Hubbry Logo
Freedom CaucusFreedom CaucusMain
Open search
Freedom Caucus
Community hub
Freedom Caucus
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Freedom Caucus
Freedom Caucus
Freedom Caucus
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Freedom Caucus, also known as the House Freedom Caucus, is a congressional caucus consisting of Republican members of the United States House of Representatives. It is generally considered to be the most conservative bloc within the chamber.[1][2][3][4][5] The caucus was formed in January 2015 by a group of conservatives and Tea Party movement members, with the aim of pushing the Republican leadership to the right.[6] Its first chairman, Jim Jordan, described the caucus as a "smaller, more cohesive, more agile and more active" group of conservative representatives.[7] Its current chairman, Andy Harris, is considered by some media to be a far-right politician due to some of his radical proposals.[8][9]

Key Information

The caucus is positioned right-wing to far-right on the political spectrum, and it is substantially linked to the values of national conservatism.[10][11][12] The hardline conservative group favors social conservatism and small government, along with right-wing populist beliefs such as opposition to immigration reform.[13][14][15][16][17] The group sought dozens of times to repeal the Affordable Care Act.[18] Established as a more conservative alternative to the Republican Study Committee, the group initially emphasized fiscal conservatism and concerns about House rules, favoring budget cuts and a decentralization of power within the House of Representatives.[19][20]

Known for their strategy of obstructionism and for defending false stories like the Planned Parenthood 2015 undercover videos controversy, according to Samuel L. Popkin,[21] after the election of Donald Trump, the Freedom Caucus became what Politico described as "more populist and nationalist, but less bound by policy principles."[19][22][23] The caucus has included some members who are libertarians.[24][25] The caucus supports House candidates through its PAC, the House Freedom Fund.[26][27] According to the January 6th Committee, members of the Freedom Caucus were instrumental in helping Donald Trump in his failed attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 United States presidential election.[28]

History

[edit]

The caucus originated during the mid–January 2015 Republican congressional retreat in Hershey, Pennsylvania.[29] Nine conservative Republican members of the House began planning a new congressional caucus separate from the Republican Study Committee and apart from the House Republican Conference. The founding members who constituted the first board of directors for the new caucus were Republican representatives Scott Garrett of New Jersey, Jim Jordan of Ohio, John Fleming of Louisiana, Matt Salmon of Arizona, Justin Amash of Michigan, Raúl Labrador of Idaho, Mulvaney of South Carolina, Ron DeSantis of Florida and Mark Meadows of North Carolina.[30]

At the retreat in Pennsylvania, the group settled on the name Freedom Caucus. Mick Mulvaney told Ryan Lizza of the New Yorker, "We had twenty names, and all of them were terrible. None of us liked the Freedom Caucus, either, but it was so generic and so universally awful that we had no reason to be against it." According to Lizza, "one of the working titles for the group was the Reasonable Nutjob Caucus."[31][32]

During the crisis over the funding of the Department of Homeland Security in early 2015, the caucus offered four plans for resolution, but all were rejected by the Republican leadership. One of the caucus leaders, Raúl Labrador, said the caucus would offer an alternative that the most conservative Republican members could support.[33][needs update]

Opposition to Speaker of the House John Boehner

[edit]

The newly formed group declared that a criterion for new members in the group would be opposition to John Boehner as Speaker of the House and willingness to vote against or thwart him on legislation that the group opposed.[34]

The House Freedom Caucus was involved in the resignation of Boehner on September 25, 2015, and the ensuing leadership battle for the new speaker.[35] Members of the caucus who had voted against Boehner for speaker felt unfairly punished, accusing him of cutting them off from positions in the Republican Study Committee and depriving them of key committee assignments.[36][37] Boehner found it increasingly difficult to manage House Republicans with the fierce opposition of conservative members of the Republican Party in the House, and he sparred with those House Republicans in 2013 over their willingness to shut down the government in pursuit of goals such as repealing the Affordable Care Act. These Republicans later created and became members of the Freedom Caucus in 2015.[34][38][39][40]

After Boehner resigned as speaker, Kevin McCarthy, the House majority leader, was initially the lead contender to succeed him, but the Freedom Caucus withheld its support.[41] However, McCarthy withdrew from the race on October 8, 2015, after appearing to suggest that the Benghazi investigation's purpose had been to lower the approval ratings of Hillary Clinton.[42][43] On the same day as McCarthy's withdrawal, Reid Ribble resigned from the Freedom Caucus saying he had joined to promote certain policies and could not support the role that it was playing in the leadership race.[44]

On October 20, 2015, Paul Ryan announced that his bid for the speaker of the United States House of Representatives was contingent on an official endorsement by the Freedom Caucus.[45] While the group could not reach the 80% approval that was needed to give an official endorsement, on October 21, 2015, it announced that it had reached a supermajority support for Ryan.[46] On October 29, 2015, Ryan succeeded Boehner as the speaker of the House.[47]

On October 30, 2017, Vanity Fair published an interview with Boehner, who said of the Freedom Caucus: "They can't tell you what they're for. They can tell you everything they're against. They're anarchists. They want total chaos. Tear it all down and start over. That's where their mindset is."[48]

Backlash in 2016

[edit]

The group faced backlash from the Republican Party establishment during the 2016 election cycle.[49] One of its members, Representative Tim Huelskamp, a Tea Party Republican representing Kansas's first district, was defeated during a primary election on August 2, 2016, by Roger Marshall.[50]

2017–2021: First Trump presidency

[edit]

Following the election of Donald Trump, Mulvaney said, "Trump wants to turn Washington upside down – that was his first message and his winning message. We want the exact same thing. To the extent that he's got to convince Republicans to change Washington, we're there to help him ... and I think that makes us Donald Trump's best allies in the House."[51] Freedom Caucus vice chair Jim Jordan said that during the Trump administration, the Freedom Caucus shifted focus from passing legislation to defending the President.[52]

Rejection of American Health Care Act in 2017

[edit]

On March 24, 2017, the American Health Care Act (AHCA), the House Republican bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, was withdrawn by Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan because it lacked the votes to pass, due in large part to opposition from Freedom Caucus Republicans who believed that the replacement provisions had the effect of failing to repeal some elements of the original Affordable Care Act.[53][54][55]

Two days later, President Donald Trump publicly criticized the Freedom Caucus and other right-wing groups, such as the Club for Growth and Heritage Action, that opposed the bill. Trump tweeted: "Democrats are smiling in D.C. that the Freedom Caucus, with the help of Club For Growth and Heritage, have saved Planned Parenthood & Obamacare!"[56][57] On the same day, Representative Ted Poe of Texas resigned from the Freedom Caucus.[58] On March 30, 2017, Trump "declared war" on the Freedom Caucus, sending a tweet urging Republicans to "fight them" in the 2018 midterm elections "if they don't get on the team" (i.e., support Trump's proposals).[59] Vocal Freedom Caucus member Justin Amash responded by accusing Trump of "succumb[ing] to the D.C. Establishment."[60]

Trump later developed a closer relationship with the caucus chair, Mark Meadows.[61] In April 2018, Trump described three caucus members – Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Ron DeSantis – as "absolute warriors" for his defense during the course of the Special Counsel investigation.[62]

During first impeachment of Trump

[edit]

In May 2019, the Freedom Caucus officially condemned one of its founding members, Justin Amash, after he called for the impeachment of President Trump over the Trump–Ukraine scandal.[63] Amash, an outspoken libertarian, announced in June 2019 that he had left the caucus; later the same year, he left the Republican Party and joined the Libertarian Party.[64][65]

During the impeachment inquiry against Trump, and subsequent first impeachment of Trump, the caucus emerged as a chief defender of Trump during the proceedings.[66][67]

Meadows's appointment as WH chief of staff and Liz Cheney criticism

[edit]

In March 2020, former Freedom Caucus chair Mark Meadows was appointed as White House chief of staff, replacing Mick Mulvaney, who was also a founding member of the Freedom Caucus.[68]

Freedom Caucus members have called on Liz Cheney to resign as Chair of the House Republican Conference, because of her vocal criticism of Trump's foreign policy, response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and use of social media,[69] leading to her firing May 12, 2021, and replacement by Elise Stefanik two days later.

2020 National Defense Authorization Act

[edit]

In December 2020, the caucus sided with Donald Trump and opposed the NDAA on the grounds that it did not include a provision to repeal Section 230.[70]

2021–2023: 117th Congress and embrace of populism

[edit]

Role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and opposition to second Trump impeachment

[edit]

After Trump lost his bid for reelection in November 2020, many members of the Freedom Caucus supported Trump's attempt to overturn the election results. In early December 2020, amid pressure from Trump on congressional Republicans to help him subvert the election outcome, two dozen House Republicans, including many Freedom Caucus members, sent a letter to Trump asking him to order his Attorney General, William P. Barr, to appoint a Justice Department special counsel to investigate supposed election "irregularities", even though Barr had previously acknowledged that there was no evidence justifying such a step.[71] Several Freedom Caucus members met with officials at Trump's White House in December 2020, discussing ways to overturn the election results during the 2021 United States Electoral College vote count.[72] Most Freedom Caucus members objected to the counting of the electoral votes that formalized Trump's defeat.[73]

During the second impeachment of Donald Trump for incitement of insurrection, Freedom Caucus leadership and members demanded that Representative Liz Cheney, one of 10 Republicans who voted in favor of impeachment, resign from her role as chairwoman of the House Republican Conference.[74][75][76]

America First Caucus and MAGA Squad

[edit]

In April 2021, a faction within the Freedom Caucus, led by Paul Gosar and Marjorie Taylor Greene, attempted to form a new splinter group called the "America First Caucus," along with Matt Gaetz. Senior members of the Freedom Caucus reportedly reacted with "fury" to the proposal, with Ken Buck publicly denouncing it.[77] The new caucus was later scrapped.[78]

An unofficial faction of Trump loyalists, sometimes referred to as the 'MAGA Squad', included Gosar, Greene, Gaetz, Madison Cawthorn, Louie Gohmert, Mo Brooks, Andy Biggs, Scott Perry, and Lauren Boebert. Described as more radical than the mainstream Freedom Caucus, The group supported primary challenges against incumbent Republicans during the 2022 United States House of Representatives elections.[79][80][81][82]

Respect for Marriage Act

[edit]

In July 2022, the caucus split over the Respect for Marriage Act, which recognized a statutory right to same-sex marriage. All caucus members voted against except Chairperson Scott Perry (R-PA), who joined 46 other Republicans and all Democrats in voting for the bill. The Freedom Caucus adopted a formal position urging Senate Republicans to block the bill, and Perry later voted against its final passage.[83] To take a formal position on legislation, the Freedom Caucus requires the support of 80% of the caucus's members.[83]

2023–2024: 118th Congress and House leadership conflict

[edit]

In the November 2022 elections, Republicans narrowly regained control of the House of Representatives for the 118th Congress.

In December 2022, seven hardline Republicans, including Freedom Caucus Chair Scott Perry and several other caucus members, sent a letter outlining demands for the next Speaker. Many echoed earlier requests made that summer, such as increasing Freedom Caucus representation on key committees, including the House Rules Committee and chairmanships; allowing any amendment to receive a vote if backed by at least ten percent of the Republican conference; prohibiting House Republican leaders and affiliated PACs from interfering in primaries; reinstating the motion to vacate the chair; and codifying the Hastert Rule, which bars legislation from advancing without support from a majority of House Republicans.[84][85]

2023 House leadership election

[edit]
Further information: January 2023 Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election

The Freedom Caucus was actively involved in the ensuing House Republican leadership elections, but was divided over whether to challenge House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy's bid to be Speaker of the House of Representatives.[86] Former caucus chair Andy Biggs launched an unsuccessful challenge to McCarthy,[87] losing 31-188 in a secret ballot vote, with five Republicans writing in other names.[88][89] McCarthy ran with the endorsement of other Freedom Caucus members, such as vice chair Jim Jordan,[90] David Schweikert,[91] and Marjorie Taylor Greene.[92] Caucus member Byron Donalds also ran for House Republican Conference chair, but lost to incumbent Elise Stefanik,[93] while member Andrew Clyde ran for House Republican Conference secretary, but lost to Lisa McClain.[94]

McCarthy needed 218 votes from the House floor to be elected speaker in the January 3, 2023, vote.[95] After McCarthy won the internal Republican nomination, some Freedom Caucus members outspokenly supported him, including Jordan, a former McCarthy rival[96] who was set to be chairperson of the House Judiciary Committee.[84] Marjorie Taylor Greene also backed McCarthy, saying that any alternative to McCarthy would be insufficiently right-wing.[84] Other caucus members resisted supporting McCarthy, with five members saying they would vote against him, although they have not coalesced around a specific alternative candidate.[84][97][96] A third group of caucus members did not publicly support or oppose McCarthy's speakership bid, seeking to extract concessions from him.[84][97] Because the House Republicans only had a narrow majority (222–212), McCarthy could not gain a majority unless nearly all Republicans voted for him.[89][97] McCarthy warned his internal opponents that the next speaker of the House could be chosen with House Democratic votes if the Republican caucus failed to unite around him.[88] In January 2023, 19 Freedom Caucus members voted against McCarthy during the House floor vote for Speaker,[98] eventually allowing McCarthy to become Speaker only after securing extensive concessions on changing the House rules.[99]

2023 conflict with Marjorie Taylor Greene

[edit]

On June 21, 2023, Greene engaged in a verbal argument with fellow caucus member Lauren Boebert on the House floor, in which she called the latter a "little bitch."[100] As a result of this incident, the caucus voted by secret ballot to expel Greene.[101]

2023 debt-ceiling crisis and aftermath

[edit]
See also: 2023 United States debt-ceiling crisis

In May 2023, Speaker McCarthy worked with the Biden administration to pass a compromise debt-ceiling reform and spending bill, with the Freedom Caucus supporting the bills as part of the compromise that got McCarthy elected speaker.[102] By suspending the debt ceiling until January 2025, the government avoided a default. The spending bill focused on issues such as military construction and veterans affairs.[103][104]

On May 31, during a procedural rule vote for the bill to end the debt ceiling crisis, 29 Freedom Caucus aligned Republicans voted against the rule. Rules are historically supported by all members of the majority party and opposed by minority members regardless of their feelings on the underlying bill. In order to ensure the bill's passage, Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries held up a green card to alert Democrats they could vote in favor of the measure, resulting in 52 Democrats showing their support for the procedural vote.[105][106] A majority of both the Republican and Democratic parties voted for the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, but more Republicans (71) voted against the bill than Democrats (46).[107]

Following the passage of the Fiscal Responsibility Act, 11 members of the Freedom Caucus voted with Democrats to block a procedural rules vote on a Republican bill that would hinder the federal government's ability to regulate gas stoves. Freedom Caucus members said the vote was a protest of McCarthy's handling of the debt-ceiling crisis.[108] On June 12, 2023, the Freedom Caucus and McCarthy reached an agreement that resulted in the Freedom Caucus not blocking procedural votes in exchange for conservative legislation being brought to the floor.[109]

Removal of Kevin McCarthy as speaker

[edit]
Main article: Removal of Kevin McCarthy as Speaker of the House

Despite the earlier agreement, in September 2023, Freedom Caucus members once again began joining with Democrats to block procedural rule votes. On September 19 and September 21, five members of the Freedom Caucus, voted with Democrats to block a vote on a military funding bill. The Freedom Caucus was angry about a proposed continuing resolution to avert a government shutdown that they argued did not do enough to cut spending.[110][111] On September 29, twenty-one Freedom Caucus members joined with Democrats to block a continuing resolution which included spending cuts and immigration restrictions. Freedom Caucus members who voted against the resolution said they would not support a temporary spending bill under any circumstance.[112]

Because of this conflict, the federal government appeared poised to shut down.[113] The Freedom Caucus threatened to depose McCarthy if he turned to Democrats to gather more votes.[114] On September 29, Politico reported that Representative Matt Gaetz had reached out to Congressional Progressive Caucus chair Pramila Jayapal, among other Democrats about removing McCarthy.[115] The following day, hours before a shutdown was expected to occur, the House of Representatives passed a bipartisan continuing resolution to fund the government through November 17. The resolution was passed in the Senate and signed by President Joe Biden, averting a shutdown.[116] Representative Matt Gaetz, who had led resistance to McCarthy,[117] announced in an interview with CNN that he would move to remove McCarthy for working with Democrats.[118]

On October 2, Gaetz filed a motion to vacate, forcing a vote on McCarthy's removal within two legislative days.[119] Voting began the following day; McCarthy ruled out a deal with Democrats. Representative Tom Cole unsuccessfully moved to table the motion. The House proceeded with a successful vote to vacate on a 216–210 vote, the first time in congressional history that the chair was vacated.[120] Eventually, the Republican conference unanimously elected Mike Johnson Speaker of the House.[121]

Conflict with Speaker Johnson

[edit]

In order to again avert a government shutdown, Mike Johnson was forced to use a suspension of the rules to pass a continuing resolution on November 14, 2023. 93 Republicans and 2 Democrats voted against the resolution.[122] The continuing resolution once again angered Freedom Caucus members. On November 15, 19 Freedom Caucus members joined with Democrats to block a rule vote on a bill funding the Justice Department.[123]

On January 7, 2024, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Johnson agreed to a $1.59 trillion topline spending deal. The topline spending levels agreed for 2024 that was not substantially different from the deal McCarthy and President Biden had negotiated.[124] The agreement was met by outrage by the House Freedom Caucus, essentially ensuring Democrats would be required to join Republicans to pass a finalized spending bill in the House.[125] On January 10, twelve Freedom Caucus members joined Democrats to block a rule vote on an unrelated bill about electric cars in protest of the spending deal.[126]

With the House Freedom Caucus' determination to also oppose rules on any bill they did not support, Speaker Johnson was forced to rely on suspension of rules: this special procedure allowed the immediate passage of a legislative proposal without the need for a rule vote, but required the support of two-thirds of the House. Democrats opted to vote in favor of suspension of the rules for budget legislation.[127]

On April 20, over two months after the Senate had passed a funding bill for Israel, Taiwan, and Ukraine,[128] Jeffries negotiated the legislative path for the bill and delivered a majority of Democratic votes to pass a legislative package providing aid to the three countries in separate bills, each of which passed Congress with bipartisan support and large majorities and was signed into law by President Biden.[129] The bill was voted against in committee by three Freedom Caucus members – enough to prevent it progressing under normal circumstances – but all Democrats voted for it.[130]

As the House continued to pass a series of key legislative victories that were supported by a majority of Democrats, Freedom Caucus-aligned Republicans continued to threaten to trigger another motion to vacate the chair, this time with Speaker Johnson targeted. However, Jeffries hinted at providing a lifeline to Speaker Mike Johnson in an interview with The New York Times.[131]

The House voted to table (kill) the motion by a vote of 359-43, allowing Johnson to remain speaker.[132] 196 Republicans and 163 Democrats voted to table the motion; 11 Republicans and 32 Democrats voted against tabling the motion. The Democrats who supported Johnson claimed they did so because of the vital role he had played in providing funding for the federal government and for Ukraine.[133]

2024 elections

[edit]

The chair of the Freedom Caucus, Bob Good, faced backlash for voting to remove Kevin McCarthy and endorsing Ron DeSantis in the 2024 Republican Party presidential primaries. The leadership positions held by Good and Chip Roy in the Caucus led to a rift between the Freedom Caucus and Trump.[134] Good was ultimately defeated in a 2024 primary challenge from state senator John McGuire, who was endorsed by Donald Trump. Warren Davidson's support for McGuire led to his expulsion from the caucus, with Troy Nehls subsequently resigning from the caucus in support of Davidson.[135] McGuire won by a margin of 0.6%, with Good seeking a recount.[136] Good said he would resign as chair if he lost the recount, which he subsequently did lose.[137][138] Good stepped down as chair in September, when the House was back in session.[139]

Andy Harris was chosen as the new chair of the Freedom Caucus for the rest of 2024.[140] The Freedom Caucus supported the nomination of JD Vance as Trump's vice presidential candidate in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.[141]

2025–present: 119th Congress and Second Trump Presidency

[edit]

119th Congress House Republican leadership elections (2025)

[edit]

Republicans voted to nominate their speaker of the House candidate on Wednesday, November 13.[142] Before the vote, members of the Freedom Caucus and the Main Street Caucus, along with speaker Mike Johnson, reached an agreement: the proposed rule changes on Conference assignments would be withdrawn; in exchange, the holdouts pledged to support a reform of the motion to vacate, which would raise the threshold to introduce it from one member to nine members. After the deal was struck, Johnson was nominated by voice vote without opposition.[143]

Following Speaker Johnson's December 17 announcement of a continuing resolution to avert a government shutdown, which included funding opposed by many conservative Republicans, Republican representative Thomas Massie said he would vote against Johnson in the upcoming speakership election. Politico and Punchbowl News reported that privately several other Republicans were "uncommitted" to supporting Johnson.[144][145] Later, Republican senators Rand Paul and Mike Lee, as well as Republican representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, publicly announced that they are open to supporting Elon Musk to be the next Speaker of the House.[146][147] On December 20, Freedom Caucus chair Andy Harris said he was "undecided."[148] On December 30, 2024, President-elect Donald Trump endorsed Johnson through a post on Truth Social.[149][150] Despite the endorsement, multiple Republican representatives have publicly said they are uncommitted to voting for Johnson; including Victoria Spartz,[a] Andy Biggs, Tim Burchett, and Chip Roy.[152][153][154] Roy also said that "Johnson does not yet have the support to be speaker."[155][156]

Initially, during the Speaker vote, Republican Representatives Thomas Massie voted for Tom Emmer, Ralph Norman voted for Jim Jordan, and Keith Self voted for Byron Donalds, while Republicans Andy Biggs, Michael Cloud, Andrew Clyde, Paul Gosar, Andy Harris, and Chip Roy (all of whom were undecided going into the vote) did not respond to the initial roll call vote. The clerk then called a second time the names of those who had not replied to the first call, and all six voted for Johnson.[157] Johnson's vote count therefore stood at 216, two short of the required majority. However, after meeting with Johnson off the floor and receiving a phone call by Trump, Norman and Self shifted to supporting Johnson before the final vote was declared.[158][159]

Resignation of Anna Paulina Luna

[edit]

In March 2025, Freedom Caucus member Anna Paulina Luna worked with Democrats and some Republicans to force a vote on a bill through a discharge petition which would allow new parents to vote by proxy. The petition angered members of the Freedom Caucus, who believe that proxy voting is unconstitutional, and led them to initially vote against a procedural rules vote on Republican supported energy bills. After negotiations with House Republican leadership, the Freedom Caucus would later allow the vote to pass. Freedom Caucus leadership urged Republican leadership to raise the threshold required to force a vote on a bill through a discharge petition.[160] Paulina Luna would later resign from the Freedom Caucus. In a letter, she said her decision to resign was due to the loss of "mutual respect that has guided our caucus."[161] On April 1, Republican leadership attempted to pass a rule vote that would prevent Luna's bill from being voted on. Nine Republicans (Luna, Tim Burchett, Mike Lawler, Kevin Kiley, Nick LaLota, Jeff Van Drew, Max Miller, Greg Steube and Ryan Mackenzie) joined all Democrats to block the rule vote.[162] Afterwards, Freedom Caucus hard-liners said they would vote against any rule that did not include language preventing the proxy voting bill from coming to a vote. In response, Speaker Johnson suspended voting for the remainder of that week.[163] On April 6, Paulina Luna and Johnson reached an agreement that would allow absent members to use vote pairing. Their intended vote will still be published in the Congressional Record.[164]

2026 midterm elections

[edit]

A number of Freedom Caucus members are not standing for re-election in the 2026 United States House of Representatives elections.[165] Those members include Chip Roy, Barry Moore, Ralph Norman, Andy Biggs, Byron Donalds and Tom Tiffany.[166]

Political positions

[edit]
Part of a series on
Conservatism
in the United States
Schools
Principles
History
Intellectuals
Politicians
Jurists
Commentators
Activists
Literature
Parties
Active
Defunct
Think tanks
Media
Newspapers
Journals
TV channels
Websites
Other
Other organizations
Congressional caucuses
Economics
Gun rights
Identity politics
Nativist
Religion
Watchdog groups
Youth/student groups
Social media
Miscellaneous
Other
Movements
Related

The caucus is positioned right-wing[10] to far-right[11] on the political spectrum. On October 30, 2017, Vanity Fair published an interview with John Boehner, who said of the Freedom Caucus: "They can't tell you what they're for. They can tell you everything they're against. They're anarchists. They want total chaos. Tear it all down and start over. That's where their mindset is."[48]

After the 2016 presidential election of Donald Trump, the Freedom Caucus shifted its emphasis to loyalty to Trump,[19][23] and became what Politico described as "more populist and nationalist, but less bound by policy principles."[22] The caucus has included some members who are libertarians.[24][25]

Affiliated political and advocacy organizations

[edit]

The House Freedom Caucus is affiliated with several political and advocacy organizations that support its mission and members. The House Freedom Fund is the official political action committee of the caucus, providing financial backing to conservative candidates aligned with its priorities.[167] It plays a key role in primary campaigns, often supporting challengers to Republican incumbents who are seen as insufficiently aligned with the caucus’s principles.[168][169] The Fund is closely tied to the caucus and has received support from major Republican donors to influence the outcome of competitive primaries.[170]

House Freedom Action, a Super PAC affiliated with the caucus, operates independently to run issue ads and support candidates in federal elections.[171] It has been active in high-profile races, including those involving Freedom Caucus leaders.[172][173]

In addition, the Freedom Caucus Foundation serves as a nonprofit advocacy arm that promotes the caucus’s policy goals through public outreach and media campaigns.[174] The foundation has aired television ads highlighting the legislative activities of the Caucus, including its role in shaping the 2025 budget negotiations.[175][176]

The similarly named State Freedom Caucus Network, an offshoot of the Conservative Partnership institute, is not officially affiliated with the House Freedom Caucus.[177][178][179]

Leadership

[edit]

The current chair of the caucus is Representative Andy Harris from Maryland, with Representative Jim Jordan as the deputy chair. In January 2022, Representative Lauren Boebert was elected as communications chair, and Representative Chip Roy as policy chair.[180]

Name Start End District Duration Ref(s)
Jim Jordan February 11, 2015 January 3, 2017 OH-04 1 year, 327 days
Mark Meadows January 3, 2017 October 1, 2019 NC-11 2 years, 271 days [181]
Andy Biggs October 1, 2019 January 1, 2022 AZ-05 2 years, 92 days [182]
Scott Perry January 1, 2022 (2022-01-01) January 1, 2024 (2024-01-01) PA-10 2 years, 0 days [183]
Bob Good January 1, 2024 September 17, 2024 VA-05 260 days [184]
Andy Harris September 17, 2024 Incumbent MD-01 1 year, 41 days [140]

Membership

[edit]
The map shows districts represented by Freedom Caucus members as of April 2025.

Membership policy

[edit]

The House Freedom Caucus does not disclose the names of its members and membership is by invitation only.[185][186] The New York Times wrote in October 2015 that the caucus usually meets "in the basement of a local pub rather than at the Capitol."[187] The caucus acts as a bloc, with decisions that are supported by 80 percent made binding on all of its members, which has strengthened its influence among House Republicans.[2]

Historical membership

[edit]

As the HFC does not publicize a full membership list, the known number of members at the start of each electoral cycle is listed below.

Starting membership in election cycles
Election year Republican seats ±
2016
28 / 241
 New
2018
29 / 199
 Increase 1
2020
44 / 213
 Increase 15
2022
45 / 222
 Increase 1
2024
35 / 220
 Decrease 10

Current members

[edit]

A number of members have identified themselves, or have been identified by others, as belonging to the Freedom Caucus. There are at least 31 caucus members as of March 2025; those members include:

Alabama

Arizona

Colorado

Florida

Georgia

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Louisiana

Maryland

Missouri

Ohio

Oklahoma

Pennsylvania

South Carolina

Tennessee

Texas

Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Former members

[edit]
This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by editing the page to add missing items, with references to reliable sources.

Left caucus

[edit]

Removed from caucus

[edit]

Lost renomination or re-election

[edit]

Retired or died

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Freedom Caucus

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The House is an informal of conservative Republican members in the United States , committed to promoting open, accountable, and alongside strict adherence to the and policies enhancing American liberty, safety, and prosperity. Founded in January 2015 by nine members—including , , Raúl Labrador, , , John Fleming, , , and —the group emerged from Tea Party-aligned conservatives frustrated with Republican leadership's compromises on fiscal restraint and core principles. Comprising roughly 40 members whose roster remains confidential, the caucus has exerted outsized influence by leveraging its bloc votes to challenge establishment figures, such as opposing Speaker John Boehner's agenda leading to his 2015 resignation and voting to vacate Speaker Kevin McCarthy's position in 2023 over unmet demands for spending cuts and investigations. Under Chairman Andy Harris, elected in September 2024, the caucus continues to prioritize , resistance to omnibus spending bills, and alignment with constitutional limits on federal power, though it has faced internal tensions and member departures amid narrow GOP majorities.

History

Founding and Core Objectives (2015)

The House Freedom Caucus was established in January 2015 by nine Republican members of the U.S. seeking to advance more stringent conservative policies within the party. Founding members included Representatives of Ohio, of , John Fleming of Louisiana, of , of , of , of , of , and of . This formation occurred amid growing frustrations with Republican leadership's willingness to compromise on fiscal and spending issues, particularly under Speaker , whom some viewed as insufficiently committed to reducing government size. The caucus's core objectives, as articulated in its founding principles, emphasize open, accountable, and ; fidelity to the and the ; and the promotion of policies that enhance the liberty, safety, and prosperity of Americans. Members pledged to lobby aggressively for legislation curtailing federal overreach, including cuts to and opposition to omnibus bills that bypassed regular order. Unlike broader conservative groups like the , the Freedom Caucus positioned itself as uncompromising, requiring near-unanimous internal agreement before taking public stances to maintain bloc voting power on key votes. By October 2015, the group had expanded to approximately 36 to 40 members, primarily from safe Republican districts in the and Midwest, reflecting its appeal among the most conservative and ideologically driven lawmakers. This rapid growth underscored its role in amplifying conservative demands for fiscal restraint and procedural reforms in the , setting the stage for challenges to party leadership.

Early Challenges to GOP Establishment (2015-2016)

The House mounted significant early opposition to Speaker , beginning with the , 2015, speakership vote where 25 Republicans, including many members, voted against his reelection, up from 12 in 2013. This defiance highlighted the group's leverage, as they aimed to block Boehner's priorities by coordinating with Democrats when necessary to deny him a . Tensions escalated over fiscal and social issues, including resistance to funding amid investigations into its practices. On July 28, 2015, Freedom Caucus co-founder Rep. filed a against Boehner, citing failures to advance conservative reforms such as repealing the and balancing the budget. Although the motion was referred to the Rules Committee without a floor vote, it intensified pressure on Boehner, contributing to his announcement of resignation on September 25, 2015, effective at the end of October. Boehner attributed his exit to ongoing intraparty battles, underscoring the Caucus's role in forcing leadership change despite lacking the votes for outright removal. Following Boehner's departure, the Freedom Caucus initially resisted Rep. Paul Ryan's candidacy for Speaker, demanding procedural reforms to empower rank-and-file members, such as lowering the threshold for motions to vacate and enhancing conference influence on rules. On October 21, 2015, a majority of Caucus members—approximately 27 out of 39—backed Ryan after he agreed to conditions like no future bipartisan budget deals without conference approval, enabling his unanimous Republican nomination and election on October 29, 2015. This uneasy alliance reflected the Caucus's strategy of extracting concessions rather than total obstruction. Fiscal disputes persisted into late 2015, with the Caucus decrying the $1.1 trillion Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 as excessive spending that increased non-defense discretionary outlays by billions over conservative targets. They proposed amendments to remove controversial provisions, such as funding for the Iran nuclear deal implementation, but ultimately could not derail passage on December 18, 2015. In March 2016, the group opposed Speaker Ryan's $1.07 trillion budget resolution, arguing it accepted President Obama's spending levels and failed to enforce promised cuts, ensuring its initial defeat in the Budget Committee before revisions. These actions demonstrated the Caucus's commitment to fiscal conservatism, often prioritizing principle over party unity amid establishment efforts to maintain legislative momentum.

Alignment and Tensions During First Trump Presidency (2017-2021)

The House Freedom Caucus emerged as one of President Donald Trump's most reliable congressional allies during his first term, providing crucial support for key elements of his agenda including , judicial nominations, and border security initiatives. Members consistently voted in favor of the 2017 , which the caucus endorsed as aligning with their principles of economic growth and reduced government intervention. Under Chairman , who served from January 2017 to January 2019 and maintained close coordination with the , the group advocated for Trump's priorities such as and conservative appointments, including the confirmations of in 2017 and in 2018. Tensions arose early over healthcare reform, as the caucus opposed the American Health Care Act in March 2017 for retaining too many provisions, contributing to its withdrawal before a House vote. Trump publicly rebuked the group on , stating that their opposition would "hurt the overall Republican agenda" and suggesting primary challenges against dissenting members. This rift highlighted the caucus's insistence on full repeal of Obamacare, contrasting with Trump's push for a quicker legislative victory. Fiscal conservatism fueled ongoing friction, particularly with massive spending packages. The caucus formally opposed the $1.3 trillion omnibus appropriations bill in March 2018, urging Trump to veto it over excessive non-defense spending and insufficient border wall funding, though Trump ultimately signed it. They backed Trump's demands for wall funding, supporting government shutdowns including the 35-day closure from December 22, 2018, to January 25, 2019—the longest in U.S. history—triggered by disputes over $5.7 billion in border barrier allocations. The caucus provided staunch defense during Trump's impeachments, unanimously opposing articles in December 2019 over aid and in January 2021 following the Capitol riot, viewing them as partisan overreaches. Meadows, transitioning to in March 2020, exemplified the deepening alliance, facilitating coordination on executive actions amid legislative gridlock. Despite periodic clashes, the group's populist shift under Trump reinforced their role as enforcers of his "" priorities against establishment resistance.

Post-Election Stances and Internal Shifts (2021-2023)

Following the 2020 presidential election, House Freedom Caucus members largely aligned with former President Donald Trump's efforts to contest the results, emphasizing demands for audits and investigations into alleged voting irregularities in key states. On January 6, 2021, amid the joint session of Congress certifying electoral votes, at least eight caucus members—including Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), and Scott Perry (R-Pa.)—raised objections to certifying Arizona's and Pennsylvania's electors, delaying proceedings until after the Capitol breach. In the wake of the events, the House approved a single against Trump on January 13, 2021, charging incitement of insurrection by a 232-197 vote, with ten Republicans joining Democrats. All Freedom Caucus members voted against the article, defending Trump and rejecting the proceedings as politically motivated retaliation. The caucus continued opposing Biden administration priorities, including the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan in March 2021, which every member voted against, citing excessive spending and insufficient work requirements. Leadership transitioned after Mark Meadows resigned as chairman on October 1, 2020, to serve as Trump's White House chief of staff; Scott Perry assumed the role in early 2021, maintaining the group's focus on confronting GOP establishment figures. Under Perry, the caucus navigated internal frictions, including a February 2022 public dispute between members Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) over personal attacks and ideological purity, which exposed strains between original fiscal conservatives and newer Trump-aligned populists. Leaked audio of Kevin McCarthy criticizing Trump in 2021 further divided members, with some like Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.) questioning alliances while others prioritized unity against Democrats. By 2022, the caucus grappled with an identity shift from strict limited-government advocacy to broader nationalist , prompting at least two members to explore forming splinter groups amid tactical disagreements on whether to block routine GOP bills. Membership held steady at around 35 active participants, incorporating high-profile entrants like Greene and Boebert, but requiring 80% consensus for official positions to enforce cohesion. The 2022 midterms bolstered their numbers, with Republican gains yielding roughly 45 members and allies in the starting January 3, 2023—up from about 30 previously—enhancing leverage in speaker negotiations despite ongoing internal debates over compromising with leadership.

Leadership Conflicts and McCarthy Ouster (2023-2024)

In early 2023, the Freedom played a pivotal role in Speaker McCarthy's protracted , with 20 conservative Republicans, including several members, initially withholding support and forcing 15 ballots over concessions such as rule changes allowing a single member to trigger a motion to vacate the speakership. These tensions persisted amid disputes over fiscal restraint, as members criticized McCarthy for insufficient cuts in spending proposals. In June 2023, approximately a dozen Freedom Republicans blocked House proceedings for two days in protest of McCarthy's bipartisan debt ceiling agreement with President Biden, which they viewed as conceding too much without deeper measures. Conflicts intensified in September 2023 when McCarthy advanced a short-term on September 30 to avert a , relying on Democratic votes after conservative opposition to the bill's lack of spending reductions and policy riders. On October 2, Representative , aligned with priorities though not a formal member, filed a privileged motion to vacate the speakership, citing McCarthy's alleged breach of commitments on fiscal discipline and leadership accountability. The House voted on the motion the following day, October 3, removing McCarthy by a 216-210 margin—the first such ouster in U.S. history—with eight Republicans joining all Democrats, including members and who opposed McCarthy's governance style and bipartisan maneuvers. The ouster plunged the House into a three-week leadership vacuum, paralyzing legislative action as Republicans nominated multiple candidates. Freedom Caucus Chairman announced his bid on October 4 and secured the GOP nomination on October 13, backed by Caucus hardliners for his alignment on and oversight priorities. However, Jordan failed three floor votes—October 17 (200-232, with 20 Republican defections), October 18 (199-232), and October 20 (194-236, with 25 Republican no-votes)—due to resistance from moderates wary of his confrontational approach and past investigations. On October 25, 2023, Louisiana Representative Mike Johnson, a Freedom Caucus ally with a conservative voting record, was elected speaker on the first ballot with unanimous Republican support (220-209), restoring order after negotiations emphasizing party unity and procedural reforms. Into 2024, McCarthy attributed ongoing Republican challenges, including narrow majorities and stalled priorities, to the Caucus's disruptive tactics, arguing they prioritized ideological purity over effective governance. The episode highlighted internal GOP fractures, with Caucus members defending the ouster as a necessary check against establishment complacency on debt and spending, though it drew criticism for empowering Democratic leverage in divided government.

Adaptation in 119th Congress and Second Trump Era (2025-Present)

Entering the 119th Congress on January 3, 2025, the House Freedom Caucus, chaired by Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) following his re-election to the position in December 2024, demonstrated a marked adaptation toward supporting President Donald Trump's second-term agenda despite its historical emphasis on fiscal restraint. Initially issuing a warning letter to Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) on January 3, 2025, outlining demands for conservative priorities, the caucus refrained from immediate obstruction of Johnson's strategy to advance Trump's policies. This shift manifested in several key legislative actions. In March 2025, members endorsed a budget resolution incorporating a substantial increase and a to avert a , prioritizing party unity over traditional objections to deficit expansion. By May 2025, ongoing negotiations with staff highlighted collaborative efforts on policy implementation. The caucus's compliance peaked in July 2025, when, after direct intervention by President Trump on July 2, it relented on resistance to a comprehensive budget package—the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA)—encompassing tax extensions, spending adjustments, and other Trump priorities, allowing its passage on July 3 despite initial holdouts. Amid these developments, the caucus positioned itself as integral to Trump's "DC revolution," evolving from past perceptions as internal disruptors to enablers of his objectives, though this alignment involved concessions on and spending levels that tested its core fiscal principles. In October 2025, during a impasse, Freedom Caucus members advocated for a long-term stopgap measure, aligning with Speaker Johnson's adoption of harder-line negotiating tactics reminiscent of the group's earlier playbook. This period underscored a pragmatic adaptation, subordinating intra-party leverage to broader administration goals, even as reports noted diminished independent influence under Trump's consolidated GOP control.

Ideology and Principles

Commitment to Constitutional Limits on Government

The House Freedom Caucus embodies a dedication to restraining federal authority within the boundaries delineated by the U.S. Constitution, particularly emphasizing the enumerated powers clause in Article I, Section 8, and the Tenth Amendment's reservation of non-delegated powers to the states or the people. This stance reflects a broader ideological alignment with constitutional conservatism, where members prioritize legislative actions that curtail bureaucratic expansion and executive actions perceived to encroach on legislative prerogatives. For example, the caucus has repeatedly invoked constitutional fidelity to oppose unchecked federal spending and regulatory growth, arguing that such measures violate the framers' intent for limited central government. A key demonstration of this commitment occurred in early 2015, shortly after the caucus's formation, when members refused to support Speaker John Boehner's reelection, citing his administration's failure to aggressively challenge executive overreach under President Obama, including immigration policies enacted via executive order. The group leveraged its influence to demand stricter enforcement of congressional oversight, such as withholding Department of Homeland Security funding unless Obama's Deferred Action for Parents of Americans program—deemed an unconstitutional circumvention of immigration law—was defunded or reversed. This tactic underscored their principle that funding bills must align with constitutional processes, preventing the executive branch from unilaterally expanding authority without legislative consent. In subsequent years, the caucus has extended this approach to internal House rules and appropriations, proposing reforms to require majority Republican support for major legislation, thereby avoiding bipartisan compromises that could perpetuate federal overreach. During the 117th (2021-2023), members opposed massive omnibus spending packages under President Biden, viewing them as bypassing regular order and enabling unchecked growth in entitlements and agencies like the IRS, which they argued exceeded constitutional taxing and spending limits. By 2023, this led to pivotal actions, including the caucus's role in ousting Speaker after he advanced a without sufficient spending cuts, reinforcing their insistence on fiscal discipline as a constitutional imperative to avert perpetual debt accumulation absent explicit authorization.

Emphasis on Fiscal Responsibility and Debt Reduction

The House Freedom Caucus has prioritized fiscal restraint as a core principle, frequently conditioning support for government funding measures on commitments to spending reductions and debt limitation. Members advocate for capping nondefense and rejecting omnibus appropriations bills that lack offsets for new expenditures, arguing that unchecked growth in federal outlays exacerbates the , which exceeded $34 trillion by early 2023. This stance reflects a broader commitment to enforcing budgetary discipline through leverage points like continuing resolutions and debt ceiling negotiations, often demanding across-the-board cuts or rescissions to prior-year appropriations. Early examples include the caucus's formal opposition to a "clean" debt ceiling increase in May 2017, insisting on accompanying spending reforms to address long-term fiscal imbalances. In 2018, the group rejected the Consolidated Appropriations Act, criticizing it for bypassing regular order and failing to incorporate sufficient reductions despite Republican control of . By 2019, amid a bipartisan budget agreement under President Trump, the caucus issued a statement decrying the deal's projected addition to deficits as "unsustainable," highlighting their resistance to agreements that expand spending caps without corresponding cuts. In the 2023 debt ceiling crisis, the Freedom Caucus demanded a decade-long freeze on nondefense at 2022 levels—approximately $760 billion—and opposed the Fiscal Responsibility Act for not securing deeper offsets against $4.8 trillion in projected growth. They further stipulated in May 2023 that no discussions proceed without enactment of House-passed spending restraint measures. Similar demands persisted into 2024 and 2025, with calls for year-long continuing resolutions incorporating 1-2% across-the-board cuts to avert omnibus packages, and pushes to codify reductions pursued by the Department of Government Efficiency under President Trump. These efforts have occasionally forced concessions, such as rescission packages, though critics from within the GOP establishment have accused the caucus of risking shutdowns without achieving proportional reduction.

Stance on Individual Liberties and Cultural Issues

The House Freedom Caucus prioritizes constitutional protections for individual liberties, including robust defense of the Second Amendment. In September 2019, the caucus stated that "the Second Amendment is fundamental to the liberties of our free people" and committed to defending the right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. Members have consistently opposed measures perceived as encroachments on these rights, such as red flag laws, which they argue enable confiscation without and undermine capabilities. The group has also resisted even some restrictive proposals backed by gun rights organizations if they impose additional federal burdens on firearm ownership. On free speech, caucus members advocate against perceived censorship, particularly in educational and digital spaces. Representative , a prominent member, co-founded the Congressional Campus Free Speech Caucus in collaboration with to counter "" cancel culture and protect conservative viewpoints on college campuses. The caucus has pursued legal challenges, such as suing the House Ethics Committee over restrictions seen as limiting members' political expression. Regarding religious liberty, members align with efforts to shield faith-based institutions and individuals from mandates that conflict with sincerely held beliefs, viewing such protections as essential to First Amendment guarantees against federal overreach. In cultural matters, the Freedom Caucus advances pro-life policies, emphasizing the sanctity of unborn life. Former chairman Andy Biggs, selected in 2019, was highlighted for his pro-life record, reflecting the group's preference for leaders opposing elective abortions. Members like Scott Perry have endorsed stringent anti-abortion legislation, such as measures banning the procedure after detection of a fetal heartbeat. The caucus has pushed to defund abortion providers and restrict military coverage for the procedure, framing these as fiscal and moral imperatives. On transgender-related policies, they have demanded revocation of Obama-era Department of Education guidance allowing students access to facilities based on gender identity rather than biological sex, prioritizing privacy and parental authority in schools. In education, caucus-aligned Republicans championed the Parents Bill of Rights in 2023, mandating parental access to curricula, records, and the ability to opt out of controversial instruction on topics like sexuality, to enhance transparency and family involvement.

Political Positions

Economic and Fiscal Policy

The House Freedom Caucus has consistently advocated for stringent fiscal measures to curb federal spending and reduce the national debt, emphasizing balanced budgets and cuts to non-defense discretionary expenditures. In March 2023, the group proposed capping such spending at fiscal year 2022 levels for the subsequent decade as a condition for supporting increases, aiming to enforce fiscal discipline amid rising deficits. This stance reflects their broader principle of rejecting "continuing resolutions" and omnibus bills that perpetuate unchecked growth in government outlays without corresponding offsets. Members frequently oppose debt ceiling hikes unless paired with substantial spending reductions, as evidenced by their near-unanimous rejection of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, where 71 Republicans, including most affiliates, voted against the measure for failing to secure $4.8 trillion in promised savings. In debt limit negotiations that year, they demanded up to $3.7 trillion in total savings over the decade, prioritizing reforms like work requirements for welfare programs and rescissions of unspent funds from prior legislation. Historically, members have supported government funding bills less than 20% of the time, leveraging shutdown threats to extract concessions on . In alignment with Republican tax policy, the Caucus endorses permanent extensions of the 2017 provisions, viewing them as pro-growth measures that stimulate economic activity without necessitating tax hikes on individuals or businesses. In April 2025, they unanimously backed a budget resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) that facilitated over $1 trillion in spending cuts alongside tax relief and increased domestic energy production, positioning it as a framework for deficit reduction. This resolution also enabled processes targeting $2 trillion or more in offsets over ten years to accompany $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. Despite criticisms from opponents labeling these proposals as extreme for prioritizing cuts to certain social programs, the Caucus maintains that such reforms are essential to avert fiscal insolvency, citing the U.S. exceeding $36 trillion as of 2025.

Immigration and Border Security

The House Freedom Caucus has consistently advocated for stringent measures to secure the U.S.- border, emphasizing physical barriers, enhanced enforcement, and the elimination of policies perceived to incentivize . Members prioritized funding for border wall construction during the first Trump administration, with Chairman leading efforts to include $5 billion in appropriations, even at the risk of government shutdowns, as demonstrated in December 2018 when the group defied Senate Republicans and House leadership to demand wall money in spending bills. This stance reflected their view that incomplete barriers left vulnerabilities exploited by smugglers and migrants, contributing to rising illegal crossings that exceeded 400,000 apprehensions annually by 2018. Opposition to amnesty provisions has been a core tenet, with the Caucus blocking House immigration bills containing pathways to for undocumented immigrants, such as the 2018 Goodlatte compromise that paired DACA protections with border security but was deemed insufficiently restrictive. In negotiations over DACA, members like Meadows collaborated with the for conservative alternatives focused on enforcement over legalization, rejecting broader reforms that could reward lawbreaking. This position aligns with their argument that without prior border securitization encourages further influxes, as evidenced by post-1986 surges in . Under the Biden administration, the Caucus condemned policies reversing Trump-era restrictions, such as ending Remain in Mexico and halting wall construction, which correlated with record-high encounters surpassing 2.4 million in fiscal year 2022. They introduced resolutions denouncing "open-borders policies" and supported H.R. 2, the Secure the Border Act of 2023, which aimed to resume wall building, limit asylum claims, and mandate E-Verify for employment. In 2024, members like Scott Perry rejected a bipartisan Senate deal as a "dumpster fire" for failing to close loopholes allowing mass releases, urging full shutdowns of asylum processing during surges. In the 119th Congress, the group has pushed for border security in packages, proposing immediate funding for barriers, military modernization tied to , and reversals of Biden-era expansions like programs that admitted over 1 million migrants. They advocate mass deportations and state-level countermeasures when federal action lags, framing lax as a causal driver of and fiscal strain from unvetted entries. This hardline approach stems from a that incremental compromises perpetuate systemic failures, prioritizing national over humanitarian often critiqued as masking avoidance in mainstream sources.

National Security and Foreign Policy

The House Freedom Caucus views through an "" lens, prioritizing U.S. protection, military readiness, and deterrence against adversaries like over expansive or unconditional abroad. Members emphasize that unchecked foreign spending undermines domestic defenses, such as securing the southern , which they regard as a core imperative intertwined with . This stance reflects a broader of neoconservative approaches favoring or prolonged engagements, favoring instead targeted support for allies facing existential threats while insisting on fiscal . On , the caucus has vocally opposed multibillion-dollar aid packages without stringent conditions or offsets, arguing they constitute "blank checks" that exacerbate U.S. debt and neglect priorities like border fortifications. In April 2024, following Iran's attack on , the group warned Republican leadership against leveraging the event to justify additional funding, viewing it as a pretext for unchecked expenditures. Representative introduced legislation to terminate all aid to , while Chairman Andy Harris advocated conditioning support on verifiable outcomes, a position echoed amid internal GOP debates that delayed packages until mid-2024. This opposition persisted into 2025, aligning with caucus demands for reallocating resources to U.S. military modernization amid the second Trump administration's focus on ending the conflict swiftly. In contrast, the has demonstrated strong bipartisan alignment on , particularly post-October 7, 2023, attacks, rejecting cease-fire calls that it deems premature or rewarding aggression. In March 2024, Chairman led a resolution formally rebuking demands for an immediate Israel-Gaza truce, framing sustained U.S. support as essential to countering without compromising Israel's self-defense rights. While some members critiqued bundled aid bills for including funding, the group broadly backed Israel's supplemental assistance, with evangelical constituencies reinforcing this pro-Israel posture against isolationist fringes. Tensions arose in February 2024 when a minority withheld votes on Israel aid over procedural concerns, but core support held amid criticisms from pro-Israel lobbies targeting caucus holdouts in primaries. Regarding military posture, the caucus seeks to bolster defense capabilities through efficiency reforms rather than blanket increases, opposing wasteful appropriations while proposing strategic enhancements. In September 2023, members derailed a $832 billion defense bill to extract broader spending concessions, highlighting perceived bloat in non-essential programs. By January 2025, in their blueprint, the group advocated modernizing forces and adding $100-200 billion over four years for priorities like munitions stockpiles and counter-China deterrence, conditional on offsetting cuts elsewhere. This approach underscores a commitment to a lean, lethal focused on peer competitors, rejecting progressive and some pushes for reductions that could erode U.S. superiority. On China, caucus rhetoric emphasizes confronting Beijing's expansionism via tariffs, technology restrictions, and vigilance, though explicit votes often align with broader GOP hawks in committees.

Social and Regulatory Reforms

The Freedom Caucus prioritizes social policies that defend constitutional protections for life and individual rights, opposing federal facilitation of . In July 2023, caucus members secured amendments to the blocking policies that reimbursed service members for travel and leave related to abortions, reversing Biden administration expansions. This action reflected broader resistance to using taxpayer funds for elective procedures, with members like Rep. consistently voting against abortion rights expansions. The group staunchly defends Second Amendment rights as essential to liberty, pledging to protect law-abiding citizens' access to firearms against encroachments like ATF restrictions on private sales or red-flag laws. Rep. , a caucus member, criticized federal overreach in gun regulations during a 2024 interview, arguing such measures undermine . Affiliated state caucuses, such as Michigan's, have denounced red-flag proposals as direct assaults on constitutional guarantees. In education, the caucus supports parental rights and to counter federal mandates, favoring tax credits and vouchers over centralized control. While federal efforts often align with broader Republican bills like the Educational Choice for Children Act reintroduced in January 2025, caucus influence emphasizes empowering families against ideological curricula. State affiliates have advanced related reforms, including Wyoming's pushes for homeschool co-ops and Idaho's 2025 parental choice tax credits up to $5,000 per student. On regulatory reforms, the caucus seeks to dismantle bureaucratic expansion through tools like regulatory budgeting and congressional oversight. Former chairman Rep. Mark Meadows introduced the Regulatory Accountability Act in 2017, mandating agencies to quantify and offset new regulatory costs with eliminations from existing rules. Members back the REINS Act, requiring joint congressional approval for major rules exceeding $100 million in impact, as proposed in early 2025 Republican megabill drafts before procedural adjustments. This approach aims to restore legislative authority over executive rulemaking, targeting accumulated regulations from prior administrations.

Organizational Structure

Leadership Selection and Roles

The House Freedom Caucus, operating as an informal congressional group without publicly available bylaws, selects its leadership through internal elections limited to its members. Candidates for positions such as chairman are typically nominated from within the caucus, followed by a vote among members to determine the winner, often conducted confidentially to maintain group cohesion. This process occurs as needed, such as upon vacancies created by retirements, primary losses, or term limits; for example, on September 17, 2024, members elected Representative Andy Harris (R-MD) as chairman, replacing Representative (R-VA) after Good's defeat in the June 2024 primary for his seat. The chairman holds the central role, serving as the public spokesperson, strategic coordinator, and negotiator for the , particularly in advocating for fiscal restraint, , and opposition to omnibus spending packages. This position involves rallying members for unified votes, engaging with broader Republican leadership on agenda priorities, and representing the group's stance in media and congressional proceedings; Harris, elected in 2024 as an original 2015 founder and Appropriations Committee member, has leveraged his role to influence budget debates amid slim GOP majorities. Supporting the chairman is a , on which the chair also serves, providing oversight and decision-making input to align the caucus's approximately 30-40 members on key issues without rigid hierarchy. Vice chairs or other officers may be appointed or elected similarly but receive less public emphasis, reflecting the caucus's emphasis on collective leverage over individual authority; past chairs like (2017) and (2017-2019) similarly focused on using the role to enforce internal discipline and extract policy concessions from GOP leadership.

Internal Governance and Voting Rules

The House Freedom Caucus requires 80 percent approval from its members to establish an official position on , leadership endorsements, or other matters, ensuring decisions reflect broad internal consensus rather than . This threshold, applied since the caucus's formation in January 2015, prevents hasty group commitments and allows members to vote independently on the House floor when no formal stance is adopted. For example, in November 2023, the caucus announced opposition to Speaker Mike Johnson's stopgap spending plan only after securing the requisite 80 percent support among its approximately 35 members. This voting mechanism extends to strategic actions, such as withholding procedural votes to influence Republican leadership, but official announcements of such tactics similarly demand the 80 percent benchmark. In practice, the rule fosters coordination during closed-door meetings, where members debate priorities like fiscal restraints or procedural reforms, but it has occasionally delayed unified responses amid internal divisions. Absent 80 percent backing, the refrains from binding directives, emphasizing voluntary alignment over enforced bloc voting. Leadership roles, including the chairmanship, are filled via internal elections conducted among members, typically annually or as vacancies arise. The , responsible for coordinating meetings and communications, wields influence but lacks formal to override member , aligning with the caucus's decentralized . Specific voting thresholds for chair selection or membership changes, such as admissions by invitation or rare expulsions, are not detailed, reflecting the group's emphasis on in . This opacity has drawn scrutiny but reinforces the caucus's focus on ideological cohesion over procedural transparency.

Membership

Eligibility Criteria and Application Process

Membership in the House Freedom Caucus is restricted to Republican members of the and is extended exclusively by invitation from existing members, reflecting the group's emphasis on ideological purity and internal cohesion. There are no publicly disclosed formal eligibility criteria beyond alignment with the caucus's core principles of , , and constitutional fidelity, though invites typically go to representatives who have demonstrated voting records and stances consistent with these tenets, often among the most conservative in the GOP conference. The application process is informal and opaque, lacking any open submission or standardized procedure; prospective members do not apply but are vetted and nominated internally through private discussions among the caucus's steering committee and broader . Decisions on new members require consensus or a vote among current participants, though exact voting thresholds—such as or simple majority—are not publicly detailed, underscoring the group's preference for confidentiality to avoid external pressures or leaks. This invitation-only model, established at the caucus's founding on January 26, 2015, by nine initial members including and , has enabled selective growth while maintaining discipline, with fluctuating based on retirements, elections, and occasional expulsions for perceived deviations from principles.

Historical Growth and Fluctuations

The House Freedom Caucus was founded on January 26, 2015, by nine Republican members of the U.S. seeking to advance more conservative fiscal and policy positions within the Republican conference, including Representatives , , John Fleming, , , , , Lighthizer, and . This initial core group emerged amid frustrations with Speaker John Boehner's leadership, particularly over spending and immigration policies, and drew from Tea Party-aligned lawmakers. Membership expanded rapidly in the ensuing months, reaching approximately 40 members by October 2015 during the 114th Congress, reflecting recruitment efforts to consolidate conservative influence ahead of the 2016 elections. From the 115th (2017–2019) through the 117th (2021–2023), the sustained a relatively stable size of 30 to 40 core members, with adjustments primarily driven by midterm elections, retirements, and occasional internal departures rather than large-scale growth or contraction. For instance, the group hovered around 35 active members as of 2022, bolstered by alignment with former President Trump's agenda but tempered by losses such as the 2019 exit of , who cited policy divergences on foreign intervention. In the 118th (2023–2025), membership and close allies numbered around 49 by early 2023, though the formal remained smaller at roughly 35–40, enabling leverage in narrow GOP majorities during speaker elections and budget negotiations. Entering the 119th in 2025, the faced notable shrinkage due to a wave of high-profile departures, including members like Representatives , , and pursuing gubernatorial bids or other opportunities, alongside retirements and electoral defeats. This reduction, from a peak influence in prior slim majorities to a diminished roster amid a more unified Republican conference under strengthened Trump-era priorities, raised questions about the group's sustained organizational cohesion and bargaining power. Such fluctuations underscore the caucus's dependence on volatile House dynamics, where gains from conservative electoral waves have periodically offset losses from internal mobility and strategic realignments.

Current Composition and Notable Figures

The House Freedom Caucus in the , which convened on January 3, 2025, is led by Chairman Representative Andy Harris of Maryland's 1st district, elected to the position on September 17, 2024, succeeding previous leadership amid efforts to align with incoming Republican priorities. Membership remains selective and invitation-based, with no public roster disclosed by the group, reflecting its operational to maintain internal cohesion and leverage in negotiations. The caucus comprises conservative Republicans emphasizing fiscal restraint, constitutional fidelity, and opposition to establishment compromises, drawing from districts prioritizing . Prominent members include Representative of Ohio's 4th district, a founding figure and influential voice on and oversight matters, often ranking high in conservative advocacy. Representative of Arizona's 5th district, a former chairman, continues to focus on budgetary discipline and election integrity. Other key figures are Representative of Texas's 21st district, noted for leading fights against omnibus spending bills; Representative of Colorado's 4th district, active in and cultural issues; and Representative of South Carolina's 5th district, involved in debt ceiling standoffs. Additional notable members encompass Representative Scott Perry of Pennsylvania's 10th district, emphasizing national security; Representative Bob Good of Virginia's 5th district, advocating deregulation; and Representative Andy Harris himself, balancing caucus purity with pragmatic engagement under the slim Republican majority. These individuals represent the caucus's core in exerting pressure for conservative policy advancements, though internal dynamics and potential 2026 departures of figures like Biggs and Norman pose future uncertainties.

Departures, Removals, and Transitions

Rep. , a founding member, resigned from the Freedom Caucus on June 10, 2019, citing its increasing alignment with President Trump following his own calls for based on the , which he argued had shifted the group away from its original principles of and fiscal restraint. Amash later left the Republican Party altogether on July 4, 2019, to run as an independent. Former Chairman stepped down from leadership on October 1, 2019, and was succeeded by Rep. , amid Meadows' growing role as a Trump advisor; he resigned from entirely on March 30, 2020, to assume the position of . In July 2023, Rep. was expelled from the caucus after clashing with members over her support for Speaker during internal GOP disputes, with Rep. confirming her ouster and citing irreconcilable differences on tactics. Rep. was removed by Chairman on March 12, , due to his opposition to the caucus's aggressive tactics during the 2023 House Speaker election, where Weber had backed McCarthy. On July 9, , Rep. was ousted for insufficient alignment on , particularly his votes against caucus priorities, prompting Rep. to resign the same night in solidarity or protest. Rep. departed voluntarily on March 31, 2025, stating in a letter that the caucus's direction no longer matched her policy focus on issues like border security and government efficiency. By August 2025, an exodus loomed as at least five prominent members, including , , and others, announced plans to retire or seek higher office ahead of the 2026 midterms, potentially reducing the caucus's influence and prompting questions about its sustainability as a cohesive bloc.

Legislative Influence and Achievements

Key Policy Wins and Leverage Tactics

The House Freedom Caucus has employed leverage tactics centered on disrupting procedural norms and party unity to extract policy concessions, including withholding votes for Republican leadership positions and major legislation. In September 2015, caucus members' refusal to back Speaker John Boehner on key votes contributed directly to his abrupt resignation after nearly five years in the role, highlighting their strategy of using internal GOP divisions to demand stricter adherence to conservative fiscal principles. Similarly, in October 2023, eight caucus-aligned members joined Democrats to remove Speaker Kevin McCarthy, forcing a protracted leadership vacuum that compelled subsequent Speaker Mike Johnson to incorporate more spending restraint measures in negotiations. A core tactic involves threatening or endorsing government shutdowns to compel reductions in or secure border security . During the 35-day partial shutdown from December 2018 to January 2019, caucus members rallied behind President Trump's insistence on , resulting in $1.375 billion appropriated for border barriers in the eventual resolution, though short of the $5.7 billion requested. This approach recurred in and appropriations battles, such as the 2023 standoff where caucus demands for returning to fiscal year 2022 spending levels with 1% annual growth caps framed negotiations, yielding the Fiscal Responsibility Act that imposed work requirements for certain welfare programs and restraints projected by the to save $1.5 trillion over a decade. Among key policy wins, the caucus influenced refinements to major packages by opposing versions lacking sufficient offsets. In May 2025, their advocacy for rescinding green energy subsidies contributed to amendments in the House bill, enhancing fiscal offsets and limiting expansive climate provisions originally enacted under Democratic control. Earlier, caucus pressure during the 2017 tax reform debates ensured extensions of individual rate cuts in the , providing a bulwark against scheduled expirations and delivering approximately $1.5 trillion in net tax relief over 10 years as scored by the Joint Committee on Taxation. These outcomes demonstrate targeted successes in curbing regulatory overreach and embedding spending limits, though broader federal outlays continued rising amid bipartisan deficits.

Impact on GOP Agenda and Trump Priorities

The House Freedom Caucus has exerted influence on the Republican Party's legislative agenda by leveraging its bloc voting power in narrow majorities to demand stricter adherence to , , and border security, often aligning with President Trump's priorities while occasionally withholding support to extract concessions. During Trump's first term, the caucus played a pivotal role in advancing , with approximately a dozen members negotiating provisions that accelerated expensing for investments and enhanced credits, contributing to the passage of the on December 20, 2017, by a 224-201 vote. On , Freedom Caucus members, including then-Chairman , backed Trump's demands for border wall funding, supporting a $10 billion allocation in an October 2017 spending package and threatening to sustain a of a December 2018 lacking sufficient wall money, which pressured GOP leaders toward harder-line positions. However, the caucus's insistence on deeper spending cuts sometimes delayed or complicated Trump's broader agenda, as seen in their opposition to omnibus bills that exceeded initial fiscal targets, such as the March 2018 $1.3 trillion package, where members like criticized it for insufficient offsets despite Trump's eventual endorsement. This dynamic forced iterative negotiations, enabling some conservative wins like rescissions of prior-year appropriations totaling $15 billion in 2018, but also highlighting tensions when Trump prioritized deal-making over purity, leading to caucus votes against measures they viewed as fiscally irresponsible. In Trump's second term, the caucus initially resisted elements of the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" in 2025, demanding additional cuts to and green energy subsidies before relenting under direct pressure on July 3, 2025, allowing its passage by a slim margin after securing promises for future offsets. Empirical outcomes show the caucus amplifying Trump's populist impulses within the GOP by blocking less conservative alternatives—such as aiding the ouster of Speakers perceived as insufficiently aligned, like in October 2023—but their leverage has diminished amid Trump's consolidated party control, with multiple instances of capitulation on budget resolutions and funding bills in early 2025 to avoid derailing signature priorities like tax extensions and energy deregulation. This pattern underscores a causal : the caucus's tactics have embedded greater fiscal hawkishness into GOP platforms, correlating with restrained deficit growth during unified Republican control in 2017-2018 (annual deficits averaging 3.8% of GDP versus 4.6% pre-Trump), yet their threats often resolve in support for Trump-endorsed packages, prioritizing advancement over obstruction.

Role in Budgetary and Spending Restraints

The House Freedom Caucus has played a pivotal role in exerting pressure on Republican leadership and Democratic majorities to incorporate spending restraints into federal negotiations, often by threatening to withhold votes on continuing resolutions (CRs), omnibus packages, and debt ceiling increases unless concessions are made. Formed in January 2015 with a foundational commitment to reducing expenditure and enforcing fiscal discipline, the group has prioritized demands for baseline spending cuts, rescissions of unspent funds, and procedural reforms like returning to regular order appropriations over massive year-end bills. Their strategy relies on the House's narrow margins, where their bloc of 30-50 members can block passage, forcing compromises that, while not always achieving their full goals, have introduced elements of restraint amid broader upward trends in federal outlays. In debt ceiling battles, the Caucus has demanded specific cuts as preconditions for lifting the limit, such as capping non-defense and reclaiming unobligated relief funds. During the March 2023 negotiations leading to the Fiscal Responsibility Act, members outlined proposals for $2 trillion in savings over a through work requirements for welfare programs and freezes on regulatory spending, influencing the final bill's inclusion of $1.5 trillion in topline caps and $30 billion in immediate rescissions—measures that deviated from unchecked baseline growth projected by the . However, several Caucus members, including Rep. , voted against the deal on June 1, 2023, arguing it failed to deliver sufficient restraint relative to the $31.4 trillion debt then outstanding. The group has repeatedly opposed omnibus spending bills, viewing them as vehicles for unchecked and deficit expansion, and instead advocated for short-term CRs or single-subject appropriations to enable targeted cuts. In March 2024, they urged rejection of a proposed $1.65 omnibus, split into two halves, citing its evasion of fiscal and failure to address border security offsets. Similarly, in August 2024, the endorsed extending funding via CR into 2025 to avert an end-of-year omnibus, a tactic echoed in their opposition to the 2018 Consolidated Appropriations Act and the December 2022 fiscal year 2023 package, where nearly all House Republicans joined in voting against the latter. These efforts have occasionally yielded partial successes, such as the exclusion of certain earmarks or the adoption of two-step processes in January 2025 budget proposals aimed at deeper tax and spending reforms. Government shutdown threats have been a core leverage tool, with the Caucus refusing support for clean CRs unless paired with policy riders like enhanced work requirements or funding reallocations. In September 2023, they demanded conservative changes in any stopgap to avert a shutdown by September 30, contributing to prolonged negotiations that delayed but ultimately incorporated some spending guardrails. More recently, during the October 2025 shutdown impasse—one of the longest in history—they backed Speaker Mike Johnson's insistence on no negotiations yielding Democrat priorities without reciprocal cuts, aligning with their long-term push for resolutions enabling reconciliation to target mandatory spending, which constitutes over 60% of the federal budget. While critics attribute rising deficits—reaching $1.8 trillion in fiscal year 2024—partly to such brinkmanship yielding incomplete reforms, Caucus actions have empirically forced inclusion of fiscal hawks' priorities in deals, such as the April 2025 budget resolution passage (216-214) that unlocked reconciliation for potential entitlement trims.

Controversies and Criticisms

Accusations of Obstructionism from Establishment GOP

Former House Speaker John Boehner attributed his resignation on September 25, 2015, in part to unrelenting pressure from Freedom Caucus members who opposed his negotiation of bipartisan spending deals and continuing resolutions, accusing them of pursuing chaos over governance. Boehner reportedly viewed the caucus's tactics—such as filing motions to vacate the speakership and blocking procedural votes—as tantamount to anarchy, later describing key figures like Jim Jordan as leading efforts that prioritized ideological purity over legislative functionality. Paul Ryan encountered similar resistance during his speakership, particularly in 2017 when Freedom Caucus demands for more conservative alterations to the American Health Care Act led to the bill's withdrawal on March 24, prompting Ryan to decry the caucus's refusal to compromise as sabotaging core Republican priorities like Obamacare repeal. Ryan's allies argued that the group's bloc voting on amendments and rules exacerbated internal divisions, stalling the GOP agenda despite unified control of and the . Kevin McCarthy, after his October 3, 2023, ouster as speaker—triggered by a Freedom Caucus-backed motion to vacate over his handling of a bipartisan continuing resolution to avert a shutdown—publicly lambasted the caucus on January 22, 2024, stating it had "stopped Republicans from being able to govern" by consistently derailing party-led initiatives. McCarthy specifically criticized their opposition to his Fiscal Responsibility Act debt ceiling deal in June 2023, which caucus members blocked via rules votes, claiming it locked in prior Democratic spending levels and prioritized disruption over deficit reduction. More recently, in April , moderate House Republicans, including members of circles, accused Freedom Caucus holdouts like Rep. of obstructing a comprehensive foreign aid and border security package, arguing their insistence on standalone border measures enabled Democratic passage of aid bills without stringent enforcement provisions. Such criticisms from establishment figures often frame the caucus's leverage—demanding offsets for spending or vetoing omnibus bills—as procedural obstruction that risks government shutdowns and alienates swing-district colleagues, though caucus defenders counter that it enforces fiscal discipline absent in compromises.

Internal Divisions and Member Conflicts

The House Freedom Caucus has experienced notable internal divisions over ideological purity, leadership support, and tactical approaches to , leading to membership oustings and resignations. In July 2024, the caucus ousted Representative (R-OH) for supporting a bipartisan border security bill that included aid, which hardliners viewed as insufficiently conservative and a betrayal of core principles on . This action prompted Representative (R-TX) to resign from the group the same night, citing disagreements over the punitive enforcement of membership standards. These events exemplified broader tensions between absolutists demanding unwavering opposition to compromise and pragmatists willing to back negotiated deals to advance partial conservative goals. Further fractures emerged in 2025 when Representative (R-FL) abruptly resigned, marking the fourth member loss or ejection in two years and underscoring an intensifying identity crisis within the caucus. Luna's departure followed patterns of dissatisfaction with the group's direction, including its handling of internal accountability and external alliances, amid discussions among hardliners to purge members failing to meet evolving ideological benchmarks. Concurrently, Representative (R-GA) drew ire from fellow members for public clashes with non-member Representative (R-CO) and perceived alignment with establishment figures, exacerbating rifts over personal conduct and loyalty. Representative (R-VA), facing his own primary challenge partly fueled by caucus infighting, became a flashpoint in these disputes, with some members questioning the sustainability of such expulsions. Divisions also surfaced during high-stakes leadership battles, particularly the 2023 speaker elections. While the caucus largely coalesced against former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), leading to his ouster on October 3, 2023, via a motion to vacate supported by members like Matt Gaetz (R-FL), not all aligned on successors. Co-founder Jim Jordan (R-OH) secured initial backing for his speakership bid but lost votes from within the caucus, including from Representative Ken Buck (R-CO), who distanced himself and refused to support Jordan, highlighting tactical splits on whether to prioritize disruption over electability. Similar fissures appeared in support for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), with the caucus formally opposing his continuing resolution funding bill in November 2023, yet some members later accommodated Johnson's compromises on spending, prompting accusations of inconsistency from purists. These conflicts reflect causal tensions between the caucus's founding emphasis on fiscal restraint and procedural reform versus pressures for unified action in a slim GOP majority, often resulting in public feuds that weaken collective leverage.

Media and Democratic Portrayals Versus Empirical Outcomes

outlets frequently portray the House Freedom Caucus as a source of congressional dysfunction and , emphasizing their role in precipitating leadership crises and over fiscal issues. For example, a September 2023 New York Times analysis labeled the group the "Wrecking-Ball Caucus," crediting it with sowing mass dysfunction through opposition to bipartisan deals and insistence on spending cuts. Similarly, a March 2024 article described their confrontational tactics as having wreaked havoc on Washington since 2015, framing them as polarizing hardliners who prioritize disruption over governance. Democratic leaders and aligned commentators reinforce this narrative by accusing the Caucus of obstructionism that endangers national priorities like aid and increases. House Minority Leader has repeatedly criticized the group for holding up must-pass legislation, as seen in their resistance to short-term funding bills in 2023. A October 2025 Washington Post editorial equated their shutdown threats to progressive tactics, arguing that such strategies consistently fail to deliver policy gains and instead invite political traps. In contrast to these depictions of futility and chaos, empirical records show the Caucus exerting leverage to secure fiscal concessions, even as compromises occur. During the 2023 debt ceiling standoff, Caucus pressure contributed to the Fiscal Responsibility Act, which codified spending caps on non-defense discretionary outlays at 2022 levels (adjusted for ) through 2025 and rescinded $30 billion in unspent funds, yielding an estimated $1.5 trillion in mandatory savings over a according to the baseline. Though 71% of Caucus members voted against the final bill—citing insufficient cuts—their initial demands shaped negotiations, forcing offsets absent in prior increases. The group has also repeatedly blocked omnibus appropriations, advocating instead for continuing resolutions that maintain prior-year levels and expose earmarks; this tactic succeeded in averting a year-end 2024 omnibus, extending via targeted bills that reduced non-defense discretionary growth to 1% annually under Speaker Johnson, compared to 6% under prior Democrat-controlled budgets. These outcomes challenge obstructionism claims, as Caucus-influenced Houses passed 12 of 12 appropriations bills individually in 2024—avoiding the omnibus pitfalls of 2021—and maintained unified opposition to unchecked deficits, with members averaging scores of 92% on fiscal votes versus 78% for non-Caucus Republicans. While federal spending rose 4% nominally from FY2023 to FY2024 amid , Caucus efforts restrained it below baseline projections by $100 billion through vetoed add-ons and clawbacks, per Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget analysis, demonstrating targeted influence despite minority status (29 members in the 118th ). upheavals, like the October 2023 ouster of Speaker McCarthy, stemmed from his deal lacking offsets but yielded rules reforms, including enhanced committee oversight, enabling subsequent passage of conservative-leaning measures without prolonged shutdowns. In July 2025, initial holdouts on a GOP megabill under President Trump secured additional border security provisions before endorsement, illustrating adaptive leverage rather than blanket failure.

Affiliated Organizations and Broader Movement

Ties to Tea Party and Conservative Advocacy Groups

The House Freedom Caucus traces its origins to the Tea Party movement, which gained prominence after the through grassroots protests against government bailouts, excessive spending, and federal overreach. Many caucus members were first elected in the 2010 midterm "Tea Party wave," where Republicans gained 63 House seats by campaigning on and . Formed in January 2015 amid frustrations with GOP leadership's compromises, the caucus absorbed veterans of the earlier , serving as a more cohesive vehicle to enforce ideological discipline within the Republican conference. Founding figures like and exemplified these ties, having risen through Tea Party-aligned campaigns emphasizing debt reduction and opposition to omnibus spending bills. The caucus's tactics—such as demanding policy riders on appropriations and withholding support for leadership unless core principles were upheld—mirrored Tea Party strategies to leverage minority influence for maximal conservative outcomes. This continuity positioned the Freedom Caucus as the institutional heir to Tea Party insurgency in , prioritizing procedural hardball over bipartisan deals. The caucus maintains strong alignments with conservative advocacy organizations that fueled Tea Party activism, including , which provided logistical support for early protests and continues to back members opposing regulatory expansion. has praised caucus leaders for advancing restrained budgets and has collaborated on policy critiques of establishment fiscal policies. Similarly, the endorses and scores Freedom Caucus members highly for promoting tax cuts, , and free-market reforms, reflecting shared commitments to over . These partnerships amplify the caucus's leverage, channeling external pressure to enforce conservative priorities in legislative negotiations.

Influence on MAGA and Populist Factions

![Jim Jordan, influential Freedom Caucus member in MAGA circles](./assets/Jim_Jordan_official_photo%252C_114th_Congress_croppedcropped
The House Freedom Caucus exerted substantial influence on the MAGA movement by supplying a cadre of congressional allies committed to tactics and policy demands aligned with Donald Trump's "" platform. Emerging from Tea Party roots in January 2015, the caucus's members provided early individual endorsements during Trump's 2016 campaign, with figures like and backing him amid establishment resistance. This support helped integrate populist insurgencies into GOP institutional power, as caucus lawmakers leveraged their bloc to amplify demands for immigration restrictions, , and fiscal restraint—core MAGA tenets. During Trump's first term, Freedom Caucus influence manifested through direct administration ties and legislative pressure. , a founding member, served as from March 2020 to January 2021, channeling caucus priorities into executive actions like regulatory rollbacks, where the group proposed revoking 228 Obama-era rules on issues from climate policy to labor standards. , as caucus chair from 2021, defended Trump against two impeachments and used committee oversight to probe perceived deep-state elements, reinforcing MAGA narratives of institutional corruption. Yet, the caucus occasionally withheld support for Trump-endorsed bills until concessions were secured, as in 2025 negotiations over budget reconciliation that yielded wins on and tax cuts, demonstrating tactical leverage rather than blind loyalty. The caucus's populist imprint extended to broader factions by modeling disruption of GOP leadership, evident in the 2023 speakership battle where members, backed by Trump, blocked Kevin McCarthy's initial bid and extracted rules reforms favoring rank-and-file power. This empowered MAGA-aligned insurgents, though internal rifts have surfaced between principle-focused traditionalists and Trump-centric populists, with state-level caucuses adapting MAGA agendas to local contexts while minimizing party infighting. Empirical outcomes show the caucus shifting GOP dynamics toward harder , with its 30-40 members in the 119th (2025-2027) holding sway in slim majorities to enforce spending restraints and priorities over establishment compromises.

References

  1. https://www.legistorm.com/organization/summary/128166/House_Freedom_Caucus.html
  2. https://www.legistorm.com/stormfeed/view_rss/609656/member/2877/title/meet-the-freedom-caucus.html
  3. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2015/10/20/house-freedom-caucus-what-is-it-and-whos-in-it/
  4. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-is-the-house-freedom-caucus-and-what-do-they-want/
  5. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/01/23/freedom-caucus-likely-to-play-a-bigger-role-in-new-gop-led-house-so-who-are-they/
  6. http://harris.house.gov/about/caucuses
  7. https://www.axios.com/2025/09/01/house-freedom-caucus-losing-clout-influence
  8. https://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/house-freedom-caucus-conservative-legislation-114593
  9. https://jordan.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-republicans-form-house-freedom-caucus
  10. https://ballotpedia.org/House_Freedom_Caucus
  11. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/12/14/a-house-divided
  12. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/25/house-speaker-john-boehner-to-resign
  13. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/07/28/rep-mark-meadows-makes-bid-to-oust-boehner-from-speakership/
  14. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-hard-line-republicans-who-pushed-john-boehner-out/
  15. https://www.cnn.com/2015/09/25/politics/boehner-resigns-house-speaker-leadership-battle
  16. https://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/paul-ryan-speaker-freedom-caucus-214989
  17. https://rollcall.com/2015/10/23/how-the-house-freedom-caucus-got-behind-paul-ryan/
  18. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/22/us/politics/paul-ryan-house-speaker-freedom-caucus.html
  19. https://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/budget-house-freedom-caucus-216876
  20. https://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/hfc-amendment-216874
  21. https://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/house-freedom-caucus-to-break-with-leadership-on-budget-220758
  22. https://jordan.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-freedom-caucus-will-not-support-current-house-budget-plan
  23. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/is-the-freedom-caucus-still-a-formidable-foe-in-2016/
  24. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/27/freedom-caucus-endorses-gop-tax-plan-243210
  25. https://ballotpedia.org/Mark_Meadows_%28North_Carolina%29
  26. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/06/mark-meadows-white-house-chief-staff-123210
  27. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/24/us/politics/health-care-affordable-care-act.html
  28. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/30/donald-trump-freedom-caucus-healthcare-bill-republicans
  29. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trump-freedom-caucus-obamacare-repeal-replace-secret-pact-236507
  30. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/22/us/politics/house-passes-spending-bill.html
  31. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/22/house-omnibus-spending-bill-479403
  32. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/25/trump-shutdown-announcement-1125529
  33. https://rollcall.com/2021/01/13/houses-second-impeachment-of-trump-will-be-different-from-first/
  34. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-you-need-to-know-about-mark-meadows-2020-election-charges
  35. https://www.npr.org/sections/insurrection-at-the-capitol/2021/01/07/954380156/here-are-the-republicans-who-objected-to-the-electoral-college-count
  36. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/01/07/us/elections/electoral-college-biden-objectors.html
  37. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/30/freedom-caucus-cracks-478429
  38. https://.org/House_Freedom_Caucus
  39. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/04/29/house-republican-freedom-caucus-challenges-00023071
  40. https://www.coloradonewsline.com/2023/01/06/mccarthy-flips-gop-holdouts-as-his-campaign-for-u-s-house-speaker-gathers-speed/
  41. https://www.wgcu.org/government-politics/2023-06-08/gop-conservatives-shutter-house-to-protest-mccarthy-biden-debt-deal-setting-up-next-budget-brawl
  42. https://www.npr.org/2023/09/30/1202713718/kevin-mccarthy-motion-to-vacate-gaetz-house-speaker
  43. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/rep-gaetz-files-resolution-to-oust-kevin-mccarthy-as-speaker-of-the-house
  44. https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/03/politics/republicans-vote-remove-mccarthy-house-speaker
  45. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/jim-jordan-speaker-race-rcna118791
  46. https://www.npr.org/2023/10/13/1205734675/house-speaker-vote-news
  47. https://tennesseelookout.com/2023/10/18/ohios-jim-jordan-fails-in-bid-for-u-s-house-speaker-leaving-chamber-paralyzed-again/
  48. https://sourcenm.com/2023/10/19/u-s-house-stalled-again-after-rejecting-jim-jordan-as-speaker-a-second-time/
  49. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/10/06/the-defining-moments-that-led-up-to-kevin-mccarthys-removal-as-house-speaker/71061548007/
  50. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jan/23/kevin-mccarthy-ex-speaker-blames-house-freedom-cau/
  51. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/01/house-freedom-caucus-leadership-feuds-00172176
  52. https://foxbaltimore.com/news/local/rep-andy-harris-re-elected-as-house-freedom-caucus-chair-vows-to-advance-trumps-agenda
  53. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/01/03/congress/freedom-caucus-warning-to-johnson-00196439
  54. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5073008-freedom-caucus-holds-fire-on-johnsons-strategy-for-passing-trump-agenda/
  55. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/troublemakers-team-players-house-freedom-caucus-softens-trump-gop-rcna195951
  56. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/05/21/congress/white-house-freedom-caucus-talks-continue-00363696
  57. https://rollcall.com/2025/07/02/trump-republicans-budget-reconciliation-bill/
  58. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/07/03/house-freedom-caucus-backs-down-again/
  59. http://harris.house.gov/media/press-releases/one-big-beautiful-bill-secures-major-wins-american-people
  60. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/from-legislative-terrorists-center-trumps-dc-revolution-where-key-conservative-caucus-now
  61. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-22/republicans-divided-over-next-steps-to-end-us-shutdown
  62. https://thehill.com/newsletters/the-movement/5553741-speaker-johnson-freedom-caucus-shutdown/
  63. https://www.wsj.com/politics/the-once-feared-house-freedom-caucus-falls-in-line-under-trump-b906129b
  64. https://puck.news/house-freedom-caucus-in-decline-as-trump-solidifies-control/
  65. https://perry.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hfc_rules_reforms_proposal_7.25.2022.pdf
  66. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/the-sad-decline-of-the-house-freedom-caucus/
  67. https://rollcall.com/2015/10/25/the-freedom-caucus-filibuster-explained/
  68. https://www.npr.org/2023/08/26/1195982210/the-freedom-caucus-shutdown-threat-recalls-tactics-of-past-house-rebels
  69. https://rollcall.com/2023/03/10/freedom-caucus-lays-out-debt-limit-spending-demands/
  70. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/23/freedom-caucus-budget-deal-1428421
  71. https://thehill.com/policy/finance/335042-freedom-caucus-opposes-clean-debt-ceiling-increase/
  72. https://www.legistorm.com/stormfeed/view_rss/1189820/member/2906/title/hfc-statement-house-freedom-caucus-opposes-omnibus.html
  73. https://rollcall.com/2023/06/01/meet-the-house-members-who-voted-against-the-debt-limit-deal/
  74. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4011101-freedom-caucus-says-no-further-discussion-on-debt-ceiling-until-senate-passes-house-gop-bill/
  75. https://thehill.com/business/budget/5331509-house-freedom-caucus-demands-budget-cuts/
  76. https://pennsylvaniaindependent.com/politics/house-freedom-caucus-spending-cuts-government-funding-shutdown-republicans/
  77. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/08/12/congress/preview-of-the-spending-fight-00173600
  78. https://www.facebook.com/freedomcaucus/photos/we-believe-the-second-amendment-is-fundamental-to-the-liberties-of-our-free-peop/2768323859868247/
  79. https://gophouse.org/posts/michigan-house-freedom-caucus-abhors-new-red-flag-bills-warns-of-unintended-consequences
  80. https://www.thetrace.org/2016/07/freedom-caucus-house-conservatives-oppose-nra-backed-gun-bill/
  81. https://yaf.org/news/reps-jim-jordan-and-kat-cammack-launch-congressional-campus-free-speech-caucus-with-young-americas-foundation/
  82. https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article272619280.html
  83. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFUbUFF5ol0
  84. https://www.axios.com/2024/09/03/scott-perry-freedom-caucus-abortion
  85. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/14/house-passes-defense-bill-despite-controversial-abortion-transgender-policies-00106373
  86. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/hrc-condemns-house-freedom-caucus-alarming-demand-to-revoke-crucially-impor
  87. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/house-republicans-pass-parents-rights-bill-in-fight-over-schools
  88. https://www.crfb.org/blogs/house-freedom-caucus-proposes-37-trillion-savings-debt-ceiling-vote
  89. http://luttrell.house.gov/media/in-the-news/daily-signal-these-are-71-republicans-who-voted-against-debt-ceiling-bill
  90. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/20/us/politics/gop-spending-hawks-trump-debt.html
  91. http://harris.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-freedom-caucus-statement-passage-budget-resolution
  92. https://cloud.house.gov/posts/the-house-freedom-caucus-rises-again
  93. http://roy.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-roy-issues-statement-budget-resolution
  94. https://nlihc.org/resource/house-freedom-caucus-proposes-funding-caps-and-work-requirements
  95. https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article223433000.html
  96. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/30/freedom-caucus-border-wall-government-shutdown-242174
  97. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-meeting-house-republicans-amid-border-wall-showdown/story?id=59930695
  98. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/27/this-is-bull-inside-the-gops-immigration-meltdown-680106
  99. https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2018/06/21/immigration-reform-stalls-in-house-as-gop-backed-plan-is-shot-down/
  100. https://rollcall.com/2017/09/12/meadows-freedom-caucus-asked-to-develop-conservative-solution-to-daca/
  101. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/14/mark-meadows-freedom-caucus-working-very-closely-white-house-write-daca-legislation/667619001/
  102. https://perry.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=402598
  103. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/2
  104. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/01/17/congress/house-gop-biden-border-rebuke-dems-00136221
  105. http://harris.house.gov/media/press-releases/hfcs-218-reconciliation-proposal-0
  106. https://gophouse.org/posts/house-freedom-caucus-introduces-legislative-package-to-combat-rampant-illegal-immigration
  107. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/01/16/congress/conservatives-missive-to-johnson-00198632
  108. https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/article/2023/07/mccarthys-deal-with-conservatives-leans-defense-bill-into-culture-war-debate-00106092
  109. https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2020/10/20/us-house-district-5-andy-biggs/
  110. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVII0iQMepA
  111. http://adriansmith.house.gov/media/press-releases/smith-owens-cassidy-colleagues-reintroduce-educational-choice-children-act
  112. https://www.idahosenategopcaucus.com/press-releases/idaho-senate-passes-house-bill-93-establishing-parental-choice-tax-credit
  113. https://wyomingnews.com/wyomingbusinessreport/industry_news/wyoming-freedom-caucus-anti-dei-bill-flies-through-house-committee/article_340c7916-d4ec-11ef-ad56-57a0b710400d.html
  114. https://www.rstreet.org/commentary/rep-meadows-introduces-bill-to-lock-in-regulatory-budgeting/
  115. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/05/22/congress/gop-loses-the-reins-00366094
  116. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/12/house-freedom-caucus-and-trump/511499/
  117. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/09/17/congress/andy-harris-house-freedom-caucus-chair-00179750
  118. https://thehill.com/homenews/4885495-andy-harris-house-freedom-caucus-chair/
  119. https://www.axios.com/2024/09/18/house-freedom-caucus-taps-andy-harris-as-new-chairman
  120. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/18/who-is-andy-harris-the-new-freedom-caucus-chair-00179828
  121. https://harris.house.gov/about/caucuses
  122. https://rollcall.com/2024/09/24/an-unusual-choice-for-house-freedom-caucus-leader-takes-reins/
  123. https://www.vox.com/2015/10/9/9488835/house-freedom-caucus-explained
  124. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4308511-freedom-caucus-opposition-speaker-johnson-stopgap-plan/
  125. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/27/the-fate-of-the-republican-health-bill-is-in-house-moderates-hands.html
  126. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4823550-house-freedom-caucus-continuing-resolution/
  127. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/10/freedom-caucus-gives-paul-ryan-a-big-majoritybut-not-a-mandate/446265/
  128. https://marylandmatters.org/briefs/maryland-rep-harris-elected-chair-of-the-ultra-conservative-freedom-caucus/
  129. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/08/24/house-freedom-caucus-conservatives/
  130. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/hard-right-freedom-caucus-gutted-key-members-run-new-jobs-2026-rcna227209
  131. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/03/house-freedom-caucus-megabill-surrender-00439657
  132. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/10/justin-amash-house-freedom-caucus-1359614
  133. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/justin-amash-steps-down-from-house-freedom-caucus/
  134. https://www.npr.org/2019/07/04/738766431/declaring-his-independence-rep-amash-leaves-the-gop
  135. https://biggs.house.gov/media/in-the-news/meadows-be-replaced-biggs-freedom-caucus-leader
  136. https://rollcall.com/2020/03/30/rep-mark-meadows-resigns-to-become-white-house-chief-of-staff/
  137. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/marjorie-taylor-greene-officially-kicked-freedom-caucus-gop-lawmaker-s-rcna93962
  138. https://www.texastribune.org/2024/03/12/texas-randy-weber-house-freedom-caucus/
  139. https://www.axios.com/2024/07/09/freedom-caucus-warren-davidson-troy-nehls-bob-good
  140. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/03/31/gop-lawmaker-leaves-house-freedom-caucus/82747413007/
  141. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5464627-freedom-caucus-chip-roy/
  142. https://www.deseret.com/politics/2025/08/29/future-of-the-freedom-caucus/
  143. https://www.npr.org/2023/05/31/1178999244/debt-ceiling-house-vote
  144. https://www.politico.com/minutes/congress/03-10-2023/
  145. https://www.ntu.org/publications/detail/house-freedom-caucus-energy-policy-changes-improved-house-reconciliation-bill
  146. https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/10/17/house-freedom-caucus-members-among-most-trump-aligned-representatives-in-congress/
  147. https://www.cato.org/blog/freedom-caucus-spending-cuts
  148. https://www.notus.org/congress/house-freedom-caucus-10-year-battle-yes-no
  149. https://cloud.house.gov/posts/10-years-in-freedom-caucus-wants-its-legacy-cemented-even-in-a-post-trump-world
  150. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/422209-freedom-caucus-says-it-will-support-veto-of-cr/
  151. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/05/22/trump-megabill-freedom-caucus-rachael-bade-column-00366409
  152. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5384637-house-freedom-caucus-opposition-trump-bill/
  153. https://www.ntu.org/publications/detail/freedom-caucus-made-trumps-tax-bill-more-beautiful
  154. https://brecheen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1464
  155. https://thehill.com/business/budget/3893956-freedom-caucus-lays-out-spending-cut-demands-for-debt-limit/
  156. https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/04/politics/freedom-caucus-mccarthy-debt-bill-cnntv
  157. https://www.wwlp.com/hill-politics/house-freedom-caucus-urges-republicans-to-vote-against-spending-package/
  158. https://rollcall.com/2024/02/05/supermajority-bar-for-spending-bills-a-real-and-risky-prospect/
  159. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/freedom-caucus-rebels-short-term-funding-bill-new-demands-rcna100993
  160. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/10/29/john-boehner-trump-house-republican-party-retirement-profile-feature-215741
  161. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/10/john-boehner-on-republican-party
  162. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/ryan-trump-pile-freedom-caucus-after-health-care-failure-n740606
  163. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/31/opinion/how-the-freedom-caucus-is-undermining-the-gop.html
  164. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4422346-mccarthy-freedom-caucus-republicans/
  165. https://www.yahoo.com/news/kevin-mccarthy-calls-freedom-caucus-213900431.html
  166. https://www.axios.com/2024/04/22/house-republicans-greene-border-security-foreign-aid
  167. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/house-republican-blasts-stonewalling-freedom-caucus/story?id=100042491
  168. https://www.newsweek.com/republican-suddenly-leaves-house-freedom-caucus-what-know-2053324
  169. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/06/23/house-freedom-caucus-members-00103296
  170. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4765413-freedom-caucus-internal-clash-bob-good/
  171. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/09/congress/inside-the-freedom-caucus-blow-up-00167077
  172. https://punchbowl.news/article/house/ken-buck-distances-self-from-house-freedom-caucus/
  173. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2023/11/14/congress/hfc-no-stopgap-spending-house-johnson-shutdown-00127011
  174. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/republicans-congress-freedom-caucus.html
  175. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/03/12/freedom-caucus-00146569
  176. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/10/01/government-shutdown-democrats-progressives-freedom-caucus/
  177. https://www.fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-freedom-caucus-was-designed-to-disrupt/
  178. https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2025/07/09/house-freedom-caucus-donald-trump-spending-bill
  179. https://www.npr.org/2023/01/08/1147762006/the-house-speaker-battle-has-roots-in-the-tea-party-movement
  180. https://www.niskanencenter.org/how-the-tea-party-paved-the-way-for-donald-trump/
  181. https://www.heritage.org/political-process/commentary/conservatives-and-the-house-freedom-caucus-time-build
  182. https://www.clubforgrowth.org/
  183. https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/house-freedom-caucus-gop-2016-endorsement-219331
  184. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/01/10/gop-fighting-speaker-mccarthy-trump-conservative-right-tea-party/10984876002/
  185. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/23/freedom-caucus-trump-policies-climate-change-net-neutrality
  186. https://www.notus.org/energy/freedom-caucus-voted-trump-reconciliation-energy-tax-credits-deal
  187. https://punchbowl.news/article/washington/donald-trump-house-freedom-caucus-relationship/
  188. https://www.exposedbycmd.org/2025/02/05/state-freedom-caucuses-push-maga-agenda-tone-down-intra-party-squabbles/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.