Hubbry Logo
James A. GarfieldJames A. GarfieldMain
Open search
James A. Garfield
Community hub
James A. Garfield
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
James A. Garfield
James A. Garfield
from Wikipedia

James Abram Garfield (November 19, 1831 – September 19, 1881) was the 20th president of the United States, serving from March 1881 until his death in September that year after being shot two months earlier. A preacher, lawyer, and Civil War general, Garfield served nine terms in the United States House of Representatives and is the only sitting member of the House to be elected president. Before his candidacy for the presidency, he had been elected to the U.S. Senate by the Ohio General Assembly—a position he declined when he became president-elect.

Key Information

Garfield was born into poverty in a log cabin and grew up in northeastern Ohio. After graduating from Williams College in 1856, he studied law and became an attorney. He was a preacher in the Stone–Campbell Movement and president of the Western Reserve Eclectic Institute, affiliated with the Disciples.[1][a] Garfield was elected as a Republican member of the Ohio State Senate in 1859, serving until 1861. He opposed Confederate secession, was a major general in the Union Army during the American Civil War, and fought in the battles of Middle Creek, Shiloh, and Chickamauga. He was elected to Congress in 1862 to represent Ohio's 19th district. Throughout his congressional service, he firmly supported the gold standard and gained a reputation as a skilled orator. He initially agreed with Radical Republican views on Reconstruction but later favored a Moderate Republican–aligned approach to civil rights enforcement for freedmen. Garfield's aptitude for mathematics extended to his own proof of the Pythagorean theorem, which he published in 1876.

At the 1880 Republican National Convention, delegates chose Garfield, who had not sought the White House, as a compromise presidential nominee on the 36th ballot. In the 1880 presidential election, he conducted a low-key front porch campaign and narrowly defeated the Democratic nominee, Winfield Scott Hancock. Garfield's accomplishments as president included his assertion of presidential authority against senatorial courtesy in executive appointments, a purge of corruption in the Post Office, and his appointment of a Supreme Court justice. He advocated for agricultural technology, an educated electorate, and civil rights for African Americans. He also proposed substantial civil service reforms, which were passed by Congress in 1883 as the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act and signed into law by his successor, Chester A. Arthur. Garfield was a member of the intraparty "Half-Breed" faction that used the powers of the presidency to defy the powerful "Stalwart" Senator Roscoe Conkling from New York. He did this by appointing Blaine faction leader William H. Robertson to the lucrative post of Collector of the Port of New York. The ensuing political battle resulted in Robertson's confirmation and the resignations of Conkling and Thomas C. Platt from the Senate.

On July 2, 1881, Charles J. Guiteau, a disappointed and delusional office seeker, shot Garfield at the Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Station in Washington. The wound was not immediately fatal, but an infection caused by his doctors' unsanitary methods in treating the wound killed Garfield on September 19. Due to his brief tenure in office, historians tend to rank Garfield as a below-average president or omit him entirely from rankings, though he has earned praise for anti-corruption and pro-civil rights stances.[3]

Childhood and early life

[edit]
A log cabin with a statue and a tree in front
Replica of the log cabin in Moreland Hills, Ohio, where Garfield was born

James Abram Garfield was born the youngest of five children on November 19, 1831, in a log cabin in Orange Township, now Moreland Hills, Ohio.[b] Garfield's ancestor Edward Garfield migrated from Hillmorton, Warwickshire, England, to Massachusetts around 1630. James's father Abram was born in Worcester, New York, and came to Ohio to woo his childhood sweetheart, Mehitabel Ballou, only to find her married. He instead wed her sister Eliza, who was born in New Hampshire. James was named after an earlier son of Eliza and Abram who had died in infancy.[4]

In early 1833, Abram and Eliza Garfield joined a Stone-Campbell church, a decision that influenced their youngest son's life.[5] Abram died later that year, and James was raised in poverty in a household led by his strong-willed mother.[6] He was her favorite child and the two remained close for the rest of his life.[7] Eliza remarried in 1842, but soon left her second husband, Warren (or Alfred) Belden, and a scandalous divorce was awarded in 1850. James took his mother's side in the matter and noted Belden's 1880 death with satisfaction in his diary.[8] Garfield also enjoyed his mother's stories about his ancestry, especially those about his Welsh great-great-grandfathers and an ancestor who served as a knight of Caerphilly Castle.[9]

Poor and fatherless, Garfield was mocked by his peers and became sensitive to slights throughout his life; he sought escape through voracious reading.[8] He left home at age 16 in 1847 and was rejected for work on the only ship in port in Cleveland. Garfield instead found work on a canal boat, managing the mules that pulled it.[10] Horatio Alger later used this labor to good effect when he wrote Garfield's campaign biography in 1880.[11]

After six weeks, illness forced Garfield to return home, and during his recuperation, his mother and a local school official secured his promise to forgo canal work for a year of school. In 1848, he began at Geauga Seminary, in nearby Chester Township, Geauga County, Ohio.[12] Garfield later said of his childhood, "I lament that I was born to poverty, and in this chaos of childhood, seventeen years passed before I caught any inspiration ... a precious 17 years when a boy with a father and some wealth might have become fixed in manly ways."[13]

Education, marriage and early career

[edit]
An unsmiling young man with curly hair wearing a three piece suit
Garfield at age 16

Garfield attended Geauga Seminary from 1848 to 1850 and learned academic subjects for which he had not previously had time. He excelled as a student and was especially interested in languages and elocution. He began to appreciate the power a speaker had over an audience, writing that the speaker's platform "creates some excitement. I love agitation and investigation and glory in defending unpopular truth against popular error."[14] Geauga was coeducational, and Garfield was attracted to one of his classmates, Lucretia Rudolph, whom he later married.[15] To support himself at Geauga, he worked as a carpenter's assistant and teacher.[16] The need to go from town to town to find work as a teacher aggravated Garfield, and he developed a dislike of what he called "place-seeking", which became, he said, "the law of my life."[17] In later years, he astounded his friends by disregarding positions that could have been his with little politicking.[17] Garfield had attended church more to please his mother than to worship God, but in his late teens he underwent a religious awakening. He attended many camp meetings, which led to his being born again on March 4, 1850, when he was baptized into Christ by being submerged in the icy waters of the Chagrin River.[18]

After he left Geauga, Garfield worked for a year at various jobs, including teaching jobs.[19] Finding that some New Englanders worked their way through college, Garfield determined to do the same and sought a school that could prepare him for the entrance examinations. From 1851 to 1854, he attended the Western Reserve Eclectic Institute (later named Hiram College) in Hiram, Ohio, a school founded by and still affiliated with the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). While there, he was most interested in the study of Greek and Latin but was inclined to learn about and discuss any new thing he encountered.[20] Securing a position on entry as janitor, he obtained a teaching position while he was still a student there.[21] Lucretia Rudolph also enrolled at the Institute and Garfield wooed her while teaching her Greek.[22] He developed a regular preaching circuit at neighboring churches and, in some cases, earned one gold dollar per service. By 1854, Garfield had learned all the Institute could teach him and was a full-time teacher.[23] Garfield then enrolled at Williams College in Williamstown, Massachusetts, as a third-year student; he received credit for two years' study at the Institute after passing a cursory examination. Garfield was also impressed with the college president, Mark Hopkins, who had responded warmly to Garfield's letter inquiring about admission. He said of Hopkins, "The ideal college is Mark Hopkins on one end of a log with a student on the other."[24] Hopkins later said of Garfield in his student days, "There was a large general capacity applicable to any subject. There was no pretense of genius, or alternation of spasmodic effort, but a satisfactory accomplishment in all directions."[25] After his first term, Garfield was hired to teach penmanship to the students of nearby Pownal, Vermont, a post Chester A. Arthur previously held.[25]

Lucretia Garfield in the 1870s

Garfield graduated Phi Beta Kappa[26] from Williams in August 1856, was named salutatorian, and spoke at the commencement. His biographer Ira Rutkow writes that Garfield's years at Williams gave him the opportunity to know and respect those of different social backgrounds, and that, despite his origin as an unsophisticated Westerner, socially conscious New Englanders liked and respected him. "In short," Rutkow writes, "Garfield had an extensive and positive first experience with the world outside the Western Reserve of Ohio."[25]

Upon his return to Ohio, the degree from a prestigious Eastern college made Garfield a man of distinction. He returned to Hiram to teach at the Institute and in 1857 was made its principal, though he did not see education as a field that would realize his full potential. The abolitionist atmosphere at Williams had enlightened him politically, after which he began to consider politics as a career.[27] He campaigned for Republican presidential candidate John C. Frémont in 1856.[28] In 1858, he married Lucretia, and they had seven children, five of whom survived infancy.[29] Soon after the wedding, he registered to read law at the office of attorney Albert Gallatin Riddle in Cleveland, though he did his studying in Hiram.[30][31] He was admitted to the bar in 1861.[32]

Local Republican leaders invited Garfield to enter politics upon the death of Cyrus Prentiss, the presumptive nominee for the local state senate seat. He was nominated at the party convention on the sixth ballot and was elected, serving from 1860 to 1861.[33] Garfield's major effort in the state senate was an unsuccessful bill providing for Ohio's first geological survey to measure its mineral resources.[34]

Civil War

[edit]
Seated portrait in army uniform. Garfield has a full beard and mustache
Garfield as a brigadier general during the Civil War

After Abraham Lincoln's election as president, several Southern states announced their secession from the Union to form a new government, the Confederate States of America. Garfield read military texts while anxiously awaiting the war effort, which he regarded as a holy crusade against the Slave Power.[35] In April 1861, the rebels bombarded Fort Sumter, one of the South's last federal outposts, beginning the Civil War. Although he had no military training, Garfield knew his place was in the Union Army.[35]

At Governor William Dennison's request, Garfield deferred his military ambitions to remain in the legislature, where he helped appropriate the funds to raise and equip Ohio's volunteer regiments.[36] When the legislature adjourned Garfield spent the spring and early summer on a speaking tour of northeastern Ohio, encouraging enlistment in the new regiments.[36] Following a trip to Illinois to purchase muskets, Garfield returned to Ohio and, in August 1861, received a commission as a colonel in the 42nd Ohio Infantry regiment.[37] The 42nd Ohio existed only on paper, so Garfield's first task was to fill its ranks. He did so quickly, recruiting many of his neighbors and former students.[37] The regiment traveled to Camp Chase, outside Columbus, Ohio, to complete training.[37] During this period, on November 19, 1861, Garfield became a Freemason, at Magnolia Lodge, No. 20 in Columbus, Ohio, receiving the third degree after his military service was completed in 1864.[38] In December, Garfield was ordered to bring the 42nd to Kentucky, where they joined the Army of the Ohio under Brigadier General Don Carlos Buell.[39]

Buell's command

[edit]

Buell quickly assigned Garfield the task of driving Confederate forces out of eastern Kentucky, giving him the 18th Brigade for the campaign, which, besides his own 42nd, included the 40th Ohio Infantry, two Kentucky infantry regiments and two cavalry units.[40] They departed Catlettsburg, Kentucky, in mid-December, advancing through the valley of the Big Sandy River.[40] The march was uneventful until Union forces reached Paintsville, Kentucky, on January 6, 1862, where Garfield's cavalry engaged the rebels at Jenny's Creek.[41] Confederate troops under Brigadier General Humphrey Marshall held the town in numbers roughly equal to Garfield's own, but Garfield positioned his troops so as to deceive Marshall into believing the rebels were outnumbered.[41] Marshall ordered his troops to withdraw to the forks of Middle Creek, on the road to Virginia, and Garfield ordered his troops to take up the pursuit.[42] They attacked the rebel positions on January 9, 1862, in the Battle of Middle Creek, the only pitched battle Garfield commanded personally.[43] At the fighting's end, the Confederates withdrew from the field and Garfield sent his troops to Prestonsburg to reprovision.[44]

Middle Creek battlefield. Garfield commanded from the distant hill in the center of the photo.

In recognition of his success, Garfield was promoted to brigadier general.[45] After Marshall's retreat, Garfield's command was the sole remaining Union force in eastern Kentucky and he announced that any men who had fought for the Confederacy would be granted amnesty if they returned to their homes, lived peaceably, and remained loyal to the Union.[46] The proclamation was surprisingly lenient, as Garfield now believed the war was a crusade for eradication of slavery.[46] Following a brief skirmish at Pound Gap, the last rebel units in the area were outflanked and retreated to Virginia.[47]

Garfield's promotion gave him command of the 20th Brigade of the Army of the Ohio, which received orders to join Major General Ulysses S. Grant's forces as they advanced on Corinth, Mississippi, in early 1862.[48] Before the 20th Brigade arrived, however, Confederate forces under General Albert Sidney Johnston surprised Grant's men in their camps, driving them back.[49] Garfield's troops received word of the battle and advanced quickly, joining the rest of the army on the second day to drive the Confederates back across the field and into retreat.[50] The action, later known as the Battle of Shiloh, was the bloodiest of the war to date; Garfield was exposed to fire for much of the day, but emerged uninjured.[50] Major General Henry W. Halleck, Grant's superior, took charge of the combined armies and advanced ponderously toward Corinth; when they arrived, the Confederates had fled.[51]

That summer, Garfield suffered from jaundice and significant weight loss.[c][53] He was forced to return home, where his wife nursed him back to health.[53] While he was home, Garfield's friends worked to gain him the Republican nomination for Congress, but he refused to campaign with the delegates.[54] He returned to military duty that autumn and went to Washington to await his next assignment.[55] During this period of idleness, a rumor of an extramarital affair caused friction in the Garfields' marriage until Lucretia eventually chose to overlook it.[56] Garfield repeatedly received tentative assignments that were quickly withdrawn, to his frustration.[57] In the meantime, he served on the court-martial of Fitz John Porter for his tardiness at the Second Battle of Bull Run.[58] He was convinced of Porter's guilt and voted with his fellow generals to convict Porter.[58] The trial lasted almost two months, from November 1862 to January 1863, and, by its end, Garfield had procured an assignment as chief of staff to Major General William S. Rosecrans.[59]

Chief of staff for Rosecrans

[edit]
General William S. Rosecrans

Generals' chiefs of staff were usually more junior officers, but Garfield's influence with Rosecrans was greater than usual, with duties extending beyond communication of orders to actual management of his Army of the Cumberland.[60] Rosecrans had a voracious appetite for conversation, especially when unable to sleep; in Garfield, he found "the first well read person in the Army" and the ideal candidate for discussions that ran deep into the night.[61] They discussed everything, especially religion, and the two became close despite Garfield's being 12 years his junior. Rosecrans, who had converted from Methodism to Roman Catholicism, softened Garfield's view of his faith.[62]

Garfield recommended that Rosecrans replace wing commanders Alexander McCook and Thomas Crittenden, as he believed they were ineffective, but Rosecrans ignored the suggestion.[63] With Rosecrans, Garfield devised the Tullahoma Campaign to pursue and trap Confederate General Braxton Bragg in Tullahoma. After initial Union success, Bragg retreated toward Chattanooga, where Rosecrans stalled and requested more troops and supplies.[64] Garfield argued for an immediate advance, in line with demands from Halleck and Lincoln.[64] After a council of war and lengthy deliberations, Rosecrans agreed to attack.[65]

At the ensuing Battle of Chickamauga on September 19 and 20, 1863, confusion among the wing commanders over Rosecrans's orders created a gap in the lines, resulting in a rout of the right flank. Rosecrans concluded that the battle was lost and fell back on Chattanooga to establish a defensive line.[66] Garfield, however, thought part of the army had held and, with Rosecrans's approval, headed across Missionary Ridge to survey the scene. Garfield's hunch was correct.[66] Consequently, his ride became legendary and Rosecrans's error reignited criticism about the latter's leadership.[66] While Rosecrans's army had avoided disaster, they were stranded in Chattanooga, surrounded by Bragg's army. Garfield sent a telegram to Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton alerting Washington to the need for reinforcements to avoid annihilation. Lincoln and Halleck responded to the request for reinforcements by sending 20,000 troops to Garfield by rail within nine days.[67] In the meantime, Grant was promoted to command of the western armies and quickly replaced Rosecrans with George H. Thomas.[68] Garfield was ordered to report to Washington, where he was promoted to major general.[69] According to historian Jean Edward Smith, Grant and Garfield had a "guarded relationship" since Grant promoted Thomas, rather than Garfield, to command of the Army of the Cumberland after Rosecrans's dismissal.[70]

Congressional career

[edit]

Election in 1862; Civil War years

[edit]
Salmon P. Chase was Garfield's ally until Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial.

While he served in the Army in early 1862, friends of Garfield approached him about running for Congress from Ohio's newly redrawn and heavily Republican 19th district. He worried that he and other state-appointed generals would receive obscure assignments, and running for Congress would allow him to resume his political career. That the new Congress would not hold its first regular session until December 1863 allowed him to continue his war service for a time.[d] Home on medical leave, he refused to campaign for the nomination, leaving that to political managers who secured it at the local convention in September 1862 on the eighth ballot. In the October general election, he defeated D.B. Woods by a two-to-one margin for a seat in the 38th Congress.[71]

Days before his Congressional term began, Garfield lost his eldest daughter, three-year-old Eliza, and became anxious and conflicted, saying his "desolation of heart" might require his return to "the wild life of the army."[72] He also assumed that the war would end before his joining the House, but it had not, and he felt strongly that he belonged in the field, rather than in Congress. He also thought he could expect a favorable command, so he decided to see President Lincoln. During their meeting, Lincoln recommended he take his House seat, as there was an excess of generals and a shortage of administration congressmen, especially those with knowledge of military affairs. Garfield accepted this recommendation and resigned his military commission to do so.[72]

Garfield met and befriended Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase, who saw Garfield as a younger version of himself. The two agreed politically and both were part of the Radical wing of the Republican Party.[73] Once he took his seat in December 1863, Garfield was frustrated at Lincoln's reluctance to press the South hard. Many radicals, led in the House by Pennsylvania's Thaddeus Stevens, wanted rebel-owned lands confiscated, but Lincoln threatened to veto any bill that proposed to do so on a widespread basis. In debate on the House floor, Garfield supported such legislation and, discussing England's Glorious Revolution, hinted that Lincoln might be thrown out of office for resisting it.[74] Garfield had supported Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation and marveled at the "strange phenomenon in the world's history, when a second-rate Illinois lawyer is the instrument to utter words which shall form an epoch memorable in all future ages."[75]

Garfield not only favored the abolition of slavery, but also believed the leaders of the rebellion had forfeited their constitutional rights. He supported the confiscation of Southern plantations and even exile or execution of rebellion leaders as a means to ensure a permanent end to slavery.[76] Garfield felt Congress had an obligation "to determine what legislation is necessary to secure equal justice to all loyal persons, without regard to color."[77] He was more supportive of Lincoln when he took action against slavery.[78]

Garfield showed leadership early in his congressional career; he was initially the only Republican vote to terminate the use of bounties in military recruiting. Some financially able recruits had used the bounty system to buy their way out of service (called commutation), which Garfield considered reprehensible.[79] He gave a speech pointing out the flaws in the existing conscription law: 300,000 recruits had been called upon to enlist, but barely 10,000 had done so, with the remainder claiming exemption, providing money, or recruiting a substitute. Lincoln appeared before the Military Affairs committee on which Garfield served, demanding a more effective bill; even if it cost him reelection, Lincoln was confident he could win the war before his term expired.[80] After many false starts, Garfield, with Lincoln's support, procured the passage of a conscription bill that excluded commutation.[81]

Under Chase's influence, Garfield became a staunch proponent of a dollar backed by a gold standard, and strongly opposed the "greenback". He also accepted the necessity of suspension of payment in gold or silver during the Civil War with strong reluctance.[82] He voted with the Radical Republicans in passing the Wade–Davis Bill, designed to give Congress more authority over Reconstruction, but Lincoln defeated it with a pocket veto.[83]

Garfield did not consider Lincoln very worthy of reelection, but there seemed to be no viable alternative. "He will probably be the man, though I think we could do better", he said.[75] Garfield attended the party convention and promoted Rosecrans as Lincoln's running mate, but delegates chose Military Governor of Tennessee Andrew Johnson.[84] Lincoln was reelected, as was Garfield.[85] By then, Chase had left the Cabinet and been appointed Chief Justice, and his relations with Garfield became more distant.[86]

Garfield took up the practice of law in 1865 to improve his personal finances. His efforts took him to Wall Street where, the day after Lincoln's assassination, a riotous crowd drew him into an impromptu speech to calm their passions: "Fellow citizens! Clouds and darkness are round about Him! His pavilion is dark waters and thick clouds of the skies! Justice and judgment are the establishment of His throne! Mercy and truth shall go before His face! Fellow citizens! God reigns, and the Government at Washington still lives!"[87] The speech, with no mention or praise of Lincoln, was, according to Garfield biographer Robert G. Caldwell, "quite as significant for what it did not contain as for what it did."[88] In the following years, Garfield had more praise for Lincoln; a year after Lincoln's death, Garfield said, "Greatest among all these developments were the character and fame of Abraham Lincoln," and in 1878 he called Lincoln "one of the few great rulers whose wisdom increased with his power".[89]

When in Washington, Garfield attended Vermont Avenue Christian Church, which later became National City Christian Church, a building constructed and funded by the Disciples.[90]

Reconstruction

[edit]

In 1864, the U.S. Senate passed the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery throughout the Union. The bill failed to pass the House by a two-thirds majority until January 31, 1865, when it was then sent to the states for ratification. The Amendment opened other issues concerning African American civil rights. Garfield asked, "[What] is freedom? Is it the bare privilege of not being chained?...If this is all, then freedom is a bitter mockery, a cruel delusion."[91][e]

Garfield supported black suffrage as firmly as he supported abolition.[93] President Johnson sought the rapid restoration of the Southern states during the months between his accession and the meeting of Congress in December 1865; Garfield hesitantly supported this policy as an experiment. Johnson, an old friend, sought Garfield's backing and their conversations led Garfield to assume Johnson's differences with Congress were not large. When Congress assembled in December (to Johnson's chagrin, without the elected representatives of the Southern states, who were excluded), Garfield urged conciliation to his colleagues, although he feared that Johnson, a former Democrat, might join other Democrats to gain political control. Garfield foresaw conflict even before February 1866, when Johnson vetoed a bill to extend the life of the Freedmen's Bureau, charged with aiding the former slaves. By April, Garfield had concluded that Johnson was either "crazy or drunk with opium."[94]

A black statue of Garfield atop an elaborate pillar. The United States Capitol rotunda is visible in the background.
Garfield Monument, by the Capitol, where he served almost twenty years

The conflict between Congress and President Johnson was the major issue of the 1866 campaign, with Johnson taking to the campaign trail in a Swing Around the Circle and Garfield facing opposition within the Republican party in his home district. With the South still disenfranchised and Northern public opinion behind the Republicans, they gained a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress. Garfield, having overcome his challengers at the district nominating convention, won reelection easily.[95]

Garfield opposed the proposed impeachment of Johnson initially when Congress convened in December 1866, but supported legislation to limit Johnson's powers, such as the Tenure of Office Act, which restricted Johnson's ability to remove presidential appointees.[96] Distracted by committee duties, Garfield spoke about these bills rarely, but was a loyal Republican vote against Johnson.[97]

On January 7, 1867, Garfield voted in support of the resolution that launched the first impeachment inquiry against Johnson (run by the House Committee on the Judiciary).[98] On December 7, 1867, he voted against the unsuccessful resolution to impeach Johnson that the House Committee on the Judiciary had sent the full House.[99] On January 27, 1868, he voted to pass the resolution that authorized the second impeachment inquiry against Johnson (run by the House Select Committee on Reconstruction).[100] Due to a court case, he was absent on February 24, 1868, when the House impeached Johnson, but gave a speech aligning himself with Thaddeus Stevens and others who sought Johnson's removal shortly thereafter.[97] Garfield was present on March 2 and 3, 1868, when the House voted on specific articles of impeachment, and voted in support of all 11 articles.[101] During the March 2 debate on the articles, Garfield argued that what he characterized as Johnson's attempts to render Ulysses S. Grant, William Tecumseh Sherman, and William H. Emory personal tools of his demonstrated Johnson's intent to disregard the law and override the Constitution, suggesting that Johnson's trial perhaps could be expedited to last only a day in order to hasten his removal.[102] When Johnson was acquitted in his trial before the Senate, Garfield was shocked and blamed the outcome on the trial's presiding officer, Chief Justice Chase, his onetime mentor.[97]

By the time Grant succeeded Johnson in 1869, Garfield had moved away from the remaining radicals (Stevens, their leader, had died in 1868). By this time, many in the Republican Party wanted to remove the "Negro question" from national affairs.[103] Garfield hailed the ratification of the 15th Amendment in 1870 as a triumph and favored Georgia's readmission to the Union as a matter of right, not politics. An influential Republican, Garfield said, "[The] Fifteen Amendment confers on the African race the care of its own destiny. It places their fortunes in their own hands."[103] In 1871, Congress took up the Ku Klux Klan Act, which was designed to combat attacks on African Americans' suffrage rights. Garfield opposed the act, saying, "I have never been more perplexed by a piece of legislation." He was torn between his indignation at the Klan, whom he called "terrorists", and his concern for the power given to the president to enforce the act through suspension of habeas corpus.[104]

Tariffs and finance

[edit]
The greenback despised by Garfield

Throughout his political career, Garfield favored the gold standard and decried attempts to increase the money supply through the issuance of paper money not backed by gold, and later, through the free and unlimited coinage of silver.[105] In 1865, he was put on the House Ways and Means Committee, a long-awaited opportunity to focus on financial and economic issues. He reprised his opposition to the greenback, saying, "Any party which commits itself to paper money will go down amid the general disaster, covered with the curses of a ruined people."[106] In 1868 Garfield gave a two-hour speech on currency in the House, which was widely applauded as his best oratory to that point; in it, he advocated a gradual resumption of specie payments, that is, the government paying out silver and gold, rather than paper money that could not be redeemed.[107]

Tariffs had been raised to high levels during the Civil War. Afterward, Garfield, who made a close study of financial affairs, advocated moving toward free trade, though the standard Republican position was a protective tariff that would allow American industries to grow. This break with his party likely cost him his place on the Ways and Means Committee in 1867, and though Republicans held the majority in the House until 1875, Garfield remained off that committee. Garfield came to chair the powerful House Appropriations Committee, but it was Ways and Means, with its influence over fiscal policy, that he really wanted to lead.[108] One reason he was denied a place on Ways and Means was the opposition of the influential Republican editor Horace Greeley.[109]

Photographic portrait of Grant
President U.S. Grant
Mathew Brady 1870

Starting in January 1870, Garfield, then chairman of the House Banking Committee, led an investigation into the Black Friday Gold Panic scandal.[110] In 1869, during Grant's first term in office, two New York conspirators, Jay Gould and James Fisk, launched a scheme to corner the gold market. The conspiracy was broken on Friday, September 24, 1869, when Grant and Treasury Secretary George Boutwell released gold into the market, causing widespread financial panic. During the investigation, rumors spread that Grant's family might have been involved. In order not to force Grant's wife to testify, Garfield had a private meeting with Grant at the White House. When Garfield showed Grant testimony about him and his family, Grant thanked Garfield but refused to read it or give a response.[111] Grant personally resented Garfield for investigating Black Friday and his wife Julia concerning possible involvement in the scandal.[70]

Garfield's investigation and final majority report, released on September 12, 1870, were thorough but found no indictable offenses and exonerated Grant and Julia of wrongdoing.[112] Garfield thought the scandal was enabled by the greenbacks that financed the speculation.[113] Garfield was not at all enthused about President Grant's reelection in 1872—until Greeley, who emerged as the candidate of the Democrats and Liberal Republicans, became the only serious alternative. Garfield said, "I would say Grant was not fit to be nominated and Greeley is not fit to be elected."[114] Both Grant and Garfield were overwhelmingly reelected.[114]

Crédit Mobilier scandal; salary grab

[edit]

The Crédit Mobilier of America scandal involved corruption in the financing of the Union Pacific Railroad, part of the transcontinental railroad which was completed in 1869. Union Pacific officers and directors secretly purchased control of the Crédit Mobilier of America company, then contracted with it to undertake construction of the railroad. The railroad paid the company's grossly inflated invoices with federal funds appropriated to subsidize the project, and the company was allowed to purchase Union Pacific securities at par value, well below the market rate. Crédit Mobilier showed large profits and stock gains, and distributed substantial dividends. The high expenses meant Congress was called upon to appropriate more funds. One of the railroad officials who controlled Crédit Mobilier was also a congressman, Oakes Ames of Massachusetts. He offered some of his colleagues the opportunity to buy Crédit Mobilier stock at par value, well below what it sold for on the market, and the railroad got its additional appropriations.[115]

Editorial cartoon: Uncle Sam directs U.S. Senators and Representatives implicated in the Crédit Mobilier scheme to commit Hara-Kiri.

The story broke in July 1872, in the middle of the presidential campaign. Among those named were Vice President Schuyler Colfax, Massachusetts Senator Henry Wilson (the Republican candidate for vice president), Speaker James G. Blaine of Maine, and Garfield. Greeley had little luck taking advantage of the scandal. When Congress reconvened after the election, Blaine, seeking to clear his name, demanded a House investigation. Evidence before the special committee exonerated Blaine. Garfield had said in September 1872 that Ames had offered him stock but he had repeatedly refused it. Testifying before the committee in January, Ames said he had offered Garfield ten shares of stock at par value, but that Garfield had never taken them or paid for them, though a year passed, from 1867 to 1868, before Garfield had finally refused. Appearing before the committee on January 14, 1873, Garfield confirmed much of this. Ames testified several weeks later that Garfield agreed to take the stock on credit, and that it was paid for by the company's huge dividends.[116] The two men differed over $300 that Garfield received and later paid back, with Garfield deeming it a loan and Ames a dividend.[117]

Garfield's biographers have been unwilling to exonerate him in the scandal. Allan Peskin writes, "Did Garfield lie? Not exactly. Did he tell the truth? Not completely. Was he corrupted? Not really. Even Garfield's enemies never claimed that his involvement in the affair influenced his behavior."[118] Rutkow writes, "Garfield's real offense was that he knowingly denied to the House investigating committee that he had agreed to accept the stock and that he had also received a dividend of $329."[119] Caldwell suggests Garfield "told the truth [before the committee, but] certainly failed to tell the whole truth, clearly evading an answer to certain vital questions and thus giving the impression of worse faults than those of which he was guilty."[120] That Crédit Mobilier was a corrupt organization had been a badly kept secret, even mentioned on the floor of Congress, and editor Sam Bowles wrote at the time that Garfield, in his positions on committees dealing with finance, "had no more right to be ignorant in a matter of such grave importance as this, than the sentinel has to snore on his post."[118]

Another issue that caused Garfield trouble in his 1874 reelection bid was the so-called "Salary Grab" of 1873, which increased the compensation for members of Congress by 50%, retroactive to 1871. As chairman of the Appropriations Committee, Garfield was responsible for shepherding the appropriations bill through the House; during the debate in February 1873, Massachusetts Representative Benjamin Butler offered the increase as an amendment, and despite Garfield's opposition, it passed the House and eventually became law. The law was very popular in the House, as almost half the members were lame ducks, but the public was outraged, and many of Garfield's constituents blamed him, though he personally refused to accept the increase. In a bad year for Republicans, who lost control of the House for the first time since the Civil War, Garfield had his closest congressional election, winning with only 57% of the vote.[f][122]

Floor leader; Hayes administration

[edit]

The Democratic takeover of the House of Representatives in 1875 meant the loss of Garfield's chairmanship of the Appropriations Committee, though the Democrats did put him on the Ways and Means Committee. With many of his leadership rivals defeated in the 1874 Democratic landslide, and Blaine elected to the Senate, Garfield was seen as the Republican floor leader, and the likely Speaker, should the party regain control of the chamber.[123]

Garfield thought the land grants given to expanding railroads was an unjust practice. He also opposed monopolistic practices by corporations, as well as the power sought by workers' unions.[124] He supported the proposed establishment of the United States civil service as a means of ridding officials of the annoyance of aggressive office seekers. He especially wished to eliminate the practice of forcing government workers, in exchange for their positions, to kick back a percentage of their wages as political contributions.[125]

As the 1876 presidential election approached, Garfield was loyal to the candidacy of Senator Blaine, and fought for the former Speaker's nomination at the 1876 Republican National Convention in Cincinnati. When it became clear, after six ballots, that Blaine could not prevail, the convention nominated Ohio Governor Rutherford B. Hayes. Although Garfield had supported Blaine, he had kept good relations with Hayes, and wholeheartedly supported the governor.[126] Garfield had hoped to retire from politics after his term expired to devote himself full-time to the practice of law, but to help his party, he sought re-election, and won it easily that October. Any celebration was short-lived, as Garfield's youngest son, Neddie, fell ill with whooping cough shortly after the congressional election, and soon died.[127]

Garfield (second from right in the row of commissioners just below the gallery) served on the Electoral Commission that decided the disputed 1876 presidential election. Painting by Cornelia Adele Strong Fassett.

When Hayes appeared to have lost the presidential election the following month to Democrat Samuel Tilden, the Republicans launched efforts to reverse the results in South Carolina, Louisiana, and Florida, where they held the governorship. If Hayes won all three states, he would take the election by a single electoral vote. Grant asked Garfield to serve as a "neutral observer" of the recount in Louisiana. The observers soon recommended to the state electoral commissions that Hayes be declared the winner—Garfield recommended the entire vote of West Feliciana Parish, which had given Tilden a sizable majority, be thrown out. The Republican governors of the three states certified that Hayes had won their states, to the outrage of Democrats, who had the state legislatures submit rival returns, and threatened to prevent the counting of the electoral vote—under the Constitution, Congress is the final arbiter of the election. Congress then established an Electoral Commission, consisting of eight Republicans and seven Democrats, to determine the winner. Despite his objection to the Commission, Garfield was appointed to it. He felt Congress should count the vote and proclaim Hayes victorious. Hayes emerged the victor by a party line vote of 8–7.[128] In exchange for recognizing Hayes as president, Southern Democrats secured the removal of federal troops from the South, ending Reconstruction.[129]

Although an Ohio Senate seat would be vacated by the resignation of John Sherman to become Treasury Secretary, Hayes needed Garfield's expertise to protect him from the agenda of a hostile Congress, and asked him not to seek it. Garfield agreed. As Hayes's key legislator in the House, he gained considerable prestige and respect for his role there.[130] When Congress debated the Bland–Allison Act, to have the government purchase large quantities of silver and strike it into legal tender dollar coins, Garfield opposed it as a deviation from the gold standard; it was enacted over Hayes's veto in February 1878.[131]

In 1876, Garfield purchased the property in Mentor that reporters later dubbed Lawnfield, where he conducted the first successful front porch campaign for the presidency.[132] Hayes suggested that Garfield run for governor in 1879, seeing that as a road likely to take Garfield to the White House. Garfield preferred to seek election as a U.S. senator. Rivals were spoken of for the seat, such as Secretary Sherman, but he had presidential ambitions (for which he sought Garfield's support), and other candidates fell by the wayside. The General Assembly elected Garfield to the Senate in January 1880, though his term was not scheduled to commence until March 4, 1881.[133]

[edit]

In 1865, Garfield became a partner in the law firm of a fellow Disciple of Christ, Jeremiah Black. They had much in common, except politics: Black was an avid Democrat, having served in the cabinet of President James Buchanan.[134] The next year, Black was retained by some pro-Confederate northern civilians who had been found guilty of treason in a military court and sentenced to death. Black saw an opportunity to strike a blow against military courts and the Republicans.[135] He had heard Garfield's military speeches, and learned of not only his oratory skills but also his resistance to expansive powers of military commissions. Black assigned the case to Garfield one week before arguments were to be made before the U. S. Supreme Court. When Black warned him of the political peril, Garfield responded, "It don't make any difference. I believe in English liberty and English law."[136] In this landmark case, Ex parte Milligan, Garfield successfully argued that civilians could not be tried before military tribunals, despite a declaration of martial law, as long as civil courts were still operating. In his first court appearance, Garfield's oral argument lasted over two hours, and though his wealthy clients refused to pay him, he had established himself as a preeminent lawyer.[135]

During Grant's first term, Garfield was discontented with public service and in 1872 again pursued opportunities in the law. But he declined a partnership offer from a Cleveland law firm when told his prospective partner was of "intemperate and licentious" reputation.[137] In 1873, after Chase's death, Garfield appealed to Grant to appoint Justice Noah H. Swayne Chief Justice, but Grant appointed Morrison R. Waite.[138]

Garfield's proof of the Pythagorean theorem features a right triangle within a trapezoid.

In 1871, Garfield traveled to Montana Territory to negotiate the removal of the Bitterroot Salish tribe to the Flathead Indian Reservation.[139] Having been told that the people would happily move, Garfield expected an easy task. Instead, he found the Salish determined to stay in their Bitterroot Valley homeland. His attempts to coerce Chief Charlo to sign the agreement nearly brought about a military clash. In the end, he convinced two subchiefs to sign and move to the reservation with a few of the Salish people. Garfield never convinced Charlo to sign, although the official treaty document voted on by Congress bore his forged mark.[140]

In 1876, Garfield developed a trapezoid proof of the Pythagorean theorem, which was published in the New England Journal of Education.[141] Mathematics historian William Dunham wrote that Garfield's trapezoid work was "really a very clever proof."[142] According to the Journal, Garfield arrived at the proof "in mathematical amusements and discussions with other members of congress."[143]

After his conversion experience in 1850, religious inquiry was a high priority for Garfield. He read widely and moved beyond the confines of his early experience as a member of the Disciples of Christ. His new, broader perspective was rooted in his devotion to freedom of inquiry and his study of history. The intensity of Garfield's religious thought was also influenced by his experience in combat and his interaction with voters.[144][145]

Presidential election of 1880

[edit]

Republican nomination

[edit]
A cartoon. Grant, on the right, is semi-kneeling while others kneel behind him. Garfield stands upright and receives a sword from Grant. Behind him are cheering throngs, and two men raise a flag in the background.
Following Grant's defeat for the nomination Puck magazine satirized Robert E. Lee's surrender to him at Appomattox by depicting Grant giving up his sword to Garfield.

Having just been elected to the Senate with John Sherman's support, Garfield was committed to Sherman for the 1880 Republican presidential nomination.[146] Before the convention began, however, a few Republicans, including Wharton Barker of Philadelphia, thought Garfield the best choice for the nomination.[146] Garfield denied any interest in the position, but the attention was enough to make Sherman suspicious of his lieutenant's ambitions.[147] Besides Sherman, the early favorites for the nomination were Blaine and former President Grant; several other candidates attracted delegates as well.[148]

The Republican Party at the time was split into two factions: the "Stalwarts", who supported the existing federal government patronage system, and the "Half-Breeds", who wanted civil service reform.[149] As the convention began, New York Senator Roscoe Conkling, floor leader for the Stalwarts, who supported former President Ulysses S. Grant, proposed that the delegates pledge to back the eventual nominee in the general election.[150] When three West Virginia delegates declined to be so bound, Conkling sought to expel them from the convention. Garfield rose to defend the men, giving a passionate speech in defense of their right to reserve judgment.[150] The crowd turned against Conkling, and he withdrew the motion.[150] The performance delighted Garfield's boosters, who were then convinced he was the only one who could attract a majority of the delegates' votes.[151]

After speeches in favor of the other front-runners, Garfield rose to place Sherman's name in nomination; his speech was well-received, but the delegates mustered little excitement for Sherman as the next president.[152] The first ballot showed Grant leading with 304 votes to Blaine's 284, and Sherman's 93 votes placed him in a distant third. Subsequent ballots demonstrated a deadlock between Grant and Blaine, with neither having the 379 votes needed for nomination.[153] Jeremiah McLain Rusk, a member of the Wisconsin delegation, and Benjamin Harrison, an Indiana delegate, sought to break the deadlock by shifting a few of the anti-Grant votes to a dark horse candidate—Garfield.[154] Garfield gained 50 votes on the 35th ballot, and a stampede began. Garfield protested to the Ohio delegation that he did not seek the nomination and would not betray Sherman, but they overruled his objections and cast their ballots for him.[155] In the next round of voting, nearly all the Sherman and Blaine delegates shifted their support to Garfield, giving him 399 votes, and the Republican nomination. Most of the Grant forces backed the former president to the end, creating a disgruntled Stalwart minority in the party.[156] To obtain that faction's support for the ticket, Chester A. Arthur, a former New York customs collector and member of Conkling's political machine, was chosen as the vice presidential nominee.[157]

Campaign against Hancock

[edit]
Garfield–Arthur election poster
1880 electoral vote results

Even with a Stalwart on the ticket, animosity between the Republican factions carried over from the convention, so Garfield traveled to New York to meet with party leaders.[158] After convincing the Stalwart crowd to put aside their differences and unite for the coming campaign, Garfield returned to Ohio, leaving the active campaigning to others, as was traditional at the time.[159] Meanwhile, the Democrats settled on their nominee, Major General Winfield Scott Hancock of Pennsylvania, a career military officer.[158] Hancock and the Democrats expected to carry the Solid South, while much of the North was considered safe territory for Garfield and the Republicans; most of the campaign focused on a few close states, including New York and Indiana.[160]

Practical differences between the candidates were few, but Republicans began the campaign with the familiar theme of waving the bloody shirt. They reminded Northern voters the Democratic Party was responsible for secession and four years of civil war, and Democrats would reverse the gains of that war, dishonor Union veterans, and pay Confederate veterans pensions out of the federal treasury.[161] Fifteen years had passed since the end of the war, and with Union generals at the head of both tickets, the bloody shirt was of diminishing value in exciting the voters.[162] With a few months to go before the election, the Republicans switched tactics to emphasize the tariff. Seizing on the Democratic platform's call for a "tariff for revenue only", Republicans told Northern workers a Hancock presidency would weaken the tariff protection that kept them in good jobs.[163] Hancock made the situation worse when, attempting to strike a moderate stance, he said, "The tariff question is a local question."[162] The Republican ploy proved effective in uniting the North behind Garfield.[164] Ultimately, of the more than 9.2 million popular votes cast, fewer than 2,000 separated the two candidates.[165] But in the Electoral College, Garfield had an easy victory over Hancock, 214 to 155.[166] The election made Garfield the only sitting member of the House ever to be elected to the presidency.[167]

Presidency (1881)

[edit]
Presidency of James A. Garfield
March 4, 1881 – September 19, 1881
Vice President
CabinetSee list
PartyRepublican
Election1880
SeatWhite House


Presidential coat of arms
(1877–1913)
Garfield cabinet
OfficeNameTerm
PresidentJames A. Garfield1881
Vice PresidentChester A. Arthur1881
Secretary of StateJames G. Blaine1881
Secretary of the TreasuryWilliam Windom1881
Secretary of WarRobert Todd Lincoln1881
Attorney GeneralWayne MacVeagh1881
Postmaster GeneralThomas Lemuel James1881
Secretary of the NavyWilliam H. Hunt1881
Secretary of the InteriorSamuel J. Kirkwood1881

Cabinet and inauguration

[edit]
President Garfield in reviewing stand, viewing inauguration ceremonies, on March 4, 1881
Line engraving of Garfield, produced around 1902 by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing as part of a presentation album of the first 26 presidents

Before his inauguration, Garfield was occupied with assembling a cabinet that might engender peace between the party's Conkling and Blaine factions. Blaine's delegates had provided much of the support for Garfield's nomination, so the Maine senator received the place of honor as Secretary of State.[168] Blaine was not only the president's closest advisor, but he was also obsessed with knowing all that took place in the White House, and allegedly posted spies there in his absence.[169] Garfield nominated William Windom of Minnesota as Secretary of the Treasury, William H. Hunt of Louisiana as Secretary of the Navy, Robert Todd Lincoln as Secretary of War, and Samuel J. Kirkwood of Iowa as Secretary of the Interior. New York was represented by Thomas Lemuel James as Postmaster General. Garfield appointed Pennsylvania's Wayne MacVeagh, an adversary of Blaine's, as Attorney General.[170] Blaine tried to sabotage the appointment by convincing Garfield to name an opponent of MacVeagh, William E. Chandler, as Solicitor General under MacVeagh. Only Chandler's rejection by the Senate forestalled MacVeagh's resignation over the matter.[171]

Because Garfield was distracted by cabinet maneuvering, his inaugural address was a "compendium of platitudes" and fell below expectations.[172][173] At one high point, however, Garfield emphasized the civil rights of African Americans, saying "Freedom can never yield its fullness of blessings so long as the law or its administration places the smallest obstacle in the pathway of any virtuous citizen."[174] After discussing the gold standard, the need for education, and an unexpected denunciation of Mormon polygamy, the speech ended. The crowd applauded, but the speech, according to Peskin, "however sincerely intended, betrayed its hasty composition by the flatness of its tone and the conventionality of its subject matter."[175]

Garfield's appointment of James infuriated Conkling, a factional opponent of the Postmaster General, who demanded a compensatory appointment for his faction, such as the position of Secretary of the Treasury. The resulting squabble occupied much of Garfield's brief presidency. The feud with Conkling reached a climax when the president, at Blaine's instigation, nominated Conkling's enemy, Judge William H. Robertson, to be Collector of the Port of New York. This was one of the prize patronage positions below cabinet level and was then held by Edwin A. Merritt. Conkling raised the time-honored principle of senatorial courtesy in an attempt to defeat the nomination, to no avail. Garfield, who believed the practice was corrupt, would not back down and threatened to withdraw all nominations unless Robertson was confirmed, intending to "settle the question whether the president is registering clerk of the Senate or the Executive of the United States."[176] Ultimately, Conkling and his New York colleague, Senator Thomas C. Platt, resigned their Senate seats to seek vindication but found only further humiliation when the New York legislature elected others in their places. Robertson was confirmed as Collector and Garfield's victory was clear. To Blaine's chagrin, the victorious Garfield returned to his goal of balancing the interests of party factions and nominated a number of Conkling's Stalwart friends to offices.[177]

With his cabinet complete, Garfield had to contend with myriad office seekers. He exclaimed, "My God! What is there in this place that a man should ever get into it." Garfield's family happily settled into the White House, but he found presidential duties exasperating.[173]

Refinance of national debt

[edit]

Garfield ordered Treasury Secretary William Windom to refund (refinance) the national debt by calling in outstanding U.S. bonds paying 6% interest. Holders would have the option of accepting cash or new bonds at 3%, closer to the interest rates of the time. Taxpayers were saved an estimated $10 million. By comparison, federal expenditures in 1881 were below $261 million (~$7.28 billion in 2024).[178][179]

Supreme Court nomination

[edit]

In 1880, President Hayes had nominated Stanley Matthews to the Supreme Court but the Senate declined to act on the nomination. In March 1881, Garfield re-nominated Matthews to the Court and the Senate confirmed Matthews by a vote of 24–23.[180] According to The New York Times, "opposition to Matthews's Supreme Court appointment ... stemmed from his prosecution in 1859 of a newspaper editor who had assisted two runaway slaves." Because Matthews was "a professed abolitionist at the time, the matter was later framed as political expediency triumphing over moral principle."[181] Matthews served on the Court until his death in 1889.[181]

Reforms

[edit]
A cartoon. Garfield, in night clothes and slippers, is on the doorstep looking at an ugly crying baby in a basket on the ground.
An 1881 Puck cartoon shows Garfield finding a baby at his front door with a tag marked "Civil Service Reform, compliments of R.B. Hayes". Hayes, his predecessor in the presidency, is seen in the background dressed like a woman and holding a bag marked "R.B. Hayes' Savings, Fremont, Ohio".

Grant and Hayes had both advocated civil service reform, and by 1881 such reform associations had organized with renewed energy across the nation. Garfield sympathized with them, believing the spoils system damaged the presidency and often eclipsed more important concerns.[182] Some reformers became disappointed when Garfield promoted limited tenure only to minor office seekers and gave appointments to his old friends.[182]

Corruption in the post office also cried out for reform. In April 1880, there had been a congressional investigation of corruption in the Post Office Department, where profiteering rings allegedly stole millions of dollars, securing bogus mail contracts on star routes.[183] After obtaining contracts with the lowest bid, costs to run the mail routes would be escalated and profits would be divided among ring members. Shortly after taking office, Garfield received word of postal corruption by an alleged star route ringleader, Assistant Postmaster General Thomas J. Brady.[184] Garfield demanded Brady's resignation and ordered prosecutions that ended in trials for conspiracy. When told that his party, including his campaign manager, Stephen W. Dorsey, was involved, Garfield directed that the corruption in the Post Office be rooted out "to the bone", regardless of where it might lead.[183] Brady resigned and was indicted for conspiracy, though jury trials in 1882 and 1883 found Brady not guilty.[185]

Civil rights and education

[edit]
Formal seated portrait in oils
Official White House portrait of James Garfield, 1881

Garfield believed the key to improving the state of African American civil rights was government supported education.[186] During Reconstruction, freedmen had gained citizenship and suffrage, which enabled them to participate in government, but Garfield believed their rights were being eroded by Southern white resistance and illiteracy, and he was concerned that blacks would become America's permanent "peasantry".[187] He proposed a "universal" education system funded by the federal government. In February 1866, as a congressman from Ohio, Garfield and Ohio School Commissioner Emerson Edward White had drafted a bill for the National Department of Education. They believed that through the use of statistics they could push the U.S. Congress to establish a federal agency for school reform.[188] But by the time of Garfield's presidency, Congress and the northern white public had lost interest in African-American rights, and Congress did not pass federal funding for universal education during his term.[187]

Garfield also worked to appoint several African Americans to prominent positions: Frederick Douglass, recorder of deeds in Washington; Robert Elliot, special agent to the Treasury; John M. Langston, Haitian minister; and Blanche K. Bruce, register to the Treasury. Garfield believed Southern support for the Republican Party could be gained by "commercial and industrial" interests rather than race issues and began to reverse Hayes's policy of conciliating Southern Democrats.[189] He appointed William H. Hunt, a Republican from Louisiana, as Secretary of the Navy.[189] To break the hold of the resurgent Democratic Party in the Solid South, Garfield took patronage advice from Virginia Senator William Mahone of the biracial independent Readjuster Party, hoping to add the independents' strength to the Republicans' there.[190]

Foreign policy and naval reform

[edit]
James G. Blaine, Garfield's Secretary of State

Garfield had little foreign policy experience, so he leaned heavily on Blaine.[191] They agreed on the need to promote freer trade, especially within the Western Hemisphere.[192] Garfield and Blaine believed increasing trade with Latin America would be the best way to keep the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland from dominating the region.[192] By encouraging exports, they believed they could increase American prosperity.[192] Garfield authorized Blaine to call for a Pan-American conference in 1882 to mediate disputes among the Latin American nations and to serve as a forum for talks on increasing trade.[193]

At the same time, they hoped to negotiate a peace in the War of the Pacific then being fought by Bolivia, Chile, and Peru.[193] Blaine favored a resolution that would result in Peru yielding no territory, but Chile by 1881 had occupied the Peruvian capital of Lima, and rejected any settlement that restored the previous status quo.[194]

Garfield sought to expand American influence in other areas, calling for renegotiation of the Clayton–Bulwer Treaty to allow the United States to construct a canal through Panama without British involvement and attempting to reduce British influence in the strategically located Kingdom of Hawaii.[195] Garfield's and Blaine's plans for the United States' involvement in the world stretched even beyond the Western Hemisphere, as he sought commercial treaties with Korea and Madagascar.[196]

Garfield also considered enhancing U.S. military strength abroad, asking Navy Secretary Hunt to investigate the navy's condition with an eye toward expansion and modernization.[197] In the end, these ambitious plans came to nothing after Garfield was assassinated. Nine countries had accepted invitations to the Pan-American conference, but the invitations were withdrawn in April 1882 after Blaine resigned from the cabinet and Arthur, Garfield's successor, cancelled the conference.[198][g] Naval reform continued under Arthur, on a more modest scale than Garfield and Hunt had envisioned, ultimately ending in the construction of the Squadron of Evolution.[199]

Assassination

[edit]

Guiteau and shooting

[edit]

Charles J. Guiteau had followed various professions in his life, but in 1880 had determined to gain federal office by supporting what he expected would be the winning Republican ticket.[200] He composed a speech, "Garfield vs. Hancock", and got it printed by the Republican National Committee. One means of persuading the voters in that era was through orators expounding on the candidate's merits, but with the Republicans seeking more famous men, Guiteau received few opportunities to speak.[201] On one occasion, according to Kenneth D. Ackerman, Guiteau was unable to finish his speech due to nerves. Guiteau, who considered himself a Stalwart, deemed his contribution to Garfield's victory sufficient to justify his appointment to the position of consul in Paris, despite the fact that he spoke no French, nor any foreign language.[202] One medical expert has since described Guiteau as possibly a narcissistic schizophrenic;[203] neuroscientist Kent Kiehl assessed him as a clinical psychopath.[204]

Garfield, shot by Charles J. Guiteau, collapses as Secretary of State Blaine gestures for help. Engraving from Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper.

One of Garfield's more wearying duties was seeing office-seekers, and he saw Guiteau at least once. White House officials suggested to Guiteau that he approach Blaine, as the consulship was within the Department of State.[205] Blaine also saw the public regularly, and Guiteau became a regular at these sessions. Blaine, who had no intention of giving Guiteau a position he was unqualified for and had not earned, simply said the deadlock in the Senate over Robertson's nomination made it impossible to consider the Paris consulship, which required Senate confirmation.[206] Once the New York senators had resigned, and Robertson had been confirmed as Collector, Guiteau pressed his claim, and Blaine told him he would not receive the position.[207]

Guiteau came to believe he had lost the position because he was a Stalwart. He decided the only way to end the Republican Party's internecine warfare was for Garfield to die—though he had nothing personal against the president. Arthur's succession would restore peace, he felt, and lead to rewards for fellow Stalwarts, including Guiteau.[208]

The assassination of Abraham Lincoln was deemed a fluke due to the Civil War, and Garfield, like most people, saw no reason the president should be guarded; his movements and plans were often printed in the newspapers. Guiteau knew Garfield would leave Washington for a cooler climate on July 2, 1881, and made plans to kill him before then. He purchased a gun he thought would look good in a museum, and followed Garfield several times, but each time his plans were frustrated, or he lost his nerve.[209] His opportunities dwindled to one—Garfield's departure by train for New Jersey on the morning of July 2.[210]

Guiteau concealed himself by the ladies' waiting room at the Sixth Street Station of the Baltimore and Potomac Railroad, from where Garfield was scheduled to depart. Most of Garfield's cabinet planned to accompany him at least part of the way. Blaine, who was to remain in Washington, came to the station to see him off. The two men were deep in conversation and did not notice Guiteau before he took out his revolver and shot Garfield twice, once in the back and once in the arm. Guiteau attempted to leave the station but was quickly captured.[211] As Blaine recognized him, Guiteau was led away, and said, "I did it. I will go to jail for it. I am a Stalwart and Arthur will be President."[h][212] News of his motivation to benefit the Stalwarts reached many with the news of the shooting, causing rage against that faction.[213]

Treatment and death

[edit]
An ornate Victorian Gothic style building with a square tower
Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Station in Washington, D.C., where Garfield was shot July 2, 1881

Garfield was struck by two shots: one glanced off his arm while the other pierced his back, shattering a rib and embedding itself in his abdomen. "My God, what is this?" he exclaimed.[214] Among those at the station was Robert Todd Lincoln, who was deeply upset, thinking back to when his father Abraham Lincoln was assassinated 16 years earlier. Garfield was taken on a mattress upstairs to a private office, where several doctors examined him. At his request, Garfield was taken back to the White House, and his wife, then in New Jersey, was sent for.[215] Blaine sent word to Vice President Arthur in New York City, who received threats against his life because of his animosity toward Garfield and Guiteau's statements.[216]

Although Joseph Lister's pioneering work in antisepsis was known to American doctors, few of them had confidence in it, and none of his advocates were among Garfield's treating physicians.[217] The physician who took charge at the depot and then at the White House was Doctor Willard Bliss.[i] A noted physician and surgeon, Bliss was an old friend of Garfield, and about a dozen doctors, led by Bliss, were soon probing the wound with unsterilized fingers and instruments. Garfield was given morphine for the pain, and asked Bliss to frankly tell him his chances, which Bliss put at one in a hundred. "Well, Doctor, we'll take that chance."[218]

Over the next few days, Garfield made some improvement, as the nation viewed the news from the capital and prayed. Although he never stood again, he was able to sit up and write several times, and his recovery was viewed so positively that a steamer was fitted out as a seagoing hospital to aid with his convalescence. He was nourished on oatmeal porridge (which he detested) and milk from a cow on the White House lawn. When told that Indian chief Sitting Bull, a prisoner of the army, was starving, Garfield said, "Let him starve..." initially, but a few moments later said, "No, send him my oatmeal."[219]

X-ray imaging, which could have assisted physicians in precisely locating the bullet in Garfield's body, would not be invented for another 14 years. Alexander Graham Bell tried to locate the bullet with a primitive metal detector, but was unsuccessful, though the device had been effective when tested on others. But Bliss limited its use on Garfield, ensuring he remained in charge. Because Bliss insisted the bullet rested someplace it did not, the detector could not locate it. Bell shortly returned after adjusting his device, which emitted an unusual tone in the area where Bliss believed the bullet was lodged. Bliss took this as confirmation that the bullet was where he declared it to be. Bliss recorded the test as a success, saying it was:

now unanimously agreed that the location of the ball has been ascertained with reasonable certainty, and that it lies, as heretofore stated, in the front wall of the abdomen, immediately over the groin, about five inches [130 mm] below and to the right of the navel.[220]

One means of keeping Garfield comfortable in Washington's summer heat was one of the first successful air conditioning units: air propelled by fans over ice and then dried reduced the temperature in the sickroom by 20 °F (11 °C).[219] Engineers from the navy and other scientists worked together to develop the unit, though there were problems to solve, such as excessive noise and increased humidity.[221]

On July 23, Garfield took a turn for the worse when his temperature increased to 104 °F (40 °C); doctors, concerned by an abscess at the wound, inserted a drainage tube. This initially helped, and the bedridden Garfield held a brief cabinet meeting on July 29; members were under orders from Bliss to discuss nothing that might excite Garfield.[222] Doctors probed the abscess, hoping to find the bullet; they likely made the infections worse. Garfield performed only one official act in August, signing an extradition paper. By the end of the month, he was much feebler than he had been, and his weight had decreased from 210 pounds (95 kg) to 130 pounds (59 kg).[223][224]

Garfield had long been anxious to escape hot, unhealthy Washington, and in early September the doctors agreed to move him to Elberon, part of Long Branch, New Jersey, where his wife had recovered earlier in the summer. He left the White House for the last time on September 5, traveling in a specially cushioned railway car; a spur line to the Francklyn Cottage, a seaside mansion given over to his use, was built in a night by volunteers. After arriving in Elberon the next day, Garfield was moved from the train car to a bedroom where he could see the ocean as officials and reporters maintained what became (after an initial rally) a death watch. Garfield's personal secretary, Joe Stanley Brown, wrote forty years later, "to this day I cannot hear the sound of the low slow roll of the Atlantic on the shore, the sound which filled my ears as I walked from my cottage to his bedside, without recalling again that ghastly tragedy."[225]

Vice President Chester A. Arthur assumed the presidency after Garfield's death.

On September 18, Garfield asked Colonel A.F. Rockwell, a friend, if he would have a place in history. Rockwell assured him he would and told Garfield he had much work still before him. But his response was, "No, my work is done."[226] The following day, Garfield, then suffering also from pneumonia and hypertension, marveled that he could not pick up a glass despite feeling well and went to sleep without discomfort. He awoke that evening around 10:15 p.m. complaining of great pain in his chest to his chief of staff General David Swaim, who was watching him, as he placed his hand over his heart.[227] The president then requested a drink of water from Swaim. After finishing his glass, Garfield said, "Oh Swaim, this terrible pain—press your hand on it." As Swaim put his hand on Garfield's chest, Garfield's hands went up reflexively. Clutching his heart, he exclaimed, "Oh, Swaim, can't you stop this? Oh, oh, Swaim!" Those were Garfield's last words.[228] Swaim ordered another attendant to send for Bliss, who found Garfield unconscious. Despite efforts to revive him, Garfield never awoke, and he was pronounced dead at about 10:30 p.m.[229][230] Learning from a reporter of Garfield's death the following day, Chester A. Arthur took the presidential oath of office administered by New York Supreme Court Justice John R. Brady.[231]

According to some historians and medical experts, Garfield might have survived his wounds had the doctors attending him had at their disposal today's medical research, knowledge, techniques, and equipment.[232][233][234] Standard medical practice at the time dictated that priority be given to locating the path of the bullet. Several of his doctors inserted their unsterilized fingers into the wound to probe for the bullet, a common practice in the 1880s.[232] Historians agree that massive infection was a significant factor in Garfield's demise.[232] Biographer Peskin said medical malpractice did not contribute to Garfield's death; the inevitable infection and blood poisoning that would ensue from a deep bullet wound resulted in damage to multiple organs and spinal fragmentation.[235] Rutkow, a professor of surgery at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, has argued that starvation also played a role. Rutkow suggests "Garfield had such a nonlethal wound. In today's world, he would have gone home in a matter of two or three days."[232] The conventional narrative regarding Garfield's post-shooting medical condition was challenged by Theodore Pappas and Shahrzad Joharifard in a 2013 article in The American Journal of Surgery. They argued that Garfield died from a late rupture of a splenic artery pseudoaneurysm, which developed secondary to the path of the bullet adjacent to the splenic artery. They also argued that his sepsis was actually caused by post-traumatic acute acalculous cholecystitis. Based on the autopsy report, the authors speculate that his gallbladder subsequently ruptured, leading to the development of a large bile-containing abscess adjacent to the gallbladder. Pappas and Joharifard say this caused the septic decline in Garfield's condition that was visible starting from July 23, 1881. Pappas and Joharifard also state that they don't believe that Garfield's doctors could have saved him even if they had been aware of his cholecystitis, since the first successful cholecystectomy (surgical removal of the gallbladder) was performed a year after Garfield's death.[236]

Guiteau was indicted on October 14, 1881, for the murder of the president. During his trial, Guiteau declared that he was not responsible for Garfield's death, admitting to the shooting but not the killing. In his defense, Guiteau wrote: "General Garfield died from malpractice. According to his own physicians, he was not fatally shot. The doctors who mistreated him ought to bear the odium of his death, and not his assailant. They ought to be indicted for murdering James A. Garfield, and not me."[237] After a chaotic trial in which Guiteau often interrupted and argued, and in which his counsel used the insanity defense, the jury found him guilty on January 25, 1882, and he was sentenced to death by hanging. Guiteau may have had neurosyphilis, a disease that causes physiological mental impairment.[238] He was executed on June 30, 1882.[239]

Funeral, memorials and commemorations

[edit]
Garfield's casket lying in state at the Capitol Rotunda

Garfield's funeral train left Long Branch on the same special track that had brought him there, traveling over tracks blanketed with flowers and past houses adorned with flags. His body was transported to the Capitol and then continued on to Cleveland for burial.[240] Shocked by his death, Marine Band leader John Philip Sousa composed the march "In Memoriam", which was played when Garfield's body was received in Washington, D.C.[241] More than 70,000 citizens, some waiting over three hours, passed by Garfield's coffin as his body lay in state from September 21 to 23, 1881,[242] at the United States Capitol rotunda; on September 25, in Cleveland, Garfield's casket was paraded down Euclid Avenue from Wilson Avenue to Public Square, with those in attendance including former presidents Grant and Hayes, and Generals William Sherman, Sheridan and Hancock.[243] More than 150,000—a number equal to the city's population—likewise paid their respects, and Sousa's march was again played.[240][244] Garfield's body was temporarily interred in the Schofield family vault in Cleveland's Lake View Cemetery until his permanent memorial was built.[240][245]

Memorials to Garfield were erected across the country. On April 10, 1882, seven months after Garfield's death, the U.S. Post Office Department issued a postage stamp in his honor.[246] In 1884, sculptor Frank Happersberger completed a monument on the grounds of the San Francisco Conservatory of Flowers.[247] In 1887, the James A. Garfield Monument was dedicated in Washington.[248] Another monument, in Philadelphia's Fairmount Park, was erected in 1896.[249] In Victoria, Australia, Cannibal Creek was renamed Garfield in his honor.[250]

Stereoscopic images of the Schofield family vault where Garfield's remains were kept until completion of his permanent memorial[251]

On May 19, 1890, Garfield's body was permanently interred, with great solemnity and fanfare, in a mausoleum in Lake View Cemetery. Attending the dedication ceremonies were former President Hayes, President Benjamin Harrison, and future president William McKinley.[252] Treasury Secretary William Windom also attended.[252] Harrison said Garfield was always a "student and instructor" and that his life works and death would "continue to be instructive and inspiring incidents in American history".[253] Three panels on the monument display Garfield as a teacher, Union major general, and orator; another shows him taking the presidential oath, and a fifth shows his body lying in state at the Capitol rotunda in Washington, D.C.[254]

Garfield's murder by a deranged office-seeker awakened public awareness of the need for civil service reform legislation. Senator George H. Pendleton, a Democrat from Ohio, launched a reform effort that resulted in the Pendleton Act in January 1883.[255] This act reversed the "spoils system" where office seekers paid up or gave political service to obtain or keep federally appointed positions.[255] Under the act, appointments were awarded on merit and competitive examination.[256] To ensure the reform was implemented, Congress and Arthur established and funded the Civil Service Commission. The Pendleton Act, however, covered only 10% of federal government workers.[256] For Arthur, previously known for having been a "veteran spoilsman", civil service reform became his most noteworthy achievement.[257]

A marble statue of Garfield by Charles Niehaus was added to the National Statuary Hall Collection in the Capitol in Washington, D.C., a gift from the State of Ohio in 1886.[258]

Garfield is honored with a life-size bronze sculpture inside the Cuyahoga County Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument in Cleveland, Ohio.[259]

On March 2, 2019, the National Park Service erected exhibit panels in Washington to mark the site of his assassination.[260]

Political views

[edit]

While serving as president, Garfield opposed labor unions and sided with the Republican Party's hard-money wing. He was also suspicious of cooperative farm programs that were supported by the Grange, a farmers' organization he called "communism in disguise". But Garfield also opposed corporate monopoly and advocated a federal education department along with increased federal support for the education of African Americans in southern states.[262]

Another study has said of Garfield:

No man could be in politics as long as Garfield had been without forming some opinions of the nature of presidential leadership, and his, by and large, were negative. Philosophically, as has been noted, he was a believer in laissez faire, and he had been suspicious of presidential power from the time when he fought Andrew Johnson.[263]

Garfield's successor as president, Chester A. Arthur, shared his laissez-faire views.[264]

Legacy and historical view

[edit]

For a few years after his assassination, Garfield's life story was seen as an exemplar of the American success story—that even the poorest boy might someday become President of the United States. Peskin wrote: "In mourning Garfield, Americans were not only honoring a president; they were paying tribute to a man whose life story embodied their own most cherished aspirations."[265] As the rivalry between Stalwarts and Half-Breeds faded from the scene in the late 1880s and after, so too did memories of Garfield. In the 1890s, Americans became disillusioned with politicians, and looked elsewhere for inspiration, focusing on industrialists, labor leaders, scientists, and others as their heroes. Increasingly, Garfield's short time as president was forgotten.[266]

External videos
video icon Booknotes interview with Kenneth Ackerman on Dark Horse: The Surprise Election and Political Murder of President James A. Garfield, July 27, 2003, C-SPAN

The 20th century saw no revival for Garfield. Thomas Wolfe deemed the presidents of the Gilded Age, including Garfield, "lost Americans" whose "gravely vacant and bewhiskered faces mixed, melted, swam together".[267] The politicians of the Gilded Age faded from the public eye, their luster eclipsed by those who had influenced America outside of political office during that time; the robber barons, the inventors, those who had sought social reform, and others who had lived as America rapidly changed. Current events and more recent figures occupied America's attention. According to Ackerman, "the busy Twentieth Century has made Garfield's era seem remote and irrelevant, its leaders ridiculed for their very obscurity."[267]

Garfield's biographers, and those who have studied his presidency, tend to think well of him, and that his presidency saw a promising start before its untimely end. Historian Justus D. Doenecke, while deeming Garfield a bit of an enigma, chronicles his achievements: "by winning a victory over the Stalwarts, he enhanced both the power and prestige of his office. As a man, he was intelligent, sensitive, and alert, and his knowledge of how government worked was unmatched."[268] Doenecke criticizes Garfield's dismissal of Merritt in Robertson's favor, and wonders if the president was truly in command of the situation even after the latter's confirmation.[269] In 1931, Caldwell wrote: "If Garfield lives in history, it will be partly on account of the charm of his personality—but also because in life and in death, he struck the first shrewd blows against a dangerous system of boss rule which seemed for a time about to engulf the politics of the nation. Perhaps if he had lived he could have done no more."[270] Rutkow writes that "James Abram Garfield's presidency is reduced to a tantalizing 'what if.'"[266]

In 2002, historian Bernard A. Weisberger said, "[Garfield] was, to some extent, a perfect moderate. He read widely (and unobtrusively) without its visibly affecting his Christianity, his Republicanism, or his general laissez-faire orthodoxy. He was not so much a scholar in politics as a politic scholar."[271] Peskin believes Garfield deserves more credit for his political career than he has received: "True, his accomplishments were neither bold nor heroic, but his was not an age that called for heroism. His stormy presidency was brief, and in some respects, unfortunate, but he did leave the office stronger than he found it. As a public man he had a hand in almost every issue of national importance for almost two decades, while as a party leader he, along with Blaine, forged the Republican Party into the instrument that would lead the United States into the twentieth century."[272]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Works cited

[edit]

Books

[edit]

Periodicals

[edit]

Online

[edit]
  • Peskin, Allan (February 2000). "Garfield, James Abram". American National Biography Online. Archived from the original on February 5, 2017. Retrieved March 6, 2015.(subscription required)
  • "5 cent Garfield". Smithsonian National Postal Museum. May 16, 2006. Archived from the original on September 7, 2014. Retrieved September 6, 2014.
  • "Garfield, James Abram 1831–1881". history.house.gov. History, Arts, & Archives United States House of Representatives. Retrieved November 12, 2022.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
James Abram Garfield (November 19, 1831 – September 19, 1881) was an American scholar, lawyer, army general, and Republican politician who served as the 20th president of the United States for six months in 1881. Born into poverty in a log cabin in Orange Township, Ohio—the last U.S. president to have such origins—Garfield rose through self-education, teaching, and legal practice before entering politics as a state senator and then long-serving U.S. representative from Ohio, where he chaired the Appropriations Committee and supported Reconstruction policies. He was the only sitting member of Congress ever elected president when he won the close 1880 election as a compromise candidate, defeating Democrat Winfield Scott Hancock amid factional Republican disputes. Garfield's brief administration focused on civil service reform to combat patronage corruption, but on July 2, 1881, he was shot by Charles J. Guiteau, a delusional office-seeker, and succumbed to resulting infections after 80 days due to inadequate medical intervention. His death elevated Chester A. Arthur to the presidency and spurred the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883. Earlier, Garfield had commanded Union forces in the Civil War, notably at the Battle of Middle Creek, earning promotion to major general for contributions to Union victories in the Western Theater.

Early Life and Education

Birth and Family Background

James Abram Garfield was born on November 19, 1831, in a log cabin on a frontier farm in Orange Township, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, then a sparsely settled area of the Western Reserve. He was the youngest of five children—four sons and one daughter—born to Abram Garfield, a farmer and canal worker who had migrated from Worcester, New York, and Eliza Ballou Garfield, whose family traced roots to early New England settlers of Huguenot descent who arrived in 1685. Abram Garfield, known locally for his physical strength and wrestling prowess, died on August 14, 1833, from complications of a cold contracted while working, at age 34, leaving 20-month-old James without memory of his father and the family in precarious financial straits. Eliza Ballou Garfield, born September 21, 1801, in Richmond, New Hampshire, to James Ballou IV—a mathematician and clairvoyant—and Mehitable Ingalls, assumed sole responsibility for the household, managing 25 acres of land through determined labor amid rural poverty. The Garfields' ancestry reflected the hardy stock of colonial America: Eliza's forebears included French Huguenots fleeing persecution, while Abram descended from English immigrants who settled in Massachusetts before moving westward; this heritage instilled values of self-reliance and piety that shaped young James amid his mother's unwavering guidance.

Childhood Hardships and Self-Reliance

James A. Garfield's early years were marked by profound economic hardship following the death of his father, Abram Garfield, in early 1833, when James was approximately 18 months old. Born into a farming family in rural northeastern Ohio, Garfield grew up on a modest frontier homestead where resources were scarce, and his widowed mother, Eliza Ballou Garfield, struggled to sustain the household. Eliza, determined to preserve family unity, sold portions of their land to cover debts incurred after her husband's passing, while managing the upbringing of her surviving children amid persistent poverty. From childhood, Garfield contributed to the family's survival through demanding physical labor, including farm work and other manual tasks typical of pioneer life, which instilled in him a strong ethic of diligence despite limited formal opportunities. These circumstances demanded early maturity; by adolescence, he had developed a capacity for independent action, reflecting the self-reliance necessary to navigate the uncertainties of widowhood and frontier existence without paternal support. At age 16 in 1847, seeking greater autonomy and adventure, Garfield left home with aspirations of seafaring but instead secured employment on the Ohio Canal, towing boats between Cleveland and Pittsburgh by managing mule teams. His tenure lasted only six weeks, ending when he contracted malaria—a common affliction among canal workers—prompting his return home, an episode that highlighted both his initiative in pursuing wage labor to aid his family and the physical toll of such endeavors in building personal resilience.

Intellectual Formation and Formal Schooling

Garfield cultivated his intellect through persistent self-study and reading, beginning in early childhood when he attended rudimentary district schools in a log hut starting at age three, where he acquired basic literacy and developed a lifelong habit of devouring available books on subjects such as arithmetic and American history, often memorizing extended passages to comprehend broader worldly concepts. After recovering from a severe bout of malarial fever around age sixteen, which followed his work as a canal boatman, he resolved to advance through intellectual pursuits rather than physical labor, marking a pivotal shift toward formal education grounded in personal determination. His formal schooling commenced at Geauga Seminary in Chester, Ohio, from 1848 to 1850, where, at ages seventeen to nineteen, he pursued academic subjects including classical languages such as Latin, for which he had previously lacked exposure, and supplemented his studies by teaching classes to offset costs, demonstrating early pedagogical aptitude. Seeking further rigor, Garfield enrolled at the Western Reserve Eclectic Institute in Hiram, Ohio, in 1851, initially as a student but quickly advancing to instructor roles in classical languages, English, history, geology, and mathematics by 1853, amid an institution affiliated with the Disciples of Christ that emphasized practical and classical learning. To complete his degree, Garfield entered Williams College in Massachusetts in 1854, commuting initially and later residing there until graduating with honors in 1856 at age twenty-five, having balanced studies with Lucretia Rudolph's schoolteaching to support their household; this period solidified his command of higher mathematics, classics, and rhetoric, preparing him for subsequent academic leadership.

Personal Life and Character

Marriage, Family Dynamics, and Domestic Role

James A. Garfield married Lucretia Rudolph, his former classmate from the Western Reserve Eclectic Institute, on November 11, 1858, at her family's home in Hiram, Ohio. Their courtship, which began cautiously in December 1853, reflected shared intellectual and religious interests, though it progressed slowly amid Garfield's demanding career pursuits. The couple forwent a honeymoon and immediately established their household in Hiram, where Garfield continued his roles as a teacher and emerging politician. The Garfields had seven children: Eliza Arabella (born July 3, 1860; died 1863), Harry Augustus (1863–1942), James Rudolph (1865–1950), Mary "Mollie" (1867–1947), Irvin McDowell (1870–1951), Abram (1872–1958), and Edward (1874–1876). Two children, Eliza and Edward, died in early childhood, while a third, possibly another infant loss, contributed to the family's early tragedies; the five surviving sons and daughter reached adulthood, with sons Harry and James achieving notable public careers. Lucretia managed the raising of the children amid frequent relocations between Ohio and Washington, D.C., often handling household duties and education independently during Garfield's absences. Family dynamics were shaped by Garfield's peripatetic professional life, which imposed long separations that strained the marriage in its early years, exacerbated by differing temperaments—Garfield's outgoing ambition contrasting Lucretia's reserved introspection. Despite these challenges, their bond deepened over time through mutual reliance, with Lucretia serving as Garfield's intellectual confidante and editorial assistant on speeches and writings. Garfield's early rural upbringing instilled a hands-on approach to domestic tasks, including farm labor and manual chores, which he continued sporadically in the initial phases of marriage before his rising status shifted primary household management to Lucretia and domestic staff. The family maintained a stable, if mobile, domestic environment, prioritizing moral and educational development amid Garfield's political ascendance.

Religious Convictions and Ethical Framework

Garfield was immersed in a religious environment from childhood, with his mother, Eliza Ballou Garfield, instilling Christian values through regular church attendance following the early death of his father. His affiliation with the Disciples of Christ, a Bible-centered restorationist movement emphasizing scriptural authority, believer's baptism by immersion, and rejection of creeds, formed the core of his convictions. Ordained as a minister in this denomination during his early twenties, Garfield preached sermons across Ohio, including at the Hiram Christian Church, where he delivered addresses as both a local leader and principal of the affiliated Western Reserve Eclectic Institute (later Hiram College). This ministerial role persisted alongside his political career, marking him as the only U.S. president to have been an ordained preacher. His religious beliefs directly informed an ethical framework grounded in personal accountability, human dignity, and opposition to moral wrongs such as slavery, which he condemned as a violation of biblical imperatives for justice and equality under God. Garfield viewed abolition not merely as a political stance but as a religious duty, arguing that slavery's persistence pained the heart of any Christian conscience and required active resistance to align human law with divine principles. This conviction drove his enlistment in the Union Army and support for emancipation measures, prioritizing moral imperatives over expediency. Garfield's ethics extended to a demand for integrity in public life, asserting that corruption in government reflected tolerated vice among the populace and that leaders bore a heightened duty to exemplify moral rectitude. He championed respect for individual religious scruples, opposing laws that infringed on personal convictions in favor of a framework allowing voluntary adherence to ethical standards rooted in faith. Throughout his diary entries and speeches, Garfield demonstrated a commitment to treating others with dignity, resisting temptations of power, and aligning actions with scriptural ethics, even as political demands tested his resolve.

Pre-Civil War Career

Entry into Ohio Politics

Garfield's entry into politics coincided with the rise of the Republican Party in Ohio, where he aligned himself with its anti-slavery platform. In 1856, while serving as principal of the Western Reserve Eclectic Institute in Hiram, he actively campaigned across Ohio for John C. Frémont, the party's first presidential candidate, marking his initial public engagement in partisan activities. This involvement stemmed from his longstanding opposition to slavery, influenced by his education and Disciple of Christ affiliations, which emphasized moral reform. By 1859, Garfield's local prominence as an educator and orator led the Republican Party in Ohio's Twenty-sixth Senatorial District to nominate him for the state senate on August 23. He secured the election on October 11, defeating the Democratic incumbent in a district encompassing Portage, Summit, and parts of Mahoning and Trumbull counties, thus beginning his legislative career at age 27. His victory reflected the growing strength of Republican anti-slavery sentiment in northeastern Ohio amid national tensions over territorial expansion and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In the Ohio State Senate from 1860 to 1861, Garfield emerged as a forceful advocate for Union preservation and abolitionist principles. During debates on the secession crisis following Abraham Lincoln's 1860 election, he delivered speeches urging the coercion of seceding Southern states to remain in the Union, arguing that disunion would undermine the constitutional compact and perpetuate slavery's expansion. His positions aligned with Radical Republican views on enforcing federal authority, though he balanced this with pragmatic appeals to Ohio's moderate voters, contributing to his rapid ascent within the party. Garfield commenced his academic pursuits after brief stints at Geauga Academy and the Western Reserve Eclectic Institute (later Hiram College), where he initially enrolled as a student in 1851 and returned as an instructor in 1854, teaching penmanship, ancient languages, and other subjects. By 1856, he had earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Williams College, where he studied classics and rhetoric, honing skills in oratory that later informed his political career. Returning to Hiram in 1856 as a full-time faculty member, he advanced to principal in 1857 and then to president of the institution, a role he held until 1861, during which he expanded the curriculum to include advanced mathematics, geology, and moral philosophy while managing administrative challenges like faculty disputes. As president of Hiram, Garfield emphasized rigorous classical scholarship, personally instructing in Greek and Latin to foster intellectual discipline among students, many from modest frontier backgrounds similar to his own. His tenure saw enrollment growth and infrastructural improvements, reflecting his commitment to accessible higher education amid the era's religious and reformist fervor tied to the Disciples of Christ movement, though he navigated tensions between academic freedom and denominational oversight. In parallel with his educational roles, Garfield pursued legal training through self-directed study beginning around 1859, drawing on borrowed texts and mentorship rather than formal apprenticeship. On January 26, 1861, he passed a rigorous oral examination before a panel of Ohio jurists and was admitted to the state bar, qualifying him for practice just months before the Civil War's outbreak precluded extensive courtroom engagement. His early legal preparation emphasized constitutional principles and equity, aligning with his scholarly interest in logic and ethics, though no major pre-war cases or publications from this phase are documented.

Civil War Military Service

Enlistment, Initial Commands, and Tactical Decisions

Upon the outbreak of the Civil War in April 1861, James A. Garfield, then serving as an Ohio state senator, sought a military commission to contribute to the Union effort. After an initial unsuccessful bid for command of the 7th Ohio Infantry, he secured appointment as colonel of the 42nd Ohio Volunteer Infantry Regiment in August 1861, following a trip to procure arms. Garfield rapidly recruited personnel to fill the regiment's ranks, which was formally organized by November 1861 and entered active service in December. Garfield's initial command focused on eastern Kentucky, where he was tasked with countering Confederate forces under Brigadier General Humphrey Marshall, who were conducting raids and threatening Union control. Departing Ohio in late December 1861, his brigade—comprising the 42nd Ohio, 40th Ohio, and elements of Kentucky cavalry totaling around 1,700 men—advanced toward Prestonsburg via Paintsville, navigating rugged terrain and limited supplies. On January 9, 1862, Garfield positioned his forces at the mouth of Abbott's Creek in Floyd County, Kentucky, preparing to engage Marshall's approximately 2,000 Confederates entrenched along Middle Creek. In tactical decisions at the Battle of Middle Creek on January 10, 1862, Garfield opted for a divided advance to outmaneuver Marshall's stronger position atop the creek's bluffs. He directed the 40th Ohio under Colonel Jonathan Cranor to execute a flanking maneuver westward to strike the Confederate rear, while the 42nd Ohio and supporting units assaulted frontally up the valley. To probe enemy lines, Garfield dispatched a cavalry squad to draw fire and reveal Confederate dispositions, enabling coordinated pressure that forced Marshall to withdraw after several hours of skirmishing, yielding Union control of the region without decisive losses. This engagement, Garfield's first field command, demonstrated his initiative in leveraging terrain and combined arms, contributing to his promotion to brigadier general shortly thereafter.

Key Engagements, Health Setbacks, and Strategic Contributions

Garfield's initial significant military action occurred during the Big Sandy Expedition in eastern Kentucky, culminating in the Battle of Middle Creek on January 10, 1862. Commanding the 18th Brigade of approximately 1,100 Ohio and Kentucky troops as colonel of the 42nd Ohio Infantry, Garfield advanced up the Big Sandy Valley to dislodge Confederate forces under Brigadier General Humphrey Marshall, who held positions with over 2,000 men. Departing Prestonsburg at 4:00 a.m., Garfield's forces encountered Rebel cavalry at the mouth of Middle Creek, repelled them, and proceeded to engage Marshall's main lines divided into three positions along the creek forks. By deploying companies to strike the enemy's left, center, and front simultaneously, Garfield's aggressive tactics compelled Marshall to abandon his artillery and supplies, withdrawing southward and evacuating eastern Kentucky, thus securing Union control of the region without decisive battle casualties on either side—Garfield reported 3 killed and 22 wounded. Following promotion to brigadier general in April 1862, Garfield commanded a brigade in the Army of the Ohio at the Battle of Shiloh on April 6–7, 1862, arriving on the second day amid the Union's counteroffensive against Confederate forces under Albert Sidney Johnston and P.G.T. Beauregard. His unit reinforced the Union right flank, contributing to the repulsion of Rebel assaults, though Garfield's direct tactical role was limited as the battle's outcome was largely determined by midday. No personal injuries were sustained, but the engagement underscored his growing field experience amid heavy fighting that resulted in over 23,000 total casualties. Garfield experienced no combat wounds but endured severe health setbacks from field conditions, including acute dysentery and possible malaria contracted after Middle Creek due to exposure in the damp Kentucky winter. Hospitalized in April 1862, he recovered sufficiently to resume duties, yet chronic neuralgia and gastrointestinal ailments persisted, exacerbating fatigue during subsequent campaigns and prompting medical leave. These illnesses, rather than battlefield trauma, culminated in his resignation as major general in July 1863, following partial recovery. Strategically, Garfield's service evolved from independent command to advisory roles, notably as chief of staff to Major General William S. Rosecrans in the Army of the Cumberland from late 1862. He played a key part in the Tullahoma Campaign of June 23–July 3, 1863, devising flanking maneuvers that advanced Union forces 84 miles through Tennessee, capturing Chattanooga's outer defenses, 6,000 prisoners, and vast supplies while inflicting minimal casualties—fewer than 600 Union losses against Confederate abandonment of middle Tennessee. This bloodless success, emphasizing deception and rapid logistics over direct assault, demonstrated Garfield's analytical contributions to operational planning, influencing Rosecrans' avoidance of fortified positions and foreshadowing Grant's later maneuvers.

Promotions, Resignation, and Wartime Reflections

Garfield's victory at Middle Creek on January 10, 1862, prompted his promotion to brigadier general of volunteers, confirmed by the Senate on April 4, 1862, with rank dating from January 1862. This advancement placed him in command of the 20th Brigade in Tennessee, where he participated in operations under Major General Ulysses S. Grant, including the advance on Corinth following the Battle of Shiloh. In February 1863, Garfield transitioned to a staff role as chief of staff for the Army of the Cumberland under Major General William S. Rosecrans, contributing to the successful Tullahoma Campaign that June, which maneuvered Confederate forces out of middle Tennessee without a major battle. During the Battle of Chickamauga on September 19–20, 1863, Garfield, despite illness, rode several miles under fire to verify Union lines and summon reinforcements from George H. Thomas's corps, an action that helped stabilize the right flank amid the Union defeat. For this service, he received promotion to major general of volunteers, dated September 20, 1863, making him one of the youngest officers to attain that rank at age 31. The promotion reflected recognition of his tactical acumen and bravery, though Garfield had already been elected to the U.S. House of Representatives from Ohio's 19th district in October 1862, campaigning minimally while in the field. Garfield submitted his resignation from the army on December 5, 1863, effective immediately, to assume his congressional seat when the 38th Congress convened later that month. The decision stemmed from his electoral victory and the conviction that civilian legislative duties outweighed continued field command, particularly as the war shifted toward its later phases; he departed Chattanooga amid ongoing siege operations but before the Battle of Missionary Ridge. This move underscored Garfield's dual commitment to military valor and political service, leveraging wartime fame for national influence. In wartime correspondence and diaries, Garfield reflected on the conflict as a moral imperative tied to abolition, stating his belief that "the sin of slavery is one of which it may be said that without the shedding of blood there is no remission," invoking biblical justification for the bloodshed required to eradicate the institution. His letters conveyed the rigors of army life, including bouts of dysentery and fever that prompted medical leaves, yet affirmed his enlistment as a patriotic duty overriding prior ecclesiastical and academic roles. Garfield also contemplated leadership challenges, criticizing inefficiencies in command structures while praising resolute subordinates like Thomas, revealing a pragmatic view of strategy shaped by frontline experience. These writings highlight his evolution from regimental officer to strategic thinker, blending personal sacrifice with ideological resolve against secession and bondage.

Congressional Career (1863–1880)

Early Terms, War Support, and Legislative Foundations

Garfield secured election to the United States House of Representatives in October 1862 for Ohio's 19th congressional district, defeating Democrat Samuel L. Young by a margin exceeding 7,000 votes amid wartime fervor that favored Republican candidates. Although the 38th Congress convened on March 4, 1863, Garfield delayed taking his seat until December 5, 1863, following his resignation as a major general in the Union Army after the Tullahoma Campaign and Chickamauga. His military record bolstered his credentials, enabling immediate influence despite his freshman status in a House dominated by war exigencies. In his initial term during the 38th Congress (1863–1865), Garfield demonstrated unwavering support for Union war efforts, aligning with radical Republicans who criticized President Abraham Lincoln's reconstruction overtures as insufficiently punitive toward the Confederacy. He advocated for the seizure of rebel property in the North to finance the war and punish disloyalty, delivering a notable House speech in 1864 endorsing confiscation bills that would divest traitors of assets without compensation. Garfield also backed appropriations for military operations, including reinforcements for General Ulysses S. Grant's campaigns, and contributed to debates strengthening the Enrollment Act of 1863 by opposing exemptions that undermined conscription equity. These positions reflected his prewar antislavery convictions and commitment to total victory, viewing secession as a criminal rebellion warranting severe retribution, including potential execution or exile for Confederate leaders. Garfield's legislative foundations emerged through committee assignments that positioned him at the intersection of finance and military needs, including service on the Ways and Means Committee, where he engaged early with wartime fiscal debates. He opposed inflationary greenback expansions beyond immediate necessities, favoring hard-money principles to preserve currency stability amid $2.6 billion in Union war debt by 1865, though he pragmatically supported borrowing to sustain armies numbering over 1 million men. These stances foreshadowed his later chairmanships of Appropriations and Banking and Currency committees, establishing him as a fiscal conservative skeptical of unchecked federal spending. By war's end, Garfield's record—marked by over 50 recorded votes on military and emancipation measures—solidified his reputation as a reliable Unionist, paving the way for reelection in 1864 by a 3-to-1 margin despite Copperhead challenges in his district.

Reconstruction Policies and Southern Readmission

As a Radical Republican congressman, Garfield opposed President Andrew Johnson's lenient Reconstruction plan, which allowed rapid Southern readmission with minimal safeguards for freed slaves, and instead championed congressional oversight to enforce loyalty and civil rights. In a February 1, 1866, House speech, he defended extending the Freedmen's Bureau against Johnson's veto, arguing it was essential for protecting African Americans from exploitation and violence by former Confederates, while insisting that rebel states must demonstrate genuine loyalty through oaths and equitable laws before regaining full Union privileges. He similarly backed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which granted citizenship and equal protection to all born in the United States, overriding Johnson's veto to establish federal authority over discriminatory state "Black Codes." Garfield viewed ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment—prohibiting states from abridging citizenship rights or equal protection—as a non-negotiable condition for readmission, writing in 1867 that Southern states accepting it promptly would morally compel Congress to restore them, but refusal warranted stricter measures. When ten states rejected it, he endorsed the Reconstruction Acts of March 2, 1867, which imposed military governance on unreconstructed areas, required new state constitutions enfranchising black males, and barred former Confederate leaders from office until loyalty was proven. These acts facilitated readmission for compliant states like Arkansas (June 1868) and the Carolinas, Florida, Louisiana, Alabama, and South Carolina (June-July 1868), with Garfield supporting the framework to prioritize freedmen's suffrage and security over hasty reconciliation. By 1869-1870, Garfield hailed the Fifteenth Amendment's ratification as securing black male voting rights nationwide, aiding the final readmissions of Virginia (January 1870), Mississippi (February 1870), Texas (March 1870), and Georgia (July 1870) after it met conditions including expelling discriminatory lawmakers. While pragmatic compared to unyielding radicals like Thaddeus Stevens, he consistently prioritized causal safeguards—such as federal enforcement against disenfranchisement—over unconditional amnesty, warning that premature leniency risked reinstating oligarchic control and nullifying emancipation's gains. His positions reflected empirical lessons from Southern resistance, including widespread violence against Unionists, underscoring the necessity of structured readmission to foster stable, rights-based governance.

Fiscal Orthodoxy: Currency, Tariffs, and Opposition to Inflation

Garfield consistently advocated for a strict adherence to the gold standard during his congressional tenure, viewing it as essential for economic stability and honest commerce. In an 1876 address, he argued that the government's currency must be equivalent to gold to ensure material prosperity and prevent dishonest dealings between individuals, criticizing depreciated paper money for undermining public confidence. Despite prevailing sentiment in his Ohio district favoring inflationary greenbacks—a fiat currency issued during the Civil War to finance the conflict—Garfield opposed their expansion, contending that such policies disproportionately benefited speculators while eroding the purchasing power of ordinary citizens and wage earners. He supported the Specie Payment Resumption Act of 1875, which mandated the redemption of greenbacks in gold by January 1, 1879, thereby committing to the contraction of the money supply to restore parity with specie and halt postwar inflation that had peaked at around 80% cumulatively from 1861 to 1865. This opposition to "soft money" extended to Garfield's broader critique of inflation as a mechanism that transferred wealth from savers and laborers to debtors and government interests. In a September 10, 1878, speech at Faneuil Hall in Boston titled "Honest Money," he emphasized that resuming specie payments would safeguard the nation's credit and prevent the moral hazard of fiat expansion, drawing on first-hand observations of wartime fiscal mismanagement where greenback issuance led to price distortions without corresponding productivity gains. Garfield's stance aligned with Republican hard-money orthodoxy, which prioritized long-term fiscal discipline over short-term inflationary relief sought by agrarian Democrats and some Western Republicans; he warned that unchecked greenback proliferation risked repeating the hyperinflationary episodes seen in other nations' debased currencies. By 1879, as inflation subsided under resumption policies, Garfield credited the gold anchor with stabilizing prices, noting in congressional debates that the real value of greenbacks had depreciated by over 50% against gold during their peak circulation of $450 million in 1865. On tariffs, Garfield championed protective duties as a cornerstone of fiscal policy, arguing they generated revenue for debt reduction while shielding domestic manufacturers from foreign competition. He backed increases in tariff rates during the 1870s, particularly on iron, steel, and woolens, to foster industrial growth amid postwar reconstruction; by 1878, average ad valorem rates hovered around 45%, which he defended as necessary to offset European subsidies and maintain American wage standards. In one statement, he asserted that such tariffs "provide for the common defence, and promote the general welfare of the nation by protecting its laborers," reflecting his belief in reciprocal trade barriers to counter dumping practices. While acknowledging revenue surpluses—exceeding $100 million annually by the late 1870s—Garfield opposed radical cuts favored by free-trade advocates, instead advocating adjustments to sustain protectionism without excess, as evidenced by his support for the 1880 Republican platform's emphasis on tariffs over direct taxes. This position contributed to partisan divides, with Democrats pushing for reductions to lower consumer costs, but Garfield maintained that protectionism had spurred manufacturing output, which grew from $1.9 billion in 1860 to $5.4 billion by 1880.

Scandals and Ethical Challenges: Crédit Mobilier and Salary Legislation

The Crédit Mobilier scandal emerged in 1872, involving the overcharging of the Union Pacific Railroad's construction costs through its sham subsidiary, Crédit Mobilier of America, which issued shares to congressmen at par value while paying dividends up to 348% using inflated government subsidies and bonds. Oakes Ames, a Massachusetts congressman and Crédit Mobilier director, distributed shares to influence favorable legislation, including to James A. Garfield, who received ten shares in 1868 valued at $1,000, from which he collected $329 in dividends before returning the certificate upon learning of the impending investigation. Garfield maintained he accepted the shares as legitimate compensation for prior legal consultations unrelated to railroad legislation and exerted no influence in Congress on Union Pacific matters, a position upheld by the House censure committee, which found insufficient evidence of bribery since Garfield lacked knowledge of Ames's corrupt intent. Despite clearance, the association damaged Garfield's reputation, resurfacing during his 1880 presidential campaign, where opponents like Winfield Scott Hancock highlighted it, though Garfield defended himself by emphasizing his non-involvement in policy favors and the shares' return. The Salary Grab Act of 1873, enacted on March 3 as a rider to an appropriations bill, raised congressional salaries from $5,000 to $7,500 annually—a 50% increase—retroactive to the session's start, alongside boosts for the president and judges, sparking public outrage over perceived self-enrichment amid economic hardship. Garfield opposed the retroactive clause, speaking against it on the House floor, proposing amendments for a smaller non-retroactive raise in conference with the Senate, and voting against the final version where possible, yet the measure passed, subjecting him to voter backlash in Ohio and nationally. To mitigate criticism, Garfield refunded the $2,500 retroactive portion to the Treasury, a gesture publicized by allies, though the scandal persisted in tarnishing his image alongside Crédit Mobilier during subsequent elections. These episodes underscored ethical pressures in Garfield's congressional tenure but did not result in formal sanctions, reflecting the era's lax standards for conflicts of interest where intent and overt corruption determined culpability over mere association.

House Leadership, Hayes Support, and Institutional Influence

Garfield ascended to prominent House leadership positions following his Civil War service, leveraging his expertise in finance and military affairs to chair key committees. From 1871 to 1875, he served as chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, where he oversaw federal budgeting and prioritized fiscal conservatism by reducing government expenditures and opposing inflationary policies such as expanded greenback issuance. In this role, Garfield devised an efficient enumeration schedule for the 1870 census, streamlining data collection on population, agriculture, and industry to inform national policy without excessive administrative costs. After the Democratic Party gained a majority in the House following the 1874 elections, Garfield transitioned to Republican minority leader, a position he assumed around 1876, where he honed his skills as a parliamentary tactician and orator defending party orthodoxy on economic issues. He staunchly advocated for the gold standard, critiquing both currency debasement and protective tariffs deemed overly burdensome, thereby shaping Republican fiscal debates amid postwar reconstruction challenges. Garfield's leadership emphasized institutional restraint, resisting expansive federal spending while promoting accountability in appropriations to curb waste and corruption. Garfield's support for Rutherford B. Hayes crystallized during the contentious 1876 presidential election, where he actively campaigned for his fellow Ohio Republican amid widespread electoral disputes in Southern states. Appointed as one of the seven House members to the Electoral Commission in early 1877—a bipartisan panel tasked with resolving competing claims from Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Oregon—Garfield voted consistently along party lines in the 8–7 decisions awarding all 20 disputed electoral votes to Hayes, securing the presidency by a single-vote margin in the Electoral College. This outcome, while criticized by Democrats as a partisan compromise tied to the Compromise of 1877 that ended Reconstruction, bolstered Hayes's administration and elevated Garfield's stature within Republican circles. Through these roles, Garfield exerted enduring institutional influence in Congress, mentoring younger members, delivering incisive speeches on monetary policy, and advocating for scientific approaches to governance, such as enhanced census methodologies to support evidence-based legislation. His efforts reinforced Republican commitments to hard money and limited government, positioning him as a bridge between Radical Reconstruction-era fervor and the party's pivot toward Gilded Age economic priorities, though his influence waned somewhat under Democratic House majorities that constrained Republican agendas.

1880 Presidential Campaign

Republican Convention Maneuvering and Nomination

The 1880 Republican National Convention convened from June 2 to 8 in Chicago's Interstate Exposition Building, drawing 756 delegates who required a simple majority of 379 votes for nomination. Leading contenders included former President Ulysses S. Grant, supported by the Stalwart faction led by Roscoe Conkling, James G. Blaine of the Half-Breed faction, and John Sherman, backed by Garfield as head of the Ohio delegation. Garfield, recently elected to the U.S. Senate by the Ohio legislature on January 6, 1880, attended as a delegate committed to Sherman's candidacy rather than his own. Garfield played a pivotal role early by nominating Sherman in a speech that highlighted the party's anti-slavery legacy, economic accomplishments, and Sherman's 25-year legislative record in areas like wartime finance and currency reform. Delivered amid a crowd of 15,000, the address aimed to unify delegates but was interrupted by shouts of "We want Garfield," signaling emerging support for him as an alternative. He also chaired the Convention Rules Committee and successfully opposed the unit rule, which would have bound state delegations en bloc and favored Stalwart control, defeating it 449 to 306. Balloting began on June 7 and extended to 36 rounds amid deadlock, with Grant consistently leading but failing to reach 379 votes. On the first ballot, Grant received 304 votes, Blaine 284, and Sherman 93, while Garfield garnered only 1-2 courtesy votes from Ohio. Shifts accelerated on the 34th ballot when Wisconsin's delegation cast its 16 votes for Garfield, followed by Indiana and Maryland on the 35th, pushing him to about 50 votes overall. On the 36th ballot, June 8, Garfield surged to 399 votes as Blaine and Sherman supporters consolidated behind him as a compromise, surpassing Grant's 306 and securing the nomination. Despite initial Stalwart opposition—Conkling's New York delegation withheld support until the end—Garfield's selection bridged factions, with endorsements from Blaine and Sherman affirming his viability. Garfield accepted the nomination by letter on June 8, expressing gratitude while emphasizing the responsibilities ahead.

General Election Against Hancock: Platforms and Voter Mobilization

The Republican platform, adopted on June 2, 1880, at the party's national convention in Chicago, reaffirmed support for a protective tariff to safeguard American industries and labor, the maintenance of the gold standard through resumption of specie payments, merit-based civil service reform to curb patronage abuses, and vigorous enforcement of civil rights protections against Southern disenfranchisement efforts. In contrast, the Democratic platform, adopted earlier that month in Chicago, declared the tariff should serve revenue purposes only without protective elements that favored manufacturers over consumers, demanded an end to federal interference in state elections, endorsed civil service reform to eliminate the "spoils system," and criticized Republican fiscal policies for burdening taxpayers with high duties and national debt. The tariff emerged as the central campaign issue, with Republicans portraying Democratic revenue-only policies as a threat to industrial jobs and wages, while Democrats accused Republicans of using protectionism to enrich Eastern capitalists at the expense of farmers and exporters. Garfield, drawing on his record as House Ways and Means Committee chairman, defended high tariffs as essential for revenue and economic stability, aligning with the party's emphasis on national prosperity. Garfield conducted a restrained "front-porch" campaign from his Mentor, Ohio, home starting in late July 1880, receiving delegations of voters who traveled to hear brief, personalized addresses rather than stumping nationwide, a departure from tradition that drew an estimated 15,000 to 17,000 visitors and humanized the candidate through direct engagement on issues like civil rights and economic opportunity. This approach, managed by surrogates including James G. Blaine and Roscoe Conkling, unified Republican factions—Stalwarts and Half-Breeds—via behind-the-scenes pacts like the August 1880 meetings in New York that secured Stalwart support in pivotal states such as New York and Indiana. Republicans mobilized voters through extensive party machinery, rallies, and pamphlets emphasizing Garfield's congressional experience and warnings of Democratic threats to protectionism, achieving high turnout among Northern industrial workers and veterans. Hancock, leveraging his Civil War heroism as a Union general, adopted a more active itinerary with speeches across battleground states, but his October 1880 Indianapolis address characterizing the tariff as a "local issue" of no national import handed Republicans a mobilizing cudgel, enabling them to rally protectionist voters by framing Democrats as indifferent to workers' livelihoods in manufacturing hubs like Pennsylvania. Democrats countered by highlighting Garfield's ties to the Crédit Mobilier scandal and appealing to Southern solidarity against "bloody shirt" Reconstruction rhetoric, securing solid support in the ex-Confederate states while competing closely in the North. Overall voter turnout reached approximately 78 percent of eligible males, the highest since 1876, reflecting intense mobilization amid fears of another disputed election like 1876, with Republicans edging out a narrow popular victory of 7,368 votes (48.3 percent to Hancock's 48.2 percent) but sweeping the Electoral College 214–155 on November 2, 1880, due to organizational edge in swing states.

Presidency (March–September 1881)

Inauguration, Cabinet Selections, and Administrative Setup

James A. Garfield was inaugurated as the 20th President of the United States on March 4, 1881, at the East Portico of the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C. The ceremony proceeded amid inclement weather, with heavy rain commencing just before the administration of the oath of office, complicating crowd management on the crowded Capitol grounds and parade route. Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite administered the oath to Garfield following the tradition established since John Quincy Adams, while Chester A. Arthur took the vice-presidential oath separately. In his inaugural address, Garfield emphasized fidelity to constitutional principles, the lessons of the Civil War, and the importance of universal suffrage, including for African Americans, as a safeguard against tyranny. He advocated for a government rooted in individual liberty and self-reliance, cautioning against expansive federal powers that could undermine personal responsibility. The address set a tone for administrative reform, signaling Garfield's intent to prioritize merit over partisan favoritism in public service, though specific implementations would follow in subsequent actions. On March 5, 1881, Garfield announced his cabinet selections, aiming to reconcile competing Republican factions—the reform-oriented Half-Breeds and the machine-politics Stalwarts—while incorporating experienced figures to ensure competence. The Senate confirmed the nominees promptly that day, reflecting broad party support despite underlying tensions. Key appointments included James G. Blaine, Garfield's former House rival, as Secretary of State to leverage diplomatic expertise and appease Half-Breed interests; William Windom as Secretary of the Treasury for fiscal continuity; and Robert T. Lincoln, son of the late president, as Secretary of War to invoke symbolic prestige and bipartisan appeal.
PositionAppointeeNotes
Secretary of StateJames G. BlaineConfirmed March 5, 1881; prominent Republican leader.
Secretary of the TreasuryWilliam WindomRetained from prior considerations for economic stability.
Secretary of WarRobert T. LincolnAppointed for familial legacy and administrative reliability.
Attorney GeneralWayne MacVeaghSelected for legal acumen in pursuing reforms.
Postmaster GeneralThomas L. JamesTasked with addressing postal inefficiencies.
Secretary of the NavyWilliam H. HuntFocused on naval readiness.
Secretary of the InteriorSamuel J. KirkwoodExperienced in western affairs.
Garfield's administrative setup emphasized centralized executive control, with the president conducting frequent personal consultations rather than relying solely on formal cabinet meetings, allowing for agile decision-making in patronage disputes and departmental oversight. This approach facilitated early efforts to assert authority over entrenched bureaucratic positions, such as in the New York Custom House, signaling a departure from laissez-faire patronage toward accountability. Initial reorganizations targeted inefficiencies in executive agencies, prioritizing qualified appointees over political loyalty where feasible, though factional pressures persisted.

Economic Initiatives: Debt Management and Fiscal Restraint

Garfield emphasized fiscal prudence in his inaugural address on March 4, 1881, pledging "rigid economy in all the expenditures of the Government" and the faithful service of executive officers to curb unnecessary spending. He advocated refunding the national debt—then approximately $2.07 billion—at lower interest rates to reduce long-term costs without disrupting the monetary system, specifically avoiding the forced withdrawal of national bank notes that could derange business. This approach aligned with his long-held preference for hard money policies backed by gold and silver, which he viewed as the only reliable foundation for the nation's currency, opposing inflationary measures like unbacked paper money expansion. To implement debt management, Garfield appointed William Windom as Secretary of the Treasury, who executed the refunding by calling in bonds bearing 6% interest and refinancing them at lower rates, achieving success through economical methods that incurred minimal administrative costs, under $4,500 for the operations. This initiative aimed to honor all obligations scrupulously while lowering interest burdens, reflecting Garfield's commitment to reducing the debt's fiscal drag without resorting to monetary manipulation or excessive taxation. Windom's efforts facilitated the exchange of high-interest debt for securities offering yields as low as 3.5% to 4%, thereby enhancing federal solvency amid post-Civil War recovery. Garfield's brief tenure precluded major legislative overhauls, but his administration prioritized restraint by resisting inflationary pressures and focusing on efficient debt servicing, consistent with his prior congressional advocacy against federal relief spending during economic downturns. These measures sought to preserve the gold standard's stability, arguing that currency integrity was essential for commerce and honest dealings, rather than yielding to demands for silver coinage increases that risked devaluation. Overall, Garfield's economic initiatives underscored a causal link between disciplined budgeting and sustained prosperity, prioritizing empirical fiscal health over short-term political expediency.

Civil Service Reform Advocacy and Patronage Conflicts

Garfield entered the presidency committed to curtailing the spoils system, which rewarded political loyalty over merit and fostered inefficiency and corruption in federal administration. He advocated for appointments based on competence rather than partisan allegiance, viewing senatorial courtesy—where senators controlled posts in their states—as an unconstitutional encroachment on executive authority. In his diary, Garfield questioned whether he was "the registering Clerk of the Senate or the Executive of the government," reflecting his determination to prioritize administrative reform. Early in his term, Garfield signaled his reformist stance by appointing James G. Blaine, leader of the Half-Breed faction favoring merit-based selections, as Secretary of State on March 5, 1881, bypassing Stalwart preferences. This choice alienated party bosses like Roscoe Conkling, who championed the patronage system as essential to party discipline. Garfield also removed Edwin A. Merritt, Conkling's appointee as Collector of the Port of New York—a lucrative position handling customs duties and employing thousands—intending to replace him with a non-partisan figure to demonstrate federal oversight over key ports. The ensuing patronage conflict centered on Garfield's nomination of William H. Robertson, a Conkling rival and former congressman, as Collector of the Port of New York on March 22, 1881. Conkling, who derived immense influence from controlling this patronage hub, demanded the nomination's withdrawal, citing tradition and his role in Garfield's election. Garfield refused, insisting on executive prerogative and arguing that yielding would perpetuate machine politics detrimental to governance. In retaliation, Conkling and Senator Thomas Platt resigned their seats on May 16, 1881, appealing to the New York legislature for re-election as a rebuke; however, the legislature confirmed Robertson's nomination two days later and denied Conkling's return, marking a significant defeat for Stalwart control. These clashes exemplified Garfield's broader push to dismantle patronage networks, which he believed undermined public trust and administrative efficacy. Though he did not live to enact comprehensive legislation, his resistance to bosses like Conkling weakened the spoils system's defenders and galvanized reform momentum; his assassin, Charles J. Guiteau—a self-proclaimed Stalwart angered by denied consular office—explicitly cited patronage frustrations in justifying the July 2, 1881, shooting, further exposing the system's perils. Garfield's most prominent judicial nomination was Stanley Matthews to the U.S. Supreme Court as an associate justice, submitted on March 14, 1881, to fill the vacancy created by Noah H. Swayne's retirement earlier that year. Matthews, a former Ohio senator and counsel for railroad companies, had been nominated by President Rutherford B. Hayes in 1880 but failed to secure Senate confirmation amid Democratic objections that his corporate ties indicated potential bias toward business interests over public regulation. Garfield's renomination persisted despite similar partisan resistance, including from Stalwart Republicans wary of challenging the spoils system, but Speaker James G. Blaine's advocacy swayed enough votes for confirmation on May 12, 1881, by the slimmest margin in Supreme Court history at 24-23. This appointment underscored Garfield's preference for legal expertise and personal acquaintance—Matthews had collaborated with him on Reconstruction-era cases—over strict machine loyalty, though critics argued it prioritized ideological alignment with moderate Republican views on commerce and property rights. Beyond the Supreme Court, Garfield nominated several judges to lower federal courts during his six months in office, resulting in six confirmations and one withdrawal. Key appointees included LeBaron B. Colt to the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island on March 9, 1881, confirmed swiftly on March 21 by voice vote to replace John P. Knowles, reflecting Garfield's aim to fill vacancies with experienced local attorneys untainted by recent scandals. Similarly, Don A. Pardee was nominated on March 14, 1881, to the U.S. Circuit Court for the Fifth Circuit, succeeding William B. Woods, and confirmed on May 13, 1881, as a Louisiana-based jurist with Civil War service and appellate background suited to regional disputes over commerce and reconstruction legacies. These selections, like Matthews', navigated Senate factions but advanced Garfield's informal push against patronage dominance in judicial posts, favoring merit amid broader executive clashes with Senator Roscoe Conkling's New York machine. Garfield pursued no major legislative overhauls to the judicial system during his truncated term, as congressional inertia and his assassination precluded initiatives like circuit restructuring or procedural codification he had eyed from congressional experience. However, his nominations embodied a reformist ethos against spoils-driven appointments, aligning with his public insistence on competence for lifetime benches to safeguard impartial adjudication of interstate commerce, civil rights claims, and emerging regulatory challenges—principles he had articulated in House debates but could implement only modestly as president. One unsuccessful effort involved Samuel F. Phillips for a circuit position, withdrawn amid delays, highlighting persistent senatorial hurdles to executive independence in judicial staffing. Overall, these actions prioritized judicial integrity over factional appeasement, though their causal impact was constrained by the era's entrenched political vetting.

Civil Rights Enforcement, Education, and Domestic Priorities

Garfield prioritized the enforcement of civil rights laws during his brief presidency, viewing the protection of African American citizenship as essential to preserving the gains of Reconstruction. In his inaugural address on March 4, 1881, he stated that "the elevation of the negro race from slavery to the full rights of citizenship is the most important political change we have known since the adoption of the Constitution," urging vigilance against encroachments on these rights by Southern state governments. To advance this, he appointed Frederick Douglass, a leading abolitionist, as Recorder of Deeds for the District of Columbia in March 1881, signaling commitment to merit-based federal roles for qualified Black individuals despite patronage pressures. Although federal troop withdrawals had limited direct enforcement options in the South, Garfield instructed Attorney General Wayne MacVeagh to prosecute violations of the Enforcement Acts, aiming to curb voter intimidation and Klan activities through judicial means rather than military intervention. Education formed a cornerstone of Garfield's domestic agenda, rooted in his belief that widespread literacy was indispensable for self-governance and economic progress, particularly for freedmen. As a former educator and congressman, he had previously authored the 1867 bill establishing the U.S. Bureau of Education to collect data on state systems and promote improvements, an initiative he continued to champion as president. In his inaugural address, Garfield advocated federal support for common schools, asserting that "the welfare of the negro... can only be secured by the diffusion of intelligence throughout the mass," and he endorsed appropriations for Southern education to counter illiteracy rates exceeding 70% among Black populations in 1880 census data. His administration sought expanded funding for institutions like Howard University and the Freedmen's Bureau remnants, emphasizing practical training in agriculture and mechanics to foster Black self-sufficiency amid post-Reconstruction economic challenges. Broader domestic priorities included bolstering national infrastructure and social welfare without expansive federal overreach, aligning with Garfield's fiscal conservatism. He backed modest appropriations for rivers and harbors improvements, totaling $3.5 million in the 1881 budget, to facilitate commerce in underdeveloped regions while rejecting pork-barrel excesses. Garfield also pursued pension reforms for Union veterans, advocating targeted increases for disabled soldiers—estimated at 50,000 claimants—over blanket expansions that could strain the $50 million annual pension outlay. These efforts reflected his first-principles approach: prioritizing verifiable need and long-term solvency over partisan largesse, though his assassination on July 2, 1881, curtailed implementation.

Foreign Affairs and Naval Modernization Efforts

Garfield's foreign policy emphasized commercial expansion and hemispheric cooperation, primarily through Secretary of State James G. Blaine's initiatives. Blaine invited representatives from all American republics to a conference in Washington in 1882 to discuss trade reciprocity and mutual interests, aiming to foster closer economic ties and reduce European influence in the Western Hemisphere, though Garfield's assassination prevented its realization. This reflected Garfield's support for reciprocity treaties as a means to open Latin American markets to U.S. goods without broadly lowering protective tariffs, with early negotiations targeting Mexico, Spain (for Cuba), and Santo Domingo. Blaine also sought to mediate the War of the Pacific (1879–1883) between Chile, Peru, and Bolivia, proposing U.S. arbitration to promote stability and access to nitrate resources, but these efforts yielded no resolution during Garfield's term. Diplomatic appointments underscored Garfield's preference for capable, non-partisan figures. He nominated poet and scholar James Russell Lowell as U.S. minister to the United Kingdom on May 23, 1881, valuing Lowell's intellectual stature to strengthen bilateral relations amid ongoing fisheries disputes in the North Atlantic. Similarly, author Lew Wallace was appointed minister to the Ottoman Empire, leveraging Wallace's literary prominence to advance U.S. interests in the Middle East. These selections prioritized merit over patronage, aligning with Garfield's broader reform ethos, though Blaine's preoccupation with domestic spoils distribution limited deeper engagement on issues like Chinese immigration or Pacific fishing rights. On naval modernization, Garfield endorsed rebuilding the U.S. Navy to project power and protect commerce, appointing William H. Hunt as Secretary of the Navy on March 4, 1881. Hunt, dismayed by the fleet's obsolescence—comprising mostly wooden vessels vulnerable to modern ironclads—advocated replacing them with steel-hulled ships powered by steam or electricity, drawing on congressional momentum predating the administration. Garfield's support aligned with his congressional experience favoring fiscal restraint alongside strategic investment, viewing naval strength as essential for enforcing the Monroe Doctrine and safeguarding trade routes, though his death halted momentum until Chester A. Arthur's continuation. This push anticipated the "New Navy" of the 1880s, emphasizing quality over quantity amid budget constraints post-Civil War.

Assassination and Death

Guiteau's Background, Ideology, and Attack

Charles J. Guiteau was born on September 8, 1841, in Freeport, Illinois, to Luther and Jane Guiteau; his mother, who exhibited signs of psychosis, died in 1848 when he was seven, leaving him raised primarily by his father and later his sister. He briefly attended the University of Michigan but withdrew in 1860 without graduating, subsequently joining the Oneida Community, a religious commune led by John Humphrey Noyes, where he remained until 1865. Guiteau's career was marked by repeated failures: admitted to the New York bar in 1866 but attracting no clients, he attempted roles as an evangelist, bill collector, and insurance salesman, often engaging in fraudulent practices such as swindling clients and accumulating debts. In 1869, he married Anne Bunn, but the union dissolved amid allegations of abuse by 1875, after which he lived parasitically off family support while pursuing grandiose schemes, including a failed theocratic newspaper. Guiteau's ideology blended religious fanaticism with fervent Republican partisanship, rooted in the perfectionist doctrines of the Oneida Community, which emphasized divine guidance and communal living; he later developed a theology claiming personal revelations from God. Politically, he aligned with the Stalwart faction of the Republican Party, supporters of Ulysses S. Grant and advocates for the spoils system of patronage appointments, viewing it as essential to party loyalty and reward. In 1880, Guiteau self-published a speech titled "Garfield vs. Hancock," which he delivered sporadically and claimed single-handedly secured James A. Garfield's presidential victory by swaying key voters; this delusion fueled his expectation of a high diplomatic post, such as consul to Vienna or Paris, as recompense despite lacking any relevant experience. His beliefs escalated into paranoia, interpreting Garfield's administration—perceived as betraying Stalwarts through civil service reforms and appointments like William Robertson over factional preferences—as a divine signal for intervention to preserve Republican unity. Guiteau's motives crystallized from repeated rejections of his patronage claims by Garfield's cabinet, which he attributed to ingratitude and a plot against the Stalwarts; he came to believe that assassinating Garfield was a "divine pressure" and patriotic necessity to elevate Vice President Chester A. Arthur, a Stalwart, to the presidency, thereby restoring party harmony and ensuring his own reward. He stalked Garfield for weeks, purchasing a .44-caliber British Bulldog revolver on June 18, 1881, for $4.16 after practicing at a shooting gallery, and composed an explanatory address to Arthur outlining the act's benefits. Family history of mental instability, including his mother's condition and siblings' afflictions, contributed to his erratic behavior, though contemporaries noted his lucidity in planning amid broader delusions of grandeur and religious mission. On July 2, 1881, at the Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Station in Washington, D.C., Guiteau approached Garfield from behind as the president entered to board a train for Williams College; he fired twice at close range, the first shot grazing Garfield's arm and the second striking his lower back, lodging the bullet near the pancreas without immediate exit. Guiteau did not flee, instead shouting, "I am a Stalwart of the Stalwarts... I did it and I want to be arrested," before being subdued and arrested on the spot by station police. He later asserted the act removed only Garfield's "offending" political half, sparing the "good" half that had won the election, reflecting his fragmented rationale blending factional loyalty with messianic self-perception.

Shooting Incident, Medical Interventions, and Treatment Disputes

On July 2, 1881, President James A. Garfield was shot twice by Charles J. Guiteau at the Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Station in Washington, D.C., as he prepared to board a train for a vacation in New Jersey. The first shot grazed Garfield's right arm, while the second struck his lower back, lodging the .44-caliber bullet in soft tissue near the spine, missing vital organs such as the heart, lungs, and major arteries. Garfield remained conscious immediately after the attack and was carried to a nearby room, where initial physicians including Dr. Charles Burleigh Purvis (the first African American physician to attend to a sitting president) attended to him, before being transported by carriage to the White House, where initial examinations confirmed the bullet's deep penetration but no exit wound. Garfield's medical care began under Dr. D. Willard Bliss, a former army surgeon who assumed primary responsibility despite lacking specialized surgical expertise for the injury and overriding initial responders. Bliss and consulting physicians, including Dr. Jedediah Hyde Baxter, repeatedly probed the wound with unsterilized fingers, metal probes, and instruments to locate the bullet, introducing bacterial contamination in an era before widespread adoption of Joseph Lister's antiseptic techniques in the United States. These interventions exacerbated infection, leading to abscesses, pus formation, and systemic pyemia (blood poisoning), which caused Garfield's fever, weight loss, and delirium; he received milk and beef tea via rectal enemas when oral intake became impossible due to throat spasms. Alexander Graham Bell attempted to aid detection using an experimental metal detector in July 1881, but metal springs in Garfield's mattress interfered, preventing precise localization. Treatment disputes centered on Bliss's domineering approach, which sidelined specialists like Dr. William A. Hammond, a former U.S. Army Surgeon General who advocated conservative management and warned against aggressive probing, and surgical consultant Dr. Frank Hamilton, who questioned the wound's depth and Bliss's unyielding control. Bliss rejected antisepsis outright, deeming it unnecessary, and clashed with advocates for exploratory surgery, insisting the bullet had migrated toward the liver despite evidence it remained lodged harmlessly in fatty tissue. These conflicts, compounded by the lack of imaging or sterile protocols, prolonged Garfield's suffering without resolving the infection; by late August, he was moved to Elberon, New Jersey, for sea air, but septic complications proved fatal on September 19, 1881. Guiteau himself claimed at trial that "the doctors killed Garfield; I just shot him," a view echoed by contemporaries critiquing the physicians' errors over the bullet's direct impact.

Final Days, Death, and Immediate Succession

Following the shooting on July 2, 1881, Garfield endured prolonged suffering from sepsis resulting from unsterile medical probes into his wound, which introduced pyogenic bacteria and formed multiple abscesses rather than the bullet itself causing direct fatality. By late August, his condition had worsened with persistent high fevers exceeding 104°F (40°C), dehydration, and delirium, exacerbated by treatments including daily doses of quinine (5–10 grains) and morphine (0.25 grains), alongside attempts at rectal feeding that contributed to malnutrition and further weakened him. On September 6, seeking cooler air for recovery, Garfield was transported by special train to Elberon, New Jersey, a seaside resort, where he briefly rallied under the care of his primary physician, Dr. D. Willard Bliss, but soon relapsed into septic shock. Garfield's final hours involved extreme agony, with labored breathing, cardiac strain, and a temperature spike to 106°F (41°C); he lapsed into unconsciousness around 10:00 p.m. on September 19, 1881, and died at 10:35 p.m. local time (9:35 p.m. Washington time), 79 days after the assassination attempt. An autopsy performed the next day by Drs. Bliss, Joseph D. Hamilton, and others revealed the bullet lodged harmlessly near the pancreas, but confirmed death from overwhelming infection via suppurating veins and arteries draining the wound site, underscoring how repeated unwashed finger and instrument manipulations had propagated bacterial spread in the pre-antiseptic era. His last coherent words reportedly urged national unity, reflecting his earlier public statements amid the crisis. Upon Garfield's death, Vice President Chester A. Arthur, residing in New York City, received telegraphic confirmation around midnight and was administered the oath of office as 21st president at 2:15 a.m. on September 20, 1881, by New York Supreme Court Justice John R. Brady in Arthur's Manhattan home at 123 Lexington Avenue, to ensure constitutional continuity without delay. Arthur initially hesitated, consulting cabinet members via telegram, but proceeded amid fears of instability, later taking a public oath in Washington, D.C., on September 22 before Chief Justice Morrison Waite to formalize the succession. The transition preserved cabinet continuity, with Secretary of State James G. Blaine retaining influence, though Arthur distanced himself from Garfield's patronage foes, signaling a pragmatic shift in administration.

Political Ideology

Constitutional Views on Executive Authority and Federalism

Garfield maintained that the executive branch possessed inherent prerogatives in administrative functions, particularly appointments and removals, to ensure efficient governance free from undue congressional interference. In 1881, he nominated William H. Robertson as Collector of the Port of New York, deliberately challenging Senator Roscoe Conkling's patronage control and thereby affirming presidential authority over federal offices traditionally dominated by Senate factions. This move exemplified his view of the presidency as an active administrative force rather than a passive executor of legislative will, a position he extended to resisting broader encroachments on removal powers. He conceptualized the chief executive as a vital source of policy direction, not a ceremonial figurehead, aligning with constitutional intent for energetic leadership within separation-of-powers bounds. Garfield pushed the office's limits as he understood them, prioritizing executive discretion in personnel to combat corruption and inefficiency, though he adhered to Senate confirmation requirements without conceding ultimate control. His diary entries and private correspondence underscored this as a defense against congressional overreach, reflecting a commitment to balanced interbranch rivalry rather than executive supremacy. On federalism, Garfield championed national supremacy to enforce constitutional guarantees, especially civil rights, viewing states' rights claims by former Confederates as incompatible with union preservation. As a congressman during Reconstruction, he supported federal measures overriding state resistance to the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, arguing that rebellion had nullified secessionist assertions of sovereignty. He critiqued Democratic states' rights doctrines as enablers of injustice, advocating centralized authority to protect freedmen's voting and citizenship against local nullification. Yet, Garfield's federalism preserved state roles in non-conflicting domains, emphasizing constitutional federalism's dual structure while prioritizing national unity where discord threatened republican principles.

Economic Philosophy: Hard Money, Protectionism, and Anti-Statism

Garfield consistently advocated for a hard money policy, emphasizing currency backed by gold and silver specie rather than unbacked paper notes. As a member of the House of Representatives, he opposed the expansion of greenbacks issued during the Civil War, arguing that such fiat money distorted economic stability and empowered undue control over commerce. In congressional debates, Garfield warned that "whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce," highlighting the risks of inflationary policies to free enterprise. He supported the Resumption Act of 1875, which facilitated the redemption of paper currency in gold, viewing specie-backed money as "honest money" essential for long-term prosperity and creditor rights. On protectionism, Garfield aligned with Republican orthodoxy by endorsing tariffs as a means to shield nascent American industries from foreign competition, particularly in manufacturing sectors vulnerable to European imports. During his 1880 presidential campaign, this stance became a central issue, with Garfield defending high protective duties to foster domestic employment and economic independence, contrasting Democratic calls for tariffs solely as revenue sources. In a June 4, 1878, House speech, he outlined the benefits of selective protectionism, arguing it prevented undercutting of wages and built industrial capacity without advocating blanket free trade. While he critiqued excessively high rates that might burden consumers, his overall position prioritized strategic barriers to promote self-sufficiency, as evidenced by campaign materials portraying him as a tariff protector. Garfield's economic outlook incorporated anti-statist elements, favoring a laissez-faire framework that minimized government interference in markets beyond essential safeguards. He expressed devotion to limited intervention, opposing cooperative farm subsidies and programs he deemed "communism in disguise," which he believed eroded individual initiative. This perspective extended to his skepticism of expansive federal economic controls, prioritizing sound fiscal policy and private enterprise to drive growth, as seen in his resistance to inflationary manipulations that could favor special interests over broad stability. His brief presidency reflected this restraint, with initial appointments signaling intent to curb patronage-driven statism in favor of merit-based administration, though cut short before fuller implementation.

Stances on Civil Liberties, Reconstruction, and National Unity

Garfield entered Congress in December 1863 as a committed Radical Republican, fresh from Union Army service, and initially pushed for harsh measures against the defeated South, including the complete abolition of slavery and the breakup of large plantations to undermine the economic basis of rebellion. He argued that the Confederacy's leaders had forfeited constitutional protections through treason, justifying property seizures and potential executions or exiles to restore national authority. These stances reflected his view that true national unity required not mere military victory but the eradication of slavery's institutional supports, as he expressed in early war correspondence framing the conflict as one between slavery and freedom. During Reconstruction, Garfield championed legislation expanding civil liberties for freedmen, including strong support for the Freedmen's Bureau to provide education, land, and legal aid against Southern oppression, as outlined in his February 1, 1866, House speech defending its role in rebuilding rebel states under federal oversight. He backed the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause and the Fifteenth Amendment's voting rights guarantee, rejecting racial disqualifications for suffrage and condemning doctrines tying political rights to skin color. While wary of excesses that might infringe broader liberties—such as overly punitive measures against former Confederates—Garfield prioritized securing Black citizenship as essential to preventing renewed sectional strife, warning that failure to elevate freedmen to full rights would perpetuate division. By the late 1870s, Garfield's positions moderated toward reconciliation, aligning with Rutherford B. Hayes's troop withdrawals from the South in exchange for Democratic promises of fair elections, though he continued advocating federal enforcement of civil rights to foster unity. In his March 4, 1881, inaugural address, he affirmed absolute religious freedom under the Constitution and pledged equal protection for all, particularly emphasizing the freedmen's "full and equal" suffrage and citizenship as the paramount post-war achievement binding the nation. This framework subordinated state claims of autonomy to federal guarantees of liberty, viewing enforced equal rights as the causal mechanism for lasting national cohesion rather than sectional forgiveness alone.

Legacy and Reassessments

Short-Term Effects and Arthur's Continuation

The assassination of President Garfield on September 19, 1881, elicited widespread national grief and unity, with churches holding prayer vigils, businesses closing, and daily bulletins on his condition drawing crowds across the United States; international sympathy poured in, including from Queen Victoria, underscoring Garfield's brief presidency's resonance beyond American borders. The event intensified scrutiny of the spoils system, as assassin Charles Guiteau's motive stemmed from rejected patronage claims, prompting the National Civil Service Reform League to distribute materials explicitly linking the killing to patronage abuses and advocating merit-based appointments. Congressional responses included eulogies and resolutions decrying the act, with figures like Senator George Hoar attributing it to systemic corruption rather than mere insanity, fostering bipartisan momentum for reform legislation by late 1881. Vice President Chester A. Arthur, sworn in as president on September 20, 1881, in New York City amid fears of Stalwart faction dominance, initially faced suspicion due to his machine politics background but quickly distanced himself by prosecuting Garfield-era scandals, including the Star Route postal fraud cases initiated under Garfield. Arthur issued a proclamation on September 22, 1881, designating a national day of mourning and praising Garfield's integrity, signaling continuity in honoring his predecessor's anti-corruption stance. Despite Garfield's clashes with Stalwarts like Roscoe Conkling, Arthur pursued naval modernization aligned with Garfield's interests, vetoing pork-laden appropriations while advocating steel-hulled ships, though he diverged on patronage by appointing reformers to key posts. Arthur's most direct response to the assassination's catalyst—patronage excesses—emerged in his endorsement of civil service reform; rejecting his prior opposition, he signed the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act on January 16, 1883, establishing merit exams for about 10% of federal jobs initially, a measure Garfield had supported but which gained urgency post-assassination. This shift surprised contemporaries, as Arthur, once a Conkling ally, prioritized executive efficiency over factional loyalty, executing Guiteau on June 30, 1882, without political interference and using the event to underscore reform's necessity. His administration thus bridged Garfield's reform impulses with practical implementation, stabilizing the Republican Party short-term by mitigating intra-party patronage wars that had fueled the 1880 nomination bitterness.

Catalyst for Civil Service and Anti-Corruption Reforms

James A. Garfield, a longstanding advocate for civil service reform, viewed the spoils system as inherently corrupt and inefficient, arguing in his March 4, 1881, inaugural address that government positions should be filled based on merit rather than political loyalty. During his brief presidency, Garfield resisted patronage pressures from Republican machine politicians, notably clashing with Senator Roscoe Conkling over appointments like the New York Customs Collectorship, prioritizing qualified candidates over party loyalists. This stance alienated Stalwart faction members who expected rewards for electoral support, exacerbating intra-party divisions rooted in the post-Civil War patronage practices that distributed approximately 100,000 federal jobs as political spoils. The July 2, 1881, assassination of Garfield by Charles J. Guiteau, a mentally unstable office-seeker denied a consular position despite his self-proclaimed role in Garfield's campaign, directly exemplified the perils of the spoils system. Guiteau, aligned with the Stalwarts, shot Garfield at a Washington, D.C., train station believing the act would install Vice President Chester A. Arthur—a patronage advocate—and secure him a reward, shouting "I am a Stalwart!" after the shooting. Guiteau's trial, which revealed his motives tied to frustrated job expectations, fueled nationwide revulsion against patronage corruption, with reformers like the National Civil Service Reform League linking the president's death to the system's abuses. Public outrage intensified reform momentum, transforming Garfield's death into the pivotal catalyst for legislative change despite prior efforts by presidents like Rutherford B. Hayes yielding limited results. In the 1882 midterm elections, anti-spoils candidates gained traction, pressuring the 47th Congress to pass the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act on January 16, 1883, which Arthur—despite his machine background—signed into law. The Act established the United States Civil Service Commission to oversee competitive examinations for merit-based appointments, initially applying to about 13.1% of federal positions (roughly 14,000 jobs), mandating that classified roles be filled without regard to political affiliation and prohibiting removals for refusing political contributions. Over time, the Pendleton Act's scope expanded through subsequent executive orders and laws, covering nearly all federal civilian employees by the mid-20th century and curtailing widespread corruption that had previously enabled scandals like the 1872 Crédit Mobilier affair. Garfield's assassination underscored the causal link between patronage-driven instability and governance failures, validating reformers' empirical critiques of a system that prioritized loyalty over competence, though critics noted it did not fully eliminate political influence in higher appointments. This reform legacy, directly precipitated by his death, marked a shift toward professionalized bureaucracy, reducing turnover from 50% per administration under spoils to stability enhancing administrative continuity.

Historiographical Evolution: Radicalism to Unification Narrative

Historians initially interpreted James A. Garfield primarily through the lens of his Radical Republican phase during the Civil War and early Reconstruction, emphasizing his fervent advocacy for emancipation, equal pay for Black soldiers, and punitive policies toward the Confederacy. As a congressman from Ohio, Garfield distinguished himself as one of the party's most uncompromising voices, criticizing President Abraham Lincoln for insufficient vigor in prosecuting the war and supporting the Thirteenth Amendment's ratification in 1865. This portrayal aligned with contemporaneous accounts and early biographies that highlighted his antislavery zeal, such as his 1864 military service and postwar push for the Fourteenth Amendment, framing him as an ideological warrior against Southern rebellion rather than a reconciler. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, this radical image persisted amid broader historiographical debates over Reconstruction, where Dunning-school scholars often critiqued Radical excesses as vengeful overreach, indirectly tempering enthusiasm for figures like Garfield without deeply reassessing his personal trajectory. Allan Peskin's 1978 biography, Garfield, reinforced elements of this view by detailing his early radicalism—such as backing Andrew Johnson's 1868 impeachment—while noting growing discomfort with extremism, yet it maintained focus on his pre-presidential militancy and intellectual rigor over any unifying pivot. Such works treated Garfield's politics as largely consistent with Radical tenets, including civil rights enforcement, but subordinated his later moderation to the drama of his assassination and brief tenure. Recent scholarship, particularly C.W. Goodyear's 2023 biography President Garfield: From Radical to Unifier, has shifted the narrative toward Garfield's evolution into a pragmatic unifier, portraying his career arc as a deliberate move from wartime radicalism to postwar emphasis on party cohesion, civil service reform, and sectional healing. Goodyear argues that by the 1870s, Garfield moderated on Southern reconstruction—deferring to time over federal coercion—while navigating Republican factions during the disputed 1876 election and his 1880 nomination, which reconciled Stalwarts and reformers. This interpretation, drawing on Garfield's correspondence and legislative record, posits him as a bridge-builder who prioritized institutional stability, contrasting earlier static radical depictions and aligning with post-Revisionist views that value Radical contributions without ignoring their pragmatic adaptations. Critics of this framing, however, contend it overemphasizes accommodation at the expense of Garfield's enduring civil rights commitments, such as his consistent support for Black education funding into the 1880s. This unification narrative reflects broader historiographical trends since the 1980s, influenced by renewed interest in Gilded Age reform amid declining emphasis on Reconstruction's punitive aspects, positioning Garfield as a potential healer whose death truncated progressive possibilities like tariff reciprocity and anti-corruption drives. Unlike earlier accounts tethered to partisan hagiography or assassination pathos, modern reassessments leverage archival insights to depict his intellectual flexibility—evident in his Supreme Court arguments and economic policy evolution—as causal to national reconciliation efforts, though skeptics note that his short presidency limits empirical verification of unifying intent.

Memorials, Cultural Depictions, and Contemporary Evaluations

The James A. Garfield Monument on the United States Capitol grounds, dedicated in 1887, features a bronze statue of Garfield sculpted by John Quincy Adams Ward, depicting him in a seated pose with elements symbolizing his life stages on the granite pedestal. In Cleveland, Ohio, the James A. Garfield Memorial at Lake View Cemetery, completed in 1890, stands 180 feet tall with a Berea sandstone structure enclosing Memorial Hall, which includes a sculpture of Garfield, red granite columns, a golden mosaic dome, and stained-glass windows commemorating his presidency. Additional tributes include a monument erected by the 10th Cavalry in 1886 at what is now Chiricahua National Monument, honoring Garfield's support for African American troops. Cultural depictions of Garfield primarily focus on his assassination rather than his political career, with limited portrayals in broader media. The 2011 PBS documentary Murder of a President examines Garfield's life, election, and shooting by Charles Guiteau, emphasizing the medical failures that prolonged his suffering. He appears as a character in Stephen Sondheim's 1990 musical Assassins, which dramatizes the motivations of presidential killers, including Guiteau's delusional claims of credit for Garfield's nomination. Books such as Kenneth D. Ackerman's The Dark Horse (2003) detail his 1880 dark-horse nomination, narrow victory, and murder, portraying the event as a pivotal moment in anti-patronage reform. Contemporary evaluations by historians highlight Garfield's intellectual promise and anti-corruption stance, tempered by his brief tenure of six months, which limited direct policy achievements. The Miller Center assesses his legacy as ambiguous, noting his early efforts to assert executive authority against senatorial patronage but critiquing appointments like replacing Alonzo B. Cornell's ally with a spoilsman, Chester A. Arthur, as inconsistent with reform ideals. Biographer C.W. Goodyear's 2023 work portrays Garfield as evolving from Radical Republican roots to a unifier, crediting his congressional experience and multilingual scholarship—evidenced by simultaneous writing in Latin, Greek, and English—for positioning him as a capable reformer whose death catalyzed the Pendleton Civil Service Act of 1883. Economic analyses, such as in Government and the American Economy (2023), dismiss his presidency's direct fiscal impact due to its brevity but affirm his advocacy for hard money policies aligned with emerging gold standard consensus. Overall, modern reassessments rank Garfield higher than mid-20th-century views, valuing his resistance to machine politics amid Gilded Age corruption, though his unrealized potential invites speculation on alternate outcomes absent Guiteau's act.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.