincial Role

In the , the Turabay dynasty established Lajjun as the capital of a semi-autonomous under nominal Ottoman , functioning as a hereditary controlling the and adjacent areas including Jenin and Haifa. The family's rule, beginning after their support for the Ottoman of the region in 1517, peaked with ‘Ali ibn Turabay's appointment as governor in 1559, granting them authority over tax collection, judicial functions, and local security as multazims and sanjak-beys. This arrangement allowed significant local autonomy, sustained by the Turabays' origins and strategic alliances, while Ottoman oversight remained indirect due to imperial priorities elsewhere. Lajjun's economy flourished as a market hub on the vital Damascus-Cairo , benefiting from agricultural output in the fertile —primarily wheat, , and —and tolls from trade, including customs and slave markets. Ottoman defter-i hazine records document revenues from Khan al-Lajjun alone at 50,000 in 1538, doubling across the sanjak by 1596 amid expanded cultivation on 135 swaths of land and operations of seven watermills taxed at 1,000 annually. The route's role in facilitating pilgrims and merchants further boosted prosperity, with the Turabays maintaining infrastructure like the Lajjun Bridge and khan to secure transit. Militarily, the Turabays contributed to Ottoman stability by quelling local unrest, protecting highways as "Amīr al-Darbayn" (emir of the two roads), and providing troops for campaigns, including the 1517 Egyptian conquest. This loyalty balanced their autonomy, as evidenced by garrison presence and conflict resolutions in Ottoman correspondence, until internal dynamics and centralizing reforms eroded their position by the late .

19th-20th Century Developments

Late Ottoman and World War I

The reforms, initiated in 1839 and continuing through the 1858 Ottoman Land Code, enhanced administrative control in by promoting and curbing raids through improved security measures under governors like those during II's rule (1876–1908). These changes facilitated the resettlement of al-Lajjun, which had been largely abandoned by the mid-19th century, by clans from nearby who registered lands via tapu deeds to cultivate fertile soils, integrating fellahin agriculture with residual nomadic elements like Turkmen groups in adjacent areas. Ottoman authorities encouraged such repopulation to boost tax revenues from revived agricultural output, though the empire's post-Crimean War debts—stemming from loans starting in 1854—intensified fiscal extraction across via more efficient, centralized collection under the reforms. By the late , permanent settlement at al-Lajjun solidified around , coinciding with archaeological surveys that highlighted the site's historical significance and economic potential. The Ottoman defeat in I's culminated in the British capture of al-Lajjun on September 22, 1918, during General Edmund Allenby's Battle of Megiddo, which shattered Ottoman lines in the and terminated approximately 400 years of imperial control since the 1516 conquest. Wartime hardships exacerbated rural vulnerabilities; a massive locust infestation from March to October 1915 devastated vegetation across , stripping fields and contributing to widespread conditions that persisted through 1918 amid Ottoman requisitions, blockades, and droughts. Eyewitness reports from the period, including those by foreign observers in and rural districts, documented starvation and temporary depopulation in peripheral villages like those on the Jezreel fringes, where locust damage halved crop yields and forced migrations.

British Mandate Period

Al-Lajjun was administered as part of the Jenin Sub-District under the British Mandate for Palestine from 1920 to 1948. The village's population, consisting entirely of Muslims, was recorded as 417 in the 1922 census and 407 in the 1931 census. By 1938, it had grown to 857 residents, reflecting influxes from nearby areas like Umm al-Fahm amid British enforcement against illicit activities. The local economy centered on , with nearly all able-bodied residents employed as laborers cultivating field crops such as cereals on roughly 44,023 dunams of in 1938, supplemented by smaller areas and rearing including 481 goats, 834 sheep, and 512 . Proximity to the —extending the pre-existing Haifa-Deraa line constructed in —enhanced connectivity and supported trade in agricultural produce, positioning al-Lajjun as an emerging regional hub for utilities and services by . , including tractors and harvesters, was introduced during this decade to boost . Infrastructure developments included the establishment of a in 1936, later fortified as a in 1940, and an elementary opened in 1937 that enrolled 83 students under two teachers by 1944. The village's strategic location near rail junctions contributed to its role in Mandate-era defense, with additional facilities such as an RAF airstrip in 1942, a bus company in 1937, a water network in 1946, and an infirmary around 1942–1943; employment opportunities arose from Camp 51 and public works during . While regional tensions over land transfers to Jewish buyers fueled unrest elsewhere in , no specific instances of such sales or significant riot involvement were recorded in al-Lajjun prior to 1948.

1948 War and Aftermath

Military Operations and Capture

In May 1948, amid escalating (ALA) attacks on Jewish convoys and settlements in the —such as those supporting the April siege of Kibbutz Mishmar HaEmek—the launched Operation Gideon to secure Jewish rear areas, disrupt Arab rail supply lines from Beisan to , and eliminate ALA bases in the lower Jezreel and Beisan valleys. The operation, conducted primarily by the with armored support, involved systematic clearance of Arab villages along key roads and tracks, beginning May 11 and continuing through the end of the month. Lajjun, defended by ALA irregulars numbering around 100-200 and positioned astride rail and road junctions northwest of , fell to Golani forces on May 30, 1948, after preparatory artillery fire from 4-inch mortars and rocket launchers, followed by infantry advances from the west and south. Resistance was limited, with most defenders withdrawing eastward toward amid the broader collapse of ALA positions in the valley; reports noted fewer than 10 casualties on their side and sporadic sniper fire rather than sustained . The village's capture severed a critical Arab link between northern fronts and facilitated control over the Megiddo area. Subsequently, IDF records indicate Lajjun served briefly as a staging and transit hub for operations in the northern sector, including routing displaced groups from adjacent sites like Ijzim after its June 24 capture during related counteroffensives.

Depopulation: Causes and Accounts

The depopulation of Lajjun, a village of approximately 1,280 residents in , unfolded gradually from mid-April through late May, coinciding with the intensification of hostilities in the sub-district following the Arab rejection of the UN Partition Plan. Eyewitness accounts and historical analyses indicate that initial flights were driven by pervasive fear, amplified by rumors of atrocities such as the April 9 , where over 100 Arab villagers died in an Irgun-Lehi assault, prompting widespread panic and preemptive evacuations in surrounding areas including the . This atmosphere of dread was compounded by the collapse of local Arab defenses after the fall of nearby and , leading many families to seek safety in rather than risk encirclement. Broadcasts from the (AHC) in during March and April further encouraged departure, with evidence from contemporary Arab press reports indicating directives to evacuate non-combatants to facilitate the advance of invading Arab armies from , , , and , which crossed into after May 15 in opposition to partition. Palestinian sources, including AHC communications, corroborate that such orders aimed to avoid civilian interference with military operations, though their extent and enforcement remain debated; historian documents similar AHC-influenced abandonments in over 20% of cases across the exodus, privileging primary Arab testimonies over later denials. In Lajjun's case, these factors prompted voluntary exodus for most, with villagers citing strategic vulnerability near Megiddo as a rationale, absent direct assaults until later. As forces under Operation Gideon advanced through the valley, partial expulsions occurred in adjacent sites, but Lajjun's capture on May 30 involved minimal resistance, with remaining inhabitants fleeing amid gunfire rather than facing documented mass expulsion orders. Post-operation surveys estimated 600 to 1,000 refugees arriving in from Lajjun and nearby villages like Ijzim, reflecting flight over coercion, as no verified or large-scale killings were recorded, unlike Arab Liberation Army actions at on May 13, where 127 Jewish defenders were executed after surrender. Morris's village-by-village assessment attributes Lajjun's outcome to a mix of fear and military pressure, without evidence of systematic tactics prevalent elsewhere. This aligns with broader patterns where Arab-initiated invasions escalated displacement, as invading forces prioritized territorial gains over civilian protection.

Israeli Control and Land Use

The lands of the former village of Lajjun were incorporated into Israeli jurisdiction following the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and placed under the administration of the Megiddo Regional Council. The village's buildings were demolished in the ensuing months to remove structures that could pose security risks and to clear the area for redevelopment. Significant portions of Lajjun's agricultural fields were repurposed for Jewish settlement and farming, with Kibbutz Megiddo established in 1949 directly on the site of the former village center, where kibbutz members have since cultivated crops and managed land for agricultural production. Some adjacent areas were afforested as part of the Megiddo Forest by the , a practice upheld by the in 2010 as justifying land retention under the 1953 Absentees' Property Law. No new urban Jewish community was built precisely replicating the village layout on the razed site, instead prioritizing agricultural and forestry uses initially, though military installations were established in the broader Megiddo area during the early statehood period before conversion to civilian purposes. By the 2020s, the underlying Roman-era Legio military camp has been integrated into preservation efforts, including salvage excavations within boundaries that uncovered artifacts while allowing continued field cultivation, alongside proposals for archaeological parks emphasizing ancient layers over modern village remnants.

Archaeology and Discoveries

Roman Legio Camp Excavations

Systematic excavations at the Roman legionary camp at Legio (ancient Lajjun) commenced in 2013 under the Regional Project (JVRP), a multi-disciplinary initiative directed by archaeologists including Matthew J. Adams and Yotam Tepper, in collaboration with the (IAA). These efforts targeted the northern and central sectors of the site, revealing architectural features consistent with a standard Roman castrum, including fortified walls, soldiers' , and elements of the complex (principia). In , excavations in the principia area exposed a monumental gate, accompanied by inscriptions interpreted as potential dedications or lists of prefects and commanders from the VI Ferrata Legion. This discovery, part of broader JVRP seasons from 2015–2019, employed targeted trenching and to delineate the headquarters' layout, confirming its role as the administrative and religious core of the base. The 2023 JVRP-IAA season focused on the central castrum, uncovering evidence of late third-century CE expansions to the principia and surrounding structures, including refurbished rooms and infrastructure upgrades, shortly before the legion's relocation to nearby Caparcotna in the early fourth century CE. Stratigraphic analysis, combined with ceramic and numismatic evidence, phases the site's from initial in the early second century CE through these final modifications. Complementary geophysical surveys, utilizing (GPR) since 2013, have mapped the full extent of the approximately 50-acre fortress, delineating viae principales, internal buildings, and perimeter defenses. These non-invasive methods, integrated with excavation data, corroborate Hadrianic origins (circa 117–138 CE) through foundational and associated artifacts, establishing Legio as a permanent base for following the .

Recent Findings and Interpretations

Excavations conducted by the Jezreel Valley Regional Project since 2013 have revealed architectural features consistent with a Roman castra, including barracks, roads, and drainage systems, alongside artifacts such as stamped roof tiles and bricks inscribed with L[eg(io)] VI F[err(ata)], directly affirming the presence of Legio VI Ferrata at Legio (el-Lajjun) from circa 120 CE to the early 4th century CE. These discoveries, corroborated by geophysical surveys like ground-penetrating radar, delineate the camp's 52-hectare perimeter and internal layout, supporting epigraphic evidence from military diplomas elsewhere that place the legion in Judaea for provincial stabilization post-Bar Kokhba revolt. In 2017, salvage work uncovered a monumental gate to the principia (), featuring limestone blocks with inscriptions likely denoting dedications or unit commanders, which scholars interpret as evidence of the legion's administrative and ceremonial functions in maintaining Roman hegemony over key Judean routes. A 2024 exposure of extensive fortress walls and tiled structures further highlighted the site's scale, with over 5,000 stamped tiles indicating for military infrastructure, underscoring Legio's role as a forward base for suppressing unrest rather than mere transit. Small finds, including coins countermarked for use and weapons of Eastern Roman design, suggest from Syrian provinces, reflecting pragmatic integration to bolster local garrisons amid Hadrianic reforms. For post-Roman phases, a June 2025 analysis of medieval texts by Marom, Adams, and Tepper identifies the Mosque of Ibrahim as a 10th-century Fatimid-era dedicated to Abraham, located near the ancient camp; its described and courtyard align with early Islamic architectural norms, though destruction in the 1948 war precludes direct excavation, leaving interpretations reliant on literary descriptions of pilgrimage sites. Ongoing challenges from the site's proximity to Megiddo Prison constrain invasive digs to salvage contexts, prompting reliance on and electromagnetic surveys that have mapped subsurface anomalies matching the camp's via principalis and principia without disturbance; these technologies reveal a precise 1,600-by-2,000-meter grid, enabling debates on the legion's abandonment around 305 CE amid Diocletianic reorganizations. Scholars caution that while empirical data affirm pacification efficacy—evidenced by reduced revolts post-deployment—narrative sources may overstate legionary brutality, prioritizing artifactual over textual bias.

Demographics and Social Structure

Historical Population Data

In the late 16th century, Ottoman tax registers (defter) recorded Lajjun within the Lajjun nahiya, encompassing 131 households subject to taxation, indicative of a modest primarily engaged in . Population estimates for the village proper during this era suggest around 200-250 individuals, based on typical household sizes of 5-6 persons derived from defter data across similar Palestinian locales. By the 1870s, amid late Ottoman reforms and increased settlement in the , Lajjun's population had expanded to approximately 700 residents, reflecting broader regional migration patterns toward fertile lands, as noted in contemporary surveys though exact censuses were sporadic. Under the British Mandate, official censuses provide precise figures: 417 inhabitants in 1922, rising to 857 in 1931 (829 , 26 , 2 ). The 1945 Village Statistics estimated 1,038 , with no recorded or , signaling near-complete ethnic homogeneity by the mid-1940s (approximately 98% Muslim), possibly due to out-migration of minorities and familial ties to regional communities. Pre-war estimates for 1948 place the at around 1,280, marking a peak driven by natural growth and influx from adjacent areas, before depopulation reduced it to zero following military events.
YearTotal PopulationComposition
1596~200-250 (est.)Primarily households
1870s~700 (est.) majority
1922417Not broken down
1931857829 , 26 , 2
19451,0381,038
1948 (pre-war)~1,280Predominantly
These figures illustrate steady growth from Ottoman times through the Mandate era, attributable to agricultural opportunities and regional stability, with a sharp halt post-1948.

Clan and Economic Life

The of al-Lajjun during the British Mandate period revolved around hamulas, or extended , which organized the village into distinct quarters corresponding to familial groups such as al-Mahajina al-Tahta, al-Ghubariyya, al-Jabbarin, al-Mahamid, and al-Mahajina al-Fawqa. These traced their settlement to fellahin migrants from nearby in the late nineteenth century, who initially exploited the area's farmland seasonally before establishing permanent residency amid reduced raids following Ottoman reforms. The mukhtar system, led by clan representatives, facilitated local governance, including through customary and coordination of communal projects like water infrastructure in the 1940s. Al-Lajjun's economy centered on , dominated by dry farming of and across roughly 44,000 dunams of cultivable land as recorded in 1938 village . cultivation remained limited, constrained by the prevalence of the musha'a communal tenure system until its partitioning in the 1910s shifted much land toward private holdings by the 1930s, enabling some mechanization with tractors and harvesters. supplemented farming, with 481 goats, 834 sheep, and 512 enumerated in 1943, alongside minor and . Crafts were rudimentary, featuring spring-powered grain mills and a small for livestock trade at Khallet al-Suq, while seasonal labor dynamics involved influxes of workers from and Transjordan for harvests, reflecting the village's role in regional agrarian networks.

Controversies and Debates

Narratives of 1948 Displacement

Palestinian narratives of Lajjun's 1948 displacement, often preserved through oral histories collected by organizations like Zochrot, emphasize forced expulsion by Israeli forces during the village's capture on May 30, 1948. Survivors such as Mahameed, displaced at age 5, recount abrupt abandonment amid advancing troops, framing the event as part of a broader pattern in the Nakba. These accounts, drawn from testimonies, attribute depopulation to direct military pressure rather than voluntary flight, though Zochrot's advocacy for Palestinian return introduces potential in sourcing. Israeli records present the displacement as a consequence of defensive operations in Operation Gideon, where the secured Lajjun on May 30 to counter irregulars defending the site and threats to Jewish supply lines in the . Official accounts describe villagers fleeing amid following the "clearing" of nearby Baysan Valley positions, prioritizing strategic imperatives over expulsion, with no evidence of orders for systematic removal. This aligns with broader empirical patterns: UN documentation notes widespread Arab flight during the but lacks corroboration for a centralized Israeli of village destruction, attributing much displacement to chaos and propagated by Arab leadership. The displacement occurred in the context of escalated conflict after Arab states' rejection of the November 29, 1947, UN Partition Plan, which allocated Lajjun to the proposed Arab state yet triggered immediate violence. opposition and subsequent invasion by five armies on May 15, 1948—post-Israel's declaration—intensified panic, with over 700,000 displaced amid battles rather than isolated expulsions. Exaggerated Nakba claims of premeditated erasure overlook prior Arab-initiated hostilities, such as the 1929 riots that demonstrated patterns of communal assault fostering mutual insecurity, though Lajjun itself saw no recorded attacks then. Causal analysis reveals war-induced exodus, not unilateral policy, as primary driver, with Arab strategic retreats and broadcasts urging evacuation contributing to flight from frontline villages like Lajjun.

Preservation vs. Development Conflicts

In 2024, Palestinian citizens of Israel, often referred to as '48 Arabs, held rallies protesting Israeli government plans to establish a national park at the site of the depopulated village of al-Lajjun, framing the initiative as an effort to "Judaize" the area by prioritizing ancient Roman heritage over remnants of the Arab village. These demonstrations, organized by descendants of the village's former residents, also included legal objections aimed at halting the transformation of al-Lajjun and 13 other 1948 depopulated sites into tourist attractions, which protesters argue erases evidence of Palestinian presence and ethnic cleansing. The New Arab, a outlet with a pro-Palestinian editorial stance, reported these events as part of broader resistance to perceived land appropriation, though such narratives often omit the context of Israel's defensive war victory in 1948 that secured control over the territory following Arab-initiated hostilities. Israeli authorities, through the (IAA), have conducted ongoing excavations at the adjacent Roman Legio camp since at least 2013, uncovering structures from the base established in the early CE, with seasons continuing into 2023 focusing on the castrum's layout and daily life artifacts. These efforts emphasize archaeological tourism to highlight the site's Roman significance, potentially conflicting with preservation of 20th-century village features like abandoned huts and agricultural terraces, as modern park development risks overlaying or removing such elements to facilitate visitor access and infrastructure. Critics from the Palestinian side contend that this selective focus on antiquity neglects recent heritage, while proponents argue that state sovereignty, affirmed by the 1948 armistice lines and subsequent stability, enables systematic preservation and study impossible under the British Mandate's fragmented administration, where sites like Legio saw minimal intervention. The underlying debate pits claims of a —rooted in narratives of displacement—against Israel's legal authority over state lands acquired through and international recognition post-1948, with development plans reflecting a prioritization of universal historical value over localized ethnic memory. This tension underscores causal factors such as the that permitted IAA-led digs, contrasting with pre-1948 amid regional , though activist accounts frequently exhibit by emphasizing victimhood without acknowledging the war's origins in Arab rejection of partition and . No major legal resolutions have emerged as of late 2024, leaving site management contested between ambitions and activist demands for inclusive commemoration.

Cultural and Religious Heritage

Notable Sites and Traditions

The Mosque of Ibrahim at al-Lajjun, constructed as a in the CE, commemorated a spring purportedly created when the prophet Abraham struck a rock with his staff, drawing pilgrims to the site during the Early Islamic and periods. Historical texts from the 10th to 15th centuries describe it as built over a round rock, with the structure now lost but potentially linked to a columned vestibule identified in 19th-century surveys at the mound's highest point. This site represented a key element of local religious heritage, tied to Abrahamic miracle traditions rather than later Ottoman constructions. An Ottoman-period cemetery occupies the southwestern corner of the village site, overlaying earlier burials and preserving graves including the tomb of Yusuf al-Hamdan, a local leader killed during the 1936 Arab Revolt against British Mandate rule. The endures in a state of neglect, with visible markers attesting to continuous use from at least the onward, though access remains restricted. Oral histories transmitted among former residents highlight the Turabay dynasty's administration of Lajjun as an Ottoman provincial capital from 1517 to 1688 CE, portraying their era as one of regional prominence in the before 18th-century decline. These accounts, drawn from interviews with descendants, emphasize the family's governance structures and economic oversight, forming a core of local lore distinct from broader archaeological narratives. The village's position adjacent to , identified biblically as the locale of in Revelation 16:16, situated Lajjun within a landscape imbued with scriptural resonance, though primarily through spatial rather than enacted traditions.

Legacy in Regional Memory

In Palestinian narratives of the Nakba, al-Lajjun symbolizes the abrupt loss of communal life and land during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, with oral histories recounting the village's capture by Israeli forces on May 30, 1948, and the flight of approximately 1,200 residents amid advancing combat operations in the . These accounts, preserved through testimonies and advocacy platforms, frame the depopulation as emblematic of systematic displacement, though such sources often emphasize victimhood without detailing the preceding Arab rejection of the Partition Plan (Resolution 181) on November 29, 1947, which allocated viable territories for both Jewish and Arab states but was dismissed by Arab leadership as infringing on purported indivisible sovereignty, triggering civil strife and interstate invasion. Empirical review of wartime dynamics reveals al-Lajjun's fall as a tactical outcome in defensive Israeli operations against irregular forces aligned with rejectionist ideologies, rather than isolated , underscoring causal links between diplomatic refusal and territorial upheavals. Archaeological work at the adjoining Legio camp substantiates the site's role in Roman imperial strategy post-120 CE, housing the VI Ferrata Legion for nearly two centuries to quell Jewish revolts following the Bar Kokhba uprising (132–136 CE), thereby evidencing persistent Jewish demographic and cultural presence in the Megiddo region amid cycles of conquest. Excavations yielding , aqueducts, and inscriptions affirm this military overlay on pre-existing Semitic layers tied to biblical-era Jewish kingdoms, countering ahistorical claims of discontinuity while illuminating administrative in later Ottoman governance, where al-Lajjun functioned as a khan waypoint reflecting loose provincial control over agrarian clans. Prospects for integrated heritage tourism, capitalizing on Legio-Megiddo's UNESCO status to educate on stratified histories, remain stymied by discordant commemorations: Palestinian activists decry Israeli park developments over village remnants as erasure tactics, while maximalist demands for pre-1948 reversion perpetuate zero-sum discourse incompatible with mutual recognition. Balanced could reframe al-Lajjun as a nexus for empirical dialogue on contingency in , yet entrenched narratives prioritizing over pragmatic coexistence hinder such endeavors.

References

  1. https://www.jezreelvalleyregionalproject.com/legio
  2. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93p3k4hj
  3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370631229_Lajjun_Forgotten_Provincial_Capital_in_Ottoman_Palestine
  4. https://pal48.ps/en/article/404/
  5. https://www.palquest.org/en/place/16833/al-lajjun
  6. https://www.zochrot.org/villages/village_details/53285/en?alLajjun_
  7. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-israel/what-is-the-jezreel-valley/
  8. https://www.touristisrael.com/jezreel-valley/8604/
  9. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0xr5x18n/qt0xr5x18n_noSplash_6858eb2fa6864bf5c00555ee8e69eb0c.pdf
  10. https://www.thattheworldmayknow.com/the-valley-of-jezreel-viewed-from-megiddo
  11. https://biblemapper.com/blog/index.php/2020/02/07/jezreel-valley-and-megiddo/
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11613942/
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230335809_The_soils_of_Israel_and_their_distribution
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287237657_The_Soils_of_Israel
  15. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-sites-places/biblical-archaeology-sites/legio/
  16. https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/1650284
  17. https://popular-archaeology.com/article/the-legionary-base-of-the-roman-sixth-ferrata-legion-at-legio-israel/
  18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27924424
  19. https://www.livius.org/articles/legion/legio-vi-ferrata/
  20. https://scriptaclassica.org/index.php/sci/article/download/3271/2787
  21. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3366/hlps.2016.0140
  22. https://www.palestineremembered.com/Jinin/al-Lajjun/index.html
  23. https://lukechandler.wordpress.com/2014/06/12/roman-legionary-camp-identified-at-megiddo/
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301894427_From_the_Bronze_Age_to_the_%27Lead_Age%27_Observations_on_Sediment_Analyses_at_Two_Archaeological_Sites_in_the_Jezreel_Valley_Israel
  25. https://www.jezreelvalleyregionalproject.com/publications
  26. https://www.britannica.com/place/Megiddo
  27. https://cris.haifa.ac.il/en/publications/the-roman-vith-legion-ferrata-at-legio-el-lajjun-israel-prelimina
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316154143_Excavations_at_the_Camp_of_the_Roman_Sixth_Ferrata_Legion_at_Legio_el-Lajjun_Israel_A_Preliminary_Report_of_the_2013_Season
  29. https://www.academia.edu/32441661/Y_Tepper_J_David_and_M_J_Adams_Excavations_at_the_Camp_of_the_Roman_Sixth_Ferrata_Legion_at_Legio_el_Lajjun_Israel_A_Preliminary_Report_of_the_2013_Season
  30. https://hadashot.iaa.org.il/Report_Detail_eng.aspx?print=all&id=14725&mag_id=122
  31. https://www.academia.edu/11540338/Tepper_Yotam_2002_Lajjun_Legio_in_Israel_Results_of_a_survey_in_and_around_the_military_camp_area_In_P_Freman_J_Bennett_Z_T_Fiema_and_B_Hoffmamm_eds_Proceedings_of_the_XVIIIth_Roman_frontier_studies_Limes_XVII_BAR_I_S_1084_1_231_242
  32. https://www.popular-archaeology.com/article/the-legionary-base-of-the-roman-sixth-ferrata-legion-at-legio-israel/
  33. https://journal.equinoxpub.com/JIA/article/view/28376
  34. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/728589
  35. https://dokumen.pub/the-towns-of-palestine-under-muslim-rule-ad-600-1600-1841718211-9781841718217.html
  36. https://sourcebooks.web.fordham.edu/source/1354-ibnbattuta.asp
  37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00758914.2023.2202484
  38. https://escholarship.org/content/qt93p3k4hj/qt93p3k4hj_noSplash_69deaa0a2bb7570d5bd79767566579e5.pdf?t=s6psdb
  39. https://www.britannica.com/place/Ottoman-Empire/The-Tanzimat-reforms-1839-76
  40. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/battle-of-megiddo/
  41. https://www.palestine-studies.org/sites/default/files/jq-articles/JQ_56-57_The_1915_Locust_0.pdf
  42. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/americancolony/amcolony-locust.html
  43. https://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/yabber/census/PalestineCensus1922.pdf
  44. http://www.scottishfriendsofpalestine.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/CountDownToCatastrophe.pdf
  45. https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/38214
  46. https://www.meforum.org/how-many-palestinian-arab-refugees
  47. https://www.palestine-studies.org/sites/default/files/attachments/jps-articles/exodus.pdf
  48. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/1948-exodus-uncovered-palestinian-press-reveals-leaders-advised-departure
  49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2536718
  50. https://www.palestineremembered.com/Jinin/al-Lajjun/Picture136127.html
  51. https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2021-01-31/ty-article/.premium/destroying-armageddon-the-apocalypse-as-a-tourism-attraction/0000017f-ef24-d8a1-a5ff-ffae72530000
  52. https://placesjournal.org/article/a-situation-a-tree-in-palestine/
  53. https://www.thenatureofcities.com/TNOC/2021/12/06/planning-is-power-how-planning-shaped-colonial-realities-in-occupied-palestine/
  54. https://hadashot.iaa.org.il/Report_Detail_Eng.aspx?id=26642
  55. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/new-discoveries-unearthed-roman-legion-camp-near-armageddon-180967654/
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374288799_The_Principia_of_the_Sixth_Legion_at_LegioCaparcotani_Ground_Penetrating_Radar_and_Excavations_in_a_Legionary_Base
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346852450_New_results_from_GPR_at_Legio_A_Roman_Legionary_Base_in_the_Jezreel_Valley_Israel
  58. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/arp.1455
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264361994_Ground-penetrating_Radar_and_Electromagnetic_Archaeogeophysical_Investigations_at_the_Roman_Legionary_Camp_at_Legio_Israel
  60. https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/archeology/1707917140-israeli-archeologists-unearth-central-roman-legion-base
  61. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/rome-an-empire-of-many-nations/roman-legionary-base-in-legiokefar-othnay-the-evidence-from-the-small-finds/53AE064F5365D671E74D74A9459A7C6D
  62. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1148&context=econ_wpapers
  63. https://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/yabber/census/VillageStatistics1945orig.pdf
  64. https://pal48.ps/en/article/404/%25D9%2582%25D8%25B1%25D9%258A%25D8%25A9-al-lajjun-%25D8%25A7%25D9%2584%25D9%2585%25D9%2587%25D8%25AC%25D8%25B1%25D8%25A9
  65. https://www.zochrot.org/testimonies/all/en/2
  66. https://raseef22.net/english/article/1097998-a-park-over-a-palestinian-village-how-isw-israel-erases-the-traces-of-its-ethnic
  67. https://pal48.ps/en/article/404/al-lajjun-depopulated-village
  68. https://www.un.org/unispal/history/
  69. https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-179435/
  70. https://ecf.org.il/issues/issue/1349
  71. https://www.newarab.com/features/48-palestinians-rally-save-lajjun-village-judaization
  72. https://twitter.com/The_NewArab/status/1824936796964237557
  73. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00310328.2024.2363671
  74. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0xr5x18n
  75. https://www.gotquestions.org/Megiddo-in-the-Bible.html
  76. https://jcpa.org/rejection-of-the-un-partition-plan-of-november-29-1947-was-a-prequel-to-the-october-7-massacre/
  77. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-israel/more-of-megiddos-roman-legionary-camp-revealed/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.