Appalachian English
Appalachian English
Main page
2048281

Appalachian English

logo
Community Hub0 subscribers
Read side by side
Appalachian English
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Appalachian English
RegionSouthern United States, Appalachia
EthnicityAppalachians
Early forms
Language codes
ISO 639-3–
Glottologappa1236
Appalachia (in white) overlaid with dialect regions defined by the 2006 ANAE. Southern American English is the dominant dialect in the region.

Appalachian English is American English native to the Appalachian mountain region of the Eastern United States. Historically, the term Appalachian dialect refers to a local English variety of southern Appalachia, also known as Smoky Mountain English or Southern Mountain English in American linguistics.[1] This variety is both influential upon and influenced by the Southern U.S. regional dialect, which has become predominant in central and southern Appalachia today, while a Western Pennsylvania regional dialect has become predominant in northern Appalachia,[2] according to the 2006 Atlas of North American English (ANAE). The ANAE identifies the "Inland South", a dialect sub-region in which the Southern U.S. dialect's defining vowel shift is the most developed,[3] as centering squarely in southern Appalachia: namely, the cities of Knoxville and Chattanooga, Tennessee; Birmingham, Alabama; Asheville, North Carolina; and Greenville, South Carolina.[4] All Appalachian English is rhotic and characterized by distinct phonology, morphology, syntax, and lexicon. It is mostly oral but its features are also sometimes represented in literary works.

Extensive research has been conducted since the 1930s to determine the origin of the Appalachian dialect. One popular theory is that the dialect is a preserved remnant of 16th-century (or "Elizabethan") English in isolation,[5][6] though a far more accurate comparison would be to 18th-century (or "colonial") English.[7] Regardless, the Appalachian dialect studied within the last century, like most dialects, actually shows a mix of both older and newer features,[7] with particular Ulster Scots immigrant influences.[8]

Appalachian English has long been a popular stereotype of Appalachians and is criticized both inside and outside the speaking area as an inferior dialect, which is often mistakenly attributed to supposed laziness, lack of education, or the region's relative isolation. American writers throughout the 20th century have used the dialect as the chosen speech of uneducated and unsophisticated characters, though research has largely disproven these stereotypes; however, due to such prejudice, the use of the Appalachian dialect is still often an impediment to educational and social advancement.[9]

Along with these pejorative associations, there has been much debate as to whether Appalachian English constitutes a dialect separate from the American Southern regional dialect, as it shares many core components with it. Research reveals that Appalachian English also includes many grammatical components similar to those of the Midland regional dialect, as well as several unique grammatical, lexical, and phonological features of its own.[10]

Phonology

[edit]
This section contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. For the distinction between [ ], / / and ⟨ ⟩, see IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters.

Phonetics

[edit]
  • The Southern Shift and Southern drawl: A vowel shift known as the Southern Shift, which largely defines the speech of most of the Southern United States, is the most developed both in Texas English and here in Appalachian English (located in a dialect region which The Atlas of North American English identifies as the "Inland South").[11] This involves several unique vowel changes, in three complex stages:
    • Stage 1: In the diphthong /aɪ/, the second half of the diphthong is often omitted (referred to as monophthongization), and it is thus pronounced similar to [äː]. (Thus, for example, the word tide in this dialect may sound to outsiders more like Todd or even tad). In extreme instances, words such as "wire", "fire", "tire", and "hired" are pronounced identically to the words "war", "far", "tar", and "hard," respectively.[12]
    • Stage 2: The diphthong /eɪ/ begins further back and open in the mouth, so that, for example, fish bait and old lace in this dialect may sound to other English speakers more like fish bite and old lice. The vowel /ɛ/ then moves in the opposite direction and acquires a "drawl" or longer, glide-like sound quality, so that red may be said to sound more like ray-ud or rih-yud. Stage 2 is most common in heavily stressed syllables.[13]
    • Stage 3: The vowel /ɪ/ is pronounced higher in the mouth and with a drawl, so that hit may be said to sound like hee-it. Conversely, the vowel /i/ lowers and then glides up again, so that feet may sound more like fih-eet or fuh-eet. Stage 3 is most common in heavily stressed syllables.[13]
  • Lax and tense vowels often neutralize before /l/, making pairs like feel/fill and fail/fell homophones for speakers in some areas. Some speakers may distinguish between the two sets of words by reversing the normal vowel sound, e.g., feel may sound like fill, and vice versa.[14]
  • Short "i" and short "e" have the same pronunciation when appearing before "n" or "m" (e.g., "pen" and "pin" are both pronounced "pin"). Adjectives are often used to distinguish between the two (e.g., "ink pen" vs. "straight pin" or "safety pin").[15]

Phonemic incidence

[edit]

Research suggests that the Appalachian dialect is one of the most distinctive and divergent dialects within the United States.[16]

  • An epenthetic /r/ sometimes occurs in some words such as wash, leading to the pronunciation "worsh"/wɔːrʃ/.[17][18]
  • An "-er" sound is often used for long "o" at the end of a word. For example, hollow— "a small, sheltered valley"— is pronounced /ˈhɑlər/, homophonous with holler.[19][20] Other examples are "potato" (pronounced "tader"), "tomato" (pronounced "mader")[citation needed], and "tobacco" (pronounced "backer").[21]
  • H-retention occurs at the beginning of certain words. It, in particular, is pronounced hit at the beginning of a sentence and also when emphasized. The word "ain't" is pronounced hain't, homophonic with a local word for ghost or spirit (itself a corruption of the word haunt).[22]
  • Participles and gerunds such as doing and mining end in /ɪn/ instead of /ɪŋ/. While this occurs to some extent in all dialects of American English, it possibly occurs with greater frequency in Southern Appalachia.[23]
  • Word final a is sometimes pronounced /i/, as in okra (/ˈokri/).[17] Also see opera --> "opry" as in the "Gran' Ol' Opry" and Dula --> "Dooley" as in "Tom Dula" (Dooley).
  • Intervocalic s in greasy is pronounced /z/, as in other Southern American and some British speech. A related matter: The noun "grease" is pronounced with an "s", but this consonant turns into a "z" in the adjective and in the verb "to grease."[24]
  • People who live in the Appalachian dialect area or elsewhere in the South pronounce the word Appalachia with a short "a" sound (as in "latch") in the third syllable, /ˌæpəˈlætʃə/ or /ˌæpəˈlætʃiə/, while those who live outside of the Appalachian dialect area or at its outer edges tend to pronounce it with a long "a" sound (as in "lay"), /ˌæpəˈleɪʃə/.[25][26]

Grammar

[edit]

Pronouns and demonstratives

[edit]

"Them" is sometimes used in place of "those" as a demonstrative in both nominal and adjectival and both nominative and oblique constructions. Examples are "Them are the pants I want" and "Give me some of them crackers."

Oblique forms of the personal pronouns are used as nominative when more than one is used (cf. French moi et toi). For example, "Me and him are real good friends" instead of "He and I are really good friends." Accusative case personal pronouns are used as reflexives in situations which, in American English, do not typically demand them (e.g., "I'm gonna get me a haircut"). The -self/-selves forms are used almost exclusively as emphatics, and then often in non-standard forms (e.g., "the preacher hisself"). Second person pronouns are often retained as subjects in imperative sentences (e.g., "You go an' get you a cookie").[27]

The possessive absolutive forms, Standard yours, his, hers, theirs, and ours appear as yourn, hisn, hern, theirn, and ourn.[28] The possessive absolute form of "yinz/yunz/you'uns" is yournses.

Pronouns and adjectives are sometimes combined with "'un" (meaning "one"), such as "young'un" to mean "child", "big'un" to mean "big one", and "you'uns" to mean "you all".[29] "Young'n'" and "'big'n'" also are common in Northern England.[30]

The word element "-ever" is sometimes reversed in words such as "whatever" ("everwhat"), "whoever" ("everwho"), and "however" ("everhow"), but the usage remains the same (e.g., "Everwho did this is in big trouble").[31]

Verbs

[edit]

Conjugation of the verb "to be"

[edit]

The conjugation of the verb "to be" is different from that of standard English in several ways, and sometimes more than one form of the verb "to be" is acceptable in Appalachian English.[32]

Divergence from standard English conjugation of the verb "to be" occurs with the highest frequency in the past tense, where grammatically plural subjects also take the singular form "was" rather than "were". Thus, the paradigm of the verb "to be" in Appalachian English more closely resembles the paradigm for other non-"be" verbs in English, where the past tense takes a single form, regardless of number or person.[32]

The use of the word ain't is also one of the most salient features of this dialect. While "ain't" is used to some extent in most American English dialects, it is used with much greater frequency in the Appalachian dialect.[33] Similarly, the phrase "it is" frequently appeared as "it are" in Appalachian English as late as the mid-twentieth century.

Conjugation among other verb types

[edit]

While the greatest amount of divergence in subject-verb concord occurs in the past tense of the verb 'to be',[32] certain types of plural subjects have an effect on concord across various types of verbs. However, plural subjects continue to show the greatest frequency of non-concord.[34] The example below is taken from Wolfram & Christian (1976:78):

Conjoined noun phrases:

  • "Me and my sister gets into a fight sometimes."
  • "A boy and his daddy was a-huntin'."

Collective noun phrases:

  • "Some people makes it from fat off a pig."
  • "People's not concerned."

Other plural noun phrases:

  • "...no matter what their parents has taught 'em."
  • "The cars was all tore up."

Expletive 'there':

  • "There's different breeds of 'em."
  • "There was 5 in our family."

A-verb-ing (a-prefixing)

[edit]
"A-prefixing" redirects here. For other uses, see A-.

A notable feature of Appalachian English is the a-prefix which occurs with participle forms ending in -ing.[35] This prefix is pronounced as a schwa [ə].[36] The a-prefix most commonly occurs with progressives, in both past and non-past tenses. For example, "My cousin had a little pony and we was a-ridin' it one day".[37] Common contexts also include where the participle form functions as an adverbial complement, such as after movement verbs (come, go, take off) and with verbs of continuing or starting (keep, start, get to). Examples include "All of a sudden a bear come a-runnin'," "He just kep' a-beggin'," and the song lyric "A froggie went a-courtin' and he did ride."[38]

Phonological rules and restrictions apply to a-prefixing; for example, it can only occur with verbs accented on the initial syllable: a-fóllowin but not a-discóverin or a-retírin.[39][40] Moreover, it cannot occur on –ing forms functioning as nouns or adjectives; the forms must function as verbs. Thus, sentences like the movie was a-charmin are ungrammatical.[40] 'A' can only be a prefix of verbs or complements of verbs with –ing.[40] However, the a-prefix may not be attached to a verb which begins with an unstressed syllable, such as discover or retire.

While much less frequent or productive, the a-prefix can also occur on participles ending in -ed, such as "a-haunted".[41]

The a-prefix has been found to occur most frequently in more animated or vivid narratives, as a stylistic device.[42]

Studies suggest that a-prefixing is more common with older speakers and might therefore disappear completely in a few years.[43] Because of the considerable difference of a-prefixing frequency according to age (the frequency varied between 10% and 50%), Walt Wolfram (1976) supports the "(...) contention that a-prefixing is a phenomenon that is dying out in Appalachia".[44]

A-prefixing can be traced back to the 16th century: The construction reached its height from 1500 to 1700 and developed out of using the preposition "on" and a verbal noun ending in -ing. Only used in formal and educated writing in the 17th century, it became nonstandard in the 18th century.[45] Montgomery (2009) argues that a-prefixing developed from the preposition "an"/"on" in Early Middle English and suggests that it arose from the loss of the -n from "on" in examples like "hee set before his eyes king Henrie the eight with all his Lordes on hunting in his forrest at Windsore" (Thomas Nashe, "Unfortunate Traveller", 1594).[46]

'Liketa'

[edit]

In Appalachian English, the form 'liketa' functions as an adverb and occurs before the past form of a verb. 'Liketa' carries a meaning similar to "on the verge of" or "came so close that I really thought x would", where x is the subject of the verb. It comes from a compression of the phrase "likely to".[47]

  • "I liketa never went to sleep last night."
  • "And I knew what I'd done and boy it liketa scared me to death."

'Liketa' also imposes a notion of impossibility on the clause in which it appears, distinguishing it from the word 'almost'. For example, "They almost made it to the top of the mountain" is allowed but not "They liketa made it to the top of the mountain." 'Liketa' does not carry the same notion of partial truth as 'almost'.[47]

Other verb forms

[edit]
  • Sometimes the past participle of a strong verb such as "do" is used in place of the past tense. For example, "I done it already" instead of "I did it already" or in the case of the verb "see", "I seen" instead of "I saw". "Went" is often used instead of "gone" as the past participle of the verb "to go". She had went to Ashland. Less frequently, "gone" is used as the simple past tense: "I gone down to the meeting, but wasn't nobody there." "Done" is used with the past tense (or a past participle commonly used as a past tense, such as "gone") to express action just completed, as in "I done went/gone to the store".
  • Some English strong verbs are occasionally conjugated as weak verbs in Appalachian English, e.g. "knowed", and "seed".
  • The construction "don't...no" is used with transitive verbs to indicate the negative, e.g. "He don't know no better." This is commonly referred to as the double negative, and is either negative or emphatically negative, never positive. "None" is often used in place of "any", as in "I don't have none."
  • Verb forms for the verb "to lay" are used instead of forms of the verb "to lie". For example, "Lay down and hush." The same occurs with "set" for "sit",[48] and "leave" for "let".
  • "Might could|would|should" is sometimes used where a speaker of standard English would say "might be able to" or "could maybe".[36] It is often used as a sort of equivalent to "If it weren't for X", such as "I might would, if I had any to spare." This is found in Scots as well.[49]
  • Verbs ending in -st, -sk, and -sp take the syllabic -es rather than Standard -s, pronounced /ɪz/, e.g. "costes".[27]

Nouns

[edit]

Double nouns

[edit]

Some nouns are spoken in pairs, the first noun describing the seemingly redundant second noun, as in "hound dog", "Cadillac car", "widow woman", "toad frog", "biscuit bread", or "rifle gun".[50]

Measurement nouns

[edit]

Measurements such as "foot" and "mile" often retain their singular form even when used in the plural sense. For example, "That stick is 3 foot long", or "We need 6 foot of drywall".[28] This is found in the Scots language.[51]

Adverbs

[edit]

The word right can be used with adjectives (e.g., "a right cold morning") and along with its standard use with adverbs, can also be used with adverbs of manner and time (e.g., "right loud" or "right often").[52]

Vocabulary

[edit]

Being part of the greater Southern United States, the dialect shares many of the same terms of the South. In its relation to south of the Midland, it has several terms in common with its North Midland counterpart, including poke (paper bag), hull (to shell), and blinds (shutters). Certain German-derived words such as smearcase (cottage cheese), however, are present in the North Midland dialect but absent in the Appalachian dialect.[53]

The following is a list of words which occur in the Appalachian dialect. These words are not exclusive to the region, but tend to occur with greater frequency than in other English dialects:[54]

  • afeared — afraid[54]
  • airish — cool, chilly[54]
  • ary/ary'ne — any[55]
  • bald — a treeless mountain summit (see Appalachian balds)[36]
  • ball-hoot — to drive recklessly fast on dangerous rural or mountain roads; derived from an old logging term for rolling or skidding logs downhill[56]
  • blinds — window shades or window shutters. While blinds usually refers to window shades, in Appalachia and the greater Midland dialect, it can also refer to window shutters.[57]
  • blinked — sour, rotten[21]
  • boomer — a small red squirrel[58]
  • brickle — brittle[54]
  • britches - pants; a derivation of the word "breeches"[59]
  • buggy — shopping cart[60]
  • caps — popcorn
  • cat-head — a large biscuit[61]
  • chancy — doubtful[54]
  • chaw — a wad of chewing tobacco
  • clean — a verb modifier which is used to mean entirely completing an action; can be used in place of 'all the way'; e.g., "He knocked it clean off the table."
  • coke — short for Coca-Cola, but applied to all flavored, carbonated sodas, regardless of brand, flavor or type. Coke is used primarily in the southern half of the dialect region, whereas pop receives more usage in southern Ohio, Eastern Kentucky, West Virginia and most of Southwest Virginia.[62]
  • Co'-cola — colloquial term for Coca-Cola, but used in the same sense as coke above.
  • cornpone — skillet cornbread made without eggs
  • counterpane — bedspread[54]
  • cove — a valley between two ridges[63]
  • discomfit — to inconvenience[54]
  • directly — later, after a while; when it becomes convenient, soon, immediately (largely depending on context)[64]
  • dope — soda[58]
  • fireboard — mantel[57]
  • fit — used in replacement of 'fought'[64]
  • fixin' —
    • a serving or helping of food; e.g., "Can I get a fixin' of fritters?"
    • an event, party or social function where food is served; e.g., "They're having a fixin' in the hall next Friday."
    • about to; e.g., "They're fixin' to get hitched."[65]
  • flannel cake — pancake[36]
  • gaum — mess;[57] used as a noun and a transitive verb; e.g., 'to gaum up' (to mess up).[66]
  • haint — used in the context of 'ghost, spirit', and not the derivation of ain't.
  • holler — hollow, as in a valley between two hills; e.g., "I continue to travel between hollers and cities."[67]
  • hull — to shell, as in to shell beans[57]
  • ill — bad-tempered[54]
  • jacket — a vest[57]
  • jarfly — cicada[68]
  • jasper — Stranger[58]
  • kyarn — carrion; dead flesh, such as roadkill; e.g., "That smells like kyarn."
  • kindly — kind of, sort of; e.g., "Just kindly give it a little twist when you throw."
  • kelvinator — refrigerator.
  • lamp oil/coal oil — kerosene[36]
  • lay out — to be truant; e.g., 'to lay out of school', 'to lay out of work'[57]
  • meeting — a gathering of people for religious purposes[69]
  • nary/nary'ne — none[55]
  • palings — fence posts[54]
  • peckerwood — a disliked person[58]
  • piece — distance; e.g., "He'd have went up the road a piece to get on the main road."[70] also refers to a snack[36]
  • plum/plumb — completely; e.g., "Son, you're plum crazy."[71]
  • poke — a brown paper bag[72]
  • poke sallet/salat/salit (etc.) — a type of salad made from boiled greens (usually pokeweed)[73]
  • pokestock/polkstalk — a single shot shotgun; historically a rifle with an unusually long barrel popular with Kentucky frontiersmen[74]
  • pop — see coke above
  • quare — queer, strange, odd; e.g., "He's shore a quare 'un."[75]
  • reckon — to suppose; e.g., "I reckon you don't like soup beans."[65]
  • right smart — good deal of; e.g., "a right smart piece" (a long way)[71][76]
  • scald — poor land, bad land[58]
  • sigogglin — not built correctly, crooked, out of balance[77]
  • skift — a dusting of snow[78]
  • slap — full, complete; e.g., "A fall in the river, which went slap-right and straight down."[79]
  • smart — hard-working; e.g., "She's a smart womern—always a-cleanin and a-sewin and a-cookin fer 'er famly."[80]
  • sop — gravy[54]
  • springhouse — a building; usually positioned over a spring used for refrigeration before the advent of refrigerators[57]
  • sugar tree — sugar maple tree[36]
  • swan/swanny — to swear, to declare to be true[81]
  • toboggan — a knit hat or tuque; rarely used to describe a type of sled
  • tote — to carry[58]
  • tow sack — burlap sack[82]
  • whistle pig — groundhog[57]
  • yonder/yander — a directional adverb meaning distant from both the speaker and the listener; e.g., "Look over yonder."[58][83]

Origins

[edit]

Early theories regarding the origins of the Appalachian dialect tend to revolve around popular notions regarding the region's general isolation and the belief that the region is culturally static or homogenous.[8] The tendency of Appalachian speakers to retain many aspects of their dialect for a generation or more after moving to large urban areas in the north and west suggests that Appalachian English is conservative rather than isolated.[84]

Beliefs about Appalachia's isolation led to the early suggestion that the dialect was a surviving relic of long-forgotten forms of English.[84] The most enduring of these early theories suggested that the Appalachian dialect was a remnant of Elizabethan English, a theory popularized by Berea College president William Goddell Frost in the late 1800s.[85] However, while Shakespearean words occasionally appear in Appalachian speech (e.g., afeared), these occurrences are rare.[57] David Hackett Fischer (1989) linked the dialect to the Southern Scots and Northumbrian English dialects of northern England, southern Scotland and Ulster.[86] However, many aspects of this theory have been questioned by linguists, with Michael Ellis (1992) arguing that the dialect is difficult to attribute to a single source.[87]

Montgommery (1991, 1995) identifies 18 characteristics of Appalachian grammar, including the use of might could for might be able to, the use of "'un" with pronouns and adjectives (e.g., young'un), the use of "done" as a helping verb (e.g., we done finished it), and 22 words such as airish ("airy") as being derived from the Scotch-Irish, Scottish and Northumbrian dialects of English.[88][89][54][90] The use of double negatives was common in England during the 17th and 18th centuries, especially in the Northern English Cumbrian dialect.[86] Montgommery also identified several features, such as the use of the "a-" prefix (e.g., "a-goin'" for "going") and the attachment of "-ed" to certain verbs (e.g., knowed), as originating in Southern and Midland English dialects.[91] The use of "it are" (usually pronounced "it err") in place of "it is" was common among the rural population of the English Midlands and South in the 1500s, 1600s and 1700s, and was correspondingly common amongst British colonists, in particular English colonists in the original thirteen colonies. The phrase fell out of use in England sometime in the early 1800s; however, it remained in use in the Appalachia region of North America until the mid-to-late twentieth century.[92][93] A few items characteristic of Appalachian grammar originate, via British English and Scots dialects, in the Old Norse language, having taken root in Britain with Scandinavian settlement there during the Viking Age (c. 800–1050 CE). Two such items are constructions with the word "till" to tell the time of day ("quarter till five") and the use of "at" in place of "that" as both a demonstrative and relative pronoun (Old Norse at ("that")).[87]

Some speech habits which can be traced back to the rural areas of northern England and the Midlands include the h-retention (e.g., hit for it), the use of the word right in the place of very (e.g., "right cold"), and the presence of words such as yonder.[83] Similarly the word "afeared" was common in northern England and the Midlands throughout the 1500s, 1600s and 1700s, though fell out of use in the early 1800s when it was supplanted in literary English after 1700 by the word "afraid". The word was used frequently in the work of Shakespeare. In Appalachia the word simply remained in use and did not get completely supplanted by the word "afraid", unlike in most of the English-speaking world.[54][94] Though the word "afeared" originates in northern England and throughout the Midlands, it is nonetheless incorrect to refer to the word "afeared" as "Elizabethan" because it was commonly used in England long after the Elizabethan era (including throughout the 1600s).[95]

Some pronunciation features reminiscent of those in the Scottish Lowlands and Ulster can also be heard, such as the pin-pen merger and goose fronting, the Scotch-Irish and English settlers had a strong influence on the Appalachian dialect,[8] linguistic analyses suggest that Appalachian English developed as a distinctive dialect among English-speaking people in North America.[17] The Appalachian dialect retains a number of speech patterns found in Colonial American English but largely discarded in Standard speech, such as "r" intrusion (e.g., "warsh" for "wash") and a "y" sound in place of "a" on the end of certain words (e.g., "okry" for "okra").[17] The southern drawl is of an unknown American origin, although some of its characteristics suggest a relationship with the drawl of Ulster accents.[96]

Native American influences in the Appalachian dialect are virtually nonexistent except for place names (e.g., "Appalachia", "Tennessee", "Chattahoochee River", "Cheoah Mountains"). While early settlers adopted numerous customs[which?] from tribes such as the Cherokee and Shawnee, they typically applied existing words from their own languages to those customs.[36]

Relation to the Ozarks

[edit]

The traditional Appalachian dialect spread to the Ozark Mountains in northern Arkansas and southern Missouri. Ozark and Appalachian English have been documented together as a single Southern Mountain dialect of the United States.[97][1][98]

Appalachian terms found in Ozark English include fireboard, tow sack, jarfly, and brickle and similar speech patterns also exist, such as epenthetic h (hit instead of it), the use of the "a-" prefix ("a-goin'" for "going"), and the d-stop in place of certain "z" sounds (e.g., "idn't" for "isn't"), all of which is seen in other dialects of older Southern American English. Studies have shown that Ozark English has more in common with the dialect of East Tennessee than with the dialect of West Tennessee or even Eastern Arkansas.[99] Other distinctive features of Ozark English include phonological idiosyncrasies (many of which it shares with Appalachian English);[97] certain syntactic patterns,[100][101] such as the use of for to, rather than to, before infinitives in some constructions;[102][103] and a number of lexical peculiarities.[104]

Controversies surrounding Appalachian English

[edit]

Linguistic boundaries of Appalachian English

[edit]

The systematic study of linguistic boundaries in the United States has advanced, succeeding its inception in 1949. The systematic study of linguistic boundaries in the United States was established by Hans Kurath.[105] Hans Kurath was an American linguist who is acknowledged for his role as chief editor of the Linguistic Atlas of New England. The Linguistic Atlas of New England was the earliest, complete linguistic atlas of a broad region.[106] Furthermore, many of Hans Kurath's initial ideas about linguistic boundaries are under discussion in the modern-day.[105] Appalachian English is one of the linguistic boundaries constructed by Hans Kurath. The origins of Appalachian English can be traced back to Scottish-Irish ancestors, and include unique grammatical and lexical differences.[87] Appalachian English can be found in the following states: Ohio; West Virginia; Kentucky; North Carolina; Northern Georgia; Northern South Carolina; western Virginia; Alabama; and Tennessee.[107] Notwithstanding, when it comes to determining its specific boundaries, some linguists believe that the boundaries should be fuzzy lines. These fuzzy lines should provide rough ideas of boundaries, rather than hard lines, because there is a lot of dialectic variety within these small areas that is often difficult to differentiate.[105] The reality is a range of dialectic variants are commonplace in the Appalachian area of the country. Categorizing all of these different variants under one umbrella may actually further complicate the process of studying the variants of Appalachian speech. Appalachian English is thought to be the oldest form of English to date-including the Shakespearean dialect-which can be a factor contributing to the myth of the dialect being outdated.[108]

Stereotypical views of Appalachian English

[edit]

In addition to the linguistic boundary debates, Appalachian English is surrounded by stereotypical views of the area and the people living in it. A sense of "Appalachianism" is positively correlated with a shortage in access to environmental influences. These environmental influences include the following: housing; schooling; employment; medical assistance; and money.[109] Appalachian English is often viewed by outsiders as a dialect of uneducated people. Individuals from Appalachia tend to be perceived as low-income and lower class, regardless of the individual's actual situation.[110] Historically, these ideas originated prior to the onset of the American Civil War.[109] Appalachian stereotypes are damaging to natives of the area. Consequently, natives hide or modify their accent when visiting or moving to areas outside of Appalachia. This is done in fear of accent discrimination. Accent discrimination undermines intelligence and the character of an individual.[109] Furthermore, easier access to social relations via the internet has expanded the quantity of negative beliefs associated with individuals from Appalachia.[109] Despite all of the debates surrounding this dialect and whether or not its boundaries are legitimate and correct, to the people of Appalachia, their variety of English is central to their identities regardless of how it is seen by linguists, as well as outsiders.[110] According to expert linguist Kirk Hazen, "Appalachia is the most misunderstood region in the nation".[111] There are roles/portrayals of the language that have inspired it to be falsely associated with a stereotypical "hillbilly". Thus, creating misjudgments from non-Appalachians about the region.[111]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Appalachian English

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Appalachian English is a group of dialect varieties of American English spoken primarily in the central and southern Appalachian Mountains region, spanning parts of West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, North Carolina, and adjacent areas.[1] This dialect emerged from the settlement patterns of Scots-Irish, English, and German immigrants beginning in the 1730s, who migrated southward along the Appalachian frontier, blending their speech forms with subsequent American innovations.[1] Unlike popular myths portraying it as an unchanged relic of Elizabethan English, empirical linguistic analysis reveals Appalachian English as a dynamic variety incorporating both retained archaic elements—such as certain grammatical structures—and novel features developed in the New World context.[2] Key phonological characteristics include the pin-pen merger, where vowels in words like "pin" and "pen" are pronounced similarly; monophthongization of diphthongs, as in "ride" sounding like "rah'd"; and variable non-rhoticity in some subregions, alongside consistent "-ing" as "-in'" (g-dropping).[1] Grammatically, it features distinctive elements like a-prefixing (e.g., "She's a-goin' to the store"), perfective "done" for completed actions (e.g., "He done finished it"), and existential "they" constructions (e.g., "They's a lot of work to do"), which reflect both Scots-Irish influences and independent evolutions not found uniformly elsewhere in American English.[3][4][5] Lexically, terms like "poke" for paper bag or "reckon" for think derive from British dialects but many, such as "bald" for a treeless mountaintop, originated in American usage within the region.[2] Sociolinguistic studies highlight Appalachian English's variation by class, ethnicity, and locality, with working-class speakers retaining more marked features, though the dialect faces stigma in educational and media contexts that often undervalue its systematic rules.[6] Research by linguists like Walt Wolfram and Michael Montgomery underscores its role in broader Southern American English patterns while documenting unique Appalachian innovations, countering isolationist narratives with evidence of ongoing contact and change.[7][8]

Geographic Distribution and Demographics

Regional Boundaries and Variability

Appalachian English encompasses the central and southern portions of the Appalachian mountain system, extending from parts of southern New York through Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, and into northern Mississippi, comprising approximately 423 counties as defined by the Appalachian Regional Commission.[9] The core dialect area concentrates in West Virginia, eastern Kentucky, western North Carolina, and eastern Tennessee, where traditional features persist most robustly due to historical settlement patterns in isolated valleys and plateaus.[10] Boundaries remain imprecise and gradient, as migration—particularly out-migration from rural to urban areas—has diffused features into adjacent regions like the Upland South and Midwest, blurring distinctions through dialect leveling.[11] Internal variability manifests across subregions divided roughly into Northern, Middle, and Southern Appalachia, with Northern encompassing southern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia, Middle focusing on central West Virginia and eastern Kentucky, and Southern covering western North Carolina, eastern Tennessee, and northern Georgia.[12] These divisions correlate with physiographic features, such as the narrower Blue Ridge Mountains in the south fostering more uniform variants compared to the broader Appalachian Plateau in central areas, where terrain-induced isolation preserved localized speech patterns longer.[13] Surveys of self-reported usage indicate a perceptual core in central-southern zones, with Northern speakers less likely to identify strongly with traditional forms than Southern counterparts, reflecting differential exposure to external linguistic influences via proximity to non-Appalachian dialects.[14] Empirical mapping from projects like the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States reveals feature distributions as clines rather than discrete borders, with higher incidences of archaic retentions in remote ridge-top communities versus transitional valleys adjacent to lowland dialects.[15] This gradient nature underscores how topographic barriers, such as steep ridges and narrow hollers, historically constrained intercourse between settlements, allowing subregional divergence while modern mobility erodes sharp divides.[16]

Speaker Populations and Socioeconomic Factors

Appalachian English is spoken by an estimated 13 to 25 million individuals across the Appalachian region, which encompasses parts of 13 states and had a total population of approximately 26.1 million as of 2020.[17][18] Speakers are disproportionately concentrated in rural counties, where the dialect maintains stronger presence amid lower rates of urbanization compared to national averages.[19] These areas exhibit median household incomes of around $64,588, representing 82% of the U.S. figure, alongside persistently higher poverty rates—particularly among those under 25, at 19.2% to 22.1%—correlating with limited economic diversification beyond traditional sectors like coal mining and agriculture.[20][21] Dialect retention correlates with socioeconomic isolation, as lower urbanization levels—contributing up to 10 percentage points to income gaps—preserve linguistic features in communities with reduced exposure to standard American English via migration or media.[22] However, no evidence establishes direct causation between the dialect and poverty; rather, geographic barriers and historical economic dependencies foster both cultural persistence and economic stagnation independently.[23] Rural speakers face dialect stigma in educational and professional settings, potentially exacerbating mobility challenges, though improvements in regional education and income since 2010 have narrowed some disparities without altering core retention patterns in isolated locales.[24] Demographic trends indicate an aging speaker base, with the region's median age reaching 41.3 years by 2023, outpacing youth influx and signaling potential dilution of traditional forms.[25] Heavy out-migration, especially of younger residents from rural counties, has led to population declines of up to 18% in some states like Kentucky between 1990 and 2010, further straining intergenerational transmission.[26] Linguistic surveys reveal variability in vowel and grammatical features across generations, with urban-bound youth showing reduced adherence to markers like monophthongization, attributable to educational standardization and external influences rather than deliberate shift.[4] Projections suggest accelerated depopulation in coalfield areas by 2050, potentially halving some county populations and weakening dialect vitality absent countervailing in-migration.[27]

Phonological Characteristics

Vowel Shifts and Qualities

Appalachian English features prominent monophthongization of the diphthong /aɪ/, where words like "ride" are realized as [rɑːd] rather than [raɪd], as evidenced by acoustic analyses measuring formant trajectories in spectrograms from sociolinguistic interviews in eastern Tennessee.[28] This process, part of the Southern Vowel Shift's first stage, shows Euclidean distances approaching zero between vowel onset and glide in rooted speakers, with monophthongal tokens reaching 90-100% in pre-voiceless contexts for some individuals.[29] While /aʊ/ exhibits less consistent monophthongization, retaining a diphthongal quality starting near [ɑ] and gliding toward a centralized [ʊ]-like vowel in many speakers, variation ties to local identity rather than age or gender.[30] The pin-pen merger, merging /ɪ/ and /ɛ/ before nasals to [ɪ̃] or [ɛ̃], occurs widely in Appalachian varieties, aligning with broader Southern patterns observed in national surveys where production data from hundreds of speakers confirm high incidence in rural inland regions.[31] Acoustic realizations vary between [ɪ] and [ɛ] targets without strong geographic stratification within the South, but the merger's prevalence in Appalachia—evident in Upper Southern subregions—distinguishes it from non-merging dialects to the north.[8] Unlike urban Northern dialects undergoing the Northern Cities Shift, Appalachian English avoids chain shifts involving raised /æ/ or lowered /ɑ/, instead preserving and advancing Southern Vowel Shift stages, including /aɪ/ monophthongization and front vowel reversals, as tracked across generations in Kentucky Plateau communities via formant plots from 30 speakers born 1884-1985.[32] This retention of pre-shift Southern qualities, with 100% of studied speakers exhibiting mid-front vowel reversals and emerging /i/-lowering post-1930, underscores Appalachian varieties' alignment with rural Southern phonology over Northern innovations.[32]

Consonant Patterns and Incidence

Appalachian English features intervocalic flapping of alveolar stops /t/ and /d/, where these consonants are realized as a brief tap [ɾ] between vowels, as in "city" pronounced [ˈsɪɾi] or "ladder" as [ˈlæɾɚ]. This process, common across North American varieties, has been acoustically analyzed in Appalachian speakers, showing flap realization influenced by stress and vowel quality, with durations distinguishing flaps from full stops in words like "whatever."[33][34] Consonant cluster reduction is prevalent, especially in final clusters involving /t/ or /d/, such as /nt/ or /nd/, where the stop is frequently deleted (e.g., "first" as [fɜrs] or "hand" as [hæn]). Field studies report deletion rates of approximately 90% before following consonants and 30% before vowels, higher than in many mainstream varieties, based on conversational data from rural communities.[30] This reduction extends to medial clusters and past-tense -ed endings, distinguishing Appalachian speech from standard forms while aligning with vernacular patterns observed in sociolinguistic corpora.[1][35] Rhoticity, the pronunciation of /r/ in post-vocalic positions, characterizes most Appalachian varieties, with speakers typically retaining [ɹ] in words like "car" [kɑɹ] or "bird" [bɜɹd], unlike non-rhotic Southern coastal dialects. However, non-rhotic or variably rhotic realizations persist in isolated pockets, particularly among older speakers in certain valleys, where /r/ may be dropped or weakened (e.g., "far" as [fɑː]), contradicting claims of uniform rhoticity across the region.[36][37][38] Additional allophonic variations include L-vocalization, where coda /l/ shifts to [w] or [oʊ] (e.g., "coal" as [koʊ] or "school" as [skuw]), more frequent in casual speech and receding among younger urban migrants. Word-medial /z/ before nasals assimilates to [d] or [d͡ʒ] (e.g., "business" as [ˈbɪdnəs]), a context-dependent process tied to speech rate, documented in phonetic analyses of natural discourse. These patterns emerge variably by age, gender, and locale, with field recordings emphasizing their embedding in rapid, conversational contexts rather than isolated elicitation.[30]

Grammatical Structures

Pronouns, Demonstratives, and Possessives

In Appalachian English, the third-person singular neuter pronoun "it" frequently appears as "hit" in subject position, especially when stressed or sentence-initial, reflecting h-prothesis from older Scots-Irish and English varieties. This alternation is documented in vernacular speech samples from the Southern Appalachians, where "hit" serves as the nominative form in elicited contexts such as "Hit's rainin' hard today." [39] [40] Demonstratives deviate from Standard American English through the use of objective "them" as a plural form equivalent to "those," often in constructions like "them thar hills" or "Pass me them tools." This feature, traced to 14th-century English precedents and reinforced by Ulster Scots immigration, functions as both determiner and pronoun in informal registers. [41] [42] Sociolinguistic interviews in West Virginia communities reveal its primary alternation with "those" rather than "these," with quantitative analysis indicating higher rates among older speakers—up to consistent use in apparent-time cohorts born before 1950—followed by a sharp intergenerational decline as younger speakers favor standard alternatives amid stigma and leveling. [43] Possessive pronouns exhibit independent forms suffixed with -n in absolute positions, yielding "hisn," "hern," "yourn," "ourn," and "theirn," patterned after the analogy of "mine" to distinguish from adjectival uses. These occur in disjunctive phrases like "That's hisn, not yourn," but rarely before nouns, as in avoiding "hern book." [39] [8] Elicited data from Smoky Mountain speech corpora confirm their retention in rural, older informants' narratives, though frequency diminishes in structured interviews, signaling conservative vernacular markers tied to historical nasal suffixes in British dialects. [39]

Verb Morphology and Syntax

Appalachian English features double modals, constructions combining two modal verbs such as might could, may can, or might would, which layer modalities for nuanced expression of possibility, permission, or obligation.[44] These occur primarily in informal speech, with might could conveying epistemic possibility alongside ability, as in "He might could fix it," reflecting a pragmatic softening not fully captured by single modals in standard English.[45] Corpus analysis from the 1.2-billion-word Corpus of North American Spoken English (CoNASE) identifies double modals concentrated in Southern U.S. dialects, including Appalachian varieties, with naturalistic frequencies showing might can as more common than might could in some datasets, though the latter predominates in older Appalachian recordings at rates up to 0.5 per 1,000 modal occurrences.[44][45] A-prefixing marks progressive aspect on verbs, attaching the prefix a- to present participles, as in "She's a-going to town" or "It was a-raining hard," deriving from Middle English adverbial prefixes rather than Scots-Irish or Gaelic influences as once hypothesized.[46] This construction emphasizes ongoing action and is restricted to dynamic verbs, excluding statives, with syntactic constraints barring it before noun phrases or in non-progressive contexts.[47] Historical evidence traces it to 17th- and 18th-century southern British settler speech, preserved in Appalachian isolation but absent in urbanizing areas, with usage varying by rurality and age in modern surveys.[46] Perfective done functions as an adverbial intensifier for completed actions, as in "I done went home" or "They done ate already," adding emphasis to past perfect or simple past events beyond standard have-auxiliary forms.[48] Sociolinguistic studies from the 1970s document higher frequencies among older Appalachian speakers, with occurrences dropping from over 20% in elderly rural informants to near zero in younger groups, indicating age-graded decline driven by education and media exposure.[48] Recent analyses confirm this pattern persists, with perfective done stigmatized and receding in urban-adjacent communities, though retained in conservative rural pockets for emphatic narrative effect.[4]

Nominal Constructions and Adverbs

Appalachian English employs distinctive nominal constructions for quantifying indefinite amounts, often using partitive phrases with nouns as measures of abundance rather than precise counts. Common examples include a heap of, a mess of, and a passel of, which denote large, unspecified quantities in contexts like food preparation or gatherings. For instance, a mess of greens refers to a substantial serving or collection of vegetables, while a passel of children indicates a group of unspecified size; these structures derive from older Southern English practices and persist in traditional speech patterns documented in regional linguistic analyses.[39] Certain collective or mass nouns in Appalachian English exhibit atypical treatment, where historically plural forms function as singulars, yielding constructions interpretable as double plurals. A documented case is a cattle, used to denote a single animal from a herd, reflecting a semantic shift that blurs count-mass distinctions and aligns with conservative usages in isolated mountain communities.[39] This pattern underscores a preference for concrete, experiential categorization over standardized grammatical plurality, as observed in Smoky Mountain varieties. Adverbs in Appalachian English frequently serve intensification and approximation, particularly in expressing degree or quantity. The adverb right acts as a versatile intensifier equivalent to "very" or "quite," as in right smart (meaning "a considerable amount") or right young (meaning "very young"), with usage rates higher in older rural speakers per sociolinguistic surveys.[39] Similarly, powerful amplifies nouns or adjectives, yielding powerful many for "a great many," emphasizing hyperbolic quantity rooted in Scots-Irish substrate influences. Other forms like tolerable convey moderate intensification ("fairly" or "somewhat"), as in tolerable good, prioritizing contextual nuance over Standard English precision. These adverbial strategies facilitate vivid, scalar descriptions tied to everyday measurement and evaluation.

Lexical Inventory

Distinctive Terms and Semantic Fields

Appalachian English maintains a lexicon distinguished by terms rooted in everyday rural existence, many of which preserve older Scots-Irish or Elizabethan English usages while others represent regional innovations adapted to mountainous terrain and agrarian practices. The Dictionary of Southern Appalachian English, drawing from over 10,000 entries compiled from historical records, oral histories, and field data, documents vocabulary that emphasizes practicality over standardization, with frequent retentions like poke—a small bag or sack, derived from Middle English pok via Scots dialects and used for carrying groceries or game—contrasting with innovations tied to local ecology.[49][50] Usage surveys in the Smoky Mountains indicate poke persists in 70-80% of rural speakers over age 50, declining among younger urban migrants due to commercial standardization.[51] In agricultural semantic fields, terms reflect subsistence farming and preservation techniques suited to the region's climate. Tater hole denotes a dug-out cellar or pit beneath cabin floors for storing potatoes (taters, a phonetic variant of "potatoes") through winter, preventing spoilage in uninsulated homes; this practice, verified in 19th-century farm ledgers from eastern Tennessee, underscores adaptive storage absent in flatter terrains.[52] Similarly, britches for trousers or overalls, from early modern English breeches, often pairs with context-specific modifiers like "tin britches" for rain gear made from metal, highlighting material improvisation in wet Appalachian soils.[50] Kinship and social terms extend plural pronouns innovatively, such as younse (or youns'es), a possessive form of "you all" or "you ones," used as in "younse's young'uns" to denote collective family belongings; this evolves from Scots-Irish you uns, with dialect corpora showing 60% frequency in multi-generational households for emphasizing communal ties over individualistic Standard English equivalents.[53] Yarb, a dialectal pronunciation of "herb," applies to wild medicinals like ginseng or sassafras gathered for remedies, retaining 17th-century English phonology (yerb > yarb) and documented in herbalist records from the 1800s as central to folk healing in isolated hollers.[54] Topographical lexicon captures the rugged landscape, with cove referring to a sheltered valley or hollow flanked by ridges—distinct from broader Southern "bottoms"—and bald for unforested summits like Roan Mountain's grassy balds, terms retained from settler surveys in the 1700s and used in 90% of navigational descriptions in dialect atlases.[55] These features illustrate retentions versus innovations: while cove echoes Scots topography, bald innovates to describe unique high-elevation meadows, with etymological ties to "bare" landforms verified in geological ethnographies.[49]

Borrowings and Innovations

Appalachian English features lexical borrowings primarily from the Scots-Irish (Ulster Scots) heritage of early settlers, including terms like airish ("chilly" or "cool") and brickle ("brittle" or "fragile").[2] These reflect the vernacular of 18th-century immigrants from northern Britain and Ireland, who comprised a significant portion of the region's initial European population between 1717 and 1775.[2] Other examples include discomfit ("to inconvenience" or "embarrass") and uses of ill to denote bad-tempered behavior, preserving semantic shifts uncommon in standard American English.[2] Direct borrowings from Native American languages remain limited in core vocabulary, despite historical interactions with groups like the Cherokee; common influences appear more in place names and medicinal practices than everyday lexicon.[2] One notable adoption is sang, a vernacular shortening for ginseng (Panax quinquefolius), a root harvested in Appalachian forests since at least the late 18th century for export to Asian markets via indigenous knowledge of its stimulant properties.[56] This term, alongside indicators like sang master and sang granny for companion plants aiding location, emerged from 19th-century foraging economies rather than direct linguistic loans.[57] Lexical innovations in Appalachian English often stem from regional topography, agriculture, and industries like coal mining, producing terms adapted to specific contexts absent elsewhere. Examples include bald for a treeless mountaintop and spring house for a structure cooling perishables over a water source, addressing mountainous isolation and self-sufficiency needs.[2] In mining communities, specialized vocabulary developed, such as conveyors for mechanized coal-hauling systems in underground operations, reflecting technological adaptations from the late 19th century onward.[58] Linguistic surveys, including the Dictionary of American Regional English, document these as post-settlement creations, with innovation rates varying by subdomain: higher in occupational lexica (e.g., 20-30% unique mining terms in coal-field subsets per regional corpora) compared to conservative retention of agrarian archaisms.[40][59] This balance counters isolation myths, showing dynamic evolution influenced by economic shifts like the 1880s coal boom.[40]

Historical Origins and Development

Early Settlement and Scots-Irish Foundations

During the 18th century, waves of settlers from Ulster, primarily Scots-Irish Protestants, migrated to the American colonies, with over 200,000 arriving between 1710 and 1775, the largest numbers initially landing in Pennsylvania.[60] These migrants, facing economic pressures like poor harvests and high rents in Ulster, sought affordable land on the frontier.[60] Historical records indicate that Scots-Irish formed the backbone of early Appalachian settlement, pushing southward from Pennsylvania into the backcountry regions of Virginia, North Carolina, and beyond.[61] The primary route for this expansion was the Great Valley Road, also known as the Great Wagon Road, which facilitated movement down the Shenandoah Valley starting in the 1730s and intensifying after 1744.[62] By the late 1750s, these settlers had reached the foothills of the Appalachians in present-day western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee, establishing communities in isolated valleys and ridges.[63] Genealogical and settlement records from areas like Tennessee confirm that Ulster emigrants constituted the largest proportion of these early inhabitants, outnumbering other groups in key frontier counties.[61] While multi-ethnic elements were present, including German settlers in northern valleys and English from coastal areas, Scots-Irish dominance prevailed in the core Appalachian uplands, shaping the region's demographic and cultural substrate.[64] Their varieties of English, influenced by Lowland Scots and Ulster dialects, formed the primary linguistic foundation.[61] Scots-Irish cultural traits, such as strong kinship networks akin to clannishness and a reliance on oral traditions for storytelling and music, promoted the intergenerational transmission of speech patterns in these remote communities.[65] These practices, rooted in their Border Scots heritage, emphasized family loyalty and verbal folklore, contributing to the retention of distinctive phonological and lexical features from their origins.[66]

Myths of Isolation and Archaic Preservation

The notion that Appalachian English represents a preserved relic of Elizabethan English, often termed the "time capsule" or "Shakespearean" hypothesis, stems from early 20th-century folklore and romanticized portrayals emphasizing geographic seclusion in the Appalachian Mountains.[67] This view posits that isolation from lowland populations since the 18th century halted linguistic evolution, retaining 16th-century forms like those in Shakespeare's works.[68] However, comparative historical linguistics demonstrates that purported archaic features, such as aorist present participles (e.g., "the house needs cleaned"), occur in Scots-Irish substrates but not uniquely as Elizabethan survivals; they align more closely with post-1700 innovations in Ulster Scots dialects influencing American varieties.[67][68] Key grammatical constructions, including double modals like "might could" or "may can," exemplify American innovations rather than archaic retentions. These structures, documented in Appalachian and Southern U.S. English from the late 19th century onward, absent from 16th-century British English corpora, emerged through contact-induced grammaticalization in colonial American contexts, possibly originating in African American Vernacular English before diffusing regionally.[69] Linguistic atlases, such as the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States (LAMSAS) from surveys conducted 1933–1972, reveal double modals concentrated in the Upland South, including Appalachia, but with isoglosses indicating post-settlement spread rather than isolated preservation.[70] Similarly, quotative "be like" (e.g., "He was like, 'Hello'"), once claimed as a modern intrusion, entered Appalachian speech via diffusion from urban Southern centers in the mid-20th century, contradicting total isolation.[71] Empirical evidence from migration records and settlement patterns refutes strict isolation, showing bidirectional contact with lowland Southern populations through trade routes, seasonal labor, and intermarriage since the early 1800s. For instance, 19th-century census data from eastern Kentucky and western Virginia document population exchanges with Piedmont and Tidewater regions, facilitating lexical and phonological diffusion, such as shared rhoticity preservation influenced by broader Southern norms rather than medieval British retentions.[40] Diffusion models in dialect geography, applied to Atlas of North American English (ANAE) data from 1990s fieldwork, confirm Appalachian English participates in U.S.-wide innovations like the Northern Cities Vowel Shift peripherally and Southern Vowel Shift centrally, features absent in Elizabethan English but developed in 20th-century American contexts.[72] These shared post-colonial developments underscore dynamic evolution over static preservation, with isolation serving more as a cultural narrative than a causal mechanism for the dialect's traits.[67]

Evolutionary Changes and Influences

The industrialization of Appalachia, particularly the coal mining boom from the late 19th century through the mid-20th century, introduced significant demographic shifts that influenced local English varieties. Migration to coalfields drew workers from diverse regions, including African Americans from the Deep South between 1870 and 1930, as well as European immigrants, fostering dialect contact in company towns and urbanizing areas.[73] This contact contributed to koineization processes, where competing linguistic variants leveled toward shared forms, especially in fringe urban centers like Huntington, West Virginia, or Knoxville, Tennessee, where rural Appalachian speakers interacted with Midland and Southern English influences.[13] Such mixing stabilized certain innovative features while diluting others, as evidenced by diachronic analyses of speech patterns in mixed communities.[74] Diachronic studies reveal ongoing feature loss in Appalachian English, particularly among younger speakers exposed to mass media, education, and mobility. The perfective done, used to mark completed actions (e.g., "She done finished"), exhibited higher frequencies in older generations but declined sharply by the early 21st century; for instance, a 1975 study of Ohio Appalachian speakers found 26 occurrences among those over 40 versus only 3 among children aged 8-11, while a 2006 West Virginia corpus showed zero instances across 21 speakers aged 15-90+.[4] This generational shift, documented across 50 years of quantitative data, reflects partial standardization rather than total erosion, with some dialects retaining variability amid broader convergence toward General American norms.[4][74] Urban fringe koineization has further accelerated these changes, blending Appalachian traits with adjacent varieties through commuting and economic integration. In areas like southern Indiana's Appalachian-influenced pockets, verbal -s marking (e.g., "they goes") persists but shows reduced intensity compared to core rural zones, attributable to contact with non-Appalachian migrants post-industrialization.[75] Overall, these evolutionary pressures—migration, urbanization, and cultural exposure—have promoted feature leveling without eliminating the dialect's core distinctiveness, as confirmed by longitudinal sociolinguistic surveys.[74]

Comparisons to Other Dialects

Similarities with Ozark English

Appalachian English and Ozark English exhibit notable similarities stemming from parallel settlement patterns by Scots-Irish immigrants in the 18th and early 19th centuries, with many Ozark settlers migrating westward from Appalachian regions starting in the late 1830s, preserving shared dialectal traits through geographic isolation in mountainous terrains.[76] Both varieties draw heavily from Ulster Scots grammatical influences, including existential "they" constructions and specialized uses of "till," which distinguish them from surrounding American Englishes.[77] Comparative studies, such as those analyzing data from the Linguistic Atlas projects, confirm these parallels in rural communities, where isolation minimized external leveling influences.[46] Grammatical features overlap significantly, including a-prefixing on present participles (e.g., "a-beggin'"), which appears in narratives from both regions as a stylistic device for emphasis, as documented in Ozark-specific analyses alongside Appalachian patterns.[46] The "liketa" construction, denoting near-misses or avertives (e.g., "He liketa died"), occurs in both dialects, reflecting shared innovative syntax not found as prominently elsewhere.[40] Additional commonalities include completive "done" (e.g., "I done told you"), double modals like "might could," and positive "anymore" for current states, alongside irregular verb forms and variable subject-verb agreement (e.g., "Them boys likes...").[76][77] Phonological traits also align, with archaic pronunciations such as "heerd" for "heard," "deef" for "deaf," and "chimley" for "chimney" preserved in both, alongside patterns of vowel shifts and centralization in stressed syllables that deviate from General American norms.[76] These phonetic overlaps, observed in atlas-based comparisons, underscore the dialects' retention of 17th-18th century British Isles substrates, particularly Scots-Irish, rather than later innovations.[77] Such shared elements highlight Ozark English as a westward extension of Appalachian varieties, with minimal divergence due to comparable sociohistorical trajectories.[76]

Divergences from General American and Southern Englishes

Appalachian English retains grammatical features that diverge from the simplifications characteristic of General American English, preserving structures rooted in earlier English varieties rather than adopting standardized forms. Notable examples include a-prefixing on present participles (e.g., "She's a-comin'" instead of "She's coming"), which marks progressive aspect in ways absent from General American.[8] Double modals, such as "might could" or "used to could," allow nuanced modality expressions not found in General American's single-modal system.[8] Perfective done functions as a marker of completed action (e.g., "He done left" for emphatic past completion), contrasting with General American's reliance on simple past tenses without such auxiliaries.[4] These retentions reflect diachronic continuity from 18th-century Scots-Irish and English inputs, rather than synchronic leveling toward standardization.[39] Phonologically, Appalachian English exhibits divergences from General American through heightened monophthongization of /aɪ/ across contexts (e.g., "bite" as [ba:t]), more pervasive than in standardized varieties, alongside consistent pin-pen merger (/ɪ/ and /ɛ/ before nasals, e.g., "pen" and "pin" pronounced alike).[30] The cot-caught merger varies subregionally, present in northern Appalachia but absent southward, differing from General American's widespread merger.[30] Compared to broader Southern Englishes, Appalachian varieties intensify elements of the Southern Vowel Shift, such as front vowel raising (e.g., "bit" as [bɪɪt]), but retain conservative consonant patterns like intrusive /t/ (e.g., "oncet" for "once") and /h/-retention (e.g., "hain’t" for "ain’t"), which are receding in urban Southern speech.[30][8] Appalachian English shows less substrate influence from African American Vernacular English (AAVE) than coastal Southern dialects, attributable to historical demographics: Appalachian counties averaged 5-10% African American populations in the 19th century, versus 30-50% in coastal plantation zones like the South Carolina Lowcountry, limiting bidirectional feature borrowing.[78] Consequently, Appalachian white varieties lack widespread AAVE hallmarks like habitual "be" (e.g., "She be working") or copula absence rates exceeding 20%, which permeate coastal Southern speech through prolonged contact.[78] Dialect maps from Labov et al. quantify these divergences, placing central Appalachia within the Southern region but noting subregional metrics like /ey/-/e/ reversal in 9 of 25 Southern speakers concentrated along Appalachian ridges, and Cartesian vowel distances under 500 Hz between /ey/ and /ay/ indicating monophthongal shifts distinct from General American uniformity.[79] Northern Appalachian areas diverge further via /o/~/oh/ merger, absent in core Southern lowlands, highlighting a gradient of phonological separation from both standardized General American and homogenized Southern baselines.[79]

Social and Cultural Dimensions

Stereotypes, Media Portrayals, and Empirical Realities

Media portrayals of Appalachian English often invoke the "hillbilly" stereotype, depicting speakers as uneducated, backward, or prone to violence, with the dialect itself serving as an auditory cue for these traits. In the 1972 film Deliverance, directed by John Boorman, rural Georgians speaking a thick Appalachian-influenced vernacular are shown as menacing and isolated antagonists, reinforcing associations between the dialect and moral depravity or lawlessness. [80] Similarly, the television series The Beverly Hillbillies (1962–1971) popularized comedic tropes of naive, poverty-stricken mountaineers relocating to urban California, using exaggerated dialect features like a-prefixing ("a-goin'") to highlight cultural clash and simplicity. [81] These representations, while entertaining, trace back to early 20th-century literature and film that caricatured Appalachians as relics of a primitive past, often ignoring the dialect's linguistic complexity. [71] Such stereotypes draw partial empirical grounding from the region's historical and ongoing socioeconomic isolation, though they overstate causation. The Appalachian Mountains' rugged terrain historically limited transportation and commerce, fostering relative seclusion that preserved dialect features amid slower modernization compared to lowland areas. [82] According to the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) analysis of 2019–2023 American Community Survey data, the region's poverty rate stands at 14.3%, exceeding the national average of 11.6%, with median household income at $64,588 versus $78,538 nationally; rates climb above 25% in many distressed central Appalachian counties like those in eastern Kentucky and West Virginia. [83] Dialect retention correlates with these metrics, as rural poverty reduces educational mobility and exposure to standardized speech, but the language does not cause economic stagnation—rather, both stem from structural factors like extractive industries' decline post-1950s coal booms and limited infrastructure investment. [4] Cultural responses to these portrayals reflect divergent viewpoints on insularity and heritage. Proponents of Appalachian pride view the dialect as a marker of resilience and distinct identity, emphasizing self-sufficiency and communal ties forged in adversity, with groups like the Appalachian Studies Association advocating reclamation of terms like "hillbilly" against external mockery. [84] Critics, however, argue that geographic and social insularity has perpetuated cycles of limited opportunity, as seen in higher-than-average rates of family instability and substance abuse in dialect-strong communities, attributing these not to inherent cultural flaws but to policy neglect and economic extraction—claims echoed in works like J.D. Vance's Hillbilly Elegy (2016), which some regional scholars contest for overgeneralizing personal anecdotes as representative. [85] Empirical linguistic surveys confirm dialect vitality persists strongest in these isolated pockets, underscoring a causal link to environment over inherent backwardness. [71]

Perceptions of Prestige, Stigma, and Discrimination

Appalachian English speakers often face perceptions of low prestige in extraregional contexts, where the dialect is stereotyped as indicative of limited education or intelligence. Linguistic discrimination studies document this bias, with Appalachian varieties rated lower on status dimensions in matched-guise experiments compared to General American English.[86] Such attitudes stem from correlations between the dialect and rural socioeconomic conditions, rather than empirical deficits in communicative efficacy, as dialectal grammar and vocabulary enable equivalent expressiveness to standardized forms.[87] In employment settings, this translates to tangible barriers, including reduced hiring opportunities due to accent-based prejudice. Research highlights how Appalachian accents trigger negative inferences during interviews, prompting speakers to adopt code-switching or bi-dialectalism for professional advancement.[88] Audit studies on regional U.S. dialects reveal callback disparities, with non-standard speech yielding 20-30% fewer responses in simulated job applications across sectors like sales and administration from 2014 onward. These outcomes reflect urban-centric hiring norms prioritizing phonetic conformity over competence, exacerbating economic disadvantages for Appalachian migrants.[89] Regional counter-narratives foster pride and legitimacy. On March 26, 2019, the Tennessee General Assembly adopted House Joint Resolution 397, declaring Appalachian English a "fully legitimate dialect" meriting respect akin to other American varieties and recommending its historical contextualization in state textbooks.[90] This legislative affirmation underscores internal valuation, driven by cultural heritage rather than external validation, and challenges stigmatizing narratives through institutional endorsement.[91]

Controversies in Classification and Study

Debates on Dialect Boundaries

Early dialectological work by Hans Kurath in his 1949 A Word Geography of the Eastern United States established the South Midland as a distinct region overlapping with Appalachia, delineating boundaries via isoglosses for features like vocabulary (e.g., "lightning bug" vs. "firefly") and pronunciation, separating it from Northern and Southern varieties.[92] These mappings portrayed relatively discrete zones, with the South Midland extending from central Pennsylvania through West Virginia into northern Alabama and Mississippi.[93] Contemporary scholarship challenges such rigid demarcations, advocating continuum models where dialect features exhibit gradual gradients rather than abrupt shifts. For instance, phonological traits like /ai/-monophthongization and the pin-pen merger display clinal distributions, with GIS-enabled analyses of acoustic data from sources like the Atlas of North American English (Labov et al., 2006) illustrating transitional zones rather than hard lines.[13] Researchers such as Flanigan (2000) argue for extensions into southeastern Ohio, while others like Dakin (1966) propose a broader "trans-Appalachian" area, highlighting how settlement patterns foster overlapping influences from Scots-Irish and English substrates.[13] Debates intensify over incorporating urban enclaves, where Appalachian migrants to cities like Cincinnati and Columbus exhibit feature retention but undergo leveling toward Midland norms due to demographic mixing.[13] Recent mappings typically exclude these areas from core boundaries, prioritizing rural mountain speech where traditional markers persist with higher frequency, as urban homogenization obscures coherence.[13] For linguistic policy and recognition—such as in educational accommodations or heritage documentation—overly expansive definitions risk diluting Appalachian English's perceived unity, conflating it with adjacent varieties and undermining arguments for its treatment as a distinct dialect deserving targeted study.[13] Proponents of precise, gradient-aware boundaries emphasize that this approach better captures causal settlement dynamics and empirical variation, avoiding the pitfalls of geographic overreach seen in non-linguistic frameworks like the Appalachian Regional Commission's 420-county designation.[9]

Validity as a Coherent Variety vs. Regional Continuum

Appalachian English has been characterized by linguists as exhibiting both unifying structural features and substantial internal heterogeneity, prompting debate over its status as a discrete dialect versus a dialect continuum marked by gradual transitions. Proponents of its coherence as a variety emphasize shared syntactic innovations, such as double modal constructions (e.g., "might could" or "may can"), which occur at elevated frequencies in Appalachian speech compared to surrounding regions and reflect systematic modal layering rather than random error.[45] These features, alongside phonological traits like a-prefixing (e.g., "going down the road" as "a-going down the road"), demonstrate rule-governed patterns that distinguish Appalachian English from General American English, supporting its classification as a unified variety with internal logic derived from historical and social convergence.[6] Such innovations are not relics of archaic preservation but active grammatical strategies, underscoring the variety's systematicity over prescriptivist notions of deficiency.[94] Conversely, evidence of extensive sub-regional variation challenges this unity, with differences in vowel systems, consonant clusters, prosody, and lexicon across Appalachian communities often surpassing shared elements in magnitude.[95] Studies highlight "Appalachian Englishes" in the plural, revealing divergent realizations—such as varying degrees of the pin-pen merger or Southern Shift vowels—that form gradients rather than sharp dialect boundaries, akin to continua in other contact zones.[11] This internal diversity, influenced by local isolation and migration patterns, suggests a spectrum of forms where peripheral areas blend into adjacent Southern or Midland Englishes, undermining claims of a singular coherent dialect.[6] Empirical assessments, including variationist analyses and geolocated corpus data, indicate partial mutual intelligibility barriers with non-Appalachian speakers, particularly for dense feature clusters like multiple modals or nonstandard morphology, though overall comprehension remains high due to lexical overlap with mainstream varieties.[45] Dialectometric approaches reveal clustering around core innovations but with continuity effects that prioritize regional gradients over discrete categorization, aligning with causal models of variation driven by contact and leveling rather than isolation alone.[95] Thus, while Appalachian English meets structural criteria for dialecthood through shared rules, its continuum-like diversity tempers assertions of unqualified coherence, favoring a nuanced view of interconnected regional forms.[11]

Contemporary Status and Research

Ongoing Linguistic Shifts and Decline

Research from the West Virginia Dialect Project indicates that Appalachian English vowel systems are undergoing shifts, with variations in the Southern Vowel Shift observed across subregions, including a "stilted" progression in Midland Appalachia that reflects evolving identity choices among speakers.[96] These changes involve systematic adjustments in front and back vowel rotations, potentially aligning certain features closer to General American patterns in response to social and demographic influences.[30] Longitudinal acoustic analyses in Appalachian-adjacent areas, such as western North Carolina, reveal cross-generational reductions in traditional Southern Shift characteristics among younger cohorts, with lowered /aɪ/ and raised /ɛ/ nuclei appearing less pronounced.[97] Sociolinguistic studies document declining prominence of vernacular features among youth, as adolescents adapt traditional forms to construct modern identities amid exposure to national media and standardized education.[98] The West Virginia Corpus of English in Appalachia, comprising interviews with diverse age groups, highlights quantitative variation where phonological and grammatical markers like a-prefixing and positive anymore decrease in frequency with apparent time, signaling intergenerational attenuation.[4] This pattern aligns with broader dialect convergence, though robust vernacular baselines persist in informal contexts.[99] Urban-rural divides exacerbate leveling, with urban Appalachian speakers demonstrating accelerated adoption of mainstream variants compared to rural counterparts, who retain dialect markers as emblems of local identity.[100] In West Virginia, paradigm leveling in morphological variables like past be forms illustrates clashes between vernacular persistence in rural settings and standardization pressures in urbanizing zones, driven by mobility and economic integration.[101] Such dynamics contribute to a regional continuum where rural isolation buffers against rapid homogenization, while urban proximity fosters convergence toward supralocal norms.[16]

Preservation Efforts and Policy Recognitions

In 2019, the Tennessee General Assembly adopted Senate Joint Resolution 227 on March 26, affirming Appalachian English as a "fully legitimate dialect" deserving respect equivalent to other American English varieties and urging its inclusion in Section VI of the biennial Tennessee Blue Book to highlight its historical significance and counter stigmas associating it with lack of education.[102] [91] The resolution traces dialect influences to early settlers, Scots-Irish immigrants, and Native American terms like "pone" for cornbread, positioning it as integral to the region's cultural identity rather than a deviation from standard norms.[103] Grassroots educational programs in Appalachian communities promote dialect awareness to mitigate stigma and foster bilingual proficiency in local speech alongside Standard American English. West Virginia University provides a downloadable week-long curriculum unit for grades 6-12, incorporating activities on Appalachian dialect features to build student appreciation of linguistic diversity in secondary classrooms.[104] Similarly, teacher training initiatives emphasize modeling Standard English while validating Appalachian varieties, as evidenced in professional development studies showing improved dialect-honoring practices reduce student alienation.[105] Preservation extends to cultural domains like heritage tourism and music, where Appalachian English persists in performative contexts. Community-led recordings of elder speakers and regional expression dictionaries document fading lexicon for posterity, sustaining oral traditions amid modernization.[106] Bluegrass music, rooted in Appalachian folk traditions, embeds dialect elements in lyrics—such as a-prefixing and non-standard verb forms—preserved through venues along Virginia's Crooked Road heritage trail, which spans 300 miles of music sites drawing tourists to authentic mountain performances.[107] [108]

Recent Empirical Studies and Technological Implications

A 2025 study published in American Speech analyzed automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance on Appalachian English using the DARLA system, revealing dialect bias with higher phoneme error rates for Southern Appalachian speech compared to mainstream varieties, particularly in vowel recognition influenced by the Southern Vowel Shift, where 50.2% of errors in the Southern dataset were attributed to such shifts.[109] Researchers noted that baseline models achieved accuracies of 69.5%, with marginal improvements from hierarchical adaptations, underscoring the need for dialect-inclusive training data to mitigate underperformance in voice-AI applications for Appalachian speakers.[110] Empirical investigations at West Virginia University, drawing from the West Virginia Corpus of English in Appalachia (WVCEA), have employed big data approaches to map subregional vowel variations, identifying phonological distinctions such as /ai/ ungliding, /æ/ breaking, and low back vowel fronting between Northern and Southern Appalachia, with individual speaker variability challenging uniform dialect models.[10] These projects, including analyses in Appalachian Englishes in the 21st Century (2022), reveal ongoing flux in features like back vowel fronting (/u/, /ʊ/, /o/), stable in some areas but shifting under external influences, informing computational linguistics tools for regional dialect simulation.[111] In speech-language pathology, recent guidance emphasizes distinguishing Appalachian English dialectal traits—such as irregular past tenses ("knowed" for "knew") or zero copula—from disorders, as standardized assessments normed on mainstream American English often yield misleading deficits without dialect adaptations.[112] The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) maintains that no dialectal variety constitutes a pathological form, advocating functional assessments to avoid misdiagnosis, with implications for equitable therapy protocols that preserve communicative competence rather than enforcing conformity.[113] This approach counters historical overpathologization, supported by sociolinguistic data showing dialect adequacy for effective expression.[114]

References

  1. Appalachian English - Margaret E. L. Renwick, Ph.D.
  2. [PDF] Language | Appalachian English - University of South Carolina
  3. A-prefixing | Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: English in North ...
  4. [PDF] Investigating Language Variation and Change in Appalachian Dialects
  5. [PDF] Appalachian English They-Existentials - Stanford University
  6. [PDF] Christian, Donna Sociolinguistic Variables in Appalachian Dialects ...
  7. [PDF] HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON A ...
  8. [PDF] Appendix: An Inventory of Distinguishing Dialect Features
  9. About the Appalachian Region
  10. Chapter 1: Just What and Where Are Appalachian Englishes?
  11. [PDF] Talking Appalachian: Voice, Identity, and Community - CORE
  12. You Ain't from Here, Are You? Subregional Variation and ...
  13. [PDF] Needed Research on the Englishes of Appalachia - UKnowledge
  14. Investigating Appalachian Englishes: Subregional Variation in the ...
  15. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/09v5z6fg
  16. [PDF] Needed Research on the Englishes of Appalachia
  17. Appalachian Midlands | Welcome to Planet Terry
  18. Reflections on Appalachian English
  19. Rural Appalachia Compared to the Rest of Rural America
  20. The Chartbook - Appalachian Regional Commission
  21. Appalachia Sees Higher Incomes, Lower Poverty Rates, and Boosts ...
  22. [PDF] Socioeconomic Review of Appalachia Then and Now
  23. [PDF] Demographic and Socioeconomic Change in Appalachia ...
  24. Dialect Influences Appalachian Students' Experiences in College
  25. Population and Age in Appalachia
  26. [PDF] Demographic and Socioeconomic Change in Appalachia ...
  27. https://dailyyonder.com/the-alarming-depopulation-of-appalachias-coalfields-a-quarter-century-of-projected-decline/2025/10/22/
  28. "Sounding Appalachian: /ai/ Monophthongization, Rising Pitch ...
  29. [PDF] Appalachia, Monophthongization, and Intonation - Paul Reed
  30. [PDF] Phonological Possibilities in Appalachian Englishes - Paul Reed
  31. Production and perception of the Pin-Pen merger
  32. [PDF] On the Southern Shift in Appalachian English Terry Lynn Irons 1 ...
  33. Flapping before a stressed vowel – whatever! - AIP Publishing
  34. (PDF) Flapping before a stressed vowel: The case of whatever
  35. Flying high above the social radar: Coronal stop deletion in modern ...
  36. [PDF] Appalachian Dialect Language Tree
  37. Discovering Appalachian English: An Empirical Perspective
  38. Appalachian U.S. Dialects: Language of the Mountains
  39. Grammar and Syntax of Smoky Mountain English (SME) | Southern ...
  40. Encyclopedia of Appalachia on Language | Southern Appalachian ...
  41. Demonstrative them | Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: English in ...
  42. them | Southern Appalachian English
  43. The fall of demonstrative them: Evidence from Appalachia
  44. Naturalistic Double Modals in North America | American Speech
  45. The semantics, sociolinguistics, and origins of double modals in ...
  46. HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON A ...
  47. Toward a Description of A-Prefixing in Appalachian English - jstor
  48. [PDF] Christian, Donna Center for Applied Linguistics, Arlington, Va ... - ERIC
  49. Dictionary of Southern Appalachian English - UNC Press
  50. The History of the Appalachian Dialect. - languagehat.com
  51. [PDF] ED373565.pdf - ERIC
  52. 34 Appalachian Words You Didn't Know Existed - Visit My Smokies
  53. Dictionary of Smoky Mountain and Southern Appalachian English
  54. Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English - Montgomery, Michael B.
  55. Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English | Blind Pig and The Acorn
  56. sang | Southern Appalachian English - University of South Carolina
  57. Ginseng, ferns and an ancient dialect - Smoky Mountain News
  58. Appalachian Word of the Week - Conveyors
  59. https://www.daredictionary.com/
  60. Conestoga Wagon · Scots-Irish Migration To Appalachia
  61. [PDF] How Scotch-Irish is your English
  62. Great Valley Road - FamilySearch
  63. The Royal Colony of North Carolina - The Scots-Irish Settlers
  64. Scots-Irish: Brief History of the Born Fighters Who Settled the ...
  65. [PDF] A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Storytelling in Ireland, Scotland and ...
  66. [PDF] Scottish and Irish Elements of Appalachian Fiddle Music
  67. [PDF] Is Shakespeare Still in the Holler? The Death of a Language Myth
  68. [PDF] Myths - Appalachian English - University of South Carolina
  69. The semantics, sociolinguistics, and origins of double modals in ...
  70. World Englishes: Volume II: North America 9781474205962 ...
  71. Combatting Stereotypes About Appalachian Dialects - Sapiens.org
  72. The Legendary Language of the Appalachian "Holler" - JSTOR Daily
  73. Featured Essay - African Americans in Appalachia
  74. [PDF] The Pace of Change in Appalachian English.
  75. Appalachian English in southern Indiana? The evidence from verbal -s
  76. Ozark English - Encyclopedia of Arkansas
  77. Just How "Old" is Ozarks English? - Springfield-Greene County Library
  78. [PDF] African American Speech in Southern Appalachia
  79. A National Map of the Regional Dialects of American English
  80. Portraying Appalachia: How the Movies Can Get it Wrong
  81. The Weird History of Hillbilly TV — THE BITTER SOUTHERNER
  82. [PDF] Isolation as a Linguistic Construct - Appalachian English
  83. The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2019-2023 ...
  84. Appalachian culture and heritage pride - Facebook
  85. What J.D. Vance Got Wrong About Appalachia in Hillbilly Elegy
  86. The development of accent attitudes in the United States
  87. [PDF] ABSTRACT DUNSTAN, STEPHANY BRETT. The Influence of ...
  88. In the Thick of Thick Accents: Employment Discrimination and the ...
  89. How Employment Law Handles Linguistic Profiling - OnLabor
  90. Tennessee Push Wants State Book to Cover Appalachian Dialect
  91. The Latest! | Southern Appalachian English
  92. [PDF] Solving Kurath's Puzzle - Appalachian English
  93. Yet Again: The Midland Dialect - jstor
  94. 3: Appalachian American English (AE) - Social Sci LibreTexts
  95. Appalachian Englishes - ResearchGate
  96. A Stilted Shift: The Southern Vowel Shift in Midland Appalachia
  97. Cross-generational vowel change in American English - PMC
  98. Community Studies of Sociolinguistic Change in Appalachia - ADS
  99. (PDF) (ING): A Vernacular Baseline for English in Appalachia
  100. Rural Voices in Appalachia: The Shifting Sociolinguistic Reality of ...
  101. A new role for an ancient variable in Appalachia: Paradigm leveling ...
  102. TN SJR0227 | 2019-2020 | 111th General Assembly - LegiScan
  103. Tennessee push wants state book to cover Appalachian dialect
  104. Dialects in Schools
  105. [PDF] Although teaching teachers to deal with dialect in their students ...
  106. Preserving Appalachian Dialects: A Fight for Cultural Survival
  107. 50 Ways to Play Along The Crooked Road, Virginia's Heritage Music ...
  108. Music Heritage
  109. Dialect Bias in Automatic Speech Recognition - Duke University Press
  110. Dialect Bias in Automatic Speech Recognition - ResearchGate
  111. Appalachian Englishes - West Virginia Dialect Project
  112. Part 2: Appalachian English and Language Diagnosis
  113. https://www.asha.org/policy/tr2003-00044/
  114. https://www.asha.org/policy/ps1983-00115/
User Avatar
No comments yet.