Hubbry Logo
CiliciaCiliciaMain
Open search
Cilicia
Community hub
Cilicia
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cilicia
Cilicia
from Wikipedia

Cilicia (/sɪˈlɪʃə/)[3][note 1] is a geographical region of southern Anatolia in West Asia, extending inland from the northeastern coasts of the Mediterranean Sea. Cilicia borders Pamphylia to the west, Lycaonia and Cappadocia to the north, Commagene to the north-east, Syria to the east and the Mediterranean Sea to the south. Cilicia has a population ranging over six million, concentrated mostly at the Cilician plain (Turkish: Çukurova). The region includes the provinces of Mersin, Adana, Osmaniye and Hatay.

Key Information

Name

[edit]

The name of Cilicia (Κιλικία) was derived from the Akkadian toponym Ḫilakku (𒆳𒄭𒋃𒆪[4]), which was the name used by the Neo-Assyrian Empire to designate the western part of what would become Cilicia.[5][6]

The English spelling Cilicia is the same as the Latin, as it was transliterated directly from the Greek form Κιλικία. The palatalization of c occurring in Western Europe in later Vulgar Latin (c. 500–700) accounts for its modern pronunciation in English.

Geography

[edit]

Cilicia is located on the southern coast of Anatolia, and it historically extended from Coracesium or the river Melas in the west to the Amanis mountains in the east, while to the north it was bounded by the Taurus Mountains, which are passable in very few places, such as the Cilician Gates.[5]

Cilicia consisted of two main contrasting regions:[6]

  • to the west was a mountainous region characterised by rough terrain, corresponding to the Neo-Assyrian period territory of Ḫilakku and the Graeco-Roman region of Rough Cilicia;
  • to the east was a fertile region defined by a smooth terrain, corresponding to the Neo-Assyrian period territory of Ḫiyawa and the Graeco-Roman region of Plain Cilicia.

The western mountainous part of Cilicia was called Rugged Cilicia or Rough Cilicia (Ancient Greek: Κιλικία Τραχεῖα, romanizedKilikía Trakheîa; Latin: Cilicia Aspera), while the eastern region was dominated by the alluvial plain of the rivers Cydnus, Sarus, and Pyramus, and was therefore known as Plain Cilicia or Flat Cilicia (Ancient Greek: Κιλικία Πεδιάς, romanizedKilikía Pediás; Latin: Cilicia Campestris).[5]

Salamis, the city on the east coast of Cyprus, was included in the Roman province of Cilicia from 58 BC until 27 BC.

Rough Cilicia

[edit]

Rough Cilicia (Ancient Greek: Κιλικία Τραχεῖα, romanizedKilikía Trakheîa; Latin: Cilicia Aspera; Neo-Assyrian Akkadian: 𒆳𒄭𒋃𒆪, romanized: Ḫilakku;[4] Neo-Babylonian Akkadian: 𒆳𒉿𒊑𒅔𒁺, romanized: Pirindu[7])[8][9][10] is a rugged mountain district[11] formed by the spurs of Taurus, which often terminate in rocky headlands with small sheltered harbours,[12] features which, in classical times, made the coast a string of havens for pirates[12][13] and, in the Middle Ages, outposts for Genoese and Venetian traders. The district is watered by the Calycadnus[14] and was covered in ancient times by forests that supplied timber to Phoenicia and Egypt. Cilicia lacked large cities.[15]

Plain Cilicia

[edit]

Plain Cilicia (Ancient Greek: Κιλικία Πεδιάς, romanizedKilikía Pediás; Latin: Cilicia Campestris; Neo-Assyrian Akkadian: 𒆳𒄣𒂊, romanized: Que;[16] Neo-Babylonian Akkadian: 𒆳𒄷𒈨𒂊, romanized: Ḫuwê[17][18]), to the east, included the rugged spurs of Taurus and a large coastal plain, with rich loamy soil,[15] known to Greeks such as Xenophon (who passed through with his mercenary group of the Ten Thousand,[19]) for its abundance (euthemia),[20] filled with sesame and millet and olives[21] and pasturage for the horses imported into ancient Israel by King Solomon.[22] Many of its high places were fortified.

The plain is watered by the three great rivers, the Cydnus (Tarsus Çay Berdan River), the Sarus (Seyhan), and the Pyramus (Ceyhan River), each of which brings down much silt from the deforested interior and which fed extensive wetlands. The Sarus now enters the sea almost due south of Tarsus, but there are clear indications that at one period it joined the Pyramus, and that the united rivers ran to the sea west of Kara-tash. Through the rich plain of Issus ran the great highway that linked east and west, on which stood the cities of Tarsus (Tarsa) on the Cydnus, Adana (Adaniya) on the Sarus, and Mopsuestia (Missis) on the Pyramus.[15]

Climate

[edit]

The climate of Cilicia shows significant differences between the mountains and the lower plains. At the lower plains, the climate reflects a typical Mediterranean style; summers are hot[23] while winters are mild, making the land, particularly, the eastern plains, fertile.[24] In the coldest month (January), the average temperature is 9 °C, and in the warmest month (August), the average temperature is 28 °C. The mountains of Cilicia have an inland climate with snowy winters. The average annual precipitation in the region is 647 mm and the average number of rainy days in a year is 76. Mersin and surrounding areas have the highest average temperature in Cilicia. Mersin also has high annual precipitation (1096 mm) and 85 rainy days in a year.

Geology

[edit]

The mountains of Cilicia are formed from ancient limestones, conglomerate, marlstone, and similar materials. The Taurus Mountains are composed of karstic limestone, while its soil is also limestone-derived, with pockets of volcanic soil.[25] The lower plain is the largest alluvial plain in Turkey.[citation needed] Expansion of limestone formations and fourth-era alluvials brought by the rivers Seyhan and Ceyhan formed the plains of the region over the course of time.

Akyatan, Akyayan, Salt Lake, Seven lakes at Aladağ, and Karstik Dipsiz lake near Karaisalı are the lakes of the region. The reservoirs in the region are Seyhan, Çatalan, Yedigöze, Kozan and Mehmetli.

The major rivers in Cilicia are Seyhan, Ceyhan, Berdan (Tarsus), Asi and Göksu.

History

[edit]

Neolithic

[edit]

Cilicia was settled from the Neolithic period onwards.[26][27][page needed] Dating of the ancient settlements of the region from Neolithic to Bronze Age is as follows: Aceramic/Neolithic: 8th and 7th millennia BC; Early Chalcolithic: 5800 BC; Middle Chalcolithic (correlated with Halaf and Ubaid developments in the east): c. 5400–4500 BC; Late Chalcolithic: 4500 – c. 3400 BC; and Early Bronze Age IA: 3400–3000 BC; EBA IB: 3000–2700 BC; EBA II: 2700–2400 BC; EBA III A-B: 2400–2000 BC.[27]: 168–170 

Probable captives from Cilicia, on the Nasiriyah stele of Naram-Sin, circa 2200 BC.[28]

Bronze Age

[edit]

During the Bronze Age, the region which would become Cilicia was known as Kizzuwatna, and silver from this region was exported to Middle Kingdom Egypt.[5]

Fugitive slave treaty between Idrimi of Alalakh (now Tell Atchana) and Pillia of Kizzuwatna (now Cilicia), (c. 1480 BC) Ref:131447 .

There exists evidence that circa 1650 BC both Hittite kings Hattusili I and Mursili I enjoyed the freedom of movement along the Pyramus River (now the Ceyhan River in southern Turkey), proving they exerted strong control over Cilicia in their battles with Syria. After the death of Murshili around 1595 BC, Hurrians wrested control from the Hittites, and Cilicia was free for two centuries. The first king of free Cilicia, Išputahšu, son of Pariyawatri, was recorded as a "great king" in both cuneiform and Hittite hieroglyphs. Another record of Hittite origins, a treaty between Išputahšu and Telipinu, king of the Hittites, is recorded in both Hittite and Akkadian.[29]

In the next century, the Cilician king Pilliya finalized treaties with both King Zidanta II of the Hittites and Idrimi of Alalakh, in which Idrimi mentions that he had assaulted several military targets throughout Eastern Cilicia. Niqmepa, who succeeded Idrimi as king of Alalakh, went so far as to ask for help from a Hurrian rival, Shaushtatar of Mitanni, to try and reduce Cilicia's power in the region. It was soon apparent, however, that increased Hittite power would soon prove Niqmepa's efforts to be futile, as the city of Kizzuwatna soon fell to the Hittites, threatening all of Cilicia. Soon after, King Sunassura was forced to accept vassalization under the Hittites, becoming the last king of ancient Cilicia.[30] After the death of Mursili I, which led to a power struggle among rival claimants to the throne, eventually leading to the collapse of Hittite supremacy, Cilicia appeared to have regained its independence.[23]

In the 13th century BC a major population shift occurred as the Sea Peoples overran Cilicia.[citation needed] The Hurrians that resided there deserted the area and moved northeast towards the Taurus Mountains, where they settled in the area of Cappadocia.[31]

Cilicia
Κιλικία (Kilikía)
Kingdom of Cilicia in 6th century BC
Kingdom of Cilicia in 6th century BC
CapitalTarsus
DemonymCilicians
King 
• c. 585 BC
Syennesis I
History 
• Established
c. 6th century BC
• Submission to the Achaemenid Empire
c. 542 BC
• Annexation by the Achaemenid Empire
401 BC
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Tarḫuntašša
Cilicia (satrapy)
Today part ofTurkey

Iron Age

[edit]

During the late Iron Age, several local states emerged in Cilicia, which therefore became dominated by two main polities:[5][32]

  • in the east was Ḫiyawa, corresponding to Plain Cilicia, and referred to as Que in Neo-Assyrian sources and as Ḫuwê in Neo-Babylonian sources;[33]
  • in the west, corresponding to Rough Cilicia, was the state referred to as Ḫilakku in Neo-Assyrian sources and as Pirindu in Neo-Babylonian sources.[34]

During the 1st millennium BC, silver from Cilicia was exported to Assyria.[5]

During the 8th to 7th centuries BC, Greek traders and colonists established settlements on the Cilician coasts, such as Nagidos and Celenderis founded by Samos, Soli founded by Lindos; Greeks also established themselves in local settlements, such as at Anchiale and Tarsus.[5]

Kingdom of Cilicia

[edit]

Following the collapse of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, an independent state, called Cilicia (Ancient Greek: Κιλικία, romanizedKilikía) by the ancient Greeks, was established in southeastern Anatolia in the 6th century BC under the rule of a native dynasty,[35] with its capital at the city of Tarsus.[5][6]

Submission to the Achaemenid Empire
[edit]

In the mid-6th century BC, the kingdom of Cilicia supported the founding king of the Persian Achaemenid Empire, Cyrus II, in his wars against Croesus of Lydia,[36] as a consequence of which Cilicia became a vassal of the Achaemenid empire as from c. 542 BC,[6] and the Cilician rulers became part of the Achaemenid administration.[36]

Under early Achaemenid rule, Cilicia maintained a significant degree of autonomy[6] and the native rulers at Tarsus acted as satraps (governors) for the Achaemenid administration, with their authority extending until as far west as Aspendus.[36][5]

Cilicia remained under efficient administration, and it would continue to provide troops for the Achaemenid wars in Anatolia, Egypt and Cyprus.[36]

Achaemenid Cilicia
Satrapy of the Achaemenid Empire
c. 542 BC–333 BC
Flag of Achaemenid Cilicia

Cilicia was located in the western part of the Achaemenid Empire, in south-east Anatolia.
CapitalTarsus
Government
 • TypeMonarchy
King of Kings 
• 405–358 BC
Artaxerxes II
• 358–338 BC
Artaxerxes III
• 338–336 BC
Arses
• 336–330 BC
Darius III
Satrap 
• c. 480 BC
Syennesis II
• c. 470s BC
Xeinagoras of Halicarnassus
• c. 401 BC
Syennesis III
• c. 390s - c. 385 BC
Camisares
• c. 385 - c. 362 BC
Datames
• c. 340s - 333 BC
Mazaeus
Historical eraAchaemenid era
• Cyrus II's conquest of Babylon
c. 542 BC
• Macedonian conquest of the Achaemenid Empire
333 BC
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Kingdom of Cilicia
Macedonian Empire
Today part ofTurkey

Satrapy of Cilicia

[edit]

In 401 BC, the Achaemenid king of kings Artaxerxes II abolished the autonomy of Cilicia in reaction to the local Cilician ruler Syennesis III's support for the rebellion of Cyrus the Younger,[36] resulting in the kingdom of Cilicia being abolished and fully integrated into the Achaemenid empire as a normal province ruled by and appointed by the Achaemenid king of kings, which it would remain until the end of the Achaemenid Empire in 333 BC.[36][6][37]

Once the revolt of Cyrus the Younger had been suppressed, Cilicia was again used as an assembly point for Achaemenid forces in preparation for military action in the Aegean Sea during 396 to 395 BC, and against Cyprus in the 380s BC.[36]

During the 390s BC, Camisares was appointed as satrap of Cilicia. Camisares was himself succeeded by his son, Datames, who eventually became the satrap of both Cilicia and Cappadocia until his assassination in c. 362 BC.[36]

Coin of Mazaios. Satrap of Cilicia, 361/0-334 BC. Tarsos, Cilicia.
Coin of Mazaios, with Artaxerxes III as Pharaoh. Satrap of Cilicia, 361/0-334 BC. Tarsos, Cilicia.

In the 340s BC, the satrap of Cilicia was Mazaeus, who was also given authority over Syria as reward for his service in a campaign against Egypt.[36]

Hellenistic period

[edit]

Following the Battle of Issus, Cilicia became part of the empire of Alexander III of Macedon.[5]

Alexander forded the Halys River in the summer of 333 BC, ending up on the border of southeastern Phrygia and Cilicia. He knew well the writings of Xenophon, and how the Cilician Gates had been "impassable if obstructed by the enemy". Alexander reasoned that by force alone he could frighten the defenders and break through, and he gathered his men to do so. In the cover of night, they attacked, startling the guards and sending them and their satrap into full flight, setting their crops aflame as they made for Tarsus. This good fortune allowed Alexander and his army to pass unharmed through the Gates and into Cilicia.[38]

During Alexander III's invasion, a lesser officer named Arsames who had fled to Cilicia from the northwest to organise new resistance there defended it against the Macedonian forces.[36]

After Alexander's death it was long a battleground of the rival Hellenistic monarchs and kingdoms, and for a time fell under Ptolemaic dominion (i.e., Egypt), but finally came to the Seleucids, who, however, never held effectually more than the eastern half.[15]

During the Hellenistic period, the Teucrid dynasty ruled at the city of Olba.[39]

Although no later Persian empire ever regained control of Cilicia, one Seleucid officer named Aribazus and attested as administrator of Cilicia in 246 BC was possibly of Persian descent.[36]

During the Hellenistic era, numerous cities were established in Cilicia, which minted coins showing the badges (gods, animals, and objects) associated with each polis.[40]

The Seleucids, especially Antiochus IV, focused on Hellenising Cilicia by establishing or rebuilding several poleis, such as Seleucia on the Calycadnus, Antioch on the Cydnus (Tarsus), Seleucia on the Pyramus (Mopsuestia), Hierapolis (Castabala), and Epiphaneia.[41]

In the 3rd century BC, sporadic Ptolemaic presence was attested in Rugged Cilicia.[42]

With the weakening of the Seleucid kingdom in the late 2nd century BC, piracy spread in Cilicia.[42]

Roman and Byzantine periods

[edit]
The Roman provinces of Asia Minor under Trajan, including Cilicia.

In 102 BC, the Roman Republic establiched a provincia of the praetor Marcus Antonius in Cilicia to fight the Cilician pirates, with the command being renewed repeatedly.[42][43]

In 83 BC, the Armenian king Tigranes II conquered Plain Cilicia, and he deported Cilicians to Tigranocerta.[42]

Between 78 and 74 BC, Publius Servilius Vatia Isauricus conquered the population of Rugged Cilicia, which made a permanent Roman presence in Cilocia possible.[42][43]

In 69 BC, Lucullus returned the Cilician deportees to Tigranocerta back to their homeland.[42]

After Pompey was given the imperium proconsulare maius, he was able to defeat the Cilician pirates in 67 BC, and he arranged for his defeated enemies to be settled in Pompeiopolis (formerly Soli) and other depopulated Cilician towns. This victory strengthened the Roman presence in Cilicia.[42][43]

Cilicia Trachea became the haunt of pirates, who were subdued by Pompey in 67 BC following a Battle of Korakesion (modern Alanya), and Tarsus was made the capital of the Roman province of Cilicia. Cilicia Pedias became Roman territory in 103 BC first conquered by Marcus Antonius Orator in his campaign against pirates, with Sulla acting as its first governor, foiling an invasion of Mithridates, and the whole was organized by Pompey, 64 BC, into a province which, for a short time, extended to and included part of Phrygia.[15]

A Roman-period triumphal arch at Anazarbus, later converted into the city's south gate

In 51 BC, the Parthian Empire was able to take advantage of the weakness of the Roman Republic to invade Cilicia (Parthian: 𐭊𐭉𐭋𐭊𐭉𐭀).[36]

In 51 or 50 BC, the proconsul Cicero successfully campaigned in Cilicia against the Eleutherokilikes in the Amanus Mountains, which further solidified the Roman presence in CIlicia.[42][43]

It was reorganized by Julius Caesar, 47 BC, and about 27 BC became part of the province Syria-Cilicia Phoenice. At first, the western district was left independent under native kings or priest-dynasts, and a small kingdom, under Tarcondimotus I, was left in the east;[44][15] but these were finally united to the province by Vespasian, AD 72.[45][15]Containing 47 known cities, it had been deemed important enough to be governed by a proconsul.[46]

After Julius Caesar's death, the provincia of Cilicia was dissolved in 43 BC, and most of Rugged Cilicia was given to Amyntas of Galatia, then to Archelaus of Cappadocia. Plain Cilicia meanwhile was ruled by the kingdom of Tarcondimotus I as well as other smaller client-states of the Roman Republic or administered as part of Syria.[42][43]

Tarcondimotus I had supported the losing side of both Roman civil wars by offering naval support to Pompey and Mark Antony, due to which his son Tarcondimotus II Philopator was deposed in 30 BC, although he was restored to power between 20 BC and 17 AD.[42]

Parts of Cilicia were given to Antiochus IV of Commagene by Caligula, who incorporated the rest of it into Syria.[42]

A province of Cilicia with Tarsus as capital was re-established in 72 AD by Vespasian.[42][43]

In 194 AD, Septimius Severus defeated Pescennius Niger at the Cilician Gates.[42] Under the Severan dynasty, during the late 2nd to early 3rd centuries AD, the city of Anazarbus, which was made into a metropolis, became a rival of Tarsus.[43]

In 259 or 260, the Persian Sasanian king of kings Shapur I defeated the Roman Emperor Valerian, whose army included Cilician soldiers. After Valerian's defeat, the Sasanian forces burnt and sacked several cities in Syria, Cilicia (Middle Persian: 𐭪𐭫𐭪𐭩𐭠𐭩) and Cappadocia, and devastated large parts of Cilicia.[36][42]

Under Emperor Diocletian's Tetrarchy (c. 297), Cilicia was governed by a consularis; with Isauria and the Syrian, Mesopotamian, Egyptian and Libyan provinces, formed the Diocesis Orientis[15] (in the late 4th century the African component was split off as Diocese of Egypt), part of the pretorian prefecture also called Oriens ('the East', also including the dioceses of Asiana and Pontica, both in Anatolia, and Thraciae in the Balkans), the rich bulk of the eastern Roman Empire. After the division of the Roman Empire, Cilicia became part of the eastern Roman Empire, the Byzantine Empire. Cilicia was one of the most important regions of the classical world and can be considered as the birthplace of Christianity.[47][48]

Diocletian made Rugged Cilicia into a province named Isauria, with its capital at Seleucia.[42]

Roman Cilicia exported the goats-hair cloth, Cilicium, which was used to make tents.[15] Tarsus was also the birthplace of the early Christian missionary and author St. Paul, likely writer of 13 of the 27 books included in the New Testament.

Cilicia had numerous Christian communities and is mentioned six times in the Book of Acts and once in the Epistle to the Galatians (1:21).[49] After Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire in the 4th century, Cilicia was included in the territories of the patriarchate of Antioch.[46] The region was divided into two civil and ecclesiastical provinces: Cilicia Prima, with a metropolitan diocese at Tarsus and suffragan dioceses for Pompeiopolis, Sebaste, Augusta, Corycus, Adana, Mallus and Zephyrium; and Cilicia Secunda, with a metropolitan diocese at Anazarbus and suffragan dioceses for Mopsuestia, Aegae, Epiphania, Irenopolis, Flavias, Castabala, Alexandria, Citidiopolis and Rhosus. Bishops from the various dioceses of Cilicia were well represented at the First Council of Nicaea in 325 and at the later ecumenical councils.[50]

In 400, Theodosius I divided Plain Cilicia into the provinces of Cilicia Prima, headquartered at Tarsus, and Cilicia Secunda, whose capital was Anazarbus.[51][43]

The Christian Church in Cilicia was under the authority of the Patriarch of Antioch.[51]

Cilicia remained prosperous, due to which several, largely ecclesiastical, construction works were undertaken there.[51]

From the middle of the 7th century, Cilicia became more and more close to the border between the Byzantine Empire and the Caliphate, resulting in the depopulation of the region.[51]

Early Islamic period

[edit]

In the 7th century Cilicia was invaded by the Muslim Arabs.[52] The area was for some time an embattled no-man's land. The Umayyad Caliphate conquered Cilicia around c. 700.[51] Under the Abbasid Caliphate, Cilicia was resettled and transformed into a fortified frontier zone (thughur). Tarsus, re-built in 787/788, quickly became the largest settlement in the region and the Arabs' most important base in their raids across the Taurus Mountains into Byzantine-held Anatolia.

In medieval Arabic Cilicia was known as Ath-Thugur As-Shamiyya meaning "Levantine outskirts".

The Muslims held the country until it was reoccupied by the Emperor Nicephorus II in 965.[15][51] During the Byzantine resettlement of Cilicia, many Armenians migrated to Cilicia, where they founded in 1071 the kingdom of Lesser Armenia.[51]

Armenian Cilicia and the Crusades

[edit]
The Kingdom of Cilician Armenia, 1199–1375.

During the time of the First Crusade, the area was controlled by the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia. The Seljuk Turkish invasions of Armenia were followed by an exodus of Armenians migrating westward into the Byzantine Empire, and in 1080 Ruben, a relative of the last king of Ani, founded in the heart of the Cilician Taurus a small principality which gradually expanded into the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia. This Christian state, surrounded by Muslim states hostile to its existence, had a stormy history of about 300 years, giving valuable support to the Crusaders, and trading with the great commercial cities of Italy.[15]

It prospered for three centuries due to the vast network of fortifications which secured all the major roads as well as the three principal harbours at Ayas, Koŕikos, and Mopsuestia.[53] Through their complex alliances with the Crusader states, the Armenian barons and kings often invited Crusaders to maintain castles in and along the borders of the Kingdom, including Bagras, Trapessac, T‛il Hamtun, Harunia, Selefkia, Amouda, and Sarvandikar.

Gosdantin (r. 1095 – c. 1100) assisted the Crusaders on their march to Antioch, and was created knight and marquis. Thoros I (r. c. 1100 – 1129), in alliance with the Christian princes of Syria, waged successful wars against the Byzantines and Seljuk Turks. Levon II (Leo the Great (r. 1187–1219)), extended the kingdom beyond Mount Taurus and established the capital at Sis. He assisted the Crusaders, was crowned King by the Archbishop of Mainz, and married one of the Lusignans of the Crusader Kingdom of Cyprus.[15]

Mongols

[edit]
Ethnic map of Cilicia and vicinity at the thirteenth century AD

Hetoum I (r. 1226–1270) made an alliance with the Mongols,[15] sending his brother Sempad to the Mongol court in person.[54][55] The Mongols then assisted with the defence of Cilicia from the Mamluks of Egypt, until the Mongols themselves converted to Islam.[15]

Turkmens

[edit]

The Ilkhanate lost cohesion after the death of Abu Sa'id (r. 1316–1335), and thus could not support the Armenian Kingdom in guarding Cilicia. Internal conflicts within the Armenian Kingdom and the devastation caused by the Black Death that arrived in 1348, led nomadic Türkmens to turn their eyes towards unstable Cilicia. In 1352, Ramazan Beg led Turkmens settled south of Çaldağı and founded their first settlement, Camili. Later that year, Ramazan Beg visited Cairo and was licensed by the Sultan to establish the new frontier Turkmen Emirate in Cilicia.[56]

Yüreğir Türkmens lived as a small community for 7 years in southeast of Adana, and named their new land, Yüreğir.

Collapse

[edit]

When Levon V died (1342), John of Lusignan was crowned king as Gosdantin IV; but he and his successors alienated the native Armenians by attempting to make them conform to the Roman Church, and by giving all posts of honour to Latins, until at last the kingdom, falling prey to internal dissensions, ceded Cilicia Pedias to the Ramadanid-supported Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt in 1375.[15][51]

Mamluk and Turkmen rule

[edit]
During the Ramadanid era, Cilicia was a buffer state between two Islamic powers.

In 1359, Mamluk Sultanate Army marched into Cilicia and took over Adana and Tarsus, two major cities of the plain, leaving few castles to Armenians. In 1375, Mamluks gained the control of the remaining areas of Cilicia, thus ending the three centuries rule of Armenians.[citation needed] Cilicia Pedias became part of the Mamluk Sultanate in 1375.[15] Mamluk Sultanate authorized Ramazan Beg led Türkmen Emirate to administer Cilicia, but took direct control of the towns, Tarsus, Ayas, Sarvandikar, Sis at the four corners of Cilicia plain and appointed an Amir and a Garrison for each. Tarsus, the former capital of Cilicia, were settled by the moors that arrived from Egypt. Türkmen Emirate which began to be known as Ramadanids, set the city of Adana as their center of power, and many Türkmen families of Yüreğir origin moved to the city.

After the death of Ramazan Bey, his son Ibrahim Bey made alliance with the Karaman Emirate. Alaeddin Bey and Ibrahim Bey together tried to break the Mameluks' might in the province. After this alliance a great Mameluk army moved in and began to plunder but Ibrahim Bey's army achieved a great victory against the Mameluks in Belen. Also in this battle Temur Bey, the general of the Mameluks, had been captured. Yilboga, the amir of Aleppo moved on to the Turkmens after this defeat and he conquered Misis Castle.

Ramadanids were the only emirate in Anatolia that were not a successor of the Anatolian Seljuk Sultanate. They are often misclassified as an Anatolian beylik, though they were an entity under Mamluks. The Ramadanids played an important role in 15th century Ottoman-Mamluk relations, being a buffer state located in the Mamluk al-'Awasim frontier zone. Cilicia were one of the last regions of Anatolia to fall under Turkish rule, and were part of the Seljuqs for a short time, thus were not effected from Sunni tariqa expansionism of the 13th century. Yüreğir Turks moved to Cilicia in the late 14th century, and had a distinct culture that influenced from Bektashi traditions which accompanied Shamanic rituals with Islam. Living together and having cultural exchange with the large Armenian community, Yüreğir Turks flourished a laid back culture.

The Karamanid Principality, one of the Turkmen Anatolian beyliks emerged after the collapse of the Anatolian Seljuks, took over[when?] the rule of Cilicia Thracea.[citation needed]

Ottoman period

[edit]

In 1516, Selim I incorporated the beylik into the Ottoman Empire after his conquest of the Mamluk state. The beys of Ramadanids held the administration of the Ottoman sanjak of Adana in a hereditary manner until 1608, with the area serving as a vassal of the Ottomans.[57]

Adana Vilayet in 1892

Ottomans ended the Ramadanid administration of Adana sanjak in 1608, ruling it directly from Constantinople then after. The autonomous sanjak was then split from the Aleppo Eyalet and established as a new province under the name of Adana Eyalet. A governor was appointed to administer the province. In late 1832, Eyalet of Egypt Vali Muhammad Ali Pasha invaded Syria, and reached Cilicia. The Convention of Kütahya that was signed on 14 May 1833, ceded Cilicia to the de facto independent Egypt.

Alawites brought to Cilicia from Syria to work at the flourishing agricultural lands. İbrahim Paşa, the son of Muhammed Ali Paşa, demolished the Adana Castle and the city walls in 1836. He built the canals for irrigation and transportation and also built water systems for the residential areas of the towns. Adana had the infrastructure it needed by the second half of the 19th century to become major center of Southeastern Anatolia.[58]

After the Oriental crisis, the Convention of Alexandria that was signed on 27 November 1840, required the return of Cilicia to Ottoman sovereignty. The American Civil War that broke out in 1861 disturbed the cotton flow to Europe and directed European cotton traders to fertile Cilicia. The region became the centre of cotton trade and one of the most economically strong regions of the Empire within decades. In 1869, Adana Eyalet was re-established as Adana Vilayet, after the re-structuring in the Ottoman Administration.[59] Adana–Mersin railway line was opened in 1886, connecting Cilicia to international ports through Port of Mersin.

A thriving regional economy, the doubling of Cilician Armenian population due to flee from the Hamidian massacres, and the end of autocratic Abdulhamid rule with the revolution of 1908, empowered the Armenian community and envisioned an autonomous Cilicia. Enraged supporters of Abdulhamid that organized under Cemiyet-i Muhammediye amidst the countercoup,[60] led to a series of anti-Armenian pogroms in 14–27 April 1909.[61] The Adana massacre resulted in the deaths of roughly 25,000 Armenians, orphaned 3500 children and caused heavy destruction of Christian neighbourhoods in the entire Vilayet.[62]

The Cilicia section of the Berlin–Baghdad railway was opened in 1912, connecting the region to the Middle East. Over the course of the Armenian genocide, an Ottoman telegraph was received by the Governor to deport the more than 70,000 Armenians of the Adana Vilayet to Syria.[63] Armenians of Zeitun had organized a successful resistance against the Ottoman onslaught. In order to finally subjugate Zeitun, the Ottomans had to resort to treachery by forcing an Armenian delegation from Marash to ask the Zeituntsis to put down their arms. Both the Armenian delegation, and later, the inhabitants of Zeitun, were left with no choice.[64]

Modern era

[edit]
French taking over Cilicia as General Gouraud arrives Mersin

Armistice of Mudros that was signed on 30 October 1918 to end the World War I, ceded the control of Cilicia to France. French Government sent four battalions of the Armenian Legion in December to take over and oversee the repatriation of more than 170,000 Armenians to Cilicia. Returning Armenians negotiated with France to establish an autonomous State of Cilicia. The Armenians formed the Armenian National Union which acted as an unofficial Cilician Armenian government composed of the four major political parties and three Armenian religious denominations.[65] Mihran Damadian, the chief negotiator for Armenians, signed the provisional Constitution of Cilicia in 1919 to bring new order to the region.[66]

The French forces were spread too thinly in the region and, as they came under withering attacks by Muslim elements both opposed and loyal to Mustafa Kemal Pasha, eventually reversed their policies in the region. A truce arranged on 28 May between the French and the Kemalists, led to the retreat of the French forces south of the Mersin-Osmaniye railroad.

Cilicie palais de gouvernement

With the changing political environment and interests, the French further reversed their policy: The repatriation was halted, and the French ultimately abandoned all pretensions to Cilicia, which they had originally hoped to attach to their mandate over Syria.[67] Cilicia Peace Treaty was signed on 9 March 1921 between France and Turkish Grand National Assembly. The treaty did not achieve the intended goals and was replaced with the Treaty of Ankara that was signed on 20 October 1921. Based on the terms of the agreement, France recognized the end of the Cilicia War, and French troops together with the remaining Armenian volunteers withdrew from the region in early January 1922.[68]

Maronite community were re-settled in Lebanon by the French Administration. Later in 1922, roughly 10,000 Greeks were forced to move to Greece by the policy of Greco-Turkish population exchange.[66][63] Cilicia Armenians settled in Lebanon, at the newly founded Armenian Bourj Hammoud town, just north-east of Beirut.[69] From the 1920s, around 60 percent of the Cilician Armenians moved to Argentina. An informal census of 1941 revealed that, 70 percent of all the Armenian Argentines in Buenos Aires had Adana origins.[70]

Republic of Turkey

[edit]

The region become part of the Republic of Turkey in 1921 with the signing of the Treaty of Ankara. On 15 April 1923, just before the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne, the Turkish government enacted the "Law of Abandoned Properties" which confiscated properties of Armenians and Greeks who were not present on their property. Cilicia were one of the regions with the most confiscated property, thus muhacirs (en: immigrants) from Balkans and Crete were relocated in the old Armenian and Greek neighbourhoods and villages of the region. All types of properties, lands, houses and workshops were distributed to them. Also during this period, there was a property rush of Muslims from Kayseri and Darende to Cilicia who were granted the ownership of large farms, factories, stores and mansions. Within a decade, Cilicia had a sharp change demographically, socially and economically and lost its diversity by turning into solely Muslim/Turkish.[66]

Remaining Jews and Christians were hit by the heavy burden of the Wealth Tax in 1942, which caused them to leave Cilicia, selling their properties for peanuts to families like Sabancı, who built their wealth on owning confiscated or cheaply purchased properties.[citation needed] Forcible change in means of production led to abuse of wealth and harsh treatment of labor later in the 20th century, as the new possessors did not have the necessary management attributes that the previous owners had for centuries.[citation needed]

Legacy

[edit]

According to one Greek myth, Cilicia was named after Cilix (Ancient Greek: Κίλιξ, romanizedKílix), a Phoenician who went to live there after searching for his sister Europa following the instructions of his father, the king Agenor of Tyre or Sidon.[42][71]

In another Greek myth, the name of Cilicia was derived from a people named the Kilikes (Κίλικες), who were Greeks who originally lived in the Troad, and who settled the coastland of Cilicia under the leadership of the seer Mopsus.[71][6] The Karatepe Luwian-Phoenician bilingual inscription mentions the House of Mopsus (Hieroglyphic Luwian: 𔑾𔗧𔗔𔗔‎, romanized: Muksas; Phoenician: 𐤌𐤐𐤔‎, romanized: MPŠ) as the reigning dynasty of the kingdom of Ḫiyawa.[42]

Society and culture

[edit]

Ancient

[edit]

Ethnicity

[edit]

The inhabitants of Ancient Cilicia were Luwians who had settled in this region in the 2nd millennium BC, and Cilicia itself had become an important centre of Luwian settlement in Anatolia in the aftermath of the Late Bronze Age collapse.[72]

This Luwian population persisted in Cilicia in the 1st millennium BC until the later Hellenistic and Roman periods, hence why the onomastics of this region, especially in its western part (Rough Cilicia), were Luwian in character, implying that it was inhabited by a large number of Luwian speakers until the early 1st millennium AD.[72]

Persian influence
[edit]

Like in the rest of the western satrapies of the Achaemenid Empire, Persians had moved in Cilicia, and archaeological evidence such as reliefs from Silifke, Adana and Korykos suggest that a Persian nobility as well as a Persianised nobility existed in Cilicia during the Achaemenid period.[36]

Cultural diversity
[edit]

Achaemenid and post-Achaemenid Cilicia was culturally very diverse, as attested by:[36]

  • Aramaic funerary inscriptions and an Aramaic foundation text at Meydancık;
  • coins minted at Soli and Tarsus of Persian, modified Persian, and non-Persian types;
  • Greek and Aramaic inscriptions.

Social organisation

[edit]

The population of the eastern part of ancient Cilicia was urbanised and participated in commercial and industrial activities, while the inhabitants of its western regions were tribally organised and led simpler lifestyles.[6]

Modern

[edit]

Significant Christian communities (Antiochian Greek Christians and Armenians) are found in Adana, İskenderun, and Mersin.[73]

Administrative structure

[edit]

Ancient

[edit]

Temple estates had existed in Cilicia since the pre-Achaemenid period, although the best documentation regarding them is from the Hellenestic period. Known temple estates include the temple of Zeus at Olbē and the temple of Artemis Perasia at Kastabala.[36]

Achaemenid

[edit]

Like the other western satrapies of the Achaemenid Empire, the satrap of Cilicia owned an estate with a palace at Tarsus, which was a large and thriving city during the Achaemenid period. Subordinate to the satrap in the local administration were lower rank officials, with some of them being landed aristocrats owning estates and villages, and others being priests in the sanctuaries of Cilicia who administered the temple estates, as well as other even lesser officials.[36]

The temple estates persisted through the Achaemenid period, implying that their existence was not perceived as detrimental to the authority of the satrap of Cilicia.[36]

The duties of the satrap including maintaining peace within his satrapy to ensure agriculture could be conducted and tribute could be produced, as well as to keep the locations at higher altitudes and the mountain passes under control loyal to the Achaemenid crown, to which it contributed 360 horses and 140 talents of silver for defence.[36]

Cilicia also provided troops to the land and maritime military forces of the Achaemenid Empire, and the satrapy itself acted as an assembly point for them.[36]

Little is known of the large cities in the Achaemenid period, although Tarsus and Soli are known to have minted coins which were used in the Achaemenid military campaigns against Cyprus and Egypt.[36]

During the Achaemenid period, the administration of Cilicia was stable and efficient, thanks to which it was agriculturally very productive and was capable of holding large military concentrations. The fact that the king of kings Darius I expected 500 talents of silver as tribute from Cilicia attests that its administration was of the necessary competence to generate a revenue that was more than trivial.[36]

Hellenistic

[edit]

In the Hellenistic period, the Cilician temple estates adopted Greek culture under the influence of Seleucid administration:[36]

  • the high priests of Zeus at Olbe were able to expand their authority after the fall of the Achaemend Empire, and they became culturally Hellenised, with their dynasts shifting their names from Tarkuaris (Ταρκυαρις, from Luwian Tarḫuwarris[74]) to Teukros (Τευκρος);
  • the chief priest of the temple of Artemis Perasia at Castabala was also a dynast who became culturally Hellenised.

Modern

[edit]

Modern Cilicia is split into four administrative provinces: Mersin, Adana, Osmaniye and Hatay. Each province is governed by the Central Government in Ankara through an appointed Provincial governor. Provinces are then divided into districts governed by the District Governors who are under the provincial governors.

Province Seat Area (km2) Districts (West to East) Population Map
Mersin Mersin 15,853 Anamur, Bozyazı, Aydıncık (Kelenderis), Gülnar, Mut, Silifke, Erdemli, Mezitli, Yenişehir Toroslar, Akdeniz, Çamlıyayla (Namrun), Tarsus 1,891,145
Adana Adana 14,030 Seyhan, Çukurova, Yüreğir, Sarıçam, Pozantı, Karaisalı, Karataş, Yumurtalık (Ayas), Ceyhan, İmamoğlu, Aladağ (Karsantı), Kozan(Sis), Feke (Vahka), Saimbeyli (Hadjin), Tufanbeyli 2,263,373
Osmaniye Osmaniye 3,767 Sumbas, Kadirli (Karsbazar), Toprakkale (Tall Hamdūn), Düziçi, Osmaniye, Hasanbeyli, Bahçe 553,012
Hatay Antakya 5,524 Erzin, Dörtyol (Chork Marzban), Hassa, İskenderun, Arsuz, Belen, Kırıkhan, Samandağ(Süveydiye), Antakya, Defne, Reyhanlı, Kumlu, Yayladağı, Altınözü 1,670,712

Religion

[edit]

Ancient

[edit]

Reflecting the diversity of Cilicia in the Achaemenid and post-Achaemenid periods, various deities of different origins have been attested there in antiquity:[36]

As a result of the strong impact of 200 years of rule by the Persian Achaemenid Empire, fire altars and magi were still present at Tarsus and in the rest of Cilicia in the c. 260s AD, as recorded by the Sasanian high priest Kartir.[36]

Demographics

[edit]

Cilicia is heavily populated due to its abundant resources, climate and plain geography. The population of Cilicia as of 31 December 2022 is 6,435,986.[1]

Hatay is the most rural province of Cilicia and also Hatay is the only province that the rural population is rising and the urban population is declining. The major reason is the mountainous geography of Hatay.

Adana Province is the most urbanized province, with most of the population centred in the city of Adana. Mersin Province has a larger rural population than Adana Province, owing to its long and narrow stretch of flat land in between the Taurus Mountains and the Mediterranean.

 
Largest populated areas in Cilicia
Rank Province Pop. Rank Province Pop.
1 Adana Adana 1,797,136 11 Silifke Mersin 127,849
2 Mersin Mersin 1,064,750 12 Kadirli Osmaniye 126,941
3 Antakya Hatay 555,833 13 Samandağ Hatay 123,999
4 Tarsus Mersin 347,314 14 Kırıkhan Hatay 119,854
5 Osmaniye Osmaniye 279,992 15 Reyhanlı Hatay 105,309
6 İskenderun Hatay 250,976 16 Arsuz Hatay 99,480
7 Ceyhan Adana 159,955 17 Düziçi Osmaniye 85,118
8 Erdemli Mersin 147,512 18 Anamur Mersin 66,828
9 Kozan Adana 132,320 19 Mut Mersin 62,803
10 Dörtyol Hatay 127,989 20 Altınözü Hatay 60,861

Economy

[edit]

Cilicia is well known for the vast fertile land and highly productive agriculture. The region is also industrialized; Tarsus, Adana and Ceyhan host numerous plants. Mersin and İskenderun seaports provide transportation of goods manufactured in Central, South and Southeast Anatolia. Ceyhan hosts oil, natural gas terminals as well as refineries and shipbuilders.

Natural resources

[edit]

Agriculture

[edit]

The Cilicia plain has some of the most fertile soil in the world in which 3 harvests can be taken each year. The region has the second richest flora in the world and it is the producer of all agricultural products of Turkey except hazelnut and tobacco. Cilicia leads Turkey in soy, peanuts and corn harvest and is a major producer of fruits and vegetables. Half of Turkey's citrus export is from Cilicia. Anamur is the only sub-tropical area of Turkey where bananas, mango, kiwi and other sub-tropical produce can be harvested.

Cilicia is the second largest honey producer in Turkey after the MuğlaAydın region.[76] Samandağ, Yumurtalık, Karataş and Bozyazı are some of the towns in the region where fishing is the major source of income. Gray mullet, red mullet, sea bass, lagos, calamari and gilt-head bream are some of the most popular fish in the region. There are aquaculture farms in Akyatan, Akyağan, Yumurtalık lakes and at Seyhan Reservoir. While not as common as other forms of agriculture, dairy and livestock are also produced throughout the region.

Mining

[edit]

Manufacturing

[edit]

Cilicia is one of the first industrialized regions of Turkey. With the improvements in agriculture and the spike of agricultural yield, agriculture-based industries are built in large numbers. Today, the manufacturing industry is mainly concentrated around Tarsus, Adana and Ceyhan. Textile, leather tanning and food processing plants are plentiful. İsdemir is a large steel plant located in İskenderun.

The petrochemical industry is rapidly developing in the region with the investments around the Ceyhan Oil Terminal. Petroleum refineries are being built in the area. Ceyhan is also expected to host the shipbuilding industry.

Commerce

[edit]

Adana is the commercial centre of the region where many of the public and private institutions have their regional offices. Mersin and Antakya are also home to regional offices of public institutions. Many industry fairs and congresses are held in the region at venues such as the TÜYAP Congress and Exhibition Centre in Adana and the Mersin Congress Centre.

Mersin Seaport is the third largest seaport in Turkey, after Istanbul and İzmir. There are 45 piers in the port. The total area of the port is 785 square kilometres (194,000 acres), and the capacity is 6,000 ships per year.

İskenderun Seaport is used mostly for transfers to Middle East and Southeastern Turkey.[77]

Ceyhan Oil Terminal is a marine transport terminal for the Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan pipeline (the "BTC"), the Kirkuk–Ceyhan Oil Pipeline, the planned Samsun-Ceyhan and the Ceyhan-Red Sea pipelines. Ceyhan will also be a natural gas terminal for a planned pipeline to be constructed parallel to the Kirkuk-Ceyhan oil pipeline, and for a planned extension of the Blue Stream Gas Pipeline from Samsun to Ceyhan.

Dörtyol Oil Terminal is a marine transport terminal for Batman-Dörtyol oil pipeline which started operating in 1967 to market Batman oil. The pipeline is 511 km long and has an annual capacity of 3.5 million tons.[78]

Tourism

[edit]
Yemiskumu Beach (Ayaş, Erdemli district of Mersin Province)

While the region has a long coastline, international tourism is not at the level of the neighbouring Antalya Province. There are a small number of hotels between Erdemli and Anamur that attracts tourists. Cilicia tourism is mostly cottage tourism serving the Cilicia locals as well as residents of Kayseri, Gaziantep and surrounding areas. Between Silifke and Mersin, high-rise and low-rise cottages line the coast, leaving almost no vacant land. The coastline from Mersin to Karataş is mostly farmland. This area is zoned for resort tourism and is expected to have a rapid development within the next 20 years. Karataş and Yumurtalık coasts are home to cottages with a bird conservatory between the two areas. Arsuz is a seaside resort that is mostly frequented by Antakya and İskenderun residents.

Plateaus on the Taurus mountains are cooler escapes for the locals who wants to chill out from hot and humid summers of the lower plains. Gözne and Çamlıyayla (Namrun) in Mersin Province, Tekir, Bürücek and Kızıldağ in Adana Province, Zorkun in Osmaniye Province and Soğukoluk in Hatay Province are the popular high plain resorts of Cilicia which are often crowded in summer. There are a few hotels and camping sites in the Tekir plateau.

Balneary tourism

[edit]

The region is a popular destination for thermal springs. Hamamat Thermal Spring, located on midway from Kırıkhan to Reyhanlı, has a very high sulphur ratio, making it the second in the world after a thermal spring in India.[79] It is the largest spa in the region and attracts many Syrians due to proximity. Haruniye Thermal Spring is located on the banks of the Ceyhan River near Düziçi town and has a serene environment. Thermal springs are a hot spot for people with rheumatism.[80] Kurttepe, Alihocalı and Ilıca mineral springs, all located in Adana Province, are popular for toxic cleansing. Ottoman Palace Thermal Resort & Spa in Antakya is one of Turkey's top resorts for revitalization.

Religious tourism

[edit]
Church of Saint Peter near Antakya.

Lying at a crossroads of three major religions, namely Judaism, Christianity and Islam, the region is home to numerous landmarks that are important for people of faith. Tarsus is the birthplace of Paul the Apostle, who returned to the city after his conversion. The city was a stronghold of Christians after his death. Ashab-ı Kehf cavern, one of the locations claimed to be the resting place of the legendary Seven Sleepers, holy to Christians and Muslims, is located north of Tarsus.

Antakya is another destination for the spiritual world, where, according to the New Testament the followers of Jesus Christ were first called Christians.[81] the Church of Saint Peter near Antakya (Antioch) is one of Christianity's oldest churches.[82] It is the home of Saint Peter, one of the 12 apostles of Jesus.[83] Antioch was called "the cradle of Christianity" as a result of its longevity and the pivotal role that it played in the emergence of both Hellenistic Judaism and early Christianity,[84]

Places of interest

[edit]

Ancient sites

[edit]
Kızkalesi (Korykos)

Kizkalesi (Maiden Castle), a fort on a small island across Kızkalesi township, was built during the early 12th century by Armenian kings of the Rubeniyan dynasty to defend the city of Korykos (present-day Kızkalesi).

Heaven & Hell, situated on a large hill north of Narlıkuyu, consists of the grabens resulting from assoil of furrings[clarification needed] for thousands of years. The natural phenomenon of the grabens is named 'Hell & Heaven' because of the exotic effects on people. Visitors can access the cave of the mythological giant Typhon.[85][better source needed]

The ancient Roman town of Soloi-Pompeiopolis, near the city of Mersin.

Yılanlı Kale (Castle of Serpents), an 11th-century Crusader castle built on a historical road connecting the Taurus mountains with the city of Antakya. The castle has 8 round towers, a military guardhouse and a church. It is located 5 km. west of Ceyhan.[86]

Anazarbus Castle, built in the 3rd century, served as the centre of the ancient metropolis of Anavarza. The city was built on a hill and had strategic importance, controlling the Cilician plain. The main castle and the city walls represent remains of the city. The city wall is 1500 m. long and 8-10m. high, with 4 entrances to the city. The castle is located 80 km. northeast of Adana.

Şar (Comona), an ancient city located in northernmost Cilicia, some 200 km. north of Adana, near Tufanbeyli. It was an historical centre of the Hittites. Remaining structures today include the amphitheatre built during the Roman period, ruins of a church from the Byzantine era and Hittite rock-works.[87]

The Church of St. Peter in Antakya was a cave on the slopes of Habibi Neccar mountain converted into a church. The church is known as the first Christians' traditional meeting place. Pope Paul VI declared the church a "Place of Pilgrimage" for Christians in 1963, and since then a special ceremony takes place on 29 June each year.

St. Simeon Monastery, a 6th-century giant structure built on a desolate hill 18 km south of Antakya. The most striking features of this monastery are its cisterns, its storage compartment, and the walls. It is believed that St. Simeon resided here atop a 20-meter stone column for 45 years.

Parks and conservation areas

[edit]

Akyatan Lagoon is a large wildlife refuge which acts as a stopover for migratory birds voyaging from Africa to Europe. The wildlife refuge has a 14,700 ha (36,000-acre) area made up of forests, lagoon, marsh, sandy and reedy lands. Akyatan lake is a natural wonder with endemic plants and endangered bird species living in it together with other species of plants and animals. 250 species of birds are observed during a study in 1990. The conservation area is located 30 km south of Adana, near Tuzla.[88]

Yumurtalık Nature Reserve covers an area of 16,430 hectares within the Seyhan-Ceyhan delta, with its lakes, lagoons and wide collection of plant and animal species. The area is an important location for many species of migrating birds, the number gets higher during the winters when the lakes become a shelter when other lakes further north freeze.[89]

Aladağlar National Park, located north of Adana, is a huge park of around 55,000 hectares, the summit of Demirkazik at 3756 m is the highest point in the middle Taurus mountain range. There is a huge range of flora and fauna, and visitors may fish in the streams full of trout. Wildlife includes wild goats, bears, lynx and sable. The most common species of plant life is black pine and cluster pine trees, with some cedar dotted between, and fir trees in the northern areas with higher humidity. The Alpine region, from the upper borders of the forest, has pastures with rocky areas and little variety of plant life because of the high altitude and slope.[90]

Karatepe-Aslantaş National Park located on the west bank of Ceyhan River in Osmaniye Province. The park includes the Karatepe Hittite fortress and an open-air museum.

Tekköz-Kengerlidüz Nature Reserve, located 30 km north of Dörtyol, is known for having an ecosystem different from the Mediterranean. The main species of trees around Kengerliduz are beech, oak and fir, and around Tekkoz are hornbeam, ash, beach, black pine and silver birch. The main animal species in the area are wild goat, roe deer, bear, hyena, wild cat, wagtail, wolf, jackal and fox.[91]

Habibi Neccar Dağı Nature Reserve is famous for its cultural as well as natural value, especially for St Pierre Church, which was carved into the rocks. The Charon monument, 200 m north of the church, is huge sculpture of Haron, known as Boatman of Hell in mythology, carved into the rocks. The main species of tree are cluster pine, oaks and sandalwood. The mountain is also home to foxes, rabbits, partridges and stock doves. Nature reserve is 10 km east of Antakya and can be accessible by public transport.[92]

Education

[edit]

There are numerous private primary and high schools besides the state schools in the region. Most popular high school in the region is Tarsus American College, founded as a missionary school in 1888 to serve Armenian community and then became a secular school in 1923. Adana Anatolian High School and Adana Science High School most important high schools in the Cilicia. In other cities, Anatolian High School and School for Science are the most popular high schools of the city.

The region is home to five state and two foundation universities.

Çukurova University is a state university founded in 1973 with the union of the faculties of Agriculture and Medicine.. Main campus is in the city of Adana, and the College of Tourism Administration is in Karataş. There is an engineering faculty in Ceyhan, and vocational schools in Kozan, Karaisalı, Pozantı and Yumurtalık. The university is one of the well-developed universities of Turkey with many cultural, social and athletic facilities, currently enrolls 40,000 students.[93]

Mersin University is a state university founded in 1992, and currently serving with 11 faculties, 6 colleges and 9 vocational schools. The university employs more than 2100 academicians and enrolls 26,980 students.[94] Main campus is in the city of Mersin. In Tarsus, there is Faculty of Technical Education and Applied Technology and Management College. In Silifke and Erdemli, university has colleges and vocational schools. There are also vocational schools in Anamur, Aydıncık, Gülnar, and Mut.

Mustafa Kemal University is a state university located in Hatay Province. University was founded in 1992, currently has 9 faculties, 4 colleges and 7 vocational schools. Main campus is in Antakya and Faculty of Engineering is in İskenderun. The university employs 708 academicians and 14,439 students as of 2007.[95]

Korkut Ata University was founded in 2007 as a state university with the union of colleges and vocational schools in Osmaniye Province and began enrollment in 2009. The university has 3 faculties and a vocational school at the main campus in the city of Osmaniye and vocational schools in Kadirli, Bahçe, Düziçi and Erzin. University employs 107 academicians and enrolled 4000 students in 2009.[96]

Adana Science and Technology University is a recently founded state university that is planned to have ten faculties, two institutions and a college. It will accommodate 1,700 academic, 470 administrative staff, and it is expected to enroll students by 2012.[97]

Çağ University is a not-for-profit tuition based university founded in 1997. It is located on midway from Adana to Tarsus. University holds around 2500 students, most of them commuting from Adana, Tarsus and Mersin.[98]

Toros University is a not-for-profit tuition based university located in Mersin. The university started enrolling students in 2010.[99]

Sports

[edit]

Football is the most popular sport in Cilicia, professionally represented at all levels of the Football in Turkey.[100]

Football Clubs in Cilicia
Club Sport League Venue (capacity) Founded
Adana Demirspor Football (men) Süper Lig New Adana Stadium (33,543) 1940
Hatayspor Football (men) Süper Lig New Hatay Stadium (25000) 1967
Adanaspor Football (men) TFF First League New Adana Stadium (33,543) 1954
İskenderun FK Football (men) TFF Second League 5 Temmuz (8217) 1978
Yeni Mersin İdman Yurdu Football (men) TFF Second League Mersin Arena (25000) 2019
Adana 01 FK Football (men) TFF Second League Ali Hoşfikirer Stadium (2544) 2019
Osmaniyespor Football (men) TFF Third League 7 Ocak (6635) 2011
Silifke Belediyespor Football (men) TFF Third League Silifke Şehir (4000) 1964
Adana İdman Yurdu Football (women) Women's Super League Muharrem Gülergin 1993
Adana Demirspor are the most popular club of Cilicia
Basketball Clubs in Cilicia
Club Sport League Venue (capacity) Founded
Mersin BŞB Basketball (women) Women's Super League Edip Buran Arena (1750) 1993
Hatay BŞB Basketball (women) Women's Super League Antakya Sport Hall (2500) 2009
Adana Basketbol Kulubü Basketball (women) Women's Super League Adana Atatürk Sports Hall (2000) 2000
Mersin Basketbol Kulübü Basketball (women) Women's Super League Edip Buran Arena (1750)
Tosyalı Toyo Osmaniye Basketball (women) Women's Super League Tosyalı Sports Hall 2000

Transportation

[edit]

Cilicia has a well-developed transportation system with two airports, two major seaports, motorways and railway lines on the historical route connecting Europe to Middle East.

Air

[edit]

Cilicia is served by two airports. Adana Şakirpaşa Airport is an international airport that have flights to European destinations. There are daily domestic flights to Istanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Antalya and Trabzon. Adana Şakirpaşa Airport serves the provinces of Mersin, Adana and Osmaniye.

Railway connections of Cilicia

Hatay Airport, opened in 2007, is a domestic airport, and currently has flights to Istanbul, Ankara and Nicosia, TRNC. Hatay Airport mostly serves Hatay Province.

Another under construction airport is Çukurova Regional Airport, According to the newspaper Hürriyet, the project's cost will be 357 million Euro. When finished, it will serve to 15 million people, and the capacity will be doubled in the future.

Sea

[edit]

There are daily seabus and vehicle-passenger ferry services from Taşucu to Kyrenia, Northern Cyprus. From Mersin port, there are ferry services to Famagusta.

Road

[edit]

The O50–O59 motorways crosses Cilicia. Motorways of Cilicia extends to Niğde on the north, Erdemli on the west and Şanlıurfa on the east, and İskenderun on the south. State road D-400 connects Cilicia to Antalya on the west. AdanaKozan, AdanaKarataş, İskenderunAntakyaAleppo double roads are other regional roads.

Railway

[edit]

Parallel to the highway network in Cilicia, there is an extensive railway network. Adana-Mersin train runs as a commuter train between Mersin, Tarsus and Adana. There are also regional trains from Adana to Ceyhan, Osmaniye and İskenderun.

Society

[edit]

Cilicia was one of the most important regions for the Ottoman Armenians because it managed very well to preserve Armenian character throughout the years. In fact, the Cilician highlands were densely populated by Armenians in small but prosperous towns and villages such as Hadjin and Zeitun, two mountainous areas where autonomy was maintained until the 19th century.[101][102] In ports and cities of the Adana plain, commerce and industry were almost entirely in the hands of the Armenians and they remained so thanks to a constant influx of Armenians from the highlands. Their population was continuously increasing in numbers in Cilicia in contrast to other parts of the Ottoman Empire, where it was, since 1878, decreasing due to repression.

List of rulers

[edit]

Satraps

[edit]

Roman client kings

[edit]

Explanatory notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

Cilicia is an ancient historical region in southeastern , corresponding to modern southern , encompassing the fertile coastal plain of Cilicia Pedias and the rugged inland area of Cilicia Tracheia, bounded by the to the north, the to the south, and roughly extending from westward to the Amanus Mountains eastward. Its strategic location facilitated trade and military campaigns, while its diverse terrain supported agriculture in the plains and in the jagged coasts.
From prehistoric settlements in the era, Cilicia fell under Hittite influence in the BCE, followed by Assyrian conquests, Persian satrapy under the Achaemenids, and incorporation into the Great's empire after his victory at Issus in 333 BCE. Hellenistic successors like the Seleucids and Ptolemies vied for control until Roman annexation in 67 BCE, prompted by the suppression of notorious by , who cleared their strongholds and restored maritime security in a swift campaign. As a , it prospered under imperial administration, serving as a key eastern frontier with cities like Tarsus, the birthplace of the Apostle Paul, and witnessing early Christian communities referenced in the . Byzantine rule persisted until Arab incursions in the CE, after which Armenian migrations amid Seljuk pressures led to the establishment of the around 1080 CE under the Rubenid dynasty, evolving into a sovereign entity by 1198 CE that allied with Crusaders and to defend against Islamic expansion. This medieval state, with capitals at Sis and Tarsus, blended Armenian, Byzantine, and Western influences, fostering trade and cultural exchange until its conquest by forces in 1375 CE. Thereafter, Ottoman incorporation integrated Cilicia into broader imperial structures, with the region retaining a multi-ethnic character including , until post-World War I partitions and the Turkish Republic's formation in 1923 absorbed it into provinces like , , and Hatay.

Etymology

Origins and Historical Usage of the Name

The name Cilicia traces its roots to the Hittite designation Kizzuwatna, which denoted a kingdom in southeastern Anatolia during the late Bronze Age, emerging around the 16th century BCE from earlier local polities like Adaniya near modern Adana. Hittite cuneiform texts document Kizzuwatna as an independent entity that allied with and was later vassalized by the Hittite Empire, reflecting its strategic position for trade and military campaigns. The term likely stems from Luwian or pre-Luwian Anatolian languages spoken in the region, with Kizzu- possibly relating to indigenous toponyms for riverine or plain areas, though exact philological derivation remains debated among Anatolianists. In the early , following the collapse, the nomenclature shifted; Assyrian annals from the 9th to 7th centuries BCE record the area as Hilakku, inhabited by the Hilakku tribes, whom kings like and campaigned against in punitive expeditions around 738–709 BCE. This Assyrian form attests to the region's continuity as a semi-autonomous zone of hill tribes resisting Mesopotamian expansion, with Hilakku potentially to Luwian Hiyawa—a paleo-Anatolian name for Cilicia appearing in inscriptions and linked by scholars to phonetic evolution toward Greek usage. The Greek Kilikía (Κιλικία) emerged by the 8th–7th centuries BCE, likely borrowed from Anatolian substrates rather than Homeric references to Cilician warriors from Aeolic Thebe ( 2.612), which denote a distinct ethnic group possibly ancestral to regional inhabitants. (Histories 7.91) employs Kilikía for the coastal territory between and by the BCE, marking its standardization in Hellenic geography amid Ionian-Assyrian contacts. Claims tying the name to later Cilician pirates—prominent from the 2nd century BCE—are anachronistic, as arose from socio-economic disruptions under Seleucid and Roman rule, not nomenclature origins; instead, Kilikía probably reflects Luwian tribal ethnonyms like Kiliku or Hiyawa variants. Roman authors adopted Cilicia for both maritime and inland extents, distinguishing Cilicia Tracheia ("Rough Cilicia")—the rugged, piracy-prone eastern coast—and Cilicia Pedias ("Flat Cilicia")—the fertile western plains—as outlined by in Geography 14.5.1, who describes Tracheia's narrow, mountainous littoral versus Pedias' level expanses suitable for agriculture. reinforces this bipartition in 5.27, attributing it to terrain-driven cultural differences, with Tracheia inhabited by fractious clans and Pedias by more settled Greek-influenced cities. The name's persistence is evident in texts, such as Acts 6:9, referencing a Jerusalem of Cilicians around 30–35 CE, underscoring its role in diaspora networks.

Geography

Physical Geography and Subregions

Cilicia encompasses a coastal region in southern distinguished by its varied terrain, featuring a expansive alluvial plain flanked by precipitous mountain chains extending from the system. Historically, its boundaries were demarcated by the to the north, the to the south, the Amanus Mountains to the east, and the elevated plateaus of to the west, with natural features like river valleys and coastal indentations defining its extent rather than rigid political lines. The region bifurcates into two contrasting subregions based on topography: Cilicia Pedias (Plain Cilicia), the eastern lowland expanse known as the plain, which spans approximately 50 km inland from the coast and supports dense historical settlements due to its flat, sediment-rich surface; and Cilicia Tracheia (Rough Cilicia), the western sector of steep, fractured highlands and deeply incised valleys descending to a jagged shoreline, rendering it largely impassable except via limited passes. The Limonlu River serves as the conventional divide between these subregions, with Pedias centered around modern and featuring broad, level expanses ideal for early agrarian nucleation, while Tracheia includes promontories and coves such as those near ancient Olba, prone to isolation by orographic barriers. Principal rivers, including the Seyhan (ancient Sarus) and (ancient Pyramos), originate in the northern Taurus ranges—Seyhan from the confluence of the Zamantı and rivers—and flow southward through the Pedias plain, carving channels that deposited thick alluvial layers and directed prehistoric and classical settlement hierarchies toward their confluences and deltas. These waterways, averaging 100-200 meters in width along their lower courses, fostered linear distributions of sites by constraining access to potable water and irrigable soils amid surrounding uplands. Cilicia's framework is further influenced by proximity to the Zone and the Cilician Basin, where ongoing tectonic interactions along strike-slip boundaries generate recurrent seismic events, evidenced by fault scarps and deformation patterns that have episodically altered river courses and coastal morphologies.

Climate and Geology

Cilicia exhibits a , featuring hot, dry summers with average temperatures reaching 28–30 °C in and mild, wet winters averaging 7–10 °C in . Annual precipitation ranges from 600–700 mm, concentrated between and , which has historically fostered agricultural habitability through reliable winter rains replenishing aquifers and soils, though coastal areas receive higher humidity-driven moisture compared to the rain-shadow aridity of inland Taurus slopes. Paleoclimate reconstructions from pollen and records indicate enhanced pluvial phases during the , such as the wet period around 9000–6000 BCE, which supported early sedentary communities by mitigating risks and enabling crop cultivation in alluvial zones. Geologically, the region comprises predominantly limestone formations in the western Taurus extensions, forming landscapes through dissolution processes that create subsurface voids and enhance groundwater storage but also amplify seismic hazards. Eastern areas feature alluvial plains from Seyhan and river depositions over tectonic basins. Situated along the Anatolian-Eurasian plate boundary, Cilicia's faulted terrain has recorded destructive earthquakes, including the 526 CE event near Antioch that killed approximately 250,000 people and triggered fires and tsunamis affecting adjacent Cilician settlements, underscoring causal links between -weakened bedrock and amplified historical disruptions to and populations. Subsurface mineral deposits, including and in the Amanos and Taurus outcrops, influenced prehistoric resource extraction, with analyses of artifacts tracing local sourcing that bolstered metallurgical advancements and economic viability amid variable climates. These ores, embedded in ophiolitic complexes, reflect the region's tectonic history of and uplift, contributing to via weathered ultramafics while exposing communities to mining-related instabilities.

Prehistory

Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Settlements

Archaeological evidence indicates human occupation in Cilicia during the period, with stratified settlements dating to the late 7th to 6th millennia BCE. At Tarsus-Gözlükule, located in the Çukurova plain, the earliest layers reveal a continuous presence characterized by mud-brick structures and evidence of early , including domesticated cereals and livestock, reflecting adaptation to the fertile alluvial soils. Similarly, Kinet Höyük near the Gulf of İskenderun yields Late remains from the 6th millennium BCE, including residual finds of coarse wares and lithic tools suggestive of subsistence farming and coastal resource exploitation. Transitioning into the Chalcolithic (ca. 5500–3000 BCE), sites across Plain Cilicia demonstrate material culture continuity, marked by the introduction of pottery production and incipient metallurgy. Sirkeli Höyük, one of the largest mounds in the region, shows Chalcolithic occupation with handmade ceramics featuring incised decorations and simple forms, alongside copper tools indicating early extractive technologies sourced from nearby Taurus ores. Surveys in the eastern Çukurova have identified multiple höyüks with Late Chalcolithic pottery akin to Amuq Phase F assemblages, evidencing localized ceramic traditions and possible interregional exchanges with northern Syria. At Yumuktepe near Mersin, Level XVI preserves Chalcolithic strata with advanced pottery kilns and arsenical copper artifacts, pointing to specialized craft production in coastal settlements. By the Early Bronze Age (ca. 3000–2000 BCE), Cilician settlements expanded, with fortified mounds and increased trade orientations. Kinet Höyük's EBA sequence, from ca. 2800 BCE, includes wheel-thrown pottery and storage facilities, signaling urbanizing trends and maritime links, as evidenced by Levantine imports and potential Cypriot influences during the Philia phase transition. Tarsus-Gözlükule exhibits EBA layers with metallic weapons and seals, indicative of hierarchical societies engaged in overland routes to Anatolia and coastal ports facilitating Cypriot copper exchanges. These developments underscore Cilicia's role as a transitional zone between Anatolian highlands and Levantine lowlands, without evidence of major population disruptions.

Ancient History

Bronze Age and Hittite Influence

The region corresponding to Cilicia, identified in Hittite texts as Kizzuwatna, featured local cultures with Hurrian and Luwian elements during the Middle and early Late as evidenced by references to indigenous deities and administrative practices in excavated tablets from sites like Tarsus-Gözlükule. Archaeological layers at Tarsus reveal fortified structures and pottery styles blending Mesopotamian influences with local Anatolian traditions, indicating trade networks but limited centralized control prior to external imperial overlays. Hittite expansion into Kizzuwatna began with military campaigns under Tudhaliya I (c. 1650–1620 BCE in high chronology), targeting the area as a strategic corridor, though initial efforts yielded vassalage rather than full annexation. By the reign of Suppiluliuma I (c. 1344–1322 BCE), Kizzuwatna had rebelled in alliance with Mitanni, prompting reconquest and integration through treaties like the parity agreement with King Sunassura, which positioned it as a buffer state against eastern threats while incorporating Hittite legal and religious frameworks onto local governance. These cuneiform documents, preserved in Hattusa archives, detail oaths to Hittite overlords and the adoption of Hurrian rituals in Hittite state cults, reflecting a pragmatic fusion rather than wholesale cultural replacement. The Hittite Empire's collapse around 1200 BCE, triggered by internal strife and external pressures, led to Kizzuwatna's fragmentation into successor entities, including the Neo-Hittite kingdom of Tarhuntassa, centered in the western Taurus fringes overlapping Cilicia's rough terrain. Luwian hieroglyphic inscriptions from regional rock reliefs attest to continuity of Hittite-derived kingship under local rulers, maintaining temple economies amid decentralized polities. Concurrently, incursions by groups termed Sea Peoples in Egyptian inscriptions—such as the Lukka, known for piratical raids on Hittite coasts—exacerbated instability, as Hittite annals record their role in vassal revolts that eroded control over Cilician passes and ports by the late 13th century BCE.

Iron Age Kingdoms and Classical Periods

During the early Iron Age, following the Late Bronze Age collapse circa 1200 BCE, Cilicia hosted Neo-Hittite successor states such as Adanawa in the plain (Cilicia Pedias) and Ḫilakku (later Pirindu) in the southeast, Luwian-speaking polities that preserved Hittite cultural elements including hieroglyphic inscriptions and These kingdoms maintained semi-autonomy amid regional fragmentation but faced Assyrian expansion, with Tiglath-Pileser III's campaigns in the 740s–730s BCE subjugating western Syrian and Philistine territories, extending influence over Cilician tribute payers in Que (identified with plain Cilicia). Later Assyrian kings, including Sargon II around 712 BCE and Esarhaddon in the 670s BCE, enforced direct control through conquests and deportations, integrating local dynasts like those in Adana as vassals while suppressing revolts. Local traditions preserved in Greek sources attribute founding of Cilician cities such as Mopsuestia to Mopsus, a legendary seer and Argonaut linked to 8th-century BCE migrations from the Aegean or Ionia, possibly reflecting historical Luwian-Greek interactions or a ruler named Muksa/Mopsus attested in Assyrian records as a Que king around 730 BCE. These polities blended Anatolian, Levantine, and emerging Phoenician influences, evidenced by bilingual inscriptions and trade in iron goods, though epigraphic evidence remains sparse due to limited excavations. Cyrus the Great's conquest of Cilicia circa 547 BCE incorporated the region into the as a satrapy within the "Beyond-the-River" (Eber-Nari) province, valued for its timber, horses, and coastal access, with local rulers retaining limited autonomy under Persian oversight. Satraps such as Mazaios (361–334 BCE) administered from Tarsus, issuing silver staters depicting and Persian motifs to facilitate trade and loyalty, while Greek mercenary revolts, including those backed by satraps like Pixodarus in adjacent , highlighted tensions until quelled. In 333 BCE, Alexander the Great traversed the Cilician Gates into the region, capturing Tarsus and defeating Darius III's army of over 100,000 at the Battle of Issus on November 5 near the Pinarus River, where Macedonian phalanx and cavalry tactics routed the Persians despite numerical inferiority, yielding control of southeastern Anatolia and Darius's family as captives. Seleucid successors ruled Cilicia from the late 4th century BCE, but dynastic wars and territorial losses after 190 BCE eroded central authority, fragmenting the province into local strongholds by the mid-2nd century BCE and enabling Cilician coastal enclaves to harbor pirates who preyed on Mediterranean shipping, capturing an estimated 400 ships annually by the 140s BCE through hit-and-run raids from fortified bases like Coracesium. This piracy, fueled by unemployed mercenaries and Seleucid decline post-110 BCE, disrupted grain supplies to Rome until suppressed in the 1st century BCE.

Persian Satrapy, Hellenistic, and Roman Rule

![CILICIA, Tarsos. Mazaios. Satrap of Cilicia, 361-0-334_BC.jpg][float-right] Cilicia was incorporated into the Achaemenid Empire following 's conquests in the mid-6th century BCE, organized as a satrapy with substantial autonomy granted to local rulers who functioned as satraps under Persian oversight. The region contributed troops, including cavalry, to imperial forces and served as a strategic buffer, with Greek mercenaries occasionally stationed there, as evidenced by 's accounts of their presence during the Anabasis in 401 BCE. Tarsus emerged as the administrative center, where satraps like Mazaios (r. 361–334 BCE) issued coinage featuring local deities such as Baaltars to legitimize rule and facilitate trade. After Alexander the Great's defeat of Persian forces at Issus in 333 BCE, Cilicia transitioned to Hellenistic control, initially under Macedonian governors before integration into the Seleucid Empire following Seleucus I's consolidation around 312 BCE. The region became a contested frontier during the Syrian Wars, with Ptolemaic Egypt briefly occupying coastal areas in the BCE, though Seleucid dominance prevailed, fostering Hellenistic urban development in cities like Tarsus and Soloi. Administrative structures emphasized tax collection and military garrisons to counter local unrest and rival claims. Roman engagement intensified in the late BCE amid efforts to curb Cilician which disrupted Mediterranean trade; initial campaigns by Publius Servilius Vatia in 78–74 BCE targeted pirate bases, but comprehensive suppression occurred under Pompey the Great in 67 BCE, who cleared the seas within 40 days using a coordinated naval and land strategy, resettling pirates inland. This led to Cilicia's formal organization as a Roman province by 64 BCE, incorporating the fertile plain (Cilicia Pedias) and rugged interior (Tracheia), governed from Tarsus with legions deployed to quell endemic banditry and revolts. Infrastructural enhancements, including paving and fortification of the Cilician Gates pass, upgraded the Via Tauri road network, enabling efficient troop movements and commerce between Anatolia and Syria. Tarsus flourished as an economic and intellectual hub under Roman rule, renowned for textile production, agriculture, and as a Stoic philosophical center; it was the birthplace of the Apostle Paul around 5 CE, whose Roman citizenship and missionary activities from the city helped establish early Christian communities amid the province's diverse pagan and Jewish populations. Provincial administration evolved under emperors like and , who traversed the region for military reforms, integrating Cilicia into broader imperial defenses while exploiting its ports for grain and timber exports.

Medieval History

Byzantine and Early Islamic Eras

In the 6th century, Emperor strengthened Cilicia's defenses against Persian threats by constructing and repairing fortifications across the region, including in Isauria and Cilicia Secunda, as chronicled by Procopius in his work On Buildings. These efforts aimed to secure the eastern frontier amid ongoing conflicts with the Sasanian Empire, which had raided Cilicia during Khosrow I's invasions in the 540s. Following the exhaustion from Byzantine-Persian wars, the mid-7th century Arab conquests under the and led to the loss of Byzantine control over much of the Cilician plain. Umayyad forces, after securing Syria by 638, conducted repeated raids through the into Anatolia, gradually consolidating authority and establishing Tarsus as a fortified base around 696 under Caliph Abd al-Malik. This created temporary Muslim emirates along the frontier, serving as launch points for further incursions. To counter these threats, Byzantine emperors from Heraclius onward implemented the theme system by the 640s, granting land to soldier-farmers (stratiotai) in military districts, including those bordering Cilicia like the Anatolikon and Kibyrrhaiotai themes, which integrated local defense with agriculture for sustained frontier security. Under the Abbasid Caliphate from 750, expansionist pressures eased due to internal consolidations and decentralizations, stabilizing the Taurus Mountains as the de facto border by the though sporadic raids persisted from Cilician emirates. The Paulician heresy, a dualistic sect originating in Armenia around 660, gained traction in frontier areas including Mopsuestia in Cilicia, where adherents rejected icons and sacraments; persecuted by orthodox Byzantines, some Paulicians allied with Abbasid forces, forming a semi-autonomous state at Tephrike until its destruction in 872 by Basil I. Byzantine reconquest accelerated in the 10th century under , who, as domestic of the East, captured over 60 fortresses in Cilicia in 962–963, weakening Arab holdouts and restoring imperial control over key sites like and Tarsus by 965.

Rise of the Armenian Kingdom

Following the Seljuk victory at Manzikert in 1071, which destabilized , Armenian nobles and populations migrated to Cilicia, augmenting existing settlements dating to the 10th century. Thousands settled in the region between the Taurus and Amanus mountains by 1080, establishing a predominant Armenian presence amid Seljuk disruptions. In 1080, Ruben I founded the Rubenid principality in mountainous , overthrowing Byzantine control and initiating independent Armenian rule. Claimed as a descendant of the Bagratuni or Ardzruni houses, Ruben consolidated authority over local Armenian and Greek lords, laying the groundwork for dynastic expansion. Rubenid successors extended territorial control through campaigns against regional powers. Leo I (Levon I), ruling from 1187, secured kingship in 1198 via ties to Latin Crusaders and papal endorsement, elevating the principality to kingdom status with coronation in Tarsus. The capital shifted to Sis (modern Kozan), a fortified site enhancing defensive capabilities. Diplomatic marriages with Crusader nobility integrated European feudal elements, while early trade pacts with Venice and Genoa under Leo I around 1201 bolstered commerce in agriculture, textiles, and ports like Ayas. These measures cultivated a feudal economy, leveraging Cilicia's Mediterranean access for prosperity.

Alliances, Conflicts, and Decline

The Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia forged strategic alliances with Crusader states, providing military support during key sieges such as Antioch in 1098, where local Armenians facilitated entry for Latin forces by opening a aiding the First Crusade's advance. These ties extended through marriage alliances in the 1220s with the Principality of Antioch to counter Seljuk threats, positioning Cilicia as a Christian bulwark against Muslim expansions in the Levant. Such partnerships, documented in Armenian chronicles like those of Smbat Sparapet, emphasized mutual defense but often subordinated Cilician rulers to Latin influence amid regional power shifts. Facing persistent threats from neighboring powers, Cilicia engaged in prolonged conflicts with the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum, including invasions under rulers like Gumushtigin Ghazi in the early 12th century, which prompted defensive coalitions with Byzantium and Antioch. Wars with the Ayyubid dynasty, particularly under al-Kamil, involved border skirmishes and temporary truces, as evidenced by diplomatic correspondence reconciling Seljuk-Ayyubid joint attacks on Cilicia around 1210–1220, though hostilities resumed amid competition for Levantine territories. The Mongol invasions beginning in 1243, following the against the Seljuks, initially devastated Anatolia but led to Cilician vassalage; King Het'um I submitted to Möngke Khan in 1254, securing autonomy through tribute and joint campaigns against Ayyubids and Abbasids, as recorded in both Armenian sources and Ilkhanid . This alliance provided temporary respite but entangled Cilicia in Mongol internal strife after the Ilkhanate's fragmentation post-1335. Internal fragmentation accelerated in the 14th century as the dissolution of Crusader states and the Ilkhanate eroded external buffers, leaving Cilicia isolated against rising Mamluk pressure. Natural calamities compounded vulnerabilities: the , arriving via trade routes around 1348, decimated populations across Anatolia and the Levant, with Armenian chronicles noting severe demographic losses that weakened military recruitment and economy. Concurrent earthquakes in 1344 and 1348 devastated infrastructure, including fortifications in Cyprus and coastal Cilicia, exacerbating fiscal strain from ongoing Mamluk raids. These factors, alongside noble infighting over succession, culminated in the Mamluk conquest of Sis in 1375, where King Leo VI was captured after a siege, ending royal independence; Mamluk records detail his imprisonment in Cairo until ransom in 1382, though Cilicia fragmented into local lordships thereafter.

Mamluk Conquest and Turkmen Infiltration

The Mamluk Sultanate exploited the deepening feudal disunity and succession crises within the during the 1370s, launching a decisive campaign that captured the capital Sis (modern Kozan) in June 1375 after a prolonged siege marked by famine and the destruction of Christian sites. This conquest ended the last independent Armenian polity in the region, with Mamluk forces under Sultan al-Ashraf Sha'ban systematically annexing Cilician territories, including Adana and Tarsus, thereby establishing direct Egyptian oversight over coastal strongholds while allowing limited local autonomies. Prior to the full Mamluk takeover, Turkmen tribal leaders had begun infiltrating Cilicia amid the kingdom's weakening grip, with Ramazan Beg founding the Ramazanid beylik around 1352 by directing Oghuz Turkmen migrations into the Çukurova plain, capitalizing on depopulated lands vacated by war and The Mamluks, seeking to buffer their frontiers against Anatolian rivals, granted the Ramazanids semi-autonomous administration over rural Cilician districts as iqta land grants, though retaining control of urban centers like Ayas and Sarvandikar to secure routes and naval access. These migrations filled agrarian vacuums left by Armenian feudal fragmentation, introducing nomadic pastoralism that transformed local demographics and economies. The Ramazanids faced persistent rivalry from the neighboring Dulkadir beylik, centered in Marash and Elbistan, whose Turkmen clans contested border territories and iqtas in eastern Cilicia through intermittent raids and alliances with Mamluk sultans, exacerbating regional instability until the 15th century. Dulkadir incursions, often backed by fluctuating Mamluk patronage, pressured Ramazanid holdings and prevented unified Turkmen consolidation, while broader Oghuz influxes from the Taurus foothills sustained demographic shifts toward Turkic settlement. This nomadic integration persisted under Mamluk suzerainty until the Ottoman Empire's decisive victory over the sultanate in the 1516–1517 campaign, which incorporated Cilicia into Ottoman domains following the Battle of Marj Dabiq and the fall of Cairo.

Ottoman and Early Modern Period

Administrative Integration and Governance

Following the Ottoman conquest of Mamluk territories in 1516–1517, Cilicia was subjected to systematic fiscal surveys via tahrir defters, which enumerated households, landholdings, and revenues to establish administrative control and judicial oversight through local kadis. These records underpinned the allocation of timars to sipahis, Ottoman cavalrymen granted revenue rights from agricultural estates in the Çukurova plain in exchange for military obligations, thereby integrating the region's productive lands into the empire's feudal-military structure. The Eyalet of Adana, formalized in 1608, encompassed core Cilician territories previously under broader eyalets like Tripoli, with a beylerbeyi appointed to oversee taxation, law enforcement, and defense. Ottoman Capitulations, renewed and expanded from the 16th century onward, privileged European merchants with judicial immunities and tariff reductions, stimulating Levantine commerce through Cilicia's ports and fostering economic ties that indirectly supported provincial stability. Tanzimat-era reforms from 1839 reorganized provinces into vilayets by 1864, elevating Adana to full vilayet status in 1869 with enhanced bureaucratic oversight, including councils and telegraph links to Istanbul for centralized governance. Nonetheless, local ayan notables retained substantial sway, frequently securing iltizam tax farms and mediating between imperial directives and tribal dynamics, which complicated 18th- and 19th-century centralization initiatives in Cilicia.

Socioeconomic Structures

The economy of Ottoman Cilicia centered on agrarian production, with the Çukurova plain's alluvial soils enabling large-scale cultivation of cotton, grains, and sesame by the 19th century. Commercial agriculture dominated production modes, shifting from subsistence farming to export-oriented crops amid global demand; cotton output in Adana vilayet expanded significantly after the 1860s, fueled by British textile needs post-American Civil War, with annual exports reaching tens of thousands of bales by the 1880s via Mersin port. Large landowners, known as ağas, controlled vast estates through çiftlik systems, employing sharecroppers (ortakçı) and seasonal laborers in a hierarchical structure that concentrated wealth among a rural elite while peasants retained limited usufruct rights under timar and miri land tenure. Armenian merchants in Adana facilitated much of the cotton trade, acting as intermediaries, financiers, and exporters through networks extending to Istanbul and Europe, contributing substantially to Ottoman customs revenues from the 16th to 19th centuries. Urban guilds (esnaf) regulated artisanal sectors like weaving and dyeing in Adana and Tarsus, enforcing quality standards and apprenticeships to support textile processing, though their influence waned with rising foreign competition. Nomadic Turkmen and Kurdish tribes, traditionally pastoralists, faced Ottoman sedentarization drives during the Tanzimat era (1839–1876), including forced resettlement on state lands to boost taxable agriculture and curb raiding, with policies granting exemptions to settled herders by the 1860s. The 1873–1875 drought-induced famine struck Cilicia alongside broader Anatolian regions, causing widespread crop failure and an estimated 100,000–150,000 deaths empire-wide from starvation and disease; Ottoman authorities responded with grain imports, tax suspensions, and telegraphed appeals for provincial relief, supplemented by missionary and European donations. By the pre-World War I period, ethnic economic divisions persisted: Armenians held niches in commerce and skilled crafts, Muslims predominated in landownership and farming, and settled nomads integrated into pastoral-agricultural hybrids, reflecting adaptive class alignments under imperial stability rather than rigid feudalism.

19th-Century Reforms and Nationalism

The Tanzimat era, commencing with the 1839 Gülhane Edict, introduced reforms aimed at establishing equality under law for all Ottoman subjects, including Armenians in Cilicia who benefited from continued millet autonomy in managing internal affairs such as education and religious courts. These measures facilitated the emergence of an Armenian mercantile class in urban centers like Adana and Mersin, though rural implementation remained limited due to entrenched local Muslim agha dominance, which undermined central authority and perpetuated unequal land tenure systems. Infrastructure development accelerated modernization, exemplified by the Baghdad Railway project, with concessions granted in 1888 and key segments through Cilicia constructed between 1904 and 1912, linking Adana to broader networks and boosting cotton exports while attracting German investment and labor influxes that altered local economies. The Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), gaining prominence after the 1908 revolution, initially promoted constitutional Ottomanism but increasingly emphasized Turkish nationalism, establishing local branches in Cilician cities that clashed with Armenian aspirations for communal protections. The Balkan Wars of 1912–1913 displaced approximately 400,000 Muslims from Balkan territories, with significant numbers resettling in Cilicia's fertile plains, straining agricultural resources and heightening ethnic frictions as refugees competed with Armenian peasants for land amid reports of prior Balkan expulsions fostering resentment toward non-Muslims. Armenian reform demands intensified by 1914, echoing the eastern provinces agreement that proposed foreign oversight and gendarme increases to curb abuses, driven by Russian diplomatic pressure and local violence amid Ottoman fears of separatism in the face of Caucasian incursions.

20th-Century Transitions

World War I Events and Population Movements

The Ottoman Empire's entry into World War I in November 1914 heightened security concerns in , a region with strategic ports and a mixed population, as Russian forces advanced in the east and local Armenian groups demonstrated pro-Russian sympathies through arms stockpiling and skirmishes. The Tehcir Law, formally the Temporary Law of Deportation enacted on May 27, 1915, authorized the relocation of Armenians from war zones to rear areas like Syria and Mesopotamia to prevent collaboration with invaders, prompted by the Van revolt in April–May 1915 where Armenian revolutionaries seized the city ahead of Russian troops, killing Ottoman officials and civilians. In , implementations began in spring 1915, targeting urban centers like and rural strongholds, with Ottoman telegrams from provincial governors documenting orders to safeguard deportee convoys against banditry and provide rations, though wartime shortages led to widespread deaths from typhus, malnutrition, and exposure—estimated at 300,000–600,000 Armenians empire-wide, attributable more to logistical collapse amid total war than centralized extermination directives. Armenian uprisings in Cilicia, including the Zeitun resistance from August 1914 and renewed clashes in March–April 1915 involving Hunchakist militias who ambushed Ottoman garrisons and executed Muslim villagers, justified relocations under the law's security provisions, with Ottoman records noting over 1,000 armed insurgents in Zeitun alone. Mutual violence ensued, as deportee columns faced attacks from both Kurdish tribes and deserter bands, while Armenian fighters documented retaliatory killings of Turks; Assyrian communities in southeastern Cilicia experienced parallel displacements, with thousands relocated southward amid similar fears of Russian ties, though on a smaller scale than Armenians. Greek populations in coastal Cilicia saw limited WWI-era movements, primarily voluntary evacuations or minor relocations for labor escalating only post-1918. Historians debating intent cite Ottoman Interior Ministry ciphers prohibiting massacres—e.g., a June 1915 directive to Talat Pasha emphasizing humane treatment—contrasting with eyewitness accounts of local excesses, underscoring implementation variances over premeditated policy. The Armistice of Mudros on October 30, 1918, enabled Allied occupations, with French troops landing in by November 1918 alongside the Armenian Legion, prompting an influx of returning deportees and refugees from . By late 1919, around 60,000 Armenians had resettled in and Marash provinces, swelling the local Armenian population to over 200,000 amid French efforts to restore pre-war demographics for Mandate stabilization, though this reversed only a fraction of prior outflows and fueled ethnic tensions with Muslim majorities. These movements, driven by wartime exigencies and post-armistice realignments, reshaped 's ethnic mosaic, with Ottoman archives logging over 100,000 Armenians deported from the region by 1916, many perishing en route due to disrupted supply lines rather than orchestrated annihilation.

French Mandate and Turkish Nationalist Resistance

Following the Armistice of Mudros on October 30, 1918, French forces occupied Cilicia as part of the post-World War I partition outlined in the 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement, which designated the region to French administration for strategic control over southern Anatolia and access to the Levant. By late 1918, French troops had secured Adana and surrounding areas, expanding to occupy the provinces of Gaziantep (Antep), Marash, and Urfa by early 1919, with approximately 80,000 personnel deployed to maintain order and facilitate the repatriation of over 170,000 Armenian survivors from the 1915-1917 deportations. The French incorporated the Armenian Legion—composed of about 4,000-6,000 Armenian volunteers who had served in Allied forces—into their operations, leveraging these units for policing and defense against local unrest. In May 1920, amid French efforts to stabilize the region, a provisional Armenian administration was established in under French protection, often referred to as the Armenian Republic of Cilicia, with a constitution drafted to organize local governance and encourage further Armenian settlement; however, it lacked full sovereignty and functioned primarily as a French-aligned entity aimed at countering Turkish nationalist influence. Turkish nationalist forces under Mustafa Kemal, operating from Ankara, launched offensives against French positions starting in January 1920, initiating the on the Cilician front. Key engagements included the fall of Marash on February 12, 1920, where French forces numbering around 8,000 withdrew after heavy combat, allowing Turkish militias to overrun defenses; similar losses occurred in Urfa by April 1920 and a prolonged siege at Antep until December 1920, where Kemalist irregulars and regular troops, totaling over 10,000 fighters, employed guerrilla tactics and encirclement to reclaim territory. These operations, part of the broader , exploited French supply line vulnerabilities and limited reinforcements, resulting in the recapture of Adana and central Cilicia by mid-1921. The military stalemate prompted negotiations, culminating in the Treaty of Ankara (Franklin-Bouillon Agreement) signed on October 20, 1921, between French representatives and the Turkish National Movement, which mandated French withdrawal from Cilicia in exchange for recognition of Turkish sovereignty over the region south of a demarcation line near the Taurus Mountains and guarantees for minority protections—though the latter were largely unenforced. French evacuation proceeded in phases, with the last troops departing by January 5, 1922, ceding control to Turkish forces without further major resistance. This shift triggered mass Armenian evacuations, with tens of thousands fleeing to Syria and Lebanon under French-organized convoys, while the concurrent Greco-Turkish population exchange protocol of January 30, 1923—formalized at Lausanne—accelerated demographic changes by mandating the relocation of approximately 10,000-20,000 Greeks from Cilician districts like Adana to Greece, further consolidating Turkish-majority populations in the area.

Incorporation into the Turkish Republic

The , signed on July 24, 1923, and ratified by Turkey on August 23, 1923, affirmed the sovereignty of the newly proclaimed Republic of Turkey over the Cilician territories, solidifying the borders established through prior military successes against French occupation and confirming the region's integration without concessions to minority autonomy claims. This treaty ended international disputes over southeastern , including Cilicia, by rejecting earlier partition proposals and recognizing Ankara's control following the 1921 Franco-Turkish Accord that prompted French evacuation. Following the republic's founding on October 29, 1923, secular reforms intensified, culminating in the abolition of the caliphate on March 3, 1924, by the Grand National Assembly, which severed ties to pan-Islamic authority and centralized state control over religious affairs, thereby diminishing the influence of clerical hierarchies among Muslim and minority groups alike. This policy, part of broader efforts to forge a secular nation-state, closed religious schools and courts, redirecting resources toward uniform civil codes and reducing communal privileges that had previously buffered minorities from central oversight. Land redistribution laws enacted in the 1920s, building on wartime abandonments, allocated former Armenian and Greek holdings—vacated amid population exchanges and prior conflicts—to Turkish settlers and local notables, bolstering agricultural consolidation in Cilicia's fertile plains without formal restitution mechanisms. Concurrently, the state quelled ethnic unrest through military campaigns, suppressing Kurdish-led rebellions in the 1930s, such as the 1930 Ararat uprising and the 1937–1938 Dersim operations, to enforce assimilation and prevent separatist threats in southeastern borderlands adjoining Cilicia. Infrastructure development advanced under state-led modernization, exemplified by the Seyhan Dam's construction from 1953 to 1956 on the Seyhan River, which irrigated over 250,000 hectares in the Çukurova region, generated hydroelectric power, and mitigated flooding to support cotton and grain production. This project, planned with U.S. technical assistance via the Tennessee Valley Authority model, marked an early phase of multipurpose dam-building to integrate rural economies into national planning.

Modern Cilicia

Political and Administrative Framework

The modern region historically known as Cilicia aligns with the Çukurova subregion in southern Turkey, encompassing the provinces of Adana, Mersin, Osmaniye, and the northern portions of Hatay Province within Turkey's unitary presidential republic framework. Central authority from Ankara dominates governance, with no autonomous regional entity for Cilicia; instead, provinces function as extensions of national administration, emphasizing uniform policy enforcement across socioeconomic and security domains. This structure prioritizes devolution for local execution while retaining centralized oversight, as outlined in Article 126 of the Turkish Constitution, which divides the country into provinces based on geographical, economic, and administrative needs. Each province is led by a governor (vali), appointed by the President and serving under the Ministry of Interior, responsible for coordinating public order, emergency response, and inter-agency collaboration while implementing national directives on education, health, and infrastructure. Provinces subdivide into districts (ilçeler), further broken into subdistricts ( bucak, though largely phased out) and neighborhoods (mahalleler), enabling granular service delivery. Adana and Mersin operate as metropolitan municipalities (büyükşehir belediyesi) under Law No. 6360 of 2012, granting expanded powers for urban planning, waste management, and public transport to elected mayors and assemblies, serving populations exceeding 750,000. Local elections, held nationally every five years, determine municipal leadership, though central government retains veto powers over budgets and appointments in cases of malfeasance.
ProvinceKey Administrative Features
AdanaMetropolitan status; focuses on agricultural logistics and industrial zoning in the Çukurova plain.
MersinPort-centric governance; 13 districts emphasizing maritime trade and tourism infrastructure.
OsmaniyeRural-oriented; 7 districts prioritizing mining and forestry under central directives.
HatayBorder province with Syria; 15 districts involving heightened security administration.
Politically, the framework integrates into Turkey's multi-party system, where national parties like the Justice and Development Party (AKP) compete in provincial constituencies for seats in the unicameral Grand National Assembly. Local dynamics reflect conservative voter bases, with AKP securing majorities in recent cycles amid national trends toward centralized executive authority post-2017 constitutional referendum. As of 2025, proposed reforms aim to enhance transparency in municipal operations, including digital oversight of procurement to curb corruption risks inherent in decentralized spending. This setup maintains causal linkages between Ankara's fiscal allocations—primarily for highways, and seismic resilience in the earthquake-prone Taurus —and provincial outcomes, underscoring the interplay of empirical resource distribution over ideological fragmentation.

Demographic Evolution

Prior to World War I, the demographic profile of Cilicia, encompassing the Ottoman Adana Vilayet, consisted predominantly of Muslims—including Turks, Kurds, and Arabs—who formed the majority, estimated at 80-85% of the approximately 430,000 residents recorded in the 1914 Ottoman census. Armenian Christians accounted for about 12%, or roughly 50,000 individuals, primarily in urban centers and agricultural districts, while Greeks numbered around 10,000 (2-3%) and other minorities a marginal share. These figures, derived from Ottoman administrative records, reflect a multi-ethnic but Muslim-dominant composition shaped by centuries of settlement patterns. The upheavals of World War I, including Armenian deportations in 1915 and the subsequent Greco-Turkish War (1919-1922), drastically altered this makeup, culminating in the 1923 Convention for the Exchange of Populations between Greece and Turkey, which relocated over 1.2 million Orthodox Christians from Turkey to Greece and resettled nearly 400,000 Muslims from Greece into Turkey. By the 1927 Turkish census, Cilicia's population—spanning modern provinces of Adana, Mersin, Osmaniye, and parts thereof—had homogenized to over 99% Muslim, with non-Muslim communities reduced to insignificant remnants through these mass movements. From 1927 onward, the region's population expanded from roughly 800,000 to over 6 million by 2023, fueled by high birth rates in the mid-20th century and rural-to-urban migration that swelled cities like (from ~120,000 urban residents in 1927 to 2.27 million metropolitan in 2023) and (from ~40,000 to 1.85 million). This urbanization concentrated over 70% of the population in coastal plains and metropolitan areas, maintaining the ethnic homogeneity while shifting from agrarian to urban demographics. Since the Syrian Civil War's onset in 2011, an influx of refugees has introduced a transient element, with approximately 600,000 Syrians under temporary protection registered in Cilicia's core provinces by 2023: 209,000 in Adana, 182,000 in Mersin, and 211,000 in Hatay. These figures represent a notable but non-permanent overlay on the predominantly Turkish Muslim base, as refugees are classified separately from citizens in official counts. Contemporary trends align with national patterns, featuring a of 1.51 children per woman in 2023—below the 2.1 replacement level—and an aging population, with those aged 65 and over increasing 20.7% to over 9 million nationwide in recent years, straining pension systems and workforce dynamics in urbanizing Cilicia.

Economic Transformation

The economy of Cilicia, encompassing the modern Turkish provinces of Adana, Mersin, and adjacent areas, experienced accelerated growth following the Turkish Republic's land reforms and infrastructure investments in the mid-20th century, with annual GDP expansion in the broader Çukurova region outpacing national averages during periods of agricultural intensification. Mechanization of farming, introduced widely from the through state-supported distribution and projects like the Seyhan Dam completed in 1956, tripled crop yields in the fertile alluvial plains, transforming subsistence agriculture into commercial production. By the 1960s, Çukurova's cotton output constituted over 40% of Turkey's total, fueling exports that reached 200,000 tons annually by the 1970s and supporting textile industries in Adana. Economic diversification reduced reliance on cotton, with manufacturing and services expanding; provincial GDP per capita in Adana and Mersin provinces grew at 5-6% annually from 2000 to 2020, driven by industrial zones producing automotive components and machinery, though full vehicle assembly remains concentrated elsewhere in Turkey. Mersin Port solidified its role as a Mediterranean hub, processing 25 million tons of cargo including 1.1 million TEUs in 2011 and expanding to nearly 2 million TEUs by 2023, facilitating 15% of Turkey's container throughput and boosting regional exports in citrus and grains. Tourism emerged as a supplementary sector, leveraging 200 km of Mediterranean coastline with beaches near Mersin and heritage sites in Tarsus, such as St. Paul's Well and the Tarsus Waterfall, attracting over 1 million visitors annually by the 2010s through cultural and ecotourism initiatives. Persistent challenges include water scarcity, with irrigation demands in Çukurova depleting groundwater by 20-30% since the 1990s amid inefficient usage and climate variability, prompting restrictions during droughts. Recovery from the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes, which struck fringes including Hatay province and caused $105 billion in national economic losses with disruptions to and in affected districts, has slowed growth, though reconstruction investments are projected to offset initial declines by 1 percentage point in regional output through 2025.

Society and Culture

Ancient Social Organization and Ethnicity

In the Cilicia, referred to as Kizzuwatna in Hittite texts, was primarily inhabited by Luwians, an Indo-European Anatolian people who spoke the Luwian language and formed the ethnic core of the region by the 2nd millennium BCE. The area was integrated into the Hittite Empire around the 16th century BCE, governed by a local ruler drawn from the Hittite royal family and titled "" suggesting a hierarchical structure blending indigenous kinship-based authority with imperial oversight. Hurrian populations and cultural influences were also significant, as indicated by religious texts and rituals from that incorporate Hurrian deities and practices alongside Luwian and Hittite elements, reflecting multiethnic interactions in a contested frontier zone between Hittite Anatolia and Hurrian Mitanni. Social organization centered on urban centers like Tarša (modern Tarsus) and Adanija (Adana), where elites controlled fertile plains agriculture, iron and silver extraction, and strategic passes such as the , as evidenced by Hittite administrative records and later Assyrian annals. Archaeological excavations at the Tarsus-Gözlükule mound reveal continuous settlement from the Neolithic period through the Bronze Age, with artifacts indicating developed urban economies but limited direct evidence for class stratification or gender roles in grave goods, which are sparse due to overlying modern occupation. Kinship ties likely underpinned tribal confederacies, particularly in peripheral areas, facilitating alliances for trade and defense under princely rule. Following the Late Bronze Age collapse around 1200 BCE, Iron Age Cilicia fragmented into Neo-Hittite polities, with the eastern plains forming the kingdom of Qu'e, ruled by dynasties like the Muksas from after Assyrian conquest in 744–727 BCE under Tiglath-pileser III, and the western mountains of Hilakku maintaining decentralized tribal structures resistant to lowland kingdoms and later Assyrian overlordship until 631 BCE. By the late 7th century BCE, unification under syennesis kings at [Tarsus](/page/TTerms of Servicearsus) marked a shift toward more centralized monarchy, though mountain tribes persisted as semi-autonomous groups. Ethnic multiethnicity intensified with Assyrian deportations and Phoenician trade contacts, overlaying Luwian bases with Semitic elements, prior to Achaemenid Persian incorporation as a satrapy in the 540s BCE. In the Hellenistic era, following Alexander's conquest in 333 BCE, Rough Cilicia's rugged highlands supported tribal pirate confederacies whose economies depended on slave raiding, supplying up to 10,000 captives daily to markets like Delos by the 1st century BCE, as reported by Strabo, highlighting adaptive kinship networks exploiting geography for predatory kinship-based enterprises amid weakening state control. Greek colonial overlays introduced further ethnic diversity through settlements and Hellenization, gradually supplanting Luwian linguistic dominance by the 2nd century BCE.

Medieval Cultural Synthesis

The Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, spanning from 1198 to 1375, witnessed a notable synthesis of cultural elements in art and architecture, driven by alliances with Western Crusader states and exposure to European styles. Cilician churches and manuscripts incorporated Gothic motifs, such as pointed arches and ornamental frames, blended with traditional Armenian basilical designs and iconography. For instance, illuminated manuscripts like the Gospels of the Hethumids from the 13th century fused Armenian miniature painting with Gothic decorative elements, reflecting the court's cosmopolitan patronage. This hybridity arose from intermarriages between Armenian nobility and Frankish elites, as well as collaborative military endeavors during the Crusades, which facilitated the exchange of architectural techniques and artistic conventions. Linguistic developments during this period included admixtures of Romance languages into Middle Armenian, particularly at the royal court, where French and Latin terms entered through diplomatic ties and mixed marriages. Manuscripts from demonstrate this evolution, with the study and use of refined Middle Armenian incorporating Western influences to suit the multilingual environment of trade and governance. The presence of Italian merchants from Genoa, Venice, and Pisa, active in Cilician ports since the early 13th century, further promoted linguistic and cultural cosmopolitanism, as commercial networks linked the region to Mediterranean Europe. Trade routes traversing Cilicia amplified this synthesis, positioning the kingdom as a hub where Eastern and Western traditions converged in literature and daily Epic narratives and chronicles, such as those chronicling interactions with neighboring powers, embodied this blend, though specific works like references to the Assassins highlight the region's entangled geopolitical narratives rather than standalone poetry. Overall, these elements underscore Cilicia's role as a medieval crossroads, where Armenian cultural continuity adapted Western innovations without subsuming indigenous forms.

Ottoman and Modern Cultural Continuity

In Ottoman Cilicia, seasonal migrations to highland yaylas in the Taurus Mountains formed a core element of folk traditions among pastoralist communities, including Yörük nomads, integrating environmental rhythms with social practices that endured into the Republican era as markers of regional identity. These migrations, documented in ethnographic accounts of late Ottoman settlement patterns, facilitated cultural exchanges across ecological zones, preserving oral histories and communal rituals tied to the landscape's agrarian cycles. Alevi-Bektaşi communities in the Taurus foothills of Cilicia maintained syncretic beliefs blending Twelver Shia elements, Sufi mysticism, and pre-Islamic Anatolian shamanistic practices, a heterodox tradition emerging from 12th-century sects that persisted through Ottoman tolerance of peripheral religious expressions. Ethnographic studies highlight how these groups incorporated local folk rituals, such as communal cem ceremonies, into modern village life, resisting full assimilation while adapting to state secularism post-1923. Culinary traditions exemplify urban cultural continuity, with Adana kebab—a hand-minced lamb dish grilled over coals—originating in the early 16th century during Sultan Selim I's campaigns, evolving from nomadic grilling methods into a staple of Adana's bazaar culture that remains central to festive and daily meals today. This dish's preparation, emphasizing fresh spices and fat-tailed meat, reflects Ottoman fusion of Central Asian and Levantine influences, as evidenced in regional cookery records, underscoring Cilicia's role as a culinary crossroads. In Turkish folk literature, aşık bard traditions evoke Cilician motifs through epic poetry referencing Taurus landscapes, heroic migrations, and agrarian labors, with performers like those in eastern Anatolian circuits drawing on Ottoman-era oral repertoires to sustain regional narratives into the 20th century. Modern adaptations in Mersin include location filming for Yeşilçam-era productions from the 1950s onward, where the port city's coastal and highland settings provided backdrops for stories of migration and rural life, fostering a localized cinematic idiom amid national industry growth. Post-1950s efforts to document and restore Cilicia's historical sites have indirectly supported minority cultural memory, including archaeological surveys of early Christian structures in areas like Seleucia, though active revivals of Greek Orthodox practices remain marginal due to 1923 population exchanges, with focus shifting to heritage tourism rather than communal worship.

Religion

Pre-Christian Beliefs and Transitions

In the Bronze and early Iron Ages, religious practices in Cilicia were rooted in Luwian traditions, with Tarhunt (also Tarḫunz or Tarhun) serving as the paramount storm god embodying weather, conquest, and royal authority, often depicted wielding a thunderbolt. Luwian hieroglyphic inscriptions from Cilician sites, dating to the 10th–8th centuries BCE, attest to his worship alongside deities like Runtiya and Šanta, reflecting continuity from Neo-Hittite states in southeastern Anatolia. Phoenician maritime influence from the BCE introduced Semitic elements, syncretizing local gods with Baal-like figures; bilingual Luwian-Phoenician texts from the region show Tarhunt equated with Baal as a storm deity, evident in royal dedications and stelae. Anatolian mother goddesses, such as Cybele (worshipped as Artemis Perasia in Greek terms), held prominence in inland sanctuaries like Kastabala, where rituals involved ecstatic cults tied to fertility and nature, persisting into Hellenistic times through Phrygian migrations. Under Achaemenid Persian rule from the 6th century BCE and intensified after Alexander's conquest in 333 BCE, Hellenistic syncretism blended Greek pantheon with indigenous beliefs; at Olba, the priestly dynasty revered Zeus Olbios from around 300 BCE, merging the local storm god with Zeus via Seleucid patronage, as indicated by temple reconstructions and coinage. Syrian deities like and gained followers in coastal areas, their cults featuring bull-slaying motifs and mystery initiations, precursors to broader Hellenistic esotericism documented in Cilician terracotta figurines showing hybrid iconography. Hellenistic mystery religions, including Cybelean rites and early Mithraic variants, appealed to diverse populations in Cilicia by the 2nd–1st centuries BCE, with pirate communities in the Taurus Mountains adopting bull-sacrifice rituals linked to solar and warrior gods, as evidenced by regional artifacts and later Roman adaptations. An early , established in Tarsus by the Seleucid era (c. 200 BCE), introduced strict monotheism amid polytheistic syncretism, with communities maintaining synagogues for Torah study and Sabbath observance, as referenced in 1st-century BCE sources and Paul's own background. This presence marked a transitional monotheistic strand, contrasting pagan pantheons while coexisting until Roman imperial shifts.

Christian Dominance and Schisms

![Cilician Armenia-en.svg.png][float-right] Christianity first took root in Cilicia during the 1st century AD through the missionary activities of the Apostle Paul, who was born in Tarsus, the region's chief city, and identified himself as a citizen of Cilicia. Early churches in the area, predating those in Antioch, were established primarily among Diaspora Jews and organized under Paul's influence, marking Cilicia as one of Anatolia's initial Christian centers. By the 2nd and 3rd centuries, Christian communities proliferated, supported by patristic figures like Athenagoras of Athens, a Cilician native who defended the faith in writings to Roman emperors around 177 AD. The region's ecclesiastical landscape fractured following the Council of Chalcedon in 451 AD, which affirmed dyophysitism and led to a schism between Chalcedonian adherents—aligned with Byzantine orthodoxy—and miaphysite (often termed Monophysite) groups, including Armenians who rejected the council's formulations. In Cilicia, under Byzantine control, Chalcedonian bishops predominated initially, but miaphysite influences grew with Armenian migrations into the area from the 8th century onward, fostering tensions and periodic persecutions. The Armenian Apostolic Church, adhering to miaphysite Christology, solidified its presence in Cilicia; by 1293, its Catholicosate relocated to Sis (modern Kozan), the capital of the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, establishing a rival hierarchy to the Chalcedonian structure and emphasizing apostolic continuity from early missions. Heterodox movements further complicated dominance, notably the Paulicians, a dualistic sect emerging in mid-7th-century Armenia and spreading to Cilicia's frontiers by the 8th century, where they rejected sacraments and icons, drawing Byzantine suppression. Persecuted under emperors like Constantine V and Basil I, Paulician strongholds in eastern Anatolia and Cilicia were dismantled by 872 AD, prompting forced migrations of survivors to Thrace and the Balkans, where they influenced later Bogomilism. These relocations, documented in Byzantine chronicles, underscored the imperial drive to enforce Chalcedonian uniformity amid frontier instability. During the Crusades, from the late 11th century, Cilicia's alliances with Latin forces introduced Western ecclesiastical elements, including the establishment of Latin bishoprics in key cities like Tarsus and Mamistra by papal legates such as Daibert of Pisa following the . This culminated in a brief 1198 union between the Armenian Church and Rome under King Leo I, though doctrinal divergences persisted, with Latin sees serving Crusader contingents while Armenian miaphysite structures endured in the kingdom's core. Such overlays highlighted Cilicia's role as a contested Christian nexus, balancing Eastern schisms with transient Western impositions until the kingdom's fall in 1375.

Islamic Preeminence and Minority Persistence

The Seljuk Turks initiated the Islamization of Cilicia through military campaigns in the late 11th century, with Suleyman ibn Qutalmish capturing eastern Cilicia in 1084 and establishing footholds that facilitated Turkmen settlement and the spread of Sunni orthodoxy. Following the Battle of Manzikert in 1071, Seljuk rulers promoted Hanafi jurisprudence via madrasas across Anatolia, including in southern regions like Cilicia, where these institutions trained administrators and clerics, contributing to gradual conversions among Armenian, Greek, and local populations through intermarriage, taxation incentives favoring Muslims, and cultural assimilation over subsequent centuries. By the 13th century, Mongol alliances temporarily bolstered Seljuk defenses against Mamluk incursions, but the eventual Mongol conversion to Islam and Turkmen migrations solidified Sunni dominance, with historical records indicating that by the early Ottoman period, Muslim Turks comprised the regional majority. Under Ottoman administration, the Adana Vilayet—encompassing much of —integrated ulema into governance as kadis, muftis, and educators, who enforced sharia in courts and oversaw waqf endowments supporting mosques and schools, further entrenching Sunni institutions amid a population where non-Muslims paid the jizya tax until reforms in the 19th century. Conversions accelerated under Ottoman policies encouraging sedentarization of nomadic Turkmens and economic integration, though precise data for Cilicia is sparse; Ottoman censuses from the 16th century onward reflect a Sunni Hanafi majority exceeding 80% in core areas like Adana and Tarsus, with residual Christian communities diminishing via emigration and apostasy. Heterodox minorities persisted amid Sunni preeminence, including Alevi communities exhibiting syncretic practices blending Shia reverence for Ali with folk elements, though distinct from the larger central Anatolian Alevi groups; in Cilicia, Nusayri-Alawite (heterodox Twelver-offshoot) enclaves maintained esoteric rituals centered on sacred sites in the Iskenderun plain. The 1923 Greco-Turkish population exchange, mandated by the Treaty of Lausanne, expelled approximately 200,000 Greek Orthodox from Anatolian regions including Cilicia's coastal enclaves like Mersin and Alexandretta (Hatay), reducing Christian demographics to under 1% by mid-century and leaving residual Alawite communities—estimated at 28% of Hatay's population in surveys—as the primary non-Sunni holdouts. Turkish Republican secularism, enshrined in the 1924 constitution and intensified via , diminished overt Islamic practice region-wide by nationalizing religious endowments, abolishing the caliphate in 1924, and closing independent madrasas in favor of state-controlled Diyanet oversight, which standardized Sunni rituals while suppressing heterodox expressions like Alevi cem ceremonies and Alawite shrines, fostering private piety over public dominance. This laicist framework, prioritizing state control over religious autonomy, correlated with declining mosque attendance metrics in urban Cilicia by the 1950s, though underground persistence of minority traditions endured despite periodic state interventions.

Economy

Historical Economic Foundations

Cilicia's pre-modern economy rested primarily on agriculture in its fertile plains, particularly the well-irrigated Pedias region east of the Lamus River, which supported prosperous farming of grains and other crops, supplemented by pastoralism in the highlands. The area's geographical position as a Mediterranean gateway facilitated overland and maritime trade, integrating it into broader networks linking , , and the , with evidence from archaeological sites showing production and exchange from the Bronze Age onward. Tax records and itineraries from late antiquity highlight Cilicia's role in regional commerce, including the export of goods like goats-hair cloth from ports such as Tarsus. Cilician piracy in the 2nd century BC severely disrupted these trade routes, with pirates basing in the region's rugged coasts and targeting slow-moving grain shipments across the eastern Mediterranean, halting commerce and inflating food prices in Rome until Pompey's suppression campaign in 67–66 BC restored safer passage under the . This clearance enabled reliable grain transport from eastern provinces, including Cilicia's own fertile outputs, bolstering imperial food supplies and economic stability. Prior disruptions had forced merchant vessels to avoid open seas, limiting agricultural surpluses' market access and underscoring the causal link between maritime security and regional prosperity. In the medieval Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia (1080–1375), a feudal system structured economic extraction, with hereditary lords overseeing land grants in exchange for military service and peasant labor, yielding tithes and dues from agricultural production that funded royal administration and trade ventures. This era saw enhanced integration with European markets, evidenced by concessions to Western merchants and portolan charts depicting Cilician ports as hubs for long-distance exchange, including commodities like sesame-derived oils amid growing Levantine cultivation. Feudal tithes, collected in kind from twice-yearly harvests in the plains, supported diversification into industry and husbandry, though vulnerability to Mongol incursions from the mid-13th century onward strained these foundations.

Contemporary Sectors and Resources

The Çukurova region's economy relies heavily on agriculture, which leverages the alluvial plains formed by the Seyhan and Ceyhan rivers to achieve high productivity in citrus fruits, grains, and vegetables, supporting Turkey's national self-sufficiency in several staples and enabling substantial exports. Adana province alone produces 1.4 million tonnes of citrus annually, representing 28% of Turkey's total citrus output, while Mersin accounts for over half of the country's lemon production, with exports reaching 600,000 metric tons in recent years despite quality and weather challenges. Wheat and other grains are cultivated across 82.6% of Adana's agricultural land, contributing to Turkey's self-sufficiency in cereals, where national production exceeds 20 million tonnes annually and supports net exports in processed forms. This sector's output underscores regional self-sufficiency, as the area's irrigated fields—covering much of the 539,000 hectares in Adana—generate trade surpluses in fruits and grains, with citrus exports from Mersin and Adana valued at hundreds of millions of dollars yearly. Mining resources in the Taurus Mountains bordering Cilicia include copper deposits, historically exploited and still present in southeastern extensions like the Ergani area, though contemporary extraction focuses more on associated sulfides and contributes modestly to regional output amid Turkey's broader mineral trade. Manufacturing complements agriculture through textile production and emerging petrochemicals in , where facilities like SASA Polyester process raw materials for fibers used in textiles, automotive parts, and packaging, with planned $25 billion investments aiming to reduce import dependency by producing paraxylene and fuels locally. The services sector, including tourism along 's coast and the new Çukurova Airport serving 9 million passengers annually, adds growing value through enhanced connectivity to Middle Eastern markets, though it trails agriculture in regional GDP share. Climate change poses risks to these sectors, with events like frost, hail, and dry springs in Çukurova reducing citrus and grain yields—such as recent lemon crop declines—and increasing irrigation demands for maize by up to 20% under projected warming scenarios, straining water resources in this semi-arid zone. Despite these pressures, the region's diversified output maintains trade balances, with agricultural exports offsetting vulnerabilities and reinforcing economic resilience.

Legacy and Debates

Enduring Historical Impact

The located in northeastern Cilicia along the preserves remains from the late 8th century BCE, including a neo-Hittite citadel built by King Azatiwataš as a border fortress controlling trade routes to northern Syria. The site's bilingual inscriptions in Luwian hieroglyphs and Phoenician script, dating to approximately 700 BCE, have provided critical evidence for deciphering Anatolian hieroglyphs and understanding late Bronze to cultural transitions in the region. These artifacts, recognized in UNESCO's Memory of the World Register in 2025, underscore Cilicia's role as a cultural crossroads blending indigenous Anatolian and Levantine influences. Cilicia's ancient cities, such as Anazarbos and Korykos, feature enduring Roman-era structures like gates, aqueducts, and harbors that reflect the region's strategic importance under imperial administration from the 1st century CE onward. Anazarbos, for instance, retains a south gate from the Severan period (circa 193–235 CE), exemplifying Cilicia's integration into the Roman province system while preserving local Hellenistic foundations. These sites, though not yet fully inscribed on UNESCO's World Heritage List, are on the tentative roster, highlighting their tangible legacy in Anatolian archaeology. Biblically, Cilicia holds significance as the birthplace of the Apostle Paul in Tarsus around 5–10 CE, where he was raised in a Jewish family before his conversion and missionary work. Paul's early ministry included time in Cilicia from approximately 35 to 46 CE, during which he evaded persecution and later returned as part of his journeys documented in , linking the region to the spread of early Christianity across the eastern Mediterranean. Genomic analyses of ancient DNA from Anatolian sites spanning the Neolithic to Bronze Age reveal substantial population continuity in the region, with modern inhabitants showing genetic profiles dominated by indigenous ancestries rather than large-scale replacements during later migrations. Studies indicate that Bronze Age Cilician populations contributed to this continuity, with limited admixture from steppe or other external sources until the Iron Age, supporting a model of cultural adoption over demographic upheaval in Anatolia's historical trajectory. This genetic persistence aligns with archaeological evidence of localized adaptations in Cilicia's fertile plains and coastal zones.

Historiographical Controversies and Territorial Narratives

Historiographical debates surrounding Cilicia's 20th-century history center on the Ottoman relocations of Armenians in 1915, framed by Armenian narratives as systematic genocide targeting an ethnic group, contrasted with Ottoman archival records depicting wartime security measures against documented Armenian revolts and collaborations with invading Russian forces. Ottoman documents detail uprisings, such as the Van rebellion in April 1915 where Armenian committees seized the city and aided Russian advances, prompting deportations from eastern provinces including Cilicia's fringes to prevent rear-guard sabotage during ; these measures were authorized by the Tehcir Law of May 27, 1915, ostensibly for military necessity amid mutual intercommunal violence. Armenian estimates of total deaths from these events range from 664,000 to 1.2 million, primarily attributing losses to deliberate extermination, while Turkish analyses, drawing on demographic records and eyewitness accounts, cite 300,000 to 600,000 Armenian fatalities alongside 2.5 million Muslim deaths from wartime hardships, emphasizing disease, exposure, and reciprocal killings rather than centralized intent. Western scholarship often privileges Armenian diaspora testimonies and missionary reports, potentially overlooking Ottoman archives due to access limitations and ideological alignments, whereas military historians like Erickson argue the relocations aligned with existential threats posed by Armenian nationalist groups like the Dashnaks, who had stockpiled arms and coordinated with Entente powers. Armenian diaspora territorial narratives assert Cilicia and "Western Armenia" as primordial homelands warranting restitution, invoking medieval Cilician Armenia (1080–1375) and proposing irredentist revanchism against Turkish sovereignty, yet these claims disregard six centuries of continuous Ottoman administration since the 1516 conquest and the multi-ethnic demographic realities under that rule. The Treaty of Lausanne in 1923 definitively recognized Turkish control over Anatolia, including Cilicia, nullifying prior Sevres provisions for Armenian autonomy and mandating population exchanges that resolved minority claims through legal finality, with no provisions for Armenian territorial revival despite French Mandate experiments in Cilicia (1918–1921) that collapsed amid Turkish reconquest and Armenian evacuations. Such diaspora advocacy, often amplified in Western academia, sidesteps Ottoman cadastral records showing Armenians as a minority (e.g., 15–20% in Cilicia per 1914 statistics) integrated via millet system, prioritizing emotional appeals over empirical continuity of Turkish-majority habitation post-1923. Archaeological evidence underscores Cilicia's layered, multi-ethnic history—spanning Luwian, Hittite, Assyrian, Greek, and Roman phases from the Bronze Age onward—without substantiating primordial ethnic exclusivity for Armenians, whose significant presence emerged post-Byzantine migrations rather than indigenous origins. Inscriptions and settlements reveal indigenous Anatolian substrates overlaid by Hellenistic and Persian influences, with no artifacts denoting an unbroken Armenian continuum predating medieval refugee influxes; this neutrality challenges homeland mythologies by highlighting cultural hybridity, as in Roman-era epigraphy documenting diverse groups like Isaurians and Syrians alongside later Armenians. Modern politicized archaeology risks retrofitting data to nationalist agendas, yet stratigraphic continuity favors cosmopolitan interpretations over anachronistic ethnic purism, aligning with causal patterns of migration and assimilation rather than static territorial entitlements.

Rulers and Administration

Ancient and Medieval Rulers

In the Late Bronze Age, the region known to the Hittites as Kizzuwatna was governed by local kings who alternated allegiance between the Hittite Empire and rival powers like Mitanni. Sunassura, a king of Kizzuwatna around 1400 BCE, initially allied with Mitanni but later submitted to Hittite king Tudhaliya II, establishing vassal status through treaties that integrated the region into the Hittite sphere. By the 14th century BCE, Hittite oversight included appointing princes as high priests of local deities, such as Kantuzili, son of Arnuwanda II, who served as sanga (high priest) of Teššob and Ḫebat in Kizzuwatna, blending religious and administrative control. During the Neo-Assyrian Empire's expansion in the 8th-7th centuries BCE, Cilicia fell under Assyrian provincial administration, with governors overseeing tribute and military levies, though specific names remain scarce in cuneiform records. Under Achaemenid Persian rule from the 6th century BCE, Cilicia operated as a satrapy with native dynasts holding the title Syennesis, predating full Persian incorporation. Syennesis III, circa 425-400 BCE, issued coinage depicting local deities and participated in Persian campaigns, maintaining semi-autonomous status while paying tribute. Datames (Tarkumuwa), satrap from approximately 384-362 BCE, inherited authority in northern Cilicia and expanded influence amid the Great Satraps' Revolt, minting staters in Tarsus featuring Baal of Tarsus before his defeat and execution by Persian loyalists. Mazaeus succeeded as satrap circa 361-334 BCE, issuing extensive coinage under Artaxerxes III and Darius III, commanding forces at Issus in 333 BCE against Alexander the Great, and subsequently serving as satrap under Macedonian rule after peaceful surrender. The medieval period saw the rise of Armenian principalities in following Byzantine-Seljuk conflicts. Ruben I (c. 1080-1095) founded the Rubenid dynasty by seizing mountain strongholds from Byzantine control, establishing an independent base amid the 's upheavals. His successors, including Constantine I (1095-1102) and Thoros I (1100-1129), expanded territories against Byzantine and Danishmend incursions, fortifying sites like Lampron and Anazarba. Levon II (1187-1219), crowning himself king in 1198 with papal and imperial recognition, elevated the principality to kingdom status, allying with Crusaders and securing coastal ports. The Rubenids yielded to the Hethumids in 1226 when Isabella (r. 1219), last Rubenid, married (1226-1270), who pursued Mongol alliances, traveling to Karakorum in 1254 to submit to Möngke Khan, ensuring temporary protection against Seljuks and Mamluks. Hethum II (1285-1293) and subsequent Hethumids navigated internal strife and external threats, with Leo III (1269-1289) consolidating power post-Mongol decline. The Lusignan dynasty assumed the throne in 1342 with Constantine II (1342-1344), a cousin of Leo IV, amid baronial elections favoring Western ties; his brief reign focused on Mamluk diplomacy. (1374-1375), the final king, defended Sis against Mamluk siege but was captured, ending independent rule and marking Cilicia's incorporation into the Mamluk Sultanate.

Ottoman Governors and Modern Officials

Following the Ottoman conquest of the Mamluk Sultanate in 1516–1517, the Ramazanid Emirate in Cilicia became a vassal state, with its beys retaining local administrative authority over Çukurova as a sanjak under nominal Ottoman suzerainty. The dynasty's rulers, such as Mahmud Bey, who had sought Ottoman refuge after Mamluk deposition in 1514, continued to govern semi-autonomously, collecting taxes and maintaining order while paying tribute to the sultan. This arrangement persisted until full incorporation around 1608–1610, after which Ramazanid descendants served as appointed Ottoman provincial officials rather than hereditary emirs, marking the end of local dynastic rule. Adana was subsequently organized as an eyalet (province) directly administered from Istanbul, with governors (beylerbeys or later valis) appointed by the to oversee military, fiscal, and judicial affairs. Examples include Keki Abdi Pasha, who served as governor of Adana Eyalet from 1780 to 1781 amid efforts to consolidate control over the region's Turkmen tribes and agricultural output. By the 19th century, under Abdülhamid II (r. 1876–1909), Cilicia fell within the Adana Vilayet, restructured during the Tanzimat reforms to emphasize centralized bureaucracy; valis were career Ottoman officials tasked with implementing land reforms, infrastructure projects like telegraph lines, and suppressing banditry, though specific appointments varied with imperial needs and rarely featured local hereditary elements. In the Republic of Turkey established in 1923, administrative continuity persisted through the vali system, but governors of Cilician provinces such as Adana were appointed directly by the central government in Ankara—initially the president or prime minister, later standardized under the Interior Ministry—eliminating any vestiges of hereditary or vassal governance in favor of bureaucratic merit and loyalty to the state. Adana Province, encompassing much of historical Cilicia, has seen rotating valis focused on modernization, including post-1920s agricultural expansion and industrial development; for instance, Yavuz Selim Köşger has held the position since 2023, overseeing regional security and economic policies. Mersin Province, detached from Icel/Adana in 1993 to form a separate entity, follows the same appointed model, with governors like Atilla Toros assuming duties in early 2025 to manage port operations and migration amid Mediterranean trade growth. This shift underscores a transition from Ottoman provincial semi-autonomy to republican centralization, with valis serving fixed terms without dynastic claims.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.