Hubbry Logo
search
logo
Fluxus
Fluxus
current hub
2299032

Fluxus

logo
Community Hub0 Subscribers
Read side by side
from Wikipedia

Fluxus Manifesto, 1963, by George Maciunas
Poster to Festum Fluxorum Fluxus 1963.

Fluxus was an international, interdisciplinary community of artists, composers, designers, and poets during the 1960s and 1970s who, inspired by John Cage, engaged in experimental art performances which emphasized the artistic tradition of chance-based process over the finished product.[1][2] Fluxus is known for experimental contributions to different artistic media and disciplines and for generating new art forms. These art forms include intermedia, a term coined by Fluxus artist Dick Higgins;[3][4][5][6] conceptual art, first developed by Henry Flynt,[7][8] an artist contentiously associated with Fluxus; and video art, first pioneered by Nam June Paik and Wolf Vostell.[9][10][11] Dutch gallerist and art critic Harry Ruhé describes Fluxus as "the most radical and experimental art movement of the sixties".[12][13]

They produced performance "events", which included enactments of scores, "Neo-Dada" noise music, and time-based works, as well as concrete poetry, visual art, urban planning, architecture, design, literature, and publishing. Many Fluxus artists share anti-commercial and anti-art sensibilities. Fluxus is sometimes described as "intermedia". The ideas and practices of composer John Cage heavily influenced Fluxus, especially his notions that one should embark on an artwork without a conception of its end, and his understanding of the work as a site of interaction between artist and audience. The process of creating was privileged over the finished product.[14] Another notable influence were the readymades of Marcel Duchamp, a French artist who was active in Dada (1916 – c. 1922). George Maciunas, largely considered to be the founder of this fluid movement, coined the name Fluxus in 1961 to title a proposed magazine.[15]

Many artists of the 1960s took part in Fluxus activities, including Joseph Beuys, Willem de Ridder, George Brecht, John Cage, Robert Filliou, Al Hansen, Dick Higgins, Bengt af Klintberg, Alison Knowles, Addi Køpcke, Yoko Ono, Nam June Paik, Shigeko Kubota, La Monte Young, Mary Bauermeister, Joseph Byrd, Ben Patterson, Daniel Spoerri, Eric Andersen, Ken Friedman, Terry Riley and Wolf Vostell. Not only were they a diverse community of collaborators who influenced each other, they were also, largely, friends. They collectively had what were, at the time, radical ideas about art and the role of art in society.[16] Fluxus founder George Maciunas proposed a well known manifesto, but few considered Fluxus to be a true movement,[17][18] and therefore the manifesto was not largely adopted. Instead, a series of festivals in Wiesbaden, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Amsterdam, London, and New York, gave rise to a loose but robust community with many similar beliefs. In keeping with the reputation Fluxus earned as a forum of experimentation,[12] some Fluxus artists came to describe Fluxus as a laboratory.[19][20]

Early history: late 50s to 1965

[edit]

Origins

[edit]
Flux Year Box 2, c. 1967, a Flux box edited and produced by George Maciunas, containing works by many early Fluxus artists

The origins of Fluxus lie in many of the concepts explored by composer John Cage in his experimental music of the 1930s through the 1960s. After attending courses on Zen Buddhism taught by D. T. Suzuki, Cage taught a series of classes in experimental composition from 1957 to 1959 at the New School for Social Research in New York City. These classes explored the notions of chance and indeterminacy in art, using music scores as a basis for compositions that could be performed in potentially infinite ways. Some of the artists and musicians who became involved in Fluxus, including Jackson Mac Low, La Monte Young, George Brecht, Al Hansen, and Dick Higgins attended Cage's classes.[21][22] A major influence is found in the work of Marcel Duchamp.[23] Also of importance was Dada Poets and Painters, edited by Robert Motherwell, a book of translations of Dada texts that was widely read by members of Fluxus.[24] The term anti-art, a precursor to Dada, was coined by Duchamp around 1913, when he created his first readymades from found objects (ordinary objects found or purchased and declared art).[25] Indifferently chosen, readymades and altered readymades challenged the notion of art as an inherently optical experience, dependent on academic art skills. The most famous example is Duchamp's altered readymade Fountain (1917), a work which he signed "R. Mutt." While taking refuge from WWI in New York, in 1915 Duchamp formed a Dada group with Francis Picabia and American artist Man Ray. Other key members included Arthur Cravan, Florine Stettheimer, and the Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven, credited by some with proposing the idea for Fountain to Duchamp.[26] By 1916 these artists, especially Duchamp, Man Ray, and Picabia, became the center for radical anti-art activities in New York City. Their artworks would inform Fluxus and conceptual art in general.[23] In the late 1950s and very early 1960s, Fluxus and contemporaneous groups or movements, including Happenings, Nouveau réalisme, mail art, and action art in Japan, Austria, and other international locations were, often placed under the rubric of Neo-Dada".[27]

A number of other contemporary events are credited as either anticipating Fluxus or as constituting proto-Fluxus events.[23] The most commonly cited include the series of Chambers Street loft concerts, in New York, curated by Yoko Ono and La Monte Young in 1961, featuring pieces by Ono, Jackson Mac Low, Joseph Byrd, and Henry Flynt;[28] the month-long Yam festival held in upstate New York by George Brecht and Robert Watts in May 1963 with Ray Johnson and Allan Kaprow (the culmination of a year's worth of Mail Art pieces);[23] and a series of concerts held in Mary Bauermeister's studio, Cologne, 1960–61, featuring Nam June Paik and John Cage among many others. It was at one of these events in 1960, during his Etude pour Piano, that Paik leapt into the audience and cut John Cage's tie off, ran out of the concert hall, and then phoned the hall's organisers to announce the piece had ended.[29] As one of the movement's founders, Dick Higgins, stated:

Fluxus started with the work, and then came together, applying the name Fluxus to work which already existed. It was as if it started in the middle of the situation, rather than at the beginning.[30][31]

Neo-Dada Anthology of Chance Operations to Early Fluxus

[edit]

In 1961 the American musician/artist La Monte Young had been enlisted to guest-edit an East Coast issue of the Wast Coast literary journal Beatitude to be called Beatitude East. But as the Beatitude connection was prematurly terminated, George Maciunas, a trained graphic designer, asked Young if he could layout and help publish the Neo-Dada material.[32] Maciunas supplied the paper, design, and some money for publishing the anthology which contained the work of New York avant-garde artists from that time. The project took the title of An Anthology of Chance Operations from its full title An Anthology of chance operations concept art anti-art indeterminacy improvisation meaningless work natural disasters plans of action stories diagrams Music poetry essays dance constructions mathematics compositions. An Anthology of Chance Operations was completed and published in 1963 by Jackson Mac Low and La Monte Young, as Maciunas had by then moved to Germany to escape his creditors.[33] After opening a short-lived art gallery on Madison Avenue, which showed work by Dick Higgins, Yoko Ono, Jonas Mekas, Ray Johnson, Henry Flynt and La Monte Young, Maciunas moved to Wiesbaden, West Germany, having taken a job as a graphic designer with the US Air Force in late 1961[34] after the gallery had gone bust. From Wiesbaden, Maciunas continued his contact with Young and other New York City-based artists and with expatriate American artists like Benjamin Patterson and Emmett Williams, whom he met in Europe. By September 1962, Maciunas was joined by Dick Higgins and Alison Knowles who traveled to Europe to help him promote a second planned publication to be called Fluxus, the first of a series of yearbooks of artists' works. Maciunas had first come up with the title Fluxus for a never done anthology of New York's Lithuanian artists, but instead applied the term to artists working in the Anthology of Chance Operations vein.[35] Because after fleeing Lithuania at the end of World War II, his family settled in New York, where he first met the group of avant-garde artists and musicians centered around John Cage and La Monte Young. Thus Maciunas coined the name Fluxus not for his perceived group of Lithuanian artists but for the Neo-Dada art being produced by a range of artists with a shared sensibility as an attempt to "fuse... cultural, social, & political revolutionaries into [a] united front and action".[36]

Maciunas first publicly coined the term Fluxus (meaning 'to flow') in a 'brochure prospectus' that he distributed to the audience at a festival he had organized, called Après Cage; Kleinen Sommerfest (After Cage; a Small Summer Festival), in Wuppertal, West Germany, 9 June 1962.[37]

Maciunas was an avid art historian, and initially referred to Fluxus as 'neo-dadaism' or 'renewed dadaism'.[38] He wrote a number of letters to Raoul Hausmann, an original dadaist, outlining his ideas. Hausmann discouraged the use of the term;

I note with much pleasure what you said about German neodadaists—but I think even the Americans should not use the term "neodadaism" because neo means nothing and -ism is old-fashioned. Why not simply "Fluxus"? It seems to me much better, because it's new, and dada is historic.[39]

As part of the festival, Maciunas wrote a lecture entitled 'Neo-Dada in the United States'.[40] After an attempt to define 'Concretist Neo-Dada' art, he explained that Fluxus was opposed to the exclusion of the everyday from art. Using 'anti-art and artistic banalities', Fluxus would fight the 'traditional artificialities of art'.[41] The lecture ended with the declaration "Anti-art is life, is nature, is true reality—it is one and all."[41]

European festivals and the Fluxkits

[edit]
Piano Activities, by Philip Corner, as performed in Wiesbaden, 1962, by (l–r) Emmett Williams, Wolf Vostell, Nam June Paik, Dick Higgins, Benjamin Patterson and George Maciunas

In 1962, Maciunas, Higgins and Knowles traveled to Europe to promote the planned Fluxus publication with concerts of antique musical instruments. With the help of a group of artists including Joseph Beuys and Wolf Vostell, Maciunas eventually organised a series of Fluxfests across Western Europe. Starting with 14 concerts between 1 and 23 September 1962, at Wiesbaden, these Fluxfests presented work by musicians such as John Cage, Ligeti, Penderecki, Terry Riley and Brion Gysin alongside performance pieces written by Higgins, Knowles, George Brecht and Nam June Paik, Ben Patterson, Robert Filliou, and Emmett Williams, amongst many others. One performance in particular, Piano Activities by Philip Corner, became notorious by challenging the important status of the piano in post-war German homes.

The score—which asks for any number of performers to, among other things, "play", "pluck or tap", "scratch or rub", "drop objects" on, "act on strings with", "strike soundboard, pins, lid or drag various kinds of objects across them" and "act in any way on underside of piano"[42]—resulted in the total destruction of a piano when performed by Maciunas, Higgins and others at Wiesbaden. The performance was considered scandalous enough to be shown on German television four times, with the introduction "The lunatics have escaped!"[43]

At the end we did Corner's Piano Activities not according to his instructions since we systematically destroyed a piano which I bought for $5 and had to have it all cut up to throw it away, otherwise we would have had to pay movers, a very practical composition, but German sentiments about this "instrument of Chopin" were hurt and they made a row about it...[44]

At the same time, Maciunas used his connections at work to start printing cheap mass-produced books and multiples by some of the artists that were involved in the performances. The first three to be printed were Composition 1961 by La Monte Young (see it here, An Anthology of Chance Operations edited by Young and Mac Low and Water Yam, by George Brecht. Water Yam, a series of event scores printed on small sheets of card and collected together in a cardboard box, was the first in a series of artworks that Maciunas printed that became known as Fluxkits. Cheap, mass-produced and easily distributed, Fluxkits were originally intended to form an ever-expanding library of modern performance art. Water Yam was published in an edition of 1000 and originally cost $4.[45] By April 1964, almost a year later, Maciunas still had 996 copies unsold.[46]

Maciunas' original plan had been to design, edit and pay for each edition himself, in exchange for the copyright to be held by the collective.[47][48] Profits were to be split 80/20 at first, in favor of the artist.[49] Since most of the composers already had publishing deals, Fluxus quickly moved away from music toward performance and visual art. John Cage, for instance, never published work under the Fluxus moniker due to his contract with the music publishers Edition Peters.[50]

Maciunas seemed to have a fantastic ability to get things done.... if you had things to be printed he could get them printed. It's pretty hard in East Brunswick to get good offset printing. It's not impossible, but it's not so easy, and since I'm very lazy it was a relief to find somebody who could take the burden off my hands. So there was this guy Maciunas, a Lithuanian or Bulgarian, or somehow a refugee or whatever—beautifully dressed—"astonishing looking" would be a better adjective. He was somehow able to carry the whole thing off, without my having to go 57 miles to find a printer.[51]

Since Maciunas was colorblind, Fluxus multiples were almost always black and white.[52]

New York and the FluxShops

[edit]
Willem de Ridder's Mail Order FluxShop, Amsterdam, with Dorothea Meijer, winter 1964–65

After his contract with the US Air Force was terminated due to ill health, Maciunas was forced to return to the US on 3 September 1963.[53] Once back in New York, he set about organizing a series of street concerts and opened a new shop, the 'Fluxhall', on Canal Street. 12 concerts, "away from the beaten track of the New York art scene",[54] took place on Canal Street, 11 April to 23 May 1964. With photographs taken by Maciunas himself, pieces by Ben Vautier, Alison Knowles and Takehisa Kosugi were performed in the street for free, although in practice there was 'no audience to speak of'[54] anyway.

The people in Fluxus had understood, as Brecht explained, that "concert halls, theaters, and art galleries" were "mummifying". Instead, these artists found themselves "preferring streets, homes, and railway stations...." Maciunas recognized a radical political potential in all this forthrightly anti-institutional production, which was an important source for his own deep commitment to it. Deploying his expertise as a professional graphic designer, Maciunas played an important role in projecting upon Fluxus whatever coherence it would later seem to have had.[55]

Along with the New York shop, Maciunas built up a distribution network for the new art across Europe and later outlets in California and Japan. Gallery and mail order outlets were established in Amsterdam, Villefranche-Sur-Mer, Milan and London, amongst others.[56] By 1965, the first anthology Fluxus 1 was available, consisting of manila envelopes bolted together containing work by numerous artists who would later become famous including La Monte Young, Christo, Joseph Byrd and Yoko Ono. Other pieces available included packs of altered playing cards by George Brecht, sensory boxes by Ay-O, a regular newsletter with contributions by artists and musicians such as Ray Johnson and John Cale, and tin cans filled with poems, songs and recipes about beans by Alison Knowles (see).

Stockhausen's Originale

[edit]
Traitor, you left Fluxus!, a postcard sent by George Maciunas to Nam June Paik, c late 1964, after the latter's involvement with Stockhausen's Originale

After returning to New York, Maciunas became reacquainted with Henry Flynt,[57] who encouraged members of Fluxus to take a more overtly political stance. One of the results of these discussions was to set up a picket line at the American premiere of Originale, a recent work by the German composer Karlheinz Stockhausen, 8 September 1964.[58] Stockhausen was deemed a 'Cultural Imperialist' by Maciunas and Flynt, while other members vehemently disagreed. The result was members of Fluxus, such as Nam June Paik and Jackson Mac Low, crossing a picket line made up of other members, including Ben Vautier and Takako Saito[59] who handed out leaflets denouncing Stockhausen as "a characteristic European-North American ruling-class Artist".[60] Dick Higgins participated in the picket, and then coolly joined the other performers inside;[61]

Maciunas and his friend Henry Flynt tried to get the Fluxus people to march around outside the circus with white cards that said Originale was bad. And they tried to say that the Fluxus people who were in the circus weren't Fluxus any more. That was silly, because it made a split. I thought it was funny, and so first I walked around with Maciunas and with Henry with a card, then I went inside and joined the circus; so both groups got angry with me. Oh well. Some people say that Fluxus died that day—I once thought so myself—but it turned out I was wrong.[62]

The event, arranged by Charlotte Moorman as part of her 2nd Annual New York Avant Garde Festival, would cement animosities between Maciunas and her,[63] with Maciunas frequently demanding that artists associated with Fluxus have nothing to do with the annual festival, and would often expel artists who ignored his demands. This hostility continued throughout Maciunas' life—much to Moorman's bemusement—despite her continued championing of Fluxus art and artists.[64]

Middle history: 1965–78

[edit]

Perceived insurgencies and the Asiatic influence

[edit]
Cut Piece, a performance piece by Yoko Ono in which the audience is invited to cut off her clothing. This version was staged at Carnegie Recital Hall, New York, 21 March 1965. Still taken from a film by Albert and David Maysles

The picketing of Originale marked the high point of Maciunas' agitprop approach,[65] an approach that estranged many of Fluxus' early proponents; Jackson Mac Low had resigned immediately after hearing 'antisocial' plans laid in April 1963, such as breaking down trucks under the Hudson River.[66] Brecht threatened to quit on the same issue, and then left New York in the spring of 1965. Despite his continued allegiance to Fluxus ideals, Dick Higgins fell out with Maciunas around the same time, ostensibly over his setting up the Something Else Press which printed many texts by key Fluxus-related personalities and other members of the avant garde. Charlotte Moorman continued to present her Annual Avant Garde Festival in New York.

Such perceived insurrections in the coherence of Maciunas' leadership of Fluxus provided an opening for Fluxus to become increasingly influenced by Japanese members of the group.[67] Since returning to Japan in 1961, Yoko Ono had been recommending colleagues look Maciunas up if they moved to New York; by the time she had returned, in early 1965, Hi Red Center, Shigeko Kubota, Takako Saito, Mieko Shiomi, Yasunao Tone and Ay-O had all started to make work for Fluxus, often of a contemplative nature.[68]

In Tokyo Japan 1964 Yoko Ono, a nonconformist to the Fluxus community,[69] independently published her artist’s book Grapefruit.[70] The book’s text itself encompassing event scores and other forms of participatory art.[71]

An event score from the book:

Cloud Piece[72]

Imagine the clouds dripping.

Dig a hole in your garden to put them in.

Proto-performance art

[edit]

On September 25, 1965, the FluxOrchestra, with La Monte Young conducting, played at Carnegie Recital Hall in New York City with a poster and program designed by George Maciunas. Copies of the program were folded into paper airplanes and launched during the evening, which included performances of "Falling Event" by Chieko Shiomi, "Symphony No. 3 'On the Floor from 'Clouds Scissors'" by George Brecht, "4 Pieces for Orchestra to La Monte Young" by Yoko Ono, "Disappearing Music for Face" by Shiomi, "Tactical Pieces for Orchestra" and "Olivetti Adding Machine in Memoriam for Adriano Olivetti" by Anthony Cox, "Trance for Orchestra" by Watts, "Sky Piece to Jesus Christ*" by Ono, "Octet for Winds 'In the Water' from 'Cloud Scissors" by Brecht, "Piece" by Shigeko Kubota, "1965 $50" by Young, "Piano Piece" by Tomas Schmit, "Sword Piece" by Cox, "Music for Late Afternoon Together With" by Shiomi, "2" by Watts, "c/t Trace" by Watts, "Intermission Event" by Willem de Ridder, "Moviee Music" by Stan Vanderbeek, "Mechanical Orchestra" by Joe Jones, and "Secret Room" by Ben Vautier.

In 1969, Fluxus artist Joe Jones opened his JJ Music Store (aka Tone Deaf Music Store) at 18 North Moore Street, where he presented his repetitive drone music machines. He created there an installation in the window so that anyone could press numerous door buttons to play the noise music machines displayed there.[73] Jones also presented small musical installation performances there, alone or with other Fluxus artists, such as Yoko Ono and John Lennon,[74] among others. From April 18 to June 12, 1970, Ono and Lennon (aka Plastic Ono Band) presented a series of Fluxus art events and concerts there called GRAPEFRUIT FLUXBANQUET. It was promoted with a poster designed by Fluxus leader George Maciunas. Performances included Come Impersonating John Lennon & Yoko Ono, Grapefruit Banquet (April 11–17) by George Maciunas, Yoshimasa Wada, Nye Ffarrabas (formerly Bici Forbes and Bici Forbes Hendricks), Geoffrey Hendricks, and Robert Watts; Do It Yourself (April 11–17) by Yoko Ono; Tickets by John Lennon + Fluxagents (April 18–24) with Wada, Ben Vautier and Maciunas; Clinic by Yoko Ono + Hi Red Center (April 25-May 1); Blue Room by Yoko + Fluxmasterliars (May 2–8); Weight & Water by Yoko + Fluxfiremen (May 9–15); Capsule by Yoko + Flux Space Center (May 16–22) with Maciunas, Paul Sharits, George Brecht, Ay-O, Ono, Watts, John Cavanaugh; Portrait of John Lennon as a Young Cloud by Yoko + Everybody (May 23–29); The Store by Yoko + Fluxfactory (May 30-June 5), with Ono, Maciunas, Wada, Ay-O; and finally Examination by Yoko + Fluxschool (June 6–12) with Ono, Geoffrey Hendricks, Watts, Mieko Shiomi and Robert Filliou.[75]

Objects blurring boundaries

[edit]

As Fluxus gradually became more famous, Maciunas' ambitions for the sale of cheap multiples grew. The second flux-anthology, the Fluxkit (late 1964),[76] collected together early 3D work made by the collective in a businessman's case, an idea borrowed directly from Duchamp's Boite en Valise[77][78] Within a year, plans for a new anthology, Fluxus 2, were in full swing to contain Flux films by John Cage and Yoko Ono (with hand held projectors provided), disrupted matchboxes and postcards by Ben Vautier, plastic food by Claes Oldenburg, FluxMedicine by Shigeko Kubota (containing empty pill packages), and artworks made of rocks, ink stamps, outdated travel tickets, undoable puzzles and a machine to facilitate humming.[79]

Maciunas' belief in the collective extended to authorship; a number of pieces from this period were anonymous, mis-attributed, or have had their authorship since questioned.[80] As a further complication, Maciunas was in the habit of dramatically changing ideas submitted by various artists before he put the works into production. Solid Plastic in Plastic Box, credited to Per Kirkeby 1967, for instance, had originally been realised by Kirkeby as a metal box, inscribed 'This Box Contains Wood'. When opened, the box would be found to contain sawdust. By the time the multiple had been manufactured by Maciunas, it was a block of solid plastic contained in a plastic box of the same color.[78] Conversely, Maciunas assigned Degree Face Clock, in which a clock face is measured out in 360°, to Kirkeby despite being an idea by Robert Watts;[81]

Some years ago, when I spoke with Robert Watts about Degree Face Clock and Compass Face Clock, he had recalled thinking up the idea himself and was surprised that George Maciunas advertised them as Per Kirkeby's. Watts shrugged and said that was the way George worked. There would be ideas in the air and Maciunas would assign the piece to one artist or another.[82]

Other tactics from this time included Maciunas buying large amounts of plastic boxes wholesale, and handing them out to artists with the simple request to turn them into Fluxkits, and the use of the rapidly growing international network of artists to contribute items needed to complete works. Robert Watts' Fluxatlas, 1973, for instance, contains small rocks sent by members of the group from around the world.[83]

Inventing performance art

[edit]

In addition to his numerous original compositions which have joined the collective's catalog of works, Larry Miller, associated with the group since 1969, has also been active as an interpreter of the "classic" scores and responsible for bringing the group's works to a wider public, blurring the lines between artist, producer and researcher. Besides Miller's own artistic work, he has also organized, reconstructed and performed at numerous Fluxus events and assembled an extensive collection of material on the history of Fluxus.[84] Through Miller, Fluxus attracted media coverage such as the worldwide CNN coverage of Off Limits exhibit at the Newark Museum (now The Newark Museum of Art) in 1999.[85] Other Miller activities as organizer, performer and presenter within the Fluxus milieu include Performance in Fluxus Continue 1963–2003 at Musee d'Art et d'Art Contemporain in Nice; Fluxus a la Carte in Amsterdam; and Centraal Fluxus Festival at Centraal Museum in Utrecht, Netherlands. In 2004, for Geoff Hendricks' Critical Mass: Happenings, Fluxus, Performance, Intermedia and Rutgers University 1958–1972, Miller reprised and updated the track and field events of the Flux Olympics, first presented in 1970.[86] For Do-it Yourself Fluxus at AI – Art Interactive – in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Miller worked as the curatorial consultant for an exhibit of works that allowed viewers hands-on experience including the reconstruction of several sections of the historic Flux Labyrinth, a massive and intricate maze that Miller originally constructed with George Maciunas at Akademie der Künste in Berlin in 1976 and which included sections by several of the Fluxus artists. Miller created a new version of the Flux Labyrinth at the In the Spirit of Fluxus exhibit at the Walker Art Center in 1994, where Griel Marcus said, "Miller was... fine tuning the monster."[87]

Feminism

[edit]

Women associated with Fluxus such as Carolee Schneemann and Charlotte Moorman, and founding members of the group such as Alison Knowles and Yoko Ono, contributed works in varying media and with differing content such as Knowles' "Make a Salad" and "Make a Soup.". Each was shaped by their times and their associations with artists of the previous generation such as Sari Dienes who were pointing the way to the changes of the 1960s and 70s with strong personnas and art.[88] Some made experimental and performative work having to do with the body that created a powerful female presence, which existed within Fluxus from the group's beginning as illustrated by works including Carolee Schneemann's "Interior Scroll", Yoko Ono's "Cut Piece", and Shigeko Kubota's "Vagina Painting". Women working within Fluxus were often simultaneously critiquing their position within a male dominated society while also exposing the inequalities within an art collective that claimed to be open and diverse. George Maciunas, in his rejection of Schneeman as a member of Fluxus, called her "guilty of Baroque tendencies, overt sexuality, and theatrical excess".[89] "Interior Scroll" was a response to Schneemann's experience as a filmmaker in the 1950s and 1960s, when male filmmakers claimed that women should restrict themselves to dance.

He said we are fond of you
You are charming
But don't ask us
To look at your films
We cannot
There are certain films
We cannot look at
The personal clutter
The persistence of feeling
The hand-touch sensibility

— Carolee Schneemann[89]

In An evening with Fluxus women: a roundtable discussion, hosted at New York University on 19 February 2009 by Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory and the Department of Performance Studies, a passage from Mieko Shiomi reads "...the best thing about Fluxus, I think, is that there was no discrimination on the basis of nationality and gender. Fluxus was open to anyone who shared similar thoughts about art and life. That's why women artists could be so active without feeling any frustration."[90]: 370 

Shigeo Kubota's Vagina Painting (1965), was performed by attaching a paintbrush dipped in red paint to her underwear, then applying it to a piece of paper while moving over it in a crouching position. The paint evoked menstrual blood. Vagina Painting has been interpreted as a critique of Jackson Pollock's action paintings, and the male-dominated abstract expressionist tradition.[91]

Utopian communities

[edit]

A number of artists in the group were interested in setting up Flux communes, intending to 'bridge the gap between the artist community and the surrounding society'[92] The first of these, La Cédille qui Sourit or The Cedilla That Smiles,[93] was set up in Villefranche-sur-Mer, France, by Robert Filliou and George Brecht, 1965–1968. Intended as an 'International Centre of Permanent Creation', the shop sold Fluxkits and other small wares as well as housing a 'non-school', boasting the motto "A carefree exchange of information and experience. No students, no teachers. Perfect licence, at times to listen at times to talk."[94] In 1966, Maciunas, Watts and others took advantage of new legislation drafted to regenerate the area of Manhattan known as 'Hell's Hundred Acres', soon to become rebranded as SoHo, allowing artists to buy live/work spaces in an area that had been blighted due to a proposed 18-lane expressway along Broome Street.[92] Led by Maciunas, plans were laid to start a series of real-estate developments in the area, designed to create an artists' community within a few streets of the FluxShop on Canal Street.

'Maciunas wanted to establish collective workshops, food-buying cooperatives and theaters to link the strengths of various media together and bridge the gap between the artist community and the surrounding society'

The first warehouse, intended to house Maciunas, Watts, Christo & Jeanne-Claude, Jonas Mekas, La Monte Young and others, was located on Greene Street. Likening these communities to the soviet Kolkhozs, Maciunas didn't hesitate to adopt the title 'Chairman of Bldg. Co-Op'[95] without first registering an office or becoming a member of the New York State Association of Realtors.[96] FluxHousing Co-Operatives continued to redevelop the area over the next decade, and were widened to include plans to set up a FluxIsland- a suitable island was located near Antigua, but the money to buy and develop it remained unforthcoming- and finally a performance arts centre called the FluxFarm established in New Marlborough, Massachusetts. The plans were continually dogged by financial problems, constant run-ins with the New York authorities, and eventually resulted, on 8 November 1975, in Maciunas being severely beaten by thugs sent by an unpaid electrical contractor.[97]

Fluxus since 1978

[edit]

Death of George Maciunas

[edit]

Maciunas moved to the Berkshire Mountains in Western Massachusetts in the late 1970s. Two decades earlier, after collecting paintings, the Boston art collector Jean Brown, and her late husband Leonard Brown, began to shift their focus to Dadaist and Surrealist art, manifestoes and periodicals. In 1971, after Mr. Brown's death, Mrs. Brown moved to Tyringham, and expanded into areas adjacent to Fluxus, including artists' books, concrete poetry, happenings, mail art and performance art. Maciunas helped turn her home, originally a Shaker seed house, into an important center for both Fluxus artists and scholars, with Mrs. Brown alternately cooking meals and showing guests her collection. Activities centered on a large archive room on the second floor built by Maciunas, who settled in nearby Great Barrington, where it was discovered in 1977 that Maciunas developed cancer of the pancreas and liver.

Three months before his death, he married his friend and companion, the poet Billie Hutching. After a legal wedding in Lee, Massachusetts, the couple performed a "Fluxwedding" in a friend's loft in SoHo, 25 February 1978. A videotape of the Maciunas' wedding was produced by Dimitri Devyatkin.[98] The bride and groom traded clothing.[99] Maciunas died on 9 May 1978 in a hospital in Boston.

His funeral was held in typical Fluxus style where they dubbed the funeral "Fluxfeast and Wake", ate foods that were only black, white, or purple.[100] Maciunas left behind his thoughts on Fluxus in a series of important video conversations called Interview With George Maciunas with Fluxus artist Larry Miller, which has been screened internationally and translated into numerous languages.[101] Over a 30 year period, Miller shot and collected Fluxus related materials including tapes on Joe Jones, Carolee Schneemann, Ben Vautier, Dick Higgins, and Alison Knowles, in addition to the 1978 Maciunas interview.

Post-Maciunas developments

[edit]

After the death of Maciunas a rift opened in Fluxus between a few collectors and curators who placed Fluxus as an art movement in a specific time frame (1962 to 1978), and the artists themselves, many of whom continued to see Fluxus as a living entity held together by its core values and world view.[102] Different theorists and historians adopted each of these views. Fluxus is therefore referred to variously in the past or the present tense. The definition of Fluxus was always a subject of controversy, complicated by the death of the original artists who were still living when Maciunas died.[103][104]

Some have argued that the unique control that curator Jon Hendricks holds over major historical Fluxus collection the Gilbert and Lila Silverman collection has enabled him to influence, through the numerous books and catalogues subsidized by the collection, the view that Fluxus died with Maciunas. Hendricks argues that Fluxus was a historical movement that occurred at a particular time, asserting that such central Fluxus artists as Dick Higgins and Nam June Paik could no longer label themselves as active Fluxus artists after 1978, and that contemporary artists influenced by Fluxus cannot lay claim to be Fluxus artists.[105][106] The Museum of Modern Art makes the same claim dating the movement to the 1960s and 1970s.[23][107] Many of the original Fluxus artists still working enjoy homages by younger Fluxus-influenced artists who stage events to commemorate Fluxus, but discourage the use of the "Fluxus" label by younger artists.[108][109] Others, including historian of art Hannah Higgins, daughter of Fluxus artists Alison Knowles and Dick Higgins, assert that although Maciunas was a key participant, there were many more, including Fluxus co-founder Higgins, who continued to work within Fluxus after the death of Maciunas.[110]

The rise of the internet in the 1990s enabled a vibrant post-Fluxus community to emerge online. Some of the original Fluxus artists from the 1960s and 1970s, including Higgins, created online communities such as the Fluxlist; following their departure, younger artists, writers, musicians, and performers have attempted to continue their work in cyberspace. The influence of Fluxus continued also in multi-media digital art performances, such as that presented by Other Minds in the SOMArts building in San Francisco to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Fluxus in September 2011.[111][112] The performance was curated by Adam Fong who was also one of the performers along with Yoshi Wada, Alison Knowles, Hannah Higgins, Luciano Chessa and Adam Overton. In 2018 the Los Angeles Philharmonic in its Fluxus Festival presented a fluxus performance incorporating John Cage's "Europeras 1 and 2" directed by Yuval Sharon.[113] Fluxus artists continue to perform today on a smaller scale.

Influences

[edit]

An immediate predecessor of Fluxus, according to Maciunas, was the Gutai group which promoted art as an anti-academic, psychophysical experience, an "art of matter as it is" as explained by Shiraga Kazuo in 1956. Gutai became connected with a sort of artistic mass-production, anticipating Fluxus's trademark, i.e., ambiguity between the cultivated and the trivial, between high and low. Indeed, avant-garde art in Japan tended toward informal rather than conceptual elements, radically opposing the extreme formality and symbolism found in Japanese art.

In the 1950s New York music scene there could be discerned many issues related to the post-war disenchantment experienced by many throughout the developed world. Such disillusionment in itself presented a case for commitment to Buddhism and Zen in everyday matters such as mental attitude, meditation, and approach to food and body care. It was also felt, however, that there was a general need for a more radical artistic sensibility. The themes of decay and of the inadequacy of the idea of modernity in artistic fields were adopted, partly from Duchamp and Dada and partly from consciousness of the uneasiness of living in contemporary society.

It is said that Fluxus challenged notions of representation, offering instead simple presentation. This, in fact, corresponds to a major difference between Western and Japanese art. Another important Fluxus characteristic was the elimination of perceived boundaries between art and life, a very prominent trend in post war art. This was exemplified by the work and writings of Josheph Beuys who stated, "every man is an artist." Fluxus's approach was an everyday, "economic" one as seen in the production of small objects made of paper and plastic. Again, this strongly corresponds with some of the fundamental characteristics of Japanese culture, i.e., the high artistic value of everyday acts and objects and the aesthetic appreciation of frugality. This also links with Japanese art, and the concept of shibumi, which may involve incompleteness, and supports the appreciation of bare objects, emphasizing subtlety rather than overtness. The renowned Japanese aesthetics scholar Onishi Yoshinori called the essence of Japanese art pantonomic because of the consciousness of no distinction between nature, art and life. Art is the way to approach life and nature/reality corresponding to actual existence.[114]

Fluxus art

[edit]

Fluxus encouraged a "do-it-yourself" aesthetic, and valued simplicity over complexity. Like Dada before it, Fluxus included a strong current of anti-commercialism and an anti-art sensibility, disparaging the conventional market-driven art world in favor of an artist-centered creative practice. As Fluxus artist Robert Filliou wrote, however, Fluxus differed from Dada in its richer set of aspirations, and the positive social and communitarian aspirations of Fluxus far outweighed the anti-art tendency that also marked the group.[115]

Among its early associates were Joseph Beuys, Dick Higgins, Davi Det Hompson, Nam June Paik, Wolf Vostell, La Monte Young, Joseph Byrd, Al Hansen and Yoko Ono who explored media ranging from performance art to poetry to experimental music to film. Taking the stance of opposition to the ideas of tradition and professionalism in the arts of their time, the Fluxus group shifted the emphasis from what an artist makes to the artist's personality, actions, and opinions. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s (their most active period) they staged "action" events, engaged in politics and public speaking, and produced sculptural works featuring unconventional materials. Their radically untraditional works included, for example, the video art of Nam June Paik and Charlotte Moorman and the performance art of Joseph Beuys and Wolf Vostell. During the early years of Fluxus, the often playful style of the Fluxus artists resulted in them being considered by some to be little more than a group of pranksters. Fluxus has also been compared to Dada and aspects of Pop Art and is seen as the starting point of mail art and no wave artists. Artists from succeeding generations such as Mark Bloch do not try to characterize themselves as Fluxus but create spinoffs such as Fluxpan or Jung Fluxus as a way of continuing some of the Fluxus ideas in a 21st-century, post-mail art context.

In terms of an artistic approach, Fluxus artists preferred to work with whatever materials were at hand, and either created their own work or collaborated in the creation process with their colleagues. Outsourcing part of the creative process to commercial fabricators was not usually part of Fluxus practice. Maciunas personally hand-assembled many of the Fluxus multiples and editions.[116] While Maciunas assembled many objects by hand, he designed and intended them for mass production.[23][117] Where multiple publishers produced signed, numbered objects in limited editions intended for sale at high prices, Maciunas produced open editions at low prices.[23][117] Several other Fluxus publishers produced different kinds of Fluxus editions. The best known of these was the Something Else Press, established by Dick Higgins, probably the largest and most extensive Fluxus publisher, producing books in editions that ran from 1,500 copies to as many as 5,000 copies, all available at standard bookstore prices.[118][119] Higgins created the term "intermedia" in a 1966 essay.[120]

The art forms most closely associated with Fluxus are event scores and Fluxus boxes. Fluxus boxes (sometimes called Fluxkits or Fluxboxes) originated with George Maciunas who would gather collections of printed cards, games, and ideas, organizing them in small plastic or wooden boxes.[121]

Event score

[edit]

An event score, such as George Brecht's "Drip Music", is essentially a performance art script that is usually only a few lines long and consists of descriptions of actions to be performed rather than dialogue.[122][123][124] Fluxus artists differentiate event scores from "happenings". Whereas happenings were sometimes complicated, lengthy performances meant to blur the lines between performer and audience, performance and reality, event performances were usually brief and simple. The event performances sought to elevate the banal, to be mindful of the mundane, and to frustrate the high culture of academic and market-driven music and art.

The idea of the event began in Henry Cowell's philosophy of music.[citation needed] Cowell, a teacher to John Cage and later to Dick Higgins, coined the term that Higgins and others later applied to short, terse descriptions of performable work. The term "score" is used in exactly the sense that one uses the term to describe a music score: a series of notes that allow anyone to perform the work, an idea linked both to what Nam June Paik labeled the "do it yourself" approach and to what Ken Friedman termed "musicality." While much is made of the do it yourself approach to art, it is vital to recognize that this idea emerges in music, and such important Fluxus artists as Paik, Higgins, or Corner began as composers, bringing to art the idea that each person can create the work by "doing it." This is what Friedman meant by musicality, extending the idea more radically to conclude that anyone can create work of any kind from a score, acknowledging the composer as the originator of the work while realizing the work freely and even interpreting it in far different ways from those the original composer might have done.

Other creative forms that have been adopted by Fluxus practitioners include collage, sound art, music, video, and poetry—especially visual poetry and concrete poetry.[125]

Use of shock

[edit]

Nam June Paik and his peers in the Fluxus art movement thoroughly understood the impact and importance of shock on the viewer. Fluxus artists believed that shock not only makes the viewer question their own reasoning, but is a means to awaken the viewer, "...from a perceptive lethargy furthered by habit."[126] Paik himself described the shock factor in his Fluxus work: "People who come to my concerts or see my objects need to be transferred into another state of consciousness. They have to be high. And in order to put them into this state of highness, a little shock is required... Anyone who came to my exhibition saw the head and was high."[127] Paik's "head" was that of a real cow displayed at the entrance to his exhibition, Exposition of Music—Electronic Television, located in the Galerie Parnass, Wuppertal, Germany in 1963.[126]

Artistic philosophies

[edit]

Fluxus is similar in spirit to the earlier art movement of Dada, emphasizing the concept of anti-art and taking jabs at the seriousness of modern art.[128] Fluxus artists used their minimal performances to highlight their perceived connections between everyday objects and art, similarly to Duchamp in pieces such as Fountain.[128] Fluxus art was often presented in "events", which Fluxus member George Brecht defined as "the smallest unit of a situation."[128][129] The events consisted of a minimal instruction, opening the events to accidents and other unintended effects.[130] Also contributing to the randomness of events was the integration of audience members into the performances, realizing Duchamp's notion of the viewer completing the art work.[130]

The Fluxus artistic philosophy has been defined as a synthesis of three key factors that define the majority of Fluxus work:

  1. Fluxus is intermedia. Fluxus creators like to see what happens when different media intersect. They use found and everyday objects, sounds, images, and texts to create new combinations of objects, sounds, images, and texts.
  2. Fluxus works are simple. The art is small, the texts are short, and the performances are brief.
  3. Fluxus is fun. Humor has always been an important element in Fluxus. [citation needed]

Late criticism

[edit]

There is a complexity in adequately charting a unified history of Fluxus. In Fluxus: A Brief History and Other Fictions, Owen Smith concedes that, with the emergence of new material published about Fluxus and its expansion into the present, its history must remain open.[131] The resistance to being pigeonholed, and with the absence of a stable identity, Fluxus opened up to wide participation but also, from what would appear in history, closed off that possibility. Maciunas made frequent acts of excommunication between 1962 and 1978 which destabilized the collective.[132] Kristine Stiles argues in one of her essays that the essence of Fluxus is "performative", while recently she feels that essence has been "eroded or threatened". Fluxus instead moved towards favoring the objects of publication, Stiles asserts: "Care must be taken that Fluxus is not transformed historically from a radical process and presentational art into a tradition static and representational art."[131] With no leadership, no identifiable guidelines, no real collective strategy, no homogeneity in terms of practices, Fluxus cannot be handled through traditional critical tools. Fluxus is an indicator of this confusion. Fluxus therefore is nearly always a discourse on the failure of discourse.[133]

Fluxus artists

[edit]

Fluxus artists shared several characteristics including wit and "childlikeness", though they lacked a consistent identity as an artistic community.[134] This vague self-identification allowed the group to include a variety of artists, including a large number of women. The possibility that Fluxus had more female members than any Western art group up to that point in history is particularly significant because Fluxus came on the heels of the white male-dominated abstract expressionism movement.[134] However, despite the designed open-endedness of Fluxus, Maciunas insisted on maintaining unity in the collective. Because of this, Maciunas was accused of expelling certain members for deviating from what he perceived as the goals of Fluxus.[135]

Many artists, writers, and composers have been associated with Fluxus over the years:

Scholars, critics, and curators associated with Fluxus

[edit]

Major collections and archives

[edit]
  • Alternative Traditions in Contemporary Art, University Library and University of Iowa Museum of Art, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
  • Archiv Sohm, Staatsgalerie Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
  • Archivio Conz, Verona, Italy
  • Artpool, Budapest, Hungary
  • Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive, Berkeley, California
  • Emily Harvey Foundation, New York City, and Venice, Italy
  • David Mayor/Fluxshoe/Beau Geste Press papers, Tate Gallery Archive, Tate Britain, London, England[137]
  • Fluxeum [de], collection Ute and Michael Berger, Wiesbaden-Erbenheim, Germany
  • Fluxus Collection, Ken Friedman papers, Tate Gallery Archive, Tate Britain, London, England
  • Fluxus Collection, Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  • Fondation du Doute[138]
  • FONDAZIONE BONOTTO, Molvena, Vicenza, Italy
  • Franklin Furnace Archive, The Museum of Modern Art, New York City
  • George Maciunas Memorial Collection, The Hood Museum of Art, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
  • Gilbert and Lila Silverman, Fluxus Foundation, Detroit, Michigan, and New York City, USA
  • Museo Vostell Malpartida[139] Cáceres, Spain
  • Museum Fluxus+ Potsdam, Germany[140]
  • Jean Brown papers, 1916–1995 finding aid, Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles[141]
  • Sammlung Maria und Walter Schnepel, Bremen, Germany
  • Institute for the Arts & Science, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
  • De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
  • TVF The Endless Story of FLUXUS,[142] Gent, Belgium
  • Jonas Mekas Visual Arts Center, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • The Israel Museum, Jerusalem, Gift from the Gilbert and Lila Silverman Collection, Detroit, to American Friends of the Israel Museum
  • In 2023, Sub Rosa records released a collection of Fluxus sound works on CD entitled Fluxus & NeoFluxus / Stolen Symphony

See also

[edit]

Selected bibliography

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Fluxus was an international avant-garde network of artists, composers, designers, and performers active from the early 1960s through the 1970s, characterized by experimental works that integrated art into daily life, rejected commercialism, and employed chance, humor, and audience participation to subvert conventional artistic norms.[1][2] Founded by Lithuanian-American artist George Maciunas in 1960, initially through experimental music circles influenced by John Cage, Fluxus organized festivals, performances, and publications aimed at democratizing art and purging it of elitist elements, echoing Dadaist anti-art principles.[1][2] Maciunas, as the central organizer, produced affordable multiples known as Fluxkits—boxed sets of instructional scores and objects for participatory actions—and issued manifestos declaring Fluxus's intent to foster a "revolutionary flood and tide in art" toward living, anti-art practices.[1][2] Key events included the 1962 Fluxus festivals across Europe, featuring improvised happenings and noise music by participants such as Nam June Paik, Yoko Ono, George Brecht, and Alison Knowles, whose Make a Salad (1962) exemplified the use of everyday actions as art.[1] Notable figures like Joseph Beuys and Dick Higgins contributed to its expansion into performance and conceptual realms, influencing later developments in these fields.[2][1] Despite its innovative output, Fluxus faced internal divisions due to Maciunas's forceful leadership and ideological purism, resulting in temporary expulsions of members like Higgins and Jackson Mac Low over disagreements on the group's direction and inclusivity, underscoring its character as a loose, contentious alliance rather than a cohesive movement.[1] Its legacy persists in challenging art's institutional boundaries, though the network's decentralized nature and resistance to formal definition limited its recognition as a unified historical phenomenon.[2][1]

Definition and Core Principles

Fundamental Concepts and Anti-Art Stance

Fluxus derived its name from the Latin term meaning "flow," symbolizing a commitment to perpetual change and fluidity in artistic expression, in opposition to the static permanence of conventional art objects and their commodification.[3][4] This core principle, articulated by founder George Maciunas in 1961, positioned Fluxus as an avant-garde network prioritizing ephemeral, process-oriented actions over enduring artifacts, aiming to integrate art seamlessly into daily life.[2][1] Central to Fluxus was an anti-art stance that sought to eradicate distinctions between artistic creation and ordinary existence, promoting "living art" as a revolutionary alternative to established aesthetics.[2][5] Maciunas envisioned Fluxus as a "flood and tide" against rigid art forms, drawing from Dadaist precedents to undermine the seriousness of modern art through irreverent, accessible interventions that blurred performer-audience boundaries and emphasized chance over technical virtuosity.[2][1] This ethos extended to a critique of bourgeois institutions, including museums and galleries, which Fluxus artists viewed as perpetuating elite gatekeeping and commercial exploitation of creativity.[6] By rejecting the specialized role of the artist and the fetishization of unique objects, Fluxus advocated for democratic dissemination of ideas via inexpensive multiples and performative scores, fostering a non-hierarchical environment where everyday materials and actions supplanted traditional craftsmanship.[6][5] Such principles underscored a broader aim to purge art of its institutional trappings, rendering it a fluid, participatory flux rather than a preserved commodity.[7]

Manifestos, Scores, and Doctrinal Statements

The Fluxus Manifesto, authored by George Maciunas in 1963, articulated core doctrinal principles through its call to "promote living art, anti-art" and "NON ART REALITY to be grasped by all peoples," targeting the elimination of bourgeois sickness and European intellectualism in artistic practice.[8] This offset lithograph document, measuring 8 1/4 x 5 13/16 inches, was distributed at early Fluxus events, including Ben Vautier's Théâtre de l'Opérette in Wiesbaden and during Ben Patterson's Paper Piece in Düsseldorf, serving as an ideological blueprint for purging dead art, imitations, and artificial constructs in favor of flux and collective accessibility.[9][10] Event scores constituted another primary textual form, comprising succinct instructions for indeterminate actions that embodied Fluxus tenets of anti-elitism and variability, allowing replication by non-specialists while prioritizing performer discretion over rigid outcomes.[11] These scores, often poetic and minimal, drew from precedents in experimental music but were adapted by Fluxus artists to democratize creation, as seen in George Brecht's "Drip Music" (1961–1962), which directed the dripping of water from an icicle or faucet onto a resonant surface, elevating mundane processes to conceptual events.[12] Similarly, Philip Corner's Piano Activities (1962), edited and published by Maciunas, listed 10 progressive tasks ranging from plucking piano wires to dismantling the instrument, underscoring destruction and improvisation as antidotes to traditional performance hierarchies.[13] Maciunas further codified Fluxus through instructional prospectuses and brochures, such as the 1962 Fluxus Brochure Prospectus distributed at the first Fluxus concert on June 1, 1962, which outlined the movement's rejection of spectacle in favor of concrete, everyday realizations.[14] These documents emphasized indeterminacy not as abstract theory but as practical tools for non-professional engagement, though their efficacy hinged on interpreters' choices, revealing inherent variability in doctrinal application.[15] While promoting universal grasp, such statements critiqued elitist art institutions, aligning with an ethos of equivalence between art and life.[16]

Historical Development

Late 1950s Origins and Formative Influences

In the late 1950s, John Cage's advocacy for chance operations and indeterminacy in music profoundly shaped the experimental milieu that preceded Fluxus, emphasizing non-intentional processes over traditional composition.[17] Cage's teachings at the New School for Social Research in New York during this period attracted composers seeking to integrate everyday sounds and performer agency, fostering gatherings that blurred music and performance boundaries. La Monte Young, arriving in New York in 1960 after studies in California, extended these ideas through the Chambers Street Loft Series co-organized with Yoko Ono from September 1960 to June 1961, presenting concerts of sustained tones, silence, and improvisational events that introduced chance-based works to interdisciplinary audiences.[18][19] These loft events, held in Ono's downtown space, featured contributions from emerging figures and exemplified proto-Fluxus experimentation without a unified manifesto or branding.[20] George Maciunas, a Lithuanian-born immigrant who had studied art history and design in New York during the 1950s, emerged as a key organizer by establishing the AG Gallery at 925 Madison Avenue in spring 1961.[21] There, Maciunas hosted "Evenings" of experimental performances, including poetry readings, noise music, and interactive actions by artists like Yoko Ono and Almus Salcius, aiming to synthesize Neo-Dada irreverence with Cagean indeterminacy.[2] The gallery served as an early hub for cross-pollination among American experimentalists, though it closed by mid-1961 due to financial issues, prompting Maciunas to evade creditors while planning broader networks.[22] Maciunas' design contributions further solidified these origins, including the layout for An Anthology of Chance Operations, Concept Art, Anti-Art, Indeterminacy, Improvisation, Meaningless Work... (1963), edited by Young with input from Jackson Mac Low and compiled from materials gathered starting in 1961.[23] This publication aggregated scores by Cage, Young, and others, documenting chance-derived practices central to Fluxus precursors.[24] Drawing on his Vilnius-area family heritage and émigré experiences, Maciunas initiated informal ties to European artists around 1961, applying the "Fluxus" label tentatively to mail-order projects and correspondences that anticipated transatlantic expansion, though formal identification remained fluid pre-1962.[25]

1960s Expansion: Festivals, Fluxkits, and International Spread

![Festum Fluxorum poster for Wiesbaden festival][float-right]
The expansion of Fluxus in the 1960s began with a series of international festivals organized by George Maciunas, starting with the inaugural event in Wiesbaden, West Germany, from September 1-14, 1962, titled FLuXuS Internationale FesTsPiELe NEUEsTER MUSiK at the Städtisches Museum.[26] This festival featured performances by core participants including Maciunas, Dick Higgins, Benjamin Patterson, Wolf Vostell, Nam June Paik, and Emmett Williams, presenting experimental actions that blurred music, theater, and visual art.[27] Subsequent events followed rapidly, such as concerts in Paris in October 1962 and the Festum Fluxorum in Copenhagen from November 23-28, 1962, at Nikolaj Kirke, extending the movement's reach across Europe and drawing audiences to provocative, participatory works.[28] These tours, totaling over a dozen by 1963 including stops in Amsterdam, Düsseldorf, and Stockholm, marked Fluxus's logistical shift from New York planning to on-the-ground European execution, with Maciunas coordinating programs that emphasized immediacy and anti-commercial ethos.[29]
Fluxkits emerged as a key innovation for disseminating Fluxus ideas, with Maciunas producing multiples like Fluxus 1 in 1964, a wooden box containing objects, scores, and ephemera by artists such as Higgins, Paik, and Yoko Ono, priced affordably to democratize access.[30] These kits, including variants like Flux Year Box 1, packaged everyday items—such as games, cards, and absurd assemblages—alongside instructional scores, intended for manipulation and performance by recipients, reflecting Fluxus's emphasis on user engagement over passive viewing.[31] Distributed through New York-based FluxShops and mail-order from Maciunas's operations, approximately 100 copies of early kits circulated among artists and collectors by mid-decade, fostering a portable "miniature museum" that bypassed traditional galleries.[32] The movement's international spread intensified through figures like Paik, who infused Asiatic influences via Zen-inspired actions from his Korean background, and Vostell, whose décollage techniques rooted in German happenings, as seen in their Wiesbaden contributions.[33] By 1964, tensions arose with external collaborations, such as the New York premiere of Karlheinz Stockhausen's Originale on November 14, involving Paik and Charlotte Moorman, prompting Maciunas to decry perceived betrayals in a postcard labeling Paik a "Fluxus traitor."[34] This period peaked Fluxus visibility, with hubs in New York sustaining production while European and emerging Asian ties—via Paik's networks—expanded participation lists to include over 20 artists across continents by 1969, though internal fractures began surfacing.[35]

1970s Evolution: Performances, Communities, and Internal Tensions

In the 1970s, Fluxus performances shifted toward extended durational actions that intensified the blurring of art and everyday existence. Dick Higgins, a core Fluxus participant, expanded happenings into prolonged, intermedia events incorporating theatrical and poetic elements, as documented in his 1970s publications and archival records of ongoing Fluxus-affiliated activities.[36][37] Similarly, Nam June Paik conducted pioneering video experiments, manipulating television signals and synthesizers to create dynamic, real-time visual compositions that extended Fluxus' critique of media and technology, with works evolving from his 1960s foundations into fuller 1970s installations.[38][39] Communal initiatives emerged as attempts to realize Fluxus' utopian ideals beyond urban centers. In 1977, George Maciunas purchased a farm in New Marlborough, Massachusetts, comprising two main houses, twelve outbuildings, and an apple orchard, envisioning it as an agricultural cooperative for Fluxus artists to foster self-sustaining collective living.[40] Events occurred there that year, drawing participants including Nam June Paik and Shigeko Kubota, but the project proved short-lived, failing to establish a permanent co-op amid logistical challenges and Maciunas' deteriorating health.[41][42] Emerging schisms highlighted internal tensions over leadership, artistic direction, and economic models. Maciunas' centralizing authority faced repeated challenges from members, as evidenced by archival correspondences and group disputes that questioned his self-appointed role.[43][44] Debates intensified around commercialization, with some artists critiquing the production of multiples and editions as diluting Fluxus' anti-institutional ethos, per documented exchanges among participants.[45] Additionally, contributions from female artists, such as transformative performances introducing bodily and identity-focused elements, generated frictions by diverging from predominant male-led aesthetics and prompting reevaluations within the collective.[46] These conflicts contributed to withdrawals and fragmented cohesion by the late 1970s.

1978 Onward: Maciunas' Death and Fragmentation

George Maciunas died of pancreatic cancer on May 9, 1978, at the age of 46, depriving Fluxus of its primary organizer and visionary who had maintained its operational structure through personal networks and administrative efforts.[7] His passing prompted a "Fluxfuneral" event orchestrated by Geoffrey Hendricks, incorporating Fluxus scores and rituals as a final collective performance, signaling the movement's effective conclusion as a coordinated entity.[1] Without Maciunas's centralizing influence, which had previously directed publications, distributions, and international festivals, Fluxus lacked mechanisms for unified decision-making, leading to rapid decentralization and the dissolution of its communal momentum.[47] In the ensuing decades, Fluxus activities fragmented into isolated initiatives by surviving artists, with no resurgence of a singular, authoritative body; regional efforts, such as mail-art exhibitions echoing Fluxus postal aesthetics in 1982 Europe, persisted sporadically but without the original's scale or ideological enforcement.[48] Japanese and European participants maintained archives and occasional events, yet these devolved into personal legacies rather than a cohesive revival, as evidenced by independent works from figures like Ken Friedman, who had overseen Fluxus West but operated autonomously post-1978.[49] The absence of centralized control allowed for interpretive expansions but diluted Fluxus's anti-institutional purity, with trademarks and nomenclature becoming contested in informal disputes over authenticity tied to Maciunas's estate, though no formal legal resolutions revived collective governance.[50] By the 2000s, Fluxus's legacy manifested primarily through institutional retrospectives that commodified its artifacts and scores, such as the 2011 exhibition "Fluxus and the Essential Questions of Life" at New York University's Grey Art Gallery, which reassembled multiples and event documentation for public display.[51] Digital collections, like the University of Iowa's Fluxus archive launched in the 2010s, further preserved materials online, enabling virtual access but underscoring the shift from live, ephemeral actions to static, market-oriented preservation—contradicting Fluxus's foundational rejection of commodified art objects.[52] This era highlighted individual artists' enduring influence, with reactivations of scores in solo shows, yet affirmed the movement's fragmentation into historical artifact rather than active insurgency.[53]

Artistic Practices

Event Scores and Performative Actions

Fluxus event scores consisted of succinct textual instructions intended to initiate minimal, indeterminate actions that integrated ordinary objects and behaviors into artistic contexts, thereby challenging conventional performance hierarchies. These scores, often no more than a few words or lines, were devised to be enacted flexibly by performers or audiences, prioritizing variability and chance over rehearsed execution, as influenced by experimental music precedents like those of John Cage.[54][1] A paradigmatic example is George Brecht's Drip Music (1959–1962), which directed: "Water dripping. / A pitcher of water is hung so that water drips from it slowly, drop by drop, onto the floor," transforming a prosaic physical process into an event highlighting perceptual attentiveness to the everyday.[54] Similarly, Brecht's Direction (1961) instructed performers to "Arrange to observe a sign indicating direction of travel. / Travel in the indicated direction," underscoring the score's capacity to reframe routine navigation as performative inquiry.[55] Nam June Paik's Zen for Head (1962) exemplified bodily and sensory engagement through its directive to dip the head into a vessel of liquid pigment and drag it across a surface to produce a mark, as Paik executed by immersing his head in black ink during performances, yielding gestural lines evocative of calligraphic improvisation amid physical discomfort.[56][57] Such actions typically endured mere seconds to under a minute, enforcing brevity to amplify absurdity and disrupt expectations of durational spectacle.[58] Performative actions derived from these scores emphasized ephemerality and direct participation, with instructions like Yoko Ono's in her 1964 collection Grapefruit—such as "Cut Piece," where the artist invited audience members onstage to sever portions of her clothing using provided scissors—eliciting unpredictable interactions that exposed vulnerabilities in social dynamics.[59] While fostering momentary immersion and collective agency, these events often yielded visceral, singular disruptions rather than enduring communal transformations, as their instructional openness invited diverse realizations but constrained outcomes to immediate, non-replicable shocks.[60][1]

Objects, Multiples, and Everyday Materials

Fluxus multiples consisted of inexpensive, mass-produced objects and assemblages that incorporated everyday materials, such as wooden blocks, bells, marbles, and found items, to subvert the notion of the unique art object.[61] These editions, often organized by George Maciunas, were designed for broad accessibility, with individual items priced between $1 and $5 and complete kits like the 1964 Fluxkit sold for $100.[61] By employing readymades and consumer-like goods, such as Robert Watts's rocks, Fluxus blurred distinctions between art and ordinary commodities, emphasizing disposability and humor over permanence.[62] Joe Jones contributed mechanical instruments constructed from household objects and toys, creating self-playing devices like automated reed organs and percussion setups that operated without human intervention.[63] These kinetic sculptures, produced in the 1960s and 1970s, exemplified Fluxus's integration of functionality and absurdity, using motors and everyday components to generate rhythmic sounds.[64] Maciunas further explored themed multiples, including the Cleanliness Flux Kit, which assembled hygiene-related items into provocative, low-cost packages critiquing societal norms through banal materials.[65] Fluxkits, such as Flux Year Box series, packaged diverse contributions into portable boxes, facilitating distribution and interaction while rejecting elite art markets through open editions and reproducible formats.[32] This approach prioritized experiential engagement over ownership, though many such objects have since gained ironic collectible status in auctions, fetching prices far exceeding their original modest valuations.[31]

Intermedia Experiments and Boundary Blurring

Fluxus practitioners pursued intermedia experiments by deliberately fusing disparate artistic disciplines—including music, visual arts, poetry, and emerging technologies—to dismantle conventional medium-specific boundaries and norms. These efforts emphasized chance operations and indeterminate outcomes, often drawing from influences like John Cage's aleatory techniques, to prioritize process over predetermined authorship or aesthetic hierarchy. By integrating everyday actions, technological interventions, and performative disruptions, artists sought to render art as fluid and non-hierarchical, challenging the compartmentalization of creative expression into rigid categories.[1][66] A prominent example involved Nam June Paik's manipulation of television sets during the 1960s, transforming passive broadcast media into interactive, sculptural interventions that merged electronics with performance and visual distortion. In works like Foot Switch Experiment (1963), Paik enabled real-time alteration of televised images via physical interference, such as magnets or bodily contact, thereby blurring lines between viewer participation, electronic sculpture, and ephemeral event.[67][68] Similarly, Wolf Vostell's décollage techniques applied destructive processes to televisions and urban assemblages, as in TV-Dé-coll/age, no. 1 (1958–59), where televisions were embedded in concrete or subjected to happenings involving auto-destruction, fusing visual art with sonic rupture and anti-consumerist critique to evoke societal violence through material negation.[69][70][68] Shock tactics further eroded boundaries by incorporating bodily provocation and violence into hybrid forms, often combining musical execution with nudity or physical extremity to subvert decorum across media. Charlotte Moorman's cello performances, such as those in Nam June Paik's Opera Sextronique (1967), featured topless playing amid electronic augmentations and audience interactions, integrating classical instrumentation with multimedia spectacle and corporeal exposure to contest gendered norms in sound and visual domains.[71][72] These actions, documented in photographs and contemporary reviews, employed chance elements like improvisational scoring to heighten unpredictability, dissolving distinctions between concert, theater, and installation.[73] Such experiments prefigured developments in video art by pioneering the artistic repurposing of consumer electronics for non-narrative, process-oriented expression, with Paik and Vostell recognized as early adopters who expanded television from entertainment device to malleable medium.[74] However, while innovative in boundary dissolution, these works have faced retrospective scrutiny for prioritizing gestural shock over sustained conceptual depth, with some analyses noting their reliance on ephemeral disruption risked veering into performative superficiality amid broader avant-garde experimentation.[75][6]

Key Figures and Contributors

George Maciunas as Central Organizer

George Maciunas (1931–1978), born in Kaunas, Lithuania, immigrated to the United States as a child and developed expertise in graphic design and art history, including studies at New York University and Cooper Union.[50] While employed as a graphic designer for the U.S. Air Force in Wiesbaden, West Germany, he coined the term "Fluxus" in 1961 to describe a projected publication and network emphasizing flux and non-traditional art forms.[76] [77] Maciunas articulated Fluxus ideology through manifestos, such as the 1963 Fluxus Manifesto, which called for purging "dead art" like abstract and illusionistic works in favor of concrete, experiential practices integrated into everyday life.[9] [77] He organized the inaugural Fluxus festival in Wiesbaden in September 1962, followed by a series of events across Europe that established the movement's international presence through performances, distributions, and networking.[50] [78] As central coordinator from 1962 onward, Maciunas managed logistics, publications, and artist multiples, while enforcing strict collective principles against individualism, often designating affiliations and expelling non-conforming participants via correspondence to maintain ideological purity.[5] This approach, documented in his letters and administrative records, reflected a visionary networking effort tempered by authoritarian control, prioritizing communal discipline over personal autonomy within Fluxus.[5][79]

Prominent Artists and Their Roles

Yoko Ono contributed numerous conceptual event scores to Fluxus, emphasizing instructional prompts that blurred art and life, as compiled in her 1964 book Grapefruit, which included pieces like "Painting to Hammer a Nail" and "Grape Piece" inviting participatory absurdity.[80] Her 1964 performance Cut Piece, where audiences progressively cut her clothing, highlighted themes of vulnerability and audience agency, diverging from Maciunas' emphasis on collective anti-art by incorporating personal exposure and feminist undertones often interpreted through individual bodily risk.[81] Ono produced over 50 such scores, fostering Fluxus' shift toward dematerialized, idea-based works rather than object production.[14] Nam June Paik pioneered video integration in Fluxus through performances like his 1963 piano actions at festivals, where he smashed instruments and manipulated magnets on TVs, establishing him as the movement's key figure in electronic media experimentation.[67] Paik's outputs included altered television sculptures and early video installations like TV Buddha (1974), which repurposed broadcast technology for interactive loops, often clashing with Maciunas' purist low-cost ethos by embracing costly tech and global connectivity themes.[82] His contributions extended to over 20 Fluxus-related video and performance pieces, influencing the movement's expansion into intermedia beyond static objects.[83] Dick Higgins advanced Fluxus theory via his 1966 essay "Statement on Intermedia," defining hybrid forms that fused poetry, music, and visuals, as seen in his visual and sound poetry series and the founding of Something Else Press in 1964, which published over 60 experimental titles including Fluxus manifestos.[84] Higgins' works, such as FOEW&OMB (1960s pattern poems), emphasized structural continuities across arts, sometimes deviating from Fluxus' anti-elitism through academic framing and publishing ventures that commodified ephemera.[85] He authored dozens of intermedia pieces, bridging Cagean indeterminacy with Fluxus performativity. Peripheral contributors included Charlotte Moorman, whose cello performances, like the 1971 TV Cello collaboration with Paik, incorporated nudity and everyday objects for provocative endurance tests, producing events at her Annual Avant Garde Festivals from 1964 onward and highlighting gender-specific physical demands in Fluxus actions.[73][86] Wolf Vostell theorized happenings through dé-collage techniques, creating outputs like Concrete Traffic (1970), an embedded truck sculpture critiquing urban decay, and early video installations that prioritized destruction and media critique over Fluxus' playful minimalism.[87][88] Fluxus drew from an international roster spanning at least six countries by 1962, including the US, Germany, Japan, and others, yet empirical participation skewed toward male artists from Europe and North America, with women like Ono and Moorman often channeled into bodily or relational roles amid the group's 20-30 core figures.[89] This composition reflected postwar migration patterns but underscored limited non-Western and female leadership despite nominal inclusivity.[52]

Influences and Context

Pre-Fluxus Roots in Dada, Cage, and Zen

The Dada movement, emerging in Zurich in 1916 amid World War I, rejected conventional aesthetics through absurdity, chance, and anti-art gestures, providing a foundational critique of institutionalized creativity that Fluxus later amplified.[90] Artists like Marcel Duchamp advanced this with readymades—ordinary manufactured objects elevated to art status without alteration, such as his porcelain urinal Fountain submitted to the Society of Independent Artists exhibition in 1917—which undermined authorial intent and craftsmanship, concepts Maciunas explicitly cited as precursors to Fluxus's dematerialization of art objects.[91] George Maciunas, Fluxus's central figure, positioned the group as evolving Dada's polemic, initially dubbing it "Neo-Dada" before adopting "Fluxus" in 1961, while surpassing Dada by integrating economic and performative dimensions into everyday absurdity.[50][92] John Cage's mid-20th-century innovations in indeterminacy and non-intentionality offered Fluxus practical methodologies for bypassing composerly control, rooted in his adoption of chance operations from the I Ching and Zen-influenced silence.[1] Cage's 4'33" (1952), a score directing performers to produce no intentional sounds for four minutes and thirty-three seconds, redefined music as ambient environmental noise, influencing Fluxus event structures that prioritized audience perception over predetermined outcomes.[93] His lectures at the Darmstadt International Summer Courses for New Music in 1958 exposed European avant-gardists, including future Fluxus participants like Nam June Paik, to these ideas, sparking a shift from serialism to open-form experimentation that catalyzed Fluxus's emergence in Germany.[94] Cage's New School for Social Research classes in experimental composition (1957–1959) further disseminated these principles to American artists, emphasizing depersonalized processes over ego-driven authorship.[52] Zen Buddhism's emphasis on mindfulness, impermanence, and non-dualistic perception infiltrated Fluxus via Cage's encounters with D.T. Suzuki's teachings in the 1940s and 1950s, which shaped his aesthetic of receptivity to the present moment.[1] Cage recommended Zen study to Paik during their 1958–1960 interactions in Germany, where Paik, already steeped in Korean and Japanese Buddhist traditions, integrated its minimalism into actions stripping art to essential, ephemeral gestures—such as voiding content for perceptual focus, prefiguring Fluxus's anti-spectacular events.[95] This Eastern influence contrasted Dada's nihilism with contemplative detachment, supplying Fluxus a philosophical tool for demystifying artistic hierarchies through simplicity and direct experience, though Paik's later video works revealed tensions between Zen austerity and technological mediation.[96]

Broader Cultural and Intellectual Milieu

Fluxus emerged in the early 1960s amid post-World War II economic recovery and social reconfiguration in Western Europe and the United States, where rapid industrialization and consumer expansion fueled disillusionment with materialist values. This period's youth rebellion, manifesting in protests against authority and traditional hierarchies, provided a receptive environment for avant-garde initiatives that blurred art with daily existence, yet Fluxus events remained confined to intimate venues like galleries and festivals, typically attracting audiences of fewer than 500 participants per gathering, far from the mass spectacles of contemporaneous countercultural phenomena such as Woodstock in 1969.[1][58] The Cold War's geopolitical flux, including ideological divides and eased transatlantic mobility for artists, enabled international collaborations—drawing participants from the U.S., Western Europe, and even Soviet-influenced regions—but did not propel Fluxus into widespread adoption, as its esoteric, instruction-based actions appealed primarily to niche intellectual circles rather than broad publics seeking escapist or political agitation.[45] Intellectually, Fluxus intersected with mid-century shifts toward process-oriented epistemologies, where event scores functioned as open protocols akin to linguistic experiments emphasizing contextual application over fixed meanings, reflecting broader philosophical skepticism toward rigid structures in an era of existential and structuralist debates. The movement's intermedia practices, which amalgamated sound, visuals, and text, aligned with emerging recognitions of media proliferation—such as television's 1960s household penetration rates exceeding 90% in the U.S.—as transformative forces reshaping perception, though Fluxus critiqued rather than embraced commercial media's homogenizing effects.[63] These elements underscored causal drivers rooted in accessible, low-cost experimentation amid rising disposable incomes, enabling reproducible objects that nominally rejected commodification, yet overlapped with Pop Art's everyday motifs and Allan Kaprow's Happenings in valorizing flux over permanence.[1] Fluxus's anti-commercial posture, articulated in manifestos decrying art-market elitism, positioned it against the 1960s' advertising boom—U.S. ad spending doubled to $15 billion between 1960 and 1965—favoring fluxkits and multiples priced under $10 for dissemination, but this ethic coexisted uneasily with practical distribution via mail-order, foreshadowing market tensions as items later fetched thousands at auction. Such dynamics reveal pragmatic adaptations to technological affordances like offset printing, which lowered barriers for non-elite creators, rather than purely ideological purity, in a milieu where artistic networks leveraged affordable travel and communication to sustain transnational flux without institutional backing.[97][77]

Reception, Achievements, and Criticisms

Contemporary Responses and Perceived Innovations

Contemporary press coverage of Fluxus's inaugural events highlighted the movement's provocative challenge to artistic norms, with reactions ranging from enthusiasm for its irreverence to bewilderment at its rejection of traditional aesthetics. A 1962 German television news report on the Wiesbaden festival captured audience responses to performances blending music, action, and everyday objects, evoking delight in some spectators for the playful disruption while eliciting confusion and discomfort in others unaccustomed to such boundary-blurring spectacles.[11] Peers within avant-garde circles, including composers influenced by John Cage, viewed these actions as a fresh extension of indeterminate music into visual and performative realms, praising the event scores—concise instructions for repeatable actions—as innovative tools for democratizing creative participation beyond elite institutions.[16] Fluxus was recognized in the mid-1960s for advancing performance art through structured yet ephemeral "events" that prioritized process over product, influencing conceptualism by emphasizing idea-driven works over commodifiable objects. Critics and participants noted the movement's role in pioneering metrics for performance, such as durational brevity and audience involvement, which contrasted with longer, more theatrical happenings.[1] Additionally, Fluxus affiliates like Nam June Paik integrated emerging technologies, with Paik's 1963 Exposition of Music—Electronic Television in Wuppertal marking an early festival dedicated to manipulated video signals as artistic medium, predating widespread video art adoption and expanding intermedia experiments.[68] [98] While Fluxus promoted accessibility via inexpensive multiples and public-oriented scores intended to erode barriers between art and life, empirical evidence from event venues indicates a niche rather than mass impact, with festivals confined to galleries and museums attracting primarily art-world insiders. The 1962 Wiesbaden gathering, for instance, drew limited attendance in a museum setting, underscoring an elite orientation despite rhetoric of universal engagement.[11] Comparative analyses confirm Fluxus performances reached smaller, specialized audiences than contemporaneous happenings, tempering claims of broad democratization with the reality of insular reception.[16]

Major Controversies and Internal Disputes

George Maciunas, as Fluxus's central organizer, periodically expelled artists he deemed disloyal or whose works deviated from the movement's emphasis on anti-art purity and collective discipline, including Nam June Paik in the early 1960s for perceived lack of adherence to group principles.[99] These purges, often documented in correspondence and meeting notes, stemmed from Maciunas's rigid enforcement of Fluxus as a non-commercial, non-professional endeavor, leading to threats of expulsion against participants who incorporated elements he viewed as impure or individualistic, such as overly theatrical or market-oriented productions; participating artists frequently resisted, asserting creative autonomy.[100] Internal tensions also arose over performances involving nudity and sexual provocation, exemplified by Charlotte Moorman's 1967 conviction for indecent exposure during Nam June Paik's Opera Sextronique, where she performed topless on February 9, resulting in her arrest and a guilty verdict on May 10 by a New York judge who dismissed cultural merit claims.[101] Maciunas subsequently blacklisted Moorman from Fluxus events, criticizing her work as insufficiently aligned with the movement's anti-spectacle ethos, while some female participants faced exclusion under pretexts of impurity in their contributions, fueling disputes over gender dynamics and artistic legitimacy within the group.[102][46] External controversies centered on accusations of obscenity in Fluxus happenings, where shock tactics like public nudity or simulated acts prompted legal scrutiny and public backlash, as in Moorman's case, which highlighted debates over whether such elements constituted radical boundary-pushing or mere sensationalism lacking substantive critique.[101] Defenders, including some Fluxus participants, argued these provocations challenged bourgeois norms and commodified culture effectively, yet contemporaries like legal authorities and rival artists contended they devolved into juvenile antics, failing to effect broader societal shifts beyond fleeting notoriety.[46][102]

Long-Term Critiques of Hypocrisy and Ineffectiveness

Critics have highlighted a core hypocrisy between Fluxus' explicit rejection of commercialism and the high market values attained by its outputs, revealing a disconnect from its democratizing intentions. In his 1963 manifesto, George Maciunas positioned Fluxus against the art object as a "non-functional commodity—to be sold and to make [a] livelihood for an artist," advocating instead for non-elitist, functional alternatives accessible to the masses.[77] However, Fluxus editions designed as inexpensive multiples, such as the 1965 Fluxkit, have since entered elite auction circuits, with a Maciunas example selling for $104,500 at Christie's in 2011—far exceeding original low-cost production aims and aligning with luxury collectibles for affluent buyers.[103] This commodification extended to broader dissemination, where anti-art ephemera inspired mass-market trinkets like gallery-shop novelties, undermining the movement's purported disdain for profit-driven replication.[104] Assessments of long-term outcomes further underscore ineffectiveness, as Fluxus failed to engender verifiable disruptions in art economics, cultural norms, or institutional power structures. Auction records and market analyses post-1970s show no alteration in prevailing dynamics, with the global art trade expanding amid commodification of Fluxus itself rather than its promised purge of bourgeois values.[103] Art critic Waldemar Januszczak characterized the movement in 2008 as "impressionable" and derivative, likening its "jokiness" to ephemeral advertising ploys that elicit fleeting amusement but lack substantive causal force or enduring transformation.[104] Outside niche academic preservation, Fluxus receded from public discourse by the late 1970s, its rebellious gestures absorbed into museums and markets without challenging their foundational incentives—evident in the institutional embrace of once-antagonistic works, which diluted original anti-establishment potency into sanitized exhibits.[105] Such patterns affirm portrayals of Fluxus as performative rather than pivotal, with empirical traces confined to collector valuations over societal reconfiguration.

Legacy and Ongoing Relevance

Influence on Subsequent Art Forms

Fluxus's emphasis on audience participation and the blurring of art-life boundaries traceable influenced performance art in the 1970s and beyond, particularly through event scores that invited viewer intervention. Yoko Ono's Cut Piece (performed 1964), where audiences cut portions of the artist's clothing, directly prefigured Marina Abramović's Rhythm 0 (1974), in which participants selected from 72 objects to act upon the motionless artist, escalating Fluxus explorations of vulnerability and agency.[1] Abramović explicitly cited Fluxus alongside Dada as formative to her endurance-based works, which extended the movement's rejection of passive spectatorship into sustained bodily confrontations.[106] In conceptual and intermedia practices, Fluxus's distribution of instructional scores via mail fostered 1970s-1990s mail art networks, exemplified by Mieko Shiomi's Spatial Poem (1965–1975), a global event coordinating participants to report dis/orientations, which evolved into decentralized correspondence art emphasizing ephemerality over commodification.[107] Similarly, early video experiments by Fluxus affiliates like Nam June Paik, who manipulated televisions as sculptural media in the late 1960s, contributed to 1970s video art's dematerialization of objects, influencing artists such as Bill Viola in narrative-driven installations by the 1980s.[11] Fluxus's participatory frameworks informed relational aesthetics and interactive installations post-1990s, though often diluted into institutionally sanctioned social experiments rather than the original anti-art flux. Nicolas Bourriaud's 1998 formulation of relational aesthetics, prioritizing interpersonal encounters, rooted in Fluxus's game-like events and communal "social music," as seen in precedents like Joseph Beuys's 1960s actions.[108] By the 2000s, this manifested in interactive works like those in SFMOMA's 2008 The Art of Participation exhibition, which traced participatory kinetics from Fluxus happenings to digital-era viewer-responsive environments, yet empirical art market data—such as auction records showing Fluxus multiples fetching under 1% of high-modernist prices—indicate niche amplification of experimental lineages over broad transformation.[109]

Institutionalization and Market Dynamics

The institutional embrace of Fluxus from the 1980s onward transformed its ephemeral outputs into preserved artifacts within major collections, contradicting its origins as an anti-art, anti-institutional network. The Getty Research Institute acquired the Jean Brown Archive in 1995, encompassing thousands of Fluxus-related documents, artworks, and ephemera that formed a core part of its avant-garde holdings and enabled systematic cataloging of the movement's materials.[110] Similarly, the Museum of Modern Art obtained the Gilbert and Lila Silverman Fluxus Collection in 2009, including over 1,500 books, artist files, and objects accumulated since the 1970s, which supported scholarly access but embedded grassroots Fluxus items in elite curatorial frameworks.[111] These archives preserved transient multiples and performances that might otherwise have dissipated, yet their integration into museum infrastructures prioritized permanence over Fluxus' emphasis on impermanence and direct action. Retrospectives in the 1990s further commodified Fluxus ephemera by framing it within traditional exhibition formats. Shows such as "Flux Attitudes" at the New Museum of Contemporary Art in 1992 and concurrent displays at the Whitney Museum presented scores, boxes, and relics as historical artifacts, drawing audiences to sanitized interpretations of once-provocative interventions.[112] This curatorial elevation, while ensuring visibility, converted low-cost, reproducible items—intended to evade market hierarchies—into objects of institutional validation, highlighting the tension between preservation needs and original anti-commercial ethos. Auction markets amplified these dynamics, with Fluxus-linked works experiencing value inflation that clashed with the movement's rejection of art as commodity. Nam June Paik's Fluxus-era pieces, for example, have fetched prices exceeding $1 million at sales by Christie's and Phillips, such as installations realizing up to $1,312,770, driven by collector demand for rarity in once-mass-produced formats.[113] This economic ascent preserved select artifacts through private wealth but negated Fluxus' causal aim of democratizing creativity outside elite circuits, as ephemera became speculative assets rather than tools for everyday subversion.[3]

Modern Interpretations and Revivals Post-2000

In the 21st century, Fluxus has experienced sporadic revivals through exhibitions that reinterpret its principles of ephemerality, participation, and anti-institutionalism, though these efforts have not coalesced into a unified movement. Notable examples include the 2017 Guggenheim Abu Dhabi festival, which adapted Fluxus event scores for contemporary audiences by incorporating interactive installations and performances drawing on original scores by artists like Yoko Ono and George Brecht. Similarly, the 2023 series of Fluxus-focused shows across European and U.S. venues, such as those documented by activist networks, emphasized archival reconstructions of happenings and multiples, often critiquing the movement's commodification in museum settings. By 2024, exhibitions like "Fluxus in the Swamp" at Santa Fe College Gallery featured site-specific activations of Fluxus relics, blending historical objects with local environmental themes to evoke the movement's DIY ethos.[114][115][116] Digital adaptations have preserved and recontextualized Fluxus materials, enabling broader access while highlighting tensions between original anti-commercial intent and online commodification. The University of Iowa's Fluxus Digital Collection, accessible since the early 2000s, digitizes over 19 linear feet of artifacts from the Fluxus West archive, including event scores, ephemera, and multiples by figures like Ben Vautier and George Maciunas, facilitating virtual reconstructions and scholarly analysis. This platform has supported remote participatory engagements, such as interactive explorations of Flux Year Box 2, but scholars note it risks reducing Fluxus's live, irreproducible essence to static digital surrogates.[117][118] Scholarly reevaluations post-2000 frame Fluxus's legacy in participatory media as a precursor to interactive digital art, yet critique its marginal relevance amid AI-driven creativity. Works like the 2009 anthology The 'Do-it-yourself' Artwork trace Fluxus event scores to new media practices, arguing they influenced user-generated content platforms by prioritizing process over product. However, contemporary analyses, including those in art journals, contend Fluxus's rejection of spectacle appears quaint or ineffective against algorithmically generated art, with no evidence of a revived collective by 2025; instead, its principles are selectively invoked in niche festivals, underscoring institutional absorption over radical disruption.[119][85]

References

User Avatar
No comments yet.