Hubbry Logo
William BucklandWilliam BucklandMain
Open search
William Buckland
Community hub
William Buckland
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
William Buckland
William Buckland
from Wikipedia

William Buckland DD, FRS (12 March 1784 – 14 August 1856) was an English theologian, geologist and palaeontologist.

Key Information

His work in the early 1820s proved that Kirkdale Cave in North Yorkshire had been a prehistoric hyena den, for which he was awarded the Copley Medal. It was praised as an example of how scientific analysis could reconstruct events in the distant past. He pioneered the use of fossilised faeces in reconstructing ecosystems, coining the term coprolites. Buckland also wrote the first full account of a fossil dinosaur, which he named Megalosaurus in 1824.

Buckland followed the Gap Theory in interpreting the biblical account of Genesis as two widely separated episodes of creation. It had emerged as a way to reconcile the scriptural account with discoveries in geology suggesting the earth was very old. Early in his career Buckland believed he had found evidence of the biblical flood, but later saw that the glaciation theory of Louis Agassiz gave a better explanation, and played a significant role in promoting it.

Buckland served as Dean of Westminster from 1845 until his death 1856.

Early life

[edit]
Bust of Buckland in the Oxford University Museum of Natural History

Buckland was born at Axminster in Devon[1] and, as a child, would accompany his father, the Rector of Templeton and Trusham, on his walks where interest in road improvements led to collecting fossil shells, including ammonites, from the Early Jurassic Lias rocks exposed in local quarries.

He was educated first at Blundell's School, Tiverton, Devon, and then at Winchester College, from where he won a scholarship to Corpus Christi College, Oxford, matriculating in 1801 and graduating BA in 1805.[2] He also attended lectures of John Kidd on mineralogy and chemistry, developed an interest in geology, and carried out field research on strata during his vacations.[1] He went on to obtain his MA degree in 1808, became a Fellow of Corpus Christi in 1809, and was ordained as a priest. He continued to make frequent geological excursions, on horseback, to various parts of England, Scotland, Ireland and Wales.

In 1813, Buckland was appointed Reader in mineralogy, in succession to John Kidd, giving lively and popular lectures with increasing emphasis on geology and palaeontology. As an unofficial curator of the Ashmolean Museum, he built up collections, touring Europe and coming into contact with scholars including Georges Cuvier.

Career, work and discoveries

[edit]

Rejection of flood geology and Kirkdale Cave

[edit]
William Conybeare drew this cartoon of Buckland poking his head into a prehistoric hyaena den in 1822 to celebrate Buckland's ground breaking analysis of the fossils found in Kirkdale Cave.[3]

In 1818, Buckland was elected a fellow of the Royal Society. That year he persuaded the Prince Regent to endow an additional Readership, this time in Geology and he became the first holder of the new appointment, delivering his inaugural address on 15 May 1819. This was published in 1820 as Vindiciæ Geologiæ; or the Connexion of Geology with Religion explained, both justifying the new science of geology and reconciling geological evidence with the biblical accounts of creation and Noah's Flood.

At a time when others were coming under the opposing influence of James Hutton's theory of uniformitarianism, Buckland developed a new hypothesis that the word "beginning" in Genesis meant an undefined period between the origin of the earth and the creation of its current inhabitants, during which a long series of extinctions and successive creations of new kinds of plants and animals had occurred. Thus, his catastrophism theory incorporated a version of Old Earth creationism or Gap creationism. Buckland believed in a global deluge during the time of Noah but was not a supporter of flood geology as he believed that only a small amount of the strata could have been formed in the single year occupied by the deluge.[4]

From his investigations of fossil bones at Kirkdale Cave, in Yorkshire, he concluded that the cave had actually been inhabited by hyaenas in antediluvian times, and that the fossils were the remains of these hyaenas and the animals they had eaten, rather than being remains of animals that had perished in the Flood and then carried from the tropics by the surging waters, as he and others had at first thought. In 1822 he wrote:

It must already appear probable, from the facts above described, particularly from the comminuted state and apparently gnawed condition of the bones, that the cave in Kirkdale was, during a long succession of years, inhabited as a den of hyaenas, and that they dragged into its recesses the other animal bodies whose remains are found mixed indiscriminately with their own: this conjecture is rendered almost certain by the discovery I made, of many small balls of the solid calcareous excrement of an animal that had fed on bones... It was at first sight recognised by the keeper of the Menagerie at Exeter Change, as resembling, in both form and appearance, the faeces of the spotted or cape hyaena, which he stated to be greedy of bones beyond all other beasts in his care.[5]

While criticised by some, Buckland's analysis of Kirkland Cave and other bone caves was widely seen as a model for how careful analysis could be used to reconstruct the Earth's past, and the Royal Society awarded Buckland the Copley Medal in 1822 for his paper on Kirkdale Cave.[6] At the presentation the society's president, Humphry Davy, said:

by these inquiries, a distinct epoch has, as it were, been established in the history of the revolutions of our globe: a point fixed from which our researches may be pursued through the immensity of ages, and the records of animate nature, as it were, carried back to the time of the creation.[6]

While Buckland's analysis convinced him that the bones found in Kirkdale Cave had not been washed into the cave by a global flood, he still believed the thin layer of mud that covered the remains of the hyaena den had been deposited in the subsequent 'Universal Deluge'.[6] He developed these ideas into his great scientific work Reliquiæ Diluvianæ, or, Observations on the Organic Remains attesting the Action of a Universal Deluge[7] which was published in 1823 and became a best seller. However, over the next decade as geology continued to progress Buckland changed his mind. In his famous Bridgewater Treatise, published in 1836, he acknowledged that the biblical account of Noah's flood could not be confirmed using geological evidence.[8] By 1840 he was very actively promoting the view that what had been interpreted as evidence of the 'Universal Deluge' two decades earlier, and subsequently of deep submergence by a new generation of geologists such as Charles Lyell, was in fact evidence of a major glaciation.

Megalosaurus

[edit]
Buckland family silhouette

He continued to live in Corpus Christi College and, in 1824, he became president of the Geological Society of London. Here he announced the discovery, at Stonesfield, of fossil bones of a giant reptile which he named Megalosaurus ('great lizard') and wrote the first full account of what would later be called a dinosaur.

In 1825, Buckland was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.[9] That year he resigned his college fellowship: he planned to take up the living of Stoke Charity in Hampshire but, before he could take up the appointment, he was made a Canon of Christ Church, a rich reward for academic distinction without serious administrative responsibilities.

Marriage

[edit]

In December 1825 he married Mary Morland of Abingdon, Oxfordshire, an accomplished illustrator and collector of fossils. Their honeymoon was a year touring Europe, with visits to famous geologists and geological sites. She continued to assist him in his work, as well as having nine children, five of whom survived to adulthood. His son Frank Buckland became a well known practical naturalist, author, and Inspector of Salmon Fisheries.

On one occasion, Mary helped him decipher footmarks found in a slab of sandstone by covering the kitchen table with paste, while he fetched their pet tortoise and confirmed his intuition, that tortoise footprints matched the fossil marks. His daughter, author Elizabeth Oke Buckland Gordon, wrote a biography of her father that included appendices of positions held by Buckland, his membership in professional societies, and an index of his publications.

The Red Lady of Paviland

[edit]

On 18 January 1823 Buckland walked into Paviland Cave in south Wales, where he discovered a skeleton which he named the Red Lady of Paviland,[10] as he at first supposed it to be the remains of a local prostitute.[11] Although Buckland found the skeleton in Paviland Cave in the same strata as the bones of extinct mammals (including mammoth), Buckland shared the view of Georges Cuvier that no humans had coexisted with any extinct animals, and he attributed the skeleton's presence there to a grave having been dug in historical times, possibly by the same people who had constructed some nearby pre-Roman fortifications, into the older layers.[12]

Carbon-data tests have since dated the skeleton, now known to be male as from circa 33,000 years before present (BP).[13] It is the oldest anatomically modern human found in the United Kingdom.

Coprolites and the Liassic food chain

[edit]
Duria Antiquior – A more Ancient Dorset, 1830 watercolour by Henry De la Beche, based on Buckland's account of Mary Anning's discoveries

The fossil hunter Mary Anning noticed that stony objects known as "bezoar stones" were often found in the abdominal region of ichthyosaur skeletons found in the Lias formation at Lyme Regis. She also noted that if such stones were broken open they often contained fossilised fish bones and scales, and sometimes bones from small ichthyosaurs. These observations by Anning led Buckland to propose in 1829 that the stones were fossilised faeces. He coined the name coprolite for them; the name came to be the general name for all fossilised faeces.

Buckland also concluded that the spiral markings on the fossils indicated that ichthyosaurs had spiral ridges in their intestines similar to those of modern sharks, and that some of these coprolites were black because the ichthyosaur had ingested ink sacs from belemnites. He wrote a vivid description of the Liassic food chain based on these observations, which would inspire Henry De la Beche to paint Duria Antiquior, the first pictorial representation of a scene from the distant past.[14] After De le Beche had a lithographic print made based on his original watercolour, Buckland kept a supply of the prints on hand to circulate at his lectures.[15] He also discussed other similar objects found in other formations, including the fossilised hyena dung he had found in Kirkdale Cave. He concluded:

In all these various formations our Coprolites form records of warfare, waged by successive generations of inhabitants of our planet on one another: the imperishable phosphate of lime, derived from their digested skeletons, has become embalmed in the substance and foundations of the everlasting hills; and the general law of Nature which bids all to eat and be eaten in their turn, is shown to have been co-extensive with animal existence on our globe; the Carnivora in each period of the world's history fulfilling their destined office, – to check excess in the progress of life, and maintain the balance of creation.[16]

Buckland had been helping and encouraging Roderick Murchison for some years, and in 1831 was able to suggest a good starting point in South Wales for Murchison's researches into the rocks beneath the secondary strata associated with the age of reptiles. Murchison would later name these older strata, characterised by marine invertebrate fossils, as Silurian, after a tribe that had lived in that area centuries earlier.[17] In 1832 Buckland presided over the second meeting of the British Association, which was then held at Oxford.

Bridgewater Treatise

[edit]
Portrait by Richard Ansdell

Buckland was commissioned to contribute one of the set of eight Bridgewater Treatises, "On the Power, Wisdom and Goodness of God, as manifested in the Creation". This took him almost five years' work and was published in 1836 with the title Geology and Mineralogy considered with reference to Natural Theology.[18] His volume included a detailed compendium of his theories of day-age, gap theory and a form of progressive creationism where faunal succession revealed by the fossil record was explained by a series of successive divine creations that prepared the earth for humans.[19] In the introduction he expressed the argument from design by asserting that the families and phyla of biology were "clusters of contrivance":

The myriads of petrified Remains which are disclosed by the researches of Geology all tend to prove that our Planet has been occupied in times preceding the Creation of the Human Race, by extinct species of Animals and Vegetables, made up, like living Organic Bodies, of 'Clusters of Contrivances,' which demonstrate the exercise of stupendous Intelligence and Power. They further show that these extinct forms of Organic Life were so closely allied, by Unity in the principles of their construction, to Classes, Orders, and Families, which make up the existing Animal and Vegetable Kingdoms, that they not only afford an argument of surpassing force, against the doctrines of the Atheist and Polytheist; but supply a chain of connected evidence, amounting to demonstration, of the continuous Being, and of many of the highest Attributes of the One Living and True God.

Following Charles Darwin's return from the Beagle voyage, Buckland discussed with him the Galapagos land iguanas and Marine iguanas.[20] He subsequently recommended Darwin's paper on the role of earthworms in soil formation for publication, praising it as "a new & important theory to explain Phenomena of universal occurrence on the surface of the Earth—in fact a new Geological Power", while rightly rejecting Darwin's suggestion that chalkland could have been formed in a similar way.[21]

Glaciation theory

[edit]

By this time Buckland was a prominent and influential scientific celebrity and a friend of the Tory prime minister, Sir Robert Peel. In co-operation with Adam Sedgwick and Charles Lyell, he prepared the report leading to the establishment of the Geological Survey of Great Britain.

Having become interested in the theory of Louis Agassiz, that polished and striated rocks as well as transported material, had been caused by ancient glaciers, he travelled to Switzerland, in 1838, to meet Agassiz and see for himself. He was convinced and was reminded of what he had seen in Scotland, Wales and northern England but had previously attributed to the Flood. When Agassiz came to Britain for the Glasgow meeting of the British Association, in 1840, they went on an extended tour of Scotland and found evidence there of former glaciation. In that year Buckland had become president of the Geological Society again and, despite their hostile reaction to his presentation of the theory, he was now satisfied that glaciation had been the origin of much of the surface deposits covering Britain.

In 1845 he was appointed by Sir Robert Peel to the vacant Deanery of Westminster[22] (he succeeded Samuel Wilberforce). Soon after, he was inducted to the living of Islip, near Oxford, a preferment attached to the deanery. As Dean and head of Chapter, Buckland was involved in repair and maintenance of Westminster Abbey and in preaching suitable sermons to the rural population of Islip, while continuing to lecture on geology at Oxford. In 1847, he was appointed a trustee in the British Museum and, in 1848, he was awarded the Wollaston Medal by the Geological Society of London.

Illness and death

[edit]

Around the end of 1850, William Buckland contracted a disorder of the neck and brain, and died of it in 1856.[23] Frank Buckland reported that an autopsy showed "the portion of the base of the skull upon which the brain rested, together with the two upper vertebrae of the neck, to be in an advanced state of caries, or decay. The irritation...was quite sufficient cause to give rise to all symptoms." Frank Buckland attributed the cause of death of both his parents to a severe accident years earlier.[24]

The plot for William's grave had been reserved, but when the gravedigger set to work, it was found that an outcrop of solid Jurassic limestone lay just below ground level and explosives had to be used for excavation. This may have been a last jest by the noted geologist, reminiscent of Richard Whately's Elegy intended for Professor Buckland written in 1820:

Where shall we our great Professor inter
That in peace may rest his bones?
If we hew him a rocky sepulchre
He'll rise and break the stones
And examine each stratum that lies around
For he's quite in his element underground

Known eccentricities

[edit]

Buckland preferred to do his field palaeontology and geological work wearing an academic gown.[26] His lectures were notable for their dramatic delivery.[27] When he lectured indoors he would bring his presentations to life by imitating the movements of the dinosaurs under discussion.[28] Buckland's passion for scientific observation and experiment extended to his home, where he had a table inlaid with dinosaur coprolites. The original table top is exhibited at the Lyme Regis Museum.[29][30]

Not only was William Buckland's home filled with specimens – animal as well as mineral, live as well as dead[31] – but he claimed that he wanted to eat at least one individual of all animal species. Reportedly according to an anecdote recounted by Augustus Hare, the most distasteful animals Buckland consumed were in his opinion mole and bluebottle fly.[32] Ostrich,[33] hedgehogs, tortoises, rats, frogs and snails were among animals reportedly served to guests,[34][31] with Buckland also having been reported as consuming alligators, young dogs, and mice.[34] He was followed in this hobby by his son Frank.[34][31]

One story recounted by Peter Lund Simmonds in 1859 reports that Buckland served soup to his guests before claiming that it was an alligator that he had dissected earlier that day, to the guests significant shock and discomfort. When asked if he had really served an alligator, he reportedly responded "as good a calf's head as ever wore a coronet".[35] Another account suggests that Buckland served his guests pickled horse tongue at a luncheon without initially telling them what they were eating.[34]

According to a widely repeated story, Buckland consumed, maybe accidentally, a portion of the mummified heart of the French King Louis XIV during a dinner at Nuneham House,[32][36] though the veracity of this particular story has been questioned.[37][38] The Louis XIV heart story goes back at least as far as an 1863 book by Nathaniel Hawthorne.[39]

Charles Darwin criticised Buckland for his behaviour in his autobiography, saying that "Buckland, who though very good-humoured and good-natured, seemed to me a vulgar and almost coarse man. He was incited more by a craving for notoriety, which sometimes made him act like a buffoon, than by a love of science."[40]

Legacy

[edit]

Dorsum Buckland, a wrinkle ridge on the Moon, is named after him. Buckland Island (known today as Ani-Jima), in the Bonin Islands (Ogasawara-Jima), was named after him by Captain Beechey on 9 June 1827. In 1846, William Buckland was rector of St. Nicholas in Islip and is commemorated on a plaque in the south aisle of the church and the "East Window" was dedicated to the memory of Buckland and his wife in 1861.[41] A plaque is dedicated to him near his summer home by the Old Rectory, The Walk, Islip (10 August 2008). There is also a bust by Henry Weekes in the south aisle at Westminster Abbey.[42]

In 1972, botanist Heikki Roivainen circumscribed Bucklandiella, a genus of moss in the family Grimmiaceae, which was named in his honour.[43] Buckland Peaks in New Zealand's Paparoa Range was named after him.[44]

The Iñupiat village of Buckland (Inupiaq: Nunatchiaq) in Alaska's Northwest Arctic Borough takes its English name from William Buckland, being named by Royal Navy officer Frederick William Beechey in 1826.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
William Buckland (1784–1856) was an influential English theologian, geologist, and paleontologist renowned for his pioneering work in vertebrate paleontology and his efforts to reconcile geological evidence with biblical accounts of creation. Born on 12 March 1784 in , , he became one of the first academic geologists in Britain, serving as the inaugural Reader in at the from 1818 and contributing foundational insights into fossil evidence of ancient environments and extinctions. His most notable achievement was the 1824 scientific description and naming of , the first to be formally identified, based on fossils from Stonesfield Slate in . Buckland's early education included schooling at Blundell's in Tiverton and before he entered , in 1801, where he earned his MA in 1808 and was ordained as a that same year. Appointed Reader in at in 1813, he quickly established himself as a dynamic and field researcher, often collecting fossils in his distinctive academic gown while carrying a large blue bag for specimens. Elected a in 1818 and president of the from 1824 to 1826—during which he helped secure its —he promoted empirical amid debates over the Earth's age and catastrophic events like the biblical . In his seminal 1823 publication Reliquiae Diluvianae, Buckland analyzed fossils from Kirkdale Cave in , reconstructing a prehistoric and interpreting the findings as evidence of a Noachian deluge, though he later embraced uniformitarian and glacial theories influenced by in the 1830s. His studies extended to coprolites ( feces), which he used to infer diets of extinct animals, including giant reptiles, and he was among the first to systematically examine such traces in paleontological contexts. Known for his eccentricity, Buckland hosted dinners featuring unusual meats like or mouse pie to demonstrate zoological adaptability, reflecting his broad interests in . Buckland married naturalist and illustrator Mary Morland in 1825; together they had nine children, five of whom survived to adulthood, and she assisted in his fossil research and publications. Advancing to Canon of , in 1825 and in 1845, he continued bridging and faith until challenges in his later years led to his resignation. Buckland died on 14 August 1856 in , leaving a legacy as a key figure in establishing as a rigorous , honored with the Geological Society's inaugural in 1848.

Early Life and Education

Birth and Family

William Buckland was born on 12 March 1784 in , , , to Charles Buckland, a clergyman serving as rector of Templeton and Trusham, and his wife Elizabeth (née Oke). As the eldest son in a family of eight children—comprising seven siblings—Buckland grew up in a household where his father's clerical duties instilled early exposure to alongside an appreciation for the natural world. The Reverend Charles Buckland, himself a keen naturalist, encouraged his son's by leading family excursions through the countryside, where young William gathered fossils, birds' eggs, and other specimens from local quarries and coastal areas. The Buckland family, rooted in modest clerical circumstances, prioritized education despite limited financial resources, providing a stable environment that nurtured Buckland's budding interests in science and . This early foundation later propelled him toward formal schooling at and .

Formal Education and Ordination

Prior to Winchester, Buckland attended in Tiverton from August 1797 to June 1798, where he focused on classical studies including , , and . Buckland attended from 1798 to 1801, where he was admitted on 25 August 1798 and departed in March 1801, developing early interests in , , and under the headmastership of Dr. William Stanley Goddard, who served during this period. His time there included explorations of local chalk pits on St. Catherine’s Hill, fostering a budding fascination with fossils and alongside his classical studies. This institutional training built upon childhood encouragement from his family, particularly his father, who had introduced him to fossil collecting near quarries. In 1801, Buckland matriculated at , on 14 May, pursuing a classical curriculum that encompassed Latin, Greek, theology, history, and natural philosophy, while earning his BA on 21 February 1805 and MA on 26 January 1808. His studies were profoundly shaped by key mentors, including Edward Copleston, the provost of Oriel College who emphasized classical and theological rigor; Christopher Pegge, whose lectures on anatomy influenced his biological interests; and John Kidd, the reader in chemistry and whose lectures on and field excursions sparked Buckland's commitment to the earth sciences. Attendance at Kidd's sessions and related texts, such as Kidd's 1809 Outlines of Mineralogy, further integrated into his theological worldview, highlighting the harmony between science and scripture. During his Oxford years, Buckland participated in geological excursions organized by Kidd, including trips to sites like Lickey Hill, where he examined pebbles and formations that honed his observational skills. These activities extended to independent fossil collecting in the region, as well as a solo summer tour in 1808 across the , , and Dorset, where he documented geological features and gathered specimens that informed his emerging interdisciplinary approach. Buckland's formal entry into the church followed soon after, with as on 20 March 1808 by the at the , , and as priest on 12 June 1808 by the Bishop of Oxford. These ceremonies marked his commitment to , aligning his scientific pursuits with theological duties and setting the stage for a career that bridged and faith.

Academic and Professional Career

Early Appointments

Following his and studies at , William Buckland secured his first significant academic position in 1813 as Reader in , succeeding John Kidd who had resigned the role. In this capacity, Buckland delivered annual lectures in the Old Ashmolean building, initially covering but soon shifting emphasis toward , where he sought to harmonize scientific observations with biblical interpretations of creation and . That same year, Buckland assumed an unofficial curatorship of the Ashmolean Museum's geological holdings, residing on its premises and systematically organizing the university's sparse collections of minerals, rocks, and fossils. He augmented these resources through personal acquisitions and fieldwork, transforming the space into a functional teaching museum by 1824, which facilitated hands-on instruction and attracted students interested in emerging paleontological evidence. Buckland's growing prominence in geological circles was further evidenced by his election as a Fellow of the in , where he contributed early papers on regional . These works established his expertise in sedimentary sequences and organic remains, laying groundwork for broader paleontological inquiries. To advance his methods, Buckland undertook a formative tour of in 1816 with fellow geologists George Greenough and William Conybeare, traveling through , , , and beyond to study rock formations and collect specimens. His approach to reconstructing extinct species from fragmentary remains was profoundly shaped by meeting in 1818 during the latter's visit to and by ongoing correspondence on .

Oxford Professorship and Administrative Roles

In 1818, William Buckland was appointed as the first Reader in at the , a position he secured by persuading the Prince Regent to endow the chair, allowing him to hold it concurrently with his existing Readership in established in 1813. His inaugural lecture, delivered in 1819 and published as Vindiciae Geologicae, emphasized the harmony between geological discoveries and scriptural accounts, setting the tone for his tenure by integrating science with theology. Buckland significantly expanded Oxford's geological resources during his professorship, establishing a dedicated room and within the by 1824 to house and display an growing collection of fossils and specimens he acquired through fieldwork and donations. He also contributed key specimens and advocated for the development of a centralized facility, laying groundwork for the eventual Oxford University Museum of Natural History, where his collections were later deposited after his death. In administrative capacities, Buckland served as an examiner for degrees and as a mentor to promising students, notably influencing , who attended his lectures in 1819 and credited them with sparking his interest in . His role extended to overseeing academic standards in natural sciences, fostering a rigorous environment that supported emerging geological scholarship at . In 1825, Buckland was appointed Canon of , a prestigious clerical position that provided financial stability while requiring him to balance duties with his ongoing teaching and research commitments at the . This dual role enabled him to continue delivering influential lectures and expanding scientific infrastructure, though it increasingly divided his time between pastoral responsibilities and academic pursuits.

Scientific and Theological Contributions

Rejection of Flood Geology and Kirkdale Cave

In his inaugural lecture as Reader in at , delivered on May 15, 1819, and published in 1820 as Vindiciae Geologicae; or, The Connexion of with Explained, William Buckland advocated for diluvialism interpreted through gradual geological processes rather than a strict, singular Flood, arguing that the formation of secondary rock strata occurred over successive long periods consistent with divine design. He rejected rigid by proposing that the "days" of Genesis could represent extended epochs, allowing for pre-human geological revolutions without contradicting sacred history, and emphasized that superficial diluvial gravels evidenced a recent universal deluge approximately 5,000–6,000 years ago, separate from deeper strata formation. Buckland's investigation of Kirkdale Cave near Kirby Moorside, , began in December 1821 after its discovery earlier that year by quarrymen, revealing an assemblage of fossil teeth and bones from , , , , , , and at least 16 other embedded in red clay mud. He observed teeth marks and gnaw patterns on the bones, later verified by experiments with a live Cape to confirm hyena activity, and noted the cave's stratigraphy, with fossils overlain by stalagmitic layers indicating deposition prior to a later inundation. In a paper presented to the Royal Society in 1822, Buckland concluded that the cave served as an ante-diluvial hyena den, where the animals dragged in and consumed prey, disproving that the remains resulted from a single catastrophic washing them into the site. Expanding on this work, Buckland published Reliquiae Diluvianae; or, Observations on the Organic Remains Contained in Caves, Fissures, and Diluvial in 1823, providing a detailed of Kirkdale as an ancient den occupied by at least 75 individuals, based on over 300 canine teeth and associated coprolites. The book included 27 illustrations, such as cross-sections of the , engravings showing gnaw marks (Plate 23), and a reconstructed (Plate 2), alongside evidence of 23 faunal species, including extinct forms like the and , suggesting multiple periods of animal habitation rather than a unified event. Theologically, Buckland integrated these findings to argue that geological evidence from Kirkdale and similar sites affirmed divine creation operating through consistent laws over time, rather than relying on a single global catastrophe to explain all distributions, thereby harmonizing empirical with Mosaic records while advancing a catastrophist framework compatible with an old in British geology.

Naming of Megalosaurus

In the early , large bones began to emerge from the Stonesfield Slate quarries near , , prompting interest among naturalists. William Buckland, then Reader in at the , started acquiring these specimens around 1815 for the university's collection, including fragments of a lower , vertebrae, a , parts of the shoulder girdle, and robust hind limb bones from multiple individuals. These bones, preserved in strata, represented an enormous extinct reptile, and Buckland consulted with contemporaries such as physician and paleontologist , who had examined similar teeth and informally proposed the name (meaning "great lizard") in his 1822 publication Organic Remains of a Former World, though without a formal . Buckland's comprehensive analysis culminated in his seminal 1824 paper, "Notice on the Megalosaurus or great Fossil Lizard of Stonesfield," presented to the Geological Society of London on February 20 and published in the society's Transactions. In it, he formally named the genus Megalosaurus, describing the jaw as housing a single row of conical, socketed teeth suited for a carnivorous diet, the vertebrae as featuring high neural spines and robust articular processes, and the limb bones as indicating powerful locomotion. Buckland estimated the animal's length at over 40 feet (about 12 meters), with a bulk comparable to a large elephant, based on proportional scaling from the fossils. The paper included five lithographed plates illustrating the jaw (at half and full scale) and vertebrae, emphasizing their reptilian affinities. Buckland compared Megalosaurus to modern lizards and crocodiles, noting similarities in dentition and skeletal structure but highlighting its unprecedented scale and terrestrial adaptations, such as strong hind limbs suggesting bipedal capability, though early visualizations depicted it as a striding quadruped akin to an oversized . This reconstruction, derived from limited material, portrayed a quadrupedal predator with a long tail for balance. In , Gideon Algernon Mantell, another pioneering paleontologist, honored Buckland by designating the type species M. bucklandii in his Geology of the South-east of England, formalizing the binomial nomenclature. The naming of marked the first scientific recognition and description of a , establishing a precedent for interpreting large reptiles as distinct from contemporary animals and laying groundwork for the emerging field of . This work profoundly influenced later classifications, including Richard Owen's 1842 introduction of the term "Dinosauria" to encompass Megalosaurus alongside and as a group of massive, extinct saurians.

Analysis of the Red Lady of Paviland

In 1822–1823, William Buckland conducted an excavation at Goat's Hole Cave, also known as Paviland Cave, located on the in , where he uncovered a partial densely coated in red . The remains, found in a flexed position within a shallow pit near the cave entrance, were accompanied by artifacts including carved ivory rods and rings likely made from mammoth tusks, perforated shells such as periwinkle and cockle, and fragments of bones, suggesting a deliberate with elements. Buckland's team also noted the presence of other faunal remains in the cave, including those of extinct mammals, which he associated with diluvial deposits. Buckland initially interpreted the skeleton as that of a female, dubbing it the "Red Lady of Paviland" based on its posture and the staining, which he believed indicated a ceremonial from the Roman era, possibly linked to a nearby military garrison. He argued that the associated ornaments, such as the items and shells, pointed to a post-Roman or early medieval context rather than great antiquity, emphasizing the ritualistic nature of the interment with used for symbolic purposes. This interpretation aligned with his broader rejection of evidence for human presence before the biblical , as he viewed the skeleton as post-diluvian and separate from the cave's earlier hyena-inhabited layers containing megafaunal bones. In his 1823 publication Reliquiae Diluvianae, Buckland detailed the Paviland findings within his framework of diluvial geology, linking the cave's strata to the deluge while explicitly dismissing the skeleton as proof of pre- human activity. He described the ochre-covered bones and artifacts as evidence of a later intrusion into diluvial gravels, reinforcing his theological commitment to a recent global and the absence of s among antediluvian fauna. This analysis represented one of Buckland's early attempts to integrate human remains into his geological narrative, prioritizing scriptural chronology over emerging ideas of deep antiquity. Subsequent radiocarbon dating in the 20th and 21st centuries has dated the skeleton to approximately 33,000–34,000 years , identifying it as that of a young adult male of type from the , buried intentionally during a warmer interstadial of the last Ice Age. These modern findings contrast sharply with Buckland's 19th-century assessment but underscore the significance of his excavation as the first scientific recovery of a prehistoric in Britain.

Studies on Coprolites and Food Chains

In the , William Buckland began examining unusual fossilized masses discovered in the Lias formations at and the Stonesfield Slate of , recognizing them as preserved excrement from ancient reptiles. These specimens, often found in association with ichthyosaur and remains, were initially collected by and others, but Buckland's detailed investigation led him to coin the term "coprolites" in his seminal 1829 paper presented to the . There, he formally described coprolites as fossilized feces, distinguishing them from mere concretions through their composition and context, and emphasized their abundance in strata as evidence of prehistoric biological processes. Buckland's innovative approach involved breaking open and microscopically analyzing coprolites, revealing undigested remains such as fish scales, bone fragments, and occasional plant matter, which provided direct insights into the diets of extinct reptiles. For instance, coprolites linked to ichthyosaurs contained fish bones and scales, confirming their piscivorous habits, while those near Megalosaurus specimens in Stonesfield included fragments indicative of a carnivorous diet preying on smaller vertebrates. This analysis not only verified the predatory nature of these ancient animals but also allowed Buckland to infer broader predator-prey relationships, reconstructing early food chains in Jurassic ecosystems where smaller fish and invertebrates formed the base, supporting mid-level predators like ichthyosaurs, which in turn served as prey for larger reptiles. Beyond , Buckland highlighted the practical value of , noting their high phosphate content—primarily —from dissolved bone remains, and promoted their use as an in the early . His advocacy, supported by chemical analyses showing their efficacy when treated with , spurred the commercial mining of coprolite deposits in eastern England during the , transforming these fossils into a key resource for improving and boosting crop yields in an era of expanding .

Bridgewater Treatise

In 1830, William Buckland was commissioned as one of eight authors to contribute to the Bridgewater Treatises, a series funded by a £8,000 bequest from Francis Henry Egerton, 1st Earl of Bridgewater, to explore "the Power, Wisdom, and Goodness of God, as manifested in the Creation" through scientific inquiry. The project was overseen by the President of the Royal Society, Davies Gilbert, with input from figures including the and the , aiming to produce works that reconciled emerging scientific discoveries with . Buckland's treatise, the sixth in the series, appeared in 1836 under the full title Geology and Mineralogy Considered with Reference to Natural Theology, published in two volumes by William Pickering at a price of £1 15s. for the set, with an initial print run of 5,000 copies. The work drew on Buckland's extensive expertise, incorporating detailed illustrations and paleontological data to argue for divine design in the earth's formation. Buckland's central thesis posited that geological processes and fossil records evidenced a purposeful creation by a wise deity, progressively adapting the earth for higher forms of , including humanity. He emphasized successions as demonstrations of organic progression through stages of increasing complexity and adaptation to changing environmental conditions, interpreting these as deliberate preparations by the Creator rather than random occurrences. In this framework, catastrophic events such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions served as essential divine mechanisms, reshaping landmasses and fostering to support advancing civilizations and human welfare. Buckland reconciled these long timescales with biblical chronology by adopting a "gap theory" interpretation of Genesis, allowing for vast pre-Adamic eras while affirming the account's spiritual truth, a position informed by earlier patristic and exegeses like those of . The treatise received widespread acclaim for bridging science and faith, with the first edition selling out rapidly and over 60,000 copies circulating within fifteen years, making it one of the most popular scientific works of the era. The Quarterly Review lauded it as a masterful synthesis that proclaimed divine agency through geological , appealing to both scholarly and general audiences. Similarly, the praised its ability to inspire reverence for God's providence amid natural wonders, solidifying its role in Victorian by influencing public discourse on the harmony between and religion. Despite some criticism for its high cost limiting accessibility, the work's impact endured, shaping educational curricula and reinforcing the cultural authority of liberal Anglican thought.

Promotion of Glaciation Theory

Initially skeptical of Louis Agassiz's 1837 proposal for a former , William Buckland questioned the extent of glacial action beyond contemporary Alpine glaciers during Agassiz's visit to Britain in 1838. However, Buckland's doubts were resolved through direct observation during an extensive fieldwork tour of in autumn 1840, accompanied by Agassiz, where they identified key glacial features such as moraines, erratic boulders, and striated bedrock around and other Highland sites. These observations provided compelling evidence of extensive ice sheets that had once covered northern Britain, convincing Buckland of the theory's validity for explaining landscape modifications. In late 1840, Buckland presented his findings in a seminal paper to the titled "On the Evidences of Glaciers in and the North of ," detailing glacial transport mechanisms responsible for displaced boulders, U-shaped valleys, and polished rock surfaces across the region. This work marked a pivotal shift in Buckland's geological framework, as he abandoned his earlier diluvialist interpretations—previously used to attribute such "diluvial" deposits to Noah's flood—and argued that massive ice sheets offered a more precise, non-catastrophic explanation for these phenomena. By aligning glacial action with uniformitarian principles of gradual, repeated processes over time, Buckland reconciled the evidence with his theological views on , extending ideas from his earlier Bridgewater on natural adaptations. Buckland's advocacy extended beyond this paper through influential lectures and further publications in 1842, including detailed accounts of glacial features in , , which helped popularize the concept among British geologists and the public. These efforts countered persistent support for flood-based explanations by emphasizing empirical field data, such as scratched and transported erratics, and played a crucial role in shifting the geological community toward widespread acceptance of glaciation theory in Britain by the mid-1840s.

Personal Life

Marriage and Family

William Buckland married Mary Morland on 31 December 1825 in Marcham, Berkshire. Mary, born in 1797 at Sheepstead House near Abingdon, was the eldest daughter of solicitor Benjamin Morland, who had a keen interest in geology, and his wife Harriet Baster. Orphaned young after her mother's death, Mary developed a passion for natural history under the guidance of family friends, becoming a skilled scientific illustrator and fossil collector before her marriage. She collaborated with Buckland on geological expeditions, contributing detailed drawings of fossils and cave formations that enhanced his publications, such as illustrations of bones from Kent's Hole and diagrams of hyena dens in Kirkdale Cave. The couple's union blended personal and professional lives, with their home at the Canonry in Christ Church serving as both residence and active laboratory, filled with animal specimens, fossils, and live creatures that immersed their household in scientific inquiry. Over nearly two decades, Mary gave birth to nine children between 1826 and 1843, though only five survived to adulthood amid the era's high rates. She balanced motherhood with fieldwork support, accompanying Buckland on digs and preparing illustrations that documented their joint discoveries, thereby integrating life with his paleontological pursuits. Among their children, the eldest son, Francis Trevelyan Buckland—known as Frank—was born on 17 December 1826 and followed in his parents' footsteps as a prominent naturalist and zoologist, later serving as Inspector of Fisheries and authoring influential works on animal husbandry. Their daughter Elizabeth Oke Buckland (later Gordon), born in 1837, contributed to preserving her father's legacy by compiling and editing The Life and Correspondence of William Buckland in 1894, which included family insights and illustrations reflecting the household's scientific environment; she also assisted with artistic elements in geological documentation. The surviving siblings, including Edward, Mary Ann, and Caroline, grew up amid the specimens and discussions that shaped Buckland's research, fostering a family dynamic where domestic life directly supported his theological and scientific endeavors.

Eccentric Habits and Personality

William Buckland was renowned for his adventurous and unconventional approach to diet, famously claiming to have tasted every created by except for man himself. He hosted dinners featuring exotic meats, such as , which he deemed a successful experiment in "quaint ," and , which proved less palatable. Other notable consumptions included on toast—described as tasting like sparrow—and meat sourced from a carcass advertised for sale. These culinary pursuits extended to more unusual fare, like a preserved bull-trout he rescued from being served at a formal , and even the mummified heart of a French king, which he impulsively consumed during a visit to Nuneham Courtenay. Buckland's home in Oxford served as a chaotic menagerie, housing an array of live animals that reflected his boundless curiosity about natural history. Among them was a bear named Tiglath Pileser, or "Tig," which he dressed in a student's cap and gown for social occasions and which once escaped, causing considerable disruption. A hyena named Billy also resided there, escaping on one occasion to damage furniture before its skeleton was donated to the university collection. The household teemed with additional creatures, including monkeys, snakes, frogs, guinea pigs, foxes, rabbits, ferrets, hawks, owls, magpies, jackdaws, dogs, cats, poultry, and a tortoise used in experiments; even a pony occasionally entered the dining room with children riding it, and tadpoles were introduced to guests. His family tolerated this lively disorder with good humor, contributing to the vibrant, if tumultuous, domestic atmosphere. Buckland's personality was marked by infectious enthusiasm and , particularly in his role as a , where he captivated audiences with vivid demonstrations. He might rush at students brandishing a to illustrate predation or parade specimens from a during talks on fossils, making accessible and exciting. Absent-mindedness was another trait, evident in incidents like losing items on fossil hunts, being mistaken for "a man with a " by locals, forgetting appointments, or carrying a turbot's head in his pocket. Anecdotes abound of his humor, such as refusing to name fossils after himself and instead dubbing them vaguely as "an animal of uncertain affinities" or "that thing," as with or Cheirotherium. He delighted in puns blending and , quipping that Cheirotherium "was a Scotchman" for always heading south, or playfully terming his field "rock-ology," which underscored his jovial integration of faith and .

Later Years and Death

Role as Dean of Westminster

In 1845, William Buckland was appointed by Sir , succeeding , in a move that surprised Buckland and marked a significant shift from his academic life in to ecclesiastical leadership in . Initially hesitant, he accepted after persuasion and relocated with his family to the spacious house in early 1846, a residence directly connected to the via multiple staircases, allowing immediate oversight of its operations. This appointment also included the rectory of Islip, where the family spent summers, but the primary focus became Westminster's administration. As Dean, Buckland's responsibilities encompassed overseeing daily Abbey services, the conduct of burials for prominent figures, and extensive restorations to preserve the historic structure. He supervised major repairs, including the 1848 reopening of the choir, and the restoration of monuments. Additionally, he implemented reforms at and improved local sanitation, reflecting his practical approach to institutional management. Buckland frequently preached sermons that wove scientific insights with theological themes, such as a 1849 address on cleanliness and during the cholera epidemic's abatement, and an 1848 sermon emphasizing Christianity's universal scope alongside examples, thereby bridging faith and empirical knowledge in his clerical role. These duties highlighted his commitment to harmonizing his geological expertise with religious duties, as seen in his continued service as a British Museum trustee and participation in British Association meetings. Despite reduced fieldwork owing to his age—Buckland was in his early sixties— he sustained geological interests by advising on the Abbey's stonework and soil composition, applying his knowledge of fossils and glaciation to practical conservation efforts. This period saw him collaborate on glacial theory with and explore agricultural applications of coprolites, though his primary energies turned toward administrative and sermonic work. Balancing these ecclesiastical demands proved challenging amid emerging health issues in the late 1840s, including a severe bout of in 1848, which strained his ability to manage both spheres effectively.

Illness and Final Years

In 1849, William Buckland's health began to deteriorate significantly, marking the onset of a debilitating illness that affected his mental clarity and physical . This decline was severe enough to end his membership on the Royal Society's council that year, and symptoms included , weakness, and substantial , later attributed to brain irritation caused by advanced decay in the base of his and upper vertebrae, possibly stemming from an earlier accident. A post-mortem examination revealed a bony tumor formed at the site of the vertebral injury, contributing to the progression of his condition. By 1850, on his doctors' advice, Buckland relocated from to the family home in , where he served as rector, seeking the quiet environment and fresh air believed to aid recovery. His son, Francis (Frank) Buckland, took primary responsibility for his care, managing household and medical affairs while continuing his own work as a naturalist. The family provided ongoing support, with Buckland's wife and daughter assisting in minor scientific tasks, such as collecting snail tongues for research, amid his worsening state. Despite the illness, Buckland produced limited scholarly output in his final years, including notes on glaciation published in 1851 that discussed glacial action in and . Thereafter, he ceased active , with his earlier works, such as a revised edition of the Bridgewater Treatise, handled posthumously by collaborators including Frank and John Phillips. The progression of his condition ultimately prevented further contributions to or . Buckland died on 14 August 1856 at the age of 72 in Islip, bringing an end to his long career. He was buried in the Islip churchyard at the west end, in a specially prepared by blasting through a limestone outcrop; his wife joined him there the following year, and the site is marked by a granite monument.

Legacy

Awards and Honors

William Buckland was elected a in 1818, recognizing his early contributions to and . In 1822, he received the prestigious from the Royal Society for his groundbreaking paper on the fossil assemblage in Kirkdale Cave, which demonstrated the cave's use as a prehistoric hyena den and marked the first such award for geological research. Buckland's stature in the scientific community was further affirmed by his election as President of the , serving from 1824 to 1826 and again from 1839 to 1841, during which he helped secure the society's in 1825. In 1848, near the end of his active career, Buckland was awarded the by the Geological Society for his lifetime achievements in advancing geological , including his pioneering work on evidence and stratigraphic interpretation. Ecclesiastically, Buckland's prominence was honored through his appointment as Canon of , in 1825, which included the conferral of a degree, and his elevation to in 1845, a position he held until his death. These roles not only reflected his integration of faith and but also provided institutional support for his scholarly pursuits.

Influence on Science and Theology

Buckland's pioneering efforts in vertebrate paleontology established the foundations of the discipline in Britain, particularly through his 1824 description of Megalosaurus as the first scientifically named dinosaur, which influenced subsequent classifications by Richard Owen and the broader recognition of Dinosauria. His innovative analysis of coprolites from Kirkdale Cave, published in 1822, demonstrated their value in reconstructing ancient ecosystems, a method now appreciated in modern paleoecology for revealing dietary and environmental insights from fossilized feces. This work challenged young-earth creationist interpretations by evidencing long-term faunal accumulation rather than a single global flood, paving the way for more nuanced understandings of deep time. Buckland's geological insights also indirectly shaped Charles Darwin and Thomas Huxley; Darwin engaged with his catastrophic theories in early editions of On the Origin of Species, while Huxley's advocacy for evolutionary paleontology built on the empirical traditions Buckland helped foster through Oxford lectures. Theologically, Buckland's Geology and Considered with Reference to (1836), the sixth , served as a cornerstone of by arguing that geological formations exemplified divine design and economy, thereby reconciling an ancient earth with Christian doctrine and countering strict young-earth literalism. This text bridged old-earth with emerging scientific evidence, portraying Earth's history as a progressive revelation of God's providence, and achieved widespread influence as one of the era's scientific best-sellers. His later shift from diluvialism—initially supporting a flood in Reliquiae Diluvianae (1823)—to endorsing Louis Agassiz's glaciation theory in the 1840s reflected an adaptive theology that prioritized empirical adaptation over rigid scriptural exegesis, influencing the transition toward uniformitarian principles in British geology. In modern historiography, Buckland's diluvialism is viewed as a transitional framework between catastrophic and uniformitarian paradigms, with 21st-century analyses highlighting how his evolving views facilitated the acceptance of gradual geological processes while maintaining theological coherence. This legacy extends to named tributes, including Dorsum Buckland, a lunar ridge system formed by compressional stresses in the basin, honoring his contributions to geological theory. On , the Buckland River in and the adjacent town of Buckland bear his name, reflecting his impact on exploratory science, while the fossil plant genus Bucklandia and the living plant genus Exbucklandia (originally named Bucklandia) commemorate his early paleobotanical interests in Jurassic cycad trunks. Additionally, his son Frank Buckland perpetuated the family legacy through popular science writing, such as Curiosities of Natural History (1857–1872), which democratized and fish culture for Victorian audiences, extending William's commitment to accessible .

References

  1. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Popular_Science_Monthly/Volume_18/April_1881/Mr._Frank_Buckland
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.