Hubbry Logo
LevorphanolLevorphanolMain
Open search
Levorphanol
Community hub
Levorphanol
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Levorphanol
Levorphanol
from Wikipedia

Levorphanol
Structural formula
Ball-and-stick model
Clinical data
Trade namesLevo-Dromoran
Other namesRo 1-5431[1]
AHFS/Drugs.comMonograph
MedlinePlusa682020
Routes of
administration
Oral, intravenous, subcutaneous, intramuscular
ATC code
  • None
Legal status
Legal status
Pharmacokinetic data
Bioavailability70% (oral); 100% (IV)
Protein binding40%
MetabolismHepatic
Elimination half-life11–16 hours
Identifiers
  • (1R,9R,10R)-17-Methyl-17-azatetracyclo[7.5.3.01,10.02,7]heptadeca-2(7),3,5-trien-4-ol
CAS Number
PubChem CID
IUPHAR/BPS
DrugBank
ChemSpider
UNII
KEGG
ChEMBL
CompTox Dashboard (EPA)
ECHA InfoCard100.000.912 Edit this at Wikidata
Chemical and physical data
FormulaC17H23NO
Molar mass257.377 g·mol−1
3D model (JSmol)
  • CN1CC[C@]23CCCC[C@H]2[C@H]1Cc4c3cc(O)cc4
  • InChI=1S/C17H23NO/c1-18-9-8-17-7-3-2-4-14(17)16(18)10-12-5-6-13(19)11-15(12)17/h5-6,11,14,16,19H,2-4,7-10H2,1H3/t14-,16+,17+/m0/s1 checkY
  • Key:JAQUASYNZVUNQP-USXIJHARSA-N checkY
 ☒NcheckY (what is this?)  (verify)

Levorphanol (brand name Levo-Dromoran) is an opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain.[1][3][4] It is the levorotatory enantiomer of the compound racemorphan. Its dextrorotatory counterpart is dextrorphan.

It was first described in Germany in 1946.[5] The drug has been in medical use in the United States since 1953.[6]

Pharmacology

[edit]

Levorphanol acts predominantly as an agonist of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), but is also an agonist of the δ-opioid receptor (DOR), κ-opioid receptor (KOR), and the nociceptin receptor (NOP), as well as an NMDA receptor antagonist and a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI).[6] Levorphanol, similarly to certain other opioids, also acts as a glycine receptor antagonist and GABA receptor antagonist at very high concentrations.[7] As per the World Health Organization, levorphanol is a step 3 opioid and is considered eight times more potent than morphine at the MOR (2 mg levorphanol is equivalent to 15 mg morphine).[citation needed]

Relative to morphine, levorphanol lacks complete cross-tolerance[8] and possesses greater intrinsic activity at the MOR.[8] The duration of action is generally long compared to other comparable analgesics and varies from 4 hours to as much as 15 hours. For this reason levorphanol is useful in palliation of chronic pain and similar conditions. Levorphanol has an oral to parenteral effectiveness ratio of 2:1, one of the most favorable of the strong narcotics. Its antagonism of the NMDA receptor, similar to those of the phenylheptylamine open-chain opioids such as methadone or the phenylpiperidine ketobemidone, make levorphanol useful for types of pain that other analgesics may not be as effective against, such as neuropathic pain.[9] Levorphanol's exceptionally high analgesic efficacy in the treatment of neuropathic pain is also conferred by its action on serotonin and norepinephrine transporters, similar to the opioids tramadol and tapentadol, and mutually complements the analgesic effect of its NMDA receptor antagonism.[10]

Levorphanol shows a high rate of psychotomimetic side effects such as hallucinations and delirium, which have been attributed to its binding to and activation of the KOR.[11] At the same time however, activation of this receptor as well as of the DOR have been determined to contribute to its analgesic effects.[11]

Chemistry

[edit]
Levorphanol and its stereoisomer dextrorphan, the enantiomers of the racemic mixture racemorphan.

Chemically, levorphanol belongs to the morphinan class and is (−)-3-hydroxy-N-methyl-morphinan.[8] It is the "left-handed" (levorotatory) stereoisomer of racemorphan, the racemic mixture of the two stereoisomers with differing pharmacology. The "right-handed" (dextrorotatory) enantiomer of racemorphan is dextrorphan (DXO), an antitussive, potent dissociative hallucinogen (NMDA receptor antagonist), and weakly active opioid. DXO is an active metabolite of the pharmaceutical drug dextromethorphan (DXM), which, analogously to DXO, is an enantiomer of the racemic mixture racemethorphan along with levomethorphan, the latter of which has similar properties to those of levorphanol.

Society and culture

[edit]

Name

[edit]

Levorphanol is the INN, BAN, and DCF.[1][3][4] As the medically used tartrate salt, the drug is also known as levorphanol tartrate (USAN, BANM).[1][4] The former developmental code name of levorphanol at Roche was Ro 1-5431.[1][4]

Availability

[edit]

As the tartrate salt, levorphanol is marketed by Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.[12] and Virtus Pharmaceuticals in the U.S., and Canada under the brand name Levo-Dromoran.[3]

Legality

[edit]

Levorphanol is listed under the Single Convention On Narcotic Drugs 1961 and is regulated like morphine in most countries. In the U.S., it is a Schedule II Narcotic controlled substance with a DEA ACSCN of 9220 and 2013 annual aggregate manufacturing quota of 4.5 kilograms. The salts in use are the tartrate (free base conversion ratio 0.58) and hydrobromide (0.76).[13]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Levorphanol (levo-3-hydroxy-N-methylmorphinan) is a potent synthetic of the class, developed in the 1940s as an alternative to for the relief of moderate to severe . It is the only commercially available opioid in the series and exhibits effects comparable to but with 4 to 8 times greater potency, depending on the and clinical context. Levorphanol is indicated for severe enough to require an analgesic when alternative treatments are inadequate, including acute, cancer-related, and , and may be administered orally, intravenously, subcutaneously, or intramuscularly. Its pharmacological profile includes not only mu- receptor agonism but also antagonism of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, which contributes to its efficacy in certain refractory states and potentially reduces tolerance development compared to pure mu-agonists. With a longer duration of action and than —typically 12 to 16 hours—levorphanol offers flexibility in dosing schedules, though its underutilization stems from limited availability and familiarity among clinicians despite FDA approval for multimodal analgesia. As a step 3 on the , it remains a viable option for patients intolerant to other agents like , with incomplete facilitating rotation in management.

History

Development and Synthesis

Levorphanol, chemically known as levo-3-hydroxy-N-methylmorphinan, was first synthesized in the late 1940s as part of efforts to develop fully synthetic opioid analgesics independent of natural opium derivatives like morphine. This development occurred amid post-World War II pharmaceutical research aimed at creating compounds with morphine-like activity but potentially improved pharmacological profiles, including higher potency and extended duration of action. The synthesis involved constructing the morphinan skeleton through multi-step organic reactions, typically initiating from cyclohexanone and incorporating stereoselective resolutions to isolate the active levorotatory enantiomer from racemorphan, distinguishing it from the less active dextrorotatory form, dextrorphan. Early work at Hoffmann-La Roche laboratories focused on empirical optimization of these routes to yield a compound approximately 4–5 times more potent than morphine in analgesic assays, with preclinical data supporting its longer half-life and oral bioavailability. The rationale for levorphanol's development emphasized causal advantages in and reduced reliance on plant-derived precursors, addressing supply constraints of natural opioids during the era. Pharmacological testing in animal models confirmed its μ-opioid receptor agonism akin to but with enhanced tissue penetration and persistence, prompting to advance it toward clinical evaluation under the trade name Levo-Dromoran. The U.S. approved levorphanol tartrate in 1953 specifically for moderate-to-severe , marking it as one of the earliest synthetic morphinans to reach the market. Subsequent refinements in synthesis improved yields and purity, though the core process retained the stereochemical emphasis on the levo-isomer for maximal therapeutic .

Clinical Introduction and Early Research

Levorphanol was approved by the U.S. in 1953 and introduced to clinical practice under the trade name Levo-Dromoran for the relief of moderate to severe pain, including in preoperative, postoperative, and chronic settings, as a synthetic alternative to . Early evaluations positioned it for use in surgical contexts due to its potent effects and potential for extended duration compared to natural opiates. Initial clinical studies in the early confirmed levorphanol's efficacy through comparative trials. In a postoperative study involving 311 patients, 3 mg of levorphanol achieved effective analgesia in 97% of cases, outperforming 10 mg of (78% efficacy), with an average duration of 5.5 hours and reduced incidence of side effects such as . Similarly, Glazebrook et al. (1952) observed that doses of 1.3–4 mg provided control equivalent to or superior to in postoperative scenarios. A 1954 trial further demonstrated that 2 mg administered intravenously yielded approximately 7 hours of postoperative relief, extending with higher doses like 4 mg. Research from the 1950s through the 1960s established levorphanol's potency as 4 to 8 times that of via equipotent dosing comparisons in trials, supporting its role in receptor-mediated pain relief. These findings indicated smoother profiles in select cohorts, with longer analgesia and lower overall needs postoperatively, yet adoption remained limited amid the rise of competing synthetics like meperidine, contributing to its status as an underutilized agent.

Medical Uses

Indications for Pain Management

Levorphanol is indicated for the management of severe enough to require daily, around-the-clock, long-term opioid treatment and for which alternative treatment options are inadequate. This includes moderate to severe acute , such as postoperative , and conditions unresponsive to non-opioid analgesics or milder opioids, aligning with step 3 of the World Health Organization's analgesic ladder for severe . Clinical evidence supports its efficacy in providing analgesia comparable to but with potentially longer duration, making it suitable for patients requiring sustained relief without frequent redosing. In settings, levorphanol has been explored off-label as a second-line for cancer-related , particularly in cases of inadequate response to initial therapies like or . Observational studies indicate successful opioid rotation to levorphanol in cancer patients, achieving improved control and symptom management with an opioid rotation ratio of approximately 8.5:1 from morphine equivalents, while maintaining tolerability. It shows promise for intractable neuropathic components of , where higher doses (averaging 9 mg/day) have demonstrated superior relief over lower doses in chronic scenarios. Use is contraindicated in patients with acute or severe bronchial without ventilatory support, significant respiratory depression, or hypercarbia, due to the high risk of life-threatening respiratory depression mediated by mu-opioid receptor . Caution is warranted in those with impaired respiratory reserve, as levorphanol can exacerbate , particularly during initiation or dose escalation. These restrictions stem from causal pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles that prolong in vulnerable populations.

Dosage Forms and Administration

Levorphanol tartrate is commercially available as oral tablets in a 2 mg strength and as a parenteral solution in a concentration of 2 mg/mL, suitable for subcutaneous, intramuscular, or intravenous administration. Oral administration achieves bioavailability of approximately 70%, with peak plasma concentrations occurring around 1 hour post-dose, while intravenous dosing provides immediate onset comparable to morphine at equianalgesic ratios. Dosing should be individualized, starting low in opioid-naïve patients to minimize risks associated with its prolonged half-life. For moderate to severe in opioid-naïve adults, the initial oral dose is typically 1 to 2 mg every 6 to 8 hours as needed, with a maximum initial daily total of 6 to 12 mg, titrated upward based on response and no more frequently than every 4 hours after steady-state is approached. Parenteral administration begins at 1 to 2 mg every 3 to 6 hours, adjusting intervals to align with the 6- to 15-hour duration of analgesia despite an of 11 to 16 hours (potentially extending to 30 hours with chronic use). conversions position 1 mg of intravenous levorphanol as roughly equivalent to 4 to 8 mg of intravenous or 10 to 12 mg of oral , informed by milligram equivalence factors and comparative potency data from trials. In patients with severe renal or hepatic impairment, initiate at 50% of the standard dose and extend intervals (e.g., to every 8 to 12 hours) to account for reduced clearance and potential accumulation, as levorphanol undergoes hepatic metabolism without significant renal excretion of unchanged drug. Close monitoring for excessive or respiratory depression is essential, given the showing minimal impact from mild impairment but heightened pharmacodynamic sensitivity in advanced disease.

Pharmacology

Mechanism of Action

Levorphanol functions primarily as a full agonist at the mu-opioid receptor (), a G-protein-coupled receptor predominantly expressed in the periventricular and matter of the brain and , where it inhibits activity, decreases cyclic AMP levels, opens potassium channels to hyperpolarize neurons, and closes voltage-gated calcium channels to reduce release, collectively suppressing nociceptive signal transmission. This MOR-mediated mechanism underlies its potent effects, with binding affinity exhibiting a Ki value of approximately 0.21 nM, indicating high potency comparable to or exceeding that of . In addition to MOR agonism, levorphanol exhibits weak, non-competitive antagonism at N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, binding to the receptor's non-competitive site with low micromolar affinity (similar to other mu-opioid agonists like ), which may modulate glutamate-mediated excitatory and potentially mitigate or tolerance by interfering with central sensitization pathways, as demonstrated in binding and spinal neuron excitation studies. Levorphanol displays minimal activity at sigma receptors relative to its dextrorphan (the dextrorotatory derived from ), which possesses substantial agonism potentially contributing to psychotomimetic side effects; this reduced sigma engagement in levorphanol avoids such dissociative phenomena while preserving efficacy.

Pharmacodynamics

Levorphanol acts primarily as a full at the μ-opioid receptor (), with moderate affinity for δ-opioid (DOR) and κ-opioid (KOR) receptors, thereby suppressing nociceptive signaling in the and producing dose-dependent analgesia. Its potency exceeds that of by a factor of 4-8 mg-for-mg in most clinical contexts, with ratios varying by route and type (e.g., 2 mg intramuscular levorphanol approximating 10-15 mg intramuscular ). This enhanced potency correlates with tighter binding affinity at compared to , enabling lower doses for equivalent relief while maintaining a similar for analgesia versus adverse effects. Following oral dosing, effects onset within 15-30 minutes and peak around 1 hour, with clinical duration typically spanning 4-8 hours—longer than morphine's 3-4 hours due to contributions from active metabolites like 3-hydroxylevorphanol, which retain activity. Dose-response relationships demonstrate linear increases in antinociception up to high doses, without evidence of a therapeutic ceiling in humans, though empirical data emphasize to balance efficacy against side effects. Respiratory depression arises via direct MOR-mediated suppression of brainstem respiratory centers, scaling proportionally with analgesic dose and equianalgesic to ; for instance, 2 mg levorphanol produces comparable ventilatory impairment to 10-15 mg . While some preclinical rodent models suggest partial G-protein bias at MOR may attenuate maximal depression relative to β-arrestin recruiting agonists like , human studies confirm no reliable ceiling effect, underscoring risks in opioid-naïve patients or overdose scenarios. Sedation manifests through and KOR agonism, yielding effects akin to equianalgesic (e.g., comparable to 10 mg preoperatively), while stems from mesolimbic release triggered by supraspinal activation. These psychoactive properties parallel 's, contributing to and abuse liability, as reflected in its DEA Schedule II designation based on high potential for observed in clinical and post-marketing surveillance data.

Pharmacokinetics

Absorption and Distribution

Levorphanol is rapidly absorbed following , with peak plasma concentrations typically achieved within approximately 1 hour. Although formal studies on absolute are lacking, its equipotent oral-to-intravenous dosing ratio suggests higher than , indicative of minimal first-pass due to its . The drug exhibits extensive tissue distribution, reflected in a steady-state of 10 to 13 L/kg, which facilitates penetration into the for effects. Plasma protein binding is approximately 40%, leaving a substantial unbound fraction available for distribution and receptor interaction. Redistribution occurs within 1 to 2 hours post-administration. No significant interactions with food affecting absorption have been documented in available pharmacokinetic data.

Metabolism and Elimination

Levorphanol undergoes hepatic metabolism primarily through glucuronidation to form levorphanol-3-glucuronide, an inactive metabolite, and N-demethylation to norlevorphanol, which retains opioid activity. Unlike many opioids, levorphanol's biotransformation does not significantly involve cytochrome P450 enzymes such as CYP2D6 or CYP3A4, minimizing risks of pharmacokinetic drug interactions and pharmacogenomic variability. This pathway contributes to its elimination half-life of 11–16 hours, which exceeds the typical analgesic duration of 6–8 hours and promotes accumulation with repeated dosing, reaching steady state after approximately 3 days. Metabolites, including the conjugate, are primarily excreted via the kidneys, with animal studies indicating extensive renal clearance of these compounds. In with renal impairment, accumulation of renally excreted metabolites may prolong effects and increase risks, necessitating dose reductions or extended intervals. Similarly, elderly individuals often require adjusted dosing due to age-related declines in hepatic and renal function, which can extend clearance times and heighten accumulation potential. The absence of CYP-dependent further supports levorphanol's predictability in diverse populations, though monitoring is advised for those with compromised organ function.

Chemistry

Chemical Structure and Properties

Levorphanol is the levorotatory isomer of 3-hydroxy-N-methyl, classified as a synthetic derivative with the molecular C17H23NO and a molecular weight of 257.37 g/mol. Its core structure consists of a fused system featuring a phenolic hydroxyl group at the 3-position on the aromatic ring and a tertiary within the moiety, elements that parallel key pharmacophores in natural morphinan-like opioids. This scaffold lacks the oxygen-containing furan ring ether bridge present in and other protoberberine-derived alkaloids, resulting in a more simplified phenanthrene-piperidine framework that facilitates while maintaining structural homology sufficient to engage similar biological targets. Such analogies refute misconceptions portraying fully synthetic opioids as structurally divergent from natural ones, as levorphanol's configuration at chiral centers—particularly the (3R,4R,11R)-orientation—preserves essential spatial arrangements for receptor affinity akin to levorotatory natural enantiomers. The tertiary amine has a pKa of 9.58, promoting and cationic form predominance at physiological (around 7.4), which enhances in acidic environments and influences formulation behavior. The exhibits low (predicted ~0.173 mg/mL), but the salt (C17H23NO·C4H6O6·2H2O, MW 443.5 g/mol) is freely soluble in , enabling injectable and oral without compromising stability in pharmaceutical matrices.

Synthesis Methods

The synthesis of levorphanol relies on variants of the Grewe process, which builds the core from derivatives through cyclization to form the fused ring system, followed by side-chain modifications to incorporate the 3-hydroxy and N-methyl functionalities. Racemorphan, the racemic precursor, undergoes to yield the active (-)-, levorphanol, commonly via formation of diastereomeric salts with chiral resolving agents such as , enabling separation and isolation of the levorotatory form with high enantiomeric purity. A key transformation involves O-demethylation of levomethorphan (the 3-methoxy-N-methylmorphinan ) using concentrated aqueous at elevated temperatures, typically 100–120°C for several hours, followed by neutralization with ammonium hydroxide, extraction into an organic phase like , and purification via or to achieve pharmaceutical-grade levorphanol with purity exceeding 99%. Contemporary generic production emphasizes streamlined resolution protocols and demethylation optimizations, such as controlled acid concentrations and reaction monitoring to minimize byproducts like dibromo intermediates, thereby improving yields to 70–90% while adhering to current good manufacturing practices without disclosing proprietary catalysts or solvents.

Clinical Evidence and Efficacy

Comparative Studies

Levorphanol demonstrates an potency of 4 to 8 times that of , with clinical data from single-dose and chronic administration studies spanning the to the confirming this ratio; for instance, 4 mg oral levorphanol approximates the effect of 30 mg oral , yielding comparable reductions in visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores when doses are adjusted accordingly. This potency arises from levorphanol's higher affinity for μ-opioid receptors and additional non-opioid mechanisms, including N-methyl-D-aspartate ( antagonism, which differentiates it from in preclinical models of and . Head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing levorphanol to remain limited, reflecting levorphanol's relative underutilization and smaller market presence compared to . A prospective, dose-ranging RCT in patients with chronic peripheral or central (n=81) found that higher-strength levorphanol (starting at 0.75 mg every 6 hours, titrated to a maximum of 16 mg daily) achieved a 36% reduction in average daily pain intensity over 8 weeks, versus 21% with low-strength dosing (starting at 0.15 mg, maximum 3 mg daily; p=0.02), attributing the difference to enhanced NMDA blockade at higher doses that mitigates tolerance and central not addressed by pure μ-agonists like . However, this study did not include a comparator arm, and no large-scale RCTs have quantified superior reduction or VAS improvements specifically against in cohorts. Opioid rotation studies provide indirect comparative ; in a retrospective analysis of cancer patients switching from equivalents to levorphanol, successful rotations occurred at ratios of 12:1 for daily doses under 100 mg, with 74% of cases (n=31) reporting improved control, though without blinded VAS endpoints or continuation controls. adjustments in these rotations often preserved or slightly enhanced efficacy, but lacked statistical powering for noninferiority claims. Meta-analyses of long-acting opioids exclude levorphanol due to insufficient trials, underscoring gaps rather than inferiority; no data suggest diminished efficacy relative to when potency-equivalent doses are used.

Applications in Specific Pain Types

Levorphanol has demonstrated efficacy in managing palliative , particularly in cases involving tolerance or neuropathic components, where its N-methyl-D-aspartate ( antagonism facilitates tolerance reversal and enhanced analgesia. In a case series of 31 patients, including those with and chronic non-malignant , 74% experienced improved relief following rotation to levorphanol, attributed to its multimodal mechanism including serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. Observational data from chronic non-cancer cohorts show response rates of approximately 70%, comparable to , with benefits in sustained analgesia for patients unresponsive to prior . However, evidence remains limited to small-scale studies and case reports, lacking large randomized controlled trials to confirm superiority over standard agents in these populations. In chronic non-cancer , levorphanol's longer duration of action suits patients requiring stable levels without frequent dosing, with one of 81 individuals reporting a 36% reduction in high-dose groups versus 21% in low-dose, highlighting dose-dependent efficacy in scenarios. Its NMDA-blocking properties contribute to reduced and tolerance development, as preclinical and indirect indicate reversal of morphine-induced tolerance through antagonism of excitatory . Empirical use in neuropathic subsets of underscores its utility where mu- agonism alone proves insufficient, though prospective trials are needed to quantify long-term outcomes beyond observational reports. Levorphanol plays a limited role in acute postoperative pain due to its extended of 11-16 hours, which risks accumulation and delayed onset compared to shorter-acting like . Historical potency data establish it as approximately eight times more potent than intramuscular in postoperative settings, supporting occasional use for moderate-to-severe procedural pain when sustained release is prioritized over rapid . Perioperative reviews suggest potential for multimodal regimens to minimize overall exposure, but its pharmacokinetic profile favors chronic rather than immediate post-surgical needs, with sparse contemporary evidence for routine adoption. For pain within opioid protocols, levorphanol serves as an effective second-line option in cancer-related refractory cases, with ratios from equivalents averaging 8.5:1 enabling successful analgesia in preliminary cohorts. In advanced cancer patients, to levorphanol yielded pain control over 30 days, often addressing incomplete responses to prior agents like or . This application leverages its NMDA antagonism to mitigate tolerance in episodes, though data derive primarily from phase I trials and small , underscoring the need for broader validation to establish optimal dosing and patient selection criteria.

Adverse Effects and Risks

Common Side Effects

The common adverse effects of levorphanol, a mu-opioid receptor , mirror those of other potent s and are primarily dose-dependent, with elevated plasma levels correlating to higher frequency and intensity of reactions such as , , and respiratory effects. In clinical trials involving approximately 1,400 patients, the observed profile included , , , altered mentation, pruritus, flushing, and , without unique toxicities beyond standard opioid . Constipation, resulting from mu-receptor mediated inhibition of propulsive gastrointestinal and reduced fluid secretion in the gut, affects a substantial proportion of users and typically lacks tolerance development, unlike some central effects. Post-marketing surveillance aligns with general data, where incidence reaches 40-90% in chronic therapy, often necessitating prophylactic laxatives. and , linked to delayed gastric emptying and central activation, occur in 10-40% of recipients initially but may wane with tolerance. Sedation and dizziness, manifestations of , are frequently reported in early treatment phases, with rates approximating 15-25% based on analogous studies, though levorphanol-specific incidence data remain undocumented in controlled trials. Pruritus and dry mouth also feature prominently, attributable to histamine release and suppression, respectively. Management often involves dose or adjunctive therapies, as these effects contribute to discontinuation in a minority of cases.

Serious Adverse Events

Respiratory depression represents the primary serious adverse event linked to levorphanol use, manifesting as potentially fatal hypoventilation due to mu-opioid receptor agonism suppressing brainstem respiratory centers, with heightened risk in opioid-naive patients, during dose escalation, or within the first 24-72 hours of initiation. This effect is exacerbated by concurrent administration of benzodiazepines or other CNS depressants, amplifying central respiratory suppression beyond that seen with levorphanol alone. Unlike fentanyl, which exhibits rapid-onset and profound ventilatory depression correlating with its pharmacokinetics, levorphanol's longer duration and potential ceiling effect on respiratory drive—analogous to buprenorphine—may contribute to relatively lower incidence in controlled dosing scenarios, though direct registry comparisons remain limited. Cardiac risks such as prolongation are absent with levorphanol, based on clinical observations and lack of reported cases, in contrast to methadone's established association with this , particularly at higher doses or with imbalances. , a potentially lethal hyperthermic condition involving autonomic instability and neuromuscular excitation, carries a causal risk when levorphanol is co-administered with serotonergic agents like SSRIs, stemming from weak serotonin inhibition properties inherent to some opioids, though levorphanol-specific case reports are scarce. Hepatotoxicity from levorphanol monotherapy is negligible, with no pattern of clinically apparent documented in toxicity databases, distinguishing it from opioid formulations combined with acetaminophen, which pose dose-dependent risks of acute hepatic failure. Other rare serious events include anaphylactoid reactions or severe CNS depression leading to , but these lack robust incidence data specific to levorphanol due to its underutilization compared to more common .

Dependence, Tolerance, and Withdrawal

Addiction Potential

Levorphanol is classified as a Schedule II controlled substance under the U.S. , reflecting its high potential for abuse akin to other potent mu-opioid receptor agonists such as . Its pharmacological profile induces and subjective effects comparable to , with package inserts explicitly stating an abuse liability as great as that of due to shared mu-agonist activity. However, of diversion remains minimal, attributable to its restricted availability primarily through hospital or specialist prescriptions rather than widespread retail distribution, resulting in negligible street prevalence compared to more commonly diverted synthetic opioids like or . Among patients on chronic therapy for non-cancer , dependence rates for mu-agonists including analogs of levorphanol range from approximately 3% to 12%, with meta-analyses of long-term users reporting an average prevalence of 3.3% overall but higher (up to 8-12%) in subsets with extended exposure or predisposing factors such as prior substance use history. These figures derive from prospective cohort studies tracking aberrant behaviors like dose escalation or loss of control, underscoring that while levorphanol shares the dependence liability of its class, actual incidence in medically supervised settings is low and not elevated beyond comparator opioids when adjusted for prescription volume. Preclinical data suggest levorphanol's additional antagonism—more potent than that of —may attenuate reinforcing properties observed in opioid self-administration paradigms, as NMDA blockers generally reduce drug-seeking behavior in models by disrupting modulation of reward pathways. Direct studies on levorphanol self-administration are scarce, but its multimodal action contrasts with pure mu-agonists implicated in epidemics, where high-volume diversion amplified abuse; levorphanol's niche use has precluded similar patterns, supporting a profile where abuse potential is theoretically high but empirically contained by distribution controls.

Management of Tolerance

Tolerance to levorphanol develops through mechanisms involving mu-opioid receptor desensitization and central sensitization, but its intrinsic non-competitive antagonism (Ki 0.6 μM) attenuates these processes more effectively than with , leading to slower dose escalation requirements in clinical use. The active metabolite further enhances this effect by providing additional NMDA blockade, counteracting glutamate-driven that exacerbates tolerance in pure mu-agonists.31308-4/fulltext) Unlike , which induces unidirectional tolerance primarily to itself, chronic levorphanol exposure produces broader , yet rotation from exploits incomplete for efficacy restoration. In , opioid rotation to levorphanol for patients tolerant to or other frequently yields a 20-50% potency reset, with successful analgesia achieved at doses below predictions (e.g., :levorphanol ratios of 12:1 for lower doses escalating to 25:1 for higher ones). This approach restores responsiveness in refractory cases, as evidenced by reports of excellent pain relief in 40% of patients switched from , without necessitating escalation. The glutamate blockade reduces wind-up phenomena, preserving long-term efficacy by limiting and receptor downregulation. Clinical protocols recommend initiating at 25-50% of calculated doses during rotation to account for this reset while monitoring for resurgence of tolerance over weeks to months.

Overdose and Toxicity

Symptoms and Treatment

Overdose with levorphanol manifests primarily through opioid-induced and respiratory depression, with symptoms including pinpoint pupils (), characterized by slow, shallow, or irregular breathing, extreme drowsiness progressing to , and reduced responsiveness to stimuli. Additional signs may encompass , , , and cold, clammy skin, with onset typically correlating to peak plasma concentrations following , which occur 1-2 hours post-ingestion due to the drug's pharmacokinetic profile. Primary treatment involves immediate administration of , an , at initial intravenous doses of 0.4-2 mg titrated to response, with repeat dosing or continuous infusion often required owing to levorphanol's extended of 11-16 hours, which exceeds that of naloxone (approximately 1-2 hours) and risks renarcotization. Supportive measures are essential, including , mechanical ventilation to address , and cardiovascular monitoring, while avoiding unverified adjunct therapies lacking in opioid toxicity reversal. Patients should be observed for at least 24-48 hours post-reversal due to the potential for delayed or recurrent symptoms from levorphanol's prolonged elimination.

Mortality Data

Levorphanol overdose fatalities represent a negligible fraction of overall opioid-related deaths , with national data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showing no significant attribution to levorphanol in provisional overdose mortality reports spanning recent years. In contrast to dominant contributors like synthetic opioids (e.g., , accounting for over 67% of opioid-involved deaths in analyzed periods), levorphanol is absent from breakdowns of leading substances in CDC's National Vital Statistics System and related analyses. This rarity stems primarily from levorphanol's limited prescription volume, as reflected in the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) aggregate of 20,000 grams for 2024—a fraction of quotas for widely used opioids like or , which reach into the millions of kilograms. Such constraints translate to an estimated annual dispensing in the low thousands of prescriptions, curtailing population-level exposure and standalone overdose incidence below detectable thresholds in large-scale surveillance like the CDC's drug overdose data. Documented cases implicating levorphanol in fatalities often involve concurrent , amplifying risks through interactions rather than levorphanol's inherent properties alone, though comprehensive case series remain sparse owing to underutilization. Peer-reviewed comparisons position levorphanol favorably against alternatives like , noting its cleaner public safety profile with lower out-of-hospital mortality signals in chronic use contexts.

Comparisons to Other Opioids

Potency and Duration

Levorphanol exhibits greater potency than , with parenteral administration demonstrating approximately 4 to 8 times the efficacy on a milligram basis. dosing charts indicate that 2 mg of parenteral levorphanol is comparable to 10 mg of parenteral , while oral formulations show ratios where 4 mg of oral levorphanol equates to 30 mg of oral , reflecting about 7.5-fold potency orally due to differences. Relative to , intravenous levorphanol is estimated at 2 to 3 times more potent, based on standard conversion metrics adjusting for receptor affinity and clinical equianalgesia. The pharmacokinetic profile of levorphanol features an elimination of 11 to 16 hours, which supports less frequent dosing compared to shorter-acting opioids like ( 3 to 4.5 hours). Its duration of analgesia typically ranges from 6 to 15 hours, exceeding that of immediate-release or formulations, which often require dosing every 4 to 6 hours. Steady-state plasma concentrations are achieved after 3 to 5 days of repeated dosing, attributable to the extended and potential for accumulation, which influences regimens for management.
OpioidParenteral Equianalgesic Dose (mg)Oral Equianalgesic Dose (mg)Relative Potency to
10301x
Levorphanol245x (parenteral); 7.5x (oral)
1.57.57x (parenteral); 4x (oral)
This table summarizes approximate conversions derived from clinical guidelines, noting variability due to individual factors such as tolerance and route-specific bioavailability.

Unique Advantages and Limitations

Levorphanol exhibits unique pharmacological advantages stemming from its activity as a mu-opioid agonist with additional NMDA receptor antagonism and inhibition of norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake, enabling efficacy in subsets of neuropathic pain refractory to other opioids. In a double-blind study of 81 patients with chronic peripheral or central neuropathic pain, high-dose levorphanol (mean 9 mg/day) reduced pain intensity by 36%, compared to 21% with low-dose (mean 2.7 mg/day), with 66% of high-dose patients achieving moderate or better relief. This NMDA antagonism may also attenuate opioid tolerance development in mu-receptor mediated analgesia, distinguishing it from pure mu-agonists like morphine, though clinical evidence remains limited to preclinical models and indirect comparisons. Furthermore, its lack of cytochrome P450 metabolism avoids pharmacokinetic interactions plaguing agents like methadone, reducing risks of variable clearance or toxicity in polypharmacy scenarios, while presenting no QTc prolongation hazard. These properties position levorphanol as versatile for opioid rotation in refractory cancer or palliative pain, where multimodal mechanisms address incomplete responses to standard opioids. Proponents highlight its potential to lower abuse diversion relative to extended-release formulations, as immediate-release dosing aligns with supervised or use, though empirical diversion data specific to levorphanol is sparse. Limitations include a substantial monitoring burden from its 12-16 hour and active metabolite, which prolongs effects and complicates outpatient titration, favoring inpatient or specialist oversight over simpler short-acting agents. Monoamine reuptake inhibition elevates risk with concurrent serotonergic drugs, such as SSRIs, mandating caution absent in non-reuptake inhibiting s. Despite advantages, underutilization persists due to limited modern guideline inclusion, scarce commercial formulations, and insufficient large-scale trials, constraining evidence for broad subpopulations beyond neuropathic subsets. Critics note that while safer than in select , overall risks like respiratory depression overshadow benefits for non-refractory cases, with no superiority in preventing dependence.

Society and Culture

Brand Names and Formulations

Levorphanol is primarily available as generic levorphanol tartrate tablets in 2 mg strength for , following the discontinuation of the branded product Levo-Dromoran as of April 2018. Originally marketed by and later by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Levo-Dromoran represented the primary commercial identity until generics from manufacturers such as Lannett, Acertis Pharmaceuticals, and Hikma supplanted it. The salt form is utilized in these formulations to improve , , and compared to the base compound, with each milligram of levorphanol base equivalent to approximately 1.42 mg of the dihydrate salt (molecular weight 443.5). Injectable formulations, once available for intravenous, subcutaneous, or intramuscular delivery as preoperative or acute pain relief options, were discontinued in the U.S. market by the early , leading to an exclusive emphasis on oral tablets thereafter. No abuse-deterrent formulations of levorphanol are commercially available, despite into extended-release variants with tamper-resistant properties that have not progressed to market approval.

Availability and Prescribing Patterns

, levorphanol is classified as a Schedule II controlled substance, available solely as oral tablets due to the absence of parenteral formulations. Prescribing remains rare and is largely restricted to pain specialists and settings for moderate to severe pain, where standard opioids prove inadequate, driven by factors such as limited familiarity rather than elevated safety risks. Globally, levorphanol holds approval in limited jurisdictions, including , but experiences scant adoption elsewhere owing to entrenched reliance on for equivalent indications, facilitated by morphine's standardized protocols, lower cost, and extensive supply chains. Since the late 1990s, amid heightened regulatory scrutiny of coinciding with rising misuse concerns, levorphanol's already niche prescribing has stagnated or contracted further, despite documented efficacy in targeted scenarios like NMDA-mediated or opioid rotation to mitigate tolerance. This pattern underscores a supply-constrained utilization, with and promotional inertia perpetuating low exposure independent of incremental safety-driven restrictions applied more broadly to opioids. In the , levorphanol has been classified as a Schedule II under the since its enactment in 1970, reflecting its high potential for abuse and dependence relative to other , though it possesses accepted medical uses for severe . This scheduling, assigned the code 9220 by the (DEA), mandates rigorous federal controls on its manufacture, importation, distribution, and dispensing, including requirements for secure storage, record-keeping, and prescriptions via DEA-registered practitioners with no refills allowed without reauthorization. Internationally, levorphanol is regulated under the (1961, as amended), where it falls under controls akin to those for due to its properties, requiring signatory nations to limit production and to medical and scientific needs while monitoring to prevent diversion. As an (INN), it is subject to these restrictions in most countries, with no substantive changes to its status reported after 2020. Monitoring data from programs such as DEA aggregate production quotas indicate low overall supply—e.g., quotas in the range of kilograms annually—correlating with minimal reported diversion incidents compared to more widely prescribed opioids.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.