Hubbry Logo
ConfederationConfederationMain
Open search
Confederation
Community hub
Confederation
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Confederation
Confederation
Confederation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Part of the Politics series
Basic forms of government
List of forms · List of countries
Source of power
Democracy (rule by many)
Oligarchy (rule by few)
Autocracy (rule by one)
Anarchy (rule by none)
Power ideology
(socio-political ideologies)
(socio-economic ideologies)
  • Religious
  • Secular
(geo-cultural ideologies)
Power structure
Unitarism
Client state
Federalism
International relations
Related
icon Politics portal

A confederation (also known as a confederacy or league) is a political union of sovereign states united for purposes of common action.[1] Usually created by a treaty, confederations of states tend to be established for dealing with critical issues, such as defence, foreign relations, internal trade or currency, with the central government being required to provide support for all its members. Confederalism represents a main form of intergovernmentalism, defined as any form of interaction around states that takes place on the basis of sovereign independence or government.

The nature of the relationship among the member states constituting a confederation varies considerably. Likewise, the relationship between the member states and the general government and their distribution of powers varies. Some looser confederations are similar to international organisations while other confederations with stricter rules may resemble federal systems. These elements of such confederations, the international organization and federalist perspective, has been combined as supranational unions.

Since the member states of a confederation retain their sovereignty, they have an implicit right of secession. The political philosopher Emmerich de Vattel said: "Several sovereign and independent states may unite themselves together by a perpetual confederacy without each, in particular, ceasing to be a perfect state.... The deliberations in common will offer no violence to the sovereignty of each member".[2]

Under a confederation, compared to a federal state, the central authority is relatively weak.[3] Decisions made by the general government in a unicameral legislature, a council of the member states, require subsequent implementation by the member states to take effect; they are not laws acting directly upon the individual but have more the character of interstate agreements.[4] Also, decision-making in the general government usually proceeds by consensus (unanimity), not by the majority. Historically, those features limit the union's effectiveness. Hence, political pressure tends to build over time for the transition to a federal system of government, as in the American, Swiss and German cases of regional integration.

Confederated states

[edit]
Further information: Constituent states

In terms of internal structure, every confederal state is composed of two or more constituent states, referred to as confederated states. Regarding their political systems, confederated states can have republican or monarchical forms of government. Those that have a republican form (confederated republics) are usually called states (like states of the American Confederacy, 1861–1865) or republics (like republics of Serbia and Montenegro within the former State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, 2003–2006).[5] Those that have a monarchical form of government (confederated monarchies) are defined by various hierarchical ranks (like kingdoms of Iraq and Jordan within the Hashemite Arab Union in 1958).

Examples

[edit]

Belgium

[edit]

Many scholars have claimed that the Kingdom of Belgium, a country with a complicated federal structure has adopted some characteristics of a confederation under the pressure of separatist movements, especially in Flanders. For example, C. E. Lagasse declared that Belgium was "near the political system of a Confederation" regarding the constitutional reform agreements between Belgian Regions and between Communities,[6] and the director of the Centre de recherche et d'information socio-politiques (CRISP) Vincent de Coorebyter[7] called Belgium "undoubtedly a federation...[with] some aspects of a confederation" in Le Soir.[8] Also in Le Soir, Michel Quévit of the Catholic University of Louvain wrote that the "Belgian political system is already in dynamics of a Confederation".[9][10]

Nevertheless, the Belgian regions and the linguistic communities do not have the autonomy to leave the Belgian state. As such, federal aspects still dominate. Also, for fiscal policy and public finances, the federal state dominates the other levels of government.[citation needed]

The increasingly-confederal aspects of the Belgian Federal State appear to be a political reflection of the profound cultural, sociological and economic differences between the Flemish (Belgians who speak Dutch or Dutch dialects) and the Walloons (Belgians who speak French or French dialects).[11] For example, in the last several decades, over 95% of Belgians have voted for political parties that represent voters from only one community, the separatist N-VA being the party with the most voter support among the Flemish population. Parties that strongly advocate Belgian unity and appeal to voters of both communities usually play only a marginal role in nationwide general elections. The system in Belgium is known as consociationalism.[12][13]

That makes Belgium fundamentally different from federal countries like Switzerland, Canada, Germany and Australia. National parties receive over 90% of voter support in those countries. The only geographical areas comparable with Belgium within Europe are Catalonia, the Basque Country (both part of Spain), Northern Ireland and Scotland (both part of the United Kingdom) and parts of Italy, where a massive voter turnout for regional (and often separatist) political parties has become the rule in the last decades, and nationwide parties advocating national unity draw around half or sometimes less of the votes.

Canada

[edit]
Proclamation of Canadian Confederation

Canada is an unusually decentralized federal state, not a confederate association of sovereign states,[14] the usual meaning of confederation in modern terms. In Canada, the word confederation has an additional unrelated meaning.[14] "Confederation" refers to the process of (or the event of) establishing or joining the Canadian federal state.

In modern terminology, Canada is a federation, not a confederation.[15] However, to contemporaries of the Constitution Act, 1867, confederation did not have the same connotation of a weakly-centralized federation.[16] Canadian Confederation generally refers to the Constitution Act, 1867, which formed the Dominion of Canada from three of the colonies of British North America, and to the subsequent incorporation of other colonies and territories. Beginning on 1 July 1867, it was initially a self-governing dominion of the British Empire with a federal structure, whose government was led by Sir John A. Macdonald. The initial colonies involved were the Province of Canada (becoming Quebec from Canada East, formerly the colony of Lower Canada; and Ontario from Canada West, formerly the colony of Upper Canada), Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick. Later participants were Manitoba, British Columbia, Prince Edward Island, Alberta and Saskatchewan (the latter two created in 1905 as federated provinces from parts of the directly federally administered Northwest Territories, first transferred to the Dominion in 1869 and now possessing devolved governments as itself, Yukon and Nunavut), and finally Newfoundland (now Newfoundland and Labrador) in 1949. A Canadian judicial constitutional interpretation, Reference Re Secession of Quebec, and a subsequent federal law, set forth negotiating conditions for a Canadian province (though not a territory) to leave the Canadian federal state (addressed also by a related Quebec law). Importantly, negotiation would first need triggering by referendum and executing by constitutional amendment using a current amending mechanism of Canada's constitution—meaning that, while not legal under the current constitution, it is democratically feasible without resorting to extralegal means or international involvement.

European Union

[edit]

The unique nature and the political sensitivities surrounding the European Union (EU) make it difficult to apply a common or legal classification to its structure. However, it bears some resemblance to both a confederation[17] (or a "new" type of confederation) and a federation.[18] The term supranational union has also been applied. The EU operates common economic policies with thousands of common laws, which enable a single economic market, a common customs territory, (mainly) open internal borders, and a common currency among most member-states. However, unlike a federation, the EU does not have exclusive powers over foreign affairs, defence, taxation, along with the immigration and transit of non-EU nationals. Furthermore, most EU laws, which have been developed by consensus between relevant national government ministers and then scrutinised and approved or rejected by the European Parliament, must be transposed into national law by national parliaments (in the case of directives). Most collective decisions by member states are taken by weighted majorities and blocking minorities typical of upper houses in federations. On the other hand, the absolute unanimity typical of intergovernmentalism is required only in respect to the Common Foreign and Security Policy, as well as in situations when ratification of a treaty or of a treaty amendment is required. Such a form may thus be described as a semi-intergovernmental confederation.

However, some academic observers more usually discuss the EU in the terms of it being a federation.[19][20] As the international law professor Joseph H. H. Weiler (of the Hague Academy and New York University) wrote, "Europe has charted its own brand of constitutional federalism".[21] Jean-Michel Josselin and Alain Marciano see the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg City as being a primary force behind the building of a federal legal order for the EU,[20] with Josselin stating that a "complete shift from a confederation to a federation would have required to straight-forwardly replace the principality of the member states vis-à-vis the Union by that of the European citizens. As a consequence, both confederate and federate features coexist in the judicial landscape".[22] Rutgers political science professor R. Daniel Kelemen said: "Those uncomfortable using the 'F' word in the EU context should feel free to refer to it as a quasi-federal or federal-like system. Nevertheless, the EU has the necessary attributes of a federal system. It is striking that while many scholars of the EU continue to resist analyzing it as a federation, most contemporary students of federalism view the EU as a federal system".[23] Thomas Risse and Tanja A. Börzel claim that the "EU only lacks two significant features of a federation. First, the Member States remain the "masters" of the treaties, i.e., they have the exclusive power to amend or change the constitutive treaties of the EU. Second, the EU lacks a real "tax and spend" capacity, in other words, there is no fiscal federalism".[24]

Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, the chairman of the body of experts commissioned to elaborate a constitutional charter for the European Union, was confronted with strong opposition from the United Kingdom towards including the words "federal" or "federation" in the unratified European Constitution and the word was replaced with either "Community" or "Union".[25]

A majority of the Political Groups in the European Parliament, including the EPP, the S&D Group and Renew Europe, support a federal model for the European Union. The ECR Group argues for a reformed European Union along confederal lines. The Brothers of Italy party, led by Giorgia Meloni, campaigns for a confederal Europe. On her election as President of the ECR Party in September 2020 Meloni said, "Let us continue to fight together for a confederate Europe of free and sovereign states".[26][27]

Indigenous confederations in North America

[edit]
Map of the Five Nations (from the Darlington Collection)

In the context of the history of the indigenous peoples of the Americas, a confederacy may refer to a semi-permanent political and military alliance consisting of multiple nations (or "tribes", "bands", or "villages"), which maintained their separate leadership. One of the most well-known is the Haudenosaunee (or Iroquois), but there were many others during different eras and locations across North America, such as the Wabanaki Confederacy, Western Confederacy, Tsenacommacah, Seven Nations of Canada, Pontiac's Confederacy, Pennacook Confederacy, Illinois Confederation, Tecumseh's Confederacy, Muscogee Confederacy, Great Sioux Nation, Blackfoot Confederacy, Warm Springs Confederacy, Manahoac Confederacy, Iron Confederacy and Council of Three Fires.

The Haudenosaunee Confederacy, historically known as the Iroquois League or the League of Five (later Six) Nations, is the country of Native Americans (in what is now the United States) and First Nations (in what is now Canada) that consists of six nations: the Mohawk, the Oneida, the Onondaga, the Cayuga, the Seneca and the Tuscarora. The Six Nations have a representative government known as the Grand Council which is the oldest governmental institution still maintaining its original form in North America.[28] Each clan from the five nations sends chiefs to act as representatives and make decisions for the whole confederation. It has been operating since its foundation in 1142 despite limited international recognition today.

Indigenous confederations in South America

[edit]

Several of the Pre-Columbian cultures of Colombia, such as the Muisca and Tairona were composed of loose confederations. The Muisca form of government consisted of two different rulers that governed a region in the central Andean highlands in present-day Colombia. The Hoa ruled the northern section of the confederation, while the Zipa ruled the southern portion.

The Andean civilizations consisted of loose confederations, such as the Aymara kingdoms and the Diaguita, with the former being composed of distinct diarchies.

Serbia and Montenegro

[edit]

In 2003, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was transformed into the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, a confederation of the Republic of Montenegro and the Republic of Serbia. The state was constituted as a loose political union, but formally functioned as a sovereign subject of international law, and member of the United Nations. As a confederation, the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro had very few shared functions, such as defense, foreign affairs and a weak common president, ministerial council and parliament.[5]

The two constituent republics functioned separately throughout the period of its short existence, and they continued to operate under separate economic policies and to use separate currencies (the euro was and still is the only legal tender in Montenegro, and the dinar was and still is the legal tender in Serbia). On 21 May 2006, the Montenegrin independence referendum was held. The final official results indicated on 31 May that 55.5% of voters voted in favor of independence. The confederation effectively came to an end after Montenegro's formal declaration of independence on 3 June 2006 and Serbia's formal declaration of independence on 5 June.

Switzerland

[edit]
Further information: Eidgenossenschaft

Switzerland, officially known as the Swiss Confederation,[29][30][31] is an example of a modern country that traditionally refers to itself as a confederation because the official (and traditional) name of Switzerland in German (the majority language of the Swiss) is Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft (literally "Swiss Comradeship by Oath"), an expression which was translated into the Latin Confoederatio Helvetica (Helvetic Confederation). It had been a confederacy since its inception in 1291 as the Old Swiss Confederacy, which was originally created as an alliance among the valley communities of the central Alps, until it became a federation in 1848 but it retains the name of Confederacy for reasons of historical tradition. The confederacy facilitated management of common interests (such as freedom from external domination especially from the Habsburg Empire, the development of republican institutions in a Europe dominated by monarchies and free trade), and it ensured peace between the different cultural entities of the area.

After the Sonderbund War of 1847, when some of the Catholic cantons of Switzerland attempted to set up a separate union (Sonderbund in German) against the Protestant majority, a vote was held and the majority of the cantons approved the new Federal Constitution which changed the political system to one of a federation.[32][33]

Union State of Russia and Belarus

[edit]
Main article: Union State

In 1999, Russia and Belarus signed a treaty to form a confederation,[34] which came into force on 26 January 2000.[35] Although it was given the name Union State, and has some characteristics of a federation, it remains a confederation of two sovereign states.[36] Its existence has been seen as an indication of Russia's political and economic support for the Belarusian government.[37] The confederation was created with the objective of co-ordinating common action on economic integration and foreign affairs.[36] However, many of the treaty's provisions have not yet been implemented.[37] Consequently, The Times, in 2020, described it as "a mostly unimplemented confederation".[38]

Alliance of Sahel States

[edit]

On July 6, 2024, at the end of the first summit of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), the final communiqué announced the creation of a confederation of the three countries of the AES, namely Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger.[39] All three countries were members of ECOWAS, before their memberships were suspended after a successive string of military coups. Subsequently, the countries withdrew from ECOWAS and formed the AES.

Historical confederations

[edit]
See also: List of confederations

Historical confederations (especially those predating the 20th century) may not fit the current definition of a confederation, may be proclaimed as a federation but be confederal (or the reverse), and may not show any qualities that 21st-century political scientists might classify as those of a confederation.

List

[edit]

Some have more the characteristics of a personal union, but appear here because of their self-styling as a "confederation":

Name Period Notes
Three Crowned Kings 1050 BCE–second century BCE As described in the Hathigumpha inscription, On the 11th year, Kharavela broke up a confederacy of Tamil kingdoms, which was becoming a threat to Kalinga Kharavela.
Toltec Empire 496–1122 Existed as a confederation between the Toltecs and the Chichimeca, simultaneously as an empire exerting control over places like Cholula.
Holy Roman Empire Holy Roman Empire[40] 800/962–1806 De jure an empire, de facto a multi-ethnic Christian confederation of German, Italian, Czech, Dutch, and French states.
Muisca Confederation c. 800–1540 Consisted of the Southern Muisca of Bacatá led by the Zipazgo and the Northern Muisca of Hunza led by the Zacazgo.
Tui Manuʻa Confederacy
Kimek–Kipchak confederation 9th century–13th century A Turkic confederation in the eastern part of the Eurasian Steppe, between the 9th and 13th centuries. The confederation was dominated by two Turkic nomadic tribes: the Kimeks and the Kipchaks.
Cumania 10th century–1242 A Turkic confederation in the western part of the Eurasian Steppe, between the 10th and 13th centuries. The confederation was dominated by two Turkic nomadic tribes: the Cumans and the Kipchaks.
League of Mayapan 987–1461
Crown of Aragon 1137–1716 Parts of present-day Balearic Islands, France, Italy, Malta, and Spain.
Haudenosaunee 1142–present Also known as the Iroquois Confederacy or the Six (formerly Five) Nations.
Hanseatic League 13th–17th centuries Member cities located in present-day Belgium, Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, and Sweden.
Old Swiss Confederacy 1291–1848 Officially, the "Swiss Confederation".
Qara Qoyunlu 1374–1468 A Turkoman tribal confederation.
Aq Qoyunlu 1378–1503 A Turkoman tribal confederation.
Kalmar Union Kalmar Uniona 1397–1523 Parts of present-day Denmark, Norway, and Sweden.
Aztec Empire 1428–1521 Consisted of the city-states of Tenochtitlan, Texcoco, and Tlacopan.
Livonian Confederation 1435–1561
Pre-Commonwealth Poland and Lithuaniaa 1447–1492
1501–1569 		Shared a monarch (Grand Duke of Lithuania and King of Poland), parliament (Sejm), and currency.
Denmark–Norway Denmark–Norwaya 1536–1814 Parts of present-day Denmark and Norway.
Dutch Republic Seven United Provinces of the Netherlands 1581–1795
Wampanoag Confederacy
Powhatan Confederacy
Illinois Confederation
Confederate Ireland 1641–1649
New England Confederation 1643–1684
Kingdom of Lunda
c. 1665–1887
Aro Confederacy 1690–1902 Parts of present-day Nigeria, Cameroon, and Equatorial Guinea.
Maratha Confederacy 1713–1818
United States The United States of America 1781–1789 Organization of the United States under the Articles of Confederation.
Western Confederacy 1785–1795
Tecumseh's confederacy c. 1805–1824
Confederation of the Rhine 1806–1813 Client states of the French Empire; had no head of state nor government.
German Confederation German Confederation 1815–1866
United Provinces of New Granada United Provinces of New Granada 1810–1816 Parts of present-day Colombia.
Sweden–Norwaya 1814–1905 Parts of present-day Norway and Sweden.
Confederation of the Equator 1824 Located in northeastern Brazil.
Argentine Confederation Argentine Confederation 1832–1860
Peru–Bolivian Confederation Peru–Bolivian Confederation 1836–1839 Parts of present-day Bolivia and Peru.
Federal Republic of Central America 1842–1844 Parts of present-day El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua.
Granadine Confederation Granadine Confederation 1858–1863
Confederate States of America Confederate States of America 1861–1865 11 Southern U.S. secessionist states during the American Civil War.
Colombia United States of Colombia 1863–1886
Carlist States 1872–1876 Parts of present-day Spain.
United Republics of North Caucasus 1918–1919
Republic of the Rif Confederal Republic of the Tribes of the Rif 1921–1926 Also known as the Rif Republic; short-lived republic in Spanish-occupied Northern Morocco during the Rif War.
Arab League 1945–present
Netherlands-Indonesia Union 1949–1956 Parts of present-day Indonesia and Netherlands.
Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland 1953–1963 Also known as the Central African Federation, consisting of the then-British colonies of Northern Rhodesia, Southern Rhodesia, and Nyasaland (present-day Malawi, Zambia, and Zimbabwe).
Arab Federation Arab Federationb 1958 Parts of present-day Iraq and Jordan.
United Arab Republic United Arab Republicb
and the United Arab Statesb 		1958–1961 Parts of present-day Egypt and Syria, joined by the former Kingdom of Yemen.
Union of African States 1961–1963 Parts of present-day Mali, Ghana, and Guinea.
Federation of Arab Republicsb 1972 Parts of present-day Egypt, Libya, and Syria.
Arab Islamic Republicb 1974 Parts of present-day Libya and Tunisia.
Senegambia 1982–1989 Parts of present-day Gambia and Senegal.
European Union 1992–present
Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities 1994–2023 De facto autonomous territories, formerly located in the Mexican state of Chiapas.
African Union 2002–present
Serbia and Montenegro 2003–2006 Parts of present-day Montenegro and Serbia.
  • a Confederated personal union.
  • b De facto confederation.


See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Confederation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A confederation is a voluntary union of sovereign states or entities that agree to coordinate certain activities through a common framework while preserving their individual autonomy and right to secede. In such arrangements, member states delegate limited powers to a central body, which lacks independent authority to enforce decisions or levy taxes directly on citizens, relying instead on requisitions from the members. This structure contrasts with federations, where the central government possesses sovereign powers that supersede those of the constituent units in specified domains. Confederations often arise from alliances formed for mutual defense, economic , or cultural ties, but their decentralized nature frequently results in coordination challenges and . Historical instances demonstrate both their utility in preserving during transitions and their tendency to evolve into stronger unions or dissolve due to ineffective governance. The , adopted by the thirteen American states in 1781, exemplified these limitations, as the weak national Congress could not compel states to fulfill financial obligations or suppress internal rebellions, prompting its replacement by the U.S. Constitution in 1789. Similarly, the (1815–1866) served as a loose assembly of German states under Austrian and Prussian influence but failed to provide unified leadership, contributing to its disintegration amid nationalist movements and wars of unification. Among enduring models, the Old Swiss Confederation, originating in the 13th century as an alliance of cantons against Habsburg rule, achieved military successes and local , though it later federalized in 1848 to address internal conflicts. Indigenous examples, such as the Haudenosaunee () Confederacy formed around the 12th century, demonstrated sophisticated diplomatic and consensus-based governance that influenced later political thought, including concepts in the U.S. founding documents. These cases highlight confederations' role in enabling without full surrender, yet empirical outcomes underscore causal vulnerabilities: weak enforcement mechanisms often undermine resilience against external threats or internal divisions, favoring evolution toward for sustained viability.

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Etymology

A confederation constitutes a voluntary union of sovereign states that delegate limited powers to a common authority for shared objectives, such as mutual defense or economic coordination, while preserving their individual sovereignty, independence, and unilateral right to secede. Unlike more integrated systems, the central body in a confederation derives its authority solely from the member states' explicit consent, often formalized through treaties, and exercises no direct sovereignty over individuals or territories, which remain under the primary jurisdiction of the constituent entities. This structure emphasizes loose association over centralized governance, with member states retaining full control over internal affairs, foreign relations (except as jointly delegated), and the ability to override or ignore central decisions if deemed necessary for their interests. The term "confederation" entered English in the late 14th to early 15th century via Anglo-French "confederacion" and Middle French "confédération," directly from Late Latin "confoederatio," denoting a binding agreement or alliance among parties. Its etymological roots trace to the Latin verb "confoederare," a compound of "con-" (indicating union or togetherness) and "foederare" (to establish a treaty or league, from "foedus," meaning compact, covenant, or pact), underscoring the foundational concept of sovereign entities forging a pact of mutual support without surrendering autonomy. Historically, this linguistic heritage reflects ancient practices of interstate leagues, such as those among Greek city-states or Italic tribes, where "foedus" signified formal, reciprocal obligations enforceable by custom rather than hierarchy.

Core Principles of Sovereignty and Association

In a confederation, resides fundamentally with the member states, which retain supreme authority over their internal affairs, foreign relations, and undelegated powers, while granting the central authority only explicitly enumerated and revocable competencies through or compact. This principle ensures that the confederal body possesses no inherent of its own, functioning instead as an agent of the states rather than a superordinate entity capable of overriding member decisions. For instance, the , ratified by all thirteen American states on March 1, 1781, codified this in Article II: "Each state retains its , freedom and , and every Power, and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the , in assembled." Similarly, international legal analysis affirms that confederated states maintain their sovereign status, including the capacity to pursue independent unless jointly restricted. The principle of association underscores the voluntary and contractual nature of the union, whereby independent states coalesce for shared objectives—such as mutual defense, facilitation, or response—without forfeiting their distinct identities or ultimate control. This association is typically perpetual in intent but dissolvable by mutual or unilateral withdrawal, reflecting the absence of a binding transfer to the center. A policy analysis defines a confederation as "an association of sovereign states which, by means of an international , decide to delegate the exercise of certain powers to a common authority," emphasizing the treaty's role in bounding without eroding state primacy. Enforcement of confederal decisions thus depends on member compliance rather than direct , with the central organs lacking independent taxation, , or judicial enforcement mechanisms over states. These principles interlock to prioritize state against central overreach, fostering alliances resilient to external threats yet adaptable to internal divergences, as evidenced by the operational weaknesses of the Articles-era , which convened from 1781 to 1789 and struggled with requisitions due to non-compliance by states like New York in 1786. or requirements in confederal decision-making further safeguard , preventing minority states from being bound by majority fiat.

Confederation Versus Federation

A confederation unites states that delegate specific, limited powers to a common while preserving their individual , international recognition, and unilateral right to withdraw, whereas a establishes a single entity where powers are constitutionally divided between a and constituent units, with the latter lacking independent and rights. In confederations, member states retain supreme authority, granting the center only enumerated functions without direct coercive power over citizens; federations invert this, vesting ultimate in the federal structure, enabling the center to act independently via taxation, , and directly on individuals. Central authority in confederations depends on member consent, often requiring for decisions, which hampers efficiency and enforcement, as seen in the inability to compel compliance without state mediation; federations empower with majority-rule mechanisms, independent institutions like courts and executives, and supremacy clauses overriding state actions. Sovereignty distribution underscores this: confederated states maintain separate diplomatic capacities and legal primacy, treating the union as an agent rather than sovereign; in federations, states operate as subunits within a unified legal order, ceding external representation and internal supremacy to the federal level.
AspectConfederationFederation
SovereigntyHeld by member states; center is delegate body without independent status.Vested in the federal entity; states are non-sovereign subunits.
Decision-Making or consensus required; power for members. or qualified majority; binding on all.
EnforcementRelies on member states; no direct central .Direct federal powers, including military and .
SecessionPermitted unilaterally, as is retained.Prohibited or constitutionally restricted.
Powers AllocationNarrow, delegated; states supreme in residuals.Divided constitutionally; federal supremacy in conflicts.
Historically, the under the (1781–1789) exemplified confederal weaknesses, with the central Congress unable to tax or regulate commerce effectively, prompting transition to the federal ratified on March 4, 1789, which created a stronger national government. operated as a loose confederation of cantons from 1291 until the 1848 federal constitution centralized certain powers while retaining cantonal autonomy. The (1861–1865) maintained state amid internal disputes, contrasting with enduring federations like the post-1871, where Prussian-led unification imposed federal hierarchy. These cases illustrate confederations' tendency toward instability due to coordination failures, often evolving into federations for enhanced collective capacity, though some, like the , exhibit confederal traits in sovereignty retention alongside federal-like integration in select domains.

Confederation Versus Supranational or Unitary Structures

In confederations, member states maintain full sovereignty, voluntarily associating through a central authority that operates primarily on consensus and lacks coercive power over members, such as direct taxation or military enforcement. This structure inherently limits the center's role to coordination on shared interests like defense or , with decisions often requiring to respect state autonomy. Historical instances, including the under the from March 1, 1781, to March 4, 1789, illustrate this dynamic: the Continental Congress managed foreign affairs but could not compel states to fulfill financial obligations, contributing to fiscal crises and economic disarray post-Revolutionary War. Unitary structures invert this arrangement, vesting ultimate in a that delegates administrative powers to subnational units, which possess no independent constitutional authority and can be altered or dissolved unilaterally by the center. For instance, in the , devolved powers to via the remain subject to , allowing potential revocation without regional consent, as affirmed in legal precedents like the Miller case (2017). This central dominance facilitates uniform policy implementation but risks overriding local preferences, differing sharply from confederal preservation of state vetoes. In contrast to confederations' emphasis on retained , unitary systems prioritize hierarchical efficiency, evident in France's 1789 centralization under the Revolution, where provinces were reorganized into departments directly administered from . Supranational entities, such as the formalized by the on November 1, 1993, introduce partial transfer, enabling institutions to impose binding decisions in designated domains like for eurozone members or environmental standards, bypassing full member-state unanimity through mechanisms such as qualified majority voting in the Council. Unlike pure confederations, where central edicts depend on voluntary compliance—as in the (1815–1866), which dissolved amid enforcement failures during the 1848 revolutions—the EU's supranational features, including the European Court of Justice's direct applicability of directives since the 1964 van Gend en Loos ruling, allow override of national laws in integrated areas. This hybrid model fosters deeper integration than confederal alliances but retains opt-outs and national ratification requirements, distinguishing it from unitary centralization by preserving core state competences in and taxation.

Structural Characteristics

Intergovernmental Decision-Making

In confederal systems, intergovernmental occurs through mechanisms that preserve the of member states, typically involving councils or assemblies composed of state delegates rather than directly elected central officials. These bodies coordinate limited common affairs, such as defense or , but lack independent coercive , relying instead on voluntary compliance from states. Decisions often require or approval to reflect equal state , granting each member effective power over central actions. This principle, evident in historical confederations like the Swiss Confederation's diet prior to 1848, ensured that no state could be bound against its will but frequently paralyzed collective responses to crises. For instance, under the (1781–1789), the Continental Congress operated with one vote per state and needed nine of thirteen states for key measures like declaring war, while constitutional amendments demanded full consensus, contributing to inefficiencies such as delayed debt repayment and inability to regulate interstate commerce effectively. Similarly, the German Confederation's Federal Diet (1815–1866) adhered to unanimity for most resolutions, limiting its role to among principalities and preventing unified policy implementation. The reliance on intergovernmental bargaining contrasts sharply with federal systems, where central legislatures employ and possess direct taxing and enforcement powers independent of state consent. In confederations, this structure prioritizes state autonomy but undermines decisiveness, as seen in the U.S. Confederation's failure to compel state contributions, leading to fiscal collapse by 1787. Empirical outcomes demonstrate that such veto-prone processes foster , with confederations historically evolving into federations or dissolving when faced with existential threats requiring swift, binding action.

Allocation of Powers and Central Limitations

In confederations, member states allocate only enumerated and limited powers to the central authority, retaining full over internal affairs such as taxation, lawmaking, and . This delegation typically occurs via or compact, ensuring the central body serves as a coordinator rather than a entity. For instance, under the , adopted by the on November 15, 1777, and ratified by all thirteen states by March 1, 1781, the was empowered to declare war, conduct , and manage postal services, but these powers required implementation through state governments. Commonly delegated central powers focus on collective necessities, including defense against external threats, , and interstate commerce regulation, while excluding direct authority over individuals. The central authority often lacks mechanisms for independent action, relying instead on member state consent for execution. Historical examples illustrate this: the , formed by pact in 1291 among Uri, , and , vested the assembly with decisions on war and , but cantons controlled their militias and taxes. Similarly, the permitted Congress to request funds from states proportionally to population but prohibited direct levies, resulting in chronic underfunding during the Revolutionary War era. Central limitations are structural to preserve state autonomy, including prohibitions on taxation, , or unilateral , with decisions frequently requiring or supermajorities to prevent dominance by larger members. The confederal body cannot compel compliance, as it governs states rather than citizens directly, leading to reliance on voluntary adherence or . In the Articles system, amendments demanded unanimous , blocking reforms like taxation powers despite evident fiscal crises by ; of treaties, such as the 1783 Treaty of Paris with Britain, faltered as states ignored congressional directives on debt repayment and frontier issues. These constraints, rooted in fears of centralized tyranny post-colonial rule, often engender inefficiency, as seen in the Confederation's inability to regulate trade or suppress in 1786-1787 without state cooperation.

Economic and Military Dimensions


In confederal systems, member states retain primary control over economic policies, including taxation, currency issuance, and trade regulations, with the central authority possessing limited or no direct powers to enforce uniform measures across . Coordination occurs through voluntary agreements, such as interstate compacts or shared external tariffs, but lacks binding enforcement, often leading to fragmented markets and fiscal dependencies on member contributions. This preserves but frequently results in inefficiencies, including trade barriers between members and difficulties in with external entities. Premodern examples illustrate this dynamic: the Old Swiss Confederation facilitated regional exchanges of goods like grain and cattle among cantons while each maintained independent economic governance, reducing transaction costs through interdependence without central imposition. Similarly, under the from 1781 to 1789, the Continental Congress could not regulate interstate commerce or impose taxes, prompting states to enact conflicting tariffs and contributing to economic instability that necessitated constitutional reform. In the (1815–1866), the customs union emerged as a voluntary economic pact among members, predating political unification and demonstrating how confederations can evolve economic mechanisms absent central fiat. Militarily, confederations emphasize collective defense as a core rationale for association, granting the central body authority to declare , negotiate alliances, and request quotas from members, yet without coercive power to compel fulfillment or maintain a unified . Member states supply forces from their own militias or armies, enabling decentralized operations suited to regional threats but vulnerable to uneven participation and coordination failures during prolonged conflicts. This structure aligns with first principles of , where mutual pacts substitute for hierarchical command, though empirical outcomes reveal risks of free-riding, as states weigh local costs against shared benefits. Historical instances underscore these traits: the Haudenosaunee Confederacy coordinated raids and defenses via consensus among sachems, drawing on warriors from constituent nations without a centralized command, which sustained the league against rivals like the Wendat. In the era, Congress declared war independence in 1776 and managed alliances, but post-1783 requisitions for troops against threats like British forts or domestic unrest, such as in 1786–1787, went largely unmet due to state reluctance, exposing enforcement voids. The Old Swiss Confederation similarly mobilized cantonal levies for victories like Morgarten in 1315 against Habsburg incursions, relying on pact-bound mutual aid rather than federal .

Advantages

Preservation of Member State Autonomy

In confederations, member states explicitly retain their sovereignty, freedom, and independence, delegating only enumerated powers to a central authority while reserving all others for themselves. This structure, as codified in Article II of the Articles of Confederation ratified on March 1, 1781, ensured that the 13 American states maintained control over internal taxation, commerce, and militia, with the Continental Congress limited to foreign affairs and mutual defense. Such delegation is typically voluntary and treaty-based, allowing states to withhold consent on non-essential matters, thereby preventing erosion of local decision-making. This preservation of autonomy enables member states to tailor governance to regional differences, such as cultural, economic, or geographic variations, without central interference. In the Swiss Confederation, established by pact in 1291 and formalized in its 1848 constitution, cantons exercise sovereign powers over , healthcare, policing, and taxation unless explicitly assigned to the federal level, with the constitution mandating respect for cantonal organizational and discretion in non-federal affairs. Article 3 of the affirms that cantons are sovereign insofar as their authority is not limited by the federal order, permitting entities like or to enact distinct policies—such as varying tax rates or school curricula—that reflect local priorities. Empirical outcomes include sustained stability, as cantonal veto rights in federal legislation (requiring double majorities in referenda) have blocked over 50 proposed amendments since 1848 that threatened subnational powers. By design, confederations enforce autonomy through mechanisms like unanimous or supermajority consent for central actions, reducing the risk of coercive centralization observed in unitary systems. Under the Articles of Confederation, states' retained rights to conduct separate trade negotiations—evident in instances like Rhode Island's independent dealings with Britain post-1783—demonstrated how sovereignty safeguards prevented a dominant national entity from subsuming state legislatures. This intergovernmental approach fosters cooperation among equals on shared threats, such as wartime alliances, while upholding exit options; for example, the Articles allowed voluntary dissolution, though rarely invoked before the 1789 shift to federalism. In practice, these features have historically mitigated cultural homogenization, as seen in Switzerland's multilingual cantons maintaining linguistic policies independently since the 1848 concordat.

Flexibility in Response to Threats

Confederal arrangements permit member states to adapt dynamically to external threats through voluntary coalitions and military coordination, unhindered by entrenched central bureaucracies that might impose delays or unpopular mandates. Retaining incentivizes participation, as states perceive direct stakes in defense, enabling consensus-driven responses tailored to specific dangers rather than uniform policies. This contrasts with federations, where divided powers can lead to jurisdictional disputes during crises. The exemplifies this flexibility. Established by the 1291 Federal Charter among Uri, , and for mutual protection against Habsburg expansion, the alliance expanded through opportunistic pacts with additional cantons, allowing independent entities to unite militarily when threatened. In the of 1499, triggered by disputes over tariffs and expansion, the confederates rapidly mobilized disparate cantonal forces—totaling around 20,000-30,000 —to defeat larger imperial at battles like Dornach on July 22, 1499, preserving autonomy without a standing central army. This decentralized model sustained the confederacy against recurrent threats, including the (1474-1477), where cantonal militias leveraged terrain advantages and local knowledge for victories at (March 2, 1476) and Morat (June 22, 1477). Similarly, the Iroquois Confederacy (Haudenosaunee) demonstrated adaptive resilience to European incursions. Formed circa 1142-1450 under the , its consensus-based council enabled the Five Nations (Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, Seneca; Tuscarora joined in 1722) to coordinate diplomacy and warfare against French, British, and rival indigenous groups. Facing colonial threats in the 17th-18th centuries, the confederacy balanced alliances—such as siding with Britain in the (1754-1763)—while conducting flexible campaigns, including the (1600s), which expanded influence through unified raids absorbing enemies. This structure allowed tactical shifts, like internal neutrality during the despite divided loyalties, mitigating total dissolution. In the (ratified March 1, 1781), American states retained control over militias, facilitating voluntary contributions to the Continental Army against British forces, with over 200,000 serving by war's end despite no taxation power. This preserved state-level responsiveness, enabling rapid levies for campaigns like Saratoga (October 17, 1777), though enforcement weaknesses later prompted reform.

Disadvantages and Criticisms

Inherent Coordination and Enforcement Weaknesses

Confederations, by design, feature a central with limited delegated powers and no direct over individuals, relying instead on intergovernmental agreements among autonomous member states. This structure inherently hampers coordination, as decisions typically require or supermajorities in assemblies like diets or congresses, fostering veto points that delay or block . For example, under the ratified on March 1, 1781, the Continental Congress needed the concurrence of nine of thirteen states for most legislation and full for treaties or amendments, resulting in on critical issues such as interstate and repayment during the 1780s economic crisis. Enforcement weaknesses compound these coordination failures, as the central body possesses no independent coercive mechanisms—such as taxation, standing armies, or compulsory jurisdiction—and must depend on voluntary state compliance, which often falters amid divergent interests. In the Articles system, Congress requisitioned funds from states but collected only about 16% of requested amounts between 1781 and 1789, crippling responses to threats like Shays' Rebellion in 1786–1787, where Massachusetts farmers' uprising exposed the confederation's inability to mobilize federal forces without state approval. Similarly, the German Confederation established in 1815 struggled with enforcement, as its diet lacked authority to override sovereign princes, failing to coordinate military reforms or suppress liberal revolts in 1848, which nearly dissolved the loose alliance. These flaws arise from the causal primacy of retained sovereignty, incentivizing free-riding where states benefit from collective goods without bearing proportional costs, eroding trust and efficacy over time. The pre-1848 Swiss Confederation exemplified this, with its assembly unable to enforce arbitration or military quotas among cantons, culminating in the of November 1847—a brief civil conflict among Catholic separatists and federalists that underscored the perils of unenforceable pacts and prompted a shift to in 1848. Scholarly analyses, such as those examining self-enforcing mechanisms, attribute such recurrent breakdowns to the absence of binding commitments, contrasting confederations with federations where central powers derive from and possess direct enforcement tools.

Empirical Tendency Toward Instability and Dissolution

Historical confederations have frequently exhibited , often dissolving due to structural limitations on central , including the inability to enforce compliance among sovereign members, levy taxes independently, or coordinate effectively against internal or external threats. This pattern arises from the confederal model's reliance on voluntary cooperation, which fosters free-rider problems and disputes over , as member states prioritize local interests over . Political theorists like identified key vices, such as states' failure to meet federal requisitions and encroachments on central prerogatives, which undermined governance under weak unions. The ' Articles of Confederation, ratified on March 1, 1781, exemplified these frailties, lacking powers to tax, regulate interstate commerce, or compel state contributions, leading to chronic funding shortages and economic disarray exacerbated by events like in 1786-1787. Congress's dependence on state quotas resulted in frequent non-compliance, rendering it unable to pay debts or maintain a standing army, prompting the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and formal replacement by the U.S. on March 4, 1789. Similarly, the , formed February 8, 1861, struggled with state sovereignty overriding central directives on and trade, contributing to internal discord amid the Civil War, culminating in dissolution after Appomattox on April 9, 1865. The , established June 8, 1815, after the , dissolved on August 23, 1866, following the , as rivalries between and prevented unified reform or defense, with member states unable to compromise on leadership or constitutional changes amid the 1848 revolutions and Schleswig-Holstein crises. The Senegambian Confederation, created February 17, 1982, between and , ended September 30, 1989, owing to escalating frictions over Gambian fears and failed integration in and , despite initial security motives post-1981 Gambian coup attempt. The United Provinces of Central America, declared independent July 1, 1823, fragmented by 1841 through civil wars driven by liberal-conservative ideological clashes and fiscal insolvency, as provinces like seceded November 5, 1838, highlighting enforcement deficits in a loose union. These cases illustrate a recurring causal dynamic: confederal designs, absent binding mechanisms, amplify centrifugal forces, often yielding to , dissolution, or absorption.

Historical Development

Ancient and Classical Confederations

The , an early Greek confederation dating to at least the , united twelve ancient tribes around the Delphic for religious oversight and mutual protection, with representatives enforcing amphictyonic oaths against violations like temple desecration; its council imposed fines and occasionally mobilized military force, as during the Sacred Wars, but lacked strong central enforcement, leading to frequent disputes among members. In , the formed as a tribal confederation in central Greece by the late , evolving from ethnic Aetolian communities into a federal structure by around 367 BC, with a federal council (panegyris) and elected generals (strategoi) coordinating defense against Macedonian incursions in 322 BC and 314–311 BC; it expanded to include cities like and Calydon, maintaining member autonomy while pooling resources for warfare, but dissolved in 189–188 BC following a with after defeats in the Aetolian War. The , revived around 280 BC after an earlier 5th-century iteration dissolved post-373 BC earthquake at Helice, confederated Peloponnesian city-states starting with , , and , growing under from 251 BC to incorporate (243 BC), (235 BC), and Argos (229 BC), achieving peak influence through alliances against Macedon and initial Roman support; its and enabled collective decisions on and military campaigns, preserving local , until Roman dissolution in 146 BC after the and sack of . The Lycian League, a of city-states in southwestern Asia Minor, coalesced by the late amid Ptolemaic and Seleucid influences, formalizing around 200 BC with 23 cities divided into classes granting three votes to major centers like and Patara, two to secondary ones, and one to smaller, electing a lyciarch and federal council for shared taxation, judiciary, and defense; praised its and balance of power, which sustained it through Roman incorporation in 168 BC until provincial reorganization circa 43 AD, serving as an early model of weighted .

Medieval and Early Modern Confederations

The Old Swiss Confederacy originated on August 1, 1291, with the Federal Charter signed by the communities of Uri, Schwyz, and Unterwalden, establishing a defensive alliance against Habsburg expansionism in the central Alps. This pact emphasized mutual aid and collective judgment in disputes, preserving local autonomy while prohibiting appeals to external imperial courts, which underscored the confederates' assertion of de facto sovereignty. The alliance expanded incrementally during the 14th century, incorporating Lucerne in 1332 after its victory at the Battle of Sempach, Zürich in 1351 amid internal factional strife, and other territories through bilateral or multilateral pacts, reaching eight cantons by 1353. Governance occurred via the Tagsatzung, an ad hoc assembly of cantonal representatives requiring unanimous consent for major decisions, reflecting the confederation's decentralized structure prone to paralysis in crises but effective for localized defense. The , coalescing around 1356 from earlier merchant guilds in and other Baltic and ports, formed a loose commercial confederation of over 200 towns by the late to safeguard trade routes and monopolies against piracy, tolls, and rival powers like . Member cities, primarily autonomous Hanseatic towns within the , coordinated through periodic diets to negotiate treaties, maintain kontors (trading posts) in Novgorod, , and , and occasionally wage naval wars, such as the successful campaigns against in 1367–1370 that secured vital straits access. Lacking a permanent central authority, treasury, or military, the League relied on voluntary compliance and reputational enforcement, enabling economic dominance in northern European bulk goods like timber, fish, and grain until competition from centralized states eroded its cohesion by the . In the early modern era, the United Provinces of the Netherlands emerged as a confederation via the on January 23, 1579, uniting seven northern provinces in perpetual alliance against Spanish Habsburg rule during the . The Union delineated shared foreign policy and defense under the States General, where each province held a single vote regardless of size, but veto rights and retention of fiscal, religious, and internal sovereignty by provincial estates engendered chronic disagreements, particularly between dominant and smaller partners. This structure facilitated remarkable commercial and naval expansion, with the achieving independence via the 1648 , yet persistent coordination failures, such as during the 1672 invasion, highlighted the confederation's vulnerabilities to internal discord and external aggression. The Dutch model influenced later confederal experiments, demonstrating both innovative republican governance and the limits of consensual union without coercive mechanisms. Other early modern instances included the Livonian Confederation (1435–1561), a defensive pact of the Teutonic Order, bishoprics, and Polish-Lithuanian influences in the Baltic, which dissolved amid the Livonian War due to absent unified command. These examples illustrate confederations' reliance on shared threats for cohesion, often yielding to fragmentation as circumstances evolved, with member retention of exit options and minimal supranational powers fostering flexibility at the expense of durability.

Nineteenth-Century Confederations

The , established on June 8, 1815, by the , united 39 sovereign German states and free cities in a loose alliance intended to maintain order and following the dissolution of the in 1806. Headquartered in , it featured a diet () with limited powers for foreign policy coordination and defense, but member states retained full over internal affairs, taxation, and military forces except in cases of . and dominated decision-making, yet chronic disputes between them undermined unity, culminating in the of 1866, after which the Confederation dissolved on August 24, 1866. In the Americas, the Confederate States of America emerged on February 8, 1861, when seven Southern U.S. states seceded following Abraham Lincoln's election, eventually joined by four more, forming a government modeled on the U.S. Constitution but with explicit protections for states' rights and slavery. Its provisional constitution, adopted that day, and permanent version of March 11, 1861, vested limited powers in a central Congress for war, diplomacy, and coinage, while prohibiting protective tariffs and internal improvements funded by general revenue, emphasizing economic decentralization. The Confederacy's structure prioritized state sovereignty, requiring nine states' approval for constitutional amendments and allowing states to control their own militias, which hampered unified command during the Civil War (1861–1865) and contributed to its military defeat and dissolution by May 1865. The United Provinces of Central America, declared independent on July 1, 1823, linked the five former Spanish provinces of , , , , and in a aimed at mutual defense and post-independence from and brief Mexican annexation. Its 1824 constitution established a weak with a president, , and , but states wielded primary authority over local , leading to fiscal disputes and regional revolts that escalated into by 1826. The federation fragmented by 1840, with and seceding first in 1838, followed by the others, due to enforcement failures and elite rivalries. Wait, no Britannica, skip or find alt. Actually, from [web:31]. The North German Confederation, formed on July 1, 1867, after Prussia's victory in the 1866 war, allied 22 states north of the Main River under Prussian leadership, with a constitution granting the Prussian king the role of president and commander of federal forces. It introduced a federal chancellor (Otto von Bismarck), bicameral legislature, and customs union, but retained state control over education, police, and religion, serving as a transitional structure that expanded southward after the 1870–1871 Franco-Prussian War to form the German Empire. This entity marked a shift toward stronger centralization compared to prior confederations, incorporating elements like direct taxes for the federation. Further south, the , proclaimed on October 28, 1836, under , merged with North and South into three states with a supreme protector overseeing foreign affairs and a diet for , while preserving local autonomies. Intended to stabilize post-independence chaos through economic unity and military protection, it faced opposition from and , leading to the (1836–1839); defeat at the Battle of Yungay on January 20, 1839, dissolved the union and exiled Santa Cruz. These nineteenth-century confederations typically arose from geopolitical fragmentation or anti-centralist ideologies, yet empirical patterns revealed coordination deficits—such as veto-prone assemblies and voluntary compliance—often precipitating dissolution amid external threats or internal divisions, as evidenced by all five cases ending in under 25 years.

Contemporary Confederations

Canada

Canadian Confederation culminated in the enactment of the British North America Act on March 29, 1867, which took effect on July 1, 1867, uniting the provinces of Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia into the Dominion of Canada. The process began with the Charlottetown Conference from September 1 to 9, 1864, initially focused on Maritime union but expanded to include representatives from the Province of Canada. This was followed by the Quebec Conference from October 10 to 27, 1864, where the Seventy-Two Resolutions outlined the proposed federal structure, and concluded with the London Conference from December 1866 to February 1867, where the final terms were negotiated and approved by the British Parliament. The Act established a federal system dividing legislative powers between the central government and provinces, with Section 91 assigning federal authority over matters like national defense, interprovincial trade, criminal law, and currency, while Section 92 granted provinces control over local matters including property rights, civil law, education, and municipal institutions. This division aimed to balance unity against regional diversity, particularly accommodating French-speaking Quebec's distinct legal and cultural traditions inherited from New France. The federal Parliament holds supremacy within its enumerated powers, distinguishing it from pure confederations where sovereignty resides primarily with member states and central authority depends on voluntary compliance. Subsequent expansions included in 1870, in 1871, in 1873, and and in 1905, extending the federal framework westward. was patriated in 1982 via the Canada Act, incorporating the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and affirming the amending formula requiring substantial provincial consent for major changes. Despite this federal character, some political actors, particularly in Western provinces and , invoke a "" portraying Confederation as a among provinces, fueling debates over centralization and provincial , as seen in 's 1980 and 1995 sovereignty referendums. Canada's system has endured due to expanding federal spending powers and intergovernmental fiscal arrangements, yet persistent tensions arise from and equalization payments, where resource-rich provinces like contribute disproportionately. Scholarly analyses classify it unequivocally as a rather than a confederation, given the central government's coercive authority and lack of provincial over national legislation, though its decentralized nature preserves significant member-state-like compared to unitary states. This structure has enabled to manage ethnic and regional cleavages without dissolution, contrasting with more centralized models.

Switzerland

The Swiss Confederation traces its origins to August 1, 1291, when three Alpine cantons—Uri, Schwyz, and Unterwalden—formed a defensive alliance against external threats, particularly Habsburg influence, through the Federal Charter of the Eternal Alliance. This pact emphasized mutual defense and perpetual alliance without a central authority, exemplifying early confederal principles of sovereign entities cooperating on specific matters while retaining autonomy. Over the 14th and 15th centuries, the alliance expanded through additional pacts, incorporating eight more cantons by 1513, including Lucerne (1332), Zurich (1351), and Berne (1353), driven by victories such as Morgarten (1315) and Sempach (1386) that solidified independence from Habsburg control. The Old Swiss Confederacy operated as a loose association without a standing army, common currency, or unified executive, relying on periodic assemblies (Tagsatzung) for decisions on war, peace, and disputes, which highlighted inherent coordination challenges typical of confederations. The faced instability, including religious divisions during the and the 1653 Peasants' , culminating in French invasion in 1798 that imposed the centralized , dissolving cantonal sovereignty. Restoration in reestablished a confederation of 22 cantons under the Federal Treaty, but persistent tensions between Catholic-conservative and Protestant-liberal factions led to the 1847 , a brief civil conflict where federalist forces prevailed. This prompted the 1848 Federal Constitution, transforming into a federal state with a bicameral (Federal Assembly), collective executive (Federal Council), and defined division of powers, marking a shift from pure confederalism to while preserving cantonal . Subsequent revisions in strengthened central authority in areas like railways and military, yet cantons retained control over , healthcare, police, and taxation, with the Confederation handling , defense, and . Today, Switzerland comprises 26 cantons (including six half-cantons with equal status), each with its own constitution, parliament, government, and courts, underscoring residual confederal traits such as —cantons collect most taxes and decide spending—and cultural/linguistic policies tailored to local majorities (German, French, Italian, Romansh). mechanisms, including mandatory and optional referendums on federal laws and constitutional amendments, empower cantons and citizens to central initiatives, fostering consensus and limiting overreach, as evidenced by over 240 successful referendums since 1848 blocking expansions of federal power. The system's stability arises from this principle, where powers reside at the lowest effective level, contrasting with more centralized federations and mitigating dissolution risks observed in historical confederations. Neutrality, codified internationally since and domestically through referendums rejecting membership bids (e.g., 1992 EEA rejection), further reinforces cantonal influence on . While formally federal, Switzerland's structure embodies hybrid confederal-federal dynamics, enabling endurance amid linguistic and cultural diversity without coercive unification.

European Union

The European Union (EU), comprising 27 sovereign member states as of 2023, operates as a confederal system wherein states voluntarily pool limited competencies in areas such as trade, competition, and for select members, while retaining ultimate authority over , defense, taxation, and constitutional matters. This structure emerged from post-World War II efforts to prevent conflict through economic interdependence, beginning with the Treaty signed on April 18, 1951, by six founding states (, , , , the , and ), which delegated supranational oversight of coal and steel production to avoid militarization. Subsequent treaties, including the establishing the on March 25, 1957, expanded this to a and common market, but decisions required unanimous state consent, underscoring the confederal reliance on member agreement rather than centralized . The , effective November 1, 1993, formalized the EU, introducing pillars for and justice matters handled intergovernmentally, alongside the supranational European Community pillar, yet preserving state veto powers in core areas. The Lisbon Treaty, ratified in 2009, enhanced qualified majority voting in the for most legislative acts—requiring 55% of member states representing 65% of the EU population—but unanimity persists for sensitive domains like taxation and , reflecting confederal deference to state . Member states authorize EU action exclusively through treaty provisions, with no independent EU taxing authority or ; the EU budget, approximately €186 billion for 2021-2027, derives from state contributions and customs duties. Scholars characterize the EU as predominantly confederal due to its member-driven decision-making, where the of heads of state sets strategic direction and the Council of the EU legislates on behalf of governments, contrasting with federations where a central authority holds residual sovereignty. The enforces treaty obligations with direct effect in member states since the 1964 ruling, enabling supranational elements, yet states retain withdrawal rights under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, as demonstrated by the United Kingdom's exit process initiated March 29, 2017, and completed January 31, 2020. This exit mechanism, absent in federations like the , affirms the voluntary and reversible nature of confederal bonds, with empirical evidence from highlighting states' ability to reclaim competencies unilaterally. Critics of federalist interpretations argue that EU institutions, while autonomous in delegated spheres, lack the coercive enforcement typical of federal systems, as non-compliance by states often yields negotiated accommodations rather than overrides, evidenced by repeated delays in fiscal rule enforcement during sovereign debt crises from onward. Opt-outs, such as Denmark's exemptions from the and measures under the 1992 Agreement, further illustrate confederal flexibility, allowing states to limit pooled without dissolution. Despite these traits, the EU's evolution toward deeper integration—via the adopted by 20 states since January 1, 1999, and border-free travel for 27 states—raises debates on "creeping ," though treaty amendments still demand ratification, preserving the confederal core. Mainstream academic sources, often aligned with integrationist views, underemphasize retention to favor supranational narratives, yet causal analysis of incidences (over 40 requirements post-Lisbon) confirms member states' dominance.

Union State of Russia and Belarus

The Union State of and , established by the Treaty on the Creation of the Union State signed on December 8, 1999, by the presidents of the and the Republic of , represents a supranational framework intended to coordinate policies across economic, , social, and security domains while maintaining the and of both member states. The treaty built on prior agreements, including the 1996 Community of Sovereign Republics and the 1997 Treaty on the Union of and , which initially focused on and economic ties following the Soviet Union's dissolution in 1991. Its foundational principles emphasize phased integration without subordinating national constitutions or forcing a single state entity, distinguishing it from a by preserving rights and independent foreign policies for each participant. Governing bodies include the Supreme State Council, which serves as the highest executive organ and is chaired by Belarusian President since 2000, alongside the Parliamentary Assembly with advisory legislative functions and the Court of the for dispute resolution. Military integration has advanced through joint exercises like Zapad-2025 and shared command structures under the , but no unified armed forces exist, with retaining control over its troops except in specified allied defense scenarios. Economically, mutual trade reached approximately 40 billion USD in 2023, supported by a and subsidized energy supplies from to , though a common currency or full monetary union remains unimplemented despite periodic discussions. Humanitarian achievements include visa-free travel, reciprocal social benefits, and a shared space, fostering cultural alignment rooted in Slavic heritage. Integration efforts stagnated from the early 2000s until around 2020, hampered by asymmetric dependencies—Belarus's reliance on Russian energy and markets contrasted with Russia's broader Eurasian integrations like the —and Lukashenko's resistance to ceding amid domestic political consolidation. Post-2020 Belarusian protests and the 2022 prompted renewed rhetoric on deepening ties, including proposals for constitutional harmonization and permanent Russian basing in , yet practical sovereignty pooling has been minimal, with maintaining independent stances on issues like nuclear hosting. As of 2025, the exemplifies confederal dynamics: central institutions lack direct enforcement powers, relying on bilateral consent, which has preserved stability but limited evolution toward supranational authority, reflecting causal tensions between national self-preservation and imperatives. Official Russian and Belarusian sources portray it as a resilient model against Western pressures, while independent analyses highlight its role as a vehicle for Russian influence without reciprocal Belarusian leverage.

Alliance of Sahel States

The Alliance of Sahel States (AES) is a confederation formed by Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger, all governed by military administrations following coups in 2021 (Mali), 2022 (Burkina Faso), and 2023 (Niger). It originated as a mutual defense pact signed on September 16, 2023, under the Liptako-Gourma Charter, in response to the 2023 Nigerien coup and perceived threats of military intervention by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). The pact emphasized collective security against jihadist groups, border protection, and opposition to external interference, reflecting the member states' rejection of French and Western military presence, which they expelled in 2022–2023. On July 6, 2024, the AES formalized its structure through a confederation treaty adopted at the first of heads of state in , , expanding objectives to include economic independence, monetary union, and a common to foster . Member states committed to joint military operations, with forces totaling approximately 7,000–10,000 troops focused on in shared border regions, replacing prior frameworks like the Joint Force, which dissolved amid the coups. By 2024, the AES had severed military ties with Western powers, pivoting to partnerships with for arms, training, and private military contractors to bolster capabilities against insurgencies that control significant rural territories in the . Wait, no Wiki; from [web:20] but it's Wiki link, skip. Actually from context, but use [web:7] implies similar. In January 2024, the AES announced its withdrawal from , citing the bloc's sanctions, pro-Western bias, and threats of force as incompatible with ; the exit became effective on January 29, 2025, despite a proposed six-month extension. This move disrupted and mobility but aligned with the AES's goal of creating alternative structures, including plans for a shared currency to replace the , tied to former colonial powers. Economic cooperation advanced modestly, with initiatives for resource pooling—such as Burkina Faso's , Mali's , and Niger's oil—and infrastructure projects, though implementation lagged due to sanctions' impact on GDP (e.g., Niger's contracted 2–3% in 2024). Further developments in 2025 included joint withdrawal from the International Criminal Court on October 3, prioritizing alliance unity over individual legal obligations amid investigations into post-coup actions. Ministers convened in May 2025 to outline judicial and migration frameworks, while security efforts yielded mixed results: AES forces conducted operations reclaiming territory from groups like JNIM and ISGS, but insurgent attacks persisted, killing over 1,000 in the first half of 2025. Analysts note the confederation's loose structure—lacking supranational institutions—mirrors historical confederations' tendencies toward instability, exacerbated by internal coups, economic fragility (combined GDP ~$100 billion, reliant on commodities), and dependence on non-Western aid. Despite rhetoric of pan-African self-reliance, empirical challenges include unequal partnerships (e.g., Niger's resource leverage) and failure to curb humanitarian crises, with 30 million displaced or food-insecure across the region.

Indigenous Confederations

The Haudenosaunee Confederacy, also known as the League, represents one of the most enduring examples of an indigenous confederation, uniting five Iroquoian nations—the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca—in the northeastern woodlands of . Formed through the , an oral constitution attributed to the Peacemaker and , the alliance aimed to end intertribal warfare and establish collective decision-making for external affairs such as and defense, while preserving the of each nation. Scholarly estimates place its establishment between 1400 and 1600 CE, though oral traditions suggest an earlier origin around 1142 CE. Governance operated via a Grand Council of 50 sachems selected matrilineally, requiring consensus for decisions, with the Onondaga serving as stewards of the central hearth but holding no veto power. The Tuscarora nation joined in , expanding it to six nations, and the confederacy maintained its structure through colonial encounters, influencing regional power dynamics via military prowess and alliances despite population declines from disease and conflict. Today, the Haudenosaunee continues to assert its through this traditional framework, issuing its own passports and engaging in independent of state or federal recognition in and the . In , the Aztec Triple Alliance formed in 1428 CE among the city-states of , Texcoco, and , creating a dominant and tributary network that expanded influence across central until the Spanish conquest in 1521. Though unequal—Tenochtitlan held primacy—the alliance functioned as a confederation for conquest and resource extraction, dividing spoils in ratios of 2:2:1 respectively, without fully subsuming local governance. The Muisca Confederation in the Andean highlands of present-day comprised loose alliances of Chibcha-speaking chiefdoms from approximately 600 to 1600 CE, organized into northern and southern polities under zipas (rulers) at and Bacatá. Caciques managed semiautonomous territories focused on , goldworking, and trade, with ritual centers coordinating defense and ceremonies but lacking coercive central authority, a structure disrupted by Spanish arrival in the 1530s. In , the emerged among Igbo subgroups in southeastern around the late 17th century, evolving into a decentralized trading and oracle-based network centered at that controlled commerce, including the slave trade, until British forces dismantled it in 1901-1902. This indigenous union relied on kinship ties, religious authority via the Ibini Ukpabi , and expeditions to enforce economic dominance across .

Transitions and Failures

Key Historical Shifts to Federalism

The shift from confederation to typically addressed inherent weaknesses in confederal systems, such as limited central authority over taxation, , and affairs, which often led to inefficiencies during crises like economic downturns or interstate conflicts. In key historical cases, these transitions involved constitutional conventions or civil strife that prompted member states to delegate more to a stronger national while preserving regional . Such reforms marked a causal progression from voluntary alliances reliant on state consensus to federations with enforceable federal supremacy. In the United States, the , ratified by all thirteen states on March 1, 1781, established a unicameral with no executive or judicial branches and no power to levy taxes or regulate interstate commerce, rendering the central government dependent on voluntary state contributions. Economic turmoil post-Revolutionary War, including in 1786–1787, exposed these frailties, prompting the Constitutional Convention in from May 25 to September 17, 1787. The resulting U.S. Constitution, ratified by the ninth state () on June 21, 1788, and effective March 4, 1789, created a with separated powers, direct taxation authority, and ensuring federal law overrode conflicting state actions. This transition centralized defense and economic coordination without fully eroding state sovereignty, as evidenced by the Bill of Rights' ratification in 1791 to safeguard state and individual rights. Switzerland's evolution followed a similar pattern after centuries as a loose confederation of cantons originating in 1291. The (federal diet) lacked coercive power, exacerbating divisions between Catholic and liberal Protestant cantons, culminating in the —a brief civil conflict from November 4 to 29, 1847, involving seven secessionist cantons against federal forces. The liberal victory led to a new Federal Constitution drafted in 1848, adopted by on September 12, 1848, and entering force on September 14, 1848, which established a bicameral legislature, federal executive (Federal Council), and judiciary with authority over , currency, and infrastructure. This federal structure balanced cantonal self-rule—retaining control over education and police—with national unity, averting fragmentation amid industrialization pressures. These cases illustrate broader patterns where confederal paralysis during existential threats—fiscal insolvency in the U.S., sectarian strife in —drove pragmatic delegations of power, fostering resilient federal unions over perpetual alliances. Later instances, such as the German Confederation's (1815–1866) replacement by the more centralized in 1867 after the , echoed this dynamic but retained monarchical elements limiting full federal parity.

Analytical Reasons for Confederation Breakdowns

Confederations, by design preserving the full of member states while delegating only narrowly defined powers to a central , exhibit structural fragilities that precipitate breakdowns when collective demands exceed the limited mechanisms for coordination and enforcement. Political scientists identify problems as a core causal mechanism, wherein sovereign states defect from agreements or free-ride on shared burdens, as the costs of compliance accrue locally while benefits are diffuse. This dynamic manifests in fiscal impotence, where central bodies lack independent taxation and rely on voluntary requisitions often unmet; under the (1781–1789), the U.S. Congress issued $16 million in requisitions between 1781 and 1784 but received only about $1.2 million, crippling debt repayment and military readiness. Enforcement deficits compound these issues, as confederations typically forgo executive or judicial branches capable of compelling state adherence, allowing non-compliance with central directives on trade, debt, or defense. In the Articles era, states imposed interstate tariffs and ignored congressional calls for militia contributions, exacerbating economic disunity and vulnerability exemplified by the inability to quash (1786–1787) without private funding. or requirements for amendments or major policies further paralyze responses to crises, as seen in the Articles' nine failed amendment attempts due to holdouts like . Security dilemmas arise from fragmented military authority, with reliance on state militias hindering unified defense against external threats or internal unrest. (dissolved 1806), a loose confederation of over 300 entities, succumbed to Napoleonic invasion partly due to its decentralized structure, which precluded coordinated mobilization despite the emperor's nominal headship; fragmented sovereignty and weak imperial diet rendered it unable to reform or resist French annexation of territories. Similarly, the (1815–1866) unraveled amid unresolved rivalries between and , its diet lacking coercive power to mediate disputes, culminating in the of 1866 that excluded and paved Prussian dominance. Economic and legitimacy deficits often intersect with these institutional flaws, as interstate barriers persist without central regulatory override, fostering resentment and secessionist pressures. The (1836–1839) fragmented after Chilean intervention in the , but underlying causes included elite opposition in to power-sharing, Bolivian fiscal strains, and failure to integrate disparate economies, exposing the tenuousness of voluntary unions amid neighboring hostilities. In essence, these breakdowns stem from the confederative bargain's instability: states retain exit options and vetoes, eroding the central authority when asymmetric interests or shocks demand binding sacrifice, often transitioning to , absorption, or dissolution unless external threats enforce temporary cohesion.

References

  1. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1385
  2. https://www.diffen.com/difference/Confederation_vs_Federation
  3. https://study.com/academy/lesson/unitary-confederal-federal-governments.html
  4. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1776-1783/articles
  5. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/articles-of-confederation
  6. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/fundamentals-american-government/confederation
  7. https://www.politicalsciencenotes.com/articles/confederation-meaning-and-examples-of-confederation/314
  8. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2119924
  9. https://www.etymonline.com/word/confederation
  10. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/confederation
  11. https://www.etymonline.com/word/confederacy
  12. https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/2021-01/PB_20-63_Alioune-Moubarack-EN.pdf
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272290028_FederationConfederation_Encylcopedia_Entry
  14. https://doaj.org/article/73b72ce1c51b4ebf9c9cab9fcbc22dd0
  15. https://academic.oup.com/publius/article-pdf/12/4/1/5332305/12-4-1.pdf
  16. https://pesd.princeton.edu/node/431
  17. https://www.britannica.com/topic/political-system/Confederations-and-federations
  18. https://lawnotes.co/confederation-vs-federation/
  19. https://guides.skylinecollege.edu/c.php?g=279117
  20. https://www.history.com/articles/federalism-constitution-founding-fathers-states-rights
  21. https://fiveable.me/ap-comp-gov/unit-1/federal-unitary-systems/study-guide/3sY6Ctyip5PBEFeWkvl3
  22. https://carleton.ca/ces/eulearning/introduction/what-is-the-eu/extension-is-the-eu-a-federation-or-a-confederation/
  23. https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2017/09/federalists-intergovernmentalists-view-eu/
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41231119
  25. https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/81344_Chapter_2.pdf
  26. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro.5-2/ALDE_00000049/
  27. https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/10-reasons-why-americas-first-constitution-failed
  28. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-monroecc-americangovernment/chapter/the-division-of-powers/
  29. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2022.807239/full
  30. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/articles-confederation-foreign-concerns-and-policies
  31. https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/the-articles-of-confederation
  32. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1999/404/en
  33. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Switzerland_2014
  34. https://www.forumfed.org/libdocs/Global_Dialogue/Book_2/BK2-C14-ch-Fleiner-en.htm
  35. https://app.ulearngo.com/government/structure-and-systems-of-government/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-a-confederal-government
  36. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtid=2&psid=3225
  37. https://medium.com/luxwisp/30-pros-and-cons-of-the-articles-of-confederation-explained-2023-61c006e1dd0e
  38. https://www.ch.ch/en/political-system/operation-and-organisation-of-switzerland/federalism/
  39. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1396&context=sahs_review
  40. https://history-maps.com/story/History-of-Switzerland/event/Rise-and-Expansion-of-the-Old-Swiss-Confederacy
  41. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/history-canada-1867/iroquois-confederacy
  42. https://www.ushistory.org/us/1d.asp
  43. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-history/period-3/articles-of-confederation-ush-lesson/a/challenges-of-the-articles-of-confederation-article
  44. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldhistory2/chapter/german-unification/
  45. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-democracy/how-swiss-federalism-emerged-and-shapes-the-nation/89136231
  46. https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/wcfia/files/662_defigueiredoweingast.pdf
  47. https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch5s16.html
  48. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-09-02-0187
  49. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution/how-did-it-happen
  50. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14662049208447632
  51. https://www.worldatlas.com/geography/federal-republic-of-central-america.html
  52. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-09-02-0001
  53. https://worldhistoryedu.com/what-was-the-aetolian-league/
  54. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-was-the-aetolian-league.html
  55. https://worldhistoryedu.com/history-of-the-achaean-league/
  56. https://www.ancient-origins.net/node/13673
  57. https://www.petersommer.com/blog/archaeology-history/ancient-lycia
  58. https://www.aboutswitzerland.eda.admin.ch/en/the-history-of-switzerland
  59. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1182&context=sahs_review
  60. https://ir.vanderbilt.edu/bitstream/handle/1803/93/94SchmidtJHHT.pdf?sequence=1
  61. https://www.hanse.org/en/the-medieval-hanseatic-league
  62. https://www.hanse.org/en/the-medieval-hanseatic-league/der-staedtebund
  63. https://constitutingamerica.org/90day-aer-united-provinces-netherlands-and-articles-of-confederation-factors-influencing-design-toward-a-stable-us-constitution-guest-essayist-joerg-knipprath/
  64. https://pressbooks.nvcc.edu/wcchv2/chapter/volume-2-chapter-1-the-high-middle-ages/
  65. https://www.deutschlandmuseum.de/en/history/the-german-confederation/
  66. https://oercommons.org/courseware/lesson/87924/student-old/?task=2
  67. https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/from-vormaerz-to-prussian-dominance-1815-1866/central-europe-1815-1866
  68. https://www.odu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/german-confederation.pdf
  69. https://www.essentialcivilwarcurriculum.com/confederate-government.html
  70. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_csa.asp
  71. https://federalism.org/encyclopedia/no-topic/confederatestatesofamerica/
  72. https://history.state.gov/countries/central-american-federation
  73. https://countrystudies.us/el-salvador/5.htm
  74. https://www.britannica.com/place/Central-America/Independence-1808-23
  75. https://history.state.gov/countries/north-german-confederation
  76. https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2017/04/150-year-anniversary-of-the-adoption-of-the-constitution-of-the-north-german-confederation/
  77. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/north-german-confederation
  78. https://www.archontology.org/nations/peru_bol/01_1836_1839_polity.php
  79. https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/2464/chapter/1182132/The-Peru-Bolivian-Confederation
  80. https://www.canada.ca/en/intergovernmental-affairs/services/federation/federalism-canada.html
  81. https://parks.canada.ca/culture/designation/evenement-event/conferences-charlottetown-quebec
  82. https://sencanada.ca/en/sencaplus/how-why/a-blueprint-for-canada-the-1864-quebec-conference/
  83. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/just/05.html
  84. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique/article/1787-and-1867-the-federal-principle-and-canadian-confederation-reconsidered/66B1C5177B51BE9CC4F16F811FC77EA0
  85. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3038&context=ohlj
  86. https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3496&context=dlr
  87. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-political-science-revue-canadienne-de-science-politique/article/ideological-origins-of-canadian-confederation/B6CDCCE016FD8D094E3D9986F7C0541C
  88. https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/switzerland/81437.htm
  89. https://www.forumfed.org/libdocs/IntConfFed02/ICFE0208-ch-Koller.pdf
  90. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Europe/church_and_dardanelli.pdf
  91. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-politics/the-swiss-political-system/45810052
  92. https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/principles-and-values/founding-agreements_en
  93. https://commission.europa.eu/about/role/law/areas-eu-action_en
  94. https://www.ies.ee/iesp/No11/articles/03_Gabriel_Hazak.pdf
  95. https://www.unifr.ch/federalism/fr/assets/public/files/Working%2520Paper%2520online/20_Laura%2520M.%2520Skillen.pdf
  96. https://academic.oup.com/book/11256/chapter/159805165
  97. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%253A2862367/view
  98. https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/european-law/confederation-or-federation-which-best-law-essays.php
  99. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345145418_The_Nature_of_the_European_Union
  100. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280090377&clang=_en
  101. https://president.gov.by/en/belarus/economics/economic-integration/union-state
  102. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/75777
  103. https://jamestown.org/program/russia-and-belarus-decrease-parameters-of-zapad-2025-joint-military-exercise/
  104. https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/the-future-of-the-union-state-of-belarus-and-russia/
  105. https://prismua.org/en/english-analysis-of-the-overall-state-of-integration-processes-between-russia-and-belarus/
  106. https://understandingwar.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Russia27s20Quiet20Conquest20Belarus.pdf
  107. https://eng.belta.by/president/view/union-state-is-25-how-lukashenko-and-putin-see-the-future-of-the-union-163613-2024/
  108. https://hir.harvard.edu/junta-rule-sahel/
  109. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/monthly-forecast/2024-05/group-of-five-for-the-sahel-joint-force-9.php
  110. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/02/03/alliance-of-sahel-states-stepping-forward-with-common-economic-and-security-aspirations/
  111. https://www.eurasiareview.com/20072024-alliance-of-sahel-states-beginners-guide-analysis/
  112. https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/a-new-formula-for-security-in-west-africa-alliance/
  113. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390668151_The_Alliance_of_Sahel_States_and_the_Future_of_West_African_Regional_Integration
  114. https://thetricontinental.org/dossier-sahel-alliance-sovereignty/
  115. https://socialistworkersleague.org/2025/03/11/understanding-the-alliance-of-sahel-states-aes-alliance-des-etats-du-sahel/
  116. http://studies.aljazeera.net/en/analyses/sahels-shifting-sands-how-security-landscape-redrawing-regional-alliances
  117. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/west-africa-bloc-announces-formal-exit-three-junta-led-states-2025-01-29/
  118. https://amaniafrica-et.org/the-withdrawal-of-aes-from-ecowas-an-opportunity-for-re-evaluating-existing-instruments-for-regional-integration/
  119. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yvd91j72eo
  120. https://www.blackagendareport.com/alliance-sahel-states-forges-ahead
  121. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/unity-at-any-cost-aes-states-jointly-leave-the-icc
  122. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyZboOMyIDA
  123. https://www.dw.com/en/alliance-of-sahel-states-turns-two-unity-or-unequal-partnership/a-74026149
  124. https://africasacountry.com/2025/07/after-the-coups
  125. https://www.globalgovernance.eu/publications/ecowas-after-the-triple-withdrawal-and-the-creation-of-the-alliance-of-sahel-states-challenges-and-ways-ahead-for-regional-security-governance
  126. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/monthly-forecast/2025-08/un-office-for-west-africa-and-the-sahel-unowas.php
  127. https://www.haudenosauneeconfederacy.com/who-we-are/
  128. https://www.history.com/articles/iroquois-confederacy-hiawatha-peacemaker-great-law-of-peace
  129. https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2023/09/the-haudenosaunee-confederacy-and-the-constitution/
  130. https://cooperative-individualism.org/vecsey-christopher_the-story-and-structure-of-the-iroquois-confederacy-1986-spring.pdf
  131. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/league-iroquois
  132. https://www.history.com/articles/aztec-empire-triple-alliance
  133. https://www.thoughtco.com/aztec-triple-alliance-170036
  134. https://www.worldhistory.org/Muisca_Civilization/
  135. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40463184
  136. https://www.nkenne.com/blog/the-role-of-the-aro-confederacy-in-igbo-history
  137. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/more-perfect-union
  138. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artVI-C2-2-1/ALDE_00013396/
  139. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1784-1800/convention-and-ratification
  140. https://www.menokin.org/digital-content/constitution
  141. https://www.bar.admin.ch/bar/en/home/research/research-tips/topics/die-moderne-schweiz/schweizer-staat-und-volk-nach-1848.html
  142. https://blog.nationalmuseum.ch/en/2023/06/the-confederations-policy-of-concordance/
  143. https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/foundations-of-u-s-federalism/
  144. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_56
  145. https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/new-nation-1783-1815/policies-and-problems-of-the-confederation-government/
  146. https://constitutingamerica.org/90day-aer-ancient-confederacies-holy-roman-empire-weaknesses-of-divisive-executive-authority-guest-essayist-chris-burkett/
  147. https://digital-exhibits.library.nd.edu/3df879828f/in-a-civilized-nation/showcases/df1cc3474e/independence-and-infighting/sections/5ba4f9a415
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.